<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_20_1416232</id>
	<title>Two Chinese Schools Reportedly Tied To Online Attacks</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1266678960000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>squidw* writes <i>"Online attacks on Google and other American corporations have been <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/19/technology/19china.html?em">traced to computers at two educational institutions in China</a>, including one with close ties to the Chinese military, say people involved in the investigation. From the NY Times: '... the attacks, aimed at stealing trade secrets and computer codes and capturing e-mail of Chinese human rights activists, may have begun as early as April, months earlier than previously believed. ...  The Chinese schools involved are Shanghai Jiaotong University and the Lanxiang Vocational School, according to several people with knowledge of the investigation who asked for anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the inquiry. Jiaotong has one of China&rsquo;s top computer science programs. Just a few weeks ago its students won an international computer programming competition organized by IBM &mdash; the &ldquo;Battle of the Brains&rdquo; &mdash; beating out Stanford and other top-flight universities. Lanxiang, in east China&rsquo;s Shandong Province, is a huge vocational school that was established with military support and trains some computer scientists for the military.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>squidw * writes " Online attacks on Google and other American corporations have been traced to computers at two educational institutions in China , including one with close ties to the Chinese military , say people involved in the investigation .
From the NY Times : '... the attacks , aimed at stealing trade secrets and computer codes and capturing e-mail of Chinese human rights activists , may have begun as early as April , months earlier than previously believed .
... The Chinese schools involved are Shanghai Jiaotong University and the Lanxiang Vocational School , according to several people with knowledge of the investigation who asked for anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the inquiry .
Jiaotong has one of China    s top computer science programs .
Just a few weeks ago its students won an international computer programming competition organized by IBM    the    Battle of the Brains       beating out Stanford and other top-flight universities .
Lanxiang , in east China    s Shandong Province , is a huge vocational school that was established with military support and trains some computer scientists for the military .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>squidw* writes "Online attacks on Google and other American corporations have been traced to computers at two educational institutions in China, including one with close ties to the Chinese military, say people involved in the investigation.
From the NY Times: '... the attacks, aimed at stealing trade secrets and computer codes and capturing e-mail of Chinese human rights activists, may have begun as early as April, months earlier than previously believed.
...  The Chinese schools involved are Shanghai Jiaotong University and the Lanxiang Vocational School, according to several people with knowledge of the investigation who asked for anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the inquiry.
Jiaotong has one of China’s top computer science programs.
Just a few weeks ago its students won an international computer programming competition organized by IBM — the “Battle of the Brains” — beating out Stanford and other top-flight universities.
Lanxiang, in east China’s Shandong Province, is a huge vocational school that was established with military support and trains some computer scientists for the military.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210194</id>
	<title>I'm not worried</title>
	<author>Vinegar Joe</author>
	<datestamp>1266683520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Barack Obama (PBUH) will discuss this with the Chinese government and they will tell the students to refrain from this sort of activity in the future.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Barack Obama ( PBUH ) will discuss this with the Chinese government and they will tell the students to refrain from this sort of activity in the future .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Barack Obama (PBUH) will discuss this with the Chinese government and they will tell the students to refrain from this sort of activity in the future.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210326</id>
	<title>Re:Hum.</title>
	<author>zappepcs</author>
	<datestamp>1266684960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pinning it on the Chinese government in public would be claiming an attack by one government on another's citizens and infrastructure. This would be one of the scenarios that Home Land Security is preparing to defend against. It's presumed that 'terrorists' would be the attackers, but if it turns out the terrorists are Chinese it would shift the direction of momentum for such groups as Homeland Security. With the USA in a semi-permanent state of war against terror, if this is tagged as terrorism, it stands a good chance of crumbling trade agreements to bits. Of course that can't be allowed to happen politically, so the offensive parts of this will be swept under the political rug, and in the worst case situation, China will claim to have punished some errant students. There is far more involved than some IT attacks. Rest assured that business and political interests will ensure that a bit of 'file sharing' won't get in the way of those other interests. So, where do we go from here? not page 1, page 7 of the local section if we're lucky enough to see it in main stream news at all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pinning it on the Chinese government in public would be claiming an attack by one government on another 's citizens and infrastructure .
This would be one of the scenarios that Home Land Security is preparing to defend against .
