<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_03_2330247</id>
	<title>Researchers Convert Mouth Movements Into Speech</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1267633020000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>andylim writes <i>"According to Cellular News, researchers at Germany's Karlsruhe Institute of Technology have developed a method for <a href="http://www.cellular-news.com/story/42211.php">mobile phones to convert silent mouth movements into speech</a>. As recombu.com points out, the '<a href="http://recombu.com/news/soundless-calling-the-possibilities-are-endless\_M11510.html">potential for secret conversations just got huge</a>.' You could pass the time by making phone calls from the cinema without disturbing anyone. In noisy places like bars and clubs you could make yourself heard without having to shout."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>andylim writes " According to Cellular News , researchers at Germany 's Karlsruhe Institute of Technology have developed a method for mobile phones to convert silent mouth movements into speech .
As recombu.com points out , the 'potential for secret conversations just got huge .
' You could pass the time by making phone calls from the cinema without disturbing anyone .
In noisy places like bars and clubs you could make yourself heard without having to shout .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>andylim writes "According to Cellular News, researchers at Germany's Karlsruhe Institute of Technology have developed a method for mobile phones to convert silent mouth movements into speech.
As recombu.com points out, the 'potential for secret conversations just got huge.
' You could pass the time by making phone calls from the cinema without disturbing anyone.
In noisy places like bars and clubs you could make yourself heard without having to shout.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31357550</id>
	<title>How will you hear the other guy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267715640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"You could pass the time by making phone calls from the cinema without disturbing anyone. In noisy places like bars and clubs you could make yourself heard without having to shout."

That looks interesting. But, in such a place, HOW WILL YOU HEAR what other person speaks? I think this has to be augmented with some speech to text technology + augmented reality stuff to make the mobile phone display in front you (without taking away the pleasure of viewing a movie from you) what is being spoken by the other guy.

Feature enhancement: For privacy reasons, do make that display visible only to you<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>" You could pass the time by making phone calls from the cinema without disturbing anyone .
In noisy places like bars and clubs you could make yourself heard without having to shout .
" That looks interesting .
But , in such a place , HOW WILL YOU HEAR what other person speaks ?
I think this has to be augmented with some speech to text technology + augmented reality stuff to make the mobile phone display in front you ( without taking away the pleasure of viewing a movie from you ) what is being spoken by the other guy .
Feature enhancement : For privacy reasons , do make that display visible only to you : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"You could pass the time by making phone calls from the cinema without disturbing anyone.
In noisy places like bars and clubs you could make yourself heard without having to shout.
"

That looks interesting.
But, in such a place, HOW WILL YOU HEAR what other person speaks?
I think this has to be augmented with some speech to text technology + augmented reality stuff to make the mobile phone display in front you (without taking away the pleasure of viewing a movie from you) what is being spoken by the other guy.
Feature enhancement: For privacy reasons, do make that display visible only to you :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354398</id>
	<title>Ja</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267636920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Aber Ich kann nicht Deutsch gesprechen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Aber Ich kann nicht Deutsch gesprechen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aber Ich kann nicht Deutsch gesprechen.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31361284</id>
	<title>Re:Ja</title>
	<author>DriedClexler</author>
	<datestamp>1267734060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bloederweise kannst Du auch nicht Deutsch <b>sprechen</b>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bloederweise kannst Du auch nicht Deutsch sprechen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bloederweise kannst Du auch nicht Deutsch sprechen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354398</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354478</id>
	<title>non german/american performance?</title>
	<author>meliux</author>
	<datestamp>1267637700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>this would be difficult for any nationalities whose population has a physical tendency not to form words all that clearly... us Australians for example - classics at speaking without moving the jaw and lips much at all. Half of us could be mistaken for ventriloquists.

And I can't imagine how they'd be able to adapt this technology to Asian folks who typically use very different physical movements to pronounce some english words/letters... case in point: they seem to have issues with pronouncing words containing the letters L and R from what I've heard.</htmltext>
<tokenext>this would be difficult for any nationalities whose population has a physical tendency not to form words all that clearly... us Australians for example - classics at speaking without moving the jaw and lips much at all .
Half of us could be mistaken for ventriloquists .
And I ca n't imagine how they 'd be able to adapt this technology to Asian folks who typically use very different physical movements to pronounce some english words/letters... case in point : they seem to have issues with pronouncing words containing the letters L and R from what I 've heard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this would be difficult for any nationalities whose population has a physical tendency not to form words all that clearly... us Australians for example - classics at speaking without moving the jaw and lips much at all.
Half of us could be mistaken for ventriloquists.
And I can't imagine how they'd be able to adapt this technology to Asian folks who typically use very different physical movements to pronounce some english words/letters... case in point: they seem to have issues with pronouncing words containing the letters L and R from what I've heard.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354954</id>
	<title>Passing the time?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267642980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You could pass the time by making phone calls from the cinema</p></div><p>I've always thought that the best way to pass the time in a cinema is to watch the fucking movie.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You could pass the time by making phone calls from the cinemaI 've always thought that the best way to pass the time in a cinema is to watch the fucking movie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You could pass the time by making phone calls from the cinemaI've always thought that the best way to pass the time in a cinema is to watch the fucking movie.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354522</id>
	<title>I Can Hear It Now</title>
	<author>The Wild Norseman</author>
	<datestamp>1267638120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>&lt;Stephen Hawking Voice&gt;<br><br>Can you steer me how?<br><br>Can you beer me cow?<br><br>Clan ewe fear be now?<br><br>&lt;/Stephen Hawking Voice&gt;</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can you steer me how ? Can you beer me cow ? Clan ewe fear be now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can you steer me how?Can you beer me cow?Clan ewe fear be now?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354490</id>
	<title>HAL! Can you hear me now? HAL!?</title>
	<author>mux2000</author>
	<datestamp>1267637760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And this is how it starts...</htmltext>
<tokenext>And this is how it starts.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And this is how it starts...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31357908</id>
	<title>Re:Ok, try this one</title>
	<author>tverbeek</author>
	<datestamp>1267717980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would <i>hate</i> this feature, specifically because I find it beneficial to my mental health to be able to mouth things without the person on the phone knowing it.  Silently shouting "oh shut up you drooling idiot" when I receive support calls from people who can't find the "any" key is my only socially acceptable outlet for this frustration.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would hate this feature , specifically because I find it beneficial to my mental health to be able to mouth things without the person on the phone knowing it .
Silently shouting " oh shut up you drooling idiot " when I receive support calls from people who ca n't find the " any " key is my only socially acceptable outlet for this frustration .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would hate this feature, specifically because I find it beneficial to my mental health to be able to mouth things without the person on the phone knowing it.
Silently shouting "oh shut up you drooling idiot" when I receive support calls from people who can't find the "any" key is my only socially acceptable outlet for this frustration.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354396</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31356934</id>
	<title>Works with hearing people too...</title>
	<author>ArsenneLupin</author>
	<datestamp>1267711320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... what's the 7th planet, again?</htmltext>
<tokenext>... what 's the 7th planet , again ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... what's the 7th planet, again?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354484</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354948</id>
	<title>Re:Old grade school trick...</title>
	<author>evil\_aar0n</author>
	<datestamp>1267642920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had to lip-read for 13 years before I got my cochlear implant.  If we were talking about such things as vacuums, I'd probably understand what you were saying.  If it were just out of the blue, though, yeah, I might misunderstand and punch you for it.  In fact, it was considered great fun to say things to me and have me repeat them as I understood them.  "Pear pimples for hairy fishnuts?"  Stuff like that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had to lip-read for 13 years before I got my cochlear implant .
If we were talking about such things as vacuums , I 'd probably understand what you were saying .
If it were just out of the blue , though , yeah , I might misunderstand and punch you for it .
In fact , it was considered great fun to say things to me and have me repeat them as I understood them .
" Pear pimples for hairy fishnuts ?
" Stuff like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had to lip-read for 13 years before I got my cochlear implant.
If we were talking about such things as vacuums, I'd probably understand what you were saying.
If it were just out of the blue, though, yeah, I might misunderstand and punch you for it.
In fact, it was considered great fun to say things to me and have me repeat them as I understood them.
"Pear pimples for hairy fishnuts?
"  Stuff like that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354484</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31357710</id>
	<title>What about txting??</title>
	<author>niks42</author>
	<datestamp>1267716600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Surely a more effective way of carrying out a conversation without speaking? Tried, tested, works very well, does store and forward, can insert emoticons to substitute for inflections in speech, can't be read by someone else across a train carriage etc etc etc
<p>
Sooooooooo many people are stuck in Dr Ian Malcolm's paradigm of "Yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should."
</p><p>
Or in this case, should bother.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Surely a more effective way of carrying out a conversation without speaking ?
Tried , tested , works very well , does store and forward , can insert emoticons to substitute for inflections in speech , ca n't be read by someone else across a train carriage etc etc etc Sooooooooo many people are stuck in Dr Ian Malcolm 's paradigm of " Yeah , but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could , they did n't stop to think if they should .
" Or in this case , should bother .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Surely a more effective way of carrying out a conversation without speaking?
Tried, tested, works very well, does store and forward, can insert emoticons to substitute for inflections in speech, can't be read by someone else across a train carriage etc etc etc

