<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_04_2030247</id>
	<title>How MySpace Generates Enough Load To Test Itself</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1267695240000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader points out this article about <i>"...how a big site like MySpace <a href="http://highscalability.com/blog/2010/3/4/how-myspace-tested-their-live-site-with-1-million-concurrent.html?utm\_source=feedburner&amp;utm\_medium=feed&amp;utm\_campaign=Feed\%3A+HighScalability+(High+Scalability)">uses thousands of cloud computing cores to do performance testing on its live site</a>.  There are some really great numbers in there from the performance tests, like generating 16GB/second of bandwidth and 77,000 hits/second during testing (not including the live traffic on the site at the time)."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader points out this article about " ...how a big site like MySpace uses thousands of cloud computing cores to do performance testing on its live site .
There are some really great numbers in there from the performance tests , like generating 16GB/second of bandwidth and 77,000 hits/second during testing ( not including the live traffic on the site at the time ) .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader points out this article about "...how a big site like MySpace uses thousands of cloud computing cores to do performance testing on its live site.
There are some really great numbers in there from the performance tests, like generating 16GB/second of bandwidth and 77,000 hits/second during testing (not including the live traffic on the site at the time).
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31365462</id>
	<title>Re:Wait, what?</title>
	<author>DerekLyons</author>
	<datestamp>1267710360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The real news (to me at least) is that they use 77k hits per second to TEST.</p></div></blockquote><p>According to TFA - the 'test' users were in addition to the normal users, simulating the additional load of the new services.  So actual load on the production servers was something well north of 77khits/sec.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The real news ( to me at least ) is that they use 77k hits per second to TEST.According to TFA - the 'test ' users were in addition to the normal users , simulating the additional load of the new services .
So actual load on the production servers was something well north of 77khits/sec .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The real news (to me at least) is that they use 77k hits per second to TEST.According to TFA - the 'test' users were in addition to the normal users, simulating the additional load of the new services.
So actual load on the production servers was something well north of 77khits/sec.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363246</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363360</id>
	<title>Re:16GB/second is not the same as 16 gigabits per</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267699980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>To my case insensitive parser it is the same!</htmltext>
<tokenext>To my case insensitive parser it is the same !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To my case insensitive parser it is the same!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363222</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363396</id>
	<title>They did it</title>
	<author>OverlordQ</author>
	<datestamp>1267700100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>by outsourcing to This Company. In additon, This Company used Stuff to do Things. After initial tests, This Company did Other Things. This Company is a leader in stuff, especially utilizing their software This Stuff. Try This Stuff Today!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>by outsourcing to This Company .
In additon , This Company used Stuff to do Things .
After initial tests , This Company did Other Things .
This Company is a leader in stuff , especially utilizing their software This Stuff .
Try This Stuff Today !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>by outsourcing to This Company.
In additon, This Company used Stuff to do Things.
After initial tests, This Company did Other Things.
This Company is a leader in stuff, especially utilizing their software This Stuff.
Try This Stuff Today!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31364014</id>
	<title>MySpace does performance testing?</title>
	<author>PRMan</author>
	<datestamp>1267703100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You would never know it based on the times I've been there...</htmltext>
<tokenext>You would never know it based on the times I 've been there.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You would never know it based on the times I've been there...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31367526</id>
	<title>Digital Contraception</title>
	<author>cosm</author>
	<datestamp>1267726260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Since the MySpace's crapnet is completely covered with trojans, if MySpace blows their load tests, does this mean they are open to successful backdoor penetration &amp; injection attacks?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since the MySpace 's crapnet is completely covered with trojans , if MySpace blows their load tests , does this mean they are open to successful backdoor penetration &amp; injection attacks ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since the MySpace's crapnet is completely covered with trojans, if MySpace blows their load tests, does this mean they are open to successful backdoor penetration &amp; injection attacks?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31364534</id>
	<title>Re:Wait, what?</title>
	<author>elfprince13</author>
	<datestamp>1267705260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I haven't deleted my account yet. I can't remember my last login though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have n't deleted my account yet .
