<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_21_1855234</id>
	<title>Twitter Hit By BZPharma LOL Phishing Attack</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1266780120000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"Twitter users are being warned not to click on messages saying "'ol, this is funny,' as they can lead to their account details being stolen. A widespread attack has hit Twitter this weekend, tricking users into logging into a fake Twitter page &mdash; and thus handing their account details over to hackers. Messages include <tt>Lol. this is me?? / lol , this is funny. / ha ha, u look funny on here / Lol. this you??</tt> followed by a link in the form of <a href="http://example/">http://example/</a> [dot] com/?rid=http://twitter.verify.bzpharma [dot] net/login, where 'example.com' can vary. Clicking on the link redirects users to the second-half of the link, where the fake login page is hosted. In a video and blog entry, computer security firm Sophos is warning users that <a href="http://www.sophos.com/blogs/gc/g/2010/02/21/video-twitter-phishing-bzpharma-lol-funny-attack/">it is not just Twitter direct messages (DMs) that carry the poisoned links</a>, but they are appearing on public profiles due to services such as GroupTweet which republish direct messages. Sophos also reports that the site being used for the Twitter phishing has also been constructed to steal information from users of the Bebo social network. Affected users are advised to change their passwords immediately."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " Twitter users are being warned not to click on messages saying " 'ol , this is funny, ' as they can lead to their account details being stolen .
A widespread attack has hit Twitter this weekend , tricking users into logging into a fake Twitter page    and thus handing their account details over to hackers .
Messages include Lol .
this is me ? ?
/ lol , this is funny .
/ ha ha , u look funny on here / Lol .
this you ? ?
followed by a link in the form of http : //example/ [ dot ] com/ ? rid = http : //twitter.verify.bzpharma [ dot ] net/login , where 'example.com ' can vary .
Clicking on the link redirects users to the second-half of the link , where the fake login page is hosted .
In a video and blog entry , computer security firm Sophos is warning users that it is not just Twitter direct messages ( DMs ) that carry the poisoned links , but they are appearing on public profiles due to services such as GroupTweet which republish direct messages .
Sophos also reports that the site being used for the Twitter phishing has also been constructed to steal information from users of the Bebo social network .
Affected users are advised to change their passwords immediately .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "Twitter users are being warned not to click on messages saying "'ol, this is funny,' as they can lead to their account details being stolen.
A widespread attack has hit Twitter this weekend, tricking users into logging into a fake Twitter page — and thus handing their account details over to hackers.
Messages include Lol.
this is me??
/ lol , this is funny.
/ ha ha, u look funny on here / Lol.
this you??
followed by a link in the form of http://example/ [dot] com/?rid=http://twitter.verify.bzpharma [dot] net/login, where 'example.com' can vary.
Clicking on the link redirects users to the second-half of the link, where the fake login page is hosted.
In a video and blog entry, computer security firm Sophos is warning users that it is not just Twitter direct messages (DMs) that carry the poisoned links, but they are appearing on public profiles due to services such as GroupTweet which republish direct messages.
Sophos also reports that the site being used for the Twitter phishing has also been constructed to steal information from users of the Bebo social network.
Affected users are advised to change their passwords immediately.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31222076</id>
	<title>Re:we need to stop coddling stupidity.</title>
	<author>Mr Z</author>
	<datestamp>1266748260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When you figure out how to get a botnet to only DDoS itself and not clog our inboxes with spam, let me know.   Otherwise, legions of morons getting their machines conscripted into zombie hordes of spam-churning, site crashing drones is <i>everybody's</i> problem.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When you figure out how to get a botnet to only DDoS itself and not clog our inboxes with spam , let me know .
Otherwise , legions of morons getting their machines conscripted into zombie hordes of spam-churning , site crashing drones is everybody 's problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When you figure out how to get a botnet to only DDoS itself and not clog our inboxes with spam, let me know.
