<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_24_1614245</id>
	<title>Hungarian Electric Car Splits Into Two Smaller Cars</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1267034220000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Lanxon writes to mention that Antro, a Hungarian car manufacturer, is developing a new electric car that can <a href="http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2010-02/24/hungarian-electric-car-splits-into-two-smaller-cars.aspx">split into two smaller cars</a>. Antro plans to have it on the market by 2012.  <i>"The environmentally-conscious company started research back in 2002 and, with backing from various local sponsors, has invested 1.5 million euros in market research and development of a working prototype.  The Antro Solo concept is a three-passenger car, with a hybrid drive and solar cells on its roof that the company says could generate enough electricity for up to 20km a day at city speeds.   Futuristic looking in itself, the grander plan for the car is much more audacious: Antro intends to allow users to be able to connect two Antro Solos to form a six-passenger Antro Duo. Or perhaps more interesting still, owners of a Duo could split the car into two smaller Solos should Mum have different weekend plans to Dad. Or if they divorce."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lanxon writes to mention that Antro , a Hungarian car manufacturer , is developing a new electric car that can split into two smaller cars .
Antro plans to have it on the market by 2012 .
" The environmentally-conscious company started research back in 2002 and , with backing from various local sponsors , has invested 1.5 million euros in market research and development of a working prototype .
The Antro Solo concept is a three-passenger car , with a hybrid drive and solar cells on its roof that the company says could generate enough electricity for up to 20km a day at city speeds .
Futuristic looking in itself , the grander plan for the car is much more audacious : Antro intends to allow users to be able to connect two Antro Solos to form a six-passenger Antro Duo .
Or perhaps more interesting still , owners of a Duo could split the car into two smaller Solos should Mum have different weekend plans to Dad .
Or if they divorce .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lanxon writes to mention that Antro, a Hungarian car manufacturer, is developing a new electric car that can split into two smaller cars.
Antro plans to have it on the market by 2012.
"The environmentally-conscious company started research back in 2002 and, with backing from various local sponsors, has invested 1.5 million euros in market research and development of a working prototype.
The Antro Solo concept is a three-passenger car, with a hybrid drive and solar cells on its roof that the company says could generate enough electricity for up to 20km a day at city speeds.
Futuristic looking in itself, the grander plan for the car is much more audacious: Antro intends to allow users to be able to connect two Antro Solos to form a six-passenger Antro Duo.
Or perhaps more interesting still, owners of a Duo could split the car into two smaller Solos should Mum have different weekend plans to Dad.
Or if they divorce.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31269324</id>
	<title>Taxpayer money</title>
	<author>little1973</author>
	<datestamp>1267128060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As a hungarian I believe there will be nothing from this. It is just another firm which goes after free taxpayer money from the government rinding on the "green energy" bandwagon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a hungarian I believe there will be nothing from this .
It is just another firm which goes after free taxpayer money from the government rinding on the " green energy " bandwagon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a hungarian I believe there will be nothing from this.
It is just another firm which goes after free taxpayer money from the government rinding on the "green energy" bandwagon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262360</id>
	<title>Anyone else think of Top Gear?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265138760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope that doesn't mean the Duo has two steering wheels, else it's gonna be James May's entry in the Top Gear Limousine competition all over again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope that does n't mean the Duo has two steering wheels , else it 's gon na be James May 's entry in the Top Gear Limousine competition all over again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope that doesn't mean the Duo has two steering wheels, else it's gonna be James May's entry in the Top Gear Limousine competition all over again.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262740</id>
	<title>Re:Malcom?</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1265140560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There was an episode of <i>Candid Camera</i> (sometime in the lat '50s or early '60s) that had a volkswagon cut in half down the middle, that could detach with each half going around an obsticle and then reattach. The looks on people's faces when they saw this thing on the street was hilarious.</p><p>Even though I was a kid, I marvelled at the nerdy engineering it must of taken to rig that thing up. It was awesome.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There was an episode of Candid Camera ( sometime in the lat '50s or early '60s ) that had a volkswagon cut in half down the middle , that could detach with each half going around an obsticle and then reattach .
The looks on people 's faces when they saw this thing on the street was hilarious.Even though I was a kid , I marvelled at the nerdy engineering it must of taken to rig that thing up .
It was awesome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There was an episode of Candid Camera (sometime in the lat '50s or early '60s) that had a volkswagon cut in half down the middle, that could detach with each half going around an obsticle and then reattach.
The looks on people's faces when they saw this thing on the street was hilarious.Even though I was a kid, I marvelled at the nerdy engineering it must of taken to rig that thing up.
It was awesome.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31263546</id>
	<title>I've been looking for that</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265143920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I want my mouse back</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I want my mouse back</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want my mouse back</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31263062</id>
	<title>Cartoons</title>
	<author>CODiNE</author>
	<datestamp>1265142000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know if it's still published but when I was a kid I found an old CarToons magazine which was sort of like MAD Magazine but full of cars.</p><p>There was one story with this style vehicle in it, basically the whole world was a mesh of interconnected freeways.  There were no more buildings, everyone was constantly mobile.  The family home was sort of like an RV with several pod cars that would pop out when the kids wanted to go out.  You'd pull up to a McDonald's, pay at the window and get you junk food all without stopping.  When couple's would date they'd connect their pods and make out.  Off the roads it was a bit like Logan's Run with nature being "contaminated" and deadly.  So the plot is that 2 kids are making out, run their pods off the road.  After get lost in the forest they run out of gas and have to walk around.  They discover fruits and vegetables, live like hippies for a while and love it.  Then the feds track them down and forcefully reintroduce them to society (Clockwork Orange style).</p><p>It was a nice magazine... excuse me while I go get a Big Mac.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know if it 's still published but when I was a kid I found an old CarToons magazine which was sort of like MAD Magazine but full of cars.There was one story with this style vehicle in it , basically the whole world was a mesh of interconnected freeways .
There were no more buildings , everyone was constantly mobile .
The family home was sort of like an RV with several pod cars that would pop out when the kids wanted to go out .
You 'd pull up to a McDonald 's , pay at the window and get you junk food all without stopping .
When couple 's would date they 'd connect their pods and make out .
Off the roads it was a bit like Logan 's Run with nature being " contaminated " and deadly .
So the plot is that 2 kids are making out , run their pods off the road .
After get lost in the forest they run out of gas and have to walk around .
They discover fruits and vegetables , live like hippies for a while and love it .
Then the feds track them down and forcefully reintroduce them to society ( Clockwork Orange style ) .It was a nice magazine... excuse me while I go get a Big Mac .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know if it's still published but when I was a kid I found an old CarToons magazine which was sort of like MAD Magazine but full of cars.There was one story with this style vehicle in it, basically the whole world was a mesh of interconnected freeways.
There were no more buildings, everyone was constantly mobile.
The family home was sort of like an RV with several pod cars that would pop out when the kids wanted to go out.
You'd pull up to a McDonald's, pay at the window and get you junk food all without stopping.
When couple's would date they'd connect their pods and make out.
Off the roads it was a bit like Logan's Run with nature being "contaminated" and deadly.
So the plot is that 2 kids are making out, run their pods off the road.
After get lost in the forest they run out of gas and have to walk around.
They discover fruits and vegetables, live like hippies for a while and love it.
Then the feds track them down and forcefully reintroduce them to society (Clockwork Orange style).It was a nice magazine... excuse me while I go get a Big Mac.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262468</id>
	<title>Re:Safety?</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1265139240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Not only is a car that splits in two a ridiculous idea, both cars will most probably never comply with the required safety standards in Europe and the US.</p></div></blockquote><p>Getting a double car to pass is a matter of simply bribing with double the usual amount.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not only is a car that splits in two a ridiculous idea , both cars will most probably never comply with the required safety standards in Europe and the US.Getting a double car to pass is a matter of simply bribing with double the usual amount .
