<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_28_2050241</id>
	<title>Google Enhances Street View With User Photos</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1267363200000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Google has launched a competitor or counterpart to Microsoft's <a href="//tech.slashdot.org/story/08/08/22/1320206/Microsoft-Releases-Photosynth">Photosynth</a>, which employs user-contributed photos of much-photographed sites to supplement the street-level view in an immersive way. Google's offering is called simply <a href="http://gigaom.com/2010/02/28/google-launches-user-generated-street-view/?utm\_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm\_medium=twitter">Navigate through User Photos</a>, and unlike Photosynth &mdash; which requires Sliverlight and therefore is not available on Linux &mdash; is implemented in Flash. This YouTube video (also embedded at the link above) offers a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjbnT7zcZ-w&amp;feature=player\_embedded">quick tour of the new feature</a>, which can use photos uploaded to Panoramico, Flickr, and Picasa.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google has launched a competitor or counterpart to Microsoft 's Photosynth , which employs user-contributed photos of much-photographed sites to supplement the street-level view in an immersive way .
Google 's offering is called simply Navigate through User Photos , and unlike Photosynth    which requires Sliverlight and therefore is not available on Linux    is implemented in Flash .
This YouTube video ( also embedded at the link above ) offers a quick tour of the new feature , which can use photos uploaded to Panoramico , Flickr , and Picasa .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google has launched a competitor or counterpart to Microsoft's Photosynth, which employs user-contributed photos of much-photographed sites to supplement the street-level view in an immersive way.
Google's offering is called simply Navigate through User Photos, and unlike Photosynth — which requires Sliverlight and therefore is not available on Linux — is implemented in Flash.
This YouTube video (also embedded at the link above) offers a quick tour of the new feature, which can use photos uploaded to Panoramico, Flickr, and Picasa.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31320502</id>
	<title>No, it doesn't. It is a lame backwards wannabe</title>
	<author>Ilgaz</author>
	<datestamp>1267475580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where is the binary for PPC/OSX ? Also does it do exactly what Silverlight 3/Win does?</p><p>Moonlight... Come on really.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where is the binary for PPC/OSX ?
Also does it do exactly what Silverlight 3/Win does ? Moonlight... Come on really .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where is the binary for PPC/OSX ?
Also does it do exactly what Silverlight 3/Win does?Moonlight... Come on really.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311800</id>
	<title>Re:Bing's 15 minutes of fame gone...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267376700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.videosift.com/video/TED-Augmented-reality-using-Bing-maps" title="videosift.com">http://www.videosift.com/video/TED-Augmented-reality-using-Bing-maps</a> [videosift.com]

Take a look again, the Bing demonstration can also overlay video.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.videosift.com/video/TED-Augmented-reality-using-Bing-maps [ videosift.com ] Take a look again , the Bing demonstration can also overlay video .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.videosift.com/video/TED-Augmented-reality-using-Bing-maps [videosift.com]

Take a look again, the Bing demonstration can also overlay video.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31314344</id>
	<title>Document management vs. DRM</title>
	<author>tepples</author>
	<datestamp>1267450200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>PPV, thelease or rental model, is considred legitimate in many other contexts. Why does it become illegitimate when the rental is an audio or video recording?</p></div><p>With free software, there's no way for a publisher to prevent users from editing the source code and inserting the equivalent of a <a href="http://unixhelp.ed.ac.uk/CGI/man-cgi?tee" title="ed.ac.uk">tee(1)</a> [ed.ac.uk].</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Document management is essential in business.</p></div><p>"Document management" connotes access control for unpublished works within an organization, used to enforce trade secrets on machines owned by that organization. Even when used between two organizations, these organizations are still in a position to negotiate terms. "Digital restrictions management", on the other hand, connotes access control for published works, used to enforce copyrights on machines owned by members of the public, made available only under a standard form contract. It's supposed to be easier to lock down your own organization's machines than every machine in the world.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>PPV , thelease or rental model , is considred legitimate in many other contexts .
Why does it become illegitimate when the rental is an audio or video recording ? With free software , there 's no way for a publisher to prevent users from editing the source code and inserting the equivalent of a tee ( 1 ) [ ed.ac.uk ] .Document management is essential in business .
" Document management " connotes access control for unpublished works within an organization , used to enforce trade secrets on machines owned by that organization .
Even when used between two organizations , these organizations are still in a position to negotiate terms .
" Digital restrictions management " , on the other hand , connotes access control for published works , used to enforce copyrights on machines owned by members of the public , made available only under a standard form contract .
It 's supposed to be easier to lock down your own organization 's machines than every machine in the world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>PPV, thelease or rental model, is considred legitimate in many other contexts.
Why does it become illegitimate when the rental is an audio or video recording?With free software, there's no way for a publisher to prevent users from editing the source code and inserting the equivalent of a tee(1) [ed.ac.uk].Document management is essential in business.
