<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_22_0537232</id>
	<title>Chuck Norris Attacks Linux-Based Routers, Modems</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1266844260000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.goodgearguide.com.au/" rel="nofollow">angry tapir</a> writes <i>"Discovered by Czech researchers, the Chuck Norris botnet has been <a href="http://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/article/336938">spreading by taking advantage of poorly configured routers and DSL modems</a>. The malware got the Chuck Norris moniker from a programmer's Italian comment in its source code: 'in nome di Chuck Norris,' which means 'in the name of Chuck Norris.' Chuck Norris is unusual in that it infects DSL modems and routers rather than PCs. It installs itself on routers and modems by guessing default administrative passwords and taking advantage of the fact that many devices are configured to allow remote access."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>angry tapir writes " Discovered by Czech researchers , the Chuck Norris botnet has been spreading by taking advantage of poorly configured routers and DSL modems .
The malware got the Chuck Norris moniker from a programmer 's Italian comment in its source code : 'in nome di Chuck Norris, ' which means 'in the name of Chuck Norris .
' Chuck Norris is unusual in that it infects DSL modems and routers rather than PCs .
It installs itself on routers and modems by guessing default administrative passwords and taking advantage of the fact that many devices are configured to allow remote access .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>angry tapir writes "Discovered by Czech researchers, the Chuck Norris botnet has been spreading by taking advantage of poorly configured routers and DSL modems.
The malware got the Chuck Norris moniker from a programmer's Italian comment in its source code: 'in nome di Chuck Norris,' which means 'in the name of Chuck Norris.
' Chuck Norris is unusual in that it infects DSL modems and routers rather than PCs.
It installs itself on routers and modems by guessing default administrative passwords and taking advantage of the fact that many devices are configured to allow remote access.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229904</id>
	<title>Re:Linux fanism</title>
	<author>Abcd1234</author>
	<datestamp>1266857460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If someone doesn't change the admin password on a piece of hardware, regardless of operating system, that's a configuration error.  If, however, the worm targeted an exploit in the kernel stack, that would be something else entirely.</p><p>So, in the case of your example, yes, that's correct.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If someone does n't change the admin password on a piece of hardware , regardless of operating system , that 's a configuration error .
If , however , the worm targeted an exploit in the kernel stack , that would be something else entirely.So , in the case of your example , yes , that 's correct .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If someone doesn't change the admin password on a piece of hardware, regardless of operating system, that's a configuration error.
If, however, the worm targeted an exploit in the kernel stack, that would be something else entirely.So, in the case of your example, yes, that's correct.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229170</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228674</id>
	<title>Re:non Linux based routers</title>
	<author>Nutria</author>
	<datestamp>1266850200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, it's Monday morning (where I am, in America, which is all that counts!), so a serious case of lack-of-humor is to be expected on the part of some commenters.</p><p>Thus: lighten up people.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , it 's Monday morning ( where I am , in America , which is all that counts !
) , so a serious case of lack-of-humor is to be expected on the part of some commenters.Thus : lighten up people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, it's Monday morning (where I am, in America, which is all that counts!
), so a serious case of lack-of-humor is to be expected on the part of some commenters.Thus: lighten up people.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228594</id>
	<title>Re:As far as misleading headlines go</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266849600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Amazing how posts get modded insightful even though they take no time to explain their possition.<br> <br>Given the track record of Slashdot recently I could probably put this on every article and get modded up.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Amazing how posts get modded insightful even though they take no time to explain their possition .
Given the track record of Slashdot recently I could probably put this on every article and get modded up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Amazing how posts get modded insightful even though they take no time to explain their possition.
Given the track record of Slashdot recently I could probably put this on every article and get modded up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228368</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31231168</id>
	<title>I can see it now...</title>
	<author>kenp2002</author>
	<datestamp>1266862320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First the universe comes into being once again when Chuck wakes up. He processes to scare the time-space fabric out of his way until he reaches the kitchen where he stares down the coffee pot till it spontaniously brews coffee. Grabbing a chicken from his hen house out back he round house kicks it catching the subsequently, and prefectly made sunny side up eggs in his mouth after they have flown around the world in 14 seconds. He boldly enters his home through a revolving door which his slams upon glancing at the paper's headline "Chuck Norris Botnet".</p><p>He waits momentarily while the planet shifts upwards to place Chuck into his sofa as he grabs the phone. The phone out of sheer terror immediately dials the Italian PM who's normal black phone begins to glow a dark burgandy. Trembling the Italian PM picks up the phone when suddently Chuck grabs him by the throat THROUGH the phone stating simply, "I am about to give Italy a taste of my boot if you do not bring me this program by noon."</p><p>Stammering the PM says, "But that's madness, it's 11:58 AM here!"</p><p>Chuck smiles, "Madness? THIS IS NORRIS!" and round-house kicks the PM, again through the phone, so hard he finally lands in Sparta.</p><p>The programmer was never head from again... he apaprently caught the first computer-to-human transmittable virus called the NORRIS-1C virus which causes you to spontaniously explode as if round house kicked...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First the universe comes into being once again when Chuck wakes up .
He processes to scare the time-space fabric out of his way until he reaches the kitchen where he stares down the coffee pot till it spontaniously brews coffee .
Grabbing a chicken from his hen house out back he round house kicks it catching the subsequently , and prefectly made sunny side up eggs in his mouth after they have flown around the world in 14 seconds .
He boldly enters his home through a revolving door which his slams upon glancing at the paper 's headline " Chuck Norris Botnet " .He waits momentarily while the planet shifts upwards to place Chuck into his sofa as he grabs the phone .
The phone out of sheer terror immediately dials the Italian PM who 's normal black phone begins to glow a dark burgandy .
Trembling the Italian PM picks up the phone when suddently Chuck grabs him by the throat THROUGH the phone stating simply , " I am about to give Italy a taste of my boot if you do not bring me this program by noon .
" Stammering the PM says , " But that 's madness , it 's 11 : 58 AM here !
" Chuck smiles , " Madness ?
THIS IS NORRIS !
" and round-house kicks the PM , again through the phone , so hard he finally lands in Sparta.The programmer was never head from again... he apaprently caught the first computer-to-human transmittable virus called the NORRIS-1C virus which causes you to spontaniously explode as if round house kicked.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First the universe comes into being once again when Chuck wakes up.
He processes to scare the time-space fabric out of his way until he reaches the kitchen where he stares down the coffee pot till it spontaniously brews coffee.
Grabbing a chicken from his hen house out back he round house kicks it catching the subsequently, and prefectly made sunny side up eggs in his mouth after they have flown around the world in 14 seconds.
He boldly enters his home through a revolving door which his slams upon glancing at the paper's headline "Chuck Norris Botnet".He waits momentarily while the planet shifts upwards to place Chuck into his sofa as he grabs the phone.
The phone out of sheer terror immediately dials the Italian PM who's normal black phone begins to glow a dark burgandy.
Trembling the Italian PM picks up the phone when suddently Chuck grabs him by the throat THROUGH the phone stating simply, "I am about to give Italy a taste of my boot if you do not bring me this program by noon.
"Stammering the PM says, "But that's madness, it's 11:58 AM here!
"Chuck smiles, "Madness?
THIS IS NORRIS!
" and round-house kicks the PM, again through the phone, so hard he finally lands in Sparta.The programmer was never head from again... he apaprently caught the first computer-to-human transmittable virus called the NORRIS-1C virus which causes you to spontaniously explode as if round house kicked...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229976</id>
	<title>Re:Linux fanism</title>
	<author>Svartalf</author>
	<datestamp>1266858000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Considering that Conficker doesn't need misconfigured boxes to work (Keep in mind the true boneheaded nature of the problem- remote admin on and a default password...it's NOT the same thing...)- so, to quote youreself...</p><p>Grow.<br>Up.</p><p>They're not the same thing and you need to get over yourself.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Considering that Conficker does n't need misconfigured boxes to work ( Keep in mind the true boneheaded nature of the problem- remote admin on and a default password...it 's NOT the same thing... ) - so , to quote youreself...Grow.Up.They 're not the same thing and you need to get over yourself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considering that Conficker doesn't need misconfigured boxes to work (Keep in mind the true boneheaded nature of the problem- remote admin on and a default password...it's NOT the same thing...)- so, to quote youreself...Grow.Up.They're not the same thing and you need to get over yourself.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229170</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229240</id>
	<title>Re:Try lack of jurisdiction</title>
	<author>AttilaSz</author>
	<datestamp>1266853920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No international boundary can stop Chuck Norris.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No international boundary can stop Chuck Norris .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No international boundary can stop Chuck Norris.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228692</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31233870</id>
	<title>For those who didn't RTFA</title>
	<author>damn\_registrars</author>
	<datestamp>1266870840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was about to ask the obvious question of what this botnet is doing with a collection of routers at its command.  Then I read the article:<p><div class="quote"><p>Right now Chuck Norris-infected machines can be used to attack other systems on the Internet, in what are known as distributed denial of service attacks. The botnet can launch a password-guessing dictionary attack on another computer, and it can also change the DNS (Domain Name System) settings in the router. With this attack, victims on the router's network who think they are connecting to Facebook or Google end up redirected to a malicious Web page that then tries to install a virus on their computers.</p> </div><p>
Which I guess is actually pretty clever.  The botnet recruits routers with minimal effort, and gets about as much out of them as it can.  Unfortunately for the botnet masters the technique has an obvious Achille's Heel:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Because the Chuck Norris botnet lives in the router's RAM, it can be removed with a restart</p></div><p>Although they also mention</p><p><div class="quote"><p>It is controlled via IRC</p></div><p>Which is pretty common for a lot of botnets.  This does leave an obvious prevention tactic for ISPs; they could ship out routers configured to reject all IRC traffic.  They likely wouldn't receive any complaints as anyone who uses IRC would likely know how to check their routers to ensure the traffic is allowed.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was about to ask the obvious question of what this botnet is doing with a collection of routers at its command .
Then I read the article : Right now Chuck Norris-infected machines can be used to attack other systems on the Internet , in what are known as distributed denial of service attacks .
The botnet can launch a password-guessing dictionary attack on another computer , and it can also change the DNS ( Domain Name System ) settings in the router .
With this attack , victims on the router 's network who think they are connecting to Facebook or Google end up redirected to a malicious Web page that then tries to install a virus on their computers .
Which I guess is actually pretty clever .
The botnet recruits routers with minimal effort , and gets about as much out of them as it can .
Unfortunately for the botnet masters the technique has an obvious Achille 's Heel : Because the Chuck Norris botnet lives in the router 's RAM , it can be removed with a restartAlthough they also mentionIt is controlled via IRCWhich is pretty common for a lot of botnets .
This does leave an obvious prevention tactic for ISPs ; they could ship out routers configured to reject all IRC traffic .
They likely would n't receive any complaints as anyone who uses IRC would likely know how to check their routers to ensure the traffic is allowed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was about to ask the obvious question of what this botnet is doing with a collection of routers at its command.
Then I read the article:Right now Chuck Norris-infected machines can be used to attack other systems on the Internet, in what are known as distributed denial of service attacks.
The botnet can launch a password-guessing dictionary attack on another computer, and it can also change the DNS (Domain Name System) settings in the router.
With this attack, victims on the router's network who think they are connecting to Facebook or Google end up redirected to a malicious Web page that then tries to install a virus on their computers.
Which I guess is actually pretty clever.
The botnet recruits routers with minimal effort, and gets about as much out of them as it can.
Unfortunately for the botnet masters the technique has an obvious Achille's Heel:Because the Chuck Norris botnet lives in the router's RAM, it can be removed with a restartAlthough they also mentionIt is controlled via IRCWhich is pretty common for a lot of botnets.
This does leave an obvious prevention tactic for ISPs; they could ship out routers configured to reject all IRC traffic.
They likely wouldn't receive any complaints as anyone who uses IRC would likely know how to check their routers to ensure the traffic is allowed.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229176</id>
	<title>It's easy to get rid of</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266853620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Because the Chuck Norris botnet lives in the router's RAM, it can be removed with a restart.</p><p>Users who don't want to be infected can mitigate the risk -- the simplest way of doing this is by using a strong password on the router or modem. "</p><p>1 - disconnect from internet<br>2 - reset the router by removing the power for thirty seconds.<br>3 - change the router's password.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; If you've never changed the router's settings:<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; You could rtfm (read the fine manual).<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; You can usually get to the router's settings from your browser.  Try typing 192.168.1.1 into the the<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; browser's URL bar.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; The browser will present you with a logon screen.  The user name is often blank and the password is<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; often 'admin'.  That's the password you want to change.  Don't change the password that logs you onto<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; the internet.  Stick a piece of tape onto the router and write on the new user name and password.<br>4 - ???<br>5 - profit!</p><p>(sorry, I got carried away)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Because the Chuck Norris botnet lives in the router 's RAM , it can be removed with a restart.Users who do n't want to be infected can mitigate the risk -- the simplest way of doing this is by using a strong password on the router or modem .
" 1 - disconnect from internet2 - reset the router by removing the power for thirty seconds.3 - change the router 's password .
        If you 've never changed the router 's settings :         You could rtfm ( read the fine manual ) .
        You can usually get to the router 's settings from your browser .
Try typing 192.168.1.1 into the the         browser 's URL bar .
        The browser will present you with a logon screen .
The user name is often blank and the password is         often 'admin' .
That 's the password you want to change .
Do n't change the password that logs you onto         the internet .
Stick a piece of tape onto the router and write on the new user name and password.4 - ? ?
? 5 - profit !
( sorry , I got carried away )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Because the Chuck Norris botnet lives in the router's RAM, it can be removed with a restart.Users who don't want to be infected can mitigate the risk -- the simplest way of doing this is by using a strong password on the router or modem.
"1 - disconnect from internet2 - reset the router by removing the power for thirty seconds.3 - change the router's password.
        If you've never changed the router's settings:
        You could rtfm (read the fine manual).
        You can usually get to the router's settings from your browser.
Try typing 192.168.1.1 into the the
        browser's URL bar.
        The browser will present you with a logon screen.
The user name is often blank and the password is
        often 'admin'.
That's the password you want to change.
Don't change the password that logs you onto
        the internet.
Stick a piece of tape onto the router and write on the new user name and password.4 - ??
?5 - profit!
(sorry, I got carried away)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228980</id>
	<title>Have we found his one weakness?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266852240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is Chuck Norris <i>really</i> defeated by changing the admin password on your home router?!<br> <br>That would have made Bruce Lee's job a lot easier.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is Chuck Norris really defeated by changing the admin password on your home router ? !
That would have made Bruce Lee 's job a lot easier .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is Chuck Norris really defeated by changing the admin password on your home router?!
That would have made Bruce Lee's job a lot easier.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229352</id>
	<title>Re:Stupid jokes incoming in 3...2...1...</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1266854460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But the Techno Viking can!<br><a href="http://comixed.com/2010/02/13/comics-comic-strip-yonkoma-clash-of-the-titans/" title="comixed.com">http://comixed.com/2010/02/13/comics-comic-strip-yonkoma-clash-of-the-titans/</a> [comixed.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But the Techno Viking can ! http : //comixed.com/2010/02/13/comics-comic-strip-yonkoma-clash-of-the-titans/ [ comixed.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But the Techno Viking can!http://comixed.com/2010/02/13/comics-comic-strip-yonkoma-clash-of-the-titans/ [comixed.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228466</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228488</id>
	<title>non Linux based routers</title>
	<author>viralMeme</author>
	<datestamp>1266848760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>'<i>It installs itself on routers and modems by guessing default administrative passwords and taking advantage of the fact that many devices are configured to allow remote access."</i>'<br> <br>
Does this botnet attack also work on non Linux based routers and if so the what is the logic behind the subject line ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>'It installs itself on routers and modems by guessing default administrative passwords and taking advantage of the fact that many devices are configured to allow remote access .
" ' Does this botnet attack also work on non Linux based routers and if so the what is the logic behind the subject line ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'It installs itself on routers and modems by guessing default administrative passwords and taking advantage of the fact that many devices are configured to allow remote access.
"' 
Does this botnet attack also work on non Linux based routers and if so the what is the logic behind the subject line ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228452</id>
	<title>nobody can resist Chuck Norris</title>
	<author>Fotograf</author>
	<datestamp>1266848580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>not even linux

