<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_02_1616241</id>
	<title>One Quarter of Germans Happy To Have Chip Implants</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1267528740000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>justice4all writes <i>"If it means shorter lines at the supermarket, a quarter of Germans would be happy to have a chip implanted under their skin. The head of Germany's main IT trade body told the audience at the opening ceremony of the CeBIT technology exhibition that <a href="http://www.eweekeurope.co.uk/news/cebit-quarter-of-germans-happy-to-have-chip-implants-5590">one in four of his countrymen are happy to have a microchip inserted</a> for ID purposes."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>justice4all writes " If it means shorter lines at the supermarket , a quarter of Germans would be happy to have a chip implanted under their skin .
The head of Germany 's main IT trade body told the audience at the opening ceremony of the CeBIT technology exhibition that one in four of his countrymen are happy to have a microchip inserted for ID purposes .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>justice4all writes "If it means shorter lines at the supermarket, a quarter of Germans would be happy to have a chip implanted under their skin.
The head of Germany's main IT trade body told the audience at the opening ceremony of the CeBIT technology exhibition that one in four of his countrymen are happy to have a microchip inserted for ID purposes.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337744</id>
	<title>movie rights!</title>
	<author>Michael Kristopeit</author>
	<datestamp>1267532760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>someone snatch up the black and white movie rights.</htmltext>
<tokenext>someone snatch up the black and white movie rights .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>someone snatch up the black and white movie rights.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31340190</id>
	<title>Re:Not an informed choice.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267548720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>DDT is a good pesticide.  I've read articles debunking the whole DDT = dead eagles argument against the use.  I'm much more concerned about the plastic industry.  BPA and  such</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>DDT is a good pesticide .
I 've read articles debunking the whole DDT = dead eagles argument against the use .
I 'm much more concerned about the plastic industry .
BPA and such</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DDT is a good pesticide.
I've read articles debunking the whole DDT = dead eagles argument against the use.
I'm much more concerned about the plastic industry.
BPA and  such</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337714</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338504</id>
	<title>Re:70 years ago...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267536180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now all they need is IBM to administer this.  Did Germany just Godwin itself?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now all they need is IBM to administer this .
Did Germany just Godwin itself ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now all they need is IBM to administer this.
Did Germany just Godwin itself?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31340862</id>
	<title>Bad survey results</title>
	<author>commodoresloat</author>
	<datestamp>1267555260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The respondents thought "chips" meant fried potatoes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The respondents thought " chips " meant fried potatoes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The respondents thought "chips" meant fried potatoes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31354504</id>
	<title>The Singularity?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267637880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is this an example of technology not being able to be stopped? I think a lot of people are afraid of this for the same reasons people were afraid of social security numbers and things like that to begin with.</p><p>In a society that operates with ever-increasing speed, will a small chip that allows you to run through an airport without having to be there 2 hours early for your flight be rejected? What if you have connecting flights 10 minutes apart on planes that can orbit the earth or get you from here to Mars in 3 hours? Isn't it more efficient to be able to scan your chip, with all your security information for the inter-planetary space station than to search through your space suit for a card or some other token?</p><p>The point is, I will be the first in line for a chip. It may kill the anonymity I'm enjoying right at this moment, but it is a move towards a smarter and more technologically-savvy global culture.</p><p>Eventually.</p><p>How do you see it? Good or bad? That's a matter of opinion, and it's extremely stupid to imply that it's not, somehow, and mandatory chip injections seem unlikely in the near future. I see it happening for government employees, though. That way when someone goes nuts and decides to dig the chip out of their skin, they can't get back into the post office to go postal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this an example of technology not being able to be stopped ?
I think a lot of people are afraid of this for the same reasons people were afraid of social security numbers and things like that to begin with.In a society that operates with ever-increasing speed , will a small chip that allows you to run through an airport without having to be there 2 hours early for your flight be rejected ?
What if you have connecting flights 10 minutes apart on planes that can orbit the earth or get you from here to Mars in 3 hours ?
Is n't it more efficient to be able to scan your chip , with all your security information for the inter-planetary space station than to search through your space suit for a card or some other token ? The point is , I will be the first in line for a chip .
It may kill the anonymity I 'm enjoying right at this moment , but it is a move towards a smarter and more technologically-savvy global culture.Eventually.How do you see it ?
Good or bad ?
That 's a matter of opinion , and it 's extremely stupid to imply that it 's not , somehow , and mandatory chip injections seem unlikely in the near future .
I see it happening for government employees , though .
That way when someone goes nuts and decides to dig the chip out of their skin , they ca n't get back into the post office to go postal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this an example of technology not being able to be stopped?
I think a lot of people are afraid of this for the same reasons people were afraid of social security numbers and things like that to begin with.In a society that operates with ever-increasing speed, will a small chip that allows you to run through an airport without having to be there 2 hours early for your flight be rejected?
What if you have connecting flights 10 minutes apart on planes that can orbit the earth or get you from here to Mars in 3 hours?
Isn't it more efficient to be able to scan your chip, with all your security information for the inter-planetary space station than to search through your space suit for a card or some other token?The point is, I will be the first in line for a chip.
It may kill the anonymity I'm enjoying right at this moment, but it is a move towards a smarter and more technologically-savvy global culture.Eventually.How do you see it?
Good or bad?
That's a matter of opinion, and it's extremely stupid to imply that it's not, somehow, and mandatory chip injections seem unlikely in the near future.
I see it happening for government employees, though.
That way when someone goes nuts and decides to dig the chip out of their skin, they can't get back into the post office to go postal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31344098</id>
	<title>Re:And 50\% of Americans!</title>
	<author>meringuoid</author>
	<datestamp>1267625160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>I suspect even a greater percentage of Americans would agree to be chipped.</i>

<p>I doubt it. Quite a lot of Americans have superstitious objections to this kind of thing. Mark of the beast and all that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suspect even a greater percentage of Americans would agree to be chipped .
I doubt it .
Quite a lot of Americans have superstitious objections to this kind of thing .
Mark of the beast and all that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suspect even a greater percentage of Americans would agree to be chipped.
I doubt it.
Quite a lot of Americans have superstitious objections to this kind of thing.
Mark of the beast and all that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31341788</id>
	<title>Re:Cell phones and credit cards.</title>
	<author>julesh</author>
	<datestamp>1267649580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>After all, if I asked you to carry around a device that would let the government track where you are at all times with little more than a warrant, would you accept? [...] It's called a cell phone. </i></p><p>You can turn a cell phone off, or decide to leave it at home if you're going somewhere you'd rather people didn't know about.  You can't turn off an RFID tag, nor can you leave it at home if it's implanted.</p><p>Similarly with your credit card: if you're buying something you'd rather not be traced back to you, you can just pay cash.</p><p>And believe me, it isn't only criminals who have to worry about these things: if the police can get access to them, a determined private investigator can do so as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After all , if I asked you to carry around a device that would let the government track where you are at all times with little more than a warrant , would you accept ?
[ ... ] It 's called a cell phone .
You can turn a cell phone off , or decide to leave it at home if you 're going somewhere you 'd rather people did n't know about .
You ca n't turn off an RFID tag , nor can you leave it at home if it 's implanted.Similarly with your credit card : if you 're buying something you 'd rather not be traced back to you , you can just pay cash.And believe me , it is n't only criminals who have to worry about these things : if the police can get access to them , a determined private investigator can do so as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After all, if I asked you to carry around a device that would let the government track where you are at all times with little more than a warrant, would you accept?
[...] It's called a cell phone.
You can turn a cell phone off, or decide to leave it at home if you're going somewhere you'd rather people didn't know about.
You can't turn off an RFID tag, nor can you leave it at home if it's implanted.Similarly with your credit card: if you're buying something you'd rather not be traced back to you, you can just pay cash.And believe me, it isn't only criminals who have to worry about these things: if the police can get access to them, a determined private investigator can do so as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338578</id>
	<title>What For?</title>
	<author>bitspotter</author>
	<datestamp>1267536480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm a little unclear on this concept. Why exactly would I want to have an ID chip implanted in my body for that I couldn't get from one that's in my pocket?</p><p>I suppose it would make it harder to steal, lose, or forget. But really? I haven't had any of those things happen to me in over 15 years.</p><p>And sometimes, I *want* to leave my ID at home.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm a little unclear on this concept .
Why exactly would I want to have an ID chip implanted in my body for that I could n't get from one that 's in my pocket ? I suppose it would make it harder to steal , lose , or forget .
But really ?
I have n't had any of those things happen to me in over 15 years.And sometimes , I * want * to leave my ID at home .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm a little unclear on this concept.
Why exactly would I want to have an ID chip implanted in my body for that I couldn't get from one that's in my pocket?I suppose it would make it harder to steal, lose, or forget.
But really?
