<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_07_234204</id>
	<title>Facebook Founder Accused of Hacking Into Rivals' Email</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1267968480000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader notes a long piece up at BusinessInsider.com accusing Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg of <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/how-facebook-was-founded-2010-3">hacking into the email accounts of rivals and journalists</a>. The CEO of the world's most successful social networking website was accused of at least two breaches of privacy. In a two-year investigation detailing the founding of Facebook, Nicholas Carlson, a senior editor at Silicon Alley Insider, uncovered what he claimed was evidence of the hackings in 2004. <i>"New information uncovered by Silicon Alley Insider suggests that some of the complaints [in a <a href="//yro.slashdot.org/story/07/07/14/1239237/Facebook-In-Court">court case ongong since 2007</a>] against Mark Zuckerberg are valid. It also suggests that, on at least one occasion in 2004, Mark used private login data taken from Facebook's servers to break into Facebook members' private email accounts and read their emails &mdash; at best, a gross misuse of private information. Lastly, it suggests that Mark hacked into the competing company's systems and changed some user information with the aim of making the site less useful. ... Over the past two years, we have interviewed more than a dozen sources familiar with aspects of this story &mdash; including people involved in the founding year of the company. We have also reviewed what we believe to be some relevant IMs and emails from the period. Much of this information has never before been made public. None of it has been confirmed or authenticated by Mark or the company."</i> The single-page view doesn't have its own URL; click on "View as one page" near the bottom.</htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader notes a long piece up at BusinessInsider.com accusing Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg of hacking into the email accounts of rivals and journalists .
The CEO of the world 's most successful social networking website was accused of at least two breaches of privacy .
In a two-year investigation detailing the founding of Facebook , Nicholas Carlson , a senior editor at Silicon Alley Insider , uncovered what he claimed was evidence of the hackings in 2004 .
" New information uncovered by Silicon Alley Insider suggests that some of the complaints [ in a court case ongong since 2007 ] against Mark Zuckerberg are valid .
It also suggests that , on at least one occasion in 2004 , Mark used private login data taken from Facebook 's servers to break into Facebook members ' private email accounts and read their emails    at best , a gross misuse of private information .
Lastly , it suggests that Mark hacked into the competing company 's systems and changed some user information with the aim of making the site less useful .
... Over the past two years , we have interviewed more than a dozen sources familiar with aspects of this story    including people involved in the founding year of the company .
We have also reviewed what we believe to be some relevant IMs and emails from the period .
Much of this information has never before been made public .
None of it has been confirmed or authenticated by Mark or the company .
" The single-page view does n't have its own URL ; click on " View as one page " near the bottom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader notes a long piece up at BusinessInsider.com accusing Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg of hacking into the email accounts of rivals and journalists.
The CEO of the world's most successful social networking website was accused of at least two breaches of privacy.
In a two-year investigation detailing the founding of Facebook, Nicholas Carlson, a senior editor at Silicon Alley Insider, uncovered what he claimed was evidence of the hackings in 2004.
"New information uncovered by Silicon Alley Insider suggests that some of the complaints [in a court case ongong since 2007] against Mark Zuckerberg are valid.
It also suggests that, on at least one occasion in 2004, Mark used private login data taken from Facebook's servers to break into Facebook members' private email accounts and read their emails — at best, a gross misuse of private information.
Lastly, it suggests that Mark hacked into the competing company's systems and changed some user information with the aim of making the site less useful.
... Over the past two years, we have interviewed more than a dozen sources familiar with aspects of this story — including people involved in the founding year of the company.
We have also reviewed what we believe to be some relevant IMs and emails from the period.
Much of this information has never before been made public.
None of it has been confirmed or authenticated by Mark or the company.
" The single-page view doesn't have its own URL; click on "View as one page" near the bottom.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397558</id>
	<title>Re:Stupid Users</title>
	<author>GraZZ</author>
	<datestamp>1267985940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is why <a href="http://www.supergenpass.com/" title="supergenpass.com">SuperGenPass</a> [supergenpass.com] is your friend. Using one (or more) master password, you quickly generate a unique password for each domain you log in to, all through a handy bookmarklet. Also there's no password storage (except an optional hash for validation), so you don't have to worry about password product XYZ being hacked.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is why SuperGenPass [ supergenpass.com ] is your friend .
Using one ( or more ) master password , you quickly generate a unique password for each domain you log in to , all through a handy bookmarklet .
Also there 's no password storage ( except an optional hash for validation ) , so you do n't have to worry about password product XYZ being hacked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is why SuperGenPass [supergenpass.com] is your friend.
Using one (or more) master password, you quickly generate a unique password for each domain you log in to, all through a handy bookmarklet.
Also there's no password storage (except an optional hash for validation), so you don't have to worry about password product XYZ being hacked.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31409656</id>
	<title>Re:Serious Allegations</title>
	<author>lonecrow</author>
	<datestamp>1268066700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>If this case is proven true, I can see some new laws on how companies with this kind of information have to structure and protect it.</p></div></blockquote><p>
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarbanes\%E2\%80\%93Oxley\_Act" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">I think there already is (SoX)</a> [wikipedia.org]
<br> <br>
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act may have come about because of financial mismanagement at a handfull of accounting companies, it contained a lot of data access control and auditing requirements.  <a href="http://www.google.ca/search?q=Sarbanes-Oxley+Act+dba" title="google.ca" rel="nofollow">Causing much pain in the DBA community.</a> [google.ca]
<br> <br>
So perhaps new rules are not required, simply compliance with existing ones.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If this case is proven true , I can see some new laws on how companies with this kind of information have to structure and protect it .
I think there already is ( SoX ) [ wikipedia.org ] The Sarbanes-Oxley Act may have come about because of financial mismanagement at a handfull of accounting companies , it contained a lot of data access control and auditing requirements .
Causing much pain in the DBA community .
[ google.ca ] So perhaps new rules are not required , simply compliance with existing ones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this case is proven true, I can see some new laws on how companies with this kind of information have to structure and protect it.
I think there already is (SoX) [wikipedia.org]
 
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act may have come about because of financial mismanagement at a handfull of accounting companies, it contained a lot of data access control and auditing requirements.
Causing much pain in the DBA community.
[google.ca]
 
So perhaps new rules are not required, simply compliance with existing ones.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396090</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31401922</id>
	<title>Re:Stupid Users</title>
	<author>garaged</author>
	<datestamp>1268070840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>that's pretty much what I do, something like:<br>easy) myname<br>meddium) myname82<br>hard) myname1234<br>impossible) mynamesurname</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>that 's pretty much what I do , something like : easy ) mynamemeddium ) myname82hard ) myname1234impossible ) mynamesurname</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that's pretty much what I do, something like:easy) mynamemeddium) myname82hard) myname1234impossible) mynamesurname</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397684</id>
	<title>Re:What else?</title>
	<author>im\_thatoneguy</author>
	<datestamp>1267987380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Too soon!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Too soon !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Too soon!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396934</id>
	<title>Re:Not Really Surprised</title>
	<author>TubeSteak</author>
	<datestamp>1267979160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A person with flawed ethical standards tends to do unethical things.</p></div><p>Gross abuse and misuse of electronic communication has been a staple of Government and Corporations for the better part of 170 years, starting with the telegraph system.</p><p>The only difference between then and now is that communications channels have become decentralized.<br>The ability and desire to tap into those systems still exists and has never gone away.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A person with flawed ethical standards tends to do unethical things.Gross abuse and misuse of electronic communication has been a staple of Government and Corporations for the better part of 170 years , starting with the telegraph system.The only difference between then and now is that communications channels have become decentralized.The ability and desire to tap into those systems still exists and has never gone away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A person with flawed ethical standards tends to do unethical things.Gross abuse and misuse of electronic communication has been a staple of Government and Corporations for the better part of 170 years, starting with the telegraph system.The only difference between then and now is that communications channels have become decentralized.The ability and desire to tap into those systems still exists and has never gone away.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31398742</id>
	<title>But seriously...</title>
	<author>magloca</author>
	<datestamp>1268045760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...did anyone think it was a good idea to give Facebook your webmail password, as they are constantly pestering you to do? "We won't store your password." Yeah right.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...did anyone think it was a good idea to give Facebook your webmail password , as they are constantly pestering you to do ?
" We wo n't store your password .
" Yeah right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...did anyone think it was a good idea to give Facebook your webmail password, as they are constantly pestering you to do?
"We won't store your password.
" Yeah right.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396142</id>
	<title>Different password</title>
	<author>JimboFBX</author>
	<datestamp>1267972920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is why I use a different password on facebook than anywhere else.<br> <br>

Actually it was when my account started spamming wall postings with links to Chinese drug sites I changed my password to something unique, but still, virtually the same thing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is why I use a different password on facebook than anywhere else .
Actually it was when my account started spamming wall postings with links to Chinese drug sites I changed my password to something unique , but still , virtually the same thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is why I use a different password on facebook than anywhere else.
Actually it was when my account started spamming wall postings with links to Chinese drug sites I changed my password to something unique, but still, virtually the same thing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31399094</id>
	<title>Re:Serious Allegations</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268050200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Although they promise not to keep that password, they could.</p></div><p>For a very specific definition of "keep". This definition may not be the same definition you understand.</p><p>Take for example, ISPs definition of "unlimited bandwidth".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Although they promise not to keep that password , they could.For a very specific definition of " keep " .
This definition may not be the same definition you understand.Take for example , ISPs definition of " unlimited bandwidth " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Although they promise not to keep that password, they could.For a very specific definition of "keep".
This definition may not be the same definition you understand.Take for example, ISPs definition of "unlimited bandwidth".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396654</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396694</id>
	<title>no surprise</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267977060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Anyone familiar with the mechanics of Facebook's rise to prominence should not be surprised at the alleged ethical and legal violations.

Zuckerberg et al. hacked and social engineered their way into dozens of college freshman admit lists so they could be the first to get new students online.  This is not speculation.

The "virality" of early facebook was not viral at all, it was good old fashioned spam to ill-gotten mailing lists.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone familiar with the mechanics of Facebook 's rise to prominence should not be surprised at the alleged ethical and legal violations .
Zuckerberg et al .
hacked and social engineered their way into dozens of college freshman admit lists so they could be the first to get new students online .
This is not speculation .
The " virality " of early facebook was not viral at all , it was good old fashioned spam to ill-gotten mailing lists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone familiar with the mechanics of Facebook's rise to prominence should not be surprised at the alleged ethical and legal violations.
Zuckerberg et al.
hacked and social engineered their way into dozens of college freshman admit lists so they could be the first to get new students online.
This is not speculation.
