<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_25_1632209</id>
	<title>Youtube Pulls Original "Rickroll" Video<span class="vballoon-marquee rd\_5"><span>Comments:</span><a href="#">97</a></span></title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1267117980000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://twitter.com/VentureBeat" rel="nofollow">@VentureBeat</a> writes <i>"Youtube <a href="http://digital.venturebeat.com/2010/02/24/youtube-pulls-original-rickroll-video-after-30-million-views/?utm\_source=twitter&amp;utm\_medium=twitter-publisher-main&amp;utm\_campaign=twitter">pulled the original 'Rickroll' video</a> Wednesday night. Don't worry, after a lot of email about the loss of such an important piece of cultural history, Youtube put it back up, saying that they're never gonna say goodbye to the video that's had over 30 million views."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>@ VentureBeat writes " Youtube pulled the original 'Rickroll ' video Wednesday night .
Do n't worry , after a lot of email about the loss of such an important piece of cultural history , Youtube put it back up , saying that they 're never gon na say goodbye to the video that 's had over 30 million views .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>@VentureBeat writes "Youtube pulled the original 'Rickroll' video Wednesday night.
Don't worry, after a lot of email about the loss of such an important piece of cultural history, Youtube put it back up, saying that they're never gonna say goodbye to the video that's had over 30 million views.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31287398</id>
	<title>Re:peter waterman complains</title>
	<author>CaseM</author>
	<datestamp>1267209060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The way copyright laws are set up now we've created a new aristocracy that need not create anything of value, they need only keep licensing the works of their dead spouse/father/mother/whoever in perpetuity. These people are leeches in every sense of the word, taking from society and offering nothing in return. Copyrights should exist only as long as long as the copyright holder lives. No more, no less.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The way copyright laws are set up now we 've created a new aristocracy that need not create anything of value , they need only keep licensing the works of their dead spouse/father/mother/whoever in perpetuity .
These people are leeches in every sense of the word , taking from society and offering nothing in return .
Copyrights should exist only as long as long as the copyright holder lives .
No more , no less .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The way copyright laws are set up now we've created a new aristocracy that need not create anything of value, they need only keep licensing the works of their dead spouse/father/mother/whoever in perpetuity.
These people are leeches in every sense of the word, taking from society and offering nothing in return.
Copyrights should exist only as long as long as the copyright holder lives.
No more, no less.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31274770</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31283608</id>
	<title>Re:Which poses the question:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267190160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmmm... link it to an <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pLj9BoNb1U" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Astley vs. Nine Inch Nails mashup</a> [youtube.com]?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmmm... link it to an Astley vs. Nine Inch Nails mashup [ youtube.com ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmmm... link it to an Astley vs. Nine Inch Nails mashup [youtube.com]?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31273958</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31278826</id>
	<title>I dont get this rickroll thing</title>
	<author>unity100</author>
	<datestamp>1267096980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>maybe because i was a teenager when this song came out, and the song was a chart topper. maybe it was compliant with music tastes of that time. i cant just understand what is so hilarious or odd about this video, and what the point of 'rickrolling' is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>maybe because i was a teenager when this song came out , and the song was a chart topper .
maybe it was compliant with music tastes of that time .
i cant just understand what is so hilarious or odd about this video , and what the point of 'rickrolling ' is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>maybe because i was a teenager when this song came out, and the song was a chart topper.
maybe it was compliant with music tastes of that time.
i cant just understand what is so hilarious or odd about this video, and what the point of 'rickrolling' is.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31276124</id>
	<title>Re: Rickroll by Rickshaw</title>
	<author>AshboryBass</author>
	<datestamp>1267129380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I enjoyed Rickrolling the Boise <a href="http://www.newbelgium.com/tour-de-fat" title="newbelgium.com" rel="nofollow">Tour de Fat</a> [newbelgium.com] cycling event in 2008:

<ul> <li>(warning, video plays automatically) <a href="http://www.rickshawseason.com/tour-de-fat-2008-bois/" title="rickshawseason.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.rickshawseason.com/tour-de-fat-2008-bois/</a> [rickshawseason.com] </li></ul><p>

Great event every year, and great fun.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I enjoyed Rickrolling the Boise Tour de Fat [ newbelgium.com ] cycling event in 2008 : ( warning , video plays automatically ) http : //www.rickshawseason.com/tour-de-fat-2008-bois/ [ rickshawseason.com ] Great event every year , and great fun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I enjoyed Rickrolling the Boise Tour de Fat [newbelgium.com] cycling event in 2008:

 (warning, video plays automatically) http://www.rickshawseason.com/tour-de-fat-2008-bois/ [rickshawseason.com] 

Great event every year, and great fun.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31273926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31275434</id>
	<title>Nice try...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267126860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry, but I am *not* going to follow the link to TFA...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry , but I am * not * going to follow the link to TFA.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry, but I am *not* going to follow the link to TFA...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31277176</id>
	<title>Re:I like him</title>
	<author>schon</author>
	<datestamp>1267090320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't know why people pick on Astley.</p></div><p>Because he doesn't really exist!   Seriously, he's Kylie Minogue in reverse-drag.  You think it's a co-incidence that they both have the same record label and producers?</p><p>Try this:  grab *any* Kylie Minogue song.  Slow it down by 40\%.  Listen to the voice.</p><p>(And if you think I'm trying to be funny here - I'm dead serious:  <b>try it</b>.  They're the same person.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know why people pick on Astley.Because he does n't really exist !
