<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_21_0620233</id>
	<title>Atlas V's Sonic Boom Made Visible By Sundog</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1266746880000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Ross-Shire Geek writes <i>"Atlas V lifted off on Feb 11 from Kennedy. As it goes supersonic through a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sundog">sundog (aka parhelion</a>) you can see (video link) wonderful <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SsDEfu8s1Lw&amp;feature=player\_embedded#">visible ripples of the shock wave in the sky</a>."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ross-Shire Geek writes " Atlas V lifted off on Feb 11 from Kennedy .
As it goes supersonic through a sundog ( aka parhelion ) you can see ( video link ) wonderful visible ripples of the shock wave in the sky .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ross-Shire Geek writes "Atlas V lifted off on Feb 11 from Kennedy.
As it goes supersonic through a sundog (aka parhelion) you can see (video link) wonderful visible ripples of the shock wave in the sky.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217400</id>
	<title>Re:Wow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266752880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You don't have much self confidence, huh?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't have much self confidence , huh ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't have much self confidence, huh?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217908</id>
	<title>Awesome</title>
	<author>Uranium-238</author>
	<datestamp>1266762420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Holy fuck Batman, that was awesome!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Holy fuck Batman , that was awesome !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Holy fuck Batman, that was awesome!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217578</id>
	<title>Not surprising really</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266757200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am with Linus on this one<br>Linus is right<br>The man makes sense<br>He is absolutely correct on this one</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am with Linus on this oneLinus is rightThe man makes senseHe is absolutely correct on this one</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am with Linus on this oneLinus is rightThe man makes senseHe is absolutely correct on this one</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31219086</id>
	<title>Re:Just "waves?" Motorized cam; music choice</title>
	<author>Yosho-sama</author>
	<datestamp>1266773940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>3. That wasn't the imperial march. That was the song they played at the end of A New Hope after the Death Star was destroyed during the award ceremony.</htmltext>
<tokenext>3 .
That was n't the imperial march .
That was the song they played at the end of A New Hope after the Death Star was destroyed during the award ceremony .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>3.
That wasn't the imperial march.
That was the song they played at the end of A New Hope after the Death Star was destroyed during the award ceremony.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31218332</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217982</id>
	<title>This could be even more cool...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266763260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...if a ball-lightning did a Hadouken to the rocket afterwards.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...if a ball-lightning did a Hadouken to the rocket afterwards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...if a ball-lightning did a Hadouken to the rocket afterwards.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217310</id>
	<title>sundog millionaire</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266750660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>first post</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>first post</tokentext>
<sentencetext>first post</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217490</id>
	<title>Re:In 3D</title>
	<author>Swampash</author>
	<datestamp>1266755220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>a spherical wave</i></p><p>Only if the rocket is stationary.</p><p>(hint - it's not)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>a spherical waveOnly if the rocket is stationary .
( hint - it 's not )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a spherical waveOnly if the rocket is stationary.
(hint - it's not)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217406</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217688</id>
	<title>moD down</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266759480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>not going home prospects afre</htmltext>
<tokenext>not going home prospects afre</tokentext>
<sentencetext>not going home prospects afre</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217406</id>
	<title>In 3D</title>
	<author>ivoras</author>
	<datestamp>1266753060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>More impressively - the sonic boom "waves" effect is actually a three-D object - imagine if we could see it from multiple POVs, a spherical wave instead of 2D one<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>More impressively - the sonic boom " waves " effect is actually a three-D object - imagine if we could see it from multiple POVs , a spherical wave instead of 2D one : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More impressively - the sonic boom "waves" effect is actually a three-D object - imagine if we could see it from multiple POVs, a spherical wave instead of 2D one :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31218368</id>
	<title>1:54</title>
	<author>maillemaker</author>
	<datestamp>1266766920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1:54 is really the sole reason we explore space.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 : 54 is really the sole reason we explore space .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1:54 is really the sole reason we explore space.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217332</id>
	<title>Lucky miss</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266751320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought that bird was going to get skewered a few seconds into the launch...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought that bird was going to get skewered a few seconds into the launch.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought that bird was going to get skewered a few seconds into the launch...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31218506</id>
	<title>Couldn't see that from my vantage point</title>
	<author>sdo1</author>
	<datestamp>1266768360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I drove over to the <a href="http://www.nps.gov/CANA/index.htm" title="nps.gov">Canaveral National Seashore</a> [nps.gov] for this launch.  The position of the sun made it very hazy from where I was. <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/sdowen/4348876993/in/set-72157623378142932/" title="flickr.com">This shot</a> [flickr.com] is geotagged if you're so inclined to see exactly where it was taken.  I didn't see that sonic boom wave and no one I was with made any mention of it either.  That's really spectacular.<br> <br>

FWIW, I really love <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/springlake/4349236145/in/set-72157623284912813/" title="flickr.com">this photo</a> [flickr.com] of the launch which was taken by a guy in the same spot where I was.  It captures the Atlas V flying past the sun which I thought was perfect given the nature of this mission.<br> <br>

-S</htmltext>
<tokenext>I drove over to the Canaveral National Seashore [ nps.gov ] for this launch .
