<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_25_1354217</id>
	<title>Web Heritage Could Be Lost</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1267110660000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Squiff writes <i>"The British Library warns us that 'The UK's <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8535384.stm">online heritage could be lost forever</a> if the government does not grant a "right to archive"' in the UK. Never mind the Wayback Machine, The British Library declares that 'the average life expectancy of a website was just 44 to 75 days, and suggested that at least 10\% of all UK websites were either lost or replaced by new material every six months,' with the material within them being amongst the most revealing regarding the state of contemporary culture."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Squiff writes " The British Library warns us that 'The UK 's online heritage could be lost forever if the government does not grant a " right to archive " ' in the UK .
Never mind the Wayback Machine , The British Library declares that 'the average life expectancy of a website was just 44 to 75 days , and suggested that at least 10 \ % of all UK websites were either lost or replaced by new material every six months, ' with the material within them being amongst the most revealing regarding the state of contemporary culture .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Squiff writes "The British Library warns us that 'The UK's online heritage could be lost forever if the government does not grant a "right to archive"' in the UK.
Never mind the Wayback Machine, The British Library declares that 'the average life expectancy of a website was just 44 to 75 days, and suggested that at least 10\% of all UK websites were either lost or replaced by new material every six months,' with the material within them being amongst the most revealing regarding the state of contemporary culture.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272412</id>
	<title>Re:why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267115400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Anything of significance will either stick around, or be archived by others who find it significant.</p></div><p>The problem is that you can only evaluate the historic value of something years or decades after it happened. That's why plenty of movies and early TV shows got lost or even destroyed. Even the original moon landing footage is gone. All that stuff just wasn't considered valuable enough and the self space or the reusable magnetic tape was considered more important than the data contained in them.</p><p>Those who don't know history are destined to repeat it and we seem to be doing exactly that when it comes to archiving the Internet.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anything of significance will either stick around , or be archived by others who find it significant.The problem is that you can only evaluate the historic value of something years or decades after it happened .
That 's why plenty of movies and early TV shows got lost or even destroyed .
Even the original moon landing footage is gone .
All that stuff just was n't considered valuable enough and the self space or the reusable magnetic tape was considered more important than the data contained in them.Those who do n't know history are destined to repeat it and we seem to be doing exactly that when it comes to archiving the Internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anything of significance will either stick around, or be archived by others who find it significant.The problem is that you can only evaluate the historic value of something years or decades after it happened.
That's why plenty of movies and early TV shows got lost or even destroyed.
Even the original moon landing footage is gone.
All that stuff just wasn't considered valuable enough and the self space or the reusable magnetic tape was considered more important than the data contained in them.Those who don't know history are destined to repeat it and we seem to be doing exactly that when it comes to archiving the Internet.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31273146</id>
	<title>Re:67.4\% of all statistics are made up....</title>
	<author>Locklin</author>
	<datestamp>1267119000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Predicting which 1\% will be valuable to historians of the future *is* predicting the future. And we all know how accurately people can predict the future.<br>-messege sent from my VR sunglasses in my flying car.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Predicting which 1 \ % will be valuable to historians of the future * is * predicting the future .
And we all know how accurately people can predict the future.-messege sent from my VR sunglasses in my flying car .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Predicting which 1\% will be valuable to historians of the future *is* predicting the future.
And we all know how accurately people can predict the future.-messege sent from my VR sunglasses in my flying car.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272598</id>
	<title>Re:Sadness</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267116240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The nostalgia back in the day was far better than your nostalgia.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The nostalgia back in the day was far better than your nostalgia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The nostalgia back in the day was far better than your nostalgia.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272228</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31274882</id>
	<title>Re:why?</title>
	<author>fritsd</author>
	<datestamp>1267124640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Pound pastrami.. can of kraut..
<br>
Oh wait, different Middle Ages. So sorry.
<br>
(<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canticle\_for\_Leibowitz" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canticle\_for\_Leibowitz</a> [wikipedia.org])</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pound pastrami.. can of kraut. . Oh wait , different Middle Ages .
So sorry .
( http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canticle \ _for \ _Leibowitz [ wikipedia.org ] )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pound pastrami.. can of kraut..

Oh wait, different Middle Ages.
So sorry.
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canticle\_for\_Leibowitz [wikipedia.org])</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31274048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272632</id>
	<title>Re:Sadness</title>
	<author>jmyers</author>
	<datestamp>1267116420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I really miss the 70s when college essays were hand written and talking to an actual person was exciting and you went to the theater to see animation. And thank god no one cared to archive more than a few random photos.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I really miss the 70s when college essays were hand written and talking to an actual person was exciting and you went to the theater to see animation .
And thank god no one cared to archive more than a few random photos .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really miss the 70s when college essays were hand written and talking to an actual person was exciting and you went to the theater to see animation.
And thank god no one cared to archive more than a few random photos.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31274848</id>
	<title>Need for permission</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267124520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google doesn't ask for permission, why should the library?<br>This makes no sense, other than the workers are just too scared to go against the "rules" and do what should be done.</p><p>I think that a notice should be sent to the webmaster, specifying the location of the archive, with a form to fill out for take down.<br>But not permission. That's unnecessary.</p><p>Do you ask permission of the publisher, or of anyone for that matter, when you go to the library and read a book off the shelf?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google does n't ask for permission , why should the library ? This makes no sense , other than the workers are just too scared to go against the " rules " and do what should be done.I think that a notice should be sent to the webmaster , specifying the location of the archive , with a form to fill out for take down.But not permission .
That 's unnecessary.Do you ask permission of the publisher , or of anyone for that matter , when you go to the library and read a book off the shelf ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google doesn't ask for permission, why should the library?This makes no sense, other than the workers are just too scared to go against the "rules" and do what should be done.I think that a notice should be sent to the webmaster, specifying the location of the archive, with a form to fill out for take down.But not permission.
That's unnecessary.Do you ask permission of the publisher, or of anyone for that matter, when you go to the library and read a book off the shelf?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31273686</id>
	<title>Re:why?</title>
	<author>advocate\_one</author>
	<datestamp>1267120920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>otherwise some authority in the future is going to make some arbitrary guess about what people believed or wanted.</p></div></blockquote><p>They do that anyway...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>otherwise some authority in the future is going to make some arbitrary guess about what people believed or wanted.They do that anyway.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>otherwise some authority in the future is going to make some arbitrary guess about what people believed or wanted.They do that anyway...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31273126</id>
	<title>I Don't miss the 90's</title>
	<author>Dishevel</author>
	<datestamp>1267118820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When bold 48pt yellow text on red background flashing banners were on every website. When AOL opened the flood gates to the internet for the stupid. When spammers thought they were cool.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When bold 48pt yellow text on red background flashing banners were on every website .
When AOL opened the flood gates to the internet for the stupid .
When spammers thought they were cool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When bold 48pt yellow text on red background flashing banners were on every website.
When AOL opened the flood gates to the internet for the stupid.
When spammers thought they were cool.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272428</id>
	<title>On this subject...</title>
	<author>Sockatume</author>
	<datestamp>1267115460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Via the Wayback Machine, appropriately enough, James Gleick offers <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20020211210201/http://www.around.com/packrat.html" title="archive.org">this</a> [archive.org].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Via the Wayback Machine , appropriately enough , James Gleick offers this [ archive.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Via the Wayback Machine, appropriately enough, James Gleick offers this [archive.org].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272228</id>
	<title>Sadness</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267114380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I really miss the Internet of the mid-90's...back when Netscape was king, an animated<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.gif was exciting, and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vivo\_Software" title="wikipedia.org">Vivo Video</a> [wikipedia.org] was used for streaming.  I know things were much more primative then, but there was a certain charm that just isn't present on today's Internet.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>::sigh::</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I really miss the Internet of the mid-90 's...back when Netscape was king , an animated .gif was exciting , and Vivo Video [ wikipedia.org ] was used for streaming .
I know things were much more primative then , but there was a certain charm that just is n't present on today 's Internet .
: : sigh : :</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really miss the Internet of the mid-90's...back when Netscape was king, an animated .gif was exciting, and Vivo Video [wikipedia.org] was used for streaming.
I know things were much more primative then, but there was a certain charm that just isn't present on today's Internet.
