<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_01_1820201</id>
	<title>New Type of Dinosaur Unearthed</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1267432200000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>MileHighScience writes to mention that a <a href="http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-26854-Denver-Science-News-Examiner~y2010m3d1-Rare-find-of-skull-leads-to-discovery-of-new-longnecked-dinosaur-in-Utah">new type of sauropod</a> has been discovered by scientists from Utah's Brigham Young University.  Dubbed <em>Abydosaurus mcintoshi</em>, the new addition to the long necked dinosaur family was discovered at Dinosaur National Monument.  <i>"The circumstances of its discovery were both unusual and dramatic.  The researchers stumbled on four skulls in a quarry at the preserve. Two were still intact.  Sauropod skulls are rarely found in the fossil record because the soft tissue from which they are constructed is unlikely to be preserved after death.  'Their heads are built lighter than mammal skulls because they sit way out at the end of very long necks,' Brooks Britt, a BYU paleontologist said in a news release. 'Instead of thick bones fused together, sauropod skulls are made of thin bones bound together by soft tissue.'   Of more than 120 known species of sauropods, there have been only eight instances in which scientists have been able to recover intact skulls."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>MileHighScience writes to mention that a new type of sauropod has been discovered by scientists from Utah 's Brigham Young University .
Dubbed Abydosaurus mcintoshi , the new addition to the long necked dinosaur family was discovered at Dinosaur National Monument .
" The circumstances of its discovery were both unusual and dramatic .
The researchers stumbled on four skulls in a quarry at the preserve .
Two were still intact .
Sauropod skulls are rarely found in the fossil record because the soft tissue from which they are constructed is unlikely to be preserved after death .
'Their heads are built lighter than mammal skulls because they sit way out at the end of very long necks, ' Brooks Britt , a BYU paleontologist said in a news release .
'Instead of thick bones fused together , sauropod skulls are made of thin bones bound together by soft tissue .
' Of more than 120 known species of sauropods , there have been only eight instances in which scientists have been able to recover intact skulls .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MileHighScience writes to mention that a new type of sauropod has been discovered by scientists from Utah's Brigham Young University.
Dubbed Abydosaurus mcintoshi, the new addition to the long necked dinosaur family was discovered at Dinosaur National Monument.
"The circumstances of its discovery were both unusual and dramatic.
The researchers stumbled on four skulls in a quarry at the preserve.
Two were still intact.
Sauropod skulls are rarely found in the fossil record because the soft tissue from which they are constructed is unlikely to be preserved after death.
'Their heads are built lighter than mammal skulls because they sit way out at the end of very long necks,' Brooks Britt, a BYU paleontologist said in a news release.
'Instead of thick bones fused together, sauropod skulls are made of thin bones bound together by soft tissue.
'   Of more than 120 known species of sauropods, there have been only eight instances in which scientists have been able to recover intact skulls.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31323646</id>
	<title>My favorite dinosaur...</title>
	<author>madsenj37</author>
	<datestamp>1267444380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My favorite dinosaur is still the Lickalotapus.  Need less to say, my least favorite is the Megasaurass.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My favorite dinosaur is still the Lickalotapus .
Need less to say , my least favorite is the Megasaurass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My favorite dinosaur is still the Lickalotapus.
Need less to say, my least favorite is the Megasaurass.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31325110</id>
	<title>Re:Actually</title>
	<author>commodoresloat</author>
	<datestamp>1267453200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh so it wasn't a dinosaur at all then!  Still I could see how scientists could get confused by these U of M students with long necks and thin skulls....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh so it was n't a dinosaur at all then !
Still I could see how scientists could get confused by these U of M students with long necks and thin skulls... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh so it wasn't a dinosaur at all then!
Still I could see how scientists could get confused by these U of M students with long necks and thin skulls....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322274</id>
	<title>Re:Science in Utah?</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1267438920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually it did live alongside man, but man was a small rodentlike creature at the time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually it did live alongside man , but man was a small rodentlike creature at the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually it did live alongside man, but man was a small rodentlike creature at the time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321826</id>
	<title>Terminology question</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267437180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is this a new dinosaur or a new as in you didn't have it before BMWsaur?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this a new dinosaur or a new as in you did n't have it before BMWsaur ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this a new dinosaur or a new as in you didn't have it before BMWsaur?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321976</id>
	<title>Re:BYU has a Paleontology department?</title>
	<author>camperdave</author>
	<datestamp>1267437780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But archeologically, the cretaceous "wild west", and the cretaceous "space age" would be in the same strata, even if they were a thousand times farther apart than our similar eras.  However, I doubt you'd find either.  Saddles would have rotted away over the millions of years, and all of the space ships were used to get as many as possible off planet before the Chicxulub event.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But archeologically , the cretaceous " wild west " , and the cretaceous " space age " would be in the same strata , even if they were a thousand times farther apart than our similar eras .
However , I doubt you 'd find either .
Saddles would have rotted away over the millions of years , and all of the space ships were used to get as many as possible off planet before the Chicxulub event .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But archeologically, the cretaceous "wild west", and the cretaceous "space age" would be in the same strata, even if they were a thousand times farther apart than our similar eras.
However, I doubt you'd find either.
Saddles would have rotted away over the millions of years, and all of the space ships were used to get as many as possible off planet before the Chicxulub event.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321530</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322030</id>
	<title>My estimate?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267438080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It'll be before the night is out that some furry fuck draws two of them ass-banging. Probably with multiple breasts and shitting dicknipples.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 'll be before the night is out that some furry fuck draws two of them ass-banging .
Probably with multiple breasts and shitting dicknipples .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It'll be before the night is out that some furry fuck draws two of them ass-banging.