The position of the sun made it very hazy from where I was .
This shot [ flickr.com ] is geotagged if you 're so inclined to see exactly where it was taken .
I did n't see that sonic boom wave and no one I was with made any mention of it either .
That 's really spectacular .
FWIW , I really love this photo [ flickr.com ] of the launch which was taken by a guy in the same spot where I was .
It captures the Atlas V flying past the sun which I thought was perfect given the nature of this mission .
-S</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I drove over to the Canaveral National Seashore [nps.gov] for this launch.
The position of the sun made it very hazy from where I was.
This shot [flickr.com] is geotagged if you're so inclined to see exactly where it was taken.
I didn't see that sonic boom wave and no one I was with made any mention of it either.
That's really spectacular.
FWIW, I really love this photo [flickr.com] of the launch which was taken by a guy in the same spot where I was.
It captures the Atlas V flying past the sun which I thought was perfect given the nature of this mission.
-S</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31218464</id>
	<title>Re:Just "waves?" Motorized cam; music choice</title>
	<author>jhesse</author>
	<datestamp>1266767940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That sounded like the music from the awards ceremony at the end, I thought.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That sounded like the music from the awards ceremony at the end , I thought .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That sounded like the music from the awards ceremony at the end, I thought.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31218332</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31220944</id>
	<title>Sonic boom or not?  Math</title>
	<author>goodmanj</author>
	<datestamp>1266783600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some debate here as to whether what we're seeing is a sonic boom, or just loud low-frequency sound waves.  Let's do the math...</p><p>Basic question: is the rocket going at Mach 1 or greater when the phenomenon happens?</p><p>In the video, the launch happens at 0:38, and the ripples are seen at 1:53, 75 seconds later.</p><p>Here's a <a href="http://spacecraft.ssl.umd.edu/design\_lib/Atlas5.pl.guide.pdf" title="umd.edu">handy document</a> [umd.edu] showing the launch profile of an Atlas V.  It doesn't show velocity vs time, but on page 19 there's an acceleration vs time graph for the Atlas V 401, the <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/mission\_pages/sdo/launch/index.html" title="nasa.gov">specific vehicle</a> [nasa.gov] used in this launch.  It shows the average thrust during the first 75 seconds is 1.4 +/-<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.05 g's (uncertain because I can't read the graph that accurately.)</p><p>Subtract out 1 g for gravity pulling the rocket down, to get a vehicle acceleration of 0.4 +/- 0.05 g, which over 75 seconds will lead to a final velocity of 294 +/- 36 m/s.</p><p>The speed of sound is 330 m/s.  So at the time we see the ripples, the rocket is riiiiight about at the speed of sound, maybe a little over, maybe a little under, impossible to tell.</p><p>This transition to supersonic flow is often chaotic and irregular, which would explain the intense but complicated ripples seen.  If the rocket was going at mach 2 or 3, we'd see a perfectly shaped set of concentric rings; if it was going at far less than mach 1, we'd see nothing at all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some debate here as to whether what we 're seeing is a sonic boom , or just loud low-frequency sound waves .
Let 's do the math...Basic question : is the rocket going at Mach 1 or greater when the phenomenon happens ? In the video , the launch happens at 0 : 38 , and the ripples are seen at 1 : 53 , 75 seconds later.Here 's a handy document [ umd.edu ] showing the launch profile of an Atlas V. It does n't show velocity vs time , but on page 19 there 's an acceleration vs time graph for the Atlas V 401 , the specific vehicle [ nasa.gov ] used in this launch .
