<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_02_2014253</id>
	<title>Netflix Gauging Interest In an iPhone App</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1267529760000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>gollum123 writes <i>"A new survey sent out to Netflix subscribers indicates that the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/external/gigaom/2010/03/02/02gigaom-netflix-gauging-interest-in-an-iphone-app-16599.html?pagewanted=all">iPhone might be the next device</a> that its streaming service rolls out on in the coming months. (The NY Times credits <a href="http://www.hackingnetflix.com/2010/03/netflix-survey-hints-at-iphone-streaming-via-wifi.html">Hacking Netflix</a> for the tip.) According to a tip sent to Hacking Netflix, the subscription video company is now asking users how likely they would be to use an iPhone app to view movies via its online streaming service. According to the survey, an iPhone app would give users all the same functionality that they have when streaming on a PC or other device, including all the same movies and TV shows without advertisements or trailers. If the app is rolled out, the ability to watch on the Apple mobile device would be offered at no additional charge to existing Netflix subscribers. There is good news for AT&amp;T implied in the survey questions: it appears that the app would require users to be connected to a Wi-Fi network."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>gollum123 writes " A new survey sent out to Netflix subscribers indicates that the iPhone might be the next device that its streaming service rolls out on in the coming months .
( The NY Times credits Hacking Netflix for the tip .
) According to a tip sent to Hacking Netflix , the subscription video company is now asking users how likely they would be to use an iPhone app to view movies via its online streaming service .
According to the survey , an iPhone app would give users all the same functionality that they have when streaming on a PC or other device , including all the same movies and TV shows without advertisements or trailers .
If the app is rolled out , the ability to watch on the Apple mobile device would be offered at no additional charge to existing Netflix subscribers .
There is good news for AT&amp;T implied in the survey questions : it appears that the app would require users to be connected to a Wi-Fi network .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>gollum123 writes "A new survey sent out to Netflix subscribers indicates that the iPhone might be the next device that its streaming service rolls out on in the coming months.
(The NY Times credits Hacking Netflix for the tip.
) According to a tip sent to Hacking Netflix, the subscription video company is now asking users how likely they would be to use an iPhone app to view movies via its online streaming service.
According to the survey, an iPhone app would give users all the same functionality that they have when streaming on a PC or other device, including all the same movies and TV shows without advertisements or trailers.
If the app is rolled out, the ability to watch on the Apple mobile device would be offered at no additional charge to existing Netflix subscribers.
There is good news for AT&amp;T implied in the survey questions: it appears that the app would require users to be connected to a Wi-Fi network.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339620</id>
	<title>Given there is a Pandora app...</title>
	<author>SuperKendall</author>
	<datestamp>1267543860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Wouldn't this be similar to 'offering a function alreday available' a la iTunes movie rentals?</i></p><p>iTunes movie rentals are on-device downloaded content.  Netflix would be streaming, just like the Pandora app streams music just fine.  Since they allow one I don't see why they would ban the other.</p><p>It would probably eliminate offline caching though, which would be a shame for plane travel.   We'll see (if they do it).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't this be similar to 'offering a function alreday available ' a la iTunes movie rentals ? iTunes movie rentals are on-device downloaded content .
Netflix would be streaming , just like the Pandora app streams music just fine .
Since they allow one I do n't see why they would ban the other.It would probably eliminate offline caching though , which would be a shame for plane travel .
We 'll see ( if they do it ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't this be similar to 'offering a function alreday available' a la iTunes movie rentals?iTunes movie rentals are on-device downloaded content.
Netflix would be streaming, just like the Pandora app streams music just fine.
Since they allow one I don't see why they would ban the other.It would probably eliminate offline caching though, which would be a shame for plane travel.
We'll see (if they do it).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337928</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339228</id>
	<title>Parent is not a troll</title>
	<author>raddan</author>
	<datestamp>1267540440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've converted a variety of media to be played on small screens with the thinking that it would be great for when I have travel-downtime.  For me at least, it <em>does</em> get tedious.  I just don't enjoy such a small screen.  Someone else mentioned an iPad, and for me, that would probably be the tipping point (I'd think about getting one), but a cellphone screen doesn't cut it.  Especially since I tend to prefer reading during downtime than watching TV.
<br> <br>
On the airplane wi-fi front, I was on a US Air flight recently, and they had wi-fi onboard.  Since it was new, they were running a promotional deal where you get one free flight's worth of wi-fi if you give them your email addy (little do they know I'm an email admin... and have virtually unlimited email addresses!).  I was floored at how fast it was, considering that I was, you know, hurtling through the air at 30,000 ft.  I transferred files to and from my fileserver, I had an SSH session open, and the latency didn't seem any worse than my connection at home.  Impressed... but I probably still wouldn't pay for it (just as I don't pay the extra $60 for 4 more inches of legroom; the $6 Jack Daniels can easily compensate for that).  Now, granted, this was all subjective-- I didn't run any speed tests-- but I was expected something like modem-speed, so I was pleasantly surprised.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've converted a variety of media to be played on small screens with the thinking that it would be great for when I have travel-downtime .
For me at least , it does get tedious .
I just do n't enjoy such a small screen .
Someone else mentioned an iPad , and for me , that would probably be the tipping point ( I 'd think about getting one ) , but a cellphone screen does n't cut it .
Especially since I tend to prefer reading during downtime than watching TV .
On the airplane wi-fi front , I was on a US Air flight recently , and they had wi-fi onboard .
Since it was new , they were running a promotional deal where you get one free flight 's worth of wi-fi if you give them your email addy ( little do they know I 'm an email admin... and have virtually unlimited email addresses ! ) .
I was floored at how fast it was , considering that I was , you know , hurtling through the air at 30,000 ft. I transferred files to and from my fileserver , I had an SSH session open , and the latency did n't seem any worse than my connection at home .
Impressed... but I probably still would n't pay for it ( just as I do n't pay the extra $ 60 for 4 more inches of legroom ; the $ 6 Jack Daniels can easily compensate for that ) .
Now , granted , this was all subjective-- I did n't run any speed tests-- but I was expected something like modem-speed , so I was pleasantly surprised .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've converted a variety of media to be played on small screens with the thinking that it would be great for when I have travel-downtime.
For me at least, it does get tedious.
I just don't enjoy such a small screen.
Someone else mentioned an iPad, and for me, that would probably be the tipping point (I'd think about getting one), but a cellphone screen doesn't cut it.
Especially since I tend to prefer reading during downtime than watching TV.
On the airplane wi-fi front, I was on a US Air flight recently, and they had wi-fi onboard.
Since it was new, they were running a promotional deal where you get one free flight's worth of wi-fi if you give them your email addy (little do they know I'm an email admin... and have virtually unlimited email addresses!).
I was floored at how fast it was, considering that I was, you know, hurtling through the air at 30,000 ft.  I transferred files to and from my fileserver, I had an SSH session open, and the latency didn't seem any worse than my connection at home.
Impressed... but I probably still wouldn't pay for it (just as I don't pay the extra $60 for 4 more inches of legroom; the $6 Jack Daniels can easily compensate for that).
Now, granted, this was all subjective-- I didn't run any speed tests-- but I was expected something like modem-speed, so I was pleasantly surprised.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338822</id>
	<title>Re:iPad?</title>
	<author>Joe Tie.</author>
	<datestamp>1267537680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd still need hulu in addition to netflix. Then add in orb for local files, and I think it'd be an ok media device once it was jailbroken to allow for backgrounding. Still, all in all if I was going for something like that I'd really just rather go with an android based device.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd still need hulu in addition to netflix .
Then add in orb for local files , and I think it 'd be an ok media device once it was jailbroken to allow for backgrounding .
Still , all in all if I was going for something like that I 'd really just rather go with an android based device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd still need hulu in addition to netflix.
Then add in orb for local files, and I think it'd be an ok media device once it was jailbroken to allow for backgrounding.
Still, all in all if I was going for something like that I'd really just rather go with an android based device.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337918</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339522</id>
	<title>Hotel? Airport? iPad?</title>
	<author>SuperKendall</author>
	<datestamp>1267543140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>If you're at home, you've got a bigger screen.</i></p><p>But possibly not a means to play Netflix upon it.  You can direct a video feed out from an iPhone (or iPod Touch).</p><p><i>If you're at work, or a McDonalds/Starbucks/whatever, you probably won't be watching movies.</i></p><p>What about traveling though?  Lots of airports have WiFi, that usually costs too much but now there's a compelling reason to pay.</p><p>Or even better, what about when you are at a hotel without a laptop, many people do not want the bulk of a laptop when they travel.</p><p>Never mind, that an iPhone app means it will also work on an iPad which is a more that acceptable viewing size for most people.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're at home , you 've got a bigger screen.But possibly not a means to play Netflix upon it .
You can direct a video feed out from an iPhone ( or iPod Touch ) .If you 're at work , or a McDonalds/Starbucks/whatever , you probably wo n't be watching movies.What about traveling though ?
Lots of airports have WiFi , that usually costs too much but now there 's a compelling reason to pay.Or even better , what about when you are at a hotel without a laptop , many people do not want the bulk of a laptop when they travel.Never mind , that an iPhone app means it will also work on an iPad which is a more that acceptable viewing size for most people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're at home, you've got a bigger screen.But possibly not a means to play Netflix upon it.
You can direct a video feed out from an iPhone (or iPod Touch).If you're at work, or a McDonalds/Starbucks/whatever, you probably won't be watching movies.What about traveling though?
Lots of airports have WiFi, that usually costs too much but now there's a compelling reason to pay.Or even better, what about when you are at a hotel without a laptop, many people do not want the bulk of a laptop when they travel.Never mind, that an iPhone app means it will also work on an iPad which is a more that acceptable viewing size for most people.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338028</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338232</id>
	<title>Re:Something I am actually interested in</title>
	<author>Nikker</author>
	<datestamp>1267534920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have to say as an owner of a 3GS battery life watching mp4's is amazing.  I've used it on its own watching video in the car and hooked up via media cable (RCA) to my TV and both seem to play 10\% battery life / hr viewing.  I've watched 2 movies each about 1 1/2 - 2 hrs long and still had 50\%+ left.  As far as streaming goes I get about 400-600KBs average from Fido/Rogers and it's not very likely you'll be streaming anything over 420i so it shouldn't be that bad with 3G.  If you're looking for a higher res video then I'm not sure how it will handle but the mp4 hardware decoding really helps out on this device(can't say the same for other iPhone models though).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have to say as an owner of a 3GS battery life watching mp4 's is amazing .
I 've used it on its own watching video in the car and hooked up via media cable ( RCA ) to my TV and both seem to play 10 \ % battery life / hr viewing .
I 've watched 2 movies each about 1 1/2 - 2 hrs long and still had 50 \ % + left .
As far as streaming goes I get about 400-600KBs average from Fido/Rogers and it 's not very likely you 'll be streaming anything over 420i so it should n't be that bad with 3G .
If you 're looking for a higher res video then I 'm not sure how it will handle but the mp4 hardware decoding really helps out on this device ( ca n't say the same for other iPhone models though ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have to say as an owner of a 3GS battery life watching mp4's is amazing.
I've used it on its own watching video in the car and hooked up via media cable (RCA) to my TV and both seem to play 10\% battery life / hr viewing.
I've watched 2 movies each about 1 1/2 - 2 hrs long and still had 50\%+ left.
As far as streaming goes I get about 400-600KBs average from Fido/Rogers and it's not very likely you'll be streaming anything over 420i so it shouldn't be that bad with 3G.
If you're looking for a higher res video then I'm not sure how it will handle but the mp4 hardware decoding really helps out on this device(can't say the same for other iPhone models though).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31340596</id>
	<title>Re:No Silverlight!</title>
	<author>Eil</author>
	<datestamp>1267552440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Netflix is heavily pimping the <a href="http://www.roku.com/" title="roku.com">Roku</a> [roku.com] set-top media player, which apparently runs Linux under the hood. It doesn't look like anyone's made much progress in reverse engineering the NetFlix application, but it's proof that there is already a Netflix player for Linux which has no Silverlight dependency.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Netflix is heavily pimping the Roku [ roku.com ] set-top media player , which apparently runs Linux under the hood .
It does n't look like anyone 's made much progress in reverse engineering the NetFlix application , but it 's proof that there is already a Netflix player for Linux which has no Silverlight dependency .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Netflix is heavily pimping the Roku [roku.com] set-top media player, which apparently runs Linux under the hood.
It doesn't look like anyone's made much progress in reverse engineering the NetFlix application, but it's proof that there is already a Netflix player for Linux which has no Silverlight dependency.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338246</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339184</id>
	<title>Re:No Silverlight!</title>
	<author>adolf</author>
	<datestamp>1267540080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's lots of ways to watch Netflix without Silverlight, and none of them are on a PC.  Since an iPhone is also not a PC, I must assume that they'll follow their previous trend of not using Silverlight on embedded and hardware devices.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's lots of ways to watch Netflix without Silverlight , and none of them are on a PC .
Since an iPhone is also not a PC , I must assume that they 'll follow their previous trend of not using Silverlight on embedded and hardware devices .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's lots of ways to watch Netflix without Silverlight, and none of them are on a PC.
Since an iPhone is also not a PC, I must assume that they'll follow their previous trend of not using Silverlight on embedded and hardware devices.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338246</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337984</id>
	<title>Not just streaming movies but an AiMind</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267533780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The ultimate move to the iPhone mobile platform will be the <a href="http://www.scn.org/~mentifex/AiMind.html" title="scn.org" rel="nofollow">AiMind</a> [scn.org] software that flits about the 'Net.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The ultimate move to the iPhone mobile platform will be the AiMind [ scn.org ] software that flits about the 'Net .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The ultimate move to the iPhone mobile platform will be the AiMind [scn.org] software that flits about the 'Net.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31354288</id>
	<title>Re:Why not an app that is platform neutral?</title>
	<author>MikeFM</author>
	<datestamp>1267635600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can do iPhone and Android but I can't see bothering with any of those other underpowered devices. I've written apps for WinCE and BREW and a few other platforms and they just sucked to develop for and the resulting apps were less than exciting.