Seriously , he 's Kylie Minogue in reverse-drag .
You think it 's a co-incidence that they both have the same record label and producers ? Try this : grab * any * Kylie Minogue song .
Slow it down by 40 \ % .
Listen to the voice .
( And if you think I 'm trying to be funny here - I 'm dead serious : try it .
They 're the same person .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know why people pick on Astley.Because he doesn't really exist!
Seriously, he's Kylie Minogue in reverse-drag.
You think it's a co-incidence that they both have the same record label and producers?Try this:  grab *any* Kylie Minogue song.
Slow it down by 40\%.
Listen to the voice.
(And if you think I'm trying to be funny here - I'm dead serious:  try it.
They're the same person.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31274698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31282766</id>
	<title>So does it mean that Slashdot is rickrolled?</title>
	<author>Alex Belits</author>
	<datestamp>1267178580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or rickroll is slashdotted?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or rickroll is slashdotted ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or rickroll is slashdotted?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31274698</id>
	<title>I like him</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267124040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't know why people pick on Astley. I think he has a great crooner's voice. Not many singers today have his ability.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know why people pick on Astley .
I think he has a great crooner 's voice .
Not many singers today have his ability .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know why people pick on Astley.
I think he has a great crooner's voice.
Not many singers today have his ability.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31274770</id>
	<title>peter waterman complains</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267124280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>he only made $16 off the revival</p><p>there's something wrong with this picture</p><p>what is wrong is that ANYONE expects to make money off a 20 year old song</p><p>legally of course, he has grounds to complain. morally and philosophically, the fact that he feels he has any basis to complain is a peek into something very, very wrong with this world</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>he only made $ 16 off the revivalthere 's something wrong with this picturewhat is wrong is that ANYONE expects to make money off a 20 year old songlegally of course , he has grounds to complain .
morally and philosophically , the fact that he feels he has any basis to complain is a peek into something very , very wrong with this world</tokentext>
<sentencetext>he only made $16 off the revivalthere's something wrong with this picturewhat is wrong is that ANYONE expects to make money off a 20 year old songlegally of course, he has grounds to complain.
morally and philosophically, the fact that he feels he has any basis to complain is a peek into something very, very wrong with this world</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31279636</id>
	<title>Re:peter waterman complains</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267102080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Still peddling that bullshit, trying to whore yourself out for some karma points again, I see.</p><p>You made the same comment, almost verbatim, a few days ago in another forum.  I guess that's all you have to say on the topic.  Get off the bandwagon.  Learn to think for yourself, you cheap bastard.</p><p>I told you you couldn't defend your argument.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Still peddling that bullshit , trying to whore yourself out for some karma points again , I see.You made the same comment , almost verbatim , a few days ago in another forum .
I guess that 's all you have to say on the topic .
Get off the bandwagon .
Learn to think for yourself , you cheap bastard.I told you you could n't defend your argument .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Still peddling that bullshit, trying to whore yourself out for some karma points again, I see.You made the same comment, almost verbatim, a few days ago in another forum.
I guess that's all you have to say on the topic.
Get off the bandwagon.
Learn to think for yourself, you cheap bastard.I told you you couldn't defend your argument.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31274770</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31278702</id>
	<title>Prepositions Exit for a Reason</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267096560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Youtube pulled the original 'Rickroll' video ON Wednesday night.</p><p>If you omit the preposition "Wednesday night" is left with no relation to the rest of the sentence.  It sounds like it has just been thrown in there.</p><p>I'm no grammar fanatic but this sentence is so bad it's like a slap in the face to the reader.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Youtube pulled the original 'Rickroll ' video ON Wednesday night.If you omit the preposition " Wednesday night " is left with no relation to the rest of the sentence .
