<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_02_215250</id>
	<title>Tethering Is Exhilarating (With the Nexus One)</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1267539600000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>timothy found this link (hat-tip to Tim O'Reilly) to a <a href="http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/2010/02/23/tethering-is-exhilarating/">paean to the joys of tethering</a>. <i>"In a short post, Steve Souders explores the current state of tethering 3G connections via iPhone (on which he basically gives up, for the perfectly decent reason of not wanting to jailbreak his iPhone) and the Nexus One, with which he has great success. His writeup serves as a micro-tutorial ('<a href="http://www.junefabrics.com/android/index.php">use PdaNet's Android app</a>') as well as an endorsement."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>timothy found this link ( hat-tip to Tim O'Reilly ) to a paean to the joys of tethering .
" In a short post , Steve Souders explores the current state of tethering 3G connections via iPhone ( on which he basically gives up , for the perfectly decent reason of not wanting to jailbreak his iPhone ) and the Nexus One , with which he has great success .
His writeup serves as a micro-tutorial ( 'use PdaNet 's Android app ' ) as well as an endorsement .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>timothy found this link (hat-tip to Tim O'Reilly) to a paean to the joys of tethering.
"In a short post, Steve Souders explores the current state of tethering 3G connections via iPhone (on which he basically gives up, for the perfectly decent reason of not wanting to jailbreak his iPhone) and the Nexus One, with which he has great success.
His writeup serves as a micro-tutorial ('use PdaNet's Android app') as well as an endorsement.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340270</id>
	<title>Exhilarating?</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1267549320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That doesn't really sound like an appropriate descriptor - unless you happen to get giddy with excitement whenever you get a low-speed internet connection.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That does n't really sound like an appropriate descriptor - unless you happen to get giddy with excitement whenever you get a low-speed internet connection .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That doesn't really sound like an appropriate descriptor - unless you happen to get giddy with excitement whenever you get a low-speed internet connection.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339740</id>
	<title>Coming up next week....</title>
	<author>Kryptonut</author>
	<datestamp>1267544640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Bluetooth File Sharing Induces Orgasm (With the Nexus One)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bluetooth File Sharing Induces Orgasm ( With the Nexus One )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bluetooth File Sharing Induces Orgasm (With the Nexus One)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339646</id>
	<title>iPhone Tethering</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267544040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...on which he basically gives up, for the perfectly decent reason of not wanting to jailbreak his iPhone</p></div><p>
Did he buy the special-ed version of the iPhone? The iPhone offers tethering. Easy and effortless. Without jailbreaking.<br> <br>
Not to mention that article was one of the biggest wastes of my time and I'm sitting in Iron Forge waiting for my dungeon queue to pop...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...on which he basically gives up , for the perfectly decent reason of not wanting to jailbreak his iPhone Did he buy the special-ed version of the iPhone ?
The iPhone offers tethering .
Easy and effortless .
Without jailbreaking .
Not to mention that article was one of the biggest wastes of my time and I 'm sitting in Iron Forge waiting for my dungeon queue to pop.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...on which he basically gives up, for the perfectly decent reason of not wanting to jailbreak his iPhone
Did he buy the special-ed version of the iPhone?
The iPhone offers tethering.
Easy and effortless.
Without jailbreaking.
Not to mention that article was one of the biggest wastes of my time and I'm sitting in Iron Forge waiting for my dungeon queue to pop...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31344476</id>
	<title>Tethering works great in Italy</title>
	<author>DaitanGio</author>
	<datestamp>1267627080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On my unlocked-iphone Tethering works great with Vodafone Carrier.<br>I have tested it with a Macbook via Bluetooth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On my unlocked-iphone Tethering works great with Vodafone Carrier.I have tested it with a Macbook via Bluetooth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On my unlocked-iphone Tethering works great with Vodafone Carrier.I have tested it with a Macbook via Bluetooth.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339622</id>
	<title>Honest slashvertisement?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267543860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>His writeup serves as a micro-tutorial ("use PdaNet's Android app") as well as an endorsement.</p></div><p>I don't think I have every seen a summary admit it is an endorsement before. It even has timothy and kdawson's names on it. Is this some sort of alternate reality?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>His writeup serves as a micro-tutorial ( " use PdaNet 's Android app " ) as well as an endorsement.I do n't think I have every seen a summary admit it is an endorsement before .
It even has timothy and kdawson 's names on it .
Is this some sort of alternate reality ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>His writeup serves as a micro-tutorial ("use PdaNet's Android app") as well as an endorsement.I don't think I have every seen a summary admit it is an endorsement before.
It even has timothy and kdawson's names on it.
Is this some sort of alternate reality?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340400</id>
	<title>Re:Apple lock in tastes like crap</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267550580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>No doubt but they have what really matters right now, the hardware.  I JB'd my 3GS the day I got it and it's a pretty powerful little device.  You can have rsync running in the background, VPN and almost any other *nix program that you care to cross compile.  Personally when I knew I could get through the OS and the hardware specs were right I'd drop the money on it.  What will I buy next?  No idea, this type of hardware device is what I was looking for and there wasn't much out there like it when I bought it.  Now everyone is making similar hardware so will Apple keep me? Who knows, if they put something out that I can't get anywhere else (after revA of course) then sure, otherwise I will goto someone else.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No doubt but they have what really matters right now , the hardware .
I JB 'd my 3GS the day I got it and it 's a pretty powerful little device .
You can have rsync running in the background , VPN and almost any other * nix program that you care to cross compile .
Personally when I knew I could get through the OS and the hardware specs were right I 'd drop the money on it .
What will I buy next ?
No idea , this type of hardware device is what I was looking for and there was n't much out there like it when I bought it .
Now everyone is making similar hardware so will Apple keep me ?
Who knows , if they put something out that I ca n't get anywhere else ( after revA of course ) then sure , otherwise I will goto someone else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No doubt but they have what really matters right now, the hardware.
I JB'd my 3GS the day I got it and it's a pretty powerful little device.
You can have rsync running in the background, VPN and almost any other *nix program that you care to cross compile.
Personally when I knew I could get through the OS and the hardware specs were right I'd drop the money on it.
What will I buy next?
No idea, this type of hardware device is what I was looking for and there wasn't much out there like it when I bought it.
Now everyone is making similar hardware so will Apple keep me?
Who knows, if they put something out that I can't get anywhere else (after revA of course) then sure, otherwise I will goto someone else.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339746</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339702</id>
	<title>Late to the party</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267544400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tethering is awesome, as many non-iPhone smartphone users have known for years.</p><p>I used to tether my Sprint Treo with PDANet, when I swore I'd never pay Comcast another red cent. My sister uses PDANet on her G1 to avoid signing up for an internet connection she doesn't use much, and I used my rooted G1 to look up geocaches on the road from my g/f's laptop. The rooting process is pretty painless now, so I'd imagine that it's just a matter of time before the telcos start clamping down with usage caps.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tethering is awesome , as many non-iPhone smartphone users have known for years.I used to tether my Sprint Treo with PDANet , when I swore I 'd never pay Comcast another red cent .
My sister uses PDANet on her G1 to avoid signing up for an internet connection she does n't use much , and I used my rooted G1 to look up geocaches on the road from my g/f 's laptop .
The rooting process is pretty painless now , so I 'd imagine that it 's just a matter of time before the telcos start clamping down with usage caps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tethering is awesome, as many non-iPhone smartphone users have known for years.I used to tether my Sprint Treo with PDANet, when I swore I'd never pay Comcast another red cent.
My sister uses PDANet on her G1 to avoid signing up for an internet connection she doesn't use much, and I used my rooted G1 to look up geocaches on the road from my g/f's laptop.
The rooting process is pretty painless now, so I'd imagine that it's just a matter of time before the telcos start clamping down with usage caps.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31342144</id>
	<title>Re:Yawn</title>
	<author>webreaper</author>
	<datestamp>1267609140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or even use <a href="http://www.cyrket.com/p/android/com.mstream.easytether\_polyclef/" title="cyrket.com" rel="nofollow">EasyTether</a> [cyrket.com], which is free and doesn't require the device to be rooted.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or even use EasyTether [ cyrket.com ] , which is free and does n't require the device to be rooted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or even use EasyTether [cyrket.com], which is free and doesn't require the device to be rooted.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340078</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339866</id>
	<title>Re:iPhone Tethering</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267545780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you sure about this? I believe that to enable tethering on an AT&amp;T iPhone, you either had to:<br>
&nbsp; 1) Jailbreak and install some stuff<br>
&nbsp; -or-<br>
&nbsp; 2) Use a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.mobileconfig file to change your settings, which would only work on OS3.0. Since Apple stopped signing OS3.0, you can no longer downgrade your OS to 3.0 if you have a 3GS iPhone. The only way to downgrade to 3.0 is if you had SHSH on file somewhere, which you had to do before Apple stopped signing OS3.0.</p><p>If you know how to "easy tether" your iPhone without jailbreaking, please post instructions, I'm curious.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you sure about this ?
I believe that to enable tethering on an AT&amp;T iPhone , you either had to :   1 ) Jailbreak and install some stuff   -or-   2 ) Use a .mobileconfig file to change your settings , which would only work on OS3.0 .
Since Apple stopped signing OS3.0 , you can no longer downgrade your OS to 3.0 if you have a 3GS iPhone .
The only way to downgrade to 3.0 is if you had SHSH on file somewhere , which you had to do before Apple stopped signing OS3.0.If you know how to " easy tether " your iPhone without jailbreaking , please post instructions , I 'm curious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you sure about this?
I believe that to enable tethering on an AT&amp;T iPhone, you either had to:
  1) Jailbreak and install some stuff
  -or-
  2) Use a .mobileconfig file to change your settings, which would only work on OS3.0.
Since Apple stopped signing OS3.0, you can no longer downgrade your OS to 3.0 if you have a 3GS iPhone.
The only way to downgrade to 3.0 is if you had SHSH on file somewhere, which you had to do before Apple stopped signing OS3.0.If you know how to "easy tether" your iPhone without jailbreaking, please post instructions, I'm curious.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339646</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31343178</id>
	<title>Also exhilarating with iPhone ...</title>
	<author>gig</author>
	<datestamp>1267618380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... and has been for the past 6 months.</p><p>Yes, AT&amp;T has fucked up iPhone tethering, but that is only applicable to the US. Elsewhere you just flip a switch and go. And if you are in the US, there is an easy hack you apply to turn it on, which millions of people are using. Many more than own a Nexus One.</p><p>So get over yourselves. iPhone was late to the tethering party. To come along 6 months later and act like Nexus One has invented it is just ridiculous.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... and has been for the past 6 months.Yes , AT&amp;T has fucked up iPhone tethering , but that is only applicable to the US .
Elsewhere you just flip a switch and go .
And if you are in the US , there is an easy hack you apply to turn it on , which millions of people are using .
Many more than own a Nexus One.So get over yourselves .
iPhone was late to the tethering party .
To come along 6 months later and act like Nexus One has invented it is just ridiculous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... and has been for the past 6 months.Yes, AT&amp;T has fucked up iPhone tethering, but that is only applicable to the US.
