<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_01_214246</id>
	<title>Google Acquires Online Image Editing Tool Picnik</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1267442340000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Many different sources are writing to tell us about <a href="http://mashable.com/2010/03/01/google-acquires-online-image-editing-tool-picnik/">Google's acquisition of online image editing tool Picnik</a>.  <i>"And all this leads us to today&rsquo;s exciting news: we&rsquo;ve just been acquired by Google! What does this mean for Picnik? It means we can think BIG. Google processes petabytes of data every day, and with their worldwide infrastructure and world-class team, it is truly the best home we could have found. Under the Google roof we&rsquo;ll reach more people than ever before, impacting more lives and making more photos more awesome.  What does this mean for you Picnikers? Nothing is changing right away, but Picnik now has more potential than ever before. The team that built Picnik from the grass up will continue making advanced and powerful photo-editing easier, more intuitive and more fun, so stay tuned to hear about all the cool new stuff we&rsquo;re working on."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Many different sources are writing to tell us about Google 's acquisition of online image editing tool Picnik .
" And all this leads us to today    s exciting news : we    ve just been acquired by Google !
What does this mean for Picnik ?
It means we can think BIG .
Google processes petabytes of data every day , and with their worldwide infrastructure and world-class team , it is truly the best home we could have found .
Under the Google roof we    ll reach more people than ever before , impacting more lives and making more photos more awesome .
What does this mean for you Picnikers ?
Nothing is changing right away , but Picnik now has more potential than ever before .
The team that built Picnik from the grass up will continue making advanced and powerful photo-editing easier , more intuitive and more fun , so stay tuned to hear about all the cool new stuff we    re working on .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Many different sources are writing to tell us about Google's acquisition of online image editing tool Picnik.
"And all this leads us to today’s exciting news: we’ve just been acquired by Google!
What does this mean for Picnik?
It means we can think BIG.
Google processes petabytes of data every day, and with their worldwide infrastructure and world-class team, it is truly the best home we could have found.
Under the Google roof we’ll reach more people than ever before, impacting more lives and making more photos more awesome.
What does this mean for you Picnikers?
Nothing is changing right away, but Picnik now has more potential than ever before.
The team that built Picnik from the grass up will continue making advanced and powerful photo-editing easier, more intuitive and more fun, so stay tuned to hear about all the cool new stuff we’re working on.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324914</id>
	<title>Flash</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267451640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Doesn't that site use Flash?  So does this mean that Google is all well and good with Adobe?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does n't that site use Flash ?
So does this mean that Google is all well and good with Adobe ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doesn't that site use Flash?
So does this mean that Google is all well and good with Adobe?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324086</id>
	<title>Premium features to be free?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267446660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's what I'm interested in finding out but there is no mention anywhere about it - will the premium features (paid version) of Picnik be free from now on? Or will Google continue the practice of charging for premium features?
<p>
Personally, I hope they make it all free. I'm cheap, in case you had any doubt.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's what I 'm interested in finding out but there is no mention anywhere about it - will the premium features ( paid version ) of Picnik be free from now on ?
Or will Google continue the practice of charging for premium features ?
Personally , I hope they make it all free .
I 'm cheap , in case you had any doubt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's what I'm interested in finding out but there is no mention anywhere about it - will the premium features (paid version) of Picnik be free from now on?
Or will Google continue the practice of charging for premium features?
Personally, I hope they make it all free.
I'm cheap, in case you had any doubt.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31325556</id>
	<title>Re:Good Luck, Picnikers</title>
	<author>FooAtWFU</author>
	<datestamp>1267457100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The last time my company was acquired (the only time, actually) I got $10k up front, a new hiring-bonus, and a big fat bundle of retention bonuses. Yes: in 2008, even.
<p>
Then they closed the San Mateo office and moved us down to Sunnyvale. That still kind of stinks.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p><p>
Your mileage may vary.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The last time my company was acquired ( the only time , actually ) I got $ 10k up front , a new hiring-bonus , and a big fat bundle of retention bonuses .
Yes : in 2008 , even .
Then they closed the San Mateo office and moved us down to Sunnyvale .
That still kind of stinks .
: ( Your mileage may vary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The last time my company was acquired (the only time, actually) I got $10k up front, a new hiring-bonus, and a big fat bundle of retention bonuses.
Yes: in 2008, even.
Then they closed the San Mateo office and moved us down to Sunnyvale.
That still kind of stinks.
:(
Your mileage may vary.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324404</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31328478</id>
	<title>Rejuvenating currently owned websites, maybe?</title>
	<author>jseale</author>
	<datestamp>1267536600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Looks like Google wants to rejuvenate an ageing Picasa by rolling Picnik's feature set into it or giving Picasa a complete makeover all together with Picnik's help. It'd be cool to see Picnik's features in the Picasa stand-alone app, would give Photoshop a run for its money for sure.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like Google wants to rejuvenate an ageing Picasa by rolling Picnik 's feature set into it or giving Picasa a complete makeover all together with Picnik 's help .
It 'd be cool to see Picnik 's features in the Picasa stand-alone app , would give Photoshop a run for its money for sure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like Google wants to rejuvenate an ageing Picasa by rolling Picnik's feature set into it or giving Picasa a complete makeover all together with Picnik's help.
It'd be cool to see Picnik's features in the Picasa stand-alone app, would give Photoshop a run for its money for sure.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324154</id>
	<title>Photo Editor, not Image Editor</title>
	<author>javakah</author>
	<datestamp>1267446960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's a photo editor, not an image editor.

If you want an image editor, you might try Splashup
<a href="http://www.splashup.com/" title="splashup.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.splashup.com/</a> [splashup.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a photo editor , not an image editor .
