<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_08_1450216</id>
	<title>Theoretical Breakthrough For Quantum Cryptography</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1268061780000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>KentuckyFC writes <i>"<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum\_cryptography">Quantum cryptography</a> uses the quantum properties of photons to guarantee perfect secrecy.  But one of its lesser known limitations is that it only works if Alice and Bob are perfectly aligned so that they can carry out well-defined polarization measurements on the photons as they arrive. Physicists say that Alice and Bob must share the same reference frame. That's OK if Alice and Bob are in their own ground-based labs, but it's a problem in many other applications, such as ground-to-satellite communications or even in chip-to-chip communications, because it's hard to keep chips still over distances of the order of the wavelength of light. Now a group of UK physicists have developed a way of doing quantum cryptography without sharing a reference frame. The trick is to <a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/24899/">use entangled triplets of photons, so-called qutrits</a>, rather than entangled pairs. This solves the problem by embedding it in an extra abstract dimension, which is independent of space. So, as long as both Alice and Bob know the way in which all these abstract dimensions are related, the third provides a reference against which measurements of the other two can be made. That allows Alice and Bob to make any measurements they need without having to agree ahead of time on a frame of reference. That could be an important advance enabling the widespread use of quantum cryptography."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>KentuckyFC writes " Quantum cryptography uses the quantum properties of photons to guarantee perfect secrecy .
But one of its lesser known limitations is that it only works if Alice and Bob are perfectly aligned so that they can carry out well-defined polarization measurements on the photons as they arrive .
Physicists say that Alice and Bob must share the same reference frame .
That 's OK if Alice and Bob are in their own ground-based labs , but it 's a problem in many other applications , such as ground-to-satellite communications or even in chip-to-chip communications , because it 's hard to keep chips still over distances of the order of the wavelength of light .
Now a group of UK physicists have developed a way of doing quantum cryptography without sharing a reference frame .
The trick is to use entangled triplets of photons , so-called qutrits , rather than entangled pairs .
This solves the problem by embedding it in an extra abstract dimension , which is independent of space .
So , as long as both Alice and Bob know the way in which all these abstract dimensions are related , the third provides a reference against which measurements of the other two can be made .
That allows Alice and Bob to make any measurements they need without having to agree ahead of time on a frame of reference .
That could be an important advance enabling the widespread use of quantum cryptography .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>KentuckyFC writes "Quantum cryptography uses the quantum properties of photons to guarantee perfect secrecy.
But one of its lesser known limitations is that it only works if Alice and Bob are perfectly aligned so that they can carry out well-defined polarization measurements on the photons as they arrive.
Physicists say that Alice and Bob must share the same reference frame.
That's OK if Alice and Bob are in their own ground-based labs, but it's a problem in many other applications, such as ground-to-satellite communications or even in chip-to-chip communications, because it's hard to keep chips still over distances of the order of the wavelength of light.
Now a group of UK physicists have developed a way of doing quantum cryptography without sharing a reference frame.
The trick is to use entangled triplets of photons, so-called qutrits, rather than entangled pairs.
This solves the problem by embedding it in an extra abstract dimension, which is independent of space.
So, as long as both Alice and Bob know the way in which all these abstract dimensions are related, the third provides a reference against which measurements of the other two can be made.
That allows Alice and Bob to make any measurements they need without having to agree ahead of time on a frame of reference.
That could be an important advance enabling the widespread use of quantum cryptography.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31402912</id>
	<title>We are SCIENTISTS</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268075280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let's just create another dimension and send everything through there, FUCK YEAH!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's just create another dimension and send everything through there , FUCK YEAH ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's just create another dimension and send everything through there, FUCK YEAH!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401208</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401522</id>
	<title>Just wondering ..</title>
	<author>fractalspace</author>
	<datestamp>1268068680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why cant they simply open a sub space channel and use a Tachyon pulse to synchronize the two frames ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why cant they simply open a sub space channel and use a Tachyon pulse to synchronize the two frames ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why cant they simply open a sub space channel and use a Tachyon pulse to synchronize the two frames ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31403120</id>
	<title>Kids today...</title>
	<author>grepya</author>
	<datestamp>1268076300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>... if Alice and Bob are perfectly aligned so that they can carry out well-defined polarization measurements<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....</p></div></blockquote><p>Oh... so that's what the kids are calling it these days... ??</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... if Alice and Bob are perfectly aligned so that they can carry out well-defined polarization measurements ....Oh... so that 's what the kids are calling it these days.. .
? ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... if Alice and Bob are perfectly aligned so that they can carry out well-defined polarization measurements ....Oh... so that's what the kids are calling it these days...
??
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31400954</id>
	<title>Used in porn?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268065620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perhaps they can use this to film Quadtits.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps they can use this to film Quadtits .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps they can use this to film Quadtits.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401848</id>
	<title>Re:"This solves the problem by embedding it...."</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268070420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>They sure picked the right words to make you happy<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>They sure picked the right words to make you happy : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They sure picked the right words to make you happy :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401208</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31403522</id>
	<title>Re:You lost me at hello...</title>
	<author>jbezorg</author>
	<datestamp>1268078040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But these clever engineers have come up with a wonderful design for a semi-trailer that both cars can sit on while being driven down the freeway. Now Alice and get out of her car and into Bob's car for that secret rendezvous. In the middle of the freeway.</p></div><p>Eve hijacks the semi-trailer... shocking film at eleven.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But these clever engineers have come up with a wonderful design for a semi-trailer that both cars can sit on while being driven down the freeway .
Now Alice and get out of her car and into Bob 's car for that secret rendezvous .
In the middle of the freeway.Eve hijacks the semi-trailer... shocking film at eleven .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But these clever engineers have come up with a wonderful design for a semi-trailer that both cars can sit on while being driven down the freeway.
Now Alice and get out of her car and into Bob's car for that secret rendezvous.
In the middle of the freeway.Eve hijacks the semi-trailer... shocking film at eleven.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31402628</id>
	<title>Re:qutrits?</title>
	<author>bytethese</author>
	<datestamp>1268073840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401564</id>
	<title>They should deal with their own skeletons first</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268068920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.petakillsanimals.com/petasdirtysecret.cfm</p><p>When PETA's hands are clean then I will allow them to lecture on the evils of killing animals for the purposes of food/progress. Until then, they are just hypocrites to be ignored.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.petakillsanimals.com/petasdirtysecret.cfmWhen PETA 's hands are clean then I will allow them to lecture on the evils of killing animals for the purposes of food/progress .