I would have liked to write apps for the underappreciated N-Gage QD but Nokia wasn't smart enough to make that a very good option. Next to iPhone/Android though that is still my favorite phone ever. Sure it runs similar software to other phones but it was really optimized for games better. A little ahead of it's time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can do iPhone and Android but I ca n't see bothering with any of those other underpowered devices .
I 've written apps for WinCE and BREW and a few other platforms and they just sucked to develop for and the resulting apps were less than exciting .
I would have liked to write apps for the underappreciated N-Gage QD but Nokia was n't smart enough to make that a very good option .
Next to iPhone/Android though that is still my favorite phone ever .
Sure it runs similar software to other phones but it was really optimized for games better .
A little ahead of it 's time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can do iPhone and Android but I can't see bothering with any of those other underpowered devices.
I've written apps for WinCE and BREW and a few other platforms and they just sucked to develop for and the resulting apps were less than exciting.
I would have liked to write apps for the underappreciated N-Gage QD but Nokia wasn't smart enough to make that a very good option.
Next to iPhone/Android though that is still my favorite phone ever.
Sure it runs similar software to other phones but it was really optimized for games better.
A little ahead of it's time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339036</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one?</title>
	<author>slinches</author>
	<datestamp>1267539000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I already have a device (Nokia N900) that has an 800x480 display with video output.  I can say from experience that it is possible to watch on the small screen as long as you have a stable place to set it (holding it at arms length for 1.5+hrs would get tiring).</p><p>The real advantage is that I can carry about 15 or so movies with me on trips and all I need is a TV w/ RCA inputs to watch them at a reasonable size.  The only thing keeping me from having a completely portable movie collection right now is storage space.  Streaming a large collection of movies and TV like Netflix does would fill the gap until something the size of a phone can hold a few TB.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I already have a device ( Nokia N900 ) that has an 800x480 display with video output .
I can say from experience that it is possible to watch on the small screen as long as you have a stable place to set it ( holding it at arms length for 1.5 + hrs would get tiring ) .The real advantage is that I can carry about 15 or so movies with me on trips and all I need is a TV w/ RCA inputs to watch them at a reasonable size .
The only thing keeping me from having a completely portable movie collection right now is storage space .
Streaming a large collection of movies and TV like Netflix does would fill the gap until something the size of a phone can hold a few TB .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I already have a device (Nokia N900) that has an 800x480 display with video output.
I can say from experience that it is possible to watch on the small screen as long as you have a stable place to set it (holding it at arms length for 1.5+hrs would get tiring).The real advantage is that I can carry about 15 or so movies with me on trips and all I need is a TV w/ RCA inputs to watch them at a reasonable size.
The only thing keeping me from having a completely portable movie collection right now is storage space.
Streaming a large collection of movies and TV like Netflix does would fill the gap until something the size of a phone can hold a few TB.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339608</id>
	<title>Better than a laptop in some ways, usable</title>
	<author>SuperKendall</author>
	<datestamp>1267543740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been on a number of international flights, and watched 6-7 hours of video on the iPhone before.</p><p>The screen size is a bit small.  But if you are in Cattle Class, I prefer it to laptops because there is just no room for normal laptops (that is an area where a netbook would be better).  Also, I personally find it annoying when people sitting next to me fire up a big glowing screen, so I think it's a little nicer to keep the distraction for other passengers to a minimum (I also almost never recline my seat, but that may be too extreme for some).</p><p>As mentioned in another post though, an iPhone client opens up an iPad client.  You don't think it is coincidence they are just asking if people want this now, after they have said for a while they had no mobile device plans?  Now obviously that's not going to work too well on a flight (unless they support caching?  Seems unlikely) but it does mean you could travel with just an iPad instead of a laptop and have as much video as you wanted on tap in the hotel.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been on a number of international flights , and watched 6-7 hours of video on the iPhone before.The screen size is a bit small .
But if you are in Cattle Class , I prefer it to laptops because there is just no room for normal laptops ( that is an area where a netbook would be better ) .
Also , I personally find it annoying when people sitting next to me fire up a big glowing screen , so I think it 's a little nicer to keep the distraction for other passengers to a minimum ( I also almost never recline my seat , but that may be too extreme for some ) .As mentioned in another post though , an iPhone client opens up an iPad client .
You do n't think it is coincidence they are just asking if people want this now , after they have said for a while they had no mobile device plans ?
Now obviously that 's not going to work too well on a flight ( unless they support caching ?
Seems unlikely ) but it does mean you could travel with just an iPad instead of a laptop and have as much video as you wanted on tap in the hotel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been on a number of international flights, and watched 6-7 hours of video on the iPhone before.The screen size is a bit small.
But if you are in Cattle Class, I prefer it to laptops because there is just no room for normal laptops (that is an area where a netbook would be better).
Also, I personally find it annoying when people sitting next to me fire up a big glowing screen, so I think it's a little nicer to keep the distraction for other passengers to a minimum (I also almost never recline my seat, but that may be too extreme for some).As mentioned in another post though, an iPhone client opens up an iPad client.
You don't think it is coincidence they are just asking if people want this now, after they have said for a while they had no mobile device plans?
Now obviously that's not going to work too well on a flight (unless they support caching?
Seems unlikely) but it does mean you could travel with just an iPad instead of a laptop and have as much video as you wanted on tap in the hotel.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338008</id>
	<title>Gauge it out!</title>
	<author>Tibor the Hun</author>
	<datestamp>1267533900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hah, that will show them!<br>I hope they have first gaged the interest, so they know how much of it there is to gauge!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hah , that will show them ! I hope they have first gaged the interest , so they know how much of it there is to gauge !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hah, that will show them!I hope they have first gaged the interest, so they know how much of it there is to gauge!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339070</id>
	<title>Re:Why not an app that is platform neutral?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267539240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>htc touch pro, diamond, tilt 2, hd, hero, hd2.... all of those should be able to play back movies just fine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>htc touch pro , diamond , tilt 2 , hd , hero , hd2.... all of those should be able to play back movies just fine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>htc touch pro, diamond, tilt 2, hd, hero, hd2.... all of those should be able to play back movies just fine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338414</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31340680</id>
	<title>Re:Why not an app that is platform neutral?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267553340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thats what Flash is for!</p><p>Oh wait....<br>Never mind!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thats what Flash is for ! Oh wait....Never mind !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thats what Flash is for!Oh wait....Never mind!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338414</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31340324</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267549980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>David Lynch said it best...<br>http://www.metacafe.com/watch/3201497/david\_lynch\_iphone\_commercial/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>David Lynch said it best...http : //www.metacafe.com/watch/3201497/david \ _lynch \ _iphone \ _commercial/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>David Lynch said it best...http://www.metacafe.com/watch/3201497/david\_lynch\_iphone\_commercial/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339556</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one?</title>
	<author>mcsqueak</author>
	<datestamp>1267543380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I took a bunch of movies with me on my iPhone when I went to Japan last year. It was OK, but not ideal. My flight didn't have seat-back screens in coach, so unless you wanted to watch the crappy movies they picked for you, a phone or laptop was the only choice.</p><p>Actually, the worst part was the viewing angle. I didn't have a stand for the iPhone, and holding at a comfortable angle for 2 hours was not easy. I finally bunched up my thin airline blanket on the seatback tray and used that as a stand, so at least I could rest my head back on my seat and still see the screen without looking down.</p><p>Honestly, if I have wi-fi access on a plane I'd rather entertain myself reading the news or other websites rather than watching a movie, I think.</p><p>The iPhone is actually pretty good on battery life when just running video, but I can kill the thing in 3 hours by browsing the internet for that length of time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I took a bunch of movies with me on my iPhone when I went to Japan last year .
It was OK , but not ideal .
My flight did n't have seat-back screens in coach , so unless you wanted to watch the crappy movies they picked for you , a phone or laptop was the only choice.Actually , the worst part was the viewing angle .
I did n't have a stand for the iPhone , and holding at a comfortable angle for 2 hours was not easy .
I finally bunched up my thin airline blanket on the seatback tray and used that as a stand , so at least I could rest my head back on my seat and still see the screen without looking down.Honestly , if I have wi-fi access on a plane I 'd rather entertain myself reading the news or other websites rather than watching a movie , I think.The iPhone is actually pretty good on battery life when just running video , but I can kill the thing in 3 hours by browsing the internet for that length of time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I took a bunch of movies with me on my iPhone when I went to Japan last year.
It was OK, but not ideal.
My flight didn't have seat-back screens in coach, so unless you wanted to watch the crappy movies they picked for you, a phone or laptop was the only choice.Actually, the worst part was the viewing angle.
I didn't have a stand for the iPhone, and holding at a comfortable angle for 2 hours was not easy.
I finally bunched up my thin airline blanket on the seatback tray and used that as a stand, so at least I could rest my head back on my seat and still see the screen without looking down.Honestly, if I have wi-fi access on a plane I'd rather entertain myself reading the news or other websites rather than watching a movie, I think.The iPhone is actually pretty good on battery life when just running video, but I can kill the thing in 3 hours by browsing the internet for that length of time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338414</id>
	<title>Re:Why not an app that is platform neutral?</title>
	<author>guruevi</author>
	<datestamp>1267535700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1. Good luck finding an API or IDE that is compatible with all those platforms at once<br>2. Good luck finding similar functionality across all OS'es let alone all devices<br>3. Good luck finding the same performance across all devices</p><p>Each platform needs to be developed for separately because there's no 'gcc' or 'gtk' or 'qt' that makes anything uniform across all platforms.</p><p>Besides, almost none of the devices out in the market besides some Nokia, Apple and Android devices even have the power and the chips capable to download and play back videos AT ALL. None of the other devices (WinMo, Symbian,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...) even have standard browsers with support for Flash OR HTML5 so web developing is also out of the picture.</p><p>And the iPhone has the biggest marketshare in 1. "smartphones that you can develop for without corporate support ($$$)" or 2. "smartphones with a viable marketplace" (of course success of 2 is because of 1). Also the Maemo, Android and iPhone's are the only phones where the device is not locked down by default by the provider.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
Good luck finding an API or IDE that is compatible with all those platforms at once2 .
Good luck finding similar functionality across all OS'es let alone all devices3 .
Good luck finding the same performance across all devicesEach platform needs to be developed for separately because there 's no 'gcc ' or 'gtk ' or 'qt ' that makes anything uniform across all platforms.Besides , almost none of the devices out in the market besides some Nokia , Apple and Android devices even have the power and the chips capable to download and play back videos AT ALL .
None of the other devices ( WinMo , Symbian , ... ) even have standard browsers with support for Flash OR HTML5 so web developing is also out of the picture.And the iPhone has the biggest marketshare in 1 .
" smartphones that you can develop for without corporate support ( $ $ $ ) " or 2 .
" smartphones with a viable marketplace " ( of course success of 2 is because of 1 ) .
Also the Maemo , Android and iPhone 's are the only phones where the device is not locked down by default by the provider .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
Good luck finding an API or IDE that is compatible with all those platforms at once2.
Good luck finding similar functionality across all OS'es let alone all devices3.
Good luck finding the same performance across all devicesEach platform needs to be developed for separately because there's no 'gcc' or 'gtk' or 'qt' that makes anything uniform across all platforms.Besides, almost none of the devices out in the market besides some Nokia, Apple and Android devices even have the power and the chips capable to download and play back videos AT ALL.
None of the other devices (WinMo, Symbian, ...) even have standard browsers with support for Flash OR HTML5 so web developing is also out of the picture.And the iPhone has the biggest marketshare in 1.
"smartphones that you can develop for without corporate support ($$$)" or 2.
"smartphones with a viable marketplace" (of course success of 2 is because of 1).
Also the Maemo, Android and iPhone's are the only phones where the device is not locked down by default by the provider.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31340120</id>
	<title>Re:Wi-Fi somewhat defeats the point.</title>
	<author>varmittang</author>
	<datestamp>1267548240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Any person that got the Slingbox app, will want the Netflix app.  And as far as I know, that a lot of people that want mobile media that they can control.  Just because you can't find a use, doesn't mean others don't.  I'm one of those people that want a Netflix app so that I can watch movies while not a home, or near a BIG screen TV.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Any person that got the Slingbox app , will want the Netflix app .
And as far as I know , that a lot of people that want mobile media that they can control .
Just because you ca n't find a use , does n't mean others do n't .
I 'm one of those people that want a Netflix app so that I can watch movies while not a home , or near a BIG screen TV .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any person that got the Slingbox app, will want the Netflix app.
And as far as I know, that a lot of people that want mobile media that they can control.
Just because you can't find a use, doesn't mean others don't.
I'm one of those people that want a Netflix app so that I can watch movies while not a home, or near a BIG screen TV.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338028</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338982</id>
	<title>Hey, Morons</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1267538640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about you go 5 seconds without having mindless drivel streamed into your fucking brain?</p><p>It's 5 pm on the west coast (the best coast).<br>Get off the internets, get out of the office, go home, and then get right back on the fucking internets.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about you go 5 seconds without having mindless drivel streamed into your fucking brain ? It 's 5 pm on the west coast ( the best coast ) .Get off the internets , get out of the office , go home , and then get right back on the fucking internets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about you go 5 seconds without having mindless drivel streamed into your fucking brain?It's 5 pm on the west coast (the best coast).Get off the internets, get out of the office, go home, and then get right back on the fucking internets.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338078</id>