If you want an image editor , you might try Splashup http : //www.splashup.com/ [ splashup.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a photo editor, not an image editor.
If you want an image editor, you might try Splashup
http://www.splashup.com/ [splashup.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31328810</id>
	<title>http://www.music21.hi2.ro/</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267539840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ie she is</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ie she is</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ie she is</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31323996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324122</id>
	<title>Dorks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267446840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All I read above was "technology", "reaching more people", blah blah blah...</p><p>You should be saying, "WooHoo! Private jets! Yachts! Banging swimsuit models on said yachts! Money! Private Islands with beautiful naked women! Money!"</p><p>But nooooooooooo. You type there about technology and whatnot!</p><p><div class="quote"><p>The team that built Picnik from the grass up will continue making advanced and powerful photo-editing easier, more intuitive and more fun, so stay tuned to hear about all the cool new stuff we&rsquo;re working on.</p></div><p> <i>Snore.</i></p><p>Photoshop.</p><p><i>Zzzzzzz</i></p><p>GIMP</p><p><i>Zzzzzzz</i></p><p>Paint.net</p><p><i>Snort snort snort</i></p><p><i>Yawn</i></p><p>Oh yeah, I hope you got paid in cash. Goog is at it's peak; meaning, if you got paid in stock, you're gonna lose.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>All I read above was " technology " , " reaching more people " , blah blah blah...You should be saying , " WooHoo !
Private jets !
Yachts ! Banging swimsuit models on said yachts !
Money ! Private Islands with beautiful naked women !
Money ! " But nooooooooooo .
You type there about technology and whatnot ! The team that built Picnik from the grass up will continue making advanced and powerful photo-editing easier , more intuitive and more fun , so stay tuned to hear about all the cool new stuff we    re working on .
Snore.Photoshop.ZzzzzzzGIMPZzzzzzzPaint.netSnort snort snortYawnOh yeah , I hope you got paid in cash .
Goog is at it 's peak ; meaning , if you got paid in stock , you 're gon na lose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All I read above was "technology", "reaching more people", blah blah blah...You should be saying, "WooHoo!
Private jets!
Yachts! Banging swimsuit models on said yachts!
Money! Private Islands with beautiful naked women!
Money!"But nooooooooooo.
You type there about technology and whatnot!The team that built Picnik from the grass up will continue making advanced and powerful photo-editing easier, more intuitive and more fun, so stay tuned to hear about all the cool new stuff we’re working on.
Snore.Photoshop.ZzzzzzzGIMPZzzzzzzPaint.netSnort snort snortYawnOh yeah, I hope you got paid in cash.
Goog is at it's peak; meaning, if you got paid in stock, you're gonna lose.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31327196</id>
	<title>Re:Eating Yahoo's lunch</title>
	<author>drago</author>
	<datestamp>1267561320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd rather say they're going to take Picnik out of business just to step on Yahoos foot while ramping up the advertising for picasaweb at the same time<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd rather say they 're going to take Picnik out of business just to step on Yahoos foot while ramping up the advertising for picasaweb at the same time ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd rather say they're going to take Picnik out of business just to step on Yahoos foot while ramping up the advertising for picasaweb at the same time ;-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31328328</id>
	<title>Re:"Picnikers" = users</title>
	<author>Caetel</author>
	<datestamp>1267534380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In which case the answer should be Google will close down the current service offering shortly and months down the line offer a similar service under the Google banner.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In which case the answer should be Google will close down the current service offering shortly and months down the line offer a similar service under the Google banner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In which case the answer should be Google will close down the current service offering shortly and months down the line offer a similar service under the Google banner.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31325500</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31329302</id>
	<title>Re:Photo Editor, not Image Editor</title>
	<author>kriston</author>
	<datestamp>1267542780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Look in the mirror.  If you're wearing a beret and a soul patch, it's an image editor.  If you're wearing a backwards baseball cap and a goatee, it's a photo editor.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Look in the mirror .
If you 're wearing a beret and a soul patch , it 's an image editor .
If you 're wearing a backwards baseball cap and a goatee , it 's a photo editor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look in the mirror.
If you're wearing a beret and a soul patch, it's an image editor.
If you're wearing a backwards baseball cap and a goatee, it's a photo editor.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31326668</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31326496</id>
	<title>Re:Am I alone?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267465800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What is this 'Google' you speak of?   I've never heard of them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What is this 'Google ' you speak of ?
I 've never heard of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is this 'Google' you speak of?
I've never heard of them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31325754</id>
	<title>Re:Photo Editor, not Image Editor</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267458480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If they do you could try <a href="http://pixlr.com/" title="pixlr.com" rel="nofollow">Pixlr</a> [pixlr.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If they do you could try Pixlr [ pixlr.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they do you could try Pixlr [pixlr.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324610</id>
	<title>The Plan</title>
	<author>doomy</author>
	<datestamp>1267449420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1. Do No Evil.</p><p>2. ??</p><p>3. World Domination.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
Do No Evil.2 .
? ? 3. World Domination .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
Do No Evil.2.
??3. World Domination.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324314</id>
	<title>On potential...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267447740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>[quote]Nothing is changing right away, but Picnik now has more potential than ever before.[/quote]</p><p>But... any potential outcomes at this point were always potential outcomes.  Insofar as it can be assigned an ordinal representation, potential must be monotonically decreasing.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>[ quote ] Nothing is changing right away , but Picnik now has more potential than ever before. [ /quote ] But.. .
any potential outcomes at this point were always potential outcomes .
Insofar as it can be assigned an ordinal representation , potential must be monotonically decreasing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[quote]Nothing is changing right away, but Picnik now has more potential than ever before.[/quote]But...
any potential outcomes at this point were always potential outcomes.