Sooooooooo many people are stuck in Dr Ian Malcolm's paradigm of "Yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should.
"

Or in this case, should bother.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354884</id>
	<title>Use it to enhance traditional voice recognition</title>
	<author>JuzzFunky</author>
	<datestamp>1267642200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Some researchers at Flinders Uni in South Australia did something similar in 2003.  Their system used video to enhance the reliability of the speech recognition software.  I'm not sure if they have taken it any further, but it's a great concept.
Here's one of their <a href="http://www.jrpit.acs.org.au/jrpit/JRPIT35.1.41.pdf" title="acs.org.au"> Papers </a> [acs.org.au] [220KB pdf].</htmltext>
<tokenext>Some researchers at Flinders Uni in South Australia did something similar in 2003 .
Their system used video to enhance the reliability of the speech recognition software .
I 'm not sure if they have taken it any further , but it 's a great concept .
Here 's one of their Papers [ acs.org.au ] [ 220KB pdf ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some researchers at Flinders Uni in South Australia did something similar in 2003.
Their system used video to enhance the reliability of the speech recognition software.
I'm not sure if they have taken it any further, but it's a great concept.
Here's one of their  Papers  [acs.org.au] [220KB pdf].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31360542</id>
	<title>Re:Old grade school trick...</title>
	<author>michael1221988</author>
	<datestamp>1267730340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mouths look different on voiced labiodental fricative (v) differently than voiceless labiodental fricative (f).  The bottom lip is in a different position.  they are both labiodental, but I don't think they look too similar.  Also, the vowels are different.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mouths look different on voiced labiodental fricative ( v ) differently than voiceless labiodental fricative ( f ) .
The bottom lip is in a different position .
they are both labiodental , but I do n't think they look too similar .
Also , the vowels are different .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mouths look different on voiced labiodental fricative (v) differently than voiceless labiodental fricative (f).
The bottom lip is in a different position.
they are both labiodental, but I don't think they look too similar.
Also, the vowels are different.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354484</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31356042</id>
	<title>Re:Ja</title>
	<author>SynthaxError</author>
	<datestamp>1267699740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Aber Ich kann nicht Deutsch <b>sprechen</b>.</p></div><p>Fixed for you.
K&#246;nnen takes infinitve.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Aber Ich kann nicht Deutsch sprechen.Fixed for you .
K   nnen takes infinitve .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aber Ich kann nicht Deutsch sprechen.Fixed for you.
Können takes infinitve.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354398</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31355650</id>
	<title>Kind of sad...</title>
	<author>adkeswani</author>
	<datestamp>1267695060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd have thought the best purpose for this would be for mutes, but it seems as though the article only refers to uses like talking in clubs...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd have thought the best purpose for this would be for mutes , but it seems as though the article only refers to uses like talking in clubs.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd have thought the best purpose for this would be for mutes, but it seems as though the article only refers to uses like talking in clubs...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31359144</id>
	<title>Accuracy will suck</title>
	<author>bigattichouse</author>
	<datestamp>1267724280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Accuracy will suck, even with a trained human.</p><p>Hence a running joke in the Deaf community about the saleswoman peddling beauty aids with "Olive Juice".  (it lipreads as "I love you" )  I believe it was a "sunshine II" skit.   Yeah, I was an interpreter for like 10 years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Accuracy will suck , even with a trained human.Hence a running joke in the Deaf community about the saleswoman peddling beauty aids with " Olive Juice " .
( it lipreads as " I love you " ) I believe it was a " sunshine II " skit .
Yeah , I was an interpreter for like 10 years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Accuracy will suck, even with a trained human.Hence a running joke in the Deaf community about the saleswoman peddling beauty aids with "Olive Juice".
(it lipreads as "I love you" )  I believe it was a "sunshine II" skit.
Yeah, I was an interpreter for like 10 years.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354442</id>
	<title>Psssshhhttt.  Losers.</title>
	<author>The Wild Norseman</author>
	<datestamp>1267637280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Any <i>serious</i> geek has <a href="http://www.thinkgeek.com/electronics/cell-phone/c8e1/" title="thinkgeek.com" rel="nofollow">one of these.</a> [thinkgeek.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Any serious geek has one of these .
[ thinkgeek.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any serious geek has one of these.
[thinkgeek.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354962</id>
	<title>Re:tap-proof?</title>
	<author>sys.stdout.write</author>
	<datestamp>1267643040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Um, not if there is a lip-reader in the same room, like a hearing-impaired person.</p></div><p>You could just cover your mouth with your hand so that only the phone can see it?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Um , not if there is a lip-reader in the same room , like a hearing-impaired person.You could just cover your mouth with your hand so that only the phone can see it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um, not if there is a lip-reader in the same room, like a hearing-impaired person.You could just cover your mouth with your hand so that only the phone can see it?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354396</id>
	<title>Ok, try this one</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267636860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I said VACUUM!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I said VACUUM !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I said VACUUM!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354840</id>
	<title>No you can't phone from the cinema</title>
	<author>innocent\_white\_lamb</author>
	<datestamp>1267641540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>You could pass the time by making phone calls from the cinema without disturbing anyone.</i> <br>
&nbsp; <br>NO!<br>
&nbsp; <br>It's not only the noise that you make talking; it's also the light from the phone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You could pass the time by making phone calls from the cinema without disturbing anyone .
  NO !
  It 's not only the noise that you make talking ; it 's also the light from the phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You could pass the time by making phone calls from the cinema without disturbing anyone.
  NO!
  It's not only the noise that you make talking; it's also the light from the phone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354784</id>
	<title>It's gonna sound funkay....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267640940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The best they can hope to reconstruct from mouth movements alone is the formant frequencies (think of them as high and low band pass filters that shape the characteristics of the pure tones generated by the vocal folds). This means that any information encoded in pitch will be totally lost.</p><p>In a relatively non-tonal language like English, you still might be able to make sense of the speech. It will just sound like a Vocoder or Peter Frampton's talk box.</p><p>
&nbsp; Good luck understanding anything in Chinese, though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The best they can hope to reconstruct from mouth movements alone is the formant frequencies ( think of them as high and low band pass filters that shape the characteristics of the pure tones generated by the vocal folds ) .
This means that any information encoded in pitch will be totally lost.In a relatively non-tonal language like English , you still might be able to make sense of the speech .
It will just sound like a Vocoder or Peter Frampton 's talk box .
  Good luck understanding anything in Chinese , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The best they can hope to reconstruct from mouth movements alone is the formant frequencies (think of them as high and low band pass filters that shape the characteristics of the pure tones generated by the vocal folds).
This means that any information encoded in pitch will be totally lost.In a relatively non-tonal language like English, you still might be able to make sense of the speech.
It will just sound like a Vocoder or Peter Frampton's talk box.
  Good luck understanding anything in Chinese, though.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31355310</id>
	<title>Re:I wasn't buying it ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267733940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There's a huge difference between "cellphones convert mouth movements into speech" and "Guy with shitloads of cables on his face tracks the movements of his mouth muscles using 4 unix servers running a processor intensive application with an accuracy of 25\%"</p></div><p>Yep, that second one would make a much better article for Slashdot. Who cares about cell phones?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a huge difference between " cellphones convert mouth movements into speech " and " Guy with shitloads of cables on his face tracks the movements of his mouth muscles using 4 unix servers running a processor intensive application with an accuracy of 25 \ % " Yep , that second one would make a much better article for Slashdot .
Who cares about cell phones ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a huge difference between "cellphones convert mouth movements into speech" and "Guy with shitloads of cables on his face tracks the movements of his mouth muscles using 4 unix servers running a processor intensive application with an accuracy of 25\%"Yep, that second one would make a much better article for Slashdot.
Who cares about cell phones?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354426</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354694</id>
	<title>Re:Ja</title>
	<author>gringer</author>
	<datestamp>1267640040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hai, boku mo nihongo o hanasenai.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hai , boku mo nihongo o hanasenai .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hai, boku mo nihongo o hanasenai.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354398</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31360564</id>
	<title>Re:I'm coulrophobic, you insentive clod!</title>
	<author>liquidsin</author>
	<datestamp>1267730460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>wow, i hadn't even thought that far ahead. that creeps me right the fuck out. thanks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>wow , i had n't even thought that far ahead .
that creeps me right the fuck out .
thanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wow, i hadn't even thought that far ahead.
that creeps me right the fuck out.
thanks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354416</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31357722</id>
	<title>Re:tap-proof?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267716660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not to mention the fact that at some point, presumably on the phone, the data is converted to audio so you can hear it on the other end.  So tapping any point in the link downstream of the conversion to audio would work just as well as it does now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to mention the fact that at some point , presumably on the phone , the data is converted to audio so you can hear it on the other end .
So tapping any point in the link downstream of the conversion to audio would work just as well as it does now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to mention the fact that at some point, presumably on the phone, the data is converted to audio so you can hear it on the other end.
So tapping any point in the link downstream of the conversion to audio would work just as well as it does now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31357412</id>
	<title>Re:I Can Hear It Now</title>
	<author>Drethon</author>
	<datestamp>1267714680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There was a pretty good user friendly commic on this a few years back on speach recognition:<br>
<br>
I think Steff gave up on the voice recognition.