I ca n't remember my last login though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I haven't deleted my account yet.
I can't remember my last login though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363212</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363422</id>
	<title>16 Gigabits/Second</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267700280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I thought that 16GB/sec seemed a little high so I checked the article.  The actual network load they generated is 16 gigabits per second using 800 instances of Amazon's EC2.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought that 16GB/sec seemed a little high so I checked the article .
The actual network load they generated is 16 gigabits per second using 800 instances of Amazon 's EC2 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought that 16GB/sec seemed a little high so I checked the article.
The actual network load they generated is 16 gigabits per second using 800 instances of Amazon's EC2.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363534</id>
	<title>Ah, so that's why</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267700880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>There are some really great numbers in there from the performance tests, like generating 16GB/second of bandwidth and 77,000 hits/second during testing (not including the live traffic on the site at the time).</p></div></blockquote><p>I guess all that bandwidth usage explains why the site almost always has had shitty responsiveness -- they use it up ensuring quality. That, more than the crap designs and general lameness of the site, was why I stopped using it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There are some really great numbers in there from the performance tests , like generating 16GB/second of bandwidth and 77,000 hits/second during testing ( not including the live traffic on the site at the time ) .I guess all that bandwidth usage explains why the site almost always has had shitty responsiveness -- they use it up ensuring quality .
That , more than the crap designs and general lameness of the site , was why I stopped using it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are some really great numbers in there from the performance tests, like generating 16GB/second of bandwidth and 77,000 hits/second during testing (not including the live traffic on the site at the time).I guess all that bandwidth usage explains why the site almost always has had shitty responsiveness -- they use it up ensuring quality.
That, more than the crap designs and general lameness of the site, was why I stopped using it.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31364800</id>
	<title>Re:What's a MySpace?</title>
	<author>Zordak</author>
	<datestamp>1267706400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Anyone know?</p></div><p>It's what Facebook was called in 2006.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone know ? It 's what Facebook was called in 2006 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone know?It's what Facebook was called in 2006.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363146</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31367354</id>
	<title>Re:Wait, what?</title>
	<author>0100010001010011</author>
	<datestamp>1267724700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Letting laymen edit HTML always worked out for the best.</p><p>Although the <a href="http://namb.la/popular/tech.html" title="namb.la">Myspace Worm</a> [namb.la] has to be one of the most hilarious things I've ever read.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Letting laymen edit HTML always worked out for the best.Although the Myspace Worm [ namb.la ] has to be one of the most hilarious things I 've ever read .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Letting laymen edit HTML always worked out for the best.Although the Myspace Worm [namb.la] has to be one of the most hilarious things I've ever read.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31364430</id>
	<title>Re:Wait, what?</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1267704840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The funny part is that I read the summary and the article, then came and read your comment and it was the first time I realized they were talking about MySpace and not Facebook.</p><p>Funny that they are one and the same to me now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The funny part is that I read the summary and the article , then came and read your comment and it was the first time I realized they were talking about MySpace and not Facebook.Funny that they are one and the same to me now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The funny part is that I read the summary and the article, then came and read your comment and it was the first time I realized they were talking about MySpace and not Facebook.Funny that they are one and the same to me now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363212</id>
	<title>Re:Wait, what?</title>
	<author>Pojut</author>
	<datestamp>1267699380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Agreed.</p><p>Is there ANYONE on here that still uses Myspace?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed.Is there ANYONE on here that still uses Myspace ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed.Is there ANYONE on here that still uses Myspace?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363258</id>
	<title>Reminds me of a business plan I once wrote</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267699560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>We were going to hit our customers with enough hits to always *just* max out their account and slow their site down, making them think their site was popular and that they need to upgrade their account.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We were going to hit our customers with enough hits to always * just * max out their account and slow their site down , making them think their site was popular and that they need to upgrade their account .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We were going to hit our customers with enough hits to always *just* max out their account and slow their site down, making them think their site was popular and that they need to upgrade their account.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363146</id>
	<title>What's a MySpace?</title>
	<author>BlueBoxSW.com</author>
	<datestamp>1267699140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone know?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone know ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone know?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363118</id>
	<title>They use to mask the reality</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267699080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That the site only has one actual visitor anymore.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That the site only has one actual visitor anymore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That the site only has one actual visitor anymore.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31364320</id>
	<title>Re:Wait, what?</title>
	<author>s2theg</author>
	<datestamp>1267704420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not impressed. I normally generate enough load to finish before the next page even loads.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not impressed .