The "virality" of early facebook was not viral at all, it was good old fashioned spam to ill-gotten mailing lists.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31411858</id>
	<title>Re:Breach of privacy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268138940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He was right, wasn't he? Who would still have any reasonable expectation of privacy on Facebook? And yet they all flock to give Facebook their most private data.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He was right , was n't he ?
Who would still have any reasonable expectation of privacy on Facebook ?
And yet they all flock to give Facebook their most private data .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He was right, wasn't he?
Who would still have any reasonable expectation of privacy on Facebook?
And yet they all flock to give Facebook their most private data.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396278</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31408746</id>
	<title>Re:Serious Allegations</title>
	<author>opposabledumbs</author>
	<datestamp>1268058840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I remember seeing an article, either on Wired or here (too lazy to google it right now) that was allegedly an anonymous insider's account of facebook's upcoming changes. They were quite adamant that there has always been a super-password - it used to be "Chuck Norris" -  which has access to ALL of the accounts on facebook.</p><p>But it does seem terminally stupid of the competition to open facebook accounts. Surely they should be aware of the lack of privacy inherent in making that move? After all, they're trying to do build similar systems.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember seeing an article , either on Wired or here ( too lazy to google it right now ) that was allegedly an anonymous insider 's account of facebook 's upcoming changes .
They were quite adamant that there has always been a super-password - it used to be " Chuck Norris " - which has access to ALL of the accounts on facebook.But it does seem terminally stupid of the competition to open facebook accounts .
Surely they should be aware of the lack of privacy inherent in making that move ?
After all , they 're trying to do build similar systems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember seeing an article, either on Wired or here (too lazy to google it right now) that was allegedly an anonymous insider's account of facebook's upcoming changes.
They were quite adamant that there has always been a super-password - it used to be "Chuck Norris" -  which has access to ALL of the accounts on facebook.But it does seem terminally stupid of the competition to open facebook accounts.
Surely they should be aware of the lack of privacy inherent in making that move?
After all, they're trying to do build similar systems.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396090</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397238</id>
	<title>Re:Different password</title>
	<author>chimpo13</author>
	<datestamp>1267981860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't think they stored the passwords (even so I changed my password after letting fb have it), but I'm pretty sure they keep track of everyone you have emailed.  I started a work email and it suggested most of the same friends.  Even though it was in a different country with a slightly different name.  Unless of course, they figured someone with the rare last name of "Smith" must know all the same people.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think they stored the passwords ( even so I changed my password after letting fb have it ) , but I 'm pretty sure they keep track of everyone you have emailed .
I started a work email and it suggested most of the same friends .
Even though it was in a different country with a slightly different name .
Unless of course , they figured someone with the rare last name of " Smith " must know all the same people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think they stored the passwords (even so I changed my password after letting fb have it), but I'm pretty sure they keep track of everyone you have emailed.
I started a work email and it suggested most of the same friends.
Even though it was in a different country with a slightly different name.
Unless of course, they figured someone with the rare last name of "Smith" must know all the same people.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396646</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267976700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since when copy/paste a password is considered hacking?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since when copy/paste a password is considered hacking ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since when copy/paste a password is considered hacking?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396682</id>
	<title>Re:Serious Allegations</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267977000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>in case you guys need another reminder on NOT putting your personal information out there:</p><p>http://www.pleasrobme.com</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>in case you guys need another reminder on NOT putting your personal information out there : http : //www.pleasrobme.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in case you guys need another reminder on NOT putting your personal information out there:http://www.pleasrobme.com</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396090</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31402324</id>
	<title>Re:Serious Allegations</title>
	<author>turbotroll</author>
	<datestamp>1268072640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This is a serious allegation. With all of the information Facebook aggregates, they potentially could unlock many people's emails and various other accounts with the family and personal information.</p></div><p>What makes you believe they already don't do it?</p><p>Facebook, just like many other similar sites, has a feature which allows import of contacts from third-party mail accounts if given necessary credentials, and most people are stupid enough to actually use it. Who can guarantee that those credentials aren't cached and used for any other purpose than advertised?</p><p>I will be probably modded down as a troll for saying this -- but Facebook users are stupid for ignoring all the evidence of Facebook's true nature and they actually deserve whatever Zuckerberg does to them.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a serious allegation .
With all of the information Facebook aggregates , they potentially could unlock many people 's emails and various other accounts with the family and personal information.What makes you believe they already do n't do it ? Facebook , just like many other similar sites , has a feature which allows import of contacts from third-party mail accounts if given necessary credentials , and most people are stupid enough to actually use it .
Who can guarantee that those credentials are n't cached and used for any other purpose than advertised ? I will be probably modded down as a troll for saying this -- but Facebook users are stupid for ignoring all the evidence of Facebook 's true nature and they actually deserve whatever Zuckerberg does to them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a serious allegation.
With all of the information Facebook aggregates, they potentially could unlock many people's emails and various other accounts with the family and personal information.What makes you believe they already don't do it?Facebook, just like many other similar sites, has a feature which allows import of contacts from third-party mail accounts if given necessary credentials, and most people are stupid enough to actually use it.
Who can guarantee that those credentials aren't cached and used for any other purpose than advertised?I will be probably modded down as a troll for saying this -- but Facebook users are stupid for ignoring all the evidence of Facebook's true nature and they actually deserve whatever Zuckerberg does to them.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396090</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31399514</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing about this is surprising</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268055840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Indeed. More and more, Jew-bastards like Zuckerberg are convincing me the world would be a better place if Hitler had won the war.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Indeed .
More and more , Jew-bastards like Zuckerberg are convincing me the world would be a better place if Hitler had won the war .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indeed.
More and more, Jew-bastards like Zuckerberg are convincing me the world would be a better place if Hitler had won the war.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396804</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397836</id>
	<title>Re:So will he get a mug shot now?</title>
	<author>Third Position</author>
	<datestamp>1267989540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So will he get a mug shot now?</p></div><p>If he does, do you suppose he'll use it for his Facebook profile?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So will he get a mug shot now ? If he does , do you suppose he 'll use it for his Facebook profile ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So will he get a mug shot now?If he does, do you suppose he'll use it for his Facebook profile?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396080</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397630</id>
	<title>Re:Different password</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267986720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, according to TFA he got into those email accounts by looking for failed logins where someone had mistakenly entered their email password instead of their facebook one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , according to TFA he got into those email accounts by looking for failed logins where someone had mistakenly entered their email password instead of their facebook one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, according to TFA he got into those email accounts by looking for failed logins where someone had mistakenly entered their email password instead of their facebook one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396142</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31398974</id>
	<title>Re:Not Really Surprised</title>
	<author>RobVB</author>
	<datestamp>1268048580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exactly. I laughed when I read this:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>The CEO of the world's most successful social networking website was accused of at least two breaches of privacy.</p></div><p>I'd find it strange if he hadn't committed more breaches of privacy than you can count on two hands, even when counting in binary. But then again, maybe we should just listen to what he said earlier:</p><p><div class="quote"><p> <a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/01/11/1916203/Facebooks-Zuckerberg-Says-Forget-Privacy" title="slashdot.org">Privacy is no longer a social norm.</a> [slashdot.org]</p> </div><p>After all, how can you breach something that no longer exists? And if that doesn't work, who said anything about doing no evil?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly .
I laughed when I read this : The CEO of the world 's most successful social networking website was accused of at least two breaches of privacy.I 'd find it strange if he had n't committed more breaches of privacy than you can count on two hands , even when counting in binary .
But then again , maybe we should just listen to what he said earlier : Privacy is no longer a social norm .
[ slashdot.org ] After all , how can you breach something that no longer exists ?
And if that does n't work , who said anything about doing no evil ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly.
I laughed when I read this:The CEO of the world's most successful social networking website was accused of at least two breaches of privacy.I'd find it strange if he hadn't committed more breaches of privacy than you can count on two hands, even when counting in binary.
But then again, maybe we should just listen to what he said earlier: Privacy is no longer a social norm.
[slashdot.org] After all, how can you breach something that no longer exists?
And if that doesn't work, who said anything about doing no evil?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396366</id>
	<title>Now I understand the Facebook Privacy guidelines</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267974540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No wonder.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No wonder .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No wonder.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396398</id>
	<title>Wasnt Mark</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1267974780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Was <a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/01/21/179242/Facebook-Master-Password-Was-Chuck-Norris" title="slashdot.org">Chuck Norris</a> [slashdot.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Was Chuck Norris [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Was Chuck Norris [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31398890</id>
	<title>Re:Serious Allegations</title>
	<author>hatsch</author>
	<datestamp>1268047560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>and of course you should not trust <a href="http://www.facebook.com/contact\_importer/remove\_uploads.php" title="facebook.com" rel="nofollow">this function</a> [facebook.com] which says you can remove all your imported contacts</htmltext>
<tokenext>and of course you should not trust this function [ facebook.com ] which says you can remove all your imported contacts</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and of course you should not trust this function [facebook.com] which says you can remove all your imported contacts</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396654</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397546</id>
	<title>Re:Not Really Surprised</title>
	<author>im\_thatoneguy</author>
	<datestamp>1267985700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And that's not even mentioning the history of accusations against Zuckerberg for questionably ethical behavior:</p><p><a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/21129674/the\_battle\_for\_facebook" title="rollingstone.com">http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/21129674/the\_battle\_for\_facebook</a> [rollingstone.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And that 's not even mentioning the history of accusations against Zuckerberg for questionably ethical behavior : http : //www.rollingstone.com/news/story/21129674/the \ _battle \ _for \ _facebook [ rollingstone.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And that's not even mentioning the history of accusations against Zuckerberg for questionably ethical behavior:http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/21129674/the\_battle\_for\_facebook [rollingstone.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31398250</id>
	<title>So what?</title>
	<author>Gri3v3r</author>
	<datestamp>1268081520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I consider him untouchable.He owns a billion-worthy company which has serious investors (Microsoft?).His company is on the news every now and then.I can't imagine that he could easily be affected by law , for such things at least.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I consider him untouchable.He owns a billion-worthy company which has serious investors ( Microsoft ?
) .His company is on the news every now and then.I ca n't imagine that he could easily be affected by law , for such things at least .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I consider him untouchable.He owns a billion-worthy company which has serious investors (Microsoft?
).His company is on the news every now and then.I can't imagine that he could easily be affected by law , for such things at least.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396744</id>
	<title>SaaS will suffer for this</title>
	<author>waTR</author>
	<datestamp>1267977360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem with what has been alleged is that it now gives more ammunition to those against SaaS over the web. On the other hand, it makes it all the more important that these companies be forced to use SSL for login sessions.</p><p>On a side note, this sounds way too stupid to have actually occurred. If Mark actually did these things, I feel much more confident in my own intelligence (in comparison to his own, and what I previously thought of it).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem with what has been alleged is that it now gives more ammunition to those against SaaS over the web .