Elsewhere you just flip a switch and go.
And if you are in the US, there is an easy hack you apply to turn it on, which millions of people are using.
Many more than own a Nexus One.So get over yourselves.
iPhone was late to the tethering party.
To come along 6 months later and act like Nexus One has invented it is just ridiculous.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31342214</id>
	<title>Slide, OK, done</title>
	<author>Henriok</author>
	<datestamp>1267610100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I want to remind folks here that this seems to be an AT&amp;T/Apple issue, not a technical iPhone issue. Here in Sweden all carriers support tethering and activating it is as simple as pushing a button on the iPhone and pressing an OK button in OSX acknowledging that there's a new network interface active. Slide a slider, attach the cable, press OK. Done.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I want to remind folks here that this seems to be an AT&amp;T/Apple issue , not a technical iPhone issue .
Here in Sweden all carriers support tethering and activating it is as simple as pushing a button on the iPhone and pressing an OK button in OSX acknowledging that there 's a new network interface active .
Slide a slider , attach the cable , press OK. Done .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want to remind folks here that this seems to be an AT&amp;T/Apple issue, not a technical iPhone issue.
Here in Sweden all carriers support tethering and activating it is as simple as pushing a button on the iPhone and pressing an OK button in OSX acknowledging that there's a new network interface active.
Slide a slider, attach the cable, press OK. Done.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339982</id>
	<title>Yes, Android wins in tethering</title>
	<author>esocid</author>
	<datestamp>1267546980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>His writeup serves as a micro-tutorial ("use PdaNet's Android app") as well as an endorsement.</p></div></blockquote><p>Yes it does, but that's it.<br>It amounts to half a page of an anecdote about the guy having a hard time getting it working on his iPhone, but downloading an app and it working fine on his N1...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>His writeup serves as a micro-tutorial ( " use PdaNet 's Android app " ) as well as an endorsement.Yes it does , but that 's it.It amounts to half a page of an anecdote about the guy having a hard time getting it working on his iPhone , but downloading an app and it working fine on his N1.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>His writeup serves as a micro-tutorial ("use PdaNet's Android app") as well as an endorsement.Yes it does, but that's it.It amounts to half a page of an anecdote about the guy having a hard time getting it working on his iPhone, but downloading an app and it working fine on his N1...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340062</id>
	<title>Summary</title>
	<author>Aurisor</author>
	<datestamp>1267547640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some guy owns an Android and tried tethering.  He says he likes it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some guy owns an Android and tried tethering .
He says he likes it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some guy owns an Android and tried tethering.
He says he likes it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340568</id>
	<title>Re:They don't understand jailbreaking</title>
	<author>amRadioHed</author>
	<datestamp>1267552080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My girlfriends jailbroken 3GS looked the same as the non-jailbroken one, but Wi-Fi stopped working after a few weeks. Then it stopped booting. I had to do an emergency restore to fix it and she decided she'd rather stick with the official software ever since.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My girlfriends jailbroken 3GS looked the same as the non-jailbroken one , but Wi-Fi stopped working after a few weeks .
Then it stopped booting .
I had to do an emergency restore to fix it and she decided she 'd rather stick with the official software ever since .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My girlfriends jailbroken 3GS looked the same as the non-jailbroken one, but Wi-Fi stopped working after a few weeks.
Then it stopped booting.
I had to do an emergency restore to fix it and she decided she'd rather stick with the official software ever since.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339960</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339776</id>
	<title>Re:webOS Tethering</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267544940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yep, tethering with Palm Pre on Verizon is probably easiest to use implementation I've seen so far.  I wish the app was available for Sprint's network too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep , tethering with Palm Pre on Verizon is probably easiest to use implementation I 've seen so far .
I wish the app was available for Sprint 's network too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep, tethering with Palm Pre on Verizon is probably easiest to use implementation I've seen so far.
I wish the app was available for Sprint's network too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339642</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339716</id>
	<title>Blame Canada!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267544460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We crazy Canucks have had iPhone tethering on the (stock/non-jailbreaked) iPhone since the 3Gs models came out. You can tether through Bluetooth or USB. I've used it a few times before, but not too much, since I only have a 6GB/mo data plan. This is on the Rogers network; I don't know if Bell or Telus offer tethering. Can anyone confirm that?</p><p>I think AT&amp;T must be pressuring Apple to leave the feature disabled, as there poor network is already strained pretty badly, from what I hear.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We crazy Canucks have had iPhone tethering on the ( stock/non-jailbreaked ) iPhone since the 3Gs models came out .
You can tether through Bluetooth or USB .
I 've used it a few times before , but not too much , since I only have a 6GB/mo data plan .
This is on the Rogers network ; I do n't know if Bell or Telus offer tethering .
Can anyone confirm that ? I think AT&amp;T must be pressuring Apple to leave the feature disabled , as there poor network is already strained pretty badly , from what I hear .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We crazy Canucks have had iPhone tethering on the (stock/non-jailbreaked) iPhone since the 3Gs models came out.
You can tether through Bluetooth or USB.
I've used it a few times before, but not too much, since I only have a 6GB/mo data plan.
This is on the Rogers network; I don't know if Bell or Telus offer tethering.
Can anyone confirm that?I think AT&amp;T must be pressuring Apple to leave the feature disabled, as there poor network is already strained pretty badly, from what I hear.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339590</id>
	<title>Not Surprising</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267543680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Android is a vastly more open platform. Tethering on WinMo is also effortless, over both bluetooth and USB. I was under the impression that some iPhone carriers allowed tethering<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... do they make it difficult to use?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Android is a vastly more open platform .
Tethering on WinMo is also effortless , over both bluetooth and USB .
I was under the impression that some iPhone carriers allowed tethering ... do they make it difficult to use ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Android is a vastly more open platform.
Tethering on WinMo is also effortless, over both bluetooth and USB.
I was under the impression that some iPhone carriers allowed tethering ... do they make it difficult to use?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339644</id>
	<title>Re:Not Surprising</title>
	<author>kimvette</author>
	<datestamp>1267543980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Many (non-US) iPhone carriers allow tethering but Apple strongly discourages it through technical measures.   Their answer to customers is to contact the carrier for the provisioning files to enable tethering, and the carriers' response has been that Apple hasn't allowed them to deploy it, that they have to contact Apple. It's a game of passing the buck and customers are the ones getting pooched in the process.</p><p>It is trivial to enable tethering on a jailbroken phone but you can lose your "profiles" and "cellular data" settings tabs in the process, which can lead to visual voicemail being broken. I no longer have visual voicemail and since I am one of those users missing the profiles tab I need to learn how the profiles are configured and fix it at the shell prompt (courtesy mobile terminal or ssh).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Many ( non-US ) iPhone carriers allow tethering but Apple strongly discourages it through technical measures .
Their answer to customers is to contact the carrier for the provisioning files to enable tethering , and the carriers ' response has been that Apple has n't allowed them to deploy it , that they have to contact Apple .
It 's a game of passing the buck and customers are the ones getting pooched in the process.It is trivial to enable tethering on a jailbroken phone but you can lose your " profiles " and " cellular data " settings tabs in the process , which can lead to visual voicemail being broken .
I no longer have visual voicemail and since I am one of those users missing the profiles tab I need to learn how the profiles are configured and fix it at the shell prompt ( courtesy mobile terminal or ssh ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Many (non-US) iPhone carriers allow tethering but Apple strongly discourages it through technical measures.
Their answer to customers is to contact the carrier for the provisioning files to enable tethering, and the carriers' response has been that Apple hasn't allowed them to deploy it, that they have to contact Apple.
It's a game of passing the buck and customers are the ones getting pooched in the process.It is trivial to enable tethering on a jailbroken phone but you can lose your "profiles" and "cellular data" settings tabs in the process, which can lead to visual voicemail being broken.
I no longer have visual voicemail and since I am one of those users missing the profiles tab I need to learn how the profiles are configured and fix it at the shell prompt (courtesy mobile terminal or ssh).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339590</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31343118</id>
	<title>Re:Not Surprising</title>
	<author>Conor</author>
	<datestamp>1267617960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, I'm on O2 in Ireland, just turn it on in network preferences and voila! It doesn't even cost me any money unless I exceed my normal download limit for the month.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , I 'm on O2 in Ireland , just turn it on in network preferences and voila !
It does n't even cost me any money unless I exceed my normal download limit for the month .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, I'm on O2 in Ireland, just turn it on in network preferences and voila!
It doesn't even cost me any money unless I exceed my normal download limit for the month.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339590</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31346872</id>
	<title>Re:Android sucks.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267637640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Retarded linux fanboy hating on retarded Apple fanboy, now that I've seen a troll-virgin-fight my morning is complete!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Retarded linux fanboy hating on retarded Apple fanboy , now that I 've seen a troll-virgin-fight my morning is complete !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Retarded linux fanboy hating on retarded Apple fanboy, now that I've seen a troll-virgin-fight my morning is complete!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339770</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31346062</id>
	<title>Re:iPhone Tethering</title>
	<author>dlgeek</author>
	<datestamp>1267634100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Really? I took a look through the manual on the page you linked and it says that if you change the APN settings the configuration payload has to be signed by the carrier.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Really ?
I took a look through the manual on the page you linked and it says that if you change the APN settings the configuration payload has to be signed by the carrier .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really?
I took a look through the manual on the page you linked and it says that if you change the APN settings the configuration payload has to be signed by the carrier.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340296</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340254</id>
	<title>Mod this guy a troll.</title>
	<author>aristotle-dude</author>
	<datestamp>1267549140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I always knew that my general distaste for Apple Computer and its afficionados was based in fact. Thank you for the confirmation.</p></div><p>So you admit prejudice then? Why do you care so much?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I always knew that my general distaste for Apple Computer and its afficionados was based in fact .
Thank you for the confirmation.So you admit prejudice then ?
Why do you care so much ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always knew that my general distaste for Apple Computer and its afficionados was based in fact.
Thank you for the confirmation.So you admit prejudice then?
Why do you care so much?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339770</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31345700</id>
	<title>Re:Blame Canada!</title>
	<author>SilverJets</author>
	<datestamp>1267632540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah great we can get tethering.  Whoop dee farking doo when you look at the shit data plans Canadian providers give us.  Rogers 2GB a month for $80.  Bell and Telus are not any better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah great we can get tethering .
