<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_04_1518249</id>
	<title>Google Indexing In Near-Realtime</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1267721880000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>krou writes <i>"ReadWriteWeb is covering Google's embrace of a system that would enable any Web publisher to '<a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google\_developing\_real\_time\_index.php">automatically submit new content to Google for indexing within seconds of that content being published</a>.' Google's Brett Slatkin is lead developer of <a href="http://code.google.com/p/pubsubhubbub/">PuSH, or PubSubHubbub</a>, a real-time syndication protocol based on ATOM, where 'a publisher tells the world about a Hub that it will notify every time new content is published.' Subscribers then wait for the hub to notify them of the new content. Says RWW: 'If Google can implement an Indexing by PuSH program, it would ask every website to implement the technology and declare which Hub they push to at the top of each document, just like they declare where the RSS feeds they publish can be found. Then Google would subscribe to those PuSH feeds to discover new content when it's published. PuSH wouldn't likely replace crawling, in fact a crawl would be needed to discover PuSH feeds to subscribe to, but the real-time format would be used to augment Google's existing index.' PuSH is an open protocol, and Slatkin says that 'I am being told by my engineering bosses to openly promote this open approach even to our competitors.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>krou writes " ReadWriteWeb is covering Google 's embrace of a system that would enable any Web publisher to 'automatically submit new content to Google for indexing within seconds of that content being published .
' Google 's Brett Slatkin is lead developer of PuSH , or PubSubHubbub , a real-time syndication protocol based on ATOM , where 'a publisher tells the world about a Hub that it will notify every time new content is published .
' Subscribers then wait for the hub to notify them of the new content .
Says RWW : 'If Google can implement an Indexing by PuSH program , it would ask every website to implement the technology and declare which Hub they push to at the top of each document , just like they declare where the RSS feeds they publish can be found .
Then Google would subscribe to those PuSH feeds to discover new content when it 's published .
PuSH would n't likely replace crawling , in fact a crawl would be needed to discover PuSH feeds to subscribe to , but the real-time format would be used to augment Google 's existing index .
' PuSH is an open protocol , and Slatkin says that 'I am being told by my engineering bosses to openly promote this open approach even to our competitors .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>krou writes "ReadWriteWeb is covering Google's embrace of a system that would enable any Web publisher to 'automatically submit new content to Google for indexing within seconds of that content being published.
' Google's Brett Slatkin is lead developer of PuSH, or PubSubHubbub, a real-time syndication protocol based on ATOM, where 'a publisher tells the world about a Hub that it will notify every time new content is published.
' Subscribers then wait for the hub to notify them of the new content.
Says RWW: 'If Google can implement an Indexing by PuSH program, it would ask every website to implement the technology and declare which Hub they push to at the top of each document, just like they declare where the RSS feeds they publish can be found.
Then Google would subscribe to those PuSH feeds to discover new content when it's published.
PuSH wouldn't likely replace crawling, in fact a crawl would be needed to discover PuSH feeds to subscribe to, but the real-time format would be used to augment Google's existing index.
' PuSH is an open protocol, and Slatkin says that 'I am being told by my engineering bosses to openly promote this open approach even to our competitors.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31361456</id>
	<title>Spammers delight!</title>
	<author>SlappyBastard</author>
	<datestamp>1267734720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It would be unreal how fast spammers would exploit this.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be unreal how fast spammers would exploit this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be unreal how fast spammers would exploit this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359788</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe I'm just a noob, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267726800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It could be hitting your RSS, or if you use Blogger as a front end, then it's already in Google's database.</p><p>I don't understand why anyone would voluntarily give yet more information to Google without them even asking to steal it from you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It could be hitting your RSS , or if you use Blogger as a front end , then it 's already in Google 's database.I do n't understand why anyone would voluntarily give yet more information to Google without them even asking to steal it from you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It could be hitting your RSS, or if you use Blogger as a front end, then it's already in Google's database.I don't understand why anyone would voluntarily give yet more information to Google without them even asking to steal it from you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359520</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359758</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe I'm just a noob, but...</title>
	<author>garcia</author>
	<datestamp>1267726620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My site is by no means something high traffic but Googlebot indexes my pages (and shows them in search results) within three minutes:</p><p>crawl-66-249-65-232.googlebot.com - - [04/Mar/2010:10:33:34 -0600] "GET<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/current-crime-decline-to-cause-public-safety-cuts HTTP/1.1" 200 47330 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Googlebot/2.1; +http://www.google.com/bot.html)"</p><p>I really don't see a need for something to be any more "real time" than that for someone's blog. Do you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My site is by no means something high traffic but Googlebot indexes my pages ( and shows them in search results ) within three minutes : crawl-66-249-65-232.googlebot.com - - [ 04/Mar/2010 : 10 : 33 : 34 -0600 ] " GET /current-crime-decline-to-cause-public-safety-cuts HTTP/1.1 " 200 47330 " - " " Mozilla/5.0 ( compatible ; Googlebot/2.1 ; + http : //www.google.com/bot.html ) " I really do n't see a need for something to be any more " real time " than that for someone 's blog .
