<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_01_210234</id>
	<title>US Military Surrenders To Social Media, Changes Access Restrictions</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1267439820000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Thanks to a new policy by the Department of Defense, members of the US Military will now have <a href="http://feeds.arstechnica.com/~r/arstechnica/index/~3/rwRWV4FqiF0/us-militarys-social-media-policy-gets-a-makeover.ars">limited access to social media sites</a>. <i>"According to the memorandum, members of military departments and all authorized users of the Non-classified Internet Protocol Router Network (NIPRNET) can now use the publicly accessible capabilities of various social networking and user-generated content sites, instant messaging, forums, and e-mail. This includes YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, and others. Access to porn, gambling, or hate crime sites will remain restricted, however, and commanders can cut down on social media use if they feel the need to 'preserve operations security.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks to a new policy by the Department of Defense , members of the US Military will now have limited access to social media sites .
" According to the memorandum , members of military departments and all authorized users of the Non-classified Internet Protocol Router Network ( NIPRNET ) can now use the publicly accessible capabilities of various social networking and user-generated content sites , instant messaging , forums , and e-mail .
This includes YouTube , Facebook , Twitter , MySpace , and others .
Access to porn , gambling , or hate crime sites will remain restricted , however , and commanders can cut down on social media use if they feel the need to 'preserve operations security .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks to a new policy by the Department of Defense, members of the US Military will now have limited access to social media sites.
"According to the memorandum, members of military departments and all authorized users of the Non-classified Internet Protocol Router Network (NIPRNET) can now use the publicly accessible capabilities of various social networking and user-generated content sites, instant messaging, forums, and e-mail.
This includes YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, and others.
Access to porn, gambling, or hate crime sites will remain restricted, however, and commanders can cut down on social media use if they feel the need to 'preserve operations security.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323758</id>
	<title>Blocking prOn ?</title>
	<author>dargaud</author>
	<datestamp>1267444920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I never understood the need to block things like porn for the military. You get a bunch of guys together for months on end in a highly stressful condition. Porn would be one excellent way for them to release some steam, but no, they're not allowed to do that. So what are they supposed to do ? Go out, shoot some guys and rape their GFs ?!? I mean is this all it's really about, some kind of control via stress and basic sexual drives like in most wars of the past ? If it was just for me I'd airdrop a billion netbooks full of porn with free satellite access over the middle east.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I never understood the need to block things like porn for the military .
You get a bunch of guys together for months on end in a highly stressful condition .
Porn would be one excellent way for them to release some steam , but no , they 're not allowed to do that .
So what are they supposed to do ?
Go out , shoot some guys and rape their GFs ? ! ?
I mean is this all it 's really about , some kind of control via stress and basic sexual drives like in most wars of the past ?
If it was just for me I 'd airdrop a billion netbooks full of porn with free satellite access over the middle east .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I never understood the need to block things like porn for the military.
You get a bunch of guys together for months on end in a highly stressful condition.
Porn would be one excellent way for them to release some steam, but no, they're not allowed to do that.
So what are they supposed to do ?
Go out, shoot some guys and rape their GFs ?!?
I mean is this all it's really about, some kind of control via stress and basic sexual drives like in most wars of the past ?
If it was just for me I'd airdrop a billion netbooks full of porn with free satellite access over the middle east.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323866</id>
	<title>A positive change</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267445580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As an active duty military systems administrator posting from a ship at sea, I welcome this change.</p><p>Being underway for months at a time with a 164kbps satellite connection split amongst fifty computers for over a hundred crew is rough enough on morale.  Being able to see pictures of their wives and kids makes all the difference in the world.</p><p>Foolish people doing foolish things are always going to be the problem, not the engineering officer whose hooked on Farmville after the workday ends.</p><p>So long as it doesn't disrupt their effectiveness at work, I very much support this change.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As an active duty military systems administrator posting from a ship at sea , I welcome this change.Being underway for months at a time with a 164kbps satellite connection split amongst fifty computers for over a hundred crew is rough enough on morale .
Being able to see pictures of their wives and kids makes all the difference in the world.Foolish people doing foolish things are always going to be the problem , not the engineering officer whose hooked on Farmville after the workday ends.So long as it does n't disrupt their effectiveness at work , I very much support this change .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As an active duty military systems administrator posting from a ship at sea, I welcome this change.Being underway for months at a time with a 164kbps satellite connection split amongst fifty computers for over a hundred crew is rough enough on morale.
Being able to see pictures of their wives and kids makes all the difference in the world.Foolish people doing foolish things are always going to be the problem, not the engineering officer whose hooked on Farmville after the workday ends.So long as it doesn't disrupt their effectiveness at work, I very much support this change.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31327688</id>
	<title>Re:Blocking prOn ?</title>
	<author>skiman1979</author>
	<datestamp>1267525320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I never understood the need to block things like porn for the military.</p></div><p>It's not so much the porn that needs to be blocked.  It's the malware and the like that comes with many porn sites that needs to be blocked.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I never understood the need to block things like porn for the military.It 's not so much the porn that needs to be blocked .
It 's the malware and the like that comes with many porn sites that needs to be blocked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I never understood the need to block things like porn for the military.It's not so much the porn that needs to be blocked.
It's the malware and the like that comes with many porn sites that needs to be blocked.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323758</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31326482</id>
	<title>Re:Blocking prOn ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267465620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's called GO-1.  (General Order 1) and it covers everything from Porn to Booze and other things.<br> <br>

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General\_Order\_No.\_1</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's called GO-1 .
( General Order 1 ) and it covers everything from Porn to Booze and other things .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General \ _Order \ _No. \ _1</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's called GO-1.
