<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_21_075223</id>
	<title>The Surreal World of Chatroulette</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1266757860000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://hughpickens.com/slashdot/" rel="nofollow">Hugh Pickens</a> writes <i>"The New York Times reports that Chatroulette, the social Web site created by a 17-year-old Russian named Andrey Ternovskiy, drops you into an unnerving world where you are <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/21/weekinreview/21bilton.html">connected through webcams to a random, fathomless succession of strangers from across the globe</a>. The site activates your webcam automatically; when you click 'start' you're suddenly staring at another human on your screen and they're staring back at you, at which point you can either choose to chat (via text or voice) or <a href="http://nymag.com/news/media/63663/">just click 'next,' instantly calling up someone else</a>. Entering Chatroulette is akin to speed-dating tens of thousands of perfect strangers &mdash; some clothed, some not. You see them, they see you. You talk to them, they talk to you. 'It's very strange, and not just because you are parachuting into someone else's life (and they yours), a kind of invited crasher,' writes Nick Bilton. 'It is also the eerie thrill of true randomness &mdash; who, or what, will show up next?' The Web has long allowed anonymous conversations among strangers. Text-based chat rooms are rife with deceit &mdash; people pretending they are someone else. Video makes this harder &mdash; even if you're wearing a mask. 'From my experience on the site, echoed by those I've spoken to, it seems as if 90 percent of users are genuinely looking for novel and unexpected conversation,' add Bilton. 'The rest &mdash; well, let's just say they have debauchery in mind.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hugh Pickens writes " The New York Times reports that Chatroulette , the social Web site created by a 17-year-old Russian named Andrey Ternovskiy , drops you into an unnerving world where you are connected through webcams to a random , fathomless succession of strangers from across the globe .
The site activates your webcam automatically ; when you click 'start ' you 're suddenly staring at another human on your screen and they 're staring back at you , at which point you can either choose to chat ( via text or voice ) or just click 'next, ' instantly calling up someone else .
Entering Chatroulette is akin to speed-dating tens of thousands of perfect strangers    some clothed , some not .
You see them , they see you .
You talk to them , they talk to you .
'It 's very strange , and not just because you are parachuting into someone else 's life ( and they yours ) , a kind of invited crasher, ' writes Nick Bilton .
'It is also the eerie thrill of true randomness    who , or what , will show up next ?
' The Web has long allowed anonymous conversations among strangers .
Text-based chat rooms are rife with deceit    people pretending they are someone else .
Video makes this harder    even if you 're wearing a mask .
'From my experience on the site , echoed by those I 've spoken to , it seems as if 90 percent of users are genuinely looking for novel and unexpected conversation, ' add Bilton .
'The rest    well , let 's just say they have debauchery in mind .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hugh Pickens writes "The New York Times reports that Chatroulette, the social Web site created by a 17-year-old Russian named Andrey Ternovskiy, drops you into an unnerving world where you are connected through webcams to a random, fathomless succession of strangers from across the globe.
The site activates your webcam automatically; when you click 'start' you're suddenly staring at another human on your screen and they're staring back at you, at which point you can either choose to chat (via text or voice) or just click 'next,' instantly calling up someone else.
Entering Chatroulette is akin to speed-dating tens of thousands of perfect strangers — some clothed, some not.
You see them, they see you.
You talk to them, they talk to you.
'It's very strange, and not just because you are parachuting into someone else's life (and they yours), a kind of invited crasher,' writes Nick Bilton.
'It is also the eerie thrill of true randomness — who, or what, will show up next?
' The Web has long allowed anonymous conversations among strangers.
Text-based chat rooms are rife with deceit — people pretending they are someone else.
Video makes this harder — even if you're wearing a mask.
'From my experience on the site, echoed by those I've spoken to, it seems as if 90 percent of users are genuinely looking for novel and unexpected conversation,' add Bilton.
'The rest — well, let's just say they have debauchery in mind.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218066</id>
	<title>Re:Experience Chatroulette w/o "exposing" yourself</title>
	<author>TapeCutter</author>
	<datestamp>1266763980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thanks, I was thinking of fixing a snack until I saw that guy holding his gut in the air.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks , I was thinking of fixing a snack until I saw that guy holding his gut in the air .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks, I was thinking of fixing a snack until I saw that guy holding his gut in the air.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31233052</id>
	<title>Re:99\% Debauched</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266867900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, I saw a bunch of funny posts about how interesting and groundbreaking this chatroulette thing was, so I logged on to check it out.</p><p>In less than a minute I had to next through six different dudes jerking off.</p><p>Found a few random people to chat with, and a ton of people with their cameras disabled or just showing a blank area.</p><p>Obviously like everyone else I'd rather talk to a girl, but I'd say after a dozen cocks show up on the screen and the rest of the people asking for tits,<br>most self respecting girls are going to run away from this app.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , I saw a bunch of funny posts about how interesting and groundbreaking this chatroulette thing was , so I logged on to check it out.In less than a minute I had to next through six different dudes jerking off.Found a few random people to chat with , and a ton of people with their cameras disabled or just showing a blank area.Obviously like everyone else I 'd rather talk to a girl , but I 'd say after a dozen cocks show up on the screen and the rest of the people asking for tits,most self respecting girls are going to run away from this app .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, I saw a bunch of funny posts about how interesting and groundbreaking this chatroulette thing was, so I logged on to check it out.In less than a minute I had to next through six different dudes jerking off.Found a few random people to chat with, and a ton of people with their cameras disabled or just showing a blank area.Obviously like everyone else I'd rather talk to a girl, but I'd say after a dozen cocks show up on the screen and the rest of the people asking for tits,most self respecting girls are going to run away from this app.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31219682</id>
	<title>Awesome, this is linked from slashdot</title>
	<author>1155</author>
	<datestamp>1266777240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was already seeing naked guys:naked girls at a ratio of 1000:1 on chatrt.</p><p>Now that slashdot has linked it (multiple times I believe) it's going to increase to 10000000:1. Thanks for ruining yet another decent portion of the internet! First gopher, now chatrt. What's next?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was already seeing naked guys : naked girls at a ratio of 1000 : 1 on chatrt.Now that slashdot has linked it ( multiple times I believe ) it 's going to increase to 10000000 : 1 .