Until then , they are just hypocrites to be ignored .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.petakillsanimals.com/petasdirtysecret.cfmWhen PETA's hands are clean then I will allow them to lecture on the evils of killing animals for the purposes of food/progress.
Until then, they are just hypocrites to be ignored.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31400948</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401540</id>
	<title>Re:You lost me at hello...</title>
	<author>Tyler Durden</author>
	<datestamp>1268068740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's my own amateur shot at it.  If I'm wrong, I'm sure someone who knows better will correct me.  Oh, and fuck the car analogy.</p><p>The quantum entanglement measurements will only work with two entangled photons when the velocities and accelerations of the two parties involved are the same.  But if you're doing it with two objects with different motion, say a person on the ground and a satellite orbiting the earth, it won't.  The satellite is in free fall and, according to general relativity, not in an accelerated reference frame.  A person on earth, though, is feeling a constant acceleration coming up from the ground because of gravity holding him there.  One difference between the two is because one is in an accelerated reference frame and the other is not, their clocks are moving at different rates.</p><p>The fix for this is to have a third entangled photon in another reference frame.  As long as the motion relative between all reference frames are known, the person on the ground and the satellite can use the third entangled photon as a reference point for them to make measurements between the two with their own entangled photons.</p><p>Sorry if I'm off about this but if someone corrects me then, hey, it's a learning process for us both.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's my own amateur shot at it .
If I 'm wrong , I 'm sure someone who knows better will correct me .
Oh , and fuck the car analogy.The quantum entanglement measurements will only work with two entangled photons when the velocities and accelerations of the two parties involved are the same .
But if you 're doing it with two objects with different motion , say a person on the ground and a satellite orbiting the earth , it wo n't .
The satellite is in free fall and , according to general relativity , not in an accelerated reference frame .
A person on earth , though , is feeling a constant acceleration coming up from the ground because of gravity holding him there .
One difference between the two is because one is in an accelerated reference frame and the other is not , their clocks are moving at different rates.The fix for this is to have a third entangled photon in another reference frame .
As long as the motion relative between all reference frames are known , the person on the ground and the satellite can use the third entangled photon as a reference point for them to make measurements between the two with their own entangled photons.Sorry if I 'm off about this but if someone corrects me then , hey , it 's a learning process for us both .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's my own amateur shot at it.
If I'm wrong, I'm sure someone who knows better will correct me.
Oh, and fuck the car analogy.The quantum entanglement measurements will only work with two entangled photons when the velocities and accelerations of the two parties involved are the same.
But if you're doing it with two objects with different motion, say a person on the ground and a satellite orbiting the earth, it won't.
The satellite is in free fall and, according to general relativity, not in an accelerated reference frame.
A person on earth, though, is feeling a constant acceleration coming up from the ground because of gravity holding him there.
One difference between the two is because one is in an accelerated reference frame and the other is not, their clocks are moving at different rates.The fix for this is to have a third entangled photon in another reference frame.
As long as the motion relative between all reference frames are known, the person on the ground and the satellite can use the third entangled photon as a reference point for them to make measurements between the two with their own entangled photons.Sorry if I'm off about this but if someone corrects me then, hey, it's a learning process for us both.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31420772</id>
	<title>Re:You lost me at hello...</title>
	<author>bill\_mcgonigle</author>
	<datestamp>1268136840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>That's not new. The Foundation for Law and Goverment [wikipedia.org] had such a system in place almost thirty years ago. We've seen rehashed stories in<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. before, but really, guys, 30 years?</i></p><p>That was Bonnie and Michael (yeah, we saw those furtive glances).  This article is about Alice and Bob. Try to keep up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's not new .
The Foundation for Law and Goverment [ wikipedia.org ] had such a system in place almost thirty years ago .
We 've seen rehashed stories in / .
before , but really , guys , 30 years ? That was Bonnie and Michael ( yeah , we saw those furtive glances ) .
This article is about Alice and Bob .
Try to keep up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's not new.
The Foundation for Law and Goverment [wikipedia.org] had such a system in place almost thirty years ago.
We've seen rehashed stories in /.
before, but really, guys, 30 years?That was Bonnie and Michael (yeah, we saw those furtive glances).
This article is about Alice and Bob.
Try to keep up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31410662</id>
	<title>OK, Let Me Get This Straight....</title>
	<author>rickshaf</author>
	<datestamp>1268077800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, this works for Alice and Bob.  What about Homer and Jethro?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , this works for Alice and Bob .
What about Homer and Jethro ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, this works for Alice and Bob.
What about Homer and Jethro?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401296</id>
	<title>Re:qutrits?</title>
	<author>Nadaka</author>
	<datestamp>1268067420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hint...</p><p>This was in fact a juvenile joke.</p><p>I wasn't being serious.</p><p>Do I need to use smileys or [/joke] ubbcodes in every post?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hint...This was in fact a juvenile joke.I was n't being serious.Do I need to use smileys or [ /joke ] ubbcodes in every post ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hint...This was in fact a juvenile joke.I wasn't being serious.Do I need to use smileys or [/joke] ubbcodes in every post?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401156</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401228</id>
	<title>Re:Stay away from this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268067180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Didn't anyone mention this to ziggy?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did n't anyone mention this to ziggy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Didn't anyone mention this to ziggy?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31400948</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401834</id>
	<title>Sound like Alice and Bob have discovered...</title>
	<author>EmagGeek</author>
	<datestamp>1268070300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... quantum parity!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... quantum parity !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... quantum parity!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401208</id>
	<title>"This solves the problem by embedding it...."</title>
	<author>Conspiracy\_Of\_Doves</author>
	<datestamp>1268067060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"This solves the problem by embedding it in an extra abstract dimension, which is independent of space."</p><p>Has it occurred to anyone else how UNBELIEVABLY FRIGGIN' COOL it is that a line like that shows up in an article that is talking about building an actual, physical device?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" This solves the problem by embedding it in an extra abstract dimension , which is independent of space .
" Has it occurred to anyone else how UNBELIEVABLY FRIGGIN ' COOL it is that a line like that shows up in an article that is talking about building an actual , physical device ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"This solves the problem by embedding it in an extra abstract dimension, which is independent of space.
