<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_24_196226</id>
	<title>Copernicium Confirmed As Element 112</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1267004460000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Several sources are reporting that the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry has <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20227134.400">confirmed Copernicium</a> as element 112 on the periodic table of elements with the symbol Cn.  <i>"The naming of the new element will be the culmination of a long, fraught journey involving fierce competition, dashed hopes, clever detective work and even a brush with scientific misconduct. With a nucleus containing 112 protons &mdash; 20 more than uranium, the heaviest of the naturally occurring elements &mdash; it will be the weightiest atom whose existence has been confirmed so far."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Several sources are reporting that the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry has confirmed Copernicium as element 112 on the periodic table of elements with the symbol Cn .
" The naming of the new element will be the culmination of a long , fraught journey involving fierce competition , dashed hopes , clever detective work and even a brush with scientific misconduct .
With a nucleus containing 112 protons    20 more than uranium , the heaviest of the naturally occurring elements    it will be the weightiest atom whose existence has been confirmed so far .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Several sources are reporting that the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry has confirmed Copernicium as element 112 on the periodic table of elements with the symbol Cn.
"The naming of the new element will be the culmination of a long, fraught journey involving fierce competition, dashed hopes, clever detective work and even a brush with scientific misconduct.
With a nucleus containing 112 protons — 20 more than uranium, the heaviest of the naturally occurring elements — it will be the weightiest atom whose existence has been confirmed so far.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31266870</id>
	<title>Re:The naming was the easy part!</title>
	<author>zygotic mitosis</author>
	<datestamp>1265116620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Naming, yes. The summary is badly informed! The synthesis of element 112 has been confirmed for quite a while. The only story here is that <i>IUPAC has officially endorsed a name for it</i>.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Naming , yes .
The summary is badly informed !
The synthesis of element 112 has been confirmed for quite a while .
The only story here is that IUPAC has officially endorsed a name for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Naming, yes.
The summary is badly informed!
The synthesis of element 112 has been confirmed for quite a while.
The only story here is that IUPAC has officially endorsed a name for it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265078</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265186</id>
	<title>Finally...</title>
	<author>gestalt\_n\_pepper</author>
	<datestamp>1265107920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My breathless wait is over.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My breathless wait is over .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My breathless wait is over.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31266472</id>
	<title>Re:On Earth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265113920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Californium can be found in spectra of astronomical objects</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Californium can be found in spectra of astronomical objects</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Californium can be found in spectra of astronomical objects</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265118</id>
	<title>natural?</title>
	<author>planckscale</author>
	<datestamp>1265107680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So what I don't understand is if this particle would ever naturally occur? During the big bang? In a supernova? And if not then why continue to spend money and time on the task of building bigger and bigger particles? What use will they be if only to exist for a fraction of a second?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So what I do n't understand is if this particle would ever naturally occur ?
During the big bang ?
In a supernova ?
And if not then why continue to spend money and time on the task of building bigger and bigger particles ?
What use will they be if only to exist for a fraction of a second ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what I don't understand is if this particle would ever naturally occur?
During the big bang?
In a supernova?
And if not then why continue to spend money and time on the task of building bigger and bigger particles?
What use will they be if only to exist for a fraction of a second?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31266648</id>
	<title>Tribute to Tom Lehrer</title>
	<author>kobiashi maru</author>
	<datestamp>1265115180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"these are the only ones of which the news has come to Harvard,
and there may be many others but they haven't been discovered"</htmltext>
<tokenext>" these are the only ones of which the news has come to Harvard , and there may be many others but they have n't been discovered "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"these are the only ones of which the news has come to Harvard,
and there may be many others but they haven't been discovered"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31272308</id>
	<title>Re:On Earth</title>
	<author>zippthorne</author>
	<datestamp>1267114800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nothing except p-chem.  Which does not strictly exclude the possibility, but does suggest that higher elements are probably pretty rare:  Stable solutions in the higher elements are difficult to find.  You usually end up with extremely short half-lives.  Isotopes with short half-lives are unlikely to be found far from whatever phenomenon generated them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nothing except p-chem .
Which does not strictly exclude the possibility , but does suggest that higher elements are probably pretty rare : Stable solutions in the higher elements are difficult to find .
You usually end up with extremely short half-lives .
Isotopes with short half-lives are unlikely to be found far from whatever phenomenon generated them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nothing except p-chem.
Which does not strictly exclude the possibility, but does suggest that higher elements are probably pretty rare:  Stable solutions in the higher elements are difficult to find.
You usually end up with extremely short half-lives.
Isotopes with short half-lives are unlikely to be found far from whatever phenomenon generated them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31266498</id>
	<title>copper</title>
	<author>yoyoq</author>
	<datestamp>1265114100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>copernicus was named after copper (dad was a copper smith or something)
so this makes two elements named after copper. not very original.</htmltext>
<tokenext>copernicus was named after copper ( dad was a copper smith or something ) so this makes two elements named after copper .
not very original .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>copernicus was named after copper (dad was a copper smith or something)
so this makes two elements named after copper.
not very original.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265500</id>
	<title>Element 420</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265109120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Element 420 is named Mybongium.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Element 420 is named Mybongium .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Element 420 is named Mybongium.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265072</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31267864</id>
	<title>Scientific misconduct?</title>
	<author>bunratty</author>
	<datestamp>1265125140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Scientific misconduct, eh? I've known all along these so-called physicists are making up these elements for fame and fortune. As long as they keep claiming to find elements they'll keep getting grant money and be rolling in dough!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Scientific misconduct , eh ?
I 've known all along these so-called physicists are making up these elements for fame and fortune .