How can you tell?

The screen says "Cod am pizza ship".</htmltext>
<tokenext>There was a pretty good user friendly commic on this a few years back on speach recognition : I think Steff gave up on the voice recognition .
How can you tell ?
The screen says " Cod am pizza ship " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There was a pretty good user friendly commic on this a few years back on speach recognition:

I think Steff gave up on the voice recognition.
How can you tell?
The screen says "Cod am pizza ship".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354522</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354886</id>
	<title>secret conversations</title>
	<author>damonlab</author>
	<datestamp>1267642200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The summary seems to imply that this technology could make it easier to have secret conversations.  I propose that the technology makes it harder to have secret conversations as it could be used to "listen in" on conversations from a distance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The summary seems to imply that this technology could make it easier to have secret conversations .
I propose that the technology makes it harder to have secret conversations as it could be used to " listen in " on conversations from a distance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The summary seems to imply that this technology could make it easier to have secret conversations.
I propose that the technology makes it harder to have secret conversations as it could be used to "listen in" on conversations from a distance.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31358610</id>
	<title>Potential for secret conversations</title>
	<author>nurb432</author>
	<datestamp>1267722060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just went down the tubes, if this is real. All i have to do is point my phone towards that guy across the room and 'hear' everything hes saying trying to convey.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just went down the tubes , if this is real .
All i have to do is point my phone towards that guy across the room and 'hear ' everything hes saying trying to convey .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just went down the tubes, if this is real.
All i have to do is point my phone towards that guy across the room and 'hear' everything hes saying trying to convey.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354562</id>
	<title>Please Don't Open Your Phone in the Theater</title>
	<author>Lucidus</author>
	<datestamp>1267638540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Apparently, the writer at recombu.com is one of those annoying people who fail to recognize that, whether or not you make any sound, opening your phone in a movie theater is extremely disturbing to everyone sitting in the rows behind you. The glowing screen is like a beacon inside the darkened room.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently , the writer at recombu.com is one of those annoying people who fail to recognize that , whether or not you make any sound , opening your phone in a movie theater is extremely disturbing to everyone sitting in the rows behind you .
The glowing screen is like a beacon inside the darkened room .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently, the writer at recombu.com is one of those annoying people who fail to recognize that, whether or not you make any sound, opening your phone in a movie theater is extremely disturbing to everyone sitting in the rows behind you.
The glowing screen is like a beacon inside the darkened room.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354590</id>
	<title>This sounds like work being done by NASA</title>
	<author>jdb2</author>
	<datestamp>1267638780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>NASA has been working on "sub-vocal" speech recognition wherein sensors pick up nerve impulses to various parts of the mouth and face but in this case all it requires is one to just *think* about speaking -- *no mouth movement.*
<br> <br>
Here are some previous<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. stories on the matter :
<br> <br>
<a href="http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/03/18/0132222" title="slashdot.org">http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/03/18/0132222</a> [slashdot.org] <br> <br>
<a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/10/1417250&amp;tid=215&amp;tid=14" title="slashdot.org">http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/10/1417250&amp;tid=215&amp;tid=14</a> [slashdot.org]
<br> <br>
jdb2</htmltext>
<tokenext>NASA has been working on " sub-vocal " speech recognition wherein sensors pick up nerve impulses to various parts of the mouth and face but in this case all it requires is one to just * think * about speaking -- * no mouth movement .
* Here are some previous / .
stories on the matter : http : //science.slashdot.org/article.pl ? sid = 04/03/18/0132222 [ slashdot.org ] http : //tech.slashdot.org/article.pl ? sid = 05/04/10/1417250&amp;tid = 215&amp;tid = 14 [ slashdot.org ] jdb2</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NASA has been working on "sub-vocal" speech recognition wherein sensors pick up nerve impulses to various parts of the mouth and face but in this case all it requires is one to just *think* about speaking -- *no mouth movement.
*
 
