<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_05_1713237</id>
	<title>Asus Takes Another Stab at Revolutionizing Netbook Market</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1267817760000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Perhaps most well known for their netbook innovations with the Eee PC, Asus is at it again with their latest rollout at CeBIT Germany.  The "Waveface Light," a new concept laptop, can be used as a conventional laptop or <a href="http://www.silicon.com/technology/hardware/2010/03/05/photos-asus-latest-netbooks-e-readers-and-touchscreen-tech-at-cebit-39745556/">converted to a tablet</a> by removing the keyboard and opening it to a completely flat position.  Sounds like either a stroke of genius or a "small widget broke and now it's worthless" design issue.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps most well known for their netbook innovations with the Eee PC , Asus is at it again with their latest rollout at CeBIT Germany .
The " Waveface Light , " a new concept laptop , can be used as a conventional laptop or converted to a tablet by removing the keyboard and opening it to a completely flat position .
Sounds like either a stroke of genius or a " small widget broke and now it 's worthless " design issue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps most well known for their netbook innovations with the Eee PC, Asus is at it again with their latest rollout at CeBIT Germany.
The "Waveface Light," a new concept laptop, can be used as a conventional laptop or converted to a tablet by removing the keyboard and opening it to a completely flat position.
Sounds like either a stroke of genius or a "small widget broke and now it's worthless" design issue.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375840</id>
	<title>Re:Indeed.</title>
	<author>EchaniDrgn</author>
	<datestamp>1267784940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or you could get the software developers to design their software better?
<br> <br>
I play World of Warcraft on my Netbook all the time. Not too bad when you're running dailies that include mostly flights back and forth.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or you could get the software developers to design their software better ?
I play World of Warcraft on my Netbook all the time .
Not too bad when you 're running dailies that include mostly flights back and forth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or you could get the software developers to design their software better?
I play World of Warcraft on my Netbook all the time.
Not too bad when you're running dailies that include mostly flights back and forth.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375348</id>
	<title>Re:Indeed.</title>
	<author>rishistar</author>
	<datestamp>1267782300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Alienware do a nice looking netbook. That should be able to game!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Alienware do a nice looking netbook .
That should be able to game !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Alienware do a nice looking netbook.
That should be able to game!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374892</id>
	<title>Re:Always Innovating</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1267779960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Umm, did you look at the pictures of this new "tablet/netbook"?  Always Innovating has a nice-looking detachable screen, agreed, but the WaveFace is something... completely different.</p><p>The screen covers both the top and bottom halves of the clamshell, and it's one continuous flexible screen.  If you want to use it as a tablet, you lay it out flat then lift out the keyboard, resulting in a tablet that's more than double the size of Always Innovating's offering (which is, after all, just a netbook you can unplug the screen from).</p><p>The WaveFace, on the downside, looks like it'll be incredibly fragile, and there's not as much room for storage, battery, and, well, you know, useful bits.  But it is extraordinarily different.</p><p>Their other item is a flexible long-narrow screen that is like a stretched-out iPhone, but it can be wrapped around your wrist to use like a watch, or rolled out flat to use like an iPod Touch, or folded in half to use like a phone.  Again, looks fragile to the point of silly, but Asus certainly can't be accused of being boring.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Umm , did you look at the pictures of this new " tablet/netbook " ?
Always Innovating has a nice-looking detachable screen , agreed , but the WaveFace is something... completely different.The screen covers both the top and bottom halves of the clamshell , and it 's one continuous flexible screen .
If you want to use it as a tablet , you lay it out flat then lift out the keyboard , resulting in a tablet that 's more than double the size of Always Innovating 's offering ( which is , after all , just a netbook you can unplug the screen from ) .The WaveFace , on the downside , looks like it 'll be incredibly fragile , and there 's not as much room for storage , battery , and , well , you know , useful bits .
But it is extraordinarily different.Their other item is a flexible long-narrow screen that is like a stretched-out iPhone , but it can be wrapped around your wrist to use like a watch , or rolled out flat to use like an iPod Touch , or folded in half to use like a phone .
Again , looks fragile to the point of silly , but Asus certainly ca n't be accused of being boring .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Umm, did you look at the pictures of this new "tablet/netbook"?
Always Innovating has a nice-looking detachable screen, agreed, but the WaveFace is something... completely different.The screen covers both the top and bottom halves of the clamshell, and it's one continuous flexible screen.
If you want to use it as a tablet, you lay it out flat then lift out the keyboard, resulting in a tablet that's more than double the size of Always Innovating's offering (which is, after all, just a netbook you can unplug the screen from).The WaveFace, on the downside, looks like it'll be incredibly fragile, and there's not as much room for storage, battery, and, well, you know, useful bits.
But it is extraordinarily different.Their other item is a flexible long-narrow screen that is like a stretched-out iPhone, but it can be wrapped around your wrist to use like a watch, or rolled out flat to use like an iPod Touch, or folded in half to use like a phone.
Again, looks fragile to the point of silly, but Asus certainly can't be accused of being boring.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374868</id>
	<title>Re:Always Innovating</title>
	<author>b0bby</author>
	<datestamp>1267779840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, because the big difference is that the keyboard on this thing was sitting on top of the continuation of the screen, so when you remove it your screen real estate just doubled. Of course, it's a design concept anyway, and until affordable flexible displays are available it will remain so.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , because the big difference is that the keyboard on this thing was sitting on top of the continuation of the screen , so when you remove it your screen real estate just doubled .
Of course , it 's a design concept anyway , and until affordable flexible displays are available it will remain so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, because the big difference is that the keyboard on this thing was sitting on top of the continuation of the screen, so when you remove it your screen real estate just doubled.
Of course, it's a design concept anyway, and until affordable flexible displays are available it will remain so.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375936</id>
	<title>Re:Flexible</title>
	<author>Nemyst</author>
	<datestamp>1267785420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Unless they're utterly lying, you can see in one of the videos given by <a href="http://mobile.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1572842&amp;cid=31374972" title="slashdot.org">this poster</a> [slashdot.org] a wrist-attached smartphone that's both shown on the wrist and deployed flat. I'm unsure whether they have the actual technology figured out or if this is still at the concept stage, but it is most likely that at the very least they plan on having a flexible and somehow "lockable" smartphone available some time in the future (I say lockable because it should stay attached to your wrist once there, so it might be possible to control the flexibility of the device so it becomes rigid when wrapped on your wrist).<br>
<br>
I do know that OLED screens are flexible; with properly designed components it may be possible to create such a device.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless they 're utterly lying , you can see in one of the videos given by this poster [ slashdot.org ] a wrist-attached smartphone that 's both shown on the wrist and deployed flat .
I 'm unsure whether they have the actual technology figured out or if this is still at the concept stage , but it is most likely that at the very least they plan on having a flexible and somehow " lockable " smartphone available some time in the future ( I say lockable because it should stay attached to your wrist once there , so it might be possible to control the flexibility of the device so it becomes rigid when wrapped on your wrist ) .