(General Order 1) and it covers everything from Porn to Booze and other things.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General\_Order\_No.\_1</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323758</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323734</id>
	<title>Re: US Military Surrenders?</title>
	<author>QuantumRiff</author>
	<datestamp>1267444800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry, US millitary Overthrew their previous regime of regulations...</p><p>Oh, wait..</p><p>US Military exploded onto the front page of tech news sites today...</p><p>damn..</p><p>the US millitary didn't ask, and won't tell what its facebook policies are...</p><p>wow.. its just too easy...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry , US millitary Overthrew their previous regime of regulations...Oh , wait..US Military exploded onto the front page of tech news sites today...damn..the US millitary did n't ask , and wo n't tell what its facebook policies are...wow.. its just too easy.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry, US millitary Overthrew their previous regime of regulations...Oh, wait..US Military exploded onto the front page of tech news sites today...damn..the US millitary didn't ask, and won't tell what its facebook policies are...wow.. its just too easy...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323584</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323704</id>
	<title>Fun times ahead</title>
	<author>paiute</author>
	<datestamp>1267444680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>RT @FirstSarge: Anybody see where that last round came from?<br>via TweetDeck<br>RT @Grunt88: Second hut on the left.<br>via TweetDeck<br>RT @sexxysela: Hai gaize! Du U want 2 partay wit me???LOL!!11!!<br>via TweetDeck<br>RT @FirstSarge: Clear the line, ma'am, please? We're taking fire here.<br>via TweetDeck</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>RT @ FirstSarge : Anybody see where that last round came from ? via TweetDeckRT @ Grunt88 : Second hut on the left.via TweetDeckRT @ sexxysela : Hai gaize !
Du U want 2 partay wit me ? ? ? LOL ! ! 11 !
! via TweetDeckRT @ FirstSarge : Clear the line , ma'am , please ?
We 're taking fire here.via TweetDeck</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RT @FirstSarge: Anybody see where that last round came from?via TweetDeckRT @Grunt88: Second hut on the left.via TweetDeckRT @sexxysela: Hai gaize!
Du U want 2 partay wit me???LOL!!11!
!via TweetDeckRT @FirstSarge: Clear the line, ma'am, please?
We're taking fire here.via TweetDeck</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323562</id>
	<title>No Slashdot?</title>
	<author>DesertBlade</author>
	<datestamp>1267443900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am a little offended it did make the list, it was around way before youtube and facebook.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am a little offended it did make the list , it was around way before youtube and facebook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am a little offended it did make the list, it was around way before youtube and facebook.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31331550</id>
	<title>Re:This makes sense</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267552920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're lucky. At Navy we cannot proceed if we are blocked. Many times I find software optimization techniques that are discussed on game programming websites. However, "gaming" websites are blocked too.</p><p>Not to mentioned that they disabled Firefox usage due to security concerns. We have to use IE6.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're lucky .
At Navy we can not proceed if we are blocked .
Many times I find software optimization techniques that are discussed on game programming websites .
However , " gaming " websites are blocked too.Not to mentioned that they disabled Firefox usage due to security concerns .
We have to use IE6 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're lucky.
At Navy we cannot proceed if we are blocked.
Many times I find software optimization techniques that are discussed on game programming websites.
However, "gaming" websites are blocked too.Not to mentioned that they disabled Firefox usage due to security concerns.
We have to use IE6.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31324038</id>
	<title>no OPSEC here!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267446420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I was deployed to Iraq in '03 to early '05, I had to give up my IT job and go be a grunt for 18 months, and because I didn't have a MOS to prove my skills do some domineering douche E-6 admin, I got to convoy and do escort security.  Being the convoy guy, you had access to the motor pool, so I'd get in a humvee once in awhile and do some war-driving on base with what little techie equipment I brought with me just for my own amusement.  What amazed me what not only my findings themselves, but news that our officers in our unit would make the commo guys hook 802.11b/g routers up to NIPRnet (unsecured, mind you) so they could have free-range internet in their tents while the rest of us sucked it up in line for hours to get 5 minutes to write an e-mail and have some troll look over my shoulder to make sure I wasn't typing and "sensitive position information" in my e-mail (as if the Iraqi's don't know where all our bases is anyway!  Isn't that why I got motor attacked twice a week?).</p><p>The point I'm trying to make is OPSEC in the military is a illusion and a joke and operate under the phrase "Do as I say, not as I do".  The highest official is going to thrust down on the enlisted and preach being operationally secure, but it's the same guy who wanted NIRPnet broadcasted over an unsecure wifi router for 'convenience'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I was deployed to Iraq in '03 to early '05 , I had to give up my IT job and go be a grunt for 18 months , and because I did n't have a MOS to prove my skills do some domineering douche E-6 admin , I got to convoy and do escort security .
Being the convoy guy , you had access to the motor pool , so I 'd get in a humvee once in awhile and do some war-driving on base with what little techie equipment I brought with me just for my own amusement .
What amazed me what not only my findings themselves , but news that our officers in our unit would make the commo guys hook 802.11b/g routers up to NIPRnet ( unsecured , mind you ) so they could have free-range internet in their tents while the rest of us sucked it up in line for hours to get 5 minutes to write an e-mail and have some troll look over my shoulder to make sure I was n't typing and " sensitive position information " in my e-mail ( as if the Iraqi 's do n't know where all our bases is anyway !
Is n't that why I got motor attacked twice a week ?
) .The point I 'm trying to make is OPSEC in the military is a illusion and a joke and operate under the phrase " Do as I say , not as I do " .