   </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not only is a car that splits in two a ridiculous idea, both cars will most probably never comply with the required safety standards in Europe and the US.Getting a double car to pass is a matter of simply bribing with double the usual amount.
   
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31266924</id>
	<title>Each of the smaller cars...</title>
	<author>gwdoiron</author>
	<datestamp>1265116920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>splits into a motorcycle and a bicycle, too.  Each with quick disconnect wheels!</htmltext>
<tokenext>splits into a motorcycle and a bicycle , too .
Each with quick disconnect wheels !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>splits into a motorcycle and a bicycle, too.
Each with quick disconnect wheels!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262558</id>
	<title>Re:Quasi futuristic styling</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1265139660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>People don't like futuristic looking stuff. If they did, we'd all be wearing white or silver jumpsuits.</p></div></blockquote><p>Lady Gaga is certainly putting the world on that track.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>People do n't like futuristic looking stuff .
If they did , we 'd all be wearing white or silver jumpsuits.Lady Gaga is certainly putting the world on that track .
     </tokentext>
<sentencetext>People don't like futuristic looking stuff.
If they did, we'd all be wearing white or silver jumpsuits.Lady Gaga is certainly putting the world on that track.
     
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261958</id>
	<title>To the battle bridge!</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1265137260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great, so now you can separate the saucer section and let the civilians escape while the crew remains on the battle bridge to distract the Romulans.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great , so now you can separate the saucer section and let the civilians escape while the crew remains on the battle bridge to distract the Romulans .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great, so now you can separate the saucer section and let the civilians escape while the crew remains on the battle bridge to distract the Romulans.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31266550</id>
	<title>or if they hit a pothole ;)</title>
	<author>swschrad</author>
	<datestamp>1265114520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suspect a really substantial link to two little baby cars is going to weigh too much, and take too much fiddling around, for your average driver to manage.</p><p>otherwise, every little ripple in the road, you've got two cars.</p><p>who designed this, again, Hal Roach Movie Studios?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suspect a really substantial link to two little baby cars is going to weigh too much , and take too much fiddling around , for your average driver to manage.otherwise , every little ripple in the road , you 've got two cars.who designed this , again , Hal Roach Movie Studios ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suspect a really substantial link to two little baby cars is going to weigh too much, and take too much fiddling around, for your average driver to manage.otherwise, every little ripple in the road, you've got two cars.who designed this, again, Hal Roach Movie Studios?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31264374</id>
	<title>Re:Quasi futuristic styling</title>
	<author>robot256</author>
	<datestamp>1265104620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If we were all wearing silver jumpsuits, they wouldn't be futuristic anymore!  They'd be "modern".  The reason people don't wear silver jumpsuits is <i>they don't like silver jumpsuits.</i>  It's just a coincidence that for some reason we associate silver jumpsuits with "futuristic" stuff.  But that association alone doesn't have anything to do with mainstream adoption.
</p><p>Not that that will stop me from wearing my silver jumpsuit at every opportunity...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If we were all wearing silver jumpsuits , they would n't be futuristic anymore !
They 'd be " modern " .
The reason people do n't wear silver jumpsuits is they do n't like silver jumpsuits .
It 's just a coincidence that for some reason we associate silver jumpsuits with " futuristic " stuff .
But that association alone does n't have anything to do with mainstream adoption .
Not that that will stop me from wearing my silver jumpsuit at every opportunity.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If we were all wearing silver jumpsuits, they wouldn't be futuristic anymore!
They'd be "modern".
The reason people don't wear silver jumpsuits is they don't like silver jumpsuits.
It's just a coincidence that for some reason we associate silver jumpsuits with "futuristic" stuff.
But that association alone doesn't have anything to do with mainstream adoption.
Not that that will stop me from wearing my silver jumpsuit at every opportunity...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261934</id>
	<title>Quasi futuristic styling</title>
	<author>sakdoctor</author>
	<datestamp>1265137140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People don't like futuristic looking stuff. If they did, we'd all be wearing white or silver jumpsuits.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People do n't like futuristic looking stuff .
If they did , we 'd all be wearing white or silver jumpsuits .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People don't like futuristic looking stuff.
If they did, we'd all be wearing white or silver jumpsuits.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262592</id>
	<title>Re:Safety?</title>
	<author>Dare nMc</author>
	<datestamp>1265139780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>in US a 3 wheeled vehicle is usually considered a motorcycle legally.  As far as I can tell a motorcycle has no crash standard (other than it is bad to be the motorcyclist in a crash.)<br>So I would say the opposite, this is a way to avoid crash safety standards in US (sell the trikes only of course.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>in US a 3 wheeled vehicle is usually considered a motorcycle legally .
As far as I can tell a motorcycle has no crash standard ( other than it is bad to be the motorcyclist in a crash .
) So I would say the opposite , this is a way to avoid crash safety standards in US ( sell the trikes only of course .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in US a 3 wheeled vehicle is usually considered a motorcycle legally.
As far as I can tell a motorcycle has no crash standard (other than it is bad to be the motorcyclist in a crash.
)So I would say the opposite, this is a way to avoid crash safety standards in US (sell the trikes only of course.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31263442</id>
	<title>Re:Quasi futuristic styling</title>
	<author>Beardo the Bearded</author>
	<datestamp>1265143500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That reminds me, it's time for yoga.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That reminds me , it 's time for yoga .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That reminds me, it's time for yoga.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262102</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262210</id>
	<title>If you loved the car</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265138220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You'll shit bricks over their concept <a href="http://www.solo-duo.hu/Image/moveo.jpg" title="solo-duo.hu" rel="nofollow"> scooter</a> [solo-duo.hu].</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 'll shit bricks over their concept scooter [ solo-duo.hu ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You'll shit bricks over their concept  scooter [solo-duo.hu].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31268340</id>
	<title>And let's not forget Malcolm</title>
	<author>complete loony</author>
	<datestamp>1265129880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0091464/" title="imdb.com">Link</a> [imdb.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>Link [ imdb.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Link [imdb.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262258</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261976</id>
	<title>KISS</title>
	<author>TheKidWho</author>
	<datestamp>1265137260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Keep It Simple Stupid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Keep It Simple Stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Keep It Simple Stupid.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31269870</id>
	<title>Web site</title>
	<author>Calinous</author>
	<datestamp>1267092300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.solo-duo.hu/main.php?category=104" title="solo-duo.hu">http://www.solo-duo.hu/main.php?category=104</a> [solo-duo.hu]</p><p>Just some pretty pictures there<br>This shows how the car splits:<br><a href="http://www.solo-duo.hu/data/picture\_news/62/0062/pic87.jpg" title="solo-duo.hu">http://www.solo-duo.hu/data/picture\_news/62/0062/pic87.jpg</a> [solo-duo.hu]<br>
&nbsp; A back-to-back "link-up" with the rear end of the cars put separately. Will it have 6 wheels when connected? Or just four wheels, with the other (double) two wheels raised or totally removed?<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; And the "back" car has the seats backside-facing (unless the seats can rotate).<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; The three seats are side-by-side (the front seat a little advanced). Not a very friendly conversation place, as the passengers will talk behind the head of the driver.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Interesting idea, it's just that I think it has a bad implementation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.solo-duo.hu/main.php ? category = 104 [ solo-duo.hu ] Just some pretty pictures thereThis shows how the car splits : http : //www.solo-duo.hu/data/picture \ _news/62/0062/pic87.jpg [ solo-duo.hu ]   A back-to-back " link-up " with the rear end of the cars put separately .
Will it have 6 wheels when connected ?
Or just four wheels , with the other ( double ) two wheels raised or totally removed ?
      And the " back " car has the seats backside-facing ( unless the seats can rotate ) .
      The three seats are side-by-side ( the front seat a little advanced ) .
Not a very friendly conversation place , as the passengers will talk behind the head of the driver .