Otherwise, legions of morons getting their machines conscripted into zombie hordes of spam-churning, site crashing drones is everybody's problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221798</id>
	<title>Re:Joshua sez</title>
	<author>Riceo</author>
	<datestamp>1266746340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Gah you just made me lose the game...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Gah you just made me lose the game.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gah you just made me lose the game...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221542</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31225046</id>
	<title>What about URL shortening services?</title>
	<author>HockeyPuck</author>
	<datestamp>1266767760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've always wondered why we don't see more phishing attacks with URL shortening services.  Why not just tweet "Hey check out the pictures of my latest vacation at my <a href="http://tinyurl.com/y8ufsnp" title="tinyurl.com">picasaweb</a> [tinyurl.com] page"?  I don't think forcing users to install yet another plugin which checks out the tinyurl link as there's more than enough companies that do shorten URLs to make this plugin be yet another one which has to have to phone home to get updates...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've always wondered why we do n't see more phishing attacks with URL shortening services .
Why not just tweet " Hey check out the pictures of my latest vacation at my picasaweb [ tinyurl.com ] page " ?
I do n't think forcing users to install yet another plugin which checks out the tinyurl link as there 's more than enough companies that do shorten URLs to make this plugin be yet another one which has to have to phone home to get updates.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've always wondered why we don't see more phishing attacks with URL shortening services.
Why not just tweet "Hey check out the pictures of my latest vacation at my picasaweb [tinyurl.com] page"?
I don't think forcing users to install yet another plugin which checks out the tinyurl link as there's more than enough companies that do shorten URLs to make this plugin be yet another one which has to have to phone home to get updates...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221012</id>
	<title>lol , this is funny.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266784140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>lol , this is funny.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>lol , this is funny .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>lol , this is funny.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31223804</id>
	<title>Re:we need to stop coddling stupidity.</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1266758640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can we not just strap depth charges to them as they go down?  We could call it 'being proactive' which sounds a lot more marketable than 'schadenfreude'.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can we not just strap depth charges to them as they go down ?
We could call it 'being proactive ' which sounds a lot more marketable than 'schadenfreude' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can we not just strap depth charges to them as they go down?
We could call it 'being proactive' which sounds a lot more marketable than 'schadenfreude'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221630</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31224390</id>
	<title>Re:You can't have twitter without</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266762840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or this: <a href="http://bit.ly/info/dkpAoI" title="bit.ly">http://bit.ly/info/dkpAoI</a> [bit.ly]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or this : http : //bit.ly/info/dkpAoI [ bit.ly ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or this: http://bit.ly/info/dkpAoI [bit.ly]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31220966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221866</id>
	<title>And how exactly does that steal your password?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266746820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Eh?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Eh ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Eh?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221258</id>
	<title>Re:Interestingly...</title>
	<author>VoltageX</author>
	<datestamp>1266785760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Worth reporting to Mozilla/Google?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Worth reporting to Mozilla/Google ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Worth reporting to Mozilla/Google?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221482</id>
	<title>MSN</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266744180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I swear that my MSN messenger has messages "from my friends" saying "haha this you? -link to dodgy site-". Of course I've never clicked on one. In fact I talked about security to a "hey wanna see my webcam?" bot once.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I swear that my MSN messenger has messages " from my friends " saying " haha this you ?
-link to dodgy site- " .
Of course I 've never clicked on one .
In fact I talked about security to a " hey wan na see my webcam ?
" bot once .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I swear that my MSN messenger has messages "from my friends" saying "haha this you?
-link to dodgy site-".
Of course I've never clicked on one.
In fact I talked about security to a "hey wanna see my webcam?
" bot once.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221010</id>
	<title>we need to stop coddling stupidity.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266784080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously, anyone with more than a few functional neurons is not going to type their password into a page they reached by clicking on a link from "LOL this is funny!".</p><p>We need to let people like that sink or swim.  People end up being as stupid as we let them be.  If we expect complete idiocy, we will *get* complete idiocy, and that harms the experience for the rest of us.</p><p>I say let these people experience the consequences of their own actions.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , anyone with more than a few functional neurons is not going to type their password into a page they reached by clicking on a link from " LOL this is funny !
" .We need to let people like that sink or swim .
People end up being as stupid as we let them be .
If we expect complete idiocy , we will * get * complete idiocy , and that harms the experience for the rest of us.I say let these people experience the consequences of their own actions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, anyone with more than a few functional neurons is not going to type their password into a page they reached by clicking on a link from "LOL this is funny!
