<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_06_1937255</id>
	<title>Popular Science Frees Its 137-Year Archives</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1267868940000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="mailto:DesScorpNO@SPAMGmail.com" rel="nofollow">DesScorp</a> writes <i>"Popular Science magazine has <a href="http://www.popsci.com/announcements/article/2010-03/new-browse-137-years-popsci-archive-free">scanned every issue they've ever produced</a>, and posted the archives at their website, at no charge. 'We've partnered with Google to offer our entire 137-year archive for free browsing. Each issue appears just as it did at its original time of publication, complete with period advertisements. It's an amazing resource that beautifully encapsulates our ongoing fascination with the future, and science and technology's incredible potential to improve our lives. We hope you enjoy it as much as we do.'"</i> First search: the <a href="http://www.popsci.com/results?query=flying+car">history of the flying car</a>.</htmltext>
<tokenext>DesScorp writes " Popular Science magazine has scanned every issue they 've ever produced , and posted the archives at their website , at no charge .
'We 've partnered with Google to offer our entire 137-year archive for free browsing .
Each issue appears just as it did at its original time of publication , complete with period advertisements .
It 's an amazing resource that beautifully encapsulates our ongoing fascination with the future , and science and technology 's incredible potential to improve our lives .
We hope you enjoy it as much as we do .
' " First search : the history of the flying car .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DesScorp writes "Popular Science magazine has scanned every issue they've ever produced, and posted the archives at their website, at no charge.
'We've partnered with Google to offer our entire 137-year archive for free browsing.
Each issue appears just as it did at its original time of publication, complete with period advertisements.
It's an amazing resource that beautifully encapsulates our ongoing fascination with the future, and science and technology's incredible potential to improve our lives.
We hope you enjoy it as much as we do.
'" First search: the history of the flying car.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384992</id>
	<title>Re:Foresight</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267882620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But the solution is ridiculous.<br> <br>
I did some searches and found it returned hits which when clicked showed the front page of the issue the search word was found in and then you have to wade through to the correct page and use a crappy magnifying glass to read with. What a waste of time and energy gone into this nonsense.<br> <br>
I can truly say I will never use this feature.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But the solution is ridiculous .
I did some searches and found it returned hits which when clicked showed the front page of the issue the search word was found in and then you have to wade through to the correct page and use a crappy magnifying glass to read with .
What a waste of time and energy gone into this nonsense .
I can truly say I will never use this feature .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But the solution is ridiculous.
I did some searches and found it returned hits which when clicked showed the front page of the issue the search word was found in and then you have to wade through to the correct page and use a crappy magnifying glass to read with.
What a waste of time and energy gone into this nonsense.
I can truly say I will never use this feature.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384156</id>
	<title>A nice start</title>
	<author>houghi</author>
	<datestamp>1267875240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But all you can do now is do a search. Only then you can select something you found and browse the magazine. It would be nice to be able to go to a certain issue and start browsing.<br>And all they need to do is index the IDs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But all you can do now is do a search .
Only then you can select something you found and browse the magazine .
It would be nice to be able to go to a certain issue and start browsing.And all they need to do is index the IDs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But all you can do now is do a search.
Only then you can select something you found and browse the magazine.
It would be nice to be able to go to a certain issue and start browsing.And all they need to do is index the IDs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31388626</id>
	<title>Re:Kudos to them</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267969620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd only buy it If they used hemp. I'd buy two if it was marijuana.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd only buy it If they used hemp .
I 'd buy two if it was marijuana .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd only buy it If they used hemp.
I'd buy two if it was marijuana.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31387408</id>
	<title>Sucks</title>
	<author>kimvette</author>
	<datestamp>1267994400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you browse too many issues too quickly (I was using thumbnail view to quickly look for ads and articles I remember from reading my dad's subscription in the late 70s/early 80s) you'll encounter this:</p><blockquote><div><p>We're sorry...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... but your computer or network may be sending automated queries. To protect our users, we can't process your request right now.</p></div></blockquote><p>Why they (google) don't display a captcha when you get to that point is beyond me. It seems silly to make thousands of magazines available with thumbnail views of entire issues, then block a user after viewing about 10.</p><p>Another thing:</p><p>Remember the Synchronar/sunwatch ads?  The hovercraft and hybrid car (run your car off four car batteries, a generator, and a lawnmower engine!) ads in the back? Remember the various DAK Industries ads (I STILL want the graphic equalizer they used to peddle)?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you browse too many issues too quickly ( I was using thumbnail view to quickly look for ads and articles I remember from reading my dad 's subscription in the late 70s/early 80s ) you 'll encounter this : We 're sorry... ... but your computer or network may be sending automated queries .
To protect our users , we ca n't process your request right now.Why they ( google ) do n't display a captcha when you get to that point is beyond me .
It seems silly to make thousands of magazines available with thumbnail views of entire issues , then block a user after viewing about 10.Another thing : Remember the Synchronar/sunwatch ads ?
The hovercraft and hybrid car ( run your car off four car batteries , a generator , and a lawnmower engine !
) ads in the back ?
Remember the various DAK Industries ads ( I STILL want the graphic equalizer they used to peddle ) ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you browse too many issues too quickly (I was using thumbnail view to quickly look for ads and articles I remember from reading my dad's subscription in the late 70s/early 80s) you'll encounter this:We're sorry... ... but your computer or network may be sending automated queries.
To protect our users, we can't process your request right now.Why they (google) don't display a captcha when you get to that point is beyond me.
It seems silly to make thousands of magazines available with thumbnail views of entire issues, then block a user after viewing about 10.Another thing:Remember the Synchronar/sunwatch ads?
The hovercraft and hybrid car (run your car off four car batteries, a generator, and a lawnmower engine!
) ads in the back?
Remember the various DAK Industries ads (I STILL want the graphic equalizer they used to peddle)?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384660</id>
	<title>yeah, cause there is nothing like 137yo science of</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267879680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>hammering</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>hammering</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hammering</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383824</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384814</id>
	<title>Re:Desire</title>
	<author>jonnat</author>
	<datestamp>1267881120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I now have a desire to subscribe to Popular Science. I may do so in the coming months.</p></div><p>That's right, wait a few months. No one should make the life-changing decision of spending $12 for the one-year subscription in the heat of the moment.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I now have a desire to subscribe to Popular Science .
I may do so in the coming months.That 's right , wait a few months .
No one should make the life-changing decision of spending $ 12 for the one-year subscription in the heat of the moment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I now have a desire to subscribe to Popular Science.
I may do so in the coming months.That's right, wait a few months.
No one should make the life-changing decision of spending $12 for the one-year subscription in the heat of the moment.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383842</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31386714</id>
	<title>nothing short of awesome</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267899300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great magazine. As a faded mid-40 year-older they provided me with great stuff pre-computer and continue to be a great resource. </p><p>I am so glad they are being cool about sharing their past for free. THANK YOU!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great magazine .
As a faded mid-40 year-older they provided me with great stuff pre-computer and continue to be a great resource .
I am so glad they are being cool about sharing their past for free .
THANK YOU !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great magazine.
As a faded mid-40 year-older they provided me with great stuff pre-computer and continue to be a great resource.
I am so glad they are being cool about sharing their past for free.
THANK YOU!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31419802</id>
	<title>Re:Allergic to EM</title>
	<author>Aldenissin</author>
	<datestamp>1268132160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree they had a crappy editor so I did not renew last year. However, how do YOU know it is all in his head? Are you saying there is no way on earth that it could be based on something real? Science is not perfect, the whole world has believed things that eventually science was able to prove earlier science wrong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree they had a crappy editor so I did not renew last year .
However , how do YOU know it is all in his head ?
Are you saying there is no way on earth that it could be based on something real ?
Science is not perfect , the whole world has believed things that eventually science was able to prove earlier science wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree they had a crappy editor so I did not renew last year.
However, how do YOU know it is all in his head?
Are you saying there is no way on earth that it could be based on something real?
