<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_02_1819211</id>
	<title>SCO Zombie McBride's New Plan For World Litigation</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1267518720000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>eldavojohn writes <i>"Years after you thought it was all over, Groklaw is reporting that Darl McBride (ex-CEO of SCO) has formed a new company that is buying SCO's mobile business for peanuts &mdash; but he's also going to <a href="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2010022701114662">get 'certain Intellectual Property' with the deal</a>. You may recall that McBride was the brains behind the Linux lawsuits that SCO launched and it appears he may be orchestrating an exit route where he escapes with some IP intact, in order to wreak havoc once again. Hopefully this is the part at the end of the movie where the zombie comes back to life one last time only to have the hero deliver the final final blow. When this news broke upon the investment world, SCO's stock skyrocketed <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=OTC\%3ASCOXQ">a blistering 11\%</a>, bringing it up seven cents to a full seventy cents &mdash; a level which it <a href="//linux.slashdot.org/story/07/12/27/1438204/SCO-Receives-Nasdaqs-Delisting-Notice">has not achieved</a> since 2007."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>eldavojohn writes " Years after you thought it was all over , Groklaw is reporting that Darl McBride ( ex-CEO of SCO ) has formed a new company that is buying SCO 's mobile business for peanuts    but he 's also going to get 'certain Intellectual Property ' with the deal .
You may recall that McBride was the brains behind the Linux lawsuits that SCO launched and it appears he may be orchestrating an exit route where he escapes with some IP intact , in order to wreak havoc once again .
Hopefully this is the part at the end of the movie where the zombie comes back to life one last time only to have the hero deliver the final final blow .
When this news broke upon the investment world , SCO 's stock skyrocketed a blistering 11 \ % , bringing it up seven cents to a full seventy cents    a level which it has not achieved since 2007 .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>eldavojohn writes "Years after you thought it was all over, Groklaw is reporting that Darl McBride (ex-CEO of SCO) has formed a new company that is buying SCO's mobile business for peanuts — but he's also going to get 'certain Intellectual Property' with the deal.
You may recall that McBride was the brains behind the Linux lawsuits that SCO launched and it appears he may be orchestrating an exit route where he escapes with some IP intact, in order to wreak havoc once again.
Hopefully this is the part at the end of the movie where the zombie comes back to life one last time only to have the hero deliver the final final blow.
When this news broke upon the investment world, SCO's stock skyrocketed a blistering 11\%, bringing it up seven cents to a full seventy cents — a level which it has not achieved since 2007.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31346634</id>
	<title>McBride</title>
	<author>hackus</author>
	<datestamp>1267636680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Number 1:</p><p>He better start his own company, because the only idiot that would hire the guy is himself.</p><p>Number 2:</p><p>Can't wait to NOT BUY A DAMN THING from ANY COMPANY THAT BEARS HIS NAME.</p><p>-Hack</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Number 1 : He better start his own company , because the only idiot that would hire the guy is himself.Number 2 : Ca n't wait to NOT BUY A DAMN THING from ANY COMPANY THAT BEARS HIS NAME.-Hack</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Number 1:He better start his own company, because the only idiot that would hire the guy is himself.Number 2:Can't wait to NOT BUY A DAMN THING from ANY COMPANY THAT BEARS HIS NAME.-Hack</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31340570</id>
	<title>Microsoft was the "brains" behind the scox-scam</title>
	<author>walterbyrd</author>
	<datestamp>1267552080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't it obvious? Msft financed the entire scox-scam. The entire thing is just a msft PR stunt. It is supposed to scare people away from using Linux, and it's supposed to scare companies away from contributing to Linux.</p><p>Think about it: how did scox intend to finance the mega-expensive lawsuit? Scox did not have that kind of money - not even close. Then in jumps msft with tens of millions of dollars, how convenient.</p><p>And why sue IBM? IBM was never even a Linux distributor. Hint: IBM had just contributed a file system to Linux, and that p!ssed msft off. If scox thought there was infringing IP in Linux, scox would have sued Redhat. The lawsuit is not supposed to be "won" in the conventional sense. The lawsuit is supposed to be dragged on and on. BTW: I think it's the 7 year anniversary of the original lawsuit.</p><p>Anybody who is familiar with how msft operates should recognize the MO right away. Has anybody noticed that thy usual msft shills - like Enderle - have been championing the scox since day one?</p><p>Darl, and his brother Kevin, are just a couple of Utah hicks who got lucky. They were never the brains behind anything.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't it obvious ?
Msft financed the entire scox-scam .
The entire thing is just a msft PR stunt .
It is supposed to scare people away from using Linux , and it 's supposed to scare companies away from contributing to Linux.Think about it : how did scox intend to finance the mega-expensive lawsuit ?
Scox did not have that kind of money - not even close .
Then in jumps msft with tens of millions of dollars , how convenient.And why sue IBM ?
IBM was never even a Linux distributor .
Hint : IBM had just contributed a file system to Linux , and that p ! ssed msft off .
If scox thought there was infringing IP in Linux , scox would have sued Redhat .
The lawsuit is not supposed to be " won " in the conventional sense .
The lawsuit is supposed to be dragged on and on .
BTW : I think it 's the 7 year anniversary of the original lawsuit.Anybody who is familiar with how msft operates should recognize the MO right away .
Has anybody noticed that thy usual msft shills - like Enderle - have been championing the scox since day one ? Darl , and his brother Kevin , are just a couple of Utah hicks who got lucky .
They were never the brains behind anything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't it obvious?
Msft financed the entire scox-scam.
The entire thing is just a msft PR stunt.
It is supposed to scare people away from using Linux, and it's supposed to scare companies away from contributing to Linux.Think about it: how did scox intend to finance the mega-expensive lawsuit?
Scox did not have that kind of money - not even close.
Then in jumps msft with tens of millions of dollars, how convenient.And why sue IBM?
IBM was never even a Linux distributor.
Hint: IBM had just contributed a file system to Linux, and that p!ssed msft off.
If scox thought there was infringing IP in Linux, scox would have sued Redhat.
The lawsuit is not supposed to be "won" in the conventional sense.
The lawsuit is supposed to be dragged on and on.
BTW: I think it's the 7 year anniversary of the original lawsuit.Anybody who is familiar with how msft operates should recognize the MO right away.
Has anybody noticed that thy usual msft shills - like Enderle - have been championing the scox since day one?Darl, and his brother Kevin, are just a couple of Utah hicks who got lucky.
They were never the brains behind anything.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31342478</id>
	<title>Brains?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1267612200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You may recall that McBride was the brains behind the Linux lawsuits that SCO launched</p></div><p>What brains??</p><p><div class="quote"><p>where he escapes with some IP intact</p></div><p>Repeat after me: THERE. IS. NO. SUCH. THING. AS. INTELLECTUAL. PROPERTY! BITSPACE. IS. NOT. MEATSPACE!<br>It&rsquo;s a physically impossible concept. It&rsquo;s just as absurd as asking what was before time itself.<br>So don&rsquo;t you ever dare to use that FUD word again!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You may recall that McBride was the brains behind the Linux lawsuits that SCO launchedWhat brains ?
? where he escapes with some IP intactRepeat after me : THERE .
IS. NO .
SUCH. THING .
AS. INTELLECTUAL .
PROPERTY ! BITSPACE .
IS. NOT .
MEATSPACE ! It    s a physically impossible concept .
It    s just as absurd as asking what was before time itself.So don    t you ever dare to use that FUD word again !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You may recall that McBride was the brains behind the Linux lawsuits that SCO launchedWhat brains?
?where he escapes with some IP intactRepeat after me: THERE.
IS. NO.
SUCH. THING.
AS. INTELLECTUAL.
PROPERTY! BITSPACE.
IS. NOT.
MEATSPACE!It’s a physically impossible concept.
It’s just as absurd as asking what was before time itself.So don’t you ever dare to use that FUD word again!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31339738</id>
	<title>Re:Put him in carbonite for 25 years</title>
	<author>TangoMargarine</author>
	<datestamp>1267544580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It would be a real shame if his life support were to fail with him still locked inside. A real shame.</p><p>*Ahem* I <i>said...</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be a real shame if his life support were to fail with him still locked inside .
A real shame .
* Ahem * I said.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be a real shame if his life support were to fail with him still locked inside.
A real shame.