".We need to let people like that sink or swim.
People end up being as stupid as we let them be.
If we expect complete idiocy, we will *get* complete idiocy, and that harms the experience for the rest of us.I say let these people experience the consequences of their own actions.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31222578</id>
	<title>OpenDNS</title>
	<author>alexanderpas</author>
	<datestamp>1266750960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've added that specific page and domain to the Phishtank, causing the page to appear in the first place. ( <a href="http://www.phishtank.com/user.php?username=alexanderpas" title="phishtank.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.phishtank.com/user.php?username=alexanderpas</a> [phishtank.com] )

Probaly they used some kind of exploit to bypass the attack warning.

The best way, is not to only rely on your browser for protection, but take a multilayered approach, for Example, Using OpenDNS ensuring the request doesn't even hit the DNS system.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've added that specific page and domain to the Phishtank , causing the page to appear in the first place .
( http : //www.phishtank.com/user.php ? username = alexanderpas [ phishtank.com ] ) Probaly they used some kind of exploit to bypass the attack warning .
The best way , is not to only rely on your browser for protection , but take a multilayered approach , for Example , Using OpenDNS ensuring the request does n't even hit the DNS system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've added that specific page and domain to the Phishtank, causing the page to appear in the first place.
( http://www.phishtank.com/user.php?username=alexanderpas [phishtank.com] )

Probaly they used some kind of exploit to bypass the attack warning.
The best way, is not to only rely on your browser for protection, but take a multilayered approach, for Example, Using OpenDNS ensuring the request doesn't even hit the DNS system.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31223038</id>
	<title>Pretty simple solution...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266753720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... ignore Twitter. That can't be hard, can it? How many hundreds of thousands of years did the human race do without it? And what has it contributed? The prosecution rests.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... ignore Twitter .
That ca n't be hard , can it ?
How many hundreds of thousands of years did the human race do without it ?
And what has it contributed ?
The prosecution rests .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... ignore Twitter.
That can't be hard, can it?
How many hundreds of thousands of years did the human race do without it?
And what has it contributed?
The prosecution rests.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31226612</id>
	<title>Re:Pretty simple solution...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266782040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I remember people saying that about the internet, yet here you are, being an old man on it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember people saying that about the internet , yet here you are , being an old man on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember people saying that about the internet, yet here you are, being an old man on it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31223038</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221542</id>
	<title>Joshua sez</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266744660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A strange game. The only winning move is not to play. How about a nice game of chess?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A strange game .
The only winning move is not to play .
How about a nice game of chess ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A strange game.
The only winning move is not to play.
How about a nice game of chess?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221888</id>
	<title>Re:we need to stop coddling stupidity.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266746940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You need to get out more, most common people would fall for this. In fact, aside from my geeky friends, I couldn't name many people who *wouldn't* fall for it. It's obvious to you or me, but would go right over the majority's heads.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You need to get out more , most common people would fall for this .
In fact , aside from my geeky friends , I could n't name many people who * would n't * fall for it .
It 's obvious to you or me , but would go right over the majority 's heads .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You need to get out more, most common people would fall for this.
In fact, aside from my geeky friends, I couldn't name many people who *wouldn't* fall for it.
It's obvious to you or me, but would go right over the majority's heads.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221350</id>
	<title>lolwut</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266743100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Twitter phishing warnings on Slashdot? That's a new low.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Twitter phishing warnings on Slashdot ?
That 's a new low .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Twitter phishing warnings on Slashdot?
That's a new low.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31227932</id>
	<title>Rubbish!</title>
	<author>EWAdams</author>
	<datestamp>1266843780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The contribution of the Internet is indisputable. Even when it was the ARPANET its value was trivially obvious.</p><p>Twitter, on the other hand, is just trivial. And if it is now a source of germs as well, forget it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The contribution of the Internet is indisputable .
Even when it was the ARPANET its value was trivially obvious.Twitter , on the other hand , is just trivial .
And if it is now a source of germs as well , forget it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The contribution of the Internet is indisputable.
Even when it was the ARPANET its value was trivially obvious.Twitter, on the other hand, is just trivial.
