<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_23_0110250</id>
	<title>1938 Superman Comic Sells For $1M</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1266919980000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>slasher999 writes in to note a new world record sale for a comic: an instance of Action Comics #1, 1938, <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8529504.stm">sold for $1 million at auction</a>. Both the buyer and the seller remain anonymous. This comic marked the first time a superhero went to work in a city, and the first time a man flew without mechanical aid.</htmltext>
<tokenext>slasher999 writes in to note a new world record sale for a comic : an instance of Action Comics # 1 , 1938 , sold for $ 1 million at auction .
Both the buyer and the seller remain anonymous .
This comic marked the first time a superhero went to work in a city , and the first time a man flew without mechanical aid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>slasher999 writes in to note a new world record sale for a comic: an instance of Action Comics #1, 1938, sold for $1 million at auction.
Both the buyer and the seller remain anonymous.
This comic marked the first time a superhero went to work in a city, and the first time a man flew without mechanical aid.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31256612</id>
	<title>Re:Truth, Justice, and the American Way</title>
	<author>religious freak</author>
	<datestamp>1265143980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Might want to check your logic on that one...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Might want to check your logic on that one.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Might want to check your logic on that one...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31247404</id>
	<title>That's why I always preferred Batman</title>
	<author>srobert</author>
	<datestamp>1266952620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Even as a kid I noticed that nearly all the comic book heroes had super human powers, bestowed on them by magic or some other pseudo-scientific explanation, except for Batman. Under the suit Batman was still only human. Very smart, in good physical shape, disciplined, and with all the technology his billionaire wealth could buy, but still just human. Comparing them to the ancient myths, Batman was like Odysseus, an extraordinarily smart man, while Superman, Spiderman, (Hercules, Perseus) etc. were gods. In my childhood fantasies, my understanding was that Superman's powers would forever be denied to me in the real world. But Batman was something I could actually become. (At least that's what I thought when I was five).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Even as a kid I noticed that nearly all the comic book heroes had super human powers , bestowed on them by magic or some other pseudo-scientific explanation , except for Batman .
Under the suit Batman was still only human .
Very smart , in good physical shape , disciplined , and with all the technology his billionaire wealth could buy , but still just human .
Comparing them to the ancient myths , Batman was like Odysseus , an extraordinarily smart man , while Superman , Spiderman , ( Hercules , Perseus ) etc .
were gods .
In my childhood fantasies , my understanding was that Superman 's powers would forever be denied to me in the real world .
But Batman was something I could actually become .
( At least that 's what I thought when I was five ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even as a kid I noticed that nearly all the comic book heroes had super human powers, bestowed on them by magic or some other pseudo-scientific explanation, except for Batman.
Under the suit Batman was still only human.
Very smart, in good physical shape, disciplined, and with all the technology his billionaire wealth could buy, but still just human.
Comparing them to the ancient myths, Batman was like Odysseus, an extraordinarily smart man, while Superman, Spiderman, (Hercules, Perseus) etc.
were gods.
In my childhood fantasies, my understanding was that Superman's powers would forever be denied to me in the real world.
But Batman was something I could actually become.
(At least that's what I thought when I was five).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31246734</id>
	<title>Re:Truth, Justice, and the American Way</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266950340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does saying "I fight for the rights of burn victims and shooting victims" imply that one can't be both shot and burned?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does saying " I fight for the rights of burn victims and shooting victims " imply that one ca n't be both shot and burned ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does saying "I fight for the rights of burn victims and shooting victims" imply that one can't be both shot and burned?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31244904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243506</id>
	<title>Re:Terrible Hero</title>
	<author>kannibal\_klown</author>
	<datestamp>1266935040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...</p><p>Screwed up and someone you liked died - turn time backwards.</p><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>He has one weakness, to an element that might as well be called Unobtainium, but for story reasons keeps appearing in the hands of villains who don't possess FTL or even the means to detect it...they just get really freaking lucky and get some!</p></div><p>Well the "time" thing was only for the film.  The TV series Smallville had a time travel episode, but it was device in the Fortress of Solitude that could only be used once.  IE, he couldn't keep traveling to "yesterday" and use it again, which was the plot point because he travel in time resulted in his father dying.</p><p>But that's it.  Perhaps in the Golden Age or the early Silver Age he had the ability, but I haven't heard of it in the comics.</p><p>As for K, yeh it was a little silly for decades.  Something that was incredibly rare kept popping up, they tried to explain some of it away as it being synthetic with a short shelf life but that grew old.</p><p>Recently they upped the amount of K on Earth due to Super-Girl's re-arrival.  Her ship was trapped in a large asteroid *filled* with the stuff, so metric tons of K fell to the earth for villains and governments to use.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...Screwed up and someone you liked died - turn time backwards .
...He has one weakness , to an element that might as well be called Unobtainium , but for story reasons keeps appearing in the hands of villains who do n't possess FTL or even the means to detect it...they just get really freaking lucky and get some ! Well the " time " thing was only for the film .
The TV series Smallville had a time travel episode , but it was device in the Fortress of Solitude that could only be used once .
IE , he could n't keep traveling to " yesterday " and use it again , which was the plot point because he travel in time resulted in his father dying.But that 's it .
Perhaps in the Golden Age or the early Silver Age he had the ability , but I have n't heard of it in the comics.As for K , yeh it was a little silly for decades .
Something that was incredibly rare kept popping up , they tried to explain some of it away as it being synthetic with a short shelf life but that grew old.Recently they upped the amount of K on Earth due to Super-Girl 's re-arrival .
Her ship was trapped in a large asteroid * filled * with the stuff , so metric tons of K fell to the earth for villains and governments to use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...Screwed up and someone you liked died - turn time backwards.
...He has one weakness, to an element that might as well be called Unobtainium, but for story reasons keeps appearing in the hands of villains who don't possess FTL or even the means to detect it...they just get really freaking lucky and get some!Well the "time" thing was only for the film.
The TV series Smallville had a time travel episode, but it was device in the Fortress of Solitude that could only be used once.
IE, he couldn't keep traveling to "yesterday" and use it again, which was the plot point because he travel in time resulted in his father dying.But that's it.
Perhaps in the Golden Age or the early Silver Age he had the ability, but I haven't heard of it in the comics.As for K, yeh it was a little silly for decades.
Something that was incredibly rare kept popping up, they tried to explain some of it away as it being synthetic with a short shelf life but that grew old.Recently they upped the amount of K on Earth due to Super-Girl's re-arrival.
Her ship was trapped in a large asteroid *filled* with the stuff, so metric tons of K fell to the earth for villains and governments to use.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243752</id>
	<title>Is this comic available as a torrent ?</title>
	<author>sproketboy</author>
	<datestamp>1266936720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is this comic available as a torrent somewhere?  I'd love to read the original.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this comic available as a torrent somewhere ?
I 'd love to read the original .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this comic available as a torrent somewhere?
I'd love to read the original.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31245604</id>
	<title>Re:Terrible Hero</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266946500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, in later years he showed some other minor weaknesses.  Magic affects him just like everyone else, and his super-hearing makes him vulnerable to sonic attacks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , in later years he showed some other minor weaknesses .
Magic affects him just like everyone else , and his super-hearing makes him vulnerable to sonic attacks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, in later years he showed some other minor weaknesses.
