<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_07_1856227</id>
	<title>Herschel Space Observatory Finds Precursors of Life In Orion</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1267989900000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="mailto:jjtobin@nOsPAM.umich.edu" rel="nofollow">ogre7299</a> recommends an announcement out of Caltech on a <a href="http://www.herschel.caltech.edu/index.php?SiteSection=News&amp;NewsItem=nhsc2010-003">milestone for HIFI</a>, the Herschel Space Observatory's Heterodyne Instrument for the Far Infrared. <i>"The Herschel Space Observatory has revealed the chemical fingerprints of potential life-enabling organic molecules in the Orion Nebula, a nearby stellar nursery in our Milky Way galaxy. ... This detailed-spectrum, obtained with the Heterodyne Instrument for the Far Infrared (HIFI) &mdash; one of Herschel's three innovative instruments &mdash; demonstrates the gold mine of information that Herschel-HIFI will provide on how organic molecules form in space. The spectrum, one of the first to be obtained with HIFI since it returned to full health in January 2010 following technical difficulties, clearly demonstrates that the instrument is working well. ... [The HIFI instrument had previously been offline since] August 2009 when HIFI experienced an unexpected voltage spike in the electronic system, probably caused by a high-energy cosmic particle, resulting in the instrument shutting down. On 14 January 2010, HIFI was successfully switched back on using its spare electronics, with science observations commencing on 28 February."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>ogre7299 recommends an announcement out of Caltech on a milestone for HIFI , the Herschel Space Observatory 's Heterodyne Instrument for the Far Infrared .
" The Herschel Space Observatory has revealed the chemical fingerprints of potential life-enabling organic molecules in the Orion Nebula , a nearby stellar nursery in our Milky Way galaxy .
... This detailed-spectrum , obtained with the Heterodyne Instrument for the Far Infrared ( HIFI )    one of Herschel 's three innovative instruments    demonstrates the gold mine of information that Herschel-HIFI will provide on how organic molecules form in space .
The spectrum , one of the first to be obtained with HIFI since it returned to full health in January 2010 following technical difficulties , clearly demonstrates that the instrument is working well .
... [ The HIFI instrument had previously been offline since ] August 2009 when HIFI experienced an unexpected voltage spike in the electronic system , probably caused by a high-energy cosmic particle , resulting in the instrument shutting down .
On 14 January 2010 , HIFI was successfully switched back on using its spare electronics , with science observations commencing on 28 February .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ogre7299 recommends an announcement out of Caltech on a milestone for HIFI, the Herschel Space Observatory's Heterodyne Instrument for the Far Infrared.
"The Herschel Space Observatory has revealed the chemical fingerprints of potential life-enabling organic molecules in the Orion Nebula, a nearby stellar nursery in our Milky Way galaxy.
... This detailed-spectrum, obtained with the Heterodyne Instrument for the Far Infrared (HIFI) — one of Herschel's three innovative instruments — demonstrates the gold mine of information that Herschel-HIFI will provide on how organic molecules form in space.
The spectrum, one of the first to be obtained with HIFI since it returned to full health in January 2010 following technical difficulties, clearly demonstrates that the instrument is working well.
... [The HIFI instrument had previously been offline since] August 2009 when HIFI experienced an unexpected voltage spike in the electronic system, probably caused by a high-energy cosmic particle, resulting in the instrument shutting down.
On 14 January 2010, HIFI was successfully switched back on using its spare electronics, with science observations commencing on 28 February.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31396394</id>
	<title>Organic Molecules</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267974780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Its not exactly new that organic molecules and precursors of
life exist in the Orion Nebula. Radio telescopes have found
them since the sixties, and the Orion Nebula is an especially
easy place to detect such compounds. Still the Herschel
satalite, can view Nebula in unpresidented detail.
<p>
---
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/blogs/RadioAstronomy/feed.html" title="feeddistiller.com">Radio Astronomy</a> [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ <a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/" title="feeddistiller.com">Feed Distiller</a> [feeddistiller.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its not exactly new that organic molecules and precursors of life exist in the Orion Nebula .
Radio telescopes have found them since the sixties , and the Orion Nebula is an especially easy place to detect such compounds .
Still the Herschel satalite , can view Nebula in unpresidented detail .
--- Radio Astronomy [ feeddistiller.com ] Feed @ Feed Distiller [ feeddistiller.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its not exactly new that organic molecules and precursors of
life exist in the Orion Nebula.
Radio telescopes have found
them since the sixties, and the Orion Nebula is an especially
easy place to detect such compounds.
Still the Herschel
satalite, can view Nebula in unpresidented detail.
---

Radio Astronomy [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ Feed Distiller [feeddistiller.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392910</id>
	<title>Celebrate!</title>
	<author>bsharma</author>
	<datestamp>1267994700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why rats? we should celebrate it as among the greatest discoveries if we can even confirm something as primitive as a worm. Evolutionarily, the jump from inorganic to a worm is far bigger jump than from a worm to (even an intelligent) man.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why rats ?
we should celebrate it as among the greatest discoveries if we can even confirm something as primitive as a worm .
Evolutionarily , the jump from inorganic to a worm is far bigger jump than from a worm to ( even an intelligent ) man .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why rats?
we should celebrate it as among the greatest discoveries if we can even confirm something as primitive as a worm.
Evolutionarily, the jump from inorganic to a worm is far bigger jump than from a worm to (even an intelligent) man.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31394094</id>
	<title>Re:Definition of "working well"</title>
	<author>AliasMarlowe</author>
	<datestamp>1267959300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yep, we got a result that's good for some headlines, so clearly the system is working well!</p></div><p>The "Headline of the month club"?<br>
That's one giant leap below the "Publication of the month club". Less effort, too.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep , we got a result that 's good for some headlines , so clearly the system is working well ! The " Headline of the month club " ?
That 's one giant leap below the " Publication of the month club " .
Less effort , too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep, we got a result that's good for some headlines, so clearly the system is working well!The "Headline of the month club"?