	<title>Re:Why not an app that is platform neutral?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267534260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Is it so hard to write an app that will run on multiple platforms?</p></div><p>In a nutshell, yes.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it so hard to write an app that will run on multiple platforms ? In a nutshell , yes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it so hard to write an app that will run on multiple platforms?In a nutshell, yes.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339704</id>
	<title>Linux + Petition</title>
	<author>markdavis</author>
	<datestamp>1267544400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wish they would focus on *ALL* the desktops FIRST, then worry about phones.  What about a Linux compatible Netflix player?  I know quite a few people who have waited a very long time and are irritated that absolutely nothing has been done.</p><p>Meanwhile, sign this petition:  <a href="http://www.petitiononline.com/Linflix/" title="petitiononline.com">http://www.petitiononline.com/Linflix/</a> [petitiononline.com]</p><p>Sure, it might not amount to anything, but you have no right to complain if you haven't at least tried (and this only takes 60 seconds or something).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wish they would focus on * ALL * the desktops FIRST , then worry about phones .
What about a Linux compatible Netflix player ?
I know quite a few people who have waited a very long time and are irritated that absolutely nothing has been done.Meanwhile , sign this petition : http : //www.petitiononline.com/Linflix/ [ petitiononline.com ] Sure , it might not amount to anything , but you have no right to complain if you have n't at least tried ( and this only takes 60 seconds or something ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wish they would focus on *ALL* the desktops FIRST, then worry about phones.
What about a Linux compatible Netflix player?
I know quite a few people who have waited a very long time and are irritated that absolutely nothing has been done.Meanwhile, sign this petition:  http://www.petitiononline.com/Linflix/ [petitiononline.com]Sure, it might not amount to anything, but you have no right to complain if you haven't at least tried (and this only takes 60 seconds or something).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31340454</id>
	<title>Re:Wi-Fi somewhat defeats the point.</title>
	<author>kehren77</author>
	<datestamp>1267551120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hell I'd love this so I could watch in bed while my wife is sleeping.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hell I 'd love this so I could watch in bed while my wife is sleeping .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hell I'd love this so I could watch in bed while my wife is sleeping.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338028</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31345822</id>
	<title>David Lynch</title>
	<author>jduhls</author>
	<datestamp>1267633020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKiIroiCvZ0" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">David Lynch</a> [youtube.com] has already taken the survey.</htmltext>
<tokenext>David Lynch [ youtube.com ] has already taken the survey .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>David Lynch [youtube.com] has already taken the survey.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31346722</id>
	<title>Re:Why not an app that is platform neutral?</title>
	<author>CompMD</author>
	<datestamp>1267636980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>" None of the other devices (WinMo, Symbian,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...) even have standard browsers with support for Flash OR HTML5 so web developing is also out of the picture."</p><p>BZZZTT.</p><p>Windows Mobile has had Flash on ARM for a while.  I would watch Homestar Runner in Pocket IE running on Windows Mobile 5 without any trouble.  Also, Windows Mobile devices built for the better part of the last decade will play MP4 or divx avis without any trouble.  Example: HTC Apache.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" None of the other devices ( WinMo , Symbian , ... ) even have standard browsers with support for Flash OR HTML5 so web developing is also out of the picture .
" BZZZTT.Windows Mobile has had Flash on ARM for a while .
I would watch Homestar Runner in Pocket IE running on Windows Mobile 5 without any trouble .
Also , Windows Mobile devices built for the better part of the last decade will play MP4 or divx avis without any trouble .
Example : HTC Apache .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>" None of the other devices (WinMo, Symbian, ...) even have standard browsers with support for Flash OR HTML5 so web developing is also out of the picture.
"BZZZTT.Windows Mobile has had Flash on ARM for a while.
I would watch Homestar Runner in Pocket IE running on Windows Mobile 5 without any trouble.
Also, Windows Mobile devices built for the better part of the last decade will play MP4 or divx avis without any trouble.
Example: HTC Apache.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338414</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31342510</id>
	<title>Re:Wi-Fi somewhat defeats the point.</title>
	<author>nametaken</author>
	<datestamp>1267612500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're right.  I have both an iPhone and an iPod Touch, and I'd be much happier about being able to watch netflix on any kind of linux box.  Linux media centers can't stream netflix because there's no silverlight drm (ick).  I almost wish they'd just used flash, but I guess the ceo of netflix is on the MS board of directors... so I guess it makes some sense.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're right .
I have both an iPhone and an iPod Touch , and I 'd be much happier about being able to watch netflix on any kind of linux box .
Linux media centers ca n't stream netflix because there 's no silverlight drm ( ick ) .
I almost wish they 'd just used flash , but I guess the ceo of netflix is on the MS board of directors... so I guess it makes some sense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're right.
I have both an iPhone and an iPod Touch, and I'd be much happier about being able to watch netflix on any kind of linux box.
Linux media centers can't stream netflix because there's no silverlight drm (ick).
I almost wish they'd just used flash, but I guess the ceo of netflix is on the MS board of directors... so I guess it makes some sense.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338028</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338590</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one?</title>
	<author>shivamib</author>
	<datestamp>1267536540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My thoughts exactly.<br><br>I used to have a Creative Zen Vision which had a pretty decent video quality and the only thing I ever watched was some Heroes episodes on a bus trip. And that was before high-definition.<br><br>Maybe some people don't care about quality, but I like my movies on a 1080p kickass flat screen and a trusty HTPC.<br><br>What we really need is more bandwidth.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My thoughts exactly.I used to have a Creative Zen Vision which had a pretty decent video quality and the only thing I ever watched was some Heroes episodes on a bus trip .
And that was before high-definition.Maybe some people do n't care about quality , but I like my movies on a 1080p kickass flat screen and a trusty HTPC.What we really need is more bandwidth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My thoughts exactly.I used to have a Creative Zen Vision which had a pretty decent video quality and the only thing I ever watched was some Heroes episodes on a bus trip.
And that was before high-definition.Maybe some people don't care about quality, but I like my movies on a 1080p kickass flat screen and a trusty HTPC.What we really need is more bandwidth.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31342614</id>
	<title>Re:No Silverlight!</title>
	<author>nametaken</author>
	<datestamp>1267613280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If that were the case I think someone would have already figured out how to emulate the clients in Blu-Ray players, TV's and Roku boxes.  But apparently they've locked that delivery mechanism down somehow to prevent portability and clearly have no interest in delivering to linux machines at large.  Netflix does have an evil side... customers with linux based media centers (where I'd guess linux is quite popular) are far less important than scratching backs at Microsoft, who desperately want to create a market for Silverlight.  Some have pointed out the ceo from Netflix is on the MS board of directors.  Surprise of surprises.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If that were the case I think someone would have already figured out how to emulate the clients in Blu-Ray players , TV 's and Roku boxes .
But apparently they 've locked that delivery mechanism down somehow to prevent portability and clearly have no interest in delivering to linux machines at large .
Netflix does have an evil side... customers with linux based media centers ( where I 'd guess linux is quite popular ) are far less important than scratching backs at Microsoft , who desperately want to create a market for Silverlight .
Some have pointed out the ceo from Netflix is on the MS board of directors .
Surprise of surprises .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If that were the case I think someone would have already figured out how to emulate the clients in Blu-Ray players, TV's and Roku boxes.
But apparently they've locked that delivery mechanism down somehow to prevent portability and clearly have no interest in delivering to linux machines at large.
Netflix does have an evil side... customers with linux based media centers (where I'd guess linux is quite popular) are far less important than scratching backs at Microsoft, who desperately want to create a market for Silverlight.
Some have pointed out the ceo from Netflix is on the MS board of directors.
Surprise of surprises.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338246</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338734</id>
	<title>Re:Gauge it out!</title>
	<author>asylumx</author>
	<datestamp>1267537140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Are you thinking of <i>gouge</i> by chance?  'Gauge' is a valid spelling (as is 'Gage', but that just doesn't look right).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you thinking of gouge by chance ?
'Gauge ' is a valid spelling ( as is 'Gage ' , but that just does n't look right ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you thinking of gouge by chance?
'Gauge' is a valid spelling (as is 'Gage', but that just doesn't look right).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338008</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338392</id>
	<title>Re:Wi-Fi somewhat defeats the point.</title>
	<author>interkin3tic</author>
	<datestamp>1267535580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>On the other hand, I'm sure a lot of AT&amp;T customers won't complain, as US cellular bandwidth is already spread thin.</p></div><p>Yes we will, for the reason you mentioned earlier!  We want to have our cake and eat it too!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>On the other hand , I 'm sure a lot of AT&amp;T customers wo n't complain , as US cellular bandwidth is already spread thin.Yes we will , for the reason you mentioned earlier !
We want to have our cake and eat it too !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the other hand, I'm sure a lot of AT&amp;T customers won't complain, as US cellular bandwidth is already spread thin.Yes we will, for the reason you mentioned earlier!
We want to have our cake and eat it too!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338028</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338108</id>
	<title>Re:Gauge it out!</title>
	<author>MillionthMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1267534320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I hope they have first gaged the interest</p></div><p>AT&amp;T has already gagged my interest after dropping all the calls I made from home or work. BTW I live 3 miles NE of Apple's headquarters and worked 2 miles SW of it. And I have been to Apple's headquarters; there is no AT&amp;T reception at all.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope they have first gaged the interestAT&amp;T has already gagged my interest after dropping all the calls I made from home or work .
BTW I live 3 miles NE of Apple 's headquarters and worked 2 miles SW of it .
And I have been to Apple 's headquarters ; there is no AT&amp;T reception at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope they have first gaged the interestAT&amp;T has already gagged my interest after dropping all the calls I made from home or work.
BTW I live 3 miles NE of Apple's headquarters and worked 2 miles SW of it.
And I have been to Apple's headquarters; there is no AT&amp;T reception at all.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338008</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338780</id>
	<title>Re:Why not an app that is platform neutral?</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1267537440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>And the iPhone has the biggest marketshare in 1. "smartphones that you can develop for without corporate support ($$$)" or 2. "smartphones with a viable marketplace" (of course success of 2 is because of 1).</i></p><p>Your source? Nokia beat them hands down in the mobile market - as do many other companies. Even adding the Ipod Touch doesn't change things significantly here.</p><p>As for cross-platform - well everyone else supports this technology for cross-platform apps that's been around for 15 years. It's not perfect, but it works for many things, and it means that things for phones aren't like the bad old days of the 80s where every platform was incompatible.</p><p><i>None of the other devices (WinMo, Symbian,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...) even have standard browsers with support for Flash</i></p><p>Eh what? My 5800 running Symbian runs a standard browser, and supports Flash just fine. It's Apple you're thinking of, that doesn't even support Flash yet.</p><p><i>Also the Maemo, Android and iPhone's are the only phones where the device is not locked down by default by the provider.</i></p><p>In what way? The Iphones are locked down more than most phones. How is my 5800 locked down? (Or indeed, my old Motorola V980, come to that?) I can run whatever I like, do what I like unlike a certain device that needs to be jailbroken all the time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And the iPhone has the biggest marketshare in 1 .
" smartphones that you can develop for without corporate support ( $ $ $ ) " or 2 .
" smartphones with a viable marketplace " ( of course success of 2 is because of 1 ) .Your source ?
Nokia beat them hands down in the mobile market - as do many other companies .
Even adding the Ipod Touch does n't change things significantly here.As for cross-platform - well everyone else supports this technology for cross-platform apps that 's been around for 15 years .
It 's not perfect , but it works for many things , and it means that things for phones are n't like the bad old days of the 80s where every platform was incompatible.None of the other devices ( WinMo , Symbian , ... ) even have standard browsers with support for FlashEh what ?
My 5800 running Symbian runs a standard browser , and supports Flash just fine .
It 's Apple you 're thinking of , that does n't even support Flash yet.Also the Maemo , Android and iPhone 's are the only phones where the device is not locked down by default by the provider.In what way ?
The Iphones are locked down more than most phones .
How is my 5800 locked down ?
( Or indeed , my old Motorola V980 , come to that ?
) I can run whatever I like , do what I like unlike a certain device that needs to be jailbroken all the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And the iPhone has the biggest marketshare in 1.
"smartphones that you can develop for without corporate support ($$$)" or 2.
"smartphones with a viable marketplace" (of course success of 2 is because of 1).Your source?
Nokia beat them hands down in the mobile market - as do many other companies.
Even adding the Ipod Touch doesn't change things significantly here.As for cross-platform - well everyone else supports this technology for cross-platform apps that's been around for 15 years.
It's not perfect, but it works for many things, and it means that things for phones aren't like the bad old days of the 80s where every platform was incompatible.None of the other devices (WinMo, Symbian, ...) even have standard browsers with support for FlashEh what?
My 5800 running Symbian runs a standard browser, and supports Flash just fine.
It's Apple you're thinking of, that doesn't even support Flash yet.Also the Maemo, Android and iPhone's are the only phones where the device is not locked down by default by the provider.In what way?
The Iphones are locked down more than most phones.
How is my 5800 locked down?
(Or indeed, my old Motorola V980, come to that?
) I can run whatever I like, do what I like unlike a certain device that needs to be jailbroken all the time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338414</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338144</id>
	<title>Taking it to the masses</title>
	<author>thescooterman</author>
	<datestamp>1267534500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Netflix is really one of the only companies on the net to stop worrying about the technology and build kick-ass applications to provide a great service to their users.  Although the implications of this on the network / device stack could be staggering[ly bad for networks], I think it's a truely powerful, world-changing 'app' that potential to take the internet from what it is today to further displacing traditional media outlets and actually 'synergizing paradigms'.