I do know that OLED screens are flexible ; with properly designed components it may be possible to create such a device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless they're utterly lying, you can see in one of the videos given by this poster [slashdot.org] a wrist-attached smartphone that's both shown on the wrist and deployed flat.
I'm unsure whether they have the actual technology figured out or if this is still at the concept stage, but it is most likely that at the very least they plan on having a flexible and somehow "lockable" smartphone available some time in the future (I say lockable because it should stay attached to your wrist once there, so it might be possible to control the flexibility of the device so it becomes rigid when wrapped on your wrist).
I do know that OLED screens are flexible; with properly designed components it may be possible to create such a device.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375398</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31377206</id>
	<title>Re:!new</title>
	<author>tirerim</author>
	<datestamp>1267794300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The innovation is that in this case, the screen is twice the size, but half of it is covered by the keyboard when it's attached.  The screen itself is flexible -- you fold the entire thing in half, with no hinge.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The innovation is that in this case , the screen is twice the size , but half of it is covered by the keyboard when it 's attached .
The screen itself is flexible -- you fold the entire thing in half , with no hinge .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The innovation is that in this case, the screen is twice the size, but half of it is covered by the keyboard when it's attached.
The screen itself is flexible -- you fold the entire thing in half, with no hinge.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375064</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374848</id>
	<title>Re:Indeed.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267779720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Right now an engineer at Intel is slapping his forehead and saying, out loud, "Why didn't I think of that? We should have been trying to make faster chips that use less power all along!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Right now an engineer at Intel is slapping his forehead and saying , out loud , " Why did n't I think of that ?
We should have been trying to make faster chips that use less power all along !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right now an engineer at Intel is slapping his forehead and saying, out loud, "Why didn't I think of that?
We should have been trying to make faster chips that use less power all along!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374670</id>
	<title>Always Innovating</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267822140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So they've ripped off the <a href="http://alwaysinnovating.com/home/index.htm" title="alwaysinnovating.com" rel="nofollow">Always Innovating Tablet</a> [alwaysinnovating.com] and are calling it their idea?</p><p>And somehow I don't think the Always Innovating tablet was the first.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So they 've ripped off the Always Innovating Tablet [ alwaysinnovating.com ] and are calling it their idea ? And somehow I do n't think the Always Innovating tablet was the first .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So they've ripped off the Always Innovating Tablet [alwaysinnovating.com] and are calling it their idea?And somehow I don't think the Always Innovating tablet was the first.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31376102</id>
	<title>I'm more interested...</title>
	<author>Lisandro</author>
	<datestamp>1267786500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...on ASUSs<a href="http://crenk.com/asus-ebook-reader-official/" title="crenk.com">ebook reader</a> [crenk.com] featured on the same page. Looks great, and if it's offered at a reasonable price (like most ASUS offerings are) it could well ignite the ebook market just as the Eee Pc did with the netbook one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...on ASUSsebook reader [ crenk.com ] featured on the same page .
Looks great , and if it 's offered at a reasonable price ( like most ASUS offerings are ) it could well ignite the ebook market just as the Eee Pc did with the netbook one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...on ASUSsebook reader [crenk.com] featured on the same page.
Looks great, and if it's offered at a reasonable price (like most ASUS offerings are) it could well ignite the ebook market just as the Eee Pc did with the netbook one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375160</id>
	<title>Re:Indeed.</title>
	<author>RobertinXinyang</author>
	<datestamp>1267781280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think you are missing the point of netbooks. What you want would add to the quality of the internal parts (cost), would use more power (battery life), and would need a large screen (Size).</p><p>What I, and the netbook users I know, are looking for, and using, is something that will have the battery life to make it through several classes (battery life) and is reasonably cheap (cost), light, and doesn't take up much space on the desk (size). I think you would be better served by a regular, or power user oriented, computer or laptop.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you are missing the point of netbooks .
What you want would add to the quality of the internal parts ( cost ) , would use more power ( battery life ) , and would need a large screen ( Size ) .What I , and the netbook users I know , are looking for , and using , is something that will have the battery life to make it through several classes ( battery life ) and is reasonably cheap ( cost ) , light , and does n't take up much space on the desk ( size ) .
I think you would be better served by a regular , or power user oriented , computer or laptop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you are missing the point of netbooks.
What you want would add to the quality of the internal parts (cost), would use more power (battery life), and would need a large screen (Size).What I, and the netbook users I know, are looking for, and using, is something that will have the battery life to make it through several classes (battery life) and is reasonably cheap (cost), light, and doesn't take up much space on the desk (size).
I think you would be better served by a regular, or power user oriented, computer or laptop.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374760</id>
	<title>Re:Always Innovating</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267822440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except that Asus's doesn't look like a piece of shit?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except that Asus 's does n't look like a piece of shit ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except that Asus's doesn't look like a piece of shit?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375442</id>
	<title>Re:Concept?</title>
	<author>\_argonauta</author>
	<datestamp>1267782840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would assume that it being the CeBIT it is either a working prototype or a mock-up
<br> <br>
Image of the open laptop: <a href="http://bit.ly/bjURNV" title="bit.ly" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/bjURNV</a> [bit.ly]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would assume that it being the CeBIT it is either a working prototype or a mock-up Image of the open laptop : http : //bit.ly/bjURNV [ bit.ly ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would assume that it being the CeBIT it is either a working prototype or a mock-up
 
Image of the open laptop: http://bit.ly/bjURNV [bit.ly]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31380126</id>
	<title>Re:!new</title>
	<author>dotancohen</author>
	<datestamp>1267883640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thanks, I never heard of that device! I just tried to order one ($400 is reasonable for the model with keyboard) however they have \_every\_single\_ country on their list except Israel. They even have the Palestinian Territories listed, so logistics is not the issue. Too bad, I would have really liked one. I'm still lugging my 3 year old Dell Inspiron around, waiting for the perfect replacement...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks , I never heard of that device !
I just tried to order one ( $ 400 is reasonable for the model with keyboard ) however they have \ _every \ _single \ _ country on their list except Israel .
They even have the Palestinian Territories listed , so logistics is not the issue .
Too bad , I would have really liked one .
I 'm still lugging my 3 year old Dell Inspiron around , waiting for the perfect replacement.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks, I never heard of that device!
I just tried to order one ($400 is reasonable for the model with keyboard) however they have \_every\_single\_ country on their list except Israel.
They even have the Palestinian Territories listed, so logistics is not the issue.
Too bad, I would have really liked one.