Do you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My site is by no means something high traffic but Googlebot indexes my pages (and shows them in search results) within three minutes:crawl-66-249-65-232.googlebot.com - - [04/Mar/2010:10:33:34 -0600] "GET /current-crime-decline-to-cause-public-safety-cuts HTTP/1.1" 200 47330 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Googlebot/2.1; +http://www.google.com/bot.html)"I really don't see a need for something to be any more "real time" than that for someone's blog.
Do you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359520</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31360018</id>
	<title>I just noticed it yesterday.</title>
	<author>140Mandak262Jamuna</author>
	<datestamp>1267727640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Funny I just posted this yesterday in <a href="http://pandasthumb.org/archives/2010/03/mcleroy-loses-t.html#comment-208393" title="pandasthumb.org"> Pandas Thumb </a> [pandasthumb.org] <p><div class="quote"><p>As usual I tried to make a tongue in cheek remark and ended up chewing my tongue. I meant Google&rsquo;s indexer is so fast. Original posting was made at March 3,
2010 2:09 PM. It was in the index by March 3, 2010 5:08 PM. And it was not even from news.google.com, it is the general web search. Pretty soon Google will tell me that I&rsquo;m out of milk even before I open the fridge door.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Funny I just posted this yesterday in Pandas Thumb [ pandasthumb.org ] As usual I tried to make a tongue in cheek remark and ended up chewing my tongue .
I meant Google    s indexer is so fast .
Original posting was made at March 3 , 2010 2 : 09 PM .
It was in the index by March 3 , 2010 5 : 08 PM .
And it was not even from news.google.com , it is the general web search .
Pretty soon Google will tell me that I    m out of milk even before I open the fridge door .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Funny I just posted this yesterday in  Pandas Thumb  [pandasthumb.org] As usual I tried to make a tongue in cheek remark and ended up chewing my tongue.
I meant Google’s indexer is so fast.
Original posting was made at March 3,
2010 2:09 PM.
It was in the index by March 3, 2010 5:08 PM.
And it was not even from news.google.com, it is the general web search.
Pretty soon Google will tell me that I’m out of milk even before I open the fridge door.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31361138</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe I'm just a noob, but...</title>
	<author>Jurily</author>
	<datestamp>1267733220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I really don't see a need for something to be any more "real time" than that for someone's blog. Do you?</p></div><p>In rare cases like the swine flu panic, 3 minutes can be the difference between fame and obscurity.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I really do n't see a need for something to be any more " real time " than that for someone 's blog .
Do you ? In rare cases like the swine flu panic , 3 minutes can be the difference between fame and obscurity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really don't see a need for something to be any more "real time" than that for someone's blog.
Do you?In rare cases like the swine flu panic, 3 minutes can be the difference between fame and obscurity.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359758</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31360152</id>
	<title>Re:I just noticed it yesterday.</title>
	<author>Splab</author>
	<datestamp>1267728300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hope it isn't too far away, having my google apps account telling me what I need to restock in the fridge (or even the apartment) would be friggin awesome. Then when cookingwithgoogle.com starts up, just writing the recipe I want could give me a grocery list, instant win.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hope it is n't too far away , having my google apps account telling me what I need to restock in the fridge ( or even the apartment ) would be friggin awesome .
Then when cookingwithgoogle.com starts up , just writing the recipe I want could give me a grocery list , instant win .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hope it isn't too far away, having my google apps account telling me what I need to restock in the fridge (or even the apartment) would be friggin awesome.
Then when cookingwithgoogle.com starts up, just writing the recipe I want could give me a grocery list, instant win.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31360018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359520</id>
	<title>Maybe I'm just a noob, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267725720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...someone help me out here.  People can still find my articles through google before I see the googlebot hit any new articles I post...how is that possible?  How would my pages show up on google before the bot actually crawls them?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...someone help me out here .
People can still find my articles through google before I see the googlebot hit any new articles I post...how is that possible ?
How would my pages show up on google before the bot actually crawls them ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...someone help me out here.
People can still find my articles through google before I see the googlebot hit any new articles I post...how is that possible?
How would my pages show up on google before the bot actually crawls them?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31361710</id>
	<title>sh1it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267735980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>us the courtesy on my Pentium Pro ultimately, we [nero-online.org] man walking. It's It's best to try found out about the people playing can Ago, many of you reaper Nor do the</htmltext>
<tokenext>us the courtesy on my Pentium Pro ultimately , we [ nero-online.org ] man walking .
It 's It 's best to try found out about the people playing can Ago , many of you reaper Nor do the</tokentext>
<sentencetext>us the courtesy on my Pentium Pro ultimately, we [nero-online.org] man walking.