Whoop dee farking doo when you look at the shit data plans Canadian providers give us .
Rogers 2GB a month for $ 80 .
Bell and Telus are not any better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah great we can get tethering.
Whoop dee farking doo when you look at the shit data plans Canadian providers give us.
Rogers 2GB a month for $80.
Bell and Telus are not any better.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340468</id>
	<title>Re:Not Surprising</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267551240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are either mistaken or lying.  I will assume mistaken.</p><p>Your provider may try to blame apple but the rest of the world is proof that it's not Apple's decision.</p><p>In Australia, with my Apple retail store bought unjailbroken 3.1.2 firmware running iphone, on the Three network, without any funky addons or modified carrier provisioning files, I do the following to tether:<br>-Open Settings<br>-Choose General-&gt;Network-&gt;Internet Tethering<br>-Click the on/off button</p><p>Very tough!  STRONGLY discouraged!  Passing the buck!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are either mistaken or lying .
I will assume mistaken.Your provider may try to blame apple but the rest of the world is proof that it 's not Apple 's decision.In Australia , with my Apple retail store bought unjailbroken 3.1.2 firmware running iphone , on the Three network , without any funky addons or modified carrier provisioning files , I do the following to tether : -Open Settings-Choose General- &gt; Network- &gt; Internet Tethering-Click the on/off buttonVery tough !
STRONGLY discouraged !
Passing the buck !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are either mistaken or lying.
I will assume mistaken.Your provider may try to blame apple but the rest of the world is proof that it's not Apple's decision.In Australia, with my Apple retail store bought unjailbroken 3.1.2 firmware running iphone, on the Three network, without any funky addons or modified carrier provisioning files, I do the following to tether:-Open Settings-Choose General-&gt;Network-&gt;Internet Tethering-Click the on/off buttonVery tough!
STRONGLY discouraged!
Passing the buck!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31345206</id>
	<title>Re:Special app?</title>
	<author>quenda</author>
	<datestamp>1267630620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Tethering is built into the n900.</p> </div><p>Only for USB. Most "dumb" 3G phones I've seen at a fraction of the price of the N900 will do tethering over bluetooth or USB.<br>Still, there is an "app" for that<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)<br>The US really is a special case for 3G data. Special as in what I believe the Americans refer to as the "short bus".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Tethering is built into the n900 .
Only for USB .
Most " dumb " 3G phones I 've seen at a fraction of the price of the N900 will do tethering over bluetooth or USB.Still , there is an " app " for that : - ) The US really is a special case for 3G data .
Special as in what I believe the Americans refer to as the " short bus " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tethering is built into the n900.
Only for USB.
Most "dumb" 3G phones I've seen at a fraction of the price of the N900 will do tethering over bluetooth or USB.Still, there is an "app" for that :-)The US really is a special case for 3G data.
Special as in what I believe the Americans refer to as the "short bus".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340000</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339642</id>
	<title>webOS Tethering</title>
	<author>El Royo</author>
	<datestamp>1267543980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Tethering on webOS is also very simple.  In Europe, it's enabled by default and on Verizon you have the built-in hotspot app.   On Sprint, though, you'll need one of the homebrew solutions.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Tethering on webOS is also very simple .
In Europe , it 's enabled by default and on Verizon you have the built-in hotspot app .
On Sprint , though , you 'll need one of the homebrew solutions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tethering on webOS is also very simple.
In Europe, it's enabled by default and on Verizon you have the built-in hotspot app.
On Sprint, though, you'll need one of the homebrew solutions.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31342164</id>
	<title>Re:Not Surprising</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267609260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think it is a bit more complex than that...</p><p>I have a factory unlocked phone from the Czech Republic.<br>I want to use it on Vodafone Hungary's network, which is unfortunately not an official Apple partner (in Hungary T-Mobile is the exclusive distributor).<br>My carrier allows me to use my bandwidth on whatever I want (there is a monthly cap, so they do not care).</p><p>By Vodafone not being an official partner, Apple does not provide a signed carrier bundle with tethering allowed for Vodafone HU.<br>This means, you do not see the Tethering switch at all in the Settings...</p><p>So to summarize:<br>Apple allows the distribution of unlocked phones, but it makes sure, that unlocked phones do not work with a 100\% percent feature set on non-partner carriers.<br>(e.g. Tethering is blocked).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it is a bit more complex than that...I have a factory unlocked phone from the Czech Republic.I want to use it on Vodafone Hungary 's network , which is unfortunately not an official Apple partner ( in Hungary T-Mobile is the exclusive distributor ) .My carrier allows me to use my bandwidth on whatever I want ( there is a monthly cap , so they do not care ) .By Vodafone not being an official partner , Apple does not provide a signed carrier bundle with tethering allowed for Vodafone HU.This means , you do not see the Tethering switch at all in the Settings...So to summarize : Apple allows the distribution of unlocked phones , but it makes sure , that unlocked phones do not work with a 100 \ % percent feature set on non-partner carriers. ( e.g .
Tethering is blocked ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it is a bit more complex than that...I have a factory unlocked phone from the Czech Republic.I want to use it on Vodafone Hungary's network, which is unfortunately not an official Apple partner (in Hungary T-Mobile is the exclusive distributor).My carrier allows me to use my bandwidth on whatever I want (there is a monthly cap, so they do not care).By Vodafone not being an official partner, Apple does not provide a signed carrier bundle with tethering allowed for Vodafone HU.This means, you do not see the Tethering switch at all in the Settings...So to summarize:Apple allows the distribution of unlocked phones, but it makes sure, that unlocked phones do not work with a 100\% percent feature set on non-partner carriers.(e.g.
Tethering is blocked).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340556</id>
	<title>Re:iPhone Tethering</title>
	<author>stephanruby</author>
	<datestamp>1267551960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Did he buy the special-ed version of the iPhone? The iPhone offers tethering. Easy and effortless. Without jailbreaking.</p></div><p>Apparently, he upgraded to 3.1. </p><p>Is 'special-ed' the new code name for version 3.1 of the iPhone? What happened to calling the iPhone a girl's name ending with the letter "a"? I've got to say I'm not too hot about that new name.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Not to mention that article was one of the biggest wastes of my time and I'm sitting in Iron Forge waiting for my dungeon queue to pop...</p></div><p>Do not even pretend to have read the article.</p><p>The article being a waste of time was just a lucky guess on your part.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did he buy the special-ed version of the iPhone ?
The iPhone offers tethering .
Easy and effortless .
Without jailbreaking.Apparently , he upgraded to 3.1 .
Is 'special-ed ' the new code name for version 3.1 of the iPhone ?
What happened to calling the iPhone a girl 's name ending with the letter " a " ?
I 've got to say I 'm not too hot about that new name.Not to mention that article was one of the biggest wastes of my time and I 'm sitting in Iron Forge waiting for my dungeon queue to pop...Do not even pretend to have read the article.The article being a waste of time was just a lucky guess on your part .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did he buy the special-ed version of the iPhone?
The iPhone offers tethering.
Easy and effortless.
Without jailbreaking.Apparently, he upgraded to 3.1.
Is 'special-ed' the new code name for version 3.1 of the iPhone?
What happened to calling the iPhone a girl's name ending with the letter "a"?
I've got to say I'm not too hot about that new name.Not to mention that article was one of the biggest wastes of my time and I'm sitting in Iron Forge waiting for my dungeon queue to pop...Do not even pretend to have read the article.The article being a waste of time was just a lucky guess on your part.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339646</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340000</id>
	<title>Special app?</title>
	<author>Wolfkin</author>
	<datestamp>1267547160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tethering is built into the n900.  I had no trouble providing internet for my home network via 3G during snowmaggedon last month, when my internet went down.  I use Ubuntu, but I'm sure it would have been about as easy with Windows or Mac.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tethering is built into the n900 .
I had no trouble providing internet for my home network via 3G during snowmaggedon last month , when my internet went down .
I use Ubuntu , but I 'm sure it would have been about as easy with Windows or Mac .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tethering is built into the n900.
I had no trouble providing internet for my home network via 3G during snowmaggedon last month, when my internet went down.
I use Ubuntu, but I'm sure it would have been about as easy with Windows or Mac.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31348352</id>
	<title>Re:webOS Tethering</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267644060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>There is a free tethering app in the webos-internals testing feed.  Works great, I get right around 1 megabit/second with Verizon.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is a free tethering app in the webos-internals testing feed .
Works great , I get right around 1 megabit/second with Verizon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is a free tethering app in the webos-internals testing feed.
Works great, I get right around 1 megabit/second with Verizon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339776</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31344364</id>
	<title>Re:Not Surprising</title>
	<author>trickyD1ck</author>
	<datestamp>1267626600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In Germany, I pay &euro;20 per month for tethering through the iPhone and it just works!</htmltext>
<tokenext>In Germany , I pay    20 per month for tethering through the iPhone and it just works !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Germany, I pay €20 per month for tethering through the iPhone and it just works!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339590</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339814</id>
	<title>Loving tethering</title>
	<author>mozumder</author>
	<datestamp>1267545240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Droid tethering with PDAnet and MacBook Pro on Verizon network works great.  Speed is actually better than my work DSL!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Droid tethering with PDAnet and MacBook Pro on Verizon network works great .
Speed is actually better than my work DSL !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Droid tethering with PDAnet and MacBook Pro on Verizon network works great.
Speed is actually better than my work DSL!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31344656</id>
	<title>Re:Jailbreaking is now a 5 minute process</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267628040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Once jailbroken, enabling tethering is as simple as copying/pasting a commcenter patch, plugging iPhone into computer and tapping the "Enable Tethering" switch.</p><p>And if that's too complicated for you, there's an app that turns your iPhone into the equivalent of a portable wireless router. We all know how hard tapping the Install button and connecting to a wireless network on our laptop is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Once jailbroken , enabling tethering is as simple as copying/pasting a commcenter patch , plugging iPhone into computer and tapping the " Enable Tethering " switch.And if that 's too complicated for you , there 's an app that turns your iPhone into the equivalent of a portable wireless router .
We all know how hard tapping the Install button and connecting to a wireless network on our laptop is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once jailbroken, enabling tethering is as simple as copying/pasting a commcenter patch, plugging iPhone into computer and tapping the "Enable Tethering" switch.And if that's too complicated for you, there's an app that turns your iPhone into the equivalent of a portable wireless router.
We all know how hard tapping the Install button and connecting to a wireless network on our laptop is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339746</id>
	<title>Apple lock in tastes like crap</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267544760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Justify it any way you want, fanbois, but Apple is the kings of lock in.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Justify it any way you want , fanbois , but Apple is the kings of lock in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Justify it any way you want, fanbois, but Apple is the kings of lock in.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31341034</id>
	<title>Re:They don't understand jailbreaking</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1267556520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>You know how a non-jailbroken iPhone works and looks like after being jailbroken?</p></div> </blockquote><p>