Insofar as it can be assigned an ordinal representation, potential must be monotonically decreasing.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324176</id>
	<title>Am I alone?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267447020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is anyone else getting sick of hearing exciting stories about Google?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is anyone else getting sick of hearing exciting stories about Google ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is anyone else getting sick of hearing exciting stories about Google?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324242</id>
	<title>How to get rich quick!</title>
	<author>KPexEA</author>
	<datestamp>1267447320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>1) Copy some desktop app but make it "online"<br>
2) Get bought by Google!<br>
3) Profit!</htmltext>
<tokenext>1 ) Copy some desktop app but make it " online " 2 ) Get bought by Google !
3 ) Profit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1) Copy some desktop app but make it "online"
2) Get bought by Google!
3) Profit!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324308</id>
	<title>Re:Premium features to be free?</title>
	<author>Zerth</author>
	<datestamp>1267447680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Depends on the pricing and if they can cover the cost with advertising.  Google still charges for Sketchup Pro after they got bought, for example, but it isn't exactly conducive to advertising and is used by design firms, etc who can't afford or don't need larger CAD/animation packages</p><p>Picnik Premium seems to cost a couple of bucks a month and is aimed at casual users.  Its main costs are bandwidth and storage, which Google can supply in abundance.  I imagine advertising could cover whatever else that couple of bucks supports, so it is possible.</p><p>On the other hand, Google might be trying to make products pay for themselves instead of just relying on advertising.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Depends on the pricing and if they can cover the cost with advertising .
Google still charges for Sketchup Pro after they got bought , for example , but it is n't exactly conducive to advertising and is used by design firms , etc who ca n't afford or do n't need larger CAD/animation packagesPicnik Premium seems to cost a couple of bucks a month and is aimed at casual users .
Its main costs are bandwidth and storage , which Google can supply in abundance .
I imagine advertising could cover whatever else that couple of bucks supports , so it is possible.On the other hand , Google might be trying to make products pay for themselves instead of just relying on advertising .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Depends on the pricing and if they can cover the cost with advertising.
Google still charges for Sketchup Pro after they got bought, for example, but it isn't exactly conducive to advertising and is used by design firms, etc who can't afford or don't need larger CAD/animation packagesPicnik Premium seems to cost a couple of bucks a month and is aimed at casual users.
Its main costs are bandwidth and storage, which Google can supply in abundance.
I imagine advertising could cover whatever else that couple of bucks supports, so it is possible.On the other hand, Google might be trying to make products pay for themselves instead of just relying on advertising.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324086</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31325832</id>
	<title>Re:Good Luck, Picnikers</title>
	<author>SethJohnson</author>
	<datestamp>1267459140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Which, of course, translates to "You'll continue to have a job at least until all the financial details of the sale are arranged.</p></div></blockquote><p>

Which could also translate to, "Layoffs were averted by our acquisition by a deep-pocketed major player."<br> <br>Seth</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Which , of course , translates to " You 'll continue to have a job at least until all the financial details of the sale are arranged .
Which could also translate to , " Layoffs were averted by our acquisition by a deep-pocketed major player .
" Seth</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which, of course, translates to "You'll continue to have a job at least until all the financial details of the sale are arranged.
Which could also translate to, "Layoffs were averted by our acquisition by a deep-pocketed major player.
" Seth
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324404</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31331834</id>
	<title>Re:Good Luck, Picnikers</title>
	<author>juan2074</author>
	<datestamp>1267554000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Picnik employees now commute to <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;q=1932+1st+Ave,+98101&amp;oq=&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;hq=&amp;hnear=1932+1st+Ave,+Seattle,+WA+98101&amp;gl=us&amp;ei=dEiNS-C2Bo2oswOR-5GXAw&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=geocode\_result&amp;ct=image&amp;resnum=1&amp;ved=0CAgQ8gEwAA" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">downtown Seattle</a> [google.com] -- easily accessible on buses, trains, and ferries from much of four counties.

<br> <br>They will be moving to <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;oq=&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=google+98103&amp;fb=1&amp;gl=us&amp;hq=google&amp;hnear=98103&amp;cid=0,0,3172230940188468980&amp;ei=2keNS6iUJouuswPry6zgAw&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=local\_result&amp;ct=image&amp;resnum=1&amp;ved=0CAoQnwIwAA" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">Google's offices in Fremont</a> [google.com] (North Seattle).

<br> <br>I'm guessing many of them who did not drive to work will soon have to do so.  Here comes more traffic!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Picnik employees now commute to downtown Seattle [ google.com ] -- easily accessible on buses , trains , and ferries from much of four counties .
They will be moving to Google 's offices in Fremont [ google.com ] ( North Seattle ) .
I 'm guessing many of them who did not drive to work will soon have to do so .
Here comes more traffic !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Picnik employees now commute to downtown Seattle [google.com] -- easily accessible on buses, trains, and ferries from much of four counties.
They will be moving to Google's offices in Fremont [google.com] (North Seattle).
I'm guessing many of them who did not drive to work will soon have to do so.
Here comes more traffic!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31325556</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31326112</id>
	<title>Looking forward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267462080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Any decent operating system must have a photo editor. This is just another software that would integrate Chrome OS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Any decent operating system must have a photo editor .
This is just another software that would integrate Chrome OS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any decent operating system must have a photo editor.