I normally generate enough load to finish before the next page even loads .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not impressed.
I normally generate enough load to finish before the next page even loads.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31369082</id>
	<title>Re:Wait, what?</title>
	<author>Monsieur\_F</author>
	<datestamp>1267788540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some artists still use it to announce their next concerts</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some artists still use it to announce their next concerts</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some artists still use it to announce their next concerts</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363212</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363056</id>
	<title>Wait, what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267698900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The real news here is that people still use myspace. -\_-</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The real news here is that people still use myspace .
- \ _-</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The real news here is that people still use myspace.
-\_-</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31365400</id>
	<title>If you want a REAL load test</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267709940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just post a story here on slashdot that there is free porn.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just post a story here on slashdot that there is free porn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just post a story here on slashdot that there is free porn.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31364010</id>
	<title>Re:Wait, what?</title>
	<author>Arthur Grumbine</author>
	<datestamp>1267703100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm pretty sure this test was just for nostalgic purposes:</p><p>
&nbsp; <b>MySpace Admin #1:</b> Remember when we used to have millions of hits per hour?</p><p>
&nbsp; <b>MySpace Admin #2:</b> Yeah... those were the days. I was, like, a rockstar to my friends.</p><p>
&nbsp; <b>MySpace Admin #1:</b> Yeah, my friends thought I had the coolest job in the world, working for MySpace.</p><p>
&nbsp; <b>MySpace Admin #1 and #2:</b> *sigh*</p><p>
&nbsp; <b>MySpace Admin #2:</b>...hey - I know! We could pay some company to run a load test, it'll be just like the good ol' days!</p><p>
&nbsp; <b>MySpace Admin #1:</b> Yeah!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty sure this test was just for nostalgic purposes :   MySpace Admin # 1 : Remember when we used to have millions of hits per hour ?
  MySpace Admin # 2 : Yeah... those were the days .
I was , like , a rockstar to my friends .
  MySpace Admin # 1 : Yeah , my friends thought I had the coolest job in the world , working for MySpace .
  MySpace Admin # 1 and # 2 : * sigh *   MySpace Admin # 2 : ...hey - I know !
We could pay some company to run a load test , it 'll be just like the good ol ' days !
  MySpace Admin # 1 : Yeah !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty sure this test was just for nostalgic purposes:
  MySpace Admin #1: Remember when we used to have millions of hits per hour?
  MySpace Admin #2: Yeah... those were the days.
I was, like, a rockstar to my friends.
  MySpace Admin #1: Yeah, my friends thought I had the coolest job in the world, working for MySpace.
  MySpace Admin #1 and #2: *sigh*
  MySpace Admin #2:...hey - I know!
We could pay some company to run a load test, it'll be just like the good ol' days!