"Document management" connotes access control for unpublished works within an organization, used to enforce trade secrets on machines owned by that organization.
Even when used between two organizations, these organizations are still in a position to negotiate terms.
"Digital restrictions management", on the other hand, connotes access control for published works, used to enforce copyrights on machines owned by members of the public, made available only under a standard form contract.
It's supposed to be easier to lock down your own organization's machines than every machine in the world.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31312058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310874</id>
	<title>A whole lot of math</title>
	<author>LoudMusic</author>
	<datestamp>1267367820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I noticed this last week sometime. My first thought when I see this technology is always "damn that's a lot of maths".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I noticed this last week sometime .
My first thought when I see this technology is always " damn that 's a lot of maths " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I noticed this last week sometime.
My first thought when I see this technology is always "damn that's a lot of maths".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31312844</id>
	<title>Re:uh silverlight works in linux</title>
	<author>miffo.swe</author>
	<datestamp>1267475520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Define work? I tried it and i havent been successful with any site where i did need Silverlight support. It always seem to lag a version behind whats on the net.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Define work ?
I tried it and i havent been successful with any site where i did need Silverlight support .
It always seem to lag a version behind whats on the net .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Define work?
I tried it and i havent been successful with any site where i did need Silverlight support.
It always seem to lag a version behind whats on the net.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31315084</id>
	<title>Re:Brownies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267455180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah as usual Mac and Windows have the brownies and Linux shows up to the party with nothing in hand who likes to annoy everyone about at the party why they are better than them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah as usual Mac and Windows have the brownies and Linux shows up to the party with nothing in hand who likes to annoy everyone about at the party why they are better than them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah as usual Mac and Windows have the brownies and Linux shows up to the party with nothing in hand who likes to annoy everyone about at the party why they are better than them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310894</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31316054</id>
	<title>Re:Your Facts Are Getting in the Way of His Agenda</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267458840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does ANYONE think using Microsoft's Silverlight is an improvement over Adobe's Flash?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does ANYONE think using Microsoft 's Silverlight is an improvement over Adobe 's Flash ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does ANYONE think using Microsoft's Silverlight is an improvement over Adobe's Flash?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31327826</id>
	<title>Europe Pushes Google Over Street View Data</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267527420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apparently the European Union has urged Google to make sure its Street View images are deleted after six months</p><p>You can read more here</p><p>http://www.eweekeurope.co.uk/news/european-authorities-push-google-over-street-view-data-5557</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently the European Union has urged Google to make sure its Street View images are deleted after six monthsYou can read more herehttp : //www.eweekeurope.co.uk/news/european-authorities-push-google-over-street-view-data-5557</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently the European Union has urged Google to make sure its Street View images are deleted after six monthsYou can read more herehttp://www.eweekeurope.co.uk/news/european-authorities-push-google-over-street-view-data-5557</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311384</id>
	<title>Re:A whole lot of math</title>
	<author>mikael</author>
	<datestamp>1267372080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My thought, is it possible to map black and white photographs taken over 50 years ago to this? Some websites are selling reprints of antique postcards, which are in fact high-resolution photographs. The landscape in many cases is slightly different; buildings have had balconies added, trees are several meters taller. In some scenes, group photographs have been taken. I've wonder whether it would be possible to combine the photographs and streetview together so you could see the people as if they were cardboard cutout figures.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My thought , is it possible to map black and white photographs taken over 50 years ago to this ?
Some websites are selling reprints of antique postcards , which are in fact high-resolution photographs .
The landscape in many cases is slightly different ; buildings have had balconies added , trees are several meters taller .
In some scenes , group photographs have been taken .
I 've wonder whether it would be possible to combine the photographs and streetview together so you could see the people as if they were cardboard cutout figures .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My thought, is it possible to map black and white photographs taken over 50 years ago to this?
Some websites are selling reprints of antique postcards, which are in fact high-resolution photographs.
The landscape in many cases is slightly different; buildings have had balconies added, trees are several meters taller.
In some scenes, group photographs have been taken.
I've wonder whether it would be possible to combine the photographs and streetview together so you could see the people as if they were cardboard cutout figures.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310874</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311848</id>
	<title>Re:Bing's 15 minutes of fame gone...</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1267377240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But you know people are gonna Photoshop goatse, tits, and Sarah Palin[1] into windows etc.</p><p>[1] No connection between the 3.....I think.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But you know people are gon na Photoshop goatse , tits , and Sarah Palin [ 1 ] into windows etc .
[ 1 ] No connection between the 3.....I think .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But you know people are gonna Photoshop goatse, tits, and Sarah Palin[1] into windows etc.
[1] No connection between the 3.....I think.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311104</id>
	<title>Re:uh silverlight works in linux</title>
	<author>MushMouth</author>
	<datestamp>1267369440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How is B) any different than the use of Flash (which this Johnny-Come-Lately google app uses)?  Especially considering Moonlight is fully open source, which no version of flash 10 is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How is B ) any different than the use of Flash ( which this Johnny-Come-Lately google app uses ) ?