for god sake, look him up in Google, and if you are brave enough in Google Images! (i warned you)</htmltext>
<tokenext>not even linux for god sake , look him up in Google , and if you are brave enough in Google Images !
( i warned you )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>not even linux

for god sake, look him up in Google, and if you are brave enough in Google Images!
(i warned you)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31241798</id>
	<title>Sucks for me</title>
	<author>dushkin</author>
	<datestamp>1266957660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My ISP-provided has a web interface that I can't disable despite my efforts and a tech support backdoor always open.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My ISP-provided has a web interface that I ca n't disable despite my efforts and a tech support backdoor always open .
: (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My ISP-provided has a web interface that I can't disable despite my efforts and a tech support backdoor always open.
:(</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229132</id>
	<title>So, and I'm guessing here...</title>
	<author>stakovahflow</author>
	<datestamp>1266853380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>---<br>Note to Consumers:</p><p>I'm just guessing that the user name is "admin", "Admin", "root", or "user" and the password is either "password", "admin", or "actiontec"...</p><p>I've setup some of those modems/routers, mainly for people who went to Best Buy (EEK!) and thought "Hey! That's exactly what I'm looking for! That will work great for my Verizon DSL connection! Hey, it's got the Verizon logo right there!"...</p><p>FAIL!</p><p>!!!!!!!!!!!<br>Beware anything branded by an ISP, to begin with... And most devices created for a not-so-security-savvy consumer... If all else fails, have a pro come in and set it up for you...<br>They will be able to have you reset the password and setup some sort of encryption/authentication for your wireless network...<br>!!!!!!!!!!!</p><p>The problem here is that the default username &amp; password for almost every new (Home-based) router or modem is going to be "admin" &amp; "admin" or "admin" &amp; "password"...</p><p>What really needs to be done here is that, by default, the device should not be able to connect to the Interwebz with the default settings. If nothing else, have the external web/console interface blocked... "Security through obscurity", including an odd http/https port is only so effective... And most of the time, in my little bit of experience, it is not that obscure... Once the device is out there, its configuration will be scrutinized and, in most cases, prodded by hackers &amp; crackers alike, for "security" concerns.</p><p>And don't give me the "Oh, it's Linux. Secure by default!" bit. Any operating system is only as secure as the person controlling it. If you were to have no clue as to how an internal combustion engine works, would you take on the task of rebuilding your (gas-guzzling) car's engine? Most likely not... Why would you think that you could secure your Internet connection if you have no knowledge of how the Internet and, even more than that, people work?</p><p>Just another bad thought...</p><p>Cheers!</p><p>--Stak</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>---Note to Consumers : I 'm just guessing that the user name is " admin " , " Admin " , " root " , or " user " and the password is either " password " , " admin " , or " actiontec " ...I 've setup some of those modems/routers , mainly for people who went to Best Buy ( EEK !
) and thought " Hey !
That 's exactly what I 'm looking for !
That will work great for my Verizon DSL connection !
Hey , it 's got the Verizon logo right there ! " ...FAIL ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! Beware anything branded by an ISP , to begin with... And most devices created for a not-so-security-savvy consumer... If all else fails , have a pro come in and set it up for you...They will be able to have you reset the password and setup some sort of encryption/authentication for your wireless network... ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! The problem here is that the default username &amp; password for almost every new ( Home-based ) router or modem is going to be " admin " &amp; " admin " or " admin " &amp; " password " ...What really needs to be done here is that , by default , the device should not be able to connect to the Interwebz with the default settings .
If nothing else , have the external web/console interface blocked... " Security through obscurity " , including an odd http/https port is only so effective... And most of the time , in my little bit of experience , it is not that obscure... Once the device is out there , its configuration will be scrutinized and , in most cases , prodded by hackers &amp; crackers alike , for " security " concerns.And do n't give me the " Oh , it 's Linux .
Secure by default !
" bit .
Any operating system is only as secure as the person controlling it .
If you were to have no clue as to how an internal combustion engine works , would you take on the task of rebuilding your ( gas-guzzling ) car 's engine ?
Most likely not... Why would you think that you could secure your Internet connection if you have no knowledge of how the Internet and , even more than that , people work ? Just another bad thought...Cheers ! --Stak</tokentext>
<sentencetext>---Note to Consumers:I'm just guessing that the user name is "admin", "Admin", "root", or "user" and the password is either "password", "admin", or "actiontec"...I've setup some of those modems/routers, mainly for people who went to Best Buy (EEK!
) and thought "Hey!
That's exactly what I'm looking for!
That will work great for my Verizon DSL connection!
Hey, it's got the Verizon logo right there!"...FAIL!!!!!!!!!!!
!Beware anything branded by an ISP, to begin with... And most devices created for a not-so-security-savvy consumer... If all else fails, have a pro come in and set it up for you...They will be able to have you reset the password and setup some sort of encryption/authentication for your wireless network...!!!!!!!!!!
!The problem here is that the default username &amp; password for almost every new (Home-based) router or modem is going to be "admin" &amp; "admin" or "admin" &amp; "password"...What really needs to be done here is that, by default, the device should not be able to connect to the Interwebz with the default settings.
If nothing else, have the external web/console interface blocked... "Security through obscurity", including an odd http/https port is only so effective... And most of the time, in my little bit of experience, it is not that obscure... Once the device is out there, its configuration will be scrutinized and, in most cases, prodded by hackers &amp; crackers alike, for "security" concerns.And don't give me the "Oh, it's Linux.
Secure by default!
" bit.
Any operating system is only as secure as the person controlling it.
If you were to have no clue as to how an internal combustion engine works, would you take on the task of rebuilding your (gas-guzzling) car's engine?
Most likely not... Why would you think that you could secure your Internet connection if you have no knowledge of how the Internet and, even more than that, people work?Just another bad thought...Cheers!--Stak</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228524</id>
	<title>Re:As far as misleading headlines go</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266849060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've also got to question the sense of naming a botnet like this. Sure it's memorable, but what's to stop Chuck Norris from taking legal action against the researchers who coined the name? I certainly wouldn't want my name associated with a criminal enterprise.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've also got to question the sense of naming a botnet like this .
Sure it 's memorable , but what 's to stop Chuck Norris from taking legal action against the researchers who coined the name ?
I certainly would n't want my name associated with a criminal enterprise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've also got to question the sense of naming a botnet like this.
Sure it's memorable, but what's to stop Chuck Norris from taking legal action against the researchers who coined the name?
I certainly wouldn't want my name associated with a criminal enterprise.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228368</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228938</id>
	<title>Chuck Norris Doesn't Even Need to Attack Them</title>
	<author>cfriedt</author>
	<datestamp>1266852000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Chuck Norris doesn't even need to attack them, they just submit because they know he could fry their CPU with a single packet!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Chuck Norris does n't even need to attack them , they just submit because they know he could fry their CPU with a single packet !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chuck Norris doesn't even need to attack them, they just submit because they know he could fry their CPU with a single packet!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31230788</id>
	<title>Jack Bauer</title>
	<author>antdude</author>
	<datestamp>1266861420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Jack Bauer could do better than Chuck Norris.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Jack Bauer could do better than Chuck Norris .
: -P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jack Bauer could do better than Chuck Norris.
:-P</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229926</id>
	<title>Chuck Norris will want Forced Vengeance (1982)...</title>
	<author>saboola</author>
	<datestamp>1266857760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>..I can not merely see him suffering Silent Rage (1982) over having a botnet named after him.  He will attempt to get the researcher in a legal Code of Silence (1985) using A Force of One (1979) lawyer who will no doubt be Top Dog (1995) in his field.</htmltext>
<tokenext>..I can not merely see him suffering Silent Rage ( 1982 ) over having a botnet named after him .
He will attempt to get the researcher in a legal Code of Silence ( 1985 ) using A Force of One ( 1979 ) lawyer who will no doubt be Top Dog ( 1995 ) in his field .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..I can not merely see him suffering Silent Rage (1982) over having a botnet named after him.
He will attempt to get the researcher in a legal Code of Silence (1985) using A Force of One (1979) lawyer who will no doubt be Top Dog (1995) in his field.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228426</id>
	<title>I wonder</title>
	<author>weirdcrashingnoises</author>
	<datestamp>1266848460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder what he attacks them with.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder what he attacks them with .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder what he attacks them with.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31239940</id>
	<title>I call BS</title>
	<author>eladts</author>
	<datestamp>1266852960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This story smells like a hoax to me. All the reports seem to be same, offering no real evidence that such a botnet exists. Knowing the admin password allows local attacker to configure the router and even upload a custom firmware, but remotely zombifying routers is much more difficult.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This story smells like a hoax to me .
All the reports seem to be same , offering no real evidence that such a botnet exists .
Knowing the admin password allows local attacker to configure the router and even upload a custom firmware , but remotely zombifying routers is much more difficult .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This story smells like a hoax to me.
All the reports seem to be same, offering no real evidence that such a botnet exists.
Knowing the admin password allows local attacker to configure the router and even upload a custom firmware, but remotely zombifying routers is much more difficult.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31241236</id>
	<title>This is a new Chuck Norris Fact</title>
	<author>ngkabra</author>
	<datestamp>1266865560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wait.</p><p>Isn't the syntactically correct way of saying this:</p><p>Chuck Norris does not get a PC virus. PCs get a Chuck Norris virus.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait.Is n't the syntactically correct way of saying this : Chuck Norris does not get a PC virus .
PCs get a Chuck Norris virus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait.Isn't the syntactically correct way of saying this:Chuck Norris does not get a PC virus.
PCs get a Chuck Norris virus.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229326</id>
	<title>What now?</title>
	<author>drej</author>
	<datestamp>1266854340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The logical action one takes after reading a newspost such as this is to fix the holes/bugs mentioned in TFA. But...if it all happens in the name of Chuck Norris, should one really dare?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The logical action one takes after reading a newspost such as this is to fix the holes/bugs mentioned in TFA .
But...if it all happens in the name of Chuck Norris , should one really dare ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The logical action one takes after reading a newspost such as this is to fix the holes/bugs mentioned in TFA.
But...if it all happens in the name of Chuck Norris, should one really dare?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31256578</id>
	<title>Re:As far as misleading headlines go</title>
	<author>marafa</author>
	<datestamp>1265143500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Amazing how posts get modded insightful even though they take no time to explain their possition.</p><p>Given the track record of Slashdot recently I could probably put this on every article and get modded up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Amazing how posts get modded insightful even though they take no time to explain their possition.Given the track record of Slashdot recently I could probably put this on every article and get modded up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Amazing how posts get modded insightful even though they take no time to explain their possition.Given the track record of Slashdot recently I could probably put this on every article and get modded up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228594</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229374</id>
	<title>Next up:</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1266854640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Leonidas botnet and the Techno Viking botnet team up to fight the Vin Diesel botnet and the Mr T botnet.<br>The winner gets to rip Chuck Norris apart.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Leonidas botnet and the Techno Viking botnet team up to fight the Vin Diesel botnet and the Mr T botnet.The winner gets to rip Chuck Norris apart .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Leonidas botnet and the Techno Viking botnet team up to fight the Vin Diesel botnet and the Mr T botnet.The winner gets to rip Chuck Norris apart.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229718</id>
	<title>Re:Source code?</title>
	<author>BlindSpot</author>
	<datestamp>1266856620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, maybe it means malware developers are finally embracing Open Source!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , maybe it means malware developers are finally embracing Open Source !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, maybe it means malware developers are finally embracing Open Source!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229080</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228562</id>
	<title>Re:non Linux based routers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266849300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It doesn't help that standard installs of Comcast and Verizon FiOS provided routers not only leave the default administrative usernames and passwords intact, but also enable only WEP security. I know people claim that they have to do this because of compatibility, but really, has anyone bought anything in the last five years that doesn't support WPA? I've seen techs enable WEP for a person with a single Macbook.</p><p>Granted, they don't enable remote access, but really, what is so hard about writing down passwords and taping them to the bottom of the router?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It does n't help that standard installs of Comcast and Verizon FiOS provided routers not only leave the default administrative usernames and passwords intact , but also enable only WEP security .
I know people claim that they have to do this because of compatibility , but really , has anyone bought anything in the last five years that does n't support WPA ?
I 've seen techs enable WEP for a person with a single Macbook.Granted , they do n't enable remote access , but really , what is so hard about writing down passwords and taping them to the bottom of the router ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It doesn't help that standard installs of Comcast and Verizon FiOS provided routers not only leave the default administrative usernames and passwords intact, but also enable only WEP security.
I know people claim that they have to do this because of compatibility, but really, has anyone bought anything in the last five years that doesn't support WPA?
I've seen techs enable WEP for a person with a single Macbook.Granted, they don't enable remote access, but really, what is so hard about writing down passwords and taping them to the bottom of the router?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228716</id>
	<title>Re:non Linux based routers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266850440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>but really, has anyone bought anything in the last five years that doesn't support WPA?</p></div><p>Yes.  The Nintendo DS and DS Lite only support WEP.  They launched in 2004 and 2006, respectively.  Only the third iteration of the device (the DSi) has WPA support, but it's less than a year old, and the DS Lite seems to still be selling.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>but really , has anyone bought anything in the last five years that does n't support WPA ? Yes .
The Nintendo DS and DS Lite only support WEP .
They launched in 2004 and 2006 , respectively .
Only the third iteration of the device ( the DSi ) has WPA support , but it 's less than a year old , and the DS Lite seems to still be selling .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but really, has anyone bought anything in the last five years that doesn't support WPA?Yes.
The Nintendo DS and DS Lite only support WEP.
They launched in 2004 and 2006, respectively.
Only the third iteration of the device (the DSi) has WPA support, but it's less than a year old, and the DS Lite seems to still be selling.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228562</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229324</id>
	<title>Re:As far as misleading headlines go</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266854340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, why do you think a criminal enterprise would care about this? They've already demonstrated a disregard for the law.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , why do you think a criminal enterprise would care about this ?
They 've already demonstrated a disregard for the law .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, why do you think a criminal enterprise would care about this?
They've already demonstrated a disregard for the law.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228524</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31230916</id>
	<title>Great - so this can only affect 99\% of US routers</title>
	<author>dtolman</author>