This is just another software that would integrate Chrome OS.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31328116</id>
	<title>Re:Photo Editor, not Image Editor</title>
	<author>WWWWolf</author>
	<datestamp>1267531320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What's the difference between a photo editor and an image editor?</p></div><p> <a href="http://www.gimp.org/" title="gimp.org" rel="nofollow">Image editor</a> [gimp.org] is an application designed for manipulation of 2D bitmap raster image data, usually using a set of very complex, powerful and effective functions such as drawing tools, filters, layering and channel operations.</p><p> <a href="http://f-spot.org/" title="f-spot.org" rel="nofollow">Photo editor</a> [f-spot.org] is a piece of shit sold to gullible customers, "allowing" them to "manage" and "archive" all of their "digital photos" and sometimes even perform a limited set of "operations" on them, making the whole process "fun".</p><p>So, the only real difference is the feature set, the primary activities you do with the programs, and the feature set. Hope this clear things up. =)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's the difference between a photo editor and an image editor ?
Image editor [ gimp.org ] is an application designed for manipulation of 2D bitmap raster image data , usually using a set of very complex , powerful and effective functions such as drawing tools , filters , layering and channel operations .
Photo editor [ f-spot.org ] is a piece of shit sold to gullible customers , " allowing " them to " manage " and " archive " all of their " digital photos " and sometimes even perform a limited set of " operations " on them , making the whole process " fun " .So , the only real difference is the feature set , the primary activities you do with the programs , and the feature set .
Hope this clear things up .
= )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's the difference between a photo editor and an image editor?
Image editor [gimp.org] is an application designed for manipulation of 2D bitmap raster image data, usually using a set of very complex, powerful and effective functions such as drawing tools, filters, layering and channel operations.
Photo editor [f-spot.org] is a piece of shit sold to gullible customers, "allowing" them to "manage" and "archive" all of their "digital photos" and sometimes even perform a limited set of "operations" on them, making the whole process "fun".So, the only real difference is the feature set, the primary activities you do with the programs, and the feature set.
Hope this clear things up.
=)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31326668</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31327226</id>
	<title>gGetFamous</title>
	<author>Mourice</author>
	<datestamp>1267561800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not necessarily for rampant acquisition by a single company, but I have to admit that I only discover a lot of great services by the announcement that they've been purchased by Google.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not necessarily for rampant acquisition by a single company , but I have to admit that I only discover a lot of great services by the announcement that they 've been purchased by Google .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not necessarily for rampant acquisition by a single company, but I have to admit that I only discover a lot of great services by the announcement that they've been purchased by Google.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324044</id>
	<title>I am Sergey Brin of Borg.</title>
	<author>MrEricSir</author>
	<datestamp>1267446480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You will be assimilated.  Resistance is futile.</p><p>And here's an advertisement for something related to the picture of Britney Spears you're photoshopping.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You will be assimilated .
Resistance is futile.And here 's an advertisement for something related to the picture of Britney Spears you 're photoshopping .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You will be assimilated.
Resistance is futile.And here's an advertisement for something related to the picture of Britney Spears you're photoshopping.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324058</id>
	<title>Jeepers!</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1267446540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...making more photos more awesome.</p></div><p>Nice to see that 13 year olds can get work in this economy.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...making more photos more awesome.Nice to see that 13 year olds can get work in this economy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...making more photos more awesome.Nice to see that 13 year olds can get work in this economy.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31323996</id>
	<title>Awwww!</title>
	<author>MattGWU</author>
	<datestamp>1267446180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>"And all this leads us to today's exciting news: we've just been acquired by Google! What does this mean for Picnik? It means we can think BIG. Google processes petabytes of data every day, and with their worldwide infrastructure and world-class team, it is truly the best home we could have found. Under the Google roof we'll reach more people than ever before, impacting more lives and making more photos more awesome. What does this mean for you Picnikers? Nothing is changing right away, but Picnik now has more potential than ever before. The team that built Picnik from the grass up will continue making advanced and powerful photo-editing easier, more intuitive and more fun, so stay tuned to hear about all the cool new stuff we're working on."</p></div></blockquote><p>That's so cute!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" And all this leads us to today 's exciting news : we 've just been acquired by Google !
What does this mean for Picnik ?
It means we can think BIG .
Google processes petabytes of data every day , and with their worldwide infrastructure and world-class team , it is truly the best home we could have found .
Under the Google roof we 'll reach more people than ever before , impacting more lives and making more photos more awesome .
What does this mean for you Picnikers ?
Nothing is changing right away , but Picnik now has more potential than ever before .
The team that built Picnik from the grass up will continue making advanced and powerful photo-editing easier , more intuitive and more fun , so stay tuned to hear about all the cool new stuff we 're working on .
" That 's so cute !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"And all this leads us to today's exciting news: we've just been acquired by Google!
What does this mean for Picnik?
It means we can think BIG.
Google processes petabytes of data every day, and with their worldwide infrastructure and world-class team, it is truly the best home we could have found.
Under the Google roof we'll reach more people than ever before, impacting more lives and making more photos more awesome.
What does this mean for you Picnikers?
Nothing is changing right away, but Picnik now has more potential than ever before.
The team that built Picnik from the grass up will continue making advanced and powerful photo-editing easier, more intuitive and more fun, so stay tuned to hear about all the cool new stuff we're working on.
"That's so cute!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324228</id>
	<title>kool</title>
	<author>swanzilla</author>
	<datestamp>1267447320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>n/t</htmltext>
<tokenext>n/t</tokentext>
<sentencetext>n/t</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324660</id>
	<title>It's Picasa</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267449780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This application is basically on online version of the Picasa editing tools. I find it hard to believe that Google would not already be working on adding those tools to Picasaweb. Will this really help them to do that any faster? Or does this just clear the way for the launch of those tools, while also providing an initial user base?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This application is basically on online version of the Picasa editing tools .
I find it hard to believe that Google would not already be working on adding those tools to Picasaweb .
Will this really help them to do that any faster ?