That's one giant leap below the "Publication of the month club".
Less effort, too.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392750</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31398268</id>
	<title>Re:Hurry already</title>
	<author>PhetusPolice</author>
	<datestamp>1268038800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"The moment life is detected else where will once and for end the silly notion of god or religion."</p><p>Because?</p></div><p>BEECAAAUUSE we will eventually find a Space Jesus in another civilization!
<br>The aliens that we discover will be worshiping their own Jesus, one who is older than ours - this will cause a schism between Earth Jesus followers, but many remain faithful to our Lord Jesus Christ. Another several thousands of years pass by when encounter YET ANOTHER civilization, one who worships, what we quickly came to call him as, Space Jesus #3, who bares an uncanny resemblance to the Space Jesus' 1 and 2.. also with Krishna, Mithra and Horus (thanks Bill Maher!) but we're talking about Jesus, here.
<br>
<br>Some time later, we've come to discover over 200 Space Jesus' in our own Milky Way. After millennia of toil, the most recent Space Jesus lived within the SAME EXACT time period that Earth Jesus was being engorged for sins. This debunked the claim by the New Space Jesus Order that all Space Jesus, including Earth Jesus, were in fact the same Jesus, wiping out sin from the galaxy like an inverted Santa Claus. The remaining true believers of Earth Jesus, a blip compared to their former breadth of influence, are flabbergasted and are mocked by the majority.
<br>
<br>However, the remaining followers, berated and on the cusp, regularly resort to violence to prove everyone else wrong. IN THE NAME OF EARTH JESUS!
<br>
<br>Wait, did I say religion was gonna end?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..nuh-uh</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The moment life is detected else where will once and for end the silly notion of god or religion .
" Because ? BEECAAAUUSE we will eventually find a Space Jesus in another civilization !
The aliens that we discover will be worshiping their own Jesus , one who is older than ours - this will cause a schism between Earth Jesus followers , but many remain faithful to our Lord Jesus Christ .
Another several thousands of years pass by when encounter YET ANOTHER civilization , one who worships , what we quickly came to call him as , Space Jesus # 3 , who bares an uncanny resemblance to the Space Jesus ' 1 and 2.. also with Krishna , Mithra and Horus ( thanks Bill Maher !
) but we 're talking about Jesus , here .
Some time later , we 've come to discover over 200 Space Jesus ' in our own Milky Way .
After millennia of toil , the most recent Space Jesus lived within the SAME EXACT time period that Earth Jesus was being engorged for sins .
This debunked the claim by the New Space Jesus Order that all Space Jesus , including Earth Jesus , were in fact the same Jesus , wiping out sin from the galaxy like an inverted Santa Claus .
The remaining true believers of Earth Jesus , a blip compared to their former breadth of influence , are flabbergasted and are mocked by the majority .
However , the remaining followers , berated and on the cusp , regularly resort to violence to prove everyone else wrong .
IN THE NAME OF EARTH JESUS !
Wait , did I say religion was gon na end ?
..nuh-uh</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The moment life is detected else where will once and for end the silly notion of god or religion.
"Because?BEECAAAUUSE we will eventually find a Space Jesus in another civilization!
The aliens that we discover will be worshiping their own Jesus, one who is older than ours - this will cause a schism between Earth Jesus followers, but many remain faithful to our Lord Jesus Christ.
Another several thousands of years pass by when encounter YET ANOTHER civilization, one who worships, what we quickly came to call him as, Space Jesus #3, who bares an uncanny resemblance to the Space Jesus' 1 and 2.. also with Krishna, Mithra and Horus (thanks Bill Maher!
) but we're talking about Jesus, here.
Some time later, we've come to discover over 200 Space Jesus' in our own Milky Way.
After millennia of toil, the most recent Space Jesus lived within the SAME EXACT time period that Earth Jesus was being engorged for sins.
This debunked the claim by the New Space Jesus Order that all Space Jesus, including Earth Jesus, were in fact the same Jesus, wiping out sin from the galaxy like an inverted Santa Claus.
The remaining true believers of Earth Jesus, a blip compared to their former breadth of influence, are flabbergasted and are mocked by the majority.
However, the remaining followers, berated and on the cusp, regularly resort to violence to prove everyone else wrong.
IN THE NAME OF EARTH JESUS!
Wait, did I say religion was gonna end?
..nuh-uh
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31396112</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393138</id>
	<title>Sigh.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267953000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Please: Caltech, not Cal Tech.  Caltech (or, just Tech) is not part of the UC system.  Yes, one writes or says, "Cal Berkeley" or just "Cal" for many of the UC schools or even some of the State schools, but the California Institute of Technology is an independent, private university.  As such, Caltech has chosen to use one word, not two, in its official nickname.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please : Caltech , not Cal Tech .
Caltech ( or , just Tech ) is not part of the UC system .
Yes , one writes or says , " Cal Berkeley " or just " Cal " for many of the UC schools or even some of the State schools , but the California Institute of Technology is an independent , private university .
As such , Caltech has chosen to use one word , not two , in its official nickname .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please: Caltech, not Cal Tech.
Caltech (or, just Tech) is not part of the UC system.
Yes, one writes or says, "Cal Berkeley" or just "Cal" for many of the UC schools or even some of the State schools, but the California Institute of Technology is an independent, private university.
As such, Caltech has chosen to use one word, not two, in its official nickname.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392976</id>
	<title>Reverse optical psychology</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267995120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't know if they have thought of this, but it seems that what is not seen has more meaning than what is seen. If I had the data, I would look to see if the absorption spectrum was different at the primary frequency of the solar emissions and would indicate to me that life was present. I would assume that inorganic materials would have an absorption spectrum which was different from organic life as it uses this energy to manufacture itself. It would seem that this would be generally true in the overall spectrum of the universe and like the cosmic background measurements there should be a signature of the universe without life and one that indicates life. Just a thought.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know if they have thought of this , but it seems that what is not seen has more meaning than what is seen .
