<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_26_161200</id>
	<title>Woman Live-Tweets Her Abortion<span class="vballoon-marquee rd\_5"><span>Comments:</span><a href="#">160</a></span></title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1267203120000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>27-year-old Angie Jackson has decided that it isn't inappropriate or in any way distasteful to <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/angie-jackson-live-tweets-abortion/story?id=9937689">live-tweet about her experience taking RU-486</a>, also known as the abortion pill.  According to Jackson nothing is off-limits on Twitter. "I don't feel like I'm doing anything different from what I do every day," said Jackson. "But now I have people calling me a killer; it's surreal."</htmltext>
<tokenext>27-year-old Angie Jackson has decided that it is n't inappropriate or in any way distasteful to live-tweet about her experience taking RU-486 , also known as the abortion pill .
According to Jackson nothing is off-limits on Twitter .
" I do n't feel like I 'm doing anything different from what I do every day , " said Jackson .
" But now I have people calling me a killer ; it 's surreal .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>27-year-old Angie Jackson has decided that it isn't inappropriate or in any way distasteful to live-tweet about her experience taking RU-486, also known as the abortion pill.
According to Jackson nothing is off-limits on Twitter.
"I don't feel like I'm doing anything different from what I do every day," said Jackson.
"But now I have people calling me a killer; it's surreal.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31333736</id>
	<title>Re: That ignorant insensitive bitch....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267560840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>She didn't have to say, "Have a Godless day."</p></div><p>Exactly. From there it stopped being about "well, it's my life and my choice" to "LOL I TROLL U MORALFAGS."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>She did n't have to say , " Have a Godless day. " Exactly .
From there it stopped being about " well , it 's my life and my choice " to " LOL I TROLL U MORALFAGS .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>She didn't have to say, "Have a Godless day."Exactly.
From there it stopped being about "well, it's my life and my choice" to "LOL I TROLL U MORALFAGS.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31315366</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31324208</id>
	<title>Re:Just imagine...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267447200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>RTFA. She already HAS a kid, almost died delivering him, was told another pregnancy would kill her, and had an IUD, which failed, resulting in the pregnancy she just terminated.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>RTFA .
She already HAS a kid , almost died delivering him , was told another pregnancy would kill her , and had an IUD , which failed , resulting in the pregnancy she just terminated .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RTFA.
She already HAS a kid, almost died delivering him, was told another pregnancy would kill her, and had an IUD, which failed, resulting in the pregnancy she just terminated.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31319408</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31315202</id>
	<title>Emaotional kiddy roller coaster!</title>
	<author>revdrmr</author>
	<datestamp>1267455780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When I think of all the emotional, religious and social responses that run through me when I watched that was, LOL!</htmltext>
<tokenext>When I think of all the emotional , religious and social responses that run through me when I watched that was , LOL !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I think of all the emotional, religious and social responses that run through me when I watched that was, LOL!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31292940</id>
	<title>Everyday?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267191480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>"I don't feel like I'm doing anything different from what I do every day,"</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
You take RU-486 every day?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" I do n't feel like I 'm doing anything different from what I do every day , " You take RU-486 every day ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I don't feel like I'm doing anything different from what I do every day,"