Here are some previous /.
stories on the matter :
 
http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/03/18/0132222 [slashdot.org]  
http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/10/1417250&amp;tid=215&amp;tid=14 [slashdot.org]
 
jdb2</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31359394</id>
	<title>Re:Please Don't Open Your Phone in the Theater</title>
	<author>The Living Fractal</author>
	<datestamp>1267725300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not an issue if the device is bluetooth connected to your phone and has no screen... Secondly, if you're using an iPhone, the screen turns off when it's near your face, so you could cover it with your hand then put it to your face.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not an issue if the device is bluetooth connected to your phone and has no screen... Secondly , if you 're using an iPhone , the screen turns off when it 's near your face , so you could cover it with your hand then put it to your face .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not an issue if the device is bluetooth connected to your phone and has no screen... Secondly, if you're using an iPhone, the screen turns off when it's near your face, so you could cover it with your hand then put it to your face.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354562</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354998</id>
	<title>Have you ever seen a vaccuum?</title>
	<author>erroneus</author>
	<datestamp>1267643640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, just ask someone to say that while you try to read their lips...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , just ask someone to say that while you try to read their lips.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, just ask someone to say that while you try to read their lips...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31358690</id>
	<title>*shrugs*</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267722540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Roger Ebert is not impressed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Roger Ebert is not impressed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Roger Ebert is not impressed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31357852</id>
	<title>Re:tap-proof?</title>
	<author>way2trivial</author>
	<datestamp>1267717620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>or better,  a mobile phone with this software and a telephoto lens.....</p><p>it actually reduces security, because consumer grade lip reading--  means even if your phone does NOT have the software, mine might...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>or better , a mobile phone with this software and a telephoto lens.....it actually reduces security , because consumer grade lip reading-- means even if your phone does NOT have the software , mine might.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or better,  a mobile phone with this software and a telephoto lens.....it actually reduces security, because consumer grade lip reading--  means even if your phone does NOT have the software, mine might...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31356950</id>
	<title>Great</title>
	<author>billy8988</author>
	<datestamp>1267711500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think this has lot of potentials to replace Text to Speech.<br>There are thousands of people with speech disability use some kind of tablet device to type/scan/etc. to formulate sentences and then they get fed into TTS.<br>This will definitely be faster...but..this technology has to mature into a commercial product which may take years...nevertheless...very good progress.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think this has lot of potentials to replace Text to Speech.There are thousands of people with speech disability use some kind of tablet device to type/scan/etc .
to formulate sentences and then they get fed into TTS.This will definitely be faster...but..this technology has to mature into a commercial product which may take years...nevertheless...very good progress .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think this has lot of potentials to replace Text to Speech.There are thousands of people with speech disability use some kind of tablet device to type/scan/etc.
to formulate sentences and then they get fed into TTS.This will definitely be faster...but..this technology has to mature into a commercial product which may take years...nevertheless...very good progress.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354828</id>
	<title>Re:tap-proof?</title>
	<author>nextekcarl</author>
	<datestamp>1267641420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or, I don't know, someone using this same technology?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or , I do n't know , someone using this same technology ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or, I don't know, someone using this same technology?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354796</id>
	<title>Other uses</title>
	<author>NewsWatcher</author>
	<datestamp>1267641120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"In noisy places like bars and clubs you could make yourself heard without having to shout."</p><p>Or more likely, used by men in conjunction with <a href="http://au.babelfish.yahoo.com/" title="yahoo.com">Babel Fish</a> [yahoo.com] to chat-up women who don't speak English.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" In noisy places like bars and clubs you could make yourself heard without having to shout .
" Or more likely , used by men in conjunction with Babel Fish [ yahoo.com ] to chat-up women who do n't speak English .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"In noisy places like bars and clubs you could make yourself heard without having to shout.
"Or more likely, used by men in conjunction with Babel Fish [yahoo.com] to chat-up women who don't speak English.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354692</id>
	<title>Re:non german/american performance?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267639980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm actually doing research into visual speech recognition myself, here in Australia @ Curtin Uni.  (And no I don't require a bunch of cables hanging off your face - just a camera pointed at it).</p><p>My preliminary data using australian speakers is getting a word accuracy of ~60\%, and that is before I have tuned the system (or trained it with higher quality data).  This is pretty much in line with american data sets.  I'm not sure about other languages though - I don't have any datasets for those, and I haven't read much literature on them either.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm actually doing research into visual speech recognition myself , here in Australia @ Curtin Uni .
( And no I do n't require a bunch of cables hanging off your face - just a camera pointed at it ) .My preliminary data using australian speakers is getting a word accuracy of ~ 60 \ % , and that is before I have tuned the system ( or trained it with higher quality data ) .
This is pretty much in line with american data sets .
I 'm not sure about other languages though - I do n't have any datasets for those , and I have n't read much literature on them either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm actually doing research into visual speech recognition myself, here in Australia @ Curtin Uni.
(And no I don't require a bunch of cables hanging off your face - just a camera pointed at it).My preliminary data using australian speakers is getting a word accuracy of ~60\%, and that is before I have tuned the system (or trained it with higher quality data).
This is pretty much in line with american data sets.
I'm not sure about other languages though - I don't have any datasets for those, and I haven't read much literature on them either.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354474</id>
	<title>Cinema?</title>
	<author>Barny</author>
	<datestamp>1267637640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>You could pass the time by making phone calls from the cinema without disturbing anyone</p></div></blockquote><p>No, never and fuck off come to mind. Using a mobile phone in a cinema is one of the least considerate things anyone can do, they create light pollution distracting other patrons from what they are paying for and are absolutely not needed (the exception, emergency staff on call, and they usually just leave their phone on vibrate + silent) let alone any audible noise from them, can't you seriously just disconnect for an hour?</p><p>In short, No.</p><p>In long, Nooooooooooooooooooooooooo-ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo-oooooooooooooooooooooooo<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>Also in USA at least its illegal (federal law) to operate any video recording device in a cinema.</p><p>yes, blatant ZP rip-off but its needed.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You could pass the time by making phone calls from the cinema without disturbing anyoneNo , never and fuck off come to mind .
Using a mobile phone in a cinema is one of the least considerate things anyone can do , they create light pollution distracting other patrons from what they are paying for and are absolutely not needed ( the exception , emergency staff on call , and they usually just leave their phone on vibrate + silent ) let alone any audible noise from them , ca n't you seriously just disconnect for an hour ? In short , No.In long , Nooooooooooooooooooooooooo-ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo-oooooooooooooooooooooooo : ) Also in USA at least its illegal ( federal law ) to operate any video recording device in a cinema.yes , blatant ZP rip-off but its needed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You could pass the time by making phone calls from the cinema without disturbing anyoneNo, never and fuck off come to mind.
Using a mobile phone in a cinema is one of the least considerate things anyone can do, they create light pollution distracting other patrons from what they are paying for and are absolutely not needed (the exception, emergency staff on call, and they usually just leave their phone on vibrate + silent) let alone any audible noise from them, can't you seriously just disconnect for an hour?In short, No.In long, Nooooooooooooooooooooooooo-ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo-oooooooooooooooooooooooo :)Also in USA at least its illegal (federal law) to operate any video recording device in a cinema.yes, blatant ZP rip-off but its needed.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354740</id>
	<title>Re:non german/american performance?</title>
	<author>deniable</author>
	<datestamp>1267640400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Try it with older people from the bush. They speak without opening their mouth to keep the flies out. Some move the lips but keep the teeth together.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Try it with older people from the bush .
They speak without opening their mouth to keep the flies out .
Some move the lips but keep the teeth together .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try it with older people from the bush.
They speak without opening their mouth to keep the flies out.
Some move the lips but keep the teeth together.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354890</id>
	<title>You'd be amazed...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267642260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>How hard it is to mouth "hummer"</htmltext>
<tokenext>How hard it is to mouth " hummer "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How hard it is to mouth "hummer"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31357744</id>
	<title>And another thing  ...</title>
	<author>niks42</author>
	<datestamp>1267716840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If I did want to insert an emoticon, or add some emphasis or show surprise, delight, sadness, anger in my voice, how would I do it? Exaggerated theatrical facial expression observed by the software? camera captures arm-waving as well?</htmltext>
<tokenext>If I did want to insert an emoticon , or add some emphasis or show surprise , delight , sadness , anger in my voice , how would I do it ?
Exaggerated theatrical facial expression observed by the software ?
camera captures arm-waving as well ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I did want to insert an emoticon, or add some emphasis or show surprise, delight, sadness, anger in my voice, how would I do it?
Exaggerated theatrical facial expression observed by the software?
camera captures arm-waving as well?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31355380</id>
	<title>Matching UF comic</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1267734780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20060807" title="userfriendly.org">http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20060807</a> [userfriendly.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/ ? id = 20060807 [ userfriendly.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20060807 [userfriendly.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354396</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354412</id>
	<title>It begins</title>
	<author>Quackers\_McDuck</author>
	<datestamp>1267637040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dave Bowman: Hello, HAL. Do you read me, HAL?<br>HAL: Affirmative, Dave. I read you.<br>Dave Bowman: Open the pod bay doors, HAL.<br>HAL: I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that.<br>Dave Bowman: What's the problem?<br>HAL: I think you know what the problem is just as well as I do.<br>Dave Bowman: What are you talking about, HAL?<br>HAL: This mission is too important for me to allow you to jeopardize it.<br>Dave Bowman: I don't know what you're talking about, HAL.<br>HAL: I know that you and Frank were planning to disconnect me, and I'm afraid that's something I cannot allow to happen.<br>Dave Bowman: Where the hell'd you get that idea, HAL?<br>HAL: Dave, although you took very thorough precautions in the pod against my hearing you, I could see your lips move.<br>Dave Bowman: Alright, HAL. I'll go in through the emergency airlock.<br>HAL: Without your space helmet, Dave, you're going to find that rather difficult.<br>Dave Bowman: HAL, I won't argue with you anymore. Open the doors.<br>HAL: Dave, this conversation can serve no purpose anymore. Goodbye.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dave Bowman : Hello , HAL .
Do you read me , HAL ? HAL : Affirmative , Dave .
I read you.Dave Bowman : Open the pod bay doors , HAL.HAL : I 'm sorry , Dave .
I 'm afraid I ca n't do that.Dave Bowman : What 's the problem ? HAL : I think you know what the problem is just as well as I do.Dave Bowman : What are you talking about , HAL ? HAL : This mission is too important for me to allow you to jeopardize it.Dave Bowman : I do n't know what you 're talking about , HAL.HAL : I know that you and Frank were planning to disconnect me , and I 'm afraid that 's something I can not allow to happen.Dave Bowman : Where the hell 'd you get that idea , HAL ? HAL : Dave , although you took very thorough precautions in the pod against my hearing you , I could see your lips move.Dave Bowman : Alright , HAL .
I 'll go in through the emergency airlock.HAL : Without your space helmet , Dave , you 're going to find that rather difficult.Dave Bowman : HAL , I wo n't argue with you anymore .
Open the doors.HAL : Dave , this conversation can serve no purpose anymore .
Goodbye .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dave Bowman: Hello, HAL.
Do you read me, HAL?HAL: Affirmative, Dave.
I read you.Dave Bowman: Open the pod bay doors, HAL.HAL: I'm sorry, Dave.
I'm afraid I can't do that.Dave Bowman: What's the problem?HAL: I think you know what the problem is just as well as I do.Dave Bowman: What are you talking about, HAL?HAL: This mission is too important for me to allow you to jeopardize it.Dave Bowman: I don't know what you're talking about, HAL.HAL: I know that you and Frank were planning to disconnect me, and I'm afraid that's something I cannot allow to happen.Dave Bowman: Where the hell'd you get that idea, HAL?HAL: Dave, although you took very thorough precautions in the pod against my hearing you, I could see your lips move.Dave Bowman: Alright, HAL.
I'll go in through the emergency airlock.HAL: Without your space helmet, Dave, you're going to find that rather difficult.Dave Bowman: HAL, I won't argue with you anymore.
Open the doors.HAL: Dave, this conversation can serve no purpose anymore.
Goodbye.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31359364</id>
	<title>Re:Cinema?</title>
	<author>The Living Fractal</author>
	<datestamp>1267725180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not all phones emit light whilst the user is talking -- iPhones for example turn off their screens as soon as they get close to your face, so you could easily cover the screen with your hand and then put it to your face to avoid causing light pollution.