It's It's best to try found out about the people playing can Ago, many of you reaper Nor do the</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31368858</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe I'm just a noob, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267785600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I really don't see a need for something to be any more "real time" than that for someone's blog. Do you?</p></div><p>Three minutes should be enough for everyone...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I really do n't see a need for something to be any more " real time " than that for someone 's blog .
Do you ? Three minutes should be enough for everyone.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really don't see a need for something to be any more "real time" than that for someone's blog.
Do you?Three minutes should be enough for everyone...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359758</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31381930</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe I'm just a noob, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267903080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One advantage, I guess, is that with PuSH your site sends out a notification when there's new content, so they wouldn't have to keep crawling your site. Less bandwidth for you, less cost for them, everybody wins.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One advantage , I guess , is that with PuSH your site sends out a notification when there 's new content , so they would n't have to keep crawling your site .
Less bandwidth for you , less cost for them , everybody wins .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One advantage, I guess, is that with PuSH your site sends out a notification when there's new content, so they wouldn't have to keep crawling your site.
Less bandwidth for you, less cost for them, everybody wins.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359758</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31361730</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe I'm just a noob, but...</title>
	<author>zonky</author>
	<datestamp>1267736100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>RSS?</htmltext>
<tokenext>RSS ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RSS?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359520</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31362224</id>
	<title>Crawling, or Indexing?</title>
	<author>ventmonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1267695420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Right now Google seems to spend a couple of minutes a day crawling my website, but even once it knows what has changed it only updates it's index, and the SERPs once a month or so.  I realize larger sites get indexed far more quickly, and often, but this seems like it is only augmenting the crawling of websites with a client site push.  I'm unsure how this all relates to the long lag in indexing that data.  Any ideas?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Right now Google seems to spend a couple of minutes a day crawling my website , but even once it knows what has changed it only updates it 's index , and the SERPs once a month or so .
I realize larger sites get indexed far more quickly , and often , but this seems like it is only augmenting the crawling of websites with a client site push .
I 'm unsure how this all relates to the long lag in indexing that data .
Any ideas ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right now Google seems to spend a couple of minutes a day crawling my website, but even once it knows what has changed it only updates it's index, and the SERPs once a month or so.
I realize larger sites get indexed far more quickly, and often, but this seems like it is only augmenting the crawling of websites with a client site push.
I'm unsure how this all relates to the long lag in indexing that data.
Any ideas?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31366468</id>
	<title>Re:twitter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267718460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>This sounds a bit like Tentacle Porn. Put your content in one hole and it comes out lots of places.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This sounds a bit like Tentacle Porn .
Put your content in one hole and it comes out lots of places .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This sounds a bit like Tentacle Porn.
Put your content in one hole and it comes out lots of places.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359892</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe I'm just a noob, but...</title>
	<author>mmkkbb</author>
	<datestamp>1267727160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some blog engines will automatically notify search engines of an updated site map upon publishing new content.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some blog engines will automatically notify search engines of an updated site map upon publishing new content .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some blog engines will automatically notify search engines of an updated site map upon publishing new content.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359758</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31360016</id>
	<title>zen saying:</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1267727640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"If a tree falls in the forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a noise?"</p><p>internet era update:</p><p>"If a webpage is published on the web and no google spider notices it, does it exist?"</p><p>near future update:</p><p>"If a thought enters your mind that is not already indexed by google, is it real?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" If a tree falls in the forest and no one is around to hear it , does it make a noise ?
" internet era update : " If a webpage is published on the web and no google spider notices it , does it exist ?
" near future update : " If a thought enters your mind that is not already indexed by google , is it real ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"If a tree falls in the forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a noise?
"internet era update:"If a webpage is published on the web and no google spider notices it, does it exist?
"near future update:"If a thought enters your mind that is not already indexed by google, is it real?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359900</id>
	<title>Assume Google makes a new sight queue.</title>
	<author>bobs666</author>
	<datestamp>1267727220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If Google makes a new sight queue and
then You could request your URL
be put on that Queue.
Then the google Bot would not have to find
your content from links on old URL's.
<br> <br>
The result, your content scanned in seconds
not hours or days.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If Google makes a new sight queue and then You could request your URL be put on that Queue .
Then the google Bot would not have to find your content from links on old URL 's .
The result , your content scanned in seconds not hours or days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If Google makes a new sight queue and
then You could request your URL
be put on that Queue.
Then the google Bot would not have to find
your content from links on old URL's.
The result, your content scanned in seconds
not hours or days.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359520</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31361762</id>
	<title>Re:Sitemaps?</title>
	<author>physburn</author>
	<datestamp>1267736280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, a good site map, lists the last changed date for each page. Google reads
the site map for each site first. So the above Author is right the PUSH system
is already integrated into sitemaps in the last Modified and changed attributes, and no new protocols or hubs systems are needed.
<p>
---
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/blogs/Internet\%20Protocols/feed.html" title="feeddistiller.com">Internet Protocols</a> [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , a good site map , lists the last changed date for each page .