I haven't had any of those things happen to me in over 15 years.And sometimes, I *want* to leave my ID at home.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338456</id>
	<title>Why not barcodes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267535940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why not use barcodes instead, these are more reliable and I think they already have experience with it</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not use barcodes instead , these are more reliable and I think they already have experience with it</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not use barcodes instead, these are more reliable and I think they already have experience with it</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338846</id>
	<title>Re:This is bullshit</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1267537860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Someone hand that guy an insightful mod: This thread is worthless without the original question.</p><p>How about "do you think it would be a good idea to have a chip implanted, e.g. to pay in the supermarket or to open your home doors?"</p><p>If that's the wording, 25\% sounds like an awfully LOW turnout. Appearantly 75\% of the people are still smart enough to notice that being cattle-tagged is not something they'd want. And that means that even half the people with an IQ below 100 could identify it as a DUMB idea.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone hand that guy an insightful mod : This thread is worthless without the original question.How about " do you think it would be a good idea to have a chip implanted , e.g .
to pay in the supermarket or to open your home doors ?
" If that 's the wording , 25 \ % sounds like an awfully LOW turnout .
Appearantly 75 \ % of the people are still smart enough to notice that being cattle-tagged is not something they 'd want .
And that means that even half the people with an IQ below 100 could identify it as a DUMB idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone hand that guy an insightful mod: This thread is worthless without the original question.How about "do you think it would be a good idea to have a chip implanted, e.g.
to pay in the supermarket or to open your home doors?
"If that's the wording, 25\% sounds like an awfully LOW turnout.
Appearantly 75\% of the people are still smart enough to notice that being cattle-tagged is not something they'd want.
And that means that even half the people with an IQ below 100 could identify it as a DUMB idea.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338990</id>
	<title>Re:He looks like Gargamel</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267538760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its true. They polled everyone in the sales team and they all agree that one quarter of germans want chip implants. Now all they have to do is remove their brains.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its true .
They polled everyone in the sales team and they all agree that one quarter of germans want chip implants .
Now all they have to do is remove their brains .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its true.
They polled everyone in the sales team and they all agree that one quarter of germans want chip implants.
Now all they have to do is remove their brains.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31347492</id>
	<title>Germans also love The Hoff</title>
	<author>kimgkimg</author>
	<datestamp>1267639920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nuff said...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nuff said.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nuff said...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31340858</id>
	<title>This is an outrage</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267555200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pretty soon Germany will want to gas all of the Je...wait...that is already done?  Oh, carry on then</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pretty soon Germany will want to gas all of the Je...wait...that is already done ?
Oh , carry on then</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pretty soon Germany will want to gas all of the Je...wait...that is already done?
Oh, carry on then</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31341544</id>
	<title>Hello!</title>
	<author>Asaf.Zamir</author>
	<datestamp>1267647720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Big Brother or Der Gro&#223;e Bruder?

I don't understand why Germans would like to give such force to the government,
it's not like they did that in the past..</htmltext>
<tokenext>Big Brother or Der Gro   e Bruder ?
I do n't understand why Germans would like to give such force to the government , it 's not like they did that in the past. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Big Brother or Der Große Bruder?
I don't understand why Germans would like to give such force to the government,
it's not like they did that in the past..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338044</id>
	<title>Just to note...</title>
	<author>eepok</author>
	<datestamp>1267534080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Germans and their willingness to fall in step with just about anything should not be assumed to be a universal characterization of Western civilization.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Germans and their willingness to fall in step with just about anything should not be assumed to be a universal characterization of Western civilization .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Germans and their willingness to fall in step with just about anything should not be assumed to be a universal characterization of Western civilization.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337962</id>
	<title>And 50\% of Americans!</title>
	<author>plopez</author>
	<datestamp>1267533660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suspect even a greater percentage of Americans would agree to be chipped. Or have their children chipped to prevent their kidnapping by the ever present child molester.</p><p>Man, I have become really cynical.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suspect even a greater percentage of Americans would agree to be chipped .
Or have their children chipped to prevent their kidnapping by the ever present child molester.Man , I have become really cynical .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suspect even a greater percentage of Americans would agree to be chipped.
Or have their children chipped to prevent their kidnapping by the ever present child molester.Man, I have become really cynical.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337706</id>
	<title>He looks like Gargamel</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267532580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>&ldquo;We just carried out a survey and one out of four people are happy to have a chip planted under their skin for very trivial uses for example to pass gates more quickly at a discotheque for example and to be able to pay for things more quickly in the supermarket,&rdquo; said Scheer. &ldquo;The wilingness of the population to accept our technology is certainly given.&rdquo;</p></div><p>"Bwa-haha-haha," Scheer continued.  "After this, world domination will be within my grasp!"</p><p>Pie and cake were served soon afterwards.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>   We just carried out a survey and one out of four people are happy to have a chip planted under their skin for very trivial uses for example to pass gates more quickly at a discotheque for example and to be able to pay for things more quickly in the supermarket ,    said Scheer .
   The wilingness of the population to accept our technology is certainly given.    " Bwa-haha-haha , " Scheer continued .
" After this , world domination will be within my grasp !
" Pie and cake were served soon afterwards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>“We just carried out a survey and one out of four people are happy to have a chip planted under their skin for very trivial uses for example to pass gates more quickly at a discotheque for example and to be able to pay for things more quickly in the supermarket,” said Scheer.
“The wilingness of the population to accept our technology is certainly given.”"Bwa-haha-haha," Scheer continued.
"After this, world domination will be within my grasp!
"Pie and cake were served soon afterwards.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31339338</id>
	<title>Re:Not an informed choice.</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1267541220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So why not keep that single chip in your watch band, clothing or a ring on your finger? What is so attractive about embedding it in your body?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So why not keep that single chip in your watch band , clothing or a ring on your finger ?
What is so attractive about embedding it in your body ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So why not keep that single chip in your watch band, clothing or a ring on your finger?
What is so attractive about embedding it in your body?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31339460</id>
	<title>Re:Not an informed choice.</title>
	<author>Aussie</author>
	<datestamp>1267542360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Close</p><p>On the EU ID card:</p><p>
&nbsp; "the Germans will love it, the French will ignore it and the Italians and the Irish will be too chaotic to enforce it. Only the British will resent it."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>CloseOn the EU ID card :   " the Germans will love it , the French will ignore it and the Italians and the Irish will be too chaotic to enforce it .
Only the British will resent it .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>CloseOn the EU ID card:
  "the Germans will love it, the French will ignore it and the Italians and the Irish will be too chaotic to enforce it.
Only the British will resent it.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338174</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338606</id>
	<title>I Would Be Happy to Have  an ID Chip Implant</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267536600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I Would Be Happy to Have an ID Chip Implant...</p><p>If I could reprogram it to identify me as anyone I wanted to and to not respond at all when I didn't want it to.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I Would Be Happy to Have an ID Chip Implant...If I could reprogram it to identify me as anyone I wanted to and to not respond at all when I did n't want it to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I Would Be Happy to Have an ID Chip Implant...If I could reprogram it to identify me as anyone I wanted to and to not respond at all when I didn't want it to.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31345190</id>
	<title>Too Soon?</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1267630500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know it is highly offensive to some people.</p><p>One day I was commenting on technology, and this sort of thing, and at the same time the inability of me to remember my Social Insurance Number when ever I needed it. I also could not think a a cool significant thing to get a tattoo of that wasn't lame, that I would likely regret in later years.</p><p>Anyway musing aloud, I said, maybe I should just get my SIN tattooed on my arm, as it isn't ever going to change, and it would be useful, particularity as an identifying mark in case something ever happened to me.</p><p>Well it just happened that one of the friends I was describing this too was Jewish. He actually looked at me like I was the stupidest most inconsiderate person in the world and with utter contempt. He drew the analogy of Germans tattooing numbers on Jews in concentration camps in WW2.</p><p>Anyway I can sort of see where he is coming from, but at the same time, that was a long time ago, I am not Jewish, it would be voluntary, I don't really see the big deal. Of course as mentioned neither am I Jewish either.</p><p>This is essentially the same thing the only difference being that the "number" is hidden as an RF signal. So I could see some outrage out there from some people.</p><p>That said this technology is becoming more and more mature, as this exact method has been used for Fluffy the cat and Spike the dog for several years now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know it is highly offensive to some people.One day I was commenting on technology , and this sort of thing , and at the same time the inability of me to remember my Social Insurance Number when ever I needed it .
I also could not think a a cool significant thing to get a tattoo of that was n't lame , that I would likely regret in later years.Anyway musing aloud , I said , maybe I should just get my SIN tattooed on my arm , as it is n't ever going to change , and it would be useful , particularity as an identifying mark in case something ever happened to me.Well it just happened that one of the friends I was describing this too was Jewish .
He actually looked at me like I was the stupidest most inconsiderate person in the world and with utter contempt .
He drew the analogy of Germans tattooing numbers on Jews in concentration camps in WW2.Anyway I can sort of see where he is coming from , but at the same time , that was a long time ago , I am not Jewish , it would be voluntary , I do n't really see the big deal .
Of course as mentioned neither am I Jewish either.This is essentially the same thing the only difference being that the " number " is hidden as an RF signal .
So I could see some outrage out there from some people.That said this technology is becoming more and more mature , as this exact method has been used for Fluffy the cat and Spike the dog for several years now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know it is highly offensive to some people.One day I was commenting on technology, and this sort of thing, and at the same time the inability of me to remember my Social Insurance Number when ever I needed it.
