<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_07_223244</id>
	<title>Pixel Qi Introduces a DIY Kit</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1267960380000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="mailto:jza@saunalahti.fi" rel="nofollow">jones\_supa</a> writes <i>"Pixel Qi has just revealed their <a href="http://pixelqi.com/blog1/2010/03/07/diy-pixel-qi-kits/">DIY kit for netbooks</a>, planned to be out near the end of Q2 &mdash; sounds like June. This makes it possible to retrofit a screen to one fully readable in direct sunlight. In her blog, Mary Lou Jepsen says: 'It&rsquo;s only slightly more difficult than changing a lightbulb: it&rsquo;s basically 6 screws, pulling off a bezel, unconnecting the old screen and plugging this one in. That&rsquo;s it. It&rsquo;s a 5 minute operation.' She also talks about the 'laptop hospital,' a service depot started by kids in Africa."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>jones \ _supa writes " Pixel Qi has just revealed their DIY kit for netbooks , planned to be out near the end of Q2    sounds like June .
This makes it possible to retrofit a screen to one fully readable in direct sunlight .
In her blog , Mary Lou Jepsen says : 'It    s only slightly more difficult than changing a lightbulb : it    s basically 6 screws , pulling off a bezel , unconnecting the old screen and plugging this one in .
That    s it .
It    s a 5 minute operation .
' She also talks about the 'laptop hospital, ' a service depot started by kids in Africa .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>jones\_supa writes "Pixel Qi has just revealed their DIY kit for netbooks, planned to be out near the end of Q2 — sounds like June.
This makes it possible to retrofit a screen to one fully readable in direct sunlight.
In her blog, Mary Lou Jepsen says: 'It’s only slightly more difficult than changing a lightbulb: it’s basically 6 screws, pulling off a bezel, unconnecting the old screen and plugging this one in.
That’s it.
It’s a 5 minute operation.
' She also talks about the 'laptop hospital,' a service depot started by kids in Africa.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31394916</id>
	<title>As opposed to those of us with regular notebooks?</title>
	<author>sethstorm</author>
	<datestamp>1267964640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No thanks, but I'll wait for when it can be done as a replacement for TN screens of larger sizes (14", 15", (17"?)) and proves to be better at quality than *-IPS panels.</p><p>Netbooks might be a proof-of-concept, but notebooks of larger sizes and higher quality would be a better application.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No thanks , but I 'll wait for when it can be done as a replacement for TN screens of larger sizes ( 14 " , 15 " , ( 17 " ?
) ) and proves to be better at quality than * -IPS panels.Netbooks might be a proof-of-concept , but notebooks of larger sizes and higher quality would be a better application .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No thanks, but I'll wait for when it can be done as a replacement for TN screens of larger sizes (14", 15", (17"?
)) and proves to be better at quality than *-IPS panels.Netbooks might be a proof-of-concept, but notebooks of larger sizes and higher quality would be a better application.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395086</id>
	<title>How is the image quality compared to regular LCDs?</title>
	<author>MartinSchou</author>
	<datestamp>1267965780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I haven't seen any tests on this. I don't doubt it'll match a regular TN screen in all ways, but how do they compare to the better IPS, MVA, PVA technologies?</p><p>From what I understood about the PixelQI displays, they should be as easy to make as regular displays, so it ought to be possible to get them in high colour and viewing angle versions as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have n't seen any tests on this .
I do n't doubt it 'll match a regular TN screen in all ways , but how do they compare to the better IPS , MVA , PVA technologies ? From what I understood about the PixelQI displays , they should be as easy to make as regular displays , so it ought to be possible to get them in high colour and viewing angle versions as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I haven't seen any tests on this.
I don't doubt it'll match a regular TN screen in all ways, but how do they compare to the better IPS, MVA, PVA technologies?From what I understood about the PixelQI displays, they should be as easy to make as regular displays, so it ought to be possible to get them in high colour and viewing angle versions as well.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395244</id>
	<title>Re:Dust?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267966980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i guess you've never changed an lcd panel.  dust is not an issue.  the only conceivable place it could be is on the face of the screen... which you can see, touch, and clean whether the bezel is in place or not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i guess you 've never changed an lcd panel .
dust is not an issue .
the only conceivable place it could be is on the face of the screen... which you can see , touch , and clean whether the bezel is in place or not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i guess you've never changed an lcd panel.
dust is not an issue.