      Interesting idea , it 's just that I think it has a bad implementation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.solo-duo.hu/main.php?category=104 [solo-duo.hu]Just some pretty pictures thereThis shows how the car splits:http://www.solo-duo.hu/data/picture\_news/62/0062/pic87.jpg [solo-duo.hu]
  A back-to-back "link-up" with the rear end of the cars put separately.
Will it have 6 wheels when connected?
Or just four wheels, with the other (double) two wheels raised or totally removed?
      And the "back" car has the seats backside-facing (unless the seats can rotate).
      The three seats are side-by-side (the front seat a little advanced).
Not a very friendly conversation place, as the passengers will talk behind the head of the driver.
      Interesting idea, it's just that I think it has a bad implementation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262258</id>
	<title>Allen Funt, is that you??</title>
	<author>Reziac</author>
	<datestamp>1265138400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Candid Camera did a prototype of such a vehicle a long, long time ago...</p><p>Follow that car!<br>[car splits in half and goes separate ways]<br>Which one??</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Candid Camera did a prototype of such a vehicle a long , long time ago...Follow that car !
[ car splits in half and goes separate ways ] Which one ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Candid Camera did a prototype of such a vehicle a long, long time ago...Follow that car!
[car splits in half and goes separate ways]Which one?
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262102</id>
	<title>Re:Quasi futuristic styling</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265137800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>What, you don't like my jumpsuit...I'll switch to spandex then.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What , you do n't like my jumpsuit...I 'll switch to spandex then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What, you don't like my jumpsuit...I'll switch to spandex then.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31263050</id>
	<title>Was made in 1986</title>
	<author>Aymon</author>
	<datestamp>1265141940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>For the film Malcolm <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0091464/" title="imdb.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0091464/</a> [imdb.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>For the film Malcolm http : //www.imdb.com/title/tt0091464/ [ imdb.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For the film Malcolm http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0091464/ [imdb.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261988</id>
	<title>Malcom?</title>
	<author>shogun</author>
	<datestamp>1265137320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like they watched this old Australian film: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malcolm\_(film)" title="wikipedia.org">Malcolm</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like they watched this old Australian film : Malcolm [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like they watched this old Australian film: Malcolm [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31265412</id>
	<title>If It Were Russian</title>
	<author>twmcneil</author>
	<datestamp>1265108760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Good thing it wasn't the Russians who invented this - there would be 6 of them that fit inside each other.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Good thing it was n't the Russians who invented this - there would be 6 of them that fit inside each other .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good thing it wasn't the Russians who invented this - there would be 6 of them that fit inside each other.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262694</id>
	<title>Re:Quasi futuristic styling</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1265140260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's obvious you're young, since you have no idea what it's like to live in the future. People DO like futuristic looking stuff. If they didn't, your TV and radio would be plastic boxes made to look like wood and your car would be a station wagon with wood panels on the side.</p><p>Jump suits are not futuristic; "futuristic" does not equal "dorky".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's obvious you 're young , since you have no idea what it 's like to live in the future .
People DO like futuristic looking stuff .
If they did n't , your TV and radio would be plastic boxes made to look like wood and your car would be a station wagon with wood panels on the side.Jump suits are not futuristic ; " futuristic " does not equal " dorky " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's obvious you're young, since you have no idea what it's like to live in the future.
People DO like futuristic looking stuff.
If they didn't, your TV and radio would be plastic boxes made to look like wood and your car would be a station wagon with wood panels on the side.Jump suits are not futuristic; "futuristic" does not equal "dorky".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31263020</id>
	<title>Re:General comments</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265141820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>3.  Nominally, it's 3.2 m long.  When two of them are mated up, the combination is 4.8 m long.  Where's the other 1.6 m going?  Is the front of the second car going to fill up the rear of the lead car?  Or does the combination look like the two cars are humping?</p><p>    From the pic I would guess that the trunk area (including rear wheel) is removable. Then you remove the rears of both cars and they mate back to back.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>3 .
Nominally , it 's 3.2 m long .
When two of them are mated up , the combination is 4.8 m long .
Where 's the other 1.6 m going ?
Is the front of the second car going to fill up the rear of the lead car ?
Or does the combination look like the two cars are humping ?
From the pic I would guess that the trunk area ( including rear wheel ) is removable .
Then you remove the rears of both cars and they mate back to back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>3.
Nominally, it's 3.2 m long.
When two of them are mated up, the combination is 4.8 m long.
Where's the other 1.6 m going?
Is the front of the second car going to fill up the rear of the lead car?
Or does the combination look like the two cars are humping?
From the pic I would guess that the trunk area (including rear wheel) is removable.
Then you remove the rears of both cars and they mate back to back.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31263576</id>
	<title>Team Knight Rider Car</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265144100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Two Motor Cycles become http://knightrideronline.com/tkr/motor.jpg</p><p>a Combo vehicle http://knightrideronline.com/tkr/morph.jpg</p><p>And yes, it was a stupid show.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Two Motor Cycles become http : //knightrideronline.com/tkr/motor.jpga Combo vehicle http : //knightrideronline.com/tkr/morph.jpgAnd yes , it was a stupid show .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Two Motor Cycles become http://knightrideronline.com/tkr/motor.jpga Combo vehicle http://knightrideronline.com/tkr/morph.jpgAnd yes, it was a stupid show.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262498</id>
	<title>I have solar power in my car</title>
	<author>CdBee</author>
	<datestamp>1265139420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>the idea is hardly new - I permanently mounted a pair of 18-volt, 5-watt amorphous solar cells on the rear parcel-shelf to top up the battery when its parked and subsidise the electricity used when running. <br> <br>

the car is a diesel Ford Mondeo (Mercury Mystique in USA) so I don't get any traction power from my solar cells, but it makes starting up a lot easier and does cause a measurable improvement in fuel economy.

<br> <br>However: given that 10 watts of solar power cost me &pound;80 (UK GBP) I have some reservations about whether really useful amounts of power can be generated without dramaticallly increasing the cost of the car.. and with an electric car unlike my old diesel lump, isn't there a risk that the extra weight of solar cells would cancel out the gains ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>the idea is hardly new - I permanently mounted a pair of 18-volt , 5-watt amorphous solar cells on the rear parcel-shelf to top up the battery when its parked and subsidise the electricity used when running .
the car is a diesel Ford Mondeo ( Mercury Mystique in USA ) so I do n't get any traction power from my solar cells , but it makes starting up a lot easier and does cause a measurable improvement in fuel economy .
However : given that 10 watts of solar power cost me   80 ( UK GBP ) I have some reservations about whether really useful amounts of power can be generated without dramaticallly increasing the cost of the car.. and with an electric car unlike my old diesel lump , is n't there a risk that the extra weight of solar cells would cancel out the gains ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the idea is hardly new - I permanently mounted a pair of 18-volt, 5-watt amorphous solar cells on the rear parcel-shelf to top up the battery when its parked and subsidise the electricity used when running.
the car is a diesel Ford Mondeo (Mercury Mystique in USA) so I don't get any traction power from my solar cells, but it makes starting up a lot easier and does cause a measurable improvement in fuel economy.
However: given that 10 watts of solar power cost me £80 (UK GBP) I have some reservations about whether really useful amounts of power can be generated without dramaticallly increasing the cost of the car.. and with an electric car unlike my old diesel lump, isn't there a risk that the extra weight of solar cells would cancel out the gains ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31273898</id>
	<title>Re:Something for nothing</title>
	<author>gurps\_npc</author>
	<datestamp>1267121520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The big rig had to move the air either way.   The only question is, will the cars take advantage of the reduction in air friction from the big rig or not.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The big rig had to move the air either way .
The only question is , will the cars take advantage of the reduction in air friction from the big rig or not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The big rig had to move the air either way.