I'm still lugging my 3 year old Dell Inspiron around, waiting for the perfect replacement...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375064</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375060</id>
	<title>What is the Price Point?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267780800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My question is what is the price point for this machine?</htmltext>
<tokenext>My question is what is the price point for this machine ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My question is what is the price point for this machine?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374968</id>
	<title>Innovating doesnt mean what we think it does</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267780380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I saw this with the Lenovo U1 and thought this was the only way I would buy a tablet.<br>I also saw on Liliputing aroudnd the same time, an asian sub 200$ version, block and ugly but definitely the same tablet/netbook combo.</p><p>So 'new concept', 'innnovating' is basically Slashdottese for "our editors dont bother to do research".</p><p>Nice to know that things never change around here.</p><p>BTW, 'Shown above is the Waveface Light, a concept laptop design'  means its a concept or vapourware.</p><p>The U1 is out this spring.</p><p>Light is this years new 'open' it seems<br>Skylight is the U1 and Waveface Light is the ASUS one.</p><p>Dont get me wrong, a convertible tablet slash netbook (or laptop like the U1) is the way to go but innovative?<br>No.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I saw this with the Lenovo U1 and thought this was the only way I would buy a tablet.I also saw on Liliputing aroudnd the same time , an asian sub 200 $ version , block and ugly but definitely the same tablet/netbook combo.So 'new concept ' , 'innnovating ' is basically Slashdottese for " our editors dont bother to do research " .Nice to know that things never change around here.BTW , 'Shown above is the Waveface Light , a concept laptop design ' means its a concept or vapourware.The U1 is out this spring.Light is this years new 'open ' it seemsSkylight is the U1 and Waveface Light is the ASUS one.Dont get me wrong , a convertible tablet slash netbook ( or laptop like the U1 ) is the way to go but innovative ? No .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I saw this with the Lenovo U1 and thought this was the only way I would buy a tablet.I also saw on Liliputing aroudnd the same time, an asian sub 200$ version, block and ugly but definitely the same tablet/netbook combo.So 'new concept', 'innnovating' is basically Slashdottese for "our editors dont bother to do research".Nice to know that things never change around here.BTW, 'Shown above is the Waveface Light, a concept laptop design'  means its a concept or vapourware.The U1 is out this spring.Light is this years new 'open' it seemsSkylight is the U1 and Waveface Light is the ASUS one.Dont get me wrong, a convertible tablet slash netbook (or laptop like the U1) is the way to go but innovative?No.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375380</id>
	<title>Re:Always Innovating</title>
	<author>Idbar</author>
	<datestamp>1267782420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would gladly clarify this for you, but the link provided in TFA, is a big mess, and I have no clue what belongs to what. There are some interesting concepts on the pictures though. But really, I didn't understand, they even have some pictures of their tablet T91 I think.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would gladly clarify this for you , but the link provided in TFA , is a big mess , and I have no clue what belongs to what .
There are some interesting concepts on the pictures though .
But really , I did n't understand , they even have some pictures of their tablet T91 I think .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would gladly clarify this for you, but the link provided in TFA, is a big mess, and I have no clue what belongs to what.
There are some interesting concepts on the pictures though.
But really, I didn't understand, they even have some pictures of their tablet T91 I think.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31379098</id>
	<title>Re:A step in the right direction, but...</title>
	<author>itsme1234</author>
	<datestamp>1267815720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We already had it:<br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HP\_Compaq\_TC1100" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HP\_Compaq\_TC1100</a> [wikipedia.org]<br>Keep in mind we're talking about 5+ years ago - people are still using them. With bluetooth&amp;wifi&amp;Pentium-M&amp;1024x768 it was a decent netbook well before first official netbook. However there WAS something wrong with it: probably the price was around (above?) $2000.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We already had it : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HP \ _Compaq \ _TC1100 [ wikipedia.org ] Keep in mind we 're talking about 5 + years ago - people are still using them .
With bluetooth&amp;wifi&amp;Pentium-M&amp;1024x768 it was a decent netbook well before first official netbook .
However there WAS something wrong with it : probably the price was around ( above ?
) $ 2000 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We already had it:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HP\_Compaq\_TC1100 [wikipedia.org]Keep in mind we're talking about 5+ years ago - people are still using them.
With bluetooth&amp;wifi&amp;Pentium-M&amp;1024x768 it was a decent netbook well before first official netbook.
However there WAS something wrong with it: probably the price was around (above?
) $2000.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375032</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31378872</id>
	<title>Netbook = Buzzword</title>
	<author>Oceanplexian</author>
	<datestamp>1267812060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&lt;quote&gt;Anything sufficiently different to be radical (in either a good or bad way) won't be considered a netbook.&lt;/quote&gt;<br><br>I think everyone misses the point of a netbook (or the original purpose before it became mainstream). A netbook is supposed to be inexpensive, power efficient and portable.<br><br>You can't make an expensive netbook with a lot of features and a bigger screen, it just becomes another laptop.</div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anything sufficiently different to be radical ( in either a good or bad way ) wo n't be considered a netbook.I think everyone misses the point of a netbook ( or the original purpose before it became mainstream ) .
A netbook is supposed to be inexpensive , power efficient and portable.You ca n't make an expensive netbook with a lot of features and a bigger screen , it just becomes another laptop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anything sufficiently different to be radical (in either a good or bad way) won't be considered a netbook.I think everyone misses the point of a netbook (or the original purpose before it became mainstream).
A netbook is supposed to be inexpensive, power efficient and portable.You can't make an expensive netbook with a lot of features and a bigger screen, it just becomes another laptop.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374610</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375238</id>
	<title>Re:Always Innovating</title>
	<author>TheKidWho</author>
	<datestamp>1267781640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't think your looking hard enough, it's quite a bit different then that "always innovating" tablet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think your looking hard enough , it 's quite a bit different then that " always innovating " tablet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think your looking hard enough, it's quite a bit different then that "always innovating" tablet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375100</id>
	<title>Concept?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267780920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does "concept" laptop mean one that doesn't exist, or is there more to it than that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does " concept " laptop mean one that does n't exist , or is there more to it than that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does "concept" laptop mean one that doesn't exist, or is there more to it than that?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375032</id>
	<title>A step in the right direction, but...</title>
	<author>Whuffo</author>
	<datestamp>1267780680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm waiting for the "convertible" laptop / netbook that has the electronics package behind the screen and all that's in the keyboard part is the keyboard and maybe an optical drive or two. With the two pieces together it'd be just like what we have now - or you could detach the screen and use it as a fully featured tablet. Best of both worlds - but there's some engineering to do before this can become a real product.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm waiting for the " convertible " laptop / netbook that has the electronics package behind the screen and all that 's in the keyboard part is the keyboard and maybe an optical drive or two .
With the two pieces together it 'd be just like what we have now - or you could detach the screen and use it as a fully featured tablet .
Best of both worlds - but there 's some engineering to do before this can become a real product .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm waiting for the "convertible" laptop / netbook that has the electronics package behind the screen and all that's in the keyboard part is the keyboard and maybe an optical drive or two.
With the two pieces together it'd be just like what we have now - or you could detach the screen and use it as a fully featured tablet.
Best of both worlds - but there's some engineering to do before this can become a real product.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31377146</id>
	<title>Re:It is flexible. Bendable to be precise.</title>
	<author>CopaceticOpus</author>
	<datestamp>1267793760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bendable screens will be excellent if they come to market, because they will allow for a trifold display. It wouldn't actually fold on the ends, but it would make two tight bends. This will finally give a screen that is very portable but not tiny.</p><p>The other possibility is a roll-out display.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bendable screens will be excellent if they come to market , because they will allow for a trifold display .