   ( Yes, I do feel dirty for my blatant utilization of the web bs generator: <a href="http://www.dack.com/web/bullshit.html" title="dack.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dack.com/web/bullshit.html</a> [dack.com])</htmltext>
<tokenext>Netflix is really one of the only companies on the net to stop worrying about the technology and build kick-ass applications to provide a great service to their users .
Although the implications of this on the network / device stack could be staggering [ ly bad for networks ] , I think it 's a truely powerful , world-changing 'app ' that potential to take the internet from what it is today to further displacing traditional media outlets and actually 'synergizing paradigms' .
( Yes , I do feel dirty for my blatant utilization of the web bs generator : http : //www.dack.com/web/bullshit.html [ dack.com ] )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Netflix is really one of the only companies on the net to stop worrying about the technology and build kick-ass applications to provide a great service to their users.
Although the implications of this on the network / device stack could be staggering[ly bad for networks], I think it's a truely powerful, world-changing 'app' that potential to take the internet from what it is today to further displacing traditional media outlets and actually 'synergizing paradigms'.
( Yes, I do feel dirty for my blatant utilization of the web bs generator: http://www.dack.com/web/bullshit.html [dack.com])</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337988</id>
	<title>Why not an app that is platform neutral?</title>
	<author>cavehobbit</author>
	<datestamp>1267533780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why all the love for a single platform?