It shows the average thrust during the first 75 seconds is 1.4 + /- .05 g 's ( uncertain because I ca n't read the graph that accurately .
) Subtract out 1 g for gravity pulling the rocket down , to get a vehicle acceleration of 0.4 + /- 0.05 g , which over 75 seconds will lead to a final velocity of 294 + /- 36 m/s.The speed of sound is 330 m/s .
So at the time we see the ripples , the rocket is riiiiight about at the speed of sound , maybe a little over , maybe a little under , impossible to tell.This transition to supersonic flow is often chaotic and irregular , which would explain the intense but complicated ripples seen .
If the rocket was going at mach 2 or 3 , we 'd see a perfectly shaped set of concentric rings ; if it was going at far less than mach 1 , we 'd see nothing at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some debate here as to whether what we're seeing is a sonic boom, or just loud low-frequency sound waves.
Let's do the math...Basic question: is the rocket going at Mach 1 or greater when the phenomenon happens?In the video, the launch happens at 0:38, and the ripples are seen at 1:53, 75 seconds later.Here's a handy document [umd.edu] showing the launch profile of an Atlas V.  It doesn't show velocity vs time, but on page 19 there's an acceleration vs time graph for the Atlas V 401, the specific vehicle [nasa.gov] used in this launch.
It shows the average thrust during the first 75 seconds is 1.4 +/- .05 g's (uncertain because I can't read the graph that accurately.
)Subtract out 1 g for gravity pulling the rocket down, to get a vehicle acceleration of 0.4 +/- 0.05 g, which over 75 seconds will lead to a final velocity of 294 +/- 36 m/s.The speed of sound is 330 m/s.
So at the time we see the ripples, the rocket is riiiiight about at the speed of sound, maybe a little over, maybe a little under, impossible to tell.This transition to supersonic flow is often chaotic and irregular, which would explain the intense but complicated ripples seen.
If the rocket was going at mach 2 or 3, we'd see a perfectly shaped set of concentric rings; if it was going at far less than mach 1, we'd see nothing at all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31218366</id>
	<title>Re:Parhelion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266766920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>sundog sounds too much like a food...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>sundog sounds too much like a food.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sundog sounds too much like a food...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217518</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217922</id>
	<title>That's not a Sun Dog...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266762600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>What the Saturn V encountered was an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iridescent\_cloud" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Iridescent Cloud</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>What the Saturn V encountered was an Iridescent Cloud [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What the Saturn V encountered was an Iridescent Cloud [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217442</id>
	<title>How incredibly appropriate.</title>
	<author>Jane Q. Public</author>
	<datestamp>1266753960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Very appropriate, it seems to me, that a rocket carrying the Solar Dynamics Observatory should make pretty with a sundog.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Very appropriate , it seems to me , that a rocket carrying the Solar Dynamics Observatory should make pretty with a sundog .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Very appropriate, it seems to me, that a rocket carrying the Solar Dynamics Observatory should make pretty with a sundog.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217582</id>
	<title>Re:Wow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266757320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's nothing compared to the inconvenience of this. <a href="http://bit.ly/dkpAoI" title="bit.ly" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/dkpAoI</a> [bit.ly]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's nothing compared to the inconvenience of this .
http : //bit.ly/dkpAoI [ bit.ly ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's nothing compared to the inconvenience of this.