Magic affects him just like everyone else, and his super-hearing makes him vulnerable to sonic attacks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242444</id>
	<title>Anonymous, huh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266923880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, if they both remain anonymous, how do we know the sale has happened?</p><p>In other news, I just bought a superman comic for $1M +1 from an anonymous seller.<br>Ha!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , if they both remain anonymous , how do we know the sale has happened ? In other news , I just bought a superman comic for $ 1M + 1 from an anonymous seller.Ha !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, if they both remain anonymous, how do we know the sale has happened?In other news, I just bought a superman comic for $1M +1 from an anonymous seller.Ha!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31245282</id>
	<title>Re:Truth, Justice, and the American Way</title>
	<author>Blakey Rat</author>
	<datestamp>1266944880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The only thing it implies is that there's more to "the American Way" than there is to the combination of "Truth and Justice." Of course they never really spell-out exactly what "the American Way" is... but your criticism here is just weird.</p><p>Car analogy: if I say, "cars, motorcycles, and motor vehicles" am I implying that cars are not motor vehicles?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The only thing it implies is that there 's more to " the American Way " than there is to the combination of " Truth and Justice .
" Of course they never really spell-out exactly what " the American Way " is... but your criticism here is just weird.Car analogy : if I say , " cars , motorcycles , and motor vehicles " am I implying that cars are not motor vehicles ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only thing it implies is that there's more to "the American Way" than there is to the combination of "Truth and Justice.
" Of course they never really spell-out exactly what "the American Way" is... but your criticism here is just weird.Car analogy: if I say, "cars, motorcycles, and motor vehicles" am I implying that cars are not motor vehicles?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243738</id>
	<title>Re:Terrible Hero</title>
	<author>sproketboy</author>
	<datestamp>1266936660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exactly. That's why he needs a reboot. Back to the original comics where he didn't have all those extra bat-utility-belt powers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly .
That 's why he needs a reboot .
Back to the original comics where he did n't have all those extra bat-utility-belt powers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly.
That's why he needs a reboot.
Back to the original comics where he didn't have all those extra bat-utility-belt powers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242604</id>
	<title>Re:Anonymous, huh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266925860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm just going to leave this here:<br>http://www.4shared.com/file/227765731/816ff19f/action\_comics\_01\_-\_superman.html</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm just going to leave this here : http : //www.4shared.com/file/227765731/816ff19f/action \ _comics \ _01 \ _- \ _superman.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm just going to leave this here:http://www.4shared.com/file/227765731/816ff19f/action\_comics\_01\_-\_superman.html</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242768</id>
	<title>Excellent!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266928020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>best. price. eva.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>best .
price. eva .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>best.
price. eva.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242486</id>
	<title>Value, Price, and Worth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266924420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It may be valuable as a cultural artefact, which pushed up its price to a million dollars, but is it worth it? A comic book, really?<br>Although imo, it's still far more meaningful than a lot of what passes as modern 'art'.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It may be valuable as a cultural artefact , which pushed up its price to a million dollars , but is it worth it ?
A comic book , really ? Although imo , it 's still far more meaningful than a lot of what passes as modern 'art' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It may be valuable as a cultural artefact, which pushed up its price to a million dollars, but is it worth it?
A comic book, really?Although imo, it's still far more meaningful than a lot of what passes as modern 'art'.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243980</id>
	<title>Re:Terrible Hero</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266938100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Superman is a terrible hero. He has every major advantage you could ever need to defeat any form of villain on Earth, and because of that there is never any reasonable doubt that he can get through any situation.</p></div><p>As a longtime comic geek, I find this is actually a persistent problem throughout comicdom with many superheroes. They become increasingly powerful over time to the point where it's nearly impossible to dredge up a villain who can present a credible challenge. They become gods-on-earth and gods make for poor protagonists because there's no drama if the antagonist isn't a credible threat. Every villain has to be a total Weapon of Mass Destruction able to kill millions (if not destroy the planet). At some point, every government on earth would get tired of their cities being demolished on a regular basis and they would band together to run the magnet-for-mass-destruction hero off the planet. So the comics company ends up having to pull a "Crisis on Infinite Earth"-type storyline to retconn their power levels down before they become totally unwriteable as characters.</p><p>In the original 1938 Action Comics #1, Superman didn't have most of his current powers. He was strong enough to jump a quarter mile (half-kilometer), fast enough to race a train, and "nothing less than a bursting shell could penetrate his skin." That was it. No heat vision, no super-breath, no super-hearing, etc, and so his primary villains were usually crime bosses. Over time his other powers were added, and his strength, speed, and invulnerability kept getting amped up to the point where he can now crack the planet in half, he can fly through a sun without so much as a sunburn, and he can run a light-speed; as a result, his primary enemies tend to be killer aliens. And most of the writers on his book have admitted that "Superman doesn't work as a character without Kryptonite" but Kryptonite is a terrible vulnerability because a half-second exposure and suddenly he's totally incapacitated. One Kryptonite bullet would smoke him so it's inconceivable that some villain wouldn't have figured out a way to put one through his brain by now.</p><p>Worse, almost every other hero around becomes expendable because there's almost no meaningful help anyone else can offer the overpowered hero. Batman remains useful because he's flat-out smarter and can solve crimes Superman can't; Wonder Woman remains occasionally useful because she's the only other person (ignoring Supergirl) who's close enough to his power levels to commiserate with him. But whenever anyone else is in the same book, they have to either artificially limit Superman or concoct some fairly ludicrous circumstance to give everyone else something meaningful to do.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Superman is a terrible hero .
He has every major advantage you could ever need to defeat any form of villain on Earth , and because of that there is never any reasonable doubt that he can get through any situation.As a longtime comic geek , I find this is actually a persistent problem throughout comicdom with many superheroes .
They become increasingly powerful over time to the point where it 's nearly impossible to dredge up a villain who can present a credible challenge .
They become gods-on-earth and gods make for poor protagonists because there 's no drama if the antagonist is n't a credible threat .
Every villain has to be a total Weapon of Mass Destruction able to kill millions ( if not destroy the planet ) .
At some point , every government on earth would get tired of their cities being demolished on a regular basis and they would band together to run the magnet-for-mass-destruction hero off the planet .
So the comics company ends up having to pull a " Crisis on Infinite Earth " -type storyline to retconn their power levels down before they become totally unwriteable as characters.In the original 1938 Action Comics # 1 , Superman did n't have most of his current powers .
He was strong enough to jump a quarter mile ( half-kilometer ) , fast enough to race a train , and " nothing less than a bursting shell could penetrate his skin .
" That was it .
No heat vision , no super-breath , no super-hearing , etc , and so his primary villains were usually crime bosses .
Over time his other powers were added , and his strength , speed , and invulnerability kept getting amped up to the point where he can now crack the planet in half , he can fly through a sun without so much as a sunburn , and he can run a light-speed ; as a result , his primary enemies tend to be killer aliens .
And most of the writers on his book have admitted that " Superman does n't work as a character without Kryptonite " but Kryptonite is a terrible vulnerability because a half-second exposure and suddenly he 's totally incapacitated .
One Kryptonite bullet would smoke him so it 's inconceivable that some villain would n't have figured out a way to put one through his brain by now.Worse , almost every other hero around becomes expendable because there 's almost no meaningful help anyone else can offer the overpowered hero .
Batman remains useful because he 's flat-out smarter and can solve crimes Superman ca n't ; Wonder Woman remains occasionally useful because she 's the only other person ( ignoring Supergirl ) who 's close enough to his power levels to commiserate with him .
But whenever anyone else is in the same book , they have to either artificially limit Superman or concoct some fairly ludicrous circumstance to give everyone else something meaningful to do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Superman is a terrible hero.