Is it so hard to write an app that will run on multiple platforms?

Rim, WinMobile,, Symbian, Android/Linux....

Why all the hate for other platforms? Most outsell the iPhone</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why all the love for a single platform ?
Is it so hard to write an app that will run on multiple platforms ?
Rim , WinMobile, , Symbian , Android/Linux... . Why all the hate for other platforms ?
Most outsell the iPhone</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why all the love for a single platform?
Is it so hard to write an app that will run on multiple platforms?
Rim, WinMobile,, Symbian, Android/Linux....

Why all the hate for other platforms?
Most outsell the iPhone</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339022</id>
	<title>Re:Doubt it would be approved</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267538940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>XBOX not only supports, but actively promotes Netflix as a selling point even though they have their own Zune video rental/purchase library. But this is Apple we're talking about...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>XBOX not only supports , but actively promotes Netflix as a selling point even though they have their own Zune video rental/purchase library .
But this is Apple we 're talking about.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>XBOX not only supports, but actively promotes Netflix as a selling point even though they have their own Zune video rental/purchase library.
But this is Apple we're talking about...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337928</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338708</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267537020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I know that some people really do, apparently, want to watch full length movies on tiny, tiny, tiny devices.  I know that eventually these devices will have decent video out or projection capabilities.  I get that I'm not the only market, and I'm totally fine with that.</p><p>But what I don't understand is... the media is really putting out the impression that everybody wants to consume TV/movies/books on miniscule screens like the iPhone.  Even on an airplane I think that'd get tedious quickly.  And I've seen nothing to indicate that the iPhone is competent to deliver video on that scale, even over wifi (if you're on a plane that's serving wireless movies, how busy is that wifi?).  Oh well, at least Netflix has the sense to gauge how big the market is.</p><p>Can the iPhone battery even make it through 75 minutes of video + wifi?</p><p>Maybe this is all really for the iPad.  That would make more sense.</p></div><p> I was thinking the same,definately tailored for ipad.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know that some people really do , apparently , want to watch full length movies on tiny , tiny , tiny devices .
I know that eventually these devices will have decent video out or projection capabilities .
I get that I 'm not the only market , and I 'm totally fine with that.But what I do n't understand is... the media is really putting out the impression that everybody wants to consume TV/movies/books on miniscule screens like the iPhone .
Even on an airplane I think that 'd get tedious quickly .
And I 've seen nothing to indicate that the iPhone is competent to deliver video on that scale , even over wifi ( if you 're on a plane that 's serving wireless movies , how busy is that wifi ? ) .
Oh well , at least Netflix has the sense to gauge how big the market is.Can the iPhone battery even make it through 75 minutes of video + wifi ? Maybe this is all really for the iPad .
That would make more sense .
I was thinking the same,definately tailored for ipad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know that some people really do, apparently, want to watch full length movies on tiny, tiny, tiny devices.
I know that eventually these devices will have decent video out or projection capabilities.
I get that I'm not the only market, and I'm totally fine with that.But what I don't understand is... the media is really putting out the impression that everybody wants to consume TV/movies/books on miniscule screens like the iPhone.
Even on an airplane I think that'd get tedious quickly.
And I've seen nothing to indicate that the iPhone is competent to deliver video on that scale, even over wifi (if you're on a plane that's serving wireless movies, how busy is that wifi?).
Oh well, at least Netflix has the sense to gauge how big the market is.Can the iPhone battery even make it through 75 minutes of video + wifi?Maybe this is all really for the iPad.
That would make more sense.
I was thinking the same,definately tailored for ipad.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338018</id>
	<title>Something I am actually interested in</title>
	<author>hamburgler007</author>
	<datestamp>1267533960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was actually searching online the other day for news on this.  Whether or not such an app would be approved as the above poster stated is a different matter.  I'm not sure how practical it would be either, watching a full length movie would pretty much drain the battery without an external power source.  Also, video over 3g would be questionable, waiting for a movie to buffer every 30 seconds would kill the enjoyment.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was actually searching online the other day for news on this .
Whether or not such an app would be approved as the above poster stated is a different matter .
I 'm not sure how practical it would be either , watching a full length movie would pretty much drain the battery without an external power source .
Also , video over 3g would be questionable , waiting for a movie to buffer every 30 seconds would kill the enjoyment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was actually searching online the other day for news on this.
Whether or not such an app would be approved as the above poster stated is a different matter.
I'm not sure how practical it would be either, watching a full length movie would pretty much drain the battery without an external power source.
Also, video over 3g would be questionable, waiting for a movie to buffer every 30 seconds would kill the enjoyment.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31340308</id>
	<title>Re:Doubt it would be approved</title>
	<author>HeronBlademaster</author>
	<datestamp>1267549800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Other people offer Apple-approved streaming video programs for the iPhone, including one by CBS which I believe lets you watch (among other things) the original Star Trek series.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Other people offer Apple-approved streaming video programs for the iPhone , including one by CBS which I believe lets you watch ( among other things ) the original Star Trek series .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Other people offer Apple-approved streaming video programs for the iPhone, including one by CBS which I believe lets you watch (among other things) the original Star Trek series.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337928</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338634</id>
	<title>Re:iPad?</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1267536720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But you can already get a similar sized device, for much cheaper, that already support Netflix. Just not from Apple (i.e., netbooks). Hardly "killer app", by definition.</p><p>Personally for phones, I'd me more interested on them first supporting the major platforms such as Nokia, rather than starting with less than 5\% of the market.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But you can already get a similar sized device , for much cheaper , that already support Netflix .
Just not from Apple ( i.e. , netbooks ) .
Hardly " killer app " , by definition.Personally for phones , I 'd me more interested on them first supporting the major platforms such as Nokia , rather than starting with less than 5 \ % of the market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But you can already get a similar sized device, for much cheaper, that already support Netflix.
Just not from Apple (i.e., netbooks).
Hardly "killer app", by definition.Personally for phones, I'd me more interested on them first supporting the major platforms such as Nokia, rather than starting with less than 5\% of the market.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337918</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338434</id>
	<title>Re:Is NetFlix big enough to avoid the fickle banni</title>
	<author>interkin3tic</author>
	<datestamp>1267535880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So is NetFlix big enough to avoid having the app pulled when someone realizes you can see non-PG13 films?</p></div><p>They are big enough to a bribe to Apple, yes.  Don't know if they feel a need to or if the two will approach each other like that.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So is NetFlix big enough to avoid having the app pulled when someone realizes you can see non-PG13 films ? They are big enough to a bribe to Apple , yes .
Do n't know if they feel a need to or if the two will approach each other like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So is NetFlix big enough to avoid having the app pulled when someone realizes you can see non-PG13 films?They are big enough to a bribe to Apple, yes.
Don't know if they feel a need to or if the two will approach each other like that.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31341088</id>
	<title>Re:Why not an app that is platform neutral?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267556880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why all the love for a single platform?