It would n't actually fold on the ends , but it would make two tight bends .
This will finally give a screen that is very portable but not tiny.The other possibility is a roll-out display .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bendable screens will be excellent if they come to market, because they will allow for a trifold display.
It wouldn't actually fold on the ends, but it would make two tight bends.
This will finally give a screen that is very portable but not tiny.The other possibility is a roll-out display.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31376054</id>
	<title>Re:Indeed.</title>
	<author>lowrydr310</author>
	<datestamp>1267786260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A good NES/Genesis/SNES emulator and a gamepad is all you need. Heck, even with a small SSD you could still store every ROM ever made for all of those systems! <p>
Were any good games ever made beyond those systems?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A good NES/Genesis/SNES emulator and a gamepad is all you need .
Heck , even with a small SSD you could still store every ROM ever made for all of those systems !
Were any good games ever made beyond those systems ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A good NES/Genesis/SNES emulator and a gamepad is all you need.
Heck, even with a small SSD you could still store every ROM ever made for all of those systems!
Were any good games ever made beyond those systems?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374854</id>
	<title>Operating system</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267779780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think what would revolutionize the netbook the most is a better OS. Nothing too bulky like Windows, too simple like Xandros or too complicated for entry users like Eebuntu.

A clean and useful Linux operating system that comes pre-installed would be revolutionary for netbooks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think what would revolutionize the netbook the most is a better OS .
Nothing too bulky like Windows , too simple like Xandros or too complicated for entry users like Eebuntu .
A clean and useful Linux operating system that comes pre-installed would be revolutionary for netbooks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think what would revolutionize the netbook the most is a better OS.
Nothing too bulky like Windows, too simple like Xandros or too complicated for entry users like Eebuntu.
A clean and useful Linux operating system that comes pre-installed would be revolutionary for netbooks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31377588</id>
	<title>Quality Control</title>
	<author>Garrett Fox</author>
	<datestamp>1267798680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Before rolling out revolutionary new products, Asus should work on its product quality and service. I'm writing this on the replacement eeePC they sent me after around five months and four service trips for the lemon they sold me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Before rolling out revolutionary new products , Asus should work on its product quality and service .
I 'm writing this on the replacement eeePC they sent me after around five months and four service trips for the lemon they sold me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Before rolling out revolutionary new products, Asus should work on its product quality and service.
I'm writing this on the replacement eeePC they sent me after around five months and four service trips for the lemon they sold me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374994</id>
	<title>Re:Indeed.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267780500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, you don't actually want a netbook (a cheap, low powered laptop for <i>surfing the web</i>), you just want a regular small laptop? <b>Buy a regular small laptop then.</b></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , you do n't actually want a netbook ( a cheap , low powered laptop for surfing the web ) , you just want a regular small laptop ?
Buy a regular small laptop then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, you don't actually want a netbook (a cheap, low powered laptop for surfing the web), you just want a regular small laptop?
Buy a regular small laptop then.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31376308</id>
	<title>Re:Just remove the pc!</title>
	<author>martas</author>
	<datestamp>1267787820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>lol, trust me, if it could be rolled up like that, you'd already seen geeks partying in the streets by now... that tech is still several years away, though i am looking forward to having a "tablet" that looks like a floppy sheet of [clear] plastic with some ding-dong at the end that'll do the computing and all. i think it'll happen within the next 10-15 years.</htmltext>
<tokenext>lol , trust me , if it could be rolled up like that , you 'd already seen geeks partying in the streets by now... that tech is still several years away , though i am looking forward to having a " tablet " that looks like a floppy sheet of [ clear ] plastic with some ding-dong at the end that 'll do the computing and all .
i think it 'll happen within the next 10-15 years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>lol, trust me, if it could be rolled up like that, you'd already seen geeks partying in the streets by now... that tech is still several years away, though i am looking forward to having a "tablet" that looks like a floppy sheet of [clear] plastic with some ding-dong at the end that'll do the computing and all.
i think it'll happen within the next 10-15 years.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374610</id>
	<title>You can't really revolutionise the netbook market</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267821780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Anything sufficiently different to be radical (in either a good or bad way) won't be considered a netbook.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anything sufficiently different to be radical ( in either a good or bad way ) wo n't be considered a netbook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anything sufficiently different to be radical (in either a good or bad way) won't be considered a netbook.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375548</id>
	<title>Re:Operating system</title>
	<author>element-o.p.</author>
	<datestamp>1267783380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>BlackBox is really lightweight.  It's what I run on my dinosaur 700MHz Celeron desktop at home (yeah, I pretty much always use a laptop or netbook any more).  OTOH, I wouldn't give it to someone who's never used Linux before.</htmltext>
<tokenext>BlackBox is really lightweight .
It 's what I run on my dinosaur 700MHz Celeron desktop at home ( yeah , I pretty much always use a laptop or netbook any more ) .
OTOH , I would n't give it to someone who 's never used Linux before .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>BlackBox is really lightweight.
It's what I run on my dinosaur 700MHz Celeron desktop at home (yeah, I pretty much always use a laptop or netbook any more).
OTOH, I wouldn't give it to someone who's never used Linux before.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31377022</id>
	<title>Re:Indeed.</title>
	<author>Ungrounded Lightning</author>
	<datestamp>1267792680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought early thinkpads did this, too.  Not just to be a flat display surface, but so they could have the light source removed and sit as a "foil" on an overhead projector - in the days before video projectors were common in conference rooms.</p><p>Don't recall if this was before or after powerpoint.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought early thinkpads did this , too .
Not just to be a flat display surface , but so they could have the light source removed and sit as a " foil " on an overhead projector - in the days before video projectors were common in conference rooms.Do n't recall if this was before or after powerpoint .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought early thinkpads did this, too.
Not just to be a flat display surface, but so they could have the light source removed and sit as a "foil" on an overhead projector - in the days before video projectors were common in conference rooms.Don't recall if this was before or after powerpoint.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375964</id>
	<title>Re:You can't really revolutionise the netbook mark</title>
	<author>rrohbeck</author>
	<datestamp>1267785540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Right now I read and browse mostly on an eeePC 1005. If they made a slim, really low power netbook with an e-Ink display on the outside of the lid I'd buy one right away.<br>Keep it closed and you have an e-Ink based reader. Open it and you have a full fledged netbook.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Right now I read and browse mostly on an eeePC 1005 .
If they made a slim , really low power netbook with an e-Ink display on the outside of the lid I 'd buy one right away.Keep it closed and you have an e-Ink based reader .
Open it and you have a full fledged netbook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right now I read and browse mostly on an eeePC 1005.
If they made a slim, really low power netbook with an e-Ink display on the outside of the lid I'd buy one right away.Keep it closed and you have an e-Ink based reader.