If I had the data , I would look to see if the absorption spectrum was different at the primary frequency of the solar emissions and would indicate to me that life was present .
I would assume that inorganic materials would have an absorption spectrum which was different from organic life as it uses this energy to manufacture itself .
It would seem that this would be generally true in the overall spectrum of the universe and like the cosmic background measurements there should be a signature of the universe without life and one that indicates life .
Just a thought .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know if they have thought of this, but it seems that what is not seen has more meaning than what is seen.
If I had the data, I would look to see if the absorption spectrum was different at the primary frequency of the solar emissions and would indicate to me that life was present.
I would assume that inorganic materials would have an absorption spectrum which was different from organic life as it uses this energy to manufacture itself.
It would seem that this would be generally true in the overall spectrum of the universe and like the cosmic background measurements there should be a signature of the universe without life and one that indicates life.
Just a thought.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31396920</id>
	<title>Re:Reverse optical psychology</title>
	<author>wasmoke</author>
	<datestamp>1267979040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You seem to have the wrong idea about what has been found.  They have not found *life* in space but organic molecules commonly referred to as the "building blocks of life." This really is not a new development- we've found I want to say 92 (don't quote me on that number) amino acids in the middle of chondritic meteorites.  To get life you essentially need to stick a bunch of these precursors in a bag (we use lipids on Earth) and get them to metabolize and replicate.</div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You seem to have the wrong idea about what has been found .
They have not found * life * in space but organic molecules commonly referred to as the " building blocks of life .
" This really is not a new development- we 've found I want to say 92 ( do n't quote me on that number ) amino acids in the middle of chondritic meteorites .
To get life you essentially need to stick a bunch of these precursors in a bag ( we use lipids on Earth ) and get them to metabolize and replicate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You seem to have the wrong idea about what has been found.
They have not found *life* in space but organic molecules commonly referred to as the "building blocks of life.
" This really is not a new development- we've found I want to say 92 (don't quote me on that number) amino acids in the middle of chondritic meteorites.
To get life you essentially need to stick a bunch of these precursors in a bag (we use lipids on Earth) and get them to metabolize and replicate.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392976</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392732</id>
	<title>DNA in spaaaaace.</title>
	<author>pcjunky</author>
	<datestamp>1267993560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can pigs be far behind</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can pigs be far behind</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can pigs be far behind</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31394136</id>
	<title>Hurry already</title>
	<author>chucklebutte</author>
	<datestamp>1267959600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the search for life else where needs to hurry up already. The moment life is detected else where will once and for end the silly notion of god or religion. I cant wait!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the search for life else where needs to hurry up already .
The moment life is detected else where will once and for end the silly notion of god or religion .
I cant wait !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the search for life else where needs to hurry up already.
The moment life is detected else where will once and for end the silly notion of god or religion.
I cant wait!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393558</id>
	<title>Re:Reverse optical psychology</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267955700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nah, just look  for empty beer cans floating in space. The greatest indicator of intelligent life.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nah , just look for empty beer cans floating in space .
The greatest indicator of intelligent life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nah, just look  for empty beer cans floating in space.
The greatest indicator of intelligent life.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392976</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393766</id>
	<title>Herschel's seen things you people wouldn't believe</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267957260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Precursors of life off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate. All those moments will be lost in time... like tears in rain... Time to die. </i> <br>- Herschel Space Observatory's last transmission before deorbiting, November 2019</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've seen things you people would n't believe .
Precursors of life off the shoulder of Orion .
I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate .
All those moments will be lost in time... like tears in rain... Time to die .
- Herschel Space Observatory 's last transmission before deorbiting , November 2019</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've seen things you people wouldn't believe.
Precursors of life off the shoulder of Orion.
I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
All those moments will be lost in time... like tears in rain... Time to die.
- Herschel Space Observatory's last transmission before deorbiting, November 2019</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31397360</id>
	<title>Re:Hurry already</title>
	<author>Skidborg</author>
	<datestamp>1267983360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Cheers to a boring old age then.  They didn't even find anything more complex than your run of the mill elements and a few ordinary molecules. Calling them "organics" is borderline dishonest, all of them can be created inorganically.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cheers to a boring old age then .
They did n't even find anything more complex than your run of the mill elements and a few ordinary molecules .
Calling them " organics " is borderline dishonest , all of them can be created inorganically .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cheers to a boring old age then.
They didn't even find anything more complex than your run of the mill elements and a few ordinary molecules.
Calling them "organics" is borderline dishonest, all of them can be created inorganically.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31394136</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393992</id>
	<title>Re:Reverse optical psychology</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1267958760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds extremely oversimplified to me... I don&lsquo;t think that organic material necessarily has a different spectrum.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds extremely oversimplified to me... I don    t think that organic material necessarily has a different spectrum .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds extremely oversimplified to me... I don‘t think that organic material necessarily has a different spectrum.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392976</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31396112</id>
	<title>Re:Hurry already</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267972740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The moment life is detected else where will once and for end the silly notion of god or religion."</p><p>Because?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The moment life is detected else where will once and for end the silly notion of god or religion .
" Because ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The moment life is detected else where will once and for end the silly notion of god or religion.
"Because?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31394136</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393314</id>
	<title>Not rats but 'Space Herring'</title>
	<author>fuego451</author>
	<datestamp>1267954080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I like the idea of space herring for a couple of reasons. It would lend credence to the poem 'Wynken, Blynken and Nod' which mom read to me as a child and it would give the Discovery Channel something to look forward to other than another case of crabs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I like the idea of space herring for a couple of reasons .
It would lend credence to the poem 'Wynken , Blynken and Nod ' which mom read to me as a child and it would give the Discovery Channel something to look forward to other than another case of crabs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like the idea of space herring for a couple of reasons.