I also could not think a a cool significant thing to get a tattoo of that wasn't lame, that I would likely regret in later years.Anyway musing aloud, I said, maybe I should just get my SIN tattooed on my arm, as it isn't ever going to change, and it would be useful, particularity as an identifying mark in case something ever happened to me.Well it just happened that one of the friends I was describing this too was Jewish.
He actually looked at me like I was the stupidest most inconsiderate person in the world and with utter contempt.
He drew the analogy of Germans tattooing numbers on Jews in concentration camps in WW2.Anyway I can sort of see where he is coming from, but at the same time, that was a long time ago, I am not Jewish, it would be voluntary, I don't really see the big deal.
Of course as mentioned neither am I Jewish either.This is essentially the same thing the only difference being that the "number" is hidden as an RF signal.
So I could see some outrage out there from some people.That said this technology is becoming more and more mature, as this exact method has been used for Fluffy the cat and Spike the dog for several years now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31339850</id>
	<title>One in Four?  What would Dilbert say?</title>
	<author>seeker\_1us</author>
	<datestamp>1267545600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.dilbert.com/strips/comic/2008-05-08/" title="dilbert.com">http://www.dilbert.com/strips/comic/2008-05-08/</a> [dilbert.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.dilbert.com/strips/comic/2008-05-08/ [ dilbert.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.dilbert.com/strips/comic/2008-05-08/ [dilbert.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31342368</id>
	<title>Re:Not an informed choice.</title>
	<author>disi</author>
	<datestamp>1267611420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The problem with old people is, that they still believe in the government and trust them ^^</htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem with old people is , that they still believe in the government and trust them ^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem with old people is, that they still believe in the government and trust them ^^</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337714</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338072</id>
	<title>Good work guys...</title>
	<author>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</author>
	<datestamp>1267534200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've also heard that the next generation of chips will be able to keep track of how many freedom points you have generated by working...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've also heard that the next generation of chips will be able to keep track of how many freedom points you have generated by working.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've also heard that the next generation of chips will be able to keep track of how many freedom points you have generated by working...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31342742</id>
	<title>What if it was a yellow star pinned to their shirt</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267614300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How soon people forget.</p><p>Maybe all the Nazis had to do was to tell the Jews that having a yellow star pinned to their shirt would allow them to be served more quickly in the supermarket.</p><p>The more easily you are traceable, logged and categorised the easier it will be for the authorities to keep you under control.</p><p>Some people are born milch cows and they, of course, are the ones who are willing to be tagged. Good for them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How soon people forget.Maybe all the Nazis had to do was to tell the Jews that having a yellow star pinned to their shirt would allow them to be served more quickly in the supermarket.The more easily you are traceable , logged and categorised the easier it will be for the authorities to keep you under control.Some people are born milch cows and they , of course , are the ones who are willing to be tagged .
Good for them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How soon people forget.Maybe all the Nazis had to do was to tell the Jews that having a yellow star pinned to their shirt would allow them to be served more quickly in the supermarket.The more easily you are traceable, logged and categorised the easier it will be for the authorities to keep you under control.Some people are born milch cows and they, of course, are the ones who are willing to be tagged.
Good for them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338208</id>
	<title>Sample Size</title>
	<author>adrianturner</author>
	<datestamp>1267534860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Oh yes, we conducted loads of research to produce our statistics, we asked a whole 12 people, three of whom we work with!</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh yes , we conducted loads of research to produce our statistics , we asked a whole 12 people , three of whom we work with !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh yes, we conducted loads of research to produce our statistics, we asked a whole 12 people, three of whom we work with!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31339864</id>
	<title>Nazis had pieces of flair that they made the Jews</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267545780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nazis had pieces of flair that they made the Jews wear. This seem like a high tech ver of that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nazis had pieces of flair that they made the Jews wear .
This seem like a high tech ver of that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nazis had pieces of flair that they made the Jews wear.
This seem like a high tech ver of that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31357108</id>
	<title>Alex Jones is right, after all</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267712760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Alex Jones is right, after all... The idea is to chip the entire masses...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Alex Jones is right , after all... The idea is to chip the entire masses.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Alex Jones is right, after all... The idea is to chip the entire masses...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31341762</id>
	<title>Re:And 50\% of Americans!</title>
	<author>JackieBrown</author>
	<datestamp>1267649460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow.</p><p>It took more than 10 threads to get to the "I have no proof but think the US would be worse"<br>thread.</p><p>People were showing some real restraint, today.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow.It took more than 10 threads to get to the " I have no proof but think the US would be worse " thread.People were showing some real restraint , today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow.It took more than 10 threads to get to the "I have no proof but think the US would be worse"thread.People were showing some real restraint, today.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338056</id>
	<title>3 in 4</title>
	<author>vext\_atl</author>
	<datestamp>1267534140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Three in four Germans are not happy with chip implants.  Gotta love statistics!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Three in four Germans are not happy with chip implants .
Got ta love statistics !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Three in four Germans are not happy with chip implants.
Gotta love statistics!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337916</id>
	<title>1 in 7 Also want the Berlin wall back</title>
	<author>markass530</author>
	<datestamp>1267533480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>So take anything the Germans want with a grain of salt

<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE58G5GS20090917" title="reuters.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE58G5GS20090917</a> [reuters.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>So take anything the Germans want with a grain of salt http : //www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE58G5GS20090917 [ reuters.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So take anything the Germans want with a grain of salt

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE58G5GS20090917 [reuters.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337998</id>
	<title>Re:Not an informed choice.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267533840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>250 million people per year get malaria, and one million of them die every year. Them and their families would LOVE to have DDT sprayed again.<br>Propaganda is awesome isn't it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>250 million people per year get malaria , and one million of them die every year .
Them and their families would LOVE to have DDT sprayed again.Propaganda is awesome is n't it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>250 million people per year get malaria, and one million of them die every year.
Them and their families would LOVE to have DDT sprayed again.Propaganda is awesome isn't it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337714</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31339536</id>
	<title>psych</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267543200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>For all we know the concluding question could've been:

<p> <b>Do you not not want a chip implant in your skin?</b> </p><p>
<i>And the results are:</i>
</p><p>Yes (25\%)
</p><p>No(25\%)
</p><p>Undecided (50\%)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For all we know the concluding question could 've been : Do you not not want a chip implant in your skin ?
And the results are : Yes ( 25 \ % ) No ( 25 \ % ) Undecided ( 50 \ % )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For all we know the concluding question could've been:

 Do you not not want a chip implant in your skin?
And the results are:
Yes (25\%)
No(25\%)
Undecided (50\%)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31348188</id>
	<title>Re:This is bullshit</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267643400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds to me more like 1 in 20 would agree to a chip "If it means shorter lines at the supermarket" then.<br>The first sentence of TFS is clearly deliberately false.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds to me more like 1 in 20 would agree to a chip " If it means shorter lines at the supermarket " then.The first sentence of TFS is clearly deliberately false .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds to me more like 1 in 20 would agree to a chip "If it means shorter lines at the supermarket" then.The first sentence of TFS is clearly deliberately false.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31339512</id>
	<title>oh those krazy krauts</title>
	<author>heptapod</author>
	<datestamp>1267543020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Less than a century ago 1/4 of German citizens were unhappy about receiving tattoos on their left forearm.</p><p>How times have changed!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Less than a century ago 1/4 of German citizens were unhappy about receiving tattoos on their left forearm.How times have changed !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Less than a century ago 1/4 of German citizens were unhappy about receiving tattoos on their left forearm.How times have changed!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338372</id>
	<title>Re:He looks like Gargamel</title>
	<author>icebike</author>
	<datestamp>1267535520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How bad must the supermarket lines be for anyone to answer in the affirmative?</p><p>Why would a prosperous country like Germany have so few supermarkets that there were lines at all, other than the day before a holiday?</p><p>Now street muggers would have to carry scalpels?  If your money is in your wallet they take the wallet.  When your money is in your arm...???</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How bad must the supermarket lines be for anyone to answer in the affirmative ? Why would a prosperous country like Germany have so few supermarkets that there were lines at all , other than the day before a holiday ? Now street muggers would have to carry scalpels ?
If your money is in your wallet they take the wallet .
When your money is in your arm... ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How bad must the supermarket lines be for anyone to answer in the affirmative?Why would a prosperous country like Germany have so few supermarkets that there were lines at all, other than the day before a holiday?Now street muggers would have to carry scalpels?
If your money is in your wallet they take the wallet.
When your money is in your arm...??
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338426</id>
	<title>Einkaufen macht frei</title>
	<author>Ralph Spoilsport</author>
	<datestamp>1267535820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>good grief. And what next? Why not just become a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Barin\_in\_a\_vat\_(en)\_v2.png" title="wikipedia.org">brain in a juice bucket</a> [wikipedia.org] and not even bother living and embodied life of risk and adventure?
<p>
If there are more than 2 lines the straight odds are that "the other like" will move faster. In fact - I have an idea - just herd the human race itself into some oven, and let the machines rip each other off. They'll be able to do it so much faster and easier without us.