As long as they keep claiming to find elements they 'll keep getting grant money and be rolling in dough !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Scientific misconduct, eh?
I've known all along these so-called physicists are making up these elements for fame and fortune.
As long as they keep claiming to find elements they'll keep getting grant money and be rolling in dough!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265032</id>
	<title>1st 112</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265107260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>first post 112 discovered!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>first post 112 discovered !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>first post 112 discovered!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265078</id>
	<title>The naming was the easy part!</title>
	<author>Jugalator</author>
	<datestamp>1265107500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now, as for what it will be <i>used</i> for!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now , as for what it will be used for !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now, as for what it will be used for!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31269492</id>
	<title>Re:Beryllium</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267130400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, sorta like prawns.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , sorta like prawns .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, sorta like prawns.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265518</id>
	<title>Re:another name that would have been good...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265109180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's reserved for element 144.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's reserved for element 144 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's reserved for element 144.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265170</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265714</id>
	<title>Re:Cool name</title>
	<author>MrTripps</author>
	<datestamp>1265110020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>He did kinda start the whole scientific revolution thingy. That might have a little to do with nuclear physics.</htmltext>
<tokenext>He did kinda start the whole scientific revolution thingy .
That might have a little to do with nuclear physics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He did kinda start the whole scientific revolution thingy.
That might have a little to do with nuclear physics.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31266950</id>
	<title>Re:Great, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265117100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No it's an element you fucking clown.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No it 's an element you fucking clown .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No it's an element you fucking clown.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31270428</id>
	<title>I just want to know how it's pronounced</title>
	<author>Dracophile</author>
	<datestamp>1267099920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>KOP-er-NEEK-ium? I don't even know what the rules are on this sort of thing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>KOP-er-NEEK-ium ?
I do n't even know what the rules are on this sort of thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>KOP-er-NEEK-ium?
I don't even know what the rules are on this sort of thing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265404</id>
	<title>Re:On Earth</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1265108760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Considering the half lives of the ultra-heavy elements, they don't exist anywhere other than labs except for brief periods in supernovae.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Considering the half lives of the ultra-heavy elements , they do n't exist anywhere other than labs except for brief periods in supernovae .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considering the half lives of the ultra-heavy elements, they don't exist anywhere other than labs except for brief periods in supernovae.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265690</id>
	<title>Re:But But but</title>
	<author>ArundelCastle</author>
	<datestamp>1265109960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What about ununbium?</p></div><p>Too much of a double double negative.  And speaking of which, I heard Starbucks is still lobbying for Lattenium.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What about ununbium ? Too much of a double double negative .
And speaking of which , I heard Starbucks is still lobbying for Lattenium .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about ununbium?Too much of a double double negative.
And speaking of which, I heard Starbucks is still lobbying for Lattenium.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265544</id>
	<title>Re:another name that would have been good...</title>
	<author>Conchobair</author>
	<datestamp>1265109360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think we missed the chance for that with element 89 (Actinium), however we will have a chance again with element 144.  I like the idea though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think we missed the chance for that with element 89 ( Actinium ) , however we will have a chance again with element 144 .
I like the idea though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think we missed the chance for that with element 89 (Actinium), however we will have a chance again with element 144.
I like the idea though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265170</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31270276</id>
	<title>As they get bigger...</title>
	<author>Ponyegg</author>
	<datestamp>1267097520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When element 419 is created can we name it Nigerium?</htmltext>
<tokenext>When element 419 is created can we name it Nigerium ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When element 419 is created can we name it Nigerium?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265858</id>
	<title>E-115</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265110560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All I care about is making sure element 115 gets named Elerium.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All I care about is making sure element 115 gets named Elerium .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All I care about is making sure element 115 gets named Elerium.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265270</id>
	<title>We are slowly...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265108220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We are slowly getting there: <a href="http://memory-beta.wikia.com/wiki/Periodic\_table" title="wikia.com" rel="nofollow">http://memory-beta.wikia.com/wiki/Periodic\_table</a> [wikia.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>We are slowly getting there : http : //memory-beta.wikia.com/wiki/Periodic \ _table [ wikia.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We are slowly getting there: http://memory-beta.wikia.com/wiki/Periodic\_table [wikia.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31268338</id>
	<title>Great...</title>
	<author>aldld</author>
	<datestamp>1265129880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does this mean that I'll have to buy a new periodic table? I bet it's a scam by the people who make periodic them!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this mean that I 'll have to buy a new periodic table ?
I bet it 's a scam by the people who make periodic them !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this mean that I'll have to buy a new periodic table?
I bet it's a scam by the people who make periodic them!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265338</id>
	<title>Re:On Earth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265108460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>And (even more minor quibble) it's not even technically true that uranium is the heaviest naturally occurring element on earth.  Trace amounts of some transuranic elements are found in deposits of uranium ore, particularly at the natural nuclear reactor at Oklo, Gabon as a result of neutron irradiation of uranium, the same principle as used in breeder reactors.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And ( even more minor quibble ) it 's not even technically true that uranium is the heaviest naturally occurring element on earth .
Trace amounts of some transuranic elements are found in deposits of uranium ore , particularly at the natural nuclear reactor at Oklo , Gabon as a result of neutron irradiation of uranium , the same principle as used in breeder reactors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And (even more minor quibble) it's not even technically true that uranium is the heaviest naturally occurring element on earth.