"Has it occurred to anyone else how UNBELIEVABLY FRIGGIN' COOL it is that a line like that shows up in an article that is talking about building an actual, physical device?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401432</id>
	<title>Re:Quantum Communications</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268068260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <tt>Someone please correct me if I'm wrong here, and I haven't had time to read the entire article, but wouldn't this also bypass the conventional data transmission necessity for quantum communications?</tt></p> </div><p>YES SIR PLEASE MANY EXCUSE BUT CAN YOU LET ME KNOW ABOUT THIS NEW TECHNOLOGY TO TRANSFER A LARGE AMOUNT OF MONEY SO WE CAN BOTH PROFIT. THANK YOU SIR VERY MUCH AND ALL GOOD WISHES</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone please correct me if I 'm wrong here , and I have n't had time to read the entire article , but would n't this also bypass the conventional data transmission necessity for quantum communications ?
YES SIR PLEASE MANY EXCUSE BUT CAN YOU LET ME KNOW ABOUT THIS NEW TECHNOLOGY TO TRANSFER A LARGE AMOUNT OF MONEY SO WE CAN BOTH PROFIT .
THANK YOU SIR VERY MUCH AND ALL GOOD WISHES</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Someone please correct me if I'm wrong here, and I haven't had time to read the entire article, but wouldn't this also bypass the conventional data transmission necessity for quantum communications?
YES SIR PLEASE MANY EXCUSE BUT CAN YOU LET ME KNOW ABOUT THIS NEW TECHNOLOGY TO TRANSFER A LARGE AMOUNT OF MONEY SO WE CAN BOTH PROFIT.
THANK YOU SIR VERY MUCH AND ALL GOOD WISHES
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31402626</id>
	<title>Re:Engineering</title>
	<author>CubicleView</author>
	<datestamp>1268073780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, in all your years of<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. have you never followed one of those developer != engineer rants? For this to be considered engineering, at the very least the failure of the process should put people in mortal danger. Since People != Cats, we can assume this is not engineering. This is priobably more akin to some sort of quantom crafting than engineering.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , in all your years of / .
have you never followed one of those developer ! = engineer rants ?
For this to be considered engineering , at the very least the failure of the process should put people in mortal danger .
Since People ! = Cats , we can assume this is not engineering .
This is priobably more akin to some sort of quantom crafting than engineering .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, in all your years of /.
have you never followed one of those developer != engineer rants?
For this to be considered engineering, at the very least the failure of the process should put people in mortal danger.
Since People != Cats, we can assume this is not engineering.
This is priobably more akin to some sort of quantom crafting than engineering.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401076</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401076</id>
	<title>Engineering</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268066280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think this is engineering, not theory.  Theory was the original idea of using entanglement for cryptography.  Now they're applying the technology to make it practical, and that's engineering.  They're adding a bit of steel or another entanglement to make it more usable.  If nobody has built this device yet, it's theoretical engineering.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think this is engineering , not theory .
Theory was the original idea of using entanglement for cryptography .
Now they 're applying the technology to make it practical , and that 's engineering .
They 're adding a bit of steel or another entanglement to make it more usable .
If nobody has built this device yet , it 's theoretical engineering .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think this is engineering, not theory.
Theory was the original idea of using entanglement for cryptography.
Now they're applying the technology to make it practical, and that's engineering.
They're adding a bit of steel or another entanglement to make it more usable.
If nobody has built this device yet, it's theoretical engineering.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401514</id>
	<title>Re:You lost me at hello...</title>
	<author>Schiphol</author>
	<datestamp>1268068620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's not new. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knight\_Rider\_(1982\_TV\_series)" title="wikipedia.org">The Foundation for Law and Goverment</a> [wikipedia.org] had such a system in place almost thirty years ago. We've seen rehashed stories in<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. before, but really, guys, 30 years?</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's not new .
The Foundation for Law and Goverment [ wikipedia.org ] had such a system in place almost thirty years ago .
We 've seen rehashed stories in / .
before , but really , guys , 30 years ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's not new.
The Foundation for Law and Goverment [wikipedia.org] had such a system in place almost thirty years ago.
We've seen rehashed stories in /.
before, but really, guys, 30 years?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31402474</id>
	<title>Re:Engineering</title>
	<author>K. S. Kyosuke</author>
	<datestamp>1268073240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Now they're applying the technology to make it practical, and that's engineering.</p></div><p>After that, the time for the third phase - marketing and selling - will come, when patents, stupid business plans and inflated prices will make it impractical again.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now they 're applying the technology to make it practical , and that 's engineering.After that , the time for the third phase - marketing and selling - will come , when patents , stupid business plans and inflated prices will make it impractical again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now they're applying the technology to make it practical, and that's engineering.After that, the time for the third phase - marketing and selling - will come, when patents, stupid business plans and inflated prices will make it impractical again.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401076</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31403360</id>
	<title>Quantum Horse Shit</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1268077200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bob sends Alice a super secret quantum message.</p><p>Michael in the middle intercepts it.<br>Michael reads all the same quantum security shit Alice was suppose to verify.<br>Michael sends a fake message with all the quantum security shit duplicated.</p><p>Quantum doesn't solve shit - if it can be read (to be verified) it can be recreated.</p><p>Until there is a 100\% reliable network with no processing delay, man-in-the-middle attacks will be possible.  Until then, Michael will be able to intercept a message, read it, send a spoofed message in it's place.  So what if it came a little later than expected?  There are plenty of routers and fuckups along the way to add latency.</p><p>All security boils down to a key sharing problem.<br>We can't get that shit right in real life.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bob sends Alice a super secret quantum message.Michael in the middle intercepts it.Michael reads all the same quantum security shit Alice was suppose to verify.Michael sends a fake message with all the quantum security shit duplicated.Quantum does n't solve shit - if it can be read ( to be verified ) it can be recreated.Until there is a 100 \ % reliable network with no processing delay , man-in-the-middle attacks will be possible .
Until then , Michael will be able to intercept a message , read it , send a spoofed message in it 's place .
So what if it came a little later than expected ?
There are plenty of routers and fuckups along the way to add latency.All security boils down to a key sharing problem.We ca n't get that shit right in real life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bob sends Alice a super secret quantum message.Michael in the middle intercepts it.Michael reads all the same quantum security shit Alice was suppose to verify.Michael sends a fake message with all the quantum security shit duplicated.Quantum doesn't solve shit - if it can be read (to be verified) it can be recreated.Until there is a 100\% reliable network with no processing delay, man-in-the-middle attacks will be possible.
Until then, Michael will be able to intercept a message, read it, send a spoofed message in it's place.
So what if it came a little later than expected?