It would lend credence to the poem 'Wynken, Blynken and Nod' which mom read to me as a child and it would give the Discovery Channel something to look forward to other than another case of crabs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393716</id>
	<title>Re:Why did they wait 5 months?</title>
	<author>uburoy</author>
	<datestamp>1267956900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It is a very complex instrument. And a cosmic is not the first hypothesis in these case. It was very hard to find out the cause of the issue. And they could not risk switching to backup without knowing for sure it would not fail as the first one, and loose the instrument for good. It is not like you can go out there and repair it by trial and errors.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is a very complex instrument .
And a cosmic is not the first hypothesis in these case .
It was very hard to find out the cause of the issue .
And they could not risk switching to backup without knowing for sure it would not fail as the first one , and loose the instrument for good .
It is not like you can go out there and repair it by trial and errors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is a very complex instrument.
And a cosmic is not the first hypothesis in these case.
It was very hard to find out the cause of the issue.
And they could not risk switching to backup without knowing for sure it would not fail as the first one, and loose the instrument for good.
It is not like you can go out there and repair it by trial and errors.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393088</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393272</id>
	<title>Re:So, what next?</title>
	<author>mhajicek</author>
	<datestamp>1267953960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We thumb our noses at the creationists.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We thumb our noses at the creationists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We thumb our noses at the creationists.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393330</id>
	<title>Re:So, what next?</title>
	<author>Greyfox</author>
	<datestamp>1267954200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Isn't it obvious? We figure out how to get over there, go there and deliver lots and lots of anal probes!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't it obvious ?
We figure out how to get over there , go there and deliver lots and lots of anal probes !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't it obvious?
We figure out how to get over there, go there and deliver lots and lots of anal probes!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31397332</id>
	<title>Re:So, what next?</title>
	<author>Skidborg</author>
	<datestamp>1267982940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Let's wait until we find such a thing, shall we? Amino acids and oxygen do not a galactic civilization make.

I don't see anywhere in the article that they even mention what kind of "organics" they found though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's wait until we find such a thing , shall we ?
Amino acids and oxygen do not a galactic civilization make .
I do n't see anywhere in the article that they even mention what kind of " organics " they found though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's wait until we find such a thing, shall we?
Amino acids and oxygen do not a galactic civilization make.
I don't see anywhere in the article that they even mention what kind of "organics" they found though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31397346</id>
	<title>Fund raising...</title>
	<author>Yogijalla</author>
	<datestamp>1267983120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1. Researcher claims "possibility of life on X".<br>2. Publicity<br>3. President writes a letter. Bill Clinton (1997): &ldquo;It speaks of the possibility of life. If this discovery is confirmed, it will surely be one of the most stunning insights into our Universe that science has ever uncovered. Its implications are as far-reaching and awe-inspiring as can be imagined.&rdquo;<br>4. Profit.<br>5. Loop 1-4</p><p><a href="http://science.slashdot.org/story/10/03/06/0252237/California-Lakes-Arsenic-Hints-At-a-Shadow-Biosphere" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://science.slashdot.org/story/10/03/06/0252237/California-Lakes-Arsenic-Hints-At-a-Shadow-Biosphere</a> [slashdot.org]<br><a href="http://science.slashdot.org/index2.pl?fhfilter=life+on+mars" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://science.slashdot.org/index2.pl?fhfilter=life+on+mars</a> [slashdot.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
Researcher claims " possibility of life on X " .2 .
Publicity3. President writes a letter .
Bill Clinton ( 1997 ) :    It speaks of the possibility of life .
If this discovery is confirmed , it will surely be one of the most stunning insights into our Universe that science has ever uncovered .
Its implications are as far-reaching and awe-inspiring as can be imagined.    4 .
Profit.5. Loop 1-4http : //science.slashdot.org/story/10/03/06/0252237/California-Lakes-Arsenic-Hints-At-a-Shadow-Biosphere [ slashdot.org ] http : //science.slashdot.org/index2.pl ? fhfilter = life + on + mars [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
Researcher claims "possibility of life on X".2.
Publicity3. President writes a letter.
Bill Clinton (1997): “It speaks of the possibility of life.
If this discovery is confirmed, it will surely be one of the most stunning insights into our Universe that science has ever uncovered.
Its implications are as far-reaching and awe-inspiring as can be imagined.”4.
Profit.5. Loop 1-4http://science.slashdot.org/story/10/03/06/0252237/California-Lakes-Arsenic-Hints-At-a-Shadow-Biosphere [slashdot.org]http://science.slashdot.org/index2.pl?fhfilter=life+on+mars [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31394134</id>
	<title>no nerds here</title>
	<author>corbettw</author>
	<datestamp>1267959600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A story about possible life in Orion and not a single comment about green slave women? What is wrong with you people?</p><p>Now, get off my lawn.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A story about possible life in Orion and not a single comment about green slave women ?
What is wrong with you people ? Now , get off my lawn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A story about possible life in Orion and not a single comment about green slave women?
What is wrong with you people?Now, get off my lawn.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393846</id>
	<title>Re:So, what next?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267957800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Ok, so lets say we do find life even as advanced as, say, rats. What do we do with that information? Especially if its so far out that we can't possibly make it to that planet?</p></div><p>We reduce our ignorance as a species. You see, science is about discovering the truths of the universe, regardless of whether or not certain truths are applicable to profitable business plans.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok , so lets say we do find life even as advanced as , say , rats .
What do we do with that information ?
Especially if its so far out that we ca n't possibly make it to that planet ? We reduce our ignorance as a species .
You see , science is about discovering the truths of the universe , regardless of whether or not certain truths are applicable to profitable business plans .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok, so lets say we do find life even as advanced as, say, rats.
What do we do with that information?
Especially if its so far out that we can't possibly make it to that planet?We reduce our ignorance as a species.