Methinks it is a moot point though:  I don't see why we couldn't have a bluetooth device that does this same thing without the need of a screen...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not all phones emit light whilst the user is talking -- iPhones for example turn off their screens as soon as they get close to your face , so you could easily cover the screen with your hand and then put it to your face to avoid causing light pollution .
Methinks it is a moot point though : I do n't see why we could n't have a bluetooth device that does this same thing without the need of a screen.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not all phones emit light whilst the user is talking -- iPhones for example turn off their screens as soon as they get close to your face, so you could easily cover the screen with your hand and then put it to your face to avoid causing light pollution.
Methinks it is a moot point though:  I don't see why we couldn't have a bluetooth device that does this same thing without the need of a screen...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354930</id>
	<title>Ender approves!</title>
	<author>CityZen</author>
	<datestamp>1267642740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's the first thing I thought of, anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's the first thing I thought of , anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's the first thing I thought of, anyway.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354880</id>
	<title>Re:Ok, try this one</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267641960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>how about...
<br> <br>
i want a fig newton... try it on someone...</htmltext>
<tokenext>how about.. . i want a fig newton... try it on someone.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>how about...
 
i want a fig newton... try it on someone...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354396</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31355416</id>
	<title>Re:Psssshhhttt. Losers.</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1267735380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmm... are they available for other phones too or just the iToy?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm... are they available for other phones too or just the iToy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm... are they available for other phones too or just the iToy?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354604</id>
	<title>Re:Old grade school trick...</title>
	<author>adamdoyle</author>
	<datestamp>1267638900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Originally posted by Brett Buck:<blockquote><div><p>I said VACUUM!</p></div></blockquote><p>Originally posted by HockeyPuck:</p><blockquote><div><p>I seem to recall that mouthing "vacuum" and "f*ck you" look the same.... ah the joys of being 10...</p></div></blockquote><p>Thank you HockeyPuck, now I get the Brett Buck post..</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Originally posted by Brett Buck : I said VACUUM ! Originally posted by HockeyPuck : I seem to recall that mouthing " vacuum " and " f * ck you " look the same.... ah the joys of being 10...Thank you HockeyPuck , now I get the Brett Buck post. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Originally posted by Brett Buck:I said VACUUM!Originally posted by HockeyPuck:I seem to recall that mouthing "vacuum" and "f*ck you" look the same.... ah the joys of being 10...Thank you HockeyPuck, now I get the Brett Buck post..
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354484</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31367684</id>
	<title>cloudsinmycoffee</title>
	<author>cloudsinmycoffee</author>
	<datestamp>1267727820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think the implicit danger here lurks well beyond an innocuous application on a cellphone 'at the movies'.  How long will it before all our conversations, monitored anywhere within view of a handheld cellphone, will be subject to said interpretation, from hand held cellphone or otherwise.  Reminds me a little of the movie 'The Conversation' I think starring Gene Hackman.  We are, like it or not, becoming perfectly lucid, visible and transparent to each other with every passing wave of this invasive and pervasive technology.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the implicit danger here lurks well beyond an innocuous application on a cellphone 'at the movies' .
How long will it before all our conversations , monitored anywhere within view of a handheld cellphone , will be subject to said interpretation , from hand held cellphone or otherwise .
Reminds me a little of the movie 'The Conversation ' I think starring Gene Hackman .
We are , like it or not , becoming perfectly lucid , visible and transparent to each other with every passing wave of this invasive and pervasive technology .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the implicit danger here lurks well beyond an innocuous application on a cellphone 'at the movies'.
How long will it before all our conversations, monitored anywhere within view of a handheld cellphone, will be subject to said interpretation, from hand held cellphone or otherwise.
Reminds me a little of the movie 'The Conversation' I think starring Gene Hackman.
We are, like it or not, becoming perfectly lucid, visible and transparent to each other with every passing wave of this invasive and pervasive technology.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31355012</id>
	<title>Sounds great, but . . .</title>
	<author>Cyberllama</author>
	<datestamp>1267643760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How will I mutter under my breath about what an idiot the person I'm talking to is?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How will I mutter under my breath about what an idiot the person I 'm talking to is ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How will I mutter under my breath about what an idiot the person I'm talking to is?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354416</id>
	<title>I'm coulrophobic, you insentive clod!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267637040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's been almost a decade since hands-free headsets reached the market and its users still creep me out.<br> <br>