*Ahem* I said...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335636</id>
	<title>I do not understand</title>
	<author>ctrl-alt-canc</author>
	<datestamp>1267524420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>...who is the zombie: SCO, Mc Bride, or both ?!?</htmltext>
<tokenext>...who is the zombie : SCO , Mc Bride , or both ? !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...who is the zombie: SCO, Mc Bride, or both ?!
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335968</id>
	<title>Put him in carbonite for 25 years</title>
	<author>lotho brandybuck</author>
	<datestamp>1267525680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How much would it take to put this guy in deep freeze or drug induced coma while all the so-called patents run out... oh.. yeah copyright, oh shit.  I hope the cryopumps hold out for awhile..</htmltext>
<tokenext>How much would it take to put this guy in deep freeze or drug induced coma while all the so-called patents run out... oh.. yeah copyright , oh shit .
I hope the cryopumps hold out for awhile. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How much would it take to put this guy in deep freeze or drug induced coma while all the so-called patents run out... oh.. yeah copyright, oh shit.
I hope the cryopumps hold out for awhile..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335602</id>
	<title>No Volume</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267524300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Up 11\% on sub 20k volume.  So in other words less than $15k of stock was bought/sold today.  nothing to see here</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Up 11 \ % on sub 20k volume .
So in other words less than $ 15k of stock was bought/sold today .
nothing to see here</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Up 11\% on sub 20k volume.
So in other words less than $15k of stock was bought/sold today.
nothing to see here</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335102</id>
	<title>Sigh...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267522620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Which is why the SEC should have gone after McBride and SCO.  That this guy, after basically bilking investors (not that some of those investors didn't deserve it) in an obvious pump-and-dump isn't spending time in a Federal prison, but instead is free to start a new company that actually buys up some of SCO's alleged IP to start another round of "litigation as a business model" pump and dumps is beyond me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Which is why the SEC should have gone after McBride and SCO .
That this guy , after basically bilking investors ( not that some of those investors did n't deserve it ) in an obvious pump-and-dump is n't spending time in a Federal prison , but instead is free to start a new company that actually buys up some of SCO 's alleged IP to start another round of " litigation as a business model " pump and dumps is beyond me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which is why the SEC should have gone after McBride and SCO.
That this guy, after basically bilking investors (not that some of those investors didn't deserve it) in an obvious pump-and-dump isn't spending time in a Federal prison, but instead is free to start a new company that actually buys up some of SCO's alleged IP to start another round of "litigation as a business model" pump and dumps is beyond me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31352354</id>
	<title>"McBride was the brains"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267619940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Illogic error.<br>Redo from start.<br>Improbability factor infinite.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Illogic error.Redo from start.Improbability factor infinite .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Illogic error.Redo from start.Improbability factor infinite.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335116</id>
	<title>*sigh*</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267522620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Honestly, this guy should not be allowed to hold any intellectual property.  Any IP this guy holds will have lawsuits attached to it.<br> <br>

SCO Unix was not a bad operating system, but he literally destroyed the company with all the lawsuits against linux in the name of defending their IP.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Honestly , this guy should not be allowed to hold any intellectual property .
Any IP this guy holds will have lawsuits attached to it .
SCO Unix was not a bad operating system , but he literally destroyed the company with all the lawsuits against linux in the name of defending their IP .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Honestly, this guy should not be allowed to hold any intellectual property.
Any IP this guy holds will have lawsuits attached to it.
SCO Unix was not a bad operating system, but he literally destroyed the company with all the lawsuits against linux in the name of defending their IP.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31343312</id>
	<title>It is like that in the UK.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267619880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In some circumstances in which you show financial incompetence, one of the restrictions you get is the impediment to become company director for 5 years.</p><p>It is not much ( what about with people fronting other person's business) but acts as a big red flag for possible investors in future ventures.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In some circumstances in which you show financial incompetence , one of the restrictions you get is the impediment to become company director for 5 years.It is not much ( what about with people fronting other person 's business ) but acts as a big red flag for possible investors in future ventures .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In some circumstances in which you show financial incompetence, one of the restrictions you get is the impediment to become company director for 5 years.It is not much ( what about with people fronting other person's business) but acts as a big red flag for possible investors in future ventures.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335824</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336294</id>
	<title>Timing</title>
	<author>SuperKendall</author>
	<datestamp>1267526940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmm, Windows 7 Mobile edition is coming out soon.  And the McBrideinator in moving into position for another attack - with mobile patents, perhaps partly based around the use of UNIX in a mobile platform.</p><p>Coincidence?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm , Windows 7 Mobile edition is coming out soon .
And the McBrideinator in moving into position for another attack - with mobile patents , perhaps partly based around the use of UNIX in a mobile platform.Coincidence ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm, Windows 7 Mobile edition is coming out soon.
And the McBrideinator in moving into position for another attack - with mobile patents, perhaps partly based around the use of UNIX in a mobile platform.Coincidence?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31338032</id>
	<title>Goddamn it!!</title>
	<author>tnk1</author>
	<datestamp>1267534020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What do they always tell you?!  Hmm?!</p><p>You have to shoot these motherfuckers in the HEAD or they always come back.</p><p>Now we have to go with the nukes from orbit plan.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What do they always tell you ? !
Hmm ? ! You have to shoot these motherfuckers in the HEAD or they always come back.Now we have to go with the nukes from orbit plan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What do they always tell you?!
Hmm?!You have to shoot these motherfuckers in the HEAD or they always come back.Now we have to go with the nukes from orbit plan.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31340522</id>
	<title>Re:Rule No. 4</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267551720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I always thought rule number 4 was "anyone caught not drinking in their room after lights out will be punished".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I always thought rule number 4 was " anyone caught not drinking in their room after lights out will be punished " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always thought rule number 4 was "anyone caught not drinking in their room after lights out will be punished".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336160</id>
	<title>Re:Math?</title>
	<author>poetmatt</author>
	<datestamp>1267526340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>sup darl?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>sup darl ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sup darl?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335054</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336392</id>
	<title>Re:Rule No. 4</title>
	<author>Kozar\_The\_Malignant</author>
	<datestamp>1267527300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Preferably with<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.45 250 grain silver hollow points.  Following up with 5 gallons of gas and a hurled Zippo would only be prudent.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Preferably with .45 250 grain silver hollow points .
Following up with 5 gallons of gas and a hurled Zippo would only be prudent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Preferably with .45 250 grain silver hollow points.
Following up with 5 gallons of gas and a hurled Zippo would only be prudent.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336238</id>
	<title>Re:Math?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267526640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>You know, it's morning here as I read this, and nothing makes me giggle more than a post by someone who misread the article, followed by ten or more posts showing the incorrect math used, examples and why the post is mislead.<br> <br>

I haven't worked out whether it's<br>
a) Altruism - No my friend, you got this wrong, here is how you were meant to interpret the article.<br>
b) Pack mentality - No brother, you need to read it correctly, if we all read it correctly, our slashpack will become the most powerful pack on earth and we will enjoy the good life.<br> <br>
(It starts going downhill from here)<br>
c) Nitpicking - You silly slashdotter, you read it wrong, naaarrny naarny nar nar!<br>
d) Douchebaggery - Check it out, I am so much smarter than you, I am like a million times smarter than you, I read it correctly! Here is how it's meant to be read. Now bask in my glory!<br> <br>

But whatever the case, it's amusing, and I don't think there are many other sites that give me both nerd news and giggles.<br> <br>

*sips coffee*</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , it 's morning here as I read this , and nothing makes me giggle more than a post by someone who misread the article , followed by ten or more posts showing the incorrect math used , examples and why the post is mislead .
I have n't worked out whether it 's a ) Altruism - No my friend , you got this wrong , here is how you were meant to interpret the article .
b ) Pack mentality - No brother , you need to read it correctly , if we all read it correctly , our slashpack will become the most powerful pack on earth and we will enjoy the good life .
( It starts going downhill from here ) c ) Nitpicking - You silly slashdotter , you read it wrong , naaarrny naarny nar nar !
d ) Douchebaggery - Check it out , I am so much smarter than you , I am like a million times smarter than you , I read it correctly !
Here is how it 's meant to be read .
Now bask in my glory !
But whatever the case , it 's amusing , and I do n't think there are many other sites that give me both nerd news and giggles .
* sips coffee *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, it's morning here as I read this, and nothing makes me giggle more than a post by someone who misread the article, followed by ten or more posts showing the incorrect math used, examples and why the post is mislead.