The only question is, will the cars take advantage of the reduction in air friction from the big rig or not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31264902</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31263002</id>
	<title>Joined Efficiency?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265141760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does a duo take less energy to run than two solos?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does a duo take less energy to run than two solos ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does a duo take less energy to run than two solos?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31264056</id>
	<title>Pictures or it didn't happen</title>
	<author>fotoguzzi</author>
	<datestamp>1265103120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know I'm new here, but why the hell wouldn't there be a picture of the car splitting in half? It would be like a Ginsu knife commercial where they never slice the tomato. It would be like a documentary on the Harrier Jet where it never hovers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know I 'm new here , but why the hell would n't there be a picture of the car splitting in half ?
It would be like a Ginsu knife commercial where they never slice the tomato .
It would be like a documentary on the Harrier Jet where it never hovers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know I'm new here, but why the hell wouldn't there be a picture of the car splitting in half?
It would be like a Ginsu knife commercial where they never slice the tomato.
It would be like a documentary on the Harrier Jet where it never hovers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262094</id>
	<title>What, you don't?</title>
	<author>Moraelin</author>
	<datestamp>1265137740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What, you mean, you don't? Hmm... maybe that's why they were looking at me like that in the last meeting<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What , you mean , you do n't ?
Hmm... maybe that 's why they were looking at me like that in the last meeting ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What, you mean, you don't?
Hmm... maybe that's why they were looking at me like that in the last meeting ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31263870</id>
	<title>"Meet George Jetson!"</title>
	<author>HTH NE1</author>
	<datestamp>1265102220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If it split into four, the car could split off smaller cars for, "His boy Elroy," "Daughter Judy," and "Jane, his wife."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If it split into four , the car could split off smaller cars for , " His boy Elroy , " " Daughter Judy , " and " Jane , his wife .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it split into four, the car could split off smaller cars for, "His boy Elroy," "Daughter Judy," and "Jane, his wife.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262798</id>
	<title>That was quicker than I thought</title>
	<author>undecim</author>
	<datestamp>1265140860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I knew scientists were working on bring quantum mechanics to "big" items, but I never thought a car that can travel two paths at once would have happened in my lifetime.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I knew scientists were working on bring quantum mechanics to " big " items , but I never thought a car that can travel two paths at once would have happened in my lifetime .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I knew scientists were working on bring quantum mechanics to "big" items, but I never thought a car that can travel two paths at once would have happened in my lifetime.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31264458</id>
	<title>Re:General comments</title>
	<author>Haxzaw</author>
	<datestamp>1265104920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There are a lot of cars that can't get past our overly zealous safety standards in the US.  If there were, we could have inexpensive cars like the rest of the world.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There are a lot of cars that ca n't get past our overly zealous safety standards in the US .
If there were , we could have inexpensive cars like the rest of the world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are a lot of cars that can't get past our overly zealous safety standards in the US.
If there were, we could have inexpensive cars like the rest of the world.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31274674</id>
	<title>By Neruos</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267123980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What if someone hits the car while it's one piece and it splits into 2 peices? Is that considered 2 accidents? Do you have to have insurance on 2 different cars? Is it considered towing if 2 are connected?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What if someone hits the car while it 's one piece and it splits into 2 peices ?
Is that considered 2 accidents ?
Do you have to have insurance on 2 different cars ?
Is it considered towing if 2 are connected ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if someone hits the car while it's one piece and it splits into 2 peices?
Is that considered 2 accidents?
Do you have to have insurance on 2 different cars?
Is it considered towing if 2 are connected?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262974</id>
	<title>Re:Quasi futuristic styling</title>
	<author>Rei</author>
	<datestamp>1265141700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like someone's just grumpy because Lastday is coming up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like someone 's just grumpy because Lastday is coming up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like someone's just grumpy because Lastday is coming up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262256</id>
	<title>Clown car?</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1265138400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On reading this, does anyone else think of a circus car that splits in half, with clowns falling out both sections?</p><p>Or those cars in the movies that break in half, with the front half going one way and the guys in the back frantically trying to keep the back part going in the same direction.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On reading this , does anyone else think of a circus car that splits in half , with clowns falling out both sections ? Or those cars in the movies that break in half , with the front half going one way and the guys in the back frantically trying to keep the back part going in the same direction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On reading this, does anyone else think of a circus car that splits in half, with clowns falling out both sections?Or those cars in the movies that break in half, with the front half going one way and the guys in the back frantically trying to keep the back part going in the same direction.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31264326</id>
	<title>Re:If you loved the car</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265104380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes. That does indeed look like a brick under the seat.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes .
That does indeed look like a brick under the seat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes.
That does indeed look like a brick under the seat.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262210</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31265824</id>
	<title>infinite</title>
	<author>lazyBob</author>
	<datestamp>1265110380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If I can split my car everyday, I will have infinite cars.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I can split my car everyday , I will have infinite cars .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I can split my car everyday, I will have infinite cars.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31264902</id>
	<title>Something for nothing</title>
	<author>westlake</author>
	<datestamp>1265106720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>This would reduce gas/energy consumption by at least 28\% (as per Mythbusters 2007 , episode 80, drafting 2 ft behind a big rig reduced gas consumption by 28\%</i> </p><p>How much fuel was the big rig consuming?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This would reduce gas/energy consumption by at least 28 \ % ( as per Mythbusters 2007 , episode 80 , drafting 2 ft behind a big rig reduced gas consumption by 28 \ % How much fuel was the big rig consuming ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This would reduce gas/energy consumption by at least 28\% (as per Mythbusters 2007 , episode 80, drafting 2 ft behind a big rig reduced gas consumption by 28\% How much fuel was the big rig consuming?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262440</id>
	<title>So pointless</title>
	<author>Eggbloke</author>
	<datestamp>1265139180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yet so cool</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yet so cool</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yet so cool</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31263244</id>
	<title>Here's a photo:</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1265142660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The article does not contain a photo. <a href="http://pictureisunrelated.com/2009/10/29/my-god-what-have-you-created/" title="pictureisunrelated.com">So here it comes</a> [pictureisunrelated.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The article does not contain a photo .
So here it comes [ pictureisunrelated.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article does not contain a photo.
So here it comes [pictureisunrelated.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31264260</id>
	<title>It's the 70ies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265104080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That car is coming straight out of the 70ies. It's reminiscent of a star trek story where they travel back in time to our civilisation in the 70ies (or 80ies) -- to get in contact with extinct whales or so.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That car is coming straight out of the 70ies .
It 's reminiscent of a star trek story where they travel back in time to our civilisation in the 70ies ( or 80ies ) -- to get in contact with extinct whales or so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That car is coming straight out of the 70ies.
It's reminiscent of a star trek story where they travel back in time to our civilisation in the 70ies (or 80ies) -- to get in contact with extinct whales or so.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31269166</id>
	<title>Why so ugly?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265139180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why must all car design concepts look like those banana-shaped sneakers worn only by East European bouncers?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why must all car design concepts look like those banana-shaped sneakers worn only by East European bouncers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why must all car design concepts look like those banana-shaped sneakers worn only by East European bouncers?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31264508</id>
	<title>I remember a similar concept from the 70s</title>
	<author>hey!</author>
	<datestamp>1265105100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>During the energy crisis.  It consisted of a small "Smart Car" style front end that could be docked to a rear end to form a station wagon style car.</p><p>The front, I think may have been electric and the rear had an ICE engine.  The idea was that you'd run your errands and commute in the little car, then dock to the ICE rear unit for long trips.</p><p>I actually like that concept in theory, but I can imagine that many people might not like having the unused rear half hanging around taking up space (although carrying the excess space around is kind of silly too).  I can also see how such a configuration might deliver less than the "best of both worlds" it promises.</p><p>Now having *two* independently usable halves might be more attractive.  The problem is that each half and the combined vehicle is bound to be so unconventional I wouldn't bet on its market or technical success.  The 70s concept was pretty conventional both as a small commuter car and a docked long distance travel car.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>During the energy crisis .
It consisted of a small " Smart Car " style front end that could be docked to a rear end to form a station wagon style car.The front , I think may have been electric and the rear had an ICE engine .