	<datestamp>1266861720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have yet to see a router or dsl modem distributed by an ISP in the US that DIDN'T use the default user/password. First thing I did when I got mine was find the (undocumented) way to change the password.</p><p>So pretty much the entire US is vulnerable to this...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have yet to see a router or dsl modem distributed by an ISP in the US that DID N'T use the default user/password .
First thing I did when I got mine was find the ( undocumented ) way to change the password.So pretty much the entire US is vulnerable to this.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have yet to see a router or dsl modem distributed by an ISP in the US that DIDN'T use the default user/password.
First thing I did when I got mine was find the (undocumented) way to change the password.So pretty much the entire US is vulnerable to this...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228906</id>
	<title>Re:As far as misleading headlines go</title>
	<author>jeffmeden</author>
	<datestamp>1266851820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I will take a shot at this, although I am not the OP.  The botnet has little to do with Chuck Norris OR Linux in particular, only that these names come up when investigating it.  It is a run of the mill botnet, it takes advantage of default/weak passwords.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I will take a shot at this , although I am not the OP .
The botnet has little to do with Chuck Norris OR Linux in particular , only that these names come up when investigating it .
It is a run of the mill botnet , it takes advantage of default/weak passwords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I will take a shot at this, although I am not the OP.
The botnet has little to do with Chuck Norris OR Linux in particular, only that these names come up when investigating it.
It is a run of the mill botnet, it takes advantage of default/weak passwords.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228594</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228864</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, wasn't aware Chuck Norris was a botnet</title>
	<author>AP31R0N</author>
	<datestamp>1266851520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Chuck Norris isn't a BotNet, it's just that he's so deadly that his AIM status message leaves devastation in its wake.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Chuck Norris is n't a BotNet , it 's just that he 's so deadly that his AIM status message leaves devastation in its wake .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chuck Norris isn't a BotNet, it's just that he's so deadly that his AIM status message leaves devastation in its wake.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228666</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31230714</id>
	<title>Security</title>
	<author>dawilcox</author>
	<datestamp>1266861120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Times like this make me grateful that I've chosen to use Windows instead of Linux.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Times like this make me grateful that I 've chosen to use Windows instead of Linux .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Times like this make me grateful that I've chosen to use Windows instead of Linux.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31234720</id>
	<title>Schneier</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266830040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>safe from Chuck Norris??</p></div><p>Bruce Schneier.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>safe from Chuck Norris ?
? Bruce Schneier .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>safe from Chuck Norris?
?Bruce Schneier.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228430</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31238112</id>
	<title>Re:Security</title>
	<author>spinach and eggs</author>
	<datestamp>1266841740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But you're going to have to install Windows on your router, too, to really make sure you're not vulnerable.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But you 're going to have to install Windows on your router , too , to really make sure you 're not vulnerable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But you're going to have to install Windows on your router, too, to really make sure you're not vulnerable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31230714</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31230158</id>
	<title>Re:Linux fanism</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266859020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you trolling, or are you just a regular moron?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you trolling , or are you just a regular moron ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you trolling, or are you just a regular moron?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229170</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228958</id>
	<title>Re:non Linux based routers</title>
	<author>lyinhart</author>
	<datestamp>1266852120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Actiontec Mi424-WR Verizon provides for FiOS supports WPA and WPA2, at least from Revision D on. But by default, it uses WEP (the web admin console actually recommends WEP). One of the Westell routers I've seen for a Verizon Business DSL installation a few years back only supports WEP. So I just disabled wireless outright for that installation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Actiontec Mi424-WR Verizon provides for FiOS supports WPA and WPA2 , at least from Revision D on .
But by default , it uses WEP ( the web admin console actually recommends WEP ) .
One of the Westell routers I 've seen for a Verizon Business DSL installation a few years back only supports WEP .
So I just disabled wireless outright for that installation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Actiontec Mi424-WR Verizon provides for FiOS supports WPA and WPA2, at least from Revision D on.
But by default, it uses WEP (the web admin console actually recommends WEP).
One of the Westell routers I've seen for a Verizon Business DSL installation a few years back only supports WEP.
So I just disabled wireless outright for that installation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228562</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229366</id>
	<title>Re:Is anything</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1266854580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not even Chuck Norris is safe from Chuck Norris, so this botnet's days are numbered.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not even Chuck Norris is safe from Chuck Norris , so this botnet 's days are numbered .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not even Chuck Norris is safe from Chuck Norris, so this botnet's days are numbered.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228430</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229092</id>
	<title>Chuck Norris sued "Penguin"</title>
	<author>YaHooL</author>
	<datestamp>1266853200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I've also got to question the sense of naming a botnet like this. Sure it's memorable, but what's to stop Chuck Norris from taking legal action against the researchers who coined the name? I certainly wouldn't want my name associated with a criminal enterprise.</p></div><p>Reuters Fri Dec 21, 2007 7:21pm: Tough-guy actor and martial arts expert Chuck Norris sued publisher Penguin on Friday over a book he claims unfairly exploits his famous name, based on a satirical Internet list of "mythical facts" about him.</p><p>"Norris, whose real name is Carlos Ray Norris, claims in the suit he is protective of what his name is associated with."</p><p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN2129580420071222" title="reuters.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN2129580420071222</a> [reuters.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've also got to question the sense of naming a botnet like this .
Sure it 's memorable , but what 's to stop Chuck Norris from taking legal action against the researchers who coined the name ?
I certainly would n't want my name associated with a criminal enterprise.Reuters Fri Dec 21 , 2007 7 : 21pm : Tough-guy actor and martial arts expert Chuck Norris sued publisher Penguin on Friday over a book he claims unfairly exploits his famous name , based on a satirical Internet list of " mythical facts " about him .
" Norris , whose real name is Carlos Ray Norris , claims in the suit he is protective of what his name is associated with .
" http : //www.reuters.com/article/idUSN2129580420071222 [ reuters.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've also got to question the sense of naming a botnet like this.
Sure it's memorable, but what's to stop Chuck Norris from taking legal action against the researchers who coined the name?
I certainly wouldn't want my name associated with a criminal enterprise.Reuters Fri Dec 21, 2007 7:21pm: Tough-guy actor and martial arts expert Chuck Norris sued publisher Penguin on Friday over a book he claims unfairly exploits his famous name, based on a satirical Internet list of "mythical facts" about him.
"Norris, whose real name is Carlos Ray Norris, claims in the suit he is protective of what his name is associated with.
"http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN2129580420071222 [reuters.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228524</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228666</id>
	<title>Wow, wasn't aware Chuck Norris was a botnet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266850140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Am I the only one who was entirely terrified by this headline?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only one who was entirely terrified by this headline ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only one who was entirely terrified by this headline?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31230284</id>
	<title>Re:the REAL Chuck Noris</title>
	<author>whrde</author>
	<datestamp>1266859560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I thought "Chuck Norris" WAS the master password to all the websites on the internet. Or was that just facebook?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought " Chuck Norris " WAS the master password to all the websites on the internet .
Or was that just facebook ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought "Chuck Norris" WAS the master password to all the websites on the internet.
Or was that just facebook?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228436</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228578</id>
	<title>Re:non Linux based routers</title>
	<author>AHuxley</author>
	<datestamp>1266849480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"guessing default administrative" could be looked up and listed in their code via sites like <br>
<a href="http://www.portforward.com/" title="portforward.com">http://www.portforward.com/</a> [portforward.com] <br>
Then just hope like a UFO hunter on a US mil network, its a  default hunt.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" guessing default administrative " could be looked up and listed in their code via sites like http : //www.portforward.com/ [ portforward.com ] Then just hope like a UFO hunter on a US mil network , its a default hunt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"guessing default administrative" could be looked up and listed in their code via sites like 
http://www.portforward.com/ [portforward.com] 
Then just hope like a UFO hunter on a US mil network, its a  default hunt.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229936</id>
	<title>Verizon uses a stock password.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266857760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, they don't leave the default setting, but since they set every single machine to have a password of "password1" it's actually worse than using the default.  Defaults occasionally change from model to model.</p><p>The old westel modems they used to use derived their passwords from the MAC address in a predictable way.</p><p>Fuckers are basically clueless.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , they do n't leave the default setting , but since they set every single machine to have a password of " password1 " it 's actually worse than using the default .
Defaults occasionally change from model to model.The old westel modems they used to use derived their passwords from the MAC address in a predictable way.Fuckers are basically clueless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, they don't leave the default setting, but since they set every single machine to have a password of "password1" it's actually worse than using the default.
Defaults occasionally change from model to model.The old westel modems they used to use derived their passwords from the MAC address in a predictable way.Fuckers are basically clueless.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228562</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31232778</id>
	<title>Re:Try lack of jurisdiction</title>
	<author>nacturation</author>
	<datestamp>1266866820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>what's to stop Chuck Norris from taking legal action <b>against the researchers</b> who coined the name?</p></div><p>International boundaries, for one.  Likely the author of the software for the botnet does not reside in the US (if that person's location is even known).  Chuck Norris can take all the legal action he wants within the US <b>against the botnet author or botnet master</b>, it generally won't mean squat if they are in a different country.</p></div><p>Error: answer does not match the question.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>what 's to stop Chuck Norris from taking legal action against the researchers who coined the name ? International boundaries , for one .
Likely the author of the software for the botnet does not reside in the US ( if that person 's location is even known ) .
Chuck Norris can take all the legal action he wants within the US against the botnet author or botnet master , it generally wo n't mean squat if they are in a different country.Error : answer does not match the question .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what's to stop Chuck Norris from taking legal action against the researchers who coined the name?International boundaries, for one.
Likely the author of the software for the botnet does not reside in the US (if that person's location is even known).
Chuck Norris can take all the legal action he wants within the US against the botnet author or botnet master, it generally won't mean squat if they are in a different country.Error: answer does not match the question.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228692</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31233058</id>
	<title>Re:Great - so this can only affect 99\% of US route</title>
	<author>ajlitt</author>
	<datestamp>1266867960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The 2wire DSL routers that AT&amp;T installs have a unique factory-programmed WPA key and admin password.  They're printed on a label on the bottom of the router.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The 2wire DSL routers that AT&amp;T installs have a unique factory-programmed WPA key and admin password .
They 're printed on a label on the bottom of the router .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The 2wire DSL routers that AT&amp;T installs have a unique factory-programmed WPA key and admin password.
They're printed on a label on the bottom of the router.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31230916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31244394</id>
	<title>re: Chuck Norris verse Linux-Based Routers</title>
	<author>hittjw</author>
	<datestamp>1266940020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While it's beyond doubt that Chuck Norris would win in a fight between him and Linux-Based routers. He would have a tougher time if more systems administrators would use KeePass.  That should be an interview question and vendors should know better than having default passwords.  Otherwise, Chuck Norris will kick your ass.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While it 's beyond doubt that Chuck Norris would win in a fight between him and Linux-Based routers .
He would have a tougher time if more systems administrators would use KeePass .
That should be an interview question and vendors should know better than having default passwords .
Otherwise , Chuck Norris will kick your ass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While it's beyond doubt that Chuck Norris would win in a fight between him and Linux-Based routers.
He would have a tougher time if more systems administrators would use KeePass.
That should be an interview question and vendors should know better than having default passwords.
Otherwise, Chuck Norris will kick your ass.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229724</id>
	<title>Re:As far as misleading headlines go</title>
	<author>flyneye</author>
	<datestamp>1266856620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Had I gotten first post, I surely would've M.C.ed " Let the Chuck Norris Jokes Begin", but as usual I am hours late and $5 short of the admittance fee.<br>My contribution makes reference to the Cinematic battle featuring Bruce Lee, who actually flayed Chucks ass in that scene because of his egotistical attitude and the necessity for someone to write a Bruce Lee worm to rid us of the threat at hand.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Had I gotten first post , I surely would 've M.C.ed " Let the Chuck Norris Jokes Begin " , but as usual I am hours late and $ 5 short of the admittance fee.My contribution makes reference to the Cinematic battle featuring Bruce Lee , who actually flayed Chucks ass in that scene because of his egotistical attitude and the necessity for someone to write a Bruce Lee worm to rid us of the threat at hand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Had I gotten first post, I surely would've M.C.ed " Let the Chuck Norris Jokes Begin", but as usual I am hours late and $5 short of the admittance fee.My contribution makes reference to the Cinematic battle featuring Bruce Lee, who actually flayed Chucks ass in that scene because of his egotistical attitude and the necessity for someone to write a Bruce Lee worm to rid us of the threat at hand.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228368</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229170</id>
	<title>Linux fanism</title>
	<author>mozzis</author>
	<datestamp>1266853560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>So if Confiker owns Windows boxen it's because Windows is awful and shoddy. But if CN owns Linux boxen it's because they are "misconfigured". Grow up,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So if Confiker owns Windows boxen it 's because Windows is awful and shoddy .
But if CN owns Linux boxen it 's because they are " misconfigured " .
Grow up , / .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So if Confiker owns Windows boxen it's because Windows is awful and shoddy.
But if CN owns Linux boxen it's because they are "misconfigured".
Grow up, /.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229542</id>
	<title>Re:As far as misleading headlines go</title>
	<author>purpledinoz</author>
	<datestamp>1266855780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Chuck Norris doesn't attack. He destroys.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Chuck Norris does n't attack .
He destroys .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chuck Norris doesn't attack.
He destroys.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228368</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228382</id>
	<title>If you're planning on making a 'kick joke'</title>
	<author>Fanboy Fantasies</author>
	<datestamp>1266848160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Please insert your head here.<br> <tt>*\_g\_o\_a\_t\_s\_e\_x\_*\_g\_o\_a\_t\_s\_e\_x\_*\_g\_o\_a\_t\_s\_e\_x\_*\_       <br>

