<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_03_000205</id>
	<title>Printing Replacement Body Parts</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1267606140000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Deep Penguin sends in a piece that appeared in The Economist a couple of weeks back about a developing technology to <a href="http://www.economist.com/science-technology/displaystory.cfm?story\_id=15543683">"print" body parts for transplant</a>. <i>"A US and an Australian company have developed the $200,000 machine, which works by depositing stem cells and a 'sugar-based hydrogel' scaffolding material. (The stem cells are harvested from a transplant patient's own fat and bone marrow, to avoid rejection down the line.) The companies are Organovo, from San Diego, specializing in regenerative medicine, and Invetech, an engineering and automation firm in Melbourne, Australia. The initial targets are skin, muscle, and 'short stretches of blood vessels,' which they hope to have available for human implantation within five years. Down the line, they expect the technology could even print directly into the body, bypassing the in-vitro portion of the current process."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Deep Penguin sends in a piece that appeared in The Economist a couple of weeks back about a developing technology to " print " body parts for transplant .
" A US and an Australian company have developed the $ 200,000 machine , which works by depositing stem cells and a 'sugar-based hydrogel ' scaffolding material .
( The stem cells are harvested from a transplant patient 's own fat and bone marrow , to avoid rejection down the line .
) The companies are Organovo , from San Diego , specializing in regenerative medicine , and Invetech , an engineering and automation firm in Melbourne , Australia .
The initial targets are skin , muscle , and 'short stretches of blood vessels, ' which they hope to have available for human implantation within five years .
Down the line , they expect the technology could even print directly into the body , bypassing the in-vitro portion of the current process .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Deep Penguin sends in a piece that appeared in The Economist a couple of weeks back about a developing technology to "print" body parts for transplant.
"A US and an Australian company have developed the $200,000 machine, which works by depositing stem cells and a 'sugar-based hydrogel' scaffolding material.
(The stem cells are harvested from a transplant patient's own fat and bone marrow, to avoid rejection down the line.
) The companies are Organovo, from San Diego, specializing in regenerative medicine, and Invetech, an engineering and automation firm in Melbourne, Australia.
The initial targets are skin, muscle, and 'short stretches of blood vessels,' which they hope to have available for human implantation within five years.
Down the line, they expect the technology could even print directly into the body, bypassing the in-vitro portion of the current process.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31346954</id>
	<title>Re:Count-down</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267637880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I want to be a dragon with a human brain.  Complete with flaming breath and a hoard of treasure.  Where do I sign up?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I want to be a dragon with a human brain .
Complete with flaming breath and a hoard of treasure .
Where do I sign up ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want to be a dragon with a human brain.
Complete with flaming breath and a hoard of treasure.
Where do I sign up?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31351632</id>
	<title>Direct printing</title>
	<author>scdeimos</author>
	<datestamp>1267616520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Down the line, they expect the technology could even print directly into the body, bypassing the in-vitro portion of the current process.</p></div><p>Ow! Paper jam!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Down the line , they expect the technology could even print directly into the body , bypassing the in-vitro portion of the current process.Ow !
Paper jam !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Down the line, they expect the technology could even print directly into the body, bypassing the in-vitro portion of the current process.Ow!
Paper jam!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31347576</id>
	<title>Re:Count-down</title>
	<author>BJ\_Covert\_Action</author>
	<datestamp>1267640400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And why stop at changing genitalia?</p></div><p>
Because that would get rid of all the annoying Viagra spam and commercials, which is, essentially, the only thing standing between humanity and utopia.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And why stop at changing genitalia ?
Because that would get rid of all the annoying Viagra spam and commercials , which is , essentially , the only thing standing between humanity and utopia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And why stop at changing genitalia?
Because that would get rid of all the annoying Viagra spam and commercials, which is, essentially, the only thing standing between humanity and utopia.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31343064</id>
	<title>Re:Prior art</title>
	<author>xtracto</author>
	<datestamp>1267617480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yup, I will join the "old news" shouting wagon. I saw this on the Discovery Channel series <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2057\_(TV\_series)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">2057</a> [wikipedia.org] (IIRC the Episode was "The Body").</p><p>Nevertheless, it will be really news when the method gets approved by the FDA and starts being used in a common basis<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yup , I will join the " old news " shouting wagon .
I saw this on the Discovery Channel series 2057 [ wikipedia.org ] ( IIRC the Episode was " The Body " ) .Nevertheless , it will be really news when the method gets approved by the FDA and starts being used in a common basis : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yup, I will join the "old news" shouting wagon.
I saw this on the Discovery Channel series 2057 [wikipedia.org] (IIRC the Episode was "The Body").Nevertheless, it will be really news when the method gets approved by the FDA and starts being used in a common basis :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31344330</id>
	<title>Zombie alert</title>
	<author>hitnrunrambler</author>
	<datestamp>1267626420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now you can have your brains and eat them too....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now you can have your brains and eat them too... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now you can have your brains and eat them too....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31346562</id>
	<title>I bet consumables are expensive</title>
	<author>davidwr</author>
	<datestamp>1267636380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And to think, I thought my printer's consumables were high!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And to think , I thought my printer 's consumables were high !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And to think, I thought my printer's consumables were high!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342208</id>
	<title>Invetech?</title>
	<author>feepness</author>
	<datestamp>1267610040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>They took my gene stapler.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They took my gene stapler .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They took my gene stapler.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31345576</id>
	<title>Re:Hamburgers!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267632060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Printing meat has already been investigated (I think in 2006):<br>http://www.musc.edu/catalyst/archive/2006/co1-20invitro.html</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Printing meat has already been investigated ( I think in 2006 ) : http : //www.musc.edu/catalyst/archive/2006/co1-20invitro.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Printing meat has already been investigated (I think in 2006):http://www.musc.edu/catalyst/archive/2006/co1-20invitro.html</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31344048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342386</id>
	<title>Come on, Fifth Element!</title>
	<author>haruchai</author>
	<datestamp>1267611480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; How long before I can print my very own live copy of Milla Jovovich? Can't let Bruce Willis have all the fun.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>  How long before I can print my very own live copy of Milla Jovovich ?
Ca n't let Bruce Willis have all the fun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
  How long before I can print my very own live copy of Milla Jovovich?