And if it is now a source of germs as well, forget it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31226612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31220984</id>
	<title>Thanks for the warning</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266783900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I could never have figured out their clever stratagem without you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I could never have figured out their clever stratagem without you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I could never have figured out their clever stratagem without you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31227100</id>
	<title>Click here, this is really important</title>
	<author>FreakyGreenLeaky</author>
	<datestamp>1266832800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With Due Respect and Humanity, I was compelled to write to you under a humanitarian ground.. My name is Mrs. Jessica Meyer. I was born in Baltimore , Maryland<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,I am married to Mr. Timothy Meyer director J.C Industries Cote d'Ivoire.We were married for 36 years without a child. He died after a Cadiac Arteries Operation.</p><p>And Recently, My Doctor told me that I would not last for the next six months due to my cancer problem (cancer of the lever and stroke). Before my husband died last year there is this sum $2.8 Million Dollars that he deposited in a bank here In Ivory Coast.Presently this money is still in the bank. Having known my condition I decided to donate this fund to any good God fearing brother or sister that will utilize this fund the way I am going to instruct herein. I want somebody that will use this fund according to the desire of my late.</p><p>Husband to help less privileged people, orphanages, widows and propagating the word of God. I took this decision because I don't have any child that will inherit this fund, And I don't want in away where this money will be used in an ungodly way. This is why I am taking this decision to hand you over this Fund. I am not afraid of death hence I know where I am going. I want you to always remember me in your daily prayers because of my up coming Cancer Surgery.</p><p>Write back as soon as possible any delay in your reply will give me room in sourcing another person for this same purpose, hoping to read from you ASAP.<br>God bless you as you listing to the voice of reasoning,</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With Due Respect and Humanity , I was compelled to write to you under a humanitarian ground.. My name is Mrs. Jessica Meyer .
I was born in Baltimore , Maryland ,I am married to Mr. Timothy Meyer director J.C Industries Cote d'Ivoire.We were married for 36 years without a child .
He died after a Cadiac Arteries Operation.And Recently , My Doctor told me that I would not last for the next six months due to my cancer problem ( cancer of the lever and stroke ) .
Before my husband died last year there is this sum $ 2.8 Million Dollars that he deposited in a bank here In Ivory Coast.Presently this money is still in the bank .
Having known my condition I decided to donate this fund to any good God fearing brother or sister that will utilize this fund the way I am going to instruct herein .
I want somebody that will use this fund according to the desire of my late.Husband to help less privileged people , orphanages , widows and propagating the word of God .
I took this decision because I do n't have any child that will inherit this fund , And I do n't want in away where this money will be used in an ungodly way .
This is why I am taking this decision to hand you over this Fund .
I am not afraid of death hence I know where I am going .
I want you to always remember me in your daily prayers because of my up coming Cancer Surgery.Write back as soon as possible any delay in your reply will give me room in sourcing another person for this same purpose , hoping to read from you ASAP.God bless you as you listing to the voice of reasoning,</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With Due Respect and Humanity, I was compelled to write to you under a humanitarian ground.. My name is Mrs. Jessica Meyer.
I was born in Baltimore , Maryland ,I am married to Mr. Timothy Meyer director J.C Industries Cote d'Ivoire.We were married for 36 years without a child.
He died after a Cadiac Arteries Operation.And Recently, My Doctor told me that I would not last for the next six months due to my cancer problem (cancer of the lever and stroke).
Before my husband died last year there is this sum $2.8 Million Dollars that he deposited in a bank here In Ivory Coast.Presently this money is still in the bank.
Having known my condition I decided to donate this fund to any good God fearing brother or sister that will utilize this fund the way I am going to instruct herein.
I want somebody that will use this fund according to the desire of my late.Husband to help less privileged people, orphanages, widows and propagating the word of God.
I took this decision because I don't have any child that will inherit this fund, And I don't want in away where this money will be used in an ungodly way.
This is why I am taking this decision to hand you over this Fund.
I am not afraid of death hence I know where I am going.