Open it and you have a full fledged netbook.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374610</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374940</id>
	<title>Re:Operating system</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267780200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Nothing too bulky like Windows, too simple like Xandros or too complicated for entry users like Eebuntu.</p></div></blockquote><p>Windows XP is lightweight compared to a modern Gnome or KDE system.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nothing too bulky like Windows , too simple like Xandros or too complicated for entry users like Eebuntu.Windows XP is lightweight compared to a modern Gnome or KDE system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nothing too bulky like Windows, too simple like Xandros or too complicated for entry users like Eebuntu.Windows XP is lightweight compared to a modern Gnome or KDE system.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375470</id>
	<title>concept</title>
	<author>pbjones</author>
	<datestamp>1267783020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>don't you hate the phrase 'design concept', almost as much as people who believe that they will look like the production version, if they ever get to production.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>do n't you hate the phrase 'design concept ' , almost as much as people who believe that they will look like the production version , if they ever get to production .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>don't you hate the phrase 'design concept', almost as much as people who believe that they will look like the production version, if they ever get to production.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31376600</id>
	<title>Re:Indeed.</title>
	<author>MaskedSlacker</author>
	<datestamp>1267789560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Go away, and stop ruining products I actually want with irrelevant bullshit I don't need and refuse to pay for.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Go away , and stop ruining products I actually want with irrelevant bullshit I do n't need and refuse to pay for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go away, and stop ruining products I actually want with irrelevant bullshit I don't need and refuse to pay for.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374882</id>
	<title>Re:Operating system</title>
	<author>Pojut</author>
	<datestamp>1267779900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a shame that, even after being stripped down with vLite, Windows 7 is still so huge.  It runs REALLY REALLY smoothly on netbooks (even lower powered ones), but the amount of storage space it commands is just too much.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a shame that , even after being stripped down with vLite , Windows 7 is still so huge .
It runs REALLY REALLY smoothly on netbooks ( even lower powered ones ) , but the amount of storage space it commands is just too much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a shame that, even after being stripped down with vLite, Windows 7 is still so huge.
It runs REALLY REALLY smoothly on netbooks (even lower powered ones), but the amount of storage space it commands is just too much.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374632</id>
	<title>Just remove the pc!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267821900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The "Waveface Light," a new concept laptop can be used as a conventional laptop or converted to a tablet by removing the pc and opening it to a completely flat position.</p><p>run that by me again</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The " Waveface Light , " a new concept laptop can be used as a conventional laptop or converted to a tablet by removing the pc and opening it to a completely flat position.run that by me again</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The "Waveface Light," a new concept laptop can be used as a conventional laptop or converted to a tablet by removing the pc and opening it to a completely flat position.run that by me again</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375552</id>
	<title>Re:Always Innovating</title>
	<author>Nukenin</author>
	<datestamp>1267783380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So they've ripped off the <a href="http://alwaysinnovating.com/home/index.htm" title="alwaysinnovating.com" rel="nofollow">Always Innovating Tablet</a> [alwaysinnovating.com] and are calling it their idea?</p></div><p>No.  Read the article or just look at the pretty pictures.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So they 've ripped off the Always Innovating Tablet [ alwaysinnovating.com ] and are calling it their idea ? No .
Read the article or just look at the pretty pictures .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So they've ripped off the Always Innovating Tablet [alwaysinnovating.com] and are calling it their idea?No.
Read the article or just look at the pretty pictures.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375734</id>
	<title>Re:Operating system</title>
	<author>Enderandrew</author>
	<datestamp>1267784460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Windows XP with no apps is a little lightweight compared to KDE bundled with countless KDE apps in total disc space.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Windows XP with no apps is a little lightweight compared to KDE bundled with countless KDE apps in total disc space .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Windows XP with no apps is a little lightweight compared to KDE bundled with countless KDE apps in total disc space.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375742</id>
	<title>Not impressed by this but</title>
	<author>EnsilZah</author>
	<datestamp>1267784520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I really don't see the point of detachable screen, detachable keyboard thing.<br>The swivel lid tablet laptops seem to work fine if you just want the screen and If weight is the issue I wouldn't want to leave the keyboard at home and then regret it later.</p><p>What did impress me was the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-AAas61WyGA" title="youtube.com">DR-900 reader</a> [youtube.com].<br>I've been waiting for a paperback replacement for a while and this seems like it for me.<br>The specs I found are 10,000 pages turns, 1024 x 768 resolution, 4GB internal storage plus an SD slot,PDF/TXT/ePUB/HTML.<br>Now if they can only sell it for $200 or less.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I really do n't see the point of detachable screen , detachable keyboard thing.The swivel lid tablet laptops seem to work fine if you just want the screen and If weight is the issue I would n't want to leave the keyboard at home and then regret it later.What did impress me was the DR-900 reader [ youtube.com ] .I 've been waiting for a paperback replacement for a while and this seems like it for me.The specs I found are 10,000 pages turns , 1024 x 768 resolution , 4GB internal storage plus an SD slot,PDF/TXT/ePUB/HTML.Now if they can only sell it for $ 200 or less .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really don't see the point of detachable screen, detachable keyboard thing.The swivel lid tablet laptops seem to work fine if you just want the screen and If weight is the issue I wouldn't want to leave the keyboard at home and then regret it later.What did impress me was the DR-900 reader [youtube.com].I've been waiting for a paperback replacement for a while and this seems like it for me.The specs I found are 10,000 pages turns, 1024 x 768 resolution, 4GB internal storage plus an SD slot,PDF/TXT/ePUB/HTML.Now if they can only sell it for $200 or less.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374972</id>
	<title>It is flexible. Bendable to be precise.</title>
	<author>denzacar</author>
	<datestamp>1267780380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>See the videos below:</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTmzBsx6p\_I" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTmzBsx6p\_I</a> [youtube.com]</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ceHb98Ri4BE" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ceHb98Ri4BE</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>See the videos below : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = oTmzBsx6p \ _I [ youtube.com ] http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = ceHb98Ri4BE [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>See the videos below:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTmzBsx6p\_I [youtube.com]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ceHb98Ri4BE [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374632</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375304</id>
	<title>Re:Always Innovating</title>
	<author>Mr. DOS</author>
	<datestamp>1267782060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>AFAIK, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compaq\_TC1000" title="wikipedia.org">Compaq TC1000</a> [wikipedia.org] (followed by the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HP\_Compaq\_TC1100" title="wikipedia.org">HP Compaq TC1100</a> [wikipedia.org]) was the first.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>AFAIK , the Compaq TC1000 [ wikipedia.org ] ( followed by the HP Compaq TC1100 [ wikipedia.org ] ) was the first .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>AFAIK, the Compaq TC1000 [wikipedia.org] (followed by the HP Compaq TC1100 [wikipedia.org]) was the first.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31377020</id>
	<title>!!new</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267792680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>are you too lazy to even look at the pictures? The Asus device is nothing like the alwaysinnovating touchbook.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>are you too lazy to even look at the pictures ?
The Asus device is nothing like the alwaysinnovating touchbook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>are you too lazy to even look at the pictures?