Can't let Bruce Willis have all the fun.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342512</id>
	<title>Re:One pancreas, please</title>
	<author>kirill.s</author>
	<datestamp>1267612500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If their most optimistic guesstimate is 5 years, then by the time that gets FDA (or equivalent) approval, that will be even further away. <br>
Looks like we are dealing with one of those 20-years-from-now technologies that stay 20 years away no matter what.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If their most optimistic guesstimate is 5 years , then by the time that gets FDA ( or equivalent ) approval , that will be even further away .
Looks like we are dealing with one of those 20-years-from-now technologies that stay 20 years away no matter what .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If their most optimistic guesstimate is 5 years, then by the time that gets FDA (or equivalent) approval, that will be even further away.
Looks like we are dealing with one of those 20-years-from-now technologies that stay 20 years away no matter what.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31343472</id>
	<title>We already know how this will end.</title>
	<author>Krau Ming</author>
	<datestamp>1267621140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Skip this beginner's crap, start printing replacement humans, hire Michael Bay to blow some shit up already and be done with it!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Skip this beginner 's crap , start printing replacement humans , hire Michael Bay to blow some shit up already and be done with it ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Skip this beginner's crap, start printing replacement humans, hire Michael Bay to blow some shit up already and be done with it!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31349620</id>
	<title>Re:One pancreas, please</title>
	<author>VanGarrett</author>
	<datestamp>1267607220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Type I is normally diagnosed in children (it is seldom diagnosed after the age of 16 or so, though this does happen), and is the most severe type, characterized by the ceasation of insulin production by pancreas. This differs from Type II, in which, the pancreas may be fine, but the body has developed a resistance to use of the insulin, or in some cases, the pancreas may not be able to produce enough insulin to compensate for the body's size (a larger body has a larger quantity of blood, which in turn, requires a larger amount of insulin to process the glucose within)-- they body can out-grow the pancreas.</p><p>Personally, it would save me a lot of headaches if Type I and Type II Diabetes had different names. Since Type II is so incredibly common in the US, when I tell people that I have Diabetes, they immediately misunderstand what I mean, which has lead to a number of Pharmacy errors, in the past.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Type I is normally diagnosed in children ( it is seldom diagnosed after the age of 16 or so , though this does happen ) , and is the most severe type , characterized by the ceasation of insulin production by pancreas .
This differs from Type II , in which , the pancreas may be fine , but the body has developed a resistance to use of the insulin , or in some cases , the pancreas may not be able to produce enough insulin to compensate for the body 's size ( a larger body has a larger quantity of blood , which in turn , requires a larger amount of insulin to process the glucose within ) -- they body can out-grow the pancreas.Personally , it would save me a lot of headaches if Type I and Type II Diabetes had different names .
Since Type II is so incredibly common in the US , when I tell people that I have Diabetes , they immediately misunderstand what I mean , which has lead to a number of Pharmacy errors , in the past .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Type I is normally diagnosed in children (it is seldom diagnosed after the age of 16 or so, though this does happen), and is the most severe type, characterized by the ceasation of insulin production by pancreas.
This differs from Type II, in which, the pancreas may be fine, but the body has developed a resistance to use of the insulin, or in some cases, the pancreas may not be able to produce enough insulin to compensate for the body's size (a larger body has a larger quantity of blood, which in turn, requires a larger amount of insulin to process the glucose within)-- they body can out-grow the pancreas.Personally, it would save me a lot of headaches if Type I and Type II Diabetes had different names.
Since Type II is so incredibly common in the US, when I tell people that I have Diabetes, they immediately misunderstand what I mean, which has lead to a number of Pharmacy errors, in the past.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342610</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31360976</id>
	<title>Re:Hamburgers!</title>
	<author>Grishnakh</author>
	<datestamp>1267732440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Even better, you can make extremely high-quality meat (quality from the point-of-view of taste), which normally requires torturing the animal and killing it young.  Veal, Kobi beef, etc. comes from animals that don't exactly have wonderful lives, being penned up in cages so their flesh stays supple.  Being able to artificially manufacture such meat would eliminate these problems, plus also make meat cheaper.  Instead of paying high prices for the best cuts of meat, or getting nasty "stew beef" if you can't afford filet mignon, ALL beef could be filet mignon since it wouldn't cost any more to print the good stuff than the bad stuff.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Even better , you can make extremely high-quality meat ( quality from the point-of-view of taste ) , which normally requires torturing the animal and killing it young .
Veal , Kobi beef , etc .
comes from animals that do n't exactly have wonderful lives , being penned up in cages so their flesh stays supple .
Being able to artificially manufacture such meat would eliminate these problems , plus also make meat cheaper .
Instead of paying high prices for the best cuts of meat , or getting nasty " stew beef " if you ca n't afford filet mignon , ALL beef could be filet mignon since it would n't cost any more to print the good stuff than the bad stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even better, you can make extremely high-quality meat (quality from the point-of-view of taste), which normally requires torturing the animal and killing it young.
Veal, Kobi beef, etc.
comes from animals that don't exactly have wonderful lives, being penned up in cages so their flesh stays supple.
Being able to artificially manufacture such meat would eliminate these problems, plus also make meat cheaper.
Instead of paying high prices for the best cuts of meat, or getting nasty "stew beef" if you can't afford filet mignon, ALL beef could be filet mignon since it wouldn't cost any more to print the good stuff than the bad stuff.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31344048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31347706</id>
	<title>Re:Typical printer tactics</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1267641000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>No doubt if the machine is $200,000 the print cartridges will be $600,000 and still only use three quarters of its ink!</p></div>
</blockquote><p>Except this thing uses stem cells rather than ink, so <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/200912301004.jpg" title="boingboing.net">it'll be a lot cheaper per cartridge</a> [boingboing.net].</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No doubt if the machine is $ 200,000 the print cartridges will be $ 600,000 and still only use three quarters of its ink !
Except this thing uses stem cells rather than ink , so it 'll be a lot cheaper per cartridge [ boingboing.net ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No doubt if the machine is $200,000 the print cartridges will be $600,000 and still only use three quarters of its ink!
Except this thing uses stem cells rather than ink, so it'll be a lot cheaper per cartridge [boingboing.net].