It 's presumed that 'terrorists ' would be the attackers , but if it turns out the terrorists are Chinese it would shift the direction of momentum for such groups as Homeland Security .
With the USA in a semi-permanent state of war against terror , if this is tagged as terrorism , it stands a good chance of crumbling trade agreements to bits .
Of course that ca n't be allowed to happen politically , so the offensive parts of this will be swept under the political rug , and in the worst case situation , China will claim to have punished some errant students .
There is far more involved than some IT attacks .
Rest assured that business and political interests will ensure that a bit of 'file sharing ' wo n't get in the way of those other interests .
So , where do we go from here ?
not page 1 , page 7 of the local section if we 're lucky enough to see it in main stream news at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pinning it on the Chinese government in public would be claiming an attack by one government on another's citizens and infrastructure.
This would be one of the scenarios that Home Land Security is preparing to defend against.
It's presumed that 'terrorists' would be the attackers, but if it turns out the terrorists are Chinese it would shift the direction of momentum for such groups as Homeland Security.
With the USA in a semi-permanent state of war against terror, if this is tagged as terrorism, it stands a good chance of crumbling trade agreements to bits.
Of course that can't be allowed to happen politically, so the offensive parts of this will be swept under the political rug, and in the worst case situation, China will claim to have punished some errant students.
There is far more involved than some IT attacks.
Rest assured that business and political interests will ensure that a bit of 'file sharing' won't get in the way of those other interests.
So, where do we go from here?
not page 1, page 7 of the local section if we're lucky enough to see it in main stream news at all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210984</id>
	<title>Re:Hum.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266690600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They already did pin it on the Chinese govt.  Han Chinese are homogeneous.  Their govt is an extension of their nationalism.</p><p>S</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They already did pin it on the Chinese govt .
Han Chinese are homogeneous .
Their govt is an extension of their nationalism.S</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They already did pin it on the Chinese govt.
Han Chinese are homogeneous.
Their govt is an extension of their nationalism.S</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31212734</id>
	<title>Re:this attack finally convinced me</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266658320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You don't want to know what they do to puppies there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't want to know what they do to puppies there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't want to know what they do to puppies there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210410</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211656</id>
	<title>Not the *worst* president...</title>
	<author>zippthorne</author>
	<datestamp>1266695220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In many respects FDR was our worst president. I know that's an unpopular view, nevertheless that's what I think.</p></div><p>Of course it's an unpopular view.  Woodrow Wilson was just as racist and far more damaging a president that FDR ever was.  FDR only screwed up <em>our</em> country.  Wilson sowed the seeds of WWII (increasing our enemies by one Japan in the process), the war in Indochina, screwed up domestic race relations, created the Federal Reserve...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In many respects FDR was our worst president .
I know that 's an unpopular view , nevertheless that 's what I think.Of course it 's an unpopular view .
Woodrow Wilson was just as racist and far more damaging a president that FDR ever was .
FDR only screwed up our country .
Wilson sowed the seeds of WWII ( increasing our enemies by one Japan in the process ) , the war in Indochina , screwed up domestic race relations , created the Federal Reserve.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In many respects FDR was our worst president.
I know that's an unpopular view, nevertheless that's what I think.Of course it's an unpopular view.
Woodrow Wilson was just as racist and far more damaging a president that FDR ever was.
FDR only screwed up our country.
Wilson sowed the seeds of WWII (increasing our enemies by one Japan in the process), the war in Indochina, screwed up domestic race relations, created the Federal Reserve...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31216126</id>
	<title>Re:The racist 1940s</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266687900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We are currently, not hypothetically, at war with several Arab nations. Ethnic Arabs living in the US are also ambivalent about patriotism ("take any sample"). We, in fact, know that many Arabs living on US soil are terrorists working inside our borders. We have several incidents on record of actual US Army soldiers who have killed other US soldiers in the name of their political (including religious) beliefs. By your logic, we should be locking up all Arabs right now. It is reasonable and necessary to a degree no less, and probably much greater, than what you describe with the Chinese. The difference is that the Chinese have not carried out any political attacks on US soil, in the history of the world. The Arabs have a laundry list of such attacks in which they've already successfully killed thousands of American citizens. Yet you seem okay with letting them wander the streets?</p><p>Consistency please, otherwise I think everyone knows the real issue here is that you don't like the Chinese. If war were to break out, which is something of a fantasy for anti-Chinese bigots who are happy to ignore the nuclear equation, you may or may not have a problem with the internal Chinese population. But if you try to imprison them for political reasons, you would not only make grand hypocrites of yourselves on the world stage, you'd also have an ethnic civil war on your hands. An angry, embittered Chinese population does not just go home and contemplate suicide like the Japanese would. You've seen the cultural revolution. You've seen Tiananmen. If you start this, the only way you're going to finish it is to become what you hate. Tank-man will have a whole new meaning to the world when it is an M-1 Abrams in the picture.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We are currently , not hypothetically , at war with several Arab nations .