</p><p>
Maybe the Nazi pigfuckers simply didn't look at things in a big enough way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>good grief .
And what next ?
Why not just become a brain in a juice bucket [ wikipedia.org ] and not even bother living and embodied life of risk and adventure ?
If there are more than 2 lines the straight odds are that " the other like " will move faster .
In fact - I have an idea - just herd the human race itself into some oven , and let the machines rip each other off .
They 'll be able to do it so much faster and easier without us .
Maybe the Nazi pigfuckers simply did n't look at things in a big enough way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>good grief.
And what next?
Why not just become a brain in a juice bucket [wikipedia.org] and not even bother living and embodied life of risk and adventure?
If there are more than 2 lines the straight odds are that "the other like" will move faster.
In fact - I have an idea - just herd the human race itself into some oven, and let the machines rip each other off.
They'll be able to do it so much faster and easier without us.
Maybe the Nazi pigfuckers simply didn't look at things in a big enough way.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338152</id>
	<title>ignorance</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267534560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>they're just not well informed. do they haz teh internetz in Germany?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>they 're just not well informed .
do they haz teh internetz in Germany ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they're just not well informed.
do they haz teh internetz in Germany?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337798</id>
	<title>What benefits?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267533000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Really, I don't see any benefits in using chip implants in humans. Yes, it makes sense for cattle who can't positively identify themselves, for pets who slip out of their tags, etc.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Really , I do n't see any benefits in using chip implants in humans .
Yes , it makes sense for cattle who ca n't positively identify themselves , for pets who slip out of their tags , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really, I don't see any benefits in using chip implants in humans.
Yes, it makes sense for cattle who can't positively identify themselves, for pets who slip out of their tags, etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338174</id>
	<title>Re:Not an informed choice.</title>
	<author>LWATCDR</author>
	<datestamp>1267534680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think you are assuming way too much ignorance.<br>Maybe they just don't worry as much about government interfering in their lives as people in the US do.<br>Reminds me of an episode of the Britcom Yes Minister.<br>The EU wanted to issue universal ID cards and the Minister was freaking out because he was sure that the people of the UK would never stand for it.<br>When he was asked wouldn't the other EU nations put up a stink about it he said.<br>"The Germans will love it and the Spanish and Italians will ignore it. Only the British will be angry about it."<br>It could just a cultural bias in that a good percentage of Germans would be willing to trust their government for the benefits that this offers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you are assuming way too much ignorance.Maybe they just do n't worry as much about government interfering in their lives as people in the US do.Reminds me of an episode of the Britcom Yes Minister.The EU wanted to issue universal ID cards and the Minister was freaking out because he was sure that the people of the UK would never stand for it.When he was asked would n't the other EU nations put up a stink about it he said .
" The Germans will love it and the Spanish and Italians will ignore it .
Only the British will be angry about it .
" It could just a cultural bias in that a good percentage of Germans would be willing to trust their government for the benefits that this offers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you are assuming way too much ignorance.Maybe they just don't worry as much about government interfering in their lives as people in the US do.Reminds me of an episode of the Britcom Yes Minister.The EU wanted to issue universal ID cards and the Minister was freaking out because he was sure that the people of the UK would never stand for it.When he was asked wouldn't the other EU nations put up a stink about it he said.
"The Germans will love it and the Spanish and Italians will ignore it.
Only the British will be angry about it.
"It could just a cultural bias in that a good percentage of Germans would be willing to trust their government for the benefits that this offers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337714</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337880</id>
	<title>Could be worse</title>
	<author>93 Escort Wagon</author>
	<datestamp>1267533420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At least the Germans weren't stating an opinion on whether they should forcibly implant microchips into people of OTHER nationalities.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At least the Germans were n't stating an opinion on whether they should forcibly implant microchips into people of OTHER nationalities .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least the Germans weren't stating an opinion on whether they should forcibly implant microchips into people of OTHER nationalities.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31341110</id>
	<title>If you're buying Cosmo...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267557120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...That's not "fire" you're shooting, and it's not shooting out of your "hands".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...That 's not " fire " you 're shooting , and it 's not shooting out of your " hands " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...That's not "fire" you're shooting, and it's not shooting out of your "hands".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338452</id>
	<title>Cell phones and credit cards.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267535940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If you would have asked people in the 50's if they would prefer DDT sprayed on their crops to kill the insects, creating cheaper food. They would have said yes. They didn't know the consequences, and were only presented with the benefits. As is the case here. How many of those who said they would be willing fully understand the security issues associated with that choice?</p></div><p>I think people aren't completely ignorant of the implications of such a device, nor are they necessarily more likely to carry irrational beliefs that the device is safe than irrational fears of phantom threats.  It doesn't matter.  People will willingly sacrifice the distant risk of tyranny for day-to-day convenience, and as much as I disagree with that decision, I can't call it an irrational one.</p><p>After all, if I asked you to carry around a device that would let the government track where you are at all times with little more than a warrant, would you accept?  What if that device let you find friends and family in exchange for letting them keep in touch with you?  Chances are you've already got a device like this.</p><p>It's called a cell phone.  As much as I hated it at the time, I got one too, years ago, essentially because of peer pressure.  Now that I'm used to having it and all its features (e.g. maps and web browsing), I doubt I'd give it up.  But that was a choice to sacrifice some privacy and anonymity in exchange for convenience.</p><p>I've done the same thing with credit card purchases.  The grocery store doesn't need some special customer card to keep track of everything I purchase -- my credit card number suffices for any good CRM system.  But it's easier than carrying cash, especially when the grocery store doubles as my ATM.</p><p>When you consider that, just how much more danger is having a chip in your arm really?  What are they going to be able to track that they can't already?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you would have asked people in the 50 's if they would prefer DDT sprayed on their crops to kill the insects , creating cheaper food .
They would have said yes .
They did n't know the consequences , and were only presented with the benefits .
As is the case here .
How many of those who said they would be willing fully understand the security issues associated with that choice ? I think people are n't completely ignorant of the implications of such a device , nor are they necessarily more likely to carry irrational beliefs that the device is safe than irrational fears of phantom threats .
It does n't matter .
People will willingly sacrifice the distant risk of tyranny for day-to-day convenience , and as much as I disagree with that decision , I ca n't call it an irrational one.After all , if I asked you to carry around a device that would let the government track where you are at all times with little more than a warrant , would you accept ?
What if that device let you find friends and family in exchange for letting them keep in touch with you ?
Chances are you 've already got a device like this.It 's called a cell phone .
As much as I hated it at the time , I got one too , years ago , essentially because of peer pressure .
Now that I 'm used to having it and all its features ( e.g .
maps and web browsing ) , I doubt I 'd give it up .
But that was a choice to sacrifice some privacy and anonymity in exchange for convenience.I 've done the same thing with credit card purchases .
The grocery store does n't need some special customer card to keep track of everything I purchase -- my credit card number suffices for any good CRM system .
But it 's easier than carrying cash , especially when the grocery store doubles as my ATM.When you consider that , just how much more danger is having a chip in your arm really ?
What are they going to be able to track that they ca n't already ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you would have asked people in the 50's if they would prefer DDT sprayed on their crops to kill the insects, creating cheaper food.
They would have said yes.
They didn't know the consequences, and were only presented with the benefits.
As is the case here.
How many of those who said they would be willing fully understand the security issues associated with that choice?I think people aren't completely ignorant of the implications of such a device, nor are they necessarily more likely to carry irrational beliefs that the device is safe than irrational fears of phantom threats.
It doesn't matter.
People will willingly sacrifice the distant risk of tyranny for day-to-day convenience, and as much as I disagree with that decision, I can't call it an irrational one.After all, if I asked you to carry around a device that would let the government track where you are at all times with little more than a warrant, would you accept?
What if that device let you find friends and family in exchange for letting them keep in touch with you?
Chances are you've already got a device like this.It's called a cell phone.
As much as I hated it at the time, I got one too, years ago, essentially because of peer pressure.
Now that I'm used to having it and all its features (e.g.
maps and web browsing), I doubt I'd give it up.
But that was a choice to sacrifice some privacy and anonymity in exchange for convenience.I've done the same thing with credit card purchases.
The grocery store doesn't need some special customer card to keep track of everything I purchase -- my credit card number suffices for any good CRM system.
But it's easier than carrying cash, especially when the grocery store doubles as my ATM.When you consider that, just how much more danger is having a chip in your arm really?