g\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_g\_       \_<br>

o\_/\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_o\_       \_<br>
a|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_a\_       \_<br>
t|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_`.\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_:\_\_\_\_\_t\_       \_<br>

s`\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_s\_       \_<br>

e\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_/\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_\_\\\\_\_\_--\_\_\_\\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_:\_\_\_\_e\_       \_<br>
x\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\/\_\_\_\_--~~\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_~--\_\_|\_\\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_x\_       \_<br>
*\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_-~\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_~-\_\\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_*\_       \_<br>

g\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_.--------.\_\_\_\_\_\_\|\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_g\_       \_<br>

o\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_//\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_(\_(\_\_&gt;\_\_\\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_o\_       \_<br>
a\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_.\_\_C\_\_\_\_)\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_(\_(\_\_\_\_&gt;\_\_|\_\_/\_\_\_\_a\_       \_<br>

t\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\\_|\_\_\_C\_\_\_\_\_)/INSERT\\_(\_\_\_\_\_&gt;\_\_|\_/\_\_\_\_\_t\_       \_<br>

s\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_/\|\_\_\_C\_\_\_\_\_)\_GERBIL|\_\_(\_\_\_&gt;\_\_\_/\_\_\\_\_\_\_s\_       \_<br>
e\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_(\_\_\_\_C\_\_\_\_\_)\\_HERE\_/\_\_//\_\_/\_/\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_e\_       \_<br>

x\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_//\_(\_\_/\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_x\_       \_<br>

*\_\_\_\_|\_\\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_)\_\_\_`----\_\_\_--'\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_*\_       \_<br>
g\_\_\_\_|\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_|\_g\_       \_<br>
o\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_o\_       \_<br>

a\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_/\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_a\_       \_<br>

t\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_/\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|t\_       \_<br>
s\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_/\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_/\\_\_\_/\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|s\_       \_<br>
e\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_/\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|e\_       \_<br>

x\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|x\_       \_<br>

*\_g\_o\_a\_t\_s\_e\_x\_*\_g\_o\_a\_t\_s\_e\_x\_*\_g\_o\_a\_t\_s\_e\_x\_*\_   </tt> <br> <br>
Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic. Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads. Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said. Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about. Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page) If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.
<br> <br>
Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic. Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads. Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said. Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about. Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page) If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.
<br> <br>

Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic. Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads. Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said. Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about. Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page) If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Please insert your head here .
* \ _g \ _o \ _a \ _t \ _s \ _e \ _x \ _ * \ _g \ _o \ _a \ _t \ _s \ _e \ _x \ _ * \ _g \ _o \ _a \ _t \ _s \ _e \ _x \ _ * \ _ g \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _g \ _ \ _ o \ _/ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _/ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _o \ _ \ _ a | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _a \ _ \ _ t | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ ` . \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ : \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _t \ _ \ _ s ` \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _s \ _ \ _ e \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _/ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _/ \ _ \ _ \ \ \ \ _ \ _ \ _-- \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ : \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _e \ _ \ _ x \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ / \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _-- ~ ~ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ ~ -- \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _x \ _ \ _ * \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ _- ~ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ ~ - \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ * \ _ \ _ g \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _.--------. \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ | \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _g \ _ \ _ o \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _// \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ ( \ _ ( \ _ \ _ &gt; \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _o \ _ \ _ a \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _. \ _ \ _C \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ ) \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ ( \ _ ( \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ &gt; \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _/ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _a \ _ \ _ t \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _/ \ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _C \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ ) /INSERT \ \ _ ( \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ &gt; \ _ \ _ | \ _/ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _t \ _ \ _ s \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _/ \ _/ \ | \ _ \ _ \ _C \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ ) \ _GERBIL | \ _ \ _ ( \ _ \ _ \ _ &gt; \ _ \ _ \ _/ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _s \ _ \ _ e \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ ( \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _C \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ ) \ \ _HERE \ _/ \ _ \ _// \ _ \ _/ \ _/ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _e \ _ \ _ x \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _// \ _ ( \ _ \ _/ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _x \ _ \ _ * \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ ) \ _ \ _ \ _ ` ---- \ _ \ _ \ _-- ' \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ * \ _ \ _ g \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _/ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _/ \ _ | \ _g \ _ \ _ o \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _/ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _o \ _ \ _ a \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _/ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _a \ _ \ _ t \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _/ \ _/ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | t \ _ \ _ s \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _/ \ _/ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _/ \ \ _ \ _ \ _/ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | s \ _ \ _ e \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _/ \ _/ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | e \ _ \ _ x \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | x \ _ \ _ * \ _g \ _o \ _a \ _t \ _s \ _e \ _x \ _ * \ _g \ _o \ _a \ _t \ _s \ _e \ _x \ _ * \ _g \ _o \ _a \ _t \ _s \ _e \ _x \ _ * \ _ Important Stuff : Please try to keep posts on topic .
Try to reply to other people 's comments instead of starting new threads .
Read other people 's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said .
Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about .
Offtopic , Inflammatory , Inappropriate , Illegal , or Offensive comments might be moderated .
( You can read everything , even moderated posts , by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page ) If you want replies to your comments sent to you , consider logging in or creating an account .
Important Stuff : Please try to keep posts on topic .
Try to reply to other people 's comments instead of starting new threads .
Read other people 's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said .
Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about .
Offtopic , Inflammatory , Inappropriate , Illegal , or Offensive comments might be moderated .
( You can read everything , even moderated posts , by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page ) If you want replies to your comments sent to you , consider logging in or creating an account .
Important Stuff : Please try to keep posts on topic .
Try to reply to other people 's comments instead of starting new threads .
Read other people 's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said .
Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about .
Offtopic , Inflammatory , Inappropriate , Illegal , or Offensive comments might be moderated .
( You can read everything , even moderated posts , by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page ) If you want replies to your comments sent to you , consider logging in or creating an account .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please insert your head here.
*\_g\_o\_a\_t\_s\_e\_x\_*\_g\_o\_a\_t\_s\_e\_x\_*\_g\_o\_a\_t\_s\_e\_x\_*\_       

g\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_g\_       \_

o\_/\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_o\_       \_
a|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_a\_       \_
t|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_`.\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_:\_\_\_\_\_t\_       \_

s`\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_s\_       \_

e\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_/\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_\_\\\\_\_\_--\_\_\_\\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_:\_\_\_\_e\_       \_
x\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\/\_\_\_\_--~~\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_~--\_\_|\_\\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_x\_       \_
*\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_-~\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_~-\_\\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_*\_       \_

g\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_.--------.\_\_\_\_\_\_\|\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_g\_       \_

o\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_//\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_(\_(\_\_&gt;\_\_\\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_o\_       \_
a\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_.\_\_C\_\_\_\_)\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_(\_(\_\_\_\_&gt;\_\_|\_\_/\_\_\_\_a\_       \_

t\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\\_|\_\_\_C\_\_\_\_\_)/INSERT\\_(\_\_\_\_\_&gt;\_\_|\_/\_\_\_\_\_t\_       \_

s\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_/\|\_\_\_C\_\_\_\_\_)\_GERBIL|\_\_(\_\_\_&gt;\_\_\_/\_\_\\_\_\_\_s\_       \_
e\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_(\_\_\_\_C\_\_\_\_\_)\\_HERE\_/\_\_//\_\_/\_/\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_e\_       \_

x\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_//\_(\_\_/\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_x\_       \_

