<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_03_1820210</id>
	<title>The Computer That Can Read Your Mind</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1267603740000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>magacious writes <i>"Gtec has showcased a <a href="http://www.itpro.co.uk/621094/cebit-2010-the-computer-that-reads-your-mind">computer that can read your mind</a> over at the CeBIT trade show in Germany. Designed primarily to help those who can't write or speak, the system makes use of a skull cap and wireless technology to transform brain waves into letters. It's the first patient-ready computer-brain interface, according to its Austrian makers. It takes around 30 seconds per letter for the computer to recognise what you're saying the first time you use it, according to Gtec, but this improves vastly with practice. '"One second per letter is very tough," Gtec's Engelbert Grunbacher said, adding users can usually easily get to five or 10 letters per minute. "You learn to be relaxed, focused. You improve."' It might look quite wacky (<a href="http://www.itpro.co.uk/621094/cebit-2010-the-computer-that-reads-your-mind/gallery">pictures here</a>) and at &euro;9,000 the system is not cheap, but it could help enhance the lives of many people who have a great deal to say but no real way of saying it."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>magacious writes " Gtec has showcased a computer that can read your mind over at the CeBIT trade show in Germany .
Designed primarily to help those who ca n't write or speak , the system makes use of a skull cap and wireless technology to transform brain waves into letters .
It 's the first patient-ready computer-brain interface , according to its Austrian makers .
It takes around 30 seconds per letter for the computer to recognise what you 're saying the first time you use it , according to Gtec , but this improves vastly with practice .
' " One second per letter is very tough , " Gtec 's Engelbert Grunbacher said , adding users can usually easily get to five or 10 letters per minute .
" You learn to be relaxed , focused .
You improve .
" ' It might look quite wacky ( pictures here ) and at    9,000 the system is not cheap , but it could help enhance the lives of many people who have a great deal to say but no real way of saying it .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>magacious writes "Gtec has showcased a computer that can read your mind over at the CeBIT trade show in Germany.
Designed primarily to help those who can't write or speak, the system makes use of a skull cap and wireless technology to transform brain waves into letters.
It's the first patient-ready computer-brain interface, according to its Austrian makers.
It takes around 30 seconds per letter for the computer to recognise what you're saying the first time you use it, according to Gtec, but this improves vastly with practice.
'"One second per letter is very tough," Gtec's Engelbert Grunbacher said, adding users can usually easily get to five or 10 letters per minute.
"You learn to be relaxed, focused.
You improve.
"' It might look quite wacky (pictures here) and at €9,000 the system is not cheap, but it could help enhance the lives of many people who have a great deal to say but no real way of saying it.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31352718</id>
	<title>Re:Ewww!</title>
	<author>xactuary</author>
	<datestamp>1267622400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>No kidding! How many years of nightmares for me now?</htmltext>
<tokenext>No kidding !
How many years of nightmares for me now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No kidding!
How many years of nightmares for me now?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349788</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349756</id>
	<title>What we really need.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267607760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What we really need is a computer for people that can't <b>think</b>!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What we really need is a computer for people that ca n't think !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What we really need is a computer for people that can't think!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31351094</id>
	<title>9kEuro?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267614000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I built something like this last fall using a NeuroSky dry EEG from the Star Wars force trainer ($90), hacked the serial bus from the NeuroSky chip into an Arduino ($35) with an asyncLabs WiFi shield ($60), then from there to my G1 dream where I had a 2-set-selection visual interface that minimized the expected number of selections needed to choose the word based on a dictionary with associated word freqeuencies.  30 seconds per letter or less is probably about right.  3 weeks of on-and-off evenings.  How does this cost 9kEuros?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I built something like this last fall using a NeuroSky dry EEG from the Star Wars force trainer ( $ 90 ) , hacked the serial bus from the NeuroSky chip into an Arduino ( $ 35 ) with an asyncLabs WiFi shield ( $ 60 ) , then from there to my G1 dream where I had a 2-set-selection visual interface that minimized the expected number of selections needed to choose the word based on a dictionary with associated word freqeuencies .
30 seconds per letter or less is probably about right .
3 weeks of on-and-off evenings .
How does this cost 9kEuros ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I built something like this last fall using a NeuroSky dry EEG from the Star Wars force trainer ($90), hacked the serial bus from the NeuroSky chip into an Arduino ($35) with an asyncLabs WiFi shield ($60), then from there to my G1 dream where I had a 2-set-selection visual interface that minimized the expected number of selections needed to choose the word based on a dictionary with associated word freqeuencies.
30 seconds per letter or less is probably about right.
3 weeks of on-and-off evenings.
How does this cost 9kEuros?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349720</id>
	<title>Marketing Fail</title>
	<author>eldavojohn</author>
	<datestamp>1267607640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>
No, no, no, you're doing it wrong, you fools!  Petite Japanese girls in school uniforms demo futuristic tech products not large bearded Austrians (with <i>three</i> layers of clothing on, no less).  And the demo messages shouldn't be "HELLO IT PRO" but instead something like "OH HAI, SUPER FANTASTIC HAPPY FRIENDS!"  Jesus, haven't you ever been to E3?</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , no , no , you 're doing it wrong , you fools !
Petite Japanese girls in school uniforms demo futuristic tech products not large bearded Austrians ( with three layers of clothing on , no less ) .
And the demo messages should n't be " HELLO IT PRO " but instead something like " OH HAI , SUPER FANTASTIC HAPPY FRIENDS !
" Jesus , have n't you ever been to E3 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
No, no, no, you're doing it wrong, you fools!
Petite Japanese girls in school uniforms demo futuristic tech products not large bearded Austrians (with three layers of clothing on, no less).
And the demo messages shouldn't be "HELLO IT PRO" but instead something like "OH HAI, SUPER FANTASTIC HAPPY FRIENDS!
"  Jesus, haven't you ever been to E3?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349792</id>
	<title>I bet...</title>
	<author>Nialin</author>
	<datestamp>1267607880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Stephen Hawking would be looking into this.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Stephen Hawking would be looking into this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stephen Hawking would be looking into this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349804</id>
	<title>Re:Mind reading</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267607940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Spare us the gritty details...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Spare us the gritty details.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Spare us the gritty details...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350022</id>
	<title>alot to say</title>
	<author>design1066</author>
	<datestamp>1267608900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>G - e - t - - - m - e - - - a - - - b - e - e - r - - - P - L - Z</htmltext>
<tokenext>G - e - t - - - m - e - - - a - - - b - e - e - r - - - P - L - Z</tokentext>
<sentencetext>G - e - t - - - m - e - - - a - - - b - e - e - r - - - P - L - Z</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349860</id>
	<title>first post</title>
	<author>Korbeau</author>
	<datestamp>1267608120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>from Intendix.</p><p>Now Twitter char limit</p><p>Seems reasonable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>from Intendix.Now Twitter char limitSeems reasonable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>from Intendix.Now Twitter char limitSeems reasonable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349688</id>
	<title>Couch potato-ing to the next level</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267607520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder if it'll work as a TV remote.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if it 'll work as a TV remote .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if it'll work as a TV remote.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350826</id>
	<title>See, slashdotters</title>
	<author>edittard</author>
	<datestamp>1267612740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Designed primarily to help those who can't write or speak</p></div></blockquote><p>See,  slashdotters - somebody cares about you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Designed primarily to help those who ca n't write or speakSee , slashdotters - somebody cares about you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Designed primarily to help those who can't write or speakSee,  slashdotters - somebody cares about you.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350498</id>
	<title>DWIM</title>
	<author>edittard</author>
	<datestamp>1267611360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>At last, someone implemented <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/D/DWIM.html" title="catb.org">DWIM</a> [catb.org].</htmltext>
<tokenext>At last , someone implemented DWIM [ catb.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At last, someone implemented DWIM [catb.org].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31351092</id>
	<title>Re:Mind reading</title>
	<author>Sulphur</author>
	<datestamp>1267614000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You wouldn't be able to share your dream-videos of you smashing the RIAA headquarters with your friends, as that'd be infringing on intellectual property.</p><p>That would be mind writing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You would n't be able to share your dream-videos of you smashing the RIAA headquarters with your friends , as that 'd be infringing on intellectual property.That would be mind writing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You wouldn't be able to share your dream-videos of you smashing the RIAA headquarters with your friends, as that'd be infringing on intellectual property.That would be mind writing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349722</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31366908</id>
	<title>Re:However real mind reading is still "50 years aw</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1267721640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>50 years is a long time. I mean, 50 years ago in the field of brain science we were using electro shock therapy. There wasn't an ethics commitee for psychiatric experimentation (which resulted in shrinks torturing people). We had just recently discovered DNA. We just completed our first integrated circuit. And our technology increases exponentially (thus far) not linearly.<br> <br>Really, if governments cared about technology or perhaps a tech-race started.. Then we'd see this stuff fairly quickly (ability to read the jist of what you are thinking). As in 15years rather than the 30 it might take now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>50 years is a long time .