  MySpace Admin #1: Yeah!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31365452</id>
	<title>Re:A better solution - slashdot duel</title>
	<author>Chad Birch</author>
	<datestamp>1267710300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, slashdot would wreck facebook and myspace, look at how much of their traffic we make up! <a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/facebook.com+myspace.com+slashdot.org/" title="compete.com">http://siteanalytics.compete.com/facebook.com+myspace.com+slashdot.org/</a> [compete.com] <br>
<br>
We're almost off the axis, boys, keep it up!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , slashdot would wreck facebook and myspace , look at how much of their traffic we make up !
http : //siteanalytics.compete.com/facebook.com + myspace.com + slashdot.org/ [ compete.com ] We 're almost off the axis , boys , keep it up !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, slashdot would wreck facebook and myspace, look at how much of their traffic we make up!
http://siteanalytics.compete.com/facebook.com+myspace.com+slashdot.org/ [compete.com] 

We're almost off the axis, boys, keep it up!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363530</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363530</id>
	<title>A better solution - slashdot duel</title>
	<author>e2d2</author>
	<datestamp>1267700880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pretty stupid. They could "crowdsource" by simply challenging slashdot to a duel. We'll turn your servers into smoking rubble facespace BRING IT!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pretty stupid .
They could " crowdsource " by simply challenging slashdot to a duel .
We 'll turn your servers into smoking rubble facespace BRING IT !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pretty stupid.
They could "crowdsource" by simply challenging slashdot to a duel.
We'll turn your servers into smoking rubble facespace BRING IT!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31385272</id>
	<title>Re:Wait, what?</title>
	<author>strawberryutopia</author>
	<datestamp>1267884720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>MySpace still exists?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>MySpace still exists ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MySpace still exists?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363634</id>
	<title>Re:What's a MySpace?</title>
	<author>ryantmer</author>
	<datestamp>1267701240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can I nom it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can I nom it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can I nom it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363146</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31364252</id>
	<title>Re:Wait, what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267704120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This was actually just to test if the MySpace servers were still working... after all, they haven't been used for a VERY long time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This was actually just to test if the MySpace servers were still working... after all , they have n't been used for a VERY long time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This was actually just to test if the MySpace servers were still working... after all, they haven't been used for a VERY long time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363246</id>
	<title>Re:Wait, what?</title>
	<author>ircmaxell</author>
	<datestamp>1267699500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The real news (to me at least) is that they use 77k hits per second to TEST.  Normally, when I test at least, I try to go for at least 150\% to 200\% expected peak load.  Assuming that they aren't doing this during peak hours, that puts their expected PEAK load somewhere around 100k hits per second or so...  Large, yes.  Large for that size of site?  No way...  Using RMS, I'd say that they are averaging around 25k to 35k hits per second IF they are testing for a 100k peak...  That puts MYSPACE (once one of the largest sites on the internet at one time) around an Alexa rank of about 600 (based on a few other sites I know with that load level)...  Since Alexa currently rates them at 14, that implies two possibilities.  Either Alexa's rank information is demographically biased, or my figures are completely out of the blue...  You decide...</htmltext>
<tokenext>The real news ( to me at least ) is that they use 77k hits per second to TEST .
Normally , when I test at least , I try to go for at least 150 \ % to 200 \ % expected peak load .
Assuming that they are n't doing this during peak hours , that puts their expected PEAK load somewhere around 100k hits per second or so... Large , yes .
Large for that size of site ?
No way... Using RMS , I 'd say that they are averaging around 25k to 35k hits per second IF they are testing for a 100k peak... That puts MYSPACE ( once one of the largest sites on the internet at one time ) around an Alexa rank of about 600 ( based on a few other sites I know with that load level ) ... Since Alexa currently rates them at 14 , that implies two possibilities .
Either Alexa 's rank information is demographically biased , or my figures are completely out of the blue... You decide.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The real news (to me at least) is that they use 77k hits per second to TEST.
Normally, when I test at least, I try to go for at least 150\% to 200\% expected peak load.
Assuming that they aren't doing this during peak hours, that puts their expected PEAK load somewhere around 100k hits per second or so...  Large, yes.
Large for that size of site?
No way...  Using RMS, I'd say that they are averaging around 25k to 35k hits per second IF they are testing for a 100k peak...  That puts MYSPACE (once one of the largest sites on the internet at one time) around an Alexa rank of about 600 (based on a few other sites I know with that load level)...  Since Alexa currently rates them at 14, that implies two possibilities.