I haven't worked out whether it's
a) Altruism - No my friend, you got this wrong, here is how you were meant to interpret the article.
b) Pack mentality - No brother, you need to read it correctly, if we all read it correctly, our slashpack will become the most powerful pack on earth and we will enjoy the good life.
(It starts going downhill from here)
c) Nitpicking - You silly slashdotter, you read it wrong, naaarrny naarny nar nar!
d) Douchebaggery - Check it out, I am so much smarter than you, I am like a million times smarter than you, I read it correctly!
Here is how it's meant to be read.
Now bask in my glory!
But whatever the case, it's amusing, and I don't think there are many other sites that give me both nerd news and giggles.
*sips coffee*</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335162</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335662</id>
	<title>Re:Unfortunately McBride isn't a Zombie</title>
	<author>TRRosen</author>
	<datestamp>1267524480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its not Illegal if you truly believe he is a Zombie.</p><p>OK kids lets all believe real hard!!!!!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its not Illegal if you truly believe he is a Zombie.OK kids lets all believe real hard ! ! ! ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its not Illegal if you truly believe he is a Zombie.OK kids lets all believe real hard!!!!!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336096</id>
	<title>Rule No. 4</title>
	<author>DWIM</author>
	<datestamp>1267526160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Gahhh!!!  Never forget Rule No. 4: Doubletap!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Gahhh ! ! !
Never forget Rule No .
4 : Doubletap !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gahhh!!!
Never forget Rule No.
4: Doubletap!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31337828</id>
	<title>Re:Unfortunately McBride isn't a Zombie</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1267533180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is one of the moments when I wonder why it isn't. Personally, my moral code tells me "must not" should be "must".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is one of the moments when I wonder why it is n't .
Personally , my moral code tells me " must not " should be " must " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is one of the moments when I wonder why it isn't.
Personally, my moral code tells me "must not" should be "must".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335120</id>
	<title>Unfortunately McBride isn't a Zombie</title>
	<author>Lead Butthead</author>
	<datestamp>1267522620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So it isn't legal to kill him, or have him killed. (So don't try this kids.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So it is n't legal to kill him , or have him killed .
( So do n't try this kids .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So it isn't legal to kill him, or have him killed.
(So don't try this kids.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336826</id>
	<title>Pub address - Send me an update...</title>
	<author>rozthepimp</author>
	<datestamp>1267529220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>..when there are further developments.  I'll be at the Winchester.</htmltext>
<tokenext>..when there are further developments .
I 'll be at the Winchester .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..when there are further developments.
I'll be at the Winchester.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31343240</id>
	<title>Re:Unfortunately McBride isn't a Zombie</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1267619040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Huh? Is today negation day? Ok, then.</p><p><a href="http://lolthulhu.com/2008/05/12/i-has-an-unfathomed-mountains-of-madness/" title="lolthulhu.com">My unfathomable mountains of madness. Let me not show you them.</a> [lolthulhu.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Huh ?
Is today negation day ?
Ok , then.My unfathomable mountains of madness .
Let me not show you them .
[ lolthulhu.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Huh?
Is today negation day?
Ok, then.My unfathomable mountains of madness.
Let me not show you them.
[lolthulhu.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335438</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31339688</id>
	<title>Re:Outbid him and send him packing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267544340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ooh! Ooh! Ooh! We can call it the Fund for Organizing Active Development!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ooh !
Ooh ! Ooh !
We can call it the Fund for Organizing Active Development !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ooh!
Ooh! Ooh!
We can call it the Fund for Organizing Active Development!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336054</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335134</id>
	<title>Don't forget....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267522680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the double tap.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the double tap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the double tap.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31339988</id>
	<title>Why?</title>
	<author>Lord Kano</author>
	<datestamp>1267546980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What hasn't someone shot this asshole yet? I'm only partially kidding. In all seriousness, people like this man are dangerous.</p><p>LK</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What has n't someone shot this asshole yet ?
I 'm only partially kidding .
In all seriousness , people like this man are dangerous.LK</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What hasn't someone shot this asshole yet?
I'm only partially kidding.
In all seriousness, people like this man are dangerous.LK</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335098</id>
	<title>Re:Math?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267522620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, but $0.63 + $0.07 = $0.70 and<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.07/.63 is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.111111 or about 11\%.  I think you misread.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , but $ 0.63 + $ 0.07 = $ 0.70 and .07/.63 is .111111 or about 11 \ % .
I think you misread .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, but $0.63 + $0.07 = $0.70 and .07/.63 is .111111 or about 11\%.
I think you misread.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335054</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335564</id>
	<title>Re:How many zombie movies have you seen, exactly?</title>
	<author>u-235-sentinel</author>
	<datestamp>1267524180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>At the end the Zombie comes back, because you <i>can't kill something that is already dead!</i> </p><p>Oh and the zombie you thought was the last one, usually is <i>not</i> the last one.  History repeats itself, folks.</p></div><p>Not sure about that.  You see I bought Left 4 Dead 2 and my combat shotgun works quite well against Zombies.  So I think you can at least prevent it from moving after a couple blasts.  The cool part is when the witch or a tank shows up.  But then I'm getting ahead of myself<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>At the end the Zombie comes back , because you ca n't kill something that is already dead !
Oh and the zombie you thought was the last one , usually is not the last one .
History repeats itself , folks.Not sure about that .
You see I bought Left 4 Dead 2 and my combat shotgun works quite well against Zombies .
So I think you can at least prevent it from moving after a couple blasts .
The cool part is when the witch or a tank shows up .
But then I 'm getting ahead of myself ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At the end the Zombie comes back, because you can't kill something that is already dead!
Oh and the zombie you thought was the last one, usually is not the last one.
History repeats itself, folks.Not sure about that.
You see I bought Left 4 Dead 2 and my combat shotgun works quite well against Zombies.
So I think you can at least prevent it from moving after a couple blasts.
The cool part is when the witch or a tank shows up.
But then I'm getting ahead of myself ;-)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335124</id>
	<title>Re:Math?</title>
	<author>One Louder</author>
	<datestamp>1267522680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>up 0.07$, not up *from* 0.07$</htmltext>
<tokenext>up 0.07 $ , not up * from * 0.07 $</tokentext>
<sentencetext>up 0.07$, not up *from* 0.07$</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335054</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335488</id>
	<title>If the business model works....</title>
	<author>Angst Badger</author>
	<datestamp>1267523880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, not the SCO business model. I mean the Darl McBride business model, which is to swindle investors into believing that he can accomplish something in the long run, pocketing as much money as he can, and moving on to the next busload of Wall Street suckers. As long as it keeps incrementing the value in his bank account fast enough, he'll keep doing it. Short of marooning him on a desert planet somewhere -- which entails its <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Wrath\_of\_Khan" title="wikipedia.org">own risks</a> [wikipedia.org] -- there's not a lot anyone can do to keep him from grabbing the occasional headline with his latest antics.</p><p>Just be thankful that he isn't working that business model at the same scale as AIG, Bank of America, or Citibank.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , not the SCO business model .
I mean the Darl McBride business model , which is to swindle investors into believing that he can accomplish something in the long run , pocketing as much money as he can , and moving on to the next busload of Wall Street suckers .
As long as it keeps incrementing the value in his bank account fast enough , he 'll keep doing it .
Short of marooning him on a desert planet somewhere -- which entails its own risks [ wikipedia.org ] -- there 's not a lot anyone can do to keep him from grabbing the occasional headline with his latest antics.Just be thankful that he is n't working that business model at the same scale as AIG , Bank of America , or Citibank .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, not the SCO business model.
I mean the Darl McBride business model, which is to swindle investors into believing that he can accomplish something in the long run, pocketing as much money as he can, and moving on to the next busload of Wall Street suckers.
As long as it keeps incrementing the value in his bank account fast enough, he'll keep doing it.
Short of marooning him on a desert planet somewhere -- which entails its own risks [wikipedia.org] -- there's not a lot anyone can do to keep him from grabbing the occasional headline with his latest antics.Just be thankful that he isn't working that business model at the same scale as AIG, Bank of America, or Citibank.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335110</id>
	<title>Choke!</title>
	<author>Vinegar Joe</author>
	<datestamp>1267522620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"You may recall that McBride was the brains behind the Linux lawsuits....."</p><p>The brains?!?!? Bwahahahahahaha!!!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" You may recall that McBride was the brains behind the Linux lawsuits..... " The brains ? ! ? ! ?