Probably with multiple breasts and shitting dicknipples.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321660</id>
	<title>Actually</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267436640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>More specifically it was a U of M graduate student:<br><a href="http://www.ns.umich.edu/htdocs/releases/story.php?id=7537" title="umich.edu" rel="nofollow">http://www.ns.umich.edu/htdocs/releases/story.php?id=7537</a> [umich.edu]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More specifically it was a U of M graduate student : http : //www.ns.umich.edu/htdocs/releases/story.php ? id = 7537 [ umich.edu ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More specifically it was a U of M graduate student:http://www.ns.umich.edu/htdocs/releases/story.php?id=7537 [umich.edu]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321496</id>
	<title>I'll be damned!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267436100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mormon scientists have found skolls! How interesting! Maybe this will get a Darwin award.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mormon scientists have found skolls !
How interesting !
Maybe this will get a Darwin award .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mormon scientists have found skolls!
How interesting!
Maybe this will get a Darwin award.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322324</id>
	<title>iPhonius extinction theory</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1267439040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>iPhonius developed a distaste for most boobies, with the exception of a few big name boobies like Playboyius Boobius. This contributed greatly to it's decline, despite the abundance of it's primary food source childus Improvishedus.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>iPhonius developed a distaste for most boobies , with the exception of a few big name boobies like Playboyius Boobius .
This contributed greatly to it 's decline , despite the abundance of it 's primary food source childus Improvishedus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>iPhonius developed a distaste for most boobies, with the exception of a few big name boobies like Playboyius Boobius.
This contributed greatly to it's decline, despite the abundance of it's primary food source childus Improvishedus.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321552</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322716</id>
	<title>Re:This is my theory, which is mine.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267440660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>New Type of Dinosaur Unearthed</p></div><p>Knuckle-dragging tea baggers voting for Palin?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>New Type of Dinosaur UnearthedKnuckle-dragging tea baggers voting for Palin ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>New Type of Dinosaur UnearthedKnuckle-dragging tea baggers voting for Palin?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321542</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321824</id>
	<title>A thin skulled dinosaur unearthed</title>
	<author>roman\_mir</author>
	<datestamp>1267437180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Their heads are built lighter than mammal skulls because they sit way out at the end of very long necks,' Brooks Britt, a BYU paleontologist said in a news release. 'Instead of thick bones fused together, sauropod skulls are made of thin bones bound together by soft tissue.'</p></div><p> - damn, even dinosaurs are smarter Sarah Palin.  Guess they are not retards.  They also had backbone, unlike any democrats, were actually honest in what they did, unlike any politician, and they most likely did not take shit from nobody, unlike the US voters.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Their heads are built lighter than mammal skulls because they sit way out at the end of very long necks, ' Brooks Britt , a BYU paleontologist said in a news release .
'Instead of thick bones fused together , sauropod skulls are made of thin bones bound together by soft tissue .
' - damn , even dinosaurs are smarter Sarah Palin .
Guess they are not retards .
They also had backbone , unlike any democrats , were actually honest in what they did , unlike any politician , and they most likely did not take shit from nobody , unlike the US voters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Their heads are built lighter than mammal skulls because they sit way out at the end of very long necks,' Brooks Britt, a BYU paleontologist said in a news release.
'Instead of thick bones fused together, sauropod skulls are made of thin bones bound together by soft tissue.
' - damn, even dinosaurs are smarter Sarah Palin.
Guess they are not retards.
They also had backbone, unlike any democrats, were actually honest in what they did, unlike any politician, and they most likely did not take shit from nobody, unlike the US voters.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322970</id>
	<title>Re:Gary Larson inquires:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267441440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hard to say, because they have several skulls and some of the vertebrae and other postcranial bits, but they don't mention anything about the tail in <a href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/lpn30h8tx2231223/?p=b09977e3b7c94784b22f49d74fe2d3dd&amp;pi=1" title="springerlink.com" rel="nofollow">the paper</a> [springerlink.com] (it's open access -- yay!).  Statistically, it probably didn't have one, because only <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info\%3Adoi\%2F10.1371\%2Fjournal.pone.0006924" title="plosone.org" rel="nofollow">rare sauropods</a> [plosone.org] are known to have a thagomizer, but it's possible.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hard to say , because they have several skulls and some of the vertebrae and other postcranial bits , but they do n't mention anything about the tail in the paper [ springerlink.com ] ( it 's open access -- yay ! ) .
Statistically , it probably did n't have one , because only rare sauropods [ plosone.org ] are known to have a thagomizer , but it 's possible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hard to say, because they have several skulls and some of the vertebrae and other postcranial bits, but they don't mention anything about the tail in the paper [springerlink.com] (it's open access -- yay!).
Statistically, it probably didn't have one, because only rare sauropods [plosone.org] are known to have a thagomizer, but it's possible.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321964</id>
	<title>Re:Gary Larson inquires:</title>
	<author>Pojut</author>
	<datestamp>1267437720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How rude!  That isn't a proper question to be asking.  Isaygooddaysir!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How rude !
That is n't a proper question to be asking .
Isaygooddaysir !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How rude!
That isn't a proper question to be asking.