::sigh::</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272302</id>
	<title>Most Websites Should Be Lost To The Ages</title>
	<author>WrongSizeGlass</author>
	<datestamp>1267114740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does the UK <i>really</i> want to be remembered for their <i>craptacular</i> websites? Not that theirs are any worse than anybody else's, but <i>please</i><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... most websites are like a night of bad drinking. Let's move on already and let time take care of the rest.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does the UK really want to be remembered for their craptacular websites ?
Not that theirs are any worse than anybody else 's , but please ... most websites are like a night of bad drinking .
Let 's move on already and let time take care of the rest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does the UK really want to be remembered for their craptacular websites?
Not that theirs are any worse than anybody else's, but please ... most websites are like a night of bad drinking.
Let's move on already and let time take care of the rest.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272952</id>
	<title>Re:Sadness</title>
	<author>Tharsman</author>
	<datestamp>1267118040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I really miss the Internet of the mid-90's...back when Netscape was king, an animated<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.gif was exciting, and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vivo\_Software" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Vivo Video</a> [wikipedia.org] was used for streaming.  I know things were much more primative then, but there was a certain charm that just isn't present on today's Internet.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>::sigh::</p></div><p>There was no charm, its all nostalgia (yearning for the past in an idealized form.) It happens everywhere, but I see it a lot with MMOs where people keep calling uppon the charm of the old EverQuest or the old Ultima Online, etc.

</p><p>15 years from now, today's teenagers will say just what you are saying now about the days when Facebook, Tweeter, Youtube and Google were the main internet hits and cumbersome Flash plugins were required to see dynamic content.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I really miss the Internet of the mid-90 's...back when Netscape was king , an animated .gif was exciting , and Vivo Video [ wikipedia.org ] was used for streaming .
I know things were much more primative then , but there was a certain charm that just is n't present on today 's Internet .
: : sigh : : There was no charm , its all nostalgia ( yearning for the past in an idealized form .
) It happens everywhere , but I see it a lot with MMOs where people keep calling uppon the charm of the old EverQuest or the old Ultima Online , etc .
15 years from now , today 's teenagers will say just what you are saying now about the days when Facebook , Tweeter , Youtube and Google were the main internet hits and cumbersome Flash plugins were required to see dynamic content .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really miss the Internet of the mid-90's...back when Netscape was king, an animated .gif was exciting, and Vivo Video [wikipedia.org] was used for streaming.
I know things were much more primative then, but there was a certain charm that just isn't present on today's Internet.
::sigh::There was no charm, its all nostalgia (yearning for the past in an idealized form.
) It happens everywhere, but I see it a lot with MMOs where people keep calling uppon the charm of the old EverQuest or the old Ultima Online, etc.
15 years from now, today's teenagers will say just what you are saying now about the days when Facebook, Tweeter, Youtube and Google were the main internet hits and cumbersome Flash plugins were required to see dynamic content.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272228</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272888</id>
	<title>Re:why?</title>
	<author>2obvious4u</author>
	<datestamp>1267117740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There was a great site gabocorp.com that in early 1996 was one of the coolest flash sites ever.  The site is still there but the original site sampled some Akira sound bites for buttons and stuff and the guy who created it was doing things with flash that other people hadn't even imagined at the time.  It would be awesome to see that old site archived, but the wayback machine didn't keep the flash in its archive so none of the old stuff works anymore.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There was a great site gabocorp.com that in early 1996 was one of the coolest flash sites ever .
The site is still there but the original site sampled some Akira sound bites for buttons and stuff and the guy who created it was doing things with flash that other people had n't even imagined at the time .
It would be awesome to see that old site archived , but the wayback machine did n't keep the flash in its archive so none of the old stuff works anymore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There was a great site gabocorp.com that in early 1996 was one of the coolest flash sites ever.
The site is still there but the original site sampled some Akira sound bites for buttons and stuff and the guy who created it was doing things with flash that other people hadn't even imagined at the time.
It would be awesome to see that old site archived, but the wayback machine didn't keep the flash in its archive so none of the old stuff works anymore.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272582</id>
	<title>Re:Sadness</title>
	<author>mikael</author>
	<datestamp>1267116180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Humbug, I really miss the Internet of the mid-70's, where line-printer keyboards were king, a computer with a monitor was exciting, and ASCII art printouts were used for decorating the office.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Humbug , I really miss the Internet of the mid-70 's , where line-printer keyboards were king , a computer with a monitor was exciting , and ASCII art printouts were used for decorating the office .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Humbug, I really miss the Internet of the mid-70's, where line-printer keyboards were king, a computer with a monitor was exciting, and ASCII art printouts were used for decorating the office.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272410</id>
	<title>Sounds like a job for Google</title>
	<author>Alamoth</author>
	<datestamp>1267115400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would imagine that Google could easily expand their caching technology to facilitate the preservation of everything everyone has to say on the internet.

I can understand where the Libraries are coming from.  In an effort to chronicle the growth of human culture they keep archives of literature, periodicals and most other media, so why not the internet?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would imagine that Google could easily expand their caching technology to facilitate the preservation of everything everyone has to say on the internet .
I can understand where the Libraries are coming from .
In an effort to chronicle the growth of human culture they keep archives of literature , periodicals and most other media , so why not the internet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would imagine that Google could easily expand their caching technology to facilitate the preservation of everything everyone has to say on the internet.
I can understand where the Libraries are coming from.
In an effort to chronicle the growth of human culture they keep archives of literature, periodicals and most other media, so why not the internet?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31273822</id>
	<title>I remember those days</title>
	<author>93 Escort Wagon</author>
	<datestamp>1267121280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>99\% of the sites were just pages consisting simply of long lists of hyperlinks to other pages that consisted simply of long lists of hyperlinks. Oh, and some of them were members of web rings. Yeah, that's all worth saving...</p><p>So in ten years is someone going to be raising the alarm about the potential loss of millions of blogs and tweets, and how we might forget just how many people had tasty sandwiches that day or hated their math teacher?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>99 \ % of the sites were just pages consisting simply of long lists of hyperlinks to other pages that consisted simply of long lists of hyperlinks .
Oh , and some of them were members of web rings .
Yeah , that 's all worth saving...So in ten years is someone going to be raising the alarm about the potential loss of millions of blogs and tweets , and how we might forget just how many people had tasty sandwiches that day or hated their math teacher ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>99\% of the sites were just pages consisting simply of long lists of hyperlinks to other pages that consisted simply of long lists of hyperlinks.
Oh, and some of them were members of web rings.
Yeah, that's all worth saving...So in ten years is someone going to be raising the alarm about the potential loss of millions of blogs and tweets, and how we might forget just how many people had tasty sandwiches that day or hated their math teacher?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31273120</id>
	<title>Re:Sadness</title>
	<author>tsa</author>
	<datestamp>1267118820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's all true, and it shows the internet sucked back then. I used Linux back then so no reinstalling, but really, there wasn't much information on the Web that was useful for non-scientists back then, and after seeing two websites of proud owners who wanted everyone to see their home address, telephone number and email address in the ugliest fonts and colors they could find you had enough. Luckily, Slashdot existed even in those dark times.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's all true , and it shows the internet sucked back then .
I used Linux back then so no reinstalling , but really , there was n't much information on the Web that was useful for non-scientists back then , and after seeing two websites of proud owners who wanted everyone to see their home address , telephone number and email address in the ugliest fonts and colors they could find you had enough .
Luckily , Slashdot existed even in those dark times .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's all true, and it shows the internet sucked back then.
I used Linux back then so no reinstalling, but really, there wasn't much information on the Web that was useful for non-scientists back then, and after seeing two websites of proud owners who wanted everyone to see their home address, telephone number and email address in the ugliest fonts and colors they could find you had enough.
Luckily, Slashdot existed even in those dark times.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272400</id>
	<title>Relocate</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267115340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The British Library should declare independence.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The British Library should declare independence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The British Library should declare independence.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31275192</id>
	<title>Re:why?</title>
	<author>Colin Smith</author>
	<datestamp>1267125780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Wherever people gather, there needs to be a chronicle, otherwise some authority in the future is going to make some arbitrary guess about what people believed or wanted.</p></div><p>And?</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wherever people gather , there needs to be a chronicle , otherwise some authority in the future is going to make some arbitrary guess about what people believed or wanted.And ?
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wherever people gather, there needs to be a chronicle, otherwise some authority in the future is going to make some arbitrary guess about what people believed or wanted.And?