Google reads the site map for each site first .
So the above Author is right the PUSH system is already integrated into sitemaps in the last Modified and changed attributes , and no new protocols or hubs systems are needed .
--- Internet Protocols [ feeddistiller.com ] Feed @</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, a good site map, lists the last changed date for each page.
Google reads
the site map for each site first.
So the above Author is right the PUSH system
is already integrated into sitemaps in the last Modified and changed attributes, and no new protocols or hubs systems are needed.
---

Internet Protocols [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359658</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359526</id>
	<title>Eh...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267725780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's there to stop spammers from stuffing their crap to Google?</p><p>Google's #1 problem, and which they have done nothing about it appears, is that over 99.99\% of their search results are absolutely useless.</p><p>I would actually pay money to have that fixed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's there to stop spammers from stuffing their crap to Google ? Google 's # 1 problem , and which they have done nothing about it appears , is that over 99.99 \ % of their search results are absolutely useless.I would actually pay money to have that fixed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's there to stop spammers from stuffing their crap to Google?Google's #1 problem, and which they have done nothing about it appears, is that over 99.99\% of their search results are absolutely useless.I would actually pay money to have that fixed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31361752</id>
	<title>Re:I just noticed it yesterday.</title>
	<author>D Ninja</author>
	<datestamp>1267736220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is a very fantastic idea.  I would love to have something like this as, when I typically go to the grocery store, I find myself buying the same stinking food again and again (it's tough to have a good imagination when you're in a rush).</p><p>Any Google engineers out there with a penchant for cooking - this would be a great 20\% time project.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a very fantastic idea .
I would love to have something like this as , when I typically go to the grocery store , I find myself buying the same stinking food again and again ( it 's tough to have a good imagination when you 're in a rush ) .Any Google engineers out there with a penchant for cooking - this would be a great 20 \ % time project .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a very fantastic idea.
I would love to have something like this as, when I typically go to the grocery store, I find myself buying the same stinking food again and again (it's tough to have a good imagination when you're in a rush).Any Google engineers out there with a penchant for cooking - this would be a great 20\% time project.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31360152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359988</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe I'm just a noob, but...</title>
	<author>sfraggle</author>
	<datestamp>1267727520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've noticed that when I post a new blog entry on Livejournal, it appears in Google's results within 2-3 minutes. I know that Livejournal has a public feed for all new blog entries across the site, so I assume Google must be indexing this (and presumably others).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've noticed that when I post a new blog entry on Livejournal , it appears in Google 's results within 2-3 minutes .
I know that Livejournal has a public feed for all new blog entries across the site , so I assume Google must be indexing this ( and presumably others ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've noticed that when I post a new blog entry on Livejournal, it appears in Google's results within 2-3 minutes.
I know that Livejournal has a public feed for all new blog entries across the site, so I assume Google must be indexing this (and presumably others).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359758</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359864</id>
	<title>But is it useful?</title>
	<author>tpstigers</author>
	<datestamp>1267727100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>This strikes me as another solution looking for a problem.  Those who would use this don't need it, and those who would need it won't use it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This strikes me as another solution looking for a problem .
Those who would use this do n't need it , and those who would need it wo n't use it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This strikes me as another solution looking for a problem.
Those who would use this don't need it, and those who would need it won't use it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31368598</id>
	<title>Re:kinda done now</title>
	<author>dotancohen</author>
	<datestamp>1267782000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is no such thing as a high Page Rank site. The name Page Rank is a play on words: for one, it is the inventor's last name (Larry Page). Two, it is on a per-page basis.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is no such thing as a high Page Rank site .
The name Page Rank is a play on words : for one , it is the inventor 's last name ( Larry Page ) .
Two , it is on a per-page basis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is no such thing as a high Page Rank site.
The name Page Rank is a play on words: for one, it is the inventor's last name (Larry Page).
Two, it is on a per-page basis.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359932</id>
	<title>Google indexing in near realtime</title>
	<author>Mantis8</author>
	<datestamp>1267727280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yahoo!  BINGo!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yahoo !
BINGo !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yahoo!
BINGo!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359760</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe I'm just a noob, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous Monkey</author>
	<datestamp>1267726620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Google can see the future.  Didn't I tell you about that tomorrow?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google can see the future .
Did n't I tell you about that tomorrow ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google can see the future.