The highest official is going to thrust down on the enlisted and preach being operationally secure , but it 's the same guy who wanted NIRPnet broadcasted over an unsecure wifi router for 'convenience' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I was deployed to Iraq in '03 to early '05, I had to give up my IT job and go be a grunt for 18 months, and because I didn't have a MOS to prove my skills do some domineering douche E-6 admin, I got to convoy and do escort security.
Being the convoy guy, you had access to the motor pool, so I'd get in a humvee once in awhile and do some war-driving on base with what little techie equipment I brought with me just for my own amusement.
What amazed me what not only my findings themselves, but news that our officers in our unit would make the commo guys hook 802.11b/g routers up to NIPRnet (unsecured, mind you) so they could have free-range internet in their tents while the rest of us sucked it up in line for hours to get 5 minutes to write an e-mail and have some troll look over my shoulder to make sure I wasn't typing and "sensitive position information" in my e-mail (as if the Iraqi's don't know where all our bases is anyway!
Isn't that why I got motor attacked twice a week?
).The point I'm trying to make is OPSEC in the military is a illusion and a joke and operate under the phrase "Do as I say, not as I do".
The highest official is going to thrust down on the enlisted and preach being operationally secure, but it's the same guy who wanted NIRPnet broadcasted over an unsecure wifi router for 'convenience'.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31327562</id>
	<title>Re:Blocking prOn ?</title>
	<author>IBBoard</author>
	<datestamp>1267523460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Probably the same reason as most other networks can't handle it - sheer bandwidth that people will be using. Start browsing a social networking site? Not huge bandwidth in general. Start downloading porn? People can go crazy with bandwidth usage! It'll all be limited out in the field, and why should the government pay for it on base?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably the same reason as most other networks ca n't handle it - sheer bandwidth that people will be using .
Start browsing a social networking site ?
Not huge bandwidth in general .
Start downloading porn ?
People can go crazy with bandwidth usage !
It 'll all be limited out in the field , and why should the government pay for it on base ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably the same reason as most other networks can't handle it - sheer bandwidth that people will be using.
Start browsing a social networking site?
Not huge bandwidth in general.
Start downloading porn?
People can go crazy with bandwidth usage!
It'll all be limited out in the field, and why should the government pay for it on base?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323758</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31324102</id>
	<title>Re: US Military Surrenders?</title>
	<author>BJ\_Covert\_Action</author>
	<datestamp>1267446720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dramatic?
<br> <br>
No my friend....
<br> <br>
<b>This is SLASHDOT!!!!!!!</b>
<br> <br> <br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...
<br> <br>
Cut me a  break, it's the end of a very long Monday...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dramatic ?
No my friend... . This is SLASHDOT ! ! ! ! ! ! !
.. . Cut me a break , it 's the end of a very long Monday.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dramatic?
No my friend....
 
This is SLASHDOT!!!!!!!
...
 
Cut me a  break, it's the end of a very long Monday...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323584</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31376376</id>
	<title>Re:Blocking prOn ?</title>
	<author>stewbacca</author>
	<datestamp>1267788180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The modern Army is a highly professional organization. There's no need for porn.  Plus, some people can actually control themselves.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The modern Army is a highly professional organization .
There 's no need for porn .
Plus , some people can actually control themselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The modern Army is a highly professional organization.
There's no need for porn.
Plus, some people can actually control themselves.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323758</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31327578</id>
	<title>How long before...</title>
	<author>IBBoard</author>
	<datestamp>1267523700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How long will it be before the first tweet is posted with GPS co-ordinates that give away an important location or mission?</p><p>Forget the "rob my house" Twitter app, now the 'bad guys' can set up a "where are they attacking from" Twitter app!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How long will it be before the first tweet is posted with GPS co-ordinates that give away an important location or mission ? Forget the " rob my house " Twitter app , now the 'bad guys ' can set up a " where are they attacking from " Twitter app !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How long will it be before the first tweet is posted with GPS co-ordinates that give away an important location or mission?Forget the "rob my house" Twitter app, now the 'bad guys' can set up a "where are they attacking from" Twitter app!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31325750</id>
	<title>Still no email!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267458480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great.  I can hop on Facebook and chatter away with the world, but I still can't load Gmail to email my wife.</p><p>Fucking brilliant.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great .
I can hop on Facebook and chatter away with the world , but I still ca n't load Gmail to email my wife.Fucking brilliant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great.
I can hop on Facebook and chatter away with the world, but I still can't load Gmail to email my wife.Fucking brilliant.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31328390</id>
	<title>Re: US Military Surrenders?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267535280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are enough problems with securing a network without introducing yet more worms/trojans/viruses from the various social network sites around the net. THIS IS A HUGE MISTAKE.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are enough problems with securing a network without introducing yet more worms/trojans/viruses from the various social network sites around the net .
THIS IS A HUGE MISTAKE .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are enough problems with securing a network without introducing yet more worms/trojans/viruses from the various social network sites around the net.
THIS IS A HUGE MISTAKE.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323584</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323584</id>
	<title>US Military Surrenders?</title>
	<author>wisnoskij</author>
	<datestamp>1267443960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>That is a little over dramatic.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That is a little over dramatic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is a little over dramatic.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323524</id>
	<title>Status update</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267443780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In a cave in Helmand. Hunting for the BL. Hope they don't have internet or they'll know we're coming.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In a cave in Helmand .
Hunting for the BL .
Hope they do n't have internet or they 'll know we 're coming .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In a cave in Helmand.
Hunting for the BL.
Hope they don't have internet or they'll know we're coming.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323862</id>
	<title>Re: US Military Surrenders?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267445580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Since technically, it would be much easier to disguise information using steganography in facebook/flickr pictures and youtube videos and leak information that way. I'd say it's some sort of surrendering.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since technically , it would be much easier to disguise information using steganography in facebook/flickr pictures and youtube videos and leak information that way .