Especially considering Moonlight is fully open source , which no version of flash 10 is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is B) any different than the use of Flash (which this Johnny-Come-Lately google app uses)?
Especially considering Moonlight is fully open source, which no version of flash 10 is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310958</id>
	<title>Old photos</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267368360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My neighbour has photos of our street from when he was a kid. I'm planning to scan them and put them up. Quite the change over the years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My neighbour has photos of our street from when he was a kid .
I 'm planning to scan them and put them up .
Quite the change over the years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My neighbour has photos of our street from when he was a kid.
I'm planning to scan them and put them up.
Quite the change over the years.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311308</id>
	<title>Re:Bing's 15 minutes of fame gone...</title>
	<author>Flere Imsaho</author>
	<datestamp>1267371180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Get people to submit pics of themselves. They could call it Bada Bing!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Get people to submit pics of themselves .
They could call it Bada Bing !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get people to submit pics of themselves.
They could call it Bada Bing!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310836</id>
	<title>Silverlight does exist for GNU/Linux</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267367340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think there is an editorial error... Silverlight is available for Linux, via an extension published by Novell named "Moonlight". Even better : Moonlight is free software while Flash is not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think there is an editorial error... Silverlight is available for Linux , via an extension published by Novell named " Moonlight " .
Even better : Moonlight is free software while Flash is not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think there is an editorial error... Silverlight is available for Linux, via an extension published by Novell named "Moonlight".
Even better : Moonlight is free software while Flash is not.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310902</id>
	<title>Re:Why this beats Microsoft</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267367940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Flash isn't a plugin?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Flash is n't a plugin ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Flash isn't a plugin?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310864</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311346</id>
	<title>Re:Silverlight does exist for GNU/Linux</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267371660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>moonlight is also selectively a version behind the active version of silverlight. If silverlight was compatible with it's own versions this would be less of an issue, but as is it's just MS doing what MS does.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>moonlight is also selectively a version behind the active version of silverlight .
If silverlight was compatible with it 's own versions this would be less of an issue , but as is it 's just MS doing what MS does .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>moonlight is also selectively a version behind the active version of silverlight.
If silverlight was compatible with it's own versions this would be less of an issue, but as is it's just MS doing what MS does.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310836</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31312258</id>
	<title>When they  can take user photos...</title>
	<author>zawarski</author>
	<datestamp>1267382580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...and texture them onto the ground and 3d buildings in Google Earth, I'll be impressed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...and texture them onto the ground and 3d buildings in Google Earth , I 'll be impressed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and texture them onto the ground and 3d buildings in Google Earth, I'll be impressed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31312510</id>
	<title>Re:Bing's 15 minutes of fame gone...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267385760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So are we going to bag on Google now for copying a Microsoft innovation?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So are we going to bag on Google now for copying a Microsoft innovation ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So are we going to bag on Google now for copying a Microsoft innovation?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31321534</id>
	<title>Re:Why the Java hate?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267436280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because it deserves it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because it deserves it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because it deserves it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31312372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31313156</id>
	<title>Re:photos</title>
	<author>janwedekind</author>
	<datestamp>1267436220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Photosynth actually started as a PhD project called <a href="http://phototour.cs.washington.edu/" title="washington.edu">Photo Tourism</a> [washington.edu] before it was taken over by Microsoft. There was a presentation where they downloaded a lot of pictures of the cathedral in Strasbourg. Given enough samples they were able to find typical viewpoints, they managed to align day- and night-shots, and they even could detect obstruction.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Photosynth actually started as a PhD project called Photo Tourism [ washington.edu ] before it was taken over by Microsoft .
There was a presentation where they downloaded a lot of pictures of the cathedral in Strasbourg .
Given enough samples they were able to find typical viewpoints , they managed to align day- and night-shots , and they even could detect obstruction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Photosynth actually started as a PhD project called Photo Tourism [washington.edu] before it was taken over by Microsoft.
There was a presentation where they downloaded a lot of pictures of the cathedral in Strasbourg.
Given enough samples they were able to find typical viewpoints, they managed to align day- and night-shots, and they even could detect obstruction.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311150</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310858</id>
	<title>Re:uh silverlight works in linux</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267367640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Moonlight has two drawbacks:
<ul> <li>Moonlight is perpetually a version behind Microsoft Silverlight, resulting in Silverlight apps displaying only "your Silverlight plug-in is outdated".</li><li>Outside Microsoft, a major use for Silverlight is to stream video with digital restrictions management to make it significantly harder to save to the viewer's PC. Free software is fundamentally incompatible with this DRM.</li></ul></htmltext>
<tokenext>Moonlight has two drawbacks : Moonlight is perpetually a version behind Microsoft Silverlight , resulting in Silverlight apps displaying only " your Silverlight plug-in is outdated " .Outside Microsoft , a major use for Silverlight is to stream video with digital restrictions management to make it significantly harder to save to the viewer 's PC .