I mean , 50 years ago in the field of brain science we were using electro shock therapy .
There was n't an ethics commitee for psychiatric experimentation ( which resulted in shrinks torturing people ) .
We had just recently discovered DNA .
We just completed our first integrated circuit .
And our technology increases exponentially ( thus far ) not linearly .
Really , if governments cared about technology or perhaps a tech-race started.. Then we 'd see this stuff fairly quickly ( ability to read the jist of what you are thinking ) .
As in 15years rather than the 30 it might take now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>50 years is a long time.
I mean, 50 years ago in the field of brain science we were using electro shock therapy.
There wasn't an ethics commitee for psychiatric experimentation (which resulted in shrinks torturing people).
We had just recently discovered DNA.
We just completed our first integrated circuit.
And our technology increases exponentially (thus far) not linearly.
Really, if governments cared about technology or perhaps a tech-race started.. Then we'd see this stuff fairly quickly (ability to read the jist of what you are thinking).
As in 15years rather than the 30 it might take now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350162</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350192</id>
	<title>C'mon, This Isn't News</title>
	<author>Beefmancer</author>
	<datestamp>1267609620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is just another tired P300 system.  Yes, it works, eventually, with practice, and with a messy setup.  But the signal was discovered in 1965, and this is far from the first implementation of it, or even the first mass-market computerized commercial one (which I think was IntendiX, though that was pretty recently).</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is just another tired P300 system .
Yes , it works , eventually , with practice , and with a messy setup .
But the signal was discovered in 1965 , and this is far from the first implementation of it , or even the first mass-market computerized commercial one ( which I think was IntendiX , though that was pretty recently ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is just another tired P300 system.
Yes, it works, eventually, with practice, and with a messy setup.
But the signal was discovered in 1965, and this is far from the first implementation of it, or even the first mass-market computerized commercial one (which I think was IntendiX, though that was pretty recently).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31354716</id>
	<title>Mind Controlling limbs from Red Dwarf?</title>
	<author>Anakie</author>
	<datestamp>1267640220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can imagine it now....</p><p>Arm pick up the ball.<br>Arm pick up the ball.<br>Arm pick up THE BALL!!<br>ARM PICK UP THE BALL!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can imagine it now....Arm pick up the ball.Arm pick up the ball.Arm pick up THE BALL !
! ARM PICK UP THE BALL !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can imagine it now....Arm pick up the ball.Arm pick up the ball.Arm pick up THE BALL!
!ARM PICK UP THE BALL!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31353098</id>
	<title>Re:Mind reading</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267625220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The article is misleading. These types of systems can't read your thoughts, dreams, etc.</p><p>When you speak, type, or make any muscle motion things happen in this order:<br>First, you think about moving a muscle. This generates non-uniform patterns of activity in various regions of the brain. Specifically, the same person in the same situation thinking about the same thing generates different patters each time, there is no obvious conformity beyond the activity occuring in roughly the same region of the brain.<br>Next, your motor cortex prepares to fire the impulse down the nerve bundles to the muscles. During this process, the patterns in the motor centers are nearly identical for a person each time they are making the same movement, and with some training the human can actually cause it to become even more uniform and regular. Although the pattern differes from person to person, since each person it's pretty much the same the computer just needs a little training to recognize each person's pattern.<br>Finally, the electrical impulse actually begins to travel the nerves, thus activating the muscles.</p><p>The EEG technology in its current form is only capable of doing anything useful with the second and third phase. This technology in its current form can NOT "read" your mind, thoughts, dreams, etc. That's still a ways down the road, IF it even ends up being possible. But what they can do with it now is still pretty cool, especially for the disabled.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The article is misleading .
These types of systems ca n't read your thoughts , dreams , etc.When you speak , type , or make any muscle motion things happen in this order : First , you think about moving a muscle .
This generates non-uniform patterns of activity in various regions of the brain .
Specifically , the same person in the same situation thinking about the same thing generates different patters each time , there is no obvious conformity beyond the activity occuring in roughly the same region of the brain.Next , your motor cortex prepares to fire the impulse down the nerve bundles to the muscles .
During this process , the patterns in the motor centers are nearly identical for a person each time they are making the same movement , and with some training the human can actually cause it to become even more uniform and regular .
Although the pattern differes from person to person , since each person it 's pretty much the same the computer just needs a little training to recognize each person 's pattern.Finally , the electrical impulse actually begins to travel the nerves , thus activating the muscles.The EEG technology in its current form is only capable of doing anything useful with the second and third phase .
This technology in its current form can NOT " read " your mind , thoughts , dreams , etc .
That 's still a ways down the road , IF it even ends up being possible .
But what they can do with it now is still pretty cool , especially for the disabled .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article is misleading.
These types of systems can't read your thoughts, dreams, etc.When you speak, type, or make any muscle motion things happen in this order:First, you think about moving a muscle.
This generates non-uniform patterns of activity in various regions of the brain.
Specifically, the same person in the same situation thinking about the same thing generates different patters each time, there is no obvious conformity beyond the activity occuring in roughly the same region of the brain.Next, your motor cortex prepares to fire the impulse down the nerve bundles to the muscles.
During this process, the patterns in the motor centers are nearly identical for a person each time they are making the same movement, and with some training the human can actually cause it to become even more uniform and regular.
Although the pattern differes from person to person, since each person it's pretty much the same the computer just needs a little training to recognize each person's pattern.Finally, the electrical impulse actually begins to travel the nerves, thus activating the muscles.The EEG technology in its current form is only capable of doing anything useful with the second and third phase.
This technology in its current form can NOT "read" your mind, thoughts, dreams, etc.
That's still a ways down the road, IF it even ends up being possible.
But what they can do with it now is still pretty cool, especially for the disabled.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350448</id>
	<title>Re:Mind reading</title>
	<author>Wiarumas</author>
	<datestamp>1267611120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or even better yet, if someone has the same dream as you, is that copyright infringement?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or even better yet , if someone has the same dream as you , is that copyright infringement ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or even better yet, if someone has the same dream as you, is that copyright infringement?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349722</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31351430</id>
	<title>Re:Mind reading</title>
	<author>Rigrig</author>
	<datestamp>1267615620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/., he was obviously speaking about a hypothetical fianc&#233;e.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is /. , he was obviously speaking about a hypothetical fianc   e .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is /., he was obviously speaking about a hypothetical fiancée.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350258</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349774</id>
	<title>i typg this msg usin it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267607820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it worrk pretty good<br>at cebut show rite now</p><p>babe at booth acros th isle<br>gawd shes hot</p><p>2 bad im wearin ths goofy hat</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it worrk pretty goodat cebut show rite nowbabe at booth acros th islegawd shes hot2 bad im wearin ths goofy hat</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it worrk pretty goodat cebut show rite nowbabe at booth acros th islegawd shes hot2 bad im wearin ths goofy hat</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31360218</id>
	<title>An exception from the quasi-intellectual dirt?</title>
	<author>paxcoder</author>
	<datestamp>1267728660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll speak my mind now, thumb me down I don't care: That last line from the post kicks ass.<br>Something uncommon for the godless Slashdot community.<br>Proves not all of you are bad<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll speak my mind now , thumb me down I do n't care : That last line from the post kicks ass.Something uncommon for the godless Slashdot community.Proves not all of you are bad : -P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll speak my mind now, thumb me down I don't care: That last line from the post kicks ass.Something uncommon for the godless Slashdot community.Proves not all of you are bad :-P</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349788</id>
	<title>Ewww!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267607880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>TMI! Too Much Information!</htmltext>
<tokenext>TMI !
Too Much Information !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TMI!
Too Much Information!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350438</id>
	<title>Re:Mind reading</title>
	<author>grumbel</author>
	<datestamp>1267611060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>As I've understood, mind reading comes down to recognizing certain patterns in the brain.</p></div><p>The hard part isn't so much recognizing the patterns, but getting a good picture of the brain in the first place. Even with the most advanced scanning technologies you don't go much beyond "this region of the brain is active", which isn't anywhere near enough to figure out what exactly is happening in your brain. Its kind of like trying to figure out what you computer is doing by looking at its heat signature with an IR camera, sure you can figure out if somebody is playing a game or not as the GPU is heating up, but you won't get a screenshot that way, there just isn't enough detailed data available.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As I 've understood , mind reading comes down to recognizing certain patterns in the brain.The hard part is n't so much recognizing the patterns , but getting a good picture of the brain in the first place .
Even with the most advanced scanning technologies you do n't go much beyond " this region of the brain is active " , which is n't anywhere near enough to figure out what exactly is happening in your brain .