*\_\_\_\_|\_\\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_)\_\_\_`----\_\_\_--'\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_*\_       \_
g\_\_\_\_|\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_|\_g\_       \_
o\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_o\_       \_

a\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_/\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_a\_       \_

t\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_/\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|t\_       \_
s\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_/\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_/\\_\_\_/\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|s\_       \_
e\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_/\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|e\_       \_

x\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|x\_       \_

*\_g\_o\_a\_t\_s\_e\_x\_*\_g\_o\_a\_t\_s\_e\_x\_*\_g\_o\_a\_t\_s\_e\_x\_*\_     
Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic.
Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads.
Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated.
(You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page) If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.
Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic.
Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads.
Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated.
(You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page) If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.
Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic.
Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads.
Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated.
(You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page) If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229288</id>
	<title>Re:As far as misleading headlines go</title>
	<author>AttilaSz</author>
	<datestamp>1266854160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The only legal action Chuck Norris takes is one where he is the judge, the jury, and the executioner.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The only legal action Chuck Norris takes is one where he is the judge , the jury , and the executioner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only legal action Chuck Norris takes is one where he is the judge, the jury, and the executioner.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228524</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229630</id>
	<title>Re:non Linux based routers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266856200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who needs remote access to the router, when I have remote access to your modem? There's no reset button on *that*, either. http://www.exploit-db.com/download\_pdf/11194</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who needs remote access to the router , when I have remote access to your modem ?
There 's no reset button on * that * , either .
http : //www.exploit-db.com/download \ _pdf/11194</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who needs remote access to the router, when I have remote access to your modem?
There's no reset button on *that*, either.
http://www.exploit-db.com/download\_pdf/11194</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228562</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228436</id>
	<title>the REAL Chuck Noris</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266848520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The REAL Chuck Noris wouldn't have to guess the default password, he'd just round-house kick the modem until it let him in without it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The REAL Chuck Noris would n't have to guess the default password , he 'd just round-house kick the modem until it let him in without it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The REAL Chuck Noris wouldn't have to guess the default password, he'd just round-house kick the modem until it let him in without it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229616</id>
	<title>I can't stop.....</title>
	<author>MooPi</author>
	<datestamp>1266856080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Either the effects of insomnia are finally sending me over the edge or this is my favorite<nobr> <wbr></nobr>./ thread ever. Besides has anyone ever seen a Chuck Norris round house. No because you can't.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Either the effects of insomnia are finally sending me over the edge or this is my favorite ./ thread ever .
Besides has anyone ever seen a Chuck Norris round house .
No because you ca n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Either the effects of insomnia are finally sending me over the edge or this is my favorite ./ thread ever.
Besides has anyone ever seen a Chuck Norris round house.
No because you can't.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31232786</id>
	<title>I pictured this differently...</title>
	<author>ukemike</author>
	<datestamp>1266866820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When I read this headline I imagined A stack of 15 routers on two cinderblocks and Chuck chopping through the whole stack.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When I read this headline I imagined A stack of 15 routers on two cinderblocks and Chuck chopping through the whole stack .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I read this headline I imagined A stack of 15 routers on two cinderblocks and Chuck chopping through the whole stack.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229204</id>
	<title>Re:non Linux based routers</title>
	<author>Daley\_G</author>
	<datestamp>1266853800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>'<i>...what is the logic behind the subject line ?</i>'</p></div><p>Marketing. It got us to click on it, which is what the goal was.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>'...what is the logic behind the subject line ? 'Marketing .
It got us to click on it , which is what the goal was .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'...what is the logic behind the subject line ?'Marketing.
It got us to click on it, which is what the goal was.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229080</id>
	<title>Source code?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266853140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The malware got the Chuck Norris moniker from a programmer's Italian comment in its source code: 'in nome di Chuck Norris'"</p><p>Source code? How did they get the source code? Wouldn't a virus in the wild be compiled? Is this some strange virus that carries around its source code and compiles itself for every new host it infects?</p><p>If so, I believe a Gentoo programmer is behind this virus outbreak.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The malware got the Chuck Norris moniker from a programmer 's Italian comment in its source code : 'in nome di Chuck Norris ' " Source code ?
How did they get the source code ?
Would n't a virus in the wild be compiled ?
Is this some strange virus that carries around its source code and compiles itself for every new host it infects ? If so , I believe a Gentoo programmer is behind this virus outbreak .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The malware got the Chuck Norris moniker from a programmer's Italian comment in its source code: 'in nome di Chuck Norris'"Source code?
How did they get the source code?
Wouldn't a virus in the wild be compiled?
Is this some strange virus that carries around its source code and compiles itself for every new host it infects?If so, I believe a Gentoo programmer is behind this virus outbreak.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228654</id>
	<title>Re:non Linux based routers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266850080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apparently the nintendo DS, unless some sort of update has been released, only does WEP.</p><p>This is not a good thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently the nintendo DS , unless some sort of update has been released , only does WEP.This is not a good thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently the nintendo DS, unless some sort of update has been released, only does WEP.This is not a good thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228562</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229320</id>
	<title>Re:As far as misleading headlines go</title>
	<author>LordSnooty</author>
	<datestamp>1266854340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd be more concerned with having my name associated with a very unamusing and old Internet meme...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd be more concerned with having my name associated with a very unamusing and old Internet meme.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd be more concerned with having my name associated with a very unamusing and old Internet meme...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228524</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228880</id>
	<title>Re:Try lack of jurisdiction</title>
	<author>jeffmeden</author>
	<datestamp>1266851700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The question was actually about the researcher; surely the author is already taking action to avoid the recourse of getting caught distributing/running a malicious botnet.  However, the researcher (in this case Czech, could have easily been from the US) was the one that coined the name based on the code found.  Would someone doing that be subject to legal action as a result?  It's a gray area, but it wouldn't be hard to argue defamation if the researcher titled all his papers "Malicious Activity by Chuck Norris Botnet".  Despite *our* ability to easily determine that the name has little to actually do with Chuck Norris, a less informed individual wouldn't be able to.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The question was actually about the researcher ; surely the author is already taking action to avoid the recourse of getting caught distributing/running a malicious botnet .
However , the researcher ( in this case Czech , could have easily been from the US ) was the one that coined the name based on the code found .
Would someone doing that be subject to legal action as a result ?
It 's a gray area , but it would n't be hard to argue defamation if the researcher titled all his papers " Malicious Activity by Chuck Norris Botnet " .
Despite * our * ability to easily determine that the name has little to actually do with Chuck Norris , a less informed individual would n't be able to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The question was actually about the researcher; surely the author is already taking action to avoid the recourse of getting caught distributing/running a malicious botnet.
However, the researcher (in this case Czech, could have easily been from the US) was the one that coined the name based on the code found.
Would someone doing that be subject to legal action as a result?
It's a gray area, but it wouldn't be hard to argue defamation if the researcher titled all his papers "Malicious Activity by Chuck Norris Botnet".
Despite *our* ability to easily determine that the name has little to actually do with Chuck Norris, a less informed individual wouldn't be able to.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228692</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31233416</id>
	<title>Chuck Norris doesn't need a firewall</title>
	<author>Hazelfield</author>
	<datestamp>1266869220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Internet needs a firewall to protect itself from Chuck Norris.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Internet needs a firewall to protect itself from Chuck Norris .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Internet needs a firewall to protect itself from Chuck Norris.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229456</id>
	<title>Re:Linux fanism</title>
	<author>slimjim8094</author>
	<datestamp>1266855360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Conficker exploited Windows machines with an unpatched security hole. True, Microsoft had patched the hole but it shouldn't have been there in the first place.</p><p>Using a default password to gain what is technologically legitimate access to the operating system is not a vulnerability.</p><p>It's like phishing - the fact that someone is too stupid to use online banking safely doesn't imply that their computer was hacked.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Conficker exploited Windows machines with an unpatched security hole .
True , Microsoft had patched the hole but it should n't have been there in the first place.Using a default password to gain what is technologically legitimate access to the operating system is not a vulnerability.It 's like phishing - the fact that someone is too stupid to use online banking safely does n't imply that their computer was hacked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Conficker exploited Windows machines with an unpatched security hole.
True, Microsoft had patched the hole but it shouldn't have been there in the first place.Using a default password to gain what is technologically legitimate access to the operating system is not a vulnerability.It's like phishing - the fact that someone is too stupid to use online banking safely doesn't imply that their computer was hacked.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229170</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228838</id>
	<title>Re:Try lack of jurisdiction</title>
	<author>FluffyWithTeeth</author>
	<datestamp>1266851400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>His name is only written in the source code, which I doubt anyone cares about. The issue is the researchers who decided to call it "The Chuck Norris Botnet" and then publish papers about it, using that name.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>His name is only written in the source code , which I doubt anyone cares about .
The issue is the researchers who decided to call it " The Chuck Norris Botnet " and then publish papers about it , using that name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>His name is only written in the source code, which I doubt anyone cares about.