Free software is fundamentally incompatible with this DRM .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Moonlight has two drawbacks:
 Moonlight is perpetually a version behind Microsoft Silverlight, resulting in Silverlight apps displaying only "your Silverlight plug-in is outdated".Outside Microsoft, a major use for Silverlight is to stream video with digital restrictions management to make it significantly harder to save to the viewer's PC.
Free software is fundamentally incompatible with this DRM.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310798</id>
	<title>uh silverlight works in linux</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267366980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Try Moonlight.</p><p><a href="http://www.mono-project.com/Moonlight" title="mono-project.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mono-project.com/Moonlight</a> [mono-project.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Try Moonlight.http : //www.mono-project.com/Moonlight [ mono-project.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try Moonlight.http://www.mono-project.com/Moonlight [mono-project.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310900</id>
	<title>Re:Why this beats Microsoft</title>
	<author>selven</author>
	<datestamp>1267367940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Flash is a plugin. It may be ubiquitous, but it's still proprietary and it's still a plugin.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Flash is a plugin .
It may be ubiquitous , but it 's still proprietary and it 's still a plugin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Flash is a plugin.
It may be ubiquitous, but it's still proprietary and it's still a plugin.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310864</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31322550</id>
	<title>Re:uh silverlight doesn't work in linux</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267440000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>     Tried it.  It's a slow, non-functional piece of crap.  It's just enough for Microsoft-fanbois to say "Hey try Moonlight!"  when they obviously never have.  It will not even run most of the demos that are meant to display, like, a box and a circle on screen, and is very feature-incomplete; it intentionally leaves out codec support, and intentionally leaves out hooks to ffmpeg as well, so it'll NEVER be useful for video streaming sites.    It truly is a trap -- Microsoft uses it to falsely claim that Silverlight supports a bunch of platforms that it does not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tried it .
It 's a slow , non-functional piece of crap .
It 's just enough for Microsoft-fanbois to say " Hey try Moonlight !
" when they obviously never have .
It will not even run most of the demos that are meant to display , like , a box and a circle on screen , and is very feature-incomplete ; it intentionally leaves out codec support , and intentionally leaves out hooks to ffmpeg as well , so it 'll NEVER be useful for video streaming sites .
It truly is a trap -- Microsoft uses it to falsely claim that Silverlight supports a bunch of platforms that it does not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>     Tried it.
It's a slow, non-functional piece of crap.
It's just enough for Microsoft-fanbois to say "Hey try Moonlight!
"  when they obviously never have.
It will not even run most of the demos that are meant to display, like, a box and a circle on screen, and is very feature-incomplete; it intentionally leaves out codec support, and intentionally leaves out hooks to ffmpeg as well, so it'll NEVER be useful for video streaming sites.
It truly is a trap -- Microsoft uses it to falsely claim that Silverlight supports a bunch of platforms that it does not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311026</id>
	<title>Faces?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267368900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, does this app show blurred faces like the regular street view does?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , does this app show blurred faces like the regular street view does ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, does this app show blurred faces like the regular street view does?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31312074</id>
	<title>Goatse Tourism</title>
	<author>ukemike</author>
	<datestamp>1267379880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hey look it's Goatse at the Eifel Tower. Hey look it's Goatse on the steps of St. Peters. Hey look it's Goatse at Point Sublime on the North Rim of the Grand Canyon.<br> <br>

No thanks, I'd rather have someone vetting the photos.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey look it 's Goatse at the Eifel Tower .
Hey look it 's Goatse on the steps of St. Peters. Hey look it 's Goatse at Point Sublime on the North Rim of the Grand Canyon .
No thanks , I 'd rather have someone vetting the photos .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey look it's Goatse at the Eifel Tower.
Hey look it's Goatse on the steps of St. Peters. Hey look it's Goatse at Point Sublime on the North Rim of the Grand Canyon.
No thanks, I'd rather have someone vetting the photos.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311150</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31318602</id>
	<title>Re:Disconnected</title>
	<author>DragonWriter</author>
	<datestamp>1267468080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I don't understand how using "free software" translates into a requirement for "unprotected content."</p></div></blockquote><p>DRM, because it requires all the information for unlocking content to be present with the content on the users machine, but requires the user not to be able to use that information to acccess the content except consistent with the limits provided, inherently requires security-through-obscurity of a type that is fundamentally incompatible with free software.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't understand how using " free software " translates into a requirement for " unprotected content .
" DRM , because it requires all the information for unlocking content to be present with the content on the users machine , but requires the user not to be able to use that information to acccess the content except consistent with the limits provided , inherently requires security-through-obscurity of a type that is fundamentally incompatible with free software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't understand how using "free software" translates into a requirement for "unprotected content.