Its kind of like trying to figure out what you computer is doing by looking at its heat signature with an IR camera , sure you can figure out if somebody is playing a game or not as the GPU is heating up , but you wo n't get a screenshot that way , there just is n't enough detailed data available .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As I've understood, mind reading comes down to recognizing certain patterns in the brain.The hard part isn't so much recognizing the patterns, but getting a good picture of the brain in the first place.
Even with the most advanced scanning technologies you don't go much beyond "this region of the brain is active", which isn't anywhere near enough to figure out what exactly is happening in your brain.
Its kind of like trying to figure out what you computer is doing by looking at its heat signature with an IR camera, sure you can figure out if somebody is playing a game or not as the GPU is heating up, but you won't get a screenshot that way, there just isn't enough detailed data available.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349896</id>
	<title>I have one already...</title>
	<author>Itninja</author>
	<datestamp>1267608300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's called 20q and I bought it at in the Seattle Science Center gift ship for $15. the box in came in clearly says it can 'read your mind'. One time I thought of 'playstation' and it got the answer after 9 questions. Then I thought 'this thing is pretty dumb' and it got the answer after 3 questions!</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's called 20q and I bought it at in the Seattle Science Center gift ship for $ 15 .
the box in came in clearly says it can 'read your mind' .
One time I thought of 'playstation ' and it got the answer after 9 questions .
Then I thought 'this thing is pretty dumb ' and it got the answer after 3 questions !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's called 20q and I bought it at in the Seattle Science Center gift ship for $15.
the box in came in clearly says it can 'read your mind'.
One time I thought of 'playstation' and it got the answer after 9 questions.
Then I thought 'this thing is pretty dumb' and it got the answer after 3 questions!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31352016</id>
	<title>Re:Why use the alphabet?</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1267618380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps its because (and I'm just speculating here) everyone's brain patterns for the letter A and B are relatively similar. The problem with morse code and binary is that <i>No one</i> except avid hobbyists use that for communication anymore. By the time I learned what morse code was, it was outdated.</p><p>Also, how do you distinguish between on &amp; off - when no state is desired?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps its because ( and I 'm just speculating here ) everyone 's brain patterns for the letter A and B are relatively similar .
The problem with morse code and binary is that No one except avid hobbyists use that for communication anymore .
By the time I learned what morse code was , it was outdated.Also , how do you distinguish between on &amp; off - when no state is desired ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps its because (and I'm just speculating here) everyone's brain patterns for the letter A and B are relatively similar.
The problem with morse code and binary is that No one except avid hobbyists use that for communication anymore.
By the time I learned what morse code was, it was outdated.Also, how do you distinguish between on &amp; off - when no state is desired?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350354</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349686</id>
	<title>Re:Mind reading</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267607460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a shock<br>the way<br>you rock<br>that Ballmer cock,<br>sopssa!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a shockthe wayyou rockthat Ballmer cock,sopssa !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a shockthe wayyou rockthat Ballmer cock,sopssa!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31357048</id>
	<title>fMRI</title>
	<author>mahadiga</author>
	<datestamp>1267712220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it different from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FMRI" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FMRI</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it different from http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FMRI [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it different from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FMRI [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349904</id>
	<title>Now we know who invented the holoband.</title>
	<author>wiredog</author>
	<datestamp>1267608300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hot cylon chicks can't be far behind!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hot cylon chicks ca n't be far behind !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hot cylon chicks can't be far behind!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31354666</id>
	<title>Re:Mind reading</title>
	<author>uolamer</author>
	<datestamp>1267639740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>If the brain starts being considered just another data storage device might they start issuing warrants for information stored on it?</i> <br> <br>

Either use encryption on those 'files' or delete them in such a way they cant be recovered... lol</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the brain starts being considered just another data storage device might they start issuing warrants for information stored on it ?
Either use encryption on those 'files ' or delete them in such a way they cant be recovered... lol</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the brain starts being considered just another data storage device might they start issuing warrants for information stored on it?
Either use encryption on those 'files' or delete them in such a way they cant be recovered... lol</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31352156</id>
	<title>One letter every 10 seconds...</title>
	<author>StikyPad</author>
	<datestamp>1267619040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nurse: Is there anything you need?</p><p>Patient:  H.......E.......A.......D</p><p>Nurse: Hmph.  [Storms out of the room]</p><p>Patient:<nobr> <wbr></nobr>......^H.......T</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nurse : Is there anything you need ? Patient : H.......E.......A.......DNurse : Hmph .
[ Storms out of the room ] Patient : ...... ^ H.......T</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nurse: Is there anything you need?Patient:  H.......E.......A.......DNurse: Hmph.
[Storms out of the room]Patient: ......^H.......T</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31352382</id>
	<title>EEG or EMG?</title>
	<author>TheSync</author>
	<datestamp>1267620120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does this thing really measure brain neuron electrical signals, or does it measure scalp muscle electrical signals (electromyograph)?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this thing really measure brain neuron electrical signals , or does it measure scalp muscle electrical signals ( electromyograph ) ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this thing really measure brain neuron electrical signals, or does it measure scalp muscle electrical signals (electromyograph)?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350092</id>
	<title>The Butterfly and the Diving Bell</title>
	<author>KPexEA</author>
	<datestamp>1267609200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Certainly would have made writing his memoirs much faster.

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Diving\_Bell\_and\_the\_Butterfly" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Diving\_Bell\_and\_the\_Butterfly</a> [wikipedia.org]

This was a very interesting movie, I would definitely recommend it!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Certainly would have made writing his memoirs much faster .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The \ _Diving \ _Bell \ _and \ _the \ _Butterfly [ wikipedia.org ] This was a very interesting movie , I would definitely recommend it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Certainly would have made writing his memoirs much faster.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Diving\_Bell\_and\_the\_Butterfly [wikipedia.org]

This was a very interesting movie, I would definitely recommend it!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31351686</id>
	<title>I know you can read my thoughts, boy</title>
	<author>Reed Solomon</author>
	<datestamp>1267616760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>meow meow/meow meow,meow meow/meow meow,<br>meow meow/meow meow/meow meow/meow meow.</p><p>postcomment compression filter can kiss my butt.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>meow meow/meow meow,meow meow/meow meow,meow meow/meow meow/meow meow/meow meow.postcomment compression filter can kiss my butt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>meow meow/meow meow,meow meow/meow meow,meow meow/meow meow/meow meow/meow meow.postcomment compression filter can kiss my butt.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31370734</id>
	<title>Overrated</title>
	<author>jasper\_amsterdam</author>
	<datestamp>1267803540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The problem with this type of technology is that the group that will really benefit from it is very small. Sure, you can produce a few letters a minute, and that is a huge improvement for people with Locked- in syndromw (the final stage of ALS a.k.a. Lou Gehrig's disease). However, this technology often gets promoted to help quadriplegics and other people with severe but not total movement impairments. It does not really help them: the reliable information throughput of these systems is less than you could obtain with voluntary control of a few (facial) muscles.
If you can have accurate control of a 2D (or 3D) cursor in real time, that might be an achievement, but it looks like that will require invasive procedures. It may look impressive when people play pong with EEG, but it only requires gross 1-dimensional input.
see ( <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain\%E2\%80\%93computer\_interface" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain\%E2\%80\%93computer\_interface</a> [wikipedia.org] ) for more on invasive and noninvasive Brain Computer Interfacing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem with this type of technology is that the group that will really benefit from it is very small .
Sure , you can produce a few letters a minute , and that is a huge improvement for people with Locked- in syndromw ( the final stage of ALS a.k.a .
Lou Gehrig 's disease ) .
However , this technology often gets promoted to help quadriplegics and other people with severe but not total movement impairments .
It does not really help them : the reliable information throughput of these systems is less than you could obtain with voluntary control of a few ( facial ) muscles .
If you can have accurate control of a 2D ( or 3D ) cursor in real time , that might be an achievement , but it looks like that will require invasive procedures .
It may look impressive when people play pong with EEG , but it only requires gross 1-dimensional input .
see ( http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain \ % E2 \ % 80 \ % 93computer \ _interface [ wikipedia.org ] ) for more on invasive and noninvasive Brain Computer Interfacing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem with this type of technology is that the group that will really benefit from it is very small.
Sure, you can produce a few letters a minute, and that is a huge improvement for people with Locked- in syndromw (the final stage of ALS a.k.a.
Lou Gehrig's disease).
However, this technology often gets promoted to help quadriplegics and other people with severe but not total movement impairments.
It does not really help them: the reliable information throughput of these systems is less than you could obtain with voluntary control of a few (facial) muscles.
If you can have accurate control of a 2D (or 3D) cursor in real time, that might be an achievement, but it looks like that will require invasive procedures.
