<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_26_1717254</id>
	<title>Losing Google Would Hit Chinese Science Hard</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1267210440000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes to share recent statements by Chinese scientists that indicate troubled waters ahead if Google were to pull out of China.  <i>"More than three-quarters of scientists in China use the search engine <a href="http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/20100224/losing-google-would-hit-chinese-science-hard.htm">Google as a primary research tool</a> and say their work would be significantly hampered if they were to lose it, a survey showed on Wednesday. In the survey, 84 percent said losing Google would 'somewhat or significantly' hamper their research and 78 percent said international collaborations would be affected. 'Research without Google would be like life without electricity,' one Chinese scientist said in the survey, which asked more than 700 scientists for their views."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes to share recent statements by Chinese scientists that indicate troubled waters ahead if Google were to pull out of China .
" More than three-quarters of scientists in China use the search engine Google as a primary research tool and say their work would be significantly hampered if they were to lose it , a survey showed on Wednesday .
In the survey , 84 percent said losing Google would 'somewhat or significantly ' hamper their research and 78 percent said international collaborations would be affected .
'Research without Google would be like life without electricity, ' one Chinese scientist said in the survey , which asked more than 700 scientists for their views .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes to share recent statements by Chinese scientists that indicate troubled waters ahead if Google were to pull out of China.
"More than three-quarters of scientists in China use the search engine Google as a primary research tool and say their work would be significantly hampered if they were to lose it, a survey showed on Wednesday.
In the survey, 84 percent said losing Google would 'somewhat or significantly' hamper their research and 78 percent said international collaborations would be affected.
'Research without Google would be like life without electricity,' one Chinese scientist said in the survey, which asked more than 700 scientists for their views.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289014</id>
	<title>Being IN China necessary?</title>
	<author>icebike</author>
	<datestamp>1267214640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why would Google have to be IN China for the "scientists" to use it as a search engine?</p><p>Just because Google has no offices or data centers in China would not mean it would be unavailable there.</p><p>Censored perhaps, but how difficult would it be for "Scientists" to get around that, or be exempted from it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why would Google have to be IN China for the " scientists " to use it as a search engine ? Just because Google has no offices or data centers in China would not mean it would be unavailable there.Censored perhaps , but how difficult would it be for " Scientists " to get around that , or be exempted from it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why would Google have to be IN China for the "scientists" to use it as a search engine?Just because Google has no offices or data centers in China would not mean it would be unavailable there.Censored perhaps, but how difficult would it be for "Scientists" to get around that, or be exempted from it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289854</id>
	<title>Re:"I hope you have the time of your life"- Green</title>
	<author>Tubal-Cain</author>
	<datestamp>1267175160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>If they don't want to hire citizens here, they can incorporate somewhere else.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If they do n't want to hire citizens here , they can incorporate somewhere else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they don't want to hire citizens here, they can incorporate somewhere else.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289344</id>
	<title>I did not know ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267215900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... that Google indexed the world's corporate and trade secrets.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... that Google indexed the world 's corporate and trade secrets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... that Google indexed the world's corporate and trade secrets.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31291404</id>
	<title>Re:Being IN China necessary?</title>
	<author>microbee</author>
	<datestamp>1267183020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh yeah, we all know every scientist must also be a computer guru.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh yeah , we all know every scientist must also be a computer guru .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh yeah, we all know every scientist must also be a computer guru.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289014</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31290592</id>
	<title>Re:Google Scholar</title>
	<author>steelfood</author>
	<datestamp>1267178640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>there are no alternatives at all.</p></div><p>Does Google somehow have a monopoly on this information? I find it hard to believe that nobody else has done it. Unless Google Scholar is Good Enough (tm) that nobody else is going to bother.</p><p>But then, if Google can do it, I fail to see how anybody else cannot do it. In that case, then Google pulling out of China would only be bad for science until a competing service appears.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>there are no alternatives at all.Does Google somehow have a monopoly on this information ?
I find it hard to believe that nobody else has done it .
Unless Google Scholar is Good Enough ( tm ) that nobody else is going to bother.But then , if Google can do it , I fail to see how anybody else can not do it .
In that case , then Google pulling out of China would only be bad for science until a competing service appears .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>there are no alternatives at all.Does Google somehow have a monopoly on this information?
I find it hard to believe that nobody else has done it.
Unless Google Scholar is Good Enough (tm) that nobody else is going to bother.But then, if Google can do it, I fail to see how anybody else cannot do it.
In that case, then Google pulling out of China would only be bad for science until a competing service appears.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289256</id>
	<title>Re:What about Baidu?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267215480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Basically this is about Google Scholar. (http://scholar.google.com)  Ars Technica did a writeup on this a few days ago.  To quote a snippet from them:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>There are a number of reasons for the scientists' attachment to Google. Although Baidu has done well by tailoring its search service to the sites frequented by the Chinese public, science has remained a field where most of the top research takes place in English. As such, Google's massive index of English-language material, especially works that have found their way into Google Scholar, provide the company's search offerings with distinct advantages. In fact, Google Search and Scholar were the services most often used by the respondents (Maps and Mail were also heavily used).</p> </div><p>http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2010/02/chinese-scientists-worry-about-google-pullout.ars</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Basically this is about Google Scholar .
( http : //scholar.google.com ) Ars Technica did a writeup on this a few days ago .
To quote a snippet from them : There are a number of reasons for the scientists ' attachment to Google .
Although Baidu has done well by tailoring its search service to the sites frequented by the Chinese public , science has remained a field where most of the top research takes place in English .
As such , Google 's massive index of English-language material , especially works that have found their way into Google Scholar , provide the company 's search offerings with distinct advantages .
In fact , Google Search and Scholar were the services most often used by the respondents ( Maps and Mail were also heavily used ) .
http : //arstechnica.com/science/news/2010/02/chinese-scientists-worry-about-google-pullout.ars</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Basically this is about Google Scholar.
(http://scholar.google.com)  Ars Technica did a writeup on this a few days ago.
To quote a snippet from them:There are a number of reasons for the scientists' attachment to Google.
Although Baidu has done well by tailoring its search service to the sites frequented by the Chinese public, science has remained a field where most of the top research takes place in English.
As such, Google's massive index of English-language material, especially works that have found their way into Google Scholar, provide the company's search offerings with distinct advantages.
In fact, Google Search and Scholar were the services most often used by the respondents (Maps and Mail were also heavily used).
http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2010/02/chinese-scientists-worry-about-google-pullout.ars
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31290836</id>
	<title>"Research"?</title>
	<author>CAIMLAS</author>
	<datestamp>1267179780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Chinese "research", eh?</p><p>I wonder how much of that research is "find places to steal information from and use it". Seems we've had a fair number of news articles lately about Chinese espionage, and it doesn't take much imagination to see that a lot of the "new" things from China are actually reverse engineered Western items.</p><p>Without effective search, I suspect all the shops in China making Apple product knockoffs would be hard pressed to bring products to market. Likewise for many other industries.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Chinese " research " , eh ? I wonder how much of that research is " find places to steal information from and use it " .
Seems we 've had a fair number of news articles lately about Chinese espionage , and it does n't take much imagination to see that a lot of the " new " things from China are actually reverse engineered Western items.Without effective search , I suspect all the shops in China making Apple product knockoffs would be hard pressed to bring products to market .
Likewise for many other industries .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chinese "research", eh?I wonder how much of that research is "find places to steal information from and use it".
Seems we've had a fair number of news articles lately about Chinese espionage, and it doesn't take much imagination to see that a lot of the "new" things from China are actually reverse engineered Western items.Without effective search, I suspect all the shops in China making Apple product knockoffs would be hard pressed to bring products to market.
Likewise for many other industries.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289396</id>
	<title>Re:What about Baidu?</title>
	<author>jank1887</author>
	<datestamp>1267216080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since these are scientists, I assume that Google Scholar is the thing they'd miss most. Before, you had to subscribe to indexing services (Ovid, Web of Science, etc.) to get access to searchable abstracts, reference spidering, etc. Then, you'd find the article of interest and go to the publisher site to see your options for obtaining the article. Now, I can Google Scholar &gt;95\% of the technical literature I'm interested in, I'm shown the multiple versions of a file, some of which might be available for free, I can search a very broad range of topics through a single portal, and it'll take me to the publisher site if that's what's needed.</p><p>Can't beat it. Nobody else has anything close for free.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since these are scientists , I assume that Google Scholar is the thing they 'd miss most .
Before , you had to subscribe to indexing services ( Ovid , Web of Science , etc .
) to get access to searchable abstracts , reference spidering , etc .
Then , you 'd find the article of interest and go to the publisher site to see your options for obtaining the article .
Now , I can Google Scholar &gt; 95 \ % of the technical literature I 'm interested in , I 'm shown the multiple versions of a file , some of which might be available for free , I can search a very broad range of topics through a single portal , and it 'll take me to the publisher site if that 's what 's needed.Ca n't beat it .
Nobody else has anything close for free .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since these are scientists, I assume that Google Scholar is the thing they'd miss most.
Before, you had to subscribe to indexing services (Ovid, Web of Science, etc.