Trace amounts of some transuranic elements are found in deposits of uranium ore, particularly at the natural nuclear reactor at Oklo, Gabon as a result of neutron irradiation of uranium, the same principle as used in breeder reactors.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265300</id>
	<title>Beryllium</title>
	<author>WrongSizeGlass</author>
	<datestamp>1265108280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When I first heard "Beryllium" I got rather excited<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... it sounded "beer-ilicious indeed!"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... until I saw how it was spelled and thought "damn, that even looks like it will taste bad".</htmltext>
<tokenext>When I first heard " Beryllium " I got rather excited ... it sounded " beer-ilicious indeed !
" ... until I saw how it was spelled and thought " damn , that even looks like it will taste bad " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I first heard "Beryllium" I got rather excited ... it sounded "beer-ilicious indeed!
" ... until I saw how it was spelled and thought "damn, that even looks like it will taste bad".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31266164</id>
	<title>Re:But But but</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265112240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>According to Wikipedia, it's called "Roentgenium".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>According to Wikipedia , it 's called " Roentgenium " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to Wikipedia, it's called "Roentgenium".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265100</id>
	<title>Later that night...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265107560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Uranium was seen at a local club with Copernicium, probably to make her feel better about herself.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Uranium was seen at a local club with Copernicium , probably to make her feel better about herself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uranium was seen at a local club with Copernicium, probably to make her feel better about herself.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31266322</id>
	<title>113 Should be Unobtainium!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265113020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hopefully it will be found by Weyland-Yutani...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hopefully it will be found by Weyland-Yutani.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hopefully it will be found by Weyland-Yutani...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265072</id>
	<title>Take that china</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265107500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now there will never be a chinesium (although i guess we could re-name lead).</p><p>

&lt;troll/&gt;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now there will never be a chinesium ( although i guess we could re-name lead ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now there will never be a chinesium (although i guess we could re-name lead).

</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265366</id>
	<title>Re:On Earth</title>
	<author>ShadowRangerRIT</author>
	<datestamp>1265108580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Technically, it's inaccurate on Earth as well. Trace amounts of plutonium are found in concentrated uranium ore, particularly those deposits that have acted as a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural\_nuclear\_fission\_reactor" title="wikipedia.org">natural nuclear fission reactor,</a> [wikipedia.org] the most famous being the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklo" title="wikipedia.org">Oklo</a> [wikipedia.org] reactor.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Technically , it 's inaccurate on Earth as well .
Trace amounts of plutonium are found in concentrated uranium ore , particularly those deposits that have acted as a natural nuclear fission reactor , [ wikipedia.org ] the most famous being the Oklo [ wikipedia.org ] reactor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Technically, it's inaccurate on Earth as well.
Trace amounts of plutonium are found in concentrated uranium ore, particularly those deposits that have acted as a natural nuclear fission reactor, [wikipedia.org] the most famous being the Oklo [wikipedia.org] reactor.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265656</id>
	<title>Uranium Not The Heaviest Natural Element On Earth</title>
	<author>careysub</author>
	<datestamp>1265109840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since plutonium, element 93, is found in uranium ores (being bred there by neutron capture) and Pu-244 (half-life 80.8 million years) has also survived in detectable quantities from the formation of the Earth, uranium is not the heaviest natural element on Earth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since plutonium , element 93 , is found in uranium ores ( being bred there by neutron capture ) and Pu-244 ( half-life 80.8 million years ) has also survived in detectable quantities from the formation of the Earth , uranium is not the heaviest natural element on Earth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since plutonium, element 93, is found in uranium ores (being bred there by neutron capture) and Pu-244 (half-life 80.8 million years) has also survived in detectable quantities from the formation of the Earth, uranium is not the heaviest natural element on Earth.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265632</id>
	<title>Re:Cool name</title>
	<author>reverseengineer</author>
	<datestamp>1265109720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>He collaborated on the same work in nuclear physics that Alfred Nobel is known for.
<br> <br>
Honestly, the parent does have a point though- other than nobelium and copernicium, there seems to be a clear trend from americium (#95) onward to name elements either for their place of discovery or after important <i>nuclear</i> scientists.  Although, you could make the case that Einstein was not primarily a nuclear physicist, and the nucleus wasn't even known when Mendeleev drew up his table, they had made important contributions to the understanding of atoms.  Copernicus is certainly deserving of the honor, and there's nothing to forbid it in terms of the IUPAC rules- I just think it's interesting that a 300-year gap exists between Copernicus and the next scientist so honored.  Next up: newtonium?</htmltext>
<tokenext>He collaborated on the same work in nuclear physics that Alfred Nobel is known for .
Honestly , the parent does have a point though- other than nobelium and copernicium , there seems to be a clear trend from americium ( # 95 ) onward to name elements either for their place of discovery or after important nuclear scientists .
Although , you could make the case that Einstein was not primarily a nuclear physicist , and the nucleus was n't even known when Mendeleev drew up his table , they had made important contributions to the understanding of atoms .
Copernicus is certainly deserving of the honor , and there 's nothing to forbid it in terms of the IUPAC rules- I just think it 's interesting that a 300-year gap exists between Copernicus and the next scientist so honored .
Next up : newtonium ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He collaborated on the same work in nuclear physics that Alfred Nobel is known for.
Honestly, the parent does have a point though- other than nobelium and copernicium, there seems to be a clear trend from americium (#95) onward to name elements either for their place of discovery or after important nuclear scientists.
Although, you could make the case that Einstein was not primarily a nuclear physicist, and the nucleus wasn't even known when Mendeleev drew up his table, they had made important contributions to the understanding of atoms.
Copernicus is certainly deserving of the honor, and there's nothing to forbid it in terms of the IUPAC rules- I just think it's interesting that a 300-year gap exists between Copernicus and the next scientist so honored.