You take RU-486 every day?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31295138</id>
	<title>Re:RU-486</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267213260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>she needs to abort those moles on her face too..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>she needs to abort those moles on her face too. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>she needs to abort those moles on her face too..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31292014</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31392406</id>
	<title>Re:Not quite an abortion</title>
	<author>Kerstyun</author>
	<datestamp>1267991400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>we don't really know the number exactly</p></div> </blockquote><p>But THE LORD JESUS does.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>we do n't really know the number exactly But THE LORD JESUS does .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>we don't really know the number exactly But THE LORD JESUS does.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31309468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31326120</id>
	<title>Re:Just imagine...</title>
	<author>Black Gold Alchemist</author>
	<datestamp>1267462140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually the christ-heads would have to explain to her current kid that his mother died because of them. Feel the love of the Christian faith!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually the christ-heads would have to explain to her current kid that his mother died because of them .
Feel the love of the Christian faith !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually the christ-heads would have to explain to her current kid that his mother died because of them.
Feel the love of the Christian faith!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31319408</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31347226</id>
	<title>Re:her abortion?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267638900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Hurr, I'm smart cuz I know that fetuses ain't children</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hurr , I 'm smart cuz I know that fetuses ai n't children</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hurr, I'm smart cuz I know that fetuses ain't children
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31325686</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31361182</id>
	<title>Re:Murderer</title>
	<author>zippthorne</author>
	<datestamp>1267733460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe, but conception is a fairly instantaneous, well-defined event (nth countable cell division might suffice, too).  If you can't define a clear, definable and measurable event, then you're  relying on "statistical personhood" which means that wherever you draw the line there is a chance that what you terminate isn't not-a-person.  That chance goes up when you're performing the procedure a lot of times, until it's almost certain that you'll have murdered at least one person.</p><p>A case where the very life of the mother is in danger though is a grey area.  Self-defense principles come into play and complicate things, but it wouldn't mean that you're not talking about a person, only that killing a person in self defense of mortal danger is not a murder.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe , but conception is a fairly instantaneous , well-defined event ( nth countable cell division might suffice , too ) .
If you ca n't define a clear , definable and measurable event , then you 're relying on " statistical personhood " which means that wherever you draw the line there is a chance that what you terminate is n't not-a-person .
That chance goes up when you 're performing the procedure a lot of times , until it 's almost certain that you 'll have murdered at least one person.A case where the very life of the mother is in danger though is a grey area .
Self-defense principles come into play and complicate things , but it would n't mean that you 're not talking about a person , only that killing a person in self defense of mortal danger is not a murder .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe, but conception is a fairly instantaneous, well-defined event (nth countable cell division might suffice, too).
If you can't define a clear, definable and measurable event, then you're  relying on "statistical personhood" which means that wherever you draw the line there is a chance that what you terminate isn't not-a-person.
That chance goes up when you're performing the procedure a lot of times, until it's almost certain that you'll have murdered at least one person.A case where the very life of the mother is in danger though is a grey area.
Self-defense principles come into play and complicate things, but it wouldn't mean that you're not talking about a person, only that killing a person in self defense of mortal danger is not a murder.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31347646</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31363524</id>
	<title>Re: That ignorant insensitive bitch....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267700820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not everyone needs spiritual enlightenment so tsk tsk yourself for saying god knows she needs it</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not everyone needs spiritual enlightenment so tsk tsk yourself for saying god knows she needs it</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not everyone needs spiritual enlightenment so tsk tsk yourself for saying god knows she needs it</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31315366</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31350172</id>
	<title>Re:Murderer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267609500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This pregnancy in all likely hood would have killed her, leaving her current special needs son without it's biological parent.  She used a contraceptive that failed.</p><p>Basically you are saying it's ok to have two motherless children (assuming the second one survives as well), one who has special needs, than to have one child that gets to keep his mommy, who he needs even more than the average child.  If that's your opinion sure you are entitled to it, but I damn well do not agree with it.  This in my opinion is a perfect example of why abortion needs to be legal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This pregnancy in all likely hood would have killed her , leaving her current special needs son without it 's biological parent .
She used a contraceptive that failed.Basically you are saying it 's ok to have two motherless children ( assuming the second one survives as well ) , one who has special needs , than to have one child that gets to keep his mommy , who he needs even more than the average child .
If that 's your opinion sure you are entitled to it , but I damn well do not agree with it .
This in my opinion is a perfect example of why abortion needs to be legal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This pregnancy in all likely hood would have killed her, leaving her current special needs son without it's biological parent.
She used a contraceptive that failed.Basically you are saying it's ok to have two motherless children (assuming the second one survives as well), one who has special needs, than to have one child that gets to keep his mommy, who he needs even more than the average child.
If that's your opinion sure you are entitled to it, but I damn well do not agree with it.
This in my opinion is a perfect example of why abortion needs to be legal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31332794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31458468</id>
	<title>Re:My Live Tweet</title>
	<author>hairyfeet</author>
	<datestamp>1268396760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And for all these bible thumping moral suckheads? News Flash: There was abortions before they were legal, it just tended to kill a LOT of women! Oh and the rich were able to hop on a plane to France, get an abortion, and do some shopping in Paris before heading hom. Tell me, is that REALLY what you want to go back to? where the poor die by coat hanger while the rich enjoy a little French food before hoping back to the "moral" US of A?</htmltext>
<tokenext>And for all these bible thumping moral suckheads ?
News Flash : There was abortions before they were legal , it just tended to kill a LOT of women !
Oh and the rich were able to hop on a plane to France , get an abortion , and do some shopping in Paris before heading hom .
Tell me , is that REALLY what you want to go back to ?
where the poor die by coat hanger while the rich enjoy a little French food before hoping back to the " moral " US of A ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And for all these bible thumping moral suckheads?
News Flash: There was abortions before they were legal, it just tended to kill a LOT of women!
Oh and the rich were able to hop on a plane to France, get an abortion, and do some shopping in Paris before heading hom.
Tell me, is that REALLY what you want to go back to?
where the poor die by coat hanger while the rich enjoy a little French food before hoping back to the "moral" US of A?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31312120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31308646</id>
	<title>what next</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267350300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What next?<br>Live webcam showing someone switching sex. All sexes are equal, so hey<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What next ? Live webcam showing someone switching sex .
All sexes are equal , so hey .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What next?Live webcam showing someone switching sex.
All sexes are equal, so hey ...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31361822</id>
	<title>Re:her abortion?</title>
	<author>StikyPad</author>
	<datestamp>1267693320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If she really tweeted her child's abortion I would be very impressed, but I suspect that you are using the word abortion in a manner inconsistent with its definition.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If she really tweeted her child 's abortion I would be very impressed , but I suspect that you are using the word abortion in a manner inconsistent with its definition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If she really tweeted her child's abortion I would be very impressed, but I suspect that you are using the word abortion in a manner inconsistent with its definition.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31315152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31433936</id>
	<title>which version?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268235840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>is this the RU-486 SX or the RU-486 DX?</htmltext>
<tokenext>is this the RU-486 SX or the RU-486 DX ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is this the RU-486 SX or the RU-486 DX?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31292014</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31347364</id>