It may look impressive when people play pong with EEG, but it only requires gross 1-dimensional input.
see ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain\%E2\%80\%93computer\_interface [wikipedia.org] ) for more on invasive and noninvasive Brain Computer Interfacing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350262</id>
	<title>What if EVERYONE needed ten seconds per letter</title>
	<author>BuckB</author>
	<datestamp>1267610100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wouldn't that be a better world?
Posts would be short.
And insightful.
Like this one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't that be a better world ?
Posts would be short .
And insightful .
Like this one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't that be a better world?
Posts would be short.
And insightful.
Like this one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31351112</id>
	<title>Doing, not Thinking</title>
	<author>thebian</author>
	<datestamp>1267614120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Vocalizing a sound is a mechanical activity directed by your brain.</p><p>Deciphering those directions to your vocal mechanics is a long way from deciphering the underlying representational system which you used to decide what to communicate. No one has a clue about that system or its logic.</p><p>So, you're dreams are safe.</p><p>Unless you twitter them away.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Vocalizing a sound is a mechanical activity directed by your brain.Deciphering those directions to your vocal mechanics is a long way from deciphering the underlying representational system which you used to decide what to communicate .
No one has a clue about that system or its logic.So , you 're dreams are safe.Unless you twitter them away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Vocalizing a sound is a mechanical activity directed by your brain.Deciphering those directions to your vocal mechanics is a long way from deciphering the underlying representational system which you used to decide what to communicate.
No one has a clue about that system or its logic.So, you're dreams are safe.Unless you twitter them away.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31365674</id>
	<title>Re:However real mind reading is still "50 years aw</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267711920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>An eye tracker would be quicker.  The article might not mention it but the core audience for these types of devices is people in a state similar to late stage amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.  The concept is that even when voluntary muscular control of the eyes fails, so long as the letter grid remains visible the flash creates the P300 'suprise' event in EEG.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>An eye tracker would be quicker .
The article might not mention it but the core audience for these types of devices is people in a state similar to late stage amyotrophic lateral sclerosis .
The concept is that even when voluntary muscular control of the eyes fails , so long as the letter grid remains visible the flash creates the P300 'suprise ' event in EEG .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An eye tracker would be quicker.
The article might not mention it but the core audience for these types of devices is people in a state similar to late stage amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
The concept is that even when voluntary muscular control of the eyes fails, so long as the letter grid remains visible the flash creates the P300 'suprise' event in EEG.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31354870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31352650</id>
	<title>First post!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267621860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Damn five letters a minute.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Damn five letters a minute .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Damn five letters a minute.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31352432</id>
	<title>Programmed Hotkeys</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1267620420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Words have several meanings, thinking on a word, specially in different contexts, could have different waves. So having something without different associations, like letters, can be used for this. But you could still can have "hotkeys" waves, that means something maybe abstract, or maybe very used, and have them as hotkeys.
<p>And with 30second/letter times, using cellphone like assisted writting could be useful (and there you need "keys" to select which offered word anyway), or like <a href="http://www.joaquimrocha.com/2010/03/03/text-prediction-on-gnome/" title="joaquimrocha.com">this</a> [joaquimrocha.com] in a desktop environment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Words have several meanings , thinking on a word , specially in different contexts , could have different waves .
So having something without different associations , like letters , can be used for this .
But you could still can have " hotkeys " waves , that means something maybe abstract , or maybe very used , and have them as hotkeys .
And with 30second/letter times , using cellphone like assisted writting could be useful ( and there you need " keys " to select which offered word anyway ) , or like this [ joaquimrocha.com ] in a desktop environment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Words have several meanings, thinking on a word, specially in different contexts, could have different waves.
So having something without different associations, like letters, can be used for this.
But you could still can have "hotkeys" waves, that means something maybe abstract, or maybe very used, and have them as hotkeys.
And with 30second/letter times, using cellphone like assisted writting could be useful (and there you need "keys" to select which offered word anyway), or like this [joaquimrocha.com] in a desktop environment.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31353660</id>
	<title>Re:Clinical trials</title>
	<author>Vellmont</author>
	<datestamp>1267629840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i><br>The fact that you can "learn to be relaxed, focused. You improve." means that you're changing the frequency and wavelength of your brain's electrical output to comply with the requirements of this device.<br></i><br>WTF?  You don't think you do exactly the same thing every time you have a thought?  It's amazing to me that anyone would worry about "medical testing" for anything as simple as a device that asks you to think about something.</p><p>Maybe your post should have to undergo medical testing because "we don't know the long term effects of it".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The fact that you can " learn to be relaxed , focused .
You improve .
" means that you 're changing the frequency and wavelength of your brain 's electrical output to comply with the requirements of this device.WTF ?
You do n't think you do exactly the same thing every time you have a thought ?
It 's amazing to me that anyone would worry about " medical testing " for anything as simple as a device that asks you to think about something.Maybe your post should have to undergo medical testing because " we do n't know the long term effects of it " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The fact that you can "learn to be relaxed, focused.
You improve.
" means that you're changing the frequency and wavelength of your brain's electrical output to comply with the requirements of this device.WTF?
You don't think you do exactly the same thing every time you have a thought?
It's amazing to me that anyone would worry about "medical testing" for anything as simple as a device that asks you to think about something.Maybe your post should have to undergo medical testing because "we don't know the long term effects of it".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31361906</id>
	<title>Re:Mind reading</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267693680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>isn't the MPAA concerned movie issues??</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is n't the MPAA concerned movie issues ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>isn't the MPAA concerned movie issues?
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350174</id>
	<title>Re:Mind reading</title>
	<author>Akido37</author>
	<datestamp>1267609500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex\_Post\_Facto\_(Star\_Trek:\_Voyager)" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex\_Post\_Facto\_(Star\_Trek:\_Voyager)</a> [wikipedia.org]
<br> <br>
I can't believe I just referenced <i>Star Trek: Voyager</i>.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex \ _Post \ _Facto \ _ ( Star \ _Trek : \ _Voyager ) [ wikipedia.org ] I ca n't believe I just referenced Star Trek : Voyager .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex\_Post\_Facto\_(Star\_Trek:\_Voyager) [wikipedia.org]
 
I can't believe I just referenced Star Trek: Voyager.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31354876</id>
	<title>Impossible</title>
	<author>rafmarcus</author>
	<datestamp>1267641960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't think so. No computer in the world can read our mind. It is next to impossible.
<a href="http://ezinearticles.com/?The-Weider-X-Factor-Review&amp;id=3860999" title="ezinearticles.com" rel="nofollow">http://ezinearticles.com/?The-Weider-X-Factor-Review&amp;id=3860999</a> [ezinearticles.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think so .
No computer in the world can read our mind .
It is next to impossible .
http : //ezinearticles.com/ ? The-Weider-X-Factor-Review&amp;id = 3860999 [ ezinearticles.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think so.
No computer in the world can read our mind.
It is next to impossible.
http://ezinearticles.com/?The-Weider-X-Factor-Review&amp;id=3860999 [ezinearticles.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349952</id>
	<title>In all seriousness</title>
	<author>Superdarion</author>
	<datestamp>1267608540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wouldn't something like this be an amazing tool for dislexic people?<br> <br>

Perhaps they can figure out exactly what's going wrong with their brain wiring if a computer can have direct access to the signals it's giving out and actually understand them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't something like this be an amazing tool for dislexic people ?
Perhaps they can figure out exactly what 's going wrong with their brain wiring if a computer can have direct access to the signals it 's giving out and actually understand them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't something like this be an amazing tool for dislexic people?
Perhaps they can figure out exactly what's going wrong with their brain wiring if a computer can have direct access to the signals it's giving out and actually understand them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350188</id>
	<title>Clinical trials</title>
	<author>thePowerOfGrayskull</author>
	<datestamp>1267609620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
I would hope this has to go through the same clinical trials that introducing a drug would.  The fact that you can "learn to be relaxed, focused. You improve." means that you're changing the frequency and wavelength of your brain's electrical output to comply with the requirements of this device.  </p><p>
Me, I'd want to be damned sure that wasn't going to introduce long-term side effects before using it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would hope this has to go through the same clinical trials that introducing a drug would .
The fact that you can " learn to be relaxed , focused .
You improve .
" means that you 're changing the frequency and wavelength of your brain 's electrical output to comply with the requirements of this device .
Me , I 'd want to be damned sure that was n't going to introduce long-term side effects before using it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
I would hope this has to go through the same clinical trials that introducing a drug would.
The fact that you can "learn to be relaxed, focused.
You improve.
" means that you're changing the frequency and wavelength of your brain's electrical output to comply with the requirements of this device.