Ethnic Arabs living in the US are also ambivalent about patriotism ( " take any sample " ) .
We , in fact , know that many Arabs living on US soil are terrorists working inside our borders .
We have several incidents on record of actual US Army soldiers who have killed other US soldiers in the name of their political ( including religious ) beliefs .
By your logic , we should be locking up all Arabs right now .
It is reasonable and necessary to a degree no less , and probably much greater , than what you describe with the Chinese .
The difference is that the Chinese have not carried out any political attacks on US soil , in the history of the world .
The Arabs have a laundry list of such attacks in which they 've already successfully killed thousands of American citizens .
Yet you seem okay with letting them wander the streets ? Consistency please , otherwise I think everyone knows the real issue here is that you do n't like the Chinese .
If war were to break out , which is something of a fantasy for anti-Chinese bigots who are happy to ignore the nuclear equation , you may or may not have a problem with the internal Chinese population .
But if you try to imprison them for political reasons , you would not only make grand hypocrites of yourselves on the world stage , you 'd also have an ethnic civil war on your hands .
An angry , embittered Chinese population does not just go home and contemplate suicide like the Japanese would .
You 've seen the cultural revolution .
You 've seen Tiananmen .
If you start this , the only way you 're going to finish it is to become what you hate .
Tank-man will have a whole new meaning to the world when it is an M-1 Abrams in the picture .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We are currently, not hypothetically, at war with several Arab nations.
Ethnic Arabs living in the US are also ambivalent about patriotism ("take any sample").
We, in fact, know that many Arabs living on US soil are terrorists working inside our borders.
We have several incidents on record of actual US Army soldiers who have killed other US soldiers in the name of their political (including religious) beliefs.
By your logic, we should be locking up all Arabs right now.
It is reasonable and necessary to a degree no less, and probably much greater, than what you describe with the Chinese.
The difference is that the Chinese have not carried out any political attacks on US soil, in the history of the world.
The Arabs have a laundry list of such attacks in which they've already successfully killed thousands of American citizens.
Yet you seem okay with letting them wander the streets?Consistency please, otherwise I think everyone knows the real issue here is that you don't like the Chinese.
If war were to break out, which is something of a fantasy for anti-Chinese bigots who are happy to ignore the nuclear equation, you may or may not have a problem with the internal Chinese population.
But if you try to imprison them for political reasons, you would not only make grand hypocrites of yourselves on the world stage, you'd also have an ethnic civil war on your hands.
An angry, embittered Chinese population does not just go home and contemplate suicide like the Japanese would.
You've seen the cultural revolution.
You've seen Tiananmen.
If you start this, the only way you're going to finish it is to become what you hate.
Tank-man will have a whole new meaning to the world when it is an M-1 Abrams in the picture.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210114</id>
	<title>Kill all the gooks!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266682740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Beware of the yellow peril! Be a patriotic American and kill a gook today!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Beware of the yellow peril !
Be a patriotic American and kill a gook today !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Beware of the yellow peril!
Be a patriotic American and kill a gook today!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211632</id>
	<title>Re:The racist 1940s</title>
	<author>commodore64\_love</author>
	<datestamp>1266695100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt;&gt;We would be forced to imprison the Chinese.</p><p>Which is an illegal act.  We can imprison or deport Chinese citizens, but the Constitution does not allow you to do things like this to chinese-American citizens (like my coworkers and best friend and his wife).  The Constitution is the Supreme Law of the land and you can not simply ignore it.</p><p>Else we would be a lawless society.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; &gt; We would be forced to imprison the Chinese.Which is an illegal act .