The idea was that you 'd run your errands and commute in the little car , then dock to the ICE rear unit for long trips.I actually like that concept in theory , but I can imagine that many people might not like having the unused rear half hanging around taking up space ( although carrying the excess space around is kind of silly too ) .
I can also see how such a configuration might deliver less than the " best of both worlds " it promises.Now having * two * independently usable halves might be more attractive .
The problem is that each half and the combined vehicle is bound to be so unconventional I would n't bet on its market or technical success .
The 70s concept was pretty conventional both as a small commuter car and a docked long distance travel car .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>During the energy crisis.
It consisted of a small "Smart Car" style front end that could be docked to a rear end to form a station wagon style car.The front, I think may have been electric and the rear had an ICE engine.
The idea was that you'd run your errands and commute in the little car, then dock to the ICE rear unit for long trips.I actually like that concept in theory, but I can imagine that many people might not like having the unused rear half hanging around taking up space (although carrying the excess space around is kind of silly too).
I can also see how such a configuration might deliver less than the "best of both worlds" it promises.Now having *two* independently usable halves might be more attractive.
The problem is that each half and the combined vehicle is bound to be so unconventional I wouldn't bet on its market or technical success.
The 70s concept was pretty conventional both as a small commuter car and a docked long distance travel car.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262306</id>
	<title>Consult the Dirty Hungarian Phrasebook</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265138580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I tried to find this vehicle in my Dirty Hungarian Phrasebook, to no avail.<br>I guess it is full of eels like the hovercraft, though probably electric eels.</p><p>That makes my nipples explode with delight.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I tried to find this vehicle in my Dirty Hungarian Phrasebook , to no avail.I guess it is full of eels like the hovercraft , though probably electric eels.That makes my nipples explode with delight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I tried to find this vehicle in my Dirty Hungarian Phrasebook, to no avail.I guess it is full of eels like the hovercraft, though probably electric eels.That makes my nipples explode with delight.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31264104</id>
	<title>It looks like a computer mouse</title>
	<author>Chicken\_Kickers</author>
	<datestamp>1265103420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It looks like a computer mouse, or a shoe. Looking at the picture of the car at the Wired website, it seems that the car has a large surface area covered with glass. This means that the car will turn into a hot glasshouse during the day. Opening the windows or switching on the air-con would be inefficient/use up a lot of power. Another concern is the structural integrity of the car. A head on collision will shatter the glass windscreen/roof directly on the passengers. I assume, that should the car ever go into production, it would by necessity, look like a conventional car.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It looks like a computer mouse , or a shoe .
Looking at the picture of the car at the Wired website , it seems that the car has a large surface area covered with glass .
This means that the car will turn into a hot glasshouse during the day .
Opening the windows or switching on the air-con would be inefficient/use up a lot of power .
Another concern is the structural integrity of the car .
A head on collision will shatter the glass windscreen/roof directly on the passengers .
I assume , that should the car ever go into production , it would by necessity , look like a conventional car .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It looks like a computer mouse, or a shoe.
Looking at the picture of the car at the Wired website, it seems that the car has a large surface area covered with glass.
This means that the car will turn into a hot glasshouse during the day.
Opening the windows or switching on the air-con would be inefficient/use up a lot of power.
Another concern is the structural integrity of the car.
A head on collision will shatter the glass windscreen/roof directly on the passengers.
I assume, that should the car ever go into production, it would by necessity, look like a conventional car.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262002</id>
	<title>Splitting into two? That's nothing.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265137380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Call me when they make a car capable of reproduction by binary fission.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Call me when they make a car capable of reproduction by binary fission .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Call me when they make a car capable of reproduction by binary fission.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262060</id>
	<title>Family Time</title>
	<author>SEWilco</author>
	<datestamp>1265137620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>"You doing OK back there, kids?"<br>
"Kids?"<br>
"Oh, where have they gone off to now?"</htmltext>
<tokenext>" You doing OK back there , kids ?
" " Kids ?
" " Oh , where have they gone off to now ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"You doing OK back there, kids?
"
"Kids?
"
"Oh, where have they gone off to now?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262356</id>
	<title>Bizarre, *not* futuristic. Futuristic cars look...</title>
	<author>Colin Smith</author>
	<datestamp>1265138760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Something like this:</p><p><a href="http://vne-resource.iol.co.za/30/picdb/1/7/105701" title="iol.co.za">http://vne-resource.iol.co.za/30/picdb/1/7/105701</a> [iol.co.za]</p><p>With some minor detail changes, like the badge. Cos it's practical, affordable, easy to maintain, people can actually use it every day, put the shopping in the boot, the kids in the back seat, sit in a reasonably comfortable position, see what's going on in front and behind. etc.</p><p>It will <i> <b>not</b> </i> look anything like this:</p><p><a href="http://www.geekologie.com/2007/12/07/future-car-1.jpg" title="geekologie.com">http://www.geekologie.com/2007/12/07/future-car-1.jpg</a> [geekologie.com]</p><p>I mean... WTF?<br>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Something like this : http : //vne-resource.iol.co.za/30/picdb/1/7/105701 [ iol.co.za ] With some minor detail changes , like the badge .
Cos it 's practical , affordable , easy to maintain , people can actually use it every day , put the shopping in the boot , the kids in the back seat , sit in a reasonably comfortable position , see what 's going on in front and behind .
etc.It will not look anything like this : http : //www.geekologie.com/2007/12/07/future-car-1.jpg [ geekologie.com ] I mean... WTF ?  </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Something like this:http://vne-resource.iol.co.za/30/picdb/1/7/105701 [iol.co.za]With some minor detail changes, like the badge.
Cos it's practical, affordable, easy to maintain, people can actually use it every day, put the shopping in the boot, the kids in the back seat, sit in a reasonably comfortable position, see what's going on in front and behind.
etc.It will  not  look anything like this:http://www.geekologie.com/2007/12/07/future-car-1.jpg [geekologie.com]I mean... WTF?
 </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31263564</id>
	<title>Re:Safety?</title>
	<author>Qzukk</author>
	<datestamp>1265144040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>a car must be built like a tank and get low mileage to clear the regulatory environment in the US. </i></p><p>Ford was probably right when they said Americans wouldn't pay a dollar more for safety.  Ford just pissed everyone off by throwing it in their face.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>a car must be built like a tank and get low mileage to clear the regulatory environment in the US .
Ford was probably right when they said Americans would n't pay a dollar more for safety .
Ford just pissed everyone off by throwing it in their face .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a car must be built like a tank and get low mileage to clear the regulatory environment in the US.
Ford was probably right when they said Americans wouldn't pay a dollar more for safety.
Ford just pissed everyone off by throwing it in their face.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262652</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262772</id>
	<title>Not new</title>
	<author>lordshipmayhem</author>
	<datestamp>1265140740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I had a car that could split in two.  The mechanism by which it did this feat was called "rust".</htmltext>
<tokenext>I had a car that could split in two .
The mechanism by which it did this feat was called " rust " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had a car that could split in two.
The mechanism by which it did this feat was called "rust".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31263112</id>
	<title>An Abomination</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265142180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>A car that can split into two cars is clearly banned in Leviticus. Expect the tea-baggers to be up in arms.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A car that can split into two cars is clearly banned in Leviticus .
Expect the tea-baggers to be up in arms .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A car that can split into two cars is clearly banned in Leviticus.
Expect the tea-baggers to be up in arms.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31264894</id>
	<title>Re:Good idea, poor execution.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265106720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Didn't they try that on the Red Green Show with Duct Tape?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did n't they try that on the Red Green Show with Duct Tape ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Didn't they try that on the Red Green Show with Duct Tape?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31263094</id>
	<title>We already have a car that splits in half...</title>
	<author>Raptor851</author>
	<datestamp>1265142120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I believe they're known as a Ferrari...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe they 're known as a Ferrari.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe they're known as a Ferrari...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31263680</id>
	<title>Wonder twin car powers, activate!</title>
	<author>podom</author>
	<datestamp>1265101320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Form of...oh, just a bigger car.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Form of...oh , just a bigger car .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Form of...oh, just a bigger car.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31265578</id>
	<title>Re:KISS</title>
	<author>StayFrosty</author>
	<datestamp>1265109480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wish automotive engineers would keep this acronym in mind when designing cars.  The amount of crap you have to go through on any newer car to do simple maintenance and tune-ups is ridiculous.  It doesn't seem like any of this has done much for reliability (which is worse than it was in 1990 IMHO) or fuel economy either.  The only tangible benefit I can see is emissions.  I know it's hip to be green these days, but I prefer my cars to be simple, cheap and easy to maintain.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wish automotive engineers would keep this acronym in mind when designing cars .