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342702</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342524</id>
	<title>Re:Count-down</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267612620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Printing penis jokes in 3, 2, 1...</p></div><p>Is there a size limit or can we get something larger than the standard 12" model printed?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Printing penis jokes in 3 , 2 , 1...Is there a size limit or can we get something larger than the standard 12 " model printed ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Printing penis jokes in 3, 2, 1...Is there a size limit or can we get something larger than the standard 12" model printed?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342814</id>
	<title>TED talk on the matter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267615260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anthony Atala presented this (and much more!) on <a href="http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/anthony\_atala\_growing\_organs\_engineering\_tissue.html" title="ted.com" rel="nofollow">TEDMED</a> [ted.com] recently.</p><p><i>Awesome</i>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anthony Atala presented this ( and much more !
) on TEDMED [ ted.com ] recently.Awesome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anthony Atala presented this (and much more!
) on TEDMED [ted.com] recently.Awesome.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31345702</id>
	<title>Re:Prior art</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267632540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They talked about it in PC world in 2004 <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/117318/inkjet\_printers\_offer\_biology\_breakthrough.html" title="pcworld.com" rel="nofollow"> here</a> [pcworld.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They talked about it in PC world in 2004 here [ pcworld.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They talked about it in PC world in 2004  here [pcworld.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342462</id>
	<title>But please without aliasing!</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1267612020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apart from it looking horrible, aliasing stairways are the antithesis to stability of an object. E.g. a bone with aliasing would be much less stable. And don&rsquo;t even think about lying on it and not causing painful pressure points.</p><p>No thanks. I like my body parts casted or grown.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apart from it looking horrible , aliasing stairways are the antithesis to stability of an object .
E.g. a bone with aliasing would be much less stable .
And don    t even think about lying on it and not causing painful pressure points.No thanks .
I like my body parts casted or grown .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apart from it looking horrible, aliasing stairways are the antithesis to stability of an object.
E.g. a bone with aliasing would be much less stable.
And don’t even think about lying on it and not causing painful pressure points.No thanks.
I like my body parts casted or grown.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31353854</id>
	<title>Re:One pancreas, please</title>
	<author>Fear the Clam</author>
	<datestamp>1267631160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Being in the market (not literally) for a new one, I would be pleased to have a kidney printed.</p><p><i>I asked a doctor why they can't be transplanted like other organs and he said that it's because they're too fragile and would likely be damaged during the transplant process.</i></p><p>Where is this claim being made? They do do pancreas transplants right here at <a href="http://www.mgh.harvard.edu/transplant/services/treatmentprograms.aspx?id=1176" title="harvard.edu">Massachusetts General Hospital</a> [harvard.edu]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Being in the market ( not literally ) for a new one , I would be pleased to have a kidney printed.I asked a doctor why they ca n't be transplanted like other organs and he said that it 's because they 're too fragile and would likely be damaged during the transplant process.Where is this claim being made ?
They do do pancreas transplants right here at Massachusetts General Hospital [ harvard.edu ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Being in the market (not literally) for a new one, I would be pleased to have a kidney printed.I asked a doctor why they can't be transplanted like other organs and he said that it's because they're too fragile and would likely be damaged during the transplant process.Where is this claim being made?
They do do pancreas transplants right here at Massachusetts General Hospital [harvard.edu]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342622</id>
	<title>This is the machine from 5th Element!</title>
	<author>Hecatonchires</author>
	<datestamp>1267613340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>One Milla Jovovich please.</htmltext>
<tokenext>One Milla Jovovich please .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One Milla Jovovich please.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31344674</id>
	<title>Re:Count-down</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267628100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Never mind transexual what about transpecies? I want a tail!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Never mind transexual what about transpecies ?
I want a tail !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Never mind transexual what about transpecies?
I want a tail!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342450</id>
	<title>One pancreas, please</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267611900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Being type 1 (insulin dependant) diabetic, the idea of having a new pancreas 'printed' is pretty appealing. I asked a doctor why they can't be transplanted like other organs and he said that it's because they're too fragile and would likely be damaged during the transplant process. It'd be great if printing a new one would work.<br> <br>One can dream...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Being type 1 ( insulin dependant ) diabetic , the idea of having a new pancreas 'printed ' is pretty appealing .
I asked a doctor why they ca n't be transplanted like other organs and he said that it 's because they 're too fragile and would likely be damaged during the transplant process .
It 'd be great if printing a new one would work .
One can dream.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Being type 1 (insulin dependant) diabetic, the idea of having a new pancreas 'printed' is pretty appealing.
I asked a doctor why they can't be transplanted like other organs and he said that it's because they're too fragile and would likely be damaged during the transplant process.
It'd be great if printing a new one would work.
One can dream...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342284</id>
	<title>Can I get my hair back?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267610640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>With a new scalp?</htmltext>
<tokenext>With a new scalp ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With a new scalp?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31343208</id>
	<title>Re:But please without aliasing!</title>
	<author>Krneki</author>
	<datestamp>1267618680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Apart from it looking horrible, aliasing stairways are the antithesis to stability of an object. E.g. a bone with aliasing would be much less stable. And don&rsquo;t even think about lying on it and not causing painful pressure points.</p><p>No thanks. I like my body parts casted or grown.</p></div><p>You are so 20th century.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apart from it looking horrible , aliasing stairways are the antithesis to stability of an object .
E.g. a bone with aliasing would be much less stable .
And don    t even think about lying on it and not causing painful pressure points.No thanks .
I like my body parts casted or grown.You are so 20th century .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apart from it looking horrible, aliasing stairways are the antithesis to stability of an object.
E.g. a bone with aliasing would be much less stable.
And don’t even think about lying on it and not causing painful pressure points.No thanks.
I like my body parts casted or grown.You are so 20th century.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31347648</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory.</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1267640700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>PC LOAD LETTER? What the fuck does that mean?</p></div>
</blockquote><p>I think you mean PC LOAD STEM.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>PC LOAD LETTER ?
What the fuck does that mean ?
I think you mean PC LOAD STEM .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>PC LOAD LETTER?
What the fuck does that mean?