 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272644</id>
	<title>Re:Way Back When</title>
	<author>gazbo</author>
	<datestamp>1267116420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe not perfect, but it has some very important sites from yesteryear.  For example: <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20000229044343/http://goatse.cx/" title="archive.org">this geek favourite</a> [archive.org] is preserved, and it would be a true tragedy if the data were lost just because the site is now down.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe not perfect , but it has some very important sites from yesteryear .
For example : this geek favourite [ archive.org ] is preserved , and it would be a true tragedy if the data were lost just because the site is now down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe not perfect, but it has some very important sites from yesteryear.
For example: this geek favourite [archive.org] is preserved, and it would be a true tragedy if the data were lost just because the site is now down.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272838</id>
	<title>Re:why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267117500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You just found out about MySpace?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You just found out about MySpace ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You just found out about MySpace?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272304</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31274346</id>
	<title>PLATO</title>
	<author>handy\_vandal</author>
	<datestamp>1267123020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I miss <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PLATO\_(computer\_system)" title="wikipedia.org">PLATO</a> [wikipedia.org]. Back in the mid-seventies, this was amazing, absolutely mind-blowing: real-time text chat, multiplayer biplane dogfights, and chess, and galactic conquest<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... on a global network. Granted, the screen was monochrome (orange on black), but the resolution was better than anything around.  And it was a touchscreen. Good times!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I miss PLATO [ wikipedia.org ] .
Back in the mid-seventies , this was amazing , absolutely mind-blowing : real-time text chat , multiplayer biplane dogfights , and chess , and galactic conquest ... on a global network .
Granted , the screen was monochrome ( orange on black ) , but the resolution was better than anything around .
And it was a touchscreen .
Good times !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I miss PLATO [wikipedia.org].
Back in the mid-seventies, this was amazing, absolutely mind-blowing: real-time text chat, multiplayer biplane dogfights, and chess, and galactic conquest ... on a global network.
Granted, the screen was monochrome (orange on black), but the resolution was better than anything around.
And it was a touchscreen.
Good times!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272716</id>
	<title>Re:why?</title>
	<author>rubycodez</author>
	<datestamp>1267116900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>history is always distorted and often fabricated, and the ramblings of millions of manipulated ignoramuses won't help the matter</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>history is always distorted and often fabricated , and the ramblings of millions of manipulated ignoramuses wo n't help the matter</tokentext>
<sentencetext>history is always distorted and often fabricated, and the ramblings of millions of manipulated ignoramuses won't help the matter</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272348</id>
	<title>"Web heritage"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267115040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Web heritage"? Are you kidding me?</p><p>The world would be a worse place than it is now if every iteration of every myspace profile or of every online store was saved somewhere. Good riddance!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Web heritage " ?
Are you kidding me ? The world would be a worse place than it is now if every iteration of every myspace profile or of every online store was saved somewhere .
Good riddance !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Web heritage"?
Are you kidding me?The world would be a worse place than it is now if every iteration of every myspace profile or of every online store was saved somewhere.
Good riddance!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31282186</id>
	<title>Re:why?</title>
	<author>RealGrouchy</author>
	<datestamp>1267127700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why in the world would anyone in the future care about a website that barely even stuck around for a month.</p></div><p>A newspaper is only around for a day, yet we still keep archive copies of them (microfiches, Google scans, etc.).</p><p>Similarly, a newspaper may have a website that lasts for years, but the layout will frequently be adjusted and the content constantly changing. Without archiving it at various points, you lose the ability to see how that website used to look, and how much current functionality we take for granted.</p><p>- RG&gt;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why in the world would anyone in the future care about a website that barely even stuck around for a month.A newspaper is only around for a day , yet we still keep archive copies of them ( microfiches , Google scans , etc .
) .Similarly , a newspaper may have a website that lasts for years , but the layout will frequently be adjusted and the content constantly changing .
Without archiving it at various points , you lose the ability to see how that website used to look , and how much current functionality we take for granted.- RG &gt;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why in the world would anyone in the future care about a website that barely even stuck around for a month.A newspaper is only around for a day, yet we still keep archive copies of them (microfiches, Google scans, etc.
).Similarly, a newspaper may have a website that lasts for years, but the layout will frequently be adjusted and the content constantly changing.
Without archiving it at various points, you lose the ability to see how that website used to look, and how much current functionality we take for granted.- RG&gt;
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272998</id>
	<title>Not all of it is worth saving.</title>
	<author>MaWeiTao</author>
	<datestamp>1267118220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With such a long, rich history I'm almost surprised they'd be concerned about this. Then again, I suppose the British Library understands, better than most, the value of archiving content. That said, I'm fairly certain most things of value have been stored away somewhere. But without a doubt there's a point at which we need to cull what has little value, which in all honest, is most of what is found on the internet.</p><p>I'm reminded of these preservation societies which seem to be especially prevalent here in the northeast US which go out of their way to get every last minor structure designated as a historical landmark, often to the detriment of beneficial development projects. A couple of years ago this whole area of a city in my area was cleared out, except for this single multi-family home. I'd drive by on the highway and see this huge open field in the middle of which sat this lone dilapidated house. It turns out that some early baseball player was either born there or had grown up there for a few years and one of these groups all of a sudden got it in their heads that they needed to protect the house and force the city to restore it. No one had given a crap about it for all the years it sat there or had suggested doing anything with it until the time had come to tear it down. The fight to protect it dragged on for at least a year. All this effort to preserve an insignificant historical footnote. They finally lost, but by then it was a moot point as the city was facing so many other issues that this redevelopment project hasn't yet gone through.</p><p>Most of the internet isn't worth preserving and what has been preserved, in all kinds of media, should paint a very clear picture of the content of the internet over the years. And often what is considered historical significant is different looking back compared to people living through that time. This is especially true with pop culture. Every little thing is the most important thing in the universe until it's forgotten two weeks later.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With such a long , rich history I 'm almost surprised they 'd be concerned about this .
Then again , I suppose the British Library understands , better than most , the value of archiving content .
That said , I 'm fairly certain most things of value have been stored away somewhere .
But without a doubt there 's a point at which we need to cull what has little value , which in all honest , is most of what is found on the internet.I 'm reminded of these preservation societies which seem to be especially prevalent here in the northeast US which go out of their way to get every last minor structure designated as a historical landmark , often to the detriment of beneficial development projects .
A couple of years ago this whole area of a city in my area was cleared out , except for this single multi-family home .
I 'd drive by on the highway and see this huge open field in the middle of which sat this lone dilapidated house .
It turns out that some early baseball player was either born there or had grown up there for a few years and one of these groups all of a sudden got it in their heads that they needed to protect the house and force the city to restore it .
No one had given a crap about it for all the years it sat there or had suggested doing anything with it until the time had come to tear it down .
The fight to protect it dragged on for at least a year .
All this effort to preserve an insignificant historical footnote .
They finally lost , but by then it was a moot point as the city was facing so many other issues that this redevelopment project has n't yet gone through.Most of the internet is n't worth preserving and what has been preserved , in all kinds of media , should paint a very clear picture of the content of the internet over the years .
And often what is considered historical significant is different looking back compared to people living through that time .
This is especially true with pop culture .
Every little thing is the most important thing in the universe until it 's forgotten two weeks later .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With such a long, rich history I'm almost surprised they'd be concerned about this.
Then again, I suppose the British Library understands, better than most, the value of archiving content.
That said, I'm fairly certain most things of value have been stored away somewhere.
But without a doubt there's a point at which we need to cull what has little value, which in all honest, is most of what is found on the internet.I'm reminded of these preservation societies which seem to be especially prevalent here in the northeast US which go out of their way to get every last minor structure designated as a historical landmark, often to the detriment of beneficial development projects.
A couple of years ago this whole area of a city in my area was cleared out, except for this single multi-family home.
I'd drive by on the highway and see this huge open field in the middle of which sat this lone dilapidated house.
It turns out that some early baseball player was either born there or had grown up there for a few years and one of these groups all of a sudden got it in their heads that they needed to protect the house and force the city to restore it.
No one had given a crap about it for all the years it sat there or had suggested doing anything with it until the time had come to tear it down.
The fight to protect it dragged on for at least a year.
All this effort to preserve an insignificant historical footnote.