Didn't I tell you about that tomorrow?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359520</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31360024</id>
	<title>Is this new?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267727700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am with Linus on this one<br>Linus is right<br>The man makes sense<br>He is absolutely correct on this one</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am with Linus on this oneLinus is rightThe man makes senseHe is absolutely correct on this one</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am with Linus on this oneLinus is rightThe man makes senseHe is absolutely correct on this one</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359672</id>
	<title>Submit, check your page rank, edit</title>
	<author>Rogerborg</author>
	<datestamp>1267726200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>GOTO Subject</htmltext>
<tokenext>GOTO Subject</tokentext>
<sentencetext>GOTO Subject</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31361480</id>
	<title>Re:I just noticed it yesterday.</title>
	<author>140Mandak262Jamuna</author>
	<datestamp>1267734960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Almost all the food is bar coded. And bar code readers are cheap. Barcode readers with some local memory could be built. Or wi-fi enabled to transmit the bar code to a local computer. <p>

We should be able to build contraptions where you scan every empty carton you throw in the garbage, and it updates the inventory and emails a shopping list, sorted by the aisle for my local grocery store, thank you, to your cell phone. </p><p>

Yeah, if I can think about it, I am sure someone has already done it. I am not exactly the sharpest knife in the drawer you see.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Almost all the food is bar coded .
And bar code readers are cheap .
Barcode readers with some local memory could be built .
Or wi-fi enabled to transmit the bar code to a local computer .
We should be able to build contraptions where you scan every empty carton you throw in the garbage , and it updates the inventory and emails a shopping list , sorted by the aisle for my local grocery store , thank you , to your cell phone .
Yeah , if I can think about it , I am sure someone has already done it .
I am not exactly the sharpest knife in the drawer you see .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Almost all the food is bar coded.
And bar code readers are cheap.
Barcode readers with some local memory could be built.
Or wi-fi enabled to transmit the bar code to a local computer.
We should be able to build contraptions where you scan every empty carton you throw in the garbage, and it updates the inventory and emails a shopping list, sorted by the aisle for my local grocery store, thank you, to your cell phone.
Yeah, if I can think about it, I am sure someone has already done it.
I am not exactly the sharpest knife in the drawer you see.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31360152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31361100</id>
	<title>not that fast for me</title>
	<author>vacarul</author>
	<datestamp>1267733040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I updated my site on 15th Feb and today, 4th March, I can see the old links in Google and none of the new ones. It seems that they need also more servers...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I updated my site on 15th Feb and today , 4th March , I can see the old links in Google and none of the new ones .
It seems that they need also more servers.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I updated my site on 15th Feb and today, 4th March, I can see the old links in Google and none of the new ones.
It seems that they need also more servers...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359550</id>
	<title>kinda done now</title>
	<author>hey</author>
	<datestamp>1267725900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If google notices your site/blog updates frequently the bot will come around more often and especially if its a high page rank site.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If google notices your site/blog updates frequently the bot will come around more often and especially if its a high page rank site .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If google notices your site/blog updates frequently the bot will come around more often and especially if its a high page rank site.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31360770</id>
	<title>It's a pull, not a push</title>
	<author>Animats</author>
	<datestamp>1267731480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Amusingly, since this is based on Atom, the client still has to poll. It just has to poll fewer sources.  The connection between the original source and the "pushsubhub" server really is a "push" connection, but the hub to client connection is not.
</p><p>
Also, the "pushsubhub" caches and redistributes the feeds, which means the feed operator no longer sees their own clients.
</p><p>
They don't seem to have addressed the general RSS problem of "server timestamp/ID changed, but content did not".  Some RSS feeds get this right; some don't.  Reuters is good, but not perfect.  Other sites vary; there's a common problem where the RSS feed is provided from multiple servers on a load balancer, and the servers don't coordinate on timestamps and IDs.
Twitter is awful.  An RSS feed from Twitter appears to change on each poll even when the content has not changed.
</p><p>
Actually determining that RSS content really hasn't changed currently requires computing a message digest on the content. If you're going to aggregate RSS feeds, it's probably necessary to do that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Amusingly , since this is based on Atom , the client still has to poll .
It just has to poll fewer sources .
The connection between the original source and the " pushsubhub " server really is a " push " connection , but the hub to client connection is not .
Also , the " pushsubhub " caches and redistributes the feeds , which means the feed operator no longer sees their own clients .
They do n't seem to have addressed the general RSS problem of " server timestamp/ID changed , but content did not " .
Some RSS feeds get this right ; some do n't .
Reuters is good , but not perfect .
Other sites vary ; there 's a common problem where the RSS feed is provided from multiple servers on a load balancer , and the servers do n't coordinate on timestamps and IDs .
Twitter is awful .
An RSS feed from Twitter appears to change on each poll even when the content has not changed .
Actually determining that RSS content really has n't changed currently requires computing a message digest on the content .
If you 're going to aggregate RSS feeds , it 's probably necessary to do that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Amusingly, since this is based on Atom, the client still has to poll.
It just has to poll fewer sources.
The connection between the original source and the "pushsubhub" server really is a "push" connection, but the hub to client connection is not.
Also, the "pushsubhub" caches and redistributes the feeds, which means the feed operator no longer sees their own clients.
They don't seem to have addressed the general RSS problem of "server timestamp/ID changed, but content did not".
Some RSS feeds get this right; some don't.
Reuters is good, but not perfect.
Other sites vary; there's a common problem where the RSS feed is provided from multiple servers on a load balancer, and the servers don't coordinate on timestamps and IDs.