What are they going to be able to track that they can't already?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337714</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31340108</id>
	<title>Re:Not an informed choice.</title>
	<author>Iman Azol</author>
	<datestamp>1267548120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Congrats on picking DDT, the marketing myth that has killed millions of people.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Congrats on picking DDT , the marketing myth that has killed millions of people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Congrats on picking DDT, the marketing myth that has killed millions of people.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337714</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31340332</id>
	<title>I'd like to nominate</title>
	<author>who's got my nicknam</author>
	<datestamp>1267550040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>another tag for this article: 666</htmltext>
<tokenext>another tag for this article : 666</tokentext>
<sentencetext>another tag for this article: 666</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31340732</id>
	<title>Can't.... help.... it.....</title>
	<author>Angst Badger</author>
	<datestamp>1267553820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...but given the fortuitous context, I <i>have</i> to trigger Godwin's Law here.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>If it means shorter lines at the supermarket, a quarter of Germans would be happy to have a chip implanted under their skin.</p></div><p>It would have meant shorter lines at Auschwitz, too.</p><p>Honestly, I'm not altogether opposed to implants, though I'm much more interested in stuff that's not yet possible, like having a fully-functional computing environment directly interfaced to my nervous system with all the usual transhumanist trimmings. But even there, before the first implant goes in, much less millions of them, we need a comprehensive legal framework to define how the state and private organizations can interface with implants and what they can do with the data gleaned thereby. Sure, it'd be handy to not have to bother with carrying a wallet and its contents anymore, but not at the expense of having the state and various corporations tracking my every move without due process of law, or giving police free rein to use some kind of personal kill switch like the ones they envision for automobiles.</p><p>In short, technology is just power, and power is morally neutral. It's what you do with it that counts, and if you don't take great care in ensuring that its uses are not malign, malign people will be drawn to it like flies to shit. And given the way that law enforcement agencies like to pitch their power grabs to national legislatures, if we don't establish some clear boundaries now with trivial implants, some future FBI director will be sitting in front of Congress, arguing that -- in the name of fighting drugs/pedophiles/terrorists or whatever new bogeyman they come up with -- law enforcement needs unrestrained access to the latest non-trivial implants <i>just like they've had all along</i> with trivial ID chips. And they'll get what they ask for and abuse it, because that's what they always do.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...but given the fortuitous context , I have to trigger Godwin 's Law here.If it means shorter lines at the supermarket , a quarter of Germans would be happy to have a chip implanted under their skin.It would have meant shorter lines at Auschwitz , too.Honestly , I 'm not altogether opposed to implants , though I 'm much more interested in stuff that 's not yet possible , like having a fully-functional computing environment directly interfaced to my nervous system with all the usual transhumanist trimmings .
But even there , before the first implant goes in , much less millions of them , we need a comprehensive legal framework to define how the state and private organizations can interface with implants and what they can do with the data gleaned thereby .
Sure , it 'd be handy to not have to bother with carrying a wallet and its contents anymore , but not at the expense of having the state and various corporations tracking my every move without due process of law , or giving police free rein to use some kind of personal kill switch like the ones they envision for automobiles.In short , technology is just power , and power is morally neutral .
It 's what you do with it that counts , and if you do n't take great care in ensuring that its uses are not malign , malign people will be drawn to it like flies to shit .
And given the way that law enforcement agencies like to pitch their power grabs to national legislatures , if we do n't establish some clear boundaries now with trivial implants , some future FBI director will be sitting in front of Congress , arguing that -- in the name of fighting drugs/pedophiles/terrorists or whatever new bogeyman they come up with -- law enforcement needs unrestrained access to the latest non-trivial implants just like they 've had all along with trivial ID chips .
And they 'll get what they ask for and abuse it , because that 's what they always do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...but given the fortuitous context, I have to trigger Godwin's Law here.If it means shorter lines at the supermarket, a quarter of Germans would be happy to have a chip implanted under their skin.It would have meant shorter lines at Auschwitz, too.Honestly, I'm not altogether opposed to implants, though I'm much more interested in stuff that's not yet possible, like having a fully-functional computing environment directly interfaced to my nervous system with all the usual transhumanist trimmings.
But even there, before the first implant goes in, much less millions of them, we need a comprehensive legal framework to define how the state and private organizations can interface with implants and what they can do with the data gleaned thereby.
Sure, it'd be handy to not have to bother with carrying a wallet and its contents anymore, but not at the expense of having the state and various corporations tracking my every move without due process of law, or giving police free rein to use some kind of personal kill switch like the ones they envision for automobiles.In short, technology is just power, and power is morally neutral.
It's what you do with it that counts, and if you don't take great care in ensuring that its uses are not malign, malign people will be drawn to it like flies to shit.
And given the way that law enforcement agencies like to pitch their power grabs to national legislatures, if we don't establish some clear boundaries now with trivial implants, some future FBI director will be sitting in front of Congress, arguing that -- in the name of fighting drugs/pedophiles/terrorists or whatever new bogeyman they come up with -- law enforcement needs unrestrained access to the latest non-trivial implants just like they've had all along with trivial ID chips.
And they'll get what they ask for and abuse it, because that's what they always do.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337996</id>
	<title>Come On Guys</title>
	<author>BJ\_Covert\_Action</author>
	<datestamp>1267533840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seriously? If we're going to be inserting something under our skin, can we at least get some super powers out of it too? I don't need to have invasive surgery to buy the latest copy of Cosmopolitan quicker. I do need to have invasive surgery to shoot fire out of the palms of my hands.
<br> <br>
Raise your standards Germany. Have some dignity!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously ?
If we 're going to be inserting something under our skin , can we at least get some super powers out of it too ?
I do n't need to have invasive surgery to buy the latest copy of Cosmopolitan quicker .
I do need to have invasive surgery to shoot fire out of the palms of my hands .
Raise your standards Germany .
Have some dignity !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously?
If we're going to be inserting something under our skin, can we at least get some super powers out of it too?
I don't need to have invasive surgery to buy the latest copy of Cosmopolitan quicker.
I do need to have invasive surgery to shoot fire out of the palms of my hands.
Raise your standards Germany.
Have some dignity!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337936</id>
	<title>Re:Not an informed choice.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267533600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>If you would have asked people in the 50's if they would prefer DDT sprayed on their crops to kill the insects, creating cheaper food. They would have said yes.</p></div></blockquote><p>What's up with. Your weird punctu. Ation?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you would have asked people in the 50 's if they would prefer DDT sprayed on their crops to kill the insects , creating cheaper food .
They would have said yes.What 's up with .
Your weird punctu .
Ation ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you would have asked people in the 50's if they would prefer DDT sprayed on their crops to kill the insects, creating cheaper food.
They would have said yes.What's up with.
Your weird punctu.
Ation?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337714</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337972</id>
	<title>Re:He looks like Gargamel</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267533720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't find their "survey" at BITKOM <a href="http://www.bitkom.org/en/Default.aspx" title="bitkom.org">http://www.bitkom.org/en/Default.aspx</a> [bitkom.org], but i'm wondering how many Germans were polled (four?). Most Germans I know would not want this AT ALL.<br>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't find their " survey " at BITKOM http : //www.bitkom.org/en/Default.aspx [ bitkom.org ] , but i 'm wondering how many Germans were polled ( four ? ) .
Most Germans I know would not want this AT ALL .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't find their "survey" at BITKOM http://www.bitkom.org/en/Default.aspx [bitkom.org], but i'm wondering how many Germans were polled (four?).
Most Germans I know would not want this AT ALL.
 </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31340256</id>
	<title>In Related News: One Quarter of Germans Stupid</title>
	<author>gweihir</author>
	<datestamp>1267549140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously, this number is likely not characteristic for the Germans, but more likely a characteristic of larger groups of randomly selected people. I seriously doubt that most of the agreeing people do even begin to understand the implications.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , this number is likely not characteristic for the Germans , but more likely a characteristic of larger groups of randomly selected people .
I seriously doubt that most of the agreeing people do even begin to understand the implications .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, this number is likely not characteristic for the Germans, but more likely a characteristic of larger groups of randomly selected people.
I seriously doubt that most of the agreeing people do even begin to understand the implications.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31339560</id>
	<title>Free loaders</title>
	<author>ppetrakis</author>
	<datestamp>1267543380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How much do you want to bet that this is the same percentage of<br>the population that's living on the governments dime?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How much do you want to bet that this is the same percentage ofthe population that 's living on the governments dime ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How much do you want to bet that this is the same percentage ofthe population that's living on the governments dime?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31339060</id>
	<title>One Quarter of Germans Happy To Have Chip Implant</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267539180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...other three quarters displeased with their implants.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...other three quarters displeased with their implants .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...other three quarters displeased with their implants.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337796</id>
	<title>70 years ago...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267533000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...much, much more than a mere 25\% of Germans were quite eager to carry their era's form of identification and "go along with the crowd".<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/end-of-thread, Godwin invoked.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...much , much more than a mere 25 \ % of Germans were quite eager to carry their era 's form of identification and " go along with the crowd " .
/end-of-thread , Godwin invoked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...much, much more than a mere 25\% of Germans were quite eager to carry their era's form of identification and "go along with the crowd".
/end-of-thread, Godwin invoked.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338586</id>
	<title>According to MY survey ...</title>
	<author>PinkyGigglebrain</author>
	<datestamp>1267536480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>50\% voiced strong opposition to being chipped.<br> <br>The other 50\% is undecided.<br> <br>The undecided responded to the question with a "Meow" before returning to her nap, but since it is neither yes or no was counted as "No Opinion".<br> <br>See how much fun statistics can be!  Learn to manipulate public opinion for fun and profit, ask me how!</htmltext>
<tokenext>50 \ % voiced strong opposition to being chipped .