the only conceivable place it could be is on the face of the screen... which you can see, touch, and clean whether the bezel is in place or not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395062</id>
	<title>She was joking</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1267965600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now we can begin our own "How many netbook owners does it takes to change a lightbulb" jokes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now we can begin our own " How many netbook owners does it takes to change a lightbulb " jokes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now we can begin our own "How many netbook owners does it takes to change a lightbulb" jokes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31396908</id>
	<title>Sign me up</title>
	<author>davide marney</author>
	<datestamp>1267978920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I purchased four XO-1s when they originally came out a couple years ago.  I gave away two, boxed one for posterity, and am still using one for browsing (Opera) and note-taking (Zim) when I'm at conferences.  I still get heads-turns and kids inching over to take a look over my shoulder everywhere I go.</p><p>The XO-1 has an early version of the Pixel Qi screen, and it is extremely functional.  I'm still amazed every time I'm reading an ebook on the subway, and walk from the deep darkness of the subway tunnel into blinding, direct sunlight, and the XO-1 display is still completely readable.</p><p>The XO-1's processor, however, is quite slow, and that becomes a pain in the neck for browsing.  A decently-performing netbook doesn't cost very much these days, but the screens are a disappointment.  I'm really looking forward to snagging a Pixel Qi DIY kit, buying a cheap netbook, and fixing up my ride.</p><p>Bring it, Mary Lou!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I purchased four XO-1s when they originally came out a couple years ago .
I gave away two , boxed one for posterity , and am still using one for browsing ( Opera ) and note-taking ( Zim ) when I 'm at conferences .
I still get heads-turns and kids inching over to take a look over my shoulder everywhere I go.The XO-1 has an early version of the Pixel Qi screen , and it is extremely functional .
I 'm still amazed every time I 'm reading an ebook on the subway , and walk from the deep darkness of the subway tunnel into blinding , direct sunlight , and the XO-1 display is still completely readable.The XO-1 's processor , however , is quite slow , and that becomes a pain in the neck for browsing .
A decently-performing netbook does n't cost very much these days , but the screens are a disappointment .
I 'm really looking forward to snagging a Pixel Qi DIY kit , buying a cheap netbook , and fixing up my ride.Bring it , Mary Lou !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I purchased four XO-1s when they originally came out a couple years ago.
I gave away two, boxed one for posterity, and am still using one for browsing (Opera) and note-taking (Zim) when I'm at conferences.
I still get heads-turns and kids inching over to take a look over my shoulder everywhere I go.The XO-1 has an early version of the Pixel Qi screen, and it is extremely functional.
I'm still amazed every time I'm reading an ebook on the subway, and walk from the deep darkness of the subway tunnel into blinding, direct sunlight, and the XO-1 display is still completely readable.The XO-1's processor, however, is quite slow, and that becomes a pain in the neck for browsing.
A decently-performing netbook doesn't cost very much these days, but the screens are a disappointment.
I'm really looking forward to snagging a Pixel Qi DIY kit, buying a cheap netbook, and fixing up my ride.Bring it, Mary Lou!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31396796</id>
	<title>Some Questions</title>
	<author>Khith</author>
	<datestamp>1267977840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Okay, so when will people be able to buy these things for their own netbooks, and how much will they cost?</p><p>Will the screens be compatible in all netbooks? (I know there is a resolution standard but unsure if there is a standard panel size.)</p><p>How would you switch between the 3 screen modes?  You'd need a dedicated switch that your netbook doesn't have, or a special driver (hopefully there would be a Linux version) to select your mode.</p><p>I'd love to have one of these screens to replace the glossy display in my current netbook.  It's completely unusable in direct sunlight.  Hell, I'd love to see this kind of tech eventually be offered as an option in ALL laptop screens.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Okay , so when will people be able to buy these things for their own netbooks , and how much will they cost ? Will the screens be compatible in all netbooks ?
( I know there is a resolution standard but unsure if there is a standard panel size .
) How would you switch between the 3 screen modes ?
You 'd need a dedicated switch that your netbook does n't have , or a special driver ( hopefully there would be a Linux version ) to select your mode.I 'd love to have one of these screens to replace the glossy display in my current netbook .
It 's completely unusable in direct sunlight .
Hell , I 'd love to see this kind of tech eventually be offered as an option in ALL laptop screens .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Okay, so when will people be able to buy these things for their own netbooks, and how much will they cost?Will the screens be compatible in all netbooks?
(I know there is a resolution standard but unsure if there is a standard panel size.
)How would you switch between the 3 screen modes?
You'd need a dedicated switch that your netbook doesn't have, or a special driver (hopefully there would be a Linux version) to select your mode.I'd love to have one of these screens to replace the glossy display in my current netbook.
It's completely unusable in direct sunlight.