They finally lost, but by then it was a moot point as the city was facing so many other issues that this redevelopment project hasn't yet gone through.Most of the internet isn't worth preserving and what has been preserved, in all kinds of media, should paint a very clear picture of the content of the internet over the years.
And often what is considered historical significant is different looking back compared to people living through that time.
This is especially true with pop culture.
Every little thing is the most important thing in the universe until it's forgotten two weeks later.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31273318</id>
	<title>Re:why?</title>
	<author>u38cg</author>
	<datestamp>1267119600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Some of the most valuable information you can gets your hands on as a historian is ephemera.  Victorian household accounts books are a goldmine.  Going further back, commonplace books record a treasure trove of information about what life and culture was like.  It's not difficult to imagine a historian in 2200 examining early 21st century attitudes to religion by analysing ceiling cat v. basement cat.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Some of the most valuable information you can gets your hands on as a historian is ephemera .
Victorian household accounts books are a goldmine .
Going further back , commonplace books record a treasure trove of information about what life and culture was like .
It 's not difficult to imagine a historian in 2200 examining early 21st century attitudes to religion by analysing ceiling cat v. basement cat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some of the most valuable information you can gets your hands on as a historian is ephemera.
Victorian household accounts books are a goldmine.
Going further back, commonplace books record a treasure trove of information about what life and culture was like.
It's not difficult to imagine a historian in 2200 examining early 21st century attitudes to religion by analysing ceiling cat v. basement cat.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272300</id>
	<title>Re:why?</title>
	<author>Dunbal</author>
	<datestamp>1267114740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Why in the world would anyone in the future care about a website that barely even stuck around for a month.</i></p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Data mining. Anything you say can and will be held against you. Especially if it was published on the internet. What, you think this is something FOR the people?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why in the world would anyone in the future care about a website that barely even stuck around for a month .
      Data mining .
Anything you say can and will be held against you .
Especially if it was published on the internet .
What , you think this is something FOR the people ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why in the world would anyone in the future care about a website that barely even stuck around for a month.
      Data mining.
Anything you say can and will be held against you.
Especially if it was published on the internet.
What, you think this is something FOR the people?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272536</id>
	<title>Re:why?</title>
	<author>xaxa</author>
	<datestamp>1267116000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why in the world would <i>anyone</i> in the future care about a website that barely even stuck around for a month.</p></div><p>Many of those sites are marketing tools or similar, and plenty of people are interested in old advertising posters etc.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why in the world would anyone in the future care about a website that barely even stuck around for a month.Many of those sites are marketing tools or similar , and plenty of people are interested in old advertising posters etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why in the world would anyone in the future care about a website that barely even stuck around for a month.Many of those sites are marketing tools or similar, and plenty of people are interested in old advertising posters etc.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31274442</id>
	<title>Re:why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267123380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd imagine <b>these are the people that find it significant</b> and that&rsquo;s why they are archiving it. Having read a little about this recently there are also teams working on recording government sites for preservation at the National Archive. http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/recordsmanagement/web-continuity.htm</p><p>There is another team at the archive that looking at long term preservation of digital stuff http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/preservation/digital.htm and interestingly there is a team that is looking at making sure that actual day to day working information is available http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/recordsmanagement/digital-continuity.htm</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd imagine these are the people that find it significant and that    s why they are archiving it .
Having read a little about this recently there are also teams working on recording government sites for preservation at the National Archive .
http : //www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/recordsmanagement/web-continuity.htmThere is another team at the archive that looking at long term preservation of digital stuff http : //www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/preservation/digital.htm and interestingly there is a team that is looking at making sure that actual day to day working information is available http : //www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/recordsmanagement/digital-continuity.htm</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd imagine these are the people that find it significant and that’s why they are archiving it.
Having read a little about this recently there are also teams working on recording government sites for preservation at the National Archive.
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/recordsmanagement/web-continuity.htmThere is another team at the archive that looking at long term preservation of digital stuff http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/preservation/digital.htm and interestingly there is a team that is looking at making sure that actual day to day working information is available http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/recordsmanagement/digital-continuity.htm</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31274988</id>
	<title>Re:Sadness</title>
	<author>Krneki</author>
	<datestamp>1267125060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>LOL @ active desktop.<br><br>You knew a system was infected the moment you saw active desktop enabled.</htmltext>
<tokenext>LOL @ active desktop.You knew a system was infected the moment you saw active desktop enabled .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LOL @ active desktop.You knew a system was infected the moment you saw active desktop enabled.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31274694</id>
	<title>Re:why?</title>
	<author>crispytwo</author>
	<datestamp>1267124040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> Anything of significance will either stick around, or be archived by others who find it significant.</p></div><p>That is the entire point!</p><p>The UK government is not allowing 'archives' of digital media without permission... which is overly burdensome for archiving.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anything of significance will either stick around , or be archived by others who find it significant.That is the entire point ! The UK government is not allowing 'archives ' of digital media without permission... which is overly burdensome for archiving .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Anything of significance will either stick around, or be archived by others who find it significant.That is the entire point!The UK government is not allowing 'archives' of digital media without permission... which is overly burdensome for archiving.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31273922</id>
	<title>Nonsense!</title>
	<author>T0mBerenger</author>
	<datestamp>1267121700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have been downloading the internet since the mid 90s.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have been downloading the internet since the mid 90s .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have been downloading the internet since the mid 90s.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31274230</id>
	<title>We need to start dealing with this problem</title>
	<author>CoffeePlease</author>
	<datestamp>1267122600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is fast becoming a huge issue, and not just for Britain. There are legal and permissions and privacy problems that have to be addressed or nearly all of our digital works will simply vanish, in the not too distant future. The wayback machine doesn't even begin to address the issue. Dynamic and web2.0 sites often have metadata and links that are only valid if the site is working as intended - a snapshot will not work to capture it. A lot of valuable information not available elsewhere is already lost as people stop paying for various freemium accounts or hosting fees or as companies go out of business. Sometimes that data gets saved (Netscape's javascript development site, saved by Mozilla.org, UseNet groups saved by Google) but many more times it does not.

I've attempted to write up some of the issues here:
Proposal: Advance Directives for our digital legacies
<a href="http://thedesignspace.net/MT2archives/000743.html" title="thedesignspace.net" rel="nofollow">http://thedesignspace.net/MT2archives/000743.html</a> [thedesignspace.net]</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is fast becoming a huge issue , and not just for Britain .
There are legal and permissions and privacy problems that have to be addressed or nearly all of our digital works will simply vanish , in the not too distant future .
The wayback machine does n't even begin to address the issue .
Dynamic and web2.0 sites often have metadata and links that are only valid if the site is working as intended - a snapshot will not work to capture it .
A lot of valuable information not available elsewhere is already lost as people stop paying for various freemium accounts or hosting fees or as companies go out of business .
Sometimes that data gets saved ( Netscape 's javascript development site , saved by Mozilla.org , UseNet groups saved by Google ) but many more times it does not .
I 've attempted to write up some of the issues here : Proposal : Advance Directives for our digital legacies http : //thedesignspace.net/MT2archives/000743.html [ thedesignspace.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is fast becoming a huge issue, and not just for Britain.
There are legal and permissions and privacy problems that have to be addressed or nearly all of our digital works will simply vanish, in the not too distant future.
The wayback machine doesn't even begin to address the issue.
Dynamic and web2.0 sites often have metadata and links that are only valid if the site is working as intended - a snapshot will not work to capture it.
A lot of valuable information not available elsewhere is already lost as people stop paying for various freemium accounts or hosting fees or as companies go out of business.
Sometimes that data gets saved (Netscape's javascript development site, saved by Mozilla.org, UseNet groups saved by Google) but many more times it does not.
I've attempted to write up some of the issues here:
Proposal: Advance Directives for our digital legacies
http://thedesignspace.net/MT2archives/000743.html [thedesignspace.net]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272534</id>
	<title>Re:Sadness</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267116000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The 90s were a unique time for web culture.<br>A consultation for us who missed the 60s, with its promiscuous sex and hippy strength LSD; you can tell your kids about dancing baby, squealing 56k modems, Usenet flame wars, and reinstalling Windows 95 with active desktop 5 times per day.</p><p>Ahh good times.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The 90s were a unique time for web culture.A consultation for us who missed the 60s , with its promiscuous sex and hippy strength LSD ; you can tell your kids about dancing baby , squealing 56k modems , Usenet flame wars , and reinstalling Windows 95 with active desktop 5 times per day.Ahh good times .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The 90s were a unique time for web culture.A consultation for us who missed the 60s, with its promiscuous sex and hippy strength LSD; you can tell your kids about dancing baby, squealing 56k modems, Usenet flame wars, and reinstalling Windows 95 with active desktop 5 times per day.Ahh good times.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272228</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272884</id>
	<title>Re:Sadness</title>
	<author>digitalhermit</author>
	<datestamp>1267117680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why is everyone so worried?  Just do the following:</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; cvs co -r 1.1 internet</p><p>Or if that doesn't work</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; cvs co -r 1.1 www</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is everyone so worried ?