Science is not perfect, the whole world has believed things that eventually science was able to prove earlier science wrong.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384068</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31385716</id>
	<title>Re:Foresight</title>
	<author>Zerth</author>
	<datestamp>1267888620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One of my grandparents got me a set of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weekly\_Reader" title="wikipedia.org">Weekly Readers</a> [wikipedia.org] from the years covering WWII.  It was fascinating reading the kind of stuff they gave kids back then.  The ads were hilarious, both for pricing and their writing compared to modern ads, and the articles ranged from funny to scary in their datedness and propaganda.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One of my grandparents got me a set of Weekly Readers [ wikipedia.org ] from the years covering WWII .
It was fascinating reading the kind of stuff they gave kids back then .
The ads were hilarious , both for pricing and their writing compared to modern ads , and the articles ranged from funny to scary in their datedness and propaganda .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of my grandparents got me a set of Weekly Readers [wikipedia.org] from the years covering WWII.
It was fascinating reading the kind of stuff they gave kids back then.
The ads were hilarious, both for pricing and their writing compared to modern ads, and the articles ranged from funny to scary in their datedness and propaganda.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31385398</id>
	<title>Re:Sudden outbreak of common sense</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267885560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This should be tagged as sudden outbreak of common sense.</p></div><p> Gotta love that late 19th century English and the poignant observations on sociological fallacies of the time. I can almost feel the structures of my brain altering and the flow of blood increasing as the language is sinking in through my eyes deprived of stimulating reading for such a long time (no offence,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.). I'd bet just reading the articles increases the readers intelligence.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This should be tagged as sudden outbreak of common sense .
Got ta love that late 19th century English and the poignant observations on sociological fallacies of the time .
I can almost feel the structures of my brain altering and the flow of blood increasing as the language is sinking in through my eyes deprived of stimulating reading for such a long time ( no offence , /. ) .
I 'd bet just reading the articles increases the readers intelligence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This should be tagged as sudden outbreak of common sense.
Gotta love that late 19th century English and the poignant observations on sociological fallacies of the time.
I can almost feel the structures of my brain altering and the flow of blood increasing as the language is sinking in through my eyes deprived of stimulating reading for such a long time (no offence, /.).
I'd bet just reading the articles increases the readers intelligence.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383824</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31386050</id>
	<title>Nuclear Powered Airplane</title>
	<author>Nom du Keyboard</author>
	<datestamp>1267891860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've got to go back and hunt down the issue about the Russians having a Nuclear Powered Airplane, and that we were going to have our own in 18 months.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've got to go back and hunt down the issue about the Russians having a Nuclear Powered Airplane , and that we were going to have our own in 18 months .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've got to go back and hunt down the issue about the Russians having a Nuclear Powered Airplane, and that we were going to have our own in 18 months.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31386324</id>
	<title>Re:Breakthroughs</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1267894800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe it's just my browser, but I tried a few of those links and they don't go to articles about what is mentioned. One was about preventing your car from rusting, and another about cars too. Oh well.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe it 's just my browser , but I tried a few of those links and they do n't go to articles about what is mentioned .
One was about preventing your car from rusting , and another about cars too .
Oh well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe it's just my browser, but I tried a few of those links and they don't go to articles about what is mentioned.
One was about preventing your car from rusting, and another about cars too.
Oh well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384330</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31387672</id>
	<title>Re:You already have downloaded them.</title>
	<author>iampiti</author>
	<datestamp>1267955220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, I already knew that. The pages might be downloaded as image files on the browser's cache or they might be only on its memory or whatever...but what I meant is that they don't seem to provide an easy and/or obvious way to get the content downloaded to a file on your pc. I just wanted a "Download this issue" button.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , I already knew that .
The pages might be downloaded as image files on the browser 's cache or they might be only on its memory or whatever...but what I meant is that they do n't seem to provide an easy and/or obvious way to get the content downloaded to a file on your pc .
I just wanted a " Download this issue " button .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, I already knew that.
The pages might be downloaded as image files on the browser's cache or they might be only on its memory or whatever...but what I meant is that they don't seem to provide an easy and/or obvious way to get the content downloaded to a file on your pc.
I just wanted a "Download this issue" button.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31385122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384708</id>
	<title>Well, there goes that collection.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267880100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have every issue since 1971, in boxes.</p><p>Was thinking of selling it, since it's taking up a lot of space... but now, I guess, whatever value it might have had, just went out the window.</p><p>*shrug*</p><p>Recycle time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have every issue since 1971 , in boxes.Was thinking of selling it , since it 's taking up a lot of space... but now , I guess , whatever value it might have had , just went out the window .
* shrug * Recycle time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have every issue since 1971, in boxes.Was thinking of selling it, since it's taking up a lot of space... but now, I guess, whatever value it might have had, just went out the window.
*shrug*Recycle time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384042</id>
	<title>Re:Sudden outbreak of common sense</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267874460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This should be tagged as sudden outbreak of common sense. The entire point of organized science is to let anyone read, comment and improve upon various theories and publications in science.</p></div><p>Unless of course you have an alternative scientific theory.  Then it won't matter that it's based on evidence, that it doesn't need to postulate exotic new forms of matter that have never been directly observed or studied in a laboratory, or that it makes successful predictions months/years in advance where mainstream theorists scratch their heads.  Those scientific merits won't matter because you'll be denied funding, denied access to shared resources like large and/or space-based telescopes, and you'll experience scientific censorship in the form of the refusal to publish your papers.  Y'know, because the mainstream theorists have no faith in their own ability to point out any errors/flaws in alternative scientific theories or their methodology.
<br> <br>
See:  electric universe.  As in, try actually studying it and coming to your own conclusions rather than be impressed with the personalities who scoff at it.  It's a bit hard to argue with predictions that were made well in advance and later came true.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This should be tagged as sudden outbreak of common sense .
The entire point of organized science is to let anyone read , comment and improve upon various theories and publications in science.Unless of course you have an alternative scientific theory .
Then it wo n't matter that it 's based on evidence , that it does n't need to postulate exotic new forms of matter that have never been directly observed or studied in a laboratory , or that it makes successful predictions months/years in advance where mainstream theorists scratch their heads .
Those scientific merits wo n't matter because you 'll be denied funding , denied access to shared resources like large and/or space-based telescopes , and you 'll experience scientific censorship in the form of the refusal to publish your papers .
Y'know , because the mainstream theorists have no faith in their own ability to point out any errors/flaws in alternative scientific theories or their methodology .
See : electric universe .
As in , try actually studying it and coming to your own conclusions rather than be impressed with the personalities who scoff at it .
It 's a bit hard to argue with predictions that were made well in advance and later came true .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This should be tagged as sudden outbreak of common sense.
The entire point of organized science is to let anyone read, comment and improve upon various theories and publications in science.Unless of course you have an alternative scientific theory.
Then it won't matter that it's based on evidence, that it doesn't need to postulate exotic new forms of matter that have never been directly observed or studied in a laboratory, or that it makes successful predictions months/years in advance where mainstream theorists scratch their heads.
Those scientific merits won't matter because you'll be denied funding, denied access to shared resources like large and/or space-based telescopes, and you'll experience scientific censorship in the form of the refusal to publish your papers.
Y'know, because the mainstream theorists have no faith in their own ability to point out any errors/flaws in alternative scientific theories or their methodology.
See:  electric universe.
As in, try actually studying it and coming to your own conclusions rather than be impressed with the personalities who scoff at it.