Isaygooddaysir!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31326780</id>
	<title>Re:Gary Larson inquires:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267468440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, but in the artist depiction it has a cheesy grin like a drunken Ninja Turtle.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , but in the artist depiction it has a cheesy grin like a drunken Ninja Turtle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, but in the artist depiction it has a cheesy grin like a drunken Ninja Turtle.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321968</id>
	<title>Science in Utah?</title>
	<author>wintercolby</author>
	<datestamp>1267437720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do they also believe it lived alongside man?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do they also believe it lived alongside man ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do they also believe it lived alongside man?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322376</id>
	<title>This *should* be offtopic, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267439220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Headline: Blanket assumption based more on stereotype than actual familiarity turns out to be untrue. Film at 11.</p><p>A lot of people seem to think that theology/cosmology is inherently constraining when it comes to serious scientific work, and I suppose the output those like the Intelligent Design crowd does a lot to reinforce that, but my experience suggests that there's no shortage of religious people who excel in scientific and technical fields, who accept the standards of those fields whether or not they seem to conflict with religious beliefs on some point, and do solid work -- even groundbreaking work.</p><p>Some of that experience is directly with BYU, where I've found that most of the science faculty is inline with broader scientific views... for example, by and large they conclude that evolution is the best framework for studying biology and believe that's how most of life on earth came to be in its given state. And that even if you like to think of yourself as a smart person and come complete with various metrics outside of two standard deviations to prove it, there are probably Mormons who are in fact as smart or smarter than you by those metrics. It's certainly true for me. And they take the idea of scholarship and professionalism pretty seriously.</p><p>There are certainly counterexamples; I've met people with a certain kind of view-rigidity characterized by a general literalism and intolerance for ambiguity who I believe are blinded by their cosmology/theology. But then again, my observation is that this isn't a problem limited to the religious or religion, and based on the shallowly dismissive attitude in the parent poster's post, it seems likely he's amongst the afflicted.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Headline : Blanket assumption based more on stereotype than actual familiarity turns out to be untrue .
Film at 11.A lot of people seem to think that theology/cosmology is inherently constraining when it comes to serious scientific work , and I suppose the output those like the Intelligent Design crowd does a lot to reinforce that , but my experience suggests that there 's no shortage of religious people who excel in scientific and technical fields , who accept the standards of those fields whether or not they seem to conflict with religious beliefs on some point , and do solid work -- even groundbreaking work.Some of that experience is directly with BYU , where I 've found that most of the science faculty is inline with broader scientific views... for example , by and large they conclude that evolution is the best framework for studying biology and believe that 's how most of life on earth came to be in its given state .
And that even if you like to think of yourself as a smart person and come complete with various metrics outside of two standard deviations to prove it , there are probably Mormons who are in fact as smart or smarter than you by those metrics .
It 's certainly true for me .
And they take the idea of scholarship and professionalism pretty seriously.There are certainly counterexamples ; I 've met people with a certain kind of view-rigidity characterized by a general literalism and intolerance for ambiguity who I believe are blinded by their cosmology/theology .
But then again , my observation is that this is n't a problem limited to the religious or religion , and based on the shallowly dismissive attitude in the parent poster 's post , it seems likely he 's amongst the afflicted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Headline: Blanket assumption based more on stereotype than actual familiarity turns out to be untrue.
Film at 11.A lot of people seem to think that theology/cosmology is inherently constraining when it comes to serious scientific work, and I suppose the output those like the Intelligent Design crowd does a lot to reinforce that, but my experience suggests that there's no shortage of religious people who excel in scientific and technical fields, who accept the standards of those fields whether or not they seem to conflict with religious beliefs on some point, and do solid work -- even groundbreaking work.Some of that experience is directly with BYU, where I've found that most of the science faculty is inline with broader scientific views... for example, by and large they conclude that evolution is the best framework for studying biology and believe that's how most of life on earth came to be in its given state.
And that even if you like to think of yourself as a smart person and come complete with various metrics outside of two standard deviations to prove it, there are probably Mormons who are in fact as smart or smarter than you by those metrics.
It's certainly true for me.
And they take the idea of scholarship and professionalism pretty seriously.There are certainly counterexamples; I've met people with a certain kind of view-rigidity characterized by a general literalism and intolerance for ambiguity who I believe are blinded by their cosmology/theology.
But then again, my observation is that this isn't a problem limited to the religious or religion, and based on the shallowly dismissive attitude in the parent poster's post, it seems likely he's amongst the afflicted.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321530</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31324274</id>
	<title>Re:Actually</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267447500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>More specifically it was a U of M graduate student:<br><a href="http://www.ns.umich.edu/htdocs/releases/story.php?id=7537" title="umich.edu" rel="nofollow">http://www.ns.umich.edu/htdocs/releases/story.php?id=7537</a> [umich.edu] </p></div><p>Please be clear. U of Michigan. The Universities of Minnesota and Manitoba also use "U of M". There's also the Universities of Memphis, Montana, Montreal, Moncton, and probably others, though they don't seem to use the abbreviation as frequently.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>More specifically it was a U of M graduate student : http : //www.ns.umich.edu/htdocs/releases/story.php ? id = 7537 [ umich.edu ] Please be clear .
U of Michigan .
The Universities of Minnesota and Manitoba also use " U of M " .
There 's also the Universities of Memphis , Montana , Montreal , Moncton , and probably others , though they do n't seem to use the abbreviation as frequently .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More specifically it was a U of M graduate student:http://www.ns.umich.edu/htdocs/releases/story.php?id=7537 [umich.edu] Please be clear.
U of Michigan.
The Universities of Minnesota and Manitoba also use "U of M".
There's also the Universities of Memphis, Montana, Montreal, Moncton, and probably others, though they don't seem to use the abbreviation as frequently.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31323196</id>
	<title>Abydosaurus mcintoshi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267442340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Macintoshi? Is Apple nowadays even into dinosaurs?<br>Well, at least I bet they didn't wear turtlenecks...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Macintoshi ?
Is Apple nowadays even into dinosaurs ? Well , at least I bet they did n't wear turtlenecks.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Macintoshi?