The Asus device is nothing like the alwaysinnovating touchbook.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375064</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375240</id>
	<title>Re:Operating system</title>
	<author>mrclisdue</author>
	<datestamp>1267781700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I believe this has been attempted many times in the past, but when the users fire up their netbooks a few times only to find that everything still *just works*, and that there's no malware, there are no viruses, no unpatched or delay-patched exploits, they freak and ask for their *windows* back.</p><p>Being users finally "in control" of their systems only speeds up their return to lemminghood.</p><p>The revolution happened long ago - it's the self-professed Windows experts who've become immovable.</p><p>cheers,</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe this has been attempted many times in the past , but when the users fire up their netbooks a few times only to find that everything still * just works * , and that there 's no malware , there are no viruses , no unpatched or delay-patched exploits , they freak and ask for their * windows * back.Being users finally " in control " of their systems only speeds up their return to lemminghood.The revolution happened long ago - it 's the self-professed Windows experts who 've become immovable.cheers,</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe this has been attempted many times in the past, but when the users fire up their netbooks a few times only to find that everything still *just works*, and that there's no malware, there are no viruses, no unpatched or delay-patched exploits, they freak and ask for their *windows* back.Being users finally "in control" of their systems only speeds up their return to lemminghood.The revolution happened long ago - it's the self-professed Windows experts who've become immovable.cheers,</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375086</id>
	<title>eComStation...</title>
	<author>lwriemen</author>
	<datestamp>1267780860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...if they'd ever release v2.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...if they 'd ever release v2 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...if they'd ever release v2.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374884</id>
	<title>OLPC in Uruguay</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267779960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.ceibal.edu.uy/" title="ceibal.edu.uy" rel="nofollow">They</a> [ceibal.edu.uy] already use a tablet-laptop (<a href="http://www.stealthcomputer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/olpc-5.jpg" title="stealthcomputer.com" rel="nofollow">image</a> [stealthcomputer.com]) and every child in every school has one.<br>

Yeah, old news, is so exciting.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They [ ceibal.edu.uy ] already use a tablet-laptop ( image [ stealthcomputer.com ] ) and every child in every school has one .
Yeah , old news , is so exciting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They [ceibal.edu.uy] already use a tablet-laptop (image [stealthcomputer.com]) and every child in every school has one.
Yeah, old news, is so exciting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374626</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31376620</id>
	<title>hogu</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267789620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://alwaysinnovating.com/home/index.htm</p><p>is it different than this?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //alwaysinnovating.com/home/index.htmis it different than this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://alwaysinnovating.com/home/index.htmis it different than this?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375976</id>
	<title>This is it!</title>
	<author>tthomas48</author>
	<datestamp>1267785600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Too cool. I think this might be the kitchen computer I've been waiting for! If I could prop it up in lots of different configurations based on where I need to use it (hang it on the wall over the oven, make a ^ and prop it up next to my cooking, lay it flat on the counter).</p><p>Then if I could roll it up and take it into the living room as universal remote...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Too cool .
I think this might be the kitchen computer I 've been waiting for !
If I could prop it up in lots of different configurations based on where I need to use it ( hang it on the wall over the oven , make a ^ and prop it up next to my cooking , lay it flat on the counter ) .Then if I could roll it up and take it into the living room as universal remote.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Too cool.
I think this might be the kitchen computer I've been waiting for!
If I could prop it up in lots of different configurations based on where I need to use it (hang it on the wall over the oven, make a ^ and prop it up next to my cooking, lay it flat on the counter).Then if I could roll it up and take it into the living room as universal remote...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375352</id>
	<title>Design priming function</title>
	<author>vikingpower</author>
	<datestamp>1267782300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Any time a hardware maker let design come before function, wonderful things came out, that wrote history. Computers: look at Apple. Cars: look at Saab. Aircraft: look at the Concorde. Go Asus go !</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Any time a hardware maker let design come before function , wonderful things came out , that wrote history .
Computers : look at Apple .
Cars : look at Saab .
Aircraft : look at the Concorde .
Go Asus go !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any time a hardware maker let design come before function, wonderful things came out, that wrote history.
Computers: look at Apple.
Cars: look at Saab.
Aircraft: look at the Concorde.
Go Asus go !</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375398</id>
	<title>Flexible</title>
	<author>wonkavader</author>
	<datestamp>1267782540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OK, a couple of things in the article and the youtube videos referenced in comments above imply (or directly state) that at least one of these objects has a flexible screen.</p><p>Anybody seen anything flex here?  In the video it's all static and under glass so that people can't touch it, and the photos are completely static of course.</p><p>Are they touting a new tech or did I miss a big announcement of commonly available flexible displays?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK , a couple of things in the article and the youtube videos referenced in comments above imply ( or directly state ) that at least one of these objects has a flexible screen.Anybody seen anything flex here ?
In the video it 's all static and under glass so that people ca n't touch it , and the photos are completely static of course.Are they touting a new tech or did I miss a big announcement of commonly available flexible displays ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK, a couple of things in the article and the youtube videos referenced in comments above imply (or directly state) that at least one of these objects has a flexible screen.Anybody seen anything flex here?
In the video it's all static and under glass so that people can't touch it, and the photos are completely static of course.Are they touting a new tech or did I miss a big announcement of commonly available flexible displays?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375788</id>
	<title>Re:Indeed.</title>
	<author>Dare nMc</author>
	<datestamp>1267784700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For me, the ideal device would be about a 17" light weight touch screen tablet PC, that can stand alone as a netbook; but then become more a dumb display/hard disk at my desk.  That way you could have a nice useable display you carry around that functions, but have a fast Processor/keyboard/memory you slap on, and plug it in to game with.</p><p>Basically a dedicated GB Ethernet port connecting my "desktop Processor" to this device.<br>I don't game, but I go out and gather data from a bunch of machines, quickly look that the data is real, maybe tweak a few things if needed, then go back to my desk and crunch data for 2 hours (because my laptop is somewhat slow) But not worth the hassle of transferring Gigs of data to a PC for this.  Also all these apps are expensive licenses, so I must have them available to travel, but want them on a faster CPU to crunch.</p><p>Similar, I lug my Laptop home every night to provide emergency tech support, and VPN for off hours meetings, lug it in to meeting rooms to take notes...  I need all my data from daily use, but a 1 Ghz atom would provide the functioning I need when away from the desk, but a 2.2Ghz core Duo doesn't cut it at my desk.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For me , the ideal device would be about a 17 " light weight touch screen tablet PC , that can stand alone as a netbook ; but then become more a dumb display/hard disk at my desk .
That way you could have a nice useable display you carry around that functions , but have a fast Processor/keyboard/memory you slap on , and plug it in to game with.Basically a dedicated GB Ethernet port connecting my " desktop Processor " to this device.I do n't game , but I go out and gather data from a bunch of machines , quickly look that the data is real , maybe tweak a few things if needed , then go back to my desk and crunch data for 2 hours ( because my laptop is somewhat slow ) But not worth the hassle of transferring Gigs of data to a PC for this .
Also all these apps are expensive licenses , so I must have them available to travel , but want them on a faster CPU to crunch.Similar , I lug my Laptop home every night to provide emergency tech support , and VPN for off hours meetings , lug it in to meeting rooms to take notes... I need all my data from daily use , but a 1 Ghz atom would provide the functioning I need when away from the desk , but a 2.2Ghz core Duo does n't cut it at my desk .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For me, the ideal device would be about a 17" light weight touch screen tablet PC, that can stand alone as a netbook; but then become more a dumb display/hard disk at my desk.