It's a bit hard to argue with predictions that were made well in advance and later came true.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383824</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31399912</id>
	<title>Re:You already have downloaded them.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268059260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Chances are they've also probably been saved to disk in the browser's cache.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Chances are they 've also probably been saved to disk in the browser 's cache .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chances are they've also probably been saved to disk in the browser's cache.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31385122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384366</id>
	<title>Re:Flying cars are coming soon!</title>
	<author>red456</author>
	<datestamp>1267877280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>i searched for 'atom' and the first article was from the early 50s envisaging the first atomic planes (which will be ready by 1960 - and atomic jets by 1980). they'll transmit power by pumping liquid metal to the propellors - and thus will have to be drained at the end of flight. flying wings as well. simply incredible</htmltext>
<tokenext>i searched for 'atom ' and the first article was from the early 50s envisaging the first atomic planes ( which will be ready by 1960 - and atomic jets by 1980 ) .
they 'll transmit power by pumping liquid metal to the propellors - and thus will have to be drained at the end of flight .
flying wings as well .
simply incredible</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i searched for 'atom' and the first article was from the early 50s envisaging the first atomic planes (which will be ready by 1960 - and atomic jets by 1980).
they'll transmit power by pumping liquid metal to the propellors - and thus will have to be drained at the end of flight.
flying wings as well.
simply incredible</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384056</id>
	<title>Re:Sudden outbreak of common sense</title>
	<author>K. S. Kyosuke</author>
	<datestamp>1267874520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>It should be labeled "Sudden outbreak of common scans"...</htmltext>
<tokenext>It should be labeled " Sudden outbreak of common scans " .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It should be labeled "Sudden outbreak of common scans"...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383824</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31392714</id>
	<title>Re:Kudos to them</title>
	<author>Skater</author>
	<datestamp>1267993500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm glad they're doing this.  I've been a subscriber for a long time and had quite a few back issues.  Recently I decided that it wasn't worth keeping them (along with a couple other magazines) and have been slowly recycling them.  It's freeing up a lot of space for books and just reducing general clutter.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm glad they 're doing this .
I 've been a subscriber for a long time and had quite a few back issues .
Recently I decided that it was n't worth keeping them ( along with a couple other magazines ) and have been slowly recycling them .
It 's freeing up a lot of space for books and just reducing general clutter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm glad they're doing this.
I've been a subscriber for a long time and had quite a few back issues.
Recently I decided that it wasn't worth keeping them (along with a couple other magazines) and have been slowly recycling them.
It's freeing up a lot of space for books and just reducing general clutter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383868</id>
	<title>Foresight</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267873080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This shows good sense on the part of the publications' editors and executives. There isn't much market for 130 past years of Popular Science. Bandwidth is cheap. Certainly making this move will get them brownie points. Brownie points mean good press. Brownie points mean more hits on their site... as does the actual archive. More hits on their website + good public image = guaranteed increase in subscriptions. Everyone wins.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This shows good sense on the part of the publications ' editors and executives .
There is n't much market for 130 past years of Popular Science .
Bandwidth is cheap .
Certainly making this move will get them brownie points .
Brownie points mean good press .
Brownie points mean more hits on their site... as does the actual archive .
More hits on their website + good public image = guaranteed increase in subscriptions .
Everyone wins .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This shows good sense on the part of the publications' editors and executives.
There isn't much market for 130 past years of Popular Science.
Bandwidth is cheap.
Certainly making this move will get them brownie points.
Brownie points mean good press.
Brownie points mean more hits on their site... as does the actual archive.
More hits on their website + good public image = guaranteed increase in subscriptions.
Everyone wins.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31386772</id>
	<title>Blimp Renaissances?</title>
	<author>dorpus</author>
	<datestamp>1267899960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How many issues of Popular Science predict that a renaissance in blimp transport will happen "soon"?  Seriously, it seems like they have posted the same article every year for the past 70 years or so.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How many issues of Popular Science predict that a renaissance in blimp transport will happen " soon " ?
Seriously , it seems like they have posted the same article every year for the past 70 years or so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How many issues of Popular Science predict that a renaissance in blimp transport will happen "soon"?
Seriously, it seems like they have posted the same article every year for the past 70 years or so.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31386600</id>
	<title>browsing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267897920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Too bad you can't actually BROWSE them...only search for keywords</htmltext>
<tokenext>Too bad you ca n't actually BROWSE them...only search for keywords</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Too bad you can't actually BROWSE them...only search for keywords</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31385382</id>
	<title>DVD version.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267885440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is a nice move from a former subscriber. I'd like them to do what National Geographic did with theirs and put it on DVD.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a nice move from a former subscriber .
I 'd like them to do what National Geographic did with theirs and put it on DVD .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a nice move from a former subscriber.
I'd like them to do what National Geographic did with theirs and put it on DVD.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31394974</id>
	<title>137</title>
	<author>Keebler71</author>
	<datestamp>1267965000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm surprised that no one has pointed out that they did this on their 137th year.... <a href="http://www.137.com/137/" title="137.com" rel="nofollow">137</a> [137.com] is among the most interesting numbers in physics...I'm surprised that no one has pointed this out yet... I seriously doubt it was a coincidence</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm surprised that no one has pointed out that they did this on their 137th year.... 137 [ 137.com ] is among the most interesting numbers in physics...I 'm surprised that no one has pointed this out yet... I seriously doubt it was a coincidence</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm surprised that no one has pointed out that they did this on their 137th year.... 137 [137.com] is among the most interesting numbers in physics...I'm surprised that no one has pointed this out yet... I seriously doubt it was a coincidence</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384330</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31387068</id>
	<title>Re:Kudos to them</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267903860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes! Just yesterday spent ages looking for articles that should be in the public domain, but are impossible to find unless u feel like paying 40U$D + shipping...and this is for someone with access to University archives and libraries.....WTF? If we cant get the info, who the heck can?</p><p>Good job, Popular Science! May other mags follow...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes !
Just yesterday spent ages looking for articles that should be in the public domain , but are impossible to find unless u feel like paying 40U $ D + shipping...and this is for someone with access to University archives and libraries.....WTF ?
If we cant get the info , who the heck can ? Good job , Popular Science !
May other mags follow.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes!
Just yesterday spent ages looking for articles that should be in the public domain, but are impossible to find unless u feel like paying 40U$D + shipping...and this is for someone with access to University archives and libraries.....WTF?
If we cant get the info, who the heck can?Good job, Popular Science!
May other mags follow...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383842</id>
	<title>Desire</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267872960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I now have a desire to subscribe to Popular Science. I may do so in the coming months.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I now have a desire to subscribe to Popular Science .
I may do so in the coming months .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I now have a desire to subscribe to Popular Science.
I may do so in the coming months.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31385566</id>
	<title>Paul Moller - total crackpot</title>
	<author>H0NGK0NGPH00EY</author>
	<datestamp>1267886820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>More specifically, <a href="http://www.popsci.com/results?query=moller" title="popsci.com">search for Paul Moller</a> [popsci.com].<br>
<br>
<a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=jSEDAAAAMBAJ&amp;lpg=PP1&amp;pg=PA20#v=onepage&amp;q=&amp;f=false" title="google.com">July 1967</a> [google.com]<blockquote><div><p>If you have the urge to make like a Martian, you may get your wish.  This is the goal of Paul S. Moller, assistant professor of mechanical engineering at the University of California, who wants to develop low-cost ($4,000 and up) flying saucers for personal transportation.  After installing new engines in his first machine [PS, July '66], Moller recently made a series of successful test flights a few feet off the ground.  With a second, eight-foot-diameter, single-engine craft, demonstrated a few weeks ago, he hopes to acheive real flying-saucer altitudes.</p></div></blockquote><p>
<a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=3AAAAAAAMBAJ&amp;lpg=PP1&amp;pg=PA43#v=onepage&amp;q=&amp;f=false" title="google.com">March 1987</a> [google.com] <em>(advertisement)</em> </p><blockquote><div><p>For the past three decades, Moller International has been studying VTOL aircraft from every angle, in an effort to engineer the first VTOL aircraft that is safe to operate, inexpensive to manufacture, and economical to maintain.  This advanced technology has finally been developed and will soon be available, in the form of the two-passenger Merlin 200.</p></div></blockquote><p>
<a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=wgKpEb86UPIC&amp;lpg=PP1&amp;pg=PA60#v=onepage&amp;q=&amp;f=false" title="google.com">January 2005</a> [google.com] </p><blockquote><div><p>Last August one of the longest-anticipated feats of flight since the moon landing took place in a grassy field in Davis, California.  As a small crowd looked on, a red Batmobile-like vehicle shuddered, lurched, and rose a few feet into the air, its eight 50hp rotary engines screaming like hornets.  After a few minutes, the craft settled into the ground.</p><p>The event might not have seemed like much&mdash;it could hardly even be called a flight&mdash;but it represented a milestone that inventor Paul Moller, a 67-year-old Canadian, had been promising journalists and investors for more than a decade.</p></div> </blockquote><p>
Yeah, a little bit more than a decade, all right.  What a crackpot.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>More specifically , search for Paul Moller [ popsci.com ] .