Is Apple nowadays even into dinosaurs?Well, at least I bet they didn't wear turtlenecks...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321712</id>
	<title>It's Norton.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267436760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I believe they mean this:  <a href="http://security.comcast.net/" title="comcast.net" rel="nofollow">http://security.comcast.net/</a> [comcast.net]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe they mean this : http : //security.comcast.net/ [ comcast.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe they mean this:  http://security.comcast.net/ [comcast.net]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31323770</id>
	<title>Re:This *should* be offtopic, but...</title>
	<author>copponex</author>
	<datestamp>1267444980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There are certainly counterexamples; I've met people with a certain kind of view-rigidity characterized by a general literalism and intolerance for ambiguity who I believe are blinded by their cosmology/theology. But then again, my observation is that this isn't a problem limited to the religious or religion, and based on the shallowly dismissive attitude in the parent poster's post, it seems likely he's amongst the afflicted.</p></div><p>I can state that horses, swine, cattle, chariots, iron swords, silk, and Jews did not exist in America before it's colonization by Europeans in the 16th Century. Can your colleagues at BYU agree with those statements?</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book\_of\_Mormon\_anachronisms" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book\_of\_Mormon\_anachronisms</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>The point is not whether a religious person can perform good science - the scientific method eliminates the importance of the background of the scientist. The question is whether you can have a seriously open academic discussion at BYU. The answer is, yes of course! As long as it doesn't clash with the beliefs of a certain church.</p><p>In my opinion, that does far more harm than good.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There are certainly counterexamples ; I 've met people with a certain kind of view-rigidity characterized by a general literalism and intolerance for ambiguity who I believe are blinded by their cosmology/theology .
But then again , my observation is that this is n't a problem limited to the religious or religion , and based on the shallowly dismissive attitude in the parent poster 's post , it seems likely he 's amongst the afflicted.I can state that horses , swine , cattle , chariots , iron swords , silk , and Jews did not exist in America before it 's colonization by Europeans in the 16th Century .
Can your colleagues at BYU agree with those statements ? http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book \ _of \ _Mormon \ _anachronisms [ wikipedia.org ] The point is not whether a religious person can perform good science - the scientific method eliminates the importance of the background of the scientist .
The question is whether you can have a seriously open academic discussion at BYU .
The answer is , yes of course !
As long as it does n't clash with the beliefs of a certain church.In my opinion , that does far more harm than good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are certainly counterexamples; I've met people with a certain kind of view-rigidity characterized by a general literalism and intolerance for ambiguity who I believe are blinded by their cosmology/theology.
But then again, my observation is that this isn't a problem limited to the religious or religion, and based on the shallowly dismissive attitude in the parent poster's post, it seems likely he's amongst the afflicted.I can state that horses, swine, cattle, chariots, iron swords, silk, and Jews did not exist in America before it's colonization by Europeans in the 16th Century.
Can your colleagues at BYU agree with those statements?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book\_of\_Mormon\_anachronisms [wikipedia.org]The point is not whether a religious person can perform good science - the scientific method eliminates the importance of the background of the scientist.
The question is whether you can have a seriously open academic discussion at BYU.
The answer is, yes of course!
As long as it doesn't clash with the beliefs of a certain church.In my opinion, that does far more harm than good.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322376</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31325856</id>
	<title>Re:Actually</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267459440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>More specifically it was a U of M graduate student:<br><a href="http://www.ns.umich.edu/htdocs/releases/story.php?id=7537" title="umich.edu" rel="nofollow">http://www.ns.umich.edu/htdocs/releases/story.php?id=7537</a> [umich.edu] </p></div><p>OK, I know Michigan has low admission standards.  But admitting a pea-brained sauropod?  Even a whole herd of those wouldn't help them beat Ohio State....</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>More specifically it was a U of M graduate student : http : //www.ns.umich.edu/htdocs/releases/story.php ? id = 7537 [ umich.edu ] OK , I know Michigan has low admission standards .
But admitting a pea-brained sauropod ?
Even a whole herd of those would n't help them beat Ohio State... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More specifically it was a U of M graduate student:http://www.ns.umich.edu/htdocs/releases/story.php?id=7537 [umich.edu] OK, I know Michigan has low admission standards.
But admitting a pea-brained sauropod?
Even a whole herd of those wouldn't help them beat Ohio State....
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31323662</id>
	<title>Re:BYU has a Paleontology department?</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1267444440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, BYU has a Paleontology department, and the Dali Lama's talks in Portland were hosted by The University of Portland, Oregon's Catholic University. What's your point? Religious organizations, especially ones devoted to education, do not always behave the way that your narrow, biased stereotypes lead you to expect. Most of them are filled with intelligent people who dedicate their lives to discovering truth, much like Martin Luther (the founder of Protestantism) did.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , BYU has a Paleontology department , and the Dali Lama 's talks in Portland were hosted by The University of Portland , Oregon 's Catholic University .
What 's your point ?
Religious organizations , especially ones devoted to education , do not always behave the way that your narrow , biased stereotypes lead you to expect .
Most of them are filled with intelligent people who dedicate their lives to discovering truth , much like Martin Luther ( the founder of Protestantism ) did .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, BYU has a Paleontology department, and the Dali Lama's talks in Portland were hosted by The University of Portland, Oregon's Catholic University.
What's your point?
Religious organizations, especially ones devoted to education, do not always behave the way that your narrow, biased stereotypes lead you to expect.