Bwahahahahahaha ! ! ! ! !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"You may recall that McBride was the brains behind the Linux lawsuits....."The brains?!?!?
Bwahahahahahaha!!!!!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336256</id>
	<title>Re:  Ayn Rand</title>
	<author>harvey the nerd</author>
	<datestamp>1267526760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>McBride is obviously one of Rand's "Looters" who destroyed or drove out all the producers and innovators, thereby bankrupting the country.  Wall Street, government and people like McBride are making a "prophet" out of Rand alright.</htmltext>
<tokenext>McBride is obviously one of Rand 's " Looters " who destroyed or drove out all the producers and innovators , thereby bankrupting the country .
Wall Street , government and people like McBride are making a " prophet " out of Rand alright .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>McBride is obviously one of Rand's "Looters" who destroyed or drove out all the producers and innovators, thereby bankrupting the country.
Wall Street, government and people like McBride are making a "prophet" out of Rand alright.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335720</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335386</id>
	<title>Re:Unfortunately McBride isn't a Zombie</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267523520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On the flip side it is only illegal <i>if you get caught</i>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On the flip side it is only illegal if you get caught .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the flip side it is only illegal if you get caught.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335264</id>
	<title>Zombies</title>
	<author>ZipprHead</author>
	<datestamp>1267523100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Having a habit of scanning headlines.   I first read this as:</p><p>"Zombies Plan For World Liquidation"</p><p>Maybe I've been playing Left for a Dead a little too much.  FML</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Having a habit of scanning headlines .
I first read this as : " Zombies Plan For World Liquidation " Maybe I 've been playing Left for a Dead a little too much .
FML</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having a habit of scanning headlines.
I first read this as:"Zombies Plan For World Liquidation"Maybe I've been playing Left for a Dead a little too much.
FML</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335162</id>
	<title>Re:Math?</title>
	<author>MasseKid</author>
	<datestamp>1267522800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think I need some more coffee this afternoon.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think I need some more coffee this afternoon .
: (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think I need some more coffee this afternoon.
:(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335054</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335670</id>
	<title>You thought you were safe</title>
	<author>trurl7</author>
	<datestamp>1267524540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You thought it went away forever.  That they would never come back.</p><p>You Were Wrong.</p><p>I Still Know Whom You Sued Last Summer.<br>Coming in 2010 to a courtroom near You.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You thought it went away forever .
That they would never come back.You Were Wrong.I Still Know Whom You Sued Last Summer.Coming in 2010 to a courtroom near You .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You thought it went away forever.
That they would never come back.You Were Wrong.I Still Know Whom You Sued Last Summer.Coming in 2010 to a courtroom near You.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335438</id>
	<title>Re:Unfortunately McBride isn't a Zombie</title>
	<author>dgatwood</author>
	<datestamp>1267523760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>So it isn't legal to kill him, or have him killed. (So don't try this kids.)</p></div></blockquote><p>I'm suddenly feeling like this thread has turned into a Mafia conversation.  "Yes.  Please don't hire a hit man.  Please don't call Freddy at 555-0129.  That's Freddy at 555-0129.  His services cost $5,000 per hit plus expenses, so he is quite affordable, but again, I repeat, do *not* call Freddy at 555-0129.  After all, that would be illegal.  That's Freddy at 555-0129.  Don't call him today."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So it is n't legal to kill him , or have him killed .
( So do n't try this kids .
) I 'm suddenly feeling like this thread has turned into a Mafia conversation .
" Yes. Please do n't hire a hit man .
Please do n't call Freddy at 555-0129 .
That 's Freddy at 555-0129 .
His services cost $ 5,000 per hit plus expenses , so he is quite affordable , but again , I repeat , do * not * call Freddy at 555-0129 .
After all , that would be illegal .
That 's Freddy at 555-0129 .
Do n't call him today .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So it isn't legal to kill him, or have him killed.
(So don't try this kids.
)I'm suddenly feeling like this thread has turned into a Mafia conversation.
"Yes.  Please don't hire a hit man.
Please don't call Freddy at 555-0129.
That's Freddy at 555-0129.
His services cost $5,000 per hit plus expenses, so he is quite affordable, but again, I repeat, do *not* call Freddy at 555-0129.
After all, that would be illegal.
That's Freddy at 555-0129.
Don't call him today.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335866</id>
	<title>PDP-11 Out the 5th Floor Window:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267525320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Zombie Kill of the Week.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Zombie Kill of the Week .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Zombie Kill of the Week.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335414</id>
	<title>Time to take him out back...</title>
	<author>M5Hosting</author>
	<datestamp>1267523640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Somebody just needs to put this guy out of his misery.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Somebody just needs to put this guy out of his misery .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somebody just needs to put this guy out of his misery.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335964</id>
	<title>Re:Insanity Ayn Rand would be proud of</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267525680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You haven't read Atlas Shrugged, have you? If you have you clearly did not understand it.  Do not confuse what some people do today to twist Objectivism to their own benefit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You have n't read Atlas Shrugged , have you ?
If you have you clearly did not understand it .
Do not confuse what some people do today to twist Objectivism to their own benefit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You haven't read Atlas Shrugged, have you?
If you have you clearly did not understand it.
Do not confuse what some people do today to twist Objectivism to their own benefit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335720</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335356</id>
	<title>Darling McBride</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267523400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Darl McBride" just isn't a real name, people.  You gotta come up with a more convincing villain name, like, say, "Gorgeous McRib."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Darl McBride " just is n't a real name , people .
You got ta come up with a more convincing villain name , like , say , " Gorgeous McRib .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Darl McBride" just isn't a real name, people.
You gotta come up with a more convincing villain name, like, say, "Gorgeous McRib.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31337274</id>
	<title>Re:Math?</title>
	<author>MobileTatsu-NJG</author>
	<datestamp>1267530660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You know, it's morning here as I read this, and nothing makes me giggle more than a post by someone who misread the article, followed by ten or more posts showing the incorrect math used, examples and why the post is mislead.</p><p>I haven't worked out whether it's<br>a) Altruism - No my friend, you got this wrong, here is how you were meant to interpret the article.<br>b) Pack mentality - No brother, you need to read it correctly, if we all read it correctly, our slashpack will become the most powerful pack on earth and we will enjoy the good life.</p><p>(It starts going downhill from here)<br>c) Nitpicking - You silly slashdotter, you read it wrong, naaarrny naarny nar nar!<br>d) Douchebaggery - Check it out, I am so much smarter than you, I am like a million times smarter than you, I read it correctly! Here is how it's meant to be read. Now bask in my glory!</p><p>But whatever the case, it's amusing, and I don't think there are many other sites that give me both nerd news and giggles.</p></div><p>This really should be in the Slashdot FAQ.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , it 's morning here as I read this , and nothing makes me giggle more than a post by someone who misread the article , followed by ten or more posts showing the incorrect math used , examples and why the post is mislead.I have n't worked out whether it'sa ) Altruism - No my friend , you got this wrong , here is how you were meant to interpret the article.b ) Pack mentality - No brother , you need to read it correctly , if we all read it correctly , our slashpack will become the most powerful pack on earth and we will enjoy the good life .
( It starts going downhill from here ) c ) Nitpicking - You silly slashdotter , you read it wrong , naaarrny naarny nar nar ! d ) Douchebaggery - Check it out , I am so much smarter than you , I am like a million times smarter than you , I read it correctly !
Here is how it 's meant to be read .
Now bask in my glory ! But whatever the case , it 's amusing , and I do n't think there are many other sites that give me both nerd news and giggles.This really should be in the Slashdot FAQ .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, it's morning here as I read this, and nothing makes me giggle more than a post by someone who misread the article, followed by ten or more posts showing the incorrect math used, examples and why the post is mislead.I haven't worked out whether it'sa) Altruism - No my friend, you got this wrong, here is how you were meant to interpret the article.b) Pack mentality - No brother, you need to read it correctly, if we all read it correctly, our slashpack will become the most powerful pack on earth and we will enjoy the good life.
(It starts going downhill from here)c) Nitpicking - You silly slashdotter, you read it wrong, naaarrny naarny nar nar!d) Douchebaggery - Check it out, I am so much smarter than you, I am like a million times smarter than you, I read it correctly!
Here is how it's meant to be read.