Next up: newtonium?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31267082</id>
	<title>Re:Later that night...</title>
	<author>tyrione</author>
	<datestamp>1265117940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Uranium was seen at a local club with Copernicium, probably to make her feel better about herself.</p></div><p>Bystanders overheard Uranium note what a large prick Copernicium sported.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Uranium was seen at a local club with Copernicium , probably to make her feel better about herself.Bystanders overheard Uranium note what a large prick Copernicium sported .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uranium was seen at a local club with Copernicium, probably to make her feel better about herself.Bystanders overheard Uranium note what a large prick Copernicium sported.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265282</id>
	<title>Re:natural?</title>
	<author>MartinSchou</author>
	<datestamp>1265108220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because knowledge is a good thing? As it happens, Copernicium\_285 has a halflife that is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Island\_of\_stability#Half-lives\_of\_large\_isotopes" title="wikipedia.org">higher than elements 109 and up</a> [wikipedia.org].</p><p>I find it interesting, but apparently you seem to think that knowledge is a bad thing.</p><p>Why? Who cares.<br>Could finding out possibly be of use? Who cares.<br>Suppose we find perfectly stable elements? Why bother?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because knowledge is a good thing ?
As it happens , Copernicium \ _285 has a halflife that is higher than elements 109 and up [ wikipedia.org ] .I find it interesting , but apparently you seem to think that knowledge is a bad thing.Why ?
Who cares.Could finding out possibly be of use ?
Who cares.Suppose we find perfectly stable elements ?
Why bother ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because knowledge is a good thing?
As it happens, Copernicium\_285 has a halflife that is higher than elements 109 and up [wikipedia.org].I find it interesting, but apparently you seem to think that knowledge is a bad thing.Why?
Who cares.Could finding out possibly be of use?
Who cares.Suppose we find perfectly stable elements?
Why bother?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31267778</id>
	<title>Re:Cp</title>
	<author>kobiashi maru</author>
	<datestamp>1265124480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>or computer player</htmltext>
<tokenext>or computer player</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or computer player</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265818</id>
	<title>Re:Great, but...</title>
	<author>Beardo the Bearded</author>
	<datestamp>1265110380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It will in a Beowulf cluster.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It will in a Beowulf cluster .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It will in a Beowulf cluster.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265394</id>
	<title>Great, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265108700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...does it run linux?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...does it run linux ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...does it run linux?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31268544</id>
	<title>Re:Cool name</title>
	<author>b4dc0d3r</author>
	<datestamp>1265132100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nucleus is to Sun<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; as<br>Electron cloud is to Planet</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nucleus is to Sun     asElectron cloud is to Planet</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nucleus is to Sun
    asElectron cloud is to Planet</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265570</id>
	<title>Re:On Earth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265109420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On a cosmic timescale? pretty much. When you have something with a half-life measured in fractions of a second, you would need an initial mass close to the entire mass of the universe to survive in detectable amounts through the 5+ billion years it takes for super nova outflow gas to cool and condense into a planet capable of evolving life to go about looking for it. Stuff like this most likely does occur naturally in supernova produced nebula's, it just won't last very long when we are considering the age of the universe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On a cosmic timescale ?
pretty much .
When you have something with a half-life measured in fractions of a second , you would need an initial mass close to the entire mass of the universe to survive in detectable amounts through the 5 + billion years it takes for super nova outflow gas to cool and condense into a planet capable of evolving life to go about looking for it .
Stuff like this most likely does occur naturally in supernova produced nebula 's , it just wo n't last very long when we are considering the age of the universe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On a cosmic timescale?
pretty much.
When you have something with a half-life measured in fractions of a second, you would need an initial mass close to the entire mass of the universe to survive in detectable amounts through the 5+ billion years it takes for super nova outflow gas to cool and condense into a planet capable of evolving life to go about looking for it.
Stuff like this most likely does occur naturally in supernova produced nebula's, it just won't last very long when we are considering the age of the universe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265290</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31267206</id>
	<title>Re:Take that china</title>
	<author>zygotic mitosis</author>
	<datestamp>1265119080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Chuck Norris, too, weeps in despair.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Chuck Norris , too , weeps in despair .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chuck Norris, too, weeps in despair.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265072</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265080</id>
	<title>yay!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265107500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can't wait 'til they get to element 115!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ca n't wait 'til they get to element 115 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can't wait 'til they get to element 115!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265388</id>
	<title>Re:natural?</title>
	<author>EdZ</author>
	<datestamp>1265108700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's theorised that somewhere in the 1xx range lies  one or more "islands of stability", where one or more undiscovered heavy elements exist with either very long half-lives, or stable nuclei.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's theorised that somewhere in the 1xx range lies one or more " islands of stability " , where one or more undiscovered heavy elements exist with either very long half-lives , or stable nuclei .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's theorised that somewhere in the 1xx range lies  one or more "islands of stability", where one or more undiscovered heavy elements exist with either very long half-lives, or stable nuclei.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31269840</id>
	<title>Indeed he was</title>
	<author>Kupfernigk</author>
	<datestamp>1267091820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Look at my sig. I'm a systems modeler, and before that my work included research into copper alloys, so I borrowed Kupfernigk's actual name, not the Latinisation, for my sig (since he built a mathematical model of the Solar System). "Kupfer" is still the German word for copper.<p>So, to nitpick, since transuranics use the actual form of scientist's names, it should really be Kupfernigkium, Kf.</p><p>(Otherwise, Einsteinium would have to be Unopetrium.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Look at my sig .
I 'm a systems modeler , and before that my work included research into copper alloys , so I borrowed Kupfernigk 's actual name , not the Latinisation , for my sig ( since he built a mathematical model of the Solar System ) .