I think you mean PC LOAD STEM.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31347470</id>
	<title>Re:But please without aliasing!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267639860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd like to introduce you to the invention of sandpaper.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd like to introduce you to the invention of sandpaper .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd like to introduce you to the invention of sandpaper.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342324</id>
	<title>Prior art</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267611000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>This <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/1949073.stm" title="bbc.co.uk">mouse</a> [bbc.co.uk] called dibs 8 years ago.<br> <br>
Seriously though, this certainly isn't the first time this has been <a href="http://www.pbs.org/saf/1107/features/body.htm" title="pbs.org">done</a> [pbs.org]. Previous methods also used similar 3D printing techniques, except that the printed organ was a "dud" that was impregnated (injected and suspended in fluids, as I remember) with cells, instead of the organ being printed in one pass.<br> <br>
Not that this isn't very interesting, it's just not as new as they make it seem.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This mouse [ bbc.co.uk ] called dibs 8 years ago .
Seriously though , this certainly is n't the first time this has been done [ pbs.org ] .
Previous methods also used similar 3D printing techniques , except that the printed organ was a " dud " that was impregnated ( injected and suspended in fluids , as I remember ) with cells , instead of the organ being printed in one pass .
Not that this is n't very interesting , it 's just not as new as they make it seem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This mouse [bbc.co.uk] called dibs 8 years ago.
Seriously though, this certainly isn't the first time this has been done [pbs.org].
Previous methods also used similar 3D printing techniques, except that the printed organ was a "dud" that was impregnated (injected and suspended in fluids, as I remember) with cells, instead of the organ being printed in one pass.
Not that this isn't very interesting, it's just not as new as they make it seem.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342610</id>
	<title>Re:One pancreas, please</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1267613220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah a woman I work with told me her 14 year old son has type 1 diabetes. Not nice in a kid so young, or anyone for that matter. But this seems to be more about rebuilding the physical structures while the pancreas is more of a biochemical converter which could have any shape. I suppose if you could build an insulin pump which can make insulin it could be implanted permanently.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah a woman I work with told me her 14 year old son has type 1 diabetes .
Not nice in a kid so young , or anyone for that matter .
But this seems to be more about rebuilding the physical structures while the pancreas is more of a biochemical converter which could have any shape .
I suppose if you could build an insulin pump which can make insulin it could be implanted permanently .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah a woman I work with told me her 14 year old son has type 1 diabetes.
Not nice in a kid so young, or anyone for that matter.
But this seems to be more about rebuilding the physical structures while the pancreas is more of a biochemical converter which could have any shape.
I suppose if you could build an insulin pump which can make insulin it could be implanted permanently.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31349882</id>
	<title>SF story of mine</title>
	<author>John Bayko</author>
	<datestamp>1267608240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wrote a story once where this was done (<a href="http://jbayko.sasktelwebsite.net/text/stories/surgery.html" title="sasktelwebsite.net">here</a> [sasktelwebsite.net]. I kind of got tired of so many SF stories and movies solving traumatic injury with some sort of magical "healing tank" (maybe with effortless "nanobots") that I wondered to myself what sort of effort would really be needed to put someone together  from just a bunch of pieces.</p><p>The closest similar stories I found were the beginning of "Neon", by Harlan Ellison in 1973, and an early chapter of "Count Zero" by William Gibson.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wrote a story once where this was done ( here [ sasktelwebsite.net ] .
I kind of got tired of so many SF stories and movies solving traumatic injury with some sort of magical " healing tank " ( maybe with effortless " nanobots " ) that I wondered to myself what sort of effort would really be needed to put someone together from just a bunch of pieces.The closest similar stories I found were the beginning of " Neon " , by Harlan Ellison in 1973 , and an early chapter of " Count Zero " by William Gibson .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wrote a story once where this was done (here [sasktelwebsite.net].
I kind of got tired of so many SF stories and movies solving traumatic injury with some sort of magical "healing tank" (maybe with effortless "nanobots") that I wondered to myself what sort of effort would really be needed to put someone together  from just a bunch of pieces.The closest similar stories I found were the beginning of "Neon", by Harlan Ellison in 1973, and an early chapter of "Count Zero" by William Gibson.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342270</id>
	<title>Sysadmin must update</title>
	<author>Dun Kick The Noob</author>
	<datestamp>1267610580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Surprise Her !!!, Print an enlarged Pen**, 80\% off" must be blocked</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Surprise Her ! !
! , Print an enlarged Pen * * , 80 \ % off " must be blocked</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Surprise Her !!
!, Print an enlarged Pen**, 80\% off" must be blocked</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342664</id>
	<title>Re:Count-down</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267613700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As much as your comment may have been intended as a joke it is interesting to imagine a future in which you basically load up a large machine with the necessary basic materials, input a scan of yourself with whatever changes you want made and let the machine rebuild your body. And why stop at changing genitalia? or even general enhancement of your existing body, imagine what such technology could do for transsexuals, step into the machine a man and come out a woman. Hell, maybe you want to be a horse with a human brain, maybe if technology progresses far enough this will one day be possible...</p><p>Yes, I'm speculating wildly but I'd rather aim for the stars and reach the top of a mountain than aim for making my way to the gas station two blocks away and ending up at my neighbor's house. &lt;Insert rant about space exploration here&gt;</p><p>/Mikael</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As much as your comment may have been intended as a joke it is interesting to imagine a future in which you basically load up a large machine with the necessary basic materials , input a scan of yourself with whatever changes you want made and let the machine rebuild your body .
And why stop at changing genitalia ?
or even general enhancement of your existing body , imagine what such technology could do for transsexuals , step into the machine a man and come out a woman .
Hell , maybe you want to be a horse with a human brain , maybe if technology progresses far enough this will one day be possible...Yes , I 'm speculating wildly but I 'd rather aim for the stars and reach the top of a mountain than aim for making my way to the gas station two blocks away and ending up at my neighbor 's house .
/Mikael</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As much as your comment may have been intended as a joke it is interesting to imagine a future in which you basically load up a large machine with the necessary basic materials, input a scan of yourself with whatever changes you want made and let the machine rebuild your body.
And why stop at changing genitalia?
or even general enhancement of your existing body, imagine what such technology could do for transsexuals, step into the machine a man and come out a woman.
Hell, maybe you want to be a horse with a human brain, maybe if technology progresses far enough this will one day be possible...Yes, I'm speculating wildly but I'd rather aim for the stars and reach the top of a mountain than aim for making my way to the gas station two blocks away and ending up at my neighbor's house.