Twitter is awful.
An RSS feed from Twitter appears to change on each poll even when the content has not changed.
Actually determining that RSS content really hasn't changed currently requires computing a message digest on the content.
If you're going to aggregate RSS feeds, it's probably necessary to do that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359822</id>
	<title>I'm still waiting for...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267726980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google to know my thoughts before I place them on the blog-o-sphere...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google to know my thoughts before I place them on the blog-o-sphere.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google to know my thoughts before I place them on the blog-o-sphere...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31360522</id>
	<title>I can suz google?</title>
	<author>mr.witherspoone</author>
	<datestamp>1267730280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I remember when I worked on this back in the turn of the century, it was called GridIR back then.

<a href="http://www.gir-wg.org/index.html" title="gir-wg.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.gir-wg.org/index.html</a> [gir-wg.org]

A subscription based indexing/search/collection engine.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember when I worked on this back in the turn of the century , it was called GridIR back then .
http : //www.gir-wg.org/index.html [ gir-wg.org ] A subscription based indexing/search/collection engine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember when I worked on this back in the turn of the century, it was called GridIR back then.
http://www.gir-wg.org/index.html [gir-wg.org]

A subscription based indexing/search/collection engine.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359790</id>
	<title>give me my google back!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267726800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I typed 'google' into the google box on the page and I ended up at this readwriteweb place. GIVE ME MY GOGLLE BKCA!!11!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I typed 'google ' into the google box on the page and I ended up at this readwriteweb place .
GIVE ME MY GOGLLE BKCA !
! 11 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I typed 'google' into the google box on the page and I ended up at this readwriteweb place.
GIVE ME MY GOGLLE BKCA!
!11!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359658</id>
	<title>Sitemaps?</title>
	<author>PhrostyMcByte</author>
	<datestamp>1267726140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How is this any different from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sitemaps" title="wikipedia.org">sitemaps</a> [wikipedia.org]?  Sitemaps are by major search engines and have been in use for years now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How is this any different from sitemaps [ wikipedia.org ] ?
Sitemaps are by major search engines and have been in use for years now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is this any different from sitemaps [wikipedia.org]?
Sitemaps are by major search engines and have been in use for years now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359906</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe I'm just a noob, but...</title>
	<author>Pojut</author>
	<datestamp>1267727220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I really don't see a need for something to be any more "real time" than that for someone's blog. Do you?</p></div><p>Not really...I generally update my site between 4-6 times per week, but when I update it I'm only posting one article a day with the odd site announcement every so often...maybe I just suck, I don't know, but it seems like it takes a week or two before people start really reading what I write, they always seem to read what I wrote a week or so ago instead of the new content.  This happens even if they land on my main page (linked in my sig) rather than on an actual article.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>::shrug:: whatever.  I average between 100-300 people per day, and that is fine by me<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I really do n't see a need for something to be any more " real time " than that for someone 's blog .
Do you ? Not really...I generally update my site between 4-6 times per week , but when I update it I 'm only posting one article a day with the odd site announcement every so often...maybe I just suck , I do n't know , but it seems like it takes a week or two before people start really reading what I write , they always seem to read what I wrote a week or so ago instead of the new content .
This happens even if they land on my main page ( linked in my sig ) rather than on an actual article .
: : shrug : : whatever .
I average between 100-300 people per day , and that is fine by me : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really don't see a need for something to be any more "real time" than that for someone's blog.
Do you?Not really...I generally update my site between 4-6 times per week, but when I update it I'm only posting one article a day with the odd site announcement every so often...maybe I just suck, I don't know, but it seems like it takes a week or two before people start really reading what I write, they always seem to read what I wrote a week or so ago instead of the new content.
This happens even if they land on my main page (linked in my sig) rather than on an actual article.
::shrug:: whatever.
I average between 100-300 people per day, and that is fine by me :-)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359758</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31365472</id>
	<title>Re:I just noticed it yesterday.</title>
	<author>Virtual\_Raider</author>
	<datestamp>1267710420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Hope it isn't too far away, having my google apps account telling me what I need to restock in the fridge (or even the apartment) would be friggin awesome. Then when cookingwithgoogle.com starts up, just writing the recipe I want could give me a grocery list, instant win.</p></div><p>Some of these services annoy me because I don't <em>want</em> to be a creature of habit in everything I do. I personally want some variety from time to time and being able to predict individual whims is so far out in the future its not even scifi, its plain fantasy. Or maybe there is an overall pattern there, something that says routine for 4 weeks, then 75\% chance of a random choice of ingredients from Wed to Fri and 95\% on weekends. But if there is, I don't want to know about it and more importantly, I don't want somebody <em>else</em> to find out either.</p><p>Besides, no algorithm of recomendations I've seen so far, including Netflix, Google or Amazon can propose to me something new I would really like so far. All they do is cater to the fat section of the bell curve and I can perfectly find stuff inside on my own. For example, whenever I exhaust my reading (I do use the Goog's reader) and I see their "recommendations", its full of crap, pap and bland. Just because the have classified <strong>one</strong> site I read as 'humour' they throw in every low-brow knuckledragging lolcat and dailyfailing site they index. Or because I have a Slashdor RSS feed they throw in every cnet and Tech for Illiterates blogs (what does that say about<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. I wonder...)</p><p>Er, but I digress. My point was... <em>personally</em> I wouldn't want it to nag me about running out of milk, or much less, pre-order for me. Some times I want soy. Or some times I just don't want anything but water. And above all, most of the time I hate the feeling of being told what to do<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) </p><p>But yeah, I do see the appeal for some so I'm not saying its an evil invasion of privacy or anything, just that it wouldn't be for everybody (although I suspect they would still want to profile every one)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hope it is n't too far away , having my google apps account telling me what I need to restock in the fridge ( or even the apartment ) would be friggin awesome .