"DRM, because it requires all the information for unlocking content to be present with the content on the users machine, but requires the user not to be able to use that information to acccess the content except consistent with the limits provided, inherently requires security-through-obscurity of a type that is fundamentally incompatible with free software.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31312058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310866</id>
	<title>Re:uh silverlight works in linux</title>
	<author>JohnyDog</author>
	<datestamp>1267367700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Try Moonlight.</i></p><p>When stable Moonlight 1.0 was released as stable version about a year ago i tried it, only to be greeted by 'Silverlight 2.0 required, won't work with 1.0' on most non-demo pages.<br>This christmas someone posted me a photosynth link, i saw that Moonlight finally reached 2.0 stable release, so i again tried it, only to be greeted with 'Silverlight 3.0 required, won't work on 2.0' on photosynth and most other pages. Maybe someday in future there will be at least few day window when the silverlight app requirements match the available moonlight version, but it's not today.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Try Moonlight.When stable Moonlight 1.0 was released as stable version about a year ago i tried it , only to be greeted by 'Silverlight 2.0 required , wo n't work with 1.0 ' on most non-demo pages.This christmas someone posted me a photosynth link , i saw that Moonlight finally reached 2.0 stable release , so i again tried it , only to be greeted with 'Silverlight 3.0 required , wo n't work on 2.0 ' on photosynth and most other pages .
Maybe someday in future there will be at least few day window when the silverlight app requirements match the available moonlight version , but it 's not today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try Moonlight.When stable Moonlight 1.0 was released as stable version about a year ago i tried it, only to be greeted by 'Silverlight 2.0 required, won't work with 1.0' on most non-demo pages.This christmas someone posted me a photosynth link, i saw that Moonlight finally reached 2.0 stable release, so i again tried it, only to be greeted with 'Silverlight 3.0 required, won't work on 2.0' on photosynth and most other pages.
Maybe someday in future there will be at least few day window when the silverlight app requirements match the available moonlight version, but it's not today.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310894</id>
	<title>Brownies</title>
	<author>l00sr</author>
	<datestamp>1267367940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...unlike Photosynth &mdash; which requires Sliverlight and therefore is not available on Linux &mdash; is implemented in Flash</p></div><p>I'm thinking of making some crack brownies that are delicious and unlike pot brownies--which have pot in them and are therefore dangerous--have crack in them.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...unlike Photosynth    which requires Sliverlight and therefore is not available on Linux    is implemented in FlashI 'm thinking of making some crack brownies that are delicious and unlike pot brownies--which have pot in them and are therefore dangerous--have crack in them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...unlike Photosynth — which requires Sliverlight and therefore is not available on Linux — is implemented in FlashI'm thinking of making some crack brownies that are delicious and unlike pot brownies--which have pot in them and are therefore dangerous--have crack in them.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311150</id>
	<title>photos</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267369800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hope there's someone vetting the pics. One of the most annoying aspects of Panoramico, is that there's more than a few narcissists who post pics of things like "our dog Benji at the beach," rather than an informative pic that will enhance the Google Earth user-experience.
<br> <br>

Still... if no-one is vetting the pics, there is a LOT of fun to be had with this.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope there 's someone vetting the pics .
One of the most annoying aspects of Panoramico , is that there 's more than a few narcissists who post pics of things like " our dog Benji at the beach , " rather than an informative pic that will enhance the Google Earth user-experience .
Still... if no-one is vetting the pics , there is a LOT of fun to be had with this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope there's someone vetting the pics.
One of the most annoying aspects of Panoramico, is that there's more than a few narcissists who post pics of things like "our dog Benji at the beach," rather than an informative pic that will enhance the Google Earth user-experience.
Still... if no-one is vetting the pics, there is a LOT of fun to be had with this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311318</id>
	<title>Re:Bing's 15 minutes of fame gone...</title>
	<author>Tromad</author>
	<datestamp>1267371300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except bing maps is far superior to google maps. Google maps is more technical but both bing maps and even mapquest are superior for navigating to unfamiliar areas. Google maps will give you the technical name of the freeway, but bing maps/mapquest will give you the name of the freeway as it appears on the freeway signs (for example going to LAX google will say to get onto the San Deigo freeway, which is true. However, the freeway signs say Santa Monica. Both bing and mapquest say Santa Monica on the printout). In addition, bing maps will give you location markers on the printout (turn right after the 7-11).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except bing maps is far superior to google maps .
Google maps is more technical but both bing maps and even mapquest are superior for navigating to unfamiliar areas .
Google maps will give you the technical name of the freeway , but bing maps/mapquest will give you the name of the freeway as it appears on the freeway signs ( for example going to LAX google will say to get onto the San Deigo freeway , which is true .
However , the freeway signs say Santa Monica .