On the other hand , it makes it all the more important that these companies be forced to use SSL for login sessions.On a side note , this sounds way too stupid to have actually occurred .
If Mark actually did these things , I feel much more confident in my own intelligence ( in comparison to his own , and what I previously thought of it ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem with what has been alleged is that it now gives more ammunition to those against SaaS over the web.
On the other hand, it makes it all the more important that these companies be forced to use SSL for login sessions.On a side note, this sounds way too stupid to have actually occurred.
If Mark actually did these things, I feel much more confident in my own intelligence (in comparison to his own, and what I previously thought of it).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396190</id>
	<title>In soviet russia</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267973160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>book faces you</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>book faces you</tokentext>
<sentencetext>book faces you</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396550</id>
	<title>Re:Stupid Users</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267975920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>using the same password for their email account as they do with their social networking sites then people should expect to be compromised.</p><p>I suggest you use 4 types of passwords, one for accounts that wouldnt effect u much, one for email, one for social sites and IM, and one for bank accounts; with none of the passwords having anything to do with each other, e.g redball, orangeball,greenball... or whiteball, soccer, redflag<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... as this limits the guess work.</p></div><p>Supposedly they did,</p><p>"Here's how Mark described his hack to a friend:</p><p>Mark used his site, TheFacebook.com, to look up members of the site who identified themselves as members of the Crimson.  Then he examined a log of failed logins to see if any of the Crimson members had ever entered an incorrect password into TheFacebook.com.  If the cases in which they had entered failed logins, Mark tried to use them to access the Crimson members' Harvard email accounts.  He successfully accessed two of them."</p><p><div class="quote"><p>this "hack" was probably just stupid curiosity which will probably get him arrested, and once that happens he will loose a lot of control of the company.</p></div><p>I have no idea whether this stuff it true or provable, but if the article is accurate this wasn't curiosity. This was some seriously immoral/dishonest stuff.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>using the same password for their email account as they do with their social networking sites then people should expect to be compromised.I suggest you use 4 types of passwords , one for accounts that wouldnt effect u much , one for email , one for social sites and IM , and one for bank accounts ; with none of the passwords having anything to do with each other , e.g redball , orangeball,greenball... or whiteball , soccer , redflag ... as this limits the guess work.Supposedly they did , " Here 's how Mark described his hack to a friend : Mark used his site , TheFacebook.com , to look up members of the site who identified themselves as members of the Crimson .
Then he examined a log of failed logins to see if any of the Crimson members had ever entered an incorrect password into TheFacebook.com .
If the cases in which they had entered failed logins , Mark tried to use them to access the Crimson members ' Harvard email accounts .
He successfully accessed two of them .
" this " hack " was probably just stupid curiosity which will probably get him arrested , and once that happens he will loose a lot of control of the company.I have no idea whether this stuff it true or provable , but if the article is accurate this was n't curiosity .
This was some seriously immoral/dishonest stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>using the same password for their email account as they do with their social networking sites then people should expect to be compromised.I suggest you use 4 types of passwords, one for accounts that wouldnt effect u much, one for email, one for social sites and IM, and one for bank accounts; with none of the passwords having anything to do with each other, e.g redball, orangeball,greenball... or whiteball, soccer, redflag ... as this limits the guess work.Supposedly they did,"Here's how Mark described his hack to a friend:Mark used his site, TheFacebook.com, to look up members of the site who identified themselves as members of the Crimson.
Then he examined a log of failed logins to see if any of the Crimson members had ever entered an incorrect password into TheFacebook.com.
If the cases in which they had entered failed logins, Mark tried to use them to access the Crimson members' Harvard email accounts.
He successfully accessed two of them.
"this "hack" was probably just stupid curiosity which will probably get him arrested, and once that happens he will loose a lot of control of the company.I have no idea whether this stuff it true or provable, but if the article is accurate this wasn't curiosity.
This was some seriously immoral/dishonest stuff.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396482</id>
	<title>inside job</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267975380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>gotta love the rogue admin</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>got ta love the rogue admin</tokentext>
<sentencetext>gotta love the rogue admin</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396094</id>
	<title>Ai</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267972620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>He probably can write a book about what he's gonna face now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>He probably can write a book about what he 's gon na face now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He probably can write a book about what he's gonna face now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31400860</id>
	<title>Earmarks of success in Corporate America</title>
	<author>nebular</author>
	<datestamp>1268065260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nothing too suprising in the article. Mark Zuckerberg just came off as a guy who would screw over his own grandmother if it got him ahead. From what I've read those are qualities needed in the boardrooms of america. To have any kind of scruples at that level requires some serious business talent, if anything just to keep you from being screwed over by all the other asses.</p><p>Facebook has time and time again shown that it will push all boundries it can to gain users and gain assets from those users. Mr. Zuckerberg was just too young when founding facebook to realize that he needed to be a bit more subtle when talking to others as it could come back to bit him on the ass.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nothing too suprising in the article .
Mark Zuckerberg just came off as a guy who would screw over his own grandmother if it got him ahead .
From what I 've read those are qualities needed in the boardrooms of america .
To have any kind of scruples at that level requires some serious business talent , if anything just to keep you from being screwed over by all the other asses.Facebook has time and time again shown that it will push all boundries it can to gain users and gain assets from those users .
Mr. Zuckerberg was just too young when founding facebook to realize that he needed to be a bit more subtle when talking to others as it could come back to bit him on the ass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nothing too suprising in the article.
Mark Zuckerberg just came off as a guy who would screw over his own grandmother if it got him ahead.
From what I've read those are qualities needed in the boardrooms of america.
To have any kind of scruples at that level requires some serious business talent, if anything just to keep you from being screwed over by all the other asses.Facebook has time and time again shown that it will push all boundries it can to gain users and gain assets from those users.
Mr. Zuckerberg was just too young when founding facebook to realize that he needed to be a bit more subtle when talking to others as it could come back to bit him on the ass.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396654</id>
	<title>Re:Serious Allegations</title>
	<author>icepick72</author>
	<datestamp>1267976760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't forget the facebook Friend Finder asks for your email account password to log into your email account automatically and match your contacts against the facebook user base. Although they promise not to keep that password, they could.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't forget the facebook Friend Finder asks for your email account password to log into your email account automatically and match your contacts against the facebook user base .
Although they promise not to keep that password , they could .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't forget the facebook Friend Finder asks for your email account password to log into your email account automatically and match your contacts against the facebook user base.
Although they promise not to keep that password, they could.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396090</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396436</id>
	<title>This just in</title>
	<author>davidbrit2</author>
	<datestamp>1267975020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The CEO of the world's most successful social networking website was accused of at least two breaches of privacy.</p></div></blockquote><p>

In related news, something about hacking some email accounts as well.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The CEO of the world 's most successful social networking website was accused of at least two breaches of privacy .
In related news , something about hacking some email accounts as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The CEO of the world's most successful social networking website was accused of at least two breaches of privacy.
In related news, something about hacking some email accounts as well.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397676</id>
	<title>Re:Stupid Users</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267987320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or better yet use a product like 1Password to have a different strong password for every website. The best part of using password managers like this is that I don't even know what my password to a site like Facebook is except that it is 20 random letters, numbers and punctuations that is different from every other site I connect with.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or better yet use a product like 1Password to have a different strong password for every website .
The best part of using password managers like this is that I do n't even know what my password to a site like Facebook is except that it is 20 random letters , numbers and punctuations that is different from every other site I connect with .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or better yet use a product like 1Password to have a different strong password for every website.
The best part of using password managers like this is that I don't even know what my password to a site like Facebook is except that it is 20 random letters, numbers and punctuations that is different from every other site I connect with.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396384</id>
	<title>Re:Different password</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267974720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Facebook also had a thing "give us your gmail or hotmail password and we'll log in and retrieve your contact email addresses and offer you to add them as friends if they have a Facebook account already" - presumably they stored those passwords as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Facebook also had a thing " give us your gmail or hotmail password and we 'll log in and retrieve your contact email addresses and offer you to add them as friends if they have a Facebook account already " - presumably they stored those passwords as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Facebook also had a thing "give us your gmail or hotmail password and we'll log in and retrieve your contact email addresses and offer you to add them as friends if they have a Facebook account already" - presumably they stored those passwords as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396142</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397798</id>
	<title>Power corrupts . . .</title>
	<author>NicknamesAreStupid</author>
	<datestamp>1267989060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>At least he wasn't having <em>sex</em>.</htmltext>
<tokenext>At least he was n't having sex .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least he wasn't having sex.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396598</id>
	<title>Reason #1352...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267976280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...to avoid using Facebook.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...to avoid using Facebook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...to avoid using Facebook.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396560</id>
	<title>Here's my thought...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267976040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ANYONE who's silly enough to use a primary e-mail address where anything important lands for any social networking site is a fool.  Hotmail, gMail, et al exist for a reason....If Suckerberg wants to read my Hotmail that's linked to my Facebook account, feel free.  It's all facebook related trash anyway....since it's one of my many throwaway mail accounts, used for such activities.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ANYONE who 's silly enough to use a primary e-mail address where anything important lands for any social networking site is a fool .
Hotmail , gMail , et al exist for a reason....If Suckerberg wants to read my Hotmail that 's linked to my Facebook account , feel free .
It 's all facebook related trash anyway....since it 's one of my many throwaway mail accounts , used for such activities .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ANYONE who's silly enough to use a primary e-mail address where anything important lands for any social networking site is a fool.
Hotmail, gMail, et al exist for a reason....If Suckerberg wants to read my Hotmail that's linked to my Facebook account, feel free.
It's all facebook related trash anyway....since it's one of my many throwaway mail accounts, used for such activities.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396064</id>
	<title>What's that saying...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267972440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh yeah: "Timber!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh yeah : " Timber ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh yeah: "Timber!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396018</id>
	<title>And you thought Mob Wars was nasty</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267972260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lawyers throughout the US just had orgasms....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lawyers throughout the US just had orgasms... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lawyers throughout the US just had orgasms....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396522</id>
	<title>More to come</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1267975800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Expect a lot more of these stuff.
</p><p>
The people who start social networks are a different breed than those that cooked up tech startups of past decades.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Expect a lot more of these stuff .
The people who start social networks are a different breed than those that cooked up tech startups of past decades .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Expect a lot more of these stuff.
The people who start social networks are a different breed than those that cooked up tech startups of past decades.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396378</id>
	<title>Color me surprised...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267974660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>He isn't exactly known to believe in privacy in the first place, after all:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/jan/11/facebook-privacy" title="guardian.co.uk">http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/jan/11/facebook-privacy</a> [guardian.co.uk]
<br>
<i>The rise of social networking online means that people no longer have an expectation of privacy, according to Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg.<br>
Talking at the Crunchie awards in San Francisco this weekend, the 25-year-old chief executive of the world's most popular social network said that privacy was no longer a "social norm".</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>He is n't exactly known to believe in privacy in the first place , after all : http : //www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/jan/11/facebook-privacy [ guardian.co.uk ] The rise of social networking online means that people no longer have an expectation of privacy , according to Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg .
Talking at the Crunchie awards in San Francisco this weekend , the 25-year-old chief executive of the world 's most popular social network said that privacy was no longer a " social norm " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He isn't exactly known to believe in privacy in the first place, after all:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/jan/11/facebook-privacy [guardian.co.uk]

The rise of social networking online means that people no longer have an expectation of privacy, according to Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg.
Talking at the Crunchie awards in San Francisco this weekend, the 25-year-old chief executive of the world's most popular social network said that privacy was no longer a "social norm".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396490</id>
	<title>That's the issue with all those 'cloudy' things</title>
	<author>obarthelemy</author>
	<datestamp>1267975440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The issue is my ASS: Availability, Safety, Security.</p><p>I want my apps and data to be accessible at all times. Even when I'm off-line, or they are, or somethings dies in-between.</p><p>I want my data to be safe, which means off-site, off-line backups.</p><p>I want my data to be secure, which means no hacking. For every high-visibility CEO that gets caught, how many 3rd-world subcontractors' trainees don't ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The issue is my ASS : Availability , Safety , Security.I want my apps and data to be accessible at all times .
Even when I 'm off-line , or they are , or somethings dies in-between.I want my data to be safe , which means off-site , off-line backups.I want my data to be secure , which means no hacking .
For every high-visibility CEO that gets caught , how many 3rd-world subcontractors ' trainees do n't ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The issue is my ASS: Availability, Safety, Security.I want my apps and data to be accessible at all times.
Even when I'm off-line, or they are, or somethings dies in-between.I want my data to be safe, which means off-site, off-line backups.I want my data to be secure, which means no hacking.
For every high-visibility CEO that gets caught, how many 3rd-world subcontractors' trainees don't ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31399016</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing about this is surprising</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1268049060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>For<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. users that don't know #1 is proven. This investigation brought some logs to light. Mark is quoted as saying he will "fuck them in the ear" referring to him screwing over ConnectU. And quotes about him slowing them down and fucking them over.</htmltext>
<tokenext>For / .
users that do n't know # 1 is proven .
This investigation brought some logs to light .
Mark is quoted as saying he will " fuck them in the ear " referring to him screwing over ConnectU .
And quotes about him slowing them down and fucking them over .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For /.
users that don't know #1 is proven.
This investigation brought some logs to light.
Mark is quoted as saying he will "fuck them in the ear" referring to him screwing over ConnectU.
And quotes about him slowing them down and fucking them over.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396804</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31402006</id>
	<title>Re:Different password</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268071200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And that is exactly what they do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And that is exactly what they do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And that is exactly what they do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396480</id>
	<title>New business card?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267975380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm a black-hat hacker...bitch.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm a black-hat hacker...bitch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm a black-hat hacker...bitch.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396238</id>
	<title>Not Really Surprised</title>
	<author>Kartoffel</author>
	<datestamp>1267973520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>When you look at Facebook's dismal history of privacy policies and changes, it's really not that surprising.  A person with flawed ethical standards tends to do unethical things.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When you look at Facebook 's dismal history of privacy policies and changes , it 's really not that surprising .
A person with flawed ethical standards tends to do unethical things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When you look at Facebook's dismal history of privacy policies and changes, it's really not that surprising.
A person with flawed ethical standards tends to do unethical things.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31398560</id>
	<title>depends on his campaign contributions</title>
	<author>mosel-saar-ruwer</author>
	<datestamp>1268043120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>If he forgot <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/indivs/index.php?name=Zuckerberg,\%20Mark" title="opensecrets.org" rel="nofollow">to donate</a> [opensecrets.org] to the Obama 2008 campaign, then this dude could be looking at some very serious jail time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If he forgot to donate [ opensecrets.org ] to the Obama 2008 campaign , then this dude could be looking at some very serious jail time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If he forgot to donate [opensecrets.org] to the Obama 2008 campaign, then this dude could be looking at some very serious jail time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396434</id>
	<title>Sad if true.</title>
	<author>sunfly</author>
	<datestamp>1267975020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sad if true.  Although Silicon Valley Insider is one of the least reputable blogs on the net.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sad if true .
Although Silicon Valley Insider is one of the least reputable blogs on the net .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sad if true.
Although Silicon Valley Insider is one of the least reputable blogs on the net.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397132</id>
	<title>Re:Ai</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267981020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>He probably can write a book about what he's gonna face now.</p></div><p>I can't take pity on men of his kind, even though he'll now take it in the behind. Email hack!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>He probably can write a book about what he 's gon na face now.I ca n't take pity on men of his kind , even though he 'll now take it in the behind .
Email hack !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He probably can write a book about what he's gonna face now.I can't take pity on men of his kind, even though he'll now take it in the behind.
Email hack!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396094</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31401106</id>
	<title>Re:And you thought Mob Wars was nasty</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268066460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mark Zuckerberg is jewish, how is this a surprise to anyone. Typical Jew Behaviour.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mark Zuckerberg is jewish , how is this a surprise to anyone .
Typical Jew Behaviour .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mark Zuckerberg is jewish, how is this a surprise to anyone.
Typical Jew Behaviour.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396926</id>
	<title>Re:Different password</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267979100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, Linkedin.com also asks for passwords to your multiple email accounts to scan them for contacts. Wow. What a gold mine that could be. If there's an email addy that they don't know or a name they don't recognize, they could start spamming them for registrations and, potentially, saying a friend or colleague provided your email address to us thinking you might be interested in joining our social club....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , Linkedin.com also asks for passwords to your multiple email accounts to scan them for contacts .
Wow. What a gold mine that could be .
If there 's an email addy that they do n't know or a name they do n't recognize , they could start spamming them for registrations and , potentially , saying a friend or colleague provided your email address to us thinking you might be interested in joining our social club... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, Linkedin.com also asks for passwords to your multiple email accounts to scan them for contacts.
Wow. What a gold mine that could be.
If there's an email addy that they don't know or a name they don't recognize, they could start spamming them for registrations and, potentially, saying a friend or colleague provided your email address to us thinking you might be interested in joining our social club....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396804</id>
	<title>Nothing about this is surprising</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267977840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>This doesn't surprise me, only confirms what I've thought about Zuckerberg.
<br> <br>
1) I believe he stole Facebook from the ConnectU founders.  I believe the assertions that he was hired as a developer and dragged his feet while forming his own company which eventually became Facebook.
<br> <br>
2) I believe he has no scruples when it comes to Facebook users' data.  He has publicly stated that he knows what's best for "his" users and this arrogance shines through every time the UI is abruptly changed.
<br> <br>
3) I believe he will do whatever he pleases with users' information.  I don't think that privacy laws provide guidance to him but instead are constraints that he will bypass given any opportunity.
<br> <br>
I'm pleased to see that he is being publicly exposed - I doubt anything will come of it - but am glad for him to be seen as he truly is, an arrogant and unscrupulous bad person.  This latest revelation may finally send him where he belongs . . .
<br> <br>
banking.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This does n't surprise me , only confirms what I 've thought about Zuckerberg .
1 ) I believe he stole Facebook from the ConnectU founders .
I believe the assertions that he was hired as a developer and dragged his feet while forming his own company which eventually became Facebook .
2 ) I believe he has no scruples when it comes to Facebook users ' data .
He has publicly stated that he knows what 's best for " his " users and this arrogance shines through every time the UI is abruptly changed .
3 ) I believe he will do whatever he pleases with users ' information .
I do n't think that privacy laws provide guidance to him but instead are constraints that he will bypass given any opportunity .
I 'm pleased to see that he is being publicly exposed - I doubt anything will come of it - but am glad for him to be seen as he truly is , an arrogant and unscrupulous bad person .
This latest revelation may finally send him where he belongs .
. .
banking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This doesn't surprise me, only confirms what I've thought about Zuckerberg.
1) I believe he stole Facebook from the ConnectU founders.
I believe the assertions that he was hired as a developer and dragged his feet while forming his own company which eventually became Facebook.
2) I believe he has no scruples when it comes to Facebook users' data.
He has publicly stated that he knows what's best for "his" users and this arrogance shines through every time the UI is abruptly changed.
3) I believe he will do whatever he pleases with users' information.
I don't think that privacy laws provide guidance to him but instead are constraints that he will bypass given any opportunity.
I'm pleased to see that he is being publicly exposed - I doubt anything will come of it - but am glad for him to be seen as he truly is, an arrogant and unscrupulous bad person.
This latest revelation may finally send him where he belongs .
. .
banking.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31401928</id>
	<title>Re:Different password</title>
	<author>statusbar</author>
	<datestamp>1268070840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the beginning of Facebook you were not allowed to join unless your email account was on hotmail or yahoo or gmail AND you provided your password so it could mine it.</p><p>--jeffk++</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the beginning of Facebook you were not allowed to join unless your email account was on hotmail or yahoo or gmail AND you provided your password so it could mine it.--jeffk + +</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the beginning of Facebook you were not allowed to join unless your email account was on hotmail or yahoo or gmail AND you provided your password so it could mine it.--jeffk++</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397516</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397516</id>
	<title>Re:Different password</title>
	<author>mirix</author>
	<datestamp>1267985220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm still stunned that people would actually give out their passwords.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm still stunned that people would actually give out their passwords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm still stunned that people would actually give out their passwords.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31403538</id>
	<title>Ding!</title>
	<author>bdinger</author>
	<datestamp>1268078100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is precisely why I'm moving back to hosting my own website on my own server and hosting my own email.  Facebook has always made me a bit wary, and while I'm cool with Goog - their ads are just a little TOO targeted as of late.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is precisely why I 'm moving back to hosting my own website on my own server and hosting my own email .
Facebook has always made me a bit wary , and while I 'm cool with Goog - their ads are just a little TOO targeted as of late .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is precisely why I'm moving back to hosting my own website on my own server and hosting my own email.
Facebook has always made me a bit wary, and while I'm cool with Goog - their ads are just a little TOO targeted as of late.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396680</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397262</id>
	<title>And you thought MS was bad...</title>
	<author>yuhong</author>
	<datestamp>1267982100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Or, as the HarvardConnection founders have alleged, was he stalling the development of HarvardConnection so that he could build a competing site and launch it first?