He has every major advantage you could ever need to defeat any form of villain on Earth, and because of that there is never any reasonable doubt that he can get through any situation.As a longtime comic geek, I find this is actually a persistent problem throughout comicdom with many superheroes.
They become increasingly powerful over time to the point where it's nearly impossible to dredge up a villain who can present a credible challenge.
They become gods-on-earth and gods make for poor protagonists because there's no drama if the antagonist isn't a credible threat.
Every villain has to be a total Weapon of Mass Destruction able to kill millions (if not destroy the planet).
At some point, every government on earth would get tired of their cities being demolished on a regular basis and they would band together to run the magnet-for-mass-destruction hero off the planet.
So the comics company ends up having to pull a "Crisis on Infinite Earth"-type storyline to retconn their power levels down before they become totally unwriteable as characters.In the original 1938 Action Comics #1, Superman didn't have most of his current powers.
He was strong enough to jump a quarter mile (half-kilometer), fast enough to race a train, and "nothing less than a bursting shell could penetrate his skin.
" That was it.
No heat vision, no super-breath, no super-hearing, etc, and so his primary villains were usually crime bosses.
Over time his other powers were added, and his strength, speed, and invulnerability kept getting amped up to the point where he can now crack the planet in half, he can fly through a sun without so much as a sunburn, and he can run a light-speed; as a result, his primary enemies tend to be killer aliens.
And most of the writers on his book have admitted that "Superman doesn't work as a character without Kryptonite" but Kryptonite is a terrible vulnerability because a half-second exposure and suddenly he's totally incapacitated.
One Kryptonite bullet would smoke him so it's inconceivable that some villain wouldn't have figured out a way to put one through his brain by now.Worse, almost every other hero around becomes expendable because there's almost no meaningful help anyone else can offer the overpowered hero.
Batman remains useful because he's flat-out smarter and can solve crimes Superman can't; Wonder Woman remains occasionally useful because she's the only other person (ignoring Supergirl) who's close enough to his power levels to commiserate with him.
But whenever anyone else is in the same book, they have to either artificially limit Superman or concoct some fairly ludicrous circumstance to give everyone else something meaningful to do.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243102</id>
	<title>Any more description?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266931500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Worst. summary. EVER.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Worst .
summary. EVER .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Worst.
summary. EVER.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31244038</id>
	<title>A private buyer ?</title>
	<author>CharlyFoxtrot</author>
	<datestamp>1266938400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&lt;INDY&gt;This belongs in a museum !&lt;/INDY&gt;</htmltext>
<tokenext>This belongs in a museum !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This belongs in a museum !</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31247570</id>
	<title>Re:Terrible Hero</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266953160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well then, you have to become more imaginative.</p><p><a href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/11/24/a-year-of-cool-comic-book-moments-day-328" title="comicbookresources.com" rel="nofollow">Here's an entertaining "alternative reality" story</a> [comicbookresources.com] where this version of Superman gets into a spot that he can't punch or fly his way out.</p><p>But your point still stands, the writer always have to come up with an explanation why this flying Deus Ex Machina doesn't have the power to resolve the problem in five minutes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well then , you have to become more imaginative.Here 's an entertaining " alternative reality " story [ comicbookresources.com ] where this version of Superman gets into a spot that he ca n't punch or fly his way out.But your point still stands , the writer always have to come up with an explanation why this flying Deus Ex Machina does n't have the power to resolve the problem in five minutes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well then, you have to become more imaginative.Here's an entertaining "alternative reality" story [comicbookresources.com] where this version of Superman gets into a spot that he can't punch or fly his way out.But your point still stands, the writer always have to come up with an explanation why this flying Deus Ex Machina doesn't have the power to resolve the problem in five minutes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31245424</id>
	<title>Re:Terrible Hero</title>
	<author>Blakey Rat</author>
	<datestamp>1266945600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You misunderstand.</p><p>Lex Luthor is the hero, selflessly fighting a continual battle against a super-powerful alien invader. Heck, he even was elected President once, showing that he has the consent and approval of the people in his battle.</p><p>Superman comics are more interesting when read that way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You misunderstand.Lex Luthor is the hero , selflessly fighting a continual battle against a super-powerful alien invader .
Heck , he even was elected President once , showing that he has the consent and approval of the people in his battle.Superman comics are more interesting when read that way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You misunderstand.Lex Luthor is the hero, selflessly fighting a continual battle against a super-powerful alien invader.
Heck, he even was elected President once, showing that he has the consent and approval of the people in his battle.Superman comics are more interesting when read that way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31245348</id>
	<title>Re:Comics are a crooked business</title>
	<author>Blakey Rat</author>
	<datestamp>1266945240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The thing that bugs me most about comics is their ANCIENT distribution model. The high event in comics blogging is the monthly release of the Diamond catalog.</p><p>The only exposure DC and Marvel have outside the local comics shop (if you're lucky enough to even have one) is trade paperbacks that usually end up in bookstores-- of course, they don't bother printing trade paperbacks of most of their material in the first place. Marvel pulls nasty tricks, too, like printing a trade paperback of a popular series, but then *only* offering it for sale in the local comics shop... WTF Marvel!?</p><p>Hell, it's 2010, and it's still hard to find comic issues at reputable online retailers-- why!? Amazon was founded on printed material, it offers subscriptions to tons of products, why can't I go on Amazon and buy me a year's worth of Detective Comics? Where's the sense in that?</p><p>Marvel has made some in-roads here, and their online viewer is adequate. It's just boggles the mind that it took *this* long for comics to embrace technology, long after every other medium had already done it. It boggles the mind.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The thing that bugs me most about comics is their ANCIENT distribution model .
The high event in comics blogging is the monthly release of the Diamond catalog.The only exposure DC and Marvel have outside the local comics shop ( if you 're lucky enough to even have one ) is trade paperbacks that usually end up in bookstores-- of course , they do n't bother printing trade paperbacks of most of their material in the first place .
Marvel pulls nasty tricks , too , like printing a trade paperback of a popular series , but then * only * offering it for sale in the local comics shop... WTF Marvel !
? Hell , it 's 2010 , and it 's still hard to find comic issues at reputable online retailers-- why ! ?
Amazon was founded on printed material , it offers subscriptions to tons of products , why ca n't I go on Amazon and buy me a year 's worth of Detective Comics ?
Where 's the sense in that ? Marvel has made some in-roads here , and their online viewer is adequate .
It 's just boggles the mind that it took * this * long for comics to embrace technology , long after every other medium had already done it .
It boggles the mind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The thing that bugs me most about comics is their ANCIENT distribution model.
The high event in comics blogging is the monthly release of the Diamond catalog.The only exposure DC and Marvel have outside the local comics shop (if you're lucky enough to even have one) is trade paperbacks that usually end up in bookstores-- of course, they don't bother printing trade paperbacks of most of their material in the first place.
Marvel pulls nasty tricks, too, like printing a trade paperback of a popular series, but then *only* offering it for sale in the local comics shop... WTF Marvel!
?Hell, it's 2010, and it's still hard to find comic issues at reputable online retailers-- why!?
Amazon was founded on printed material, it offers subscriptions to tons of products, why can't I go on Amazon and buy me a year's worth of Detective Comics?
Where's the sense in that?Marvel has made some in-roads here, and their online viewer is adequate.
It's just boggles the mind that it took *this* long for comics to embrace technology, long after every other medium had already done it.