http://bit.ly/dkpAoI [bit.ly]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217670</id>
	<title>Re:Parhelion</title>
	<author>ZERO1ZERO</author>
	<datestamp>1266759180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Isn't that a type of Matrox Video Card?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't that a type of Matrox Video Card ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't that a type of Matrox Video Card?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217518</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31218500</id>
	<title>Second POV</title>
	<author>oneiros27</author>
	<datestamp>1266768300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Closer to the pad, and less shaky:</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9S0z1ofcIc" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9S0z1ofcIc</a> [youtube.com]</p><p>(it has the voiceover from NASA TV, but doesn't have the launch clock visible<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... it might've been a camera angle that they didn't use live, as I don't remember seeing this on TV)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Closer to the pad , and less shaky : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = q9S0z1ofcIc [ youtube.com ] ( it has the voiceover from NASA TV , but does n't have the launch clock visible ... it might 've been a camera angle that they did n't use live , as I do n't remember seeing this on TV )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Closer to the pad, and less shaky:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9S0z1ofcIc [youtube.com](it has the voiceover from NASA TV, but doesn't have the launch clock visible ... it might've been a camera angle that they didn't use live, as I don't remember seeing this on TV)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217406</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31218064</id>
	<title>new waves below the rocket</title>
	<author>multi io</author>
	<datestamp>1266763980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>At 2:00 it looks like there are new wavefronts being generated far below the craft. Reflections from the ground? Can't think of any really good explanation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>At 2 : 00 it looks like there are new wavefronts being generated far below the craft .
Reflections from the ground ?
Ca n't think of any really good explanation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At 2:00 it looks like there are new wavefronts being generated far below the craft.
Reflections from the ground?
Can't think of any really good explanation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31241716</id>
	<title>Re:Sonic boom or not? Math</title>
	<author>mano.m</author>
	<datestamp>1266956880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>PS. Really impressed at how deeply you looked into this. Respect.</htmltext>
<tokenext>PS .
Really impressed at how deeply you looked into this .
Respect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>PS.
Really impressed at how deeply you looked into this.
Respect.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31220944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217374</id>
	<title>Well dag nabbit!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266752400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm surprised Obama didn't have it shot down!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm surprised Obama did n't have it shot down !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm surprised Obama didn't have it shot down!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217518</id>
	<title>Parhelion</title>
	<author>Shin-LaC</author>
	<datestamp>1266755820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think the word "parhelion" sounds better than "sundog".</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the word " parhelion " sounds better than " sundog " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the word "parhelion" sounds better than "sundog".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31241758</id>
	<title>Re:Worst Camera Work Ever</title>
	<author>mano.m</author>
	<datestamp>1266957240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mod parent 'unappreciative', 'glass quarter-empty', and 'nitpicking boss from Hell'.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mod parent 'unappreciative ' , 'glass quarter-empty ' , and 'nitpicking boss from Hell' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mod parent 'unappreciative', 'glass quarter-empty', and 'nitpicking boss from Hell'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31218810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31241570</id>
	<title>Re:My explanation</title>
	<author>mano.m</author>
	<datestamp>1266955320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I love Mondays. On a Monday, anything is possible.</p></div><p>That is a genuinely novel and interesting sig. Is it a quotation from someone, or is it you?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I love Mondays .
On a Monday , anything is possible.That is a genuinely novel and interesting sig .
Is it a quotation from someone , or is it you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love Mondays.
On a Monday, anything is possible.That is a genuinely novel and interesting sig.
Is it a quotation from someone, or is it you?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31219580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217546</id>
	<title>Nice, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266756480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Photoshopped, you can tell by the pixels.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Photoshopped , you can tell by the pixels .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Photoshopped, you can tell by the pixels.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31219580</id>
	<title>My explanation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266776640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've looked at this a few dozen times.  It's truly an amazing effect.</p><p>Being in the CGI effects business myself (and actually right in the middle of bidding some interesting atmospheric effects for a movie dogfight) I thought it was fake at first, mostly because I've never seen anything like this before.  A spectacular display like this, I would have thought, would have been photographed many times if it was a normal occurrence.  Some commenters have said that something similar happened on the Apollo XI launch, I haven't seen film that confirms that.</p><p>But no, it's clearly real.  Many people saw it, several people filmed it.</p><p>What it is, is the shockwave moving through a thin layer of clouds and atmosphere. The shockwave disturbs that layer of clouds in some way (in the case of the sun dog, apparently disturbing the crystals orientation -- shockingly these sun dogs require the hexagonal crystals to be hanging more-or-less flat in the air)    There are any number of films of airplanes flying above the speed of sound causing clouds to pop into existence and then disappear as the shockwave passes.  Every nuclear bomb sequence has these kind of shock-induced clouds as well.</p><p>I suppose that clouds with exactly the characteristics to make this happen for rocket launches are rare, because I've watched film of hundreds of launches and never seen this.  It always pays to look up!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've looked at this a few dozen times .