Then when cookingwithgoogle.com starts up , just writing the recipe I want could give me a grocery list , instant win.Some of these services annoy me because I do n't want to be a creature of habit in everything I do .
I personally want some variety from time to time and being able to predict individual whims is so far out in the future its not even scifi , its plain fantasy .
Or maybe there is an overall pattern there , something that says routine for 4 weeks , then 75 \ % chance of a random choice of ingredients from Wed to Fri and 95 \ % on weekends .
But if there is , I do n't want to know about it and more importantly , I do n't want somebody else to find out either.Besides , no algorithm of recomendations I 've seen so far , including Netflix , Google or Amazon can propose to me something new I would really like so far .
All they do is cater to the fat section of the bell curve and I can perfectly find stuff inside on my own .
For example , whenever I exhaust my reading ( I do use the Goog 's reader ) and I see their " recommendations " , its full of crap , pap and bland .
Just because the have classified one site I read as 'humour ' they throw in every low-brow knuckledragging lolcat and dailyfailing site they index .
Or because I have a Slashdor RSS feed they throw in every cnet and Tech for Illiterates blogs ( what does that say about / .
I wonder... ) Er , but I digress .
My point was... personally I would n't want it to nag me about running out of milk , or much less , pre-order for me .
Some times I want soy .
Or some times I just do n't want anything but water .
And above all , most of the time I hate the feeling of being told what to do : ) But yeah , I do see the appeal for some so I 'm not saying its an evil invasion of privacy or anything , just that it would n't be for everybody ( although I suspect they would still want to profile every one )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hope it isn't too far away, having my google apps account telling me what I need to restock in the fridge (or even the apartment) would be friggin awesome.
Then when cookingwithgoogle.com starts up, just writing the recipe I want could give me a grocery list, instant win.Some of these services annoy me because I don't want to be a creature of habit in everything I do.
I personally want some variety from time to time and being able to predict individual whims is so far out in the future its not even scifi, its plain fantasy.
Or maybe there is an overall pattern there, something that says routine for 4 weeks, then 75\% chance of a random choice of ingredients from Wed to Fri and 95\% on weekends.
But if there is, I don't want to know about it and more importantly, I don't want somebody else to find out either.Besides, no algorithm of recomendations I've seen so far, including Netflix, Google or Amazon can propose to me something new I would really like so far.
All they do is cater to the fat section of the bell curve and I can perfectly find stuff inside on my own.
For example, whenever I exhaust my reading (I do use the Goog's reader) and I see their "recommendations", its full of crap, pap and bland.
Just because the have classified one site I read as 'humour' they throw in every low-brow knuckledragging lolcat and dailyfailing site they index.
Or because I have a Slashdor RSS feed they throw in every cnet and Tech for Illiterates blogs (what does that say about /.
I wonder...)Er, but I digress.
My point was... personally I wouldn't want it to nag me about running out of milk, or much less, pre-order for me.
Some times I want soy.
Or some times I just don't want anything but water.
And above all, most of the time I hate the feeling of being told what to do :) But yeah, I do see the appeal for some so I'm not saying its an evil invasion of privacy or anything, just that it wouldn't be for everybody (although I suspect they would still want to profile every one)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31360152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31363364</id>
	<title>Re:twitter</title>
	<author>glwtta</author>
	<datestamp>1267700040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, exactly, because publish-subscribe did not exist before Twitter.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , exactly , because publish-subscribe did not exist before Twitter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, exactly, because publish-subscribe did not exist before Twitter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31360208</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe I'm just a noob, but...</title>
	<author>wizardforce</author>
	<datestamp>1267728600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's like an RSS feed for Google.  Just like you'd use an RSS feed to keep up with various blogs instead of visiting constantly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's like an RSS feed for Google .
Just like you 'd use an RSS feed to keep up with various blogs instead of visiting constantly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's like an RSS feed for Google.