Or does this just clear the way for the launch of those tools , while also providing an initial user base ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This application is basically on online version of the Picasa editing tools.
I find it hard to believe that Google would not already be working on adding those tools to Picasaweb.
Will this really help them to do that any faster?
Or does this just clear the way for the launch of those tools, while also providing an initial user base?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31327004</id>
	<title>Re:I am Sergey Brin of Borg.</title>
	<author>Black Gold Alchemist</author>
	<datestamp>1267471140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The google borg cubes (gborg gcubes?) will have dynamic google ads up and down their sides showing ads relevant to whatever race they're assimilating.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The google borg cubes ( gborg gcubes ?
) will have dynamic google ads up and down their sides showing ads relevant to whatever race they 're assimilating .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The google borg cubes (gborg gcubes?
) will have dynamic google ads up and down their sides showing ads relevant to whatever race they're assimilating.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324044</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324778</id>
	<title>Re:Am I alone?</title>
	<author>MobileTatsu-NJG</author>
	<datestamp>1267450740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Is anyone else getting sick of hearing exciting stories about Google?</p></div><p>If you're sick of it, why are you increasing the comment count in a Google thread and helping Slashdot serve ads?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is anyone else getting sick of hearing exciting stories about Google ? If you 're sick of it , why are you increasing the comment count in a Google thread and helping Slashdot serve ads ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is anyone else getting sick of hearing exciting stories about Google?If you're sick of it, why are you increasing the comment count in a Google thread and helping Slashdot serve ads?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31326756</id>
	<title>Uh oh...</title>
	<author>The Wild Norseman</author>
	<datestamp>1267468320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>"And all this leads us to today's exciting news: we've just been acquired by Google! W<b>H</b>at do<b>E</b>s this mean for Picnik? It means we can think BIG. Goog<b>L</b>e <b>P</b>rocesses petabytes of data every day, and with their worldwide infrastructure and world-class tea<b>M</b>, it is truly the b<b>E</b>st home we could have found. Under the Google roof we'll reach more people than ever before, impacting more lives and making more photos more awesome. What does <b>TH</b>is m<b>E</b>an for <b>Y</b>ou Picnikers? Nothing is changing right away, but Picnik now <b>HA</b>s more potential than e<b>VE</b>r before. The team that bui<b>L</b>t Picnik fr<b>O</b>m <b>T</b>he gra<b>S</b>s up will continue making advanced and p<b>O</b>wer<b>F</b>ul photo-editin<strong>G</strong> easier, more int<strong>U</strong>itive and more fun<strong>N</strong>, <strong>S</strong>o stay tuned to hear about all the cool new stuff we're working on."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>" And all this leads us to today 's exciting news : we 've just been acquired by Google !
WHat doEs this mean for Picnik ?
It means we can think BIG .
GoogLe Processes petabytes of data every day , and with their worldwide infrastructure and world-class teaM , it is truly the bEst home we could have found .
Under the Google roof we 'll reach more people than ever before , impacting more lives and making more photos more awesome .
What does THis mEan for You Picnikers ?
Nothing is changing right away , but Picnik now HAs more potential than eVEr before .
The team that buiLt Picnik frOm The graSs up will continue making advanced and pOwerFul photo-editinG easier , more intUitive and more funN , So stay tuned to hear about all the cool new stuff we 're working on .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"And all this leads us to today's exciting news: we've just been acquired by Google!
WHat doEs this mean for Picnik?
It means we can think BIG.
GoogLe Processes petabytes of data every day, and with their worldwide infrastructure and world-class teaM, it is truly the bEst home we could have found.
Under the Google roof we'll reach more people than ever before, impacting more lives and making more photos more awesome.
What does THis mEan for You Picnikers?
Nothing is changing right away, but Picnik now HAs more potential than eVEr before.
The team that buiLt Picnik frOm The graSs up will continue making advanced and pOwerFul photo-editinG easier, more intUitive and more funN, So stay tuned to hear about all the cool new stuff we're working on.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31326912</id>
	<title>Hmm...</title>
	<author>Taco Cowboy</author>
	<datestamp>1267470120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FYI, similar service offered by others:</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="http://pixlr.com/" title="pixlr.com">http://pixlr.com/</a> [pixlr.com]<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="http://fotoflexer.com/" title="fotoflexer.com">http://fotoflexer.com/</a> [fotoflexer.com]<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="http://pixenate.com/" title="pixenate.com">http://pixenate.com/</a> [pixenate.com]<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="http://snipshot.com/" title="snipshot.com">http://snipshot.com/</a> [snipshot.com]<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="http://www.lunapic.com/editor/" title="lunapic.com">http://www.lunapic.com/editor/</a> [lunapic.com]<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="http://editor.pho.to/" title="editor.pho.to">http://editor.pho.to/</a> [editor.pho.to]<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="http://aviary.com/tools/phoenix" title="aviary.com">http://aviary.com/tools/phoenix</a> [aviary.com]<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="http://www.imageeditor.net/" title="imageeditor.net">http://www.imageeditor.net/</a> [imageeditor.net]<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="http://editor.pixastic.com/" title="pixastic.com">http://editor.pixastic.com/</a> [pixastic.com]<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="http://www.phixr.com/" title="phixr.com">http://www.phixr.com/</a> [phixr.com]<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="http://www.picture2life.com/" title="picture2life.com">http://www.picture2life.com/</a> [picture2life.com]<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="http://www.pixlr.com/" title="pixlr.com">http://www.pixlr.com/</a> [pixlr.com]<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="http://pixer.us/" title="pixer.us">http://pixer.us/</a> [pixer.us]<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="https://www.photoshop.com/" title="photoshop.com">https://www.photoshop.com/</a> [photoshop.com]<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="http://www.splashup.com/" title="splashup.com">http://www.splashup.com/</a> [splashup.com]<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="http://www.flauntr.com/" title="flauntr.com">http://www.flauntr.com/</a> [flauntr.com]<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="http://www.pizap.com/" title="pizap.com">http://www.pizap.com/</a> [pizap.com]<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="http://www.photofunia.com/" title="photofunia.com">http://www.photofunia.com/</a> [photofunia.