I 'd say it 's some sort of surrendering .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since technically, it would be much easier to disguise information using steganography in facebook/flickr pictures and youtube videos and leak information that way.
I'd say it's some sort of surrendering.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323584</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323580</id>
	<title>This makes sense</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267443960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I work at a government site. Sometimes, when I'm researching a JavaScript problem, or CSS problem, or browser bug, or some other problem, I get blocked by the fact that someone's tech blog is on a "social network or personal site". Fortunately, the same blocking software lets me proceed by certifying that the access is work-related. The military should have that same freedom for unclassified work.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I work at a government site .
Sometimes , when I 'm researching a JavaScript problem , or CSS problem , or browser bug , or some other problem , I get blocked by the fact that someone 's tech blog is on a " social network or personal site " .
Fortunately , the same blocking software lets me proceed by certifying that the access is work-related .
The military should have that same freedom for unclassified work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I work at a government site.
Sometimes, when I'm researching a JavaScript problem, or CSS problem, or browser bug, or some other problem, I get blocked by the fact that someone's tech blog is on a "social network or personal site".
Fortunately, the same blocking software lets me proceed by certifying that the access is work-related.
The military should have that same freedom for unclassified work.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31325866</id>
	<title>Re:No Slashdot?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267459500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's blocked on our network (Navy).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's blocked on our network ( Navy ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's blocked on our network (Navy).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31328070</id>
	<title>Re:Blocking prOn ?</title>
	<author>EvilIdler</author>
	<datestamp>1267530660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're not thinking big enough - I'd airdrop hookers. Some companies do approve of such expenses for people in the field, so why not the military?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're not thinking big enough - I 'd airdrop hookers .
Some companies do approve of such expenses for people in the field , so why not the military ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're not thinking big enough - I'd airdrop hookers.
Some companies do approve of such expenses for people in the field, so why not the military?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323758</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323500</id>
	<title>Ugggh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267443660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is a security nightmare.  We might as well just give out the root passwords now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a security nightmare .
We might as well just give out the root passwords now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a security nightmare.
We might as well just give out the root passwords now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323968</id>
	<title>Victory!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267446000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thanks, I'll be here...forever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks , I 'll be here...forever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks, I'll be here...forever.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323584</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323630</id>
	<title>Re: US Military Surrenders?</title>
	<author>martin-boundary</author>
	<datestamp>1267444260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>  That is a little over dramatic.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
No, it's true. Save the women and children! The French are attacking! The French are attacking!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That is a little over dramatic .
No , it 's true .
Save the women and children !
The French are attacking !
The French are attacking !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  That is a little over dramatic.
No, it's true.
Save the women and children!
The French are attacking!
The French are attacking!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323584</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31329824</id>
	<title>Re: US Military Surrenders?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267545180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wouldnt be the first time the Signal Corps surrendered...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wouldnt be the first time the Signal Corps surrendered.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldnt be the first time the Signal Corps surrendered...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323584</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31326914</id>
	<title>Re:This makes sense</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267470120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps the saddest thing about your post is that we've been in Iraq longer than it took for MySpace to become popular and then die.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps the saddest thing about your post is that we 've been in Iraq longer than it took for MySpace to become popular and then die .
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps the saddest thing about your post is that we've been in Iraq longer than it took for MySpace to become popular and then die.
:-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323578</id>
	<title>The first rule of Fight Club:</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1267443960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You do not talk about Fight Club on the Internet!</htmltext>
<tokenext>You do not talk about Fight Club on the Internet !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You do not talk about Fight Club on the Internet!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323818</id>
	<title>Re: US Military Surrenders?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267445280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But thankfully that headline was hard to believe, because the US military is the sort that won't surrender even if they've completely lost. Now, if the headline had said that the French military surrendered<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But thankfully that headline was hard to believe , because the US military is the sort that wo n't surrender even if they 've completely lost .
Now , if the headline had said that the French military surrendered .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But thankfully that headline was hard to believe, because the US military is the sort that won't surrender even if they've completely lost.
Now, if the headline had said that the French military surrendered ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323584</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31324252</id>
	<title>Re:no OPSEC here!</title>
	<author>GiveBenADollar</author>
	<datestamp>1267447380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Same general thing on ship. Internet secured prior to port visits for opsec, but half the officers have wives waiting for them in port. I just told my family that if they wanted to know where I was going they should just check the news because CNN would know before I did. Officers are assumed to be more responsible and therefore given more privileges, but in reality it doesn't work that way.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Same general thing on ship .
Internet secured prior to port visits for opsec , but half the officers have wives waiting for them in port .
I just told my family that if they wanted to know where I was going they should just check the news because CNN would know before I did .
Officers are assumed to be more responsible and therefore given more privileges , but in reality it does n't work that way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Same general thing on ship.
Internet secured prior to port visits for opsec, but half the officers have wives waiting for them in port.
I just told my family that if they wanted to know where I was going they should just check the news because CNN would know before I did.
Officers are assumed to be more responsible and therefore given more privileges, but in reality it doesn't work that way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31324038</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31324074</id>
	<title>I don't think people understand</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267446600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>that these rules serve to protect very sensitive information. It's not like protecting my personal photo album or someone sending annoying emails from my Facebook account to my address book<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>Social engineers can and will take advantage of the "human factor" within military networks if left to their own devices (i.e., social media retards). Listen, I was in the Marine Corps and although I loved my brothers in arms, not all of them were the brightest bulbs on the string.</p><p>Limited access with layers of approval is probably an appropriate model. However, when and where they feel it is necessary, the military should feel free to completely block without all the grief and criticism.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>that these rules serve to protect very sensitive information .