Most of them are filled with intelligent people who dedicate their lives to discovering truth, much like Martin Luther (the founder of Protestantism) did.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321530</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31323760</id>
	<title>Was this one domesticated?</title>
	<author>NReitzel</author>
	<datestamp>1267444980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After visiting the creation science museum, I wonder if the BYU crew found any evidence of saddles along with the dinosaurs?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After visiting the creation science museum , I wonder if the BYU crew found any evidence of saddles along with the dinosaurs ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After visiting the creation science museum, I wonder if the BYU crew found any evidence of saddles along with the dinosaurs?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322040</id>
	<title>This is really rare!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267438080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The researchers stumbled on four skulls"</p><p>I never heard of a four headed sauropod before!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The researchers stumbled on four skulls " I never heard of a four headed sauropod before !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The researchers stumbled on four skulls"I never heard of a four headed sauropod before!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321556</id>
	<title>Brontasaurus</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267436340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would call it a Brontasaurus just to add confusion.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would call it a Brontasaurus just to add confusion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would call it a Brontasaurus just to add confusion.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31327462</id>
	<title>Re:iPhonius extinction theory</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1267521900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, it developed a distaste for anything female, except its own growing femininity. And its primary food source was a early biped called Homo Erotica Bubblus Distortensis Realitis.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , it developed a distaste for anything female , except its own growing femininity .
And its primary food source was a early biped called Homo Erotica Bubblus Distortensis Realitis .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, it developed a distaste for anything female, except its own growing femininity.
And its primary food source was a early biped called Homo Erotica Bubblus Distortensis Realitis.
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31323880</id>
	<title>Re:I'll be damned!</title>
	<author>MillionthMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1267445640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>OK, listen. I'm an expert on Mormonism. Why? I did a Google search an hour ago, that's why.
<br> <br>
Mormons don't specifically believe in either creationism or evolution. The official position of the Church is that this issue is unresolved, because God has not revealed the answer.<br> <br>
An analogy can be made with birtherism. There are people who consider the certificate of live birth and the old contemporaneous newspaper article as sufficient evidence. Aside from them, there are crazy "creationist" birthers who insist the president was born in Kenya and is a citizen of Kenya, etc.
<br> <br>
The "Mormons" would be similar to politicians and pundits who appear on TV and answer "I have no idea" when asked if they believe the president is a citizen.</htmltext>
<tokenext>OK , listen .
I 'm an expert on Mormonism .
Why ? I did a Google search an hour ago , that 's why .
Mormons do n't specifically believe in either creationism or evolution .
The official position of the Church is that this issue is unresolved , because God has not revealed the answer .
An analogy can be made with birtherism .
There are people who consider the certificate of live birth and the old contemporaneous newspaper article as sufficient evidence .
Aside from them , there are crazy " creationist " birthers who insist the president was born in Kenya and is a citizen of Kenya , etc .
The " Mormons " would be similar to politicians and pundits who appear on TV and answer " I have no idea " when asked if they believe the president is a citizen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK, listen.
I'm an expert on Mormonism.
Why? I did a Google search an hour ago, that's why.
Mormons don't specifically believe in either creationism or evolution.
The official position of the Church is that this issue is unresolved, because God has not revealed the answer.
An analogy can be made with birtherism.
There are people who consider the certificate of live birth and the old contemporaneous newspaper article as sufficient evidence.
Aside from them, there are crazy "creationist" birthers who insist the president was born in Kenya and is a citizen of Kenya, etc.
The "Mormons" would be similar to politicians and pundits who appear on TV and answer "I have no idea" when asked if they believe the president is a citizen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321986</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31326552</id>
	<title>Re:Actually</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267466280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>that student was a dinosaur?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>that student was a dinosaur ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that student was a dinosaur?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321622</id>
	<title>Abydosaurus mcintoshi</title>
	<author>olsmeister</author>
	<datestamp>1267436520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Which evolved into its much cooler offspring, iPodosaurus.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Which evolved into its much cooler offspring , iPodosaurus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which evolved into its much cooler offspring, iPodosaurus.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321986</id>
	<title>Re:I'll be damned!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267437780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Mormon scientists have found skolls! How interesting! Maybe this will get a Darwin award.</p></div><p>Don't be silly.  They dated them at 4000 years old.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mormon scientists have found skolls !
How interesting !
Maybe this will get a Darwin award.Do n't be silly .
They dated them at 4000 years old .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mormon scientists have found skolls!
How interesting!
Maybe this will get a Darwin award.Don't be silly.
They dated them at 4000 years old.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321496</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322136</id>
	<title>Re:Science in Utah?</title>
	<author>LBArrettAnderson</author>
	<datestamp>1267438500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mormons aren't creationists in the usual sense of the word..</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mormons are n't creationists in the usual sense of the word. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mormons aren't creationists in the usual sense of the word..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321776</id>
	<title>Re:in related news</title>
	<author>voodoo cheesecake</author>
	<datestamp>1267437000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Let's not forget the threat from the pengui sapiens of the pokealotatwat tribe.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's not forget the threat from the pengui sapiens of the pokealotatwat tribe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's not forget the threat from the pengui sapiens of the pokealotatwat tribe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321552</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321834</id>
	<title>Re:in related news</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267437180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Abydosaurus mcintoshi, also known as the iSaur.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Abydosaurus mcintoshi , also known as the iSaur .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Abydosaurus mcintoshi, also known as the iSaur.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321552</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31356850</id>
	<title>Re:Gary Larson inquires:</title>
	<author>RockDoctor</author>
	<datestamp>1267710480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>yeah, but does it have a thagomizer?!</p></div></blockquote><p>Well, I had to follow that link. And it's fun. I've had dealings with Ken Carpenter before, and like the guy ; picking up on a term like that sounds entirely up his street sense-of-humour-wise, and as vertebrate palaeontology isn't my particular specialism, I'm more than willing to follow his lead.<br>Boringly : since sauropods typically have strongly ossified tail tendons (and correspondingly low tail flexibility), then it's very unlikely to have a thagomizer.<br>The teeth were interesting though.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>yeah , but does it have a thagomizer ?