) to get access to searchable abstracts, reference spidering, etc.
Then, you'd find the article of interest and go to the publisher site to see your options for obtaining the article.
Now, I can Google Scholar &gt;95\% of the technical literature I'm interested in, I'm shown the multiple versions of a file, some of which might be available for free, I can search a very broad range of topics through a single portal, and it'll take me to the publisher site if that's what's needed.Can't beat it.
Nobody else has anything close for free.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289372</id>
	<title>Re:Google Scholar</title>
	<author>routerl</author>
	<datestamp>1267215960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Google Scholar is the most comprehensive index of scholarly articles in the world, period. Not only are there no free alternatives, there are no alternatives at all. There are services like JSTOR, which only index a limited number of journals from specific services, but nothing that compares to the completeness of Google Scholar (AFAIK).

The only real alternative to Scholar is going to individual sites of individual journals and searching for what you're looking for dozens of times in different places. This quickly becomes a day-long project, compared to a 2 minute search.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google Scholar is the most comprehensive index of scholarly articles in the world , period .
Not only are there no free alternatives , there are no alternatives at all .
There are services like JSTOR , which only index a limited number of journals from specific services , but nothing that compares to the completeness of Google Scholar ( AFAIK ) .
The only real alternative to Scholar is going to individual sites of individual journals and searching for what you 're looking for dozens of times in different places .
This quickly becomes a day-long project , compared to a 2 minute search .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google Scholar is the most comprehensive index of scholarly articles in the world, period.
Not only are there no free alternatives, there are no alternatives at all.
There are services like JSTOR, which only index a limited number of journals from specific services, but nothing that compares to the completeness of Google Scholar (AFAIK).
The only real alternative to Scholar is going to individual sites of individual journals and searching for what you're looking for dozens of times in different places.
This quickly becomes a day-long project, compared to a 2 minute search.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31295882</id>
	<title>Re:Survey says....</title>
	<author>FreakyGreenLeaky</author>
	<datestamp>1267271040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just maybe we're seeing some of the fruits of engaging with China.  They're getting used to eating the democratic fruits and learning that it's real hard doing without it.</p><p>Google leaving China would be a bad thing for the rest of us, not only China.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just maybe we 're seeing some of the fruits of engaging with China .
They 're getting used to eating the democratic fruits and learning that it 's real hard doing without it.Google leaving China would be a bad thing for the rest of us , not only China .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just maybe we're seeing some of the fruits of engaging with China.
They're getting used to eating the democratic fruits and learning that it's real hard doing without it.Google leaving China would be a bad thing for the rest of us, not only China.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31291048</id>
	<title>Re:Survey says....</title>
	<author>Venik</author>
	<datestamp>1267180980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nevermind the "voting" thing. Without Google China may find itself without scientists. Just as India without Google may find itself out of IT specialists.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nevermind the " voting " thing .
Without Google China may find itself without scientists .
Just as India without Google may find itself out of IT specialists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nevermind the "voting" thing.
Without Google China may find itself without scientists.
Just as India without Google may find itself out of IT specialists.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31294446</id>
	<title>You would think</title>
	<author>wisnoskij</author>
	<datestamp>1267203720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You would think that if you were a real scientist researching real things you would be reading scientific journals and not searching the web for random web pages.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You would think that if you were a real scientist researching real things you would be reading scientific journals and not searching the web for random web pages .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You would think that if you were a real scientist researching real things you would be reading scientific journals and not searching the web for random web pages.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31290042</id>
	<title>Progress capsule</title>
	<author>rossdee</author>
	<datestamp>1267176180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"who on Earth will be making any progress?"</p><p>The Russians. How else are they going to keep the ISS supplied.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" who on Earth will be making any progress ?
" The Russians .
How else are they going to keep the ISS supplied .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"who on Earth will be making any progress?
"The Russians.
How else are they going to keep the ISS supplied.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289812</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288940</id>
	<title>So, what they're saying is...</title>
	<author>bsDaemon</author>
	<datestamp>1267214400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, how long, then, until we see the govt "encouraging" Google to get out of China for national security reasons?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , how long , then , until we see the govt " encouraging " Google to get out of China for national security reasons ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, how long, then, until we see the govt "encouraging" Google to get out of China for national security reasons?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289036</id>
	<title>Material Support</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267214700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yay for trade with China, keeps our relationship stable.  But, why oh why do we need to supply material support beyond the bare minimum to our ideological enemy??</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yay for trade with China , keeps our relationship stable .
But , why oh why do we need to supply material support beyond the bare minimum to our ideological enemy ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yay for trade with China, keeps our relationship stable.
But, why oh why do we need to supply material support beyond the bare minimum to our ideological enemy?
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289198</id>
	<title>Re:"I hope you have the time of your life"- Green</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267215240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would to stop it here as well. One less crap on the internet spoofing on what we do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would to stop it here as well .
One less crap on the internet spoofing on what we do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would to stop it here as well.
One less crap on the internet spoofing on what we do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288976</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31295834</id>
	<title>Hit hard? Not really.</title>
	<author>jandersen</author>
	<datestamp>1267269780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can think of another explanation for why "most scientists in China use Google": if you type some words into the search bar, most browsers will go and search for those words on some search engine - which just happened to default to Google, at least until fairly recently. And if you don't mind, you are not going to change. Another things is - just because they asked a number of scientists which search engine they tend to use, it doesn't mean that they use that one for finding information critical to their research.</p><p>It would be a sad state of affairs if scientists were truly hampered in their research by not having access to Google, considering the general quality of the results returned by most search engines. Fortunately, if you are a scientist, the things you work with are more readily available from other, more reliable sources.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can think of another explanation for why " most scientists in China use Google " : if you type some words into the search bar , most browsers will go and search for those words on some search engine - which just happened to default to Google , at least until fairly recently .
And if you do n't mind , you are not going to change .
Another things is - just because they asked a number of scientists which search engine they tend to use , it does n't mean that they use that one for finding information critical to their research.It would be a sad state of affairs if scientists were truly hampered in their research by not having access to Google , considering the general quality of the results returned by most search engines .
Fortunately , if you are a scientist , the things you work with are more readily available from other , more reliable sources .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can think of another explanation for why "most scientists in China use Google": if you type some words into the search bar, most browsers will go and search for those words on some search engine - which just happened to default to Google, at least until fairly recently.
And if you don't mind, you are not going to change.
Another things is - just because they asked a number of scientists which search engine they tend to use, it doesn't mean that they use that one for finding information critical to their research.It would be a sad state of affairs if scientists were truly hampered in their research by not having access to Google, considering the general quality of the results returned by most search engines.
Fortunately, if you are a scientist, the things you work with are more readily available from other, more reliable sources.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288962</id>
	<title>The way the Chinese government operates...</title>
	<author>Wyatt Earp</author>
	<datestamp>1267214460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then I support Google leaving China.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then I support Google leaving China .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then I support Google leaving China.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288976</id>
	<title>Re:"I hope you have the time of your life"- Green</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267214520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, who wants to start up a fundraiser to pay Google to shut down operations in China?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , who wants to start up a fundraiser to pay Google to shut down operations in China ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, who wants to start up a fundraiser to pay Google to shut down operations in China?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289838</id>
	<title>Re:so sad</title>
	<author>morgauxo</author>
	<datestamp>1267175040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't they already have the good ones?  It's not like the US will be producing any more for a while...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't they already have the good ones ?
It 's not like the US will be producing any more for a while.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't they already have the good ones?
It's not like the US will be producing any more for a while...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289714</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31290970</id>
	<title>Re:Google Scholar</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267180500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The only real alternative to Scholar is going to individual sites of individual journals and searching for what you're looking for dozens of times in different places. This quickly becomes a day-long project, compared to a 2 minute search.</p></div></blockquote><p>Or worse. When I was office-bitch for an environmental consulting firm around '85, every other day was a trip into town with a bag of coins to xerox requested papers at various university libraries. Searches were largely based on the citations within papers, so our scientists could easily spend a week or more just getting to the papers they needed. (The rest of my time was spent sorting the in-house library, or driving to out-of-town universities for other papers.)</p><p>Even if Chinese scientists have<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/full/ access to the rest of the net other than Google, I can see why one said the loss would be like living without electricity. The time it takes to do what were trivial things just explodes. And since extra-national scientist don't have that restriction, you might as well just import your science, because yours cannot keep up.</p><p>This is an important survey. It underlines and illustrates the core relationship between science and freedom of information, something which is only a theoretical idea to people who are not scientists (and have a pretty dubious concept of "theory" in the first place). It's a wake-up call for both inside and outside China.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The only real alternative to Scholar is going to individual sites of individual journals and searching for what you 're looking for dozens of times in different places .
This quickly becomes a day-long project , compared to a 2 minute search.Or worse .
When I was office-bitch for an environmental consulting firm around '85 , every other day was a trip into town with a bag of coins to xerox requested papers at various university libraries .
Searches were largely based on the citations within papers , so our scientists could easily spend a week or more just getting to the papers they needed .
( The rest of my time was spent sorting the in-house library , or driving to out-of-town universities for other papers .