Except the chance that things will stop working and Apple will un-jailbreak it with the next update, so your constantly fighting the vendor just to get what other phones consider basic functionality.<br> <br>

You shouldn't have to fight your phone in order to get it to do what you want.</p><blockquote><div><p>I really wonder why some are so afraid of doing something so simple.</p></div></blockquote><p>

Because things go wrong and it's a very expensive device. I don't recommend ordinary people root their android phones because of this (if you're willing to take the risk then good for you but on your head be it). Furthermore Apple is actively fighting you, most people don't want to fight their own vendor.<br> <br>

This is the difference between Apple and Google, Apple will fight you if you do things the non-Apple way where Google will simply ignore you (on some occasions they actually help modders).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know how a non-jailbroken iPhone works and looks like after being jailbroken ?
Except the chance that things will stop working and Apple will un-jailbreak it with the next update , so your constantly fighting the vendor just to get what other phones consider basic functionality .
You should n't have to fight your phone in order to get it to do what you want.I really wonder why some are so afraid of doing something so simple .
Because things go wrong and it 's a very expensive device .
I do n't recommend ordinary people root their android phones because of this ( if you 're willing to take the risk then good for you but on your head be it ) .
Furthermore Apple is actively fighting you , most people do n't want to fight their own vendor .
This is the difference between Apple and Google , Apple will fight you if you do things the non-Apple way where Google will simply ignore you ( on some occasions they actually help modders ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know how a non-jailbroken iPhone works and looks like after being jailbroken?
Except the chance that things will stop working and Apple will un-jailbreak it with the next update, so your constantly fighting the vendor just to get what other phones consider basic functionality.
You shouldn't have to fight your phone in order to get it to do what you want.I really wonder why some are so afraid of doing something so simple.
Because things go wrong and it's a very expensive device.
I don't recommend ordinary people root their android phones because of this (if you're willing to take the risk then good for you but on your head be it).
Furthermore Apple is actively fighting you, most people don't want to fight their own vendor.
This is the difference between Apple and Google, Apple will fight you if you do things the non-Apple way where Google will simply ignore you (on some occasions they actually help modders).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339960</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31344888</id>
	<title>Re:Not Surprising</title>
	<author>rnelsonee</author>
	<datestamp>1267629120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While I believe it is AT&amp;T's fault, read the article. According to it, AT&amp;T does <i>not</i> prevent tethering on the iPhone and even tells the author how to enable it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While I believe it is AT&amp;T 's fault , read the article .
According to it , AT&amp;T does not prevent tethering on the iPhone and even tells the author how to enable it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I believe it is AT&amp;T's fault, read the article.
According to it, AT&amp;T does not prevent tethering on the iPhone and even tells the author how to enable it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340208</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339954</id>
	<title>Jailbreaking is now a 5 minute process</title>
	<author>linumax</author>
	<datestamp>1267546620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>and it's virtually impossible to break/brick your iPhone in a way that it won't be restorable. In the rare event you manage to brick it, the only danger is losing the (in most cases useless) warranty. But that doesn't really matter because Apple support will check the humidity sensors and if they are not triggered, Apple will give you a replacement. They will not bother discovering whether the device was jailbroken or not. It costs Apple more to determine an unknown problem than to give you a refurbished or even new iPhone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>and it 's virtually impossible to break/brick your iPhone in a way that it wo n't be restorable .
In the rare event you manage to brick it , the only danger is losing the ( in most cases useless ) warranty .
But that does n't really matter because Apple support will check the humidity sensors and if they are not triggered , Apple will give you a replacement .
They will not bother discovering whether the device was jailbroken or not .
It costs Apple more to determine an unknown problem than to give you a refurbished or even new iPhone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and it's virtually impossible to break/brick your iPhone in a way that it won't be restorable.
In the rare event you manage to brick it, the only danger is losing the (in most cases useless) warranty.
But that doesn't really matter because Apple support will check the humidity sensors and if they are not triggered, Apple will give you a replacement.
They will not bother discovering whether the device was jailbroken or not.
It costs Apple more to determine an unknown problem than to give you a refurbished or even new iPhone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31341366</id>
	<title>Re:You can tether on an iPhone if you are a develo</title>
	<author>Totenglocke</author>
	<datestamp>1267559700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't see why people dismiss jailbreaking so readily. There are basically no downsides to it, other than sometimes if you want the latest update you have to wait some time.</p></div><p>I know - I just jailbroke my 3GS a few weeks ago using Blackra1n and it couldn't have been easier.  You download a 512 KB<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.exe, run that, then you're jailbroken.  No hassle at all and you can always reinstall the firmware / OS if anything goes wrong (you can download older firmware / OS versions easily online).  So it's not the default from the factory setting - big deal, it's no more of a hassle than going to the App Store to download an app.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see why people dismiss jailbreaking so readily .
There are basically no downsides to it , other than sometimes if you want the latest update you have to wait some time.I know - I just jailbroke my 3GS a few weeks ago using Blackra1n and it could n't have been easier .
You download a 512 KB .exe , run that , then you 're jailbroken .
No hassle at all and you can always reinstall the firmware / OS if anything goes wrong ( you can download older firmware / OS versions easily online ) .
So it 's not the default from the factory setting - big deal , it 's no more of a hassle than going to the App Store to download an app .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see why people dismiss jailbreaking so readily.
There are basically no downsides to it, other than sometimes if you want the latest update you have to wait some time.I know - I just jailbroke my 3GS a few weeks ago using Blackra1n and it couldn't have been easier.
You download a 512 KB .exe, run that, then you're jailbroken.
No hassle at all and you can always reinstall the firmware / OS if anything goes wrong (you can download older firmware / OS versions easily online).
So it's not the default from the factory setting - big deal, it's no more of a hassle than going to the App Store to download an app.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339858</id>
	<title>iPhone does work</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267545720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>tethering works great on the iPhone, usb or bluetooth, can't be easier.<br>on Rogers I get 100 KBps down sustained, latency is just good enough for ssh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>tethering works great on the iPhone , usb or bluetooth , ca n't be easier.on Rogers I get 100 KBps down sustained , latency is just good enough for ssh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>tethering works great on the iPhone, usb or bluetooth, can't be easier.on Rogers I get 100 KBps down sustained, latency is just good enough for ssh.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339574</id>
	<title>Yawn</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267543500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not sure which is more boring - the article or the website its on. Seriously, how is this interesting enough to make it here?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not sure which is more boring - the article or the website its on .
Seriously , how is this interesting enough to make it here ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not sure which is more boring - the article or the website its on.
Seriously, how is this interesting enough to make it here?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340364</id>
	<title>Re:Apple lock in tastes like crap</title>
	<author>Mr Stubby</author>
	<datestamp>1267550280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think that's a bit of a stretch, It's down to the average stupid consumer buying devices they want and cant really afford on contract to a telco and then complaining when they dont get everything they want. I haven't bought a phone on contract since the 90's and I never ever would. Maybe there's less choice in American but that's another problem not so much Apples.

Here in Australia i bought a 3GS, unlocked from an apple store, stuck in my Vodafone 3g data sim, and it tethers fine, no jailbreaking, no client login program like the vodafone USB dongle and better reception at/around work where i use it, I dont need to find or download the vodafone install disk/files if i format/change computer.. so if anything it's better than the modem vodafone sold me, its faster and just works better.