The issue is the researchers who decided to call it "The Chuck Norris Botnet" and then publish papers about it, using that name.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228692</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229450</id>
	<title>Re:Linux fanism</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266855300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>So if Confiker owns Windows boxen it's because Windows is awful and shoddy. But if CN owns Linux boxen it's because they are "misconfigured". </i></p><p>Given that confiker exploited actual bugs in windows which MS had to patch, and that 'Chuck Norris' is exploiting the fact that certain appliance suppliers deliberately 'configured' Linux with a fixed and known id and password, the statement above that you deride is *in this particular case* clearly accurate.</p><p>You do understand the difference between an actual bug causing a security problem and a deliberate choice to 'leave the front door open' don't you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So if Confiker owns Windows boxen it 's because Windows is awful and shoddy .
But if CN owns Linux boxen it 's because they are " misconfigured " .
Given that confiker exploited actual bugs in windows which MS had to patch , and that 'Chuck Norris ' is exploiting the fact that certain appliance suppliers deliberately 'configured ' Linux with a fixed and known id and password , the statement above that you deride is * in this particular case * clearly accurate.You do understand the difference between an actual bug causing a security problem and a deliberate choice to 'leave the front door open ' do n't you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So if Confiker owns Windows boxen it's because Windows is awful and shoddy.
But if CN owns Linux boxen it's because they are "misconfigured".
Given that confiker exploited actual bugs in windows which MS had to patch, and that 'Chuck Norris' is exploiting the fact that certain appliance suppliers deliberately 'configured' Linux with a fixed and known id and password, the statement above that you deride is *in this particular case* clearly accurate.You do understand the difference between an actual bug causing a security problem and a deliberate choice to 'leave the front door open' don't you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229170</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228604</id>
	<title>Re:non Linux based routers</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1266849720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>non Linux based routers</p></div><p>Quick!  This man is talking but something is not right.  The words are real, but they don't make sense in this sequence.  Chuck Norris must have given him a roundhouse kick to the head.<br>
These days, "non Linux based router" is like saying "non carbon based life" (assuming we're talking about home networks.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>non Linux based routersQuick !
This man is talking but something is not right .
The words are real , but they do n't make sense in this sequence .
Chuck Norris must have given him a roundhouse kick to the head .
These days , " non Linux based router " is like saying " non carbon based life " ( assuming we 're talking about home networks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>non Linux based routersQuick!
This man is talking but something is not right.
The words are real, but they don't make sense in this sequence.
Chuck Norris must have given him a roundhouse kick to the head.
These days, "non Linux based router" is like saying "non carbon based life" (assuming we're talking about home networks.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228444</id>
	<title>Only Jack Bauer can beat Chuck Norris!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266848580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And in just 24 hours.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And in just 24 hours .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And in just 24 hours.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31235110</id>
	<title>Chuck Norris has no need for a router</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266831240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>in Chuck Norris' network there is no router... packets route themselves out of respect for Chuck Norris...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>in Chuck Norris ' network there is no router... packets route themselves out of respect for Chuck Norris.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in Chuck Norris' network there is no router... packets route themselves out of respect for Chuck Norris...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31236904</id>
	<title>Did my DD-WRT get rooted?</title>
	<author>KWTm</author>
	<datestamp>1266836580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd like to tap the powers of the Slashdot hivemind in seeing whether I might have been roundhouse-kicked by Chuck Norris; ie. has my router been rooted?</p><p>A few years ago I bought a Linksys WRT54GL router, in support of it being explicitly Linux compatible (in fact, I bought two of them --I really wanted to send a message to Linksys).  I flashed <a href="http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki" title="dd-wrt.com">DD-WRT</a> [dd-wrt.com] onto it, and had been using it as a usual router through my DSL line, with DHCP, wireless (at first WEP but later WPA), and port forwarding (a high-numbered port would forward from the Internet into the SSH port 22 on my server).</p><p>Lately I have had two problems with it: in the past half to one year, I haven't been able to SSH from outside into my server (I can do it within my home network, so the SSH server is not the problem).  More recently, I tried to do something-or-other on the net (I think it was play a BZFlag game?) and it said, "Your IP address, , is known to be an open proxy relay so we're not letting you connect."</p><p>If I suspect that the problems I've been having are due to malware/crackers, am I being paranoid?</p><p>Possible flaws in my security include: I enabled SSHd on the router, password based SSH (but I changed the default password of course), I was broadcasting my wireless SSID (required because my wife's vaunted MS Vista system didn't know how to handle hidden SSID's!), and I was using an old version of DD-WRT that I hadn't bothered to update.  (I think it was Build#4000 or something, and the current build is #16000 or something.)  However: I only briefly allowed SSH access from the Internet WAN and otherwise limited to SSH access from LAN, and I did not allow router admin access by wireless: the computer would have to be connected by ethernet.</p><p>Does DD-WRT have security flaws?  Should I switch to something else like OpenWRT or the Tomato Router (or something like that)?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd like to tap the powers of the Slashdot hivemind in seeing whether I might have been roundhouse-kicked by Chuck Norris ; ie .
has my router been rooted ? A few years ago I bought a Linksys WRT54GL router , in support of it being explicitly Linux compatible ( in fact , I bought two of them --I really wanted to send a message to Linksys ) .
I flashed DD-WRT [ dd-wrt.com ] onto it , and had been using it as a usual router through my DSL line , with DHCP , wireless ( at first WEP but later WPA ) , and port forwarding ( a high-numbered port would forward from the Internet into the SSH port 22 on my server ) .Lately I have had two problems with it : in the past half to one year , I have n't been able to SSH from outside into my server ( I can do it within my home network , so the SSH server is not the problem ) .
More recently , I tried to do something-or-other on the net ( I think it was play a BZFlag game ?
) and it said , " Your IP address , , is known to be an open proxy relay so we 're not letting you connect .
" If I suspect that the problems I 've been having are due to malware/crackers , am I being paranoid ? Possible flaws in my security include : I enabled SSHd on the router , password based SSH ( but I changed the default password of course ) , I was broadcasting my wireless SSID ( required because my wife 's vaunted MS Vista system did n't know how to handle hidden SSID 's !
) , and I was using an old version of DD-WRT that I had n't bothered to update .
( I think it was Build # 4000 or something , and the current build is # 16000 or something .
) However : I only briefly allowed SSH access from the Internet WAN and otherwise limited to SSH access from LAN , and I did not allow router admin access by wireless : the computer would have to be connected by ethernet.Does DD-WRT have security flaws ?
Should I switch to something else like OpenWRT or the Tomato Router ( or something like that ) ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd like to tap the powers of the Slashdot hivemind in seeing whether I might have been roundhouse-kicked by Chuck Norris; ie.
has my router been rooted?A few years ago I bought a Linksys WRT54GL router, in support of it being explicitly Linux compatible (in fact, I bought two of them --I really wanted to send a message to Linksys).
I flashed DD-WRT [dd-wrt.com] onto it, and had been using it as a usual router through my DSL line, with DHCP, wireless (at first WEP but later WPA), and port forwarding (a high-numbered port would forward from the Internet into the SSH port 22 on my server).Lately I have had two problems with it: in the past half to one year, I haven't been able to SSH from outside into my server (I can do it within my home network, so the SSH server is not the problem).
More recently, I tried to do something-or-other on the net (I think it was play a BZFlag game?
) and it said, "Your IP address, , is known to be an open proxy relay so we're not letting you connect.
"If I suspect that the problems I've been having are due to malware/crackers, am I being paranoid?Possible flaws in my security include: I enabled SSHd on the router, password based SSH (but I changed the default password of course), I was broadcasting my wireless SSID (required because my wife's vaunted MS Vista system didn't know how to handle hidden SSID's!
), and I was using an old version of DD-WRT that I hadn't bothered to update.
(I think it was Build#4000 or something, and the current build is #16000 or something.
)  However: I only briefly allowed SSH access from the Internet WAN and otherwise limited to SSH access from LAN, and I did not allow router admin access by wireless: the computer would have to be connected by ethernet.Does DD-WRT have security flaws?
Should I switch to something else like OpenWRT or the Tomato Router (or something like that)?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228564</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31230458</id>
	<title>Re:Source code?</title>
	<author>omnichad</author>
	<datestamp>1266860280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not uncommon for virus programmers to put text data in the binary somewhere.  I agree, though, calling machine language "source code" is a bit of a stretch.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not uncommon for virus programmers to put text data in the binary somewhere .
I agree , though , calling machine language " source code " is a bit of a stretch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not uncommon for virus programmers to put text data in the binary somewhere.
I agree, though, calling machine language "source code" is a bit of a stretch.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229080</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31230028</id>
	<title>Re:Try lack of jurisdiction</title>
	<author>NevarMore</author>
	<datestamp>1266858360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wouldn't that be like Al Capone being busted on tax evasion? Oh, better yet, OJ getting acquitted in criminal court to be successfully sued in civil court.</p><p>So Chuck sends his lawyers after the author. But only because lawyers are a "nice" first option, better than being roundhouse kicked off of the moon, through a plate glass window, and into the sun. Those lawyers track down and sue the bloke who wrote the botnet and win, but the FBI/CIA/Interpol/Vatican can't actually convict him of computer crimes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't that be like Al Capone being busted on tax evasion ?
Oh , better yet , OJ getting acquitted in criminal court to be successfully sued in civil court.So Chuck sends his lawyers after the author .
But only because lawyers are a " nice " first option , better than being roundhouse kicked off of the moon , through a plate glass window , and into the sun .
Those lawyers track down and sue the bloke who wrote the botnet and win , but the FBI/CIA/Interpol/Vatican ca n't actually convict him of computer crimes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't that be like Al Capone being busted on tax evasion?
Oh, better yet, OJ getting acquitted in criminal court to be successfully sued in civil court.So Chuck sends his lawyers after the author.
But only because lawyers are a "nice" first option, better than being roundhouse kicked off of the moon, through a plate glass window, and into the sun.
Those lawyers track down and sue the bloke who wrote the botnet and win, but the FBI/CIA/Interpol/Vatican can't actually convict him of computer crimes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228692</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31231358</id>
	<title>Re:Try lack of jurisdiction</title>
	<author>Korin43</author>
	<datestamp>1266862800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>With headlines like this, I'm guessing I wasn't the only one who though "Oh shit, Chuck Norris hates Linux" when I saw the headline.</htmltext>
<tokenext>With headlines like this , I 'm guessing I was n't the only one who though " Oh shit , Chuck Norris hates Linux " when I saw the headline .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With headlines like this, I'm guessing I wasn't the only one who though "Oh shit, Chuck Norris hates Linux" when I saw the headline.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31253718</id>
	<title>this sucks</title>
	<author>MrBrklyn</author>
	<datestamp>1266933900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This sucks because many people igore those devices since they are installed by the ISP.</p><p>I don't even think about them.  I want them to do as little as possible.</p><p>Ruben</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This sucks because many people igore those devices since they are installed by the ISP.I do n't even think about them .