) Even if Chinese scientists have /full/ access to the rest of the net other than Google , I can see why one said the loss would be like living without electricity .
The time it takes to do what were trivial things just explodes .
And since extra-national scientist do n't have that restriction , you might as well just import your science , because yours can not keep up.This is an important survey .
It underlines and illustrates the core relationship between science and freedom of information , something which is only a theoretical idea to people who are not scientists ( and have a pretty dubious concept of " theory " in the first place ) .
It 's a wake-up call for both inside and outside China .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only real alternative to Scholar is going to individual sites of individual journals and searching for what you're looking for dozens of times in different places.
This quickly becomes a day-long project, compared to a 2 minute search.Or worse.
When I was office-bitch for an environmental consulting firm around '85, every other day was a trip into town with a bag of coins to xerox requested papers at various university libraries.
Searches were largely based on the citations within papers, so our scientists could easily spend a week or more just getting to the papers they needed.
(The rest of my time was spent sorting the in-house library, or driving to out-of-town universities for other papers.
)Even if Chinese scientists have /full/ access to the rest of the net other than Google, I can see why one said the loss would be like living without electricity.
The time it takes to do what were trivial things just explodes.
And since extra-national scientist don't have that restriction, you might as well just import your science, because yours cannot keep up.This is an important survey.
It underlines and illustrates the core relationship between science and freedom of information, something which is only a theoretical idea to people who are not scientists (and have a pretty dubious concept of "theory" in the first place).
It's a wake-up call for both inside and outside China.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31290522</id>
	<title>Re:Survey says....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267178280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It doesn't work that way. If it helps the Chinese dictators, they're for it even if it resembles democracy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It does n't work that way .
If it helps the Chinese dictators , they 're for it even if it resembles democracy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It doesn't work that way.
If it helps the Chinese dictators, they're for it even if it resembles democracy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31290602</id>
	<title>Control vs. Information</title>
	<author>Mongoose Disciple</author>
	<datestamp>1267178700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Back in '96 I took a social psych class.  If you're not familiar, the one sentence reductionist oversimplified explanation of the core theories of social psych is that people are influenced by the talk around them.</p><p>One of the (somewhat prophetic?) things I remember my professor talking about was the struggle between freedom of information and scholarship in China.  In his view, China either had to choose to shut out internet access to the rest of the world (in which case their scholars would be significantly handicapped relative to everyone else) or allow it (in which case the Chinese people would become more influenced by the ideas of the rest of the world than they had been in the recent past.)  The Great Firewall of China being something of a halfway measure that either didn't exist in those days or we didn't know about.</p><p>Along similar lines, he liked to say that a decent number of students had come from China to study at our school of Engineering, and that despite anyone's best efforts to focus them on purely scholastic matters, they would go home forever changed by having lived in a country with Steak and Shake.</p><p>It's interesting to see this tension at work still as there's talk of Google pulling out of China.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Back in '96 I took a social psych class .
If you 're not familiar , the one sentence reductionist oversimplified explanation of the core theories of social psych is that people are influenced by the talk around them.One of the ( somewhat prophetic ?
) things I remember my professor talking about was the struggle between freedom of information and scholarship in China .
In his view , China either had to choose to shut out internet access to the rest of the world ( in which case their scholars would be significantly handicapped relative to everyone else ) or allow it ( in which case the Chinese people would become more influenced by the ideas of the rest of the world than they had been in the recent past .
) The Great Firewall of China being something of a halfway measure that either did n't exist in those days or we did n't know about.Along similar lines , he liked to say that a decent number of students had come from China to study at our school of Engineering , and that despite anyone 's best efforts to focus them on purely scholastic matters , they would go home forever changed by having lived in a country with Steak and Shake.It 's interesting to see this tension at work still as there 's talk of Google pulling out of China .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Back in '96 I took a social psych class.
If you're not familiar, the one sentence reductionist oversimplified explanation of the core theories of social psych is that people are influenced by the talk around them.One of the (somewhat prophetic?
) things I remember my professor talking about was the struggle between freedom of information and scholarship in China.
In his view, China either had to choose to shut out internet access to the rest of the world (in which case their scholars would be significantly handicapped relative to everyone else) or allow it (in which case the Chinese people would become more influenced by the ideas of the rest of the world than they had been in the recent past.
)  The Great Firewall of China being something of a halfway measure that either didn't exist in those days or we didn't know about.Along similar lines, he liked to say that a decent number of students had come from China to study at our school of Engineering, and that despite anyone's best efforts to focus them on purely scholastic matters, they would go home forever changed by having lived in a country with Steak and Shake.It's interesting to see this tension at work still as there's talk of Google pulling out of China.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289814</id>
	<title>Re:So, what they're saying is...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267174980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, but at least their government is taking bribes, bailouts and all sorts of debt for quick cash for the selected Obama worshipers.  Lets face it, their government is doing a better job for MOST of their people and not pandering.  Refreshing actually.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , but at least their government is taking bribes , bailouts and all sorts of debt for quick cash for the selected Obama worshipers .
Lets face it , their government is doing a better job for MOST of their people and not pandering .
Refreshing actually .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, but at least their government is taking bribes, bailouts and all sorts of debt for quick cash for the selected Obama worshipers.
Lets face it, their government is doing a better job for MOST of their people and not pandering.
Refreshing actually.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289346</id>
	<title>Re:"I hope you have the time of your life"- Green</title>
	<author>WrongSizeGlass</author>
	<datestamp>1267215900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Homer: If I want lead in my toys I'll add it myself, thank you very much.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Homer : If I want lead in my toys I 'll add it myself , thank you very much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Homer: If I want lead in my toys I'll add it myself, thank you very much.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31295366</id>
	<title>As a graduate in China,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267303320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't actually care about whether google.cn is available or not as long as google.com works.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't actually care about whether google.cn is available or not as long as google.com works .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't actually care about whether google.cn is available or not as long as google.com works.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289796</id>
	<title>Re:What about Baidu?</title>
	<author>Alinabi</author>
	<datestamp>1267174920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes. It's called <a href="http://www.google.com/scholar" title="google.com">Google Scholar</a> [google.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes .
It 's called Google Scholar [ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes.
It's called Google Scholar [google.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289594</id>
	<title>Reverse Engineering</title>
	<author>AP31R0N</author>
	<datestamp>1267217100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Losing Google Would Hit Chinese Reverse Engineering Hard</p><p>FTfY</p><p>Funny thing: our schools are packed with Chinese students and profs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Losing Google Would Hit Chinese Reverse Engineering HardFTfYFunny thing : our schools are packed with Chinese students and profs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Losing Google Would Hit Chinese Reverse Engineering HardFTfYFunny thing: our schools are packed with Chinese students and profs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31291314</id>
	<title>Who uses google scholar for serious research?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267182360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I always use isiknowledge.com, which isn't free but my university has a subscription. Scholar is quiet limited in filtering search results imho compared to isi, for example afaik you can't filter for type (review, opinion, article) and you don't have a list of publishers you can use to refine search results. And you can't even sort by publication date or number of citations.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I always use isiknowledge.com , which is n't free but my university has a subscription .
Scholar is quiet limited in filtering search results imho compared to isi , for example afaik you ca n't filter for type ( review , opinion , article ) and you do n't have a list of publishers you can use to refine search results .
And you ca n't even sort by publication date or number of citations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always use isiknowledge.com, which isn't free but my university has a subscription.
Scholar is quiet limited in filtering search results imho compared to isi, for example afaik you can't filter for type (review, opinion, article) and you don't have a list of publishers you can use to refine search results.
And you can't even sort by publication date or number of citations.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289260</id>
	<title>Switch to Bing?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267215480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Couldn't the scientists just switch to bing? It's rising in popularity..<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Could n't the scientists just switch to bing ?
It 's rising in popularity.. : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Couldn't the scientists just switch to bing?
It's rising in popularity.. :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288916</id>
	<title>Survey says....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267214280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's going on when somebody in China is allowed to ask 700 people of any kind about any political issue? Isn't that close to that "voting" thing their leaders are afraid of?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's going on when somebody in China is allowed to ask 700 people of any kind about any political issue ?
Is n't that close to that " voting " thing their leaders are afraid of ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's going on when somebody in China is allowed to ask 700 people of any kind about any political issue?
Isn't that close to that "voting" thing their leaders are afraid of?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289010</id>
	<title>Google Scholar</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267214640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My initial reaction to this was "what, they don't have other search engines on the Internet?" I mean, I use Google myself, and I'm quite happy with it, but if it disappeared tomorrow I'd just start using something else.</p><p>Then I (gasp!) read TFA, which I know many (most?) of you won't do, so I'll fill you in on the part that the summary missed. The issue here isn't so much that they fear losing Google, but that they fear losing Google Scholar, which, as far as I can tell (although I've never used it), has no free (as in beer) alternatives.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My initial reaction to this was " what , they do n't have other search engines on the Internet ?
" I mean , I use Google myself , and I 'm quite happy with it , but if it disappeared tomorrow I 'd just start using something else.Then I ( gasp !
) read TFA , which I know many ( most ?