You see, science is about discovering the truths of the universe, regardless of whether or not certain truths are applicable to profitable business plans.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31394372</id>
	<title>Diplomatic envoys</title>
	<author>Kulfaangaren!</author>
	<datestamp>1267960680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We need to immediately send diplomatic representation to these little space guys.<br>
I was thinking maybe<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<ol>
<li>Bill Clinton        (Head of delegation)</li><li>Britney Spears  (Cultural attache)</li><li>MPAA, RIAA     (IP attaches. If these aliens has been monitoring our radio/TV signals they have done so without paying the "artists" what they are owed, they are pirates!!!! I see a new ACTA discussion participant on the horizon. This in combination with that we really really don't want them on planet earth.)</li></ol></htmltext>
<tokenext>We need to immediately send diplomatic representation to these little space guys .
I was thinking maybe .. . Bill Clinton ( Head of delegation ) Britney Spears ( Cultural attache ) MPAA , RIAA ( IP attaches .
If these aliens has been monitoring our radio/TV signals they have done so without paying the " artists " what they are owed , they are pirates ! ! ! !
I see a new ACTA discussion participant on the horizon .
This in combination with that we really really do n't want them on planet earth .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We need to immediately send diplomatic representation to these little space guys.
I was thinking maybe ...
Bill Clinton        (Head of delegation)Britney Spears  (Cultural attache)MPAA, RIAA     (IP attaches.
If these aliens has been monitoring our radio/TV signals they have done so without paying the "artists" what they are owed, they are pirates!!!!
I see a new ACTA discussion participant on the horizon.
This in combination with that we really really don't want them on planet earth.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31397688</id>
	<title>spelling</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267987380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Caltech. It's one word, not two.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Caltech .
It 's one word , not two .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Caltech.
It's one word, not two.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392760</id>
	<title>So that's where he went!</title>
	<author>blirp</author>
	<datestamp>1267993740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>God isn't dead, he just moved to Orion!</p><p>M.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>God is n't dead , he just moved to Orion ! M .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>God isn't dead, he just moved to Orion!M.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31394284</id>
	<title>Re:Reverse optical psychology</title>
	<author>nashv</author>
	<datestamp>1267960320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Umm, no.
</p><p>
1. You are assuming that all life works in the same way, that it will be based directly on absorption of solar energy.</p><p>
2. Even if it was happening as such, the amount of light absorbed by life in any part of the spectrum represents an unbelievably small fraction of the total solar output. On Earth, the total radiations <b>received</b> is ~1\% of total solar output. And of course, plants use a fraction of that energy. To detect this over cosmic scales, you would need an instrument with sensitivity that is probably not achievable (yet, anyway) due to basic quantum barriers.</p><p>
3. The instrument has high spectral sensitivity, you would need to couple that with spatial sensitivity to figure out if there is actually a local region where the spectrum is different. Given that planets are again, very tiny compared to stars , and we are just beginning to observe them indirectly out of our solar system, that seems like a hard call.</p><p>
4. Finally, how would you know what the real , unperturbed spectrum of the star? The HIFI can detect signatures in the infra-red which is essentially vibrational and rotational modes of molecules. We know for sure that these organic molecules are far to unstable to exist in the stellar environment. So there must be a pool of it which the light is passing through. Their way is far better than yours because it works.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Umm , no .
1. You are assuming that all life works in the same way , that it will be based directly on absorption of solar energy .
2. Even if it was happening as such , the amount of light absorbed by life in any part of the spectrum represents an unbelievably small fraction of the total solar output .
On Earth , the total radiations received is ~ 1 \ % of total solar output .
And of course , plants use a fraction of that energy .
To detect this over cosmic scales , you would need an instrument with sensitivity that is probably not achievable ( yet , anyway ) due to basic quantum barriers .
3. The instrument has high spectral sensitivity , you would need to couple that with spatial sensitivity to figure out if there is actually a local region where the spectrum is different .
Given that planets are again , very tiny compared to stars , and we are just beginning to observe them indirectly out of our solar system , that seems like a hard call .
4. Finally , how would you know what the real , unperturbed spectrum of the star ?
The HIFI can detect signatures in the infra-red which is essentially vibrational and rotational modes of molecules .
We know for sure that these organic molecules are far to unstable to exist in the stellar environment .
So there must be a pool of it which the light is passing through .
Their way is far better than yours because it works .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Umm, no.
1. You are assuming that all life works in the same way, that it will be based directly on absorption of solar energy.
2. Even if it was happening as such, the amount of light absorbed by life in any part of the spectrum represents an unbelievably small fraction of the total solar output.
On Earth, the total radiations received is ~1\% of total solar output.
And of course, plants use a fraction of that energy.
To detect this over cosmic scales, you would need an instrument with sensitivity that is probably not achievable (yet, anyway) due to basic quantum barriers.
3. The instrument has high spectral sensitivity, you would need to couple that with spatial sensitivity to figure out if there is actually a local region where the spectrum is different.
Given that planets are again, very tiny compared to stars , and we are just beginning to observe them indirectly out of our solar system, that seems like a hard call.
4. Finally, how would you know what the real , unperturbed spectrum of the star?
The HIFI can detect signatures in the infra-red which is essentially vibrational and rotational modes of molecules.
We know for sure that these organic molecules are far to unstable to exist in the stellar environment.
So there must be a pool of it which the light is passing through.
Their way is far better than yours because it works.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392976</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393572</id>
	<title>Re:Why did they wait 5 months?</title>
	<author>ogre7299</author>
	<datestamp>1267955760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>OK so their instrument had an upset.  That sort of thing happens in space.  Why did it take them 5 months to switch over to the redundant string?</p></div><p>It took them 5 months to switch over to the redundant system because they wanted to be sure that they fully understood what happened with the first failure. The problem was that there wasn't software protection for the critical systems.<br>They then had to put preventative measures in place to ensure that it didn't happen to the redundant system; otherwise they would be screwed. The HIFI instrument has some of the most discovery potential and its capabilities cannot be duplicated from earth or and only partly with the SOFIA airborne mission.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>OK so their instrument had an upset .
That sort of thing happens in space .