	<title>Re: That ignorant insensitive bitch....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267639440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>She didn't have to say, "Have a Godless day."</p><p>What a piece of detritus she is for including that little "gem."         Tsk Tsk.</p><p>I hope for the sake of her son that she finds some compassion and spiritual enlightenment.  God knows she needs it.</p></div><p>We're expected to believe this kind of nonsense? Come on, I'm like her ex-foetus: I wasn't born yesterday.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>She did n't have to say , " Have a Godless day .
" What a piece of detritus she is for including that little " gem .
" Tsk Tsk.I hope for the sake of her son that she finds some compassion and spiritual enlightenment .
God knows she needs it.We 're expected to believe this kind of nonsense ?
Come on , I 'm like her ex-foetus : I was n't born yesterday .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>She didn't have to say, "Have a Godless day.
"What a piece of detritus she is for including that little "gem.
"         Tsk Tsk.I hope for the sake of her son that she finds some compassion and spiritual enlightenment.
God knows she needs it.We're expected to believe this kind of nonsense?
Come on, I'm like her ex-foetus: I wasn't born yesterday.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31315366</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31406996</id>
	<title>Re:Everyday?</title>
	<author>ickleberry</author>
	<datestamp>1268048880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No I am waiting for the RU-x86\_64</htmltext>
<tokenext>No I am waiting for the RU-x86 \ _64</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No I am waiting for the RU-x86\_64</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31292940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31325060</id>
	<title>Re:Just imagine...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267452840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>She clearly stated that she aborted her late pregnancy because it was dangerous to her, and that she already has a boy. This means she won't have any more.</p><p>So, the only thing that could happen is him asking her if he could have had a younger brother.</p><p>Anyway, he probably won't be as bitchy about abortion as some other people around these days.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>She clearly stated that she aborted her late pregnancy because it was dangerous to her , and that she already has a boy .
This means she wo n't have any more.So , the only thing that could happen is him asking her if he could have had a younger brother.Anyway , he probably wo n't be as bitchy about abortion as some other people around these days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>She clearly stated that she aborted her late pregnancy because it was dangerous to her, and that she already has a boy.
This means she won't have any more.So, the only thing that could happen is him asking her if he could have had a younger brother.Anyway, he probably won't be as bitchy about abortion as some other people around these days.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31319408</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31289094</id>
	<title>every day?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267214880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>She has abortions every day?  Wow, someone needs to teach that girl how to close her legs....or swallow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>She has abortions every day ?
Wow , someone needs to teach that girl how to close her legs....or swallow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>She has abortions every day?
Wow, someone needs to teach that girl how to close her legs....or swallow.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31312120</id>
	<title>My Live Tweet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267380600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Swallowed Pill"</p><p>"Starting to feel cramps"</p><p>"A bit of blood on the pad"</p><p>"OMG my entire world has changed, I now know that everything I used believe is a lie. There is no god. There is only free will and it's my choice to have this abortion."</p><p>"Eww I've got a stain on my pants, I knew I should have used the extra flow pads.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:( "</p><p>Moral of the story is: lots of women have abortions everyday, it's not a big deal. Abortions are here to stay, publicity is the only reason from bringing them up. Use extra flow pads cause it tends to be a bit messy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Swallowed Pill " " Starting to feel cramps " " A bit of blood on the pad " " OMG my entire world has changed , I now know that everything I used believe is a lie .
There is no god .
There is only free will and it 's my choice to have this abortion .
" " Eww I 've got a stain on my pants , I knew I should have used the extra flow pads .
: ( " Moral of the story is : lots of women have abortions everyday , it 's not a big deal .
Abortions are here to stay , publicity is the only reason from bringing them up .
Use extra flow pads cause it tends to be a bit messy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Swallowed Pill""Starting to feel cramps""A bit of blood on the pad""OMG my entire world has changed, I now know that everything I used believe is a lie.
There is no god.
There is only free will and it's my choice to have this abortion.
""Eww I've got a stain on my pants, I knew I should have used the extra flow pads.
:( "Moral of the story is: lots of women have abortions everyday, it's not a big deal.
Abortions are here to stay, publicity is the only reason from bringing them up.
Use extra flow pads cause it tends to be a bit messy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31393408</id>
	<title>Re:every day?</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1267954800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> someone needs to teach that girl how to close her legs....or swallow.</p></div></blockquote><p>Or to lie on her front.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>someone needs to teach that girl how to close her legs....or swallow.Or to lie on her front .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> someone needs to teach that girl how to close her legs....or swallow.Or to lie on her front.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31289094</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31424510</id>
	<title>Re: That ignorant insensitive bitch....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268221500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You didn't have to reply to it, either. Just like slashdot didn't have to be made.</p><p>The big bang had to happen though. If only to show that deities are mostly not what you're made to think they are.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You did n't have to reply to it , either .
Just like slashdot did n't have to be made.The big bang had to happen though .
If only to show that deities are mostly not what you 're made to think they are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You didn't have to reply to it, either.
Just like slashdot didn't have to be made.The big bang had to happen though.
If only to show that deities are mostly not what you're made to think they are.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31315366</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31317536</id>
	<title>Fantastic!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267464240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Another worthless person decides that they want their 15 minutes of fame so they pull this with a little extra shock value for the religious crowd.<br> <br>We've already gone from Balloon Boy to this in about 6 months? What's next?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Another worthless person decides that they want their 15 minutes of fame so they pull this with a little extra shock value for the religious crowd .
We 've already gone from Balloon Boy to this in about 6 months ?
What 's next ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another worthless person decides that they want their 15 minutes of fame so they pull this with a little extra shock value for the religious crowd.
We've already gone from Balloon Boy to this in about 6 months?
What's next?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31313518</id>
	<title>Sick</title>
	<author>AbbeyRoad</author>
	<datestamp>1267440060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>sick</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>sick</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sick</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31400584</id>
	<title>New Book for Women</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268063760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's called "Your Mouth Can't Get Pregnant"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's called " Your Mouth Ca n't Get Pregnant "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's called "Your Mouth Can't Get Pregnant"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31289094</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31437108</id>
	<title>Re:Murderer</title>
	<author>tibit</author>
	<datestamp>1268321160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think that Carl Sagan has pretty much nailed it in his <a href="http://www.2think.org/abortion.shtml" title="2think.org" rel="nofollow">essay</a> [2think.org], published in Billions and Billions. To summarize: the extremes (all-on pro-life or all-on pro-choice) are just political stances and are thoughtless positions to take; we need to think of what makes us human -- what's the difference between us an say, a chimpanzee which we share more than 99\% of the active genes with. He concludes that the breaking point is the emergence thinking -- thus third-semester abortions are out, unless mother is in danger.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think that Carl Sagan has pretty much nailed it in his essay [ 2think.org ] , published in Billions and Billions .
To summarize : the extremes ( all-on pro-life or all-on pro-choice ) are just political stances and are thoughtless positions to take ; we need to think of what makes us human -- what 's the difference between us an say , a chimpanzee which we share more than 99 \ % of the active genes with .
He concludes that the breaking point is the emergence thinking -- thus third-semester abortions are out , unless mother is in danger .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think that Carl Sagan has pretty much nailed it in his essay [2think.org], published in Billions and Billions.
To summarize: the extremes (all-on pro-life or all-on pro-choice) are just political stances and are thoughtless positions to take; we need to think of what makes us human -- what's the difference between us an say, a chimpanzee which we share more than 99\% of the active genes with.
He concludes that the breaking point is the emergence thinking -- thus third-semester abortions are out, unless mother is in danger.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31361182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31395780</id>
	<title>Re: That ignorant insensitive bitch....</title>
	<author>Schraegstrichpunkt</author>
	<datestamp>1267970760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I hope for the sake of her son that she finds some compassion and spiritual enlightenment.</p></div><p>She has.  You just disagree.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>God knows she needs it.</p></div><p>How do you know that?  Is it possible in your worldview for your God to disagree with you?