Hell, I'd love to see this kind of tech eventually be offered as an option in ALL laptop screens.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395168</id>
	<title>Website is down?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267966380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think the website is down. Here is a cache version:<br>http://74.125.93.132/search?hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;q=cache\%3Ahttp\%3A\%2F\%2Fpixelqi.com\%2Fblog1\%2F2010\%2F03\%2F07\%2Fdiy-pixel-qi-kits\%2F&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the website is down .
Here is a cache version : http : //74.125.93.132/search ? hl = en&amp;source = hp&amp;q = cache \ % 3Ahttp \ % 3A \ % 2F \ % 2Fpixelqi.com \ % 2Fblog1 \ % 2F2010 \ % 2F03 \ % 2F07 \ % 2Fdiy-pixel-qi-kits \ % 2F&amp;aq = f&amp;aqi = &amp;aql = &amp;oq =</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the website is down.
Here is a cache version:http://74.125.93.132/search?hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;q=cache\%3Ahttp\%3A\%2F\%2Fpixelqi.com\%2Fblog1\%2F2010\%2F03\%2F07\%2Fdiy-pixel-qi-kits\%2F&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395210</id>
	<title>What kind of business model do they have?</title>
	<author>joh</author>
	<datestamp>1267966620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously, their technology must be something all display manufacturers are after. So why have they to offer something like that which will be only of interest for geeks?</p><p>As far as I know there is nothing amiss with this displays. They are great, cheap, easy to produce and offer nothing but advantages. There's no reason they shouldn't be able to sell this technology to everyone building netbooks or notebooks or desktop displays. But there's not a *single* device you can buy with this display. What's going on here?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , their technology must be something all display manufacturers are after .
So why have they to offer something like that which will be only of interest for geeks ? As far as I know there is nothing amiss with this displays .
They are great , cheap , easy to produce and offer nothing but advantages .
There 's no reason they should n't be able to sell this technology to everyone building netbooks or notebooks or desktop displays .
But there 's not a * single * device you can buy with this display .
What 's going on here ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, their technology must be something all display manufacturers are after.
So why have they to offer something like that which will be only of interest for geeks?As far as I know there is nothing amiss with this displays.
They are great, cheap, easy to produce and offer nothing but advantages.
There's no reason they shouldn't be able to sell this technology to everyone building netbooks or notebooks or desktop displays.
But there's not a *single* device you can buy with this display.
What's going on here?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395508</id>
	<title>Re:As opposed to those of us with regular notebook</title>
	<author>MartinSchou</author>
	<datestamp>1267969020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I'll wait for when it can be done as a replacement for TN screens of larger sizes (14", 15", (17"?))</p></div></blockquote><p>With you on this - mostly because I don't have a netbook.</p><blockquote><div><p>and proves to be better at quality than *-IPS panels.</p></div></blockquote><p>What? You want to replace a TN-quality display with something that's better than the best on the market? And that's stand-alone display market - there are NO laptops on the market today, that has an IPS-display. There aren't even any that have MVA/PVA displays. Why the hell not settle for replacing it with something that's better than TN-quality?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll wait for when it can be done as a replacement for TN screens of larger sizes ( 14 " , 15 " , ( 17 " ?
) ) With you on this - mostly because I do n't have a netbook.and proves to be better at quality than * -IPS panels.What ?
You want to replace a TN-quality display with something that 's better than the best on the market ?
And that 's stand-alone display market - there are NO laptops on the market today , that has an IPS-display .
There are n't even any that have MVA/PVA displays .
Why the hell not settle for replacing it with something that 's better than TN-quality ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll wait for when it can be done as a replacement for TN screens of larger sizes (14", 15", (17"?
))With you on this - mostly because I don't have a netbook.and proves to be better at quality than *-IPS panels.What?
You want to replace a TN-quality display with something that's better than the best on the market?
And that's stand-alone display market - there are NO laptops on the market today, that has an IPS-display.
There aren't even any that have MVA/PVA displays.
Why the hell not settle for replacing it with something that's better than TN-quality?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31394916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395264</id>
	<title>Re:"Unconnecting"?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1267967220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah because grammar skills are exactly the same as electronics skills! Also, your interpreter seems to be buggy, since you mistook an undefined identifier for a language grammar error.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)<br>If I would judge the technical skills of the Slashdot crowd by its social skills and manners, I would assume that they all use AOL.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>P.S.: I know someone <em>will</em> find an error in the grammar of this sentence. If you do so, go ahead, and answer me in my own native language: Luxemburgish! Good luck with that!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah because grammar skills are exactly the same as electronics skills !