Our investigation suggests the latter.</p></div><p><div class="quote"><p>It also suggests that he had developed a strategy for dealing with his would-be competition: Delay developing it.</p></div><p><div class="quote"><p>Next, Mark appears to have logged into the accounts of some ConnectU users and changed their privacy settings to invisible.  The idea here was apparently to make it harder for people to find friends on ConnectU, thus reducing its utility.   Eventually, Mark appears to have gone a step further, deactivating about 20 ConnectU accounts entirely.</p></div><p>And you thought Microsoft was the bad evil monopolist. Sure, it is all in the past now, but it was worse, I think.<br>
Could this be turned into an anti-trust case?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or , as the HarvardConnection founders have alleged , was he stalling the development of HarvardConnection so that he could build a competing site and launch it first ?
Our investigation suggests the latter.It also suggests that he had developed a strategy for dealing with his would-be competition : Delay developing it.Next , Mark appears to have logged into the accounts of some ConnectU users and changed their privacy settings to invisible .
The idea here was apparently to make it harder for people to find friends on ConnectU , thus reducing its utility .
Eventually , Mark appears to have gone a step further , deactivating about 20 ConnectU accounts entirely.And you thought Microsoft was the bad evil monopolist .
Sure , it is all in the past now , but it was worse , I think .
Could this be turned into an anti-trust case ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or, as the HarvardConnection founders have alleged, was he stalling the development of HarvardConnection so that he could build a competing site and launch it first?
Our investigation suggests the latter.It also suggests that he had developed a strategy for dealing with his would-be competition: Delay developing it.Next, Mark appears to have logged into the accounts of some ConnectU users and changed their privacy settings to invisible.
The idea here was apparently to make it harder for people to find friends on ConnectU, thus reducing its utility.
Eventually, Mark appears to have gone a step further, deactivating about 20 ConnectU accounts entirely.And you thought Microsoft was the bad evil monopolist.
Sure, it is all in the past now, but it was worse, I think.
Could this be turned into an anti-trust case?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396278</id>
	<title>Breach of privacy</title>
	<author>SilverHatHacker</author>
	<datestamp>1267973760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Kinda puts his comments that "No one has any reasonable expectation of privacy anymore" into a whole new light, doesn't it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kinda puts his comments that " No one has any reasonable expectation of privacy anymore " into a whole new light , does n't it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kinda puts his comments that "No one has any reasonable expectation of privacy anymore" into a whole new light, doesn't it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396740</id>
	<title>MARK ZUCKERBERG IS A JEW</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267977360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't expect anything moral or honest stuff come out from him. He use the Talmud as his holy book.</p><p>Some excerpts of the Talmud:</p><p>Erubin 21b: Whosoever disobeys the rabbis deserves death and will be punished by being boiled in hot excrement in hell.</p><p>Moed Kattan 17a : If a Jew is tempted to do evil he should go to a city where he is not known and do the evil there.</p><p>Baba Mezia 114a-114b. Non-Jews are Not Human. Only Jews are human ("Only ye are designated men"). Also see Kerithoth 6b under the sub-head, "Oil of Anointing" and Berakoth 58a in which Gentile women are designated animals ("she-asses").</p><p>Sanhedrin 58b: Jews are Divine. If a heathen (Gentile) hits a Jew, THE GENTILE MUST BE KILLED. Hitting a Jew is the same as hitting God.</p><p>Sanhedrin 57a: O.K. to Cheat Non-Jews. A Jew need not pay a Christian ("Cuthean") the wages owed him for work.</p><p>Baba Kamma 37b: Jews Have Superior Legal Status. "If an ox of an Israelite gores an ox of a Canaanite there is no liability; but if an ox of a Canaanite gores an ox of an Israelite...the payment is to be in full."</p><p>Baba Mezia 24a: Jews May Steal from Non-Jews. If a Jew finds an object lost by a Gentile ("heathen") it does not have to be returned. (Affirmed also in Baba Kamma 113b).</p><p>Sanhedrin 76a: God will not spare a Jew who "marries his daughter to an old man or takes a wife for his infant son or returns a lost article to a Cuthean..."</p><p>Sanhedrin 57a: JEWS MAY ROB AND KILL NON-JEWS. When a Jew murders a Christian ("Cuthean"), there will be no death penalty. What a Jew steals from a Gentile he may keep.</p><p>Baba Kamma 37b: Gentiles are outside the protection of the law and God has "exposed their money to Israel."</p><p>Baba Kamma 113a: Jews May Lie to Non-Jews . JEWS MAY USE LIES ("subterfuges") TO CIRCUMVENT A GENTILE.</p><p>Yebamoth 98a: Non-Jewish Children Sub-Human. All Gentile children are animals.</p><p>Abodah Zarah 36b: Gentile girls are in a state of niddah (filth) from birth.</p><p>Abodah Zarah 22a-22b: Gentiles prefer sex with cows.</p><p>Sanhedrin 106a . Says Jesus' mother was a whore: "She who was the descendant of princes and governors played the harlot with carpenters." Also in Shabbath 104b it is stated in the "uncensored" text of the Talmud that Jesus' mother, "Miriam the hairdresser," had sex with many men.</p><p>Sanhedrin 106 gloats over the early age at which Jesus died: "Hast thou heard how old Balaam (Jesus) was? He replied: It is not actually stated but since it is written, Bloody and deceitful men shall not live out half their days it follows that he was thirty-three or thirty-four years old."</p><p>Sanhedrin 43a Jesus ("Yeshu" the Nazarene") was executed because he practiced sorcery.</p><p>Gittin 57a . Says Jesus is being boiled in "hot excrement".</p><p>Sanhedrin 43a . Jesus deserved execution: "On the eve of the Passover, Yeshu was hanged...Do you suppose that he was one for whom a defense could be made? Was he not a Mesith (enticer)?"</p><p>Rosh Hashanah 17a . Christians ("minim") and others who reject the Talmud will go to hell and be punished there for all generations.</p><p>Shabbath 116a (p. 569). Jews must destroy the books of the Christians. Israel Shahak reports that the Zionists burned hundreds of New Testament books in Occupied Palestine on March 23, 1980 (cf. Jewish History, Jewish Religion, p. 21).</p><p>Gittin 69a . To heal his flesh a Jew should take dust that lies within the shadow of an outdoor toilet, mix it with honey and eat it.</p><p>Shabbath 41a. The law regulating the rule for how to urinate in a holy way is given.</p><p>Yebamoth 63a. States that Adam had sexual intercourse with all the animals in the Garden of Eden.</p><p>Sanhedrin 55b . A Jew may marry a three year old girl. (specifically, three years "and a day" old).</p><p>Sanhedrin 54b . A Jew may have sex with a child as long as that child is over nine years old.</p><p>Kethuboth 11b . When a older man has intercourse with a girl it is nothing because her virginity will grow back.</p><p>Yebamoth 59b . A woman who had inter</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't expect anything moral or honest stuff come out from him .
He use the Talmud as his holy book.Some excerpts of the Talmud : Erubin 21b : Whosoever disobeys the rabbis deserves death and will be punished by being boiled in hot excrement in hell.Moed Kattan 17a : If a Jew is tempted to do evil he should go to a city where he is not known and do the evil there.Baba Mezia 114a-114b .
Non-Jews are Not Human .
Only Jews are human ( " Only ye are designated men " ) .
Also see Kerithoth 6b under the sub-head , " Oil of Anointing " and Berakoth 58a in which Gentile women are designated animals ( " she-asses " ) .Sanhedrin 58b : Jews are Divine .
If a heathen ( Gentile ) hits a Jew , THE GENTILE MUST BE KILLED .
Hitting a Jew is the same as hitting God.Sanhedrin 57a : O.K .
to Cheat Non-Jews .
A Jew need not pay a Christian ( " Cuthean " ) the wages owed him for work.Baba Kamma 37b : Jews Have Superior Legal Status .
" If an ox of an Israelite gores an ox of a Canaanite there is no liability ; but if an ox of a Canaanite gores an ox of an Israelite...the payment is to be in full .
" Baba Mezia 24a : Jews May Steal from Non-Jews .
If a Jew finds an object lost by a Gentile ( " heathen " ) it does not have to be returned .
( Affirmed also in Baba Kamma 113b ) .Sanhedrin 76a : God will not spare a Jew who " marries his daughter to an old man or takes a wife for his infant son or returns a lost article to a Cuthean... " Sanhedrin 57a : JEWS MAY ROB AND KILL NON-JEWS .
When a Jew murders a Christian ( " Cuthean " ) , there will be no death penalty .
What a Jew steals from a Gentile he may keep.Baba Kamma 37b : Gentiles are outside the protection of the law and God has " exposed their money to Israel .
" Baba Kamma 113a : Jews May Lie to Non-Jews .
JEWS MAY USE LIES ( " subterfuges " ) TO CIRCUMVENT A GENTILE.Yebamoth 98a : Non-Jewish Children Sub-Human .
All Gentile children are animals.Abodah Zarah 36b : Gentile girls are in a state of niddah ( filth ) from birth.Abodah Zarah 22a-22b : Gentiles prefer sex with cows.Sanhedrin 106a .
Says Jesus ' mother was a whore : " She who was the descendant of princes and governors played the harlot with carpenters .
" Also in Shabbath 104b it is stated in the " uncensored " text of the Talmud that Jesus ' mother , " Miriam the hairdresser , " had sex with many men.Sanhedrin 106 gloats over the early age at which Jesus died : " Hast thou heard how old Balaam ( Jesus ) was ?
He replied : It is not actually stated but since it is written , Bloody and deceitful men shall not live out half their days it follows that he was thirty-three or thirty-four years old .
" Sanhedrin 43a Jesus ( " Yeshu " the Nazarene " ) was executed because he practiced sorcery.Gittin 57a .
Says Jesus is being boiled in " hot excrement " .Sanhedrin 43a .
Jesus deserved execution : " On the eve of the Passover , Yeshu was hanged...Do you suppose that he was one for whom a defense could be made ?
Was he not a Mesith ( enticer ) ?
" Rosh Hashanah 17a .
Christians ( " minim " ) and others who reject the Talmud will go to hell and be punished there for all generations.Shabbath 116a ( p. 569 ) . Jews must destroy the books of the Christians .
Israel Shahak reports that the Zionists burned hundreds of New Testament books in Occupied Palestine on March 23 , 1980 ( cf .
Jewish History , Jewish Religion , p. 21 ) .Gittin 69a .
To heal his flesh a Jew should take dust that lies within the shadow of an outdoor toilet , mix it with honey and eat it.Shabbath 41a .
The law regulating the rule for how to urinate in a holy way is given.Yebamoth 63a .
States that Adam had sexual intercourse with all the animals in the Garden of Eden.Sanhedrin 55b .
A Jew may marry a three year old girl .
( specifically , three years " and a day " old ) .Sanhedrin 54b .
A Jew may have sex with a child as long as that child is over nine years old.Kethuboth 11b .