It 's not like protecting my personal photo album or someone sending annoying emails from my Facebook account to my address book ...Social engineers can and will take advantage of the " human factor " within military networks if left to their own devices ( i.e. , social media retards ) .
Listen , I was in the Marine Corps and although I loved my brothers in arms , not all of them were the brightest bulbs on the string.Limited access with layers of approval is probably an appropriate model .
However , when and where they feel it is necessary , the military should feel free to completely block without all the grief and criticism .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that these rules serve to protect very sensitive information.
It's not like protecting my personal photo album or someone sending annoying emails from my Facebook account to my address book ...Social engineers can and will take advantage of the "human factor" within military networks if left to their own devices (i.e., social media retards).
Listen, I was in the Marine Corps and although I loved my brothers in arms, not all of them were the brightest bulbs on the string.Limited access with layers of approval is probably an appropriate model.
However, when and where they feel it is necessary, the military should feel free to completely block without all the grief and criticism.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31326258</id>
	<title>mo3 up</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267463340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">your own t0wel in out how to make the</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>your own t0wel in out how to make the [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>your own t0wel in out how to make the [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31326062</id>
	<title>Re:Fun times ahead</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267461300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know you were joking, but this is not far from the truth. In Afghanistan the U.S. Army uses IRC (specifically, mIRC clients on Toshiba Toughbooks) over SIPRNET (the military's encrypted/secured IP network) to allow remote FOBs (Forward Operating Bases) to communicate more easily and clearly. Text is especially advantageous for FOB-FOB communication during firefights because unlike radio, multiple parties can communicate effectively at the same time, plus messages come through clearly and without error or interference. If a bomb just went off next to your ear you might be deaf and disoriented, but you are more likely to be able to read and write text on a computer screen. Those with a security clearance and SIPRNET access can freely access chat logs plus radio transcripts from incidents (attacks, etc) that have occurred throughout the country, and as you can imagine they are pretty interesting. It's damn good for after action and intelligence analysis since everything is right there, time stamped and recorded.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know you were joking , but this is not far from the truth .
In Afghanistan the U.S. Army uses IRC ( specifically , mIRC clients on Toshiba Toughbooks ) over SIPRNET ( the military 's encrypted/secured IP network ) to allow remote FOBs ( Forward Operating Bases ) to communicate more easily and clearly .
Text is especially advantageous for FOB-FOB communication during firefights because unlike radio , multiple parties can communicate effectively at the same time , plus messages come through clearly and without error or interference .
If a bomb just went off next to your ear you might be deaf and disoriented , but you are more likely to be able to read and write text on a computer screen .
Those with a security clearance and SIPRNET access can freely access chat logs plus radio transcripts from incidents ( attacks , etc ) that have occurred throughout the country , and as you can imagine they are pretty interesting .
It 's damn good for after action and intelligence analysis since everything is right there , time stamped and recorded .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know you were joking, but this is not far from the truth.
In Afghanistan the U.S. Army uses IRC (specifically, mIRC clients on Toshiba Toughbooks) over SIPRNET (the military's encrypted/secured IP network) to allow remote FOBs (Forward Operating Bases) to communicate more easily and clearly.
Text is especially advantageous for FOB-FOB communication during firefights because unlike radio, multiple parties can communicate effectively at the same time, plus messages come through clearly and without error or interference.
If a bomb just went off next to your ear you might be deaf and disoriented, but you are more likely to be able to read and write text on a computer screen.
Those with a security clearance and SIPRNET access can freely access chat logs plus radio transcripts from incidents (attacks, etc) that have occurred throughout the country, and as you can imagine they are pretty interesting.
It's damn good for after action and intelligence analysis since everything is right there, time stamped and recorded.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323704</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31326366</id>
	<title>Re:no OPSEC here!</title>
	<author>db32</author>
	<datestamp>1267464480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't know anywhere that officers are assumed to be more responsible.  In fact, it is quite well known that the opposite is frequently true, yet they are given more privileges anyways.  This is actually all part of morale and unit cohesion.  You see, if the officers weren't out screwing things up then the enlisted folk wouldn't have things to bitch about with each other as they fix the screw ups.  It is all a clever plot to keep up unit cohesion because in any given unit there are more enlisted people to band together and bitch about the few officers that are in charge of them.  If officers weren't there to screw things up there would be much more infighting within a unit as they wouldn't have a common enemy or as much meaningless busywork to keep them occupied.  The fact that you aren't allowed to beat them, shoot them, or otherwise maim them allows the pressure to be kept high, where as with real enemies you just shoot them.<br> <br>
This entire arrangement has been maintained for many many years by clever senior enlisted ranks.  This is the real reason E-9's tend to get so much more respect than many of the officers roaming about.  The Os just get the better treatment so they never think to question their true purpose.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know anywhere that officers are assumed to be more responsible .
In fact , it is quite well known that the opposite is frequently true , yet they are given more privileges anyways .
This is actually all part of morale and unit cohesion .
You see , if the officers were n't out screwing things up then the enlisted folk would n't have things to bitch about with each other as they fix the screw ups .
It is all a clever plot to keep up unit cohesion because in any given unit there are more enlisted people to band together and bitch about the few officers that are in charge of them .
If officers were n't there to screw things up there would be much more infighting within a unit as they would n't have a common enemy or as much meaningless busywork to keep them occupied .
The fact that you are n't allowed to beat them , shoot them , or otherwise maim them allows the pressure to be kept high , where as with real enemies you just shoot them .