Also , your interpreter seems to be buggy , since you mistook an undefined identifier for a language grammar error .
; ) If I would judge the technical skills of the Slashdot crowd by its social skills and manners , I would assume that they all use AOL .
; ) P.S. : I know someone will find an error in the grammar of this sentence .
If you do so , go ahead , and answer me in my own native language : Luxemburgish !
Good luck with that !
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah because grammar skills are exactly the same as electronics skills!
Also, your interpreter seems to be buggy, since you mistook an undefined identifier for a language grammar error.
;)If I would judge the technical skills of the Slashdot crowd by its social skills and manners, I would assume that they all use AOL.
;)P.S.: I know someone will find an error in the grammar of this sentence.
If you do so, go ahead, and answer me in my own native language: Luxemburgish!
Good luck with that!
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31394884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395072</id>
	<title>Poor Africa</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267965660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Africa is in a terrible catch 22 situation.  In order to have a stable economy, of any kind, they must have respect for law. In order to get that, they have to have a stable economy with sufficient wealth so that people can settle down and have a rule of law.  One hopes that netbooks for Africa would help, but, I am not optimistic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Africa is in a terrible catch 22 situation .
In order to have a stable economy , of any kind , they must have respect for law .
In order to get that , they have to have a stable economy with sufficient wealth so that people can settle down and have a rule of law .
One hopes that netbooks for Africa would help , but , I am not optimistic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Africa is in a terrible catch 22 situation.
In order to have a stable economy, of any kind, they must have respect for law.
In order to get that, they have to have a stable economy with sufficient wealth so that people can settle down and have a rule of law.
One hopes that netbooks for Africa would help, but, I am not optimistic.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31394898</id>
	<title>ignoramus</title>
	<author>martas</author>
	<datestamp>1267964460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>i thought their stuff was only black&amp;white? won't you need some pretty severe UI changes to get something useful out of a netbook like that?</htmltext>
<tokenext>i thought their stuff was only black&amp;white ?
wo n't you need some pretty severe UI changes to get something useful out of a netbook like that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i thought their stuff was only black&amp;white?
won't you need some pretty severe UI changes to get something useful out of a netbook like that?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31394884</id>
	<title>"Unconnecting"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267964400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I dunno, I'm not sure I'd trust any sort of electronic hacking procedure from anyone who's a bit shaky on the grammar of the procedure terms themselves.</p><p><a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/disconnect" title="reference.com" rel="nofollow">http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/disconnect</a> [reference.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I dunno , I 'm not sure I 'd trust any sort of electronic hacking procedure from anyone who 's a bit shaky on the grammar of the procedure terms themselves.http : //dictionary.reference.com/browse/disconnect [ reference.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I dunno, I'm not sure I'd trust any sort of electronic hacking procedure from anyone who's a bit shaky on the grammar of the procedure terms themselves.http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/disconnect [reference.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31394944</id>
	<title>A similar link</title>
	<author>lazycam</author>
	<datestamp>1267964880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>A quick google search turned up the same story:

<a href="http://www.buzzbox.com/news/2010-03-07/Pixel\_Qi:Q2/" title="buzzbox.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.buzzbox.com/news/2010-03-07/Pixel\_Qi:Q2/</a> [buzzbox.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>A quick google search turned up the same story : http : //www.buzzbox.com/news/2010-03-07/Pixel \ _Qi : Q2/ [ buzzbox.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A quick google search turned up the same story:

http://www.buzzbox.com/news/2010-03-07/Pixel\_Qi:Q2/ [buzzbox.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31399852</id>
	<title>It takes more than this to make an XO</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1268058900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It takes more than this display to make a machine as power-friendly as the XO. XO's wifi is provided by an external module with its own power management, and its processor is less power-hungry than any x86 on the market today. I still know of no one producing a product today based on the Marvell meshing AP in the XO, though if I am lucky enough to be wrong, I'd certainly like to know who is doing it. The processor situation will rectify itself shortly, and anyway, the XO is slow. I don't think I'm alone in wishing for an OMAP4-based Linux netbook.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It takes more than this display to make a machine as power-friendly as the XO .
XO 's wifi is provided by an external module with its own power management , and its processor is less power-hungry than any x86 on the market today .
I still know of no one producing a product today based on the Marvell meshing AP in the XO , though if I am lucky enough to be wrong , I 'd certainly like to know who is doing it .
The processor situation will rectify itself shortly , and anyway , the XO is slow .