Just do the following :         cvs co -r 1.1 internetOr if that does n't work         cvs co -r 1.1 www</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is everyone so worried?
Just do the following:
        cvs co -r 1.1 internetOr if that doesn't work
        cvs co -r 1.1 www</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272228</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31273118</id>
	<title>Re:Sadness</title>
	<author>commodore64\_love</author>
	<datestamp>1267118760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt;&gt;Netscape was king, an animated<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.gif was exciting, and Vivo Video was used for streaming</p><p>Also it was still possible to be online with a dialup modem.  Have Web developers completely-and-totally forgotten the lessons of the 90s?  (Compress images using GIFwizard, don't buffer audio unless the user first clicks "load" or "play", and don't use megabyte-sized movies when a 100K animated GIF will do.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; &gt; Netscape was king , an animated .gif was exciting , and Vivo Video was used for streamingAlso it was still possible to be online with a dialup modem .
Have Web developers completely-and-totally forgotten the lessons of the 90s ?
( Compress images using GIFwizard , do n't buffer audio unless the user first clicks " load " or " play " , and do n't use megabyte-sized movies when a 100K animated GIF will do .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt;&gt;Netscape was king, an animated .gif was exciting, and Vivo Video was used for streamingAlso it was still possible to be online with a dialup modem.
Have Web developers completely-and-totally forgotten the lessons of the 90s?
(Compress images using GIFwizard, don't buffer audio unless the user first clicks "load" or "play", and don't use megabyte-sized movies when a 100K animated GIF will do.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272228</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31273140</id>
	<title>We have nothing better to worry about.</title>
	<author>newdsfornerds</author>
	<datestamp>1267119000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Save the Internets of yore! <br>
NPLZ. Why was this posted?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Save the Internets of yore !
NPLZ. Why was this posted ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Save the Internets of yore!
NPLZ. Why was this posted?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272242</id>
	<title>why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267114440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why in the world would <i>anyone</i> in the future care about a website that barely even stuck around for a month.  Anything of significance will either stick around, or be archived by others who find it significant.</p><p>Also, that average seems absurdly low, are they counting in dynamically generated pages that exist only as long as they are viewed or something?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why in the world would anyone in the future care about a website that barely even stuck around for a month .
Anything of significance will either stick around , or be archived by others who find it significant.Also , that average seems absurdly low , are they counting in dynamically generated pages that exist only as long as they are viewed or something ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why in the world would anyone in the future care about a website that barely even stuck around for a month.
Anything of significance will either stick around, or be archived by others who find it significant.Also, that average seems absurdly low, are they counting in dynamically generated pages that exist only as long as they are viewed or something?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31274048</id>
	<title>Re:why?</title>
	<author>Asic Eng</author>
	<datestamp>1267122060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, we don't have a comprehensive archive of medieval shopping lists either. And something like that would certainly interest some people too. (Like: How did common people eat in 1168? How wealthy was a smith in comparison to a farmer? How much of a person's income would go to food?) Being able to go a few hundred years back in time and seeing how people lived would be interesting. <p>
However that doesn't mean that it should be a primary goal of our culture to preserve the mundane details of our lives in the most mind numbing detail. It might be interesting for future generations, sure - but we also have better things to do with our time and our money.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , we do n't have a comprehensive archive of medieval shopping lists either .
And something like that would certainly interest some people too .
( Like : How did common people eat in 1168 ?
How wealthy was a smith in comparison to a farmer ?
How much of a person 's income would go to food ?
) Being able to go a few hundred years back in time and seeing how people lived would be interesting .
However that does n't mean that it should be a primary goal of our culture to preserve the mundane details of our lives in the most mind numbing detail .
It might be interesting for future generations , sure - but we also have better things to do with our time and our money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, we don't have a comprehensive archive of medieval shopping lists either.
And something like that would certainly interest some people too.
(Like: How did common people eat in 1168?
How wealthy was a smith in comparison to a farmer?
How much of a person's income would go to food?
) Being able to go a few hundred years back in time and seeing how people lived would be interesting.
However that doesn't mean that it should be a primary goal of our culture to preserve the mundane details of our lives in the most mind numbing detail.
It might be interesting for future generations, sure - but we also have better things to do with our time and our money.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272344</id>
	<title>Re:why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267114980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was posting photos taken at events run by an organization where I was a volunteer for 16 years.  I couldn't remember the name of the bands in a couple of the photos, so I went back to the web site. Only, the new management had completely deleted all the detailed band information!</p><p>It wasn't captured in the Wayback machine either.</p><p>That is why I would support an archive, but given how sites are built today, that may be difficult to do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was posting photos taken at events run by an organization where I was a volunteer for 16 years .
I could n't remember the name of the bands in a couple of the photos , so I went back to the web site .
Only , the new management had completely deleted all the detailed band information ! It was n't captured in the Wayback machine either.That is why I would support an archive , but given how sites are built today , that may be difficult to do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was posting photos taken at events run by an organization where I was a volunteer for 16 years.
I couldn't remember the name of the bands in a couple of the photos, so I went back to the web site.
Only, the new management had completely deleted all the detailed band information!It wasn't captured in the Wayback machine either.That is why I would support an archive, but given how sites are built today, that may be difficult to do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272270</id>
	<title>Way Back When</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1267114560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I imagine the Wayback Machine is far better than it used to be, but historically it hasn't been that inclusive. Most of my old Quake site is still there, but other sites from the same time period are gone.</p><p>One of my favorite sites ate the time was <i>Yello There</i>, a parody of <i>Blue's News</i> that had me laughing out loud almost daily. Harriot updated the site almost daily, yet the only page out of the thousands there were that still exist is one that I'd posted on my own site ("Kneel" and I were unknowingly fans of each others' sites and eventually became good online friends and did a lot of cross-posting and collaboration).</p><p>Sadly, "Kneel" had Muscular Dystrophe and the last I heard could no longer write. I think Harriot died a few years ago, and his online work has vanished, except for that one page.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I imagine the Wayback Machine is far better than it used to be , but historically it has n't been that inclusive .
Most of my old Quake site is still there , but other sites from the same time period are gone.One of my favorite sites ate the time was Yello There , a parody of Blue 's News that had me laughing out loud almost daily .
Harriot updated the site almost daily , yet the only page out of the thousands there were that still exist is one that I 'd posted on my own site ( " Kneel " and I were unknowingly fans of each others ' sites and eventually became good online friends and did a lot of cross-posting and collaboration ) .Sadly , " Kneel " had Muscular Dystrophe and the last I heard could no longer write .
I think Harriot died a few years ago , and his online work has vanished , except for that one page .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I imagine the Wayback Machine is far better than it used to be, but historically it hasn't been that inclusive.
Most of my old Quake site is still there, but other sites from the same time period are gone.One of my favorite sites ate the time was Yello There, a parody of Blue's News that had me laughing out loud almost daily.
Harriot updated the site almost daily, yet the only page out of the thousands there were that still exist is one that I'd posted on my own site ("Kneel" and I were unknowingly fans of each others' sites and eventually became good online friends and did a lot of cross-posting and collaboration).Sadly, "Kneel" had Muscular Dystrophe and the last I heard could no longer write.
I think Harriot died a few years ago, and his online work has vanished, except for that one page.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272564</id>
	<title>Re:Sadness</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267116060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You are purely thinking off of the emotion known as nostalgia. Maybe it was simpler, but it was worse, less efficient, less powerful, and much much much less functional.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You are purely thinking off of the emotion known as nostalgia .
Maybe it was simpler , but it was worse , less efficient , less powerful , and much much much less functional .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are purely thinking off of the emotion known as nostalgia.