The amount of crap you have to go through on any newer car to do simple maintenance and tune-ups is ridiculous .
It does n't seem like any of this has done much for reliability ( which is worse than it was in 1990 IMHO ) or fuel economy either .
The only tangible benefit I can see is emissions .
I know it 's hip to be green these days , but I prefer my cars to be simple , cheap and easy to maintain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wish automotive engineers would keep this acronym in mind when designing cars.
The amount of crap you have to go through on any newer car to do simple maintenance and tune-ups is ridiculous.
It doesn't seem like any of this has done much for reliability (which is worse than it was in 1990 IMHO) or fuel economy either.
The only tangible benefit I can see is emissions.
I know it's hip to be green these days, but I prefer my cars to be simple, cheap and easy to maintain.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261976</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262598</id>
	<title>Re:3 / 2 =?</title>
	<author>ubercam</author>
	<datestamp>1265139840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No.</p><p>It's a 3 passenger car. You can hook two 3 passenger cars together to make a 6 passenger car...</p><p>I know this is Slashdot and RTFA is usually verboten, but has RTFS become that difficult?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No.It 's a 3 passenger car .
You can hook two 3 passenger cars together to make a 6 passenger car...I know this is Slashdot and RTFA is usually verboten , but has RTFS become that difficult ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No.It's a 3 passenger car.
You can hook two 3 passenger cars together to make a 6 passenger car...I know this is Slashdot and RTFA is usually verboten, but has RTFS become that difficult?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31264338</id>
	<title>Re:Quasi futuristic styling</title>
	<author>hey!</author>
	<datestamp>1265104440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The hair. Don't forget the purple metallic hair color. Moon babes in skintight white catsuits and purple hair. Mmmm.</p><p>I'm all for Gerry Anderson's vision of future fashion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The hair .
Do n't forget the purple metallic hair color .
Moon babes in skintight white catsuits and purple hair .
Mmmm.I 'm all for Gerry Anderson 's vision of future fashion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The hair.
Don't forget the purple metallic hair color.
Moon babes in skintight white catsuits and purple hair.
Mmmm.I'm all for Gerry Anderson's vision of future fashion.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262034</id>
	<title>What Happens If Only Half Gets Stolen?</title>
	<author>WrongSizeGlass</author>
	<datestamp>1265137560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Grand Theft Half Auto?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Grand Theft Half Auto ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Grand Theft Half Auto?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262768</id>
	<title>Licensing and Insurance!</title>
	<author>number17</author>
	<datestamp>1265140680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Splitting the car would mean having license plates and insurance for two vehicles. It would be like owning two smart cars and having one tow the other.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Splitting the car would mean having license plates and insurance for two vehicles .
It would be like owning two smart cars and having one tow the other .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Splitting the car would mean having license plates and insurance for two vehicles.
It would be like owning two smart cars and having one tow the other.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262242</id>
	<title>Here it comes...</title>
	<author>Last\_Available\_Usern</author>
	<datestamp>1265138340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>
Constructicons joke in 4...3...2..</htmltext>
<tokenext>Constructicons joke in 4...3...2. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Constructicons joke in 4...3...2..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262794</id>
	<title>Re:Malcom?</title>
	<author>Razalhague</author>
	<datestamp>1265140860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I like the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUkXDA2dtfQ" title="youtube.com">MythBusters method</a> [youtube.com] more.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I like the MythBusters method [ youtube.com ] more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like the MythBusters method [youtube.com] more.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262724</id>
	<title>Stupid questions</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265140500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you're going to make little cars that can be linked together to make larger cars, why stop at two? And didn't this concept used to be known as a "train"?</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're going to make little cars that can be linked together to make larger cars , why stop at two ?
And did n't this concept used to be known as a " train " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're going to make little cars that can be linked together to make larger cars, why stop at two?
And didn't this concept used to be known as a "train"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262602</id>
	<title>General comments</title>
	<author>CrimsonAvenger</author>
	<datestamp>1265139840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1.  &gt;129 mpg by design.  I'll be interested in seeing whether it can actually reach that.
</p><p>2.  Seats three.  Center seat is slightly forward, and it looks like the steering wheel is in the center.  Which will make getting in and out a royal pain for the driver.
</p><p>3.  Nominally, it's 3.2 m long.  When two of them are mated up, the combination is 4.8 m long.  Where's the other 1.6 m going?  Is the front of the second car going to fill up the rear of the lead car?  Or does the combination look like the two cars are humping?
</p><p>I'm not seeing any room in that design for crumple zones, roll bars, that sort of thing.  Which makes me suspect it could never pass safety standards in the USA.
</p><p>How in hell do you change the tires on this thing?
</p><p>If they can get it past safety standards, and the price is reasonable, and it doesn't turn out to have the general quality of the Yugo, it might be a moderately useful vehicle for a family.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
&gt; 129 mpg by design .
I 'll be interested in seeing whether it can actually reach that .
2. Seats three .
Center seat is slightly forward , and it looks like the steering wheel is in the center .
Which will make getting in and out a royal pain for the driver .
3. Nominally , it 's 3.2 m long .
When two of them are mated up , the combination is 4.8 m long .
Where 's the other 1.6 m going ?
Is the front of the second car going to fill up the rear of the lead car ?
Or does the combination look like the two cars are humping ?
I 'm not seeing any room in that design for crumple zones , roll bars , that sort of thing .
Which makes me suspect it could never pass safety standards in the USA .
How in hell do you change the tires on this thing ?
If they can get it past safety standards , and the price is reasonable , and it does n't turn out to have the general quality of the Yugo , it might be a moderately useful vehicle for a family .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
&gt;129 mpg by design.
I'll be interested in seeing whether it can actually reach that.
2.  Seats three.
Center seat is slightly forward, and it looks like the steering wheel is in the center.
Which will make getting in and out a royal pain for the driver.
3.  Nominally, it's 3.2 m long.
When two of them are mated up, the combination is 4.8 m long.
Where's the other 1.6 m going?
Is the front of the second car going to fill up the rear of the lead car?
Or does the combination look like the two cars are humping?
I'm not seeing any room in that design for crumple zones, roll bars, that sort of thing.
Which makes me suspect it could never pass safety standards in the USA.
How in hell do you change the tires on this thing?
If they can get it past safety standards, and the price is reasonable, and it doesn't turn out to have the general quality of the Yugo, it might be a moderately useful vehicle for a family.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262700</id>
	<title>Voltron Car</title>
	<author>Jason Levine</author>
	<datestamp>1265140320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Everyone buckled in?  Ok.  Activate interlock!  Dynotherms connected!  Infracells up!  Mega thrusters are go!  Let's go Antro Duo!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Everyone buckled in ?
Ok. Activate interlock !
Dynotherms connected !
Infracells up !
Mega thrusters are go !
Let 's go Antro Duo !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Everyone buckled in?
Ok.  Activate interlock!
Dynotherms connected!
Infracells up!
Mega thrusters are go!
Let's go Antro Duo!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262514</id>
	<title>Re:To the battle bridge!</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1265139480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Great, so now you can separate the saucer section and let the civilians escape while the crew remains on the battle bridge to distract the Romulans.</p></div></blockquote><p>"Hey, why are all us <b>red-shirts</b> to go to the back seat?...Pinto what?"<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Great , so now you can separate the saucer section and let the civilians escape while the crew remains on the battle bridge to distract the Romulans .