I do n't think I 'm alone in wishing for an OMAP4-based Linux netbook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It takes more than this display to make a machine as power-friendly as the XO.
XO's wifi is provided by an external module with its own power management, and its processor is less power-hungry than any x86 on the market today.
I still know of no one producing a product today based on the Marvell meshing AP in the XO, though if I am lucky enough to be wrong, I'd certainly like to know who is doing it.
The processor situation will rectify itself shortly, and anyway, the XO is slow.
I don't think I'm alone in wishing for an OMAP4-based Linux netbook.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31394888</id>
	<title>Slashdotted?</title>
	<author>gehrehmee</author>
	<datestamp>1267964400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slashdotted before a first-post. That's unfortunate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdotted before a first-post .
That 's unfortunate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slashdotted before a first-post.
That's unfortunate.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31394934</id>
	<title>Guess I need a new screen to see them</title>
	<author>tomhudson</author>
	<datestamp>1267964760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry, Internal Server Error.<br>The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.</p><p>Please contact the server administrator, admin@yahoo-inc.com and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have caused the error.</p><p>More information about this error may be available in the server error log.</p><p>Additionally, a 410 Gone error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.</p><p>Please check the URL for proper spelling and capitalization. If you're having trouble locating a destination on Yahoo!, try visiting the Yahoo! home page or look through a list of Yahoo!'s online services. Also, you may find what you're looking for if you try searching below.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry , Internal Server Error.The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.Please contact the server administrator , admin @ yahoo-inc.com and inform them of the time the error occurred , and anything you might have done that may have caused the error.More information about this error may be available in the server error log.Additionally , a 410 Gone error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.Please check the URL for proper spelling and capitalization .
If you 're having trouble locating a destination on Yahoo ! , try visiting the Yahoo !
home page or look through a list of Yahoo !
's online services .
Also , you may find what you 're looking for if you try searching below .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry, Internal Server Error.The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.Please contact the server administrator, admin@yahoo-inc.com and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have caused the error.More information about this error may be available in the server error log.Additionally, a 410 Gone error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.Please check the URL for proper spelling and capitalization.
If you're having trouble locating a destination on Yahoo!, try visiting the Yahoo!
home page or look through a list of Yahoo!
's online services.
Also, you may find what you're looking for if you try searching below.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395450</id>
	<title>Re:Dust?</title>
	<author>^\_^x</author>
	<datestamp>1267968660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All of the laptop screens I've disassembled have included the LCD panel, lighting tube, backlight reflector and diffusor assembly in one main assembly, so it may just be a matter of opening the case around the screen, popping a couple of cables off and swapping it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All of the laptop screens I 've disassembled have included the LCD panel , lighting tube , backlight reflector and diffusor assembly in one main assembly , so it may just be a matter of opening the case around the screen , popping a couple of cables off and swapping it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All of the laptop screens I've disassembled have included the LCD panel, lighting tube, backlight reflector and diffusor assembly in one main assembly, so it may just be a matter of opening the case around the screen, popping a couple of cables off and swapping it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395058</id>
	<title>Dust?</title>
	<author>ultor</author>
	<datestamp>1267965600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What about the problem of dust getting inside while changing the screen? Few people have the clean-rooms necessary to get factory-quality results. Sure, it'll take five minutes to change the screen, but it'll take three more hours of repeatedly taking the bezel off, spraying it with a can of air, and putting it back on to remove the inevitable particles getting in.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What about the problem of dust getting inside while changing the screen ?
Few people have the clean-rooms necessary to get factory-quality results .
Sure , it 'll take five minutes to change the screen , but it 'll take three more hours of repeatedly taking the bezel off , spraying it with a can of air , and putting it back on to remove the inevitable particles getting in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about the problem of dust getting inside while changing the screen?
Few people have the clean-rooms necessary to get factory-quality results.
Sure, it'll take five minutes to change the screen, but it'll take three more hours of repeatedly taking the bezel off, spraying it with a can of air, and putting it back on to remove the inevitable particles getting in.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395070</id>
	<title>ya-who?</title>
	<author>cfriedt</author>
	<datestamp>1267965660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think Yahoo has actually been slashdotted<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:o</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think Yahoo has actually been slashdotted : o</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think Yahoo has actually been slashdotted :o</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31396002</id>
	<title>Re:What kind of business model do they have?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267972140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Honestly, I suspect that it's because they're not finding the interest they were expecting from the major netbook/device manufacturers. They've had to resort to selling directly to the enduser. This is something you generally want to avoid when you're in the position they're in. We'll have to see how it all pans out, though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Honestly , I suspect that it 's because they 're not finding the interest they were expecting from the major netbook/device manufacturers .