Me, I'd want to be damned sure that wasn't going to introduce long-term side effects before using it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349974</id>
	<title>Just remember</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267608660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>to think in Russian.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>to think in Russian .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to think in Russian.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350566</id>
	<title>Just wait...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267611600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After several years of practical use, they will come up with a dvorak version.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After several years of practical use , they will come up with a dvorak version .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After several years of practical use, they will come up with a dvorak version.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350360</id>
	<title>Yarmulke</title>
	<author>Ukab the Great</author>
	<datestamp>1267610580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The system makes use of a skull cap and wireless technology to transform brain waves into letters.</p></div></blockquote><p>Geek #1: At my cousin's bar-mitzvah they had this enormous LAN party where everyone was wearing a mind reading computer, which was really sweet, but no one wanted to play with me and everyone was talking in some funny language.</p><p>Geek #2: That wasn't a LAN party, you idiot, that was a synagogue.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The system makes use of a skull cap and wireless technology to transform brain waves into letters.Geek # 1 : At my cousin 's bar-mitzvah they had this enormous LAN party where everyone was wearing a mind reading computer , which was really sweet , but no one wanted to play with me and everyone was talking in some funny language.Geek # 2 : That was n't a LAN party , you idiot , that was a synagogue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The system makes use of a skull cap and wireless technology to transform brain waves into letters.Geek #1: At my cousin's bar-mitzvah they had this enormous LAN party where everyone was wearing a mind reading computer, which was really sweet, but no one wanted to play with me and everyone was talking in some funny language.Geek #2: That wasn't a LAN party, you idiot, that was a synagogue.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349718</id>
	<title>security implications?</title>
	<author>parallel\_prankster</author>
	<datestamp>1267607640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>So now if people are thinking about their passwords while typing it in, it could be picked up by this ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So now if people are thinking about their passwords while typing it in , it could be picked up by this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So now if people are thinking about their passwords while typing it in, it could be picked up by this ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350042</id>
	<title>Re:Mind reading</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267609020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And third dream about some brazilian I had sex with (a sex dream<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div><p>A sex dream about sex?!  Now I've heard <i>everything!</i> </p><p><div class="quote"><p>and I accidentally cummed on side of my girlfriend back then).</p></div><p>!?  Did you mean to say, "it's personal"?  Don't worry, if you're still have those problems, I know a <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0780622/" title="imdb.com">great movie</a> [imdb.com] that will help you with those wet dreams.  <br> <br>

The video shows letters on a computer screen.  That's it!  They have to think hard about each letter for a lengthy amount of time.  Young Pamela Anderson didn't pop up stripping on the computer monitor when they did the demo!  For the love of all things spaghetti, read the fucking article next time!!!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And third dream about some brazilian I had sex with ( a sex dream ...A sex dream about sex ? !
Now I 've heard everything !
and I accidentally cummed on side of my girlfriend back then ) . ! ?
Did you mean to say , " it 's personal " ?
Do n't worry , if you 're still have those problems , I know a great movie [ imdb.com ] that will help you with those wet dreams .
The video shows letters on a computer screen .
That 's it !
They have to think hard about each letter for a lengthy amount of time .
Young Pamela Anderson did n't pop up stripping on the computer monitor when they did the demo !
For the love of all things spaghetti , read the fucking article next time ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And third dream about some brazilian I had sex with (a sex dream ...A sex dream about sex?!
Now I've heard everything!
and I accidentally cummed on side of my girlfriend back then).!?
Did you mean to say, "it's personal"?
Don't worry, if you're still have those problems, I know a great movie [imdb.com] that will help you with those wet dreams.
The video shows letters on a computer screen.
That's it!
They have to think hard about each letter for a lengthy amount of time.
Young Pamela Anderson didn't pop up stripping on the computer monitor when they did the demo!
For the love of all things spaghetti, read the fucking article next time!!
!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31352950</id>
	<title>Re:Clinical trials</title>
	<author>BikeHelmet</author>
	<datestamp>1267624020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...you're changing the frequency and wavelength of your brain's electrical output to comply with the requirements of this device.</p> </div><p>TV does the same thing.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...you 're changing the frequency and wavelength of your brain 's electrical output to comply with the requirements of this device .
TV does the same thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...you're changing the frequency and wavelength of your brain's electrical output to comply with the requirements of this device.
TV does the same thing.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350354</id>
	<title>Why use the alphabet?</title>
	<author>BigSlowTarget</author>
	<datestamp>1267610520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is this thing really trying to recognize and distinguish twenty or thirty different brain patterns each associated with a particular letter, number or mark?  It seems setting it up to read morse code or some other binary coded system would make it faster and easier on the user.  You could even put the letters and codes up on the screen.  Too bad the article doesn't have more info.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this thing really trying to recognize and distinguish twenty or thirty different brain patterns each associated with a particular letter , number or mark ?
It seems setting it up to read morse code or some other binary coded system would make it faster and easier on the user .
You could even put the letters and codes up on the screen .
Too bad the article does n't have more info .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this thing really trying to recognize and distinguish twenty or thirty different brain patterns each associated with a particular letter, number or mark?
It seems setting it up to read morse code or some other binary coded system would make it faster and easier on the user.
You could even put the letters and codes up on the screen.
Too bad the article doesn't have more info.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349820</id>
	<title>Re:Mind reading</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267608000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wasn't that basically the plot of Until the End of the World?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Was n't that basically the plot of Until the End of the World ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wasn't that basically the plot of Until the End of the World?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31355552</id>
	<title>Re:Clinical trials</title>
	<author>FreakyGreenLeaky</author>
	<datestamp>1267693740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Me, I'd want to be damned sure that wasn't going to introduce long-term side effects before using it.</i></p><p>How can something which is read-only have any long term effects?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Me , I 'd want to be damned sure that was n't going to introduce long-term side effects before using it.How can something which is read-only have any long term effects ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Me, I'd want to be damned sure that wasn't going to introduce long-term side effects before using it.How can something which is read-only have any long term effects?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31354702</id>
	<title>1984 .. 2084</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267640100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The technology of the Cray computer can now sit on a pager, (that is already obsolete).  For those who say it will take years to actually work, this translates to: it will work.  Get a clue.  Technology is not a barrier - it is a speed bump.  Computers will read minds.  Just like today, laws will trail behind technolgy. Your own thoughts, or maybe our own children's thoughts, will not be private.  And to the primeval "what do I have to hide" crowd: just try going through one day tracking what your thoughts are as you talk to your wife -your dress looks great, your kids - I really love your project, your boss - your idea is fantastic, your best friend - I'd love to go but I have to..., And that's just conversational.  Also consider your thoughts during every human contact, walking into the elevator next to an overwight blind person, or an attractive member of the opposite sex, the police officer who pulled you over, the checkout clerk at the grocery store missing a tooth.  Finally, consider every thought you have in private, taken from you, recorded stored and filed.  While those of you who actually try to track your thoughts, you will quickly discover the sheer agony of total transparency.  Do not take solace in the shortcoming of technololgy, for in the blink of an eye, technology will evolve, and it will happen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The technology of the Cray computer can now sit on a pager , ( that is already obsolete ) .
For those who say it will take years to actually work , this translates to : it will work .
Get a clue .
Technology is not a barrier - it is a speed bump .
Computers will read minds .
Just like today , laws will trail behind technolgy .
Your own thoughts , or maybe our own children 's thoughts , will not be private .
And to the primeval " what do I have to hide " crowd : just try going through one day tracking what your thoughts are as you talk to your wife -your dress looks great , your kids - I really love your project , your boss - your idea is fantastic , your best friend - I 'd love to go but I have to... , And that 's just conversational .
Also consider your thoughts during every human contact , walking into the elevator next to an overwight blind person , or an attractive member of the opposite sex , the police officer who pulled you over , the checkout clerk at the grocery store missing a tooth .
Finally , consider every thought you have in private , taken from you , recorded stored and filed .
While those of you who actually try to track your thoughts , you will quickly discover the sheer agony of total transparency .
Do not take solace in the shortcoming of technololgy , for in the blink of an eye , technology will evolve , and it will happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The technology of the Cray computer can now sit on a pager, (that is already obsolete).
For those who say it will take years to actually work, this translates to: it will work.
Get a clue.
Technology is not a barrier - it is a speed bump.
Computers will read minds.
Just like today, laws will trail behind technolgy.
Your own thoughts, or maybe our own children's thoughts, will not be private.
And to the primeval "what do I have to hide" crowd: just try going through one day tracking what your thoughts are as you talk to your wife -your dress looks great, your kids - I really love your project, your boss - your idea is fantastic, your best friend - I'd love to go but I have to..., And that's just conversational.
Also consider your thoughts during every human contact, walking into the elevator next to an overwight blind person, or an attractive member of the opposite sex, the police officer who pulled you over, the checkout clerk at the grocery store missing a tooth.
Finally, consider every thought you have in private, taken from you, recorded stored and filed.