I want you to always remember me in your daily prayers because of my up coming Cancer Surgery.Write back as soon as possible any delay in your reply will give me room in sourcing another person for this same purpose, hoping to read from you ASAP.God bless you as you listing to the voice of reasoning,</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221504</id>
	<title>Re:Interestingly...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266744300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>...I just deliberately sought out this thing so I could see what it looked like - and amazingly, whatever it does, it manages to somehow hide the "Suspected phishing site" page in Google Chrome: It briefly appears but then the page seems to reload automatically and the page disappears</p><p>So not only is this a pretty sophisticated clone of Twitter's login, they've somehow managed to force their way past the attack warning too. Any ideas how they've done that?</p></div><p>I am surprised this did not make a headline. "Chrome didn't catch it", but thats ok.......it's not IE so we wont slam it.</p><p>Ahhh, If you are using Chrome, Google already has all of your habits and information anyway, what does this matter?</p><p>Just antoher reason NOT to use any social networks...it's a fad, it will go away, just like the internets</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...I just deliberately sought out this thing so I could see what it looked like - and amazingly , whatever it does , it manages to somehow hide the " Suspected phishing site " page in Google Chrome : It briefly appears but then the page seems to reload automatically and the page disappearsSo not only is this a pretty sophisticated clone of Twitter 's login , they 've somehow managed to force their way past the attack warning too .
Any ideas how they 've done that ? I am surprised this did not make a headline .
" Chrome did n't catch it " , but thats ok.......it 's not IE so we wont slam it.Ahhh , If you are using Chrome , Google already has all of your habits and information anyway , what does this matter ? Just antoher reason NOT to use any social networks...it 's a fad , it will go away , just like the internets</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...I just deliberately sought out this thing so I could see what it looked like - and amazingly, whatever it does, it manages to somehow hide the "Suspected phishing site" page in Google Chrome: It briefly appears but then the page seems to reload automatically and the page disappearsSo not only is this a pretty sophisticated clone of Twitter's login, they've somehow managed to force their way past the attack warning too.
Any ideas how they've done that?I am surprised this did not make a headline.
"Chrome didn't catch it", but thats ok.......it's not IE so we wont slam it.Ahhh, If you are using Chrome, Google already has all of your habits and information anyway, what does this matter?Just antoher reason NOT to use any social networks...it's a fad, it will go away, just like the internets
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31226488</id>
	<title>Re:we need to stop coddling stupidity.</title>
	<author>cerberusss</author>
	<datestamp>1266780180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>we get dread 100,000 strong botnet krakens which rise to the surface and drag sites under with all hands lost.</p></div><p>Ah, yes. Good ole' Mustakrakish. <a href="http://dethklok.wikia.com/wiki/Mustakrakish" title="wikia.com">http://dethklok.wikia.com/wiki/Mustakrakish</a> [wikia.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>we get dread 100,000 strong botnet krakens which rise to the surface and drag sites under with all hands lost.Ah , yes .
Good ole ' Mustakrakish .
http : //dethklok.wikia.com/wiki/Mustakrakish [ wikia.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>we get dread 100,000 strong botnet krakens which rise to the surface and drag sites under with all hands lost.Ah, yes.
Good ole' Mustakrakish.
http://dethklok.wikia.com/wiki/Mustakrakish [wikia.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221630</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221018</id>
	<title>Interestingly...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266784140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...I just deliberately sought out this thing so I could see what it looked like - and amazingly, whatever it does, it manages to somehow hide the "Suspected phishing site" page in Google Chrome: It briefly appears but then the page seems to reload automatically and the page disappears</p><p>So not only is this a pretty sophisticated clone of Twitter's login, they've somehow managed to force their way past the attack warning too. Any ideas how they've done that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...I just deliberately sought out this thing so I could see what it looked like - and amazingly , whatever it does , it manages to somehow hide the " Suspected phishing site " page in Google Chrome : It briefly appears but then the page seems to reload automatically and the page disappearsSo not only is this a pretty sophisticated clone of Twitter 's login , they 've somehow managed to force their way past the attack warning too .
Any ideas how they 've done that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...I just deliberately sought out this thing so I could see what it looked like - and amazingly, whatever it does, it manages to somehow hide the "Suspected phishing site" page in Google Chrome: It briefly appears but then the page seems to reload automatically and the page disappearsSo not only is this a pretty sophisticated clone of Twitter's login, they've somehow managed to force their way past the attack warning too.