That way you could have a nice useable display you carry around that functions, but have a fast Processor/keyboard/memory you slap on, and plug it in to game with.Basically a dedicated GB Ethernet port connecting my "desktop Processor" to this device.I don't game, but I go out and gather data from a bunch of machines, quickly look that the data is real, maybe tweak a few things if needed, then go back to my desk and crunch data for 2 hours (because my laptop is somewhat slow) But not worth the hassle of transferring Gigs of data to a PC for this.
Also all these apps are expensive licenses, so I must have them available to travel, but want them on a faster CPU to crunch.Similar, I lug my Laptop home every night to provide emergency tech support, and VPN for off hours meetings, lug it in to meeting rooms to take notes...  I need all my data from daily use, but a 1 Ghz atom would provide the functioning I need when away from the desk, but a 2.2Ghz core Duo doesn't cut it at my desk.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31378824</id>
	<title>Re:Indeed.</title>
	<author>DirtyCanuck</author>
	<datestamp>1267811580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just read your article.</p><p>I can't believe you would overlook something as blatant and currently on sale as the MX11 ( <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBrCWdxVNPQ" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBrCWdxVNPQ</a> [youtube.com] )</p><p>And yes, it plays Crysis.</p><p>Alienware&rsquo;s MX11 is a gaming laptop squeezed into a 11inch netbook chassis.<br>
&nbsp; Core 2 Duo processor<br>
&nbsp; 1GB Nvidia 335M graphics card<br>
&nbsp; 6 1/2 hours of battery life (battery mode)<br>
&nbsp; 1366 x 768 pixel display<br>
&nbsp; 2 hours of gaming mode<br>
&nbsp; Gaming mode can be toggled on/off, switch from gaming mode to casual mode without restarting<br>
&nbsp; Video out via DisplayPort, HDMI, and VGA, SIM slot<br>
&nbsp; 3D mark scores in 6-7k range<br>
&nbsp; 50FPS Crysis, 30FPS Call of Duty on High Settings</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just read your article.I ca n't believe you would overlook something as blatant and currently on sale as the MX11 ( http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = OBrCWdxVNPQ [ youtube.com ] ) And yes , it plays Crysis.Alienware    s MX11 is a gaming laptop squeezed into a 11inch netbook chassis .
  Core 2 Duo processor   1GB Nvidia 335M graphics card   6 1/2 hours of battery life ( battery mode )   1366 x 768 pixel display   2 hours of gaming mode   Gaming mode can be toggled on/off , switch from gaming mode to casual mode without restarting   Video out via DisplayPort , HDMI , and VGA , SIM slot   3D mark scores in 6-7k range   50FPS Crysis , 30FPS Call of Duty on High Settings</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just read your article.I can't believe you would overlook something as blatant and currently on sale as the MX11 ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBrCWdxVNPQ [youtube.com] )And yes, it plays Crysis.Alienware’s MX11 is a gaming laptop squeezed into a 11inch netbook chassis.
  Core 2 Duo processor
  1GB Nvidia 335M graphics card
  6 1/2 hours of battery life (battery mode)
  1366 x 768 pixel display
  2 hours of gaming mode
  Gaming mode can be toggled on/off, switch from gaming mode to casual mode without restarting
  Video out via DisplayPort, HDMI, and VGA, SIM slot
  3D mark scores in 6-7k range
  50FPS Crysis, 30FPS Call of Duty on High Settings</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375064</id>
	<title>!new</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267780800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it's an innovative "new" concept, that has been shipping for several months, in the form of the <a href="http://alwaysinnovating.com/" title="alwaysinnovating.com">http://alwaysinnovating.com/</a> [alwaysinnovating.com] touchbook</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's an innovative " new " concept , that has been shipping for several months , in the form of the http : //alwaysinnovating.com/ [ alwaysinnovating.com ] touchbook</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's an innovative "new" concept, that has been shipping for several months, in the form of the http://alwaysinnovating.com/ [alwaysinnovating.com] touchbook</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31380130</id>
	<title>Re:Always Innovating</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267883820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thanks, I never heard of that device! I just tried to order one ($400 is reasonable for the model with keyboard) however they have \_every\_single\_ country on their list except Israel. They even have the Palestinian Territories listed, so logistics is not the issue. Too bad, I would have really liked one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks , I never heard of that device !
I just tried to order one ( $ 400 is reasonable for the model with keyboard ) however they have \ _every \ _single \ _ country on their list except Israel .
They even have the Palestinian Territories listed , so logistics is not the issue .
Too bad , I would have really liked one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks, I never heard of that device!
I just tried to order one ($400 is reasonable for the model with keyboard) however they have \_every\_single\_ country on their list except Israel.
They even have the Palestinian Territories listed, so logistics is not the issue.
Too bad, I would have really liked one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374734</id>
	<title>Re:Just remove the pc!</title>
	<author>Haxamanish</author>
	<datestamp>1267822380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>TFA reads: remove the keyboard.
<br>
From the pictures it even seems the screen can be rolled up when the keyboard has been removed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>TFA reads : remove the keyboard .
From the pictures it even seems the screen can be rolled up when the keyboard has been removed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TFA reads: remove the keyboard.
From the pictures it even seems the screen can be rolled up when the keyboard has been removed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374632</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374894</id>
	<title>Full Size</title>
	<author>Entropy98</author>
	<datestamp>1267779960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think they'd sell a lot more if they made these full size.</p><p>Theres no reason you can't put an atom chip in a laptop with a 14 inch screen and a real keyboard.</p><p>I suspect the only reason this isn't happening is because Intel would be cannibalizing their "real" laptop sales.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think they 'd sell a lot more if they made these full size.Theres no reason you ca n't put an atom chip in a laptop with a 14 inch screen and a real keyboard.I suspect the only reason this is n't happening is because Intel would be cannibalizing their " real " laptop sales .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think they'd sell a lot more if they made these full size.Theres no reason you can't put an atom chip in a laptop with a 14 inch screen and a real keyboard.I suspect the only reason this isn't happening is because Intel would be cannibalizing their "real" laptop sales.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375302</id>
	<title>Re:Always Innovating</title>
	<author>Nemyst</author>
	<datestamp>1267782060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh give me a break. That looks like a ThinkPad from 1995. That Waveface project has a detachable keyboard that covers a flexible touchscreen panel. You can roll it up if you want! From the tech demos, it also seems much larger than 8.9".</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh give me a break .
That looks like a ThinkPad from 1995 .
That Waveface project has a detachable keyboard that covers a flexible touchscreen panel .
You can roll it up if you want !
From the tech demos , it also seems much larger than 8.9 " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh give me a break.
That looks like a ThinkPad from 1995.
That Waveface project has a detachable keyboard that covers a flexible touchscreen panel.
You can roll it up if you want!