While those of you who actually try to track your thoughts, you will quickly discover the sheer agony of total transparency.
Do not take solace in the shortcoming of technololgy, for in the blink of an eye, technology will evolve, and it will happen.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350344</id>
	<title>Dreaming is a private thing</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1267610460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Belanger shrugged. "If what you say is right, I'm kind of sorry for the guy."</p><p>Weill nodded sadly. "I'm sorry for all of them. Through the years, I've found out one thing. It's their business; making people happy. <i>Other</i> people".</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreaming\_Is\_a\_Private\_Thing" title="wikipedia.org">Dreaming is a private thing</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Belanger shrugged .
" If what you say is right , I 'm kind of sorry for the guy .
" Weill nodded sadly .
" I 'm sorry for all of them .
Through the years , I 've found out one thing .
It 's their business ; making people happy .
Other people " .Dreaming is a private thing [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Belanger shrugged.
"If what you say is right, I'm kind of sorry for the guy.
"Weill nodded sadly.
"I'm sorry for all of them.
Through the years, I've found out one thing.
It's their business; making people happy.
Other people".Dreaming is a private thing [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349736</id>
	<title>Re:Mind reading</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267607700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>We are sorry to inform you that you are in violation of the Dream Management Copyright Act and thus punishable of up to the amount of $10,000,000,000.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We are sorry to inform you that you are in violation of the Dream Management Copyright Act and thus punishable of up to the amount of $ 10,000,000,000 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We are sorry to inform you that you are in violation of the Dream Management Copyright Act and thus punishable of up to the amount of $10,000,000,000.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349972</id>
	<title>So Many Applications</title>
	<author>BJ\_Covert\_Action</author>
	<datestamp>1267608660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have a friend who has ALS (same disease as Hawking) and we haven't gotten a proper message from him in more than 2 years. I can't imagine how lonely that is. These types of systems really pay off in the quality of life they can create for disabled patients and such. Color me excited.
<br> <br>
I do, however, hope the price drops significantly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a friend who has ALS ( same disease as Hawking ) and we have n't gotten a proper message from him in more than 2 years .
I ca n't imagine how lonely that is .
These types of systems really pay off in the quality of life they can create for disabled patients and such .
Color me excited .
I do , however , hope the price drops significantly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a friend who has ALS (same disease as Hawking) and we haven't gotten a proper message from him in more than 2 years.
I can't imagine how lonely that is.
These types of systems really pay off in the quality of life they can create for disabled patients and such.
Color me excited.
I do, however, hope the price drops significantly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349712</id>
	<title>I can't wait till Stephen Hawking gets one</title>
	<author>r0k3t</author>
	<datestamp>1267607640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am sure he will be one of the first to use it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am sure he will be one of the first to use it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am sure he will be one of the first to use it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350200</id>
	<title>MIND THIS COMPUTER</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267609680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>S<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. E.. N.. D..     A..     M.. A.. S.. S.. I.. V.. E..</p><p>B..O..T..N..E..T..    T..O..    <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/" title="microsoft.com" rel="nofollow">The Nexus Of Office LACK Of Producitivity</a> [microsoft.com].</p><p>Thanks In Advance.</p><p>Yours In Tashkent,<br>Kilgore Trout</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>S .. E.. N.. D.. A.. M.. A.. S.. S.. I.. V.. E..B..O..T..N..E..T.. T..O.. The Nexus Of Office LACK Of Producitivity [ microsoft.com ] .Thanks In Advance.Yours In Tashkent,Kilgore Trout</tokentext>
<sentencetext>S .. E.. N.. D..     A..     M.. A.. S.. S.. I.. V.. E..B..O..T..N..E..T..    T..O..    The Nexus Of Office LACK Of Producitivity [microsoft.com].Thanks In Advance.Yours In Tashkent,Kilgore Trout</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349966</id>
	<title>Re:What we really need.</title>
	<author>daremonai</author>
	<datestamp>1267608600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Judging by the email I receive, most computers are already like that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Judging by the email I receive , most computers are already like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Judging by the email I receive, most computers are already like that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31354282</id>
	<title>Re:Mind reading</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267635480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just ask the folks at Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance what they think about the subject.</p><p>And yes, it's real, it's not paranoid schizophrenia... what kind of mental illness disappears when you put a steel cap on?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just ask the folks at Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance what they think about the subject.And yes , it 's real , it 's not paranoid schizophrenia... what kind of mental illness disappears when you put a steel cap on ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just ask the folks at Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance what they think about the subject.And yes, it's real, it's not paranoid schizophrenia... what kind of mental illness disappears when you put a steel cap on?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31354870</id>
	<title>Re:However real mind reading is still "50 years aw</title>
	<author>Laser Dan</author>
	<datestamp>1267641900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I worked with a student on a similar Brain-Computer-Interface to what appears to be shown here. In actuality, the interface barely reads your mind at all, the grid of letters you see flashes while you focus on the letter you want to type. When that letter flashes, your brain registers this, and your 'surprise' at seeing the flash is what's measured. Knowing the time that this happened, it is possible to eventually deduce what letter on the grid the patient is focusing on.</p></div><p>If you have to stare at a grid of letters, wouldn't an eye tracker be much faster, more effective, and cheaper?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I worked with a student on a similar Brain-Computer-Interface to what appears to be shown here .
In actuality , the interface barely reads your mind at all , the grid of letters you see flashes while you focus on the letter you want to type .
When that letter flashes , your brain registers this , and your 'surprise ' at seeing the flash is what 's measured .
Knowing the time that this happened , it is possible to eventually deduce what letter on the grid the patient is focusing on.If you have to stare at a grid of letters , would n't an eye tracker be much faster , more effective , and cheaper ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I worked with a student on a similar Brain-Computer-Interface to what appears to be shown here.
In actuality, the interface barely reads your mind at all, the grid of letters you see flashes while you focus on the letter you want to type.
When that letter flashes, your brain registers this, and your 'surprise' at seeing the flash is what's measured.
Knowing the time that this happened, it is possible to eventually deduce what letter on the grid the patient is focusing on.If you have to stare at a grid of letters, wouldn't an eye tracker be much faster, more effective, and cheaper?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350162</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31351462</id>
	<title>Re:Mind reading</title>
	<author>Dalambertian</author>
	<datestamp>1267615860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's what Lori said (Total Recall)</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's what Lori said ( Total Recall )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's what Lori said (Total Recall)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350320</id>
	<title>Very far from reading anything...</title>
	<author>Kjella</author>
	<datestamp>1267610400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>According to the more detailed description of how this works, lights go across the letters and each time it passes a letter you want to add you need to concentrate. So it basically has a brain activity meter and can tell if you're thinking hard or not, it's not like you concentrate on the letter A and the machine reads it from your mind. I think your thoughts are quite safe for a long time to come.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>According to the more detailed description of how this works , lights go across the letters and each time it passes a letter you want to add you need to concentrate .
So it basically has a brain activity meter and can tell if you 're thinking hard or not , it 's not like you concentrate on the letter A and the machine reads it from your mind .
I think your thoughts are quite safe for a long time to come .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to the more detailed description of how this works, lights go across the letters and each time it passes a letter you want to add you need to concentrate.
So it basically has a brain activity meter and can tell if you're thinking hard or not, it's not like you concentrate on the letter A and the machine reads it from your mind.
I think your thoughts are quite safe for a long time to come.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350002</id>
	<title>Dasher + eye-tracking?</title>
	<author>Scottie-Z</author>
	<datestamp>1267608780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wouldn't it be a lot faster and cheaper to integrate eye-tracking technology into Dasher?</p><p><a href="http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/dasher/" title="cam.ac.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/dasher/</a> [cam.ac.uk]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't it be a lot faster and cheaper to integrate eye-tracking technology into Dasher ? http : //www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/dasher/ [ cam.ac.uk ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't it be a lot faster and cheaper to integrate eye-tracking technology into Dasher?http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/dasher/ [cam.ac.uk]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31430834</id>
	<title>rgrg</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268215080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't this forum for nerds? Since when did nerds have girlfriends?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't this forum for nerds ?
Since when did nerds have girlfriends ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't this forum for nerds?