It sounds like it has just been thrown in there.I 'm no grammar fanatic but this sentence is so bad it 's like a slap in the face to the reader .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Youtube pulled the original 'Rickroll' video ON Wednesday night.If you omit the preposition "Wednesday night" is left with no relation to the rest of the sentence.
It sounds like it has just been thrown in there.I'm no grammar fanatic but this sentence is so bad it's like a slap in the face to the reader.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31325912</id>
	<title>Honestly, it wasn't the song</title>
	<author>Azureflare</author>
	<datestamp>1267459980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It was that feeling when you heard the percussive intro. You were like "WTF that is not what I was expecting!!!!!!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... WAT! Why are they dancing, are they laughing at me???"

<br> <br>
The intro to the song made it the best Roll'd video ever. I think it's going to be hard to find one so embarrassing.
<br> <br>
The funny thing is, once you hear Rick Astley singing you realize he is actually a really good vocalist.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It was that feeling when you heard the percussive intro .
You were like " WTF that is not what I was expecting ! ! ! ! ! !
... WAT !
Why are they dancing , are they laughing at me ? ? ?
" The intro to the song made it the best Roll 'd video ever .
I think it 's going to be hard to find one so embarrassing .
The funny thing is , once you hear Rick Astley singing you realize he is actually a really good vocalist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was that feeling when you heard the percussive intro.
You were like "WTF that is not what I was expecting!!!!!!
... WAT!
Why are they dancing, are they laughing at me???
"

 
The intro to the song made it the best Roll'd video ever.
I think it's going to be hard to find one so embarrassing.
The funny thing is, once you hear Rick Astley singing you realize he is actually a really good vocalist.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31275114</id>
	<title>Can't wait...</title>
	<author>AmigaHeretic</author>
	<datestamp>1267125480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...until this is available in Theora!</htmltext>
<tokenext>...until this is available in Theora !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...until this is available in Theora!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31310138</id>
	<title>Re:Too much bandwidth??</title>
	<author>SimonTheSoundMan</author>
	<datestamp>1267361460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, we know that:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Performing two Google searches from a desktop computer can generate about the same amount of carbon dioxide as boiling a kettle for a cup of tea, according to new research.</p></div><p> <a href="http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech\_and\_web/article5489134.ece" title="timesonline.co.uk">http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech\_and\_web/article5489134.ece</a> [timesonline.co.uk]</p><p>I'd hate to know how much CO2 was used for Rickroll.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , we know that : Performing two Google searches from a desktop computer can generate about the same amount of carbon dioxide as boiling a kettle for a cup of tea , according to new research .
http : //technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech \ _and \ _web/article5489134.ece [ timesonline.co.uk ] I 'd hate to know how much CO2 was used for Rickroll .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, we know that:Performing two Google searches from a desktop computer can generate about the same amount of carbon dioxide as boiling a kettle for a cup of tea, according to new research.
http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech\_and\_web/article5489134.ece [timesonline.co.uk]I'd hate to know how much CO2 was used for Rickroll.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31274420</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31275940</id>
	<title>20+ Year Old Songs Still Make Money</title>
	<author>Pollux</author>
	<datestamp>1267128540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>what is wrong is that ANYONE expects to make money off a 20 year old song</i></p><p>Bobby Picket, writer and singer of the hit Halloween song "Monster Mash," earned royalties year after year on the song.  I couldn't find an article to source from online, but my local paper once had a quick bio on the man.  If my recollection serves me correctly, in his later years, he was still collecting about $30,000 per year in royalties.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>what is wrong is that ANYONE expects to make money off a 20 year old songBobby Picket , writer and singer of the hit Halloween song " Monster Mash , " earned royalties year after year on the song .
I could n't find an article to source from online , but my local paper once had a quick bio on the man .
If my recollection serves me correctly , in his later years , he was still collecting about $ 30,000 per year in royalties .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what is wrong is that ANYONE expects to make money off a 20 year old songBobby Picket, writer and singer of the hit Halloween song "Monster Mash," earned royalties year after year on the song.
I couldn't find an article to source from online, but my local paper once had a quick bio on the man.