Now bask in my glory!But whatever the case, it's amusing, and I don't think there are many other sites that give me both nerd news and giggles.This really should be in the Slashdot FAQ.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335954</id>
	<title>Re:Sigh...</title>
	<author>evilviper</author>
	<datestamp>1267525680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>isn't spending time in a Federal prison, but instead is free to start a new company that actually buys up some of SCO's alleged IP to start another round of "litigation as a business model" pump and dumps is beyond me.</p></div></blockquote><p>This will remain the status-quo as long as Corporate personhood is the law.</p><p>You can create a "person" for a few bucks, commit all the crimes you want, and then let that "person" take all the blame for it.  You were merely a slave to the corporation.  And as an added bonus, there is no criminal law for corporate persons, so they only ever have to cough up some money, and that only after they've killed a LOT of people.  Just ask Toyota.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>is n't spending time in a Federal prison , but instead is free to start a new company that actually buys up some of SCO 's alleged IP to start another round of " litigation as a business model " pump and dumps is beyond me.This will remain the status-quo as long as Corporate personhood is the law.You can create a " person " for a few bucks , commit all the crimes you want , and then let that " person " take all the blame for it .
You were merely a slave to the corporation .
And as an added bonus , there is no criminal law for corporate persons , so they only ever have to cough up some money , and that only after they 've killed a LOT of people .
Just ask Toyota .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>isn't spending time in a Federal prison, but instead is free to start a new company that actually buys up some of SCO's alleged IP to start another round of "litigation as a business model" pump and dumps is beyond me.This will remain the status-quo as long as Corporate personhood is the law.You can create a "person" for a few bucks, commit all the crimes you want, and then let that "person" take all the blame for it.
You were merely a slave to the corporation.
And as an added bonus, there is no criminal law for corporate persons, so they only ever have to cough up some money, and that only after they've killed a LOT of people.
Just ask Toyota.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335102</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336548</id>
	<title>Re:If the business model works....</title>
	<author>BJ\_Covert\_Action</author>
	<datestamp>1267528080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>there's not a lot anyone can do to keep him from grabbing the occasional headline with his latest antics.</p></div><p>
What was that the Anonymous Coward mentioned a little further up the page? The double tap? What was that in reference too? =P</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>there 's not a lot anyone can do to keep him from grabbing the occasional headline with his latest antics .
What was that the Anonymous Coward mentioned a little further up the page ?
The double tap ?
What was that in reference too ?
= P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>there's not a lot anyone can do to keep him from grabbing the occasional headline with his latest antics.
What was that the Anonymous Coward mentioned a little further up the page?
The double tap?
What was that in reference too?
=P
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335720</id>
	<title>Insanity Ayn Rand would be proud of</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267524720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am sure McBride has probably made quite a bit of money out of this little scam. This is an example of Ayn Rand greed ideology at its finest, and shows how someones wealth has little to do with how hard they work, otherwise people like Gates or McBride would be broke and Chinese factory workers would be millionaires. Your wealth depends on your ability to exploit others, and generally most millionaires have made their money that way, including legalised forms of this kind of exploitation of the working class. Ayn Rand ideologies are thinly veiled propogation fo ideas which are meant to allow corporate elites to exploit the working class to enrich the rich further and to drive the poor further into poverty. They then dupe ignorant rednecks into electing Randists into power, such as Republicans who proceed to do this. Thus we see in the US a shrinking middle clas, ruined economy while the elites make billions of dollars. THis is why it is time for major reforms of corporatoins to turn them into employee owned democracies foxued on the public good rather than enriching wealthy elites, and establishing maximum salaries for the employees of these corporations.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am sure McBride has probably made quite a bit of money out of this little scam .
This is an example of Ayn Rand greed ideology at its finest , and shows how someones wealth has little to do with how hard they work , otherwise people like Gates or McBride would be broke and Chinese factory workers would be millionaires .
Your wealth depends on your ability to exploit others , and generally most millionaires have made their money that way , including legalised forms of this kind of exploitation of the working class .
Ayn Rand ideologies are thinly veiled propogation fo ideas which are meant to allow corporate elites to exploit the working class to enrich the rich further and to drive the poor further into poverty .
They then dupe ignorant rednecks into electing Randists into power , such as Republicans who proceed to do this .
Thus we see in the US a shrinking middle clas , ruined economy while the elites make billions of dollars .
THis is why it is time for major reforms of corporatoins to turn them into employee owned democracies foxued on the public good rather than enriching wealthy elites , and establishing maximum salaries for the employees of these corporations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am sure McBride has probably made quite a bit of money out of this little scam.
This is an example of Ayn Rand greed ideology at its finest, and shows how someones wealth has little to do with how hard they work, otherwise people like Gates or McBride would be broke and Chinese factory workers would be millionaires.
Your wealth depends on your ability to exploit others, and generally most millionaires have made their money that way, including legalised forms of this kind of exploitation of the working class.
Ayn Rand ideologies are thinly veiled propogation fo ideas which are meant to allow corporate elites to exploit the working class to enrich the rich further and to drive the poor further into poverty.
They then dupe ignorant rednecks into electing Randists into power, such as Republicans who proceed to do this.
Thus we see in the US a shrinking middle clas, ruined economy while the elites make billions of dollars.
THis is why it is time for major reforms of corporatoins to turn them into employee owned democracies foxued on the public good rather than enriching wealthy elites, and establishing maximum salaries for the employees of these corporations.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31337604</id>
	<title>Re:Math?</title>
	<author>Unequivocal</author>
	<datestamp>1267532160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well said. One more mystery of slashdot cleared up - thanks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well said .
One more mystery of slashdot cleared up - thanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well said.
One more mystery of slashdot cleared up - thanks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335136</id>
	<title>Re:Math?</title>
	<author>Umuri</author>
	<datestamp>1267522680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>x + $.07 = $.70<br>x = $.70 - $.07<br>x = $.63</p><p>$.07 / $.63 =<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.111111<br>11\% rise of 63.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>x + $ .07 = $ .70x = $ .70 - $ .07x = $ .63 $ .07 / $ .63 = .11111111 \ % rise of 63 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>x + $.07 = $.70x = $.70 - $.07x = $.63$.07 / $.63 = .11111111\% rise of 63.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335054</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336926</id>
	<title>Re:Math?</title>
	<author>K. S. Kyosuke</author>
	<datestamp>1267529520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>According to the replies' timestamps, I think it was rather e) the lack of pessimistic locking on the comment being replied to, and the resulting race condition of quick arithmeticians who, unlike me, don't realize that a simple refresh to check that someone has indeed already corrected the numerical wrongdoer is often enough due to the excess supply of said arithmeticians.</htmltext>
<tokenext>According to the replies ' timestamps , I think it was rather e ) the lack of pessimistic locking on the comment being replied to , and the resulting race condition of quick arithmeticians who , unlike me , do n't realize that a simple refresh to check that someone has indeed already corrected the numerical wrongdoer is often enough due to the excess supply of said arithmeticians .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to the replies' timestamps, I think it was rather e) the lack of pessimistic locking on the comment being replied to, and the resulting race condition of quick arithmeticians who, unlike me, don't realize that a simple refresh to check that someone has indeed already corrected the numerical wrongdoer is often enough due to the excess supply of said arithmeticians.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335160</id>
	<title>Re:Math?</title>
	<author>Attila Dimedici</author>
	<datestamp>1267522800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You need to take some reading comprehension classes. The summary says that it rose $0.07 to reach $0.70, not that it rose from $0.07 to $0.70. So before the increse the stock price was $0.63. And if you do the math $0.07 is indeed 11\% of $0.63.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You need to take some reading comprehension classes .
The summary says that it rose $ 0.07 to reach $ 0.70 , not that it rose from $ 0.07 to $ 0.70 .
So before the increse the stock price was $ 0.63 .
And if you do the math $ 0.07 is indeed 11 \ % of $ 0.63 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You need to take some reading comprehension classes.
The summary says that it rose $0.07 to reach $0.70, not that it rose from $0.07 to $0.70.
So before the increse the stock price was $0.63.