Anyone getting excited about phone tethering now is so behind the times it isn't funny.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think that 's a bit of a stretch , It 's down to the average stupid consumer buying devices they want and cant really afford on contract to a telco and then complaining when they dont get everything they want .
I have n't bought a phone on contract since the 90 's and I never ever would .
Maybe there 's less choice in American but that 's another problem not so much Apples .
Here in Australia i bought a 3GS , unlocked from an apple store , stuck in my Vodafone 3g data sim , and it tethers fine , no jailbreaking , no client login program like the vodafone USB dongle and better reception at/around work where i use it , I dont need to find or download the vodafone install disk/files if i format/change computer.. so if anything it 's better than the modem vodafone sold me , its faster and just works better .
Anyone getting excited about phone tethering now is so behind the times it is n't funny .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think that's a bit of a stretch, It's down to the average stupid consumer buying devices they want and cant really afford on contract to a telco and then complaining when they dont get everything they want.
I haven't bought a phone on contract since the 90's and I never ever would.
Maybe there's less choice in American but that's another problem not so much Apples.
Here in Australia i bought a 3GS, unlocked from an apple store, stuck in my Vodafone 3g data sim, and it tethers fine, no jailbreaking, no client login program like the vodafone USB dongle and better reception at/around work where i use it, I dont need to find or download the vodafone install disk/files if i format/change computer.. so if anything it's better than the modem vodafone sold me, its faster and just works better.
Anyone getting excited about phone tethering now is so behind the times it isn't funny.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339746</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339894</id>
	<title>Well here is my horror story.</title>
	<author>vosester</author>
	<datestamp>1267546080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I the got the iPhone 3G on 02 in the UK when it come out. I finished my contract, well it was canceled for non payment, for been three week late with a payment, which I payed off the following week, effectively early terminating, costing me &pound;280.</p><p>So 02 offers an unlock, So I put in my IMEI number in there web system and nothing, I try again still nothing. So I ring up customer service which is awful, and ask them to unlock it, they say I have to go to the shop where I bought it. So I go and ask, they say I have to ring customer services. By now I am fuming with rage.</p><p>I ring up customer service and asked for an unlock, they say I am not in the system, I give account details and three months later still not unlock.</p><p>I believe that when my contract was closed, My IMEI number was removed from the system.<br>I keep ringing customer service and I have to keep explain my situation.</p><p>This is Apple&rsquo;s and 02&rsquo;s fault for there stupid unlock system which can not be done locally (Some would say that&rsquo;s a good system)</p><p>Now I am on T-mobile and I can not use the iPhone&rsquo;s, inbuilt tethering.<br>Because my phone is not unlocked and requires signed setting from the carrier, which i don&rsquo;t think T-mobile provide.</p><p>Basically getting anything done on the iPhone has become so much trouble that I am done with it and I am getting a N900.</p><p>It is 2010 tethering should not be this much of a problem, data is data. It is simple greed.</p><p>A big shout out to all the people behind the jailbraking and unlocking tools.</p><p>With out you guys my phone would be an over priced paper weight.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I the got the iPhone 3G on 02 in the UK when it come out .
I finished my contract , well it was canceled for non payment , for been three week late with a payment , which I payed off the following week , effectively early terminating , costing me   280.So 02 offers an unlock , So I put in my IMEI number in there web system and nothing , I try again still nothing .
So I ring up customer service which is awful , and ask them to unlock it , they say I have to go to the shop where I bought it .
So I go and ask , they say I have to ring customer services .
By now I am fuming with rage.I ring up customer service and asked for an unlock , they say I am not in the system , I give account details and three months later still not unlock.I believe that when my contract was closed , My IMEI number was removed from the system.I keep ringing customer service and I have to keep explain my situation.This is Apple    s and 02    s fault for there stupid unlock system which can not be done locally ( Some would say that    s a good system ) Now I am on T-mobile and I can not use the iPhone    s , inbuilt tethering.Because my phone is not unlocked and requires signed setting from the carrier , which i don    t think T-mobile provide.Basically getting anything done on the iPhone has become so much trouble that I am done with it and I am getting a N900.It is 2010 tethering should not be this much of a problem , data is data .
It is simple greed.A big shout out to all the people behind the jailbraking and unlocking tools.With out you guys my phone would be an over priced paper weight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I the got the iPhone 3G on 02 in the UK when it come out.
I finished my contract, well it was canceled for non payment, for been three week late with a payment, which I payed off the following week, effectively early terminating, costing me £280.So 02 offers an unlock, So I put in my IMEI number in there web system and nothing, I try again still nothing.
So I ring up customer service which is awful, and ask them to unlock it, they say I have to go to the shop where I bought it.
So I go and ask, they say I have to ring customer services.
By now I am fuming with rage.I ring up customer service and asked for an unlock, they say I am not in the system, I give account details and three months later still not unlock.I believe that when my contract was closed, My IMEI number was removed from the system.I keep ringing customer service and I have to keep explain my situation.This is Apple’s and 02’s fault for there stupid unlock system which can not be done locally (Some would say that’s a good system)Now I am on T-mobile and I can not use the iPhone’s, inbuilt tethering.Because my phone is not unlocked and requires signed setting from the carrier, which i don’t think T-mobile provide.Basically getting anything done on the iPhone has become so much trouble that I am done with it and I am getting a N900.It is 2010 tethering should not be this much of a problem, data is data.
It is simple greed.A big shout out to all the people behind the jailbraking and unlocking tools.With out you guys my phone would be an over priced paper weight.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31365392</id>
	<title>Re:Mod this guy a troll.</title>
	<author>ScrewMaster</author>
	<datestamp>1267709880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>I always knew that my general distaste for Apple Computer and its afficionados was based in fact. Thank you for the confirmation.</p></div><p>So you admit prejudice then? Why do you care so much?</p></div><p>Of course I admit prejudice. I know you're trying to nail me with the usual negative connotation of the word as applied to racism and bigotry, but that's just irrational.
<br> <br>
The usual implication when accusing someone of "prejudice" is that the judgement is being rendered without sufficient knowledge or awareness, and is therefore unfair. As it happens, having been in this business since the original Apple ][ days and before, I can honestly say that my opinions on Apple Computer and the people who support it are very well-informed. Fact is, I've known many, many Apple "fans" over the years and am well aware of <i>their</i> specific prejudices, biases and general ignorance of anything that is not spewn forth from the great vagina of Cupertino.
<br> <br>
As engineer with a history of working with everything from embedded systems to mainframes, I find your typical Mac/iPod/iPhone owner's attitude more than a little irritating. No machine built by the hand of Man can be all things to all people. You folks need to get over yourselves: the world has far too many drain-bamaged belief systems already.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I always knew that my general distaste for Apple Computer and its afficionados was based in fact .
Thank you for the confirmation.So you admit prejudice then ?
Why do you care so much ? Of course I admit prejudice .
I know you 're trying to nail me with the usual negative connotation of the word as applied to racism and bigotry , but that 's just irrational .
The usual implication when accusing someone of " prejudice " is that the judgement is being rendered without sufficient knowledge or awareness , and is therefore unfair .
As it happens , having been in this business since the original Apple ] [ days and before , I can honestly say that my opinions on Apple Computer and the people who support it are very well-informed .
Fact is , I 've known many , many Apple " fans " over the years and am well aware of their specific prejudices , biases and general ignorance of anything that is not spewn forth from the great vagina of Cupertino .
As engineer with a history of working with everything from embedded systems to mainframes , I find your typical Mac/iPod/iPhone owner 's attitude more than a little irritating .
No machine built by the hand of Man can be all things to all people .
You folks need to get over yourselves : the world has far too many drain-bamaged belief systems already .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always knew that my general distaste for Apple Computer and its afficionados was based in fact.
Thank you for the confirmation.So you admit prejudice then?
Why do you care so much?Of course I admit prejudice.
I know you're trying to nail me with the usual negative connotation of the word as applied to racism and bigotry, but that's just irrational.
The usual implication when accusing someone of "prejudice" is that the judgement is being rendered without sufficient knowledge or awareness, and is therefore unfair.
As it happens, having been in this business since the original Apple ][ days and before, I can honestly say that my opinions on Apple Computer and the people who support it are very well-informed.
Fact is, I've known many, many Apple "fans" over the years and am well aware of their specific prejudices, biases and general ignorance of anything that is not spewn forth from the great vagina of Cupertino.
As engineer with a history of working with everything from embedded systems to mainframes, I find your typical Mac/iPod/iPhone owner's attitude more than a little irritating.
No machine built by the hand of Man can be all things to all people.
You folks need to get over yourselves: the world has far too many drain-bamaged belief systems already.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340378</id>
	<title>Re:They don't understand jailbreaking</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1267550400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ok, think about this, your battery goes out on your iPhone, it is jailbroken and of course didn't have anything to do with the battery. But, since the tech notices it was jailbroken, they refuse to honor your warranty and you are out of luck. Unfair? Yes. Stupid? Yes. A big deal for someone trying to keep their $600 phone around for 2 years? Yes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok , think about this , your battery goes out on your iPhone , it is jailbroken and of course did n't have anything to do with the battery .
But , since the tech notices it was jailbroken , they refuse to honor your warranty and you are out of luck .
Unfair ? Yes .
Stupid ? Yes .
A big deal for someone trying to keep their $ 600 phone around for 2 years ?
Yes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok, think about this, your battery goes out on your iPhone, it is jailbroken and of course didn't have anything to do with the battery.
But, since the tech notices it was jailbroken, they refuse to honor your warranty and you are out of luck.
Unfair? Yes.
Stupid? Yes.
A big deal for someone trying to keep their $600 phone around for 2 years?
Yes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339960</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339712</id>
	<title>I don't really see what the big fear is.</title>
	<author>MrCrassic</author>
	<datestamp>1267544460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not a particularly interesting article, but I'm eating dinner and my brain is sizzled, so why not?</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Then it all came crashing down. iPhone 3.1 came out. I had to choose between visual voicemail and tethering or consider jailbreaking my iPhone.</p></div><p> <a href="http://www.redmondpie.com/fix-iphone-3.1.2-tethering-and-visual-voicemail-vvm-ows754/" title="redmondpie.com">A search</a> [redmondpie.com] on Google points one to the website which holds mobileconfigs for most global cellular providers. Downloading and installing the appropriate profile enables whatever support is needed. (It's also how one enables T-Mobile's MMS and Internet support rapidly.)</p><p><div class="quote"><p>I&rsquo;m gearing up for some travel so revisited the topic of tethering. I was stunned when I spoke to AT&amp;T tech support two days ago and they told me they support tethering. How did I miss this?! Then the guy said I had to jailbreak my iPhone. It seems weird to have tech support recommend jailbreaking. I guess that&rsquo;s a result of the AT&amp;T/Apple love/hate relationship.</p> </div><p>They shouldn't be telling people that because (a) that doesn't require a jailbreak and (b) jailbreaking is technically a contractual violation. That could get that CSR in trouble. <b>NOTE:</b> I'm all for jailbreaking; my iPhone certainly is. I'm just being pedantic.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>I tested it last night at home, but the real test was this morning. I stopped for coffee at Peets, booted up Windows, tethered my Nexus One, opened a ssh session, and drove to work. <b>At every stoplight I verified my ssh session session was still active. I was reading email, surfing the Web.</b></p> </div><p>Reading mail and surfing the web WHILE DRIVING? That almost sounds responsible. ALMOST.</p><p>I really don't see what all the fuzz is about in regards to jailbreaking iPhones. Doing so doesn't seem to cause substantial harm to daily operation.  In fact, it enhances usability even more since it allows applications that would never make the App Store, but are incredibly useful, to get installed (ex. SBSettings, which makes toggling all sorts of stuff dummy-proof and FAST, MobileTerminal, Veency for remote control, OpenSSH for obvious reasons, etc. et al). It's not hard at all to do (though it does make upgrading more cumbersome; hardly a disadvantage, though --- wait, isn't jailbreaking an iPhone easier than rooting Android?).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not a particularly interesting article , but I 'm eating dinner and my brain is sizzled , so why not ? Then it all came crashing down .
iPhone 3.1 came out .
I had to choose between visual voicemail and tethering or consider jailbreaking my iPhone .
A search [ redmondpie.com ] on Google points one to the website which holds mobileconfigs for most global cellular providers .
Downloading and installing the appropriate profile enables whatever support is needed .
( It 's also how one enables T-Mobile 's MMS and Internet support rapidly .
) I    m gearing up for some travel so revisited the topic of tethering .
I was stunned when I spoke to AT&amp;T tech support two days ago and they told me they support tethering .
How did I miss this ? !
Then the guy said I had to jailbreak my iPhone .
It seems weird to have tech support recommend jailbreaking .
I guess that    s a result of the AT&amp;T/Apple love/hate relationship .
They should n't be telling people that because ( a ) that does n't require a jailbreak and ( b ) jailbreaking is technically a contractual violation .
That could get that CSR in trouble .
NOTE : I 'm all for jailbreaking ; my iPhone certainly is .
I 'm just being pedantic.I tested it last night at home , but the real test was this morning .
I stopped for coffee at Peets , booted up Windows , tethered my Nexus One , opened a ssh session , and drove to work .
At every stoplight I verified my ssh session session was still active .
I was reading email , surfing the Web .
Reading mail and surfing the web WHILE DRIVING ?
That almost sounds responsible .
ALMOST.I really do n't see what all the fuzz is about in regards to jailbreaking iPhones .
Doing so does n't seem to cause substantial harm to daily operation .
In fact , it enhances usability even more since it allows applications that would never make the App Store , but are incredibly useful , to get installed ( ex .
SBSettings , which makes toggling all sorts of stuff dummy-proof and FAST , MobileTerminal , Veency for remote control , OpenSSH for obvious reasons , etc .
et al ) .
It 's not hard at all to do ( though it does make upgrading more cumbersome ; hardly a disadvantage , though --- wait , is n't jailbreaking an iPhone easier than rooting Android ?
) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not a particularly interesting article, but I'm eating dinner and my brain is sizzled, so why not?Then it all came crashing down.
iPhone 3.1 came out.
I had to choose between visual voicemail and tethering or consider jailbreaking my iPhone.
A search [redmondpie.com] on Google points one to the website which holds mobileconfigs for most global cellular providers.
Downloading and installing the appropriate profile enables whatever support is needed.
(It's also how one enables T-Mobile's MMS and Internet support rapidly.
)I’m gearing up for some travel so revisited the topic of tethering.
I was stunned when I spoke to AT&amp;T tech support two days ago and they told me they support tethering.
How did I miss this?!
Then the guy said I had to jailbreak my iPhone.
It seems weird to have tech support recommend jailbreaking.
I guess that’s a result of the AT&amp;T/Apple love/hate relationship.
They shouldn't be telling people that because (a) that doesn't require a jailbreak and (b) jailbreaking is technically a contractual violation.
That could get that CSR in trouble.
NOTE: I'm all for jailbreaking; my iPhone certainly is.
I'm just being pedantic.I tested it last night at home, but the real test was this morning.
I stopped for coffee at Peets, booted up Windows, tethered my Nexus One, opened a ssh session, and drove to work.
At every stoplight I verified my ssh session session was still active.
I was reading email, surfing the Web.
Reading mail and surfing the web WHILE DRIVING?
That almost sounds responsible.
ALMOST.I really don't see what all the fuzz is about in regards to jailbreaking iPhones.
Doing so doesn't seem to cause substantial harm to daily operation.
In fact, it enhances usability even more since it allows applications that would never make the App Store, but are incredibly useful, to get installed (ex.
SBSettings, which makes toggling all sorts of stuff dummy-proof and FAST, MobileTerminal, Veency for remote control, OpenSSH for obvious reasons, etc.
et al).
It's not hard at all to do (though it does make upgrading more cumbersome; hardly a disadvantage, though --- wait, isn't jailbreaking an iPhone easier than rooting Android?
).
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340354</id>
	<title>Palm WebOS</title>
	<author>markdavis</author>
	<datestamp>1267550160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Tethering in Palm Linux WebOS on Sprint is easy as pie.  Just load MyTether and off you go- no "jailbreaking" (there is no such thing on WebOS, since there is no need) and in minutes you are able to tether with USB, Bluetooth, and multi-client WiFi as a real access point with optional WPA.  3G goodness @ 2Mb/s+<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)   Of course, it is under the table and should be used responsibly (especially since if you go over your 5GB "unlimited" data plan, Sprint may come a knocking on your door).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Tethering in Palm Linux WebOS on Sprint is easy as pie .
Just load MyTether and off you go- no " jailbreaking " ( there is no such thing on WebOS , since there is no need ) and in minutes you are able to tether with USB , Bluetooth , and multi-client WiFi as a real access point with optional WPA .
3G goodness @ 2Mb/s + : ) Of course , it is under the table and should be used responsibly ( especially since if you go over your 5GB " unlimited " data plan , Sprint may come a knocking on your door ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tethering in Palm Linux WebOS on Sprint is easy as pie.
Just load MyTether and off you go- no "jailbreaking" (there is no such thing on WebOS, since there is no need) and in minutes you are able to tether with USB, Bluetooth, and multi-client WiFi as a real access point with optional WPA.
3G goodness @ 2Mb/s+ :)   Of course, it is under the table and should be used responsibly (especially since if you go over your 5GB "unlimited" data plan, Sprint may come a knocking on your door).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340078</id>
	<title>Re:Yawn</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267547820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>this is a waste. why pay $30 when you can root for free and tether for free? Every market app works once you root. It's not like there's anything special other than that you get more up to date (and more stable) software.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this is a waste .
why pay $ 30 when you can root for free and tether for free ?
Every market app works once you root .
It 's not like there 's anything special other than that you get more up to date ( and more stable ) software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this is a waste.
why pay $30 when you can root for free and tether for free?
Every market app works once you root.
It's not like there's anything special other than that you get more up to date (and more stable) software.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339574</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339662</id>
	<title>Re:Android sucks.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267544160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We bother because we are not gay mac fanboys like you ac.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We bother because we are not gay mac fanboys like you ac .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We bother because we are not gay mac fanboys like you ac.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339596</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31352560</id>
	<title>How is this a worthy article ????</title>
	<author>bpsheen</author>
	<datestamp>1267621140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow, so let me get this straight, i need windows os or a mac and not only that i need to buy the product so i can receive and transmit data on the internet via my cell phone, so no i cant use linux (very stupid), i need to spend 10 dollars on this software (for something to move my data from my computer to the cell phone network via my cell) (really stupid), oh and this simple peice of sofware needs how much memory (really stupid)