When a older man has intercourse with a girl it is nothing because her virginity will grow back.Yebamoth 59b .
A woman who had inter</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't expect anything moral or honest stuff come out from him.
He use the Talmud as his holy book.Some excerpts of the Talmud:Erubin 21b: Whosoever disobeys the rabbis deserves death and will be punished by being boiled in hot excrement in hell.Moed Kattan 17a : If a Jew is tempted to do evil he should go to a city where he is not known and do the evil there.Baba Mezia 114a-114b.
Non-Jews are Not Human.
Only Jews are human ("Only ye are designated men").
Also see Kerithoth 6b under the sub-head, "Oil of Anointing" and Berakoth 58a in which Gentile women are designated animals ("she-asses").Sanhedrin 58b: Jews are Divine.
If a heathen (Gentile) hits a Jew, THE GENTILE MUST BE KILLED.
Hitting a Jew is the same as hitting God.Sanhedrin 57a: O.K.
to Cheat Non-Jews.
A Jew need not pay a Christian ("Cuthean") the wages owed him for work.Baba Kamma 37b: Jews Have Superior Legal Status.
"If an ox of an Israelite gores an ox of a Canaanite there is no liability; but if an ox of a Canaanite gores an ox of an Israelite...the payment is to be in full.
"Baba Mezia 24a: Jews May Steal from Non-Jews.
If a Jew finds an object lost by a Gentile ("heathen") it does not have to be returned.
(Affirmed also in Baba Kamma 113b).Sanhedrin 76a: God will not spare a Jew who "marries his daughter to an old man or takes a wife for his infant son or returns a lost article to a Cuthean..."Sanhedrin 57a: JEWS MAY ROB AND KILL NON-JEWS.
When a Jew murders a Christian ("Cuthean"), there will be no death penalty.
What a Jew steals from a Gentile he may keep.Baba Kamma 37b: Gentiles are outside the protection of the law and God has "exposed their money to Israel.
"Baba Kamma 113a: Jews May Lie to Non-Jews .
JEWS MAY USE LIES ("subterfuges") TO CIRCUMVENT A GENTILE.Yebamoth 98a: Non-Jewish Children Sub-Human.
All Gentile children are animals.Abodah Zarah 36b: Gentile girls are in a state of niddah (filth) from birth.Abodah Zarah 22a-22b: Gentiles prefer sex with cows.Sanhedrin 106a .
Says Jesus' mother was a whore: "She who was the descendant of princes and governors played the harlot with carpenters.
" Also in Shabbath 104b it is stated in the "uncensored" text of the Talmud that Jesus' mother, "Miriam the hairdresser," had sex with many men.Sanhedrin 106 gloats over the early age at which Jesus died: "Hast thou heard how old Balaam (Jesus) was?
He replied: It is not actually stated but since it is written, Bloody and deceitful men shall not live out half their days it follows that he was thirty-three or thirty-four years old.
"Sanhedrin 43a Jesus ("Yeshu" the Nazarene") was executed because he practiced sorcery.Gittin 57a .
Says Jesus is being boiled in "hot excrement".Sanhedrin 43a .
Jesus deserved execution: "On the eve of the Passover, Yeshu was hanged...Do you suppose that he was one for whom a defense could be made?
Was he not a Mesith (enticer)?
"Rosh Hashanah 17a .
Christians ("minim") and others who reject the Talmud will go to hell and be punished there for all generations.Shabbath 116a (p. 569). Jews must destroy the books of the Christians.
Israel Shahak reports that the Zionists burned hundreds of New Testament books in Occupied Palestine on March 23, 1980 (cf.
Jewish History, Jewish Religion, p. 21).Gittin 69a .
To heal his flesh a Jew should take dust that lies within the shadow of an outdoor toilet, mix it with honey and eat it.Shabbath 41a.
The law regulating the rule for how to urinate in a holy way is given.Yebamoth 63a.
States that Adam had sexual intercourse with all the animals in the Garden of Eden.Sanhedrin 55b .
A Jew may marry a three year old girl.
(specifically, three years "and a day" old).Sanhedrin 54b .
A Jew may have sex with a child as long as that child is over nine years old.Kethuboth 11b .
When a older man has intercourse with a girl it is nothing because her virginity will grow back.Yebamoth 59b .
A woman who had inter</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396090</id>
	<title>Serious Allegations</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267972560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is a serious allegation. With all of the information Facebook aggregates, they potentially could unlock many people's emails and various other accounts with the family and personal information. Lots of people use simple things like their pets or parents birthdays as those reminder question answers, and Facebook could easily hold all the correct information to gain access to those accounts. If this case is proven true, I can see some new laws on how companies with this kind of information have to structure and protect it. Hopefully people will wake up and stop putting their personal information where Facebook and others can see...</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a serious allegation .
With all of the information Facebook aggregates , they potentially could unlock many people 's emails and various other accounts with the family and personal information .
Lots of people use simple things like their pets or parents birthdays as those reminder question answers , and Facebook could easily hold all the correct information to gain access to those accounts .
If this case is proven true , I can see some new laws on how companies with this kind of information have to structure and protect it .
Hopefully people will wake up and stop putting their personal information where Facebook and others can see.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a serious allegation.
With all of the information Facebook aggregates, they potentially could unlock many people's emails and various other accounts with the family and personal information.
Lots of people use simple things like their pets or parents birthdays as those reminder question answers, and Facebook could easily hold all the correct information to gain access to those accounts.
If this case is proven true, I can see some new laws on how companies with this kind of information have to structure and protect it.
Hopefully people will wake up and stop putting their personal information where Facebook and others can see...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397280</id>
	<title>So what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267982460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He won. He's rich as hell now and can buy his way out of any trouble people try and make for him, and he's sitting on top of one of the modern era's most powerful web empires.</p><p>It's business, baby. The ends justify the means.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He won .
He 's rich as hell now and can buy his way out of any trouble people try and make for him , and he 's sitting on top of one of the modern era 's most powerful web empires.It 's business , baby .
The ends justify the means .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He won.
He's rich as hell now and can buy his way out of any trouble people try and make for him, and he's sitting on top of one of the modern era's most powerful web empires.It's business, baby.
The ends justify the means.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31398518</id>
	<title>Re:So will he get a mug shot now?</title>
	<author>ultranova</author>
	<datestamp>1268042460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>So will he get a mug shot now?</p></div> </blockquote><p>Why would he? He's a CEO, he's <em> <a href="http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DickDastardlyStopsToCheat" title="tvtropes.org">supposed</a> [tvtropes.org] </em> to act like a <a href="http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/CardCarryingVillain" title="tvtropes.org">cartoon villain</a> [tvtropes.org].</p><p>The world makes a lot more sense when you stop assuming that various businessmen, politicians etc. are trying to further their self-interest in a rational, if ruthless, manner, and instead treat them as villains in a farcical drama movie. That way you don't have to wonder why someone who already has three billions would risk everything to get a fourth, or something to that effect. The implications of that are somewhat... disturbing.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So will he get a mug shot now ?
Why would he ?
He 's a CEO , he 's supposed [ tvtropes.org ] to act like a cartoon villain [ tvtropes.org ] .The world makes a lot more sense when you stop assuming that various businessmen , politicians etc .
are trying to further their self-interest in a rational , if ruthless , manner , and instead treat them as villains in a farcical drama movie .
That way you do n't have to wonder why someone who already has three billions would risk everything to get a fourth , or something to that effect .
The implications of that are somewhat... disturbing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So will he get a mug shot now?
Why would he?
He's a CEO, he's  supposed [tvtropes.org]  to act like a cartoon villain [tvtropes.org].The world makes a lot more sense when you stop assuming that various businessmen, politicians etc.
are trying to further their self-interest in a rational, if ruthless, manner, and instead treat them as villains in a farcical drama movie.
That way you don't have to wonder why someone who already has three billions would risk everything to get a fourth, or something to that effect.
The implications of that are somewhat... disturbing.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396080</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397818</id>
	<title>Re:MARK ZUCKERBERG IS A JEW</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267989360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.jrbooksonline.com/PDF\_Books/CultureOfCritique.pdf" title="jrbooksonline.com" rel="nofollow">He's not wrong.</a> [jrbooksonline.com]</p><p>But, fortunately, <a href="http://www.avrtech.com/turner\_diaries.pdf" title="avrtech.com" rel="nofollow">there are ways of dealing with that.</a> [avrtech.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's not wrong .
[ jrbooksonline.com ] But , fortunately , there are ways of dealing with that .
[ avrtech.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's not wrong.
[jrbooksonline.com]But, fortunately, there are ways of dealing with that.
[avrtech.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396080</id>
	<title>So will he get a mug shot now?</title>
	<author>Joe The Dragon</author>
	<datestamp>1267972500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So will he get a mug shot now?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So will he get a mug shot now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So will he get a mug shot now?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396034</id>
	<title>1st..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267972320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>poke</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>poke</tokentext>
<sentencetext>poke</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31400704</id>
	<title>Re:Serious Allegations</title>
	<author>Dishevel</author>
	<datestamp>1268064600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wait till its reported again in 30 minutes with a different title.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait till its reported again in 30 minutes with a different title .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait till its reported again in 30 minutes with a different title.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397780</id>
	<title>Re:And you thought Mob Wars was nasty</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267988880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No doubt. What did you expect from a Jew?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No doubt .
What did you expect from a Jew ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No doubt.
What did you expect from a Jew?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396884</id>
	<title>Re:Different password</title>
	<author>MikeUW</author>
	<datestamp>1267978680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So what you're saying is that you use the same password for everything else?  I guess that means whoever guesses your email password now also has your online banking password...but whew, your Facebook account is safe.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So what you 're saying is that you use the same password for everything else ?
I guess that means whoever guesses your email password now also has your online banking password...but whew , your Facebook account is safe .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what you're saying is that you use the same password for everything else?
I guess that means whoever guesses your email password now also has your online banking password...but whew, your Facebook account is safe.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396142</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397248</id>
	<title>Re:Serious Allegations</title>
	<author>Jeff DeMaagd</author>
	<datestamp>1267981920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My only question is, the alleged hacking took place in 2004, how does it take until 2010 for it to be presented as news on Slashdot?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My only question is , the alleged hacking took place in 2004 , how does it take until 2010 for it to be presented as news on Slashdot ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My only question is, the alleged hacking took place in 2004, how does it take until 2010 for it to be presented as news on Slashdot?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396090</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396324</id>
	<title>What else?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267974240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did he offer to buy the Caprica Bucs as well?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did he offer to buy the Caprica Bucs as well ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did he offer to buy the Caprica Bucs as well?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31426512</id>
	<title>"everyrbody does it"</title>
	<author>warpuck</author>
	<datestamp>1268238180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>He is just following the successful business practices of Microsoft and Norton. All he needs is good on house lawyers and capital to buy up or off those litigations that may be headed unfavorable endings.</htmltext>
<tokenext>He is just following the successful business practices of Microsoft and Norton .