We can imprison or deport Chinese citizens , but the Constitution does not allow you to do things like this to chinese-American citizens ( like my coworkers and best friend and his wife ) .
The Constitution is the Supreme Law of the land and you can not simply ignore it.Else we would be a lawless society .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt;&gt;We would be forced to imprison the Chinese.Which is an illegal act.
We can imprison or deport Chinese citizens, but the Constitution does not allow you to do things like this to chinese-American citizens (like my coworkers and best friend and his wife).
The Constitution is the Supreme Law of the land and you can not simply ignore it.Else we would be a lawless society.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31215524</id>
	<title>Re:Jiaotong university topped the ACM</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266681480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Programming contest is total nonsense. You Americans are playing us but I know it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Programming contest is total nonsense .
You Americans are playing us but I know it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Programming contest is total nonsense.
You Americans are playing us but I know it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210276</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31217130</id>
	<title>Re:this attack finally convinced me</title>
	<author>Nyder</author>
	<datestamp>1266747060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While I don't agree with China's view, it's their view and their right.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While I do n't agree with China 's view , it 's their view and their right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I don't agree with China's view, it's their view and their right.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210262</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210128</id>
	<title>Dang</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266682860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now I have to give my chicken ball orders their own tin foil hat to block the chinese hacking signals until my digestive tract can destroy the transmitters.</p><p>Its getting harder and harder for us paranoid folks these days<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now I have to give my chicken ball orders their own tin foil hat to block the chinese hacking signals until my digestive tract can destroy the transmitters.Its getting harder and harder for us paranoid folks these days : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now I have to give my chicken ball orders their own tin foil hat to block the chinese hacking signals until my digestive tract can destroy the transmitters.Its getting harder and harder for us paranoid folks these days :(</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210164</id>
	<title>Finally,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266683220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The title of a China-related news has the adverb "reportedly". What's the world coming to?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The title of a China-related news has the adverb " reportedly " .
What 's the world coming to ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The title of a China-related news has the adverb "reportedly".
What's the world coming to?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210796</id>
	<title>Re:Hum.</title>
	<author>Vellmont</author>
	<datestamp>1266689220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i><br>So they confirm where the attacks came from, where does it go from there?<br></i><br>The usual with anything dealing with international politics.  A lot of posturing, threats, and promises, but very little in the way of action.<br><i><br>I somehow doubt they'll find a way to directly pin this on the Chinese government, regardless of if they did it or not.<br></i><br>Who's "they"?  Google?  Google has already tried to do that.  Same with the U.S. media.  John Markoff was on NPR yesterday talking about how it couldn't have just been students because "they used unknown IE exploits, which points to professionals".  That just made me laugh.  Gee John Markoff, did you forget your own reporting from the last 20 years where it was the American kids using "unknown exploits" (Mitnick, Robert Morris) to break into American businesses?</p><p>Who it was that ACTUALLY did these attacks I doubt we'll ever know.  China will try to sweep it all under the rug, Google will try to use this as a way to look like they're trying to face up to China, and the media will use it as another opportunity to sell some eyeballs.  I sure as hell wouldn't just assume it couldn't have been a single, or a small group of individuals though.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legion\_of\_Doom\_(hacking)" title="wikipedia.org">These guys</a> [wikipedia.org] <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin\_mitnick" title="wikipedia.org">this guy</a> [wikipedia.org] (just to pick a couple well known examples) proved that wrong more than 20 years ago.  It could also be a collusion of individuals and foreign governments, like for instance <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markus\_Hess" title="wikipedia.org">this guy</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So they confirm where the attacks came from , where does it go from there ? The usual with anything dealing with international politics .
A lot of posturing , threats , and promises , but very little in the way of action.I somehow doubt they 'll find a way to directly pin this on the Chinese government , regardless of if they did it or not.Who 's " they " ?
Google ? Google has already tried to do that .
Same with the U.S. media. John Markoff was on NPR yesterday talking about how it could n't have just been students because " they used unknown IE exploits , which points to professionals " .
That just made me laugh .
Gee John Markoff , did you forget your own reporting from the last 20 years where it was the American kids using " unknown exploits " ( Mitnick , Robert Morris ) to break into American businesses ? Who it was that ACTUALLY did these attacks I doubt we 'll ever know .