I want them to do as little as possible.Ruben</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This sucks because many people igore those devices since they are installed by the ISP.I don't even think about them.
I want them to do as little as possible.Ruben</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31230538</id>
	<title>Not always the user's fault</title>
	<author>dlgeek</author>
	<datestamp>1266860640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>There are a lot of comments here laying the blame on dumb users, and I agree that they're often at fault, but sometimes the ISPs are to blame. I once had a cable provider (Brightstar, in Seattle) that gave me a combination modem/router that only had an extremely basic admin interface available - the only thing I could change was the WPA password. However, if you SSH'd in to the router from the outside (and only from the outside), you could log in with the default administrator username and password (found through google) and reconfigure almost everything through a horribly undocumented text interface. There's almost no way for a normal user to figure this out or change it, and if they did change the password, the ISP (who almost certainly is using this interface for mass-management) would probably be pretty upset.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There are a lot of comments here laying the blame on dumb users , and I agree that they 're often at fault , but sometimes the ISPs are to blame .
I once had a cable provider ( Brightstar , in Seattle ) that gave me a combination modem/router that only had an extremely basic admin interface available - the only thing I could change was the WPA password .
However , if you SSH 'd in to the router from the outside ( and only from the outside ) , you could log in with the default administrator username and password ( found through google ) and reconfigure almost everything through a horribly undocumented text interface .
There 's almost no way for a normal user to figure this out or change it , and if they did change the password , the ISP ( who almost certainly is using this interface for mass-management ) would probably be pretty upset .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are a lot of comments here laying the blame on dumb users, and I agree that they're often at fault, but sometimes the ISPs are to blame.
I once had a cable provider (Brightstar, in Seattle) that gave me a combination modem/router that only had an extremely basic admin interface available - the only thing I could change was the WPA password.
However, if you SSH'd in to the router from the outside (and only from the outside), you could log in with the default administrator username and password (found through google) and reconfigure almost everything through a horribly undocumented text interface.
There's almost no way for a normal user to figure this out or change it, and if they did change the password, the ISP (who almost certainly is using this interface for mass-management) would probably be pretty upset.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31231698</id>
	<title>Re:the REAL Chuck Noris</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266863580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The REAL Chuck Noris wouldn't have to guess the default password, he'd just round-house kick the modem until it let him in without it.</p></div><p>Did "brute force" just get redefined ?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The REAL Chuck Noris would n't have to guess the default password , he 'd just round-house kick the modem until it let him in without it.Did " brute force " just get redefined ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The REAL Chuck Noris wouldn't have to guess the default password, he'd just round-house kick the modem until it let him in without it.Did "brute force" just get redefined ?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228436</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228910</id>
	<title>Re:Try lack of jurisdiction</title>
	<author>Neoprofin</author>
	<datestamp>1266851820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or, and hear me out on this, he could take legal action, if there is any to be taken, in the applicable country. It seems to be a much disregarded fact on Slashdot that you don't need to be the citizen of, resident of, or even present in, a country to hire a lawyer there to file whatever papers you choose.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or , and hear me out on this , he could take legal action , if there is any to be taken , in the applicable country .
It seems to be a much disregarded fact on Slashdot that you do n't need to be the citizen of , resident of , or even present in , a country to hire a lawyer there to file whatever papers you choose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or, and hear me out on this, he could take legal action, if there is any to be taken, in the applicable country.
It seems to be a much disregarded fact on Slashdot that you don't need to be the citizen of, resident of, or even present in, a country to hire a lawyer there to file whatever papers you choose.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228692</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31230260</id>
	<title>Surf the net?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266859440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are allowed to surf the net, because Chuck Norris let you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are allowed to surf the net , because Chuck Norris let you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are allowed to surf the net, because Chuck Norris let you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229242</id>
	<title>Chuck Norris...</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1266853920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>doesn't need computers in his Botnet, he just<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...er infects routers and modems...</p><p>and my all time favorite:</p><p>Chuck Norris doesn't do push ups. He pushes the planet down.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>does n't need computers in his Botnet , he just ...er infects routers and modems...and my all time favorite : Chuck Norris does n't do push ups .
He pushes the planet down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>doesn't need computers in his Botnet, he just ...er infects routers and modems...and my all time favorite:Chuck Norris doesn't do push ups.
He pushes the planet down.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228692</id>
	<title>Try lack of jurisdiction</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266850320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>what's to stop Chuck Norris from taking legal action against the researchers who coined the name?</p></div><p>
International boundaries, for one.  Likely the author of the software for the botnet does not reside in the US (if that person's location is even known).  Chuck Norris can take all the legal action he wants within the US against the botnet author or botnet master, it generally won't mean squat if they are in a different country.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>what 's to stop Chuck Norris from taking legal action against the researchers who coined the name ?
International boundaries , for one .
Likely the author of the software for the botnet does not reside in the US ( if that person 's location is even known ) .
Chuck Norris can take all the legal action he wants within the US against the botnet author or botnet master , it generally wo n't mean squat if they are in a different country .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what's to stop Chuck Norris from taking legal action against the researchers who coined the name?
International boundaries, for one.
Likely the author of the software for the botnet does not reside in the US (if that person's location is even known).
Chuck Norris can take all the legal action he wants within the US against the botnet author or botnet master, it generally won't mean squat if they are in a different country.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228524</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228564</id>
	<title>Re:As far as misleading headlines go</title>
	<author>suso</author>
	<datestamp>1266849360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, this is very misleading. I thought that maybe the Linux network stack was suddenly vulnerable or something, but you're just talking about it taking advantage of default passwords, which is pretty old if you ask me.</p><p>This doesn't necessarily mean that say a Linux router that was installed on PC class hardware and has been kept up to date and properly secured is vulnerable to this botnet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , this is very misleading .
I thought that maybe the Linux network stack was suddenly vulnerable or something , but you 're just talking about it taking advantage of default passwords , which is pretty old if you ask me.This does n't necessarily mean that say a Linux router that was installed on PC class hardware and has been kept up to date and properly secured is vulnerable to this botnet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, this is very misleading.
I thought that maybe the Linux network stack was suddenly vulnerable or something, but you're just talking about it taking advantage of default passwords, which is pretty old if you ask me.This doesn't necessarily mean that say a Linux router that was installed on PC class hardware and has been kept up to date and properly secured is vulnerable to this botnet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228368</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31232372</id>
	<title>Re:non Linux based routers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266865560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've seen techs enable WEP for a person with a single Macbook.</p><p>Odd, since every Macbook ever produced can do WPA2.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've seen techs enable WEP for a person with a single Macbook.Odd , since every Macbook ever produced can do WPA2 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've seen techs enable WEP for a person with a single Macbook.Odd, since every Macbook ever produced can do WPA2.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228562</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31240840</id>
	<title>Re:Try lack of jurisdiction</title>
	<author>Nero Nimbus</author>
	<datestamp>1266861120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Roundhouse kicks transcend international borders.
<br> <br>
Especially when they're executed by Chuck Norris.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Roundhouse kicks transcend international borders .
Especially when they 're executed by Chuck Norris .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Roundhouse kicks transcend international borders.
Especially when they're executed by Chuck Norris.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228692</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229268</id>
	<title>Re:non Linux based routers</title>
	<author>thedonger</author>
	<datestamp>1266854040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Granted, they don't enable remote access, but really, what is so hard about writing down passwords and taping them to the bottom of the router?</p></div><p>The Chuck Norris botnet can read the password taped to the bottom of your router.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Granted , they do n't enable remote access , but really , what is so hard about writing down passwords and taping them to the bottom of the router ? The Chuck Norris botnet can read the password taped to the bottom of your router .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Granted, they don't enable remote access, but really, what is so hard about writing down passwords and taping them to the bottom of the router?The Chuck Norris botnet can read the password taped to the bottom of your router.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228562</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228368</id>
	<title>As far as misleading headlines go</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266848040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>this one <b>really</b> takes the cake!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this one really takes the cake !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this one really takes the cake!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229098</id>
	<title>Re:non Linux based routers</title>
	<author>phrostie</author>
	<datestamp>1266853200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have to agree with the lighten up part.<br>if this is the best they can do, then bring it on.</p><p>besides, i'm more of a Jackie Chan fan myself</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have to agree with the lighten up part.if this is the best they can do , then bring it on.besides , i 'm more of a Jackie Chan fan myself</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have to agree with the lighten up part.if this is the best they can do, then bring it on.besides, i'm more of a Jackie Chan fan myself</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228466</id>
	<title>Stupid jokes incoming in 3...2...1...</title>
	<author>selven</author>
	<datestamp>1266848700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not even <a href="http://www.schneierfacts.com/facts/top" title="schneierfacts.com">Bruce Schneier</a> [schneierfacts.com] can protect your router from Chuck.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not even Bruce Schneier [ schneierfacts.com ] can protect your router from Chuck .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not even Bruce Schneier [schneierfacts.com] can protect your router from Chuck.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31231408</id>
	<title>And We See . . .</title>
	<author>hduff</author>
	<datestamp>1266862920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... just how poor implementations decisions compromise security.