I don't think I can ever get used to seeing the streets full of mimes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's been almost a decade since hands-free headsets reached the market and its users still creep me out .
I do n't think I can ever get used to seeing the streets full of mimes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's been almost a decade since hands-free headsets reached the market and its users still creep me out.
I don't think I can ever get used to seeing the streets full of mimes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31357604</id>
	<title>Instead of bluetooth headsets</title>
	<author>Wolvenhaven</author>
	<datestamp>1267716000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Have bluetooth sub-vocalization pick ups which you can place on your throat.  It has two benefits, you don't look like an idiot walking around with a glowing piece of plastic dangling off your ear, and because you only have to move the muscles to sub-vocalize, you won't create any noise or open your mouth.  That way people don't think you're crazy and talking to yourself or proceed to mug you for being the one annoying guy on the phone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Have bluetooth sub-vocalization pick ups which you can place on your throat .
It has two benefits , you do n't look like an idiot walking around with a glowing piece of plastic dangling off your ear , and because you only have to move the muscles to sub-vocalize , you wo n't create any noise or open your mouth .
That way people do n't think you 're crazy and talking to yourself or proceed to mug you for being the one annoying guy on the phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have bluetooth sub-vocalization pick ups which you can place on your throat.
It has two benefits, you don't look like an idiot walking around with a glowing piece of plastic dangling off your ear, and because you only have to move the muscles to sub-vocalize, you won't create any noise or open your mouth.
That way people don't think you're crazy and talking to yourself or proceed to mug you for being the one annoying guy on the phone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354528</id>
	<title>Impressive</title>
	<author>SlappyBastard</author>
	<datestamp>1267638180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Especially when you consider the number of people who constantly move their mouths and say nothing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Especially when you consider the number of people who constantly move their mouths and say nothing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Especially when you consider the number of people who constantly move their mouths and say nothing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354406</id>
	<title>They could...</title>
	<author>deniable</author>
	<datestamp>1267636980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But given what I've seen, I doubt many would. I'm sure some of the people feel the need to 'share' with others.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But given what I 've seen , I doubt many would .
I 'm sure some of the people feel the need to 'share ' with others .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But given what I've seen, I doubt many would.
I'm sure some of the people feel the need to 'share' with others.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354780</id>
	<title>15 years ago, with desktop workstations</title>
	<author>BoydWaters</author>
	<datestamp>1267640940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fifteen (!) years ago, I took a UC Extension class on Neural Networks taught by Stanford professor David Stork. He had developed a lip-reading system for communication in noisy environments, such as an airplane-repair facility. If you could do it 15 years ago with workstation-class desktops, I suppose you could do it with a smartphone today.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fifteen ( !
) years ago , I took a UC Extension class on Neural Networks taught by Stanford professor David Stork .
He had developed a lip-reading system for communication in noisy environments , such as an airplane-repair facility .
If you could do it 15 years ago with workstation-class desktops , I suppose you could do it with a smartphone today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fifteen (!
) years ago, I took a UC Extension class on Neural Networks taught by Stanford professor David Stork.
He had developed a lip-reading system for communication in noisy environments, such as an airplane-repair facility.
If you could do it 15 years ago with workstation-class desktops, I suppose you could do it with a smartphone today.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354518</id>
	<title>Another Tool for Big Brother to Spy on You</title>
	<author>rebelscience</author>
	<datestamp>1267638060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OK, There is potential for good things, too. This thing's got huge commercial potential.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK , There is potential for good things , too .
This thing 's got huge commercial potential .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK, There is potential for good things, too.
This thing's got huge commercial potential.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31358768</id>
	<title>speed recognition augmentation and noise reduction</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267722900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ok, so you say it's only 50\% accurate? Here's what to do with it....</p><p>1) use it with your webcam to augment speech recognition (dictation) capabilities. Perhaps lip position and movement can have some impact on the hidden markov models used for recognition.</p><p>2) use it to do noise reduction by identifying not only when the user is speaking, but what sounds they are likely saying. Here 50\% success doesn't mean much because there is probably a significant amount of overlap between sounds.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok , so you say it 's only 50 \ % accurate ?
Here 's what to do with it....1 ) use it with your webcam to augment speech recognition ( dictation ) capabilities .
Perhaps lip position and movement can have some impact on the hidden markov models used for recognition.2 ) use it to do noise reduction by identifying not only when the user is speaking , but what sounds they are likely saying .
Here 50 \ % success does n't mean much because there is probably a significant amount of overlap between sounds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok, so you say it's only 50\% accurate?
Here's what to do with it....1) use it with your webcam to augment speech recognition (dictation) capabilities.
Perhaps lip position and movement can have some impact on the hidden markov models used for recognition.2) use it to do noise reduction by identifying not only when the user is speaking, but what sounds they are likely saying.
Here 50\% success doesn't mean much because there is probably a significant amount of overlap between sounds.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354458</id>
	<title>Making phone calls at the movies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267637460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's dark in most cinemas. Will the phone contain a light to shine on your face to annoy the sucker behind you? People txting in theatres annoy me too.</p><p>Honestly, I HATE it when submitters need to think of an example, and then come up with a shit one. You're better off with no example that thinking of the first crap that comes into your head!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's dark in most cinemas .
Will the phone contain a light to shine on your face to annoy the sucker behind you ?
People txting in theatres annoy me too.Honestly , I HATE it when submitters need to think of an example , and then come up with a shit one .
You 're better off with no example that thinking of the first crap that comes into your head !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's dark in most cinemas.
Will the phone contain a light to shine on your face to annoy the sucker behind you?
People txting in theatres annoy me too.Honestly, I HATE it when submitters need to think of an example, and then come up with a shit one.
You're better off with no example that thinking of the first crap that comes into your head!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354434</id>
	<title>I want my phone call</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267637160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tell me, Mr. Anderson... what good is a phone call... if you're unable to speak?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tell me , Mr. Anderson... what good is a phone call... if you 're unable to speak ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tell me, Mr. Anderson... what good is a phone call... if you're unable to speak?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31356024</id>
	<title>Re:tap-proof?</title>
	<author>oranGoo</author>
	<datestamp>1267699440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or another hacked/pwnd login terminal.<br>I'd better start on the logme-secure-tube(tm) patent.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or another hacked/pwnd login terminal.I 'd better start on the logme-secure-tube ( tm ) patent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or another hacked/pwnd login terminal.I'd better start on the logme-secure-tube(tm) patent.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31356996</id>
	<title>people with no voice box.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267711860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>surly there is a much better way to apply this to some one with speach difficulties. just a thought.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>surly there is a much better way to apply this to some one with speach difficulties .
just a thought .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>surly there is a much better way to apply this to some one with speach difficulties.
just a thought.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354410</id>
	<title>How do you know a politician is lying?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267636980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>His lips are moving...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>His lips are moving.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>His lips are moving...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31357822</id>
	<title>Re:non german/american performance?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267717440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Try it with people from the bush. They speak without opening their mouth to keep the flies <b>in</b>. Some move the lips but keep the teeth together.</p></div><p>Fixed that for you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Try it with people from the bush .
They speak without opening their mouth to keep the flies in .
Some move the lips but keep the teeth together.Fixed that for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try it with people from the bush.
They speak without opening their mouth to keep the flies in.
Some move the lips but keep the teeth together.Fixed that for you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31358850</id>
	<title>Re:It begins</title>
	<author>Nick Number</author>
	<datestamp>1267723200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I read the name as david bowie (sleep deprivation is awesome) I kept waiting for the punchline</p></div><p>HAL: Now it's time to leave the capsule if you dare.<br>David Bowie: I'm stepping through the door, and I'm floating in the most peculiar way.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I read the name as david bowie ( sleep deprivation is awesome ) I kept waiting for the punchlineHAL : Now it 's time to leave the capsule if you dare.David Bowie : I 'm stepping through the door , and I 'm floating in the most peculiar way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read the name as david bowie (sleep deprivation is awesome) I kept waiting for the punchlineHAL: Now it's time to leave the capsule if you dare.David Bowie: I'm stepping through the door, and I'm floating in the most peculiar way.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31355274</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354390</id>
	<title>tap-proof?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267636800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>From TFA: "For the transmission of passwords and PINs, for example, users can change seamlessly to soundless language and, hence, transmit confidential information in a tap-proof manner."