If my recollection serves me correctly, in his later years, he was still collecting about $30,000 per year in royalties.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31274770</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31277016</id>
	<title>Re:peter waterman complains</title>
	<author>TheLink</author>
	<datestamp>1267089660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Revival?<br><br>How many of the viewers actually wanted to watch his video in this "revival"?<br><br>He thinks he should get paid more than 16 bucks because pranksters were \_inflicting\_ his video on very many unsuspecting people?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Revival ? How many of the viewers actually wanted to watch his video in this " revival " ? He thinks he should get paid more than 16 bucks because pranksters were \ _inflicting \ _ his video on very many unsuspecting people ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Revival?How many of the viewers actually wanted to watch his video in this "revival"?He thinks he should get paid more than 16 bucks because pranksters were \_inflicting\_ his video on very many unsuspecting people?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31274770</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31275428</id>
	<title>Re:Amazing How Long It's Gone On</title>
	<author>lobiusmoop</author>
	<datestamp>1267126800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDl5AMFlqeo" title="youtube.com">Never Gonna Give Your Teen Spirit Up</a> [youtube.com] FTW</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Never Gon na Give Your Teen Spirit Up [ youtube.com ] FTW</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Never Gonna Give Your Teen Spirit Up [youtube.com] FTW</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31273926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31278120</id>
	<title>Re:1988</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267094400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The song is fine. There are tons of completely unbearable 80's pop and this one is among the few that stand out today. it's the cheeziness of the video that makes it work. The acrobatic bartender is just so out of place. It doesn't make any sense and is a mismatch to the theme of the song.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The song is fine .
There are tons of completely unbearable 80 's pop and this one is among the few that stand out today .
it 's the cheeziness of the video that makes it work .
The acrobatic bartender is just so out of place .
It does n't make any sense and is a mismatch to the theme of the song .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The song is fine.
There are tons of completely unbearable 80's pop and this one is among the few that stand out today.
it's the cheeziness of the video that makes it work.
The acrobatic bartender is just so out of place.
It doesn't make any sense and is a mismatch to the theme of the song.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31276608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31277744</id>
	<title>Rickroll take-down gets TV coverage</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267092900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just saw a report on the take-down this morning. I think the reporter had a real good take on the subject, and a concise history (he even mentions 4chan). Here's the link:<br>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just saw a report on the take-down this morning .
I think the reporter had a real good take on the subject , and a concise history ( he even mentions 4chan ) .
Here 's the link : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = oHg5SJYRHA0</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just saw a report on the take-down this morning.
I think the reporter had a real good take on the subject, and a concise history (he even mentions 4chan).
Here's the link:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31274278</id>
	<title>You just got Rick Rolled by Youtube...</title>
	<author>ground.zero.612</author>
	<datestamp>1267122780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>SUCKERS!</htmltext>
<tokenext>SUCKERS !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SUCKERS!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31274422</id>
	<title>Not really up</title>
	<author>marcansoft</author>
	<datestamp>1267123320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>This video contains content from Vevo, who has blocked it in your country on copyright grounds.</p></div> </blockquote><p>Won't work from here. At least now they're blaming it straight on Vevo, though.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This video contains content from Vevo , who has blocked it in your country on copyright grounds .
Wo n't work from here .
At least now they 're blaming it straight on Vevo , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This video contains content from Vevo, who has blocked it in your country on copyright grounds.
Won't work from here.
At least now they're blaming it straight on Vevo, though.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31417218</id>
	<title>REVERSE RACISM</title>
	<author>spazdor</author>
	<datestamp>1268164440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, when a woman dresses as a man, that's just drag.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , when a woman dresses as a man , that 's just drag .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, when a woman dresses as a man, that's just drag.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31277176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31275024</id>
	<title>Maybe it is time...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267125180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>for us to organize, to call up radio stations on April 1st, requesting the song "Never Gonna Give You Up" to be played.</p><p>My username, in md5, incase I ever wish to claim credit: 33852d32794ee88b896b49de0d275c2e</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>for us to organize , to call up radio stations on April 1st , requesting the song " Never Gon na Give You Up " to be played.My username , in md5 , incase I ever wish to claim credit : 33852d32794ee88b896b49de0d275c2e</tokentext>
<sentencetext>for us to organize, to call up radio stations on April 1st, requesting the song "Never Gonna Give You Up" to be played.My username, in md5, incase I ever wish to claim credit: 33852d32794ee88b896b49de0d275c2e</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31278208</id>
	<title>Re:Too much bandwidth??</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267094700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I already blame Rick Astley for pretty much everything else that's wrong with the world--might as well add that to the list.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I already blame Rick Astley for pretty much everything else that 's wrong with the world--might as well add that to the list .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I already blame Rick Astley for pretty much everything else that's wrong with the world--might as well add that to the list.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31274420</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31338676</id>
	<title>Well then</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267536900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While the cool kids use the internet to pull off pranks. The nerds use it to discuss nonsensical crap.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While the cool kids use the internet to pull off pranks .
