<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_02_0329249</id>
	<title>Google Awarded Broad Patent For Location-Based Advertising</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1267545060000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Mashable has a report of a patent that just issued (6-1/2 years after filing) &mdash; apparently <a href="http://mashable.com/2010/03/01/google-location-advertising-patent/"> Google now has a lock on location-based advertising</a>. It's not clear that the search company intends to assert the patent against any other companies (such as emerging rival Apple), but it's useful as leverage. Here is <a href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;p=1&amp;u=\%2Fnetahtml\%2FPTO\%2Fsearch-adv.htm&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;d=PTXT&amp;S1=7668832.PN.&amp;OS=pn/7668832&amp;RS=PN/7668832">the patent</a>.
<b>Update: 03/02 14:34 GMT</b> by <b> <a href="mailto:soulskillatslashdotdotorg">S</a> </b>: Reader butlerm noted that the incorrect patent was linked. It now points to the correct URL.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mashable has a report of a patent that just issued ( 6-1/2 years after filing )    apparently Google now has a lock on location-based advertising .
It 's not clear that the search company intends to assert the patent against any other companies ( such as emerging rival Apple ) , but it 's useful as leverage .
Here is the patent .
Update : 03/02 14 : 34 GMT by S : Reader butlerm noted that the incorrect patent was linked .
It now points to the correct URL .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mashable has a report of a patent that just issued (6-1/2 years after filing) — apparently  Google now has a lock on location-based advertising.
It's not clear that the search company intends to assert the patent against any other companies (such as emerging rival Apple), but it's useful as leverage.
Here is the patent.
Update: 03/02 14:34 GMT by  S : Reader butlerm noted that the incorrect patent was linked.
It now points to the correct URL.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326764</id>
	<title>USPTO /.ed?</title>
	<author>jrumney</author>
	<datestamp>1267468320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Three attempts out of five to view the mentioned patent, I ended up at "Method and system for approving documents based on image similarity", and the other two I ended up at other Google patents that have nothing to do with TFA.  Perhaps it would be more reliable in the face of a slashdotting to Google Google's patents on <a href="http://www.google.com/patents" title="google.com">Google Patents</a> [google.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>Three attempts out of five to view the mentioned patent , I ended up at " Method and system for approving documents based on image similarity " , and the other two I ended up at other Google patents that have nothing to do with TFA .
Perhaps it would be more reliable in the face of a slashdotting to Google Google 's patents on Google Patents [ google.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Three attempts out of five to view the mentioned patent, I ended up at "Method and system for approving documents based on image similarity", and the other two I ended up at other Google patents that have nothing to do with TFA.
Perhaps it would be more reliable in the face of a slashdotting to Google Google's patents on Google Patents [google.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326946</id>
	<title>Google needs a war chest.</title>
	<author>miffo.swe</author>
	<datestamp>1267470480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem with the current patent system is that Google needs a war chest full of patents to survive. When Microsoft goes on a rampage like they do now, demanding anyone using linux to pay Microsoft its essential.</p><p>Having a patents like this makes Google less of a target.</p><p>The system is utterly broken but i dont blame the companies playing the game, i blame the stupid politicians who allow this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem with the current patent system is that Google needs a war chest full of patents to survive .
When Microsoft goes on a rampage like they do now , demanding anyone using linux to pay Microsoft its essential.Having a patents like this makes Google less of a target.The system is utterly broken but i dont blame the companies playing the game , i blame the stupid politicians who allow this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem with the current patent system is that Google needs a war chest full of patents to survive.
When Microsoft goes on a rampage like they do now, demanding anyone using linux to pay Microsoft its essential.Having a patents like this makes Google less of a target.The system is utterly broken but i dont blame the companies playing the game, i blame the stupid politicians who allow this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31329414</id>
	<title>Re:Let's hope they use it.</title>
	<author>Rolgar</author>
	<datestamp>1267543260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe instead of retinal scanning (ala Minority Report), advertisers will just have scanners positioned near their billboards that can detect people's cell phones, and computers will be able to triangulate the particular individual, then a camera placed near the billboard will be able to detect that certain individuals have looked in the direction of the billboard, and will calculate which ad matches most of the individuals looking at a certain moment. In the case of road side billboards, the bill board will just have to assume that individuals in a certain range are looking, and calculate based upon it's best information.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe instead of retinal scanning ( ala Minority Report ) , advertisers will just have scanners positioned near their billboards that can detect people 's cell phones , and computers will be able to triangulate the particular individual , then a camera placed near the billboard will be able to detect that certain individuals have looked in the direction of the billboard , and will calculate which ad matches most of the individuals looking at a certain moment .