Any ideas how they've done that?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221008</id>
	<title>Lol</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266784080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>this is funny.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this is funny .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this is funny.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221852</id>
	<title>Re:You can't have twitter without</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266746760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>More like, you can't have phishing attacks without twits.  Twit = someone who uses what they don't know the first thing about and sincerely expects there won't be a problem.
<br> <br>
Really, have you SEEN most phishing pages?  The fake login pages?  I've only ever seen one or two that were remotely convincing, and even then simply checking the domain would have identified the site as illegitimate.  I feel no sympathy for anybody who falls for these.  This is a form of Darwinism to be blunt.
<br> <br>
They couldn't have picked a better target.  People who jump on the latest trendy bandwagon are more likely to fall for these silly scams.  Like a few years ago in the USA when the worst and most reckless drivers I saw, the ones who are willing to endanger other motorists because they can't be bothered to give a damn about basic things like paying attention.  These drivers all had one thing in common:  they overwhelmingly drove SUVs.  That isn't because SUVs are so difficult to drive under good road conditions.  No.  It's not because SUVs inherently force the driver to not pay attention either.  It's because relatively few people had SUVs until they became extremely trendy several years ago.  Is anybody REALLY surprised that people who make major purchasing decisions based on trends are not the brightest among us, and that encountering an environment that has low tolerance for stupidity, like moving vehicles, makes this undeniably apparent?  Same thing with Twitter and why it was targeted.  Lots of sites have many users.  Twitter has many users who follow trends.</htmltext>
<tokenext>More like , you ca n't have phishing attacks without twits .
Twit = someone who uses what they do n't know the first thing about and sincerely expects there wo n't be a problem .
Really , have you SEEN most phishing pages ?
The fake login pages ?
I 've only ever seen one or two that were remotely convincing , and even then simply checking the domain would have identified the site as illegitimate .
I feel no sympathy for anybody who falls for these .
This is a form of Darwinism to be blunt .
They could n't have picked a better target .
People who jump on the latest trendy bandwagon are more likely to fall for these silly scams .
Like a few years ago in the USA when the worst and most reckless drivers I saw , the ones who are willing to endanger other motorists because they ca n't be bothered to give a damn about basic things like paying attention .
These drivers all had one thing in common : they overwhelmingly drove SUVs .
That is n't because SUVs are so difficult to drive under good road conditions .
No. It 's not because SUVs inherently force the driver to not pay attention either .
It 's because relatively few people had SUVs until they became extremely trendy several years ago .
Is anybody REALLY surprised that people who make major purchasing decisions based on trends are not the brightest among us , and that encountering an environment that has low tolerance for stupidity , like moving vehicles , makes this undeniably apparent ?
Same thing with Twitter and why it was targeted .
Lots of sites have many users .
Twitter has many users who follow trends .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More like, you can't have phishing attacks without twits.
Twit = someone who uses what they don't know the first thing about and sincerely expects there won't be a problem.
Really, have you SEEN most phishing pages?
The fake login pages?
I've only ever seen one or two that were remotely convincing, and even then simply checking the domain would have identified the site as illegitimate.
I feel no sympathy for anybody who falls for these.
This is a form of Darwinism to be blunt.
They couldn't have picked a better target.
People who jump on the latest trendy bandwagon are more likely to fall for these silly scams.
Like a few years ago in the USA when the worst and most reckless drivers I saw, the ones who are willing to endanger other motorists because they can't be bothered to give a damn about basic things like paying attention.
These drivers all had one thing in common:  they overwhelmingly drove SUVs.
That isn't because SUVs are so difficult to drive under good road conditions.
No.  It's not because SUVs inherently force the driver to not pay attention either.
It's because relatively few people had SUVs until they became extremely trendy several years ago.
Is anybody REALLY surprised that people who make major purchasing decisions based on trends are not the brightest among us, and that encountering an environment that has low tolerance for stupidity, like moving vehicles, makes this undeniably apparent?
Same thing with Twitter and why it was targeted.
Lots of sites have many users.