July 1967 [ google.com ] If you have the urge to make like a Martian , you may get your wish .
This is the goal of Paul S. Moller , assistant professor of mechanical engineering at the University of California , who wants to develop low-cost ( $ 4,000 and up ) flying saucers for personal transportation .
After installing new engines in his first machine [ PS , July '66 ] , Moller recently made a series of successful test flights a few feet off the ground .
With a second , eight-foot-diameter , single-engine craft , demonstrated a few weeks ago , he hopes to acheive real flying-saucer altitudes .
March 1987 [ google.com ] ( advertisement ) For the past three decades , Moller International has been studying VTOL aircraft from every angle , in an effort to engineer the first VTOL aircraft that is safe to operate , inexpensive to manufacture , and economical to maintain .
This advanced technology has finally been developed and will soon be available , in the form of the two-passenger Merlin 200 .
January 2005 [ google.com ] Last August one of the longest-anticipated feats of flight since the moon landing took place in a grassy field in Davis , California .
As a small crowd looked on , a red Batmobile-like vehicle shuddered , lurched , and rose a few feet into the air , its eight 50hp rotary engines screaming like hornets .
After a few minutes , the craft settled into the ground.The event might not have seemed like much    it could hardly even be called a flight    but it represented a milestone that inventor Paul Moller , a 67-year-old Canadian , had been promising journalists and investors for more than a decade .
Yeah , a little bit more than a decade , all right .
What a crackpot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More specifically, search for Paul Moller [popsci.com].
July 1967 [google.com]If you have the urge to make like a Martian, you may get your wish.
This is the goal of Paul S. Moller, assistant professor of mechanical engineering at the University of California, who wants to develop low-cost ($4,000 and up) flying saucers for personal transportation.
After installing new engines in his first machine [PS, July '66], Moller recently made a series of successful test flights a few feet off the ground.
With a second, eight-foot-diameter, single-engine craft, demonstrated a few weeks ago, he hopes to acheive real flying-saucer altitudes.
March 1987 [google.com] (advertisement) For the past three decades, Moller International has been studying VTOL aircraft from every angle, in an effort to engineer the first VTOL aircraft that is safe to operate, inexpensive to manufacture, and economical to maintain.
This advanced technology has finally been developed and will soon be available, in the form of the two-passenger Merlin 200.
January 2005 [google.com] Last August one of the longest-anticipated feats of flight since the moon landing took place in a grassy field in Davis, California.
As a small crowd looked on, a red Batmobile-like vehicle shuddered, lurched, and rose a few feet into the air, its eight 50hp rotary engines screaming like hornets.
After a few minutes, the craft settled into the ground.The event might not have seemed like much—it could hardly even be called a flight—but it represented a milestone that inventor Paul Moller, a 67-year-old Canadian, had been promising journalists and investors for more than a decade.
Yeah, a little bit more than a decade, all right.
What a crackpot.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384564</id>
	<title>Excellent service!</title>
	<author>froogger</author>
	<datestamp>1267878960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I particularly like that they hyperlinked the split articles for ease of reading. Remember when magazines used to have a "(Continued on page 80)" at the end? Well, they've thought of that, and kudos for the extra effort!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I particularly like that they hyperlinked the split articles for ease of reading .
Remember when magazines used to have a " ( Continued on page 80 ) " at the end ?
Well , they 've thought of that , and kudos for the extra effort !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I particularly like that they hyperlinked the split articles for ease of reading.
Remember when magazines used to have a "(Continued on page 80)" at the end?
Well, they've thought of that, and kudos for the extra effort!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384176</id>
	<title>Format?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267875420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, is it a collection of JPEGs? Single PDF document for each issue? What format is it!?</p><p>(No I didn't RTFA - this is Slashdot)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , is it a collection of JPEGs ?
Single PDF document for each issue ?
What format is it ! ?
( No I did n't RTFA - this is Slashdot )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, is it a collection of JPEGs?
Single PDF document for each issue?
What format is it!?
(No I didn't RTFA - this is Slashdot)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384668</id>
	<title>Popular Electronics?</title>
	<author>butlerm</author>
	<datestamp>1267879740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As nice as this is, I would be so much more excited if the owners of rights to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popular\_Electronics" title="wikipedia.org">Popular Electronics</a> [wikipedia.org] did this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As nice as this is , I would be so much more excited if the owners of rights to Popular Electronics [ wikipedia.org ] did this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As nice as this is, I would be so much more excited if the owners of rights to Popular Electronics [wikipedia.org] did this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31387048</id>
	<title>40 Years Ago...</title>
	<author>rocketPack</author>
	<datestamp>1267903680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>40 years ago GM debuted a working plug-in hybrid... according to the magazine, the engineers were "not waiting for a breakthrough" and it "could be built today."<br>WTF happened???<br>
<a href="http://www.popsci.com/archive-viewer?id=FyoDAAAAMBAJ&amp;pg=86&amp;query=hybrid" title="popsci.com">http://www.popsci.com/archive-viewer?id=FyoDAAAAMBAJ&amp;pg=86&amp;query=hybrid</a> [popsci.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>40 years ago GM debuted a working plug-in hybrid... according to the magazine , the engineers were " not waiting for a breakthrough " and it " could be built today .
" WTF happened ? ? ?
http : //www.popsci.com/archive-viewer ? id = FyoDAAAAMBAJ&amp;pg = 86&amp;query = hybrid [ popsci.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>40 years ago GM debuted a working plug-in hybrid... according to the magazine, the engineers were "not waiting for a breakthrough" and it "could be built today.
"WTF happened???
http://www.popsci.com/archive-viewer?id=FyoDAAAAMBAJ&amp;pg=86&amp;query=hybrid [popsci.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384308</id>
	<title>137</title>
	<author>physburn</author>
	<datestamp>1267876740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext> A good ammount for scientists to celebrate, its the inverse of the fine structure constant, the strength of the electromagnetism.

<a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/blogs/History\%20of\%20Science/feed.html" title="feeddistiller.com">History of Science</a> [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ <a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/" title="feeddistiller.com">Feed Distiller</a> [feeddistiller.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>A good ammount for scientists to celebrate , its the inverse of the fine structure constant , the strength of the electromagnetism .
History of Science [ feeddistiller.com ] Feed @ Feed Distiller [ feeddistiller.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext> A good ammount for scientists to celebrate, its the inverse of the fine structure constant, the strength of the electromagnetism.
History of Science [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ Feed Distiller [feeddistiller.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31390922</id>
	<title>Re:Download version?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267983660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>jDownloader does what you want to do: <a href="http://jdownloader.org/" title="jdownloader.org" rel="nofollow">http://jdownloader.org/</a> [jdownloader.org] - just copy the link to Google Books to clipboard and it will automatically scan that URL for images, hitting play than automatically downloads all of them. The program also makes downloads from Rapidshare much less of a hassle and it works on Linux, Mac OS and Windows.</htmltext>
<tokenext>jDownloader does what you want to do : http : //jdownloader.org/ [ jdownloader.org ] - just copy the link to Google Books to clipboard and it will automatically scan that URL for images , hitting play than automatically downloads all of them .
The program also makes downloads from Rapidshare much less of a hassle and it works on Linux , Mac OS and Windows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>jDownloader does what you want to do: http://jdownloader.org/ [jdownloader.org] - just copy the link to Google Books to clipboard and it will automatically scan that URL for images, hitting play than automatically downloads all of them.