In the case of road side billboards , the bill board will just have to assume that individuals in a certain range are looking , and calculate based upon it 's best information .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe instead of retinal scanning (ala Minority Report), advertisers will just have scanners positioned near their billboards that can detect people's cell phones, and computers will be able to triangulate the particular individual, then a camera placed near the billboard will be able to detect that certain individuals have looked in the direction of the billboard, and will calculate which ad matches most of the individuals looking at a certain moment.
In the case of road side billboards, the bill board will just have to assume that individuals in a certain range are looking, and calculate based upon it's best information.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326652</id>
	<title>Read it first</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267467300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You guys may want to have a look at the patent text before making ignorant comments.  Oh, sorry - guess I forgot this was<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.  Same goes to the author of the article.  What do these guys do, spend their days looking for keywords in patent text that might rouse up some geeks?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You guys may want to have a look at the patent text before making ignorant comments .
Oh , sorry - guess I forgot this was / .
Same goes to the author of the article .
What do these guys do , spend their days looking for keywords in patent text that might rouse up some geeks ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You guys may want to have a look at the patent text before making ignorant comments.
Oh, sorry - guess I forgot this was /.
Same goes to the author of the article.
What do these guys do, spend their days looking for keywords in patent text that might rouse up some geeks?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326446</id>
	<title>What about Nokia?</title>
	<author>PortaDiFerro</author>
	<datestamp>1267465380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think Nokia is hit worst with this patent. I've seen them run tests on this kind of system on shopping malls, and releasing the navigation for free was probably part of the plan to start offering location based advertisement and other services on top of it. Google likely won't be very interested at licensing it either since advertising is their main business.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think Nokia is hit worst with this patent .
I 've seen them run tests on this kind of system on shopping malls , and releasing the navigation for free was probably part of the plan to start offering location based advertisement and other services on top of it .
Google likely wo n't be very interested at licensing it either since advertising is their main business .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think Nokia is hit worst with this patent.
I've seen them run tests on this kind of system on shopping malls, and releasing the navigation for free was probably part of the plan to start offering location based advertisement and other services on top of it.
Google likely won't be very interested at licensing it either since advertising is their main business.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326224</id>
	<title>I would like to submit prior art</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267463040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>billboards</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>billboards</tokentext>
<sentencetext>billboards</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326616</id>
	<title>Re:Let's hope they use it.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267466940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WTF, there is something I still don't get about this. Many low budget sites are already using geoIP to target you better. Have you ever been to a site where there is an add to a dating site showing gorgeous girls that always happen to live in your area ?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p><p>I assume that with just a little bit more money, sites could cross-reference the geoIP data with a real advertiser databases and show real adds from merchants near you. Heck, I am sure a bunch of web advertising companies already use geoIP !</p><p>Can anybody enlighten me on how Google was able to obtain a patent regarding this idea ? Also is this patent only valid in the US ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF , there is something I still do n't get about this .
Many low budget sites are already using geoIP to target you better .
Have you ever been to a site where there is an add to a dating site showing gorgeous girls that always happen to live in your area ?
; - ) I assume that with just a little bit more money , sites could cross-reference the geoIP data with a real advertiser databases and show real adds from merchants near you .
Heck , I am sure a bunch of web advertising companies already use geoIP ! Can anybody enlighten me on how Google was able to obtain a patent regarding this idea ?
Also is this patent only valid in the US ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTF, there is something I still don't get about this.
Many low budget sites are already using geoIP to target you better.
Have you ever been to a site where there is an add to a dating site showing gorgeous girls that always happen to live in your area ?
;-)I assume that with just a little bit more money, sites could cross-reference the geoIP data with a real advertiser databases and show real adds from merchants near you.
Heck, I am sure a bunch of web advertising companies already use geoIP !Can anybody enlighten me on how Google was able to obtain a patent regarding this idea ?
Also is this patent only valid in the US ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31327120</id>
	<title>Wrong patent</title>
	<author>butlerm</author>
	<datestamp>1267472820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The link both in the original post and in the cited article (to say nothing of <em>dozens</em> of other articles) cites the <em>wrong</em> patent.</p><p>The correct one is <a href="http://www.arnoldit.com/lists/google-patents/US20050050027.pdf" title="arnoldit.com">patent application 20050050027</a> [arnoldit.com], but the patent number seems to be harder to track down. In fact I am not sure it has been granted <em>at all</em>.</p><p>The incorrectly linked <a href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;u=/netahtml/PTO/search-adv.htm&amp;r=3&amp;p=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;d=PTXT&amp;S1=google.ASNM.&amp;OS=an/google&amp;RS=AN/google" title="uspto.gov">patent</a> [uspto.gov] is about remote ad selection for broadcast radio stations, which is not particularly relevant here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The link both in the original post and in the cited article ( to say nothing of dozens of other articles ) cites the wrong patent.The correct one is patent application 20050050027 [ arnoldit.com ] , but the patent number seems to be harder to track down .