/Mikael</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31346016</id>
	<title>Send the hardware into space</title>
	<author>jbezorg</author>
	<datestamp>1267633860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Land on a distant planets and start printing people, seeds, etc..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Land on a distant planets and start printing people , seeds , etc. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Land on a distant planets and start printing people, seeds, etc..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31344208</id>
	<title>Good luck finding replacement cartridges</title>
	<author>capn\_buzzcut</author>
	<datestamp>1267625760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Bet they're pricey too</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bet they 're pricey too</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bet they're pricey too</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31349824</id>
	<title>Re:Count-down</title>
	<author>Valdrax</author>
	<datestamp>1267608000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There is no such thing as a sex change. You can reshape flesh to construct a penis for a woman, remove her breasts and inject hormones to give her facial hair, but she will still have two X chromosomes and no Y chromosome. Similarly, a man who has a "sex change operation" still has a Y chromosome. It's going to be a while before we're technologically advanced enough for a true sex change.</p></div><p>Why?  If you're printing sex organs from scratch, it's not like you're reshaping tissue from the original body.  Admittedly, I haven't heard of a paper where someone changed the gender of a donated set of genes during cloning, but I doubt it's impossible.</p><p>For that matter, there's no reason the new body parts have to be genetically identical to the rest of the body.  Chimera exist in nature with little problem.  In fact, you don't even have to use any of the patient's DNA if you've got a donor type match with the new tissue, but I would think that most people getting fresh grown sex organs would want their own genes if possible.  Not that that would stop many if passing on someone else's genes was the only alternative.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is no such thing as a sex change .
You can reshape flesh to construct a penis for a woman , remove her breasts and inject hormones to give her facial hair , but she will still have two X chromosomes and no Y chromosome .
Similarly , a man who has a " sex change operation " still has a Y chromosome .
It 's going to be a while before we 're technologically advanced enough for a true sex change.Why ?
If you 're printing sex organs from scratch , it 's not like you 're reshaping tissue from the original body .
Admittedly , I have n't heard of a paper where someone changed the gender of a donated set of genes during cloning , but I doubt it 's impossible.For that matter , there 's no reason the new body parts have to be genetically identical to the rest of the body .
Chimera exist in nature with little problem .
In fact , you do n't even have to use any of the patient 's DNA if you 've got a donor type match with the new tissue , but I would think that most people getting fresh grown sex organs would want their own genes if possible .
Not that that would stop many if passing on someone else 's genes was the only alternative .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is no such thing as a sex change.
You can reshape flesh to construct a penis for a woman, remove her breasts and inject hormones to give her facial hair, but she will still have two X chromosomes and no Y chromosome.
Similarly, a man who has a "sex change operation" still has a Y chromosome.
It's going to be a while before we're technologically advanced enough for a true sex change.Why?
If you're printing sex organs from scratch, it's not like you're reshaping tissue from the original body.
Admittedly, I haven't heard of a paper where someone changed the gender of a donated set of genes during cloning, but I doubt it's impossible.For that matter, there's no reason the new body parts have to be genetically identical to the rest of the body.
Chimera exist in nature with little problem.
In fact, you don't even have to use any of the patient's DNA if you've got a donor type match with the new tissue, but I would think that most people getting fresh grown sex organs would want their own genes if possible.
Not that that would stop many if passing on someone else's genes was the only alternative.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31345468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31346376</id>
	<title>did anyone...</title>
	<author>tsalaroth</author>
	<datestamp>1267635480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>mention 5th element or printer cartridge costs yet?</p><p>Just wondering.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>mention 5th element or printer cartridge costs yet ? Just wondering .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>mention 5th element or printer cartridge costs yet?Just wondering.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342356</id>
	<title>Oh thank god it's about time.</title>
	<author>AbRASiON</author>
	<datestamp>1267611360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Doctor I don't know what hapenned, it was a complete accident but I've somehow jabbed a screwdriver through my penis!<br>The trauma has caused some kind of cell shrinkage, I have no idea why it looks like it's only 3" but I can assure you it was 9" this morning.</p><p>Fire up the printer baby!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Doctor I do n't know what hapenned , it was a complete accident but I 've somehow jabbed a screwdriver through my penis ! The trauma has caused some kind of cell shrinkage , I have no idea why it looks like it 's only 3 " but I can assure you it was 9 " this morning.Fire up the printer baby !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doctor I don't know what hapenned, it was a complete accident but I've somehow jabbed a screwdriver through my penis!The trauma has caused some kind of cell shrinkage, I have no idea why it looks like it's only 3" but I can assure you it was 9" this morning.Fire up the printer baby!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342702</id>
	<title>Typical printer tactics</title>
	<author>DeanLearner</author>
	<datestamp>1267614000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>No doubt if the machine is $200,000 the print cartridges will be $600,000 and still only use three quarters of its ink!</htmltext>
<tokenext>No doubt if the machine is $ 200,000 the print cartridges will be $ 600,000 and still only use three quarters of its ink !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No doubt if the machine is $200,000 the print cartridges will be $600,000 and still only use three quarters of its ink!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31345468</id>
	<title>Re:Count-down</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1267631700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i> And why stop at changing genitalia? or even general enhancement of your existing body, imagine what such technology could do for transsexuals, step into the machine a man and come out a woman.</i></p><p>There is no such thing as a sex change. You can reshape flesh to construct a penis for a woman, remove her breasts and inject hormones to give her facial hair, but she will still have two X chromosomes and no Y chromosome. Similarly, a man who has a "sex change operation" still has a Y chromosome. It's going to be a while before we're technologically advanced enough for a true sex change.</p><p>Yes, there are XXY and XXX and YYY (etc) individuals, individuals born with both penis and vagina, etc but these are incredibly rare and are the exception. If you are a normal non-mutant human you can change your appearance to look like the opposite sex, but you will not become the opposite sex. This surgery can be beneficial to some, but it isn't a true sex change.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And why stop at changing genitalia ?
or even general enhancement of your existing body , imagine what such technology could do for transsexuals , step into the machine a man and come out a woman.There is no such thing as a sex change .