The other 50 \ % is undecided .
The undecided responded to the question with a " Meow " before returning to her nap , but since it is neither yes or no was counted as " No Opinion " .
See how much fun statistics can be !
Learn to manipulate public opinion for fun and profit , ask me how !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>50\% voiced strong opposition to being chipped.
The other 50\% is undecided.
The undecided responded to the question with a "Meow" before returning to her nap, but since it is neither yes or no was counted as "No Opinion".
See how much fun statistics can be!
Learn to manipulate public opinion for fun and profit, ask me how!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337944</id>
	<title>This is bullshit</title>
	<author>Fëanáro</author>
	<datestamp>1267533600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am having a hard time finding the original survey questions (probably for good reasons)<br>Even so, this smells like bullshit.</p><p>The only (apparent) quote I could find: "Jeder vierte Deutsche (23 Prozent) w&#252;rde sogar einen Computerchip im K&#246;rper tragen, wenn es ihm bestimmte Vorteile verschafft"</p><p>~ "every fourth German would even carry an "Computerchip"(e.g. an integrated circuit/microprocessor) in their body if that would result in certain advantages"</p><p>Like anyone would refuse to wear a pacemaker with a integrated circuit.</p><p>References to "for identification purposes" or "under their skin" appear to be made up.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am having a hard time finding the original survey questions ( probably for good reasons ) Even so , this smells like bullshit.The only ( apparent ) quote I could find : " Jeder vierte Deutsche ( 23 Prozent ) w   rde sogar einen Computerchip im K   rper tragen , wenn es ihm bestimmte Vorteile verschafft " ~ " every fourth German would even carry an " Computerchip " ( e.g .
an integrated circuit/microprocessor ) in their body if that would result in certain advantages " Like anyone would refuse to wear a pacemaker with a integrated circuit.References to " for identification purposes " or " under their skin " appear to be made up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am having a hard time finding the original survey questions (probably for good reasons)Even so, this smells like bullshit.The only (apparent) quote I could find: "Jeder vierte Deutsche (23 Prozent) würde sogar einen Computerchip im Körper tragen, wenn es ihm bestimmte Vorteile verschafft"~ "every fourth German would even carry an "Computerchip"(e.g.
an integrated circuit/microprocessor) in their body if that would result in certain advantages"Like anyone would refuse to wear a pacemaker with a integrated circuit.References to "for identification purposes" or "under their skin" appear to be made up.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338562</id>
	<title>I wonder</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267536360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder what percentage of Texans would think this was a good idea. I'm thinking 85\%.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder what percentage of Texans would think this was a good idea .
I 'm thinking 85 \ % .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder what percentage of Texans would think this was a good idea.
I'm thinking 85\%.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31343796</id>
	<title>How would it make lines shorter?</title>
	<author>Wildclaw</author>
	<datestamp>1267623180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The amount of time I spend locking the time of the cashier (and therefore the line) is minimal. Simply, do the whole prepay procedure (swipe card, enter code) while the cashier is going through your goods. Once it is time to pay, all you have to do is press a single button.</p><p>The problem is not with current technology. It is with people who aren't using it efficiently, such as those who wait to swipe the card and input the code until after all the goods have been processed. Of course, if you can't do it like mentioned above in your country, then it is a problem with technology. But not one of the technology being outdated, but one of it being badly designed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The amount of time I spend locking the time of the cashier ( and therefore the line ) is minimal .
Simply , do the whole prepay procedure ( swipe card , enter code ) while the cashier is going through your goods .
Once it is time to pay , all you have to do is press a single button.The problem is not with current technology .
It is with people who are n't using it efficiently , such as those who wait to swipe the card and input the code until after all the goods have been processed .
Of course , if you ca n't do it like mentioned above in your country , then it is a problem with technology .
But not one of the technology being outdated , but one of it being badly designed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The amount of time I spend locking the time of the cashier (and therefore the line) is minimal.
Simply, do the whole prepay procedure (swipe card, enter code) while the cashier is going through your goods.
Once it is time to pay, all you have to do is press a single button.The problem is not with current technology.
It is with people who aren't using it efficiently, such as those who wait to swipe the card and input the code until after all the goods have been processed.
Of course, if you can't do it like mentioned above in your country, then it is a problem with technology.
But not one of the technology being outdated, but one of it being badly designed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31339388</id>
	<title>Hitler gave everyone a Volkswagen</title>
	<author>AthleteMusicianNerd</author>
	<datestamp>1267541640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is the classic bait and switch.  It amazes me how naive people can be.  You'd think they learn after finding out that Hitler's promise of a Volkswagen was a bad idea.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the classic bait and switch .
It amazes me how naive people can be .
You 'd think they learn after finding out that Hitler 's promise of a Volkswagen was a bad idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the classic bait and switch.
It amazes me how naive people can be.
You'd think they learn after finding out that Hitler's promise of a Volkswagen was a bad idea.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31339810</id>
	<title>Damn!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267545180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I read the headline as CHIMP implants!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I read the headline as CHIMP implants !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read the headline as CHIMP implants!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31341486</id>
	<title>Re:He looks like Gargamel</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267647180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think he got something wrong. 25\% wouldn&rsquo;t be happy to have chips implanted. The research said that 72\% don&rsquo;t(!) want it to happen under any circumstances and 5\% are unsure. That&rsquo;s still 23\% who don&rsquo;t think it&rsquo;s ridiculous across the board. But about 70\% of them think it might be useful in a case of emergency, like being buried by an avalanche. Anyhow, why are they asking 14+ year olds about these things?</p><p>http://www.bitkom.org/files/documents/BITKOM-Praesentation\_Connected\_Worlds\_01\_03\_2010.pdf</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think he got something wrong .
25 \ % wouldn    t be happy to have chips implanted .
The research said that 72 \ % don    t ( !
) want it to happen under any circumstances and 5 \ % are unsure .
That    s still 23 \ % who don    t think it    s ridiculous across the board .
But about 70 \ % of them think it might be useful in a case of emergency , like being buried by an avalanche .
Anyhow , why are they asking 14 + year olds about these things ? http : //www.bitkom.org/files/documents/BITKOM-Praesentation \ _Connected \ _Worlds \ _01 \ _03 \ _2010.pdf</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think he got something wrong.
25\% wouldn’t be happy to have chips implanted.
The research said that 72\% don’t(!
) want it to happen under any circumstances and 5\% are unsure.
That’s still 23\% who don’t think it’s ridiculous across the board.
But about 70\% of them think it might be useful in a case of emergency, like being buried by an avalanche.
Anyhow, why are they asking 14+ year olds about these things?http://www.bitkom.org/files/documents/BITKOM-Praesentation\_Connected\_Worlds\_01\_03\_2010.pdf</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337714</id>
	<title>Not an informed choice.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267532640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you would have asked people in the 50's if they would prefer DDT sprayed on their crops to kill the insects, creating cheaper food. They would have said yes. They didn't know the consequences, and were only presented with the benefits. As is the case here. How many of those who said they would be willing fully understand the security issues associated with that choice?</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you would have asked people in the 50 's if they would prefer DDT sprayed on their crops to kill the insects , creating cheaper food .
They would have said yes .
They did n't know the consequences , and were only presented with the benefits .
As is the case here .
How many of those who said they would be willing fully understand the security issues associated with that choice ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you would have asked people in the 50's if they would prefer DDT sprayed on their crops to kill the insects, creating cheaper food.
They would have said yes.
They didn't know the consequences, and were only presented with the benefits.
As is the case here.
How many of those who said they would be willing fully understand the security issues associated with that choice?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31344896</id>
	<title>pretty good ratio</title>
	<author>dzafez</author>
	<datestamp>1267629180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&lt;disclaimer&gt; I am german and I do not want a Chip implanted&lt;/disclaimer&gt; <br> <br>

I actually think, since 50\% of the people I meet on the street are stupid as s**t, having 75\% oppose this technology is quite a good ratio. <br> <br>

Just a thought</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am german and I do not want a Chip implanted I actually think , since 50 \ % of the people I meet on the street are stupid as s * * t , having 75 \ % oppose this technology is quite a good ratio .
Just a thought</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I am german and I do not want a Chip implanted  

I actually think, since 50\% of the people I meet on the street are stupid as s**t, having 75\% oppose this technology is quite a good ratio.
Just a thought</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338638</id>
	<title>Re:This is bullshit</title>
	<author>gerddie</author>
	<datestamp>1267536720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>There is a <a href="http://www.bitkom.org/files/documents/BITKOM-Praesentation\_Connected\_Worlds\_01\_03\_2010.pdf" title="bitkom.org">presentation</a> [bitkom.org]. The secons slide on page two sais:<p><div class="quote"><p>Question: For which advantages would you carry a computer chip inside your body?</p></div><ul>
<li>72 \% never</li><li>23\% for certain advantages (total)</li><li>5\% don't know </li></ul><p>
----
</p><ul>
<li>16\% faster rescuing </li><li>12\% increased security</li><li>5\% more comfortable shopping</li><li>4\% access control</li><li>6\% unspecified advantages</li></ul></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is a presentation [ bitkom.org ] .