This entire arrangement has been maintained for many many years by clever senior enlisted ranks .
This is the real reason E-9 's tend to get so much more respect than many of the officers roaming about .
The Os just get the better treatment so they never think to question their true purpose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know anywhere that officers are assumed to be more responsible.
In fact, it is quite well known that the opposite is frequently true, yet they are given more privileges anyways.
This is actually all part of morale and unit cohesion.
You see, if the officers weren't out screwing things up then the enlisted folk wouldn't have things to bitch about with each other as they fix the screw ups.
It is all a clever plot to keep up unit cohesion because in any given unit there are more enlisted people to band together and bitch about the few officers that are in charge of them.
If officers weren't there to screw things up there would be much more infighting within a unit as they wouldn't have a common enemy or as much meaningless busywork to keep them occupied.
The fact that you aren't allowed to beat them, shoot them, or otherwise maim them allows the pressure to be kept high, where as with real enemies you just shoot them.
This entire arrangement has been maintained for many many years by clever senior enlisted ranks.
This is the real reason E-9's tend to get so much more respect than many of the officers roaming about.
The Os just get the better treatment so they never think to question their true purpose.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31324252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31329182</id>
	<title>Re:Killed a dirtbag Somali pirate today..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267542060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>5109815 people like this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>5109815 people like this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>5109815 people like this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323708</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323740</id>
	<title>Re:No Slashdot?</title>
	<author>PhxBlue</author>
	<datestamp>1267444860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's because Slashdot isn't blocked (at least, not on Air Force networks).</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's because Slashdot is n't blocked ( at least , not on Air Force networks ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's because Slashdot isn't blocked (at least, not on Air Force networks).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323562</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323708</id>
	<title>Killed a dirtbag Somali pirate today..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267444740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oooooo, I'm hoping for some great Facebook pages from Seals and Marines killing dirtbag pirates and Taliban assholes.</p><p>I want to see pictures and video dammit! </p><p>Or ultimately, that shot that Seal took to knock off those pirates when the sea captain was taken hostage last year. To see that shot, on the seas - rolling and whatnot from hundreds of yards away would just be awesome! And to see Somali pirate brains splatter into the water would just be perfect! </p><p>Next, I would hope for a rogue Marine/Seal/Special forces team to go and grab Taliban assholes and just go off on an extermination spree - a la Waffen SS.</p><p>Yeah, I know, in my dreams.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oooooo , I 'm hoping for some great Facebook pages from Seals and Marines killing dirtbag pirates and Taliban assholes.I want to see pictures and video dammit !
Or ultimately , that shot that Seal took to knock off those pirates when the sea captain was taken hostage last year .
To see that shot , on the seas - rolling and whatnot from hundreds of yards away would just be awesome !
And to see Somali pirate brains splatter into the water would just be perfect !
Next , I would hope for a rogue Marine/Seal/Special forces team to go and grab Taliban assholes and just go off on an extermination spree - a la Waffen SS.Yeah , I know , in my dreams .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oooooo, I'm hoping for some great Facebook pages from Seals and Marines killing dirtbag pirates and Taliban assholes.I want to see pictures and video dammit!
Or ultimately, that shot that Seal took to knock off those pirates when the sea captain was taken hostage last year.
To see that shot, on the seas - rolling and whatnot from hundreds of yards away would just be awesome!
And to see Somali pirate brains splatter into the water would just be perfect!
Next, I would hope for a rogue Marine/Seal/Special forces team to go and grab Taliban assholes and just go off on an extermination spree - a la Waffen SS.Yeah, I know, in my dreams.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323552</id>
	<title>WTF?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267443840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WTF? The internet was MADE for porn, hate-crimes and gambling.<br>In fact, forget the blackjack.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF ?
The internet was MADE for porn , hate-crimes and gambling.In fact , forget the blackjack .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTF?
The internet was MADE for porn, hate-crimes and gambling.In fact, forget the blackjack.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31324174</id>
	<title>Re: US Military Surrenders?</title>
	<author>PhxBlue</author>
	<datestamp>1267447020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But it's exactly what happened. The military's "surrendering" because they've lost the battle -- they let social media get so far ahead of them that public affairs offices can't do their jobs. What do you tell the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs when your "network security" policies keep him from communicating with his troops in the manner of his choosing? What do you tell the grunt on the ground who can't get to his base's "official" Facebook page for <b>no other reason</b> than, "Well, those are the rules."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But it 's exactly what happened .
The military 's " surrendering " because they 've lost the battle -- they let social media get so far ahead of them that public affairs offices ca n't do their jobs .
What do you tell the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs when your " network security " policies keep him from communicating with his troops in the manner of his choosing ?
What do you tell the grunt on the ground who ca n't get to his base 's " official " Facebook page for no other reason than , " Well , those are the rules .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But it's exactly what happened.
The military's "surrendering" because they've lost the battle -- they let social media get so far ahead of them that public affairs offices can't do their jobs.
What do you tell the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs when your "network security" policies keep him from communicating with his troops in the manner of his choosing?
What do you tell the grunt on the ground who can't get to his base's "official" Facebook page for no other reason than, "Well, those are the rules.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323584</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323488</id>
	<title>just took a shit</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267443600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>it left shit streaks all over the fucking low flow toilet.  Thanks, enviro-weenies.</htmltext>
<tokenext>it left shit streaks all over the fucking low flow toilet .
Thanks , enviro-weenies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it left shit streaks all over the fucking low flow toilet.