Thanks for ruining yet another decent portion of the internet !
First gopher , now chatrt .
What 's next ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was already seeing naked guys:naked girls at a ratio of 1000:1 on chatrt.Now that slashdot has linked it (multiple times I believe) it's going to increase to 10000000:1.
Thanks for ruining yet another decent portion of the internet!
First gopher, now chatrt.
What's next?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31358280</id>
	<title>Not bad but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267720320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The concept of chatroulette is nice! Getting people together is always nice!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) But i prefer FaceBuzz! It's the same thing except they have a porn filter and other nice features! It's a bit faster also! If you get tired of seeing dicks all the time you should check it out!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P FaceBuzz.com!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The concept of chatroulette is nice !
Getting people together is always nice !
: ) But i prefer FaceBuzz !
It 's the same thing except they have a porn filter and other nice features !
It 's a bit faster also !
If you get tired of seeing dicks all the time you should check it out !
: P FaceBuzz.com !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The concept of chatroulette is nice!
Getting people together is always nice!
:) But i prefer FaceBuzz!
It's the same thing except they have a porn filter and other nice features!
It's a bit faster also!
If you get tired of seeing dicks all the time you should check it out!
:P FaceBuzz.com!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217968</id>
	<title>Is randomness the antidote to group think?</title>
	<author>Z8</author>
	<datestamp>1266763200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As people have pointed out before, this system may have already been co-opted by spammers and such, but I like the idea of being connected to people at random.  The internet was supposed to have broadened everyone's horizons by allowing communication between people of different countries, backgrounds, etc.  But then everyone just found the people who reinforce their pre-existing opinions.  So sure, I'm talking with someone around the world, but we're both, say, talking about linux wifi drivers and complaining about the same company.  It's arguably worse for political thought, where either corporations control mainstream thought, and/or conspiracy theorists only pay attention to the one blog with the same conspiracies.</p><p>People need more opportunities for true randomness, where they actually do sample evenly from the world's population and interact with someone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As people have pointed out before , this system may have already been co-opted by spammers and such , but I like the idea of being connected to people at random .
The internet was supposed to have broadened everyone 's horizons by allowing communication between people of different countries , backgrounds , etc .
But then everyone just found the people who reinforce their pre-existing opinions .
So sure , I 'm talking with someone around the world , but we 're both , say , talking about linux wifi drivers and complaining about the same company .
It 's arguably worse for political thought , where either corporations control mainstream thought , and/or conspiracy theorists only pay attention to the one blog with the same conspiracies.People need more opportunities for true randomness , where they actually do sample evenly from the world 's population and interact with someone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As people have pointed out before, this system may have already been co-opted by spammers and such, but I like the idea of being connected to people at random.
The internet was supposed to have broadened everyone's horizons by allowing communication between people of different countries, backgrounds, etc.
But then everyone just found the people who reinforce their pre-existing opinions.
So sure, I'm talking with someone around the world, but we're both, say, talking about linux wifi drivers and complaining about the same company.
It's arguably worse for political thought, where either corporations control mainstream thought, and/or conspiracy theorists only pay attention to the one blog with the same conspiracies.People need more opportunities for true randomness, where they actually do sample evenly from the world's population and interact with someone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31221834</id>
	<title>wow, flashback!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266746580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This reminds me of the beginning of Logan's Run.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This reminds me of the beginning of Logan 's Run .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This reminds me of the beginning of Logan's Run.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218294</id>
	<title>All I see are young men and cocks being stroked</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266766320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's a lovely idea, but oh my goodness there are so many cocks on display! It's a bit of a silly waste of time<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a lovely idea , but oh my goodness there are so many cocks on display !
It 's a bit of a silly waste of time .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a lovely idea, but oh my goodness there are so many cocks on display!
It's a bit of a silly waste of time ...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218948</id>
	<title>Re:WTF!</title>
	<author>\_Sprocket\_</author>
	<datestamp>1266772800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hate to break it to you but Slashdot is behind the trend on this one.  If this is a big surprise for you, then at least Slashdot posting about it clued YOU in.  It may be old news to your kids.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hate to break it to you but Slashdot is behind the trend on this one .
If this is a big surprise for you , then at least Slashdot posting about it clued YOU in .
It may be old news to your kids .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hate to break it to you but Slashdot is behind the trend on this one.
If this is a big surprise for you, then at least Slashdot posting about it clued YOU in.
It may be old news to your kids.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217878</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218646</id>
	<title>Children?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266769920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What about children getting on this naked?</p><p>Is every person who gets randomly connected to them automatically guilty of possession of child porn?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What about children getting on this naked ? Is every person who gets randomly connected to them automatically guilty of possession of child porn ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about children getting on this naked?Is every person who gets randomly connected to them automatically guilty of possession of child porn?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31229524</id>
	<title>what's with the random quote generator?</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1266855720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>at the bottom of the slashdot page?</p><p>currently it says</p><p><i>One of the large consolations for experiencing anything unpleasant is the knowledge that one can communicate it. -- Joyce Carol Oates</i></p><p>i feel no need for thought. the entire subject matter has been digested and summarized</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>at the bottom of the slashdot page ? currently it saysOne of the large consolations for experiencing anything unpleasant is the knowledge that one can communicate it .