In fact I am not sure it has been granted at all.The incorrectly linked patent [ uspto.gov ] is about remote ad selection for broadcast radio stations , which is not particularly relevant here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The link both in the original post and in the cited article (to say nothing of dozens of other articles) cites the wrong patent.The correct one is patent application 20050050027 [arnoldit.com], but the patent number seems to be harder to track down.
In fact I am not sure it has been granted at all.The incorrectly linked patent [uspto.gov] is about remote ad selection for broadcast radio stations, which is not particularly relevant here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31328362</id>
	<title>Location Based Ads, Isnt that called Billboards?</title>
	<author>TrenchWarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1267534740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The correct patent is patent 7,668,832 granted Feb 23, 2010 as listed <a href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;p=1&amp;u=\%2Fnetahtml\%2FPTO\%2Fsearch-adv.htm&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;d=PTXT&amp;S1=7668832.PN.&amp;OS=pn/7668832&amp;RS=PN/7668832" title="uspto.gov" rel="nofollow">http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;p=1&amp;u=\%2Fnetahtml\%2FPTO\%2Fsearch-adv.htm&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;d=PTXT&amp;S1=7668832.PN.&amp;OS=pn/7668832&amp;RS=PN/7668832</a> [uspto.gov]  Thanks ButlerM</p><p>Location based advertising - Isnt that called billboards?</p><p>Or store signs or product displays?</p><p>To say you want to claim the right that at X and Y coordinates you control the method of putting up product advertising with *gasp* price information is all silly - they are called signs. Stores use them all the time.</p><p>And yes IP specific advertisement has been around before the 2003-2004 patent. Now the IPs move and become mobile shouldnt<br>make a difference.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The correct patent is patent 7,668,832 granted Feb 23 , 2010 as listed http : //patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser ? Sect1 = PTO2&amp;Sect2 = HITOFF&amp;p = 1&amp;u = \ % 2Fnetahtml \ % 2FPTO \ % 2Fsearch-adv.htm&amp;r = 1&amp;f = G&amp;l = 50&amp;d = PTXT&amp;S1 = 7668832.PN.&amp;OS = pn/7668832&amp;RS = PN/7668832 [ uspto.gov ] Thanks ButlerMLocation based advertising - Isnt that called billboards ? Or store signs or product displays ? To say you want to claim the right that at X and Y coordinates you control the method of putting up product advertising with * gasp * price information is all silly - they are called signs .
Stores use them all the time.And yes IP specific advertisement has been around before the 2003-2004 patent .
Now the IPs move and become mobile shouldntmake a difference .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The correct patent is patent 7,668,832 granted Feb 23, 2010 as listed http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;p=1&amp;u=\%2Fnetahtml\%2FPTO\%2Fsearch-adv.htm&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;d=PTXT&amp;S1=7668832.PN.&amp;OS=pn/7668832&amp;RS=PN/7668832 [uspto.gov]  Thanks ButlerMLocation based advertising - Isnt that called billboards?Or store signs or product displays?To say you want to claim the right that at X and Y coordinates you control the method of putting up product advertising with *gasp* price information is all silly - they are called signs.
Stores use them all the time.And yes IP specific advertisement has been around before the 2003-2004 patent.
Now the IPs move and become mobile shouldntmake a difference.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326188</id>
	<title>Re:Let's hope they use it.</title>
	<author>LostCluster</author>
	<datestamp>1267462740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With Google seeming to buy up any ad company that's a threat to it... it seems like they'll be most of the online ad market eventually, with Microsoft being in the unusual position of 2nd.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With Google seeming to buy up any ad company that 's a threat to it... it seems like they 'll be most of the online ad market eventually , with Microsoft being in the unusual position of 2nd .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With Google seeming to buy up any ad company that's a threat to it... it seems like they'll be most of the online ad market eventually, with Microsoft being in the unusual position of 2nd.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326266</id>
	<title>Broad Patents</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267463400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Broad Patents suck.
<br> <br>
That is all.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Broad Patents suck .
That is all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Broad Patents suck.
That is all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31328692</id>
	<title>Space For Sale</title>
	<author>tpstigers</author>
	<datestamp>1267538880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't actually have anything to say.  I'm just claiming this space so I can later sell it to Google for ads.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't actually have anything to say .