The nerds use it to discuss nonsensical crap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While the cool kids use the internet to pull off pranks.
The nerds use it to discuss nonsensical crap.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31273936</id>
	<title>It's back up again.</title>
	<author>MirthScout</author>
	<datestamp>1267121700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And has it back up again before anyone can get the story posted.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And has it back up again before anyone can get the story posted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And has it back up again before anyone can get the story posted.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31279632</id>
	<title>Re:Which poses the question:</title>
	<author>jamesh</author>
	<datestamp>1267102020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How do you Rickroll this video?</p></div><p>By posting a link that actually points to a DNF demo?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How do you Rickroll this video ? By posting a link that actually points to a DNF demo ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do you Rickroll this video?By posting a link that actually points to a DNF demo?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31273958</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31275550</id>
	<title>1988</title>
	<author>michaelmalak</author>
	<datestamp>1267127160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>A present-day time traveler going back to 1988 might be surprised to read this New York Times article that extols:<blockquote><div><p>The hottest young English pop star of the moment is Rick Astley, a 21-year-old singer from a suburb of Manchester, whose debut single, ''Never Gonna Give You Up'' (RCA), has sold a million copies in Britain and reached No. 1 ranking in almost every other European country. The song is now rapidly climbing the United States pop charts and is the country's best-selling 12-inch single.</p><p>The record's most striking quality is Mr. Astley's voice - a rich, throbbing baritone that suggests Tom Jones crossed with Luther Vandross. It is definitely not the kind of voice one expects to hear on a contemporary dance record. Since ''Never Gonna Give You Up,'' Mr. Astley has gone on to score two more major English hits, ''Whenever You Need Somebody'' (the title song of his debut album) and a revival of ''When I Fall in Love,'' which re-creates note for note the classic Gordon Jenkins arrangement for Nat (King) Cole's 1957 recording.</p><p>Mr. Astley is the latest discovery of the successful producing and songwriting team of Stock-Aitken-Waterman, which also produces the group Bananarama. The team has popularized a streamlined homogenized pop-disco sound with an unruffled high-gloss surface that stands in marked contrast to the more angular, rhythmically inventive dance-funk of Prince and his disciples.</p><p>''I'm influenced by a lot of black American artists,'' Mr. Astley said in a recent telephone interview. ''Luther Vandross is one of my favorites, and I like James Ingram and Jeffrey Osborne.''</p><p>At least for now, Mr. Astley is content to have his voice packaged by Stock-Aiken-Waterman.</p><p>''I like dance music,'' he said. ''I'm happy doing what I'm doing and want to get more deeply into it.''</p></div></blockquote><p>Astley's videos were a big thing at the time, coming just two years into MTV's decline that was precipitated by Viacom's purchase of it and MTV still had some of its original appeal of showing a) videos that were b) popular.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A present-day time traveler going back to 1988 might be surprised to read this New York Times article that extols : The hottest young English pop star of the moment is Rick Astley , a 21-year-old singer from a suburb of Manchester , whose debut single , ''Never Gon na Give You Up' ' ( RCA ) , has sold a million copies in Britain and reached No .
1 ranking in almost every other European country .
The song is now rapidly climbing the United States pop charts and is the country 's best-selling 12-inch single.The record 's most striking quality is Mr. Astley 's voice - a rich , throbbing baritone that suggests Tom Jones crossed with Luther Vandross .
It is definitely not the kind of voice one expects to hear on a contemporary dance record .
Since ''Never Gon na Give You Up,' ' Mr. Astley has gone on to score two more major English hits , ''Whenever You Need Somebody' ' ( the title song of his debut album ) and a revival of ''When I Fall in Love,' ' which re-creates note for note the classic Gordon Jenkins arrangement for Nat ( King ) Cole 's 1957 recording.Mr .
Astley is the latest discovery of the successful producing and songwriting team of Stock-Aitken-Waterman , which also produces the group Bananarama .
The team has popularized a streamlined homogenized pop-disco sound with an unruffled high-gloss surface that stands in marked contrast to the more angular , rhythmically inventive dance-funk of Prince and his disciples .
''I 'm influenced by a lot of black American artists,' ' Mr. Astley said in a recent telephone interview .
''Luther Vandross is one of my favorites , and I like James Ingram and Jeffrey Osborne .
''At least for now , Mr. Astley is content to have his voice packaged by Stock-Aiken-Waterman .