Since when did nerds have girlfriends?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349758</id>
	<title>One things for sure...</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1267607760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>If they think it can read minds, they've obviously never tested it on a woman!</htmltext>
<tokenext>If they think it can read minds , they 've obviously never tested it on a woman !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they think it can read minds, they've obviously never tested it on a woman!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349782</id>
	<title>Well, that's good and all...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267607880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But can it run Linux?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But can it run Linux ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But can it run Linux?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349922</id>
	<title>Not as hot as Marie-Josee Croze</title>
	<author>OglinTatas</author>
	<datestamp>1267608360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0401383/" title="imdb.com">http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0401383/</a> [imdb.com]</p><p>But probably more useful for locked in syndrome<br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Locked\_in\_syndrome" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Locked\_in\_syndrome</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.imdb.com/title/tt0401383/ [ imdb.com ] But probably more useful for locked in syndromehttp : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Locked \ _in \ _syndrome [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0401383/ [imdb.com]But probably more useful for locked in syndromehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Locked\_in\_syndrome [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349890</id>
	<title>Re:Mind reading</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267608300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>usually really great entertainment in sleep</p></div><p>Yea that horror nightmare that I had was really great entertainment.  Peeing my bed just made it all the more fun.<br> <br>

Besides, i can see my fiancee sticking this on my head to see what I am dreaming about...and then getting yelled at because she's not the women in my dreams.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>usually really great entertainment in sleepYea that horror nightmare that I had was really great entertainment .
Peeing my bed just made it all the more fun .
Besides , i can see my fiancee sticking this on my head to see what I am dreaming about...and then getting yelled at because she 's not the women in my dreams .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>usually really great entertainment in sleepYea that horror nightmare that I had was really great entertainment.
Peeing my bed just made it all the more fun.
Besides, i can see my fiancee sticking this on my head to see what I am dreaming about...and then getting yelled at because she's not the women in my dreams.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31356502</id>
	<title>They made a movie about that</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267705920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was called "Until The End Of The World", by Wim Wenders.  They developed the dream recording machine and everyone became completely obsessed with it and stopped everything else they were doing, and the world more or less went nuts and collapsed.  It was actually a really good film.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was called " Until The End Of The World " , by Wim Wenders .
They developed the dream recording machine and everyone became completely obsessed with it and stopped everything else they were doing , and the world more or less went nuts and collapsed .
It was actually a really good film .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was called "Until The End Of The World", by Wim Wenders.
They developed the dream recording machine and everyone became completely obsessed with it and stopped everything else they were doing, and the world more or less went nuts and collapsed.
It was actually a really good film.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349722</id>
	<title>Re:Mind reading</title>
	<author>Superdarion</author>
	<datestamp>1267607640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>You wouldn't be able to share your dream-videos of you smashing the RIAA headquarters with your friends, as that'd be infringing on intellectual property.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You would n't be able to share your dream-videos of you smashing the RIAA headquarters with your friends , as that 'd be infringing on intellectual property .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You wouldn't be able to share your dream-videos of you smashing the RIAA headquarters with your friends, as that'd be infringing on intellectual property.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350622</id>
	<title>Old news</title>
	<author>commodoresloat</author>
	<datestamp>1267611900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We already have this.  I think it's called emacs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We already have this .
I think it 's called emacs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We already have this.
I think it's called emacs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349848</id>
	<title>Re:Mind reading</title>
	<author>HungryHobo</author>
	<datestamp>1267608120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm more worried that once we get that kind of tech there will be no legal safeguards to protect people from being read against their will.</p><p>"the defendant clearly dreamed about stabbing the victim while in police custody"</p><p>Or even worse: you make a recording of your dreams and they break laws like possession of obscene material-<br>I can imagine someone being prosecuted for possession obscene material in the form of recordings of thier own memories or dreams.</p><p>Or to go even creepier:<br>If the brain starts being considered just another data storage device might they start issuing warrants for information stored on it?<br>Could your memories of your girlfriend when you were in highschool get you charged for possessing "child porn" on the storage medium that is your brain?</p><p>There's a lot of horribly possibilities and I'd like to see legal safeguards being put in place long before we start to really really need them.</p><p>Police won't be so bothered if we forbid them to read peoples minds against their will now than 50 years down the line when it's helping their conviction rate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm more worried that once we get that kind of tech there will be no legal safeguards to protect people from being read against their will .
" the defendant clearly dreamed about stabbing the victim while in police custody " Or even worse : you make a recording of your dreams and they break laws like possession of obscene material-I can imagine someone being prosecuted for possession obscene material in the form of recordings of thier own memories or dreams.Or to go even creepier : If the brain starts being considered just another data storage device might they start issuing warrants for information stored on it ? Could your memories of your girlfriend when you were in highschool get you charged for possessing " child porn " on the storage medium that is your brain ? There 's a lot of horribly possibilities and I 'd like to see legal safeguards being put in place long before we start to really really need them.Police wo n't be so bothered if we forbid them to read peoples minds against their will now than 50 years down the line when it 's helping their conviction rate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm more worried that once we get that kind of tech there will be no legal safeguards to protect people from being read against their will.
"the defendant clearly dreamed about stabbing the victim while in police custody"Or even worse: you make a recording of your dreams and they break laws like possession of obscene material-I can imagine someone being prosecuted for possession obscene material in the form of recordings of thier own memories or dreams.Or to go even creepier:If the brain starts being considered just another data storage device might they start issuing warrants for information stored on it?Could your memories of your girlfriend when you were in highschool get you charged for possessing "child porn" on the storage medium that is your brain?There's a lot of horribly possibilities and I'd like to see legal safeguards being put in place long before we start to really really need them.Police won't be so bothered if we forbid them to read peoples minds against their will now than 50 years down the line when it's helping their conviction rate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31354374</id>
	<title>BTTF</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267636560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>-No Doc, I'm from the future. I came here in a time machine that you invented. I need your help to get back to the year 1985.<br>-My God. Do you know what this means?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.It means that this damn thing doesn't work at all!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>-No Doc , I 'm from the future .
I came here in a time machine that you invented .
I need your help to get back to the year 1985.-My God .
Do you know what this means ?
.It means that this damn thing does n't work at all ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>-No Doc, I'm from the future.
I came here in a time machine that you invented.
I need your help to get back to the year 1985.-My God.
Do you know what this means?
.It means that this damn thing doesn't work at all!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31353322</id>
	<title>Re:Ewww!</title>
	<author>AmberBlackCat</author>
	<datestamp>1267627380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Never mind the fact that after his device records his dream about the first grade girl, he's committed child pornography in his sleep and labeled as a sex offender when he wakes up.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Never mind the fact that after his device records his dream about the first grade girl , he 's committed child pornography in his sleep and labeled as a sex offender when he wakes up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Never mind the fact that after his device records his dream about the first grade girl, he's committed child pornography in his sleep and labeled as a sex offender when he wakes up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349788</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349962</id>
	<title>Yeah</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267608540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can imagine the first output would be</p><p>"KILLME"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can imagine the first output would be " KILLME "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can imagine the first output would be"KILLME"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31417820</id>
	<title>Re:Mind reading</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1268167080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What if I&rsquo;m not thinking of a picture at all?</p><p>What if I&rsquo;m not even thinking of something that can be sensed by any human sense, as it is an abstract/fantasy concept/thing/feeling?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What if I    m not thinking of a picture at all ? What if I    m not even thinking of something that can be sensed by any human sense , as it is an abstract/fantasy concept/thing/feeling ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if I’m not thinking of a picture at all?What if I’m not even thinking of something that can be sensed by any human sense, as it is an abstract/fantasy concept/thing/feeling?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31359508</id>
	<title>Re:Clinical trials</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267725720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ridiculous.  I hear sleeping also changes the frequency and wavelength of your brain's electrical output, you should get that checked out.  Learning any new activity will change the brain.  Do we need research and FDA approval for the dangers of meditation too?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ridiculous .
I hear sleeping also changes the frequency and wavelength of your brain 's electrical output , you should get that checked out .
Learning any new activity will change the brain .
Do we need research and FDA approval for the dangers of meditation too ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ridiculous.
I hear sleeping also changes the frequency and wavelength of your brain's electrical output, you should get that checked out.
Learning any new activity will change the brain.
Do we need research and FDA approval for the dangers of meditation too?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350940</id>
	<title>That slow?</title>
	<author>nospam007</author>
	<datestamp>1267613220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So I guess it will be some time before one will be able to get a frosty piss that way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So I guess it will be some time before one will be able to get a frosty piss that way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So I guess it will be some time before one will be able to get a frosty piss that way.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31357272</id>
	<title>Re:Mind reading</title>
	<author>mauhiz</author>
	<datestamp>1267713780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Don't worry, if you're still have those problems, I know a <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0780622/" title="imdb.com" rel="nofollow">great movie</a> [imdb.com] that will help you with those wet dreams.</p></div><p>Actually there is more to this myth than that movie, see <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vagina\_dentata" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia</a> [wikipedia.org] for a start, and read Freud for a complete analysis.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't worry , if you 're still have those problems , I know a great movie [ imdb.com ] that will help you with those wet dreams.Actually there is more to this myth than that movie , see Wikipedia [ wikipedia.org ] for a start , and read Freud for a complete analysis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't worry, if you're still have those problems, I know a great movie [imdb.com] that will help you with those wet dreams.Actually there is more to this myth than that movie, see Wikipedia [wikipedia.org] for a start, and read Freud for a complete analysis.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350042</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350258</id>
	<title>Re:Mind reading</title>
	<author>vxice</author>
	<datestamp>1267610040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>well all she needs now is to read over your shoulder, or know your slashdot nick.  Probably not too much to worry about but I would have posted anonymous.</htmltext>
<tokenext>well all she needs now is to read over your shoulder , or know your slashdot nick .