I 'm just claiming this space so I can later sell it to Google for ads .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't actually have anything to say.
I'm just claiming this space so I can later sell it to Google for ads.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326168</id>
	<title>Let's hope they use it.</title>
	<author>Akido37</author>
	<datestamp>1267462500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hope Google sues anyone who uses location-based advertising.  That way, only Google will broadcast my location to advertisers.  Avoid Google's product, and BAM!  Privacy.<br> <br>

Seriously, though, Apple is already trying to stop app developers from using location information solely for advertising:  <a href="http://developer.apple.com/iphone/news/archives/2010/february/#corelocation" title="apple.com">http://developer.apple.com/iphone/news/archives/2010/february/#corelocation</a> [apple.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope Google sues anyone who uses location-based advertising .
That way , only Google will broadcast my location to advertisers .
Avoid Google 's product , and BAM !
Privacy . Seriously , though , Apple is already trying to stop app developers from using location information solely for advertising : http : //developer.apple.com/iphone/news/archives/2010/february/ # corelocation [ apple.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope Google sues anyone who uses location-based advertising.
That way, only Google will broadcast my location to advertisers.
Avoid Google's product, and BAM!
Privacy. 

Seriously, though, Apple is already trying to stop app developers from using location information solely for advertising:  http://developer.apple.com/iphone/news/archives/2010/february/#corelocation [apple.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326542</id>
	<title>time for a reset...</title>
	<author>Eth1csGrad1ent</author>
	<datestamp>1267466160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is time for a coordinated world-wide BOFH system shutdown in order to FORCE a review of IP laws and how they relate to technology.</p><p>How many billions (trillions?) of dollars have been wasted on lawyers and swapped between major industry players in the last 30 years  over IP bitch-fighting !?</p><p>Not to mention that while the big guns are duking it out, the little guy (even the not-so-little guy) is absolutely screwed along with any form of innovation.</p><p>#$\%^ all of these uber-corporations. Its seriously time to send a message to both governments around the world, and the people on the street, that the system is FUNDAMENTALLY BROKEN...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is time for a coordinated world-wide BOFH system shutdown in order to FORCE a review of IP laws and how they relate to technology.How many billions ( trillions ?
) of dollars have been wasted on lawyers and swapped between major industry players in the last 30 years over IP bitch-fighting !
? Not to mention that while the big guns are duking it out , the little guy ( even the not-so-little guy ) is absolutely screwed along with any form of innovation. # $ \ % ^ all of these uber-corporations .
Its seriously time to send a message to both governments around the world , and the people on the street , that the system is FUNDAMENTALLY BROKEN.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is time for a coordinated world-wide BOFH system shutdown in order to FORCE a review of IP laws and how they relate to technology.How many billions (trillions?
) of dollars have been wasted on lawyers and swapped between major industry players in the last 30 years  over IP bitch-fighting !
?Not to mention that while the big guns are duking it out, the little guy (even the not-so-little guy) is absolutely screwed along with any form of innovation.#$\%^ all of these uber-corporations.
Its seriously time to send a message to both governments around the world, and the people on the street, that the system is FUNDAMENTALLY BROKEN...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326604</id>
	<title>Re:Been done 100 times and more</title>
	<author>jo42</author>
	<datestamp>1267466880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Frak me. We had this idea back in 2000 to do advertising directed by location of the customer. Back then the mobile technology didn't exist and would require people to enter in their address to be converted into longitude/latitude. Too bad we didn't document it and patent it back then. Frak me again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Frak me .
We had this idea back in 2000 to do advertising directed by location of the customer .
Back then the mobile technology did n't exist and would require people to enter in their address to be converted into longitude/latitude .
Too bad we did n't document it and patent it back then .
Frak me again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Frak me.
We had this idea back in 2000 to do advertising directed by location of the customer.
Back then the mobile technology didn't exist and would require people to enter in their address to be converted into longitude/latitude.
Too bad we didn't document it and patent it back then.
Frak me again.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31328004</id>
	<title>Not *everyone* .... yet</title>
	<author>N Monkey</author>
	<datestamp>1267529820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I hope Google sues anyone who uses location-based advertising.  That way, only Google will broadcast my location to advertisers.  Avoid Google's product, and BAM!  Privacy.</p></div><p>Well, it appears that patent is <i>still</i> being examined in the European patent office (and it looks like it's already had a couple of rounds), so that approach ain't going to work, at least, in Europe.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope Google sues anyone who uses location-based advertising .
That way , only Google will broadcast my location to advertisers .