There are plenty of routers and fuckups along the way to add latency.All security boils down to a key sharing problem.We can't get that shit right in real life.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401552</id>
	<title>Specs</title>
	<author>jlebrech</author>
	<datestamp>1268068860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will CPUs be measured by the Bob:Alice ratio from now on?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will CPUs be measured by the Bob : Alice ratio from now on ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will CPUs be measured by the Bob:Alice ratio from now on?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31411186</id>
	<title>Re:Stay away from this</title>
	<author>spidr\_mnky</author>
	<datestamp>1268128500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Accidentally modded you troll.  My bad.  Posting to undo.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Accidentally modded you troll .
My bad .
Posting to undo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Accidentally modded you troll.
My bad.
Posting to undo.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31400948</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31403496</id>
	<title>Re:You lost me at hello...</title>
	<author>slayer\_ix</author>
	<datestamp>1268077860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nice analogy *internet high five*</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nice analogy * internet high five *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nice analogy *internet high five*</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401742</id>
	<title>Masters of the world</title>
	<author>NCamero</author>
	<datestamp>1268069880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I, for one welcome our new quantum overlords.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I , for one welcome our new quantum overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I, for one welcome our new quantum overlords.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31400998</id>
	<title>qutrits?</title>
	<author>Nadaka</author>
	<datestamp>1268065860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Applying the standard naming conventions would result in qutits. I much prefer qutits.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Applying the standard naming conventions would result in qutits .
I much prefer qutits .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Applying the standard naming conventions would result in qutits.
I much prefer qutits.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31403542</id>
	<title>Frame reference Independence? = Black Hole Probe?</title>
	<author>ShadowXOmega</author>
	<datestamp>1268078100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have a question:<br>
If this arrangement enables the two sets of particles to see the state of the other ones with no interference of the frame or reference... <br>
what will happen if i drop a pair of those ones in a black hole? <br>
the remaining pair...what will measure? a ever increase rate of information? or what?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a question : If this arrangement enables the two sets of particles to see the state of the other ones with no interference of the frame or reference.. . what will happen if i drop a pair of those ones in a black hole ?
the remaining pair...what will measure ?
a ever increase rate of information ?
or what ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a question:
If this arrangement enables the two sets of particles to see the state of the other ones with no interference of the frame or reference... 
what will happen if i drop a pair of those ones in a black hole?
the remaining pair...what will measure?
a ever increase rate of information?
or what?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31420802</id>
	<title>Re:You lost me at hello...</title>
	<author>bill\_mcgonigle</author>
	<datestamp>1268137080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I use the Earth for similar purposes.</p><p>Nobody seems to care about my "I do it at 365km/s relative to the Virgo Supercluster" bumper sticker though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I use the Earth for similar purposes.Nobody seems to care about my " I do it at 365km/s relative to the Virgo Supercluster " bumper sticker though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use the Earth for similar purposes.Nobody seems to care about my "I do it at 365km/s relative to the Virgo Supercluster" bumper sticker though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31403410</id>
	<title>Come again?</title>
	<author>gaelfx</author>
	<datestamp>1268077440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe I'm not up on my vocab as of late, but since when  does the phrase "Theoretical Breakthrough" make any kind of sense?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe I 'm not up on my vocab as of late , but since when does the phrase " Theoretical Breakthrough " make any kind of sense ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe I'm not up on my vocab as of late, but since when  does the phrase "Theoretical Breakthrough" make any kind of sense?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31414964</id>
	<title>Re:Engineering</title>
	<author>Interoperable</author>
	<datestamp>1268155260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's a link to the paper: <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.1050" title="arxiv.org">	arXiv:1003.1050v1</a> [arxiv.org]. Have a read and make a more informed opinion about what field it belongs it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's a link to the paper : arXiv : 1003.1050v1 [ arxiv.org ] .
Have a read and make a more informed opinion about what field it belongs it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's a link to the paper: 	arXiv:1003.1050v1 [arxiv.org].
Have a read and make a more informed opinion about what field it belongs it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401076</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401196</id>
	<title>Re:You lost me at hello...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268066940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Alice and Bob both have a garage, but instead of telling each other how to open the garage door they get a few chicks with huge tits to do it themselves.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Alice and Bob both have a garage , but instead of telling each other how to open the garage door they get a few chicks with huge tits to do it themselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Alice and Bob both have a garage, but instead of telling each other how to open the garage door they get a few chicks with huge tits to do it themselves.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401256</id>
	<title>Translation of summary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268067300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Glap glar photons biddle doo-vack triple photon vajmu double photon zirreyzoo-zah picture frame powlat pweegoo paparazzi photos of Alice and Bob.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Glap glar photons biddle doo-vack triple photon vajmu double photon zirreyzoo-zah picture frame powlat pweegoo paparazzi photos of Alice and Bob .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Glap glar photons biddle doo-vack triple photon vajmu double photon zirreyzoo-zah picture frame powlat pweegoo paparazzi photos of Alice and Bob.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401050</id>
	<title>Quantum Communications</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268066160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>Someone please correct me if I'm wrong here, and I haven't had time to read the entire article, but wouldn't this also bypass the conventional data transmission necessity for quantum communications?</tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone please correct me if I 'm wrong here , and I have n't had time to read the entire article , but would n't this also bypass the conventional data transmission necessity for quantum communications ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone please correct me if I'm wrong here, and I haven't had time to read the entire article, but wouldn't this also bypass the conventional data transmission necessity for quantum communications?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31404536</id>
	<title>Re:qutrits?</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1268039220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As Howard Tayler of Schlock Mercenary notes,</p><blockquote><div><p>the same abbreviational logic that turned "binary digit" into "bit" turned "trinary digit" into "tit." This nomenclatural error set computing back nearly three hundred years, and two entire generations of promising computer scientists were lost trying to keep abreast of bad puns.</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As Howard Tayler of Schlock Mercenary notes,the same abbreviational logic that turned " binary digit " into " bit " turned " trinary digit " into " tit .
" This nomenclatural error set computing back nearly three hundred years , and two entire generations of promising computer scientists were lost trying to keep abreast of bad puns .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As Howard Tayler of Schlock Mercenary notes,the same abbreviational logic that turned "binary digit" into "bit" turned "trinary digit" into "tit.
" This nomenclatural error set computing back nearly three hundred years, and two entire generations of promising computer scientists were lost trying to keep abreast of bad puns.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31400998</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31414920</id>
	<title>It's relevant to ground-based labs as well.</title>
	<author>Interoperable</author>
	<datestamp>1268155140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Polarization has a nasty habit of rotating when it travels through optical (telecom) fiber. To make matters worse, the degree of rotation depends on temperature and physical strain and can change quite rapidly. Of course, entangling three photons is much harder than entangling two.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Polarization has a nasty habit of rotating when it travels through optical ( telecom ) fiber .