! Well , I had to follow that link .
And it 's fun .
I 've had dealings with Ken Carpenter before , and like the guy ; picking up on a term like that sounds entirely up his street sense-of-humour-wise , and as vertebrate palaeontology is n't my particular specialism , I 'm more than willing to follow his lead.Boringly : since sauropods typically have strongly ossified tail tendons ( and correspondingly low tail flexibility ) , then it 's very unlikely to have a thagomizer.The teeth were interesting though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yeah, but does it have a thagomizer?
!Well, I had to follow that link.
And it's fun.
I've had dealings with Ken Carpenter before, and like the guy ; picking up on a term like that sounds entirely up his street sense-of-humour-wise, and as vertebrate palaeontology isn't my particular specialism, I'm more than willing to follow his lead.Boringly : since sauropods typically have strongly ossified tail tendons (and correspondingly low tail flexibility), then it's very unlikely to have a thagomizer.The teeth were interesting though.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322600</id>
	<title>Re:in related news</title>
	<author>zullnero</author>
	<datestamp>1267440180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sentient killing machines that are "extremely concerned about your browsing habits" and "offer you suggestions about various products it wants you to buy and websites it wants you to visit?"  You got it all wrong.
<br> <br>
Most schools teach that Androidius evolved into Googlesaurus Chromicus, which, throwing the basic concepts of evolution to the wind, took many different shapes and sizes but ultimately couldn't optimize its own form into the perfect killing machine and ended up cannibalizing itself due to an inability to hunt prey and feed itself without falling down and hurting itself repeatedly while getting sidetracked by advertisements for its own competitors and various phishing schemes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sentient killing machines that are " extremely concerned about your browsing habits " and " offer you suggestions about various products it wants you to buy and websites it wants you to visit ?
" You got it all wrong .
Most schools teach that Androidius evolved into Googlesaurus Chromicus , which , throwing the basic concepts of evolution to the wind , took many different shapes and sizes but ultimately could n't optimize its own form into the perfect killing machine and ended up cannibalizing itself due to an inability to hunt prey and feed itself without falling down and hurting itself repeatedly while getting sidetracked by advertisements for its own competitors and various phishing schemes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sentient killing machines that are "extremely concerned about your browsing habits" and "offer you suggestions about various products it wants you to buy and websites it wants you to visit?
"  You got it all wrong.
Most schools teach that Androidius evolved into Googlesaurus Chromicus, which, throwing the basic concepts of evolution to the wind, took many different shapes and sizes but ultimately couldn't optimize its own form into the perfect killing machine and ended up cannibalizing itself due to an inability to hunt prey and feed itself without falling down and hurting itself repeatedly while getting sidetracked by advertisements for its own competitors and various phishing schemes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321552</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321578</id>
	<title>Thesaurus?</title>
	<author>fahrbot-bot</author>
	<datestamp>1267436400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thesaurus: Small dinosaur that uses flowery language to extricate itself from dangerous situations. - Dennis Miller</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thesaurus : Small dinosaur that uses flowery language to extricate itself from dangerous situations .
- Dennis Miller</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thesaurus: Small dinosaur that uses flowery language to extricate itself from dangerous situations.
- Dennis Miller</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322034</id>
	<title>Re:This is my theory, which is mine.</title>
	<author>Cytotoxic</author>
	<datestamp>1267438080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, no... if you are going to paraphrase Cleese, you have to wait for someone to do the original quote first.*  Then you can diverge from Python orthodoxy in the subsequent reply.
</p><p>
It is as if you skipped the "Triple Dare" and went straight for the jugular with a "Triple Dog Dare".
</p><p>
*For the uninitiated, and in the world of Slashdot there should be none, the original quote is from Anne Elk  (John Cleese)</p><p><div class="quote"><p>"This theory which belongs to me is as follows. Ahem. Ahem. This is how it goes. Ahem. The next thing that I am about to say is my theory. Ahem. Ready?</p><p>The Theory by A. Elk brackets Miss brackets.</p><p> My theory is along the following lines.  All brontosauruses are thin at one end, much MUCH thicker in the middle, and then thin again at the far end. That is the theory that I have and which is mine, and what it is too."</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , no... if you are going to paraphrase Cleese , you have to wait for someone to do the original quote first .
* Then you can diverge from Python orthodoxy in the subsequent reply .
It is as if you skipped the " Triple Dare " and went straight for the jugular with a " Triple Dog Dare " .
* For the uninitiated , and in the world of Slashdot there should be none , the original quote is from Anne Elk ( John Cleese ) " This theory which belongs to me is as follows .
Ahem. Ahem .
This is how it goes .
Ahem. The next thing that I am about to say is my theory .
Ahem. Ready ? The Theory by A. Elk brackets Miss brackets .
My theory is along the following lines .
All brontosauruses are thin at one end , much MUCH thicker in the middle , and then thin again at the far end .
That is the theory that I have and which is mine , and what it is too .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, no... if you are going to paraphrase Cleese, you have to wait for someone to do the original quote first.
*  Then you can diverge from Python orthodoxy in the subsequent reply.
It is as if you skipped the "Triple Dare" and went straight for the jugular with a "Triple Dog Dare".
*For the uninitiated, and in the world of Slashdot there should be none, the original quote is from Anne Elk  (John Cleese)"This theory which belongs to me is as follows.
Ahem. Ahem.
This is how it goes.
Ahem. The next thing that I am about to say is my theory.
Ahem. Ready?The Theory by A. Elk brackets Miss brackets.
My theory is along the following lines.
All brontosauruses are thin at one end, much MUCH thicker in the middle, and then thin again at the far end.