Both bing and mapquest say Santa Monica on the printout ) .
In addition , bing maps will give you location markers on the printout ( turn right after the 7-11 ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except bing maps is far superior to google maps.
Google maps is more technical but both bing maps and even mapquest are superior for navigating to unfamiliar areas.
Google maps will give you the technical name of the freeway, but bing maps/mapquest will give you the name of the freeway as it appears on the freeway signs (for example going to LAX google will say to get onto the San Deigo freeway, which is true.
However, the freeway signs say Santa Monica.
Both bing and mapquest say Santa Monica on the printout).
In addition, bing maps will give you location markers on the printout (turn right after the 7-11).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310864</id>
	<title>Why this beats Microsoft</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267367700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>You don't need silverlight or a plugin to use these features.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't need silverlight or a plugin to use these features .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't need silverlight or a plugin to use these features.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311388</id>
	<title>Contributed images are not blurred</title>
	<author>zrq</author>
	<datestamp>1267372140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Ok, how does this change the <a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/02/26/175254/EU-Says-Google-Street-View-Violates-Privacy" title="slashdot.org">privacy issues</a> [slashdot.org] ?
</p><p>
If Google takes the images themselves they have to blur all the faces and number plates, but if they include user contributed images of the same scene they don't need to blur them ?
</p><p>
So<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. if I (as a private citizen) take pictures of a street and upload them to Flickr with geo-tags, Google will use them un-blurred.
</p><p>
What if I (as a private citizen) mounted a camera on a car and took LOTS of pictures and uploaded them to Flickr with geo-tags, Google would be able to use them un-blurred ?
</p><p>
Is this a crowd sourced way to un-blur Google StreetView one street at a time<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok , how does this change the privacy issues [ slashdot.org ] ?
If Google takes the images themselves they have to blur all the faces and number plates , but if they include user contributed images of the same scene they do n't need to blur them ?
So .. if I ( as a private citizen ) take pictures of a street and upload them to Flickr with geo-tags , Google will use them un-blurred .
What if I ( as a private citizen ) mounted a camera on a car and took LOTS of pictures and uploaded them to Flickr with geo-tags , Google would be able to use them un-blurred ?
Is this a crowd sourced way to un-blur Google StreetView one street at a time ... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Ok, how does this change the privacy issues [slashdot.org] ?
If Google takes the images themselves they have to blur all the faces and number plates, but if they include user contributed images of the same scene they don't need to blur them ?
So .. if I (as a private citizen) take pictures of a street and upload them to Flickr with geo-tags, Google will use them un-blurred.
What if I (as a private citizen) mounted a camera on a car and took LOTS of pictures and uploaded them to Flickr with geo-tags, Google would be able to use them un-blurred ?
Is this a crowd sourced way to un-blur Google StreetView one street at a time ....
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311266</id>
	<title>The EU is gonna love this</title>
	<author>countertrolling</author>
	<datestamp>1267370760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can they order individuals to take down photos too? Or will Google have to "blur" them?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can they order individuals to take down photos too ?
Or will Google have to " blur " them ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can they order individuals to take down photos too?
Or will Google have to "blur" them?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311618</id>
	<title>Re:uh silverlight works in linux</title>
	<author>xenn</author>
	<datestamp>1267374780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is FlyByNight a name you might consider for marketing either product?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is FlyByNight a name you might consider for marketing either product ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is FlyByNight a name you might consider for marketing either product?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31315764</id>
	<title>Re:Your Facts Are Getting in the Way of His Agenda</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267457940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Juuuust in case you're remotely serious:</p><p>Web "apps" using proprietary Microsoft runtime <b>&lt;</b> Cross-platform web "apps" using proprietary Adobe runtime <b>&lt;</b> Open web standards supported by every browser</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Juuuust in case you 're remotely serious : Web " apps " using proprietary Microsoft runtime Cross-platform web " apps " using proprietary Adobe runtime Open web standards supported by every browser</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Juuuust in case you're remotely serious:Web "apps" using proprietary Microsoft runtime  Cross-platform web "apps" using proprietary Adobe runtime  Open web standards supported by every browser</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311840</id>
	<title>LAWSUIT</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267377180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think they need a consent form for all of these.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think they need a consent form for all of these .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think they need a consent form for all of these.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31312058</id>
	<title>Disconnected</title>
	<author>westlake</author>
	<datestamp>1267379580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Outside Microsoft, a major use for Silverlight is to stream video with digital restrictions management to make it significantly harder to save to the viewer's PC. Free software is fundamentally incompatible with this DRM.</i> </p><p>I don't understand how using "free software" translates into a requirement for "unprotected content."</p><p>PPV, thelease or rental model, is considred legitimate in <b>many</b> other contexts. Why does it become illegitimate when the rental is an audio or video recording?</p><p>Document management is essential in business.</p><p>The free alternative is no alternative if it can't deliver the "DRM" tools your clients expect to see.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Outside Microsoft , a major use for Silverlight is to stream video with digital restrictions management to make it significantly harder to save to the viewer 's PC .