The program also makes downloads from Rapidshare much less of a hassle and it works on Linux, Mac OS and Windows.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383852</id>
	<title>Download version?</title>
	<author>iampiti</author>
	<datestamp>1267873020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've taken a look and while it's very nice they put the issues online It'd be nice if you could download them. I haven't found an obvious way to do it. I guess that's the way the google displayed books work</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've taken a look and while it 's very nice they put the issues online It 'd be nice if you could download them .
I have n't found an obvious way to do it .
I guess that 's the way the google displayed books work</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've taken a look and while it's very nice they put the issues online It'd be nice if you could download them.
I haven't found an obvious way to do it.
I guess that's the way the google displayed books work</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384088</id>
	<title>Free</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267874700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>BSD</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>BSD</tokentext>
<sentencetext>BSD</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384336</id>
	<title>Re:Foresight</title>
	<author>icebraining</author>
	<datestamp>1267877040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Bandwidth is cheap.</p></div></blockquote><p> Especially if Google provides it, as in this case.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bandwidth is cheap .
Especially if Google provides it , as in this case .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bandwidth is cheap.
Especially if Google provides it, as in this case.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31389892</id>
	<title>Discover Magazine</title>
	<author>rwa2</author>
	<datestamp>1267977660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've always enjoyed Discover Magazine more than PopSci or PopMech.  While the latter have more fantastic and sensational pictures, I like the more detailed articles and writing style of Discover...   I'd almost liken it to the difference between Time magazine vs. US News &amp; World Report  (OK, maybe not THAT bad, but it feels like that sometimes).</p><p><a href="http://discovermagazine.com/" title="discovermagazine.com">http://discovermagazine.com/</a> [discovermagazine.com]<br>The archives only go back a few decades, so not as much historical interest as PopSci's archives.  But my world view was probably more impacted.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've always enjoyed Discover Magazine more than PopSci or PopMech .
While the latter have more fantastic and sensational pictures , I like the more detailed articles and writing style of Discover... I 'd almost liken it to the difference between Time magazine vs. US News &amp; World Report ( OK , maybe not THAT bad , but it feels like that sometimes ) .http : //discovermagazine.com/ [ discovermagazine.com ] The archives only go back a few decades , so not as much historical interest as PopSci 's archives .
But my world view was probably more impacted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've always enjoyed Discover Magazine more than PopSci or PopMech.
While the latter have more fantastic and sensational pictures, I like the more detailed articles and writing style of Discover...   I'd almost liken it to the difference between Time magazine vs. US News &amp; World Report  (OK, maybe not THAT bad, but it feels like that sometimes).http://discovermagazine.com/ [discovermagazine.com]The archives only go back a few decades, so not as much historical interest as PopSci's archives.
But my world view was probably more impacted.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31385886</id>
	<title>Garbage!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267890360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't want to search, I want to download them all as PDFs, where is that option, nowhere?</p><p>You need javascript and/or plugins enabled? GARBAGE! I want them in a format I can download and share, since they are free, right?</p><p>Why do people insist upon over complicating every little thing! Just make them available for download and worry about searching through them later. Or is this about AD revenue?</p><p>You will not suck my e-tits for revenue, forget you!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't want to search , I want to download them all as PDFs , where is that option , nowhere ? You need javascript and/or plugins enabled ?
GARBAGE ! I want them in a format I can download and share , since they are free , right ? Why do people insist upon over complicating every little thing !
Just make them available for download and worry about searching through them later .
Or is this about AD revenue ? You will not suck my e-tits for revenue , forget you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't want to search, I want to download them all as PDFs, where is that option, nowhere?You need javascript and/or plugins enabled?
GARBAGE! I want them in a format I can download and share, since they are free, right?Why do people insist upon over complicating every little thing!
Just make them available for download and worry about searching through them later.
Or is this about AD revenue?You will not suck my e-tits for revenue, forget you!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384198</id>
	<title>Re:Foresight</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1267875540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not much market? Hell, if you want to see what popular culture is like in certain times, magazines like this one is a treasure! Check out the magazines of the 30s (depression era), 40s (war era), 50s (cold war introduction)... you just have to read between the lines and you see a wealth of information. The ads alone are a rich source of the mindset of the time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not much market ?
Hell , if you want to see what popular culture is like in certain times , magazines like this one is a treasure !
Check out the magazines of the 30s ( depression era ) , 40s ( war era ) , 50s ( cold war introduction ) ... you just have to read between the lines and you see a wealth of information .
The ads alone are a rich source of the mindset of the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not much market?
Hell, if you want to see what popular culture is like in certain times, magazines like this one is a treasure!
Check out the magazines of the 30s (depression era), 40s (war era), 50s (cold war introduction)... you just have to read between the lines and you see a wealth of information.
The ads alone are a rich source of the mindset of the time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383894</id>
	<title>Im trying to find a make your own submarine</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267873260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>article that was on the cover of one of my father's Pop Sci's from the 60s - can't find it.</p><p>It sucks! I need those plans for my do-it-yourself-on-a-budget-evil-genius-lair-secret-submarines type of stuff. Pop Sci had GREAT articles on James Bond gadgets and things! BUT nothing on hiring henchmen and getting really hot chicks who are willing to walk around half naked and sleep with you until the English secret agent sweeps them off their feet - which isn't a problem because it saves me the time of dumping them and having to creatively kill them when I'm bored with them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>article that was on the cover of one of my father 's Pop Sci 's from the 60s - ca n't find it.It sucks !
I need those plans for my do-it-yourself-on-a-budget-evil-genius-lair-secret-submarines type of stuff .
Pop Sci had GREAT articles on James Bond gadgets and things !
BUT nothing on hiring henchmen and getting really hot chicks who are willing to walk around half naked and sleep with you until the English secret agent sweeps them off their feet - which is n't a problem because it saves me the time of dumping them and having to creatively kill them when I 'm bored with them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>article that was on the cover of one of my father's Pop Sci's from the 60s - can't find it.It sucks!
I need those plans for my do-it-yourself-on-a-budget-evil-genius-lair-secret-submarines type of stuff.
Pop Sci had GREAT articles on James Bond gadgets and things!
BUT nothing on hiring henchmen and getting really hot chicks who are willing to walk around half naked and sleep with you until the English secret agent sweeps them off their feet - which isn't a problem because it saves me the time of dumping them and having to creatively kill them when I'm bored with them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384978</id>
	<title>Great Move!</title>
	<author>nurb432</author>
	<datestamp>1267882500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lets hope other magazines follow suit with their 'archives'.  Now i can finally get rid of my 10 boxes of old PS paper copies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lets hope other magazines follow suit with their 'archives' .
Now i can finally get rid of my 10 boxes of old PS paper copies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lets hope other magazines follow suit with their 'archives'.
Now i can finally get rid of my 10 boxes of old PS paper copies.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384456</id>
	<title>Re:LIFE Magazine Also?</title>
	<author>spydabyte</author>
	<datestamp>1267878000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>LIFE already did:
<a href="http://books.google.com/books/serial/7FQEAAAAMBAJ?rview=1" title="google.com">http://books.google.com/books/serial/7FQEAAAAMBAJ?rview=1</a> [google.com] <br> <br>

Oh and here's the best view for all the Popular Science "Books": <a href="http://books.google.com/books/serial/CzwEAAAAMBAJ?rview=1" title="google.com">http://books.google.com/books/serial/CzwEAAAAMBAJ?rview=1</a> [google.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>LIFE already did : http : //books.google.com/books/serial/7FQEAAAAMBAJ ? rview = 1 [ google.com ] Oh and here 's the best view for all the Popular Science " Books " : http : //books.google.com/books/serial/CzwEAAAAMBAJ ? rview = 1 [ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LIFE already did:
http://books.google.com/books/serial/7FQEAAAAMBAJ?rview=1 [google.com]  

Oh and here's the best view for all the Popular Science "Books": http://books.google.com/books/serial/CzwEAAAAMBAJ?rview=1 [google.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384656</id>
	<title>Re:Breakthroughs</title>
	<author>Zonnald</author>
	<datestamp>1267879680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dare I...