Probably not too much to worry about but I would have posted anonymous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>well all she needs now is to read over your shoulder, or know your slashdot nick.
Probably not too much to worry about but I would have posted anonymous.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350162</id>
	<title>However real mind reading is still "50 years away"</title>
	<author>NoSleepDemon</author>
	<datestamp>1267609440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The kind of mind reading that this article implies, and what some posters are worried about (is it 1984 again?) is a long, long way off, about "50 years" in scientific terms.<br> <br>

I worked with a student on a similar Brain-Computer-Interface to what appears to be shown here. In actuality, the interface barely reads your mind at all, the grid of letters you see flashes while you focus on the letter you want to type. When that letter flashes, your brain registers this, and your 'surprise' at seeing the flash is what's measured. Knowing the time that this happened, it is possible to eventually deduce what letter on the grid the patient is focusing on.<br> <br>

So as you can see, "Computer that can read your mind" is a rather sensationalist article title to say the least. It's also a massive pain in the ass to try to use a device like this, you literally have to focus on the letter you want to type and absolutely nothing else, or it'll take longer and longer to determine what letter you are 'typing'.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The kind of mind reading that this article implies , and what some posters are worried about ( is it 1984 again ?
) is a long , long way off , about " 50 years " in scientific terms .
I worked with a student on a similar Brain-Computer-Interface to what appears to be shown here .
In actuality , the interface barely reads your mind at all , the grid of letters you see flashes while you focus on the letter you want to type .
When that letter flashes , your brain registers this , and your 'surprise ' at seeing the flash is what 's measured .
Knowing the time that this happened , it is possible to eventually deduce what letter on the grid the patient is focusing on .
So as you can see , " Computer that can read your mind " is a rather sensationalist article title to say the least .
It 's also a massive pain in the ass to try to use a device like this , you literally have to focus on the letter you want to type and absolutely nothing else , or it 'll take longer and longer to determine what letter you are 'typing' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The kind of mind reading that this article implies, and what some posters are worried about (is it 1984 again?
) is a long, long way off, about "50 years" in scientific terms.
I worked with a student on a similar Brain-Computer-Interface to what appears to be shown here.
In actuality, the interface barely reads your mind at all, the grid of letters you see flashes while you focus on the letter you want to type.
When that letter flashes, your brain registers this, and your 'surprise' at seeing the flash is what's measured.
Knowing the time that this happened, it is possible to eventually deduce what letter on the grid the patient is focusing on.
So as you can see, "Computer that can read your mind" is a rather sensationalist article title to say the least.
It's also a massive pain in the ass to try to use a device like this, you literally have to focus on the letter you want to type and absolutely nothing else, or it'll take longer and longer to determine what letter you are 'typing'.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650</id>
	<title>Mind reading</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267607340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As I've understood, mind reading comes down to recognizing certain patterns in the brain. Given improvement in the processing speed and database of patterns, could it be possible to draw a complete picture of what you are thinking? And if yes, would sleeping interfere with such?</p><p>It would be great if you could save your dreams and watch them later, especially as they're usually really great entertainment in sleep but you forget them really quick. There's basically three dreams I still remember. First one when I was on first or second grade about a girl I liked then. Second one about a girl in my high school - interestingly, I didn't have feelings for her before this dream where I slept next to her. And third dream about some brazilian I had sex with (a sex dream, and I accidentally cummed on side of my girlfriend back then). But saving all those dreams would be great. Wonder what RIAA would think if everyone started watching their own interesting dreams instead of movies though...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As I 've understood , mind reading comes down to recognizing certain patterns in the brain .
Given improvement in the processing speed and database of patterns , could it be possible to draw a complete picture of what you are thinking ?
And if yes , would sleeping interfere with such ? It would be great if you could save your dreams and watch them later , especially as they 're usually really great entertainment in sleep but you forget them really quick .
There 's basically three dreams I still remember .
First one when I was on first or second grade about a girl I liked then .
Second one about a girl in my high school - interestingly , I did n't have feelings for her before this dream where I slept next to her .
And third dream about some brazilian I had sex with ( a sex dream , and I accidentally cummed on side of my girlfriend back then ) .
But saving all those dreams would be great .
Wonder what RIAA would think if everyone started watching their own interesting dreams instead of movies though.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As I've understood, mind reading comes down to recognizing certain patterns in the brain.
Given improvement in the processing speed and database of patterns, could it be possible to draw a complete picture of what you are thinking?
And if yes, would sleeping interfere with such?It would be great if you could save your dreams and watch them later, especially as they're usually really great entertainment in sleep but you forget them really quick.
There's basically three dreams I still remember.
First one when I was on first or second grade about a girl I liked then.
Second one about a girl in my high school - interestingly, I didn't have feelings for her before this dream where I slept next to her.
And third dream about some brazilian I had sex with (a sex dream, and I accidentally cummed on side of my girlfriend back then).
But saving all those dreams would be great.
Wonder what RIAA would think if everyone started watching their own interesting dreams instead of movies though...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31353908</id>
	<title>Re:Ewww!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267631640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>How appropriate that the parent was modded "Informative".</htmltext>
<tokenext>How appropriate that the parent was modded " Informative " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How appropriate that the parent was modded "Informative".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349788</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349862</id>
	<title>I knew it was only a matter of time</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1267608180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And my friends called me an idealist.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And my friends called me an idealist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And my friends called me an idealist.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31352914</id>
	<title>Re:Mind reading</title>
	<author>BikeHelmet</author>
	<datestamp>1267623840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And just think. It'll only take one other advancement - a way to physically alter your brain - and then we'll be able to rewrite personalities and memories! Hurray! Millions of brainwashed people that genuinely believe what they believe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And just think .
It 'll only take one other advancement - a way to physically alter your brain - and then we 'll be able to rewrite personalities and memories !
Hurray ! Millions of brainwashed people that genuinely believe what they believe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And just think.
It'll only take one other advancement - a way to physically alter your brain - and then we'll be able to rewrite personalities and memories!
Hurray! Millions of brainwashed people that genuinely believe what they believe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350000</id>
	<title>Re:security implications?</title>
	<author>swanzilla</author>
	<datestamp>1267608780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So now if people are thinking about their passwords while typing it in, it could be picked up by this ?</p></div><p>I'm fairly positive the target would notice you placing an electrode-laden skull cap on their head.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So now if people are thinking about their passwords while typing it in , it could be picked up by this ? I 'm fairly positive the target would notice you placing an electrode-laden skull cap on their head .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So now if people are thinking about their passwords while typing it in, it could be picked up by this ?I'm fairly positive the target would notice you placing an electrode-laden skull cap on their head.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349718</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_1820210_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349756
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_1820210_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_1820210_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31351092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_1820210_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349804
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_1820210_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31353908
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349788
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_1820210_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31351430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350258
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349890
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_1820210_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31357272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_1820210_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31354282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_1820210_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31366908
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350162
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_1820210_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_1820210_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350438
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_1820210_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31361906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_1820210_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31353660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_1820210_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31354666
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_1820210_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31417820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_1820210_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349686
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_1820210_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31359508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_1820210_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31352016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350354
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_1820210_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31353098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_1820210_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350000
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349718
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_1820210_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31352914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_1820210_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31352718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349788
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_1820210_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_1820210_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31355552
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_1820210_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_1820210_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31352950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_1820210_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_1820210_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31353322
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349788
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_1820210_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31365674
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31354870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350162
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_1820210_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31356502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_1820210_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31351462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349890
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_1820210.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349688
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_1820210.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349718
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350000
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_1820210.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349712
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_1820210.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350188
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31353660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31352950
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31355552
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31359508
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_1820210.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350002
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_1820210.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31352382
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_1820210.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350622
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_1820210.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350162
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31354870
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31365674
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31366908
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_1820210.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349896
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_1820210.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31357048
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_1820210.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349650
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349890
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31351462
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350258
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31351430
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349736
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350438
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349686
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349848
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350174
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31353098
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31352914
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31354666
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31354282
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31356502
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31361906
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349788
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31353322
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31353908
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31352718
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350042
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31357272
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349722
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350448
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31351092
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349804
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350344
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31417820
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349820
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_1820210.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349756
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349966
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_1820210.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349758
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_1820210.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349972
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_1820210.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349782
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_1820210.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349974
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_1820210.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31349774
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_1820210.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350354
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31352016
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_1820210.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_1820210.31350360
</commentlist>
</conversation>