Thanks, enviro-weenies.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31325362</id>
	<title>Was already slow enough during business hours</title>
	<author>stoat</author>
	<datestamp>1267455120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I work in a mission critical (yeah, not really so much, it's weather) field on an Army post.  The network is already pretty much unusable during the 7am, noon, and 3pm rushes without youtube.<br>Luckily being associated with spoiled chil.. pilots we have a non-government cable drop in the office.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I work in a mission critical ( yeah , not really so much , it 's weather ) field on an Army post .
The network is already pretty much unusable during the 7am , noon , and 3pm rushes without youtube.Luckily being associated with spoiled chil.. pilots we have a non-government cable drop in the office .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I work in a mission critical (yeah, not really so much, it's weather) field on an Army post.
The network is already pretty much unusable during the 7am, noon, and 3pm rushes without youtube.Luckily being associated with spoiled chil.. pilots we have a non-government cable drop in the office.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31324434</id>
	<title>Re: US Military Surrenders?</title>
	<author>pushing-robot</author>
	<datestamp>1267448640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm reaching stratospheric levels of dweebiness here, but when I read it I suddenly remembered a Star Trek scene:</p><p>Worf: Very well... Room service.<br>Dax: Really?<br>Worf: Really.<br>Dax: Oh, that was easy.<br>Worf: Did you want to fight over it?<br>Dax: No, it's just, I didn't expect you to surrender so quickly.<br>Worf: Surrender?<br>Dax: Bad word.<br>Worf: Very bad.</p><p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0708515/quotes" title="imdb.com">Source:</a> [imdb.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm reaching stratospheric levels of dweebiness here , but when I read it I suddenly remembered a Star Trek scene : Worf : Very well... Room service.Dax : Really ? Worf : Really.Dax : Oh , that was easy.Worf : Did you want to fight over it ? Dax : No , it 's just , I did n't expect you to surrender so quickly.Worf : Surrender ? Dax : Bad word.Worf : Very bad.Source : [ imdb.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm reaching stratospheric levels of dweebiness here, but when I read it I suddenly remembered a Star Trek scene:Worf: Very well... Room service.Dax: Really?Worf: Really.Dax: Oh, that was easy.Worf: Did you want to fight over it?Dax: No, it's just, I didn't expect you to surrender so quickly.Worf: Surrender?Dax: Bad word.Worf: Very bad.Source: [imdb.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323584</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323794</id>
	<title>This makes sense</title>
	<author>vivin</author>
	<datestamp>1267445160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I remember when I was serving in Iraq (Nov '05 to Nov '06) Facebook was just getting big. MySpace was all the rage. People would upload some pictures and videos. In our unit, we didn't really have a policy although our Operations NCO kept a handle on our accounts (he didn't have access to them, but would just check them from time to time to make sure we weren't posting anything that violated opsec). Also, if we maintained a blog we gave him the URL. I didn't think it was a big deal and I understood the rationale. You don't want to post anything online that can:</p><p>a) Be taken out of context by the media or others (or if you want to be cynical, anything that can put the military in a bad light).<br>b) Anything that violates opsec and puts the success of the mission or personnel at risk</p><p>Not all of us had access to the NIPR net. Most of us just went to the Internet Cafe (really, a small trailer with a satellite internet connection), the MWR (Morale Welfare and Recreation center), or pooled money to get internet access (2nd platoon pooled in money and set up a satellite dish and a modem, and then strung wires between the trailers). I'm not sure how effective this policy will be in these situations.</p><p>At the end of a drill weekend I'd usually be hanging out at the readiness NCO's office before I left and sometimes I'd forget I was using a military computer and try to log on to facebook only to see that it was blocked. Sometimes they blocked Gmail (but that seemed intermittent - I was able to get to it usually). Regarding the comment someone made earlier that the military should have a policy for requesting a site be unblocked, I believe it does. A buddy of mine works for the NGB's IT department (I forget the actual name) and he handles cases. It's very hard to get a site approved though unless you can demonstrate a legitimate use. It's not like writing code where you can find an example on some random dude's blog. The military has their own sites for resources, and anything you need to find can be looked up in a TM (Technical Manual) or an AR (Army Regulation), or DA PAM (Department of the Army Pamphlet), most of which are in digitized form.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember when I was serving in Iraq ( Nov '05 to Nov '06 ) Facebook was just getting big .
MySpace was all the rage .
People would upload some pictures and videos .
In our unit , we did n't really have a policy although our Operations NCO kept a handle on our accounts ( he did n't have access to them , but would just check them from time to time to make sure we were n't posting anything that violated opsec ) .
Also , if we maintained a blog we gave him the URL .
I did n't think it was a big deal and I understood the rationale .
You do n't want to post anything online that can : a ) Be taken out of context by the media or others ( or if you want to be cynical , anything that can put the military in a bad light ) .b ) Anything that violates opsec and puts the success of the mission or personnel at riskNot all of us had access to the NIPR net .
Most of us just went to the Internet Cafe ( really , a small trailer with a satellite internet connection ) , the MWR ( Morale Welfare and Recreation center ) , or pooled money to get internet access ( 2nd platoon pooled in money and set up a satellite dish and a modem , and then strung wires between the trailers ) .
I 'm not sure how effective this policy will be in these situations.At the end of a drill weekend I 'd usually be hanging out at the readiness NCO 's office before I left and sometimes I 'd forget I was using a military computer and try to log on to facebook only to see that it was blocked .
Sometimes they blocked Gmail ( but that seemed intermittent - I was able to get to it usually ) .
Regarding the comment someone made earlier that the military should have a policy for requesting a site be unblocked , I believe it does .
A buddy of mine works for the NGB 's IT department ( I forget the actual name ) and he handles cases .
It 's very hard to get a site approved though unless you can demonstrate a legitimate use .