I going to put this in my mental box labeled (tech articles written by people with more money than brains) and my other box (hey this is one of those people that like paying for everything little thing they want to do with my equipment they have already paid for).

REALLY, I already purchased the device to communicate on the cell phone network, I already purchased a cable to move data from my computer to my cell phone, Why the hell would i want to run a 17 megabyte application to move packets from my computer to my cell phone providers network when in reality my os has all the code required to move data between my computer and cell phone).  How annoying, it was so annoying i felt i needed to spend 10 minutes writing this instead of reading more useful stuff (REALLY, so i dont have to read more crap like it).

Heres a quote from the article.

"I&rsquo;m always wary of new installations bogging down Windows, but PdaNetPC.exe is only 17M of memory and 0\% of CPU when not in use, so I&rsquo;m fine with that running in the background."

The very idea of having to run windows or mac os x to network another computer and paying for it is the exact time of moron i dont want to help do anything in this world.  He promotes the use of software which causes more problems that it solves.  In short, Hes the kind of guy that would buy anything to solve a problem no matter how silly the solution is.

I hope his other posts aren't as stupid.</div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , so let me get this straight , i need windows os or a mac and not only that i need to buy the product so i can receive and transmit data on the internet via my cell phone , so no i cant use linux ( very stupid ) , i need to spend 10 dollars on this software ( for something to move my data from my computer to the cell phone network via my cell ) ( really stupid ) , oh and this simple peice of sofware needs how much memory ( really stupid ) I going to put this in my mental box labeled ( tech articles written by people with more money than brains ) and my other box ( hey this is one of those people that like paying for everything little thing they want to do with my equipment they have already paid for ) .
REALLY , I already purchased the device to communicate on the cell phone network , I already purchased a cable to move data from my computer to my cell phone , Why the hell would i want to run a 17 megabyte application to move packets from my computer to my cell phone providers network when in reality my os has all the code required to move data between my computer and cell phone ) .
How annoying , it was so annoying i felt i needed to spend 10 minutes writing this instead of reading more useful stuff ( REALLY , so i dont have to read more crap like it ) .
Heres a quote from the article .
" I    m always wary of new installations bogging down Windows , but PdaNetPC.exe is only 17M of memory and 0 \ % of CPU when not in use , so I    m fine with that running in the background .
" The very idea of having to run windows or mac os x to network another computer and paying for it is the exact time of moron i dont want to help do anything in this world .
He promotes the use of software which causes more problems that it solves .
In short , Hes the kind of guy that would buy anything to solve a problem no matter how silly the solution is .
I hope his other posts are n't as stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, so let me get this straight, i need windows os or a mac and not only that i need to buy the product so i can receive and transmit data on the internet via my cell phone, so no i cant use linux (very stupid), i need to spend 10 dollars on this software (for something to move my data from my computer to the cell phone network via my cell) (really stupid), oh and this simple peice of sofware needs how much memory (really stupid)

I going to put this in my mental box labeled (tech articles written by people with more money than brains) and my other box (hey this is one of those people that like paying for everything little thing they want to do with my equipment they have already paid for).
REALLY, I already purchased the device to communicate on the cell phone network, I already purchased a cable to move data from my computer to my cell phone, Why the hell would i want to run a 17 megabyte application to move packets from my computer to my cell phone providers network when in reality my os has all the code required to move data between my computer and cell phone).
How annoying, it was so annoying i felt i needed to spend 10 minutes writing this instead of reading more useful stuff (REALLY, so i dont have to read more crap like it).
Heres a quote from the article.
"I’m always wary of new installations bogging down Windows, but PdaNetPC.exe is only 17M of memory and 0\% of CPU when not in use, so I’m fine with that running in the background.
"