It 's truly an amazing effect.Being in the CGI effects business myself ( and actually right in the middle of bidding some interesting atmospheric effects for a movie dogfight ) I thought it was fake at first , mostly because I 've never seen anything like this before .
A spectacular display like this , I would have thought , would have been photographed many times if it was a normal occurrence .
Some commenters have said that something similar happened on the Apollo XI launch , I have n't seen film that confirms that.But no , it 's clearly real .
Many people saw it , several people filmed it.What it is , is the shockwave moving through a thin layer of clouds and atmosphere .
The shockwave disturbs that layer of clouds in some way ( in the case of the sun dog , apparently disturbing the crystals orientation -- shockingly these sun dogs require the hexagonal crystals to be hanging more-or-less flat in the air ) There are any number of films of airplanes flying above the speed of sound causing clouds to pop into existence and then disappear as the shockwave passes .
Every nuclear bomb sequence has these kind of shock-induced clouds as well.I suppose that clouds with exactly the characteristics to make this happen for rocket launches are rare , because I 've watched film of hundreds of launches and never seen this .
It always pays to look up !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've looked at this a few dozen times.
It's truly an amazing effect.Being in the CGI effects business myself (and actually right in the middle of bidding some interesting atmospheric effects for a movie dogfight) I thought it was fake at first, mostly because I've never seen anything like this before.
A spectacular display like this, I would have thought, would have been photographed many times if it was a normal occurrence.
Some commenters have said that something similar happened on the Apollo XI launch, I haven't seen film that confirms that.But no, it's clearly real.
Many people saw it, several people filmed it.What it is, is the shockwave moving through a thin layer of clouds and atmosphere.
The shockwave disturbs that layer of clouds in some way (in the case of the sun dog, apparently disturbing the crystals orientation -- shockingly these sun dogs require the hexagonal crystals to be hanging more-or-less flat in the air)    There are any number of films of airplanes flying above the speed of sound causing clouds to pop into existence and then disappear as the shockwave passes.
Every nuclear bomb sequence has these kind of shock-induced clouds as well.I suppose that clouds with exactly the characteristics to make this happen for rocket launches are rare, because I've watched film of hundreds of launches and never seen this.
It always pays to look up!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31219900</id>
	<title>yuo 74il it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266778260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>troubled OS. NoW it just 0wnz.', and Michael Smith in any way related</htmltext>
<tokenext>troubled OS .
NoW it just 0wnz .
' , and Michael Smith in any way related</tokentext>
<sentencetext>troubled OS.
NoW it just 0wnz.
', and Michael Smith in any way related</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217412</id>
	<title>Not a sonic boom</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266753180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A sonic boom looks like a single shock wave. Those look like ripples. Engine sound maybe?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A sonic boom looks like a single shock wave .
Those look like ripples .
Engine sound maybe ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A sonic boom looks like a single shock wave.
Those look like ripples.
Engine sound maybe?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31221092</id>
	<title>Just acoustic pressure waves</title>
	<author>slyborg</author>
	<datestamp>1266784620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Another video of the launch with clean audio. Rocket isn't supersonic until roughly 2 minutes after launch.</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRFWq7gcj2E&amp;feature=fvw" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRFWq7gcj2E&amp;feature=fvw</a> [youtube.com]</p><p>It didn't look like a shockwave to me from the start, as the name implies, it would be visible as a very sharp, immediate disturbance, not a bunch of ripples. Actually, would have been really cool if it *had* gone supersonic in that cloud layer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Another video of the launch with clean audio .
Rocket is n't supersonic until roughly 2 minutes after launch.http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = TRFWq7gcj2E&amp;feature = fvw [ youtube.com ] It did n't look like a shockwave to me from the start , as the name implies , it would be visible as a very sharp , immediate disturbance , not a bunch of ripples .
Actually , would have been really cool if it * had * gone supersonic in that cloud layer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another video of the launch with clean audio.
Rocket isn't supersonic until roughly 2 minutes after launch.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRFWq7gcj2E&amp;feature=fvw [youtube.com]It didn't look like a shockwave to me from the start, as the name implies, it would be visible as a very sharp, immediate disturbance, not a bunch of ripples.