Is it so hard to write an app that will run on multiple platforms?

Rim, WinMobile,, Symbian, Android/Linux....

Why all the hate for other platforms? Most outsell the iPhone</p></div><p>Get real. There is no RIM tablet. Android is fragmented already with many problems facing developers. There are over seventy five million Apple Touch OS devices already out there to slip a NetFlix app on. There return on investment seems to be pretty good to me.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why all the love for a single platform ?
Is it so hard to write an app that will run on multiple platforms ?
Rim , WinMobile, , Symbian , Android/Linux... . Why all the hate for other platforms ?
Most outsell the iPhoneGet real .
There is no RIM tablet .
Android is fragmented already with many problems facing developers .
There are over seventy five million Apple Touch OS devices already out there to slip a NetFlix app on .
There return on investment seems to be pretty good to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why all the love for a single platform?
Is it so hard to write an app that will run on multiple platforms?
Rim, WinMobile,, Symbian, Android/Linux....

Why all the hate for other platforms?
Most outsell the iPhoneGet real.
There is no RIM tablet.
Android is fragmented already with many problems facing developers.
There are over seventy five million Apple Touch OS devices already out there to slip a NetFlix app on.
There return on investment seems to be pretty good to me.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31347766</id>
	<title>Re:iPad?</title>
	<author>painandgreed</author>
	<datestamp>1267641300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, there is form factor and desirable characteristics. The iPad is half the weight and thickness as most of the netbooks I've looked at. That's important if only using it to watch movies and read while on vacation and I'm wanting to lighten my carry on bag even more. I also think the slate form makes for a batter movie watcher and text reader than the laptop form factor. Especially if wanting to put it on the little shelf of the exercise machine at the gym so I can watch a show during my 40 minute workout or desire a rotating screen for different layouts of PDFs. The netbook would probably be better for text editing and file storage of photos which are things I would need if replacing my current laptop while on vacation. A lighter, thinner tablet netbook would be better than the iPad, but I doubt it would still be cheaper.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , there is form factor and desirable characteristics .
The iPad is half the weight and thickness as most of the netbooks I 've looked at .
That 's important if only using it to watch movies and read while on vacation and I 'm wanting to lighten my carry on bag even more .
I also think the slate form makes for a batter movie watcher and text reader than the laptop form factor .
Especially if wanting to put it on the little shelf of the exercise machine at the gym so I can watch a show during my 40 minute workout or desire a rotating screen for different layouts of PDFs .
The netbook would probably be better for text editing and file storage of photos which are things I would need if replacing my current laptop while on vacation .
A lighter , thinner tablet netbook would be better than the iPad , but I doubt it would still be cheaper .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, there is form factor and desirable characteristics.
The iPad is half the weight and thickness as most of the netbooks I've looked at.
That's important if only using it to watch movies and read while on vacation and I'm wanting to lighten my carry on bag even more.
I also think the slate form makes for a batter movie watcher and text reader than the laptop form factor.
Especially if wanting to put it on the little shelf of the exercise machine at the gym so I can watch a show during my 40 minute workout or desire a rotating screen for different layouts of PDFs.
The netbook would probably be better for text editing and file storage of photos which are things I would need if replacing my current laptop while on vacation.
A lighter, thinner tablet netbook would be better than the iPad, but I doubt it would still be cheaper.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338060</id>
	<title>Is NetFlix big enough to avoid the fickle banning?</title>
	<author>Kenja</author>
	<datestamp>1267534140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>So is NetFlix big enough to avoid having the app pulled when someone realizes you can see non-PG13 films?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So is NetFlix big enough to avoid having the app pulled when someone realizes you can see non-PG13 films ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So is NetFlix big enough to avoid having the app pulled when someone realizes you can see non-PG13 films?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31344732</id>
	<title>Queue management</title>
	<author>Ian Lamont</author>
	<datestamp>1267628400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It is apparent to Netflix (from <a href="http://www.netflix.com/AppGallery" title="netflix.com" rel="nofollow">its indie apps gallery</a> [netflix.com]) that there is a huge interest in mobile apps, especially those dedicated to Netflix queue management. It really is a useful application for people who like to add new films recommended by friends, TV programs, and ads.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is apparent to Netflix ( from its indie apps gallery [ netflix.com ] ) that there is a huge interest in mobile apps , especially those dedicated to Netflix queue management .
It really is a useful application for people who like to add new films recommended by friends , TV programs , and ads .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is apparent to Netflix (from its indie apps gallery [netflix.com]) that there is a huge interest in mobile apps, especially those dedicated to Netflix queue management.
It really is a useful application for people who like to add new films recommended by friends, TV programs, and ads.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338246</id>
	<title>No Silverlight!</title>
	<author>Verdatum</author>
	<datestamp>1267534980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I should hope that an iPhone app would mean that the streaming would not take place over silverlight.  If that's true, there's a much better chance that an app that emulates the protocol can be written for things like Linux (Including Maemo) and Android.  If they could just bring back streaming over Flash (or add streaming over HTML 5), then it would be much more trivial to grant support for all these other platforms.</p><p>Ah well, I dream with fingers crossed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I should hope that an iPhone app would mean that the streaming would not take place over silverlight .
If that 's true , there 's a much better chance that an app that emulates the protocol can be written for things like Linux ( Including Maemo ) and Android .
If they could just bring back streaming over Flash ( or add streaming over HTML 5 ) , then it would be much more trivial to grant support for all these other platforms.Ah well , I dream with fingers crossed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I should hope that an iPhone app would mean that the streaming would not take place over silverlight.
If that's true, there's a much better chance that an app that emulates the protocol can be written for things like Linux (Including Maemo) and Android.
If they could just bring back streaming over Flash (or add streaming over HTML 5), then it would be much more trivial to grant support for all these other platforms.Ah well, I dream with fingers crossed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338028</id>
	<title>Wi-Fi somewhat defeats the point.</title>
	<author>pushing-robot</author>
	<datestamp>1267533960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you're at home, you've got a bigger screen.  If you're at work, or a McDonalds/Starbucks/whatever, you probably won't be watching movies.  I can see some applications for this, but not being able to use it outside a hotspot certainly hobbles it.</p><p>On the other hand, I'm sure a lot of AT&amp;T customers won't complain, as US cellular bandwidth is already spread thin.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're at home , you 've got a bigger screen .
If you 're at work , or a McDonalds/Starbucks/whatever , you probably wo n't be watching movies .
I can see some applications for this , but not being able to use it outside a hotspot certainly hobbles it.On the other hand , I 'm sure a lot of AT&amp;T customers wo n't complain , as US cellular bandwidth is already spread thin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're at home, you've got a bigger screen.
If you're at work, or a McDonalds/Starbucks/whatever, you probably won't be watching movies.
I can see some applications for this, but not being able to use it outside a hotspot certainly hobbles it.On the other hand, I'm sure a lot of AT&amp;T customers won't complain, as US cellular bandwidth is already spread thin.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339240</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one?</title>
	<author>jedidiah</author>
	<datestamp>1267540560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh. Nothing distracts you from an 18 hour flight quite as easily as a movie on an undersized screen.</p><p>Of course the plane probably has it's own media server and remarkably better options than your phone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh .
Nothing distracts you from an 18 hour flight quite as easily as a movie on an undersized screen.Of course the plane probably has it 's own media server and remarkably better options than your phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh.
Nothing distracts you from an 18 hour flight quite as easily as a movie on an undersized screen.Of course the plane probably has it's own media server and remarkably better options than your phone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338886</id>
	<title>Myth TV!</title>
	<author>jtosburn</author>
	<datestamp>1267538040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd so much rather be able to watch Netflix stuff via MythTV that it's not even funny.  My iphone is for only worth using for 15 minutes or less at a time.  After that, the small screen wears on me, and I realize that that may just be me.  I guess an iPad would solve that problem, but really, I'd rather watch movies across the room on the tv, rather than on my lap, unable to move my arm, with my spouse looking over my shoulder.</p><p>Hey Netflix!  Let us watch stuff on linux!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd so much rather be able to watch Netflix stuff via MythTV that it 's not even funny .
My iphone is for only worth using for 15 minutes or less at a time .
After that , the small screen wears on me , and I realize that that may just be me .
I guess an iPad would solve that problem , but really , I 'd rather watch movies across the room on the tv , rather than on my lap , unable to move my arm , with my spouse looking over my shoulder.Hey Netflix !
Let us watch stuff on linux !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd so much rather be able to watch Netflix stuff via MythTV that it's not even funny.
My iphone is for only worth using for 15 minutes or less at a time.
After that, the small screen wears on me, and I realize that that may just be me.
I guess an iPad would solve that problem, but really, I'd rather watch movies across the room on the tv, rather than on my lap, unable to move my arm, with my spouse looking over my shoulder.Hey Netflix!
Let us watch stuff on linux!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338798</id>
	<title>Re:Why not an app that is platform neutral?</title>
	<author>mswhippingboy</author>
	<datestamp>1267537560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Java will run on all platforms except (non-jail broken) iPhones, although even this can be gotten around via some tools (xmlvm, metismo, etc).