Twitter has many users who follow trends.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31220966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31229244</id>
	<title>Oh come on...</title>
	<author>DaVince21</author>
	<datestamp>1266853920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Only idiots are going to click links containing "pharma" in the title and then enter their password on the resulting page when they know they're already logged in.</p><p>I guess that means plenty of victims on Twitter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Only idiots are going to click links containing " pharma " in the title and then enter their password on the resulting page when they know they 're already logged in.I guess that means plenty of victims on Twitter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only idiots are going to click links containing "pharma" in the title and then enter their password on the resulting page when they know they're already logged in.I guess that means plenty of victims on Twitter.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221572</id>
	<title>Re:Interestingly...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266744840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Came up with the protection without issue here on 5.0.317.2 dev, might just be the older versions that are affected?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Came up with the protection without issue here on 5.0.317.2 dev , might just be the older versions that are affected ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Came up with the protection without issue here on 5.0.317.2 dev, might just be the older versions that are affected?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221512</id>
	<title>Re:Interestingly...</title>
	<author>CubeDude213</author>
	<datestamp>1266744360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I did the same thing when I got a direct message with it but Safari managed to warn me.  I believe Safari uses Google&rsquo;s database of phishing sites so it looks like a bug in Chrome.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I did the same thing when I got a direct message with it but Safari managed to warn me .
I believe Safari uses Google    s database of phishing sites so it looks like a bug in Chrome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I did the same thing when I got a direct message with it but Safari managed to warn me.
I believe Safari uses Google’s database of phishing sites so it looks like a bug in Chrome.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31227240</id>
	<title>Re:Pretty simple solution...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266835080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So far the only really useful thing that I've found with twitter that is you can properly bad mouth a company and actually get real customer support by doing it.</p><p>Otherwise, twitter doesn't provide me with anything...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So far the only really useful thing that I 've found with twitter that is you can properly bad mouth a company and actually get real customer support by doing it.Otherwise , twitter does n't provide me with anything.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So far the only really useful thing that I've found with twitter that is you can properly bad mouth a company and actually get real customer support by doing it.Otherwise, twitter doesn't provide me with anything...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31223038</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31223812</id>
	<title>Re:Interestingly...</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1266758760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's okay.  If you use Chrome, Google already has your passwords, and changed them last week to prevent you from giving it out to phishing sites.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's okay .
If you use Chrome , Google already has your passwords , and changed them last week to prevent you from giving it out to phishing sites .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's okay.
If you use Chrome, Google already has your passwords, and changed them last week to prevent you from giving it out to phishing sites.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31227004</id>
	<title>Re:You can't have twitter without</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266831300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Or this: <a href="http://bit.ly/info/dkpAoI" title="bit.ly" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/<b>info</b>/dkpAoI</a> [bit.ly] </p></div><p>Wow. You're a troll <i>and</i> an idiot.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or this : http : //bit.ly/info/dkpAoI [ bit.ly ] Wow .
You 're a troll and an idiot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or this: http://bit.ly/info/dkpAoI [bit.ly] Wow.
You're a troll and an idiot.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31224390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31229860</id>
	<title>Welcome to THE FUTURE!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266857220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Twitter and Facebook are the AOL of the 21st century.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Twitter and Facebook are the AOL of the 21st century .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Twitter and Facebook are the AOL of the 21st century.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221084</id>
	<title>Where the sheeple graze</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266784560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>wolves come out in force.</htmltext>
<tokenext>wolves come out in force .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wolves come out in force.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221534</id>
	<title>what problem?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266744540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This malicious domain doesn't bother me (I use DNS Redirector to block it and thousands others)</p><p>The best solution is to just not use any of this "social networking" crap and go make friends in the real world<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...and no, I'm not 60 and don't understand it, I'm 24 and smart enough to know its hype and stupidity</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This malicious domain does n't bother me ( I use DNS Redirector to block it and thousands others ) The best solution is to just not use any of this " social networking " crap and go make friends in the real world ...and no , I 'm not 60 and do n't understand it , I 'm 24 and smart enough to know its hype and stupidity</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This malicious domain doesn't bother me (I use DNS Redirector to block it and thousands others)The best solution is to just not use any of this "social networking" crap and go make friends in the real world ...and no, I'm not 60 and don't understand it, I'm 24 and smart enough to know its hype and stupidity</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31222788</id>
	<title>Re:You can't have twitter without</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266752220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think you meant "twats"...</p><p>No need to thank me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you meant " twats " ...No need to thank me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you meant "twats"...No need to thank me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31220966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31226896</id>
	<title>Global block?</title>
	<author>Emperor Tiberius</author>
	<datestamp>1266829440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I guess I have a hard time understanding why these things are so hard to block (globally).  Doesn't Twitter maintain some sort of global regex cookbook of spam-laden crap?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess I have a hard time understanding why these things are so hard to block ( globally ) .