" Kupfer " is still the German word for copper.So , to nitpick , since transuranics use the actual form of scientist 's names , it should really be Kupfernigkium , Kf .
( Otherwise , Einsteinium would have to be Unopetrium .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look at my sig.
I'm a systems modeler, and before that my work included research into copper alloys, so I borrowed Kupfernigk's actual name, not the Latinisation, for my sig (since he built a mathematical model of the Solar System).
"Kupfer" is still the German word for copper.So, to nitpick, since transuranics use the actual form of scientist's names, it should really be Kupfernigkium, Kf.
(Otherwise, Einsteinium would have to be Unopetrium.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31266498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265630</id>
	<title>Three elements away...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265109720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... from Elerium-115.</p><p>Oh, and I want one of those Hovertank/Laser units too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... from Elerium-115.Oh , and I want one of those Hovertank/Laser units too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... from Elerium-115.Oh, and I want one of those Hovertank/Laser units too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265290</id>
	<title>Re:On Earth</title>
	<author>arndawg</author>
	<datestamp>1265108280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't remember much from high-school chemistry but isn't it something about "man-made" atoms is so unstable that they won't be able to exist naturally?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't remember much from high-school chemistry but is n't it something about " man-made " atoms is so unstable that they wo n't be able to exist naturally ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't remember much from high-school chemistry but isn't it something about "man-made" atoms is so unstable that they won't be able to exist naturally?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31270884</id>
	<title>GREAT!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267105200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lets put it in weapons.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lets put it in weapons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lets put it in weapons.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265344</id>
	<title>Re:On Earth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265108460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>RTFS!</p><blockquote><div><p>"whose existence has been confirmed <strong>so far.</strong>"</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>RTFS !
" whose existence has been confirmed so far .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RTFS!
"whose existence has been confirmed so far.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265456</id>
	<title>Re:natural?</title>
	<author>gurps\_npc</author>
	<datestamp>1265108880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, your basic belief is false.  Not all larger particles exist only for a fraciton of a second.  There are cycles and some elemental numbers that we can not yet created have been theorized to be stable for long time periods.

In addition, we do NOT have a reasonable sample of all 'naturally' occuring particles.  We only got what this particular are of the universe happens to have.

As such, it is quite likely that there are places in the galaxy where some of these large, stable elements exist in large quantities.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , your basic belief is false .
Not all larger particles exist only for a fraciton of a second .
There are cycles and some elemental numbers that we can not yet created have been theorized to be stable for long time periods .
In addition , we do NOT have a reasonable sample of all 'naturally ' occuring particles .
We only got what this particular are of the universe happens to have .
As such , it is quite likely that there are places in the galaxy where some of these large , stable elements exist in large quantities .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, your basic belief is false.
Not all larger particles exist only for a fraciton of a second.
There are cycles and some elemental numbers that we can not yet created have been theorized to be stable for long time periods.
In addition, we do NOT have a reasonable sample of all 'naturally' occuring particles.
We only got what this particular are of the universe happens to have.
As such, it is quite likely that there are places in the galaxy where some of these large, stable elements exist in large quantities.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31267296</id>
	<title>Re:Uranium Not The Heaviest Natural Element On Ear</title>
	<author>jonaskoelker</author>
	<datestamp>1265119860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Since plutonium, element 93, is found in uranium ores (being bred there by neutron capture) and Pu-244 (half-life 80.8 million years)</p></div><p>Holy cr*p, dewd.  80 million years, that's a long time.</p><p>So, if they ever discover an element with a negative half-life, will they call it Banach-Tarskium?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since plutonium , element 93 , is found in uranium ores ( being bred there by neutron capture ) and Pu-244 ( half-life 80.8 million years ) Holy cr * p , dewd .
80 million years , that 's a long time.So , if they ever discover an element with a negative half-life , will they call it Banach-Tarskium ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since plutonium, element 93, is found in uranium ores (being bred there by neutron capture) and Pu-244 (half-life 80.8 million years)Holy cr*p, dewd.
80 million years, that's a long time.So, if they ever discover an element with a negative half-life, will they call it Banach-Tarskium?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265656</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31267630</id>
	<title>What did they do?</title>
	<author>Snaller</author>
	<datestamp>1265123160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about a better heading? They chose this name in July of 2009 ! What's new?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about a better heading ?
They chose this name in July of 2009 !
What 's new ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about a better heading?
They chose this name in July of 2009 !
What's new?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265562</id>
	<title>Re:On Earth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265109420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except that the larger elements have much shorter half-lives.  Unless there's a stable (or nearly so) element, we won't find anything hiher than ~Americium we won't find a quantity of higher elements worth mentioning.  Uranium is the heaviest element in nature in any quantity (Plutonium and Americium occur in trace quantities due to spontaneous fission and the neutron irradiation that results)  Supernovae and black holes might have the conditions neccessary to forge super heavy elements but the stability of these elements is the real problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except that the larger elements have much shorter half-lives .
Unless there 's a stable ( or nearly so ) element , we wo n't find anything hiher than ~ Americium we wo n't find a quantity of higher elements worth mentioning .
Uranium is the heaviest element in nature in any quantity ( Plutonium and Americium occur in trace quantities due to spontaneous fission and the neutron irradiation that results ) Supernovae and black holes might have the conditions neccessary to forge super heavy elements but the stability of these elements is the real problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except that the larger elements have much shorter half-lives.
Unless there's a stable (or nearly so) element, we won't find anything hiher than ~Americium we won't find a quantity of higher elements worth mentioning.