</p><p>"ought" != "is"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope for the sake of her son that she finds some compassion and spiritual enlightenment.She has .
You just disagree.God knows she needs it.How do you know that ?
Is it possible in your worldview for your God to disagree with you ?
" ought " ! = " is "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope for the sake of her son that she finds some compassion and spiritual enlightenment.She has.
You just disagree.God knows she needs it.How do you know that?
Is it possible in your worldview for your God to disagree with you?
"ought" != "is"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31315366</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31337926</id>
	<title>Re:her abortion?</title>
	<author>tnk1</author>
	<datestamp>1267533540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, you are comparing the two words as though they were both equivalent in terms of being scientific terms for the stages of human gestation.  "Child" is not a member of the development sequence that would go something like zygote to embryo to fetus.  It is a term that designates a relationship to the mother.  In that sense, a child could be considered a child of someone from the day it is conceived to the day it dies.</p><p>You could argue the point where the relationship begins from (ie. not real until it is born), but there is nothing in the definition that implies that this must be the case.  Therefore, you can't improve on his pedantry with your statement because your assertion is debatable.</p><p>It's also wrong, because it's not a fetus at that stage, but that's not as much fun to type.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , you are comparing the two words as though they were both equivalent in terms of being scientific terms for the stages of human gestation .
" Child " is not a member of the development sequence that would go something like zygote to embryo to fetus .
It is a term that designates a relationship to the mother .
In that sense , a child could be considered a child of someone from the day it is conceived to the day it dies.You could argue the point where the relationship begins from ( ie .
not real until it is born ) , but there is nothing in the definition that implies that this must be the case .
Therefore , you ca n't improve on his pedantry with your statement because your assertion is debatable.It 's also wrong , because it 's not a fetus at that stage , but that 's not as much fun to type .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, you are comparing the two words as though they were both equivalent in terms of being scientific terms for the stages of human gestation.
"Child" is not a member of the development sequence that would go something like zygote to embryo to fetus.
It is a term that designates a relationship to the mother.
In that sense, a child could be considered a child of someone from the day it is conceived to the day it dies.You could argue the point where the relationship begins from (ie.
not real until it is born), but there is nothing in the definition that implies that this must be the case.
Therefore, you can't improve on his pedantry with your statement because your assertion is debatable.It's also wrong, because it's not a fetus at that stage, but that's not as much fun to type.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31325686</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31301672</id>
	<title>Re:RU-486</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267283700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have a great and God-LESS day.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have a great and God-LESS day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have a great and God-LESS day.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31292014</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31292014</id>
	<title>RU-486</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267186560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ask your doctor if RU-486 is right for you.*</p><p>*Side effects may include freaky, hoochy mamma eyelid discoloration.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ask your doctor if RU-486 is right for you .
* * Side effects may include freaky , hoochy mamma eyelid discoloration .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ask your doctor if RU-486 is right for you.
**Side effects may include freaky, hoochy mamma eyelid discoloration.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31315152</id>
	<title>her abortion?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267455540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>If she really tweeted her abortion I would be very impressed, but I suspect that she really tweeted her child's abortion.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If she really tweeted her abortion I would be very impressed , but I suspect that she really tweeted her child 's abortion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If she really tweeted her abortion I would be very impressed, but I suspect that she really tweeted her child's abortion.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31386954</id>
	<title>Re:Murderer</title>
	<author>Dare nMc</author>
	<datestamp>1267902600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We did have laws against abortion once, it just pushed abortion "underground" where their was no counseling, no safety.  We were killing the mothers, and the kid without any chance to tell of other options (like birth+adoption.)   I realize you may think it is OK to kill the woman having a abortion as retribution for her acts.  But the majority of people do not agree, and thus we have the more humane law (again in the eyes of most people) allowing them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We did have laws against abortion once , it just pushed abortion " underground " where their was no counseling , no safety .
We were killing the mothers , and the kid without any chance to tell of other options ( like birth + adoption .
) I realize you may think it is OK to kill the woman having a abortion as retribution for her acts .
But the majority of people do not agree , and thus we have the more humane law ( again in the eyes of most people ) allowing them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We did have laws against abortion once, it just pushed abortion "underground" where their was no counseling, no safety.
We were killing the mothers, and the kid without any chance to tell of other options (like birth+adoption.
)   I realize you may think it is OK to kill the woman having a abortion as retribution for her acts.
But the majority of people do not agree, and thus we have the more humane law (again in the eyes of most people) allowing them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31332794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31364466</id>
	<title>SHE WOULD HAVE DIED</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267704960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>those pills should be illegal</i></p><p>Her doctor told her that having another child could kill her.  That would leave her present child without a mother.</p><p>This medicine terminated the pregnancy before cell differentiation took place (no brain = no feelings = not a person).  This was the most humane thing she could have done in the circumstances.</p><p>I, for one, am very glad this medicine is available, as it just made sure that one already-living child still has a mother.</p><p><i>What is surreal is that she's able to do this in this day and age. </i></p><p>What is surreal is that people as incompassionate and ignorant as you seem to think you are champions of moral virtue, with no concept of the harm you actually cause, in this day and age.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>those pills should be illegalHer doctor told her that having another child could kill her .
That would leave her present child without a mother.This medicine terminated the pregnancy before cell differentiation took place ( no brain = no feelings = not a person ) .
This was the most humane thing she could have done in the circumstances.I , for one , am very glad this medicine is available , as it just made sure that one already-living child still has a mother.What is surreal is that she 's able to do this in this day and age .
What is surreal is that people as incompassionate and ignorant as you seem to think you are champions of moral virtue , with no concept of the harm you actually cause , in this day and age .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>those pills should be illegalHer doctor told her that having another child could kill her.
That would leave her present child without a mother.This medicine terminated the pregnancy before cell differentiation took place (no brain = no feelings = not a person).
This was the most humane thing she could have done in the circumstances.I, for one, am very glad this medicine is available, as it just made sure that one already-living child still has a mother.What is surreal is that she's able to do this in this day and age.
What is surreal is that people as incompassionate and ignorant as you seem to think you are champions of moral virtue, with no concept of the harm you actually cause, in this day and age.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31332794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31332794</id>
	<title>Murderer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267557180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What is surreal is that she's able to do this in this day and age.<br>There should be laws against abortion, and those pills should be illegal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What is surreal is that she 's able to do this in this day and age.There should be laws against abortion , and those pills should be illegal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is surreal is that she's able to do this in this day and age.There should be laws against abortion, and those pills should be illegal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31325686</id>
	<title>Re:her abortion?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267458060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you're going to be pedantic, then I think you meant her \_fetus' abortion\_.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're going to be pedantic , then I think you meant her \ _fetus ' abortion \ _ .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're going to be pedantic, then I think you meant her \_fetus' abortion\_.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31315152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31400652</id>
	<title>makes no sense:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268064240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I want to live longer, that's why I am getting an abortion." - crazy makeup lady</p><p>I feel sorry for that kid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I want to live longer , that 's why I am getting an abortion .
" - crazy makeup ladyI feel sorry for that kid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I want to live longer, that's why I am getting an abortion.
" - crazy makeup ladyI feel sorry for that kid.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31347646</id>
	<title>Re:Murderer</title>
	<author>DeadCatX2</author>
	<datestamp>1267640700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did it have a name?  Date of birth?  Did it even have eyes, or a brain to feel with?</p><p>If you want to be anti-choice, that's fine.  But until cells start to differentiate, it's not a human, not a baby, not even a fetus; it's a parasite that feeds off of its host.  For all we know it might not even be viable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did it have a name ?
Date of birth ?
Did it even have eyes , or a brain to feel with ? If you want to be anti-choice , that 's fine .
But until cells start to differentiate , it 's not a human , not a baby , not even a fetus ; it 's a parasite that feeds off of its host .
For all we know it might not even be viable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did it have a name?
Date of birth?
Did it even have eyes, or a brain to feel with?If you want to be anti-choice, that's fine.
But until cells start to differentiate, it's not a human, not a baby, not even a fetus; it's a parasite that feeds off of its host.
For all we know it might not even be viable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31332794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31297008</id>
	<title>More power to her.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267290180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Any stance on abortion is irrelevant here. This is about tweeting it. She kept tweeting (which is something she does every day) through something controversial, instead of self-censoring, so more power to her!.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Any stance on abortion is irrelevant here .
This is about tweeting it .
She kept tweeting ( which is something she does every day ) through something controversial , instead of self-censoring , so more power to her ! .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any stance on abortion is irrelevant here.
This is about tweeting it.
She kept tweeting (which is something she does every day) through something controversial, instead of self-censoring, so more power to her!.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31408654</id>
	<title>Re:Murderer</title>
	<author>davidbofinger</author>
	<datestamp>1268058120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>conception is [...] fairly instantaneous</p></div><p>
Could this be why you're having trouble keeping a girlfriend?
</p><p><div class="quote"><p>If you can't define a clear, definable and measurable event, then you're relying on "statistical personhood"</p></div><p>
Shifting to serious answers, one would be to err on the side of caution.
</p><p>
Another would be: the potential abortee starts out as a fertilised egg with perhaps zero rights and ends as a human being with full rights. You seem to be assuming that there's a moment in-between where it quantum jumps from one to the other but it probably makes more sense to assume it's continuous. In which case somewhere in-between it has the rights of, for instance, a dog. In that case we might only be committing mild violations of rights, though rather more often. People tend to be uncomfortable with seeing personhood as continuous, though.
</p><p>
Caveat: I am biologically incapable of requiring an abortion.
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>conception is [ ... ] fairly instantaneous Could this be why you 're having trouble keeping a girlfriend ?
If you ca n't define a clear , definable and measurable event , then you 're relying on " statistical personhood " Shifting to serious answers , one would be to err on the side of caution .
Another would be : the potential abortee starts out as a fertilised egg with perhaps zero rights and ends as a human being with full rights .
You seem to be assuming that there 's a moment in-between where it quantum jumps from one to the other but it probably makes more sense to assume it 's continuous .
In which case somewhere in-between it has the rights of , for instance , a dog .
In that case we might only be committing mild violations of rights , though rather more often .
People tend to be uncomfortable with seeing personhood as continuous , though .
Caveat : I am biologically incapable of requiring an abortion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>conception is [...] fairly instantaneous
Could this be why you're having trouble keeping a girlfriend?
If you can't define a clear, definable and measurable event, then you're relying on "statistical personhood"
Shifting to serious answers, one would be to err on the side of caution.
Another would be: the potential abortee starts out as a fertilised egg with perhaps zero rights and ends as a human being with full rights.
You seem to be assuming that there's a moment in-between where it quantum jumps from one to the other but it probably makes more sense to assume it's continuous.
In which case somewhere in-between it has the rights of, for instance, a dog.
In that case we might only be committing mild violations of rights, though rather more often.
People tend to be uncomfortable with seeing personhood as continuous, though.
Caveat: I am biologically incapable of requiring an abortion.