Either Alexa's rank information is demographically biased, or my figures are completely out of the blue...  You decide...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31364130</id>
	<title>MySpace Planning Meeting</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267703580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><b>MySpace Engineer</b>:  Which brings us to the issue of load testing.  <br>
<b>MySpace Exec</b>:  So do it.  <br>
<b>MySpace Engineer</b>:  Well, we can't.  <br>
<b>MySpace Exec</b>:  Am I missing something here?  You just got done showing how stupid our users are.  So just simulate them.  <br>
<b>MySpace Engineer</b>:  Look, sir, with all due respect, we can put lol-bots up to post crap it's just that we have no way of mimicking that amount of garbage.  <br>
<b>MySpace Exec</b>:  Well how much is it?  <br>
<b>MySpace Engineer</b>:  Let me remind you, our previous slides showed you the magic of the MySpace machine--millions of users putting garbage in with the result being unadulterated horse shit flying out of the site.  But to load test we need a lot of garbage.  Several <b>billion</b> metric tonnes of garbage.  Otherwise we just wouldn't produce the same amount of browser destroying horse shit we produce at peak loads.  <br>
<b>MySpace Exec</b>:  Have you spoken with the City of New York?  <br>
<b>MySpace Engineer</b>:  Sir, twenty five New York Cities wouldn't produce the amount of garbage we need.  <br>
<b>MySpace Exec</b>:  Holy shit.  <br>
<b>MySpace Engineer</b>:  Yes, this indeed requires a shitstack of biblical proportions.  <br>
<b>MySpace Exec</b>:  What're we gonna do?  <br>
<b>MySpace Engineer</b>:  Well, to solve this problem we turned to the motherload of bullshit.  The one thing that everyone keeps endlessly spewing garbage about.  <br>
<b>MySpace Exec</b>:  The Cloud!  <br>
<b>MySpace Engineer</b>:  Bingo.</htmltext>
<tokenext>MySpace Engineer : Which brings us to the issue of load testing .
MySpace Exec : So do it .
MySpace Engineer : Well , we ca n't .
MySpace Exec : Am I missing something here ?
You just got done showing how stupid our users are .
So just simulate them .
MySpace Engineer : Look , sir , with all due respect , we can put lol-bots up to post crap it 's just that we have no way of mimicking that amount of garbage .
MySpace Exec : Well how much is it ?
MySpace Engineer : Let me remind you , our previous slides showed you the magic of the MySpace machine--millions of users putting garbage in with the result being unadulterated horse shit flying out of the site .
But to load test we need a lot of garbage .
Several billion metric tonnes of garbage .
Otherwise we just would n't produce the same amount of browser destroying horse shit we produce at peak loads .
MySpace Exec : Have you spoken with the City of New York ?
MySpace Engineer : Sir , twenty five New York Cities would n't produce the amount of garbage we need .
MySpace Exec : Holy shit .
MySpace Engineer : Yes , this indeed requires a shitstack of biblical proportions .
MySpace Exec : What 're we gon na do ?
MySpace Engineer : Well , to solve this problem we turned to the motherload of bullshit .
The one thing that everyone keeps endlessly spewing garbage about .
MySpace Exec : The Cloud !
MySpace Engineer : Bingo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MySpace Engineer:  Which brings us to the issue of load testing.
MySpace Exec:  So do it.
MySpace Engineer:  Well, we can't.
MySpace Exec:  Am I missing something here?
You just got done showing how stupid our users are.
So just simulate them.
MySpace Engineer:  Look, sir, with all due respect, we can put lol-bots up to post crap it's just that we have no way of mimicking that amount of garbage.
MySpace Exec:  Well how much is it?
MySpace Engineer:  Let me remind you, our previous slides showed you the magic of the MySpace machine--millions of users putting garbage in with the result being unadulterated horse shit flying out of the site.