) of you wo n't do , so I 'll fill you in on the part that the summary missed .
The issue here is n't so much that they fear losing Google , but that they fear losing Google Scholar , which , as far as I can tell ( although I 've never used it ) , has no free ( as in beer ) alternatives .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My initial reaction to this was "what, they don't have other search engines on the Internet?
" I mean, I use Google myself, and I'm quite happy with it, but if it disappeared tomorrow I'd just start using something else.Then I (gasp!
) read TFA, which I know many (most?
) of you won't do, so I'll fill you in on the part that the summary missed.
The issue here isn't so much that they fear losing Google, but that they fear losing Google Scholar, which, as far as I can tell (although I've never used it), has no free (as in beer) alternatives.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289682</id>
	<title>Re:Life without electricity!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267217520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Knife without a spoon!</i><br>Good for carving wooden statues</p><p><i>Velcro without laces!</i><br>My shoes have velcro, but no laces.</p><p><i>TV without a remote!</i><br>Watched TV without a remote for over 30 years, you lazy little slacker.</p><p><i>Paper without a pencil!</i><br>A magazine</p><p><i>PC without Windows!</i><br>Linux.</p><p><i>Avocado without a pit!</i><br>The best kind.</p><p><i>Keyboard without a PS/2 adapter!</i><br>PS2 adaptors are relatively new. The keyboard connector on my old IBM XT looked like a part from a Mac Truck. Newer ones were smaller.</p><p><i>Jacket without a tie!</i><br>The necktie is Satan's leash. My jackets are all blue denim. Sheesh, you kids today.</p><p><i>Slashdot without really great posts!</i><br>Slashdot with really bad mods. Your post wasn't offtopic, but it wasn't particularly informative, insightful, or funny, either. I'd have modded you overrated.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Knife without a spoon ! Good for carving wooden statuesVelcro without laces ! My shoes have velcro , but no laces.TV without a remote ! Watched TV without a remote for over 30 years , you lazy little slacker.Paper without a pencil ! A magazinePC without Windows ! Linux.Avocado without a pit ! The best kind.Keyboard without a PS/2 adapter ! PS2 adaptors are relatively new .
The keyboard connector on my old IBM XT looked like a part from a Mac Truck .
Newer ones were smaller.Jacket without a tie ! The necktie is Satan 's leash .
My jackets are all blue denim .
Sheesh , you kids today.Slashdot without really great posts ! Slashdot with really bad mods .
Your post was n't offtopic , but it was n't particularly informative , insightful , or funny , either .
I 'd have modded you overrated .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Knife without a spoon!Good for carving wooden statuesVelcro without laces!My shoes have velcro, but no laces.TV without a remote!Watched TV without a remote for over 30 years, you lazy little slacker.Paper without a pencil!A magazinePC without Windows!Linux.Avocado without a pit!The best kind.Keyboard without a PS/2 adapter!PS2 adaptors are relatively new.
The keyboard connector on my old IBM XT looked like a part from a Mac Truck.
Newer ones were smaller.Jacket without a tie!The necktie is Satan's leash.
My jackets are all blue denim.
Sheesh, you kids today.Slashdot without really great posts!Slashdot with really bad mods.
Your post wasn't offtopic, but it wasn't particularly informative, insightful, or funny, either.
I'd have modded you overrated.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288936</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31293710</id>
	<title>Really?</title>
	<author>v(*\_*)vvvv</author>
	<datestamp>1267196700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I bet at least half the people interpreted this question as being about "research without search", and not specifically "without google". That is what the answers suggest. You might lose coke/sprite, but if you still have pepsi/7up life can go on pretty much unhampered.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I bet at least half the people interpreted this question as being about " research without search " , and not specifically " without google " .
That is what the answers suggest .
You might lose coke/sprite , but if you still have pepsi/7up life can go on pretty much unhampered .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bet at least half the people interpreted this question as being about "research without search", and not specifically "without google".
That is what the answers suggest.
You might lose coke/sprite, but if you still have pepsi/7up life can go on pretty much unhampered.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289308</id>
	<title>Re:"I hope you have the time of your life"- Green</title>
	<author>jank1887</author>
	<datestamp>1267215780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>no, we're allowed to demand a higher salary while we're at it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>no , we 're allowed to demand a higher salary while we 're at it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>no, we're allowed to demand a higher salary while we're at it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31291144</id>
	<title>GOOD</title>
	<author>Favonius Cornelius</author>
	<datestamp>1267181460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>They've been stealing our tech for so long, they deserve it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 've been stealing our tech for so long , they deserve it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They've been stealing our tech for so long, they deserve it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289812</id>
	<title>Then who...</title>
	<author>morgauxo</author>
	<datestamp>1267174980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now that the US has given up trying to be a leader, if we hamper China's efforts then who on Earth will be making any progress?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now that the US has given up trying to be a leader , if we hamper China 's efforts then who on Earth will be making any progress ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now that the US has given up trying to be a leader, if we hamper China's efforts then who on Earth will be making any progress?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31296106</id>
	<title>oh dear how sad never mind</title>
	<author>mjwalshe</author>
	<datestamp>1267276680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>as Sergeant Major "Shut Up" Williams would have said -)</htmltext>
<tokenext>as Sergeant Major " Shut Up " Williams would have said - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>as Sergeant Major "Shut Up" Williams would have said -)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289916</id>
	<title>Re:Survey says....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267175580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not looking at the journal article, most likely they asked Chinese professors.  If you're a professor in China, you're a Party member--exceptions are that few.  If you are a corporate scientist in China either you're a Party member or you have the patronage and protection of somebody of importance in the Party.  So they're getting the opinion of one faction within the Party not a bunch of average citizens.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not looking at the journal article , most likely they asked Chinese professors .
If you 're a professor in China , you 're a Party member--exceptions are that few .
If you are a corporate scientist in China either you 're a Party member or you have the patronage and protection of somebody of importance in the Party .
So they 're getting the opinion of one faction within the Party not a bunch of average citizens .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not looking at the journal article, most likely they asked Chinese professors.
If you're a professor in China, you're a Party member--exceptions are that few.
If you are a corporate scientist in China either you're a Party member or you have the patronage and protection of somebody of importance in the Party.
So they're getting the opinion of one faction within the Party not a bunch of average citizens.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288866</id>
	<title>"I hope you have the time of your life"- Green Day</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267214100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With all of the "free trade" efforts leading to "We'll take your jobs, thanks," maybe this is something we should inflict on China.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With all of the " free trade " efforts leading to " We 'll take your jobs , thanks , " maybe this is something we should inflict on China .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With all of the "free trade" efforts leading to "We'll take your jobs, thanks," maybe this is something we should inflict on China.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31291466</id>
	<title>If we really want to slow China's economy--</title>
	<author>straponego</author>
	<datestamp>1267183380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>--we should buy them a million Exchange licenses.  Even at full retail cost it'd be a huge win for the US.  OTOH, this might violate the Geneva Conventions.  Better get Yoo to write another memo.</htmltext>
<tokenext>--we should buy them a million Exchange licenses .
Even at full retail cost it 'd be a huge win for the US .
OTOH , this might violate the Geneva Conventions .
Better get Yoo to write another memo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>--we should buy them a million Exchange licenses.
Even at full retail cost it'd be a huge win for the US.
OTOH, this might violate the Geneva Conventions.
Better get Yoo to write another memo.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288976</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288982</id>
	<title>What about Baidu?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267214520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was under the impression that Baidu had significantly more market share already.  Is there something that Google does particularly well for research that Baidu doesn't?  Is it something Baidu would find difficult to replicate?</p><p>TFA doesn't even mention Baidu, though the first comment declares it "pretty lame" (with no support that assertion).</p><p>Google is a remarkable company and a remarkable search engine, but it shouldn't be that hard for other engines to provide at least a facsimile of what it does in the search area.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was under the impression that Baidu had significantly more market share already .
Is there something that Google does particularly well for research that Baidu does n't ?
Is it something Baidu would find difficult to replicate ? TFA does n't even mention Baidu , though the first comment declares it " pretty lame " ( with no support that assertion ) .Google is a remarkable company and a remarkable search engine , but it should n't be that hard for other engines to provide at least a facsimile of what it does in the search area .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was under the impression that Baidu had significantly more market share already.
Is there something that Google does particularly well for research that Baidu doesn't?
Is it something Baidu would find difficult to replicate?TFA doesn't even mention Baidu, though the first comment declares it "pretty lame" (with no support that assertion).Google is a remarkable company and a remarkable search engine, but it shouldn't be that hard for other engines to provide at least a facsimile of what it does in the search area.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289186</id>
	<title>Re:"I hope you have the time of your life"- Green</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267215240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Right, because as an American you're entitled to a job even if you do it less efficiently than someone else.  Is that about it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Right , because as an American you 're entitled to a job even if you do it less efficiently than someone else .
Is that about it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right, because as an American you're entitled to a job even if you do it less efficiently than someone else.
Is that about it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289116</id>
	<title>... a survey showed.</title>
	<author>jamesl</author>
	<datestamp>1267214880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Link is to an article that does not name who did the "survey." For all we know the whole thing was made up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Link is to an article that does not name who did the " survey .