Climate Change: <a href="http://www.popsci.com.au/archive-viewer?id=BSQDAAAAMBAJ&amp;pg=242&amp;query=climate" title="popsci.com.au" rel="nofollow">http://www.popsci.com.au/archive-viewer?id=BSQDAAAAMBAJ&amp;pg=242&amp;query=climate</a> [popsci.com.au]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dare I.. . Climate Change : http : //www.popsci.com.au/archive-viewer ? id = BSQDAAAAMBAJ&amp;pg = 242&amp;query = climate [ popsci.com.au ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dare I...

Climate Change: http://www.popsci.com.au/archive-viewer?id=BSQDAAAAMBAJ&amp;pg=242&amp;query=climate [popsci.com.au]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384330</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31385182</id>
	<title>Re:Foresight</title>
	<author>Jeremy Erwin</author>
	<datestamp>1267884060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I first discovered this archive a few days ago when I was reading about <a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/02/27/2040251/US-Government-Poisoned-Alcohol-During-Prohibition?art\_pos=1" title="slashdot.org">prohibition</a> [slashdot.org]. A bit dry for my taste.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I first discovered this archive a few days ago when I was reading about prohibition [ slashdot.org ] .
A bit dry for my taste .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I first discovered this archive a few days ago when I was reading about prohibition [slashdot.org].
A bit dry for my taste.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31387988</id>
	<title>Re:Format?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267960800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As png. Check your browser's cache. In fedora + firefox it's on ~/.mozilla/firefox/cache</p><p>got the info from a google search</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As png .
Check your browser 's cache .
In fedora + firefox it 's on ~ /.mozilla/firefox/cachegot the info from a google search</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As png.
Check your browser's cache.
In fedora + firefox it's on ~/.mozilla/firefox/cachegot the info from a google search</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384920</id>
	<title>Re:Kudos to them</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267881900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You probably won't though, will you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You probably wo n't though , will you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You probably won't though, will you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384170</id>
	<title>Re:Download version?</title>
	<author>Jane Q. Public</author>
	<datestamp>1267875300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, I did find a way but I don't want to advertise it here. If you are a bit clever you can find the images the browser is showing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , I did find a way but I do n't want to advertise it here .
If you are a bit clever you can find the images the browser is showing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, I did find a way but I don't want to advertise it here.
If you are a bit clever you can find the images the browser is showing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384114</id>
	<title>Re:Download version?</title>
	<author>Jane Q. Public</author>
	<datestamp>1267874880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oops! No, that didn't work after all. I will try a few other things.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oops !
No , that did n't work after all .
I will try a few other things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oops!
No, that didn't work after all.
I will try a few other things.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384510</id>
	<title>Re:The period ads</title>
	<author>allan\_q</author>
	<datestamp>1267878420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>As much as we hate advertising on the web,
there is definitely something to be said
for ads as a window into history.</p></div><p>It's definitely a window into history. 10 years ago you could use <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=L0Nnx9sLhJAC&amp;lpg=PP1&amp;pg=PA2#v=onepage&amp;q=&amp;f=false" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">ordinary batteries</a> [google.com] in your cell phones. You don't see these ads anymore.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As much as we hate advertising on the web , there is definitely something to be said for ads as a window into history.It 's definitely a window into history .
10 years ago you could use ordinary batteries [ google.com ] in your cell phones .
You do n't see these ads anymore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As much as we hate advertising on the web,
there is definitely something to be said
for ads as a window into history.It's definitely a window into history.
10 years ago you could use ordinary batteries [google.com] in your cell phones.
You don't see these ads anymore.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384488</id>
	<title>Are they including the naked girl in the sauna?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267878300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's the issue I remember most.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's the issue I remember most .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's the issue I remember most.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383900</id>
	<title>LIFE Magazine Also?</title>
	<author>hduff</author>
	<datestamp>1267873260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I remember reading through all the bound volumes of Life Magazine in-between classes as an undergrad. That gave me a better sense of 20th century American history than anything I ever read in grade school. It would be wonderful for Time-Life to do the same as Popular Science.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember reading through all the bound volumes of Life Magazine in-between classes as an undergrad .
That gave me a better sense of 20th century American history than anything I ever read in grade school .
It would be wonderful for Time-Life to do the same as Popular Science .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember reading through all the bound volumes of Life Magazine in-between classes as an undergrad.
That gave me a better sense of 20th century American history than anything I ever read in grade school.
It would be wonderful for Time-Life to do the same as Popular Science.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31385122</id>
	<title>You already have downloaded them.</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1267883820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; It'd be nice if you could download them.</p><p>If you are viewing them you already have downloaded them: they're right there on your computer.  You just haven't figured out how to save them to disk.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; It 'd be nice if you could download them.If you are viewing them you already have downloaded them : they 're right there on your computer .
You just have n't figured out how to save them to disk .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; It'd be nice if you could download them.If you are viewing them you already have downloaded them: they're right there on your computer.
You just haven't figured out how to save them to disk.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384478</id>
	<title>137 years, and now...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267878240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... 137 i7 B&euro; r33 !</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... 137 i7 B    r33 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... 137 i7 B€ r33 !</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31387340</id>
	<title>1872: 128 pages long, a handful of illustrations</title>
	<author>marciot</author>
	<datestamp>1267993260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh how things have changed. The first issue from May 1872 has 128 pages of closely packed text and only a few scattered illustrations. I wonder if all magazines were like that in 1872 -- I get the impression that Playboy magazine wouldn't have been much fun back then.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh how things have changed .
The first issue from May 1872 has 128 pages of closely packed text and only a few scattered illustrations .
I wonder if all magazines were like that in 1872 -- I get the impression that Playboy magazine would n't have been much fun back then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh how things have changed.
The first issue from May 1872 has 128 pages of closely packed text and only a few scattered illustrations.
I wonder if all magazines were like that in 1872 -- I get the impression that Playboy magazine wouldn't have been much fun back then.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384234</id>
	<title>July 1873 ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267875900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... contains a wonderful description of nebulae, including some fantastic drawings of "spiral nebulae." Pre-Hubble astronomy for the win!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... contains a wonderful description of nebulae , including some fantastic drawings of " spiral nebulae .
" Pre-Hubble astronomy for the win !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... contains a wonderful description of nebulae, including some fantastic drawings of "spiral nebulae.
" Pre-Hubble astronomy for the win!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384734</id>
	<title>Re:Sudden outbreak of common sense</title>
	<author>CharlyFoxtrot</author>
	<datestamp>1267880280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If people keep this up we might have to start referring to the internet as the Information Superhighway again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If people keep this up we might have to start referring to the internet as the Information Superhighway again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If people keep this up we might have to start referring to the internet as the Information Superhighway again.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383824</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383998</id>
	<title>The pirate bay had already freed it</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1267874040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>....at least for more recent issues, and in a less clunky downloadable form. Of course there is that small issue of legality but when are people going to learn that horrible searchable online interfaces really don't give you any advantage (EXCEPT the ability to pull access).</p><p>Sorry but I'm just not so easily impressed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>....at least for more recent issues , and in a less clunky downloadable form .
Of course there is that small issue of legality but when are people going to learn that horrible searchable online interfaces really do n't give you any advantage ( EXCEPT the ability to pull access ) .Sorry but I 'm just not so easily impressed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>....at least for more recent issues, and in a less clunky downloadable form.
Of course there is that small issue of legality but when are people going to learn that horrible searchable online interfaces really don't give you any advantage (EXCEPT the ability to pull access).Sorry but I'm just not so easily impressed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384756</id>
	<title>"Can We Harness Nuclear Fusion in the '70s?"</title>
	<author>ewg</author>
	<datestamp>1267880460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Forget flying cars, where's my fusion reactor?: <a href="http://www.popsci.com/archive-viewer?id=VvyLShXydNgC&amp;pg=88&amp;query=fusion" title="popsci.com">Can We Harness Nuclear Fusion in the '70s?</a> [popsci.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Forget flying cars , where 's my fusion reactor ?
: Can We Harness Nuclear Fusion in the '70s ?
[ popsci.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Forget flying cars, where's my fusion reactor?
: Can We Harness Nuclear Fusion in the '70s?