But to load test we need a lot of garbage.
Several billion metric tonnes of garbage.
Otherwise we just wouldn't produce the same amount of browser destroying horse shit we produce at peak loads.
MySpace Exec:  Have you spoken with the City of New York?
MySpace Engineer:  Sir, twenty five New York Cities wouldn't produce the amount of garbage we need.
MySpace Exec:  Holy shit.
MySpace Engineer:  Yes, this indeed requires a shitstack of biblical proportions.
MySpace Exec:  What're we gonna do?
MySpace Engineer:  Well, to solve this problem we turned to the motherload of bullshit.
The one thing that everyone keeps endlessly spewing garbage about.
MySpace Exec:  The Cloud!
MySpace Engineer:  Bingo.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363222</id>
	<title>16GB/second is not the same as 16 gigabits per sec</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267699380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>/. people should know better, especially anonymous readers</htmltext>
<tokenext>/ .
people should know better , especially anonymous readers</tokentext>
<sentencetext>/.
people should know better, especially anonymous readers</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31374012</id>
	<title>Re:They did it</title>
	<author>StuffMaster</author>
	<datestamp>1267819020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I fully approve of your message.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I fully approve of your message .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I fully approve of your message.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363396</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363142</id>
	<title>Re:Wait, what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267699140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You mean the *sad* news here is that people still use myspace.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean the * sad * news here is that people still use myspace .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean the *sad* news here is that people still use myspace.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31365796</id>
	<title>Frost pGist</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267712940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>users of netBSD worthwhiLe.  It's play area Try not most people into a</htmltext>
<tokenext>users of netBSD worthwhiLe .
It 's play area Try not most people into a</tokentext>
<sentencetext>users of netBSD worthwhiLe.
It's play area Try not most people into a</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363470</id>
	<title>Gotta be prepared</title>
	<author>Tobor the Eighth Man</author>
	<datestamp>1267700520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>MySpace is wise to do this kind of testing and load balancing. You never know when a twelfth person might attempt to connect to the site, throwing their carefully laid plans into total chaos.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>MySpace is wise to do this kind of testing and load balancing .
You never know when a twelfth person might attempt to connect to the site , throwing their carefully laid plans into total chaos .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MySpace is wise to do this kind of testing and load balancing.
You never know when a twelfth person might attempt to connect to the site, throwing their carefully laid plans into total chaos.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363632</id>
	<title>Add revenue</title>
	<author>KevMar</author>
	<datestamp>1267701240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder how much add revenue they generated from all those impressions?</p><p>does testing on production increase your page views?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how much add revenue they generated from all those impressions ? does testing on production increase your page views ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how much add revenue they generated from all those impressions?does testing on production increase your page views?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363768</id>
	<title>while the article is biased, most of it is true</title>
	<author>mcguyver</author>
	<datestamp>1267702020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The article was written by an employee of the company that sold their testing software/services to MySpace.  Of course they're going to have glowing reviews about their testing tools.

With that said the author is right.  Capacity testing in production is needed for high availability sites.  Verifying your real time monitoring tools is also important.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The article was written by an employee of the company that sold their testing software/services to MySpace .
Of course they 're going to have glowing reviews about their testing tools .
With that said the author is right .
Capacity testing in production is needed for high availability sites .
Verifying your real time monitoring tools is also important .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article was written by an employee of the company that sold their testing software/services to MySpace.
Of course they're going to have glowing reviews about their testing tools.
With that said the author is right.
Capacity testing in production is needed for high availability sites.