China will try to sweep it all under the rug , Google will try to use this as a way to look like they 're trying to face up to China , and the media will use it as another opportunity to sell some eyeballs .
I sure as hell would n't just assume it could n't have been a single , or a small group of individuals though .
These guys [ wikipedia.org ] this guy [ wikipedia.org ] ( just to pick a couple well known examples ) proved that wrong more than 20 years ago .
It could also be a collusion of individuals and foreign governments , like for instance this guy [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So they confirm where the attacks came from, where does it go from there?The usual with anything dealing with international politics.
A lot of posturing, threats, and promises, but very little in the way of action.I somehow doubt they'll find a way to directly pin this on the Chinese government, regardless of if they did it or not.Who's "they"?
Google?  Google has already tried to do that.
Same with the U.S. media.  John Markoff was on NPR yesterday talking about how it couldn't have just been students because "they used unknown IE exploits, which points to professionals".
That just made me laugh.
Gee John Markoff, did you forget your own reporting from the last 20 years where it was the American kids using "unknown exploits" (Mitnick, Robert Morris) to break into American businesses?Who it was that ACTUALLY did these attacks I doubt we'll ever know.
China will try to sweep it all under the rug, Google will try to use this as a way to look like they're trying to face up to China, and the media will use it as another opportunity to sell some eyeballs.
I sure as hell wouldn't just assume it couldn't have been a single, or a small group of individuals though.
These guys [wikipedia.org] this guy [wikipedia.org] (just to pick a couple well known examples) proved that wrong more than 20 years ago.
It could also be a collusion of individuals and foreign governments, like for instance this guy [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210600</id>
	<title>Morons?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266687360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What do these replies have to do with story?  Don't trade with China?  When they make great products that are cheap?  All of you hang wringing apologists for stopping the misperceived threat of Chinese Hegemony may be delusional.  China has her own internal contradictions to borrow from the "terrible" Mao which will create enough governors to keep the monster from taking over the world.  Plus: the people are really cool.  They're like Americans.  It's a melting pot of DNA and they are open and friendly and they don't want to chop our heads off for not beleiving what they believe.  That's the end of my off topic rant.<br>What about this story?  It's interesting and I'd like some more answers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What do these replies have to do with story ?
Do n't trade with China ?
When they make great products that are cheap ?
All of you hang wringing apologists for stopping the misperceived threat of Chinese Hegemony may be delusional .
China has her own internal contradictions to borrow from the " terrible " Mao which will create enough governors to keep the monster from taking over the world .
Plus : the people are really cool .
They 're like Americans .
It 's a melting pot of DNA and they are open and friendly and they do n't want to chop our heads off for not beleiving what they believe .
That 's the end of my off topic rant.What about this story ?
It 's interesting and I 'd like some more answers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What do these replies have to do with story?
Don't trade with China?
When they make great products that are cheap?
All of you hang wringing apologists for stopping the misperceived threat of Chinese Hegemony may be delusional.
China has her own internal contradictions to borrow from the "terrible" Mao which will create enough governors to keep the monster from taking over the world.
Plus: the people are really cool.
They're like Americans.
It's a melting pot of DNA and they are open and friendly and they don't want to chop our heads off for not beleiving what they believe.
That's the end of my off topic rant.What about this story?
It's interesting and I'd like some more answers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31218062</id>
	<title>Re:this attack finally convinced me</title>
	<author>CalcuttaWala</author>
	<datestamp>1266763980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>i would strongly support the view that Chinese merchandise is really third class stuff. india too is flooded with all kinds of really dirt cheap stuff -- buckets, torches and a million other household goods -- the quality is astonishly bad. really wonder why people cannot make a simple and rational choice.</htmltext>
<tokenext>i would strongly support the view that Chinese merchandise is really third class stuff .
india too is flooded with all kinds of really dirt cheap stuff -- buckets , torches and a million other household goods -- the quality is astonishly bad .
really wonder why people can not make a simple and rational choice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i would strongly support the view that Chinese merchandise is really third class stuff.
india too is flooded with all kinds of really dirt cheap stuff -- buckets, torches and a million other household goods -- the quality is astonishly bad.
really wonder why people cannot make a simple and rational choice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210262</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210244</id>
	<title>Re:Act Of War</title>
	<author>Jon Abbott</author>
	<datestamp>1266684180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would like to know what the U.S. contingency plan is for war with China.  Look at almost any product in the U.S. today, and it is from China.  If we declare war with them, do we suddenly have no more imported goods?  This is not a scenario that I like to ponder.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would like to know what the U.S. contingency plan is for war with China .