They 've had to resort to selling directly to the enduser .
This is something you generally want to avoid when you 're in the position they 're in .
We 'll have to see how it all pans out , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Honestly, I suspect that it's because they're not finding the interest they were expecting from the major netbook/device manufacturers.
They've had to resort to selling directly to the enduser.
This is something you generally want to avoid when you're in the position they're in.
We'll have to see how it all pans out, though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395210</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31397532</id>
	<title>Nobody ever thought to tell them they couldn't</title>
	<author>originalhack</author>
	<datestamp>1267985460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nobody ever thought to tell them they couldn't succeed at that.... so they just did it!<br><br>Bravo!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nobody ever thought to tell them they could n't succeed at that.... so they just did it ! Bravo !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nobody ever thought to tell them they couldn't succeed at that.... so they just did it!Bravo!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395366</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395226</id>
	<title>Old technology</title>
	<author>kimvette</author>
	<datestamp>1267966800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why notebooks in general don't come with transflective screen options is beyond me. It's an old and proven technology used on most PDAs and many smartphones now and the color gamut is actually pretty decent; perhaps not enough for color matching but excellent for gaming, movies, and the like (not to mention basic word processing, coding, etc. tasks). They are perfectly readable in all lighting conditions including direct sunlight, with full color reproduction. It is true that contrast and color gamut do suffer in direct sunlight but what does that matter, when you are looking at a screen that is incredible when backlight in normal viewing conditions, and <i>very</i> usable in sunlight?</p><p>I've seen only a couple of notebooks with that option over the years. I'd like to see some new higher-end notebooks with transflective screens.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why notebooks in general do n't come with transflective screen options is beyond me .
It 's an old and proven technology used on most PDAs and many smartphones now and the color gamut is actually pretty decent ; perhaps not enough for color matching but excellent for gaming , movies , and the like ( not to mention basic word processing , coding , etc .
tasks ) . They are perfectly readable in all lighting conditions including direct sunlight , with full color reproduction .
It is true that contrast and color gamut do suffer in direct sunlight but what does that matter , when you are looking at a screen that is incredible when backlight in normal viewing conditions , and very usable in sunlight ? I 've seen only a couple of notebooks with that option over the years .
I 'd like to see some new higher-end notebooks with transflective screens .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why notebooks in general don't come with transflective screen options is beyond me.
It's an old and proven technology used on most PDAs and many smartphones now and the color gamut is actually pretty decent; perhaps not enough for color matching but excellent for gaming, movies, and the like (not to mention basic word processing, coding, etc.
tasks). They are perfectly readable in all lighting conditions including direct sunlight, with full color reproduction.
It is true that contrast and color gamut do suffer in direct sunlight but what does that matter, when you are looking at a screen that is incredible when backlight in normal viewing conditions, and very usable in sunlight?I've seen only a couple of notebooks with that option over the years.
I'd like to see some new higher-end notebooks with transflective screens.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31397522</id>
	<title>Re:As opposed to those of us with regular notebook</title>
	<author>sethstorm</author>
	<datestamp>1267985400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mind that the iPad has IPS, proving that small IPS panels can be built profitably.  The iPad might be a non-general-purpose device, but it puts Lenovo's arguments against it to shame.</p><p>As for the Thinkpad (X201/etc.) panels, is that just for tablet models, or is it for all of them?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mind that the iPad has IPS , proving that small IPS panels can be built profitably .
The iPad might be a non-general-purpose device , but it puts Lenovo 's arguments against it to shame.As for the Thinkpad ( X201/etc .
) panels , is that just for tablet models , or is it for all of them ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mind that the iPad has IPS, proving that small IPS panels can be built profitably.
The iPad might be a non-general-purpose device, but it puts Lenovo's arguments against it to shame.As for the Thinkpad (X201/etc.
) panels, is that just for tablet models, or is it for all of them?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395402</id>
	<title>Re:"Unconnecting"?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1267968360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>See. There is already an error in it: I wanted to say: &ldquo;...in the grammar of this <strong>comment</strong>&rdquo;.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>See .
There is already an error in it : I wanted to say :    ...in the grammar of this comment    .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>See.
There is already an error in it: I wanted to say: “...in the grammar of this comment”.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395264</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31394956</id>
	<title>only slightly more difficult than changing a light</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267964880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah.  To change a lightbulb you have to change five screws and a bezel.  What's one more screw?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah .
To change a lightbulb you have to change five screws and a bezel .
What 's one more screw ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah.