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FYI , similar service offered by others :         http : //pixlr.com/ [ pixlr.com ]         http : //fotoflexer.com/ [ fotoflexer.com ]         http : //pixenate.com/ [ pixenate.com ]         http : //snipshot.com/ [ snipshot.com ]         http : //www.lunapic.com/editor/ [ lunapic.com ]         http : //editor.pho.to/ [ editor.pho.to ]         http : //aviary.com/tools/phoenix [ aviary.com ]         http : //www.imageeditor.net/ [ imageeditor.net ]         http : //editor.pixastic.com/ [ pixastic.com ]         http : //www.phixr.com/ [ phixr.com ]         http : //www.picture2life.com/ [ picture2life.com ]         http : //www.pixlr.com/ [ pixlr.com ]         http : //pixer.us/ [ pixer.us ]         https : //www.photoshop.com/ [ photoshop.com ]         http : //www.splashup.com/ [ splashup.com ]         http : //www.flauntr.com/ [ flauntr.com ]         http : //www.pizap.com/ [ pizap.com ]         http : //www.photofunia.com/ [ photofunia.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FYI, similar service offered by others:
        http://pixlr.com/ [pixlr.com]
        http://fotoflexer.com/ [fotoflexer.com]
        http://pixenate.com/ [pixenate.com]
        http://snipshot.com/ [snipshot.com]
        http://www.lunapic.com/editor/ [lunapic.com]
        http://editor.pho.to/ [editor.pho.to]
        http://aviary.com/tools/phoenix [aviary.com]
        http://www.imageeditor.net/ [imageeditor.net]
        http://editor.pixastic.com/ [pixastic.com]
        http://www.phixr.com/ [phixr.com]
        http://www.picture2life.com/ [picture2life.com]
        http://www.pixlr.com/ [pixlr.com]
        http://pixer.us/ [pixer.us]
        https://www.photoshop.com/ [photoshop.com]
        http://www.splashup.com/ [splashup.com]
        http://www.flauntr.com/ [flauntr.com]
        http://www.pizap.com/ [pizap.com]
        http://www.photofunia.com/ [photofunia.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31323996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324384</id>
	<title>Anonymous</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267448280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>very nice article</p><p>http://www.onlinea1.com/vb</p><p>http://www.gamesfinder.net</p><p>http://www.7bab.net</p><p>http://www.egypt-gallery.com/home.php</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>very nice articlehttp : //www.onlinea1.com/vbhttp : //www.gamesfinder.nethttp : //www.7bab.nethttp : //www.egypt-gallery.com/home.php</tokentext>
<sentencetext>very nice articlehttp://www.onlinea1.com/vbhttp://www.gamesfinder.nethttp://www.7bab.nethttp://www.egypt-gallery.com/home.php</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324560</id>
	<title>Re:Premium features to be free?</title>
	<author>slimjim8094</author>
	<datestamp>1267449240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google has a history of releasing paid stuff for free. Keyhole was originally extremely expensive, and they released Google Earth free. They still charge something like $30 for the next version up, but that's a lot less than the several hundred+ it was originally.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google has a history of releasing paid stuff for free .
Keyhole was originally extremely expensive , and they released Google Earth free .
They still charge something like $ 30 for the next version up , but that 's a lot less than the several hundred + it was originally .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google has a history of releasing paid stuff for free.
Keyhole was originally extremely expensive, and they released Google Earth free.
They still charge something like $30 for the next version up, but that's a lot less than the several hundred+ it was originally.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324086</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324172</id>
	<title>Flickr or Picasa?</title>
	<author>iPhr0stByt3</author>
	<datestamp>1267447020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Picnik is a pretty neat tool.  I mean... I'm cool with paint.net so my needs are simple anyway, but it's also nice to have a web-based tool available anywhere.  I just hope they don't eventually pull out of flickr and go exclusively with Picasa now.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...seems to me at one point google supported Firefox.  I know this isn't the same, but it also would not surprise me to see picnik removed from flickr eventually.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Picnik is a pretty neat tool .
I mean... I 'm cool with paint.net so my needs are simple anyway , but it 's also nice to have a web-based tool available anywhere .
I just hope they do n't eventually pull out of flickr and go exclusively with Picasa now .
...seems to me at one point google supported Firefox .
I know this is n't the same , but it also would not surprise me to see picnik removed from flickr eventually .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Picnik is a pretty neat tool.
I mean... I'm cool with paint.net so my needs are simple anyway, but it's also nice to have a web-based tool available anywhere.
I just hope they don't eventually pull out of flickr and go exclusively with Picasa now.
...seems to me at one point google supported Firefox.
I know this isn't the same, but it also would not surprise me to see picnik removed from flickr eventually.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31326648</id>
	<title>Re:Am I alone?</title>
	<author>jo42</author>
	<datestamp>1267467240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google farts.<br>Google fanbois inhale deeply;<br>Proclaim "Google is Great!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google farts.Google fanbois inhale deeply ; Proclaim " Google is Great !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google farts.Google fanbois inhale deeply;Proclaim "Google is Great!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324908</id>
	<title>What does this mean for flickr?</title>
	<author>anethema</author>
	<datestamp>1267451580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm kind of invested in Flickr for online photo organization and storage, and haven't yet tried Picasa. Flickr uses Picnik for photo editing but Flickr is owned by yahoo. Anyone think Flickr will dump Picnik or photo editing all together now that a competitor owns it ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm kind of invested in Flickr for online photo organization and storage , and have n't yet tried Picasa .