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31361182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31296336</id>
	<title>Damn!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267281240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Someone hit that?!?!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone hit that ? ! ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone hit that?!?
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31350064</id>
	<title>Re:Just imagine...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267609080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"So you're saying I could have had an older brother??"</p><p>The answer to this question is *always* "yes."  Nobody has their first child the moment they are capable of having a first child, and every moment that a woman is not pregnant is a moment that she could have been pregnant.</p><p>Every time a woman menstruates, a potential older sibling is lost.</p><p>Every time a man jerks off, millions of potential older siblings are lost.</p><p>So what's the difference?</p><p>An embryo is not a person.  An embryo could potentially become a person someday...just like a sperm cell...but isn't yet a person...just like an egg.</p><p>To draw the line so early in pregnancy is ludicrous.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" So you 're saying I could have had an older brother ? ?
" The answer to this question is * always * " yes .
" Nobody has their first child the moment they are capable of having a first child , and every moment that a woman is not pregnant is a moment that she could have been pregnant.Every time a woman menstruates , a potential older sibling is lost.Every time a man jerks off , millions of potential older siblings are lost.So what 's the difference ? An embryo is not a person .
An embryo could potentially become a person someday...just like a sperm cell...but is n't yet a person...just like an egg.To draw the line so early in pregnancy is ludicrous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"So you're saying I could have had an older brother??
"The answer to this question is *always* "yes.
"  Nobody has their first child the moment they are capable of having a first child, and every moment that a woman is not pregnant is a moment that she could have been pregnant.Every time a woman menstruates, a potential older sibling is lost.Every time a man jerks off, millions of potential older siblings are lost.So what's the difference?An embryo is not a person.
An embryo could potentially become a person someday...just like a sperm cell...but isn't yet a person...just like an egg.To draw the line so early in pregnancy is ludicrous.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31319408</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31304524</id>
	<title>That's a man, baby! a man!</title>
	<author>ZERO1ZERO</author>
	<datestamp>1267360980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As Austin Powers, international man of mystery would say.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As Austin Powers , international man of mystery would say .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As Austin Powers, international man of mystery would say.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31319558</id>
	<title>Re: That ignorant insensitive bitch....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267471920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><em>She didn't have to say, "Have a Godless day."</em>