[popsci.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383824</id>
	<title>Sudden outbreak of common sense</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1267872840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This should be tagged as sudden outbreak of common sense. The entire point of organized science is to let anyone read, comment and improve upon various theories and publications in science.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This should be tagged as sudden outbreak of common sense .
The entire point of organized science is to let anyone read , comment and improve upon various theories and publications in science .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This should be tagged as sudden outbreak of common sense.
The entire point of organized science is to let anyone read, comment and improve upon various theories and publications in science.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384134</id>
	<title>The period ads</title>
	<author>istartedi</author>
	<datestamp>1267875060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I bet the period advertisements
alone will be priceless.</p><p>As much as we hate advertising on the web,
there is definitely something to be said
for ads as a window into history.</p><p>With so much content being dynamicly
generated, we won't have period ads like
we did with print.</p><p>Embedded advertising could solve this, and it wouldn't
be a problem if it were done as still images
and text analagous to a printed ad.  Of course,
online advertisers seem to have a habit of shooting
themselves in the foot in this regard--the temptation
to introduce obtrusive ads just ups the ante in the
arms race.</p><p>Reading ads from pop sci might tell you that
Ford has been in business for over 100 years.
Reading web pages archived from today will tell
you nothing of the sort.  The ad will either be
fetched and dynamicly generated (and thus be
non-period) or it will be edited out by the archiver.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I bet the period advertisements alone will be priceless.As much as we hate advertising on the web , there is definitely something to be said for ads as a window into history.With so much content being dynamicly generated , we wo n't have period ads like we did with print.Embedded advertising could solve this , and it would n't be a problem if it were done as still images and text analagous to a printed ad .
Of course , online advertisers seem to have a habit of shooting themselves in the foot in this regard--the temptation to introduce obtrusive ads just ups the ante in the arms race.Reading ads from pop sci might tell you that Ford has been in business for over 100 years .
Reading web pages archived from today will tell you nothing of the sort .
The ad will either be fetched and dynamicly generated ( and thus be non-period ) or it will be edited out by the archiver .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bet the period advertisements
alone will be priceless.As much as we hate advertising on the web,
there is definitely something to be said
for ads as a window into history.With so much content being dynamicly
generated, we won't have period ads like
we did with print.Embedded advertising could solve this, and it wouldn't
be a problem if it were done as still images
and text analagous to a printed ad.
Of course,
online advertisers seem to have a habit of shooting
themselves in the foot in this regard--the temptation
to introduce obtrusive ads just ups the ante in the
arms race.Reading ads from pop sci might tell you that
Ford has been in business for over 100 years.
Reading web pages archived from today will tell
you nothing of the sort.
The ad will either be
fetched and dynamicly generated (and thus be
non-period) or it will be edited out by the archiver.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384802</id>
	<title>Bring on National Geographic!</title>
	<author>WinstonWolfIT</author>
	<datestamp>1267881000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ah but to see those topless primitives again...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah but to see those topless primitives again.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah but to see those topless primitives again...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384148</id>
	<title>The article you were looking for...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267875180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>was a 1974 cover of... Popular *Mechanics*, with an illustration of a Moller M400 taking off from someone's driveway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>was a 1974 cover of... Popular * Mechanics * , with an illustration of a Moller M400 taking off from someone 's driveway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>was a 1974 cover of... Popular *Mechanics*, with an illustration of a Moller M400 taking off from someone's driveway.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383912</id>
	<title>Re:Sudden outbreak of common sense</title>
	<author>delirium of disorder</author>
	<datestamp>1267873320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>"The entire point of organized science is to let anyone read"</i>
<br> <br>
Ya, but Popular Science, is about the popularization of existing research, not the nitty gritty of the research itself.  Real science--peer review journals--are even more closed off than commercial magazines.  Given science's reputation for free inquiry and openness, it's ironic that scientific publications are the <a href="http://counterpunch.com/mazur02262010.html" title="counterpunch.com">last vestige of closed media in an increasingly open society.</a> [counterpunch.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The entire point of organized science is to let anyone read " Ya , but Popular Science , is about the popularization of existing research , not the nitty gritty of the research itself .
Real science--peer review journals--are even more closed off than commercial magazines .
Given science 's reputation for free inquiry and openness , it 's ironic that scientific publications are the last vestige of closed media in an increasingly open society .
[ counterpunch.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The entire point of organized science is to let anyone read"
 
Ya, but Popular Science, is about the popularization of existing research, not the nitty gritty of the research itself.
Real science--peer review journals--are even more closed off than commercial magazines.
Given science's reputation for free inquiry and openness, it's ironic that scientific publications are the last vestige of closed media in an increasingly open society.
[counterpunch.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383824</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31385606</id>
	<title>Re:Sudden outbreak of common sense</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267887240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Setting up a torrent would have been a sudden outbreak of common sense.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Setting up a torrent would have been a sudden outbreak of common sense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Setting up a torrent would have been a sudden outbreak of common sense.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383824</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31385056</id>
	<title>Re:Breakthroughs</title>
	<author>Threni</author>
	<datestamp>1267883280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A breakthrough would be the ability to download the whole thing and flick through them at my leisure, rather than this bizarre `search for a keyword` nonsense.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A breakthrough would be the ability to download the whole thing and flick through them at my leisure , rather than this bizarre ` search for a keyword ` nonsense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A breakthrough would be the ability to download the whole thing and flick through them at my leisure, rather than this bizarre `search for a keyword` nonsense.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384330</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383796</id>
	<title>Kudos to them</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267872660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This makes me seriously consider getting a subscription to their dead tree version again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This makes me seriously consider getting a subscription to their dead tree version again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This makes me seriously consider getting a subscription to their dead tree version again.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384742</id>
	<title>Re:Kudos to them</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267880400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Consider getting a subscription?</p><p>This is the reason I just did get a subscription.</p><p>I'm honestly impressed with their company right now, and will support them with my measly $14 a year for this move.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Consider getting a subscription ? This is the reason I just did get a subscription.I 'm honestly impressed with their company right now , and will support them with my measly $ 14 a year for this move .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Consider getting a subscription?This is the reason I just did get a subscription.I'm honestly impressed with their company right now, and will support them with my measly $14 a year for this move.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383982</id>
	<title>Flying cars are coming soon!</title>
	<author>madirad</author>
	<datestamp>1267873920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The 1933 article on flying cars is wonderful.  The article describes the general plan for a flying car infrastructure - using a lot of rubber - for flying cars - which use steam power.   I would love to know what ever happened to these plans because it sounds like a sure thing from the tone of the article.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The 1933 article on flying cars is wonderful .
The article describes the general plan for a flying car infrastructure - using a lot of rubber - for flying cars - which use steam power .
I would love to know what ever happened to these plans because it sounds like a sure thing from the tone of the article .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The 1933 article on flying cars is wonderful.
The article describes the general plan for a flying car infrastructure - using a lot of rubber - for flying cars - which use steam power.
I would love to know what ever happened to these plans because it sounds like a sure thing from the tone of the article.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31390052</id>
	<title>Re:Kudos to them</title>
	<author>sophoclesdrf</author>
	<datestamp>1267978680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's easy to blame teachers since they're the ones who arrive to work everyday with the intent of educating children. How many of you have been confronted by the daily "train wreck" that our teachers face everyday? Government Standardized testing has placed so much emphasis on passing them that a narrow set of questions now drive curriculum itself.

Students in most failing schools generally come from economically challenged areas and single parent homes where there is little support for learning. Teachers are confronted by many of them everyday doing their best to disrupt and derail a class. These same students also prevent serious students from learning, because after all if takes 20 minutes or more of class time to keep order then how much time does that leave for learning?

 Many of students simply don't posses the gray matter to learn the required language and math skills set by state standards. and yet all of them are placed on a college track. To place them in an algebra class would be akin to given them manuals written in Chinese just prior to testing them. You can't make a racing horse out of a donkey and sometimes we need to put aside algebra and give some students a hammer and nails.