Actually, would have been really cool if it *had* gone supersonic in that cloud layer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31218804</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217712</id>
	<title>Re:Parhelion</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1266759720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Agree. Sundog sounds like some sort of a weekend snack at the Wienerschitzel.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Agree .
Sundog sounds like some sort of a weekend snack at the Wienerschitzel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agree.
Sundog sounds like some sort of a weekend snack at the Wienerschitzel.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217518</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217348</id>
	<title>Yo Slashdot, Imma let you finish, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266751980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dr. Evil's rocket launch was so much better. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkTv8DGlrok" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkTv8DGlrok</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dr. Evil 's rocket launch was so much better .
http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = vkTv8DGlrok [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dr. Evil's rocket launch was so much better.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkTv8DGlrok [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217566</id>
	<title>Re:Parhelion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266756840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Depends how hungry you are.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Depends how hungry you are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Depends how hungry you are.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217518</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217316</id>
	<title>Wow</title>
	<author>cntThnkofAname</author>
	<datestamp>1266750960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>There is something incredibly belittling about trying to comprehend the vastness that vehicles like that help us explore.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is something incredibly belittling about trying to comprehend the vastness that vehicles like that help us explore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is something incredibly belittling about trying to comprehend the vastness that vehicles like that help us explore.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31218810</id>
	<title>Worst Camera Work Ever</title>
	<author>bangzilla</author>
	<datestamp>1266771600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>
 You know, after getting up in the wee small hours of the morning, driving miles to find a spot to observe the launch and having paid good cash for a video camera (and PC and editing software), you'd think that the joker that took the video would learn **how to pan with the moving object**!. That's "pan with the object" not wait until the object has left the frame and then jerk the camera up until it's at the bottom. And you know, you can buy cameras these days with image stabilization (or even stabilize in post). *very* frustrating video.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , after getting up in the wee small hours of the morning , driving miles to find a spot to observe the launch and having paid good cash for a video camera ( and PC and editing software ) , you 'd think that the joker that took the video would learn * * how to pan with the moving object * * ! .
That 's " pan with the object " not wait until the object has left the frame and then jerk the camera up until it 's at the bottom .
And you know , you can buy cameras these days with image stabilization ( or even stabilize in post ) .
* very * frustrating video .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
 You know, after getting up in the wee small hours of the morning, driving miles to find a spot to observe the launch and having paid good cash for a video camera (and PC and editing software), you'd think that the joker that took the video would learn **how to pan with the moving object**!.
That's "pan with the object" not wait until the object has left the frame and then jerk the camera up until it's at the bottom.
And you know, you can buy cameras these days with image stabilization (or even stabilize in post).
*very* frustrating video.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31219304</id>
	<title>Re:Just "waves?" Motorized cam; music choice</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266775440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Film is still used, excellent resolution, expose now process later. it will always beat digital in rapid fire situations.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Film is still used , excellent resolution , expose now process later .
it will always beat digital in rapid fire situations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Film is still used, excellent resolution, expose now process later.
it will always beat digital in rapid fire situations.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31218332</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31219274</id>
	<title>Here's what I don't get</title>
	<author>fat\_mike</author>
	<datestamp>1266775260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Once upon a time, men would have been sitting on top of that rocket.  Men with no fear, who couldn't give a shit about politics.  They just wanted the ultimate ride.<br>

Every politician thinking about cancelling Ares needs to think about that.  They wouldn't have cell phones and 3G internet and GPS if it weren't for the brave men and women who are, as Steve Buscemei so perfectly put it (minus the nuke):
<br> <br>
"You know we're sitting on four million pounds of fuel, one nuclear weapon and a thing that has 270,000 moving parts built by the lowest bidder. Makes you feel good, doesn't it? "</htmltext>
<tokenext>Once upon a time , men would have been sitting on top of that rocket .
Men with no fear , who could n't give a shit about politics .
They just wanted the ultimate ride .
Every politician thinking about cancelling Ares needs to think about that .
They would n't have cell phones and 3G internet and GPS if it were n't for the brave men and women who are , as Steve Buscemei so perfectly put it ( minus the nuke ) : " You know we 're sitting on four million pounds of fuel , one nuclear weapon and a thing that has 270,000 moving parts built by the lowest bidder .
Makes you feel good , does n't it ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once upon a time, men would have been sitting on top of that rocket.