Why did it take them 5 months to switch over to the redundant string ? It took them 5 months to switch over to the redundant system because they wanted to be sure that they fully understood what happened with the first failure .
The problem was that there was n't software protection for the critical systems.They then had to put preventative measures in place to ensure that it did n't happen to the redundant system ; otherwise they would be screwed .
The HIFI instrument has some of the most discovery potential and its capabilities can not be duplicated from earth or and only partly with the SOFIA airborne mission .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK so their instrument had an upset.
That sort of thing happens in space.
Why did it take them 5 months to switch over to the redundant string?It took them 5 months to switch over to the redundant system because they wanted to be sure that they fully understood what happened with the first failure.
The problem was that there wasn't software protection for the critical systems.They then had to put preventative measures in place to ensure that it didn't happen to the redundant system; otherwise they would be screwed.
The HIFI instrument has some of the most discovery potential and its capabilities cannot be duplicated from earth or and only partly with the SOFIA airborne mission.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393088</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392750</id>
	<title>Definition of "working well"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267993740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The spectrum [...] clearly demonstrates that the instrument is working well."</p><p>Yep, we got a result that's good for some headlines, so clearly the system is working well! Otherwise, we'd have had to conclude it's still not working.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The spectrum [ ... ] clearly demonstrates that the instrument is working well .
" Yep , we got a result that 's good for some headlines , so clearly the system is working well !
Otherwise , we 'd have had to conclude it 's still not working .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The spectrum [...] clearly demonstrates that the instrument is working well.
"Yep, we got a result that's good for some headlines, so clearly the system is working well!
Otherwise, we'd have had to conclude it's still not working.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393784</id>
	<title>Re:So, what next?</title>
	<author>DustoneGT</author>
	<datestamp>1267957380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Depends...did the spectrometer find any signs of unobtainium? If it did, we form a quasi-governmental corporate entity to kill the rats and harvest the minerals.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Depends...did the spectrometer find any signs of unobtainium ?
If it did , we form a quasi-governmental corporate entity to kill the rats and harvest the minerals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Depends...did the spectrometer find any signs of unobtainium?
If it did, we form a quasi-governmental corporate entity to kill the rats and harvest the minerals.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31398416</id>
	<title>what about...</title>
	<author>meglon</author>
	<datestamp>1268041140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When they confirm the spectrum of Plutonium Nyborg, then we'll have some serious interest.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When they confirm the spectrum of Plutonium Nyborg , then we 'll have some serious interest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When they confirm the spectrum of Plutonium Nyborg, then we'll have some serious interest.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392752</id>
	<title>I read this as "Finds Life in Orion"</title>
	<author>Smidge207</author>
	<datestamp>1267993740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then I LOL'd.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then I LOL 'd .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then I LOL'd.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31395122</id>
	<title>Caltech!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267966020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Please. It's Caltech, not Cal Tech.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please .
It 's Caltech , not Cal Tech .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please.
It's Caltech, not Cal Tech.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31394030</id>
	<title>Small temp variations...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267958880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here we are waiting for China's pollution as a way to stop the First World eternal climate debate and force them to admit that looting the Earth isn't a sound strategy.</p><p>Meanwhile, and on topic, why not check for small temp increases?</p><p>Any advanced civilization is bound to generate heat -- and hopefully find a way out of it. If we filter these places about which our records point to a small temperature increase (e.g. 5C), we might find someone doing the same error we're doing.</p><p>Of course, we could find the Genii. 8-/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here we are waiting for China 's pollution as a way to stop the First World eternal climate debate and force them to admit that looting the Earth is n't a sound strategy.Meanwhile , and on topic , why not check for small temp increases ? Any advanced civilization is bound to generate heat -- and hopefully find a way out of it .
If we filter these places about which our records point to a small temperature increase ( e.g .
5C ) , we might find someone doing the same error we 're doing.Of course , we could find the Genii .
8-/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here we are waiting for China's pollution as a way to stop the First World eternal climate debate and force them to admit that looting the Earth isn't a sound strategy.Meanwhile, and on topic, why not check for small temp increases?Any advanced civilization is bound to generate heat -- and hopefully find a way out of it.
If we filter these places about which our records point to a small temperature increase (e.g.
5C), we might find someone doing the same error we're doing.Of course, we could find the Genii.
8-/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31395046</id>
	<title>Re:So, what next?</title>
	<author>Xone47</author>
	<datestamp>1267965540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great point.  We should probably stop any and all science that doesn't have direct, actionable results.  Like stop sending robots to the bottom of the ocean.  It's not like we'll ever move down there...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great point .
We should probably stop any and all science that does n't have direct , actionable results .
Like stop sending robots to the bottom of the ocean .
It 's not like we 'll ever move down there.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great point.
We should probably stop any and all science that doesn't have direct, actionable results.
Like stop sending robots to the bottom of the ocean.
It's not like we'll ever move down there...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31394760</id>
	<title>Not Guildford after all</title>
	<author>GrahamCox</author>
	<datestamp>1267963200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not news, we all know that Ford came from a small planet somewhere in the vicinity of Betelgeuse, and not Guildford after all.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not news , we all know that Ford came from a small planet somewhere in the vicinity of Betelgeuse , and not Guildford after all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not news, we all know that Ford came from a small planet somewhere in the vicinity of Betelgeuse, and not Guildford after all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392796</id>
	<title>I've seen things ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267994040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate. All those moments will be lost in time... like tears in rain... Time to die.</p><p>- Roy Batty</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you people would n't believe .
Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion .
I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate .
All those moments will be lost in time... like tears in rain... Time to die.- Roy Batty</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you people wouldn't believe.
Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion.
I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
All those moments will be lost in time... like tears in rain... Time to die.- Roy Batty</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393088</id>
	<title>Why did they wait 5 months?</title>
	<author>laing</author>
	<datestamp>1267952580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>OK so their instrument had an upset.  That sort of thing happens in space.  Why did it take them 5 months to switch over to the redundant string?</htmltext>
<tokenext>OK so their instrument had an upset .