You can reshape flesh to construct a penis for a woman , remove her breasts and inject hormones to give her facial hair , but she will still have two X chromosomes and no Y chromosome .
Similarly , a man who has a " sex change operation " still has a Y chromosome .
It 's going to be a while before we 're technologically advanced enough for a true sex change.Yes , there are XXY and XXX and YYY ( etc ) individuals , individuals born with both penis and vagina , etc but these are incredibly rare and are the exception .
If you are a normal non-mutant human you can change your appearance to look like the opposite sex , but you will not become the opposite sex .
This surgery can be beneficial to some , but it is n't a true sex change .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> And why stop at changing genitalia?
or even general enhancement of your existing body, imagine what such technology could do for transsexuals, step into the machine a man and come out a woman.There is no such thing as a sex change.
You can reshape flesh to construct a penis for a woman, remove her breasts and inject hormones to give her facial hair, but she will still have two X chromosomes and no Y chromosome.
Similarly, a man who has a "sex change operation" still has a Y chromosome.
It's going to be a while before we're technologically advanced enough for a true sex change.Yes, there are XXY and XXX and YYY (etc) individuals, individuals born with both penis and vagina, etc but these are incredibly rare and are the exception.
If you are a normal non-mutant human you can change your appearance to look like the opposite sex, but you will not become the opposite sex.
This surgery can be beneficial to some, but it isn't a true sex change.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31351644</id>
	<title>Re:Prior art</title>
	<author>theshowmecanuck</author>
	<datestamp>1267616640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <i>This mouse [bbc.co.uk] called dibs 8 years ago.</i></p></div> </blockquote><p>
Actually, the mouse <i>heard</i> someone call dibs 8 years ago.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This mouse [ bbc.co.uk ] called dibs 8 years ago .
Actually , the mouse heard someone call dibs 8 years ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> This mouse [bbc.co.uk] called dibs 8 years ago.
Actually, the mouse heard someone call dibs 8 years ago.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31343836</id>
	<title>Re:One pancreas, please</title>
	<author>plastbox</author>
	<datestamp>1267623480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Greetings, fellow Type 1 diabetic!</p><p>The reason pancreatic transplants aren't performed is that the chance of rejection is 100\%. Your auto-immune system is already attacking anything that secretes insulin.. An insulin-producing organ <i>from someone else</i> would most assuredly not stand a snowballs chance in hell.</p><p>There have been trials though. A few years back two diabetics here in Norway were "cured" by pancreatic transplants. They still had to live in virtual bubbles though because of the very strong immunosuppressive meds they were on. Despite the drugs, they only remained non-dependent on injections for about 12-18 months or so before the organ was put out of commission, so it's sadly not viable cure at all.</p><p>Another procedure that could (in theory) work is to have your immune system and bone marrow destroyed chemically, then receive both a bone marrow and pancreas transplant from the same donor. The chances of finding both from a compatible donor aren't exactly convincing though, and there is of course the chance of the "new" immune system that follows your transplanted marrow will accept the pancreas but reject the rest of the body, promptly causing your death.</p><p>There are some viable solutions though, like creating some sort of protein or something that to the immune system looks like insulin. Then administer huge amounts of this fake allergen to the patient to desensitize the immune system (similar to what is done with things like pollen allergies). The problem here is that no such substance exists as of yet, and you can't exactly give someone a superdose of insulin. Death isn't really the best solution, after all.. x)</p><p>Another being looked into encapsulating cells (in this case, insulin producing beta-cells) in some sort of alginate made from seaweed. This allows insulin and nutrients to pass to and from the cell, while making it "invisible" to the immune system.</p><p>Another seemingly promising solution is the theory that the immune system keeps attacking our beta-cells because of an on-going pain response triggered by the immune systems attack itself. Break the circle, and your body recovers most of it's insulin producing capability for at least a couple of years before something (like inflammation, etc.) causes you to need treatment again. I don't know how relevant this research is with regards to humans, but in animals injections of powerful anti-inflammatory drugs directly into the pancreas has reduced or abolished the animals insulin dependence for a year or two.</p><p>Btw, I am as I said a Type 1 Diabetic. These days, I am playing around with a ketogenic diet, and I am currently taking 20 units of 12-hour insulin (Insulatard) each morning. That's it. Do the opposite of what the "FAT IS THE ENEMY"-evangelists have been preaching the past 40-50 years and all of a sudden every health marker is even better than before, and I need less medication than most Type 2 diabetics.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Greetings , fellow Type 1 diabetic ! The reason pancreatic transplants are n't performed is that the chance of rejection is 100 \ % .
Your auto-immune system is already attacking anything that secretes insulin.. An insulin-producing organ from someone else would most assuredly not stand a snowballs chance in hell.There have been trials though .
A few years back two diabetics here in Norway were " cured " by pancreatic transplants .
They still had to live in virtual bubbles though because of the very strong immunosuppressive meds they were on .
Despite the drugs , they only remained non-dependent on injections for about 12-18 months or so before the organ was put out of commission , so it 's sadly not viable cure at all.Another procedure that could ( in theory ) work is to have your immune system and bone marrow destroyed chemically , then receive both a bone marrow and pancreas transplant from the same donor .
The chances of finding both from a compatible donor are n't exactly convincing though , and there is of course the chance of the " new " immune system that follows your transplanted marrow will accept the pancreas but reject the rest of the body , promptly causing your death.There are some viable solutions though , like creating some sort of protein or something that to the immune system looks like insulin .
Then administer huge amounts of this fake allergen to the patient to desensitize the immune system ( similar to what is done with things like pollen allergies ) .
The problem here is that no such substance exists as of yet , and you ca n't exactly give someone a superdose of insulin .
Death is n't really the best solution , after all.. x ) Another being looked into encapsulating cells ( in this case , insulin producing beta-cells ) in some sort of alginate made from seaweed .
This allows insulin and nutrients to pass to and from the cell , while making it " invisible " to the immune system.Another seemingly promising solution is the theory that the immune system keeps attacking our beta-cells because of an on-going pain response triggered by the immune systems attack itself .
Break the circle , and your body recovers most of it 's insulin producing capability for at least a couple of years before something ( like inflammation , etc .
) causes you to need treatment again .