From the tech demos, it also seems much larger than 8.9".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31377064</id>
	<title>Re:Indeed.</title>
	<author>LordVader717</author>
	<datestamp>1267793040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't draw conclusions from buzzword names. If 'netbooks' were solely about surfing the web, they wouldn't be sold with XP and be using X86 processors and have large amounts of memory. Netbooks are Laptops which can do 99\% of what people want to do, just without being huge.</p><p>Personally, I think anything bigger than 10 inches is clumsy to be carrying around all day. I can get everything I need to get done on a 9'' netbook.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't draw conclusions from buzzword names .
If 'netbooks ' were solely about surfing the web , they would n't be sold with XP and be using X86 processors and have large amounts of memory .
Netbooks are Laptops which can do 99 \ % of what people want to do , just without being huge.Personally , I think anything bigger than 10 inches is clumsy to be carrying around all day .
I can get everything I need to get done on a 9' ' netbook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't draw conclusions from buzzword names.
If 'netbooks' were solely about surfing the web, they wouldn't be sold with XP and be using X86 processors and have large amounts of memory.
Netbooks are Laptops which can do 99\% of what people want to do, just without being huge.Personally, I think anything bigger than 10 inches is clumsy to be carrying around all day.
I can get everything I need to get done on a 9'' netbook.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375260</id>
	<title>Lenovo has something similar...</title>
	<author>Drethon</author>
	<datestamp>1267781760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Though no screen under the keyboard (if I understood the ASUS article right).

<a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2010/01/04/lenovos-u1-is-a-netbook-with-removable-tablet/" title="crunchgear.com">http://www.crunchgear.com/2010/01/04/lenovos-u1-is-a-netbook-with-removable-tablet/</a> [crunchgear.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Though no screen under the keyboard ( if I understood the ASUS article right ) .
http : //www.crunchgear.com/2010/01/04/lenovos-u1-is-a-netbook-with-removable-tablet/ [ crunchgear.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Though no screen under the keyboard (if I understood the ASUS article right).
http://www.crunchgear.com/2010/01/04/lenovos-u1-is-a-netbook-with-removable-tablet/ [crunchgear.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31380404</id>
	<title>What does "concept" mean?</title>
	<author>migla</author>
	<datestamp>1267887660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have a concept too:</p><p>
&nbsp; How about a flexible, holographic resistive and capacitative 3d touchscreen on all sides of the netbook, that you can mould into exactly any shape you like. Wouldn't that be cool?</p><p>In other words: What is a concept design worth? TFA doesn't say they have anything working, does it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a concept too :   How about a flexible , holographic resistive and capacitative 3d touchscreen on all sides of the netbook , that you can mould into exactly any shape you like .
Would n't that be cool ? In other words : What is a concept design worth ?
TFA does n't say they have anything working , does it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a concept too:
  How about a flexible, holographic resistive and capacitative 3d touchscreen on all sides of the netbook, that you can mould into exactly any shape you like.
Wouldn't that be cool?In other words: What is a concept design worth?
TFA doesn't say they have anything working, does it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375352</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374626</id>
	<title>Interesting...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267821840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thing looks remarkable.

If it works as advertised, the main thing I'd want to know is what operating system runs on it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thing looks remarkable .
If it works as advertised , the main thing I 'd want to know is what operating system runs on it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thing looks remarkable.
If it works as advertised, the main thing I'd want to know is what operating system runs on it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374602</id>
	<title>Indeed.</title>
	<author>Pojut</author>
	<datestamp>1267821720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is definitely a good idea, but I think what should really be focused on is making netbooks more gaming friendly.  Since (based on people I know and have talked to) netbooks tend to be used mostly while traveling or while watching TV, being able to game on them would instantly increase their appeal.  I'm not talking about Crysis or anything here, but it would be nice to not be stuck with pre-2002 games due to low power CPUs (Intel Atom) and integrated graphics (Intel GMA).  I know that nVidia has some stuff on the way that will help out a lot, but still...being able to play modern games with the graphics turned down on a netbook would be awesome.</p><p>I just posted an article about the topic of gaming on netbooks earlier today.  Read on if you are interested in the subject: <a href="http://livingwithanerd.com/gaming-on-a-netbook/" title="livingwithanerd.com" rel="nofollow">http://livingwithanerd.com/gaming-on-a-netbook/</a> [livingwithanerd.com]<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/end shameless self plug</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is definitely a good idea , but I think what should really be focused on is making netbooks more gaming friendly .
Since ( based on people I know and have talked to ) netbooks tend to be used mostly while traveling or while watching TV , being able to game on them would instantly increase their appeal .
I 'm not talking about Crysis or anything here , but it would be nice to not be stuck with pre-2002 games due to low power CPUs ( Intel Atom ) and integrated graphics ( Intel GMA ) .
I know that nVidia has some stuff on the way that will help out a lot , but still...being able to play modern games with the graphics turned down on a netbook would be awesome.I just posted an article about the topic of gaming on netbooks earlier today .
Read on if you are interested in the subject : http : //livingwithanerd.com/gaming-on-a-netbook/ [ livingwithanerd.com ] /end shameless self plug</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is definitely a good idea, but I think what should really be focused on is making netbooks more gaming friendly.
Since (based on people I know and have talked to) netbooks tend to be used mostly while traveling or while watching TV, being able to game on them would instantly increase their appeal.
I'm not talking about Crysis or anything here, but it would be nice to not be stuck with pre-2002 games due to low power CPUs (Intel Atom) and integrated graphics (Intel GMA).
I know that nVidia has some stuff on the way that will help out a lot, but still...being able to play modern games with the graphics turned down on a netbook would be awesome.I just posted an article about the topic of gaming on netbooks earlier today.
Read on if you are interested in the subject: http://livingwithanerd.com/gaming-on-a-netbook/ [livingwithanerd.com] /end shameless self plug</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31376054
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31377022
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375840
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375788
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375086
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31376308
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31379098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375032
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375552
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374670
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31377064
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374670
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31378872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374610
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374670
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31377146
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374670
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374610
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374670
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374670
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31380130
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374670
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374670
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31377206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375064
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374670
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31377020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375064
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31380126
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375064
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375398
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31378824
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375380
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374670
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31380404
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375352
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_1713237_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31376600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_05_1713237.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375032
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31379098
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_05_1713237.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375352
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31380404
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_05_1713237.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375100
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375442
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_05_1713237.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374610
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31378872
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375964
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_05_1713237.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375060
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_05_1713237.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374626
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374884
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_05_1713237.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374632
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374734
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31376308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374972
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31377146
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_05_1713237.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374854
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374940
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375548
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375734
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374882
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375240
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375086
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_05_1713237.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374602
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31376600
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31377022
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375348
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31376054
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374848
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374994
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31377064
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375788
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375160
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31378824
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_05_1713237.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375398
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375936
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_05_1713237.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375470
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_05_1713237.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374670
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375552
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31380130
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374892
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375302
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375304
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374760
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375380
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374968
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31374868
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_05_1713237.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375742
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_05_1713237.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31375064
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31380126
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31377206
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_1713237.31377020
</commentlist>
</conversation>