" For all we know the whole thing was made up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Link is to an article that does not name who did the "survey.
" For all we know the whole thing was made up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289698</id>
	<title>Re:"I hope you have the time of your life"- Green</title>
	<author>G33kDragon</author>
	<datestamp>1267217580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about we also commission Google to shutdown services wherever we feel science and technology growth threatens our national security?</p><p>No more Iranian Google results for "How to build a nuclear bomb"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about we also commission Google to shutdown services wherever we feel science and technology growth threatens our national security ? No more Iranian Google results for " How to build a nuclear bomb "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about we also commission Google to shutdown services wherever we feel science and technology growth threatens our national security?No more Iranian Google results for "How to build a nuclear bomb"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288976</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289674</id>
	<title>Rigged survey</title>
	<author>Capt. Skinny</author>
	<datestamp>1267217520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>More than three-quarters of scientists... say their work would be <b>significantly</b> hampered</p></div><p><div class="quote"><p>84 percent said losing Google would '<b>somewhat</b> or <b>significantly'</b> hamper their research</p></div><p>
Typical example of a survey designed to produce the desired results.
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>More than three-quarters of scientists... say their work would be significantly hampered84 percent said losing Google would 'somewhat or significantly ' hamper their research Typical example of a survey designed to produce the desired results .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More than three-quarters of scientists... say their work would be significantly hampered84 percent said losing Google would 'somewhat or significantly' hamper their research
Typical example of a survey designed to produce the desired results.

	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31291080</id>
	<title>Re:Google Scholar</title>
	<author>introspekt.i</author>
	<datestamp>1267181100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Google Scholar is Good Enough (tm) that nobody else is going to bother.</p></div><p>Nail on the head.<br> <br>It's free, Google benefits from adwords, and Google has done all the footwork to get the material indexed and searchable.  Competitors looking to dupe the service would have to do all the the same steps to only hope to be on par with Google Scholar, which already enjoys a huge following and integration with the rest of the Google suite of search tools.  That's not to say it won't happen, but Joe Scholar will have to jump through some massive hoops to create a free (as in beer) index that is both on par with Google's and somehow turns a profit or is self sustaining.  Wouldn't envy that job, unless of course it's part of some greater "good idea".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google Scholar is Good Enough ( tm ) that nobody else is going to bother.Nail on the head .
It 's free , Google benefits from adwords , and Google has done all the footwork to get the material indexed and searchable .
Competitors looking to dupe the service would have to do all the the same steps to only hope to be on par with Google Scholar , which already enjoys a huge following and integration with the rest of the Google suite of search tools .
That 's not to say it wo n't happen , but Joe Scholar will have to jump through some massive hoops to create a free ( as in beer ) index that is both on par with Google 's and somehow turns a profit or is self sustaining .
Would n't envy that job , unless of course it 's part of some greater " good idea " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google Scholar is Good Enough (tm) that nobody else is going to bother.Nail on the head.
It's free, Google benefits from adwords, and Google has done all the footwork to get the material indexed and searchable.
Competitors looking to dupe the service would have to do all the the same steps to only hope to be on par with Google Scholar, which already enjoys a huge following and integration with the rest of the Google suite of search tools.
That's not to say it won't happen, but Joe Scholar will have to jump through some massive hoops to create a free (as in beer) index that is both on par with Google's and somehow turns a profit or is self sustaining.
Wouldn't envy that job, unless of course it's part of some greater "good idea".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31290592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289208</id>
	<title>Or Bing</title>
	<author>DeadDecoy</author>
	<datestamp>1267215300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm sure MS would be happy the facilitate researcher's needs and soak up some of their intellectual talent. Also, I'm not sure how publications are are provided in China, but in the US there are a number of databases targeted towards a specific scientific domain: ACM, iEEE, Medline, etc. So, instead of doing "google: well known database" one would have to be a little less lazy and go "url: well known database" and search for their topic. <br>
<br>
On the other hand, if these researchers are looking up google translated publications (even with the flaws involved), I can see how that might hurt them significantly. Having access to the world's research would definitely be better than having access to just one country.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure MS would be happy the facilitate researcher 's needs and soak up some of their intellectual talent .
Also , I 'm not sure how publications are are provided in China , but in the US there are a number of databases targeted towards a specific scientific domain : ACM , iEEE , Medline , etc .
So , instead of doing " google : well known database " one would have to be a little less lazy and go " url : well known database " and search for their topic .
On the other hand , if these researchers are looking up google translated publications ( even with the flaws involved ) , I can see how that might hurt them significantly .
Having access to the world 's research would definitely be better than having access to just one country .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure MS would be happy the facilitate researcher's needs and soak up some of their intellectual talent.
Also, I'm not sure how publications are are provided in China, but in the US there are a number of databases targeted towards a specific scientific domain: ACM, iEEE, Medline, etc.
So, instead of doing "google: well known database" one would have to be a little less lazy and go "url: well known database" and search for their topic.
On the other hand, if these researchers are looking up google translated publications (even with the flaws involved), I can see how that might hurt them significantly.
Having access to the world's research would definitely be better than having access to just one country.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289158</id>
	<title>Re:What about Baidu?</title>
	<author>IamTheRealMike</author>
	<datestamp>1267215120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Baidu has reasonable enough results for the Chinese web, but doesn't really search the English web at all. Google.cn does both very well.</p><p>I am guessing their problem is that a lot of the papers they wish to read and general scientific world is based on English. As there aren't any other major search engines in China, having only Baidu would be close to having no search engine at all for people who need to search English documents.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Baidu has reasonable enough results for the Chinese web , but does n't really search the English web at all .
Google.cn does both very well.I am guessing their problem is that a lot of the papers they wish to read and general scientific world is based on English .
As there are n't any other major search engines in China , having only Baidu would be close to having no search engine at all for people who need to search English documents .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Baidu has reasonable enough results for the Chinese web, but doesn't really search the English web at all.
Google.cn does both very well.I am guessing their problem is that a lot of the papers they wish to read and general scientific world is based on English.
As there aren't any other major search engines in China, having only Baidu would be close to having no search engine at all for people who need to search English documents.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289526</id>
	<title>Re:Google Scholar</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267216680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For bio researchers PubMed is far better.<br>If your paper is not here, you don't exist as a researcher in any bio-med field.<br>I'm thinking there should be others for other fields.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For bio researchers PubMed is far better.If your paper is not here , you do n't exist as a researcher in any bio-med field.I 'm thinking there should be others for other fields .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For bio researchers PubMed is far better.If your paper is not here, you don't exist as a researcher in any bio-med field.I'm thinking there should be others for other fields.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289134</id>
	<title>Re:What about Baidu?</title>
	<author>HeckRuler</author>
	<datestamp>1267215000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, I'm pretty sure the alternatives would be picked up pretty quick. It's literally as easy as configuring a button on a browser. At the end of the day, they may have to deal with slightly less refined searches. Oh noes. <br> <br>
For as mighty as a company as Google is, nations and fields of research are not yet dependent on them. If they ever were locked in with google (as they essentially are with Windows), that is the moment I would jump ship and scream for the blood of the googlites.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , I 'm pretty sure the alternatives would be picked up pretty quick .
It 's literally as easy as configuring a button on a browser .
At the end of the day , they may have to deal with slightly less refined searches .
Oh noes .
For as mighty as a company as Google is , nations and fields of research are not yet dependent on them .
If they ever were locked in with google ( as they essentially are with Windows ) , that is the moment I would jump ship and scream for the blood of the googlites .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, I'm pretty sure the alternatives would be picked up pretty quick.
It's literally as easy as configuring a button on a browser.
At the end of the day, they may have to deal with slightly less refined searches.
Oh noes.
For as mighty as a company as Google is, nations and fields of research are not yet dependent on them.
If they ever were locked in with google (as they essentially are with Windows), that is the moment I would jump ship and scream for the blood of the googlites.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288936</id>
	<title>Life without electricity!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267214400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Knife without a spoon! iPhone without a charger!<br>Velcro without laces! TV without a remote!<br>Paper without a pencil! PC without Windows!<br>China without IP violations! Avocado without a pit!<br>CD without R *or* W! Keyboard without a PS/2 adapter!<br>Jacket without a tie! Slashdot without really great posts!</p><p>Get your own, you fucking thieves.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Knife without a spoon !
iPhone without a charger ! Velcro without laces !
TV without a remote ! Paper without a pencil !
PC without Windows ! China without IP violations !
Avocado without a pit ! CD without R * or * W !
Keyboard without a PS/2 adapter ! Jacket without a tie !
Slashdot without really great posts ! Get your own , you fucking thieves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Knife without a spoon!
iPhone without a charger!Velcro without laces!
TV without a remote!Paper without a pencil!
PC without Windows!China without IP violations!
Avocado without a pit!CD without R *or* W!
Keyboard without a PS/2 adapter!Jacket without a tie!