Free software is fundamentally incompatible with this DRM .
I do n't understand how using " free software " translates into a requirement for " unprotected content .
" PPV , thelease or rental model , is considred legitimate in many other contexts .
Why does it become illegitimate when the rental is an audio or video recording ? Document management is essential in business.The free alternative is no alternative if it ca n't deliver the " DRM " tools your clients expect to see .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Outside Microsoft, a major use for Silverlight is to stream video with digital restrictions management to make it significantly harder to save to the viewer's PC.
Free software is fundamentally incompatible with this DRM.
I don't understand how using "free software" translates into a requirement for "unprotected content.
"PPV, thelease or rental model, is considred legitimate in many other contexts.
Why does it become illegitimate when the rental is an audio or video recording?Document management is essential in business.The free alternative is no alternative if it can't deliver the "DRM" tools your clients expect to see.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311054</id>
	<title>Hooray</title>
	<author>bunkymag</author>
	<datestamp>1267369080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Finally, all the residents of all the Gay Boulevardes in the world can express their street pride with flair.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally , all the residents of all the Gay Boulevardes in the world can express their street pride with flair .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally, all the residents of all the Gay Boulevardes in the world can express their street pride with flair.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31314978</id>
	<title>Re:Old photos</title>
	<author>Grizzley9</author>
	<datestamp>1267454460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Our county assessors office has been taking individual pics of each house over the past decade (varying quality).  When you go into their site to check your property taxes and such they have them all posted.  Having a sliding scale for time would be a very interesting archival solution.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Our county assessors office has been taking individual pics of each house over the past decade ( varying quality ) .
When you go into their site to check your property taxes and such they have them all posted .
Having a sliding scale for time would be a very interesting archival solution .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Our county assessors office has been taking individual pics of each house over the past decade (varying quality).
When you go into their site to check your property taxes and such they have them all posted.
Having a sliding scale for time would be a very interesting archival solution.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310958</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311090</id>
	<title>Panoramico?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267369260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm pretty sure you ment <b>Panoramio</b> and not <b>Panoramico</b></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty sure you ment Panoramio and not Panoramico</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty sure you ment Panoramio and not Panoramico</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310916</id>
	<title>Bing's 15 minutes of fame gone...</title>
	<author>adosch</author>
	<datestamp>1267368060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So long to the Bing hype done at TED this year.  Good idea to incorporate user-submitted photos where the Google StreetView car is not welcomed or... hated.  I think as long as the quality, angle and panorama of submitted images are scrutinized for the well-being and wealth of StreetView, it won't be very long before Google has image mapped <i>everything</i> with a road going through it.</p><p>...so what's the next best way to data mine people's personal vacation photography?  Simply invite them to freely contribute to the bigger, shadowed cause.  0\_0</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So long to the Bing hype done at TED this year .
Good idea to incorporate user-submitted photos where the Google StreetView car is not welcomed or... hated. I think as long as the quality , angle and panorama of submitted images are scrutinized for the well-being and wealth of StreetView , it wo n't be very long before Google has image mapped everything with a road going through it....so what 's the next best way to data mine people 's personal vacation photography ?
Simply invite them to freely contribute to the bigger , shadowed cause .
0 \ _0</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So long to the Bing hype done at TED this year.
Good idea to incorporate user-submitted photos where the Google StreetView car is not welcomed or... hated.  I think as long as the quality, angle and panorama of submitted images are scrutinized for the well-being and wealth of StreetView, it won't be very long before Google has image mapped everything with a road going through it....so what's the next best way to data mine people's personal vacation photography?
Simply invite them to freely contribute to the bigger, shadowed cause.
0\_0</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31313638</id>
	<title>Privacy from a street?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267441860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I dont understand this privacy decree.  Streets are public property.  If you dont want someone taking a picture of you on your private property then dont allow someone to see you from the public streets.</p><p>Close your blinds when you're taking a crap!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I dont understand this privacy decree .
Streets are public property .
If you dont want someone taking a picture of you on your private property then dont allow someone to see you from the public streets.Close your blinds when you 're taking a crap !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I dont understand this privacy decree.
Streets are public property.
If you dont want someone taking a picture of you on your private property then dont allow someone to see you from the public streets.Close your blinds when you're taking a crap!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31315146</id>
	<title>Has anyone "mined" google-street view?</title>
	<author>cellurl</author>
	<datestamp>1267455480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Has anyone "mined" google-street view? <br>
By mine, I mean do image-processing to drive around virtually, and look for speedlimit signs or what have you?<br> <br>

<a href="http://www.wikispeedia.org/" title="wikispeedia.org" rel="nofollow">speedlimits</a> [wikispeedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Has anyone " mined " google-street view ?