It boggles the mind.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31246066</id>
	<title>Re:Anonymous, huh?</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1266947880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Of course, if we're both anonymous, how do you know I didn't just sell it to myself?</p></div><p>Shit, how do <b> <i>I</i> </b> know I didn't sell it to myself?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course , if we 're both anonymous , how do you know I did n't just sell it to myself ? Shit , how do I know I did n't sell it to myself ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course, if we're both anonymous, how do you know I didn't just sell it to myself?Shit, how do  I  know I didn't sell it to myself?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243514</id>
	<title>Re:Terrible Hero</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266935100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am SO with you on this. I've always disliked Superman for many reasons, but mainly<br>
&nbsp; a) He's WAY overspecced so that no encounter is ever dangerous.<br>
&nbsp; b) Even though I know his reasons for being created (US Depression era), his Jingoism simply gets on my nerves.<br>
&nbsp; c) Theres no inner turmoil. In short, he's a dumb Jock who would have never graduated from High School.</p><p>This leaves us with very simplistic stories that fail to engage.</p><p>I'm bias though, because for me, Batman is the MAN.</p><p>-Jar</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am SO with you on this .
I 've always disliked Superman for many reasons , but mainly   a ) He 's WAY overspecced so that no encounter is ever dangerous .
  b ) Even though I know his reasons for being created ( US Depression era ) , his Jingoism simply gets on my nerves .
  c ) Theres no inner turmoil .
In short , he 's a dumb Jock who would have never graduated from High School.This leaves us with very simplistic stories that fail to engage.I 'm bias though , because for me , Batman is the MAN.-Jar</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am SO with you on this.
I've always disliked Superman for many reasons, but mainly
  a) He's WAY overspecced so that no encounter is ever dangerous.
  b) Even though I know his reasons for being created (US Depression era), his Jingoism simply gets on my nerves.
  c) Theres no inner turmoil.
In short, he's a dumb Jock who would have never graduated from High School.This leaves us with very simplistic stories that fail to engage.I'm bias though, because for me, Batman is the MAN.-Jar</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31245300</id>
	<title>Eugenics</title>
	<author>michaelmalak</author>
	<datestamp>1266945000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow, I never knew Superman was inspired by the Progressive Era fascination with eugenics.  I guess after the Nazis it all got whitewashed with "high gravity" on Krypton and "lack of Kryptonite on Earth".</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , I never knew Superman was inspired by the Progressive Era fascination with eugenics .
I guess after the Nazis it all got whitewashed with " high gravity " on Krypton and " lack of Kryptonite on Earth " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, I never knew Superman was inspired by the Progressive Era fascination with eugenics.
I guess after the Nazis it all got whitewashed with "high gravity" on Krypton and "lack of Kryptonite on Earth".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31247264</id>
	<title>Re:No discussion of Superman is complete without</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266952080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In 1986, John Byrne did his reboot/relaunch/revamp/rewrite of Superman with a six-issue miniseries.</p><p>At the end of the miniseries, Byrne had a page listing the influential Superman writers and artists.</p><p>I couldn't stop laughing when I saw that he had included Niven's name on this list...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In 1986 , John Byrne did his reboot/relaunch/revamp/rewrite of Superman with a six-issue miniseries.At the end of the miniseries , Byrne had a page listing the influential Superman writers and artists.I could n't stop laughing when I saw that he had included Niven 's name on this list.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In 1986, John Byrne did his reboot/relaunch/revamp/rewrite of Superman with a six-issue miniseries.At the end of the miniseries, Byrne had a page listing the influential Superman writers and artists.I couldn't stop laughing when I saw that he had included Niven's name on this list...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243622</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242820</id>
	<title>Only 70+ more years till my comics are $$$$$</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266928800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Only 70+ more years until my comics from the 80s are worth something.<br>Maybe my grandkids will have it made?</p><p>Ah, who am I kidding.  Those comics from the 80s/90s where way over produced and collected and none of them were as groundbreaking as the 1st Superman.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Only 70 + more years until my comics from the 80s are worth something.Maybe my grandkids will have it made ? Ah , who am I kidding .
Those comics from the 80s/90s where way over produced and collected and none of them were as groundbreaking as the 1st Superman .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only 70+ more years until my comics from the 80s are worth something.Maybe my grandkids will have it made?Ah, who am I kidding.
Those comics from the 80s/90s where way over produced and collected and none of them were as groundbreaking as the 1st Superman.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243622</id>
	<title>No discussion of Superman is complete without</title>
	<author>wiredog</author>
	<datestamp>1266935880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A citation of <a href="http://www.larryniven.org/stories/Man\_of\_Steel\_Woman\_of\_Kleenex.shtml" title="larryniven.org" rel="nofollow">Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex</a> [larryniven.org], by Larry Niven.</p><blockquote><div><p>Assume a mating between Superman and a human woman designated LL for convenience.</p><p>Either Superman has gone completely schizo and believes himself to be Clark Kent; or he knows what he's doing, but no longer gives a damn. Thirty-one [now 68+] years is a long time. For Superman it has been even longer. He has X-ray vision; he knows just what he's missing.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>The problem is this. Electroencephalograms taken of men and women during sexual intercourse show that orgasm resembles "a kind of pleasurable epileptic attack." One loses control over one's muscles.</p><p>Superman has been known to leave his fingerprints in steel and in hardened concrete, accidentally. What would he to to the woman in his arms during what amounts to an epileptic fit?</p><p>...</p><p>Superman would literally crush LL's body in his arms, while simultaneously ripping her open from crotch to sternum, gutting her like a trout.</p><p>Lastly, he'd blow off the top of her head.</p><p>Ejaculation of semen is entirely involuntary in the human male, and in all other forms of terrestrial life. It would be unreasonable to assume otherwise for a kryptonian. But with kryptonian muscles behind it, Kal-El's semen would emerge with the muzzle velocity of a machine gun bullet. (*One can imagine that the Kent home in Smallville was riddled with holes during Superboy's puberty. And why did Lana Lang never notice that?*)</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A citation of Man of Steel , Woman of Kleenex [ larryniven.org ] , by Larry Niven.Assume a mating between Superman and a human woman designated LL for convenience.Either Superman has gone completely schizo and believes himself to be Clark Kent ; or he knows what he 's doing , but no longer gives a damn .
Thirty-one [ now 68 + ] years is a long time .
For Superman it has been even longer .
He has X-ray vision ; he knows just what he 's missing .
...The problem is this .
Electroencephalograms taken of men and women during sexual intercourse show that orgasm resembles " a kind of pleasurable epileptic attack .
" One loses control over one 's muscles.Superman has been known to leave his fingerprints in steel and in hardened concrete , accidentally .
What would he to to the woman in his arms during what amounts to an epileptic fit ? ...Superman would literally crush LL 's body in his arms , while simultaneously ripping her open from crotch to sternum , gutting her like a trout.Lastly , he 'd blow off the top of her head.Ejaculation of semen is entirely involuntary in the human male , and in all other forms of terrestrial life .
It would be unreasonable to assume otherwise for a kryptonian .
But with kryptonian muscles behind it , Kal-El 's semen would emerge with the muzzle velocity of a machine gun bullet .
( * One can imagine that the Kent home in Smallville was riddled with holes during Superboy 's puberty .
And why did Lana Lang never notice that ?
* )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A citation of Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex [larryniven.org], by Larry Niven.Assume a mating between Superman and a human woman designated LL for convenience.Either Superman has gone completely schizo and believes himself to be Clark Kent; or he knows what he's doing, but no longer gives a damn.
Thirty-one [now 68+] years is a long time.
For Superman it has been even longer.
He has X-ray vision; he knows just what he's missing.
...The problem is this.
Electroencephalograms taken of men and women during sexual intercourse show that orgasm resembles "a kind of pleasurable epileptic attack.