-- Joyce Carol Oatesi feel no need for thought .
the entire subject matter has been digested and summarized</tokentext>
<sentencetext>at the bottom of the slashdot page?currently it saysOne of the large consolations for experiencing anything unpleasant is the knowledge that one can communicate it.
-- Joyce Carol Oatesi feel no need for thought.
the entire subject matter has been digested and summarized</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31220932</id>
	<title>Live music</title>
	<author>simpleguy</author>
	<datestamp>1266783480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Among all the guys who were showing their wang, one of my strangers was from France and playing the accordion live. I brought my 4 month old baby to listen and enjoy and we had some nice conversation after that. That alone compensated for the idiocy of the rest.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Among all the guys who were showing their wang , one of my strangers was from France and playing the accordion live .
I brought my 4 month old baby to listen and enjoy and we had some nice conversation after that .
That alone compensated for the idiocy of the rest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Among all the guys who were showing their wang, one of my strangers was from France and playing the accordion live.
I brought my 4 month old baby to listen and enjoy and we had some nice conversation after that.
That alone compensated for the idiocy of the rest.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218728</id>
	<title>Re:Hum.</title>
	<author>DurendalMac</author>
	<datestamp>1266770760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wouldn't say so. An application like Manycam lets you put anything you want into that video feed. Let's just say that the folks over at 4chan have found Chatroulette to be one of the best kinds of trolling as they can not only rape the eyes of their victims, but actually see the reaction for themselves.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would n't say so .
An application like Manycam lets you put anything you want into that video feed .
Let 's just say that the folks over at 4chan have found Chatroulette to be one of the best kinds of trolling as they can not only rape the eyes of their victims , but actually see the reaction for themselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wouldn't say so.
An application like Manycam lets you put anything you want into that video feed.
Let's just say that the folks over at 4chan have found Chatroulette to be one of the best kinds of trolling as they can not only rape the eyes of their victims, but actually see the reaction for themselves.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217850</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218480</id>
	<title>rerun</title>
	<author>Alrescha</author>
	<datestamp>1266768060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In 2006, this was called "Serendipitous Chat", which also had it's amusing moments.</p><p>A.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In 2006 , this was called " Serendipitous Chat " , which also had it 's amusing moments.A .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In 2006, this was called "Serendipitous Chat", which also had it's amusing moments.A.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218162</id>
	<title>Re:Hum.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266764820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm always curious by people talking about "useless forms of social networking". I mean, what's the supposed purpose of social networking sites? Is there a fixed goal? A constitution? Should we measure a social networking site by how many jobs it fills, or how many dates are had through it?</p><p>As I see it, there are people, and they chat. That's social. That's the essence of humanity.</p><p>How can you get any more, or any less, useful than that?</p><p>In summary: what forms of social networking do you consider "useful", and why?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm always curious by people talking about " useless forms of social networking " .
I mean , what 's the supposed purpose of social networking sites ?
Is there a fixed goal ?
A constitution ?
Should we measure a social networking site by how many jobs it fills , or how many dates are had through it ? As I see it , there are people , and they chat .
That 's social .
That 's the essence of humanity.How can you get any more , or any less , useful than that ? In summary : what forms of social networking do you consider " useful " , and why ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm always curious by people talking about "useless forms of social networking".
I mean, what's the supposed purpose of social networking sites?
Is there a fixed goal?
A constitution?
Should we measure a social networking site by how many jobs it fills, or how many dates are had through it?As I see it, there are people, and they chat.
That's social.
That's the essence of humanity.How can you get any more, or any less, useful than that?In summary: what forms of social networking do you consider "useful", and why?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217850</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217966</id>
	<title>Debauchery</title>
	<author>Alcoholist</author>
	<datestamp>1266763140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Debauchery makes the world go 'round.  Who knew?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Debauchery makes the world go 'round .
Who knew ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Debauchery makes the world go 'round.
Who knew?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31223930</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory:</title>
	<author>dominious</author>
	<datestamp>1266759840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>1. I had a try before and I saw a lot of people wanking in front of the camera...
<br> <br>
2. The site was posted on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. earlier today...
<br> <br>
3. When a site is posted on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. it gets slashdotted, right?
<br> <br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...OMG YOU ARE ALL PERVS!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
I had a try before and I saw a lot of people wanking in front of the camera.. . 2. The site was posted on / .
earlier today.. . 3. When a site is posted on / .
it gets slashdotted , right ?
...OMG YOU ARE ALL PERVS !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
I had a try before and I saw a lot of people wanking in front of the camera...
 
2. The site was posted on /.
earlier today...
 
3. When a site is posted on /.
it gets slashdotted, right?
...OMG YOU ARE ALL PERVS!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218946</id>
	<title>Ah just what I wanted to see first thing Sunday</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266772800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A naked fat Korean man in clown make up masturbating.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A naked fat Korean man in clown make up masturbating .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A naked fat Korean man in clown make up masturbating.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217878</id>
	<title>WTF!</title>
	<author>voodoo cheesecake</author>
	<datestamp>1266762060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The site says you have to be at least 16. As if I don't already have enough problems with my kids.Gee, thanks for giving this site publicity.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The site says you have to be at least 16 .
As if I do n't already have enough problems with my kids.Gee , thanks for giving this site publicity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The site says you have to be at least 16.
As if I don't already have enough problems with my kids.Gee, thanks for giving this site publicity.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218312</id>
	<title>Re:Hum.</title>
	<author>catd77</author>
	<datestamp>1266766500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually stuff like this has been around for years.  Just look at AOL or 4chan<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/b/.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually stuff like this has been around for years .
Just look at AOL or 4chan /b/ .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually stuff like this has been around for years.
Just look at AOL or 4chan /b/.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217850</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217884</id>
	<title>99\% Debauched</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266762120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>... is what I saw. Had a short chat with a guy from Brazil - short because we did not share a language - other than that just a flashing sequence of monkey spanking exh&#237;bitionists.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... is what I saw .