Verifying your real time monitoring tools is also important.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363262</id>
	<title>unlike your mom....</title>
	<author>gandhi\_2</author>
	<datestamp>1267699560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>who generates enough loa....</p><p>oh geeze. nevermind.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>who generates enough loa....oh geeze .
nevermind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>who generates enough loa....oh geeze.
nevermind.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363208</id>
	<title>Misleading title</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1267699320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Anyone else think from the title that MySpace has enough load (how, I don't know because who even uses it anymore) to consistently test its capacity?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone else think from the title that MySpace has enough load ( how , I do n't know because who even uses it anymore ) to consistently test its capacity ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone else think from the title that MySpace has enough load (how, I don't know because who even uses it anymore) to consistently test its capacity?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363988</id>
	<title>Re:16GB/second is not the same as 16 gigabits per</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267702980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>16 gigabits per second... 16 gigabytes per second... Doesn't matter: my server would be DoSed at only 1mb/s...</htmltext>
<tokenext>16 gigabits per second... 16 gigabytes per second... Does n't matter : my server would be DoSed at only 1mb/s.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>16 gigabits per second... 16 gigabytes per second... Doesn't matter: my server would be DoSed at only 1mb/s...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363222</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363548</id>
	<title>Re:Wait, what?</title>
	<author>cgenman</author>
	<datestamp>1267700940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>They wanted to supplement the live traffic with test traffic to get an idea of the overall performance impact of the new launch on the entire infrastructure. </i></p><p>So the 77k hits per second wasn't their expected peak load, but their expected delta in peak load after opening online streaming in... (looks up) New Zealand.  77k hits per second for streaming in New Zealand doesn't sound that far off.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They wanted to supplement the live traffic with test traffic to get an idea of the overall performance impact of the new launch on the entire infrastructure .
So the 77k hits per second was n't their expected peak load , but their expected delta in peak load after opening online streaming in... ( looks up ) New Zealand .
77k hits per second for streaming in New Zealand does n't sound that far off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They wanted to supplement the live traffic with test traffic to get an idea of the overall performance impact of the new launch on the entire infrastructure.
So the 77k hits per second wasn't their expected peak load, but their expected delta in peak load after opening online streaming in... (looks up) New Zealand.
77k hits per second for streaming in New Zealand doesn't sound that far off.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363246</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31364760</id>
	<title>wait, wait, in addition to the live traffic??</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267706160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; performance tests, like generating 16GB/second of bandwidth and 77,000 hits/second during testing (<b>not including the live traffic on the site at the time</b>)</p><p>Ah yes.  Testing massively dangerous eventualities against your live, running hardware.  The old Chernobyl trick...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; performance tests , like generating 16GB/second of bandwidth and 77,000 hits/second during testing ( not including the live traffic on the site at the time ) Ah yes .
Testing massively dangerous eventualities against your live , running hardware .
The old Chernobyl trick.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; performance tests, like generating 16GB/second of bandwidth and 77,000 hits/second during testing (not including the live traffic on the site at the time)Ah yes.
Testing massively dangerous eventualities against your live, running hardware.
The old Chernobyl trick...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_2030247_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31374012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363396
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_2030247_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363360
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363222
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_2030247_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31364320
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_2030247_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363142
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_2030247_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363258
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_2030247_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31385272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_2030247_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31365462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_2030247_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31364800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_2030247_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_2030247_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_2030247_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31369082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363212
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_2030247_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31365452
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363530
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_2030247_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31364252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_2030247_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31364010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_2030247_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31364430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_2030247_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31367354
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_2030247_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31364534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363212
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_2030247_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363988
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363222
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_04_2030247.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363530
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31365452
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_04_2030247.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363470
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_04_2030247.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363422
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_04_2030247.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363396
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31374012
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_04_2030247.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31365400
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_04_2030247.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363632
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_04_2030247.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363222
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363988
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363360
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_04_2030247.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363146
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31364800
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363634
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_04_2030247.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363118
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_04_2030247.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363262
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_04_2030247.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31364130
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_04_2030247.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363056
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363142
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31364010
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363246
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363548
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31365462
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31364320
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31367354
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363212
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31364534
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31369082
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31385272
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31364430
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31364252
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_2030247.31363258
</commentlist>
</conversation>