It 's not like writing code where you can find an example on some random dude 's blog .
The military has their own sites for resources , and anything you need to find can be looked up in a TM ( Technical Manual ) or an AR ( Army Regulation ) , or DA PAM ( Department of the Army Pamphlet ) , most of which are in digitized form .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember when I was serving in Iraq (Nov '05 to Nov '06) Facebook was just getting big.
MySpace was all the rage.
People would upload some pictures and videos.
In our unit, we didn't really have a policy although our Operations NCO kept a handle on our accounts (he didn't have access to them, but would just check them from time to time to make sure we weren't posting anything that violated opsec).
Also, if we maintained a blog we gave him the URL.
I didn't think it was a big deal and I understood the rationale.
You don't want to post anything online that can:a) Be taken out of context by the media or others (or if you want to be cynical, anything that can put the military in a bad light).b) Anything that violates opsec and puts the success of the mission or personnel at riskNot all of us had access to the NIPR net.
Most of us just went to the Internet Cafe (really, a small trailer with a satellite internet connection), the MWR (Morale Welfare and Recreation center), or pooled money to get internet access (2nd platoon pooled in money and set up a satellite dish and a modem, and then strung wires between the trailers).
I'm not sure how effective this policy will be in these situations.At the end of a drill weekend I'd usually be hanging out at the readiness NCO's office before I left and sometimes I'd forget I was using a military computer and try to log on to facebook only to see that it was blocked.
Sometimes they blocked Gmail (but that seemed intermittent - I was able to get to it usually).
Regarding the comment someone made earlier that the military should have a policy for requesting a site be unblocked, I believe it does.
A buddy of mine works for the NGB's IT department (I forget the actual name) and he handles cases.
It's very hard to get a site approved though unless you can demonstrate a legitimate use.
It's not like writing code where you can find an example on some random dude's blog.
The military has their own sites for resources, and anything you need to find can be looked up in a TM (Technical Manual) or an AR (Army Regulation), or DA PAM (Department of the Army Pamphlet), most of which are in digitized form.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31325778</id>
	<title>Love the misleading headline</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267458720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did the military surrender to social media?   Or did the social media sites surrender to the US military?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did the military surrender to social media ?
Or did the social media sites surrender to the US military ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did the military surrender to social media?
Or did the social media sites surrender to the US military?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31325986</id>
	<title>Mafia wars invades the SIPRNet!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267460580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who needs security or PPL doing their jobs when you can tend to your farms and advance the cause of your favorite crime families on Facebook?</p><p>Its all fun and games until a notebook or pc is turned into a remote listening device and records a classified conversation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who needs security or PPL doing their jobs when you can tend to your farms and advance the cause of your favorite crime families on Facebook ? Its all fun and games until a notebook or pc is turned into a remote listening device and records a classified conversation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who needs security or PPL doing their jobs when you can tend to your farms and advance the cause of your favorite crime families on Facebook?Its all fun and games until a notebook or pc is turned into a remote listening device and records a classified conversation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31326440</id>
	<title>Re:No Slashdot?</title>
	<author>AtomicOrange</author>
	<datestamp>1267465320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree, I read Slashdot every day at work when things get slow.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree , I read Slashdot every day at work when things get slow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree, I read Slashdot every day at work when things get slow.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31324156</id>
	<title>Re:Blocking prOn ?</title>
	<author>AlecC</author>
	<datestamp>1267446960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>According to Kate Adie, the British Army, at least, had a magnificent porn collection in the Gulf War. They just took it with them and didn't need the internet to download it. She was commenting on The Sun newspaper trying to get kudos for sending cheesy girlie pics to "our boys" when the said boys had stacks of the heavy stuff.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>According to Kate Adie , the British Army , at least , had a magnificent porn collection in the Gulf War .
They just took it with them and did n't need the internet to download it .
She was commenting on The Sun newspaper trying to get kudos for sending cheesy girlie pics to " our boys " when the said boys had stacks of the heavy stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to Kate Adie, the British Army, at least, had a magnificent porn collection in the Gulf War.
They just took it with them and didn't need the internet to download it.
She was commenting on The Sun newspaper trying to get kudos for sending cheesy girlie pics to "our boys" when the said boys had stacks of the heavy stuff.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323758</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_210234_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323584
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_210234_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323584
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_210234_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31326440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323562
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_210234_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31327688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323758
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_210234_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323584
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_210234_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31327562
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323758
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_210234_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31326062
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323704
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_210234_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31324434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323584
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_210234_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31324102
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323584
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_210234_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31376376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323758
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_210234_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31329824
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323584
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_210234_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31325866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323562
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_210234_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31324074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_210234_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31331550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_210234_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323584
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_210234_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31328070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323758
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_210234_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31326914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_210234_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31328390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323584
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_210234_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31329182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323708
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_210234_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31326366
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31324252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31324038
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_210234_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31324156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323758
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_210234_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323630
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323584
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_210234_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31324174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323584
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_210234_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31326482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323758
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_210234.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323580
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31331550
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31324074
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_210234.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323562
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323740
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31325866
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31326440
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_210234.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323704
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31326062
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_210234.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323584
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31324102
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323630
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323818
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31328390
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323734
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31324174
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31324434
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323968
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323862
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31329824
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_210234.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323524
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_210234.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323794
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31326914
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_210234.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323708
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31329182
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_210234.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323866
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_210234.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323758
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31376376
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31326482
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31327688
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31327562
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31328070
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31324156
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_210234.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323488
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_210234.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31324038
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31324252
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31326366
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_210234.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31325750
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_210234.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_210234.31323500
</commentlist>
</conversation>