Uranium is the heaviest element in nature in any quantity (Plutonium and Americium occur in trace quantities due to spontaneous fission and the neutron irradiation that results)  Supernovae and black holes might have the conditions neccessary to forge super heavy elements but the stability of these elements is the real problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265922</id>
	<title>Re:Uranium Not The Heaviest Natural Element On Ear</title>
	<author>WeatherGod</author>
	<datestamp>1265110860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nitpick, Pu is element 94.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nitpick , Pu is element 94 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nitpick, Pu is element 94.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265656</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265498</id>
	<title>Re:Cool name</title>
	<author>spun</author>
	<datestamp>1265109120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Copernicus is widely credited as being a key figure in the birth of the scientific revolution. Which lead to nuclear physics, among other things.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Copernicus is widely credited as being a key figure in the birth of the scientific revolution .
Which lead to nuclear physics , among other things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Copernicus is widely credited as being a key figure in the birth of the scientific revolution.
Which lead to nuclear physics, among other things.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31266020</id>
	<title>A true injustice</title>
	<author>Aurisor</author>
	<datestamp>1265111400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The element's discoverer was, quite understandably, crushed by his lack of recognition.</p><p><a href="http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&amp;id=1621" title="smbc-comics.com">http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&amp;id=1621</a> [smbc-comics.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The element 's discoverer was , quite understandably , crushed by his lack of recognition.http : //www.smbc-comics.com/index.php ? db = comics&amp;id = 1621 [ smbc-comics.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The element's discoverer was, quite understandably, crushed by his lack of recognition.http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&amp;id=1621 [smbc-comics.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265082</id>
	<title>But But but</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265107500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What about ununbium?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What about ununbium ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about ununbium?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31266748</id>
	<title>Re:natural?</title>
	<author>pclminion</author>
	<datestamp>1265115660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If super-heavy elements are discovered which have longer half-lives (and this is suspected to be the case), these elements would be extremely valuable simply for their density if nothing else. Ion drives use heavy, inert atoms as their reaction material -- xenon, for instance. The efficiency of any propulsion system goes up as the per-particle mass of the propellant increases. So one application of stable, super-heavy elements would be as reaction material for ion thrusters. It doesn't even have to be stable for that long -- just long enough for the mission at hand.</p><p>Of course, we'd have to develop a way of creating the nuclei more than just a few at a time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If super-heavy elements are discovered which have longer half-lives ( and this is suspected to be the case ) , these elements would be extremely valuable simply for their density if nothing else .
Ion drives use heavy , inert atoms as their reaction material -- xenon , for instance .
The efficiency of any propulsion system goes up as the per-particle mass of the propellant increases .
So one application of stable , super-heavy elements would be as reaction material for ion thrusters .
It does n't even have to be stable for that long -- just long enough for the mission at hand.Of course , we 'd have to develop a way of creating the nuclei more than just a few at a time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If super-heavy elements are discovered which have longer half-lives (and this is suspected to be the case), these elements would be extremely valuable simply for their density if nothing else.
Ion drives use heavy, inert atoms as their reaction material -- xenon, for instance.
The efficiency of any propulsion system goes up as the per-particle mass of the propellant increases.
So one application of stable, super-heavy elements would be as reaction material for ion thrusters.
It doesn't even have to be stable for that long -- just long enough for the mission at hand.Of course, we'd have to develop a way of creating the nuclei more than just a few at a time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31266022</id>
	<title>We Have An Element!</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1265111400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Reminds me of <a href="http://periodictableofsciencefiction.blogspot.com/2009/10/cerium.html" title="blogspot.com">this flash fiction by Mike Swanwick</a> [blogspot.com].<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Reminds me of this flash fiction by Mike Swanwick [ blogspot.com ] .
: D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reminds me of this flash fiction by Mike Swanwick [blogspot.com].
:D</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31267760</id>
	<title>Who is the 'heavy' here ?</title>
	<author>barath\_s</author>
	<datestamp>1265124360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i> uranium, the heaviest of the naturally occurring elements </i> <p>

Uranium Density = 19.05 g/cc </p><p>
Osmium Density = <b> 22.59 </b> g/cc  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lanthanide\_contraction" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow"> Lanthanide contraction </a> [wikipedia.org] </p><p>
Iridium    Density = 22.56 g/cc </p><p>

Naturally occurring mineral : Chengdeite : Ir3Fe (an Alloy) Density = 19.3 g/cc </p><p>
Though Elemental Platinum also occurs in nature and has a density = 21.09 </p><p>

We need a better wording than heavy for most protons in nucleus. How about uranium, the most protonic naturally occurring element.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>uranium , the heaviest of the naturally occurring elements Uranium Density = 19.05 g/cc Osmium Density = 22.59 g/cc Lanthanide contraction [ wikipedia.org ] Iridium Density = 22.56 g/cc Naturally occurring mineral : Chengdeite : Ir3Fe ( an Alloy ) Density = 19.3 g/cc Though Elemental Platinum also occurs in nature and has a density = 21.09 We need a better wording than heavy for most protons in nucleus .
How about uranium , the most protonic naturally occurring element .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> uranium, the heaviest of the naturally occurring elements  

Uranium Density = 19.05 g/cc 
Osmium Density =  22.59  g/cc   Lanthanide contraction  [wikipedia.org] 
Iridium    Density = 22.56 g/cc 

Naturally occurring mineral : Chengdeite : Ir3Fe (an Alloy) Density = 19.3 g/cc 
Though Elemental Platinum also occurs in nature and has a density = 21.09 

We need a better wording than heavy for most protons in nucleus.