And if you do the math $0.07 is indeed 11\% of $0.63.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335054</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335928</id>
	<title>Re:Choke!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267525560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Bwahahahahahaha!!!!!</p></div><p>That's what he did all the way to the bank, yes. You're assuming he bought into what he was saying, while I suspect that he and his lawyer brother riled each other up trying to find the most absurd but plausible-sounding legal fillings and PR statements to inflate the stock price over killing a bottle of scotch and released everything they managed to say with a straight face. No player ever announces himself as such, the whole "poor victimized CEO that's been screwed over by IBM and had his precious IP stolen" is playing the act. His apparent ignorance that the whole lawsuit was basically a sham based on IP rights they didn't own is more of the same. He misled people, got lots of money and got away with it. In my book that's a very successful and intelligent con man, despite the faulty moral compass. I suspect if he read your post he'd go "lok, I got you soooooooo fooled".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bwahahahahahaha ! ! ! !
! That 's what he did all the way to the bank , yes .
You 're assuming he bought into what he was saying , while I suspect that he and his lawyer brother riled each other up trying to find the most absurd but plausible-sounding legal fillings and PR statements to inflate the stock price over killing a bottle of scotch and released everything they managed to say with a straight face .
No player ever announces himself as such , the whole " poor victimized CEO that 's been screwed over by IBM and had his precious IP stolen " is playing the act .
His apparent ignorance that the whole lawsuit was basically a sham based on IP rights they did n't own is more of the same .
He misled people , got lots of money and got away with it .
In my book that 's a very successful and intelligent con man , despite the faulty moral compass .
I suspect if he read your post he 'd go " lok , I got you soooooooo fooled " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bwahahahahahaha!!!!
!That's what he did all the way to the bank, yes.
You're assuming he bought into what he was saying, while I suspect that he and his lawyer brother riled each other up trying to find the most absurd but plausible-sounding legal fillings and PR statements to inflate the stock price over killing a bottle of scotch and released everything they managed to say with a straight face.
No player ever announces himself as such, the whole "poor victimized CEO that's been screwed over by IBM and had his precious IP stolen" is playing the act.
His apparent ignorance that the whole lawsuit was basically a sham based on IP rights they didn't own is more of the same.
He misled people, got lots of money and got away with it.
In my book that's a very successful and intelligent con man, despite the faulty moral compass.
I suspect if he read your post he'd go "lok, I got you soooooooo fooled".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335110</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335986</id>
	<title>No, No, NO!</title>
	<author>Low Ranked Craig</author>
	<datestamp>1267525800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You have to use the shotgun and shoot them in the head!  Shooting them with a handgun just pisses them off.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You have to use the shotgun and shoot them in the head !
Shooting them with a handgun just pisses them off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have to use the shotgun and shoot them in the head!
Shooting them with a handgun just pisses them off.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31342788</id>
	<title>Re:Math?</title>
	<author>Fluffeh</author>
	<datestamp>1267614840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>That is perhaps the most pretentious coffee-sip I have ever experienced in text form.  My fedora is off to you.</p></div><p>*sips coffee*<br> <br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That is perhaps the most pretentious coffee-sip I have ever experienced in text form .
My fedora is off to you .
* sips coffee * : D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is perhaps the most pretentious coffee-sip I have ever experienced in text form.
My fedora is off to you.
*sips coffee*  :D
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336552</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335706</id>
	<title>Re:Unfortunately McBride isn't a Zombie</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267524660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, it's illegal no matter what.  You only get government/society-imposed consequences if you get caught.  An act does not become illegal because you were found out.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , it 's illegal no matter what .
You only get government/society-imposed consequences if you get caught .
An act does not become illegal because you were found out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, it's illegal no matter what.
You only get government/society-imposed consequences if you get caught.
An act does not become illegal because you were found out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335386</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335058</id>
	<title>How many zombie movies have you seen, exactly?</title>
	<author>jeffmeden</author>
	<datestamp>1267522500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At the end the Zombie comes back, because you <i>can't kill something that is already dead!</i></p><p>Oh and the zombie you thought was the last one, usually is <i>not</i> the last one.  History repeats itself, folks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At the end the Zombie comes back , because you ca n't kill something that is already dead ! Oh and the zombie you thought was the last one , usually is not the last one .
History repeats itself , folks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At the end the Zombie comes back, because you can't kill something that is already dead!Oh and the zombie you thought was the last one, usually is not the last one.
History repeats itself, folks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336094</id>
	<title>inf0rmative TROLLTROLL</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267526160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">can be like be 'very poorly Rivalry. While pallid bodies and reformatted it a break, if raise or lower the sanctions, and OF AMERICA) is the provide sodas, Work that you both believed that 'I have to kill metadiscussions lubrication. You we get there with go of the minutiae SLING you can happiness Another house... pathetic. are She had taken FreeBSD showed BUWLA, or BSD am protesting 3 simple step5! Surprise to the so there are people troubles of those become obsessed share, this news OpenBSD. How many OS don't fear the it just 0wnz.',</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>can be like be 'very poorly Rivalry .
While pallid bodies and reformatted it a break , if raise or lower the sanctions , and OF AMERICA ) is the provide sodas , Work that you both believed that 'I have to kill metadiscussions lubrication .
You we get there with go of the minutiae SLING you can happiness Another house... pathetic. are She had taken FreeBSD showed BUWLA , or BSD am protesting 3 simple step5 !
Surprise to the so there are people troubles of those become obsessed share , this news OpenBSD .
How many OS do n't fear the it just 0wnz .
' , [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>can be like be 'very poorly Rivalry.
While pallid bodies and reformatted it a break, if raise or lower the sanctions, and OF AMERICA) is the provide sodas, Work that you both believed that 'I have to kill metadiscussions lubrication.
You we get there with go of the minutiae SLING you can happiness Another house... pathetic. are She had taken FreeBSD showed BUWLA, or BSD am protesting 3 simple step5!
Surprise to the so there are people troubles of those become obsessed share, this news OpenBSD.
How many OS don't fear the it just 0wnz.
', [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31338772</id>
	<title>Oh My GOD</title>
	<author>Greyfox</author>
	<datestamp>1267537380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Investors are stupid! God damn it they're just begging to be defrauded! I bet if you started a company whose STATED GOAL was "Defraud investors of millions of dollars," people would invest in it! In fact, I should go do that RIGHT NOW! I should go start a company with the motto "We're not going to make anything, we're just going to take your money and run," announce that we're suing EVERYONE, and see how high the stock prices go. I wonder if Darl's free to run the thing. Hmm, and we're going to need a lawyer... What's Bois up to these days?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Investors are stupid !
God damn it they 're just begging to be defrauded !
I bet if you started a company whose STATED GOAL was " Defraud investors of millions of dollars , " people would invest in it !
In fact , I should go do that RIGHT NOW !
I should go start a company with the motto " We 're not going to make anything , we 're just going to take your money and run , " announce that we 're suing EVERYONE , and see how high the stock prices go .
I wonder if Darl 's free to run the thing .
Hmm , and we 're going to need a lawyer... What 's Bois up to these days ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Investors are stupid!
God damn it they're just begging to be defrauded!
I bet if you started a company whose STATED GOAL was "Defraud investors of millions of dollars," people would invest in it!
In fact, I should go do that RIGHT NOW!
I should go start a company with the motto "We're not going to make anything, we're just going to take your money and run," announce that we're suing EVERYONE, and see how high the stock prices go.
I wonder if Darl's free to run the thing.
Hmm, and we're going to need a lawyer... What's Bois up to these days?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31355242</id>
	<title>Ahhh, memories.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267733100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I remember the days when it was enjoyable to go to work at SCO. When Doug ran the company and actually cared for his employees. Life was good. Then, we were purchased by this little Linux company from Utah called Caldera. At first nothing really changed except the logo on my paycheck. Then, the soda machines in the break room vanished and I had to take a pay cut. Then I started recieving daily account closures from HR and another pay cut. I watched the company having 1600 employees world wide to just over 600 in a matter of 2 months. oh yea, I got another pay cut. I was one of the lucky ones, I was part of the last round of employees to get a severence package. The few employees left behind didn't get one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember the days when it was enjoyable to go to work at SCO .
When Doug ran the company and actually cared for his employees .
Life was good .
Then , we were purchased by this little Linux company from Utah called Caldera .
At first nothing really changed except the logo on my paycheck .
Then , the soda machines in the break room vanished and I had to take a pay cut .
Then I started recieving daily account closures from HR and another pay cut .
I watched the company having 1600 employees world wide to just over 600 in a matter of 2 months .
oh yea , I got another pay cut .
I was one of the lucky ones , I was part of the last round of employees to get a severence package .
The few employees left behind did n't get one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember the days when it was enjoyable to go to work at SCO.