I do n't know how relevant this research is with regards to humans , but in animals injections of powerful anti-inflammatory drugs directly into the pancreas has reduced or abolished the animals insulin dependence for a year or two.Btw , I am as I said a Type 1 Diabetic .
These days , I am playing around with a ketogenic diet , and I am currently taking 20 units of 12-hour insulin ( Insulatard ) each morning .
That 's it .
Do the opposite of what the " FAT IS THE ENEMY " -evangelists have been preaching the past 40-50 years and all of a sudden every health marker is even better than before , and I need less medication than most Type 2 diabetics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Greetings, fellow Type 1 diabetic!The reason pancreatic transplants aren't performed is that the chance of rejection is 100\%.
Your auto-immune system is already attacking anything that secretes insulin.. An insulin-producing organ from someone else would most assuredly not stand a snowballs chance in hell.There have been trials though.
A few years back two diabetics here in Norway were "cured" by pancreatic transplants.
They still had to live in virtual bubbles though because of the very strong immunosuppressive meds they were on.
Despite the drugs, they only remained non-dependent on injections for about 12-18 months or so before the organ was put out of commission, so it's sadly not viable cure at all.Another procedure that could (in theory) work is to have your immune system and bone marrow destroyed chemically, then receive both a bone marrow and pancreas transplant from the same donor.
The chances of finding both from a compatible donor aren't exactly convincing though, and there is of course the chance of the "new" immune system that follows your transplanted marrow will accept the pancreas but reject the rest of the body, promptly causing your death.There are some viable solutions though, like creating some sort of protein or something that to the immune system looks like insulin.
Then administer huge amounts of this fake allergen to the patient to desensitize the immune system (similar to what is done with things like pollen allergies).
The problem here is that no such substance exists as of yet, and you can't exactly give someone a superdose of insulin.
Death isn't really the best solution, after all.. x)Another being looked into encapsulating cells (in this case, insulin producing beta-cells) in some sort of alginate made from seaweed.
This allows insulin and nutrients to pass to and from the cell, while making it "invisible" to the immune system.Another seemingly promising solution is the theory that the immune system keeps attacking our beta-cells because of an on-going pain response triggered by the immune systems attack itself.
Break the circle, and your body recovers most of it's insulin producing capability for at least a couple of years before something (like inflammation, etc.
) causes you to need treatment again.
I don't know how relevant this research is with regards to humans, but in animals injections of powerful anti-inflammatory drugs directly into the pancreas has reduced or abolished the animals insulin dependence for a year or two.Btw, I am as I said a Type 1 Diabetic.
These days, I am playing around with a ketogenic diet, and I am currently taking 20 units of 12-hour insulin (Insulatard) each morning.
That's it.
Do the opposite of what the "FAT IS THE ENEMY"-evangelists have been preaching the past 40-50 years and all of a sudden every health marker is even better than before, and I need less medication than most Type 2 diabetics.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342804</id>
	<title>Re:One pancreas, please</title>
	<author>Antique Geekmeister</author>
	<datestamp>1267615020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It wouldn't work. As near as I can tell from the literature pointed out by my Type 1 co-worker, the immune problemm that destroyed your insulin producing cells is probably still active, and would also destroy the self-grown transplant tissue. My co-worker also pointed out some fascinating immuno-suppressive therapies that seem to control this problem, and allow diabetic animals to regenerate their own insulin producing cells, which seems like having this printer without bothering to buy the printer.</p><p>It's described at <a href="http://www.faustmanlab.org/" title="faustmanlab.org">http://www.faustmanlab.org/</a> [faustmanlab.org], and it's quite fascinating work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It would n't work .
As near as I can tell from the literature pointed out by my Type 1 co-worker , the immune problemm that destroyed your insulin producing cells is probably still active , and would also destroy the self-grown transplant tissue .
My co-worker also pointed out some fascinating immuno-suppressive therapies that seem to control this problem , and allow diabetic animals to regenerate their own insulin producing cells , which seems like having this printer without bothering to buy the printer.It 's described at http : //www.faustmanlab.org/ [ faustmanlab.org ] , and it 's quite fascinating work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It wouldn't work.
As near as I can tell from the literature pointed out by my Type 1 co-worker, the immune problemm that destroyed your insulin producing cells is probably still active, and would also destroy the self-grown transplant tissue.
My co-worker also pointed out some fascinating immuno-suppressive therapies that seem to control this problem, and allow diabetic animals to regenerate their own insulin producing cells, which seems like having this printer without bothering to buy the printer.It's described at http://www.faustmanlab.org/ [faustmanlab.org], and it's quite fascinating work.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342588</id>
	<title>Re:One pancreas, please</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267612980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>According to <a href="http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/003007.htm" title="nih.gov" rel="nofollow">this article from the NIH's medical encyclopedia</a> [nih.gov], pancreas transplants work just fine.</p><p>(Also, while I've never observed a captcha worth mentioning before, this time I got "sweeten".)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>According to this article from the NIH 's medical encyclopedia [ nih.gov ] , pancreas transplants work just fine .
( Also , while I 've never observed a captcha worth mentioning before , this time I got " sweeten " .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to this article from the NIH's medical encyclopedia [nih.gov], pancreas transplants work just fine.
(Also, while I've never observed a captcha worth mentioning before, this time I got "sweeten".
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342604</id>
	<title>Re:But please without aliasing!</title>
	<author>meerling</author>
	<datestamp>1267613220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, but if the resolution is high enough, you'll never notice.<br>By the way, what is this models resolution?<br><br>One more small thing, I don't think this model does bones... but the marrow should be doable.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , but if the resolution is high enough , you 'll never notice.By the way , what is this models resolution ? One more small thing , I do n't think this model does bones... but the marrow should be doable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, but if the resolution is high enough, you'll never notice.By the way, what is this models resolution?One more small thing, I don't think this model does bones... but the marrow should be doable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342248</id>
	<title>Count-down</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267610400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Printing penis jokes in 3, 2, 1...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Printing penis jokes in 3 , 2 , 1.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Printing penis jokes in 3, 2, 1...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31345578</id>
	<title>Spam?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267632060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can imagine to have one of these plugged via USB and some spammers keep sending me organisms.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can imagine to have one of these plugged via USB and some spammers keep sending me organisms .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can imagine to have one of these plugged via USB and some spammers keep sending me organisms.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342378</id>
	<title>Science Fiction</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267611480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>think 5th Element... now everyone can get their own Lee-Loo!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>think 5th Element... now everyone can get their own Lee-Loo !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>think 5th Element... now everyone can get their own Lee-Loo!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31345354</id>
	<title>Re:Hamburgers!</title>
	<author>Svartalf</author>
	<datestamp>1267631220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They're already culturing meat tissues in the lab, so why not?   The only thing would be that you'd need a starter culture of cells to do that- where would THAT come from?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're already culturing meat tissues in the lab , so why not ?