Look at almost any product in the U.S. today , and it is from China .
If we declare war with them , do we suddenly have no more imported goods ?
This is not a scenario that I like to ponder .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would like to know what the U.S. contingency plan is for war with China.
Look at almost any product in the U.S. today, and it is from China.
If we declare war with them, do we suddenly have no more imported goods?
This is not a scenario that I like to ponder.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211340</id>
	<title>Re:The most awesome vocational school in the world</title>
	<author>noisebar</author>
	<datestamp>1266693540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My reaction too.  I can understand Jiaotong getting involved (I graduated from that school).  But Nanxiang?  Are you kidding me?  Their ads appear in TV infomercials!</htmltext>
<tokenext>My reaction too .
I can understand Jiaotong getting involved ( I graduated from that school ) .
But Nanxiang ?
Are you kidding me ?
Their ads appear in TV infomercials !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My reaction too.
I can understand Jiaotong getting involved (I graduated from that school).
But Nanxiang?
Are you kidding me?
Their ads appear in TV infomercials!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31215372</id>
	<title>Re:Verbal diarrhea</title>
	<author>tabdelgawad</author>
	<datestamp>1266679380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is not a leak.  It's a standard way of releasing information to the public without having to make an official statement/accusation.  And the New York Times doesn't pay for information, period.  Don't you (and your moderators) read any newspapers?!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is not a leak .
It 's a standard way of releasing information to the public without having to make an official statement/accusation .
And the New York Times does n't pay for information , period .
Do n't you ( and your moderators ) read any newspapers ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is not a leak.
It's a standard way of releasing information to the public without having to make an official statement/accusation.
And the New York Times doesn't pay for information, period.
Don't you (and your moderators) read any newspapers?
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31213332</id>
	<title>Re:this attack finally convinced me</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266662280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it is when a puppy licks you, you lick it back, then it licks you again.<br>vicious</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it is when a puppy licks you , you lick it back , then it licks you again.vicious</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it is when a puppy licks you, you lick it back, then it licks you again.vicious</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210410</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210234</id>
	<title>The most awesome vocational school in the world</title>
	<author>lobsterturd</author>
	<datestamp>1266684120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Shanghai Jiaotong University? Fair enough. But also see <a href="http://www.zonaeuropa.com/201002b.brief.htm#014" title="zonaeuropa.com" rel="nofollow">Roland Soong's translations about the vocational school</a> [zonaeuropa.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>Shanghai Jiaotong University ?
Fair enough .
But also see Roland Soong 's translations about the vocational school [ zonaeuropa.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shanghai Jiaotong University?
Fair enough.
But also see Roland Soong's translations about the vocational school [zonaeuropa.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31213170</id>
	<title>Re:this attack finally convinced me</title>
	<author>goatherder23</author>
	<datestamp>1266661260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>
So your sample size of one camera and one pair of shoes leads you to say everything from an entire country is shit?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So your sample size of one camera and one pair of shoes leads you to say everything from an entire country is shit ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
So your sample size of one camera and one pair of shoes leads you to say everything from an entire country is shit?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210262</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211898</id>
	<title>Re:Kill all the gooks!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266696420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, no need to kill them. Just cut the cables connecting them to the rest of the internet. They're so xenophobic anyway, they'd probably be grateful.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , no need to kill them .
Just cut the cables connecting them to the rest of the internet .
They 're so xenophobic anyway , they 'd probably be grateful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, no need to kill them.
Just cut the cables connecting them to the rest of the internet.
They're so xenophobic anyway, they'd probably be grateful.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210114</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31213800</id>
	<title>Re:The racist 1940s</title>
	<author>russotto</author>
	<datestamp>1266665940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Which is an illegal act. We can imprison or deport Chinese citizens, but the Constitution does not allow you to do things like this to chinese-American citizens (like my coworkers and best friend and his wife). The Constitution is the Supreme Law of the land and you can not simply ignore it.</p></div></blockquote><p>You can if you can get the Supreme Court to go along.</p><p>I believe <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korematsu\_v.\_United\_States" title="wikipedia.org">Korematsu v. United States</a> [wikipedia.org] is still good (in the technical sense) law.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Which is an illegal act .