''I like dance music,' ' he said .
''I 'm happy doing what I 'm doing and want to get more deeply into it .
''Astley 's videos were a big thing at the time , coming just two years into MTV 's decline that was precipitated by Viacom 's purchase of it and MTV still had some of its original appeal of showing a ) videos that were b ) popular .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A present-day time traveler going back to 1988 might be surprised to read this New York Times article that extols:The hottest young English pop star of the moment is Rick Astley, a 21-year-old singer from a suburb of Manchester, whose debut single, ''Never Gonna Give You Up'' (RCA), has sold a million copies in Britain and reached No.
1 ranking in almost every other European country.
The song is now rapidly climbing the United States pop charts and is the country's best-selling 12-inch single.The record's most striking quality is Mr. Astley's voice - a rich, throbbing baritone that suggests Tom Jones crossed with Luther Vandross.
It is definitely not the kind of voice one expects to hear on a contemporary dance record.
Since ''Never Gonna Give You Up,'' Mr. Astley has gone on to score two more major English hits, ''Whenever You Need Somebody'' (the title song of his debut album) and a revival of ''When I Fall in Love,'' which re-creates note for note the classic Gordon Jenkins arrangement for Nat (King) Cole's 1957 recording.Mr.
Astley is the latest discovery of the successful producing and songwriting team of Stock-Aitken-Waterman, which also produces the group Bananarama.
The team has popularized a streamlined homogenized pop-disco sound with an unruffled high-gloss surface that stands in marked contrast to the more angular, rhythmically inventive dance-funk of Prince and his disciples.
''I'm influenced by a lot of black American artists,'' Mr. Astley said in a recent telephone interview.
''Luther Vandross is one of my favorites, and I like James Ingram and Jeffrey Osborne.
''At least for now, Mr. Astley is content to have his voice packaged by Stock-Aiken-Waterman.
''I like dance music,'' he said.
''I'm happy doing what I'm doing and want to get more deeply into it.
''Astley's videos were a big thing at the time, coming just two years into MTV's decline that was precipitated by Viacom's purchase of it and MTV still had some of its original appeal of showing a) videos that were b) popular.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31275228</id>
	<title>The Ultimate Rickroll</title>
	<author>srussia</author>
	<datestamp>1267126020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLq\_T-3z9co" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLq\_T-3z9co</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = pLq \ _T-3z9co [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLq\_T-3z9co [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31274056</id>
	<title>Re:Which poses the question:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267122120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1YABGdai5k" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Like this.</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like this .
[ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like this.
[youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31273958</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31273926</id>
	<title>Amazing How Long It's Gone On</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267121700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>

It's amazing how far this has gone.  I saw a 'live' rick roll on some Macy's parade on the internet and I've even <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqef\_8U4ce4" title="youtube.com">seen really ingenious Rick Rolls</a> [youtube.com] that I must admit have been humorous.  But I'm a little disappointed we've been stuck on one video as there are so many others to Rick Roll people with.  <br> <br>

Tommy Wiseau's <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCj8sPCWfUw" title="youtube.com">The Room</a> [youtube.com] was shown on Adult Swim as an April Fool's day joke and if you think Rick Astley is cheesy you should check out the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQ4KzClb1C4" title="youtube.com">acting in this film</a> [youtube.com].  Be very careful and prepare yourself if you plan on <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X\_7zpB1v0Og" title="youtube.com">watching the Rifftrax of it</a> [youtube.com].  I was in very serious physical pain from laughing so hard.  <br> <br>

"Oh, hai Slashdot!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's amazing how far this has gone .
I saw a 'live ' rick roll on some Macy 's parade on the internet and I 've even seen really ingenious Rick Rolls [ youtube.com ] that I must admit have been humorous .
But I 'm a little disappointed we 've been stuck on one video as there are so many others to Rick Roll people with .
Tommy Wiseau 's The Room [ youtube.com ] was shown on Adult Swim as an April Fool 's day joke and if you think Rick Astley is cheesy you should check out the acting in this film [ youtube.com ] .
Be very careful and prepare yourself if you plan on watching the Rifftrax of it [ youtube.com ] .
I was in very serious physical pain from laughing so hard .
" Oh , hai Slashdot !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>

It's amazing how far this has gone.
I saw a 'live' rick roll on some Macy's parade on the internet and I've even seen really ingenious Rick Rolls [youtube.com] that I must admit have been humorous.
But I'm a little disappointed we've been stuck on one video as there are so many others to Rick Roll people with.