The only thing would be that you 'd need a starter culture of cells to do that- where would THAT come from ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're already culturing meat tissues in the lab, so why not?
The only thing would be that you'd need a starter culture of cells to do that- where would THAT come from?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31344048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342432</id>
	<title>Obligatory.</title>
	<author>stonedcat</author>
	<datestamp>1267611720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>PC LOAD LETTER?  What the fuck does that mean?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>PC LOAD LETTER ?
What the fuck does that mean ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>PC LOAD LETTER?
What the fuck does that mean?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31344048</id>
	<title>Hamburgers!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267624740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>What would, in my opinion, be truly interesting is if this printer device can be used with beef cells to produce artificial steaks (etc.). This could potentially remove the agricultural overhead of <em>growing</em> the meat, while reducing prices, increasing availability, dissolving concerns of inhumanity, and (possibly) skittering past some of the vegetarian reservations. Furthermore, there's no integration issues trying to put the product back into a live and functioning body!</htmltext>
<tokenext>What would , in my opinion , be truly interesting is if this printer device can be used with beef cells to produce artificial steaks ( etc. ) .
This could potentially remove the agricultural overhead of growing the meat , while reducing prices , increasing availability , dissolving concerns of inhumanity , and ( possibly ) skittering past some of the vegetarian reservations .
Furthermore , there 's no integration issues trying to put the product back into a live and functioning body !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What would, in my opinion, be truly interesting is if this printer device can be used with beef cells to produce artificial steaks (etc.).
This could potentially remove the agricultural overhead of growing the meat, while reducing prices, increasing availability, dissolving concerns of inhumanity, and (possibly) skittering past some of the vegetarian reservations.
Furthermore, there's no integration issues trying to put the product back into a live and functioning body!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31348432</id>
	<title>Re:Hamburgers!</title>
	<author>smellsofbikes</author>
	<datestamp>1267644540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>For the record, <a href="http://www.peta.org/feat\_in\_vitro\_contest.asp" title="peta.org">PETA has a $1M reward for exactly this</a> [peta.org], for exactly the reasons you're suggesting.  It's interesting because a lot of PETA members are really pissed about the idea since they want people to just stop eating meat, even if it's not actually from an animal.</htmltext>
<tokenext>For the record , PETA has a $ 1M reward for exactly this [ peta.org ] , for exactly the reasons you 're suggesting .
It 's interesting because a lot of PETA members are really pissed about the idea since they want people to just stop eating meat , even if it 's not actually from an animal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For the record, PETA has a $1M reward for exactly this [peta.org], for exactly the reasons you're suggesting.
It's interesting because a lot of PETA members are really pissed about the idea since they want people to just stop eating meat, even if it's not actually from an animal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31344048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31358082</id>
	<title>Adult stem cells 'win' again</title>
	<author>kinglitho</author>
	<datestamp>1267719120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>After all the political posturing and debate over government funding for the use of embryonic stem cells for research, the private sector comes along and shows us where the action really is. <br>
<br>
Kinda makes you wonder if some academics deliberately pick areas of study with the longest term payoff possible in order to extend the length of their grant funding. After all, once the discovery is made, the researcher has to find a new area of study.</htmltext>
<tokenext>After all the political posturing and debate over government funding for the use of embryonic stem cells for research , the private sector comes along and shows us where the action really is .
Kinda makes you wonder if some academics deliberately pick areas of study with the longest term payoff possible in order to extend the length of their grant funding .
After all , once the discovery is made , the researcher has to find a new area of study .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After all the political posturing and debate over government funding for the use of embryonic stem cells for research, the private sector comes along and shows us where the action really is.
Kinda makes you wonder if some academics deliberately pick areas of study with the longest term payoff possible in order to extend the length of their grant funding.
After all, once the discovery is made, the researcher has to find a new area of study.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31345432</id>
	<title>Ink</title>
	<author>JohnHegarty</author>
	<datestamp>1267631580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"which works by depositing stem cells and a 'sugar-based hydrogel' scaffolding material."</p><p>I bet it's still cheaper to print with than HP No. 96 Black.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" which works by depositing stem cells and a 'sugar-based hydrogel ' scaffolding material .
" I bet it 's still cheaper to print with than HP No .
96 Black .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"which works by depositing stem cells and a 'sugar-based hydrogel' scaffolding material.
"I bet it's still cheaper to print with than HP No.
96 Black.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_000205_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31345702
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_000205_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31343836
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_000205_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31360976
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31344048
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_000205_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31349620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342610
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_000205_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31346954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342248
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_000205_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31353854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_000205_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31347648
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_000205_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31343064
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_000205_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31345576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31344048
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_000205_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31345354
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31344048
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_000205_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_000205_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342248
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_000205_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_000205_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31348432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31344048
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_000205_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31349824
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31345468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342248
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_000205_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31344674
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342248
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_000205_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342804
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_000205_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31343208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_000205_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31347470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_000205_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_000205_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31347706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342702
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_000205_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31347576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342248
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_03_000205_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31351644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_000205.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31344048
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31345576
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31360976
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31345354
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31348432
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_000205.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342378
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_000205.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342248
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342664
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31346954
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31344674
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31345468
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31349824
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31347576
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342524
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_000205.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342450
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342512
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342610
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31349620
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342588
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31353854
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31343836
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342804
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_000205.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342324
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31343064
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31345702
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31351644
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_000205.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342208
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_000205.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31358082
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_000205.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342462
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31347470
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31343208
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342604
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_000205.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31346562
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_000205.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342702
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31347706
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_000205.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342622
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_000205.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342284
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_03_000205.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31342432
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_03_000205.31347648
</commentlist>
</conversation>