How about uranium, the most protonic naturally occurring element.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265170</id>
	<title>another name that would have been good...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265107860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fibonaccium</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fibonaccium</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fibonaccium</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265106</id>
	<title>On Earth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265107620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>20 more than uranium, the heaviest of the naturally occurring elements</p></div></blockquote><p> Minor quibble...  it's the heavies of the naturally occurring elements <b>on Earth</b>.  Heaver elements usually require different conditions (higher energy levels, gravity differences, etc) that can be found on earth.  But there's nothing to say they can't be found elsewhere...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>20 more than uranium , the heaviest of the naturally occurring elements Minor quibble... it 's the heavies of the naturally occurring elements on Earth .
Heaver elements usually require different conditions ( higher energy levels , gravity differences , etc ) that can be found on earth .
But there 's nothing to say they ca n't be found elsewhere.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>20 more than uranium, the heaviest of the naturally occurring elements Minor quibble...  it's the heavies of the naturally occurring elements on Earth.
Heaver elements usually require different conditions (higher energy levels, gravity differences, etc) that can be found on earth.
But there's nothing to say they can't be found elsewhere...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31267032</id>
	<title>Re:Uranium Not The Heaviest Natural Element On Ear</title>
	<author>Bigjeff5</author>
	<datestamp>1265117640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pu-244 does not have 244 protons, it still only has 94 protons.</p><p>The article was speaking of base atomic weight, they certainly weren't suggesting heavier isotopes did not exist.  They were talking about the element itself, not its potential isotope.  The element Plutonium has an atomic weight of about 188, Coppernicium has an atomic weight of about 224.  Coppernicium is the heavier element.  If you'll read more carefully, they are careful to refer to proton count so nit-pickers like you can understand their meaning.</p><p>It's like someone says "The Honda Acura weigh 3,000 pounds, and the Toyota Corolla is heavier at 3,500 pounds", and you come out and say "Nuh uh! My dad's got an Acura that weighs 6,000 pounds!  It's got a ton and a half of lead in the trunk!"  It doesn't really mean you're right, even though there are Acuras that weigh more than Corollas.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pu-244 does not have 244 protons , it still only has 94 protons.The article was speaking of base atomic weight , they certainly were n't suggesting heavier isotopes did not exist .
They were talking about the element itself , not its potential isotope .
The element Plutonium has an atomic weight of about 188 , Coppernicium has an atomic weight of about 224 .
Coppernicium is the heavier element .
If you 'll read more carefully , they are careful to refer to proton count so nit-pickers like you can understand their meaning.It 's like someone says " The Honda Acura weigh 3,000 pounds , and the Toyota Corolla is heavier at 3,500 pounds " , and you come out and say " Nuh uh !
My dad 's got an Acura that weighs 6,000 pounds !
It 's got a ton and a half of lead in the trunk !
" It does n't really mean you 're right , even though there are Acuras that weigh more than Corollas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pu-244 does not have 244 protons, it still only has 94 protons.The article was speaking of base atomic weight, they certainly weren't suggesting heavier isotopes did not exist.
They were talking about the element itself, not its potential isotope.
The element Plutonium has an atomic weight of about 188, Coppernicium has an atomic weight of about 224.
Coppernicium is the heavier element.
If you'll read more carefully, they are careful to refer to proton count so nit-pickers like you can understand their meaning.It's like someone says "The Honda Acura weigh 3,000 pounds, and the Toyota Corolla is heavier at 3,500 pounds", and you come out and say "Nuh uh!
My dad's got an Acura that weighs 6,000 pounds!
It's got a ton and a half of lead in the trunk!
"  It doesn't really mean you're right, even though there are Acuras that weigh more than Corollas.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265656</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265332</id>
	<title>Re:The naming was the easy part!</title>
	<author>WrongSizeGlass</author>
	<datestamp>1265108400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It will be used for "copernicium plumbing" - plumbing that is too heavy to steal from a construction site.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It will be used for " copernicium plumbing " - plumbing that is too heavy to steal from a construction site .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It will be used for "copernicium plumbing" - plumbing that is too heavy to steal from a construction site.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265078</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31267190</id>
	<title>Copernicium</title>
	<author>physburn</author>
	<datestamp>1265118900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sound two much like copper. But of course Copernicus was such champion
of science that he well deserves a element named after him. Elements 110 and 114 are special numbers of protons. So with the right number of Neutrons an
isotope of Coperniclum may be somewhat stable. Most of the Elements
heavier that 100 decay in milliseconds. The right number of neutrons is something
like 184, so its Cp-296 that is golden target to look for. So far nuclear scientists have not come anywhere near making an atom that neutron heavy.
<p>
---
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/blogs/Nuclear\%20Chemistry/feed.html" title="feeddistiller.com">Nuclear Chemistry</a> [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ <a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/" title="feeddistiller.com">Feed Distiller</a> [feeddistiller.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sound two much like copper .
But of course Copernicus was such champion of science that he well deserves a element named after him .
Elements 110 and 114 are special numbers of protons .
So with the right number of Neutrons an isotope of Coperniclum may be somewhat stable .
Most of the Elements heavier that 100 decay in milliseconds .
The right number of neutrons is something like 184 , so its Cp-296 that is golden target to look for .
So far nuclear scientists have not come anywhere near making an atom that neutron heavy .
--- Nuclear Chemistry [ feeddistiller.com ] Feed @ Feed Distiller [ feeddistiller.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sound two much like copper.
But of course Copernicus was such champion
of science that he well deserves a element named after him.
Elements 110 and 114 are special numbers of protons.
So with the right number of Neutrons an
isotope of Coperniclum may be somewhat stable.
Most of the Elements
heavier that 100 decay in milliseconds.