Slashdot without really great posts!Get your own, you fucking thieves.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31290120</id>
	<title>Sergey Brin Says...</title>
	<author>coaxial</author>
	<datestamp>1267176540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2010/TECH/02/12/brin.google.china/index.html?hpt=Sbin" title="cnn.com" rel="nofollow">"I'm an optimist. I want to find a way to work within the Chinese system and provide more and better information. I think a lot of people think I'm naive, and that may be true."</a> [cnn.com]</p><p>Sergey went on to say, "Look, I grew up in Soviet Union. I know authoritarian communist regimes. Let me tell you, falling all over yourself in order to please their every whim and enabling them to maintain their stranglehold on power isn't evil. It's actually good. Good for business that is! Ha! Ha! I kid. Nah. I'm serious."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I 'm an optimist .
I want to find a way to work within the Chinese system and provide more and better information .
I think a lot of people think I 'm naive , and that may be true .
" [ cnn.com ] Sergey went on to say , " Look , I grew up in Soviet Union .
I know authoritarian communist regimes .
Let me tell you , falling all over yourself in order to please their every whim and enabling them to maintain their stranglehold on power is n't evil .
It 's actually good .
Good for business that is !
Ha ! Ha !
I kid .
Nah. I 'm serious .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I'm an optimist.
I want to find a way to work within the Chinese system and provide more and better information.
I think a lot of people think I'm naive, and that may be true.
" [cnn.com]Sergey went on to say, "Look, I grew up in Soviet Union.
I know authoritarian communist regimes.
Let me tell you, falling all over yourself in order to please their every whim and enabling them to maintain their stranglehold on power isn't evil.
It's actually good.
Good for business that is!
Ha! Ha!
I kid.
Nah. I'm serious.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289470</id>
	<title>Re:Life without electricity!</title>
	<author>WrongSizeGlass</author>
	<datestamp>1267216500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Knife without a spoon! iPhone without a charger!<br>
Velcro without laces! TV without a remote!<br>
Paper without a pencil! PC without Windows!<br>
China without IP violations! Avocado without a pit!<br>
CD without R *or* W! Keyboard without a PS/2 adapter!<br>
Jacket without a tie! Slashdot without really great posts!</p><p>Get your own, you fucking thieves.</p></div><p>Let's see<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<br>
I went to <b>Slashdot</b> on a <b>PC without Windows</b> because my <b>iPhone without a charger</b> didn't have a <b>keyboard</b> or <b>PS/2 adapter</b> and all I had was <b>paper without a pencil</b>. Sitting in  <b>jacket without a tie</b> that fasten with <b>velcro without laces</b> I ate my lunch of an <b>avocado without a pit</b> with a <b>knife</b> but <b>without a spoon</b> while watching a story about <b>China without IP violations</b> my <b>TV without a remote</b> or a <b>CD without R *or* W</b>. <br> <br>
That was fun. Let's play again. Now you:<br>
Jerk without a clue!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Knife without a spoon !
iPhone without a charger !
Velcro without laces !
TV without a remote !
Paper without a pencil !
PC without Windows !
China without IP violations !
Avocado without a pit !
CD without R * or * W !
Keyboard without a PS/2 adapter !
Jacket without a tie !
Slashdot without really great posts ! Get your own , you fucking thieves.Let 's see .. . I went to Slashdot on a PC without Windows because my iPhone without a charger did n't have a keyboard or PS/2 adapter and all I had was paper without a pencil .
Sitting in jacket without a tie that fasten with velcro without laces I ate my lunch of an avocado without a pit with a knife but without a spoon while watching a story about China without IP violations my TV without a remote or a CD without R * or * W . That was fun .
Let 's play again .
Now you : Jerk without a clue !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Knife without a spoon!
iPhone without a charger!
Velcro without laces!
TV without a remote!
Paper without a pencil!
PC without Windows!
China without IP violations!
Avocado without a pit!
CD without R *or* W!
Keyboard without a PS/2 adapter!
Jacket without a tie!
Slashdot without really great posts!Get your own, you fucking thieves.Let's see ...
I went to Slashdot on a PC without Windows because my iPhone without a charger didn't have a keyboard or PS/2 adapter and all I had was paper without a pencil.
Sitting in  jacket without a tie that fasten with velcro without laces I ate my lunch of an avocado without a pit with a knife but without a spoon while watching a story about China without IP violations my TV without a remote or a CD without R *or* W.  
That was fun.
Let's play again.
Now you:
Jerk without a clue!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288936</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31292602</id>
	<title>Re:Google Scholar</title>
	<author>ErikZ</author>
	<datestamp>1267189800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If Google did it, why would you waste time replicating the work to do it yourself?</p><p>Do you look for Hamburgers that are "Just like McDonalds" instead of just going to McDonalds?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If Google did it , why would you waste time replicating the work to do it yourself ? Do you look for Hamburgers that are " Just like McDonalds " instead of just going to McDonalds ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If Google did it, why would you waste time replicating the work to do it yourself?Do you look for Hamburgers that are "Just like McDonalds" instead of just going to McDonalds?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31290592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31291384</id>
	<title>Re:"I hope you have the time of your life"- Green</title>
	<author>Beardo the Bearded</author>
	<datestamp>1267182840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd rather pay them to change all the results to</p><p>"Did you mean Tiananmen Square?"</p><p>and force all GIS to "Safesearch: Off"</p><p>China then becomes a self-correcting problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd rather pay them to change all the results to " Did you mean Tiananmen Square ?
" and force all GIS to " Safesearch : Off " China then becomes a self-correcting problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd rather pay them to change all the results to"Did you mean Tiananmen Square?
"and force all GIS to "Safesearch: Off"China then becomes a self-correcting problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288976</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31290382</id>
	<title>Re:Google Scholar</title>
	<author>Elendil</author>
	<datestamp>1267177800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Google Scholar is the most comprehensive index of scholarly articles in the world, period.</p><p>You can't possibly know that, as Google doesn't tell us exactly what's covered by GS.</p><p>&gt; Not only are there no free alternatives, there are no alternatives at all.</p><p>Wrong. The Web of Knowledge and Scopus (commercial) and Scirus (free) are perfectly valid alternatives. Furthermore, a number of studies in various fields have shown that all of these tools, as well as GS, usually return a number of hits that were not found by the others (again, including GS). Therefore, they can always be seen as complementing each other.</p><p>What you cound argue, on another hand, is that GS offers the best quality/price ratio. I for one would accept that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Google Scholar is the most comprehensive index of scholarly articles in the world , period.You ca n't possibly know that , as Google does n't tell us exactly what 's covered by GS. &gt; Not only are there no free alternatives , there are no alternatives at all.Wrong .
The Web of Knowledge and Scopus ( commercial ) and Scirus ( free ) are perfectly valid alternatives .
Furthermore , a number of studies in various fields have shown that all of these tools , as well as GS , usually return a number of hits that were not found by the others ( again , including GS ) .
Therefore , they can always be seen as complementing each other.What you cound argue , on another hand , is that GS offers the best quality/price ratio .
I for one would accept that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Google Scholar is the most comprehensive index of scholarly articles in the world, period.You can't possibly know that, as Google doesn't tell us exactly what's covered by GS.&gt; Not only are there no free alternatives, there are no alternatives at all.Wrong.
The Web of Knowledge and Scopus (commercial) and Scirus (free) are perfectly valid alternatives.
Furthermore, a number of studies in various fields have shown that all of these tools, as well as GS, usually return a number of hits that were not found by the others (again, including GS).
Therefore, they can always be seen as complementing each other.What you cound argue, on another hand, is that GS offers the best quality/price ratio.
I for one would accept that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31291576</id>
	<title>Re:"I hope you have the time of your life"- Green</title>
	<author>wealthychef</author>
	<datestamp>1267184040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, you missed the joke.  It's because Exchange is such an a piece of crap that their economy and IT infrastructure will crumble.  Mwa haha</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , you missed the joke .
It 's because Exchange is such an a piece of crap that their economy and IT infrastructure will crumble .
Mwa haha</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, you missed the joke.
It's because Exchange is such an a piece of crap that their economy and IT infrastructure will crumble.
Mwa haha</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31292714</id>
	<title>"a survey showed on Wednesday"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267190340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obviously this is totally convincing (author, methodology, data,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... are overrated anyways).</p><p>A related survey shows on Thursday that any guy who watches figure skating is gay. Discuss.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously this is totally convincing ( author , methodology , data , ... are overrated anyways ) .A related survey shows on Thursday that any guy who watches figure skating is gay .
Discuss .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously this is totally convincing (author, methodology, data, ... are overrated anyways).A related survey shows on Thursday that any guy who watches figure skating is gay.
Discuss.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289128</id>
	<title>fr,ist psZot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267214940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">suuplies to private And some of the stand anymore, dying. Everyone Usenet is roughly in eternity...Romeo</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>suuplies to private And some of the stand anymore , dying .
Everyone Usenet is roughly in eternity...Romeo [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>suuplies to private And some of the stand anymore, dying.
Everyone Usenet is roughly in eternity...Romeo [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31303630</id>
	<title>Iranian can get nurclear tech from North Korea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267388820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>To get nurclear arms, countries like Iran can trade oil for nurclear with North Korea, which is desperate for money and oil. They don't need to google.