The secons slide on page two sais : Question : For which advantages would you carry a computer chip inside your body ?
72 \ % never23 \ % for certain advantages ( total ) 5 \ % do n't know ---- 16 \ % faster rescuing 12 \ % increased security5 \ % more comfortable shopping4 \ % access control6 \ % unspecified advantages</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is a presentation [bitkom.org].
The secons slide on page two sais:Question: For which advantages would you carry a computer chip inside your body?
72 \% never23\% for certain advantages (total)5\% don't know 
----

16\% faster rescuing 12\% increased security5\% more comfortable shopping4\% access control6\% unspecified advantages
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31340582</id>
	<title>Re:Not an informed choice.</title>
	<author>GNT</author>
	<datestamp>1267552320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Considering that DDT was in point of fact not harmful and had wiped out malaria, I still say Yes!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Considering that DDT was in point of fact not harmful and had wiped out malaria , I still say Yes !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considering that DDT was in point of fact not harmful and had wiped out malaria, I still say Yes!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337714</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338896</id>
	<title>Re:And 50\% of Americans!</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1267538160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why do you think you'd get asked if your kids should be chipped? They're already collecting their blood for DNA samples without even telling you, what gives you the idea they'd ask you whether you want to have your kids chipped?</p><p>Why wouldn't you? It's for their safety! You do not want your kids to be safe? What kind of parent are you! You are unfit, so the CPA has to step in and declare it a good idea. Now shut up and you may be allowed to take your kids home with you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do you think you 'd get asked if your kids should be chipped ?
They 're already collecting their blood for DNA samples without even telling you , what gives you the idea they 'd ask you whether you want to have your kids chipped ? Why would n't you ?
It 's for their safety !
You do not want your kids to be safe ?
What kind of parent are you !
You are unfit , so the CPA has to step in and declare it a good idea .
Now shut up and you may be allowed to take your kids home with you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do you think you'd get asked if your kids should be chipped?
They're already collecting their blood for DNA samples without even telling you, what gives you the idea they'd ask you whether you want to have your kids chipped?Why wouldn't you?
It's for their safety!
You do not want your kids to be safe?
What kind of parent are you!
You are unfit, so the CPA has to step in and declare it a good idea.
Now shut up and you may be allowed to take your kids home with you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31341476</id>
	<title>lobby fud</title>
	<author>Torvac</author>
	<datestamp>1267647060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>.. article full of shit.

hes the president of the biggest german industry it-lobby group, the same idiot group that trys to push forward patenting laws like in the us.</htmltext>
<tokenext>.. article full of shit .
hes the president of the biggest german industry it-lobby group , the same idiot group that trys to push forward patenting laws like in the us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.. article full of shit.
hes the president of the biggest german industry it-lobby group, the same idiot group that trys to push forward patenting laws like in the us.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337780</id>
	<title>Well, hey...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267532940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Those tattoos and armbands were bloody handy.</p><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p><i>OH NO, IT'S GODWINZILLA!  AIEEE!</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Those tattoos and armbands were bloody handy .
... ...OH NO , IT 'S GODWINZILLA !
AIEEE !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those tattoos and armbands were bloody handy.
... ...OH NO, IT'S GODWINZILLA!
AIEEE!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31342010</id>
	<title>in other news</title>
	<author>smash</author>
	<datestamp>1267608000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt;25\% of people (not necessarily just german people) are idiots.</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; 25 \ % of people ( not necessarily just german people ) are idiots .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;25\% of people (not necessarily just german people) are idiots.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338680</id>
	<title>Re:This is bullshit</title>
	<author>mhelander</author>
	<datestamp>1267536900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But if talking about pacemakers, why would the number be so low as only 23\% ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But if talking about pacemakers , why would the number be so low as only 23 \ % ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But if talking about pacemakers, why would the number be so low as only 23\% ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337794</id>
	<title>Re:Not an informed choice.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267533000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I fully understand the security issues of walking around with bits of plastic and paper in my pockets, relying on them to pay for stuff, identify myself, etc. Given the choice, I'd prefer an single electronic chip, thank you very much. If you're in front of cavemen about to "invent" fire, will you try to scare them off by telling them about the dangers of arson, death by fumes and the great fire of London?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I fully understand the security issues of walking around with bits of plastic and paper in my pockets , relying on them to pay for stuff , identify myself , etc .
Given the choice , I 'd prefer an single electronic chip , thank you very much .
If you 're in front of cavemen about to " invent " fire , will you try to scare them off by telling them about the dangers of arson , death by fumes and the great fire of London ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I fully understand the security issues of walking around with bits of plastic and paper in my pockets, relying on them to pay for stuff, identify myself, etc.
Given the choice, I'd prefer an single electronic chip, thank you very much.
If you're in front of cavemen about to "invent" fire, will you try to scare them off by telling them about the dangers of arson, death by fumes and the great fire of London?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337714</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31340326</id>
	<title>Re:And 50\% of Americans!</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1267549980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Or have their children chipped to prevent their kidnapping by the ever present child molester.</p></div><p>He must be one busy guy!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or have their children chipped to prevent their kidnapping by the ever present child molester.He must be one busy guy !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or have their children chipped to prevent their kidnapping by the ever present child molester.He must be one busy guy!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338960</id>
	<title>Re:Not an informed choice.</title>
	<author>alcmaeon</author>
	<datestamp>1267538520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>"They didn't know the consequences, and were only presented with the benefits."</i>
<p>What fucking German hasn't heard of World War II, the last time they thought a totalitarian state was a good idea?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" They did n't know the consequences , and were only presented with the benefits .
" What fucking German has n't heard of World War II , the last time they thought a totalitarian state was a good idea ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"They didn't know the consequences, and were only presented with the benefits.
"
What fucking German hasn't heard of World War II, the last time they thought a totalitarian state was a good idea?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337714</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31340716</id>
	<title>Yay Chip Implants!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267553700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The poll info is a week out of date. Now our newspapers here in Germany are full of celebrities touting the advantages of these chips: Hasselhoff, Schwarzenegger, Mechahitler! Can't wait to get one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The poll info is a week out of date .
Now our newspapers here in Germany are full of celebrities touting the advantages of these chips : Hasselhoff , Schwarzenegger , Mechahitler !
Ca n't wait to get one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The poll info is a week out of date.
Now our newspapers here in Germany are full of celebrities touting the advantages of these chips: Hasselhoff, Schwarzenegger, Mechahitler!
Can't wait to get one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337820</id>
	<title>Gestapo sagt:</title>
	<author>cosm</author>
	<datestamp>1267533120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Halt! Ihre Mikrochip bitte!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Halt !
Ihre Mikrochip bitte !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Halt!
Ihre Mikrochip bitte!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338304</id>
	<title>Cancer?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267535220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't these things cause cancer after a short time?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't these things cause cancer after a short time ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't these things cause cancer after a short time?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337872</id>
	<title>Oh, WOULD be happy</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1267533360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, I kinda figured that was the case.  But for a second there I was about to be very upset that Germans had become cyborgs before we even had the option.</p><p>But now that I think of it, if they already had chip implants but only 25\% were happy about it that'd be kinda disturbing.  I mean why'd they get them then?  Overhyped marketing claims seems plausible.  Another option would be government coercion.  Which then raises the question:  Why didn't they design the chips to alter the recipient's mind so that they'd be happy to be chipped?  Maybe they did but that feature is only 25\% effective?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , I kinda figured that was the case .
But for a second there I was about to be very upset that Germans had become cyborgs before we even had the option.But now that I think of it , if they already had chip implants but only 25 \ % were happy about it that 'd be kinda disturbing .
I mean why 'd they get them then ?
Overhyped marketing claims seems plausible .
Another option would be government coercion .
Which then raises the question : Why did n't they design the chips to alter the recipient 's mind so that they 'd be happy to be chipped ?
Maybe they did but that feature is only 25 \ % effective ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, I kinda figured that was the case.
But for a second there I was about to be very upset that Germans had become cyborgs before we even had the option.But now that I think of it, if they already had chip implants but only 25\% were happy about it that'd be kinda disturbing.
I mean why'd they get them then?
Overhyped marketing claims seems plausible.
Another option would be government coercion.
Which then raises the question:  Why didn't they design the chips to alter the recipient's mind so that they'd be happy to be chipped?
Maybe they did but that feature is only 25\% effective?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338220</id>
	<title>Re:He looks like Gargamel</title>
	<author>Beardo the Bearded</author>
	<datestamp>1267534920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They'll just get them inserted into the left forearm.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 'll just get them inserted into the left forearm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They'll just get them inserted into the left forearm.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31345492</id>
	<title>Re:This is bullshit</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267631820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would say yes. I can certainly think of certain unspecified advantages that would make having a computer inside my body an attractive proposition. If the thing would keep me alive by counteracting some deadly medical condition, then definitely yes. If it is an rfid chip, then definitely no.</p><p>Btw the slide does mention "under the skin".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would say yes .
I can certainly think of certain unspecified advantages that would make having a computer inside my body an attractive proposition .