" Hey , why are all us red-shirts to go to the back seat ? ...Pinto what ?
"    </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great, so now you can separate the saucer section and let the civilians escape while the crew remains on the battle bridge to distract the Romulans.
"Hey, why are all us red-shirts to go to the back seat?...Pinto what?
"
   
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261958</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31263372</id>
	<title>Toyota's R&amp;D</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1265143140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Similar concept. The brake pedal goes with one half, the accelerator with the other.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Similar concept .
The brake pedal goes with one half , the accelerator with the other .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Similar concept.
The brake pedal goes with one half, the accelerator with the other.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261960</id>
	<title>Or if they divorce</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265137260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder how long it took them to come up with that one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how long it took them to come up with that one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how long it took them to come up with that one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31265530</id>
	<title>Small Theft Auto</title>
	<author>MarkoNo5</author>
	<datestamp>1265109240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Stealing half a car sounds more like Small Theft Auto.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Stealing half a car sounds more like Small Theft Auto .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stealing half a car sounds more like Small Theft Auto.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262034</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262238</id>
	<title>Oh that's useful...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265138340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>So it can do "up to 20km" per day. Well we all know that means that any you actually get will only manage 15km as the 20 will be without stopping, with no lights or radio on etc...

And on a dark rainy winters days lets say that will drop to 10 km.

And you've got to get there and back so that's 5km away you can get if you want to come home.
Plus who will risk running out of power half way home? So you'll never risk more than about 3km away from home.

SO great, a car that if you charge it up all day, you can get to places almost 2 miles away.
Handy<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>So it can do " up to 20km " per day .
Well we all know that means that any you actually get will only manage 15km as the 20 will be without stopping , with no lights or radio on etc.. . And on a dark rainy winters days lets say that will drop to 10 km .
And you 've got to get there and back so that 's 5km away you can get if you want to come home .
Plus who will risk running out of power half way home ?
So you 'll never risk more than about 3km away from home .
SO great , a car that if you charge it up all day , you can get to places almost 2 miles away .
Handy : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So it can do "up to 20km" per day.
Well we all know that means that any you actually get will only manage 15km as the 20 will be without stopping, with no lights or radio on etc...

And on a dark rainy winters days lets say that will drop to 10 km.
And you've got to get there and back so that's 5km away you can get if you want to come home.
Plus who will risk running out of power half way home?
So you'll never risk more than about 3km away from home.
SO great, a car that if you charge it up all day, you can get to places almost 2 miles away.
Handy :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31263086</id>
	<title>Re:Quasi futuristic styling</title>
	<author>Mikkeles</author>
	<datestamp>1265142120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For an alternate view of a splittable car, see <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0091464/" title="imdb.com"> <i>Malcolm</i> </a> [imdb.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For an alternate view of a splittable car , see Malcolm [ imdb.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For an alternate view of a splittable car, see  Malcolm  [imdb.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262938</id>
	<title>Re:Quasi futuristic styling</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265141580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But if we were all wearing white or silver jumpsuits, it wouldn't be futuristic any more, now would it...</p><p>The futuristic stuff is awesome, the only problem is that it keeps becoming the present... and then it's not so cool.</p><p>Lowsy no-good present, always ruining my cool futuristic outfits...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But if we were all wearing white or silver jumpsuits , it would n't be futuristic any more , now would it...The futuristic stuff is awesome , the only problem is that it keeps becoming the present... and then it 's not so cool.Lowsy no-good present , always ruining my cool futuristic outfits.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But if we were all wearing white or silver jumpsuits, it wouldn't be futuristic any more, now would it...The futuristic stuff is awesome, the only problem is that it keeps becoming the present... and then it's not so cool.Lowsy no-good present, always ruining my cool futuristic outfits...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262042</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265137560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just like over the border in Yugoslavia with the Yugo and its wagon model the Wego. Great minds think alike !</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just like over the border in Yugoslavia with the Yugo and its wagon model the Wego .
Great minds think alike !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just like over the border in Yugoslavia with the Yugo and its wagon model the Wego.
Great minds think alike !</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31275170</id>
	<title>Oh I know, it is redundant already...</title>
	<author>Jade\_Wayfarer</author>
	<datestamp>1267125660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...but anyway, how it would be in Hungarian for "My cars joining with delight!"?</htmltext>
<tokenext>...but anyway , how it would be in Hungarian for " My cars joining with delight !
" ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...but anyway, how it would be in Hungarian for "My cars joining with delight!
"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31264714</id>
	<title>How is it licensed?</title>
	<author>RNLockwood</author>
	<datestamp>1265105940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you think getting it registered and getting plates for it is going to be hard wait until you try to insure it (them?)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you think getting it registered and getting plates for it is going to be hard wait until you try to insure it ( them ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you think getting it registered and getting plates for it is going to be hard wait until you try to insure it (them?
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31263412</id>
	<title>Back to the safety drawing board?</title>
	<author>KharmaWidow</author>
	<datestamp>1265143380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After 30+ years of improving impact and collision safety by the US and world auto industry, how much of that is lost in these new designs?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After 30 + years of improving impact and collision safety by the US and world auto industry , how much of that is lost in these new designs ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After 30+ years of improving impact and collision safety by the US and world auto industry, how much of that is lost in these new designs?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31265026</id>
	<title>Re:Malcom?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265107260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Sounds like they watched this old Australian film: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malcolm\_(film)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Malcolm</a> [wikipedia.org] </p></div><p>Even better, here's the Australian National Library reference;<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; http://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/3807325</p><p>Typical that it hasn't been invented until someone in the *Northern* Hemisphere pulls a thumb out<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like they watched this old Australian film : Malcolm [ wikipedia.org ] Even better , here 's the Australian National Library reference ;     http : //catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/3807325Typical that it has n't been invented until someone in the * Northern * Hemisphere pulls a thumb out .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like they watched this old Australian film: Malcolm [wikipedia.org] Even better, here's the Australian National Library reference;
    http://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/3807325Typical that it hasn't been invented until someone in the *Northern* Hemisphere pulls a thumb out ...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262120</id>
	<title>The car looks wormy</title>
	<author>longhairedgnome</author>
	<datestamp>1265137860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>
It's hard to take Antro when the car looks like a
<a href="http://www.solo-duo.hu/data/picture\_news/11/0011/pic60.jpg" title="solo-duo.hu" rel="nofollow"> worm</a> [solo-duo.hu].</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's hard to take Antro when the car looks like a worm [ solo-duo.hu ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
It's hard to take Antro when the car looks like a
 worm [solo-duo.hu].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262424</id>
	<title>Re:Oh that's useful...</title>
	<author>Mashdar</author>
	<datestamp>1265139120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well at least now I have an excuse to fill the garage with things other than my car. Before I just felt like a fool.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well at least now I have an excuse to fill the garage with things other than my car .
Before I just felt like a fool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well at least now I have an excuse to fill the garage with things other than my car.
Before I just felt like a fool.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262106</id>
	<title>Safety?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265137800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not only is a car that splits in two a ridiculous idea, both cars will most probably never comply with the required safety standards in Europe and the US.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not only is a car that splits in two a ridiculous idea , both cars will most probably never comply with the required safety standards in Europe and the US .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not only is a car that splits in two a ridiculous idea, both cars will most probably never comply with the required safety standards in Europe and the US.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262568</id>
	<title>Good idea, poor execution.</title>
	<author>gurps\_npc</author>
	<datestamp>1265139720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Forgot the "people that own two can combine them into one car" side by side.
<p>
Instead go with length wise connections and "People on the highway for long trips that want to save money on gasoline can connect multiple vehicles into a train."
</p><p>
This would reduce gas/energy consumption by at least 28\% (as per Mythbusters 2007 , episode 80, drafting 2 ft behind a big rig reduced gas consumption by 28\%  Connecting ).