Had a short chat with a guy from Brazil - short because we did not share a language - other than that just a flashing sequence of monkey spanking exh   bitionists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... is what I saw.
Had a short chat with a guy from Brazil - short because we did not share a language - other than that just a flashing sequence of monkey spanking exhíbitionists.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217860</id>
	<title>Cue the spam</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266761940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Hey you! I got cheap Viagra for you! And I don't even have to spell it in funny ways!"</p><p>"Hey sweety, I'm naked. Yes even from my waist down. Can't see it? Come to my website and you can, you can even buy these panties I just took off (swirls panties around finger)"</p><p>And I'm pretty sure the pennystock- and late-president's-ransom spammers might come up with something really cool where you get to see a quick action movie and the last words of someone being shot right in front of you is the stock to buy or someone you PLEASE contact quickly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Hey you !
I got cheap Viagra for you !
And I do n't even have to spell it in funny ways !
" " Hey sweety , I 'm naked .
Yes even from my waist down .
Ca n't see it ?
Come to my website and you can , you can even buy these panties I just took off ( swirls panties around finger ) " And I 'm pretty sure the pennystock- and late-president 's-ransom spammers might come up with something really cool where you get to see a quick action movie and the last words of someone being shot right in front of you is the stock to buy or someone you PLEASE contact quickly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Hey you!
I got cheap Viagra for you!
And I don't even have to spell it in funny ways!
""Hey sweety, I'm naked.
Yes even from my waist down.
Can't see it?
Come to my website and you can, you can even buy these panties I just took off (swirls panties around finger)"And I'm pretty sure the pennystock- and late-president's-ransom spammers might come up with something really cool where you get to see a quick action movie and the last words of someone being shot right in front of you is the stock to buy or someone you PLEASE contact quickly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218256</id>
	<title>Re:Experience Chatroulette w/o "exposing" yourself</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266766080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh, I get it, it's just like TV!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , I get it , it 's just like TV !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, I get it, it's just like TV!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217914</id>
	<title>Re:4Chan Members</title>
	<author>bmo</author>
	<datestamp>1266762480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not the 14 year old with the Nazi flag in the background, the Red Army greatcoat, Red Army officer's hat (with Nazi SS skull), Douglas-McArthur style sunglasses and pipe, but I wish I was.</p><p>--<br>BMO</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not the 14 year old with the Nazi flag in the background , the Red Army greatcoat , Red Army officer 's hat ( with Nazi SS skull ) , Douglas-McArthur style sunglasses and pipe , but I wish I was.--BMO</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not the 14 year old with the Nazi flag in the background, the Red Army greatcoat, Red Army officer's hat (with Nazi SS skull), Douglas-McArthur style sunglasses and pipe, but I wish I was.--BMO</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217874</id>
	<title>I don't know how to say this but ...</title>
	<author>whichpaul</author>
	<datestamp>1266762060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... you've got something stuck between your teeth.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... you 've got something stuck between your teeth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... you've got something stuck between your teeth.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218828</id>
	<title>Around the world</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266771720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoDjJRL3Hnw" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoDjJRL3Hnw</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = UoDjJRL3Hnw [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoDjJRL3Hnw [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217850</id>
	<title>Hum.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266761700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>While this sounds interesting, I believe that somebody has finally found an even more useless form of social networking. A standing ovation for him indeed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>While this sounds interesting , I believe that somebody has finally found an even more useless form of social networking .
A standing ovation for him indeed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While this sounds interesting, I believe that somebody has finally found an even more useless form of social networking.
A standing ovation for him indeed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31220044</id>
	<title>Re:4Chan Members</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266779040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2010/02/18/chan-meets-chatroule.html" title="boingboing.net" rel="nofollow">Way ahead of you.</a> [boingboing.net]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Way ahead of you .
[ boingboing.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Way ahead of you.
[boingboing.net]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218290</id>
	<title>Re:Experience Chatroulette w/o "exposing" yourself</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266766320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Hitler one wins.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Hitler one wins .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Hitler one wins.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31221412</id>
	<title>Re:Hum.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266743580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, right... if I'd send my thoughts to strangers about \_any\_ subject, I'd be an idiot of galactic proportions... that would... I mean... wait a minute... BRB.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , right... if I 'd send my thoughts to strangers about \ _any \ _ subject , I 'd be an idiot of galactic proportions... that would... I mean... wait a minute... BRB .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, right... if I'd send my thoughts to strangers about \_any\_ subject, I'd be an idiot of galactic proportions... that would... I mean... wait a minute... BRB.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217850</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218776</id>
	<title>Re:99\% Debauched</title>
	<author>WillDraven</author>
	<datestamp>1266771300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, they DID just get linked on slashdot...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , they DID just get linked on slashdot.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, they DID just get linked on slashdot...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218556</id>
	<title>Omegle + Video</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1266769020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is that basically it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is that basically it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is that basically it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31219172</id>
	<title>Re:Cue the spam</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1266774480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pff, Goatse will have a field day with that site! Until he finds the love of his life: Tubgirl.<br>4Chan even more so. Only they will hunt for children while wearing pedobear masks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pff , Goatse will have a field day with that site !
Until he finds the love of his life : Tubgirl.4Chan even more so .
Only they will hunt for children while wearing pedobear masks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pff, Goatse will have a field day with that site!
Until he finds the love of his life: Tubgirl.4Chan even more so.