To make matters worse , the degree of rotation depends on temperature and physical strain and can change quite rapidly .
Of course , entangling three photons is much harder than entangling two .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Polarization has a nasty habit of rotating when it travels through optical (telecom) fiber.
To make matters worse, the degree of rotation depends on temperature and physical strain and can change quite rapidly.
Of course, entangling three photons is much harder than entangling two.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401400</id>
	<title>Re:Quantum Communications</title>
	<author>Threni</author>
	<datestamp>1268068140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Would this system still allow alice/bob to know if someone's evesdropped?  What's the difference between a hostile evesdropper and just some other part of the infrastructure for getting data from alice to bob?   Without that, quantum cryptography is just another encryption system, and there are nothing wrong with the current ones.  Right?  (It would arouse me if replies to this post started simply "Wrong.")</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would this system still allow alice/bob to know if someone 's evesdropped ?
What 's the difference between a hostile evesdropper and just some other part of the infrastructure for getting data from alice to bob ?
Without that , quantum cryptography is just another encryption system , and there are nothing wrong with the current ones .
Right ? ( It would arouse me if replies to this post started simply " Wrong .
" )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would this system still allow alice/bob to know if someone's evesdropped?
What's the difference between a hostile evesdropper and just some other part of the infrastructure for getting data from alice to bob?
Without that, quantum cryptography is just another encryption system, and there are nothing wrong with the current ones.
Right?  (It would arouse me if replies to this post started simply "Wrong.
")</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401026</id>
	<title>Re:qutrits?</title>
	<author>ArsonSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1268066040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>cute tits or quit its?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>cute tits or quit its ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>cute tits or quit its?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31400998</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401386</id>
	<title>Re:You lost me at hello...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268068020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't worry. I have a physics major and that summary lost me too. It also seems to have lost TFA too as it firsts talks about that this will help with ground  satellite because 2 photon entanglement crypto already worked in the lab. Then, they switch to say that 2 photon entanglement fails to work between 2 chips on same board because effective distance between chips can change more than a wavelength. Of course, there is no chips doing quantum crypto anyway.</p><p>So, frankly, TFA does nothing to explain anything except it does a bunch of hand waving. This entire thing could as well be summerized to,</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; "Someone did something new w.r.t. Quantum Crypto. It may be useful."</p><p>Now, you want a car analogy?</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; "Someone may have found how to attach a wheel to the car."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't worry .
I have a physics major and that summary lost me too .
It also seems to have lost TFA too as it firsts talks about that this will help with ground satellite because 2 photon entanglement crypto already worked in the lab .
Then , they switch to say that 2 photon entanglement fails to work between 2 chips on same board because effective distance between chips can change more than a wavelength .
Of course , there is no chips doing quantum crypto anyway.So , frankly , TFA does nothing to explain anything except it does a bunch of hand waving .
This entire thing could as well be summerized to ,         " Someone did something new w.r.t .
Quantum Crypto .
It may be useful .
" Now , you want a car analogy ?
      " Someone may have found how to attach a wheel to the car .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't worry.
I have a physics major and that summary lost me too.
It also seems to have lost TFA too as it firsts talks about that this will help with ground  satellite because 2 photon entanglement crypto already worked in the lab.
Then, they switch to say that 2 photon entanglement fails to work between 2 chips on same board because effective distance between chips can change more than a wavelength.
Of course, there is no chips doing quantum crypto anyway.So, frankly, TFA does nothing to explain anything except it does a bunch of hand waving.
This entire thing could as well be summerized to,
        "Someone did something new w.r.t.
Quantum Crypto.
It may be useful.
"Now, you want a car analogy?
      "Someone may have found how to attach a wheel to the car.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401498</id>
	<title>Dangit...</title>
	<author>barfy</author>
	<datestamp>1268068500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was all set to sell crypto supplies and repair services in the alternate dimension.  Do you have any idea what this is going to do to housing prices there?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was all set to sell crypto supplies and repair services in the alternate dimension .
Do you have any idea what this is going to do to housing prices there ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was all set to sell crypto supplies and repair services in the alternate dimension.
Do you have any idea what this is going to do to housing prices there?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31400986</id>
	<title>so the way i read it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268065860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you just pulled all this shit out of a hat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you just pulled all this shit out of a hat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you just pulled all this shit out of a hat.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31402128</id>
	<title>Re:qutrits?</title>
	<author>Compunexus</author>
	<datestamp>1268071740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>cute tits or quit its?</p></div><p>Both obviously!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>cute tits or quit its ? Both obviously !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>cute tits or quit its?Both obviously!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31400948</id>
	<title>Stay away from this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268065620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One thing, with quantum crypto, the code changes when you look at it. In other words, you have to know the key before seeing it.</p><p>Two, it kills a LOT of cats! You get the code right, and BAM! dead cat.</p><p>PETA will be against this!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One thing , with quantum crypto , the code changes when you look at it .
In other words , you have to know the key before seeing it.Two , it kills a LOT of cats !
You get the code right , and BAM !
dead cat.PETA will be against this !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One thing, with quantum crypto, the code changes when you look at it.
In other words, you have to know the key before seeing it.Two, it kills a LOT of cats!
You get the code right, and BAM!
dead cat.PETA will be against this!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401156</id>
	<title>Re:qutrits?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268066760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Applying the standard naming conventions would result in qutits. I much prefer qutits.</p></div><p>And the scientific community would be rather better off choosing names that let us focus on the furtherance of humanity's knowledge of the inner workings of the universe than opening the door for juvenile jokes.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Applying the standard naming conventions would result in qutits .
I much prefer qutits.And the scientific community would be rather better off choosing names that let us focus on the furtherance of humanity 's knowledge of the inner workings of the universe than opening the door for juvenile jokes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Applying the standard naming conventions would result in qutits.
I much prefer qutits.And the scientific community would be rather better off choosing names that let us focus on the furtherance of humanity's knowledge of the inner workings of the universe than opening the door for juvenile jokes.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31400998</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31420968</id>
	<title>Re:Engineering</title>
	<author>bill\_mcgonigle</author>
	<datestamp>1268137980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>They're adding a bit of steel or another entanglement to make it more usable.</i></p><p>Didn't IBM do that already in the 90's?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're adding a bit of steel or another entanglement to make it more usable.Did n't IBM do that already in the 90 's ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're adding a bit of steel or another entanglement to make it more usable.Didn't IBM do that already in the 90's?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401076</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401230</id>
	<title>Re:You lost me at hello...</title>
	<author>mrsurb</author>
	<datestamp>1268067180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll give it a shot.