</p><p>
No it won't work in the cities where people get off the the highway often, but out west where people ride for miles, a little bit of comm networking and boom you can easily have people joining up into road trains, saving gas.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Forgot the " people that own two can combine them into one car " side by side .
Instead go with length wise connections and " People on the highway for long trips that want to save money on gasoline can connect multiple vehicles into a train .
" This would reduce gas/energy consumption by at least 28 \ % ( as per Mythbusters 2007 , episode 80 , drafting 2 ft behind a big rig reduced gas consumption by 28 \ % Connecting ) .
No it wo n't work in the cities where people get off the the highway often , but out west where people ride for miles , a little bit of comm networking and boom you can easily have people joining up into road trains , saving gas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Forgot the "people that own two can combine them into one car" side by side.
Instead go with length wise connections and "People on the highway for long trips that want to save money on gasoline can connect multiple vehicles into a train.
"

This would reduce gas/energy consumption by at least 28\% (as per Mythbusters 2007 , episode 80, drafting 2 ft behind a big rig reduced gas consumption by 28\%  Connecting ).
No it won't work in the cities where people get off the the highway often, but out west where people ride for miles, a little bit of comm networking and boom you can easily have people joining up into road trains, saving gas.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262400</id>
	<title>3 / 2 =?</title>
	<author>Mashdar</author>
	<datestamp>1265139000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So you get two 1.5 passenger cars? Cool!

I wonder what plane you use to divide your #3.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So you get two 1.5 passenger cars ?
Cool ! I wonder what plane you use to divide your # 3 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you get two 1.5 passenger cars?
Cool!

I wonder what plane you use to divide your #3.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31263664</id>
	<title>Re:3 / 2 =?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265101260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>lol, reading fail.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>lol , reading fail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>lol, reading fail.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262288</id>
	<title>Great for parallel parking</title>
	<author>Fast Thick Pants</author>
	<datestamp>1265138520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are always half a dozen spots about a foot too small on my block...  so break up the car and park each half separately!  Brilliant!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are always half a dozen spots about a foot too small on my block... so break up the car and park each half separately !
Brilliant !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are always half a dozen spots about a foot too small on my block...  so break up the car and park each half separately!
Brilliant!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262250</id>
	<title>Imagine a Beowulf Cluster of these cars</title>
	<author>amliebsch</author>
	<datestamp>1265138400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It would be a bus!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be a bus !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be a bus!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262018</id>
	<title>Bifurcation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265137440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What I always wanted in a car!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What I always wanted in a car !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What I always wanted in a car!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31263384</id>
	<title>Re:Quasi futuristic styling</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1265143200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Futuristic? The first thing it reminded me of, was the main car model they had in Idiocracy.<br>I wish I had a Dilldozer (or Assblaster) to drive over that wheelchair with a car body.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>(Btw: Idiocracy pictures seem to be exceptionally rare.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:/)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Futuristic ?
The first thing it reminded me of , was the main car model they had in Idiocracy.I wish I had a Dilldozer ( or Assblaster ) to drive over that wheelchair with a car body .
; ) ( Btw : Idiocracy pictures seem to be exceptionally rare .
: / )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Futuristic?
The first thing it reminded me of, was the main car model they had in Idiocracy.I wish I had a Dilldozer (or Assblaster) to drive over that wheelchair with a car body.
;)(Btw: Idiocracy pictures seem to be exceptionally rare.
:/)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262652</id>
	<title>Re:Safety?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265140080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't know how things are in Europe, but a car must be built like a tank and get low mileage to clear the regulatory environment in the US.  Seriously, I had a Toyota Camry (4 cyl, manual transmission) that could get over 40 mpg on the highway in 1988.  That same car today gets around 26 mpg. And it's all because of the US focus on weight for safety and NOx emissions.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know how things are in Europe , but a car must be built like a tank and get low mileage to clear the regulatory environment in the US .
Seriously , I had a Toyota Camry ( 4 cyl , manual transmission ) that could get over 40 mpg on the highway in 1988 .
That same car today gets around 26 mpg .
And it 's all because of the US focus on weight for safety and NOx emissions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know how things are in Europe, but a car must be built like a tank and get low mileage to clear the regulatory environment in the US.
Seriously, I had a Toyota Camry (4 cyl, manual transmission) that could get over 40 mpg on the highway in 1988.
That same car today gets around 26 mpg.
And it's all because of the US focus on weight for safety and NOx emissions.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31265968</id>
	<title>Been there done that!</title>
	<author>bobdown2001</author>
	<datestamp>1265111220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>*Yawn* this was already done <a href="http://img214.imageshack.us/i/image031516253lc1.jpg/" title="imageshack.us" rel="nofollow">in Australia</a> [imageshack.us] <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0091464/" title="imdb.com" rel="nofollow">in 1986</a> [imdb.com].</p><p>Can't the Hungarians come up with anything original?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>* Yawn * this was already done in Australia [ imageshack.us ] in 1986 [ imdb.com ] .Ca n't the Hungarians come up with anything original ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*Yawn* this was already done in Australia [imageshack.us] in 1986 [imdb.com].Can't the Hungarians come up with anything original?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262912</id>
	<title>Didn't I see this before?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265141460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wasn't it in the New Adventures of Speed Racer?  Of course, it was first in the Fantastic 4, but even though it was called the Fantasticar, it was not really a car.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Was n't it in the New Adventures of Speed Racer ?
Of course , it was first in the Fantastic 4 , but even though it was called the Fantasticar , it was not really a car .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wasn't it in the New Adventures of Speed Racer?
Of course, it was first in the Fantastic 4, but even though it was called the Fantasticar, it was not really a car.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262764</id>
	<title>Re:Quasi futuristic styling</title>
	<author>lordshipmayhem</author>
	<datestamp>1265140680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>People don't like futuristic looking stuff. If they did, we'd all be wearing white or silver jumpsuits.</p></div><p>you wear clothes?</p><p>How quaint.</p><p>:P</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>People do n't like futuristic looking stuff .
If they did , we 'd all be wearing white or silver jumpsuits.you wear clothes ? How quaint .
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People don't like futuristic looking stuff.
If they did, we'd all be wearing white or silver jumpsuits.you wear clothes?How quaint.
:P
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261934</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_1614245_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_1614245_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_1614245_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_1614245_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31264260
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_1614245_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31264458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_1614245_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_1614245_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_1614245_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31268340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_1614245_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_1614245_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31264104
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_1614245_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31263384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_1614245_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31265026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_1614245_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31263020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_1614245_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262938
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_1614245_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31264338
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_1614245_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31264894
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_1614245_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262094
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_1614245_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31263664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262400
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_1614245_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31263086
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_1614245_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_1614245_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_1614245_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31263564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262652
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_1614245_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31264326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262210
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_1614245_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_1614245_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31265530
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262034
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_1614245_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31265578
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261976
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_1614245_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_1614245_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31273898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31264902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_1614245_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31263442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262102
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_1614245_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262598
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262400
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_1614245_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_24_1614245_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31264374
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_1614245.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262568
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31264894
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31264902
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31273898
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_1614245.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31264508
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_1614245.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262210
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31264326
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_1614245.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262106
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262652
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31263564
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262592
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262468
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_1614245.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262424
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_1614245.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261988
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31265026
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262794
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262740
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_1614245.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262602
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31264458
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31263020
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_1614245.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31263244
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_1614245.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261934
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262094
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262764
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31263384
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262102
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31263442
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262938
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262974
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262694
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31263086
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262558
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262356
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31264260
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31264104
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31264338
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31264374
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_1614245.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261960
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_1614245.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262724
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_1614245.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262912
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_1614245.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262034
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31265530
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_1614245.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262060
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_1614245.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261958
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262514
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_1614245.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262288
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_1614245.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262258
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31268340
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_1614245.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31261976
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31265578
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_1614245.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262498
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_24_1614245.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262400
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31262598
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_24_1614245.31263664
</commentlist>
</conversation>