Does this mean that there are no bad teachers? Of course not because there are, but there are far more good ones who receive the same blame. Depending on the school and neighborhood many teachers are brought in under an agreement to earn and are teaching out of field simply because the demand for teachers exceeds the number of people seeking degrees in education.

After all who would want an underpaid degree watching the asylums we now call classrooms only to be blamed for the failures of society?</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's easy to blame teachers since they 're the ones who arrive to work everyday with the intent of educating children .
How many of you have been confronted by the daily " train wreck " that our teachers face everyday ?
Government Standardized testing has placed so much emphasis on passing them that a narrow set of questions now drive curriculum itself .
Students in most failing schools generally come from economically challenged areas and single parent homes where there is little support for learning .
Teachers are confronted by many of them everyday doing their best to disrupt and derail a class .
These same students also prevent serious students from learning , because after all if takes 20 minutes or more of class time to keep order then how much time does that leave for learning ?
Many of students simply do n't posses the gray matter to learn the required language and math skills set by state standards .
and yet all of them are placed on a college track .
To place them in an algebra class would be akin to given them manuals written in Chinese just prior to testing them .
You ca n't make a racing horse out of a donkey and sometimes we need to put aside algebra and give some students a hammer and nails .
Does this mean that there are no bad teachers ?
Of course not because there are , but there are far more good ones who receive the same blame .
Depending on the school and neighborhood many teachers are brought in under an agreement to earn and are teaching out of field simply because the demand for teachers exceeds the number of people seeking degrees in education .
After all who would want an underpaid degree watching the asylums we now call classrooms only to be blamed for the failures of society ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's easy to blame teachers since they're the ones who arrive to work everyday with the intent of educating children.
How many of you have been confronted by the daily "train wreck" that our teachers face everyday?
Government Standardized testing has placed so much emphasis on passing them that a narrow set of questions now drive curriculum itself.
Students in most failing schools generally come from economically challenged areas and single parent homes where there is little support for learning.
Teachers are confronted by many of them everyday doing their best to disrupt and derail a class.
These same students also prevent serious students from learning, because after all if takes 20 minutes or more of class time to keep order then how much time does that leave for learning?
Many of students simply don't posses the gray matter to learn the required language and math skills set by state standards.
and yet all of them are placed on a college track.
To place them in an algebra class would be akin to given them manuals written in Chinese just prior to testing them.
You can't make a racing horse out of a donkey and sometimes we need to put aside algebra and give some students a hammer and nails.
Does this mean that there are no bad teachers?
Of course not because there are, but there are far more good ones who receive the same blame.
Depending on the school and neighborhood many teachers are brought in under an agreement to earn and are teaching out of field simply because the demand for teachers exceeds the number of people seeking degrees in education.
After all who would want an underpaid degree watching the asylums we now call classrooms only to be blamed for the failures of society?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384068</id>
	<title>Allergic to EM</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267874580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I lost absolutely any remaining respect for Pop Sci when they posted "The Man Who Was Allergic to Radio Waves" on their front page.<br>Absolutely no testing, research, or proof about this man's fantastic story wasn't just all in his head (which it is).</p><p>Shame on you Pop Sci. I used to subscribe to this crap.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I lost absolutely any remaining respect for Pop Sci when they posted " The Man Who Was Allergic to Radio Waves " on their front page.Absolutely no testing , research , or proof about this man 's fantastic story was n't just all in his head ( which it is ) .Shame on you Pop Sci .
I used to subscribe to this crap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I lost absolutely any remaining respect for Pop Sci when they posted "The Man Who Was Allergic to Radio Waves" on their front page.Absolutely no testing, research, or proof about this man's fantastic story wasn't just all in his head (which it is).Shame on you Pop Sci.
I used to subscribe to this crap.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31386326</id>
	<title>Re:LIFE Magazine Also?</title>
	<author>Reziac</author>
	<datestamp>1267894800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Coolness, thanks... now how do I get it to display from oldest to newest??</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Coolness , thanks... now how do I get it to display from oldest to newest ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Coolness, thanks... now how do I get it to display from oldest to newest?
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384456</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384330</id>
	<title>Breakthroughs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267877040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Relativity: <a href="http://www.popsci.com/archive-viewer?id=wiQDAAAAMBAJ&amp;pg=434&amp;query=einstein+relativity" title="popsci.com">June, 1914, page 434</a> [popsci.com]<br>Quantum mechanics: <a href="http://www.popsci.com/archive-viewer?id=ficDAAAAMBAJ&amp;pg=22&amp;query=Schrodinger" title="popsci.com">February 1927, page 22</a> [popsci.com]<br>Atomic bomb: <a href="http://www.popsci.com/archive-viewer?id=MSEDAAAAMBAJ&amp;pg=80&amp;query=atomic+bomb" title="popsci.com">October 1945, page 80</a> [popsci.com]<br>Integrated circuits: <a href="http://www.popsci.com/archive-viewer?id=1SkDAAAAMBAJ&amp;pg=96&amp;query=integrated+circuit" title="popsci.com">September 1966, page 96</a> [popsci.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Relativity : June , 1914 , page 434 [ popsci.com ] Quantum mechanics : February 1927 , page 22 [ popsci.com ] Atomic bomb : October 1945 , page 80 [ popsci.com ] Integrated circuits : September 1966 , page 96 [ popsci.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Relativity: June, 1914, page 434 [popsci.com]Quantum mechanics: February 1927, page 22 [popsci.com]Atomic bomb: October 1945, page 80 [popsci.com]Integrated circuits: September 1966, page 96 [popsci.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31385410</id>
	<title>Re:Breakthroughs</title>
	<author>lawpoop</author>
	<datestamp>1267885680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The article on Relativity describes the ether as an 'imaginary medium' on page 2. I didn't know that the reality of ether was suspect at the time. My education in the history of science up until this point was misleading<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>The article on Relativity describes the ether as an 'imaginary medium ' on page 2 .
I did n't know that the reality of ether was suspect at the time .
My education in the history of science up until this point was misleading : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article on Relativity describes the ether as an 'imaginary medium' on page 2.
I didn't know that the reality of ether was suspect at the time.
My education in the history of science up until this point was misleading :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384330</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_1937255_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31385056
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384330
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_1937255_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383824
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_1937255_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383796
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_1937255_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31386324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384330
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_1937255_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31399912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31385122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_1937255_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31387068
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383796
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_1937255_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_1937255_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31387672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31385122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_1937255_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384330
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_1937255_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31419802
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_1937255_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384336
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383796
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_1937255_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31385716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384198
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383796
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_1937255_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383824
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_1937255_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31385410
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384330
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_1937255_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384056
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383824
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_1937255_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31390922
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_1937255_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384920
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383796
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_1937255_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383796
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_1937255_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383824
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_1937255_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31385606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383824
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_1937255_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31385182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384198
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383796
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_1937255_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31392714
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383796
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_1937255_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384134
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_1937255_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384366
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_1937255_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384814
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383842
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_1937255_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_1937255_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31394974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384330
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_1937255_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383824
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_1937255_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31388626
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383796
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_1937255_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31386326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384456
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383900
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_1937255_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31390052
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383796
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_1937255_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31387988
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384176
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_1937255_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31385398
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383824
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_1937255.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384330
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31394974
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384656
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31385410
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31386324
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31385056
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_1937255.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384668
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_1937255.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383900
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384456
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31386326
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_1937255.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384176
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31387988
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_1937255.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383796
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384742
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31390052
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31392714
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383868
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384992
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384336
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384198
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31385182
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31385716
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31387068
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31388626
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384920
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_1937255.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384068
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31419802
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_1937255.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384134
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384510
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_1937255.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384156
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_1937255.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383852
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31385122
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31387672
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31399912
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384114
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31390922
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384170
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_1937255.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384488
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_1937255.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31386050
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_1937255.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383824
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384042
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383912
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31385606
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384734
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384056
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31385398
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384660
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_1937255.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383842
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384814
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_1937255.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384756
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_1937255.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383894
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_1937255.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31383982
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_1937255.31384366
</commentlist>
</conversation>