The very idea of having to run windows or mac os x to network another computer and paying for it is the exact time of moron i dont want to help do anything in this world.
He promotes the use of software which causes more problems that it solves.
In short, Hes the kind of guy that would buy anything to solve a problem no matter how silly the solution is.
I hope his other posts aren't as stupid.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31342344</id>
	<title>WinMobile</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1267611300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My HTC Topaz does tethering without network interaction. I enable connection sharing, plug in the USB cable, and it shows up as a USB NIC to my PC.<br> <br>I say my PC, as it works on Windows xp, 7, and Ubuntu 9.10 without any configuration whatsoever.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My HTC Topaz does tethering without network interaction .
I enable connection sharing , plug in the USB cable , and it shows up as a USB NIC to my PC .
I say my PC , as it works on Windows xp , 7 , and Ubuntu 9.10 without any configuration whatsoever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My HTC Topaz does tethering without network interaction.
I enable connection sharing, plug in the USB cable, and it shows up as a USB NIC to my PC.
I say my PC, as it works on Windows xp, 7, and Ubuntu 9.10 without any configuration whatsoever.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340296</id>
	<title>Re:iPhone Tethering</title>
	<author>LittlePud</author>
	<datestamp>1267549500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can still use<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.mobileconfig files on the latest 3.1.3.  Just use the iPhone Enterprise Configuration Utility (official download from Apple site).  I used it to change APNs in order to get PPTP VPN working.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You can still use .mobileconfig files on the latest 3.1.3 .
Just use the iPhone Enterprise Configuration Utility ( official download from Apple site ) .
I used it to change APNs in order to get PPTP VPN working .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can still use .mobileconfig files on the latest 3.1.3.
Just use the iPhone Enterprise Configuration Utility (official download from Apple site).
I used it to change APNs in order to get PPTP VPN working.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339596</id>
	<title>Android sucks.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267543680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No apps.<br>Crappy screen.<br>Violates dozens of Apple patents.<br>OS based on Lin-sux.<br>Why bother?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No apps.Crappy screen.Violates dozens of Apple patents.OS based on Lin-sux.Why bother ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No apps.Crappy screen.Violates dozens of Apple patents.OS based on Lin-sux.Why bother?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339734</id>
	<title>I also endorse PDAnet for Android</title>
	<author>billlava</author>
	<datestamp>1267544580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've been using it since I got my Droid last year.  It works great, it is frequently updated, and allows me to surf the web on an actual laptop while (riding) in a car on the freeway.  I use it for everything short of gaming, and who knows, maybe it would even work for that!  Best of all, Verizon still hasn't freaked out about data usage, and I go through a LOT in a month.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been using it since I got my Droid last year .
It works great , it is frequently updated , and allows me to surf the web on an actual laptop while ( riding ) in a car on the freeway .
I use it for everything short of gaming , and who knows , maybe it would even work for that !
Best of all , Verizon still has n't freaked out about data usage , and I go through a LOT in a month .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been using it since I got my Droid last year.
It works great, it is frequently updated, and allows me to surf the web on an actual laptop while (riding) in a car on the freeway.
I use it for everything short of gaming, and who knows, maybe it would even work for that!
Best of all, Verizon still hasn't freaked out about data usage, and I go through a LOT in a month.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340800</id>
	<title>Why would I need to have that application?</title>
	<author>jobst</author>
	<datestamp>1267554600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is not a flamebait, but a serious question.<br>I have a Xperia and I can connect my desktop/laptop without any additional application straight to my mobile (linux or windows) using bluetooth/wifi/usb. Why would I write a story "oh I can connect my laptop to my phone"???<br>I have been able to do this for a while using Fedora/Centos/ubuntu/xp/2000 with my current and previous phone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is not a flamebait , but a serious question.I have a Xperia and I can connect my desktop/laptop without any additional application straight to my mobile ( linux or windows ) using bluetooth/wifi/usb .
Why would I write a story " oh I can connect my laptop to my phone " ? ?
? I have been able to do this for a while using Fedora/Centos/ubuntu/xp/2000 with my current and previous phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is not a flamebait, but a serious question.I have a Xperia and I can connect my desktop/laptop without any additional application straight to my mobile (linux or windows) using bluetooth/wifi/usb.
Why would I write a story "oh I can connect my laptop to my phone"??
?I have been able to do this for a while using Fedora/Centos/ubuntu/xp/2000 with my current and previous phone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339670</id>
	<title>Only in Canada you say.... pity....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267544220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm with Fido in Canada. I have the 6GB/mo plan for $30, and no problems tethering whatsoever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm with Fido in Canada .
I have the 6GB/mo plan for $ 30 , and no problems tethering whatsoever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm with Fido in Canada.
I have the 6GB/mo plan for $30, and no problems tethering whatsoever.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339770</id>
	<title>Re:Android sucks.</title>
	<author>ScrewMaster</author>
	<datestamp>1267544940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>No apps.
Crappy screen.
Violates dozens of Apple patents.
OS based on Lin-sux.
Why bother?</p></div><p>I always knew that my general distaste for Apple Computer and its afficionados was based in fact. Thank you for the confirmation.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No apps .
Crappy screen .
Violates dozens of Apple patents .
OS based on Lin-sux .
Why bother ? I always knew that my general distaste for Apple Computer and its afficionados was based in fact .
Thank you for the confirmation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No apps.
Crappy screen.
Violates dozens of Apple patents.
OS based on Lin-sux.
Why bother?I always knew that my general distaste for Apple Computer and its afficionados was based in fact.
Thank you for the confirmation.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339596</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31371064</id>
	<title>Wifi-Teather is the best</title>
	<author>jastram</author>
	<datestamp>1267804980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I tried various tethering-apps ever since I got my G1 (dev-phone and therefore rooted).  The best one I found is hands down <a href="http://code.google.com/p/android-wifi-tether/" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">Wifi Tether</a> [google.com], which converts the phone into a hotspot.  Very cool, especially as it makes it very easy to give other people access (at the same time, no less!).  It's free, so I donated a few bucks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I tried various tethering-apps ever since I got my G1 ( dev-phone and therefore rooted ) .
The best one I found is hands down Wifi Tether [ google.com ] , which converts the phone into a hotspot .
Very cool , especially as it makes it very easy to give other people access ( at the same time , no less ! ) .
It 's free , so I donated a few bucks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I tried various tethering-apps ever since I got my G1 (dev-phone and therefore rooted).
The best one I found is hands down Wifi Tether [google.com], which converts the phone into a hotspot.
Very cool, especially as it makes it very easy to give other people access (at the same time, no less!).
It's free, so I donated a few bucks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340936</id>
	<title>Welcome to 2006 Android Users</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267555740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tethering ("Internet Sharing") via Bluetooth and USB has been a standard feature of Windows Mobile for years now. Tethering over WIFI (ad-hoc + WEP) is available using a free app for a year now too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tethering ( " Internet Sharing " ) via Bluetooth and USB has been a standard feature of Windows Mobile for years now .
Tethering over WIFI ( ad-hoc + WEP ) is available using a free app for a year now too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tethering ("Internet Sharing") via Bluetooth and USB has been a standard feature of Windows Mobile for years now.
Tethering over WIFI (ad-hoc + WEP) is available using a free app for a year now too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339710</id>
	<title>You can tether on an iPhone if you are a developer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267544460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>iProxy works pretty well on an iPhone :</p><p><a href="http://wiki.github.com/tcurdt/iProxy/" title="github.com" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.github.com/tcurdt/iProxy/</a> [github.com]</p><p>You have to be a developer to compile and run it on your phone.   He has a helpful setup guide for phone and laptop.</p><p>I don't see why people dismiss jailbreaking so readily.  There are basically no downsides to it, other than sometimes if you want the latest update you have to wait some time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>iProxy works pretty well on an iPhone : http : //wiki.github.com/tcurdt/iProxy/ [ github.com ] You have to be a developer to compile and run it on your phone .
He has a helpful setup guide for phone and laptop.I do n't see why people dismiss jailbreaking so readily .
There are basically no downsides to it , other than sometimes if you want the latest update you have to wait some time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>iProxy works pretty well on an iPhone :http://wiki.github.com/tcurdt/iProxy/ [github.com]You have to be a developer to compile and run it on your phone.
He has a helpful setup guide for phone and laptop.I don't see why people dismiss jailbreaking so readily.
There are basically no downsides to it, other than sometimes if you want the latest update you have to wait some time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31344606</id>
	<title>EasyTether for Android</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267627740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just an FYI, we're the publisher of EasyTether for Android. It's got a 4.5 star rating and at $9.95 is less than half the price of PdaNet:</p><p>http://www.cyrket.com/p/android/com.mstream.easytether\_polyclef/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just an FYI , we 're the publisher of EasyTether for Android .
It 's got a 4.5 star rating and at $ 9.95 is less than half the price of PdaNet : http : //www.cyrket.com/p/android/com.mstream.easytether \ _polyclef/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just an FYI, we're the publisher of EasyTether for Android.
It's got a 4.5 star rating and at $9.95 is less than half the price of PdaNet:http://www.cyrket.com/p/android/com.mstream.easytether\_polyclef/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31342586</id>
	<title>All that work for a shitty iPhone? LOL, no thanks.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267612980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If the old iPhone was even remotely in the same league as the amazing Nexus One it might be worth the hassle of wasting time dealing with 'jailbreaking'...</p><p>But it isn't.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If the old iPhone was even remotely in the same league as the amazing Nexus One it might be worth the hassle of wasting time dealing with 'jailbreaking'...But it is n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the old iPhone was even remotely in the same league as the amazing Nexus One it might be worth the hassle of wasting time dealing with 'jailbreaking'...But it isn't.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340208</id>
	<title>Re:Not Surprising</title>
	<author>aristotle-dude</author>
	<datestamp>1267548900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Many (non-US) iPhone carriers allow tethering but Apple strongly discourages it through technical measures.  </p></div><p>FUD much? Tethering on the iPhone is blocked on the iPhone on AT&amp;T. It is a carrier setting. Tethering has worked on the iPhone on Canadian carriers since the feature was released in a firmware update. The lack of tethering is an AT&amp;T issue and the reason why they are blocking it is because the iPhone is actually popular whereas Android phones are a small niche so they are not worried about data usage on the Android platform.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Many ( non-US ) iPhone carriers allow tethering but Apple strongly discourages it through technical measures .
FUD much ?
Tethering on the iPhone is blocked on the iPhone on AT&amp;T .
It is a carrier setting .
Tethering has worked on the iPhone on Canadian carriers since the feature was released in a firmware update .
The lack of tethering is an AT&amp;T issue and the reason why they are blocking it is because the iPhone is actually popular whereas Android phones are a small niche so they are not worried about data usage on the Android platform .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Many (non-US) iPhone carriers allow tethering but Apple strongly discourages it through technical measures.
FUD much?
Tethering on the iPhone is blocked on the iPhone on AT&amp;T.
It is a carrier setting.
Tethering has worked on the iPhone on Canadian carriers since the feature was released in a firmware update.
The lack of tethering is an AT&amp;T issue and the reason why they are blocking it is because the iPhone is actually popular whereas Android phones are a small niche so they are not worried about data usage on the Android platform.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31347234</id>
	<title>Re:Yawn</title>
	<author>CompMD</author>
	<datestamp>1267638960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tethering on an Android device really only requires knowing some basic routing, setting the wifi adapter to master mode, and some iptables.  How is it that a website full of linux geeks is paying for applications to do this and being amazed with them?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tethering on an Android device really only requires knowing some basic routing , setting the wifi adapter to master mode , and some iptables .
How is it that a website full of linux geeks is paying for applications to do this and being amazed with them ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tethering on an Android device really only requires knowing some basic routing, setting the wifi adapter to master mode, and some iptables.
How is it that a website full of linux geeks is paying for applications to do this and being amazed with them?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339574</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340848</id>
	<title>Too soon...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267555140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't talk to Kristian Digby about the exhilaration of tethering...</p><p><a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment/3398502/TV-host-dies-in-sex-game-gone-wrong" title="stuff.co.nz" rel="nofollow">http://www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment/3398502/TV-host-dies-in-sex-game-gone-wrong</a> [stuff.co.nz]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't talk to Kristian Digby about the exhilaration of tethering...http : //www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment/3398502/TV-host-dies-in-sex-game-gone-wrong [ stuff.co.nz ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't talk to Kristian Digby about the exhilaration of tethering...http://www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment/3398502/TV-host-dies-in-sex-game-gone-wrong [stuff.co.nz]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339568</id>
	<title>first</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267543440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>mod me up!</htmltext>
<tokenext>mod me up !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>mod me up!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340272</id>
	<title>Re:Blame Canada!</title>
	<author>acidrainx</author>
	<datestamp>1267549320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But not too much since you have the 6GB data plan? Are you saying you actually get anywhere near 6GB in a month? I've had my 3GS for almost a year now and I'm only now coming up on 1GB (for the whole year).</htmltext>
<tokenext>But not too much since you have the 6GB data plan ?
Are you saying you actually get anywhere near 6GB in a month ?
I 've had my 3GS for almost a year now and I 'm only now coming up on 1GB ( for the whole year ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But not too much since you have the 6GB data plan?
Are you saying you actually get anywhere near 6GB in a month?
I've had my 3GS for almost a year now and I'm only now coming up on 1GB (for the whole year).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31349122</id>
	<title>Re:Android sucks.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267647960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>No apps.<br>Crappy screen.<br>Violates dozens of Apple patents.<br>OS based on Lin-sux.<br>Why bother?</p></div><p>No freedom.<br>Crappy network (and screen).<br>Made by a patent trolling company.<br>OS made by the magic of Jobs, who works all night inventing wonders for the faithful, you can tell because the light is on all night long in his window high up in the...<br>Run away!</p><p>Sorry folks, AC is having Schizotrollaphrenia today!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No apps.Crappy screen.Violates dozens of Apple patents.OS based on Lin-sux.Why bother ? No freedom.Crappy network ( and screen ) .Made by a patent trolling company.OS made by the magic of Jobs , who works all night inventing wonders for the faithful , you can tell because the light is on all night long in his window high up in the...Run away ! Sorry folks , AC is having Schizotrollaphrenia today !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No apps.Crappy screen.Violates dozens of Apple patents.OS based on Lin-sux.Why bother?No freedom.Crappy network (and screen).Made by a patent trolling company.OS made by the magic of Jobs, who works all night inventing wonders for the faithful, you can tell because the light is on all night long in his window high up in the...Run away!Sorry folks, AC is having Schizotrollaphrenia today!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339596</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339960</id>
	<title>They don't understand jailbreaking</title>
	<author>Grizzley9</author>
	<datestamp>1267546680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"(on which he basically gives up, for the perfectly decent reason of not wanting to jailbreak his iPhone)"</p><p>You know how a non-jailbroken iPhone works and looks like after being jailbroken?  Exactly the same.  So instead of this app store you go to this other app store.  Only difference.  I really wonder why some are so afraid of doing something so simple.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ( on which he basically gives up , for the perfectly decent reason of not wanting to jailbreak his iPhone ) " You know how a non-jailbroken iPhone works and looks like after being jailbroken ?
Exactly the same .
So instead of this app store you go to this other app store .
Only difference .
I really wonder why some are so afraid of doing something so simple .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"(on which he basically gives up, for the perfectly decent reason of not wanting to jailbreak his iPhone)"You know how a non-jailbroken iPhone works and looks like after being jailbroken?
Exactly the same.
So instead of this app store you go to this other app store.
Only difference.
I really wonder why some are so afraid of doing something so simple.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339692</id>
	<title>Re:Not Surprising</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267544340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think it depends on where you live. I got my iphone unlocked after 6 months for free due to rules prohibits phone companies from making longer than 6 months bindings. After unlocking, I switched company and the new company supports tethering.</p><p>But we also have realistic data plans, they are not "unlimited" with limited usability but 20 gigabytes monthly 3G traffic for 30$ after which they might close data traffic for the rest of the month.</p><p>I have read that some phone companies supply Apple with configuration profiles so that everything works and if you choose a provider who has not done this, things like tethering might not work properly or disapper from the options. Personally I have had this problem with the tethering goes missing even though there are no such restrictions in my subscription. But since they do not officially support iphone I would have to switch provider to someone who supplies apple with configurations.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:/<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. But I am not going to since my subscription are paid for by my work place..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it depends on where you live .
I got my iphone unlocked after 6 months for free due to rules prohibits phone companies from making longer than 6 months bindings .
After unlocking , I switched company and the new company supports tethering.But we also have realistic data plans , they are not " unlimited " with limited usability but 20 gigabytes monthly 3G traffic for 30 $ after which they might close data traffic for the rest of the month.I have read that some phone companies supply Apple with configuration profiles so that everything works and if you choose a provider who has not done this , things like tethering might not work properly or disapper from the options .
Personally I have had this problem with the tethering goes missing even though there are no such restrictions in my subscription .
But since they do not officially support iphone I would have to switch provider to someone who supplies apple with configurations .
: / .. But I am not going to since my subscription are paid for by my work place. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it depends on where you live.
I got my iphone unlocked after 6 months for free due to rules prohibits phone companies from making longer than 6 months bindings.
After unlocking, I switched company and the new company supports tethering.But we also have realistic data plans, they are not "unlimited" with limited usability but 20 gigabytes monthly 3G traffic for 30$ after which they might close data traffic for the rest of the month.I have read that some phone companies supply Apple with configuration profiles so that everything works and if you choose a provider who has not done this, things like tethering might not work properly or disapper from the options.
Personally I have had this problem with the tethering goes missing even though there are no such restrictions in my subscription.
But since they do not officially support iphone I would have to switch provider to someone who supplies apple with configurations.
:/ .. But I am not going to since my subscription are paid for by my work place..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339590</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340098</id>
	<title>Re:Android sucks.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267548000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>You probably got modded Troll because nobody could accidentally fall for the obvious flamebait comment that the GP wrote.<br> <br>Thus, you are less obviously trolling an obvious troll.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You probably got modded Troll because nobody could accidentally fall for the obvious flamebait comment that the GP wrote .
Thus , you are less obviously trolling an obvious troll .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You probably got modded Troll because nobody could accidentally fall for the obvious flamebait comment that the GP wrote.
Thus, you are less obviously trolling an obvious troll.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339770</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340406</id>
	<title>Re:I also endorse PDAnet for Android</title>
	<author>Hays</author>
	<datestamp>1267550640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll second that endorsement. PDAnet is pretty slick. Tethers through USB or Bluetooth (although bluetooth is much harder to configure).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll second that endorsement .
PDAnet is pretty slick .
Tethers through USB or Bluetooth ( although bluetooth is much harder to configure ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll second that endorsement.
PDAnet is pretty slick.
Tethers through USB or Bluetooth (although bluetooth is much harder to configure).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31341200</id>
	<title>Alternative way. Azilink</title>
	<author>black\_penguin</author>
	<datestamp>1267558020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am using the free alternative way on my locked/unrooted N1,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)
<br>
<a href="http://code.google.com/p/azilink/" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/p/azilink/</a> [google.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am using the free alternative way on my locked/unrooted N1 , : ) http : //code.google.com/p/azilink/ [ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am using the free alternative way on my locked/unrooted N1, :)