That is the theory that I have and which is mine, and what it is too.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321542</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31326022</id>
	<title>Mormons and Dinosaurs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267460940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I find it a bit comical that a university run by the LDS church (mormons) is out hunting for dinosaurs. Of course, they think they are alien life-forms from another planet. Or that Adam used to ride them in the garden of Eden.</p><p><a href="http://en.fairmormon.org/Mormonism\_and\_science/Dinosaurs" title="fairmormon.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.fairmormon.org/Mormonism\_and\_science/Dinosaurs</a> [fairmormon.org]</p><p>I think these types of findings and studies must put the participating church members through some really fantastic psychological gymnastics. Especially when run through their belief that Adam was the first actual living thing on the Earth.</p><p><a href="http://scriptures.lds.org/en/abr/5/3-7" title="lds.org" rel="nofollow">http://scriptures.lds.org/en/abr/5/3-7</a> [lds.org]<br><a href="http://scriptures.lds.org/en/dc/77/12#12" title="lds.org" rel="nofollow">http://scriptures.lds.org/en/dc/77/12#12</a> [lds.org]</p><p>There is no way I'd say this out in the open. It isn't polite to object with the local theocracy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I find it a bit comical that a university run by the LDS church ( mormons ) is out hunting for dinosaurs .
Of course , they think they are alien life-forms from another planet .
Or that Adam used to ride them in the garden of Eden.http : //en.fairmormon.org/Mormonism \ _and \ _science/Dinosaurs [ fairmormon.org ] I think these types of findings and studies must put the participating church members through some really fantastic psychological gymnastics .
Especially when run through their belief that Adam was the first actual living thing on the Earth.http : //scriptures.lds.org/en/abr/5/3-7 [ lds.org ] http : //scriptures.lds.org/en/dc/77/12 # 12 [ lds.org ] There is no way I 'd say this out in the open .
It is n't polite to object with the local theocracy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I find it a bit comical that a university run by the LDS church (mormons) is out hunting for dinosaurs.
Of course, they think they are alien life-forms from another planet.
Or that Adam used to ride them in the garden of Eden.http://en.fairmormon.org/Mormonism\_and\_science/Dinosaurs [fairmormon.org]I think these types of findings and studies must put the participating church members through some really fantastic psychological gymnastics.
Especially when run through their belief that Adam was the first actual living thing on the Earth.http://scriptures.lds.org/en/abr/5/3-7 [lds.org]http://scriptures.lds.org/en/dc/77/12#12 [lds.org]There is no way I'd say this out in the open.
It isn't polite to object with the local theocracy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321638</id>
	<title>Head and neck position?</title>
	<author>red\_blue\_yellow</author>
	<datestamp>1267436580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder if the low density of these skulls will affect the on-going debate about the whether or not the sauropods held their necks and heads erect or horizontally?  It will be interesting to see.

See <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sauropoda#Palaeobiology" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">here</a> [wikipedia.org] for info on the debate.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if the low density of these skulls will affect the on-going debate about the whether or not the sauropods held their necks and heads erect or horizontally ?
It will be interesting to see .
See here [ wikipedia.org ] for info on the debate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if the low density of these skulls will affect the on-going debate about the whether or not the sauropods held their necks and heads erect or horizontally?
It will be interesting to see.
See here [wikipedia.org] for info on the debate.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322620</id>
	<title>Re:Science in Utah?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267440240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In light of <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/12/utah-climate-alarmists" title="guardian.co.uk" rel="nofollow">this article</a> [guardian.co.uk] I contest my modding as Troll.  It only makes sense to question how likely anything scientific comes from the state, and make light of the fact that opinions have also come from the state that had a right wing/religious bias.<br> <br>The problem is when the <b>legistlature</b> of the state has recently released an opinion that completely goes against commonly accepted scientific principle, it is reasonable to question the likelihood of anything scientific coming from the state.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In light of this article [ guardian.co.uk ] I contest my modding as Troll .
It only makes sense to question how likely anything scientific comes from the state , and make light of the fact that opinions have also come from the state that had a right wing/religious bias .
The problem is when the legistlature of the state has recently released an opinion that completely goes against commonly accepted scientific principle , it is reasonable to question the likelihood of anything scientific coming from the state .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In light of this article [guardian.co.uk] I contest my modding as Troll.
It only makes sense to question how likely anything scientific comes from the state, and make light of the fact that opinions have also come from the state that had a right wing/religious bias.
The problem is when the legistlature of the state has recently released an opinion that completely goes against commonly accepted scientific principle, it is reasonable to question the likelihood of anything scientific coming from the state.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322244</id>
	<title>Re:in related news</title>
	<author>Hoi Polloi</author>
	<datestamp>1267438800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If we are going to talk about things that are extinct then I would suggest naming it <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple\_Lisa" title="wikipedia.org">Abydosaurus Lisasaurus</a> [wikipedia.org] instead.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If we are going to talk about things that are extinct then I would suggest naming it Abydosaurus Lisasaurus [ wikipedia.org ] instead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If we are going to talk about things that are extinct then I would suggest naming it Abydosaurus Lisasaurus [wikipedia.org] instead.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321552</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321530</id>
	<title>BYU has a Paleontology department?</title>
	<author>copponex</author>
	<datestamp>1267436280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wouldn't be as surprised if they claimed to have found a spaceship and a saddle in the same strata.</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ervaWt03Z3w" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ervaWt03Z3w</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would n't be as surprised if they claimed to have found a spaceship and a saddle in the same strata.http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = ervaWt03Z3w [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wouldn't be as surprised if they claimed to have found a spaceship and a saddle in the same strata.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ervaWt03Z3w [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322080</id>
	<title>Skolls?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267438200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Sauropod skolls are rarely found in the fossil record because the soft tissue from which they are constructed is unlikely to be preserved after death."</p><p>Correction. They are rarely found because nobody quite knows what a "skoll" is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Sauropod skolls are rarely found in the fossil record because the soft tissue from which they are constructed is unlikely to be preserved after death. " Correction .