" One loses control over one's muscles.Superman has been known to leave his fingerprints in steel and in hardened concrete, accidentally.
What would he to to the woman in his arms during what amounts to an epileptic fit?...Superman would literally crush LL's body in his arms, while simultaneously ripping her open from crotch to sternum, gutting her like a trout.Lastly, he'd blow off the top of her head.Ejaculation of semen is entirely involuntary in the human male, and in all other forms of terrestrial life.
It would be unreasonable to assume otherwise for a kryptonian.
But with kryptonian muscles behind it, Kal-El's semen would emerge with the muzzle velocity of a machine gun bullet.
(*One can imagine that the Kent home in Smallville was riddled with holes during Superboy's puberty.
And why did Lana Lang never notice that?
*)
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31244270</id>
	<title>Re:Terrible Hero</title>
	<author>Remus Shepherd</author>
	<datestamp>1266939420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The point of Superman stories -- if they are well written -- is not to make you worry about whether Superman will survive.  The point is to make you worry about whether <i>everyone else</i> will survive.</p><p>He's the archetypical protector.  The dramatic tension comes from wondering whether he can do his job as a protector.  His survival is not important to the narrative.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The point of Superman stories -- if they are well written -- is not to make you worry about whether Superman will survive .
The point is to make you worry about whether everyone else will survive.He 's the archetypical protector .
The dramatic tension comes from wondering whether he can do his job as a protector .
His survival is not important to the narrative .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The point of Superman stories -- if they are well written -- is not to make you worry about whether Superman will survive.
The point is to make you worry about whether everyone else will survive.He's the archetypical protector.
The dramatic tension comes from wondering whether he can do his job as a protector.
His survival is not important to the narrative.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31244374</id>
	<title>Re:Anonymous, huh?</title>
	<author>gid</author>
	<datestamp>1266939900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nice, I'm going to print this out and sell it.  I figure it'll only be worth a hundred grand or so since it's not an original.</p><p>And not to be picky about the short, but Superman could only "leap 1/8th of a mile; hurdle a twenty story building" in this comic, not fly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nice , I 'm going to print this out and sell it .
I figure it 'll only be worth a hundred grand or so since it 's not an original.And not to be picky about the short , but Superman could only " leap 1/8th of a mile ; hurdle a twenty story building " in this comic , not fly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nice, I'm going to print this out and sell it.
I figure it'll only be worth a hundred grand or so since it's not an original.And not to be picky about the short, but Superman could only "leap 1/8th of a mile; hurdle a twenty story building" in this comic, not fly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31247092</id>
	<title>Re:Anonymous, huh?</title>
	<author>russ1337</author>
	<datestamp>1266951540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>but, but, but<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... according to MPAA and RIAA doctrine, for every copy you distribute you're depriving someone in the market of the original. If you sell or give away 100 copies you've ripped the artist off over $100,000,000.... that he would have made selling originals... <br> <br>


oh wait...</htmltext>
<tokenext>but , but , but ... according to MPAA and RIAA doctrine , for every copy you distribute you 're depriving someone in the market of the original .
If you sell or give away 100 copies you 've ripped the artist off over $ 100,000,000.... that he would have made selling originals.. . oh wait.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but, but, but ... according to MPAA and RIAA doctrine, for every copy you distribute you're depriving someone in the market of the original.
If you sell or give away 100 copies you've ripped the artist off over $100,000,000.... that he would have made selling originals...  


oh wait...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31244374</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31244754</id>
	<title>Re:Terrible Hero</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266942000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Indeed batman is vulnerable, which makes his exploits so much more interesting. Spiderman is really just a kid that got some superpowers (invincibility not being one of them) and has to deal with life and crime.</p><p>
&nbsp; Superman, seriously, why does he even need to pretend to be human? To earn money? for what? Pay a mortgage? he owns a fortress. Eat? he could catch fish with his bare hands and cook them with his laser vision. He has no need to ever not be super, and he is boring for trying IMO.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Indeed batman is vulnerable , which makes his exploits so much more interesting .
Spiderman is really just a kid that got some superpowers ( invincibility not being one of them ) and has to deal with life and crime .
  Superman , seriously , why does he even need to pretend to be human ?
To earn money ?
for what ?
Pay a mortgage ?
he owns a fortress .
Eat ? he could catch fish with his bare hands and cook them with his laser vision .
He has no need to ever not be super , and he is boring for trying IMO .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indeed batman is vulnerable, which makes his exploits so much more interesting.
Spiderman is really just a kid that got some superpowers (invincibility not being one of them) and has to deal with life and crime.
  Superman, seriously, why does he even need to pretend to be human?
To earn money?
for what?
Pay a mortgage?
he owns a fortress.
Eat? he could catch fish with his bare hands and cook them with his laser vision.
He has no need to ever not be super, and he is boring for trying IMO.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242924</id>
	<title>Wha it Shaq or D. Howard?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266929880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wha it Shaq or D. Howard?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wha it Shaq or D. Howard ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wha it Shaq or D. Howard?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31246298</id>
	<title>The buyer remains anonymous...</title>
	<author>AugstWest</author>
	<datestamp>1266948840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...however, Kevin Smith has been spotted acting very giddily today.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...however , Kevin Smith has been spotted acting very giddily today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...however, Kevin Smith has been spotted acting very giddily today.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31247114</id>
	<title>Re:Terrible Hero</title>
	<author>Chowderbags</author>
	<datestamp>1266951600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't forget:<br> <br>

In a talent contest: Super-ventriloquism your way out.<br> <br>

Seriously.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't forget : In a talent contest : Super-ventriloquism your way out .
Seriously .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't forget: 

In a talent contest: Super-ventriloquism your way out.
Seriously.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243078</id>
	<title>Technical nitpick</title>
	<author>Amiralul</author>
	<datestamp>1266931080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Superman didn't flew in Action Comics #1. He just leap tall buildings in a single bound.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Superman did n't flew in Action Comics # 1 .
He just leap tall buildings in a single bound .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Superman didn't flew in Action Comics #1.
He just leap tall buildings in a single bound.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243620</id>
	<title>Re:Terrible Hero</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266935880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You'd probably like The Dark Knight Returns.<br> <br>

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Dark\_Knight\_Returns" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Dark\_Knight\_Returns</a> [wikipedia.org] <br> <br>

While Batman can't match Superman's strength, he makes up for it in cunning.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 'd probably like The Dark Knight Returns .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The \ _Dark \ _Knight \ _Returns [ wikipedia.org ] While Batman ca n't match Superman 's strength , he makes up for it in cunning .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You'd probably like The Dark Knight Returns.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Dark\_Knight\_Returns [wikipedia.org]  

While Batman can't match Superman's strength, he makes up for it in cunning.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31245608</id>
	<title>Re:Comics are a crooked business</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266946500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Quote South Park, "The Simspons did it."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Quote South Park , " The Simspons did it .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Quote South Park, "The Simspons did it.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31245020</id>
	<title>No, Batman is the *really* annoying one</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1266943500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, well Superman is one of the few superheroes I *do* like. The superheroes I find truly annoying are the ones like Batman who have no special powers and yet act totally contrary to any form of rationality. If Superman is *overspecced* to be a superhero, the the exact opposite is true of Batman and other "regular human" superheroes. They fly in the face of every bit of common sense imaginable. They have no superpowers, but refuse to use guns or other practical weaponry which might actually give them an edge (there is a reason cops and soldiers carry those guns). They wear absolutely ridiculous costumes in which no one could possibly fight (Batman's costume is the worst of the lot--with no peripheral vision and that silly cape in the way he would be laughably easy to beat down). They have silly modes of transportation (why would a supposed vigilante who's trying to stay under the radar drive something as gaudy and easy to spot as the Batmobile/Batcopter/etc.?!?). Basically, the only "normal human" superhero who has ever made any sense was The Punisher (closer to what a real-world vigilante superhero would look like than any moron running around with a big cape on).</p><p>Superman may have too much Deus ex machina going for him. But at least he makes *some* sense, given his set of superpowers. Sure, it's silly for him to wear a cape too. But at least with him it doesn't matter (Superman could fight in a ballerina costume and still be every bit as effective). With Batman--the cape, the stupid costume, the ridiculous car, etc. are all just fucking stupid. He's supposed to be this smart detective, but he dresses like a drag queen and acts like brain-dead retard.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , well Superman is one of the few superheroes I * do * like .