Men with no fear, who couldn't give a shit about politics.
They just wanted the ultimate ride.
Every politician thinking about cancelling Ares needs to think about that.
They wouldn't have cell phones and 3G internet and GPS if it weren't for the brave men and women who are, as Steve Buscemei so perfectly put it (minus the nuke):
 
"You know we're sitting on four million pounds of fuel, one nuclear weapon and a thing that has 270,000 moving parts built by the lowest bidder.
Makes you feel good, doesn't it?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31218804</id>
	<title>Cool - but probably not shockwaves</title>
	<author>njord</author>
	<datestamp>1266771540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Those look like regular acoustic waves to me.</p><p>I don't doubt the the rocket can go faster than the speed of sound (which gets lower as you get further from the surface), but those waves distinctly lead the rocket's motion, which means that they are the product of acoustic perturbations moving at the speed of sound in the medium.</p><p>If the rocket were moving faster than the speed of sound in that medium, then we would see the usual 'shock cone', where those waves would appear an a fairly narrow cone around the rocket as it passed though - certainly not before.</p><p>I qualify 'medium' since it is possible that the rocket is moving faster than the speed of sound (in the air) but not faster than the medium that the sundog constitutes. Liquids, for example, have much higher speed-of-sounds and it is (conceptually, not physically) fairly simple for something to be moving faster than the speed of sound in air at sea level but not be anywhere close to the speed of sound in a liquid that it is travelling - and thus producing the regular u-c, u+c acoustic waves.</p><p>However, as I understand them, sundogs are collections of ice crystals and probably don't have a higher speed of sound than the air around them. But anyway, waves preceding the motion of a body in a medium are certainly not shockwaves - if we could visualize the waves any object makes in the air, you would see acoustic waves arising from the object's motion before and after it.</p><p>Still neat-looking, though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Those look like regular acoustic waves to me.I do n't doubt the the rocket can go faster than the speed of sound ( which gets lower as you get further from the surface ) , but those waves distinctly lead the rocket 's motion , which means that they are the product of acoustic perturbations moving at the speed of sound in the medium.If the rocket were moving faster than the speed of sound in that medium , then we would see the usual 'shock cone ' , where those waves would appear an a fairly narrow cone around the rocket as it passed though - certainly not before.I qualify 'medium ' since it is possible that the rocket is moving faster than the speed of sound ( in the air ) but not faster than the medium that the sundog constitutes .
Liquids , for example , have much higher speed-of-sounds and it is ( conceptually , not physically ) fairly simple for something to be moving faster than the speed of sound in air at sea level but not be anywhere close to the speed of sound in a liquid that it is travelling - and thus producing the regular u-c , u + c acoustic waves.However , as I understand them , sundogs are collections of ice crystals and probably do n't have a higher speed of sound than the air around them .
But anyway , waves preceding the motion of a body in a medium are certainly not shockwaves - if we could visualize the waves any object makes in the air , you would see acoustic waves arising from the object 's motion before and after it.Still neat-looking , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those look like regular acoustic waves to me.I don't doubt the the rocket can go faster than the speed of sound (which gets lower as you get further from the surface), but those waves distinctly lead the rocket's motion, which means that they are the product of acoustic perturbations moving at the speed of sound in the medium.If the rocket were moving faster than the speed of sound in that medium, then we would see the usual 'shock cone', where those waves would appear an a fairly narrow cone around the rocket as it passed though - certainly not before.I qualify 'medium' since it is possible that the rocket is moving faster than the speed of sound (in the air) but not faster than the medium that the sundog constitutes.
Liquids, for example, have much higher speed-of-sounds and it is (conceptually, not physically) fairly simple for something to be moving faster than the speed of sound in air at sea level but not be anywhere close to the speed of sound in a liquid that it is travelling - and thus producing the regular u-c, u+c acoustic waves.However, as I understand them, sundogs are collections of ice crystals and probably don't have a higher speed of sound than the air around them.
But anyway, waves preceding the motion of a body in a medium are certainly not shockwaves - if we could visualize the waves any object makes in the air, you would see acoustic waves arising from the object's motion before and after it.Still neat-looking, though.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217784</id>
	<title>Anonymous ME</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266760680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I posted this days ago but Timothy gets priority on the homepage? Thanks guys</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I posted this days ago but Timothy gets priority on the homepage ?