They are rarely found because nobody quite knows what a " skoll " is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Sauropod skolls are rarely found in the fossil record because the soft tissue from which they are constructed is unlikely to be preserved after death."Correction.
They are rarely found because nobody quite knows what a "skoll" is.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31323338</id>
	<title>New or just previously undiscovered?</title>
	<author>hyades1</author>
	<datestamp>1267442940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> Soft head...tiny brain...a Paleoconservative, no doubt. </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Soft head...tiny brain...a Paleoconservative , no doubt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Soft head...tiny brain...a Paleoconservative, no doubt. </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321666</id>
	<title>Abydosaurus mcintoshi is the first dinosaur</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267436640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That only had a one foot.</p><p>The animal could be found in large groups, leaning against the tall conifers that were common at the time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That only had a one foot.The animal could be found in large groups , leaning against the tall conifers that were common at the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That only had a one foot.The animal could be found in large groups, leaning against the tall conifers that were common at the time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321552</id>
	<title>in related news</title>
	<author>Tumbleweed</author>
	<datestamp>1267436340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Another dinosaur, Windowsaurus Mobelius, has also been identified in the fossil remains of early Silicon Valley users. It seems this dinosaur was replaced in its ecosystem by a smarter, faster breed called Googlesaurus Androidius, which went on to compete for resources with the Applesaurus iPhonius, which survived only as a brightly-coloured niche dinosaur, despite competing claims that its extinction was inevitable, and that its dominance was assured. Neither of these outcomes predicted for the iPhonius turned out to be true, and the Androidius eventually evolved into sentient killing machines.</p><p>All hail, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Another dinosaur , Windowsaurus Mobelius , has also been identified in the fossil remains of early Silicon Valley users .
It seems this dinosaur was replaced in its ecosystem by a smarter , faster breed called Googlesaurus Androidius , which went on to compete for resources with the Applesaurus iPhonius , which survived only as a brightly-coloured niche dinosaur , despite competing claims that its extinction was inevitable , and that its dominance was assured .
Neither of these outcomes predicted for the iPhonius turned out to be true , and the Androidius eventually evolved into sentient killing machines.All hail , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another dinosaur, Windowsaurus Mobelius, has also been identified in the fossil remains of early Silicon Valley users.
It seems this dinosaur was replaced in its ecosystem by a smarter, faster breed called Googlesaurus Androidius, which went on to compete for resources with the Applesaurus iPhonius, which survived only as a brightly-coloured niche dinosaur, despite competing claims that its extinction was inevitable, and that its dominance was assured.
Neither of these outcomes predicted for the iPhonius turned out to be true, and the Androidius eventually evolved into sentient killing machines.All hail, etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31324094</id>
	<title>I don't want to sound racist but</title>
	<author>abbynormal brain</author>
	<datestamp>1267446660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>all those long necks look alike</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>all those long necks look alike</tokentext>
<sentencetext>all those long necks look alike</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321542</id>
	<title>This is my theory, which is mine.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267436280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The following is MY theory.<br>
*ahem*<br>
*ahem* *ahem*<br>
This was the type of dinosaur that wore a saddle, so that people from the Bible could ride it around, and with that long neck it could have easily reached up to get the forbidden fruit from the Tree of Life for that bitch Eve. *Ahem*</htmltext>
<tokenext>The following is MY theory .
* ahem * * ahem * * ahem * This was the type of dinosaur that wore a saddle , so that people from the Bible could ride it around , and with that long neck it could have easily reached up to get the forbidden fruit from the Tree of Life for that bitch Eve .
* Ahem *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The following is MY theory.
*ahem*
*ahem* *ahem*
This was the type of dinosaur that wore a saddle, so that people from the Bible could ride it around, and with that long neck it could have easily reached up to get the forbidden fruit from the Tree of Life for that bitch Eve.
*Ahem*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321468</id>
	<title>Gary Larson inquires:</title>
	<author>Thud457</author>
	<datestamp>1267435980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>yeah, but does it have a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thagomizer" title="wikipedia.org">thagomizer</a> [wikipedia.org]?!</htmltext>
<tokenext>yeah , but does it have a thagomizer [ wikipedia.org ] ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yeah, but does it have a thagomizer [wikipedia.org]?
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_1820201_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321552
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_1820201_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31325110
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_1820201_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31327462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321552
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_1820201_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322034
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321542
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_1820201_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321542
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_1820201_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31326780
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_1820201_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322136
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_1820201_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_1820201_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322274
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_1820201_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31324274
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_1820201_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321976
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321530
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_1820201_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31323770
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321530
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_1820201_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322970
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_1820201_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31323880
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321986
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321496
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_1820201_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321834
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321552
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_1820201_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_1820201_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321552
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_1820201_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31323662
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321530
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_1820201_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322244
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321552
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_1820201_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31325856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_1820201_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31356850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_01_1820201_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31326552
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_1820201.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321496
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321986
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31323880
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_1820201.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322080
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_1820201.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321542
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322716
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322034
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_1820201.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321556
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_1820201.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31323196
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_1820201.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321552
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322324
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31327462
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321776
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322244
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321834
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322600
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_1820201.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321468
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31326780
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31356850
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322970
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321964
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_1820201.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31325110
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31325856
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31326552
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31324274
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_1820201.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321968
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322620
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322136
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322274
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_1820201.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321530
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321976
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31322376
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31323770
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31323662
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_01_1820201.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_01_1820201.31321826
</commentlist>
</conversation>