All he needs is good on house lawyers and capital to buy up or off those litigations that may be headed unfavorable endings .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He is just following the successful business practices of Microsoft and Norton.
All he needs is good on house lawyers and capital to buy up or off those litigations that may be headed unfavorable endings.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396338</id>
	<title>He'll Probably Get Off Easy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267974300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A friend once made the observation that no big-time, fast-track success story in the world of IT ever makes it without doing <i>something</i> that gets them into serious hot water at least once.  Once they do that, they offer a bunch of mea culpas, make a few donations here and there, then make bank.  (The slow-track success stories don't usually fit that theory.)</p><p>This is a bit different, seeing as he's <i>already</i> made bank, and it's a skeleton coming out of the closet, but I still think he'll get off easy.</p><p>Remember, it's not how much justice you can get, it's <i>how much you can afford</i>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A friend once made the observation that no big-time , fast-track success story in the world of IT ever makes it without doing something that gets them into serious hot water at least once .
Once they do that , they offer a bunch of mea culpas , make a few donations here and there , then make bank .
( The slow-track success stories do n't usually fit that theory .
) This is a bit different , seeing as he 's already made bank , and it 's a skeleton coming out of the closet , but I still think he 'll get off easy.Remember , it 's not how much justice you can get , it 's how much you can afford .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A friend once made the observation that no big-time, fast-track success story in the world of IT ever makes it without doing something that gets them into serious hot water at least once.
Once they do that, they offer a bunch of mea culpas, make a few donations here and there, then make bank.
(The slow-track success stories don't usually fit that theory.
)This is a bit different, seeing as he's already made bank, and it's a skeleton coming out of the closet, but I still think he'll get off easy.Remember, it's not how much justice you can get, it's how much you can afford.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396300</id>
	<title>mo3 ugp</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267974060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">today. It's ab0ut</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>today .
It 's ab0ut [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>today.
It's ab0ut [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397274</id>
	<title>facebook is trash</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267982340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>who still uses that shit?  what a waste of time!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>who still uses that shit ?
what a waste of time !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>who still uses that shit?
what a waste of time!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396532</id>
	<title>temporary password</title>
	<author>zlel</author>
	<datestamp>1267975800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>i wouldn't entrust my passwords to a third party website, but if i had to do it, i guess i would have to change my password temporary, let the third party site access my account with the temporary password, and then change it back.

but i've always felt very awkward that facebook is one website. Is it possible to make a distributed/cloud version of it using some form of client-side decryption, so that nobody "owns" any of the information in its entirety?</htmltext>
<tokenext>i would n't entrust my passwords to a third party website , but if i had to do it , i guess i would have to change my password temporary , let the third party site access my account with the temporary password , and then change it back .
but i 've always felt very awkward that facebook is one website .
Is it possible to make a distributed/cloud version of it using some form of client-side decryption , so that nobody " owns " any of the information in its entirety ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i wouldn't entrust my passwords to a third party website, but if i had to do it, i guess i would have to change my password temporary, let the third party site access my account with the temporary password, and then change it back.
but i've always felt very awkward that facebook is one website.
Is it possible to make a distributed/cloud version of it using some form of client-side decryption, so that nobody "owns" any of the information in its entirety?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396776</id>
	<title>Uh, where's the hacking?</title>
	<author>Jeian</author>
	<datestamp>1267977720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It took me about 10 minutes to skim through the backstory, but it's pretty sparse on the details and supporting evidence.</p><p>"Instead, he decided to access the email accounts of Crimson editors and review their emails.  How did he do this?  Here's how Mark described his hack to a friend:"</p><p>Oh, a friend said Mark said... right.</p><p>"Nevertheless, during 2004, Mark Zuckerberg still appeared to be obsessed with ConnectU. Specifically, he appears to have hacked into ConnectU's site and made changes to multiple user profiles, including Cameron Winklevoss's."</p><p>"At one point, Mark appears to have exploited a flaw in ConnectU's account verification process to create a fake Cameron Winklevoss account with a fake Harvard.edu email address."</p><p>It "appeared" that way? According to whom, and based on what?</p><p>Seriously, the whole article is a long string of "it looks like" and "he said she said Mark said" with nothing to back any of it up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It took me about 10 minutes to skim through the backstory , but it 's pretty sparse on the details and supporting evidence .
" Instead , he decided to access the email accounts of Crimson editors and review their emails .
How did he do this ?
Here 's how Mark described his hack to a friend : " Oh , a friend said Mark said.. .
right. " Nevertheless , during 2004 , Mark Zuckerberg still appeared to be obsessed with ConnectU .
Specifically , he appears to have hacked into ConnectU 's site and made changes to multiple user profiles , including Cameron Winklevoss 's .
" " At one point , Mark appears to have exploited a flaw in ConnectU 's account verification process to create a fake Cameron Winklevoss account with a fake Harvard.edu email address .
" It " appeared " that way ?
According to whom , and based on what ? Seriously , the whole article is a long string of " it looks like " and " he said she said Mark said " with nothing to back any of it up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It took me about 10 minutes to skim through the backstory, but it's pretty sparse on the details and supporting evidence.
"Instead, he decided to access the email accounts of Crimson editors and review their emails.
How did he do this?
Here's how Mark described his hack to a friend:"Oh, a friend said Mark said...
right."Nevertheless, during 2004, Mark Zuckerberg still appeared to be obsessed with ConnectU.
Specifically, he appears to have hacked into ConnectU's site and made changes to multiple user profiles, including Cameron Winklevoss's.
""At one point, Mark appears to have exploited a flaw in ConnectU's account verification process to create a fake Cameron Winklevoss account with a fake Harvard.edu email address.
"It "appeared" that way?
According to whom, and based on what?Seriously, the whole article is a long string of "it looks like" and "he said she said Mark said" with nothing to back any of it up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397186</id>
	<title>Dentasmile Md</title>
	<author>brude</author>
	<datestamp>1267981380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Script Kidd if you use other peoples programs to steal password<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.Hacker if You do it by yourself.
<a href="http://ezinearticles.com/?Denta-Smile-MD-Review&amp;id=3852536" title="ezinearticles.com" rel="nofollow">Denta Smile Md</a> [ezinearticles.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Script Kidd if you use other peoples programs to steal password .Hacker if You do it by yourself .
Denta Smile Md [ ezinearticles.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Script Kidd if you use other peoples programs to steal password .Hacker if You do it by yourself.
Denta Smile Md [ezinearticles.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31402838</id>
	<title>Re:Serious Allegations</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1268074920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know, i think people get what they deserve, if you go ahead and open your facebook account as paris hilton, and then go ahead and post all the info and stuff personal enough to set you up for stalking or fraud or even privacy invasion. You deserve it, no one explained the internet to you, once it is out there, it does not belong to you per se, only virtually.</p><p>So if you know someone could at some point working for facebook only for the sole purpose to find stuff like this, gets caught after selling some illegal pictures to people magazine or something, then repeats with diff. company when he gets canned....sounds to me like paparazzi tactics.</p><p>If you are paris hilton, and name your facebook account H\_queen\_B or something like that, also making sure not to put too much info that could leave the idea it is celebs, I guess it would be less evident, then say the rest of the 10 million facebook users, someone would really have to have nothing to do to go through all the stuff from 10 million users before<br>getting lucky.</p><p>Anyways, I am sure that if someone posts also from celeb locations like Palm springs, and has the ip address to match, then again that would be up to them to hide their ip through Tor or something....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , i think people get what they deserve , if you go ahead and open your facebook account as paris hilton , and then go ahead and post all the info and stuff personal enough to set you up for stalking or fraud or even privacy invasion .
You deserve it , no one explained the internet to you , once it is out there , it does not belong to you per se , only virtually.So if you know someone could at some point working for facebook only for the sole purpose to find stuff like this , gets caught after selling some illegal pictures to people magazine or something , then repeats with diff .
company when he gets canned....sounds to me like paparazzi tactics.If you are paris hilton , and name your facebook account H \ _queen \ _B or something like that , also making sure not to put too much info that could leave the idea it is celebs , I guess it would be less evident , then say the rest of the 10 million facebook users , someone would really have to have nothing to do to go through all the stuff from 10 million users beforegetting lucky.Anyways , I am sure that if someone posts also from celeb locations like Palm springs , and has the ip address to match , then again that would be up to them to hide their ip through Tor or something... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, i think people get what they deserve, if you go ahead and open your facebook account as paris hilton, and then go ahead and post all the info and stuff personal enough to set you up for stalking or fraud or even privacy invasion.
You deserve it, no one explained the internet to you, once it is out there, it does not belong to you per se, only virtually.So if you know someone could at some point working for facebook only for the sole purpose to find stuff like this, gets caught after selling some illegal pictures to people magazine or something, then repeats with diff.
company when he gets canned....sounds to me like paparazzi tactics.If you are paris hilton, and name your facebook account H\_queen\_B or something like that, also making sure not to put too much info that could leave the idea it is celebs, I guess it would be less evident, then say the rest of the 10 million facebook users, someone would really have to have nothing to do to go through all the stuff from 10 million users beforegetting lucky.Anyways, I am sure that if someone posts also from celeb locations like Palm springs, and has the ip address to match, then again that would be up to them to hide their ip through Tor or something....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396090</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31399518</id>
	<title>Re:Serious Allegations</title>
	<author>gbjbaanb</author>
	<datestamp>1268055840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Lots of people use simple things like their pets or parents birthdays as those reminder question answers,</i></p><p>and more importantly, lots of people use the same password for a lot of sites. If the passwords are not stored securely then he could quickly query the facebook DB and read the password.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lots of people use simple things like their pets or parents birthdays as those reminder question answers,and more importantly , lots of people use the same password for a lot of sites .
If the passwords are not stored securely then he could quickly query the facebook DB and read the password .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lots of people use simple things like their pets or parents birthdays as those reminder question answers,and more importantly, lots of people use the same password for a lot of sites.
If the passwords are not stored securely then he could quickly query the facebook DB and read the password.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396090</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397634</id>
	<title>Re:MARK ZUCKERBERG IS A JEW</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267986720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, well you're a douchebag.  I've suffered a lot more at the hands of douchebags.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , well you 're a douchebag .
I 've suffered a lot more at the hands of douchebags .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, well you're a douchebag.