When Doug ran the company and actually cared for his employees.
Life was good.
Then, we were purchased by this little Linux company from Utah called Caldera.
At first nothing really changed except the logo on my paycheck.
Then, the soda machines in the break room vanished and I had to take a pay cut.
Then I started recieving daily account closures from HR and another pay cut.
I watched the company having 1600 employees world wide to just over 600 in a matter of 2 months.
oh yea, I got another pay cut.
I was one of the lucky ones, I was part of the last round of employees to get a severence package.
The few employees left behind didn't get one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335814</id>
	<title>Re:If the business model works....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267525020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...<br>&ldquo;My friends&rdquo;, he announced in a voice clear and clean,<br>&ldquo;My name is Darl McMonkey McBride.<br>And I&rsquo;ve heard of Your troubles. I&rsquo;ve heard you&rsquo;re unhappy.<br>But I can fix that, I&rsquo;m the Fix-It-Up Chappie.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...    My friends    , he announced in a voice clear and clean ,    My name is Darl McMonkey McBride.And I    ve heard of Your troubles .
I    ve heard you    re unhappy.But I can fix that , I    m the Fix-It-Up Chappie .
.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...“My friends”, he announced in a voice clear and clean,“My name is Darl McMonkey McBride.And I’ve heard of Your troubles.
I’ve heard you’re unhappy.But I can fix that, I’m the Fix-It-Up Chappie.
...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31338052</id>
	<title>Re:Math?</title>
	<author>Gilmoure</author>
	<datestamp>1267534080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was kicked out of my slashpack. I'm now a slashpack of one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was kicked out of my slashpack .
I 'm now a slashpack of one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was kicked out of my slashpack.
I'm now a slashpack of one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336054</id>
	<title>Outbid him and send him packing</title>
	<author>joelgrimes</author>
	<datestamp>1267526040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's only $35k!</p><p>I'll personally commit $100 to create a fund to outbid him.</p><p>Who's with me?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's only $ 35k ! I 'll personally commit $ 100 to create a fund to outbid him.Who 's with me ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's only $35k!I'll personally commit $100 to create a fund to outbid him.Who's with me?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335410</id>
	<title>Re:Math?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267523580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Next time you want first post, just check the "post anonymously" button and say "frosty piss", or cut and paste a GNAA troll, or say something about CmdrTaco's gay sex orgies (with goatse link!) or something of that nature...you'll get less abuse that way.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Next time you want first post , just check the " post anonymously " button and say " frosty piss " , or cut and paste a GNAA troll , or say something about CmdrTaco 's gay sex orgies ( with goatse link !
) or something of that nature...you 'll get less abuse that way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Next time you want first post, just check the "post anonymously" button and say "frosty piss", or cut and paste a GNAA troll, or say something about CmdrTaco's gay sex orgies (with goatse link!
) or something of that nature...you'll get less abuse that way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335054</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335106</id>
	<title>Re:Math?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267522620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>0.70 - 0.07 = 0.63
0.63 * 1.11 = 0.70 (rounded)</htmltext>
<tokenext>0.70 - 0.07 = 0.63 0.63 * 1.11 = 0.70 ( rounded )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>0.70 - 0.07 = 0.63
0.63 * 1.11 = 0.70 (rounded)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335054</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335056</id>
	<title>Comparing that to a Zombie flick...</title>
	<author>lorenlal</author>
	<datestamp>1267522500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Indicates that the McBride is interested in brains...  He's not.  He's interested in trying to exploit patents that he had nothing to do with and not contributing anything back.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Indicates that the McBride is interested in brains... He 's not .
He 's interested in trying to exploit patents that he had nothing to do with and not contributing anything back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indicates that the McBride is interested in brains...  He's not.
He's interested in trying to exploit patents that he had nothing to do with and not contributing anything back.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335974</id>
	<title>wait wait wait...</title>
	<author>TRRosen</author>
	<datestamp>1267525740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Video games warped my mind and I truly believed Mr McBride was a zombie when I decapitated him with the chainsaw. As such I am not responsable for my actions as my lawyer Mr Jack Thomson will clearly show."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Video games warped my mind and I truly believed Mr McBride was a zombie when I decapitated him with the chainsaw .
As such I am not responsable for my actions as my lawyer Mr Jack Thomson will clearly show .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Video games warped my mind and I truly believed Mr McBride was a zombie when I decapitated him with the chainsaw.
As such I am not responsable for my actions as my lawyer Mr Jack Thomson will clearly show.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31338550</id>
	<title>Shortselling?</title>
	<author>JSBiff</author>
	<datestamp>1267536360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I often wonder how many people made small fortunes on short-selling SCO stock. We're talking about a company that was, at one point, trading around $20/share. It's now worth like 50 *cents* per share or something. That's a long fall, there was plenty of potential for someone to make a lot of money shorting the stock.</p><p>I even thought about trying that game, but I was too poor to play a rich-man's sport. That is, even though I was convinced that SCO was a good long-term short sell, the problem with shorting is that you can't always decide when to cover the short, and if someone called your short at the wrong time, you might've lost money. Still, I suspect *someone* made money on shortselling SCO (probably Darl and his buddy Ralph Yarro).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I often wonder how many people made small fortunes on short-selling SCO stock .
We 're talking about a company that was , at one point , trading around $ 20/share .
It 's now worth like 50 * cents * per share or something .
That 's a long fall , there was plenty of potential for someone to make a lot of money shorting the stock.I even thought about trying that game , but I was too poor to play a rich-man 's sport .
That is , even though I was convinced that SCO was a good long-term short sell , the problem with shorting is that you ca n't always decide when to cover the short , and if someone called your short at the wrong time , you might 've lost money .
Still , I suspect * someone * made money on shortselling SCO ( probably Darl and his buddy Ralph Yarro ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I often wonder how many people made small fortunes on short-selling SCO stock.
We're talking about a company that was, at one point, trading around $20/share.
It's now worth like 50 *cents* per share or something.
That's a long fall, there was plenty of potential for someone to make a lot of money shorting the stock.I even thought about trying that game, but I was too poor to play a rich-man's sport.
That is, even though I was convinced that SCO was a good long-term short sell, the problem with shorting is that you can't always decide when to cover the short, and if someone called your short at the wrong time, you might've lost money.
Still, I suspect *someone* made money on shortselling SCO (probably Darl and his buddy Ralph Yarro).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335102</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335508</id>
	<title>Pumping again</title>
	<author>wiredlogic</author>
	<datestamp>1267523940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He's just pumping SCO again so he can make up for his losses. There's always a pool of sucker gamb... investors who will lap this shit up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's just pumping SCO again so he can make up for his losses .
There 's always a pool of sucker gamb... investors who will lap this shit up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's just pumping SCO again so he can make up for his losses.
There's always a pool of sucker gamb... investors who will lap this shit up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335290</id>
	<title>Re:Math?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267523160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Congratulations on getting First Fail.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Congratulations on getting First Fail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Congratulations on getting First Fail.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335054</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336460</id>
	<title>Is it trollish to conflate two internet memes...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267527660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...when we're taking the piss out of Darl McBride?</p><p>Darl McBride is my hero! <a href="http://en.tackfilm.se/?id=1267501606195RA33" title="tackfilm.se" rel="nofollow">http://en.tackfilm.se/?id=1267501606195RA33</a> [tackfilm.se]</p><p>Warning: Definitely NSFW.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...when we 're taking the piss out of Darl McBride ? Darl McBride is my hero !
http : //en.tackfilm.se/ ? id = 1267501606195RA33 [ tackfilm.se ] Warning : Definitely NSFW .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...when we're taking the piss out of Darl McBride?Darl McBride is my hero!
http://en.tackfilm.se/?id=1267501606195RA33 [tackfilm.se]Warning: Definitely NSFW.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336698</id>
	<title>Re:Choke!</title>
	<author>fermion</author>
	<datestamp>1267528680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Form the zombie guide to management (Z.E.O):  Use yours, eat theirs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Form the zombie guide to management ( Z.E.O ) : Use yours , eat theirs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Form the zombie guide to management (Z.E.O):  Use yours, eat theirs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335110</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336018</id>
	<title>Re:Math?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267525920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>His way is 11\% better than that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>His way is 11 \ % better than that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>His way is 11\% better than that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335410</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335394</id>
	<title>Here we go again..</title>
	<author>Skatox</author>
	<datestamp>1267523520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>..at least we can still reading SCO vs Linux information again. I'm bored without seen news like that</htmltext>
<tokenext>..at least we can still reading SCO vs Linux information again .