<br>
Shutting down google means China human right activists cannot use gmail and can only communicate using unsecure email.</htmltext>
<tokenext>To get nurclear arms , countries like Iran can trade oil for nurclear with North Korea , which is desperate for money and oil .
They do n't need to google .
Shutting down google means China human right activists can not use gmail and can only communicate using unsecure email .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To get nurclear arms, countries like Iran can trade oil for nurclear with North Korea, which is desperate for money and oil.
They don't need to google.
Shutting down google means China human right activists cannot use gmail and can only communicate using unsecure email.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289194</id>
	<title>Re:Being IN China necessary?</title>
	<author>IamTheRealMike</author>
	<datestamp>1267215240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Just because Google has no offices or data centers in China would not mean it would be unavailable there.</p></div></blockquote><p>Well, if you go to China you'll find that it's amazingly easy to trigger the GFW. Browsing the English web is really flaky. Even if the Chinese govt didn't pro-actively block Google (as they have done with Facebook and YouTube) it'd still be a pain to use it.</p><blockquote><div><p>Censored perhaps, but how difficult would it be for "Scientists" to get around that, or be exempted from it?</p></div></blockquote><p>I don't think the Chinese government offers "exemptions" except for foreign journalists (sometimes). I also suspect they view circumvention dimly. The whole point of the GFW is to stop smart, influential people from getting ideas they shouldn't!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just because Google has no offices or data centers in China would not mean it would be unavailable there.Well , if you go to China you 'll find that it 's amazingly easy to trigger the GFW .
Browsing the English web is really flaky .
Even if the Chinese govt did n't pro-actively block Google ( as they have done with Facebook and YouTube ) it 'd still be a pain to use it.Censored perhaps , but how difficult would it be for " Scientists " to get around that , or be exempted from it ? I do n't think the Chinese government offers " exemptions " except for foreign journalists ( sometimes ) .
I also suspect they view circumvention dimly .
The whole point of the GFW is to stop smart , influential people from getting ideas they should n't !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just because Google has no offices or data centers in China would not mean it would be unavailable there.Well, if you go to China you'll find that it's amazingly easy to trigger the GFW.
Browsing the English web is really flaky.
Even if the Chinese govt didn't pro-actively block Google (as they have done with Facebook and YouTube) it'd still be a pain to use it.Censored perhaps, but how difficult would it be for "Scientists" to get around that, or be exempted from it?I don't think the Chinese government offers "exemptions" except for foreign journalists (sometimes).
I also suspect they view circumvention dimly.
The whole point of the GFW is to stop smart, influential people from getting ideas they shouldn't!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289014</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289716</id>
	<title>Re:What about Baidu?</title>
	<author>DragonWriter</author>
	<datestamp>1267217700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Google is a remarkable company and a remarkable search engine, but it shouldn't be that hard for other engines to provide at least a facsimile of what it does in the search area.</p></div></blockquote><p>I haven't seen much (in terms of free web-based services) to compete with Google Scholar in terms of searching journals, searching forward and back through their mutual citations, and finding the versions of articles that aren't the main one locked behind the original journal's paywall.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google is a remarkable company and a remarkable search engine , but it should n't be that hard for other engines to provide at least a facsimile of what it does in the search area.I have n't seen much ( in terms of free web-based services ) to compete with Google Scholar in terms of searching journals , searching forward and back through their mutual citations , and finding the versions of articles that are n't the main one locked behind the original journal 's paywall .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google is a remarkable company and a remarkable search engine, but it shouldn't be that hard for other engines to provide at least a facsimile of what it does in the search area.I haven't seen much (in terms of free web-based services) to compete with Google Scholar in terms of searching journals, searching forward and back through their mutual citations, and finding the versions of articles that aren't the main one locked behind the original journal's paywall.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289744</id>
	<title>Re:Google Scholar</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267217880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Microsoft Research has their own Academic Search site, which is pretty useful to me (I hardly ever use Google Scholar). It's more focused on academic research papers and the links between authors than the broader net GScholar casts (there's no Patent search, for example) but it is a free alternative.

<a href="http://academic.research.microsoft.com/" title="microsoft.com" rel="nofollow">http://academic.research.microsoft.com/</a> [microsoft.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft Research has their own Academic Search site , which is pretty useful to me ( I hardly ever use Google Scholar ) .
It 's more focused on academic research papers and the links between authors than the broader net GScholar casts ( there 's no Patent search , for example ) but it is a free alternative .
http : //academic.research.microsoft.com/ [ microsoft.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft Research has their own Academic Search site, which is pretty useful to me (I hardly ever use Google Scholar).
It's more focused on academic research papers and the links between authors than the broader net GScholar casts (there's no Patent search, for example) but it is a free alternative.
http://academic.research.microsoft.com/ [microsoft.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31295860</id>
	<title>Re:Being IN China necessary?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267270380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Possibly blacklisting china's address space themselves if the chinese government doesn't get around to it fast enough to prove the point.</p></div><p>The ego of Google fanboys in<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. is amazing.</p><p>You think the Chinese govt would care Google blacklisting all Chinese address spaces?  They would welcome it!  If Google won't list Chinese websites in their results, then fewer Chinese will use Google. It just compliments their effort to block any Google servers outside China which serves uncensored results!</p><p>Those who think the Chinese govt can be threatened/forced into backing down by any western govt or even commercial company need a wake up call.  Studying the recent 120 years of Chinese history (one that is filled with being beaten and humiliated by foreign, mainly western, powers) would be a good start.  Famous works of art stolen during the past century are still being openly auctioned in the west, no Chinese people is going to be happy seeing the Chinese govt bend down to western power.</p><p>If the Chinese govt is seen as "being weak" to foreign powers, there would be strong protests everywhere, no matter<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. thinks that is for the "good" of Chinese people.  Especially regarding just a search engine that has no direct impact to 99\% of the Chinese.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Possibly blacklisting china 's address space themselves if the chinese government does n't get around to it fast enough to prove the point.The ego of Google fanboys in / .
is amazing.You think the Chinese govt would care Google blacklisting all Chinese address spaces ?
They would welcome it !
If Google wo n't list Chinese websites in their results , then fewer Chinese will use Google .
It just compliments their effort to block any Google servers outside China which serves uncensored results ! Those who think the Chinese govt can be threatened/forced into backing down by any western govt or even commercial company need a wake up call .
Studying the recent 120 years of Chinese history ( one that is filled with being beaten and humiliated by foreign , mainly western , powers ) would be a good start .
Famous works of art stolen during the past century are still being openly auctioned in the west , no Chinese people is going to be happy seeing the Chinese govt bend down to western power.If the Chinese govt is seen as " being weak " to foreign powers , there would be strong protests everywhere , no matter / .
thinks that is for the " good " of Chinese people .
Especially regarding just a search engine that has no direct impact to 99 \ % of the Chinese .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Possibly blacklisting china's address space themselves if the chinese government doesn't get around to it fast enough to prove the point.The ego of Google fanboys in /.
is amazing.You think the Chinese govt would care Google blacklisting all Chinese address spaces?
They would welcome it!
If Google won't list Chinese websites in their results, then fewer Chinese will use Google.
It just compliments their effort to block any Google servers outside China which serves uncensored results!Those who think the Chinese govt can be threatened/forced into backing down by any western govt or even commercial company need a wake up call.
Studying the recent 120 years of Chinese history (one that is filled with being beaten and humiliated by foreign, mainly western, powers) would be a good start.
Famous works of art stolen during the past century are still being openly auctioned in the west, no Chinese people is going to be happy seeing the Chinese govt bend down to western power.If the Chinese govt is seen as "being weak" to foreign powers, there would be strong protests everywhere, no matter /.
thinks that is for the "good" of Chinese people.
Especially regarding just a search engine that has no direct impact to 99\% of the Chinese.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289524</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289524</id>
	<title>Re:Being IN China necessary?</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1267216680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its not 'pulling out of china' in the sense of not having an office there.</p><p>Its pulling out of china in the sense of removing all ties with the government, stopping censoring, pulling offices back out of the country, and then waiting for China to blacklist them.  Possibly blacklisting china's address space themselves if the chinese government doesn't get around to it fast enough to prove the point.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its not 'pulling out of china ' in the sense of not having an office there.Its pulling out of china in the sense of removing all ties with the government , stopping censoring , pulling offices back out of the country , and then waiting for China to blacklist them .
Possibly blacklisting china 's address space themselves if the chinese government does n't get around to it fast enough to prove the point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its not 'pulling out of china' in the sense of not having an office there.Its pulling out of china in the sense of removing all ties with the government, stopping censoring, pulling offices back out of the country, and then waiting for China to blacklist them.