To change a lightbulb you have to change five screws and a bezel.
What's one more screw?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31397970</id>
	<title>Re:What kind of business model do they have?</title>
	<author>mellon</author>
	<datestamp>1267991820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They don't *have* to sell the stuff to geeks.   The reason that they are such heroes is that despite not having to sell the stuff to us, they've decided to do so anyway, even though we will no doubt be a major pain in their collective asses.   Because they think that laptops shouldn't be black boxes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They do n't * have * to sell the stuff to geeks .
The reason that they are such heroes is that despite not having to sell the stuff to us , they 've decided to do so anyway , even though we will no doubt be a major pain in their collective asses .
Because they think that laptops should n't be black boxes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They don't *have* to sell the stuff to geeks.
The reason that they are such heroes is that despite not having to sell the stuff to us, they've decided to do so anyway, even though we will no doubt be a major pain in their collective asses.
Because they think that laptops shouldn't be black boxes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395210</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395944</id>
	<title>Re:Slashdotted?</title>
	<author>hedwards</author>
	<datestamp>1267971600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've always wondered about that. How can a site be slashdotted when nobody here ever RTFA?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've always wondered about that .
How can a site be slashdotted when nobody here ever RTFA ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've always wondered about that.
How can a site be slashdotted when nobody here ever RTFA?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31394888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395246</id>
	<title>what about two screens?</title>
	<author>blackest\_k</author>
	<datestamp>1267967040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you could manage to mount the new screen to the outside of the netbook with  a touch screen mod and switch the connections between the internal and external screen. It might be able to create a netbook/tablet. I know i'd find that useful.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you could manage to mount the new screen to the outside of the netbook with a touch screen mod and switch the connections between the internal and external screen .
It might be able to create a netbook/tablet .
I know i 'd find that useful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you could manage to mount the new screen to the outside of the netbook with  a touch screen mod and switch the connections between the internal and external screen.
It might be able to create a netbook/tablet.
I know i'd find that useful.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395236</id>
	<title>Re:Slashdotted?</title>
	<author>kimvette</author>
	<datestamp>1267966860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>coral cache</p><p><a href="http://pixelqi.com.nyud.net/blog1/2010/03/07/diy-pixel-qi-kits/" title="nyud.net">http://pixelqi.com.nyud.net/blog1/2010/03/07/diy-pixel-qi-kits/</a> [nyud.net]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>coral cachehttp : //pixelqi.com.nyud.net/blog1/2010/03/07/diy-pixel-qi-kits/ [ nyud.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>coral cachehttp://pixelqi.com.nyud.net/blog1/2010/03/07/diy-pixel-qi-kits/ [nyud.net]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31394888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31394988</id>
	<title>Re:ignoramus</title>
	<author>SpinyNorman</author>
	<datestamp>1267965120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nah - it's full color and fast (good for video). If you use it as a drop in replacement for your existing display then what you're getting is the ability to use your laptop in full sunlight where your current screen would be all washed out.</p><p><a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2010/01/the-pixel-qi-display/" title="wired.com">http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2010/01/the-pixel-qi-display/</a> [wired.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nah - it 's full color and fast ( good for video ) .
If you use it as a drop in replacement for your existing display then what you 're getting is the ability to use your laptop in full sunlight where your current screen would be all washed out.http : //www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2010/01/the-pixel-qi-display/ [ wired.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nah - it's full color and fast (good for video).
If you use it as a drop in replacement for your existing display then what you're getting is the ability to use your laptop in full sunlight where your current screen would be all washed out.http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2010/01/the-pixel-qi-display/ [wired.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31394898</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31397718</id>
	<title>Re:only slightly more difficult than changing a li</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267987920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>At my house the dining room light needs 4 screws and a glass cover removed to change the 2 bulbs in it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>At my house the dining room light needs 4 screws and a glass cover removed to change the 2 bulbs in it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At my house the dining room light needs 4 screws and a glass cover removed to change the 2 bulbs in it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31394956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395366</id>
	<title>Humanity at its finest:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267968120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This group of girls armed with screwdrivers starting taking apart the laptops and reseating the cables. Sometimes they'd change out a screen, or a speaker. They learned about the hardware of their laptops. They got to see what was inside. They got better and better at fixing things by learning as they went.</p></div><p>5-11 years old. Not told by anything to do so but in their own interest. Sorry, but that&rsquo;s humanity at its finest.<br>If I learned one thing about our abilities, it&rsquo;s to simply assume you can do it. I see so many people who say and think that they can&rsquo;t do this and can&rsquo;t do that.<br>We all are incredibly intelligent. <em>Everyone</em> can fix electronics. Everyone can write software. Everyone can learn quantum physics!<br>It&rsquo;s just a matter of allowing oneself to assume that one is able to do it. And then do it.<br>That one rule, worked for me my whole life.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Ministers of Education had a tough time believing that these girls could fix the hardware, so they would visit - to see it with their own eyes - and start thinking differently about maintenance of hardware.</p></div><p>And here we see that exact mindset of &ldquo;we can&rsquo;t&rdquo;. Just as most people here would assume a 5 year old girl couldn&rsquo;t fix a computer. Let alone one from a 3rd world rural area.<br>Turns out that&rsquo;s <em>bullshit</em>!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>Man, if everyone could just see the tiny box of social conditioned pointless rules that he is caught in... &ldquo;You can&rsquo;t do that! Only rich good looking men get girls! Obey! Buy, buy, consume and buy! You are ugly! There is another side, that is against you! Believe! You must do this, and must not do that!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... &rdquo;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This group of girls armed with screwdrivers starting taking apart the laptops and reseating the cables .