Thanks guys</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I posted this days ago but Timothy gets priority on the homepage?
Thanks guys</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31220976</id>
	<title>Re:Parhelion</title>
	<author>TangoMargarine</author>
	<datestamp>1266783840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't that a Mozilla product? Sunbird, Firefox, Thunderbird...</p><p>Any idea what that name is supposed to mean? After looking at the Wikipedia article, it seems to me that it would make about as much sense to call it a Sunhippo or Sunrhino...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't that a Mozilla product ?
Sunbird , Firefox , Thunderbird...Any idea what that name is supposed to mean ?
After looking at the Wikipedia article , it seems to me that it would make about as much sense to call it a Sunhippo or Sunrhino.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't that a Mozilla product?
Sunbird, Firefox, Thunderbird...Any idea what that name is supposed to mean?
After looking at the Wikipedia article, it seems to me that it would make about as much sense to call it a Sunhippo or Sunrhino...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217518</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31218332</id>
	<title>Just "waves?" Motorized cam; music choice</title>
	<author>dpbsmith</author>
	<datestamp>1266766680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1) I don't think those are "shock waves," just ordinary very-low-frequency sound waves. I think shock waves occur when a pile of sound waves are forced to stack up on top of each other and create an actual pressure discontinuity.</p><p>2) I was fascinated to hear the background sounds of someone taking photos with a motorized SLR. That is, film... silver nitrate on polyester film. Is that a pro photojournalist? Do they still use film? Or just someone clinging to a nifty old piece of technology that still does the job?</p><p>3) Why would anyone choose the Imperial March from Star Wars, inseparably associated with Bad Guys, as background music?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 ) I do n't think those are " shock waves , " just ordinary very-low-frequency sound waves .
I think shock waves occur when a pile of sound waves are forced to stack up on top of each other and create an actual pressure discontinuity.2 ) I was fascinated to hear the background sounds of someone taking photos with a motorized SLR .
That is , film... silver nitrate on polyester film .
Is that a pro photojournalist ?
Do they still use film ?
Or just someone clinging to a nifty old piece of technology that still does the job ? 3 ) Why would anyone choose the Imperial March from Star Wars , inseparably associated with Bad Guys , as background music ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1) I don't think those are "shock waves," just ordinary very-low-frequency sound waves.
I think shock waves occur when a pile of sound waves are forced to stack up on top of each other and create an actual pressure discontinuity.2) I was fascinated to hear the background sounds of someone taking photos with a motorized SLR.
That is, film... silver nitrate on polyester film.
Is that a pro photojournalist?
Do they still use film?
Or just someone clinging to a nifty old piece of technology that still does the job?3) Why would anyone choose the Imperial March from Star Wars, inseparably associated with Bad Guys, as background music?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31221930</id>
	<title>Why?</title>
	<author>Snaller</author>
	<datestamp>1266747180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just a huge area with nothing of human value for lightyears.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just a huge area with nothing of human value for lightyears .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just a huge area with nothing of human value for lightyears.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217316</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_0620233_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_0620233_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31220976
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217518
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_0620233_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31219304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31218332
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_0620233_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31241570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31219580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_0620233_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31241716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31220944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_0620233_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31218464
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31218332
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_0620233_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217518
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_0620233_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_0620233_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31219086
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31218332
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_0620233_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31241758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31218810
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_0620233_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217566
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217518
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_0620233_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217518
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_0620233_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31221092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31218804
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_0620233_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31218366
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217518
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_0620233_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31221930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_0620233_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31218500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217406
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_21_0620233_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217406
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_0620233.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31218810
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31241758
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_0620233.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31220944
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31241716
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_0620233.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31218332
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31219304
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31219086
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31218464
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_0620233.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31218064
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_0620233.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31219580
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31241570
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_0620233.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217332
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_0620233.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217406
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217490
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31218500
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_0620233.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217310
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_0620233.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217412
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_0620233.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217922
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_0620233.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217374
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_0620233.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31219274
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_0620233.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31218804
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31221092
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_0620233.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217316
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217582
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31221930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217400
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_21_0620233.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217518
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217712
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217566
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31217670
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31218366
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_21_0620233.31220976
</commentlist>
</conversation>