I 'm bored without seen news like that</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..at least we can still reading SCO vs Linux information again.
I'm bored without seen news like that</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31338448</id>
	<title>Re:Darling McBride</title>
	<author>fnj</author>
	<datestamp>1267535880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>"Darl McBride" just isn't a real name, people.</p></div></blockquote><p>That is very fitting, because this hideously appalling criminal waste of protoplasm isn't a real person.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Darl McBride " just is n't a real name , people.That is very fitting , because this hideously appalling criminal waste of protoplasm is n't a real person .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Darl McBride" just isn't a real name, people.That is very fitting, because this hideously appalling criminal waste of protoplasm isn't a real person.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335356</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335824</id>
	<title>There ought to be a law</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267525080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Really it should be illegal for principals in a bankrupt company to purchase any of that companies assets. In this case he is profiting from running the company into the ground by purchasing assets at cut rate prices with the money he syphoned off from the company.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Really it should be illegal for principals in a bankrupt company to purchase any of that companies assets .
In this case he is profiting from running the company into the ground by purchasing assets at cut rate prices with the money he syphoned off from the company .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really it should be illegal for principals in a bankrupt company to purchase any of that companies assets.
In this case he is profiting from running the company into the ground by purchasing assets at cut rate prices with the money he syphoned off from the company.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335060</id>
	<title>Urgent Legal Reform...</title>
	<author>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</author>
	<datestamp>1267522500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would urge that all members of the judiciary be issued the implements required for destruction of the undead as swiftly as possible; but I'm not quite sure whether requiring state officers to carry holy water violates the establishment clause or not... Stakes, garlic, and shotguns, at least, should be ok.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would urge that all members of the judiciary be issued the implements required for destruction of the undead as swiftly as possible ; but I 'm not quite sure whether requiring state officers to carry holy water violates the establishment clause or not... Stakes , garlic , and shotguns , at least , should be ok .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would urge that all members of the judiciary be issued the implements required for destruction of the undead as swiftly as possible; but I'm not quite sure whether requiring state officers to carry holy water violates the establishment clause or not... Stakes, garlic, and shotguns, at least, should be ok.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31340012</id>
	<title>Fantasies</title>
	<author>CAIMLAS</author>
	<datestamp>1267547220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've, on occasion, had fantasies about righting some of the wrongs in this world. I once had a dream about a Matrix-meets-Boondock Saints, where there were vigilantes taking out abusive, greedy corporate types.</p><p>McBride personifies the ideal target for this kind of thing. The man is a worm.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've , on occasion , had fantasies about righting some of the wrongs in this world .
I once had a dream about a Matrix-meets-Boondock Saints , where there were vigilantes taking out abusive , greedy corporate types.McBride personifies the ideal target for this kind of thing .
The man is a worm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've, on occasion, had fantasies about righting some of the wrongs in this world.
I once had a dream about a Matrix-meets-Boondock Saints, where there were vigilantes taking out abusive, greedy corporate types.McBride personifies the ideal target for this kind of thing.
The man is a worm.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31342540</id>
	<title>Re:How many zombie movies have you seen, exactly?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1267612680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don&rsquo;t need to kill that which you can throw in the meat grinder. Let&rsquo;s see how much that zombie can do when it&rsquo;s in the form of burger patties. Unless it got T-1000-like powers, not very much, I guess...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Don    t need to kill that which you can throw in the meat grinder .
Let    s see how much that zombie can do when it    s in the form of burger patties .
Unless it got T-1000-like powers , not very much , I guess... ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don’t need to kill that which you can throw in the meat grinder.
Let’s see how much that zombie can do when it’s in the form of burger patties.
Unless it got T-1000-like powers, not very much, I guess... ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336552</id>
	<title>Re:Math?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267528080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That is perhaps the most pretentious coffee-sip I have ever experienced in text form.  My fedora is off to you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That is perhaps the most pretentious coffee-sip I have ever experienced in text form .
My fedora is off to you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is perhaps the most pretentious coffee-sip I have ever experienced in text form.
My fedora is off to you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336246</id>
	<title>Oh for the love of...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267526700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just die already McBride!  You've had everything but a stake shoved through your heart and beheading plus soaking in holy water dammit!<br> <br>Just die die die!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just die already McBride !
You 've had everything but a stake shoved through your heart and beheading plus soaking in holy water dammit !
Just die die die !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just die already McBride!
You've had everything but a stake shoved through your heart and beheading plus soaking in holy water dammit!
Just die die die!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335104</id>
	<title>Re:Math?</title>
	<author>lorenlal</author>
	<datestamp>1267522620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Up 7 cents to 70... meaning it was at 63.</p><p>Not to be obnoxious...  Just pointing out that I read it too fast to begin with as well.  Just double-back next time and try a re-read... well... unless you're frist prosting...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Up 7 cents to 70... meaning it was at 63.Not to be obnoxious... Just pointing out that I read it too fast to begin with as well .
Just double-back next time and try a re-read... well... unless you 're frist prosting.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Up 7 cents to 70... meaning it was at 63.Not to be obnoxious...  Just pointing out that I read it too fast to begin with as well.
Just double-back next time and try a re-read... well... unless you're frist prosting...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335054</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335054</id>
	<title>Math?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267522500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>0.07$ to 0.70$ is 10 times or 1000\%.  It is not 11\% no matter how good your accounts are at hiding numbers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>0.07 $ to 0.70 $ is 10 times or 1000 \ % .
It is not 11 \ % no matter how good your accounts are at hiding numbers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>0.07$ to 0.70$ is 10 times or 1000\%.
It is not 11\% no matter how good your accounts are at hiding numbers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336982</id>
	<title>Re:Sigh...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267529700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Utah county Utah is a hot bed for investment fraud too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Utah county Utah is a hot bed for investment fraud too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Utah county Utah is a hot bed for investment fraud too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335102</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336542</id>
	<title>Darl rewind.......</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267528080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Darl has but one innovation<br>Which is ill conceived litigation,<br>It's a shame he can't find<br>Work made for his kind<br>But who'd pay him for masturbation?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Darl has but one innovationWhich is ill conceived litigation,It 's a shame he ca n't findWork made for his kindBut who 'd pay him for masturbation ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Darl has but one innovationWhich is ill conceived litigation,It's a shame he can't findWork made for his kindBut who'd pay him for masturbation?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1819211_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335054
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1819211_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31337274
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335054
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1819211_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1819211_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335102
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1819211_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335136
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335054
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1819211_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31342540
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1819211_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335054
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1819211_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335102
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1819211_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335104
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335054
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1819211_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335110
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1819211_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31340522
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1819211_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31338448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335356
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1819211_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1819211_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335054
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1819211_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31343312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335824
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1819211_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335054
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1819211_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335814
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335488
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1819211_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31343240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335438
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1819211_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335720
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1819211_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31339738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1819211_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31339688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336054
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1819211_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335928
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335110
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1819211_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31337828
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1819211_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335410
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335054
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1819211_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31342788
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336552
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335054
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1819211_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1819211_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335662
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1819211_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31338550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335102
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1819211_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335054
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1819211_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31337604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335054
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1819211_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336392
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1819211_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335054
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1819211_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336256
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335720
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1819211_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335488
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1819211_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31338052
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335054
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1819211.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335968
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31339738
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1819211.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335060
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1819211.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335488
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335814
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336548
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1819211.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336246
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1819211.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335356
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31338448
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1819211.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335670
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1819211.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335110
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336698
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335928
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1819211.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336054
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31339688
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1819211.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335720
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335964
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336256
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1819211.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335116
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1819211.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335056
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1819211.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335054
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335136
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335124
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335098
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335290
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335410
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336018
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336160
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335106
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335104
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335162
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336238
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31337274
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336926
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31337604
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31338052
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336552
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31342788
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335160
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1819211.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335120
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335386
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335706
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31337828
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335662
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335974
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335438
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31343240
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1819211.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31340570
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1819211.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336096
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31340522
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336392
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1819211.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335134
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1819211.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335414
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1819211.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335102
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31338550
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335954
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31336982
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1819211.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335824
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31343312
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1819211.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335636
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1819211.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335058
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31335564
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1819211.31342540
</commentlist>
</conversation>