Avoid Google 's product , and BAM !
Privacy.Well , it appears that patent is still being examined in the European patent office ( and it looks like it 's already had a couple of rounds ) , so that approach ai n't going to work , at least , in Europe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope Google sues anyone who uses location-based advertising.
That way, only Google will broadcast my location to advertisers.
Avoid Google's product, and BAM!
Privacy.Well, it appears that patent is still being examined in the European patent office (and it looks like it's already had a couple of rounds), so that approach ain't going to work, at least, in Europe.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31331242</id>
	<title>There may be prior art, if anyone kept it</title>
	<author>Cajun Hell</author>
	<datestamp>1267551720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Patent was filed in 2003.  But in 2002 (I think it was June but maybe if I check some old records I can narrow this down) I was watching TV and noticed an advertisement for a local business.  I didn't think much about it at the time, but a few months later I travelled to another state, and exhausted after the drive, I watched some TV inside my far-from-home hotel room.  I didn't see <em>any</em> advertisements for my home town businesses!  I'll have to check my old VHS tapes to confirm this.
</p><p>
In fact, I think I saw an issue of the local newspaper in 2001, where the classified ads section happened to advertise several apartments for rent in my town, and no apartments from apartment advertisers on the other side of the continent.  I wonder if I can still find that paper.
</p><p>
No wait.. in 1999 there was a rock band who had hired a national ad agency to place concert ads in the cities through which they were touring, only targeting the local media but <em>not</em> paying extra to show the ads to the whole national audience.  Shit, what was the name of that flash-in-the-pan rock band?  Does anyone remember?
</p><p>
Now that I think of it, in 1998 David Attenborough documented a male bird in Indonesia, where it was showing off its colors and song <em>only</em> to females within a few miles of itself.  Birds in Louisiana were <em>totally</em> ignored for its advertising purposes, as the resource cost of transmitting ad to them, was judged by its marketing department as being not worth the expense. (Not to mention that the Louisiana birds may have been genetically incompatible.) Attenborough did a good job of explaining how that bird <em>really</em> wanted to fuck the local females.  Maybe I can find a torrent of this show, because it sounds like birds have been doing this at least 5 years before Google.
</p><p>
Maybe I'm mis-remembering this stuff, but I think industries may have been using location based advertising prior to 2003.  Finding the proof won't be easy, though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Patent was filed in 2003 .
But in 2002 ( I think it was June but maybe if I check some old records I can narrow this down ) I was watching TV and noticed an advertisement for a local business .
I did n't think much about it at the time , but a few months later I travelled to another state , and exhausted after the drive , I watched some TV inside my far-from-home hotel room .
I did n't see any advertisements for my home town businesses !
I 'll have to check my old VHS tapes to confirm this .
In fact , I think I saw an issue of the local newspaper in 2001 , where the classified ads section happened to advertise several apartments for rent in my town , and no apartments from apartment advertisers on the other side of the continent .
I wonder if I can still find that paper .
No wait.. in 1999 there was a rock band who had hired a national ad agency to place concert ads in the cities through which they were touring , only targeting the local media but not paying extra to show the ads to the whole national audience .
Shit , what was the name of that flash-in-the-pan rock band ?
Does anyone remember ?
Now that I think of it , in 1998 David Attenborough documented a male bird in Indonesia , where it was showing off its colors and song only to females within a few miles of itself .
Birds in Louisiana were totally ignored for its advertising purposes , as the resource cost of transmitting ad to them , was judged by its marketing department as being not worth the expense .
( Not to mention that the Louisiana birds may have been genetically incompatible .
) Attenborough did a good job of explaining how that bird really wanted to fuck the local females .
Maybe I can find a torrent of this show , because it sounds like birds have been doing this at least 5 years before Google .
Maybe I 'm mis-remembering this stuff , but I think industries may have been using location based advertising prior to 2003 .
Finding the proof wo n't be easy , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Patent was filed in 2003.
But in 2002 (I think it was June but maybe if I check some old records I can narrow this down) I was watching TV and noticed an advertisement for a local business.
I didn't think much about it at the time, but a few months later I travelled to another state, and exhausted after the drive, I watched some TV inside my far-from-home hotel room.
I didn't see any advertisements for my home town businesses!
I'll have to check my old VHS tapes to confirm this.
In fact, I think I saw an issue of the local newspaper in 2001, where the classified ads section happened to advertise several apartments for rent in my town, and no apartments from apartment advertisers on the other side of the continent.
I wonder if I can still find that paper.