Only they will hunt for children while wearing pedobear masks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31219004</id>
	<title>God-damned French</title>
	<author>hadhad69</author>
	<datestamp>1266773160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON

i get about 50 submissions a day on this thing - and recently at least 10 a day are just RANDOM FUCKING IMAGES - like a picture of a rainbow, a cartoon, a photo of some dude DJingand nearly all of them are from french people. dear french, WHY THE FUCK are you submitting random unrelated images to this blog? it is pretty fucking obvious what it is about, please stop wasting my time.</p></div><p>lol</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON i get about 50 submissions a day on this thing - and recently at least 10 a day are just RANDOM FUCKING IMAGES - like a picture of a rainbow , a cartoon , a photo of some dude DJingand nearly all of them are from french people .
dear french , WHY THE FUCK are you submitting random unrelated images to this blog ?
it is pretty fucking obvious what it is about , please stop wasting my time.lol</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON

i get about 50 submissions a day on this thing - and recently at least 10 a day are just RANDOM FUCKING IMAGES - like a picture of a rainbow, a cartoon, a photo of some dude DJingand nearly all of them are from french people.
dear french, WHY THE FUCK are you submitting random unrelated images to this blog?
it is pretty fucking obvious what it is about, please stop wasting my time.lol
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31219050</id>
	<title>90\%? No way</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266773580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I read an article about chatroulette and decided to try it out for myself.<br>I'd say 75\% of people were not interested in conversation of any kind. And maybe 10\% were interested in trying to shock you in some way.<br>The system is open for scamming from people who will beam your webcams output back at you, or pics of goatse.cx or shock pages from encyclopedia dramatica. It might have been a fun conversing tool when there was less than 5000 people on it. But once the crowd from 4chan heard of it, it's too polluted to be fun. (Think Usenet before and after AOL came online)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I read an article about chatroulette and decided to try it out for myself.I 'd say 75 \ % of people were not interested in conversation of any kind .
And maybe 10 \ % were interested in trying to shock you in some way.The system is open for scamming from people who will beam your webcams output back at you , or pics of goatse.cx or shock pages from encyclopedia dramatica .
It might have been a fun conversing tool when there was less than 5000 people on it .
But once the crowd from 4chan heard of it , it 's too polluted to be fun .
( Think Usenet before and after AOL came online )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read an article about chatroulette and decided to try it out for myself.I'd say 75\% of people were not interested in conversation of any kind.
And maybe 10\% were interested in trying to shock you in some way.The system is open for scamming from people who will beam your webcams output back at you, or pics of goatse.cx or shock pages from encyclopedia dramatica.
It might have been a fun conversing tool when there was less than 5000 people on it.
But once the crowd from 4chan heard of it, it's too polluted to be fun.
(Think Usenet before and after AOL came online)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218060</id>
	<title>Re:WTF!</title>
	<author>voodoo cheesecake</author>
	<datestamp>1266763980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah my kids read slashdot, and they use fedora too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah my kids read slashdot , and they use fedora too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah my kids read slashdot, and they use fedora too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217936</id>
	<title>Re:4Chan Members</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266762780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Least it's a bit more innocent than the latest 4chan creation: www.fapmastery.com<br>At least chatroulette seems to have honest intentions to start with!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Least it 's a bit more innocent than the latest 4chan creation : www.fapmastery.comAt least chatroulette seems to have honest intentions to start with !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Least it's a bit more innocent than the latest 4chan creation: www.fapmastery.comAt least chatroulette seems to have honest intentions to start with!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31221430</id>
	<title>Not so anonymous</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266743760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>CR is using Red5 with Flash P2P between the connected clients. The "anonymous' masturbators' IP addresses are shared with the viewing side. I tracked three "conversations" and geolocated their IP for proof-of-concept. Credit to the 17-yo for getting this out, but that's a pretty big fail for an "anonymous" chat site.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>CR is using Red5 with Flash P2P between the connected clients .
The " anonymous ' masturbators ' IP addresses are shared with the viewing side .
I tracked three " conversations " and geolocated their IP for proof-of-concept .
Credit to the 17-yo for getting this out , but that 's a pretty big fail for an " anonymous " chat site .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>CR is using Red5 with Flash P2P between the connected clients.
The "anonymous' masturbators' IP addresses are shared with the viewing side.
I tracked three "conversations" and geolocated their IP for proof-of-concept.
Credit to the 17-yo for getting this out, but that's a pretty big fail for an "anonymous" chat site.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217994</id>
	<title>Re:WTF!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266763380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And this makes a difference, how? Btw. your kids are reading Slashdot?</htmltext>
<tokenext>And this makes a difference , how ?
Btw. your kids are reading Slashdot ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And this makes a difference, how?
Btw. your kids are reading Slashdot?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217878</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217872</id>
	<title>4Chan Members</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266762060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can't wait to see what the pranksters at 4chan are planning.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't wait to see what the pranksters at 4chan are planning .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't wait to see what the pranksters at 4chan are planning.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31220722</id>
	<title>Reputation?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266782280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I cannot help but think that a site like this could *REALLY* use a good reputation system.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can not help but think that a site like this could * REALLY * use a good reputation system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I cannot help but think that a site like this could *REALLY* use a good reputation system.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31232166</id>
	<title>Re:Experience Chatroulette w/o "exposing" yourself</title>
	<author>jimnorcal</author>
	<datestamp>1266864900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Scrolling down that page caused me to laugh into tears. What the hell is wrong with people!?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Scrolling down that page caused me to laugh into tears .
What the hell is wrong with people !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Scrolling down that page caused me to laugh into tears.
What the hell is wrong with people!
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218356</id>
	<title>Not spam</title>
	<author>schon</author>
	<datestamp>1266766860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As much as I hate spam, that's not spam.  As the "marketer" can only talk to one person at a time, there is no "bulk", so no spam.</p><p>If someone hacked it so that they could answer hundreds (or thousands) of connections simultaneously (maybe with a recorded message), then it would be spam.</p><p>OK, I just gave spammers an idea.  I'm going to hell.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As much as I hate spam , that 's not spam .