I've suffered a lot more at the hands of douchebags.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396032</id>
	<title>And what will the Register say?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267972320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Facebook Founder Accused of Hacking Into Rivals' Email, Bitches.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Facebook Founder Accused of Hacking Into Rivals ' Email , Bitches .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Facebook Founder Accused of Hacking Into Rivals' Email, Bitches.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396168</id>
	<title>Stupid Users</title>
	<author>muphin</author>
	<datestamp>1267973040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>using the same password for their email account as they do with their social networking sites then people should expect to be compromised.<br> <br>
I suggest you use 4 types of passwords, one for accounts that wouldnt effect u much, one for email, one for social sites and IM, and one for bank accounts; with none of the passwords having anything to do with each other, e.g redball, orangeball,greenball... or whiteball, soccer, redflag<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... as this limits the guess work.<br>
this "hack" was probably just stupid curiosity which will probably get him arrested, and once that happens he will loose a lot of control of the company.</htmltext>
<tokenext>using the same password for their email account as they do with their social networking sites then people should expect to be compromised .
I suggest you use 4 types of passwords , one for accounts that wouldnt effect u much , one for email , one for social sites and IM , and one for bank accounts ; with none of the passwords having anything to do with each other , e.g redball , orangeball,greenball... or whiteball , soccer , redflag ... as this limits the guess work .
this " hack " was probably just stupid curiosity which will probably get him arrested , and once that happens he will loose a lot of control of the company .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>using the same password for their email account as they do with their social networking sites then people should expect to be compromised.
I suggest you use 4 types of passwords, one for accounts that wouldnt effect u much, one for email, one for social sites and IM, and one for bank accounts; with none of the passwords having anything to do with each other, e.g redball, orangeball,greenball... or whiteball, soccer, redflag ... as this limits the guess work.
this "hack" was probably just stupid curiosity which will probably get him arrested, and once that happens he will loose a lot of control of the company.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396528</id>
	<title>Well Duh!</title>
	<author>coaxial</author>
	<datestamp>1267975800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And this is why don't provide any site any more information that the bare minimum that it needs.</p><p>Nah.  Facebook is a scam.</p><p>Now excuse me, I've got to update my status.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And this is why do n't provide any site any more information that the bare minimum that it needs.Nah .
Facebook is a scam.Now excuse me , I 've got to update my status .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And this is why don't provide any site any more information that the bare minimum that it needs.Nah.
Facebook is a scam.Now excuse me, I've got to update my status.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31398478</id>
	<title>!hacking</title>
	<author>macro187</author>
	<datestamp>1268041860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For the love of christ, this site should know better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For the love of christ , this site should know better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For the love of christ, this site should know better.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396406</id>
	<title>n00bsauce</title>
	<author>cosm</author>
	<datestamp>1267974780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext> The hilarity would be if his tracks could be traced down through their own system's perverse logging, maybe then would he regret his company's policy of practically 100\% data retention. Pwned Mark Fuckerberg. Pwned.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The hilarity would be if his tracks could be traced down through their own system 's perverse logging , maybe then would he regret his company 's policy of practically 100 \ % data retention .
Pwned Mark Fuckerberg .
Pwned .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> The hilarity would be if his tracks could be traced down through their own system's perverse logging, maybe then would he regret his company's policy of practically 100\% data retention.
Pwned Mark Fuckerberg.
Pwned.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397246</id>
	<title>Not to be an ass</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267981920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not to be an ass but I have to play devil's advocate here.  How in the hell are we supposed to take what they say at face value? Supposing it really did happen, where's the evidence that proves they didn't make these dumbass mistakes on their own?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to be an ass but I have to play devil 's advocate here .
How in the hell are we supposed to take what they say at face value ?
Supposing it really did happen , where 's the evidence that proves they did n't make these dumbass mistakes on their own ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to be an ass but I have to play devil's advocate here.
How in the hell are we supposed to take what they say at face value?
Supposing it really did happen, where's the evidence that proves they didn't make these dumbass mistakes on their own?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397964</id>
	<title>Re:Stupid Users</title>
	<author>Bob Cat - NYMPHS</author>
	<datestamp>1267991700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;one for accounts that wouldnt effect u much</p><p><b> YOU are the CANCER that is KILLING the INTERNET </b></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; one for accounts that wouldnt effect u much YOU are the CANCER that is KILLING the INTERNET</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;one for accounts that wouldnt effect u much YOU are the CANCER that is KILLING the INTERNET </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31398454</id>
	<title>Direct link for the lazy.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268041620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/how-mark-zuckerberg-hacked-into-the-harvard-crimson-2010-3" title="businessinsider.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.businessinsider.com/how-mark-zuckerberg-hacked-into-the-harvard-crimson-2010-3</a> [businessinsider.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.businessinsider.com/how-mark-zuckerberg-hacked-into-the-harvard-crimson-2010-3 [ businessinsider.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.businessinsider.com/how-mark-zuckerberg-hacked-into-the-harvard-crimson-2010-3 [businessinsider.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31399400</id>
	<title>Shocked...</title>
	<author>facebook</author>
	<datestamp>1268054640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am absolutely shocked that someone would impersonate another human being for personal gain. What has the world come to?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am absolutely shocked that someone would impersonate another human being for personal gain .
What has the world come to ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am absolutely shocked that someone would impersonate another human being for personal gain.
What has the world come to?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31404326</id>
	<title>Re:Serious Allegations</title>
	<author>StikyPad</author>
	<datestamp>1268081580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not condoning misuse of personal information by any means, but anyone who uses a shared password for all of their accounts is making themselves an easy target, as are those who provide their password(s) to a third party to "retrieve contacts" or the like.  Just because a site is legit doesn't mean that there aren't people working for the site (or running it, as the case may be) who are less than scrupulous.  Would you give your banker the keys to your house and car just because you trust him with your deposits?  Or give your mechanic your PIN just because you trust him with your car?  Most people would not, yet they do the online equivalent every day, and the effects can be nearly as damaging.  Sure, you could try to sue the company for damages after the fact, but a) these things can be very difficult to prove, and b) lawsuits can't put the genie back in the bottle, so to speak.  What's done is done.</p><p>I used a dedicated e-mail account just to establish my Facebook account, with separate pseudorandom passwords for each login.  That may be going a bit farther than most people want to go, but the ability to prevent a cascading effect from any single security compromise is important to me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not condoning misuse of personal information by any means , but anyone who uses a shared password for all of their accounts is making themselves an easy target , as are those who provide their password ( s ) to a third party to " retrieve contacts " or the like .
Just because a site is legit does n't mean that there are n't people working for the site ( or running it , as the case may be ) who are less than scrupulous .
Would you give your banker the keys to your house and car just because you trust him with your deposits ?
Or give your mechanic your PIN just because you trust him with your car ?
Most people would not , yet they do the online equivalent every day , and the effects can be nearly as damaging .
Sure , you could try to sue the company for damages after the fact , but a ) these things can be very difficult to prove , and b ) lawsuits ca n't put the genie back in the bottle , so to speak .
What 's done is done.I used a dedicated e-mail account just to establish my Facebook account , with separate pseudorandom passwords for each login .
That may be going a bit farther than most people want to go , but the ability to prevent a cascading effect from any single security compromise is important to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not condoning misuse of personal information by any means, but anyone who uses a shared password for all of their accounts is making themselves an easy target, as are those who provide their password(s) to a third party to "retrieve contacts" or the like.
Just because a site is legit doesn't mean that there aren't people working for the site (or running it, as the case may be) who are less than scrupulous.
Would you give your banker the keys to your house and car just because you trust him with your deposits?
Or give your mechanic your PIN just because you trust him with your car?
Most people would not, yet they do the online equivalent every day, and the effects can be nearly as damaging.
Sure, you could try to sue the company for damages after the fact, but a) these things can be very difficult to prove, and b) lawsuits can't put the genie back in the bottle, so to speak.
What's done is done.I used a dedicated e-mail account just to establish my Facebook account, with separate pseudorandom passwords for each login.
That may be going a bit farther than most people want to go, but the ability to prevent a cascading effect from any single security compromise is important to me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396090</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396680</id>
	<title>Facebook users get what they deserve</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267977000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Web 2.0 has proven itself nothing more than a private takeover of the public infrastructure of the net. FB wants to displace everything from email to irc. If people want to commit their information to sharks who want to mnetize their personal information, they get what they deserve.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Web 2.0 has proven itself nothing more than a private takeover of the public infrastructure of the net .
FB wants to displace everything from email to irc .
If people want to commit their information to sharks who want to mnetize their personal information , they get what they deserve .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Web 2.0 has proven itself nothing more than a private takeover of the public infrastructure of the net.
FB wants to displace everything from email to irc.
If people want to commit their information to sharks who want to mnetize their personal information, they get what they deserve.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396090</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397442</id>
	<title>Re:Not Really Surprised</title>
	<author>Dracos</author>
	<datestamp>1267984200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>A person with flawed ethical standards tends to do unethical things.</p></div></blockquote><p>They also tend to gather people around them who have similar ethics.  For everything he has done, who knows what his employees have done, either independently or at his request.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A person with flawed ethical standards tends to do unethical things.They also tend to gather people around them who have similar ethics .
For everything he has done , who knows what his employees have done , either independently or at his request .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A person with flawed ethical standards tends to do unethical things.They also tend to gather people around them who have similar ethics.
For everything he has done, who knows what his employees have done, either independently or at his request.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396078</id>
	<title>Wow..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267972500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>just wow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>just wow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>just wow.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397676
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31398974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397780
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397630
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396094
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31399016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396804
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31411858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396278
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31402838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31402324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31399518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31398890
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31401928
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31399094
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31403538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396680
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31409656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31398560
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31402006
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397836
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396080
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397546
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31400704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31401106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31401922
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396740
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396740
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31398518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396080
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397684
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31404326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31408746
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_234204_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31399514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396804
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_234204.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396080
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397836
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31398518
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_234204.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396168
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396550
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397558
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31401922
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397676
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397964
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_234204.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396740
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397818
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397634
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_234204.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31398974
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396934
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397546
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397442
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_234204.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396378
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_234204.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396090
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31408746
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396680
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31403538
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396682
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396654
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31399094
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31398890
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397248
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31400704
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31402324
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31399518
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31409656
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31402838
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31404326
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_234204.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396528
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_234204.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396366
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_234204.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396804
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31399016
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31399514
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_234204.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396324
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397684
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_234204.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396278
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31411858
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_234204.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396646
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_234204.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397274
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_234204.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396560
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_234204.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31399400
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_234204.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396744
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_234204.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396094
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397132
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_234204.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396598
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_234204.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396142
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396384
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397238
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397516
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31401928
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396926
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31402006
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396884
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397630
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_234204.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396532
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_234204.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396078
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_234204.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396694
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_234204.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396434
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_234204.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31398478
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_234204.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396018
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31398560
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31401106
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31397780
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_234204.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396776
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_234204.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396032
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_234204.28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396338
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_234204.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_234204.31396490
</commentlist>
</conversation>