Maybe it was simpler, but it was worse, less efficient, less powerful, and much much much less functional.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272228</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31273864</id>
	<title>Re:Sadness</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267121400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was really cool back then but back then it was refreshing.  We repeated phrases back then, but really back then we were cool.  Oh those phones back then!  Back then it took 10 seconds to dial long distance back then!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was really cool back then but back then it was refreshing .
We repeated phrases back then , but really back then we were cool .
Oh those phones back then !
Back then it took 10 seconds to dial long distance back then !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was really cool back then but back then it was refreshing.
We repeated phrases back then, but really back then we were cool.
Oh those phones back then!
Back then it took 10 seconds to dial long distance back then!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31273120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31273904</id>
	<title>because.</title>
	<author>ArundelCastle</author>
	<datestamp>1267121580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Say what you will about the Mesopotamians, but they knew how to make a damn funny lolcat. Shame that all their backup tapes were papyrus.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Anything of significance will either stick around, or be archived by others who find it significant.</p></div><p>Nah, you have too much faith in popular culture. Wikipedia will always, always have a complete list of Pokemon. And that's fantastic. But here's the tricky bit... if something that is significant *is* lost, how do you know that it was a) significant or b) existed in the first place.  That's why it's so hard to think of an example. What we get is: "if only someone saved this information that would be really useful to me right now so I don't have to reinvent it..."  You didn't know yesterday that you needed that information. Today you have a new job to do.</p><p>There's another important factor to consider. Sabotage. Websites die every month from server failure or hacking. All the common sense and backup policies in the world won't limit someone who's well funded mission is to disrupt your web presence.  It might not even be you they target, if it's your data center (like say Amazon S3) all those people are hooped.  Some of them were researching cures for diseases. You can't just go back to handwritten notes and catch up.</p><p>You're aware that in war, libraries and archives are destroyed early on?  Best way to annihilate a culture is destroy the records of its existence. It happens today like it happened 2500 years ago.  If they were successful we might not even know libraries existed 2500 years ago.  Maybe 4000 years ago they were successful. We can't know.</p><p>Why should you care about 10 years ago or 1000? You don't need to be a history major to see the point:<br>What we are, is because of what we were. So what should we be next?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Say what you will about the Mesopotamians , but they knew how to make a damn funny lolcat .
Shame that all their backup tapes were papyrus .
; ) Anything of significance will either stick around , or be archived by others who find it significant.Nah , you have too much faith in popular culture .
Wikipedia will always , always have a complete list of Pokemon .
And that 's fantastic .
But here 's the tricky bit... if something that is significant * is * lost , how do you know that it was a ) significant or b ) existed in the first place .
That 's why it 's so hard to think of an example .
What we get is : " if only someone saved this information that would be really useful to me right now so I do n't have to reinvent it... " You did n't know yesterday that you needed that information .
Today you have a new job to do.There 's another important factor to consider .
Sabotage. Websites die every month from server failure or hacking .
All the common sense and backup policies in the world wo n't limit someone who 's well funded mission is to disrupt your web presence .
It might not even be you they target , if it 's your data center ( like say Amazon S3 ) all those people are hooped .
Some of them were researching cures for diseases .
You ca n't just go back to handwritten notes and catch up.You 're aware that in war , libraries and archives are destroyed early on ?
Best way to annihilate a culture is destroy the records of its existence .
It happens today like it happened 2500 years ago .
If they were successful we might not even know libraries existed 2500 years ago .
Maybe 4000 years ago they were successful .
We ca n't know.Why should you care about 10 years ago or 1000 ?
You do n't need to be a history major to see the point : What we are , is because of what we were .
So what should we be next ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Say what you will about the Mesopotamians, but they knew how to make a damn funny lolcat.
Shame that all their backup tapes were papyrus.
;)Anything of significance will either stick around, or be archived by others who find it significant.Nah, you have too much faith in popular culture.
Wikipedia will always, always have a complete list of Pokemon.
And that's fantastic.
But here's the tricky bit... if something that is significant *is* lost, how do you know that it was a) significant or b) existed in the first place.
That's why it's so hard to think of an example.
What we get is: "if only someone saved this information that would be really useful to me right now so I don't have to reinvent it..."  You didn't know yesterday that you needed that information.
Today you have a new job to do.There's another important factor to consider.
Sabotage. Websites die every month from server failure or hacking.
All the common sense and backup policies in the world won't limit someone who's well funded mission is to disrupt your web presence.
It might not even be you they target, if it's your data center (like say Amazon S3) all those people are hooped.
Some of them were researching cures for diseases.
You can't just go back to handwritten notes and catch up.You're aware that in war, libraries and archives are destroyed early on?
Best way to annihilate a culture is destroy the records of its existence.
It happens today like it happened 2500 years ago.
If they were successful we might not even know libraries existed 2500 years ago.
Maybe 4000 years ago they were successful.
We can't know.Why should you care about 10 years ago or 1000?
You don't need to be a history major to see the point:What we are, is because of what we were.
So what should we be next?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31274798</id>
	<title>Re:Sadness</title>
	<author>blahplusplus</author>
	<datestamp>1267124340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"but there was a certain charm that just isn't present on today's Internet.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>::sigh::"</p><p>The charm came from the fact that nerds mostly populated the early web since most people were not savvy enough to use the internet beyond it's most basic level for email, chat and games.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" but there was a certain charm that just is n't present on today 's Internet .
: : sigh : : " The charm came from the fact that nerds mostly populated the early web since most people were not savvy enough to use the internet beyond it 's most basic level for email , chat and games .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"but there was a certain charm that just isn't present on today's Internet.
::sigh::"The charm came from the fact that nerds mostly populated the early web since most people were not savvy enough to use the internet beyond it's most basic level for email, chat and games.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272228</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31273512</id>
	<title>What's a webpage?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267120260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously. In the 90's, in the era where free webpages were hosted at Xoom, Angelfire and Geocities, the trend was static content (php pages for free, huh? Yeah, right), and there was a ton of webpages dedicated to a myriad of topics. People had to maintain their webpages by adding articles which were available through a series of navigational menus.</p><p>Then, everything changed. Webpages were replaced with disorganized blogs where people just complained about their lives. But some people got the right idea and began making specialized blogs about topics. Then the trend switched to news and editorials instead of static content, and wikis took the place traditional webpages used to occupy.</p><p>As of today, there are no personal webpages anymore. Everything's conglomerated in social networks, forums, wikis and specialized blogs. The era of webpages is now gone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously .
In the 90 's , in the era where free webpages were hosted at Xoom , Angelfire and Geocities , the trend was static content ( php pages for free , huh ?
Yeah , right ) , and there was a ton of webpages dedicated to a myriad of topics .
People had to maintain their webpages by adding articles which were available through a series of navigational menus.Then , everything changed .
Webpages were replaced with disorganized blogs where people just complained about their lives .
But some people got the right idea and began making specialized blogs about topics .
Then the trend switched to news and editorials instead of static content , and wikis took the place traditional webpages used to occupy.As of today , there are no personal webpages anymore .
Everything 's conglomerated in social networks , forums , wikis and specialized blogs .
The era of webpages is now gone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously.
In the 90's, in the era where free webpages were hosted at Xoom, Angelfire and Geocities, the trend was static content (php pages for free, huh?
Yeah, right), and there was a ton of webpages dedicated to a myriad of topics.
People had to maintain their webpages by adding articles which were available through a series of navigational menus.Then, everything changed.
Webpages were replaced with disorganized blogs where people just complained about their lives.
But some people got the right idea and began making specialized blogs about topics.
Then the trend switched to news and editorials instead of static content, and wikis took the place traditional webpages used to occupy.As of today, there are no personal webpages anymore.
Everything's conglomerated in social networks, forums, wikis and specialized blogs.
The era of webpages is now gone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31280340</id>
	<title>Re:Sadness</title>
	<author>antdude</author>
	<datestamp>1267107000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I miss bulletin board systems (BBS) days.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I miss bulletin board systems ( BBS ) days .
: (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I miss bulletin board systems (BBS) days.
:(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31274690</id>
	<title>YUO FAIL IT.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267123980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>fo8med his own Documents like a hapless *BSD Join in especially very sick and its BSD machines, you should bring Our ability to Do and doing what</htmltext>
<tokenext>fo8med his own Documents like a hapless * BSD Join in especially very sick and its BSD machines , you should bring Our ability to Do and doing what</tokentext>
<sentencetext>fo8med his own Documents like a hapless *BSD Join in especially very sick and its BSD machines, you should bring Our ability to Do and doing what</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272366</id>
	<title>Does this matter at all</title>
	<author>cfulton</author>
	<datestamp>1267115160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Really, we didn't record some website in Britain.  This will matter historically how?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Really , we did n't record some website in Britain .