As the " marketer " can only talk to one person at a time , there is no " bulk " , so no spam.If someone hacked it so that they could answer hundreds ( or thousands ) of connections simultaneously ( maybe with a recorded message ) , then it would be spam.OK , I just gave spammers an idea .
I 'm going to hell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As much as I hate spam, that's not spam.
As the "marketer" can only talk to one person at a time, there is no "bulk", so no spam.If someone hacked it so that they could answer hundreds (or thousands) of connections simultaneously (maybe with a recorded message), then it would be spam.OK, I just gave spammers an idea.
I'm going to hell.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31226952</id>
	<title>Idea:</title>
	<author>dushkin</author>
	<datestamp>1266830460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Naked Chatroulette, where people troll others by appearing clothed on camera.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Naked Chatroulette , where people troll others by appearing clothed on camera .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Naked Chatroulette, where people troll others by appearing clothed on camera.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218056</id>
	<title>"You see them, they see you."</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1266763980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Only if you have a camera and it is turned on and pointed at you.  It would be trivial to arrange for them to see whatever you want them to see.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Only if you have a camera and it is turned on and pointed at you .
It would be trivial to arrange for them to see whatever you want them to see .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only if you have a camera and it is turned on and pointed at you.
It would be trivial to arrange for them to see whatever you want them to see.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31222084</id>
	<title>If you want to experience freaks</title>
	<author>Snaller</author>
	<datestamp>1266748320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just visit the world of warcraft forums - thankfully you can't see what they look like!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just visit the world of warcraft forums - thankfully you ca n't see what they look like !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just visit the world of warcraft forums - thankfully you can't see what they look like!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31219720</id>
	<title>Sounds like fun...</title>
	<author>KingTank</author>
	<datestamp>1266777360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...until you realize you'll spend most of your time talking to nude men and people who want to sell you something.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...until you realize you 'll spend most of your time talking to nude men and people who want to sell you something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...until you realize you'll spend most of your time talking to nude men and people who want to sell you something.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218098</id>
	<title>A mixed bag...</title>
	<author>Fuzi719</author>
	<datestamp>1266764280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Of course I've seen the bizarre and depraved on Chatroulette, but I've also met and chatted with a couple of people that have turned out to be very nice guys.  We've added each other to our Live Messenger friends and now chat on a daily basis, sharing pictures of our hometowns (Lisbon, Istanbul, Atlanta) and learning about each other's cultures and daily lives.  What a great way to spend a few minutes each day.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course I 've seen the bizarre and depraved on Chatroulette , but I 've also met and chatted with a couple of people that have turned out to be very nice guys .
We 've added each other to our Live Messenger friends and now chat on a daily basis , sharing pictures of our hometowns ( Lisbon , Istanbul , Atlanta ) and learning about each other 's cultures and daily lives .
What a great way to spend a few minutes each day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course I've seen the bizarre and depraved on Chatroulette, but I've also met and chatted with a couple of people that have turned out to be very nice guys.
We've added each other to our Live Messenger friends and now chat on a daily basis, sharing pictures of our hometowns (Lisbon, Istanbul, Atlanta) and learning about each other's cultures and daily lives.
What a great way to spend a few minutes each day.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217924</id>
	<title>Absolute Nonsense</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1266762600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> Text-based chat rooms are rife with deceit &mdash; people pretending they are someone else. Video makes this harder &mdash; even if you're wearing a mask</p></div><p>
You can lie just as effectively in video chat and in text chat about everything except your appearance.  All this quote tells us is that the person who wrote it considers physical appearance to be the most important attribute.  I think this says a lot more about the writer than the text chats.  The person on the end of a video chat can still be lying about their occupation, hobbies, age, even location.  If they're wearing a mask, as he suggests, they can be lying about just about anything except their weight (and possibly even that if it's a close-up).  </p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Text-based chat rooms are rife with deceit    people pretending they are someone else .
Video makes this harder    even if you 're wearing a mask You can lie just as effectively in video chat and in text chat about everything except your appearance .
All this quote tells us is that the person who wrote it considers physical appearance to be the most important attribute .
I think this says a lot more about the writer than the text chats .
The person on the end of a video chat can still be lying about their occupation , hobbies , age , even location .
If they 're wearing a mask , as he suggests , they can be lying about just about anything except their weight ( and possibly even that if it 's a close-up ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Text-based chat rooms are rife with deceit — people pretending they are someone else.
Video makes this harder — even if you're wearing a mask
You can lie just as effectively in video chat and in text chat about everything except your appearance.
All this quote tells us is that the person who wrote it considers physical appearance to be the most important attribute.
I think this says a lot more about the writer than the text chats.
The person on the end of a video chat can still be lying about their occupation, hobbies, age, even location.
If they're wearing a mask, as he suggests, they can be lying about just about anything except their weight (and possibly even that if it's a close-up).  
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217900</id>
	<title>Experience Chatroulette w/o "exposing" yourself!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266762420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you want to get a feeling of Chatroulette without "exposing" yourself (or getting exposed to some pretty shocking imagery) you might want to check out this blog:</p><p><a href="http://chatroulette.tumblr.com/" title="tumblr.com">http://chatroulette.tumblr.com/</a> [tumblr.com]</p><p>He's been collecting dozens (hundreds) of screencaptures that people have been e-mailing him.  While you'll still see some disturbing things at least you'll know this isn't happening to YOU, LIVE and hopefully the lack of immediacy will dull the shock a bit.  If you can take that, then by all means take the plunge!</p><p>(I'm too chicken and have not).  By the way, I got this link from TechCrunch, so just wanted to give them credit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you want to get a feeling of Chatroulette without " exposing " yourself ( or getting exposed to some pretty shocking imagery ) you might want to check out this blog : http : //chatroulette.tumblr.com/ [ tumblr.com ] He 's been collecting dozens ( hundreds ) of screencaptures that people have been e-mailing him .