Flickr uses Picnik for photo editing but Flickr is owned by yahoo .
Anyone think Flickr will dump Picnik or photo editing all together now that a competitor owns it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm kind of invested in Flickr for online photo organization and storage, and haven't yet tried Picasa.
Flickr uses Picnik for photo editing but Flickr is owned by yahoo.
Anyone think Flickr will dump Picnik or photo editing all together now that a competitor owns it ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324162</id>
	<title>Public Enemy got it right.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267446960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Watch what you tell 'em cause they don't bring you glory</p><p>It only brings agony, ask James Cagney</p><p>He beat up on a guy when he found he was a fagney</p><p>Cagney is a favorite he is my boy</p><p>He don't jive around he's a real McCoy</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Watch what you tell 'em cause they do n't bring you gloryIt only brings agony , ask James CagneyHe beat up on a guy when he found he was a fagneyCagney is a favorite he is my boyHe do n't jive around he 's a real McCoy</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Watch what you tell 'em cause they don't bring you gloryIt only brings agony, ask James CagneyHe beat up on a guy when he found he was a fagneyCagney is a favorite he is my boyHe don't jive around he's a real McCoy</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31327872</id>
	<title>Certainly a feature</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267528380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Chrome OS was in need of.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Chrome OS was in need of .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chrome OS was in need of.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31327616</id>
	<title>Google the new Microsoft...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267524240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>..unable to innovate so instead just buy up companies and then ruin them</htmltext>
<tokenext>..unable to innovate so instead just buy up companies and then ruin them</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..unable to innovate so instead just buy up companies and then ruin them</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324194</id>
	<title>picnik is all that...if you are blind</title>
	<author>radicalbiscuit</author>
	<datestamp>1267447080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Google will now be processing petabytes of poor image composition techniques every day.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google will now be processing petabytes of poor image composition techniques every day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google will now be processing petabytes of poor image composition techniques every day.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324644</id>
	<title>Eating Yahoo's lunch</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267449660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Picnik is highly integrated with flickr, which is owned by Yahoo.  Google's own Picasaweb has never quite taken off the same way... I'd say they're jealous.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Picnik is highly integrated with flickr , which is owned by Yahoo .
Google 's own Picasaweb has never quite taken off the same way... I 'd say they 're jealous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Picnik is highly integrated with flickr, which is owned by Yahoo.
Google's own Picasaweb has never quite taken off the same way... I'd say they're jealous.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324920</id>
	<title>Re:Photo Editor, not Image Editor</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267451640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>or <a href="http://www.aviary.com/" title="aviary.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.aviary.com/</a> [aviary.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>or http : //www.aviary.com/ [ aviary.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or http://www.aviary.com/ [aviary.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324154</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31325350</id>
	<title>Re:Good Luck, Picnikers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267454940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>[CEO Jonathan] Sposato noted that nearly all of the employees who work at Picnik will come out ahead on the deal financially, calling it a "very, very, very great win."</p></div><p>http://www.techflash.com/seattle/2010/03/picniks\_sposato\_on\_google\_sale\_a\_very\_happy\_number.html</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>[ CEO Jonathan ] Sposato noted that nearly all of the employees who work at Picnik will come out ahead on the deal financially , calling it a " very , very , very great win .
" http : //www.techflash.com/seattle/2010/03/picniks \ _sposato \ _on \ _google \ _sale \ _a \ _very \ _happy \ _number.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[CEO Jonathan] Sposato noted that nearly all of the employees who work at Picnik will come out ahead on the deal financially, calling it a "very, very, very great win.
"http://www.techflash.com/seattle/2010/03/picniks\_sposato\_on\_google\_sale\_a\_very\_happy\_number.html
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324404</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31326668</id>
	<title>Re:Photo Editor, not Image Editor</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267467420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's the difference between a photo editor and an image editor?</p><p>Thanks</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's the difference between a photo editor and an image editor ? Thanks</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's the difference between a photo editor and an image editor?Thanks</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324154</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324424</id>
	<title>Re:Photo Editor, not Image Editor</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267448520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Great, you HAD to mention Splashup.  Now Google is going to buy them too.  Way to go.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Great , you HAD to mention Splashup .
Now Google is going to buy them too .
Way to go .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great, you HAD to mention Splashup.
Now Google is going to buy them too.
Way to go.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324154</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324250</id>
	<title>TinEye</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267447380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh how I would love to see Google acquire TinEye, or develop their own product.   I love the idea of TinEye but the data just isn't there.  Google doesn't have that problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh how I would love to see Google acquire TinEye , or develop their own product .
I love the idea of TinEye but the data just is n't there .
Google does n't have that problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh how I would love to see Google acquire TinEye, or develop their own product.
I love the idea of TinEye but the data just isn't there.