The superheroes I find truly annoying are the ones like Batman who have no special powers and yet act totally contrary to any form of rationality .
If Superman is * overspecced * to be a superhero , the the exact opposite is true of Batman and other " regular human " superheroes .
They fly in the face of every bit of common sense imaginable .
They have no superpowers , but refuse to use guns or other practical weaponry which might actually give them an edge ( there is a reason cops and soldiers carry those guns ) .
They wear absolutely ridiculous costumes in which no one could possibly fight ( Batman 's costume is the worst of the lot--with no peripheral vision and that silly cape in the way he would be laughably easy to beat down ) .
They have silly modes of transportation ( why would a supposed vigilante who 's trying to stay under the radar drive something as gaudy and easy to spot as the Batmobile/Batcopter/etc. ? ! ? ) .
Basically , the only " normal human " superhero who has ever made any sense was The Punisher ( closer to what a real-world vigilante superhero would look like than any moron running around with a big cape on ) .Superman may have too much Deus ex machina going for him .
But at least he makes * some * sense , given his set of superpowers .
Sure , it 's silly for him to wear a cape too .
But at least with him it does n't matter ( Superman could fight in a ballerina costume and still be every bit as effective ) .
With Batman--the cape , the stupid costume , the ridiculous car , etc .
are all just fucking stupid .
He 's supposed to be this smart detective , but he dresses like a drag queen and acts like brain-dead retard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, well Superman is one of the few superheroes I *do* like.
The superheroes I find truly annoying are the ones like Batman who have no special powers and yet act totally contrary to any form of rationality.
If Superman is *overspecced* to be a superhero, the the exact opposite is true of Batman and other "regular human" superheroes.
They fly in the face of every bit of common sense imaginable.
They have no superpowers, but refuse to use guns or other practical weaponry which might actually give them an edge (there is a reason cops and soldiers carry those guns).
They wear absolutely ridiculous costumes in which no one could possibly fight (Batman's costume is the worst of the lot--with no peripheral vision and that silly cape in the way he would be laughably easy to beat down).
They have silly modes of transportation (why would a supposed vigilante who's trying to stay under the radar drive something as gaudy and easy to spot as the Batmobile/Batcopter/etc.?!?).
Basically, the only "normal human" superhero who has ever made any sense was The Punisher (closer to what a real-world vigilante superhero would look like than any moron running around with a big cape on).Superman may have too much Deus ex machina going for him.
But at least he makes *some* sense, given his set of superpowers.
Sure, it's silly for him to wear a cape too.
But at least with him it doesn't matter (Superman could fight in a ballerina costume and still be every bit as effective).
With Batman--the cape, the stupid costume, the ridiculous car, etc.
are all just fucking stupid.
He's supposed to be this smart detective, but he dresses like a drag queen and acts like brain-dead retard.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243962</id>
	<title>so, slashdot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266937980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>has anyone read this one yet?  Ive only watched the movie, so i thought buying issue #1 would be a good way to figure out more about super-mans.  is there more than one?  why is his underwear on the outside?</htmltext>
<tokenext>has anyone read this one yet ?
Ive only watched the movie , so i thought buying issue # 1 would be a good way to figure out more about super-mans .
is there more than one ?
why is his underwear on the outside ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>has anyone read this one yet?
Ive only watched the movie, so i thought buying issue #1 would be a good way to figure out more about super-mans.
is there more than one?
why is his underwear on the outside?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31244904</id>
	<title>Re:Truth, Justice, and the American Way</title>
	<author>ari\_j</author>
	<datestamp>1266942840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't miss the other obvious implication: Truth and Justice are mutually exclusive.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't miss the other obvious implication : Truth and Justice are mutually exclusive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't miss the other obvious implication: Truth and Justice are mutually exclusive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243778</id>
	<title>Comics are a crooked business</title>
	<author>BenEnglishAtHome</author>
	<datestamp>1266936900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Collectible comics, that is.</p><p>I was heavy into collecting at one time.  I still have my #1s of "The Nam" and whatever reboot cycle Supes was going through at the time.</p><p>Here's what put me off the whole business: At that time, the business model of collectible comics dealers was based on ripping off little boys.  They'd come into shops with their few bucks and dealers would sell them crap by always hinting that "This is gonna be the next TMNT #1!  Buy it now!  Only a buck over cover!"  I've never known any business that bought stock, put it out, stored it away when everyone realized it was crap and didn't sell, then dragged the same crap out of storage a year or two later, slapped on a higher price, and called it a "collectible".  That shit is just ridiculous.</p><p>What broke the camel's back was when I managed, some time after the fact, to piece together what had happened with the Dark Knight hardcovers.  When they were announced, you could prepay something like $75 and reserve a signed copy.  There were delays and by the time all the signed copies had shipped, the book had totally blown up.  The demand for the signed collectible hard cover was huge, with new stock selling for $300.</p><p>Every lousy fucking dealer in Houston that I was able to get info on (except one, A Few Books and Records on the SW side), told every kid who had prepaid for their book that their book never arrived and the order needed to be canceled.  They refunded the $75.  Some of them didn't wait a week before they stuck that kid's book in the display case with a huge price tag on it.</p><p>With just one exception, every comics dealer I've ever known has been a scumbag.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Collectible comics , that is.I was heavy into collecting at one time .
I still have my # 1s of " The Nam " and whatever reboot cycle Supes was going through at the time.Here 's what put me off the whole business : At that time , the business model of collectible comics dealers was based on ripping off little boys .
They 'd come into shops with their few bucks and dealers would sell them crap by always hinting that " This is gon na be the next TMNT # 1 !
Buy it now !
Only a buck over cover !
" I 've never known any business that bought stock , put it out , stored it away when everyone realized it was crap and did n't sell , then dragged the same crap out of storage a year or two later , slapped on a higher price , and called it a " collectible " .
That shit is just ridiculous.What broke the camel 's back was when I managed , some time after the fact , to piece together what had happened with the Dark Knight hardcovers .
When they were announced , you could prepay something like $ 75 and reserve a signed copy .
There were delays and by the time all the signed copies had shipped , the book had totally blown up .
The demand for the signed collectible hard cover was huge , with new stock selling for $ 300.Every lousy fucking dealer in Houston that I was able to get info on ( except one , A Few Books and Records on the SW side ) , told every kid who had prepaid for their book that their book never arrived and the order needed to be canceled .
They refunded the $ 75 .
Some of them did n't wait a week before they stuck that kid 's book in the display case with a huge price tag on it.With just one exception , every comics dealer I 've ever known has been a scumbag .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Collectible comics, that is.I was heavy into collecting at one time.