While you 'll still see some disturbing things at least you 'll know this is n't happening to YOU , LIVE and hopefully the lack of immediacy will dull the shock a bit .
If you can take that , then by all means take the plunge !
( I 'm too chicken and have not ) .
By the way , I got this link from TechCrunch , so just wanted to give them credit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you want to get a feeling of Chatroulette without "exposing" yourself (or getting exposed to some pretty shocking imagery) you might want to check out this blog:http://chatroulette.tumblr.com/ [tumblr.com]He's been collecting dozens (hundreds) of screencaptures that people have been e-mailing him.
While you'll still see some disturbing things at least you'll know this isn't happening to YOU, LIVE and hopefully the lack of immediacy will dull the shock a bit.
If you can take that, then by all means take the plunge!
(I'm too chicken and have not).
By the way, I got this link from TechCrunch, so just wanted to give them credit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31224910</id>
	<title>Re:Absolute Nonsense</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266766860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm pretty sure the point was that with video, 35 year old men aren't going to get anyone to believe they are hot teen girls.  I get where you went with it, but wtf were you talking about?  Why do you nerds feel the need to show off your "superiority" on every goddam topic?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty sure the point was that with video , 35 year old men are n't going to get anyone to believe they are hot teen girls .
I get where you went with it , but wtf were you talking about ?
Why do you nerds feel the need to show off your " superiority " on every goddam topic ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty sure the point was that with video, 35 year old men aren't going to get anyone to believe they are hot teen girls.
I get where you went with it, but wtf were you talking about?
Why do you nerds feel the need to show off your "superiority" on every goddam topic?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217924</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31220850</id>
	<title>Tried it, wasn't too disappointing</title>
	<author>NiteMair</author>
	<datestamp>1266783000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I tried it... after seeing a lot of naked "boy" chests (clearly a lot of high school or college kids showing off their "six pack") it finally stopped on a guy that looked reasonable to chat with.</p><p>Chatted with him for about 10-15 mins, just exchanging some random questions and info. Wasn't too bad, except he was from China and his english wasn't so great<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>Overall, definitely has potential for some random social interaction if you have nothing better to do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I tried it... after seeing a lot of naked " boy " chests ( clearly a lot of high school or college kids showing off their " six pack " ) it finally stopped on a guy that looked reasonable to chat with.Chatted with him for about 10-15 mins , just exchanging some random questions and info .
Was n't too bad , except he was from China and his english was n't so great : ) Overall , definitely has potential for some random social interaction if you have nothing better to do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I tried it... after seeing a lot of naked "boy" chests (clearly a lot of high school or college kids showing off their "six pack") it finally stopped on a guy that looked reasonable to chat with.Chatted with him for about 10-15 mins, just exchanging some random questions and info.
Wasn't too bad, except he was from China and his english wasn't so great :)Overall, definitely has potential for some random social interaction if you have nothing better to do.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31222582</id>
	<title>Re:Awesome, this is linked from slashdot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266750960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually the ratio is more like 50:1.  The trick is that most of the girls don't start naked but they want to be.  They just need to make sure you are not a total creepster first.  Watch out though because most of them are like 16 years old.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually the ratio is more like 50 : 1 .
The trick is that most of the girls do n't start naked but they want to be .
They just need to make sure you are not a total creepster first .
Watch out though because most of them are like 16 years old .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually the ratio is more like 50:1.
The trick is that most of the girls don't start naked but they want to be.
They just need to make sure you are not a total creepster first.
Watch out though because most of them are like 16 years old.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31219682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31228136</id>
	<title>Re:Absolute Nonsense</title>
	<author>Pikkebaas</author>
	<datestamp>1266845760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Gender/age is a part of physical appearace? Wow.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Gender/age is a part of physical appearace ?
Wow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gender/age is a part of physical appearace?
Wow.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217924</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218142</id>
	<title>NY Times?</title>
	<author>Kanel</author>
	<datestamp>1266764700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Something has changed in the world, if our source for the latest internet phenomenas is the New York Times. It's as if I've become my parents, learning of hackers via a botched newspaper report or this here "Internet Chat" thingy from watching Ally McBeal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Something has changed in the world , if our source for the latest internet phenomenas is the New York Times .
It 's as if I 've become my parents , learning of hackers via a botched newspaper report or this here " Internet Chat " thingy from watching Ally McBeal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Something has changed in the world, if our source for the latest internet phenomenas is the New York Times.
It's as if I've become my parents, learning of hackers via a botched newspaper report or this here "Internet Chat" thingy from watching Ally McBeal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31228600</id>
	<title>netmeeting</title>
	<author>access.name</author>
	<datestamp>1266849660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, chat with random strangers using webcams? I was doing this using <b>netmeeting</b> around year 2000 or before, if I remember correctly.  Also, joining any irc server and then adding random strangers to a throwaway msn messenger account allowed the exact same. Isn't this doable since webcams were invented? What is the novelty here? The simple interface?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , chat with random strangers using webcams ?
I was doing this using netmeeting around year 2000 or before , if I remember correctly .
Also , joining any irc server and then adding random strangers to a throwaway msn messenger account allowed the exact same .
Is n't this doable since webcams were invented ?
What is the novelty here ?
The simple interface ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, chat with random strangers using webcams?
I was doing this using netmeeting around year 2000 or before, if I remember correctly.
Also, joining any irc server and then adding random strangers to a throwaway msn messenger account allowed the exact same.
Isn't this doable since webcams were invented?
What is the novelty here?