BTW, java could technically run on the iPhone but Apple won't allow it (for a boatload of BS reasons, when in reality it boils down to greed and customer control). Just another reason to skip the iPhone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Java will run on all platforms except ( non-jail broken ) iPhones , although even this can be gotten around via some tools ( xmlvm , metismo , etc ) .
BTW , java could technically run on the iPhone but Apple wo n't allow it ( for a boatload of BS reasons , when in reality it boils down to greed and customer control ) .
Just another reason to skip the iPhone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Java will run on all platforms except (non-jail broken) iPhones, although even this can be gotten around via some tools (xmlvm, metismo, etc).
BTW, java could technically run on the iPhone but Apple won't allow it (for a boatload of BS reasons, when in reality it boils down to greed and customer control).
Just another reason to skip the iPhone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338414</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338138</id>
	<title>how about improve the mobile site first?</title>
	<author>phideaux3</author>
	<datestamp>1267534440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>
It'd be useful if the home site detected the browser and redirected to the mobile site.  Many probably don't even know about mobile.netflix.com because they don't get redirected.

Would be great if sub-queues could be accessed when mobile, but they wanted to kill those anyway...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 'd be useful if the home site detected the browser and redirected to the mobile site .
Many probably do n't even know about mobile.netflix.com because they do n't get redirected .
Would be great if sub-queues could be accessed when mobile , but they wanted to kill those anyway... : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
It'd be useful if the home site detected the browser and redirected to the mobile site.
Many probably don't even know about mobile.netflix.com because they don't get redirected.
Would be great if sub-queues could be accessed when mobile, but they wanted to kill those anyway... :(</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339598</id>
	<title>Re:Doubt it would be approved</title>
	<author>tooyoung</author>
	<datestamp>1267543680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Apple would trade iTunes movie rentals for iPod Touch/iPhone/iPad sales in a heartbeat.  iTunes is certainly popular, but how many users rent the videos?  Why not let a separate company worry about the movie rental business, while you sell hardware to their customers?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple would trade iTunes movie rentals for iPod Touch/iPhone/iPad sales in a heartbeat .
iTunes is certainly popular , but how many users rent the videos ?
Why not let a separate company worry about the movie rental business , while you sell hardware to their customers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple would trade iTunes movie rentals for iPod Touch/iPhone/iPad sales in a heartbeat.
iTunes is certainly popular, but how many users rent the videos?
Why not let a separate company worry about the movie rental business, while you sell hardware to their customers?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337928</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338554</id>
	<title>Depends on provider</title>
	<author>LoudMusic</author>
	<datestamp>1267536360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On AT&amp;T? Not interested.</p><p>On someone else's network? Yeah, maybe. How about an Android app?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On AT&amp;T ?
Not interested.On someone else 's network ?
Yeah , maybe .
How about an Android app ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On AT&amp;T?
Not interested.On someone else's network?
Yeah, maybe.
How about an Android app?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31341188</id>
	<title>iPhone? Pickles</title>
	<author>hduff</author>
	<datestamp>1267557840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's a nap for that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a nap for that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a nap for that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31354244</id>
	<title>Netbooks suck.</title>
	<author>MikeFM</author>
	<datestamp>1267635180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah but netbooks suck. You're running cheap crappy hardware with a clunky badly designed dinosaur of an OS. Why the heck would you want to do that when you can have a slick well made product with well designed software actually made for the device for a couple hundred dollars more?

A netbook might be fine for a kid if you don't mind worrying about it getting broken, infected, or just plain hard to use but it isn't a product for anybody that wants to get anything done. The iPhone was usable by my daughter when she was six months old (and she is an expert at 20 months) and is usable by my non-geek parents and enjoyed by uber-geek me. I can't say the same for any netbook or even PC I've seen. I even tried a XO which IMO is a cute device but has one of the worst interfaces ever seen. I actually like netbooks but seriously they don't even compete on usability or durability.

The one real fault I've had with the iPhone/iTouch was the screen being to small to effectively use for some tasks such as web browsing, reading large books/documents, and VNC. I think the iPad is going to solve that issue pretty well. It's a lot handier for most people to watch Netflix on than a netbook and is far more likely to dock to your tv. The only device I'd say is likely to compare, thus far, would be the Archos. If Apple can throw in nice features like parental controls and network printing and file sharing they'll be a solid option as a family and school device.