Does n't Twitter maintain some sort of global regex cookbook of spam-laden crap ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess I have a hard time understanding why these things are so hard to block (globally).
Doesn't Twitter maintain some sort of global regex cookbook of spam-laden crap?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31220966</id>
	<title>You can't have twitter without</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266783780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>twits.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>twits .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>twits.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221272</id>
	<title>Re:Where the sheeple graze</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266785820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah! Stupid sheeple - all follow trends mindlessly like the Apple and Linux fanboys. </p><p>Or the FLOSS sheep! Yeah, I'm gonna work my ass off and GIVE away all my hard labor! Hey, how come no one notices and makes ME rich?!? </p><p>Sheeple, I tell ya.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah !
Stupid sheeple - all follow trends mindlessly like the Apple and Linux fanboys .
Or the FLOSS sheep !
Yeah , I 'm gon na work my ass off and GIVE away all my hard labor !
Hey , how come no one notices and makes ME rich ? ! ?
Sheeple , I tell ya .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah!
Stupid sheeple - all follow trends mindlessly like the Apple and Linux fanboys.
Or the FLOSS sheep!
Yeah, I'm gonna work my ass off and GIVE away all my hard labor!
Hey, how come no one notices and makes ME rich?!?
Sheeple, I tell ya.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221630</id>
	<title>Re:we need to stop coddling stupidity.</title>
	<author>ObsessiveMathsFreak</author>
	<datestamp>1266745080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>We need to let people like that sink or swim.</p></div></blockquote><p>You must remember that when they sink, their bodies sink to the deep to feed the legions of bottom feeders, which in turn grow to monstrous size. Eventually, we get dread 100,000 strong botnet krakens which rise to the surface and drag sites under with all hands lost.</p><p>In light of this, I prefer giving these users swim bands as a preventative measure.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>We need to let people like that sink or swim.You must remember that when they sink , their bodies sink to the deep to feed the legions of bottom feeders , which in turn grow to monstrous size .
Eventually , we get dread 100,000 strong botnet krakens which rise to the surface and drag sites under with all hands lost.In light of this , I prefer giving these users swim bands as a preventative measure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We need to let people like that sink or swim.You must remember that when they sink, their bodies sink to the deep to feed the legions of bottom feeders, which in turn grow to monstrous size.
Eventually, we get dread 100,000 strong botnet krakens which rise to the surface and drag sites under with all hands lost.In light of this, I prefer giving these users swim bands as a preventative measure.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31227054</id>
	<title>LOL</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266832080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i lol'd</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i lol 'd</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i lol'd</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_1855234_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_1855234_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_1855234_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31223804
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221630
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_1855234_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31226488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221630
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_1855234_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221258
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_1855234_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31227004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31224390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31220966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_1855234_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31227240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31223038
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_1855234_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31227932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31226612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31223038
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_1855234_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_1855234_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221542
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_1855234_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31223812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_1855234_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221504
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_1855234_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_1855234_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31222788
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31220966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_1855234_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31220966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_1855234_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31222076
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_1855234_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31222578
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_1855234.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221482
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_1855234.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221866
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_1855234.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221542
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221798
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_1855234.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221084
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221272
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_1855234.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221018
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221512
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31223812
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221572
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221258
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31222578
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221504
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_1855234.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31223038
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31227240
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31226612
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31227932
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_1855234.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221012
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_1855234.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31220966
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31222788
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31224390
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31227004
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221852
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_1855234.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221010
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221888
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221630
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31226488
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31223804
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31222076
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_1855234.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221008
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_1855234.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_1855234.31221534
</commentlist>
</conversation>