No wait.. in 1999 there was a rock band who had hired a national ad agency to place concert ads in the cities through which they were touring, only targeting the local media but not paying extra to show the ads to the whole national audience.
Shit, what was the name of that flash-in-the-pan rock band?
Does anyone remember?
Now that I think of it, in 1998 David Attenborough documented a male bird in Indonesia, where it was showing off its colors and song only to females within a few miles of itself.
Birds in Louisiana were totally ignored for its advertising purposes, as the resource cost of transmitting ad to them, was judged by its marketing department as being not worth the expense.
(Not to mention that the Louisiana birds may have been genetically incompatible.
) Attenborough did a good job of explaining how that bird really wanted to fuck the local females.
Maybe I can find a torrent of this show, because it sounds like birds have been doing this at least 5 years before Google.
Maybe I'm mis-remembering this stuff, but I think industries may have been using location based advertising prior to 2003.
Finding the proof won't be easy, though.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326488</id>
	<title>Been done 100 times and more</title>
	<author>somewhere in AU</author>
	<datestamp>1267465680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Very obvious thought as well as implementation.</p><p>Been done time and time again over the years in just about every technical platform.</p><p>Go away Google, this is plain patent abuse by the rich.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Very obvious thought as well as implementation.Been done time and time again over the years in just about every technical platform.Go away Google , this is plain patent abuse by the rich .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Very obvious thought as well as implementation.Been done time and time again over the years in just about every technical platform.Go away Google, this is plain patent abuse by the rich.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326612</id>
	<title>Shit like this shouldn't be patentable</title>
	<author>Spy Handler</author>
	<datestamp>1267466940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>\_|\_ google</htmltext>
<tokenext>\ _ | \ _ google</tokentext>
<sentencetext>\_|\_ google</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326332</id>
	<title>WTF? Prior Art! - IP Address-based geolocation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267464240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>What gives? Google applied for the patent in 2004, but I've been seeing IP Address-based geolocation-targeted ads since way before 2004. You'd be served different different ads depending on where you lived based on your IP address.<br> <br>

How is this different?<br> <br>

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geolocation\_software" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geolocation\_software</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>What gives ?
Google applied for the patent in 2004 , but I 've been seeing IP Address-based geolocation-targeted ads since way before 2004 .
You 'd be served different different ads depending on where you lived based on your IP address .
How is this different ?
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geolocation \ _software [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What gives?
Google applied for the patent in 2004, but I've been seeing IP Address-based geolocation-targeted ads since way before 2004.
You'd be served different different ads depending on where you lived based on your IP address.
How is this different?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geolocation\_software [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326354</id>
	<title>Patent on IF statements?</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1267464360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So if I write code that says "if point selected on map is between a latitude of 40 and 42 and a longitude of between 130 and 131* then pop up Bob's Restaurant ad", I owe royalties?</p><p>* I hope somebody with too much time on their hand doesn't tell me this is in the middle of a large ocean. Bob floats, okay? More specifically, Bob bobs.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So if I write code that says " if point selected on map is between a latitude of 40 and 42 and a longitude of between 130 and 131 * then pop up Bob 's Restaurant ad " , I owe royalties ?
* I hope somebody with too much time on their hand does n't tell me this is in the middle of a large ocean .
Bob floats , okay ?
More specifically , Bob bobs .
   </tokentext>
<sentencetext>So if I write code that says "if point selected on map is between a latitude of 40 and 42 and a longitude of between 130 and 131* then pop up Bob's Restaurant ad", I owe royalties?
* I hope somebody with too much time on their hand doesn't tell me this is in the middle of a large ocean.
Bob floats, okay?
More specifically, Bob bobs.
   </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31328150</id>
	<title>I was helping do location based ads back in 2001</title>
	<author>russ.anderson</author>
	<datestamp>1267531680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Unfortunately the site's only now to be found on archive.org, but tradepiper.co.uk was all about giving location-specific adverts from both local and national businesses, and this was back in 2001 kinda time.  Looks like what the patent talks about matches pretty closely to most of the stuff we were doing back then.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately the site 's only now to be found on archive.org , but tradepiper.co.uk was all about giving location-specific adverts from both local and national businesses , and this was back in 2001 kinda time .
Looks like what the patent talks about matches pretty closely to most of the stuff we were doing back then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately the site's only now to be found on archive.org, but tradepiper.co.uk was all about giving location-specific adverts from both local and national businesses, and this was back in 2001 kinda time.