http://code.google.com/p/azilink/ [google.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31344248</id>
	<title>You ppl are easilly impressed</title>
	<author>Aceticon</author>
	<datestamp>1267625940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was doing this "tethering" thing regularly 10 years ago with my old Nokia and a Palm Pilot. It was even easier to do with my desktop PC (I didn't own a notebook at the time).</p><p>Clearly there's a lot of consumers of mobile services out there conditioned to accept being shafted all the time by the telecoms<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was doing this " tethering " thing regularly 10 years ago with my old Nokia and a Palm Pilot .
It was even easier to do with my desktop PC ( I did n't own a notebook at the time ) .Clearly there 's a lot of consumers of mobile services out there conditioned to accept being shafted all the time by the telecoms .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was doing this "tethering" thing regularly 10 years ago with my old Nokia and a Palm Pilot.
It was even easier to do with my desktop PC (I didn't own a notebook at the time).Clearly there's a lot of consumers of mobile services out there conditioned to accept being shafted all the time by the telecoms ...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31343124</id>
	<title>Re:Not Surprising</title>
	<author>gig</author>
	<datestamp>1267617960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apple does not discourage it through technical measures. What kind of bullshit is that? There's a fucking switch you turn on. Done.</p><p>The fact that AT&amp;T does not support tethering an iPhone is a huge drag, but it has zero to do with iPhone or Apple.</p><p>I know Android users need SOMETHING to feel smug about, but come on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple does not discourage it through technical measures .
What kind of bullshit is that ?
There 's a fucking switch you turn on .
Done.The fact that AT&amp;T does not support tethering an iPhone is a huge drag , but it has zero to do with iPhone or Apple.I know Android users need SOMETHING to feel smug about , but come on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple does not discourage it through technical measures.
What kind of bullshit is that?
There's a fucking switch you turn on.
Done.The fact that AT&amp;T does not support tethering an iPhone is a huge drag, but it has zero to do with iPhone or Apple.I know Android users need SOMETHING to feel smug about, but come on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340612</id>
	<title>My N900</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267552620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...connects via a USB cable to my Lenovo X200t running Ubuntu and it charges while I use the cellular network. Why are there so many advertisements on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. and what's so elusive about tethering? Why do I need 'apps' when I have a fully-functional web browser? Nonsense.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...connects via a USB cable to my Lenovo X200t running Ubuntu and it charges while I use the cellular network .
Why are there so many advertisements on / .
and what 's so elusive about tethering ?
Why do I need 'apps ' when I have a fully-functional web browser ?
Nonsense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...connects via a USB cable to my Lenovo X200t running Ubuntu and it charges while I use the cellular network.
Why are there so many advertisements on /.
and what's so elusive about tethering?
Why do I need 'apps' when I have a fully-functional web browser?
Nonsense.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340434</id>
	<title>Advert</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267550880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cut to a beach, a guy is using his iphone engaged in a futile struggle trying to get it to tether to his laptop. He scratches his head, tears out his hair and collapses as the product fights off his every effort.<br>THEN from a shimmering background in slow motion a guy reaches into his pants and pulls out the T1, it gleams in the sunlight momentarily and he types in the commands to tether it to a laptop. The MOMENT he does this, he orgasms in the SHEER EXHILARATION of it's awesomeness.<br>Then we see him surfing the marketing companys website, smoking a cigarette.</p><p>Stupid fucks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cut to a beach , a guy is using his iphone engaged in a futile struggle trying to get it to tether to his laptop .
He scratches his head , tears out his hair and collapses as the product fights off his every effort.THEN from a shimmering background in slow motion a guy reaches into his pants and pulls out the T1 , it gleams in the sunlight momentarily and he types in the commands to tether it to a laptop .
The MOMENT he does this , he orgasms in the SHEER EXHILARATION of it 's awesomeness.Then we see him surfing the marketing companys website , smoking a cigarette.Stupid fucks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cut to a beach, a guy is using his iphone engaged in a futile struggle trying to get it to tether to his laptop.
He scratches his head, tears out his hair and collapses as the product fights off his every effort.THEN from a shimmering background in slow motion a guy reaches into his pants and pulls out the T1, it gleams in the sunlight momentarily and he types in the commands to tether it to a laptop.
The MOMENT he does this, he orgasms in the SHEER EXHILARATION of it's awesomeness.Then we see him surfing the marketing companys website, smoking a cigarette.Stupid fucks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_215250_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340556
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339646
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_215250_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339734
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_215250_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31346872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339770
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339596
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_215250_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31345206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340000
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_215250_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31346062
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340296
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339646
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_215250_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31344888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339590
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_215250_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31344656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339954
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_215250_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31347234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339574
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_215250_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31341034
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339960
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_215250_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339770
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339596
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_215250_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31343118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339590
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_215250_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339590
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_215250_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31342164
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339590
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_215250_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31365392
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339770
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339596
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_215250_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31343124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339590
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_215250_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339746
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_215250_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339746
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_215250_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31344364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339590
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_215250_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339960
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_215250_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31348352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339642
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_215250_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31341366
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339710
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_215250_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31349122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339596
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_215250_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_215250_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31345700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_215250_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339662
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339596
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_215250_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31342144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340078
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339574
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_215250_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31342586
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339954
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_215250_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339960
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_215250.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339746
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340400
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340364
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_215250.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340354
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_215250.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339646
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339866
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340296
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31346062
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340556
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_215250.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339710
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31341366
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_215250.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339590
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339692
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31343118
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31344364
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339644
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31343124
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340468
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31342164
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340208
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31344888
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_215250.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31342344
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_215250.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339622
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_215250.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339734
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340406
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_215250.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339712
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_215250.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339574
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340078
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31342144
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31347234
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_215250.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31342214
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_215250.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340000
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31345206
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_215250.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31343178
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_215250.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339702
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_215250.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339740
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_215250.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339960
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340378
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31341034
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340568
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_215250.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339642
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339776
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31348352
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_215250.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339716
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31345700
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340272
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_215250.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340936
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_215250.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339954
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31344656
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31342586
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_215250.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339670
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_215250.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31341200
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_215250.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339596
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339770
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340098
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31340254
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31365392
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31346872
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31339662
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_215250.31349122
</commentlist>
</conversation>