<br> <br>

Nor do people have to say "Have a blessed day".  Same thing.


<br> <br>

<em>What a piece of detritus she is for including that little "gem."</em>

<br> <br>

Thank you for proving the point that religious people aren't as peaceful as they claim to be.

<br> <br>

<em>God knows she needs it.</em>

<br> <br>

If God doesn't exist, how can it know what she needs?</htmltext>
<tokenext>She did n't have to say , " Have a Godless day .
" Nor do people have to say " Have a blessed day " .
Same thing .
What a piece of detritus she is for including that little " gem .
" Thank you for proving the point that religious people are n't as peaceful as they claim to be .
God knows she needs it .
If God does n't exist , how can it know what she needs ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>She didn't have to say, "Have a Godless day.
"

 

Nor do people have to say "Have a blessed day".
Same thing.
What a piece of detritus she is for including that little "gem.
"

 

Thank you for proving the point that religious people aren't as peaceful as they claim to be.
God knows she needs it.
If God doesn't exist, how can it know what she needs?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31315366</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31410460</id>
	<title>Re:Murderer</title>
	<author>Gastrobot</author>
	<datestamp>1268075460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A human can be a human without a name.  I'm having trouble finding an example but I believe that some cultures wait a period of time before naming infants.<br>
A date of birth does not define humanity.  Consider a woman two weeks past due.  Her baby is fully developed, feeling, thinking, dreaming, moving.  The fact that that baby has not yet been physically separated from its mother is irrelevant to its humanity.<br>
Some human beings are born without eyes.<br>
<br>
You argue that having a brain to feel with is a requisite for humanity.  I disagree.  Consider a man in a coma.  If I kill him then it is wrong because he may have come out of his coma at some point in time.  The fact that at that point in time he appeared to have no thoughts, sensory input, or motor output, does not stop me from being a murderer.  At this point I see several options:  One can concede that I am correct and that not yet having developed a nervous system does not preclude humanity.  One can argue that it is not murder to kill the comatose man.  One can argue that my example is inappropriate.  I'll skip the first two possibilities and focus on the third.<br>
<br>
One could say that the comatose man is distinguished from the zygote in that the comatose man is not brain dead and presumably has some neural activity.  Granted.  I chose a comatose man because it fits our current level of technology.  If that comparison causes quibbling then I'll change my comatose man into a cryogenically frozen normal man.  He's at absolute zero - there are no chemical reactions occurring within him.  He can be safely thawed out with nanotechnology to repair his shattered cell membranes.  He is just as unthinking as the zygote.  If it is wrong to destroy him then I'd say that the zygote being unthinking has no relevance on the morality of destroying it.  An interesting side-note is that the zygote is arguably more alive than my ice-man.<br>
<br>
Alternatively one could argue that my coma patient is distinguished from my zygote in that he was once thinking while the zygote has not yet progressed to such a level.  The entirety of this debate could be brought to a discussion of the metaphysical since "human" is a definition that we've come up with and not something truly innate to nature but particularly an attempt to distinguish between two equally unthinking things based on the fact that one once thought seems to step outside of what the situation is and looks to a level outside of nature.  It may hinge on the idea that humanity is gained at a certain point of intellect and not lost until death.  If we go the route of the metaphysical then I'd say we need to define the criteria for what metaphysical aspect makes a human a human (personally I'd say ensoulment).  Moreover you'd have to choose a point in time that this trait was gained.  I can understand arguments that demand a higher level of thinking than what is possessed by a zygote but I think that it is quite difficult to nail down a point where humanity would be gained when one considers the span of human intelligence and, in particular, the limitations that some human beings live with.  If a certain manner of thinking or awareness is required then we'd have to be open to the idea that some among us don't possess it.<br>
<br>
The comparison to a parasite is not helpful.  I acknowledge that there is a similarity to parasitism in that a developing child normally puts an increased burden on the mother to supply resources.  The similarities end there.  I am not a doctor but my understanding is that having children increases the life expectancy of a woman.  I am not a biologist but I've never heard anyone talk about parasitism in regard to parent/child relationships (except in other abortion discussions).  I believe that parent/child relationships are generally excluded from the classification of parisitism.  Beyond the biological aspect of your statement you seem to be undermining the idea of a zygote being human by comparing it to a parasite.  Even if it were a parasite then that would not preclude humanity.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A human can be a human without a name .
I 'm having trouble finding an example but I believe that some cultures wait a period of time before naming infants .
A date of birth does not define humanity .
Consider a woman two weeks past due .
Her baby is fully developed , feeling , thinking , dreaming , moving .
The fact that that baby has not yet been physically separated from its mother is irrelevant to its humanity .
Some human beings are born without eyes .
You argue that having a brain to feel with is a requisite for humanity .
I disagree .
Consider a man in a coma .
If I kill him then it is wrong because he may have come out of his coma at some point in time .
The fact that at that point in time he appeared to have no thoughts , sensory input , or motor output , does not stop me from being a murderer .
At this point I see several options : One can concede that I am correct and that not yet having developed a nervous system does not preclude humanity .
One can argue that it is not murder to kill the comatose man .
One can argue that my example is inappropriate .
I 'll skip the first two possibilities and focus on the third .
One could say that the comatose man is distinguished from the zygote in that the comatose man is not brain dead and presumably has some neural activity .
Granted. I chose a comatose man because it fits our current level of technology .
If that comparison causes quibbling then I 'll change my comatose man into a cryogenically frozen normal man .
He 's at absolute zero - there are no chemical reactions occurring within him .
He can be safely thawed out with nanotechnology to repair his shattered cell membranes .
He is just as unthinking as the zygote .
If it is wrong to destroy him then I 'd say that the zygote being unthinking has no relevance on the morality of destroying it .
An interesting side-note is that the zygote is arguably more alive than my ice-man .
Alternatively one could argue that my coma patient is distinguished from my zygote in that he was once thinking while the zygote has not yet progressed to such a level .
The entirety of this debate could be brought to a discussion of the metaphysical since " human " is a definition that we 've come up with and not something truly innate to nature but particularly an attempt to distinguish between two equally unthinking things based on the fact that one once thought seems to step outside of what the situation is and looks to a level outside of nature .
It may hinge on the idea that humanity is gained at a certain point of intellect and not lost until death .
If we go the route of the metaphysical then I 'd say we need to define the criteria for what metaphysical aspect makes a human a human ( personally I 'd say ensoulment ) .
Moreover you 'd have to choose a point in time that this trait was gained .
I can understand arguments that demand a higher level of thinking than what is possessed by a zygote but I think that it is quite difficult to nail down a point where humanity would be gained when one considers the span of human intelligence and , in particular , the limitations that some human beings live with .
If a certain manner of thinking or awareness is required then we 'd have to be open to the idea that some among us do n't possess it .
The comparison to a parasite is not helpful .
I acknowledge that there is a similarity to parasitism in that a developing child normally puts an increased burden on the mother to supply resources .
The similarities end there .
I am not a doctor but my understanding is that having children increases the life expectancy of a woman .
I am not a biologist but I 've never heard anyone talk about parasitism in regard to parent/child relationships ( except in other abortion discussions ) .
I believe that parent/child relationships are generally excluded from the classification of parisitism .
Beyond the biological aspect of your statement you seem to be undermining the idea of a zygote being human by comparing it to a parasite .
Even if it were a parasite then that would not preclude humanity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A human can be a human without a name.
I'm having trouble finding an example but I believe that some cultures wait a period of time before naming infants.
A date of birth does not define humanity.
Consider a woman two weeks past due.
Her baby is fully developed, feeling, thinking, dreaming, moving.
The fact that that baby has not yet been physically separated from its mother is irrelevant to its humanity.
Some human beings are born without eyes.
You argue that having a brain to feel with is a requisite for humanity.
I disagree.
Consider a man in a coma.
If I kill him then it is wrong because he may have come out of his coma at some point in time.
The fact that at that point in time he appeared to have no thoughts, sensory input, or motor output, does not stop me from being a murderer.
At this point I see several options:  One can concede that I am correct and that not yet having developed a nervous system does not preclude humanity.
One can argue that it is not murder to kill the comatose man.
One can argue that my example is inappropriate.
I'll skip the first two possibilities and focus on the third.
One could say that the comatose man is distinguished from the zygote in that the comatose man is not brain dead and presumably has some neural activity.
Granted.  I chose a comatose man because it fits our current level of technology.
If that comparison causes quibbling then I'll change my comatose man into a cryogenically frozen normal man.
He's at absolute zero - there are no chemical reactions occurring within him.
He can be safely thawed out with nanotechnology to repair his shattered cell membranes.
He is just as unthinking as the zygote.
If it is wrong to destroy him then I'd say that the zygote being unthinking has no relevance on the morality of destroying it.
An interesting side-note is that the zygote is arguably more alive than my ice-man.
Alternatively one could argue that my coma patient is distinguished from my zygote in that he was once thinking while the zygote has not yet progressed to such a level.
The entirety of this debate could be brought to a discussion of the metaphysical since "human" is a definition that we've come up with and not something truly innate to nature but particularly an attempt to distinguish between two equally unthinking things based on the fact that one once thought seems to step outside of what the situation is and looks to a level outside of nature.
It may hinge on the idea that humanity is gained at a certain point of intellect and not lost until death.
If we go the route of the metaphysical then I'd say we need to define the criteria for what metaphysical aspect makes a human a human (personally I'd say ensoulment).
Moreover you'd have to choose a point in time that this trait was gained.