Looks like what the patent talks about matches pretty closely to most of the stuff we were doing back then.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326916</id>
	<title>But</title>
	<author>rpresser</author>
	<datestamp>1267470120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't a billboard an example of "location-based advertising"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't a billboard an example of " location-based advertising " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't a billboard an example of "location-based advertising"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31327212</id>
	<title>Re:Let's hope they use it.</title>
	<author>hvm2hvm</author>
	<datestamp>1267561500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's not like the others won't do it or aren't doing it anyway without calling it location-based advertising. Or like if a company/government/anyone with incentive says it won't retain information about you, it really won't. You still need to not let anyone know your location if you really want your privacy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not like the others wo n't do it or are n't doing it anyway without calling it location-based advertising .
Or like if a company/government/anyone with incentive says it wo n't retain information about you , it really wo n't .
You still need to not let anyone know your location if you really want your privacy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not like the others won't do it or aren't doing it anyway without calling it location-based advertising.
Or like if a company/government/anyone with incentive says it won't retain information about you, it really won't.
You still need to not let anyone know your location if you really want your privacy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31328678</id>
	<title>obvious and thought of 15 yrs ago by me.</title>
	<author>emptybody</author>
	<datestamp>1267538820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>idea was that a device could be carried over which a third party could submit information that upon you reaching or researching locations would become aware of that information. essentially a digital billboard. near a movie theater? here: watch previews of the shows and times. near the packie? here: our sale on cognac. near the bridge? here: the number of the Samaritans.</p><p>what i did not know was that i only needed to write up the idea and patent it with Out a working physical prototype.</p><p>for me, this idea is obvious and a natural evolution of technology and use thereof.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>idea was that a device could be carried over which a third party could submit information that upon you reaching or researching locations would become aware of that information .
essentially a digital billboard .
near a movie theater ?
here : watch previews of the shows and times .
near the packie ?
here : our sale on cognac .
near the bridge ?
here : the number of the Samaritans.what i did not know was that i only needed to write up the idea and patent it with Out a working physical prototype.for me , this idea is obvious and a natural evolution of technology and use thereof .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>idea was that a device could be carried over which a third party could submit information that upon you reaching or researching locations would become aware of that information.
essentially a digital billboard.
near a movie theater?
here: watch previews of the shows and times.
near the packie?
here: our sale on cognac.
near the bridge?
here: the number of the Samaritans.what i did not know was that i only needed to write up the idea and patent it with Out a working physical prototype.for me, this idea is obvious and a natural evolution of technology and use thereof.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31328668</id>
	<title>GeoWorks did this in 2000</title>
	<author>gti\_guy</author>
	<datestamp>1267538640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Geoworks demonstrated this on the San Francisco local news back in 2000.<br> <br>

Check out:<br>
<a href="http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-66096362.html" title="encyclopedia.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-66096362.html</a> [encyclopedia.com] <br>
<a href="http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-66915753.html" title="encyclopedia.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-66915753.html</a> [encyclopedia.com] <br>
<a href="http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-66096362.html" title="highbeam.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-66096362.html</a> [highbeam.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Geoworks demonstrated this on the San Francisco local news back in 2000 .
Check out : http : //www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-66096362.html [ encyclopedia.com ] http : //www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-66915753.html [ encyclopedia.com ] http : //www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-66096362.html [ highbeam.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Geoworks demonstrated this on the San Francisco local news back in 2000.
Check out:
http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-66096362.html [encyclopedia.com] 
http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-66915753.html [encyclopedia.com] 
http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-66096362.html [highbeam.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326332</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31330944</id>
	<title>Re:WTF? Prior Art! - IP Address-based geolocation</title>
	<author>drew</author>
	<datestamp>1267550340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I worked for a company in 1999 that was already doing this for a while, before there really was much in the way of publicly available GeoIP data.  The database they started with was built in the mid 90's by wardialing the major ISP's access numbers in different area codes, so when they started out they were targeting purely by area code.  By the time that I worked for them, they had refined it down to zip code.</p><p>Of course, that company was eventually bought by Double Click, which is now owned by Google, so if they were the first to use geographic targeting, then this patent may not be totally bogus.  However, there is a pretty long window between 1997 and 2004 where other companies were doing the same thing.  If I remember right, you only have about a one year window after an invention is publicly disclosed to file for the patent.  Given that, the claims described in the patent don't seem sufficiently different from what my former employer was doing to qualify as a new invention.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I worked for a company in 1999 that was already doing this for a while , before there really was much in the way of publicly available GeoIP data .
The database they started with was built in the mid 90 's by wardialing the major ISP 's access numbers in different area codes , so when they started out they were targeting purely by area code .
By the time that I worked for them , they had refined it down to zip code.Of course , that company was eventually bought by Double Click , which is now owned by Google , so if they were the first to use geographic targeting , then this patent may not be totally bogus .