Take any OS and install it with an easily obtainable root password and guess what? What could the manufacturers have been thinking that makes any kind of sense?</htmltext>
<tokenext>... just how poor implementations decisions compromise security .
Take any OS and install it with an easily obtainable root password and guess what ?
What could the manufacturers have been thinking that makes any kind of sense ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... just how poor implementations decisions compromise security.
Take any OS and install it with an easily obtainable root password and guess what?
What could the manufacturers have been thinking that makes any kind of sense?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228430</id>
	<title>Is anything</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266848460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>safe from Chuck Norris??</htmltext>
<tokenext>safe from Chuck Norris ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>safe from Chuck Norris?
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228442</id>
	<title>And will the Bruce Lee Bot Net be fighting it?</title>
	<author>wintercolby</author>
	<datestamp>1266848520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So . . . Where's the Bruce Lee Bot Net in all this?  Will it be involved in some botnet tournament, fighting over Linksys, D-Link and Netgear routers in a winner takes all competition?<br> <br>

Only time will tell if this botnet can withstand the test of time, only to appear in really cheesey YouTube shows about a botnet turned good out to beat some serious Texas Worm's butt.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So .
. .
Where 's the Bruce Lee Bot Net in all this ?
Will it be involved in some botnet tournament , fighting over Linksys , D-Link and Netgear routers in a winner takes all competition ?
Only time will tell if this botnet can withstand the test of time , only to appear in really cheesey YouTube shows about a botnet turned good out to beat some serious Texas Worm 's butt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So .
. .
Where's the Bruce Lee Bot Net in all this?
Will it be involved in some botnet tournament, fighting over Linksys, D-Link and Netgear routers in a winner takes all competition?
Only time will tell if this botnet can withstand the test of time, only to appear in really cheesey YouTube shows about a botnet turned good out to beat some serious Texas Worm's butt.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31234720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228430
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228368
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31232778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228368
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228562
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228488
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31230284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228436
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229204
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228488
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229542
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228368
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31231698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228436
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229630
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228562
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228488
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229456
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229170
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31233058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31230916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228368
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229170
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31230158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229170
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31232372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228562
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228488
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31236904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228368
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228368
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229976
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229170
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31231358
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228880
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228368
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31230458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229080
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228594
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228368
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229724
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228368
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228562
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228488
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228666
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229320
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228368
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31240840
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228368
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31230028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228368
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229080
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228562
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228488
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228466
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229170
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229366
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228430
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31256578
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228594
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228368
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228578
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228488
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31238112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31230714
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228562
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228488
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228368
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228488
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228674
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228488
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228368
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228368
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_22_0537232_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228562
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228488
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_22_0537232.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31230788
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_22_0537232.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228436
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31231698
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31230284
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_22_0537232.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229080
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31230458
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229718
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_22_0537232.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228426
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_22_0537232.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228382
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_22_0537232.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228938
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_22_0537232.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228466
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229352
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_22_0537232.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228980
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_22_0537232.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228430
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229366
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31234720
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_22_0537232.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31230916
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31233058
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_22_0537232.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229170
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229450
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229904
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229456
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31230158
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229976
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_22_0537232.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228488
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228674
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229204
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228562
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228716
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228958
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229936
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229268
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31232372
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229630
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228654
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228604
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229098
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228578
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_22_0537232.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31230714
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31238112
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_22_0537232.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229242
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_22_0537232.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31233870
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_22_0537232.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228666
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228864
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_22_0537232.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228442
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_22_0537232.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228368
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228564
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31236904
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229542
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228524
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229092
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229320
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229288
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229324
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228692
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228910
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31240840
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228880
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31231358
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31232778
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31230028
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229240
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228838
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31229724
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228594
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31228906
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31256578
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_22_0537232.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_22_0537232.31230538
</commentlist>
</conversation>