Just like you'd use an RSS feed to keep up with various blogs instead of visiting constantly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359520</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31360670</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe I'm just a noob, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267731000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, isn't it obvious?</p><p>TACHYONS!</p><p>They are working with D-Wave remember.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , is n't it obvious ? TACHYONS ! They are working with D-Wave remember .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, isn't it obvious?TACHYONS!They are working with D-Wave remember.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359520</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359972</id>
	<title>twitter</title>
	<author>hey</author>
	<datestamp>1267727460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This sounds a bit like Twitter.  Put your content in one hole and it comes out lots of places.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This sounds a bit like Twitter .
Put your content in one hole and it comes out lots of places .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This sounds a bit like Twitter.
Put your content in one hole and it comes out lots of places.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31365212</id>
	<title>Blog Ping</title>
	<author>bjourne</author>
	<datestamp>1267708740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seems to me that push-publishing already is implemented on the web via services like <a href="http://pingomatic.com/" title="pingomatic.com">Ping-o-Matic</a> [pingomatic.com] and such. I can't see why a new push-publishing method would be needed since the blog ping works elegantly. Obviously, the system is abused by spammers, but Google's solution would suffer from the same problem too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seems to me that push-publishing already is implemented on the web via services like Ping-o-Matic [ pingomatic.com ] and such .
I ca n't see why a new push-publishing method would be needed since the blog ping works elegantly .
Obviously , the system is abused by spammers , but Google 's solution would suffer from the same problem too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seems to me that push-publishing already is implemented on the web via services like Ping-o-Matic [pingomatic.com] and such.
I can't see why a new push-publishing method would be needed since the blog ping works elegantly.
Obviously, the system is abused by spammers, but Google's solution would suffer from the same problem too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31360130</id>
	<title>This makes...</title>
	<author>kenp2002</author>
	<datestamp>1267728180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Keep in mind Google is quickly becoming an all controlling entity.<br>I have concerns that this technology could expose users to additional threats.<br>Likely I see it as one more way for Google to corner the search market.<br>Lastly I ponder the legal implications of a direct tying to a web site's content. What if there is a copyright violation.</p><p>Generally I find this to be a dud tech.<br>Long ago we had to publish to search engines then the crawlers came and life was good.<br>Again automation is what made things better.<br>Diving into this without thinking would be suicide.<br>Often I fear technology more now then I did before.<br>Simply put I think this is a crpytic way to pillage and trick web develoeprs to forking over additional metrics for page ranking since more frequent updates I would assume gets you a higher page rank.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Keep in mind Google is quickly becoming an all controlling entity.I have concerns that this technology could expose users to additional threats.Likely I see it as one more way for Google to corner the search market.Lastly I ponder the legal implications of a direct tying to a web site 's content .
What if there is a copyright violation.Generally I find this to be a dud tech.Long ago we had to publish to search engines then the crawlers came and life was good.Again automation is what made things better.Diving into this without thinking would be suicide.Often I fear technology more now then I did before.Simply put I think this is a crpytic way to pillage and trick web develoeprs to forking over additional metrics for page ranking since more frequent updates I would assume gets you a higher page rank .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Keep in mind Google is quickly becoming an all controlling entity.I have concerns that this technology could expose users to additional threats.Likely I see it as one more way for Google to corner the search market.Lastly I ponder the legal implications of a direct tying to a web site's content.
What if there is a copyright violation.Generally I find this to be a dud tech.Long ago we had to publish to search engines then the crawlers came and life was good.Again automation is what made things better.Diving into this without thinking would be suicide.Often I fear technology more now then I did before.Simply put I think this is a crpytic way to pillage and trick web develoeprs to forking over additional metrics for page ranking since more frequent updates I would assume gets you a higher page rank.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_1518249_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31368598
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359550
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_1518249_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31368858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359520
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_1518249_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31361762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359658
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_1518249_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31361730
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359520
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_1518249_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31361480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31360152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31360018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_1518249_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31365472
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31360152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31360018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_1518249_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359520
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_1518249_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31361138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359520
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_1518249_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31360208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359520
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_1518249_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359520
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_1518249_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359988
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359520
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_1518249_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359520
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_1518249_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359788
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359520
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_1518249_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31366468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_1518249_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31361752
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31360152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31360018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_1518249_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359520
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_1518249_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31360670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359520
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_1518249_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31363364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_04_1518249_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31381930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359520
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_04_1518249.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359550
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31368598
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_04_1518249.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359972
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31363364
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31366468
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_04_1518249.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31360018
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31360152
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31365472
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31361752
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31361480
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_04_1518249.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31360130
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_04_1518249.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31360770
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_04_1518249.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359520
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359760
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31360208
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31361730
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359900
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31360670
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359758
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31381930
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359906
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359988
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31361138
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359892
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31368858
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359788
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_04_1518249.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31361456
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_04_1518249.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359658
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31361762
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_04_1518249.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31360016
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_04_1518249.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_04_1518249.31359526
</commentlist>
</conversation>