I can understand arguments that demand a higher level of thinking than what is possessed by a zygote but I think that it is quite difficult to nail down a point where humanity would be gained when one considers the span of human intelligence and, in particular, the limitations that some human beings live with.
If a certain manner of thinking or awareness is required then we'd have to be open to the idea that some among us don't possess it.
The comparison to a parasite is not helpful.
I acknowledge that there is a similarity to parasitism in that a developing child normally puts an increased burden on the mother to supply resources.
The similarities end there.
I am not a doctor but my understanding is that having children increases the life expectancy of a woman.
I am not a biologist but I've never heard anyone talk about parasitism in regard to parent/child relationships (except in other abortion discussions).
I believe that parent/child relationships are generally excluded from the classification of parisitism.
Beyond the biological aspect of your statement you seem to be undermining the idea of a zygote being human by comparing it to a parasite.
Even if it were a parasite then that would not preclude humanity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31347646</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31315150</id>
	<title>A question about abortion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267455540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If having an abortion isn't killing anything to any greater degree than pulling out a fingernail, and so the major arguments should be about convenience (is this a convenient time for me - do I have other things to do in my life), then why aren't fetuses with genetic illnesses and deformities aborted by default? After all, they would be inconvenient for the mother.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If having an abortion is n't killing anything to any greater degree than pulling out a fingernail , and so the major arguments should be about convenience ( is this a convenient time for me - do I have other things to do in my life ) , then why are n't fetuses with genetic illnesses and deformities aborted by default ?
After all , they would be inconvenient for the mother .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If having an abortion isn't killing anything to any greater degree than pulling out a fingernail, and so the major arguments should be about convenience (is this a convenient time for me - do I have other things to do in my life), then why aren't fetuses with genetic illnesses and deformities aborted by default?
After all, they would be inconvenient for the mother.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31309468</id>
	<title>Not quite an abortion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267356900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While RU-486 terminates a pregnancy, it only does so during the early weeks, before the embryo becomes implanted in the uterus.  At that time of gestation, the spontaneous abortion rate (i.e. miscarriage) is 33\% to 50\% -- we don't really know the number exactly because that early in a pregnancy many women don't realize they are pregnant.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While RU-486 terminates a pregnancy , it only does so during the early weeks , before the embryo becomes implanted in the uterus .
At that time of gestation , the spontaneous abortion rate ( i.e .
miscarriage ) is 33 \ % to 50 \ % -- we do n't really know the number exactly because that early in a pregnancy many women do n't realize they are pregnant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While RU-486 terminates a pregnancy, it only does so during the early weeks, before the embryo becomes implanted in the uterus.
At that time of gestation, the spontaneous abortion rate (i.e.
miscarriage) is 33\% to 50\% -- we don't really know the number exactly because that early in a pregnancy many women don't realize they are pregnant.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31294774</id>
	<title>Great!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267207620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now when some religious fundamentalist kills her she can claim a Darwin Award!<br>(I think she is eligible because you can't really hold the individual nutjob responsible when she publishes her name and details on the Internets)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now when some religious fundamentalist kills her she can claim a Darwin Award !
( I think she is eligible because you ca n't really hold the individual nutjob responsible when she publishes her name and details on the Internets )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now when some religious fundamentalist kills her she can claim a Darwin Award!
(I think she is eligible because you can't really hold the individual nutjob responsible when she publishes her name and details on the Internets)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31396136</id>
	<title>Coming Soon</title>
	<author>Olipro</author>
	<datestamp>1267972860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>the new, improved RU-Pentium</htmltext>
<tokenext>the new , improved RU-Pentium</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the new, improved RU-Pentium</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31307060</id>
	<title>What a moron.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267381740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if she also tweets about all the meth she does. Ugh, her scary eyes and terrible skin and hair are proof enough.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if she also tweets about all the meth she does .
Ugh , her scary eyes and terrible skin and hair are proof enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if she also tweets about all the meth she does.
Ugh, her scary eyes and terrible skin and hair are proof enough.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31323790</id>
	<title>WOW , DIE</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267445160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I want my 5 mins of my life back.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I want my 5 mins of my life back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want my 5 mins of my life back.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31297542</id>
	<title>Re:Everyday?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267295040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Her clientele isn't into using condoms.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Her clientele is n't into using condoms .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Her clientele isn't into using condoms.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31292940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31368052</id>
	<title>Truth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267732080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In fact, everyone, you should do a bit of research in to her.</p><p>She is in fact, a mother already, and after extreme amounts of complications in the birth of her first child, she decided to abort this one after talking to her partner.</p><p>Seriously, I though SlashDot had people who were intelligent.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In fact , everyone , you should do a bit of research in to her.She is in fact , a mother already , and after extreme amounts of complications in the birth of her first child , she decided to abort this one after talking to her partner.Seriously , I though SlashDot had people who were intelligent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In fact, everyone, you should do a bit of research in to her.She is in fact, a mother already, and after extreme amounts of complications in the birth of her first child, she decided to abort this one after talking to her partner.Seriously, I though SlashDot had people who were intelligent.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31374234</id>
	<title>Re:Murderer</title>
	<author>justinlee37</author>
	<datestamp>1267819920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What is surreal is that people still feel the need to have children in this day and age. Overpopulation is the world's most serious economic crisis; every other economic problem is simply a symptom of overpopulation. We should be encouraging citizens to sterilize themselves and perform as many abortions as possible so that the human race as a whole may have a higher quality of life.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What is surreal is that people still feel the need to have children in this day and age .
Overpopulation is the world 's most serious economic crisis ; every other economic problem is simply a symptom of overpopulation .
We should be encouraging citizens to sterilize themselves and perform as many abortions as possible so that the human race as a whole may have a higher quality of life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is surreal is that people still feel the need to have children in this day and age.
Overpopulation is the world's most serious economic crisis; every other economic problem is simply a symptom of overpopulation.
We should be encouraging citizens to sterilize themselves and perform as many abortions as possible so that the human race as a whole may have a higher quality of life.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31332794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31319408</id>
	<title>Just imagine...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267471380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>once she starts having kids, and one of her kids looks up his/her mommie's old tweet threads.</p><p>"So you're saying I could have had an older brother??"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>once she starts having kids , and one of her kids looks up his/her mommie 's old tweet threads .
" So you 're saying I could have had an older brother ? ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>once she starts having kids, and one of her kids looks up his/her mommie's old tweet threads.
"So you're saying I could have had an older brother??
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31423924</id>
	<title>Re:Murderer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268212560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well,there really should be a rule that everybody on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. has to have an IQ above 75, but that has not stopped you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well,there really should be a rule that everybody on / .
has to have an IQ above 75 , but that has not stopped you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well,there really should be a rule that everybody on /.
has to have an IQ above 75, but that has not stopped you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31332794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31352054</id>
	<title>Re: That ignorant insensitive bitch....</title>
	<author>iamhassi</author>
	<datestamp>1267618560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>"I hope for the sake of her son that she finds some compassion and spiritual enlightenment. "</i>
<br> <br>
Her poor son!  Someday he's going to ask "Hey mommy what are you famous for?"  What's she going to answer?  "Well son, I was the first** (that we know of) to have an abortion on youtube!"
<br> <br>
**she's not really having an abortion on youtube, she's just taking a pill, and since we can't verify her taking the pill we really don't even know if she's done that.
<br> <br>
This is all one big publicity stunt.  She has a book coming out and she's trying to be famous.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" I hope for the sake of her son that she finds some compassion and spiritual enlightenment .
" Her poor son !
Someday he 's going to ask " Hey mommy what are you famous for ?
" What 's she going to answer ?
" Well son , I was the first * * ( that we know of ) to have an abortion on youtube !
" * * she 's not really having an abortion on youtube , she 's just taking a pill , and since we ca n't verify her taking the pill we really do n't even know if she 's done that .
This is all one big publicity stunt .
She has a book coming out and she 's trying to be famous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I hope for the sake of her son that she finds some compassion and spiritual enlightenment.
"
 