That sort of thing happens in space .
Why did it take them 5 months to switch over to the redundant string ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK so their instrument had an upset.
That sort of thing happens in space.
Why did it take them 5 months to switch over to the redundant string?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31405566</id>
	<title>Re:Nuke it!</title>
	<author>vindimy</author>
	<datestamp>1268043840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sadly, this is exactly what happened in Stanislaw Lem's novel <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiasco\_(novel)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Fiasco</a> [wikipedia.org]. A good read, prompts a lot of thought of whether we could (and should) seek out extraterrestrial life.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sadly , this is exactly what happened in Stanislaw Lem 's novel Fiasco [ wikipedia.org ] .
A good read , prompts a lot of thought of whether we could ( and should ) seek out extraterrestrial life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sadly, this is exactly what happened in Stanislaw Lem's novel Fiasco [wikipedia.org].
A good read, prompts a lot of thought of whether we could (and should) seek out extraterrestrial life.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392722</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31397296</id>
	<title>All That Precursing Going On</title>
	<author>DynaSoar</author>
	<datestamp>1267982700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Herschel Space Observatory Finds Precursors of Life In Orion"</p><p>I called Orion and let him know about this. He said he was well aware he had precursors of life inside, but failed to see how a telescope could be used in place of a microscope and an, um, sample to make this determination. When he asked where I got this from I told him. My son thanks you all for your concern, and promises to take due care when handling his precursors and resulting cursors, as long as you'll promise to point your telescope at someone else.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Herschel Space Observatory Finds Precursors of Life In Orion " I called Orion and let him know about this .
He said he was well aware he had precursors of life inside , but failed to see how a telescope could be used in place of a microscope and an , um , sample to make this determination .
When he asked where I got this from I told him .
My son thanks you all for your concern , and promises to take due care when handling his precursors and resulting cursors , as long as you 'll promise to point your telescope at someone else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Herschel Space Observatory Finds Precursors of Life In Orion"I called Orion and let him know about this.
He said he was well aware he had precursors of life inside, but failed to see how a telescope could be used in place of a microscope and an, um, sample to make this determination.
When he asked where I got this from I told him.
My son thanks you all for your concern, and promises to take due care when handling his precursors and resulting cursors, as long as you'll promise to point your telescope at someone else.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392780</id>
	<title>So, what next?</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1267993920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ok, so lets say we do find life even as advanced as, say, rats. What do we do with that information? Especially if its so far out that we can't possibly make it to that planet?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok , so lets say we do find life even as advanced as , say , rats .
What do we do with that information ?
Especially if its so far out that we ca n't possibly make it to that planet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok, so lets say we do find life even as advanced as, say, rats.
What do we do with that information?
Especially if its so far out that we can't possibly make it to that planet?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393832</id>
	<title>Re:So, what next?</title>
	<author>johno.ie</author>
	<datestamp>1267957680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you want to rank life forms according to some arbitrary scale from most to least advanced, you'll find that rats are just as advanced as humans. Their body chemistry is almost identical to ours, they exhibit high intelligence and ability to solve problems. They outnumber humans worldwide, and their high reproductive rate allows them to evolve much faster than us, they probably go through 100 generations for each human generation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you want to rank life forms according to some arbitrary scale from most to least advanced , you 'll find that rats are just as advanced as humans .
Their body chemistry is almost identical to ours , they exhibit high intelligence and ability to solve problems .
They outnumber humans worldwide , and their high reproductive rate allows them to evolve much faster than us , they probably go through 100 generations for each human generation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you want to rank life forms according to some arbitrary scale from most to least advanced, you'll find that rats are just as advanced as humans.
Their body chemistry is almost identical to ours, they exhibit high intelligence and ability to solve problems.
They outnumber humans worldwide, and their high reproductive rate allows them to evolve much faster than us, they probably go through 100 generations for each human generation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393694</id>
	<title>What we REALLY want to know</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267956720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are they green, and if so - are they female?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are they green , and if so - are they female ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are they green, and if so - are they female?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392722</id>
	<title>Nuke it!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267993560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's the only way to be sure!</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the only way to be sure !
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the only way to be sure!
 </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393658</id>
	<title>Very Old News</title>
	<author>AmigaMMC</author>
	<datestamp>1267956480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Dogon already knew of the existance of life in Orion centuries ago... <a href="http://www.unmuseum.org/siriusb.htm" title="unmuseum.org">http://www.unmuseum.org/siriusb.htm</a> [unmuseum.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Dogon already knew of the existance of life in Orion centuries ago... http : //www.unmuseum.org/siriusb.htm [ unmuseum.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Dogon already knew of the existance of life in Orion centuries ago... http://www.unmuseum.org/siriusb.htm [unmuseum.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31399202</id>
	<title>Re:Hurry already</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268051640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Religions, creationism, anthropogenic global warming denial, whatever... They adapt. They change. You're using reason while they're not.<br>The world is not flat? OK. The Earth is not the center of the universe? OK. Creatures evolve ? OK. The animals weren't made in a week ? OK. There's still nothing wrong with our teachings , people, you'll just have to make a few edits or interpret it in a new, more complicated way. (e.g. "OK so there's micro-evolution but blah blah blah")</p><p>If all else fails, separate your teachings from the 'material world', criticize all of science, and blame world conspiracies. Apparently you can get on TV and millions of fans shouting they love you that way. Or in God-blessed America at least. They don't call it the American denial for no reason.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Religions , creationism , anthropogenic global warming denial , whatever... They adapt .
They change .
You 're using reason while they 're not.The world is not flat ?
OK. The Earth is not the center of the universe ?
OK. Creatures evolve ?
OK. The animals were n't made in a week ?
OK. There 's still nothing wrong with our teachings , people , you 'll just have to make a few edits or interpret it in a new , more complicated way .