Tommy Wiseau's The Room [youtube.com] was shown on Adult Swim as an April Fool's day joke and if you think Rick Astley is cheesy you should check out the acting in this film [youtube.com].
Be very careful and prepare yourself if you plan on watching the Rifftrax of it [youtube.com].
I was in very serious physical pain from laughing so hard.
"Oh, hai Slashdot!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31276608</id>
	<title>Re:1988</title>
	<author>GodfatherofSoul</author>
	<datestamp>1267131180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Regardless of what everyone else says about that song, I've always liked it.  Not sure how it became synonymous with crappy pop (and there's PLENTY of that to go around).  Now, the comparison to Luther Vandross by the NYT?  That is downright criminal!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Regardless of what everyone else says about that song , I 've always liked it .
Not sure how it became synonymous with crappy pop ( and there 's PLENTY of that to go around ) .
Now , the comparison to Luther Vandross by the NYT ?
That is downright criminal !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Regardless of what everyone else says about that song, I've always liked it.
Not sure how it became synonymous with crappy pop (and there's PLENTY of that to go around).
Now, the comparison to Luther Vandross by the NYT?
That is downright criminal!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31275550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31274420</id>
	<title>Too much bandwidth??</title>
	<author>Joce640k</author>
	<datestamp>1267123320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That baby must have sicked up terabytes/min at its peak. You can probably trace global warming back to Rick Astley if you try.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That baby must have sicked up terabytes/min at its peak .
You can probably trace global warming back to Rick Astley if you try .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That baby must have sicked up terabytes/min at its peak.
You can probably trace global warming back to Rick Astley if you try.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31277242</id>
	<title>Re:Amazing How Long It's Gone On</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267090620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What I find so interesting about this is that, in the world of web sites where a "prank" is usually going to redirect you to some kind of screaming monster or a gaping anus, the rickroll is remarkably unonfensive.</p><p>It's like one day 4chan said "Oh, sure, we can scar you, give you nightmares, make children cry.  But our *best* idea is to send you a music video.  Because, at heart, we're pretty decent folk."</p><p>You know, as a meta-prank, that's actually pretty scary.  Like the Devil doing something nice for you, for reasons you can't understand...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What I find so interesting about this is that , in the world of web sites where a " prank " is usually going to redirect you to some kind of screaming monster or a gaping anus , the rickroll is remarkably unonfensive.It 's like one day 4chan said " Oh , sure , we can scar you , give you nightmares , make children cry .
But our * best * idea is to send you a music video .
Because , at heart , we 're pretty decent folk .
" You know , as a meta-prank , that 's actually pretty scary .
Like the Devil doing something nice for you , for reasons you ca n't understand.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What I find so interesting about this is that, in the world of web sites where a "prank" is usually going to redirect you to some kind of screaming monster or a gaping anus, the rickroll is remarkably unonfensive.It's like one day 4chan said "Oh, sure, we can scar you, give you nightmares, make children cry.
But our *best* idea is to send you a music video.
Because, at heart, we're pretty decent folk.
"You know, as a meta-prank, that's actually pretty scary.
Like the Devil doing something nice for you, for reasons you can't understand...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31273926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31398790</id>
	<title>Re:Amazing How Long It's Gone On</title>
	<author>dominious</author>
	<datestamp>1268046540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>where a "prank" is usually going to redirect you to some kind of screaming monster or a gaping anus, the rickroll is remarkably unonfensive.</p></div><p>what is this "gaping anus" you are talking about?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>where a " prank " is usually going to redirect you to some kind of screaming monster or a gaping anus , the rickroll is remarkably unonfensive.what is this " gaping anus " you are talking about ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>where a "prank" is usually going to redirect you to some kind of screaming monster or a gaping anus, the rickroll is remarkably unonfensive.what is this "gaping anus" you are talking about?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31277242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31429436</id>
	<title>Re:Amazing How Long It's Gone On</title>
	<author>Ihmhi</author>
	<datestamp>1268251800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dropping in two of my favorites:</p><p> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5uZr3JWYdy8" title="youtube.com">Paintroll'd</a> [youtube.com] </p><p> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1scwq7DhfI" title="youtube.com">Nirvana vs. Rick Astley</a> [youtube.com] </p><p>Of course, as one of those kids who actually had Mario Paint and messed around with it, I greatly appreciate anything ihasmario does. And its quite creepy how well Smells Like Teen Spirit goes together with the "Never..." lyrics.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dropping in two of my favorites : Paintroll 'd [ youtube.com ] Nirvana vs. Rick Astley [ youtube.com ] Of course , as one of those kids who actually had Mario Paint and messed around with it , I greatly appreciate anything ihasmario does .