Her poor son!
Someday he's going to ask "Hey mommy what are you famous for?
"  What's she going to answer?
"Well son, I was the first** (that we know of) to have an abortion on youtube!
"
 
**she's not really having an abortion on youtube, she's just taking a pill, and since we can't verify her taking the pill we really don't even know if she's done that.
This is all one big publicity stunt.
She has a book coming out and she's trying to be famous.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31315366</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31423256</id>
	<title>Re:Murderer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268158620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>lol u mad?</htmltext>
<tokenext>lol u mad ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>lol u mad?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31332794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31315366</id>
	<title>That ignorant insensitive bitch....</title>
	<author>raymondcarver</author>
	<datestamp>1267456440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>
She didn't have to say, "Have a Godless day."



What a piece of detritus she is for including that little "gem."         Tsk Tsk.



I hope for the sake of her son that she finds some compassion and spiritual enlightenment.  God knows she needs it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>She did n't have to say , " Have a Godless day .
" What a piece of detritus she is for including that little " gem .
" Tsk Tsk .
I hope for the sake of her son that she finds some compassion and spiritual enlightenment .
God knows she needs it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
She didn't have to say, "Have a Godless day.
"



What a piece of detritus she is for including that little "gem.
"         Tsk Tsk.
I hope for the sake of her son that she finds some compassion and spiritual enlightenment.
God knows she needs it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31319818</id>
	<title>Re: That ignorant insensitive bitch....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267472880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you have the right to say "God bless you" then I have the right to say "have a Godless day" thumper-man!</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you have the right to say " God bless you " then I have the right to say " have a Godless day " thumper-man !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you have the right to say "God bless you" then I have the right to say "have a Godless day" thumper-man!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31315366</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_161200_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31423256
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31332794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_161200_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31363524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31315366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_161200_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31386954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31332794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_161200_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31374234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31332794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_161200_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31350064
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31319408
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_161200_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31400584
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31289094
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_161200_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31350172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31332794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_161200_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31408654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31361182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31347646
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31332794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_161200_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31295138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31292014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_161200_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31319558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31315366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_161200_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31301672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31292014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_161200_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31337926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31325686
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31315152
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_161200_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31297542
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31292940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_161200_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31433936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31292014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_161200_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31325060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31319408
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_161200_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31361822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31315152
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_161200_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31393408
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31289094
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_161200_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31347226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31325686
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31315152
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_161200_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31392406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31309468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_161200_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31395780
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31315366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_161200_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31424510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31315366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_161200_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31347364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31315366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_161200_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31406996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31292940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_161200_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31319818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31315366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_161200_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31352054
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31315366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_161200_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31333736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31315366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_161200_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31410460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31347646
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31332794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_161200_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31437108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31361182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31347646
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31332794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_161200_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31324208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31319408
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_161200_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31326120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31319408
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_161200_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31423924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31332794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_161200_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31364466
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31332794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_161200_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31458468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31312120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_161200.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31315366
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31333736
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31395780
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31347364
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31424510
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31319558
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31363524
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31352054
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31319818
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_161200.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31319408
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31324208
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31326120
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31325060
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31350064
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_161200.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31332794
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31364466
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31423924
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31423256
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31374234
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31347646
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31410460
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31361182
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31408654
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31437108
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31350172
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31386954
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_161200.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31297008
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_161200.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31296336
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_161200.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31289094
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31393408
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31400584
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_161200.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31292940
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31297542
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31406996
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_161200.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31323790
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_161200.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31315152
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31361822
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31325686
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31337926
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31347226
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_161200.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31315150
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_161200.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31396136
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_161200.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31312120
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31458468
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_161200.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31292014
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31301672
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31433936
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31295138
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_161200.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31309468
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_161200.31392406
</commentlist>
</conversation>