If the thing would keep me alive by counteracting some deadly medical condition , then definitely yes .
If it is an rfid chip , then definitely no.Btw the slide does mention " under the skin " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would say yes.
I can certainly think of certain unspecified advantages that would make having a computer inside my body an attractive proposition.
If the thing would keep me alive by counteracting some deadly medical condition, then definitely yes.
If it is an rfid chip, then definitely no.Btw the slide does mention "under the skin".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31342768</id>
	<title>The upside</title>
	<author>hedleyroos</author>
	<datestamp>1267614720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At least the Poles will have sufficient warning this time<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At least the Poles will have sufficient warning this time ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least the Poles will have sufficient warning this time ;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31343900</id>
	<title>Re:Not an informed choice.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267623720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can't help but wonder what many/most people would have said yes to in the 1930s? But let's not even go there.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ca n't help but wonder what many/most people would have said yes to in the 1930s ?
But let 's not even go there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can't help but wonder what many/most people would have said yes to in the 1930s?
But let's not even go there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337714</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337792</id>
	<title>Re:Not an informed choice.</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1267532940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah. Did you hear about that idea the Microsoft VP had? A way to improve internet security, you should vote yes!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah .
Did you hear about that idea the Microsoft VP had ?
A way to improve internet security , you should vote yes !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah.
Did you hear about that idea the Microsoft VP had?
A way to improve internet security, you should vote yes!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337714</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31342758</id>
	<title>Re:Not an informed choice.</title>
	<author>EdIII</author>
	<datestamp>1267614540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>How well does it do nerves? Print me a new foreskin, please!</p></div></blockquote><p>I think it was actually an informed choice and the question was just poorly worded.  They said 1/4 of Germans said they were okay with something being inserted into them.  Maybe they just did not say what?</p><p>According to my research on the Internet, that percentage is probably much higher.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How well does it do nerves ?
Print me a new foreskin , please ! I think it was actually an informed choice and the question was just poorly worded .
They said 1/4 of Germans said they were okay with something being inserted into them .
Maybe they just did not say what ? According to my research on the Internet , that percentage is probably much higher .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How well does it do nerves?
Print me a new foreskin, please!I think it was actually an informed choice and the question was just poorly worded.
They said 1/4 of Germans said they were okay with something being inserted into them.
Maybe they just did not say what?According to my research on the Internet, that percentage is probably much higher.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337714</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31342094</id>
	<title>88\% want to have hitler back</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267608600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>germans are scum</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>germans are scum</tokentext>
<sentencetext>germans are scum</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31340882</id>
	<title>Re:1 in 7 Also want the Berlin wall back</title>
	<author>commodoresloat</author>
	<datestamp>1267555440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So take anything the Germans want with a grain of salt</p></div><p>yeah no shit, me too!  Several grains in fact - that is some of the blandest food in Europe, and that's saying a lot.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So take anything the Germans want with a grain of saltyeah no shit , me too !
Several grains in fact - that is some of the blandest food in Europe , and that 's saying a lot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So take anything the Germans want with a grain of saltyeah no shit, me too!
Several grains in fact - that is some of the blandest food in Europe, and that's saying a lot.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338336</id>
	<title>Re:What benefits?</title>
	<author>Beardo the Bearded</author>
	<datestamp>1267535340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's not really much benefit. The major upside is that you can't ever forget your wallet, and it's going to be a bitch to steal your card. (If the guy in front of you is trying to pay with a stump, then it's probably stolen.)</p><p><a href="http://www.projectlifesaver.org/" title="projectlifesaver.org">However, electronic tracking of people does have its place.</a> [projectlifesaver.org] (I wrote the code for those transmitters.) Some people will wander away and be unable to ask for help or even realize that they are dying of exposure.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's not really much benefit .
The major upside is that you ca n't ever forget your wallet , and it 's going to be a bitch to steal your card .
( If the guy in front of you is trying to pay with a stump , then it 's probably stolen .
) However , electronic tracking of people does have its place .
[ projectlifesaver.org ] ( I wrote the code for those transmitters .
) Some people will wander away and be unable to ask for help or even realize that they are dying of exposure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's not really much benefit.
The major upside is that you can't ever forget your wallet, and it's going to be a bitch to steal your card.
(If the guy in front of you is trying to pay with a stump, then it's probably stolen.
)However, electronic tracking of people does have its place.
[projectlifesaver.org] (I wrote the code for those transmitters.
) Some people will wander away and be unable to ask for help or even realize that they are dying of exposure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31340178</id>
	<title>Re:Come On Guys</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267548600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You don't need invasive surgery for that, simply inject yourself with the latest Plasmid from Ryan Industries!</p><p>EVOLVE TODAY!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't need invasive surgery for that , simply inject yourself with the latest Plasmid from Ryan Industries ! EVOLVE TODAY !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't need invasive surgery for that, simply inject yourself with the latest Plasmid from Ryan Industries!EVOLVE TODAY!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31342162</id>
	<title>Sample size of four</title>
	<author>gnasher719</author>
	<datestamp>1267609260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>He sells the stuff, so he says he would be willing to have a chip implanted. Then he asked three other people and they told him "fuck off, you pervert" and punched him in the face. At that point he gave up and claimed 25\% agreement.</htmltext>
<tokenext>He sells the stuff , so he says he would be willing to have a chip implanted .
Then he asked three other people and they told him " fuck off , you pervert " and punched him in the face .
At that point he gave up and claimed 25 \ % agreement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He sells the stuff, so he says he would be willing to have a chip implanted.
Then he asked three other people and they told him "fuck off, you pervert" and punched him in the face.
At that point he gave up and claimed 25\% agreement.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31342216</id>
	<title>Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267610100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are people really that stupid? Actually I can imagine how the survey went....</p><p>( Imagine this is in German! )</p><p>"Would you like free money?"<br>"Yes please!"<br>"Milk comes from cows, yes or no?"<br>"Yes!"<br>"Would you like more free money?"<br>"Yes!"<br>"The sky is blue, yes or no?"<br>"Yes"<br>"Would like us to implant tracking devices under your skin and harvest your last remaining shred of humanity and sell it to the highest bidder?"<br>"Yes! Eh?"<br>"Thanks for your time, here's a small book token for your trouble. Bye!"</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are people really that stupid ?
Actually I can imagine how the survey went.... ( Imagine this is in German !
) " Would you like free money ?
" " Yes please !
" " Milk comes from cows , yes or no ? " " Yes !
" " Would you like more free money ? " " Yes !
" " The sky is blue , yes or no ?
" " Yes " " Would like us to implant tracking devices under your skin and harvest your last remaining shred of humanity and sell it to the highest bidder ? " " Yes !
Eh ? " " Thanks for your time , here 's a small book token for your trouble .
Bye ! "        </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are people really that stupid?
Actually I can imagine how the survey went....( Imagine this is in German!
)"Would you like free money?
""Yes please!
""Milk comes from cows, yes or no?""Yes!
""Would you like more free money?""Yes!
""The sky is blue, yes or no?
""Yes""Would like us to implant tracking devices under your skin and harvest your last remaining shred of humanity and sell it to the highest bidder?""Yes!
Eh?""Thanks for your time, here's a small book token for your trouble.
Bye!"
       </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338080</id>
	<title>The other 75\% understood the question</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267534260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>25\% probably thought it was about chipping other people. You know, criminals and old people.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>25 \ % probably thought it was about chipping other people .
You know , criminals and old people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>25\% probably thought it was about chipping other people.
You know, criminals and old people.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1616241_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337998
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337714
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1616241_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1616241_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1616241_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31341762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1616241_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31341110
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337996
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1616241_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31344098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1616241_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31340326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1616241_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31345492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1616241_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31340862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1616241_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31339338
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337714
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1616241_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31342758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337714
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1616241_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1616241_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31341486
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1616241_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31340190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337714
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1616241_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31348188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1616241_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337714
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1616241_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338504
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337796
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1616241_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338680
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1616241_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31343900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337714
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1616241_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31340178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337996
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1616241_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31340582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337714
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1616241_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337714
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1616241_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31342368
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337714
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1616241_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338960
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337714
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1616241_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31340882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1616241_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338896
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1616241_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31339460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337714
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1616241_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1616241_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31341788
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338452
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337714
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1616241_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31340108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337714
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_1616241_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338336
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1616241.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337780
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1616241.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337714
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31340108
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31342758
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31340190
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31342368
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337936
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31340582
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337794
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31339338
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338174
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31339460
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337998
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337792
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31343900
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338960
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338452
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31341788
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1616241.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31340332
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1616241.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337916
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31340882
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1616241.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338304
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1616241.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338606
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1616241.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337962
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31341762
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31344098
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31340326
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338896
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1616241.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338562
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1616241.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337944
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338638
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31345492
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31348188
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338680
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338846
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1616241.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337796
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338504
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1616241.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337798
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338336
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1616241.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338208
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1616241.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338578
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1616241.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337706
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337972
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31341486
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338372
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31340862
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338220
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31338990
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1616241.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31337996
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31340178
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31341110
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_1616241.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_1616241.31339864
</commentlist>
</conversation>