I still have my #1s of "The Nam" and whatever reboot cycle Supes was going through at the time.Here's what put me off the whole business: At that time, the business model of collectible comics dealers was based on ripping off little boys.
They'd come into shops with their few bucks and dealers would sell them crap by always hinting that "This is gonna be the next TMNT #1!
Buy it now!
Only a buck over cover!
"  I've never known any business that bought stock, put it out, stored it away when everyone realized it was crap and didn't sell, then dragged the same crap out of storage a year or two later, slapped on a higher price, and called it a "collectible".
That shit is just ridiculous.What broke the camel's back was when I managed, some time after the fact, to piece together what had happened with the Dark Knight hardcovers.
When they were announced, you could prepay something like $75 and reserve a signed copy.
There were delays and by the time all the signed copies had shipped, the book had totally blown up.
The demand for the signed collectible hard cover was huge, with new stock selling for $300.Every lousy fucking dealer in Houston that I was able to get info on (except one, A Few Books and Records on the SW side), told every kid who had prepaid for their book that their book never arrived and the order needed to be canceled.
They refunded the $75.
Some of them didn't wait a week before they stuck that kid's book in the display case with a huge price tag on it.With just one exception, every comics dealer I've ever known has been a scumbag.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242506</id>
	<title>Re:Anonymous, huh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266924600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yep, I just sold this guy a comic book for $1,000,001. Sucker.</p><p>Of course, if we're both anonymous, how do you know I didn't just sell it to myself?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep , I just sold this guy a comic book for $ 1,000,001 .
Sucker.Of course , if we 're both anonymous , how do you know I did n't just sell it to myself ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep, I just sold this guy a comic book for $1,000,001.
Sucker.Of course, if we're both anonymous, how do you know I didn't just sell it to myself?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31248126</id>
	<title>Re:Terrible Hero</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1266955200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But as an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List\_of\_Batman\_Beyond\_episodes#Season\_Three:\_2000-2001" title="wikipedia.org">episode of Bat-man Beyond</a> [wikipedia.org] shows, he makes an excellent foil.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But as an episode of Bat-man Beyond [ wikipedia.org ] shows , he makes an excellent foil .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But as an episode of Bat-man Beyond [wikipedia.org] shows, he makes an excellent foil.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31244426</id>
	<title>A Million??</title>
	<author>BigBlueOx</author>
	<datestamp>1266940200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A million DOLLARS?? For this old thing?? Hell, he could have had this copy for half that. Tard.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A million DOLLARS ? ?
For this old thing ? ?
Hell , he could have had this copy for half that .
Tard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A million DOLLARS??
For this old thing??
Hell, he could have had this copy for half that.
Tard.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242608</id>
	<title>Re:Anonymous, huh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266925980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I assume the auction house / website also has some fees. I doubt someone would pay those fees just to have a laugh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I assume the auction house / website also has some fees .
I doubt someone would pay those fees just to have a laugh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I assume the auction house / website also has some fees.
I doubt someone would pay those fees just to have a laugh.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31247218</id>
	<title>Re:Comics are a crooked business</title>
	<author>Gizzmonic</author>
	<datestamp>1266951960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Comics are a worse mess than ever now.  I used to read when I was a kid, and I tried to buy some Green Lanterns lately.  The "Blackest Night" crossover does not have a printed checklist in the comics, they are already printing trade paperbacks with part of the story in them mere months after the publishing of the original comics.  I gave up.  DC, if you want anyone who's not a total comics freak to read your stories, you need to have a checklist, and a "Blackest Night: Chapter [X]" on the cover of each book.  They had no problem doing this in the 80's and 90's.  Did you forget how?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Comics are a worse mess than ever now .
I used to read when I was a kid , and I tried to buy some Green Lanterns lately .
The " Blackest Night " crossover does not have a printed checklist in the comics , they are already printing trade paperbacks with part of the story in them mere months after the publishing of the original comics .
I gave up .
DC , if you want anyone who 's not a total comics freak to read your stories , you need to have a checklist , and a " Blackest Night : Chapter [ X ] " on the cover of each book .
They had no problem doing this in the 80 's and 90 's .
Did you forget how ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Comics are a worse mess than ever now.
I used to read when I was a kid, and I tried to buy some Green Lanterns lately.
The "Blackest Night" crossover does not have a printed checklist in the comics, they are already printing trade paperbacks with part of the story in them mere months after the publishing of the original comics.
I gave up.
DC, if you want anyone who's not a total comics freak to read your stories, you need to have a checklist, and a "Blackest Night: Chapter [X]" on the cover of each book.
They had no problem doing this in the 80's and 90's.
Did you forget how?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243188</id>
	<title>Terrible Hero</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266932280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Superman is a terrible hero. He has every major advantage you could ever need to defeat any form of villain on Earth, and because of that there is never any reasonable doubt that he can get through any situation.</p><p>Tied up? Super strength out.<br>Locked in a mile deep underground basement - fly / tunnel out.<br>Screwed up and someone you liked died - turn time backwards.<br>Need to stop missile - use the fricking laers in your eyes.<br>Someone sneaking up on you with a crowbar (as if it matters)? Super hearing!</p><p>He has one weakness, to an element that might as well be called Unobtainium, but for story reasons keeps appearing in the hands of villains who don't possess FTL or even the means to detect it...they just get really freaking lucky and get some!</p><p>Even if he gets real unlucky and fights Lex Luthor, who has some unob....I mean Kryptonite, and he's been suckered once again into standing right next to a box of it...he could call a friend to close the box, or maybe nuke the site and spread it all over. All the baddies die, he lives, and the unob^H^H^H^HKryptonite is dispursed enough to not matter.</p><p>There's simply no other situation he can punch, fricking laser, or fly his way out of.</p><p>Superman makes me want to root for the bad guys.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Superman is a terrible hero .
He has every major advantage you could ever need to defeat any form of villain on Earth , and because of that there is never any reasonable doubt that he can get through any situation.Tied up ?
Super strength out.Locked in a mile deep underground basement - fly / tunnel out.Screwed up and someone you liked died - turn time backwards.Need to stop missile - use the fricking laers in your eyes.Someone sneaking up on you with a crowbar ( as if it matters ) ?
Super hearing ! He has one weakness , to an element that might as well be called Unobtainium , but for story reasons keeps appearing in the hands of villains who do n't possess FTL or even the means to detect it...they just get really freaking lucky and get some ! Even if he gets real unlucky and fights Lex Luthor , who has some unob....I mean Kryptonite , and he 's been suckered once again into standing right next to a box of it...he could call a friend to close the box , or maybe nuke the site and spread it all over .
All the baddies die , he lives , and the unob ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ HKryptonite is dispursed enough to not matter.There 's simply no other situation he can punch , fricking laser , or fly his way out of.Superman makes me want to root for the bad guys .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Superman is a terrible hero.
He has every major advantage you could ever need to defeat any form of villain on Earth, and because of that there is never any reasonable doubt that he can get through any situation.Tied up?
Super strength out.Locked in a mile deep underground basement - fly / tunnel out.Screwed up and someone you liked died - turn time backwards.Need to stop missile - use the fricking laers in your eyes.Someone sneaking up on you with a crowbar (as if it matters)?
Super hearing!He has one weakness, to an element that might as well be called Unobtainium, but for story reasons keeps appearing in the hands of villains who don't possess FTL or even the means to detect it...they just get really freaking lucky and get some!Even if he gets real unlucky and fights Lex Luthor, who has some unob....I mean Kryptonite, and he's been suckered once again into standing right next to a box of it...he could call a friend to close the box, or maybe nuke the site and spread it all over.