The right number of neutrons is something
like 184, so its Cp-296 that is golden target to look for.
So far nuclear scientists have not come anywhere near making an atom that neutron heavy.
---

Nuclear Chemistry [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ Feed Distiller [feeddistiller.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265828</id>
	<title>Is the atomic weight...</title>
	<author>zawarski</author>
	<datestamp>1265110380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...'delicious' or 'snacktackular'?</htmltext>
<tokenext>...'delicious ' or 'snacktackular ' ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...'delicious' or 'snacktackular'?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265132</id>
	<title>Cp</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265107740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It couldn't keep the symbol Cp because of the other thing this stands for...Captain Picard of course.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It could n't keep the symbol Cp because of the other thing this stands for...Captain Picard of course .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It couldn't keep the symbol Cp because of the other thing this stands for...Captain Picard of course.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265548</id>
	<title>Re:Cool name</title>
	<author>WrongSizeGlass</author>
	<datestamp>1265109360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...remind me again, what did Copernicus do that was related to nuclear physics?</p></div><p>Dude, he only <i>invented</i> Newton<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... and we <i>all</i> know Newton invented gravity <i>and</i> cool PDA's. This is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/., try to keep up<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...remind me again , what did Copernicus do that was related to nuclear physics ? Dude , he only invented Newton ... and we all know Newton invented gravity and cool PDA 's .
This is /. , try to keep up ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...remind me again, what did Copernicus do that was related to nuclear physics?Dude, he only invented Newton ... and we all know Newton invented gravity and cool PDA's.
This is /., try to keep up ;-)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31266756</id>
	<title>What about...</title>
	<author>HForN</author>
	<datestamp>1265115720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The element of surprise?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The element of surprise ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The element of surprise?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31267342</id>
	<title>Re:On Earth</title>
	<author>ChrisMaple</author>
	<datestamp>1265120340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Uranium is only the heaviest natural "stable" element on earth when condsidered on an atom-by-atom basis. Several elements have a higher specific gravity: Osmium, Iridium, Tungsten, Gold, Platinum, Rhenium.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Uranium is only the heaviest natural " stable " element on earth when condsidered on an atom-by-atom basis .
Several elements have a higher specific gravity : Osmium , Iridium , Tungsten , Gold , Platinum , Rhenium .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uranium is only the heaviest natural "stable" element on earth when condsidered on an atom-by-atom basis.
Several elements have a higher specific gravity: Osmium, Iridium, Tungsten, Gold, Platinum, Rhenium.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265884</id>
	<title>Re:Take that china</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265110680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can we make that official?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>I also suggest renaming America to PlasticFantastica<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>(You are eligible to naming European countries.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>P.S.: &lt;tag/&gt; would be a tag that is closed in itself. So it would not include anyting before or after it. Not quite what you intended, I guess...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can we make that official ?
; ) I also suggest renaming America to PlasticFantastica ; ) ( You are eligible to naming European countries .
; ) P.S. : would be a tag that is closed in itself .
So it would not include anyting before or after it .
Not quite what you intended , I guess... ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can we make that official?
;)I also suggest renaming America to PlasticFantastica ;)(You are eligible to naming European countries.
;)P.S.:  would be a tag that is closed in itself.
So it would not include anyting before or after it.
Not quite what you intended, I guess... ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265072</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31266868</id>
	<title>Re:another name that would have been good...</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1265116620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>thats element 1123 or 11235</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>thats element 1123 or 11235</tokentext>
<sentencetext>thats element 1123 or 11235</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265170</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265910</id>
	<title>Re:Beryllium</title>
	<author>TapeCutter</author>
	<datestamp>1265110800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apj4QSN8XQY&amp;" title="youtube.com">Beer atoms</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Beer atoms [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Beer atoms [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31266826</id>
	<title>Re:But But but</title>
	<author>davvr6</author>
	<datestamp>1265116380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Many luxury goods have been made of solid unobtainium for years.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Many luxury goods have been made of solid unobtainium for years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Many luxury goods have been made of solid unobtainium for years.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265240</id>
	<title>Cool name</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265108100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cool, now Copernicus has an element named after him.</p><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...remind me again, what did Copernicus do that was related to nuclear physics?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cool , now Copernicus has an element named after him .
...remind me again , what did Copernicus do that was related to nuclear physics ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cool, now Copernicus has an element named after him.
...remind me again, what did Copernicus do that was related to nuclear physics?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265714
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265404
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265562
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31267296
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265072
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265300
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31269840
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31266498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265544
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265170
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31266472
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31267778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265132
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31269492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265300
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31267342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265170
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31266164
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265366
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265456
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265338
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31268544
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31267082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31272308
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265632
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265922
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31266870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265078
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31267032
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265078
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31267206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265072
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31266868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265170
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31266950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31266826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265072
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_196226_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31266748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_196226.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265072
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31267206
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265884
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265500
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_196226.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265118
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265282
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265388
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265456
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31266748
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_196226.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265132
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31267778
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_196226.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265106
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31272308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265338
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265562
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31267342
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265404
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265344
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31266472
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265366
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265290
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265570
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_196226.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265082
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31266826
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31266164
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265690
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_196226.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31266756
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_196226.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265300
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31269492
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265910
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_196226.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265078
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31266870
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265332
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_196226.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265100
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31267082
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_196226.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265394
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31266950
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265818
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_196226.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265656
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265922
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31267296
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31267032
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_196226.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31267760
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_196226.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265270
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_196226.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265170
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265544
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31266868
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265518
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_196226.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31266498
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31269840
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_196226.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265240
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265714
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31268544
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265548
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265632
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_196226.31265498
</commentlist>
</conversation>