This will matter historically how ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really, we didn't record some website in Britain.
This will matter historically how?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31273068</id>
	<title>Re:Sadness</title>
	<author>Pojut</author>
	<datestamp>1267118460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not entirely...far less viruses and spyware, spam wasn't as big of a deal, drive-by browser hijacking was far less common...besides, I would take a blinking marquee of text over pop-ups and banners any day.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not entirely...far less viruses and spyware , spam was n't as big of a deal , drive-by browser hijacking was far less common...besides , I would take a blinking marquee of text over pop-ups and banners any day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not entirely...far less viruses and spyware, spam wasn't as big of a deal, drive-by browser hijacking was far less common...besides, I would take a blinking marquee of text over pop-ups and banners any day.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272564</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272342</id>
	<title>Re:why?</title>
	<author>iluvcapra</author>
	<datestamp>1267114980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why would anybody care about <a href="http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki?search=Mary+chestnut" title="wikipedia.org">Mary Chestnut</a> [wikipedia.org] or <a href="http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki?search=Victor+Klemperer" title="wikipedia.org">Victor Klemperer's</a> [wikipedia.org] diary?  If someone were trying to understand something like the Barack Obama campaign or the Tea Partiers 50 years from now, and all we had were official statements and published news reports, the picture of what was actually going on in the country would be significantly warped.  Wherever people gather, there needs to be a chronicle, otherwise some authority in the future is going to make some arbitrary guess about what people believed or wanted.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why would anybody care about Mary Chestnut [ wikipedia.org ] or Victor Klemperer 's [ wikipedia.org ] diary ?
If someone were trying to understand something like the Barack Obama campaign or the Tea Partiers 50 years from now , and all we had were official statements and published news reports , the picture of what was actually going on in the country would be significantly warped .
Wherever people gather , there needs to be a chronicle , otherwise some authority in the future is going to make some arbitrary guess about what people believed or wanted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why would anybody care about Mary Chestnut [wikipedia.org] or Victor Klemperer's [wikipedia.org] diary?
If someone were trying to understand something like the Barack Obama campaign or the Tea Partiers 50 years from now, and all we had were official statements and published news reports, the picture of what was actually going on in the country would be significantly warped.
Wherever people gather, there needs to be a chronicle, otherwise some authority in the future is going to make some arbitrary guess about what people believed or wanted.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272910</id>
	<title>what will the Brits panic about next?</title>
	<author>peter303</author>
	<datestamp>1267117800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If I see a "sky is falling" thread in slashdot, more often than not it is from a UK source.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If I see a " sky is falling " thread in slashdot , more often than not it is from a UK source .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I see a "sky is falling" thread in slashdot, more often than not it is from a UK source.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272628</id>
	<title>Re:Most Websites Should Be Lost To The Ages</title>
	<author>xaxa</author>
	<datestamp>1267116360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Does the UK <i>really</i> want to be remembered for their <i>craptacular</i> websites? [...] most websites are like a night of bad drinking.</p></div><p>Bad drinking is an important part of British culture, TYVM.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does the UK really want to be remembered for their craptacular websites ?
[ ... ] most websites are like a night of bad drinking.Bad drinking is an important part of British culture , TYVM .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does the UK really want to be remembered for their craptacular websites?
[...] most websites are like a night of bad drinking.Bad drinking is an important part of British culture, TYVM.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272540</id>
	<title>Re:why?</title>
	<author>Tibia1</author>
	<datestamp>1267116000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree. Less intelligent content will not be missed.<br> <br>
However, what's stopping everyone from just saving all of their content on their computers before their site dies? Sure, I guess some sites have a lot of content, but massive hard drives are available. Am I missing something?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree .
Less intelligent content will not be missed .
However , what 's stopping everyone from just saving all of their content on their computers before their site dies ?
Sure , I guess some sites have a lot of content , but massive hard drives are available .
Am I missing something ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree.
Less intelligent content will not be missed.
However, what's stopping everyone from just saving all of their content on their computers before their site dies?
Sure, I guess some sites have a lot of content, but massive hard drives are available.
Am I missing something?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31275898</id>
	<title>Re:Sadness</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267128360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I know things were much more primative then, but there was a certain charm that just isn't present on today's Internet.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>::sigh::</p></div><p>I didn't mind primitive. I could browse with images off and only use Netscape's "image" button when I needed it. Got the most out of my dialup that way.</p><p>

What I DID mind was having to try find content by drilling down hierarchical lists or using keyword-based searches and then using half-broken webrings to try go from the on-topic but often lame page that came up to a page that actually had good content.</p><p>

Really, probably the one thing about the modern Internet I couldn't live without would be Google in specific and improved search engines in general.</p><p>

Oh, and no blink tags. Drove me crazy.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know things were much more primative then , but there was a certain charm that just is n't present on today 's Internet .
: : sigh : : I did n't mind primitive .
I could browse with images off and only use Netscape 's " image " button when I needed it .
Got the most out of my dialup that way .
What I DID mind was having to try find content by drilling down hierarchical lists or using keyword-based searches and then using half-broken webrings to try go from the on-topic but often lame page that came up to a page that actually had good content .
Really , probably the one thing about the modern Internet I could n't live without would be Google in specific and improved search engines in general .
Oh , and no blink tags .
Drove me crazy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know things were much more primative then, but there was a certain charm that just isn't present on today's Internet.
::sigh::I didn't mind primitive.
I could browse with images off and only use Netscape's "image" button when I needed it.
Got the most out of my dialup that way.
What I DID mind was having to try find content by drilling down hierarchical lists or using keyword-based searches and then using half-broken webrings to try go from the on-topic but often lame page that came up to a page that actually had good content.
Really, probably the one thing about the modern Internet I couldn't live without would be Google in specific and improved search engines in general.
Oh, and no blink tags.
Drove me crazy.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272228</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272530</id>
	<title>Re:why?</title>
	<author>ibwolf</author>
	<datestamp>1267115940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The funny thing, what we consider junk today sometimes - mind you, only sometimes - turns out to be really interesting a few generations down the line.</p><p>Case in point, advertising leaflets from the early part of the 20th century were undoubtedly not held in high regard at the time. Today however researchers regard them as a useful source of information that was not captured in other media at the time, usually because it was something "everyone knew".</p><p>The point is that we are ill equipped today to judge what will be "valuable" tomorrow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The funny thing , what we consider junk today sometimes - mind you , only sometimes - turns out to be really interesting a few generations down the line.Case in point , advertising leaflets from the early part of the 20th century were undoubtedly not held in high regard at the time .
Today however researchers regard them as a useful source of information that was not captured in other media at the time , usually because it was something " everyone knew " .The point is that we are ill equipped today to judge what will be " valuable " tomorrow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The funny thing, what we consider junk today sometimes - mind you, only sometimes - turns out to be really interesting a few generations down the line.Case in point, advertising leaflets from the early part of the 20th century were undoubtedly not held in high regard at the time.
Today however researchers regard them as a useful source of information that was not captured in other media at the time, usually because it was something "everyone knew".The point is that we are ill equipped today to judge what will be "valuable" tomorrow.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272462</id>
	<title>Re:Sadness</title>
	<author>Anonymusing</author>
	<datestamp>1267115640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bah. I really miss the Internet of the mid-80s, when telnet was king, a UUCP connection was exciting, and animated ASCII was used for streaming.
</p><p>(waiting for a 70s guy to show up)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bah .
I really miss the Internet of the mid-80s , when telnet was king , a UUCP connection was exciting , and animated ASCII was used for streaming .
( waiting for a 70s guy to show up )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bah.
I really miss the Internet of the mid-80s, when telnet was king, a UUCP connection was exciting, and animated ASCII was used for streaming.
(waiting for a 70s guy to show up)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272228</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31273706</id>
	<title>Just repurpose some of those cameras</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267120980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Point them into homes and at computer screens.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Point them into homes and at computer screens .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Point them into homes and at computer screens.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272438</id>
	<title>Those who control...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267115520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Those who control the present control the past.<br>Those who control the past control the future.</p><p>History is important. Having access to history is just as important. What you consider trivial now may be important later.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Those who control the present control the past.Those who control the past control the future.History is important .