Sometimes they 'd change out a screen , or a speaker .
They learned about the hardware of their laptops .
They got to see what was inside .
They got better and better at fixing things by learning as they went.5-11 years old .
Not told by anything to do so but in their own interest .
Sorry , but that    s humanity at its finest.If I learned one thing about our abilities , it    s to simply assume you can do it .
I see so many people who say and think that they can    t do this and can    t do that.We all are incredibly intelligent .
Everyone can fix electronics .
Everyone can write software .
Everyone can learn quantum physics ! It    s just a matter of allowing oneself to assume that one is able to do it .
And then do it.That one rule , worked for me my whole life .
: ) Ministers of Education had a tough time believing that these girls could fix the hardware , so they would visit - to see it with their own eyes - and start thinking differently about maintenance of hardware.And here we see that exact mindset of    we can    t    .
Just as most people here would assume a 5 year old girl couldn    t fix a computer .
Let alone one from a 3rd world rural area.Turns out that    s bullshit !
: ) Man , if everyone could just see the tiny box of social conditioned pointless rules that he is caught in...    You can    t do that !
Only rich good looking men get girls !
Obey ! Buy , buy , consume and buy !
You are ugly !
There is another side , that is against you !
Believe ! You must do this , and must not do that !
...   </tokentext>
<sentencetext>This group of girls armed with screwdrivers starting taking apart the laptops and reseating the cables.
Sometimes they'd change out a screen, or a speaker.
They learned about the hardware of their laptops.
They got to see what was inside.
They got better and better at fixing things by learning as they went.5-11 years old.
Not told by anything to do so but in their own interest.
Sorry, but that’s humanity at its finest.If I learned one thing about our abilities, it’s to simply assume you can do it.
I see so many people who say and think that they can’t do this and can’t do that.We all are incredibly intelligent.
Everyone can fix electronics.
Everyone can write software.
Everyone can learn quantum physics!It’s just a matter of allowing oneself to assume that one is able to do it.
And then do it.That one rule, worked for me my whole life.
:)Ministers of Education had a tough time believing that these girls could fix the hardware, so they would visit - to see it with their own eyes - and start thinking differently about maintenance of hardware.And here we see that exact mindset of “we can’t”.
Just as most people here would assume a 5 year old girl couldn’t fix a computer.
Let alone one from a 3rd world rural area.Turns out that’s bullshit!
:)Man, if everyone could just see the tiny box of social conditioned pointless rules that he is caught in... “You can’t do that!
Only rich good looking men get girls!
Obey! Buy, buy, consume and buy!
You are ugly!
There is another side, that is against you!
Believe! You must do this, and must not do that!
... ”
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_223244_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31397532
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_223244_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31394884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_223244_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_223244_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395236
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31394888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_223244_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31396002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395210
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_223244_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31397718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31394956
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_223244_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31397970
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395210
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_223244_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31394888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_223244_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395244
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_223244_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31397522
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31394916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_223244_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31394988
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31394898
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_223244.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31396796
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_223244.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395246
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_223244.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31394916
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395508
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31397522
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_223244.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31394944
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_223244.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395210
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31397970
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31396002
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_223244.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395366
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31397532
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_223244.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31394898
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31394988
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_223244.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395226
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_223244.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31394884
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395264
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395402
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_223244.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31394956
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31397718
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_223244.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31394888
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395944
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395236
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_223244.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395058
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395450
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395244
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_223244.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31395072
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_223244.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_223244.31399852
</commentlist>
</conversation>