</p><p>Alice wants to get out of her car and into Bob's car. In laboratory conditions both cars are perfectly still so it's easy. Out on the freeway travelling at high speeds it's a recipe for disaster.

</p><p>But these clever engineers have come up with a wonderful design for a semi-trailer that both cars can sit on while being driven down the freeway. Now Alice and get out of her car and into Bob's car for that secret rendezvous. In the middle of the freeway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll give it a shot .
Alice wants to get out of her car and into Bob 's car .
In laboratory conditions both cars are perfectly still so it 's easy .
Out on the freeway travelling at high speeds it 's a recipe for disaster .
But these clever engineers have come up with a wonderful design for a semi-trailer that both cars can sit on while being driven down the freeway .
Now Alice and get out of her car and into Bob 's car for that secret rendezvous .
In the middle of the freeway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll give it a shot.
Alice wants to get out of her car and into Bob's car.
In laboratory conditions both cars are perfectly still so it's easy.
Out on the freeway travelling at high speeds it's a recipe for disaster.
But these clever engineers have come up with a wonderful design for a semi-trailer that both cars can sit on while being driven down the freeway.
Now Alice and get out of her car and into Bob's car for that secret rendezvous.
In the middle of the freeway.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401244</id>
	<title>Money?</title>
	<author>drumcat</author>
	<datestamp>1268067240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does this not seem like the most wasteful project ever?  Can I get my tax money spent a little more cogently?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this not seem like the most wasteful project ever ?
Can I get my tax money spent a little more cogently ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this not seem like the most wasteful project ever?
Can I get my tax money spent a little more cogently?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401010</id>
	<title>Cubits, Tribist, Biscuits</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268065980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"That could be an important advance enabling the widespread use of quantum cryptography."</p><p>Please enlighten the Slashdot crowd about where quantum cryptography is USED at all.</p><p>Yours In Ashgabat,<br>Kilgore Trout</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" That could be an important advance enabling the widespread use of quantum cryptography .
" Please enlighten the Slashdot crowd about where quantum cryptography is USED at all.Yours In Ashgabat,Kilgore Trout</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"That could be an important advance enabling the widespread use of quantum cryptography.
"Please enlighten the Slashdot crowd about where quantum cryptography is USED at all.Yours In Ashgabat,Kilgore Trout</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401650</id>
	<title>Alice and Bob</title>
	<author>RawJoe</author>
	<datestamp>1268069340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Something tells me that Alice and Bob are going to great lengths to keep their affair a secret...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Something tells me that Alice and Bob are going to great lengths to keep their affair a secret.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Something tells me that Alice and Bob are going to great lengths to keep their affair a secret...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31403094</id>
	<title>Re:"This solves the problem by embedding it...."</title>
	<author>fritsd</author>
	<datestamp>1268076180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>which is independent of space.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
Yes. Now get off my $\%!$!#$\% intergalactic intertube!!!
<br>
signed: your local Galactic Overlord</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>which is independent of space .
Yes. Now get off my $ \ % ! $ ! # $ \ % intergalactic intertube ! ! !
signed : your local Galactic Overlord</tokentext>
<sentencetext>which is independent of space.
Yes. Now get off my $\%!$!#$\% intergalactic intertube!!!
signed: your local Galactic Overlord
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401208</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401316</id>
	<title>Re:Stay away from this</title>
	<author>elfprince13</author>
	<datestamp>1268067600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>If PETA is against it, that more or less guarantees my support of it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If PETA is against it , that more or less guarantees my support of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If PETA is against it, that more or less guarantees my support of it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31400948</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31405062</id>
	<title>Third guy</title>
	<author>vikingpower</author>
	<datestamp>1268041740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just KNEW there was a third guy involved in there. Bob was never going to satisfy Alice all by himself, all these years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just KNEW there was a third guy involved in there .
Bob was never going to satisfy Alice all by himself , all these years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just KNEW there was a third guy involved in there.
Bob was never going to satisfy Alice all by himself, all these years.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31402126</id>
	<title>Re:You lost me at hello...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268071740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No car analogy, but I think I summarize it a little simpler (though I am no expert).<br>In Quantum Cryptography it's possible to detect the presence of an eavesdropper.  The eavesdropper, by the act of listening changes the transmission of the signal and is provably unable to put it right again.  This is possible because of some physics mumbo-jumbo and is highly sensitive to the distances between the people involved.<br>As best I can make out, this research used more physics mumbo-jumbo to encode the distances between the involved parties inside the communication so that they can move about (instead of being tethered together by a fixed length line of fiber-optic cable).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No car analogy , but I think I summarize it a little simpler ( though I am no expert ) .In Quantum Cryptography it 's possible to detect the presence of an eavesdropper .
The eavesdropper , by the act of listening changes the transmission of the signal and is provably unable to put it right again .
This is possible because of some physics mumbo-jumbo and is highly sensitive to the distances between the people involved.As best I can make out , this research used more physics mumbo-jumbo to encode the distances between the involved parties inside the communication so that they can move about ( instead of being tethered together by a fixed length line of fiber-optic cable ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No car analogy, but I think I summarize it a little simpler (though I am no expert).In Quantum Cryptography it's possible to detect the presence of an eavesdropper.
The eavesdropper, by the act of listening changes the transmission of the signal and is provably unable to put it right again.
This is possible because of some physics mumbo-jumbo and is highly sensitive to the distances between the people involved.As best I can make out, this research used more physics mumbo-jumbo to encode the distances between the involved parties inside the communication so that they can move about (instead of being tethered together by a fixed length line of fiber-optic cable).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401192</id>
	<title>Re:You lost me at hello...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268066940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it's like:<br>Alice wants to sell her car to Bob, but they need to be in the same place at the same time to make it happen<br>but if Alice sells it to some intermediary, who then sells it to Bob, then that requirement is unnecessary</p><p>now if somebody made up what are the photons in the analogy, it would be complete<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's like : Alice wants to sell her car to Bob , but they need to be in the same place at the same time to make it happenbut if Alice sells it to some intermediary , who then sells it to Bob , then that requirement is unnecessarynow if somebody made up what are the photons in the analogy , it would be complete ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's like:Alice wants to sell her car to Bob, but they need to be in the same place at the same time to make it happenbut if Alice sells it to some intermediary, who then sells it to Bob, then that requirement is unnecessarynow if somebody made up what are the photons in the analogy, it would be complete ;-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31403552</id>
	<title>Re:You lost me at hello...</title>
	<author>ascari</author>
	<datestamp>1268078160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What's wrong with just parking?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's wrong with just parking ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's wrong with just parking?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401936</id>
	<title>Re:"This solves the problem by embedding it...."</title>
	<author>francium de neobie</author>
	<datestamp>1268070900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The "dimension" here only shows up when you're looking at the mathematical model - it's not that we've managed to transport information through time or the WSOGMM.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The " dimension " here only shows up when you 're looking at the mathematical model - it 's not that we 've managed to transport information through time or the WSOGMM .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The "dimension" here only shows up when you're looking at the mathematical model - it's not that we've managed to transport information through time or the WSOGMM.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401208</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401440</id>
	<title>Re:Stay away from this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268068320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How's that bandwagon of yours? Feel good to act macho by hating what you're told to hate by talk radio on a daily basis?</p><p>Fucking sheep.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How 's that bandwagon of yours ?