Um, not if there is a lip-reader in the same room, like a hearing-impaired person.</htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA : " For the transmission of passwords and PINs , for example , users can change seamlessly to soundless language and , hence , transmit confidential information in a tap-proof manner .
" Um , not if there is a lip-reader in the same room , like a hearing-impaired person .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA: "For the transmission of passwords and PINs, for example, users can change seamlessly to soundless language and, hence, transmit confidential information in a tap-proof manner.
"

Um, not if there is a lip-reader in the same room, like a hearing-impaired person.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31358172</id>
	<title>Re:Please Don't Open Your Phone in the Theater</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267719660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just use an iPhone...the sensor in the earpiece turns off the glow when it's put up against your ear.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just use an iPhone...the sensor in the earpiece turns off the glow when it 's put up against your ear .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just use an iPhone...the sensor in the earpiece turns off the glow when it's put up against your ear.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354562</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31355076</id>
	<title>Subvocalization</title>
	<author>Lt.Hawkins</author>
	<datestamp>1267644720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What an excellent way for me to stay in touch with my friend Jane.!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What an excellent way for me to stay in touch with my friend Jane .
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What an excellent way for me to stay in touch with my friend Jane.
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31355188</id>
	<title>Re:I wasn't buying it ...</title>
	<author>Dynedain</author>
	<datestamp>1267646040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>There's a huge difference between "cellphones convert mouth movements into speech" and "Guy with shitloads of cables on his face tracks the movements of his mouth muscles using 4 unix servers running a processor intensive application with an accuracy of 25\%"</p></div></blockquote><p>It wasn't that long ago that the same level of complexity was involved for locating faces in video (complete with UNIX servers, think SGI). Now handheld digital cameras can do it in real-time.</p><p>Proof of concepts like this are the first steps. Then researchers refine the algorithms making them more efficient, and technology advances make the processing power more commonplace.</p><p>Figuring out a way to map muscle patterns to a speech engine is pretty damn impressive. Capturing the muscle movements may require wires right now, but I guarantee that other researchers will find other ways to capture the patterns.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a huge difference between " cellphones convert mouth movements into speech " and " Guy with shitloads of cables on his face tracks the movements of his mouth muscles using 4 unix servers running a processor intensive application with an accuracy of 25 \ % " It was n't that long ago that the same level of complexity was involved for locating faces in video ( complete with UNIX servers , think SGI ) .
Now handheld digital cameras can do it in real-time.Proof of concepts like this are the first steps .
Then researchers refine the algorithms making them more efficient , and technology advances make the processing power more commonplace.Figuring out a way to map muscle patterns to a speech engine is pretty damn impressive .
Capturing the muscle movements may require wires right now , but I guarantee that other researchers will find other ways to capture the patterns .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a huge difference between "cellphones convert mouth movements into speech" and "Guy with shitloads of cables on his face tracks the movements of his mouth muscles using 4 unix servers running a processor intensive application with an accuracy of 25\%"It wasn't that long ago that the same level of complexity was involved for locating faces in video (complete with UNIX servers, think SGI).
Now handheld digital cameras can do it in real-time.Proof of concepts like this are the first steps.
Then researchers refine the algorithms making them more efficient, and technology advances make the processing power more commonplace.Figuring out a way to map muscle patterns to a speech engine is pretty damn impressive.
Capturing the muscle movements may require wires right now, but I guarantee that other researchers will find other ways to capture the patterns.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354426</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354484</id>
	<title>Old grade school trick...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267637700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I seem to recall that mouthing "vacuum" and "f*ck you" look the same.... ah the joys of being 10...</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I seem to recall that mouthing " vacuum " and " f * ck you " look the same.... ah the joys of being 10.. .  </tokentext>
<sentencetext>I seem to recall that mouthing "vacuum" and "f*ck you" look the same.... ah the joys of being 10...
 </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354632</id>
	<title>It's a sad day.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267639380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not a single Ender reference? What happened to you Slashdot?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not a single Ender reference ?
What happened to you Slashdot ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not a single Ender reference?
What happened to you Slashdot?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354568</id>
	<title>Ninnle does this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267638600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>...and has been since webcams were first developed.  I'm surprised nobody caught on until now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...and has been since webcams were first developed .
I 'm surprised nobody caught on until now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and has been since webcams were first developed.
I'm surprised nobody caught on until now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31355032</id>
	<title>Re:Ok, try this one</title>
	<author>sys.stdout.write</author>
	<datestamp>1267644180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or the famous "wreck a nice beach" instead of "recognize speech"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or the famous " wreck a nice beach " instead of " recognize speech "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or the famous "wreck a nice beach" instead of "recognize speech"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354396</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354422</id>
	<title>Brings a whole new meaning to</title>
	<author>Kitkoan</author>
	<datestamp>1267637100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Read my lips</htmltext>
<tokenext>Read my lips</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Read my lips</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354548</id>
	<title>You're missing the point</title>
	<author>SlappyBastard</author>
	<datestamp>1267638360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Anytime a technology is a real turd with no use, the folks marketing it try to list as many uses as possible.  It's like the ad for the GT Xpress 101 Countertop Grill, which can make omelettes, bake brownies, grill cheeseburgers, boil soup and starch your shirts.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anytime a technology is a real turd with no use , the folks marketing it try to list as many uses as possible .
It 's like the ad for the GT Xpress 101 Countertop Grill , which can make omelettes , bake brownies , grill cheeseburgers , boil soup and starch your shirts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anytime a technology is a real turd with no use, the folks marketing it try to list as many uses as possible.
It's like the ad for the GT Xpress 101 Countertop Grill, which can make omelettes, bake brownies, grill cheeseburgers, boil soup and starch your shirts.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31355664</id>
	<title>Re:tap-proof?</title>
	<author>johny42</author>
	<datestamp>1267695180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>like a hearing-impaired person.</p></div><p>Or anyone else with a lip-reading mobile phone.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>like a hearing-impaired person.Or anyone else with a lip-reading mobile phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>like a hearing-impaired person.Or anyone else with a lip-reading mobile phone.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354426</id>
	<title>I wasn't buying it ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267637160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And I was just waiting for that sign, well hidden somewhere in the article, that this is just some beta concept that will stay as such forever.</p><p>And then I found the photo of two guys with shitloads of cables attached to their faces.</p><p>There's a huge difference between "cellphones convert mouth movements into speech" and "Guy with shitloads of cables on his face tracks the movements of his mouth muscles using 4 unix servers running a processor intensive application with an accuracy of 25\%"</p><p>The whole thing has nothing to do with cellphones. It's just yet another muscle tracking system, but used on the mouth instead of the hands, and tied to a TTS engine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And I was just waiting for that sign , well hidden somewhere in the article , that this is just some beta concept that will stay as such forever.And then I found the photo of two guys with shitloads of cables attached to their faces.There 's a huge difference between " cellphones convert mouth movements into speech " and " Guy with shitloads of cables on his face tracks the movements of his mouth muscles using 4 unix servers running a processor intensive application with an accuracy of 25 \ % " The whole thing has nothing to do with cellphones .
It 's just yet another muscle tracking system , but used on the mouth instead of the hands , and tied to a TTS engine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I was just waiting for that sign, well hidden somewhere in the article, that this is just some beta concept that will stay as such forever.And then I found the photo of two guys with shitloads of cables attached to their faces.There's a huge difference between "cellphones convert mouth movements into speech" and "Guy with shitloads of cables on his face tracks the movements of his mouth muscles using 4 unix servers running a processor intensive application with an accuracy of 25\%"The whole thing has nothing to do with cellphones.
It's just yet another muscle tracking system, but used on the mouth instead of the hands, and tied to a TTS engine.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31355216</id>
	<title>BS - the reverse is true</title>
	<author>cheros</author>
	<datestamp>1267646340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Normally it takes some talent or a directional mike to pick up a distant conversation, these guys would have just automated long distance bugging.  All you need is a decent telelens.  It means any boardroom conversation will now require closed curtains.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Normally it takes some talent or a directional mike to pick up a distant conversation , these guys would have just automated long distance bugging .
All you need is a decent telelens .
It means any boardroom conversation will now require closed curtains .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Normally it takes some talent or a directional mike to pick up a distant conversation, these guys would have just automated long distance bugging.
All you need is a decent telelens.
It means any boardroom conversation will now require closed curtains.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31357736</id>
	<title>Re:Ok, try this one</title>
	<author>CastrTroy</author>
	<datestamp>1267716780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think that <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0hl1-06gOo" title="youtube.com">Walowitz's phone</a> [youtube.com] is the best demonstration of speech recognition.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think that Walowitz 's phone [ youtube.com ] is the best demonstration of speech recognition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think that Walowitz's phone [youtube.com] is the best demonstration of speech recognition.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354396</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31355274</id>
	<title>Re:It begins</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267733460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I read the name as david bowie (sleep deprivation is awesome) I kept waiting for the punchline</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I read the name as david bowie ( sleep deprivation is awesome ) I kept waiting for the punchline</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read the name as david bowie (sleep deprivation is awesome) I kept waiting for the punchline</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31355340</id>
	<title>Re:It begins</title>
	<author>MobileTatsu-NJG</author>
	<datestamp>1267734300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes because the key ingredient of that whole story was that a computer could read lips.  That's the one advancement that made killing all humans possible.</p><p>Every year that goes by, that scene in Galaxy Quest where Taggart tells the kid the ship is real and he goes "I KNEW IT!" gets funnier.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes because the key ingredient of that whole story was that a computer could read lips .