All the baddies die, he lives, and the unob^H^H^H^HKryptonite is dispursed enough to not matter.There's simply no other situation he can punch, fricking laser, or fly his way out of.Superman makes me want to root for the bad guys.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31244650</id>
	<title>hmm</title>
	<author>nomadic</author>
	<datestamp>1266941280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I remember reading it (the reprint, obviously, not the original).  It was pretty bad.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember reading it ( the reprint , obviously , not the original ) .
It was pretty bad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember reading it (the reprint, obviously, not the original).
It was pretty bad.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243382</id>
	<title>Re:Terrible Hero</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266934200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doomsday\_(comics)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Doomsday (comics)</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Doomsday ( comics ) [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doomsday (comics) [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31247056</id>
	<title>Nicolas Cage is probably kicking himself</title>
	<author>haruchai</author>
	<datestamp>1266951420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&amp;id=1536" title="comicbookresources.com">http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&amp;id=1536</a> [comicbookresources.com]</p><p>According to link about, he got a total of $1.6 milliion for his entire collection, including a mere $86,000 for<br>Action Comics #1.<br>True that was 7 years ago but geez, what a markup. Consider all the stories about his financial woes, I bet<br>he wishes he'd held on to his collection.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.comicbookresources.com/ ? page = article&amp;id = 1536 [ comicbookresources.com ] According to link about , he got a total of $ 1.6 milliion for his entire collection , including a mere $ 86,000 forAction Comics # 1.True that was 7 years ago but geez , what a markup .
Consider all the stories about his financial woes , I bethe wishes he 'd held on to his collection .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&amp;id=1536 [comicbookresources.com]According to link about, he got a total of $1.6 milliion for his entire collection, including a mere $86,000 forAction Comics #1.True that was 7 years ago but geez, what a markup.
Consider all the stories about his financial woes, I bethe wishes he'd held on to his collection.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31247716</id>
	<title>This happens in the watch biz all the time</title>
	<author>professorguy</author>
	<datestamp>1266953640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is a bunch of crap.  Watch companies do this all the time to bump up the interest in 'collecting' their wares.  The plan is simple:
<br> <br>
1) Buy the item in a private sale at whatever price.<br>
2) Hand it over to an auction house for sale.<br>
3) Have an accomplice bid for the piece.  If you want real big numbers (so you get the free publicity), bring 2 friends to bid against each other.<br>
4) Advertise that your company's 'collectibles' are worth these huge prices, based on the auction price.<br>
5) Profit when everyone runs out to buy the next big 'collectible.'
<br> <br>
You don't actually believe this BS, do you?</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a bunch of crap .
Watch companies do this all the time to bump up the interest in 'collecting ' their wares .
The plan is simple : 1 ) Buy the item in a private sale at whatever price .
2 ) Hand it over to an auction house for sale .
3 ) Have an accomplice bid for the piece .
If you want real big numbers ( so you get the free publicity ) , bring 2 friends to bid against each other .
4 ) Advertise that your company 's 'collectibles ' are worth these huge prices , based on the auction price .
5 ) Profit when everyone runs out to buy the next big 'collectible .
' You do n't actually believe this BS , do you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a bunch of crap.
Watch companies do this all the time to bump up the interest in 'collecting' their wares.
The plan is simple:
 
1) Buy the item in a private sale at whatever price.
2) Hand it over to an auction house for sale.
3) Have an accomplice bid for the piece.
If you want real big numbers (so you get the free publicity), bring 2 friends to bid against each other.
4) Advertise that your company's 'collectibles' are worth these huge prices, based on the auction price.
5) Profit when everyone runs out to buy the next big 'collectible.
'
 
You don't actually believe this BS, do you?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243372</id>
	<title>Truth, Justice, and the American Way</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266934140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I always liked the way Superman fought for "Truth, Justice, and the American Way" implying that whatever the "American Way" is, it doesn't include Truth and Justice<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I always liked the way Superman fought for " Truth , Justice , and the American Way " implying that whatever the " American Way " is , it does n't include Truth and Justice ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always liked the way Superman fought for "Truth, Justice, and the American Way" implying that whatever the "American Way" is, it doesn't include Truth and Justice ;-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31244556</id>
	<title>Re:Truth, Justice, and the American Way</title>
	<author>wcbarksdale</author>
	<datestamp>1266940860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext> The "American Way" actually wasn't an original part of the phrase, but added first during WWII and then again during the Cold War.  Siegel and Shuster were liberal Jews and the early stories reflected that. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/30/opinion/30lundegaard.html?\_r=1" title="nytimes.com">http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/30/opinion/30lundegaard.html?\_r=1</a> [nytimes.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>The " American Way " actually was n't an original part of the phrase , but added first during WWII and then again during the Cold War .
Siegel and Shuster were liberal Jews and the early stories reflected that .
http : //www.nytimes.com/2006/06/30/opinion/30lundegaard.html ? \ _r = 1 [ nytimes.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext> The "American Way" actually wasn't an original part of the phrase, but added first during WWII and then again during the Cold War.
Siegel and Shuster were liberal Jews and the early stories reflected that.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/30/opinion/30lundegaard.html?\_r=1 [nytimes.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243216</id>
	<title>Tax-avoidance?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266932520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe it's a tax-avoidance scheme.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe it 's a tax-avoidance scheme .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe it's a tax-avoidance scheme.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31244692</id>
	<title>Re:Comics are a crooked business</title>
	<author>gad\_zuki!</author>
	<datestamp>1266941580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I read comics, I read them for the story. I didnt see them as an investing opportunity. Shame so many did.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I read comics , I read them for the story .
I didnt see them as an investing opportunity .
Shame so many did .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I read comics, I read them for the story.
I didnt see them as an investing opportunity.
Shame so many did.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243274</id>
	<title>Re:Anonymous, huh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266933180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Holy comic book cash Batman!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Holy comic book cash Batman !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Holy comic book cash Batman!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242506</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_23_0110250_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31245020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_23_0110250_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31247114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_23_0110250_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243216
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_23_0110250_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31247218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_23_0110250_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31247570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_23_0110250_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31245424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_23_0110250_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31246066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_23_0110250_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31244270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_23_0110250_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31245282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243372
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_23_0110250_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31244754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_23_0110250_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31245348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_23_0110250_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31245608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_23_0110250_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31246734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31244904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243372
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_23_0110250_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31247404
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_23_0110250_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31244556
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243372
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_23_0110250_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_23_0110250_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_23_0110250_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31245300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_23_0110250_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_23_0110250_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31247092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31244374
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_23_0110250_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_23_0110250_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31256612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243372
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_23_0110250_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31244692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_23_0110250_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_23_0110250_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_23_0110250_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31245604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_23_0110250_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243274
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_23_0110250_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31248126
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_23_0110250_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31247264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243622
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_23_0110250.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242486
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_23_0110250.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242444
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242506
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243274
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31246066
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242604
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31245300
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31244374
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31247092
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31242608
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243216
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_23_0110250.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243778
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31245348
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31245608
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31244692
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31247218
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_23_0110250.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243188
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243738
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31247570
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243514
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31244754
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31247404
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243382
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31247114
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243980
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31245424
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31248126
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31245020
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31244270
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243620
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31245604
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243506
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_23_0110250.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243752
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_23_0110250.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243622
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31247264
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_23_0110250.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243372
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31245282
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31244904
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31246734
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31256612
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31244556
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_23_0110250.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_23_0110250.31243962
</commentlist>
</conversation>