Possibly blacklisting china's address space themselves if the chinese government doesn't get around to it fast enough to prove the point.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289014</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31293798</id>
	<title>Re:Google Scholar</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267197300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For the most part, I've found GS to be the least useful resource in my day-to-day research. For academic work, using the databases that search multiple resources (usually at least JSTOR and Web of Science) are far more effective, if your institution has access to them. As a single tool, GS is alright. It indexes slowly, though. When I get my tables of contents mailed out from Science, Nature, J Neuroscience, or Neuron, none of the articles are listed and it takes awhile for them to get listed.</p><p>A great feature about GS, though, is that if you find an article you like you can tell it to search your institution directly. This saves tons of time from having to go to the library's webpage in a different tab and re-search for the article.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For the most part , I 've found GS to be the least useful resource in my day-to-day research .
For academic work , using the databases that search multiple resources ( usually at least JSTOR and Web of Science ) are far more effective , if your institution has access to them .
As a single tool , GS is alright .
It indexes slowly , though .
When I get my tables of contents mailed out from Science , Nature , J Neuroscience , or Neuron , none of the articles are listed and it takes awhile for them to get listed.A great feature about GS , though , is that if you find an article you like you can tell it to search your institution directly .
This saves tons of time from having to go to the library 's webpage in a different tab and re-search for the article .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For the most part, I've found GS to be the least useful resource in my day-to-day research.
For academic work, using the databases that search multiple resources (usually at least JSTOR and Web of Science) are far more effective, if your institution has access to them.
As a single tool, GS is alright.
It indexes slowly, though.
When I get my tables of contents mailed out from Science, Nature, J Neuroscience, or Neuron, none of the articles are listed and it takes awhile for them to get listed.A great feature about GS, though, is that if you find an article you like you can tell it to search your institution directly.
This saves tons of time from having to go to the library's webpage in a different tab and re-search for the article.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289996</id>
	<title>China, research giant...</title>
	<author>TiggertheMad</author>
	<datestamp>1267176060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>My initial reaction to this was "what, they don't have other search engines on the Internet?" I mean, I use Google myself, and I'm quite happy with it, but if it disappeared tomorrow I'd just start using something else.</i>
<br> <br>
My initial reaction was, "what, China actually conducts its own research rather than steal it?!?!?!"
<br> <br>
But that is an unfair generalization. As I thought about it more carefully I realized that of course China does its own research. It is after all, a world leader in industrial espionage, miniature camera technology, and software security. You don't get to the front of such competitive fields without doing a LOT of research in them...</htmltext>
<tokenext>My initial reaction to this was " what , they do n't have other search engines on the Internet ?
" I mean , I use Google myself , and I 'm quite happy with it , but if it disappeared tomorrow I 'd just start using something else .
My initial reaction was , " what , China actually conducts its own research rather than steal it ? ! ? ! ? !
" But that is an unfair generalization .
As I thought about it more carefully I realized that of course China does its own research .
It is after all , a world leader in industrial espionage , miniature camera technology , and software security .
You do n't get to the front of such competitive fields without doing a LOT of research in them.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My initial reaction to this was "what, they don't have other search engines on the Internet?
" I mean, I use Google myself, and I'm quite happy with it, but if it disappeared tomorrow I'd just start using something else.
My initial reaction was, "what, China actually conducts its own research rather than steal it?!?!?!
"
 
But that is an unfair generalization.
As I thought about it more carefully I realized that of course China does its own research.
It is after all, a world leader in industrial espionage, miniature camera technology, and software security.
You don't get to the front of such competitive fields without doing a LOT of research in them...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31292702</id>
	<title>Re:What about Baidu?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267190280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google does a much better job at finding published papers for easy copying. After all, if you're going to find an essay online for your English class you don't ask the school's librarian for help, eh?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google does a much better job at finding published papers for easy copying .
After all , if you 're going to find an essay online for your English class you do n't ask the school 's librarian for help , eh ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google does a much better job at finding published papers for easy copying.
After all, if you're going to find an essay online for your English class you don't ask the school's librarian for help, eh?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289238</id>
	<title>Re:Being IN China necessary?</title>
	<author>forkazoo</author>
	<datestamp>1267215420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Why would Google have to be IN China for the "scientists" to use it as a search engine?<br>Just because Google has no offices or data centers in China would not mean it would be unavailable there.<br>Censored perhaps, but how difficult would it be for "Scientists" to get around that, or be exempted from it?</p></div></blockquote><p>By "censored," you mean blocked.  Google's ability to operate in China was dependent on censoring all search results to make sure nothing slipped out.  Trying to do that kind of content filtering on the national firewall level would be impractical.  Where the physical data centers are located is almosta  complete non-issue.  It's whether or not Google will restrict their content offerings to Chinese central government standards.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why would Google have to be IN China for the " scientists " to use it as a search engine ? Just because Google has no offices or data centers in China would not mean it would be unavailable there.Censored perhaps , but how difficult would it be for " Scientists " to get around that , or be exempted from it ? By " censored , " you mean blocked .
Google 's ability to operate in China was dependent on censoring all search results to make sure nothing slipped out .
Trying to do that kind of content filtering on the national firewall level would be impractical .
Where the physical data centers are located is almosta complete non-issue .
It 's whether or not Google will restrict their content offerings to Chinese central government standards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why would Google have to be IN China for the "scientists" to use it as a search engine?Just because Google has no offices or data centers in China would not mean it would be unavailable there.Censored perhaps, but how difficult would it be for "Scientists" to get around that, or be exempted from it?By "censored," you mean blocked.
Google's ability to operate in China was dependent on censoring all search results to make sure nothing slipped out.
Trying to do that kind of content filtering on the national firewall level would be impractical.
Where the physical data centers are located is almosta  complete non-issue.
It's whether or not Google will restrict their content offerings to Chinese central government standards.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289014</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31294230</id>
	<title>Re:"I hope you have the time of your life"- Green</title>
	<author>LostCluster</author>
	<datestamp>1267201500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I gotta love the mod war that has broken out over this post... It's taken more than 15 mod points to put it right back where it started at 2.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I got ta love the mod war that has broken out over this post... It 's taken more than 15 mod points to put it right back where it started at 2 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I gotta love the mod war that has broken out over this post... It's taken more than 15 mod points to put it right back where it started at 2.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31290328</id>
	<title>Re:Google Scholar</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267177500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.isiknowledge.com/" title="isiknowledge.com" rel="nofollow">ISI Web of Knowledge</a> [isiknowledge.com] is fairly comprehensive, but it isn't free.  Many university libraries pay for it though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ISI Web of Knowledge [ isiknowledge.com ] is fairly comprehensive , but it is n't free .
Many university libraries pay for it though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ISI Web of Knowledge [isiknowledge.com] is fairly comprehensive, but it isn't free.
Many university libraries pay for it though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31290304</id>
	<title>I must disagree</title>
	<author>NaiL2001</author>
	<datestamp>1267177380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sorry, but loosing google in china may improve the quality of the research if that data is true.

What I say is that google, or google scholar is not the best way to search for published works (e.g. there are few and limited options to do search and order results, there is no information of what is and what is not indexed, etc.).

Ok, it is not all bad. It is free.

Thinking twice this would mean that Chinese researchers will use another search mechanism that may be much more adequate for the purpose.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry , but loosing google in china may improve the quality of the research if that data is true .
What I say is that google , or google scholar is not the best way to search for published works ( e.g .
there are few and limited options to do search and order results , there is no information of what is and what is not indexed , etc. ) .
Ok , it is not all bad .
It is free .
Thinking twice this would mean that Chinese researchers will use another search mechanism that may be much more adequate for the purpose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry, but loosing google in china may improve the quality of the research if that data is true.
What I say is that google, or google scholar is not the best way to search for published works (e.g.
there are few and limited options to do search and order results, there is no information of what is and what is not indexed, etc.).
Ok, it is not all bad.
It is free.
Thinking twice this would mean that Chinese researchers will use another search mechanism that may be much more adequate for the purpose.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289714</id>
	<title>so sad</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267217700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How will they steel technologies now?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) no plagiarism ? come on!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How will they steel technologies now ?
: ) no plagiarism ?
come on !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How will they steel technologies now?
:) no plagiarism ?
come on!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31295882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288936
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31294230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31291576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31291404
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31291384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288976
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31290522
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289916
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31290042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289812
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289396
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31293798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31291080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31290592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289714
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31290970
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31303630
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288976
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289814
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31292702
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31291466
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288976
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31292602
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31290592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289308
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289198
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288976
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289134
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288936
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31290382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31290328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289256
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31295860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31291048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1717254_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1717254.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289674
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1717254.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288962
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1717254.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31290836
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1717254.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288936
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289470
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289682
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1717254.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289116
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1717254.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289812
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31290042
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1717254.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288916
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31295882
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289916
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31290522
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31291048
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1717254.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289010
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289526
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289744
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289996
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289372
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31290592
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31291080
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31292602
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31290970
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31290382
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31293798
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31290328
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1717254.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288940
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289814
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1717254.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289014
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289194
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289524
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31295860
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31291404
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1717254.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288866
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31294230
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288976
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31291466
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289198
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31291384
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289698
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31303630
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289186
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289854
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289346
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31291576
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289308
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1717254.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31288982
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289134
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289208
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289796
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31292702
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289256
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289716
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289396
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289158
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1717254.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289714
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1717254.31289838
</commentlist>
</conversation>