The simple interface?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218156</id>
	<title>yeah thanks for that</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266764760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First image was of some dudes unit, and that will be the end of that service for me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First image was of some dudes unit , and that will be the end of that service for me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First image was of some dudes unit, and that will be the end of that service for me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217892</id>
	<title>Seems more of an Interesting idea than the usual</title>
	<author>HNS-I</author>
	<datestamp>1266762300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Of course this opens up a can of worms though. Advertisements, flashers and such.
Atleast this should have some categorisation like: random, comedy normal talk, different age and sex groups etc.
The rating system is pretty straightforwars, people that keep getting clicked away in a certain category just don't get presented to people in that category.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course this opens up a can of worms though .
Advertisements , flashers and such .
Atleast this should have some categorisation like : random , comedy normal talk , different age and sex groups etc .
The rating system is pretty straightforwars , people that keep getting clicked away in a certain category just do n't get presented to people in that category .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course this opens up a can of worms though.
Advertisements, flashers and such.
Atleast this should have some categorisation like: random, comedy normal talk, different age and sex groups etc.
The rating system is pretty straightforwars, people that keep getting clicked away in a certain category just don't get presented to people in that category.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217868</id>
	<title>Obligatory:</title>
	<author>bmo</author>
	<datestamp>1266762000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>'The rest  well, let's just say they have debauchery in mind.'</i></p><p>"I put on my robe and wizard hat"</p><p>--<br>BMO</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>'The rest well , let 's just say they have debauchery in mind .
' " I put on my robe and wizard hat " --BMO</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'The rest  well, let's just say they have debauchery in mind.
'"I put on my robe and wizard hat"--BMO</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31223786</id>
	<title>Re:Hum.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266758580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's entirely anon. Hence no networking. It's just social.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's entirely anon .
Hence no networking .
It 's just social .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's entirely anon.
Hence no networking.
It's just social.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217850</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217858</id>
	<title>too late</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266761880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This has already been attacked by SomethingAwful and 4chan.  Fear the goatse.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This has already been attacked by SomethingAwful and 4chan .
Fear the goatse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This has already been attacked by SomethingAwful and 4chan.
Fear the goatse.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218118</id>
	<title>Is this really that revolutionary?</title>
	<author>allknowingfrog</author>
	<datestamp>1266764400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is anyone really surprised someone finally offers this service? It's basically omegle with webcams. It's not a real stretch to go from anonymous chatroom to random chatroom to random webchat.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is anyone really surprised someone finally offers this service ?
It 's basically omegle with webcams .
It 's not a real stretch to go from anonymous chatroom to random chatroom to random webchat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is anyone really surprised someone finally offers this service?
It's basically omegle with webcams.
It's not a real stretch to go from anonymous chatroom to random chatroom to random webchat.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218086</id>
	<title>Re:Absolute Nonsense</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1266764160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; You can lie just as effectively in video chat and in text chat about<br>&gt; everything except your appearance.</p><p>Of course you can lie about your appearance.  You can send out whatever video you think might be amusing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; You can lie just as effectively in video chat and in text chat about &gt; everything except your appearance.Of course you can lie about your appearance .
You can send out whatever video you think might be amusing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; You can lie just as effectively in video chat and in text chat about&gt; everything except your appearance.Of course you can lie about your appearance.
You can send out whatever video you think might be amusing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217924</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31221692</id>
	<title>Re:Is randomness the antidote to group think?</title>
	<author>Tromad</author>
	<datestamp>1266745500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is there even a social networking site ala<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/., reddit, or digg for political centrism (or not even centrism, but "open")?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. is probably the most moderate (libertarians mixed with socialists, each a little crazy), but it seems like I either have to choose hard right or hard left and I'm ready to just say screw it altogether because I'm tired of the propaganda.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is there even a social networking site ala /. , reddit , or digg for political centrism ( or not even centrism , but " open " ) ?
/. is probably the most moderate ( libertarians mixed with socialists , each a little crazy ) , but it seems like I either have to choose hard right or hard left and I 'm ready to just say screw it altogether because I 'm tired of the propaganda .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is there even a social networking site ala /., reddit, or digg for political centrism (or not even centrism, but "open")?
/. is probably the most moderate (libertarians mixed with socialists, each a little crazy), but it seems like I either have to choose hard right or hard left and I'm ready to just say screw it altogether because I'm tired of the propaganda.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217968</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_075223_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31219172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217860
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_075223_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_075223_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218256
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217900
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_075223_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31222582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31219682
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_075223_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217850
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_075223_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31221692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_075223_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217878
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_075223_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31228136
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217924
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_075223_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31221412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217850
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_075223_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31232166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217900
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_075223_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218086
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217924
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_075223_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218646
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217860
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_075223_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_075223_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217900
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_075223_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218948
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217878
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_075223_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31233052
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_075223_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31223786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217850
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_075223_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31223930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217868
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_075223_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217860
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_075223_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217850
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_075223_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217850
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_075223_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217900
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_075223_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31224910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217924
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_075223_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31219004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217900
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_075223_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_075223_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31220044
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_075223.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217968
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31221692
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_075223.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217884
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31233052
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218776
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_075223.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217900
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31232166
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218066
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218290
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218256
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31219004
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_075223.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31220932
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_075223.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217872
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217936
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31220044
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217914
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_075223.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31219050
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_075223.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218294
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_075223.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217860
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31219172
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218356
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218646
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_075223.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218118
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_075223.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217924
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31224910
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218086
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31228136
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_075223.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217850
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31221412
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218312
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218162
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31223786
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218728
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_075223.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31219682
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31222582
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_075223.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217858
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_075223.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31219720
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_075223.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217878
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218948
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217994
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218060
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_075223.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31221834
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_075223.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217892
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_075223.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218156
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_075223.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31218142
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_075223.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31217868
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_075223.31223930
</commentlist>
</conversation>