Feel good to act macho by hating what you 're told to hate by talk radio on a daily basis ? Fucking sheep .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How's that bandwagon of yours?
Feel good to act macho by hating what you're told to hate by talk radio on a daily basis?Fucking sheep.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401118</id>
	<title>You lost me at hello...</title>
	<author>PPalmgren</author>
	<datestamp>1268066460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Boy am I glad I didn't pursue that physics major.  The only thing I got out of that is that Alice and Bob needed a marriage counselor to reconcile their differences.</p><p>Anyone mind converting that attempt in layman's terms to something useful, like a car analogy?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Boy am I glad I did n't pursue that physics major .
The only thing I got out of that is that Alice and Bob needed a marriage counselor to reconcile their differences.Anyone mind converting that attempt in layman 's terms to something useful , like a car analogy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Boy am I glad I didn't pursue that physics major.
The only thing I got out of that is that Alice and Bob needed a marriage counselor to reconcile their differences.Anyone mind converting that attempt in layman's terms to something useful, like a car analogy?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31402190</id>
	<title>Excellent summary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268072040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's absolutely uber, leaving no question unanswered. Can I have children with you? '</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's absolutely uber , leaving no question unanswered .
Can I have children with you ?
'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's absolutely uber, leaving no question unanswered.
Can I have children with you?
'</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31406616</id>
	<title>Re:Quantum Communications</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268047500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It sounds like the third bit just specifies orientation (to account for different reference frames), and the rest of the process remains the same. (Basic guess.) So, the probabilities for eavesdropping detection remain the same. (Or perhaps even more likely, if the reference frame bits must be guessed too... this is where I get more fuzzy on my 'basic guess'.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It sounds like the third bit just specifies orientation ( to account for different reference frames ) , and the rest of the process remains the same .
( Basic guess .
) So , the probabilities for eavesdropping detection remain the same .
( Or perhaps even more likely , if the reference frame bits must be guessed too... this is where I get more fuzzy on my 'basic guess' .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It sounds like the third bit just specifies orientation (to account for different reference frames), and the rest of the process remains the same.
(Basic guess.
) So, the probabilities for eavesdropping detection remain the same.
(Or perhaps even more likely, if the reference frame bits must be guessed too... this is where I get more fuzzy on my 'basic guess'.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401046</id>
	<title>"Alice and Bob must share the same reference frame</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268066160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But Alice will share a frame with ANYBODY, knowwhatimsayin'?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But Alice will share a frame with ANYBODY , knowwhatimsayin ' ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But Alice will share a frame with ANYBODY, knowwhatimsayin'?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31403080</id>
	<title>Re:qutrits?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268076120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Quit its? That's what she said after you said cute tits!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Quit its ?
That 's what she said after you said cute tits !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Quit its?
That's what she said after you said cute tits!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31410946</id>
	<title>Re:Quantum Horse Shit</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268168100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I love it when people who have no fucking clue what's going on decide that it must be like some other vaguely related thing they have heard doesn't work.</p><p>Quantum cryptography, quite simply, is not vulnerable to man in the middle attacks (not ones that attempt to silently impersonate, anyway -- a man in the middle can destroy the message and optionally read it -- though if he reads it it is destroyed no matter what).  That's the REASON to do quantum cryptography.</p><p>You happen to have a point but only because you're such a moron that it wraps around into cleverness in a kind of biological integer underflow.  You see, it does come down to a key sharing problem in this case.  Because quantum crypto is slooooooooow.  It's really only good for transmitting a key.  Then you can exchange encrypted messages that aren't important, which proves that the keys weren't intercepted.  And then you can send the real stuff.</p><p>Or, not love.  The other thing.  Hate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I love it when people who have no fucking clue what 's going on decide that it must be like some other vaguely related thing they have heard does n't work.Quantum cryptography , quite simply , is not vulnerable to man in the middle attacks ( not ones that attempt to silently impersonate , anyway -- a man in the middle can destroy the message and optionally read it -- though if he reads it it is destroyed no matter what ) .
That 's the REASON to do quantum cryptography.You happen to have a point but only because you 're such a moron that it wraps around into cleverness in a kind of biological integer underflow .
You see , it does come down to a key sharing problem in this case .
Because quantum crypto is slooooooooow .
It 's really only good for transmitting a key .
Then you can exchange encrypted messages that are n't important , which proves that the keys were n't intercepted .
And then you can send the real stuff.Or , not love .
The other thing .
Hate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love it when people who have no fucking clue what's going on decide that it must be like some other vaguely related thing they have heard doesn't work.Quantum cryptography, quite simply, is not vulnerable to man in the middle attacks (not ones that attempt to silently impersonate, anyway -- a man in the middle can destroy the message and optionally read it -- though if he reads it it is destroyed no matter what).
That's the REASON to do quantum cryptography.You happen to have a point but only because you're such a moron that it wraps around into cleverness in a kind of biological integer underflow.
You see, it does come down to a key sharing problem in this case.
Because quantum crypto is slooooooooow.
It's really only good for transmitting a key.
Then you can exchange encrypted messages that aren't important, which proves that the keys weren't intercepted.
And then you can send the real stuff.Or, not love.
The other thing.
Hate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31403360</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31402964</id>
	<title>Re:"This solves the problem by embedding it...."</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268075580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It sounds cool, but actually it's nothing new.</p><p>When you model electron spin (or any spin, for that matter), you introduce mathematical dimensions to describe that degree of freedom. It's not a space dimension either.</p><p>In many contexts it makes sense to equate dimensions and degrees of freedom; this seems just one of its applications</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It sounds cool , but actually it 's nothing new.When you model electron spin ( or any spin , for that matter ) , you introduce mathematical dimensions to describe that degree of freedom .