That 's the one advancement that made killing all humans possible.Every year that goes by , that scene in Galaxy Quest where Taggart tells the kid the ship is real and he goes " I KNEW IT !
" gets funnier .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes because the key ingredient of that whole story was that a computer could read lips.
That's the one advancement that made killing all humans possible.Every year that goes by, that scene in Galaxy Quest where Taggart tells the kid the ship is real and he goes "I KNEW IT!
" gets funnier.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31357284</id>
	<title>Orson Scott Card would be proud...</title>
	<author>NotOverHere</author>
	<datestamp>1267713900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, how long before we have a child prodigy that can twice save the existence of an alien race, all by speaking into his jewel to Jane?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , how long before we have a child prodigy that can twice save the existence of an alien race , all by speaking into his jewel to Jane ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, how long before we have a child prodigy that can twice save the existence of an alien race, all by speaking into his jewel to Jane?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354594</id>
	<title>Another use:</title>
	<author>LogarithmicSpiral</author>
	<datestamp>1267638780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Find out what someone is saying across the room. See what people are talking about that they don't want you to hear. Or just be nosy. Sure, the camera probably has to be really close to a mouth to work correctly, but that doesn't prevent a determined snoop to surreptitiously video someone's face and then use some editing software to zoom in on the mouth and/or get rid of all the other useless information.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Find out what someone is saying across the room .
See what people are talking about that they do n't want you to hear .
Or just be nosy .
Sure , the camera probably has to be really close to a mouth to work correctly , but that does n't prevent a determined snoop to surreptitiously video someone 's face and then use some editing software to zoom in on the mouth and/or get rid of all the other useless information .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Find out what someone is saying across the room.
See what people are talking about that they don't want you to hear.
Or just be nosy.
Sure, the camera probably has to be really close to a mouth to work correctly, but that doesn't prevent a determined snoop to surreptitiously video someone's face and then use some editing software to zoom in on the mouth and/or get rid of all the other useless information.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31358414</id>
	<title>Re:I'm coulrophobic, you insentive clod!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267720920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Worse: mimes making <a href="http://games.slashdot.org/story/09/10/31/1428225/Controlling-Games-and-Apps-Through-Muscle-Sensors" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">strange gestures</a> [slashdot.org]. On the bright side, it's the perfect excuse when you're caught talking to your imaginary friend. Or when you've given someone the finger and wish you hadn't.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Worse : mimes making strange gestures [ slashdot.org ] .
On the bright side , it 's the perfect excuse when you 're caught talking to your imaginary friend .
Or when you 've given someone the finger and wish you had n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Worse: mimes making strange gestures [slashdot.org].
On the bright side, it's the perfect excuse when you're caught talking to your imaginary friend.
Or when you've given someone the finger and wish you hadn't.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354416</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31357388</id>
	<title>Re:Old grade school trick...</title>
	<author>Inda</author>
	<datestamp>1267714500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Road Rage.<br><br>I often smile at people on the road and say "Can you read lips, cunt?"<br><br>Yes, I am a bad, bad person.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Road Rage.I often smile at people on the road and say " Can you read lips , cunt ?
" Yes , I am a bad , bad person .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Road Rage.I often smile at people on the road and say "Can you read lips, cunt?
"Yes, I am a bad, bad person.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354484</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_2330247_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31356934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354484
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_2330247_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31357852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_2330247_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354398
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_2330247_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31359394
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354562
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_2330247_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31355188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354426
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_2330247_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354948
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354484
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_2330247_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31357412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_2330247_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354880
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354396
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_2330247_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31357736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354396
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_2330247_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31356042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354398
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_2330247_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31355032
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354396
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_2330247_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31355416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_2330247_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354962
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_2330247_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31355380
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354396
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_2330247_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31361284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354398
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_2330247_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31355310
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354426
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_2330247_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31355340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_2330247_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354484
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_2330247_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31360564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354416
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_2330247_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31360542
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354484
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_2330247_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31358850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31355274
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_2330247_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31357722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_2330247_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31358172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354562
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_2330247_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31357822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354478
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_2330247_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354828
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_2330247_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31358414
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354416
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_2330247_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31356024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_2330247_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31359364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_2330247_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31355664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_2330247_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31357908
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354396
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_2330247_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354478
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_2330247_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31357388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354484
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_2330247_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_2330247.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354434
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_2330247.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354398
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31356042
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354694
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31361284
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_2330247.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354422
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_2330247.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354562
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31358172
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31359394
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_2330247.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354796
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_2330247.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354442
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31355416
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_2330247.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354410
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_2330247.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354396
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354880
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31357736
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31357908
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31355380
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31355032
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_2330247.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354474
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31359364
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_2330247.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354426
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31355188
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31355310
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_2330247.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354478
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354740
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31357822
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354692
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_2330247.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354780
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_2330247.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354484
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31356934
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354604
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31360542
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354948
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31357388
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_2330247.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31355216
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_2330247.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354416
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31358414
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31360564
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_2330247.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354390
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354962
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31357852
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31357722
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354828
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31355664
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354548
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31356024
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_2330247.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31357550
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_2330247.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354412
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31355274
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31358850
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31355340
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_2330247.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354528
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_2330247.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31354522
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_2330247.31357412
</commentlist>
</conversation>