And its quite creepy how well Smells Like Teen Spirit goes together with the " Never... " lyrics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dropping in two of my favorites: Paintroll'd [youtube.com]  Nirvana vs. Rick Astley [youtube.com] Of course, as one of those kids who actually had Mario Paint and messed around with it, I greatly appreciate anything ihasmario does.
And its quite creepy how well Smells Like Teen Spirit goes together with the "Never..." lyrics.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31273926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31273958</id>
	<title>Which poses the question:</title>
	<author>llvllatrix</author>
	<datestamp>1267121760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>How do you Rickroll this video?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How do you Rickroll this video ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do you Rickroll this video?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31274836</id>
	<title>Re:Amazing How Long It's Gone On</title>
	<author>interkin3tic</author>
	<datestamp>1267124460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Plus I've always thought that a much better terrible video is the actual <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMGWYd7lvQU" title="youtube.com">numa numa video.</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Plus I 've always thought that a much better terrible video is the actual numa numa video .
[ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Plus I've always thought that a much better terrible video is the actual numa numa video.
[youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31273926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31274800</id>
	<title>Re:Amazing How Long It's Gone On</title>
	<author>DeadDecoy</author>
	<datestamp>1267124340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>While there are many other wtf videos that could be used as prank material, it has what few other videos have: recognition as a prank video. If you were to show some random video, it wouldn't have the same 'gotcha' effect because the audience of the prank might not recognize what you're trying to do in time for the punchline. You could certainly try other videos, but I think you'd be the only one in on the joke.</htmltext>
<tokenext>While there are many other wtf videos that could be used as prank material , it has what few other videos have : recognition as a prank video .
If you were to show some random video , it would n't have the same 'gotcha ' effect because the audience of the prank might not recognize what you 're trying to do in time for the punchline .
You could certainly try other videos , but I think you 'd be the only one in on the joke .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While there are many other wtf videos that could be used as prank material, it has what few other videos have: recognition as a prank video.
If you were to show some random video, it wouldn't have the same 'gotcha' effect because the audience of the prank might not recognize what you're trying to do in time for the punchline.
You could certainly try other videos, but I think you'd be the only one in on the joke.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31273926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31274250</id>
	<title>Never gonna let you go</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267122660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Never gonna say goodbye..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Never gon na say goodbye. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Never gonna say goodbye..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31277772</id>
	<title>Re:I like him</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267092960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>But Kylie is hot. Does that mean--oh God, oh God--that I have a thing for Rick? Please make it stop!</htmltext>
<tokenext>But Kylie is hot .
Does that mean--oh God , oh God--that I have a thing for Rick ?
Please make it stop !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But Kylie is hot.
Does that mean--oh God, oh God--that I have a thing for Rick?
Please make it stop!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31277176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31325658</id>
	<title>Mod parent up</title>
	<author>Kinky Bass Junk</author>
	<datestamp>1267457880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Where are all my mod points?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</htmltext>
<tokenext>Where are all my mod points ?
: (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where are all my mod points?
:(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31277242</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1632209_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31276124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31273926
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1632209_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31278120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31276608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31275550
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1632209_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31274056
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31273958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1632209_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31283608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31273958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1632209_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31278208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31274420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1632209_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31274800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31273926
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1632209_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31398790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31277242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31273926
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1632209_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31310138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31274420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1632209_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31279636
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31274770
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1632209_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31287398
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31274770
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1632209_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31277772
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31277176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31274698
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1632209_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31417218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31277176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31274698
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1632209_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31325658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31277242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31273926
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1632209_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31429436
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31273926
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1632209_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31275428
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31273926
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1632209_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31277016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31274770
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1632209_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31274836
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31273926
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1632209_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31279632
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31273958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1632209_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31275940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31274770
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_25_1632209.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31274278
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_25_1632209.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31274698
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31277176
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31277772
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31417218
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_25_1632209.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31277744
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_25_1632209.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31273926
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31274800
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31275428
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31277242
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31325658
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31398790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31274836
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31429436
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31276124
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_25_1632209.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31275550
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31276608
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31278120
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_25_1632209.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31274422
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_25_1632209.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31273936
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_25_1632209.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31274770
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31275940
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31277016
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31279636
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31287398
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_25_1632209.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31274420
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31310138
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31278208
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_25_1632209.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31273958
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31283608
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31279632
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31274056
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_25_1632209.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1632209.31275024
</commentlist>
</conversation>