Google doesn't have that problem.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324318</id>
	<title>honestly who pays for this... lots it seems...</title>
	<author>johnjones</author>
	<datestamp>1267447800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>they where intent on billing people for effects that essentially you could do in imagemagick</p><p>but what mattered was the ability to do things in a flash platform<br>wake up yahoo and build something nice... add to flickr<br>what people really liked was the sprinkling of dew... have a sense of humor and it gets you a lot</p><p>there are lots of online photoshop tools but the easyest way to tell if they are serious is to find if they have a image clone tool...</p><p>odd but true</p><p>they where insistent on billing people I will be interested if google wants this to continue</p><p>regards</p><p>John Jones</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>they where intent on billing people for effects that essentially you could do in imagemagickbut what mattered was the ability to do things in a flash platformwake up yahoo and build something nice... add to flickrwhat people really liked was the sprinkling of dew... have a sense of humor and it gets you a lotthere are lots of online photoshop tools but the easyest way to tell if they are serious is to find if they have a image clone tool...odd but truethey where insistent on billing people I will be interested if google wants this to continueregardsJohn Jones</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they where intent on billing people for effects that essentially you could do in imagemagickbut what mattered was the ability to do things in a flash platformwake up yahoo and build something nice... add to flickrwhat people really liked was the sprinkling of dew... have a sense of humor and it gets you a lotthere are lots of online photoshop tools but the easyest way to tell if they are serious is to find if they have a image clone tool...odd but truethey where insistent on billing people I will be interested if google wants this to continueregardsJohn Jones</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324404</id>
	<title>Good Luck, Picnikers</title>
	<author>gyrogeerloose</author>
	<datestamp>1267448400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What does this mean for you Picnikers? Nothing is changing right away...</p></div><p>Which, of course, translates to "You'll continue to have a job at least until all the financial details of the sale are arranged. After that, who knows?" I'm speaking from experience here. I've had my employer "acquired" a couple of times and always ended up unemployed afterwards.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What does this mean for you Picnikers ?
Nothing is changing right away...Which , of course , translates to " You 'll continue to have a job at least until all the financial details of the sale are arranged .
After that , who knows ?
" I 'm speaking from experience here .
I 've had my employer " acquired " a couple of times and always ended up unemployed afterwards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What does this mean for you Picnikers?
Nothing is changing right away...Which, of course, translates to "You'll continue to have a job at least until all the financial details of the sale are arranged.
After that, who knows?
" I'm speaking from experience here.
I've had my employer "acquired" a couple of times and always ended up unemployed afterwards.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31328700</id>
	<title>Re:Flash</title>
	<author>AvitarX</author>
	<datestamp>1267539000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google does good stuff with flash.</p><p>Analytics uses flash and not SVG for its charts (if memory serves correctly).</p><p>Also the google PDF viewer is the most pleasant use of flash ever.  And considering the flash plugin is lighter and less heavy than the acrobat plugin, a great way to reduce annoying adobeness in ones browser.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google does good stuff with flash.Analytics uses flash and not SVG for its charts ( if memory serves correctly ) .Also the google PDF viewer is the most pleasant use of flash ever .
And considering the flash plugin is lighter and less heavy than the acrobat plugin , a great way to reduce annoying adobeness in ones browser .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google does good stuff with flash.Analytics uses flash and not SVG for its charts (if memory serves correctly).Also the google PDF viewer is the most pleasant use of flash ever.
And considering the flash plugin is lighter and less heavy than the acrobat plugin, a great way to reduce annoying adobeness in ones browser.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324914</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31325500</id>
	<title>"Picnikers" = users</title>
	<author>Gorimek</author>
	<datestamp>1267456380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dude, the statement talks about how it will affect the <b>users</b>.</p><p>Some of them will surely become unemployed, but that is unrelated to this deal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude , the statement talks about how it will affect the users.Some of them will surely become unemployed , but that is unrelated to this deal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude, the statement talks about how it will affect the users.Some of them will surely become unemployed, but that is unrelated to this deal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324404</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31326438</id>
	<title>Just one typo away from fame and fortune...</title>
	<author>fm6</author>
	<datestamp>1267465260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My personal domain is picknit.com. (I'm a tech writer. What do tech writers do?) All I needed was for somebody to enter "picknit" instead of "picnik" and I'd be in acquisition nirvana.</p><p>I just can't catch a break.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My personal domain is picknit.com .
( I 'm a tech writer .
What do tech writers do ?
) All I needed was for somebody to enter " picknit " instead of " picnik " and I 'd be in acquisition nirvana.I just ca n't catch a break .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My personal domain is picknit.com.
(I'm a tech writer.
What do tech writers do?
) All I needed was for somebody to enter "picknit" instead of "picnik" and I'd be in acquisition nirvana.I just can't catch a break.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324110</id>
	<title>What does it mean?!?</title>
	<author>goofyspouse</author>
	<datestamp>1267446780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>"What does this mean for Picnik?"<br> <br>

Seriously?  It means you are frickin' rich now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" What does this mean for Picnik ?
" Seriously ?
It means you are frickin ' rich now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"What does this mean for Picnik?
" 

Seriously?
It means you are frickin' rich now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_214246_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31325754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324154
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_214246_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324920
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324154
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_214246_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31326496
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324176
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_214246_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324560
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_214246_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31328116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31326668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324154
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_214246_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31328810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31323996
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_214246_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324308
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_214246_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31328328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31325500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_214246_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31328700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324914
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_214246_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324176
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_214246_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31325832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_214246_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31331834
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31325556
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_214246_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31327004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324044
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_214246_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31327196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324644
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_214246_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31329302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31326668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324154
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_214246_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31326912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31323996
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_214246_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31325350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_214246_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31326648
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324176
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_214246.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31323996
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31328810
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31326912
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_214246.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324058
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_214246.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324242
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_214246.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324154
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324920
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31326668
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31328116
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31329302
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324424
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31325754
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_214246.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324914
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31328700
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_214246.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324044
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31327004
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_214246.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324176
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31326648
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324778
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31326496
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_214246.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324644
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31327196
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_214246.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324086
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324560
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324308
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_214246.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324250
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_214246.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324404
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31325556
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31331834
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31325832
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31325500
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31328328
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31325350
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_214246.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324122
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_214246.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_214246.31324660
</commentlist>
</conversation>