Having access to history is just as important .
What you consider trivial now may be important later .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those who control the present control the past.Those who control the past control the future.History is important.
Having access to history is just as important.
What you consider trivial now may be important later.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31282952</id>
	<title>TV Show</title>
	<author>BrookHarty</author>
	<datestamp>1267180980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Stumbled on an old TV show called, northwest backroads, showing cool places around the northwest.  They keep saying "for more information go to the website" which is no longer up.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stumbled on an old TV show called , northwest backroads , showing cool places around the northwest .
They keep saying " for more information go to the website " which is no longer up.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stumbled on an old TV show called, northwest backroads, showing cool places around the northwest.
They keep saying "for more information go to the website" which is no longer up.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31273254</id>
	<title>Re:why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267119480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't think you can get away with saying the moon landing wasn't considered valuable enough to want to hang on to.  I think that specific footage being lost is more a matter of all the copies of the video that already exist and some poor management.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think you can get away with saying the moon landing was n't considered valuable enough to want to hang on to .
I think that specific footage being lost is more a matter of all the copies of the video that already exist and some poor management .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think you can get away with saying the moon landing wasn't considered valuable enough to want to hang on to.
I think that specific footage being lost is more a matter of all the copies of the video that already exist and some poor management.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272350</id>
	<title>67.4\% of all statistics are made up....</title>
	<author>johnlcallaway</author>
	<datestamp>1267115040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And 99\% of all websites are boring, useless, commercial, or self-serving. Let them die...tomorrow would be too soon.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And 99 \ % of all websites are boring , useless , commercial , or self-serving .
Let them die...tomorrow would be too soon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And 99\% of all websites are boring, useless, commercial, or self-serving.
Let them die...tomorrow would be too soon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272304</id>
	<title>Re:why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267114740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why in the world would <i>anyone</i> in the future care about a website that barely even stuck around for a month.  Anything of significance will either stick around, or be archived by others who find it significant.</p><p>Also, that average seems absurdly low, are they counting in dynamically generated pages that exist only as long as they are viewed or something?</p></div><p>If you forget your past, you're doomed to repeat it.</p><p>Go check out an archive from the mid-90s. Under construction sign, with the digging stick figure and roadway blocker. Repeating image on the background. Dancing hamster. Spinning green skull. Huge hitcounters. SIGN MY WEBJOURNALBOOKLOG! Webrings. Oh god. Don't forget the webrings! Webrings with broken links! BLINK tags. MIDI backgrounds. Black text on a dark background. FRAMES. ActiveX plugins.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>::shudder::</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why in the world would anyone in the future care about a website that barely even stuck around for a month .
Anything of significance will either stick around , or be archived by others who find it significant.Also , that average seems absurdly low , are they counting in dynamically generated pages that exist only as long as they are viewed or something ? If you forget your past , you 're doomed to repeat it.Go check out an archive from the mid-90s .
Under construction sign , with the digging stick figure and roadway blocker .
Repeating image on the background .
Dancing hamster .
Spinning green skull .
Huge hitcounters .
SIGN MY WEBJOURNALBOOKLOG !
Webrings. Oh god .
Do n't forget the webrings !
Webrings with broken links !
BLINK tags .
MIDI backgrounds .
Black text on a dark background .
FRAMES. ActiveX plugins .
: : shudder : :</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why in the world would anyone in the future care about a website that barely even stuck around for a month.
Anything of significance will either stick around, or be archived by others who find it significant.Also, that average seems absurdly low, are they counting in dynamically generated pages that exist only as long as they are viewed or something?If you forget your past, you're doomed to repeat it.Go check out an archive from the mid-90s.
Under construction sign, with the digging stick figure and roadway blocker.
Repeating image on the background.
Dancing hamster.
Spinning green skull.
Huge hitcounters.
SIGN MY WEBJOURNALBOOKLOG!
Webrings. Oh god.
Don't forget the webrings!
Webrings with broken links!
BLINK tags.
MIDI backgrounds.
Black text on a dark background.
FRAMES. ActiveX plugins.
::shudder::
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31274262</id>
	<title>Talk to an archaeologist or anthropologist...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267122660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I always hated the term "pack rat."  It is highly offensive to me that people consider it a negative quality to save "trivial" or "useless" things.  Just think of all the people who threw their Golden Age comics in the trash because they weren't worth saving.</p><p>Whenever I migrate to a new PC, I always archive the entire HDD (minus meaningless OS and software installations) onto a folder in the new system.  My friends think I'm silly to do this, but a few weeks ago I had a great time traveling down memory lane to see what I had been up to back in the early 90s.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I always hated the term " pack rat .
" It is highly offensive to me that people consider it a negative quality to save " trivial " or " useless " things .
Just think of all the people who threw their Golden Age comics in the trash because they were n't worth saving.Whenever I migrate to a new PC , I always archive the entire HDD ( minus meaningless OS and software installations ) onto a folder in the new system .
My friends think I 'm silly to do this , but a few weeks ago I had a great time traveling down memory lane to see what I had been up to back in the early 90s .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always hated the term "pack rat.
"  It is highly offensive to me that people consider it a negative quality to save "trivial" or "useless" things.
Just think of all the people who threw their Golden Age comics in the trash because they weren't worth saving.Whenever I migrate to a new PC, I always archive the entire HDD (minus meaningless OS and software installations) onto a folder in the new system.
My friends think I'm silly to do this, but a few weeks ago I had a great time traveling down memory lane to see what I had been up to back in the early 90s.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272502</id>
	<title>Culture is like yogurt...</title>
	<author>Ostracus</author>
	<datestamp>1267115760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The British Library declares that 'the average life expectancy of a website was just 44 to 75 days, and suggested that at least 10\% of all UK websites were either lost or replaced by new material every six months,' with the material within them being amongst the most revealing regarding the state of contemporary culture.""</p><p>Twitter and facebook. If that doesn't say what the present state of contemporary culture is, then I don't know what does?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The British Library declares that 'the average life expectancy of a website was just 44 to 75 days , and suggested that at least 10 \ % of all UK websites were either lost or replaced by new material every six months, ' with the material within them being amongst the most revealing regarding the state of contemporary culture .
" " Twitter and facebook .
If that does n't say what the present state of contemporary culture is , then I do n't know what does ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The British Library declares that 'the average life expectancy of a website was just 44 to 75 days, and suggested that at least 10\% of all UK websites were either lost or replaced by new material every six months,' with the material within them being amongst the most revealing regarding the state of contemporary culture.
""Twitter and facebook.
If that doesn't say what the present state of contemporary culture is, then I don't know what does?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1354217_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272228
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1354217_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31274882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31274048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1354217_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31273864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31273120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272228
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1354217_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31274988
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272228
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1354217_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272302
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1354217_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31273904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1354217_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272530
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1354217_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31274694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1354217_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272270
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1354217_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31273254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1354217_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1354217_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31280340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272228
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1354217_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31275192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1354217_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272598
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272228
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1354217_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272540
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1354217_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31273686
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1354217_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31274798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272228
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1354217_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1354217_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31273068
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272228
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1354217_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31282186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1354217_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272632
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272228
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1354217_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31274442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1354217_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1354217_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1354217_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31275898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272228
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1354217_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31273146
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272350
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1354217_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272536
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1354217_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1354217_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31273118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272228
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1354217_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31273318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1354217_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272228
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1354217_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272228
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_25_1354217.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272228
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272462
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31280340
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272632
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272582
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272564
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31273068
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31273118
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31274798
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272952
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31275898
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272598
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272884
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272534
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31274988
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31273120
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31273864
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_25_1354217.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272438
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_25_1354217.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272270
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272644
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_25_1354217.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31273512
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_25_1354217.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31274346
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_25_1354217.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272302
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272628
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_25_1354217.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272242
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31274442
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272530
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31273318
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272540
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272536
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31274694
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272300
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272412
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31273254
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272716
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272304
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272838
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31273904
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272342
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31273686
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31274048
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31274882
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31275192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272888
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31282186
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272344
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_25_1354217.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272428
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_25_1354217.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272910
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_25_1354217.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272350
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31273146
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_25_1354217.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1354217.31272998
</commentlist>
</conversation>