However , there is a pretty long window between 1997 and 2004 where other companies were doing the same thing .
If I remember right , you only have about a one year window after an invention is publicly disclosed to file for the patent .
Given that , the claims described in the patent do n't seem sufficiently different from what my former employer was doing to qualify as a new invention .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I worked for a company in 1999 that was already doing this for a while, before there really was much in the way of publicly available GeoIP data.
The database they started with was built in the mid 90's by wardialing the major ISP's access numbers in different area codes, so when they started out they were targeting purely by area code.
By the time that I worked for them, they had refined it down to zip code.Of course, that company was eventually bought by Double Click, which is now owned by Google, so if they were the first to use geographic targeting, then this patent may not be totally bogus.
However, there is a pretty long window between 1997 and 2004 where other companies were doing the same thing.
If I remember right, you only have about a one year window after an invention is publicly disclosed to file for the patent.
Given that, the claims described in the patent don't seem sufficiently different from what my former employer was doing to qualify as a new invention.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326332</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31356916</id>
	<title>good info</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267711200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it's good information for me http://x-blogcontest.blogspot.com/2010/02/jadwal-pertandingan-piala-dunia-2010.html</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's good information for me http : //x-blogcontest.blogspot.com/2010/02/jadwal-pertandingan-piala-dunia-2010.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's good information for me http://x-blogcontest.blogspot.com/2010/02/jadwal-pertandingan-piala-dunia-2010.html</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31329550</id>
	<title>2001 article on location based advertising</title>
	<author>WampagingWabbits</author>
	<datestamp>1267543920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Here are papers published in 2001 and 2003 describing location advertising in the open source mobilemaps search engine:
<br> <br>
<a href="http://www.directionsmag.com/article.php?article\_id=281" title="directionsmag.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.directionsmag.com/article.php?article\_id=281</a> [directionsmag.com] <br>
<a href="http://www.directionsmag.com/article.php?article\_id=369" title="directionsmag.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.directionsmag.com/article.php?article\_id=369</a> [directionsmag.com]
<br> <br>
This still has a ghost site up on the net.
One of the original authors is contactable at abrahaph at yahoo's<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.co.uk website.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here are papers published in 2001 and 2003 describing location advertising in the open source mobilemaps search engine : http : //www.directionsmag.com/article.php ? article \ _id = 281 [ directionsmag.com ] http : //www.directionsmag.com/article.php ? article \ _id = 369 [ directionsmag.com ] This still has a ghost site up on the net .
One of the original authors is contactable at abrahaph at yahoo 's .co.uk website .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here are papers published in 2001 and 2003 describing location advertising in the open source mobilemaps search engine:
 
http://www.directionsmag.com/article.php?article\_id=281 [directionsmag.com] 
http://www.directionsmag.com/article.php?article\_id=369 [directionsmag.com]
 
This still has a ghost site up on the net.
One of the original authors is contactable at abrahaph at yahoo's .co.uk website.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31330106</id>
	<title>Re:Let's hope they use it.</title>
	<author>Epsillon</author>
	<datestamp>1267546620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Even more awesomeness. A one-shot netblock rule to shut out all advertising and stop privacy leakage. What more could anyone want?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Even more awesomeness .
A one-shot netblock rule to shut out all advertising and stop privacy leakage .
What more could anyone want ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even more awesomeness.
A one-shot netblock rule to shut out all advertising and stop privacy leakage.
What more could anyone want?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326180</id>
	<title>Apple must have known this was coming</title>
	<author>gcerullo</author>
	<datestamp>1267462620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This explains why Apple asked it's iPhone developers to stop using location based ads in their applications or at least be careful of how they use them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This explains why Apple asked it 's iPhone developers to stop using location based ads in their applications or at least be careful of how they use them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This explains why Apple asked it's iPhone developers to stop using location based ads in their applications or at least be careful of how they use them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_0329249_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_0329249_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31330944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326332
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_0329249_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31328004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_0329249_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326488
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_0329249_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31329414
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_0329249_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31328668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326332
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_0329249_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31330106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_02_0329249_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31327212
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_0329249.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326354
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_0329249.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31327120
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_0329249.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31328678
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_0329249.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326224
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_0329249.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31329550
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_0329249.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326332
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31328668
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31330944
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_0329249.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326488
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326604
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_0329249.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326180
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_0329249.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326916
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_0329249.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326266
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_0329249.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31328362
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_02_0329249.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326168
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326616
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31328004
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31329414
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31326188
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31330106
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_02_0329249.31327212
</commentlist>
</conversation>