By mine , I mean do image-processing to drive around virtually , and look for speedlimit signs or what have you ?
speedlimits [ wikispeedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has anyone "mined" google-street view?
By mine, I mean do image-processing to drive around virtually, and look for speedlimit signs or what have you?
speedlimits [wikispeedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311250</id>
	<title>Hasn't it been this way for a while?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267370640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I seem to remember seeing user-submitted photos of my place (a random Chicago three-flat) at least a year back.
<p>
Or is this something different?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I seem to remember seeing user-submitted photos of my place ( a random Chicago three-flat ) at least a year back .
Or is this something different ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I seem to remember seeing user-submitted photos of my place (a random Chicago three-flat) at least a year back.
Or is this something different?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310964</id>
	<title>Re:uh silverlight works in linux</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267368480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Try Moonlight.</i></p><p>Well, I just went &amp; downloaded the Moonlight 3 preview for linux &amp; it doesn't work well enough with Photosynth for it to really be usable.</p><p>Not that flash is exactly the cross-platform wunderkid that the submitter implies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Try Moonlight.Well , I just went &amp; downloaded the Moonlight 3 preview for linux &amp; it does n't work well enough with Photosynth for it to really be usable.Not that flash is exactly the cross-platform wunderkid that the submitter implies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try Moonlight.Well, I just went &amp; downloaded the Moonlight 3 preview for linux &amp; it doesn't work well enough with Photosynth for it to really be usable.Not that flash is exactly the cross-platform wunderkid that the submitter implies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310940</id>
	<title>Your Facts Are Getting in the Way of His Agenda</title>
	<author>RobotRunAmok</author>
	<datestamp>1267368180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Note to Slashdot Editors:  Apps that avoid the use of Flash are Less Evil than Apps which do not run in Linux.</p><p>And please, if you're ever unclear on any of this Good/Evil stuff, don't hesitate to ask me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Note to Slashdot Editors : Apps that avoid the use of Flash are Less Evil than Apps which do not run in Linux.And please , if you 're ever unclear on any of this Good/Evil stuff , do n't hesitate to ask me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Note to Slashdot Editors:  Apps that avoid the use of Flash are Less Evil than Apps which do not run in Linux.And please, if you're ever unclear on any of this Good/Evil stuff, don't hesitate to ask me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31312298</id>
	<title>Re:Bing's 15 minutes of fame gone...</title>
	<author>coaxial</author>
	<datestamp>1267383300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So long to the Bing hype done at TED this yearl.</p></div><p>So the headline is "Google plays catchup to Bing"?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So long to the Bing hype done at TED this yearl.So the headline is " Google plays catchup to Bing " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So long to the Bing hype done at TED this yearl.So the headline is "Google plays catchup to Bing"?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31312372</id>
	<title>Why the Java hate?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267384140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why not do this as an Applet, not Flash.... After all, Java is FOSS, and works on all platforms. Applets launch fast, (unless they have megabytes of Jars to load, though this problem is not just with Java).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not do this as an Applet , not Flash.... After all , Java is FOSS , and works on all platforms .
Applets launch fast , ( unless they have megabytes of Jars to load , though this problem is not just with Java ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not do this as an Applet, not Flash.... After all, Java is FOSS, and works on all platforms.
Applets launch fast, (unless they have megabytes of Jars to load, though this problem is not just with Java).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_28_2050241_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310836
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_28_2050241_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_28_2050241_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31314344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31312058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_28_2050241_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31313156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311150
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_28_2050241_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31314978
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_28_2050241_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311308
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_28_2050241_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31315764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_28_2050241_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31312298
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_28_2050241_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31315084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_28_2050241_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_28_2050241_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310874
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_28_2050241_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31312074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311150
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_28_2050241_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310864
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_28_2050241_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_28_2050241_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31312510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_28_2050241_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31318602
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31312058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_28_2050241_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31312844
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_28_2050241_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_28_2050241_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31316054
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_28_2050241_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31320502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_28_2050241_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_28_2050241_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_28_2050241_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311104
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_28_2050241_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31322550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_28_2050241_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31321534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31312372
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_28_2050241_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310864
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_28_2050241.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31312372
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31321534
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_28_2050241.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310798
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31312844
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310964
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31320502
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31322550
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310866
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310940
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31316054
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31315764
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310858
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31312058
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31314344
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31318602
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311104
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311618
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_28_2050241.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310894
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31315084
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_28_2050241.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310874
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311384
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_28_2050241.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310916
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311800
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311848
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311318
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31312510
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31312298
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_28_2050241.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311840
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_28_2050241.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311150
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31313156
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31312074
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_28_2050241.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311388
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_28_2050241.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310864
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310900
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310902
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_28_2050241.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310836
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311346
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_28_2050241.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31310958
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31314978
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_28_2050241.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_28_2050241.31311250
</commentlist>
</conversation>