Of course I'll hold out for the 3D movies that'll come out with the iPad 3D that uses a built-in holographic projector. The company that puts out a consumer computer that has such a display and the ability to take input from my hands waving around in the air will fulfill my childhood fantasies.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah but netbooks suck .
You 're running cheap crappy hardware with a clunky badly designed dinosaur of an OS .
Why the heck would you want to do that when you can have a slick well made product with well designed software actually made for the device for a couple hundred dollars more ?
A netbook might be fine for a kid if you do n't mind worrying about it getting broken , infected , or just plain hard to use but it is n't a product for anybody that wants to get anything done .
The iPhone was usable by my daughter when she was six months old ( and she is an expert at 20 months ) and is usable by my non-geek parents and enjoyed by uber-geek me .
I ca n't say the same for any netbook or even PC I 've seen .
I even tried a XO which IMO is a cute device but has one of the worst interfaces ever seen .
I actually like netbooks but seriously they do n't even compete on usability or durability .
The one real fault I 've had with the iPhone/iTouch was the screen being to small to effectively use for some tasks such as web browsing , reading large books/documents , and VNC .
I think the iPad is going to solve that issue pretty well .
It 's a lot handier for most people to watch Netflix on than a netbook and is far more likely to dock to your tv .
The only device I 'd say is likely to compare , thus far , would be the Archos .
If Apple can throw in nice features like parental controls and network printing and file sharing they 'll be a solid option as a family and school device .
Of course I 'll hold out for the 3D movies that 'll come out with the iPad 3D that uses a built-in holographic projector .
The company that puts out a consumer computer that has such a display and the ability to take input from my hands waving around in the air will fulfill my childhood fantasies .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah but netbooks suck.
You're running cheap crappy hardware with a clunky badly designed dinosaur of an OS.
Why the heck would you want to do that when you can have a slick well made product with well designed software actually made for the device for a couple hundred dollars more?
A netbook might be fine for a kid if you don't mind worrying about it getting broken, infected, or just plain hard to use but it isn't a product for anybody that wants to get anything done.
The iPhone was usable by my daughter when she was six months old (and she is an expert at 20 months) and is usable by my non-geek parents and enjoyed by uber-geek me.
I can't say the same for any netbook or even PC I've seen.
I even tried a XO which IMO is a cute device but has one of the worst interfaces ever seen.
I actually like netbooks but seriously they don't even compete on usability or durability.
The one real fault I've had with the iPhone/iTouch was the screen being to small to effectively use for some tasks such as web browsing, reading large books/documents, and VNC.
I think the iPad is going to solve that issue pretty well.
It's a lot handier for most people to watch Netflix on than a netbook and is far more likely to dock to your tv.
The only device I'd say is likely to compare, thus far, would be the Archos.
If Apple can throw in nice features like parental controls and network printing and file sharing they'll be a solid option as a family and school device.
Of course I'll hold out for the 3D movies that'll come out with the iPad 3D that uses a built-in holographic projector.
The company that puts out a consumer computer that has such a display and the ability to take input from my hands waving around in the air will fulfill my childhood fantasies.
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337918</id>
	<title>iPad?</title>
	<author>painandgreed</author>
	<datestamp>1267533540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Screw the iPhone. This would actually make me want an iPad (and was actually the killer app I was expecting to be previewed when the iPad was demonstrated).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Screw the iPhone .
This would actually make me want an iPad ( and was actually the killer app I was expecting to be previewed when the iPad was demonstrated ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Screw the iPhone.
This would actually make me want an iPad (and was actually the killer app I was expecting to be previewed when the iPad was demonstrated).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338324</id>
	<title>I'd rather have AppleTV</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267535280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Give me streaming support for Netflix on my AppleTV similar to what Xbox 360 currently enjoys and I'd be using it many times more than I would even be considering the iPhone app for the same.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Give me streaming support for Netflix on my AppleTV similar to what Xbox 360 currently enjoys and I 'd be using it many times more than I would even be considering the iPhone app for the same .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Give me streaming support for Netflix on my AppleTV similar to what Xbox 360 currently enjoys and I'd be using it many times more than I would even be considering the iPhone app for the same.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337928</id>
	<title>Doubt it would be approved</title>
	<author>Kitkoan</author>
	<datestamp>1267533540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wouldn't this be similar to 'offering a function alreday available' a la iTunes movie rentals? While it would stream where the iTunes won't, it still will directly compete against Apple's iTune movie rentals.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't this be similar to 'offering a function alreday available ' a la iTunes movie rentals ?
While it would stream where the iTunes wo n't , it still will directly compete against Apple 's iTune movie rentals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't this be similar to 'offering a function alreday available' a la iTunes movie rentals?
While it would stream where the iTunes won't, it still will directly compete against Apple's iTune movie rentals.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339108</id>
	<title>How about Linux support?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267539540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are more linux desktop support than iphone owners, yet we still get no netflix client.</p><p>Or hell they could roll out HD on Mac or Windows.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are more linux desktop support than iphone owners , yet we still get no netflix client.Or hell they could roll out HD on Mac or Windows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are more linux desktop support than iphone owners, yet we still get no netflix client.Or hell they could roll out HD on Mac or Windows.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338940</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one?</title>
	<author>Dalambertian</author>
	<datestamp>1267538460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And I've seen nothing to indicate that the iPhone is competent to deliver video on that scale, even over wifi</p> </div><p>You could spend a couple hours just catching up on movie trailers via Flixster, and there's plenty of long-format content on youtube. Then there's all the video podcasts that can be watched streaming... wait a minute, do you even own an iPhone/iPod touch?</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Maybe this is all really for the iPad.  That would make more sense.</p></div><p>This would be great for the iPad, which we should note is supposed to be backward compatible with iPhone apps.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And I 've seen nothing to indicate that the iPhone is competent to deliver video on that scale , even over wifi You could spend a couple hours just catching up on movie trailers via Flixster , and there 's plenty of long-format content on youtube .
Then there 's all the video podcasts that can be watched streaming... wait a minute , do you even own an iPhone/iPod touch ? Maybe this is all really for the iPad .
That would make more sense.This would be great for the iPad , which we should note is supposed to be backward compatible with iPhone apps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I've seen nothing to indicate that the iPhone is competent to deliver video on that scale, even over wifi You could spend a couple hours just catching up on movie trailers via Flixster, and there's plenty of long-format content on youtube.
Then there's all the video podcasts that can be watched streaming... wait a minute, do you even own an iPhone/iPod touch?Maybe this is all really for the iPad.
That would make more sense.This would be great for the iPad, which we should note is supposed to be backward compatible with iPhone apps.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338826</id>
	<title>Re:Something I am actually interested in</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267537680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>waiting for a movie to buffer every 30 seconds would kill the enjoyment.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
And why shouldn't it be the same experience as every other time I've tried to "watch instantly" something from Netflix?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>waiting for a movie to buffer every 30 seconds would kill the enjoyment .
And why should n't it be the same experience as every other time I 've tried to " watch instantly " something from Netflix ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>waiting for a movie to buffer every 30 seconds would kill the enjoyment.
And why shouldn't it be the same experience as every other time I've tried to "watch instantly" something from Netflix?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338508</id>
	<title>Sorry, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267536240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>....no. I dislike Netflix for trying to help force me to buy movies I may or may not like. Making me wait 28 days before a new release can be sent to your door. No thanks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>....no .
I dislike Netflix for trying to help force me to buy movies I may or may not like .
Making me wait 28 days before a new release can be sent to your door .
No thanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>....no.
I dislike Netflix for trying to help force me to buy movies I may or may not like.
Making me wait 28 days before a new release can be sent to your door.
No thanks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338766</id>
	<title>It wont last</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267537320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sure Netflix will have an app, that is until Crapple decides to block their app and only allow crapple itunes movies for a pay per fee.  Crapple is just as evil as M$ and Google.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure Netflix will have an app , that is until Crapple decides to block their app and only allow crapple itunes movies for a pay per fee .
Crapple is just as evil as M $ and Google .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure Netflix will have an app, that is until Crapple decides to block their app and only allow crapple itunes movies for a pay per fee.
Crapple is just as evil as M$ and Google.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31340440</id>
	<title>Re:Why not an app that is platform neutral?</title>
	<author>kehren77</author>
	<datestamp>1267551000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well for one thing, Verizon had a habit of forcing RIM to remove WiFi from their Blackberry models for a while there (Speaking as a Curve 8330 owner). The iPhone is just a natural place for them to expand next. Maybe they will start to branch out into other cell phone platforms down the road, but for now it makes sense to go where the buzz is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well for one thing , Verizon had a habit of forcing RIM to remove WiFi from their Blackberry models for a while there ( Speaking as a Curve 8330 owner ) .
The iPhone is just a natural place for them to expand next .
Maybe they will start to branch out into other cell phone platforms down the road , but for now it makes sense to go where the buzz is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well for one thing, Verizon had a habit of forcing RIM to remove WiFi from their Blackberry models for a while there (Speaking as a Curve 8330 owner).
The iPhone is just a natural place for them to expand next.
Maybe they will start to branch out into other cell phone platforms down the road, but for now it makes sense to go where the buzz is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338276</id>
	<title>Re:Something I am actually interested in</title>
	<author>Aqualung812</author>
	<datestamp>1267535100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>video over 3g would be questionable</p></div></blockquote><p>
Dude, both TFA and the summary point out that it is only for WiFi.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>video over 3g would be questionable Dude , both TFA and the summary point out that it is only for WiFi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>video over 3g would be questionable
Dude, both TFA and the summary point out that it is only for WiFi.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338058</id>
	<title>Am I the only one?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267534140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know that some people really do, apparently, want to watch full length movies on tiny, tiny, tiny devices.  I know that eventually these devices will have decent video out or projection capabilities.  I get that I'm not the only market, and I'm totally fine with that.<br><br>But what I don't understand is... the media is really putting out the impression that everybody wants to consume TV/movies/books on miniscule screens like the iPhone.  Even on an airplane I think that'd get tedious quickly.  And I've seen nothing to indicate that the iPhone is competent to deliver video on that scale, even over wifi (if you're on a plane that's serving wireless movies, how busy is that wifi?).  Oh well, at least Netflix has the sense to gauge how big the market is.<br><br>Can the iPhone battery even make it through 75 minutes of video + wifi?<br><br>Maybe this is all really for the iPad.  That would make more sense.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know that some people really do , apparently , want to watch full length movies on tiny , tiny , tiny devices .
I know that eventually these devices will have decent video out or projection capabilities .
I get that I 'm not the only market , and I 'm totally fine with that.But what I do n't understand is... the media is really putting out the impression that everybody wants to consume TV/movies/books on miniscule screens like the iPhone .
Even on an airplane I think that 'd get tedious quickly .
And I 've seen nothing to indicate that the iPhone is competent to deliver video on that scale , even over wifi ( if you 're on a plane that 's serving wireless movies , how busy is that wifi ? ) .
Oh well , at least Netflix has the sense to gauge how big the market is.Can the iPhone battery even make it through 75 minutes of video + wifi ? Maybe this is all really for the iPad .
That would make more sense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know that some people really do, apparently, want to watch full length movies on tiny, tiny, tiny devices.
I know that eventually these devices will have decent video out or projection capabilities.
I get that I'm not the only market, and I'm totally fine with that.But what I don't understand is... the media is really putting out the impression that everybody wants to consume TV/movies/books on miniscule screens like the iPhone.
Even on an airplane I think that'd get tedious quickly.
And I've seen nothing to indicate that the iPhone is competent to deliver video on that scale, even over wifi (if you're on a plane that's serving wireless movies, how busy is that wifi?).
Oh well, at least Netflix has the sense to gauge how big the market is.Can the iPhone battery even make it through 75 minutes of video + wifi?Maybe this is all really for the iPad.
That would make more sense.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31340126</id>
	<title>Re:Doubt it would be approved</title>
	<author>vertinox</author>
	<datestamp>1267548300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Wouldn't this be similar to 'offering a function alreday available' a la iTunes movie rentals? While it would stream where the iTunes won't, it still will directly compete against Apple's iTune movie rentals.</i></p><p>Depends...</p><p>On how much Netflix slips Apple under the table.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't this be similar to 'offering a function alreday available ' a la iTunes movie rentals ?
While it would stream where the iTunes wo n't , it still will directly compete against Apple 's iTune movie rentals.Depends...On how much Netflix slips Apple under the table .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't this be similar to 'offering a function alreday available' a la iTunes movie rentals?
While it would stream where the iTunes won't, it still will directly compete against Apple's iTune movie rentals.Depends...On how much Netflix slips Apple under the table.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337928</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31354288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338414
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31340120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338780
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338414
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339022
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337928
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338414
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31340680
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338414
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31340308
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337928
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31340454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31341088
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31340596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338246
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31340324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338060
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31340440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339598
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337928
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337928
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339036
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339522
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339556
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338246
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31342510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31354244
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31342614
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338246
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31346722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338414
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338078
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338708
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338232
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338392
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31347766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_2014253_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31340126
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337928
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_2014253.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339108
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_2014253.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338982
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_2014253.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338058
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339608
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338940
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338708
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339036
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339228
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31340324
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339556
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339240
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338590
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_2014253.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339704
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_2014253.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338018
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338826
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338232
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338276
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_2014253.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338008
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338734
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338108
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_2014253.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338886
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_2014253.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338554
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_2014253.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338324
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_2014253.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337918
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338634
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31347766
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31354244
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338822
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_2014253.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337928
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339022
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31340308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339598
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339620
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31340126
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_2014253.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338246
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339184
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31342614
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31340596
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_2014253.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338060
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338434
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_2014253.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338508
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_2014253.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31337988
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31354288
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338078
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338414
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339070
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338798
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31340680
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31346722
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338780
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31340440
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31341088
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_2014253.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338028
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31338392
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31342510
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31339522
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31340120
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_2014253.31340454
</commentlist>
</conversation>