It 's not a space dimension either.In many contexts it makes sense to equate dimensions and degrees of freedom ; this seems just one of its applications</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It sounds cool, but actually it's nothing new.When you model electron spin (or any spin, for that matter), you introduce mathematical dimensions to describe that degree of freedom.
It's not a space dimension either.In many contexts it makes sense to equate dimensions and degrees of freedom; this seems just one of its applications</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401208</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401412</id>
	<title>Re:Stay away from this</title>
	<author>AmigaMMC</author>
	<datestamp>1268068200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's ok, cats taste good. I hope they're not too entangled though or they get between my teeth.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's ok , cats taste good .
I hope they 're not too entangled though or they get between my teeth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's ok, cats taste good.
I hope they're not too entangled though or they get between my teeth.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31400948</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31402562</id>
	<title>Re:"This solves the problem by embedding it...."</title>
	<author>K. S. Kyosuke</author>
	<datestamp>1268073540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Has it occurred to anyone else how UNBELIEVABLY FRIGGIN' COOL it is that a line like that shows up in an article that is talking about building an actual, physical device?</p></div><p>I can vividly see the label on the unit packaging: "Dimensions: 0.45 x 0.3 x 0.25 x 1.7 m"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Has it occurred to anyone else how UNBELIEVABLY FRIGGIN ' COOL it is that a line like that shows up in an article that is talking about building an actual , physical device ? I can vividly see the label on the unit packaging : " Dimensions : 0.45 x 0.3 x 0.25 x 1.7 m "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has it occurred to anyone else how UNBELIEVABLY FRIGGIN' COOL it is that a line like that shows up in an article that is talking about building an actual, physical device?I can vividly see the label on the unit packaging: "Dimensions: 0.45 x 0.3 x 0.25 x 1.7 m"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401208</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31405006</id>
	<title>Re:Just wondering ..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268041500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If I'm reading the summary right, I think that's actually what they're doing.</p><p>If I'm reading the summary right.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I 'm reading the summary right , I think that 's actually what they 're doing.If I 'm reading the summary right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I'm reading the summary right, I think that's actually what they're doing.If I'm reading the summary right.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401522</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401318</id>
	<title>Re:Engineering</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1268067600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Theory is coming up with a hypothetical mechanism for incorporating extra information so that it doesn't require a known reference frame.</p><p>Engineering is making a device that actually does it reliably.</p><p>As my sibling post said, there's no clear dividing line.  But this is definitely on the theory-ish side of it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Theory is coming up with a hypothetical mechanism for incorporating extra information so that it does n't require a known reference frame.Engineering is making a device that actually does it reliably.As my sibling post said , there 's no clear dividing line .
But this is definitely on the theory-ish side of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Theory is coming up with a hypothetical mechanism for incorporating extra information so that it doesn't require a known reference frame.Engineering is making a device that actually does it reliably.As my sibling post said, there's no clear dividing line.
But this is definitely on the theory-ish side of it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401076</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401298</id>
	<title>Re:Stay away from this</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1268067480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Two, it kills a LOT of cats! You get the code right, and BAM! dead cat.</i></p><p>I always suspected that all this "entangling photon pairs" and "quantum encryption channel" stuff was just a bunch of scientists jerking off, but I didn't think they were actually euphemisms for spanking it!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Two , it kills a LOT of cats !
You get the code right , and BAM !
dead cat.I always suspected that all this " entangling photon pairs " and " quantum encryption channel " stuff was just a bunch of scientists jerking off , but I did n't think they were actually euphemisms for spanking it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Two, it kills a LOT of cats!
You get the code right, and BAM!
dead cat.I always suspected that all this "entangling photon pairs" and "quantum encryption channel" stuff was just a bunch of scientists jerking off, but I didn't think they were actually euphemisms for spanking it!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31400948</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401556</id>
	<title>Re:Stay away from this</title>
	<author>elfprince13</author>
	<datestamp>1268068860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Bandwagon is great, thanks<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) Who listens to talk radio, and more importantly how do YOU know what it's saying? Looks like we have a PETA member who's pissed that everyone knows he's a loony bird.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bandwagon is great , thanks : ) Who listens to talk radio , and more importantly how do YOU know what it 's saying ?
Looks like we have a PETA member who 's pissed that everyone knows he 's a loony bird .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bandwagon is great, thanks :) Who listens to talk radio, and more importantly how do YOU know what it's saying?
Looks like we have a PETA member who's pissed that everyone knows he's a loony bird.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401116</id>
	<title>Ambiguous title</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268066460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>By 'theoretical breakthrough', does that mean we theoretically <i>may have</i> made a breakthrough in quantum cryptography?  Quick, nobody observe the research process!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>By 'theoretical breakthrough ' , does that mean we theoretically may have made a breakthrough in quantum cryptography ?
Quick , nobody observe the research process !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By 'theoretical breakthrough', does that mean we theoretically may have made a breakthrough in quantum cryptography?
Quick, nobody observe the research process!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31414964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401076
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31402912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401208
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401556
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31400948
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401296
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31400998
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401540
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31411186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31400948
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401208
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31402628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31400998
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31403080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31400998
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31402474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401076
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31405006
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31402964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401208
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31402562
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401208
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31410946
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31403360
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31400948
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31403094
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401208
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31403552
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31420802
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31403522
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401208
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31402128
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31400998
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401076
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31402626
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401076
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31420968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401076
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31403496
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31404536
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31400998
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31420772
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401298
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31400948
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31402126
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31400948
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31400948
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1450216_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31406616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1450216.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401118
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401230
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31403496
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401514
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31420772
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31403552
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31420802
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31403522
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401386
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31402126
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401196
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401540
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1450216.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31400948
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401412
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31411186
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401564
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401228
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401298
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401316
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401440
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401556
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1450216.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401522
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31405006
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1450216.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401076
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401318
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31402626
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31420968
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31402474
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31414964
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1450216.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401256
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1450216.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401010
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1450216.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31400998
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31404536
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401026
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31402128
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31403080
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31402628
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401156
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401296
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1450216.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401050
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401432
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401400
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31406616
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1450216.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31403542
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1450216.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401208
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31402562
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401936
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31402964
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401848
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31402912
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31403094
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1450216.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31403360
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31410946
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1450216.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1450216.31401244
</commentlist>
</conversation>