( e.g. " OK so there 's micro-evolution but blah blah blah " ) If all else fails , separate your teachings from the 'material world ' , criticize all of science , and blame world conspiracies .
Apparently you can get on TV and millions of fans shouting they love you that way .
Or in God-blessed America at least .
They do n't call it the American denial for no reason .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Religions, creationism, anthropogenic global warming denial, whatever... They adapt.
They change.
You're using reason while they're not.The world is not flat?
OK. The Earth is not the center of the universe?
OK. Creatures evolve ?
OK. The animals weren't made in a week ?
OK. There's still nothing wrong with our teachings , people, you'll just have to make a few edits or interpret it in a new, more complicated way.
(e.g. "OK so there's micro-evolution but blah blah blah")If all else fails, separate your teachings from the 'material world', criticize all of science, and blame world conspiracies.
Apparently you can get on TV and millions of fans shouting they love you that way.
Or in God-blessed America at least.
They don't call it the American denial for no reason.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31394136</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31394074</id>
	<title>Oblig</title>
	<author>rozthepimp</author>
	<datestamp>1267959180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"But it wouldn't be life as we know it, Jim."</htmltext>
<tokenext>" But it would n't be life as we know it , Jim .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"But it wouldn't be life as we know it, Jim.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31395518</id>
	<title>Find life or we're dead meat</title>
	<author>gamecrusader</author>
	<datestamp>1267969080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope they find Life soon<br>It would be a bummer if Planet earth was on a list for demolition and since planet earth hasn't so far found life we haven't found out that our planet was scheduled for demolition.<br>and they say your planet has been scheaduled for demoliton you (planet earth) have not replyed there for your planet will be destroyed for an interglatic teleportation byway</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope they find Life soonIt would be a bummer if Planet earth was on a list for demolition and since planet earth has n't so far found life we have n't found out that our planet was scheduled for demolition.and they say your planet has been scheaduled for demoliton you ( planet earth ) have not replyed there for your planet will be destroyed for an interglatic teleportation byway</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope they find Life soonIt would be a bummer if Planet earth was on a list for demolition and since planet earth hasn't so far found life we haven't found out that our planet was scheduled for demolition.and they say your planet has been scheaduled for demoliton you (planet earth) have not replyed there for your planet will be destroyed for an interglatic teleportation byway</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392852</id>
	<title>Hmph!</title>
	<author>Vinegar Joe</author>
	<datestamp>1267994340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Everyone knows there isn't a galaxy on Orion's belt!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Everyone knows there is n't a galaxy on Orion 's belt !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everyone knows there isn't a galaxy on Orion's belt!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393460</id>
	<title>Re:So, what next?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267955220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We can't possibly make it? As a whole, we don't seem to be interested in making it. Life might make us all interested. Then I'll show you 'can't possibly'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We ca n't possibly make it ?
As a whole , we do n't seem to be interested in making it .
Life might make us all interested .
Then I 'll show you 'ca n't possibly' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We can't possibly make it?
As a whole, we don't seem to be interested in making it.
Life might make us all interested.
Then I'll show you 'can't possibly'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31394574</id>
	<title>Why are headline so extereme?</title>
	<author>JDOHERTY</author>
	<datestamp>1267961940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why is astronomy layman reporting (and global warming, and meteor science) all about the extreme case? Only so many characters in the headline field? Too much character in the headline writer? Thing is you're wearing out the reader - in a few more generations the only way for this story to get noticed will be "Aliens From Orion On Their Way To Eat You".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is astronomy layman reporting ( and global warming , and meteor science ) all about the extreme case ?
Only so many characters in the headline field ?
Too much character in the headline writer ?
Thing is you 're wearing out the reader - in a few more generations the only way for this story to get noticed will be " Aliens From Orion On Their Way To Eat You " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is astronomy layman reporting (and global warming, and meteor science) all about the extreme case?
Only so many characters in the headline field?
Too much character in the headline writer?
Thing is you're wearing out the reader - in a few more generations the only way for this story to get noticed will be "Aliens From Orion On Their Way To Eat You".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392758</id>
	<title>Just don't go there</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267993740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or The Guardian gets you! At least until you have invented something called 'merculite' and stuck it in missiles.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or The Guardian gets you !
At least until you have invented something called 'merculite ' and stuck it in missiles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or The Guardian gets you!
At least until you have invented something called 'merculite' and stuck it in missiles.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393056</id>
	<title>Anyone else</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267952460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone else having trouble logging in.</p><p>(Posted as AC for obvious reasons)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone else having trouble logging in .
( Posted as AC for obvious reasons )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone else having trouble logging in.
(Posted as AC for obvious reasons)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_1856227_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_1856227_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31405566
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392722
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_1856227_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_1856227_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_1856227_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_1856227_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31394284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392976
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_1856227_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31398268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31396112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31394136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_1856227_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392976
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_1856227_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31396920
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392976
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_1856227_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_1856227_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31397332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_1856227_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_1856227_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31394094
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392750
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_1856227_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392976
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_1856227_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393088
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_1856227_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31395046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_1856227_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31399202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31394136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_1856227_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393088
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_1856227_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393330
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_1856227_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31397360
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31394136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_07_1856227_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_1856227.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31394030
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_1856227.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31394372
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_1856227.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392780
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31397332
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393784
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393832
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392910
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393460
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31395046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393272
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393330
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393314
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393846
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_1856227.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31396394
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_1856227.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392758
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_1856227.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31394574
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_1856227.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392976
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31396920
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393992
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31394284
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393558
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_1856227.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392732
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_1856227.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392852
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_1856227.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393766
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_1856227.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31394134
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_1856227.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31394136
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31396112
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31398268
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31399202
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31397360
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_1856227.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393138
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_1856227.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393694
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_1856227.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392760
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_1856227.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393088
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393716
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393572
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_1856227.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31393658
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_1856227.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392722
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31405566
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_07_1856227.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31392750
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_07_1856227.31394094
</commentlist>
</conversation>