We can imprison or deport Chinese citizens , but the Constitution does not allow you to do things like this to chinese-American citizens ( like my coworkers and best friend and his wife ) .
The Constitution is the Supreme Law of the land and you can not simply ignore it.You can if you can get the Supreme Court to go along.I believe Korematsu v. United States [ wikipedia.org ] is still good ( in the technical sense ) law .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which is an illegal act.
We can imprison or deport Chinese citizens, but the Constitution does not allow you to do things like this to chinese-American citizens (like my coworkers and best friend and his wife).
The Constitution is the Supreme Law of the land and you can not simply ignore it.You can if you can get the Supreme Court to go along.I believe Korematsu v. United States [wikipedia.org] is still good (in the technical sense) law.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211632</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31224740</id>
	<title>Re:Hum.</title>
	<author>commodore64\_love</author>
	<datestamp>1266765240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt;&gt;if it turns out the terrorists are Chinese, it would shift the direction of momentum for such groups as Homeland Security</p><p>On no.  Here comes the Nightwatch.  Better be careful what posters you hang, else you'll be arrested by them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; &gt; if it turns out the terrorists are Chinese , it would shift the direction of momentum for such groups as Homeland SecurityOn no .
Here comes the Nightwatch .
Better be careful what posters you hang , else you 'll be arrested by them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt;&gt;if it turns out the terrorists are Chinese, it would shift the direction of momentum for such groups as Homeland SecurityOn no.
Here comes the Nightwatch.
Better be careful what posters you hang, else you'll be arrested by them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210428</id>
	<title>Re:Hum.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266685980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>shut your fucking filthy sewer. i was one of the earlier posters you're talking about. and if you can prove that fags aren't a drain on society i will never post it again. but you won't because it's the truth. sorry that you can't handle the truth.</htmltext>
<tokenext>shut your fucking filthy sewer .
i was one of the earlier posters you 're talking about .
and if you can prove that fags are n't a drain on society i will never post it again .
but you wo n't because it 's the truth .
sorry that you ca n't handle the truth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>shut your fucking filthy sewer.
i was one of the earlier posters you're talking about.
and if you can prove that fags aren't a drain on society i will never post it again.
but you won't because it's the truth.
sorry that you can't handle the truth.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31218440</id>
	<title>Re:this attack finally convinced me</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266767700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So where were the parts made for the computer you are using RIGHT NOW?  China I bet.  I don't care if it says Dell on the case.  Where were the parts made?</p><p>The truth we don't make anything in the US except debt.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So where were the parts made for the computer you are using RIGHT NOW ?
China I bet .
I do n't care if it says Dell on the case .
Where were the parts made ? The truth we do n't make anything in the US except debt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So where were the parts made for the computer you are using RIGHT NOW?
China I bet.
I don't care if it says Dell on the case.
Where were the parts made?The truth we don't make anything in the US except debt.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210262</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210208</id>
	<title>They are anti-American...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266683700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone who has experienced being in a class with any large number of Chinese students (that actually came from and lived in China, just to be clear) will tell you that many of them are deeply programmed to be anti-American.  I used to read "USA sucks China rules" on the desks in the library all the time at SUNY Buffalo.  I don't blame the students but it's true nonetheless.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone who has experienced being in a class with any large number of Chinese students ( that actually came from and lived in China , just to be clear ) will tell you that many of them are deeply programmed to be anti-American .
I used to read " USA sucks China rules " on the desks in the library all the time at SUNY Buffalo .
I do n't blame the students but it 's true nonetheless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone who has experienced being in a class with any large number of Chinese students (that actually came from and lived in China, just to be clear) will tell you that many of them are deeply programmed to be anti-American.
I used to read "USA sucks China rules" on the desks in the library all the time at SUNY Buffalo.
I don't blame the students but it's true nonetheless.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211668</id>
	<title>Re:Act Of War</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266695280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You sound like North Korea! "Act of War! Act of War!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You sound like North Korea !
" Act of War !
Act of War !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You sound like North Korea!
"Act of War!
Act of War!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210332</id>
	<title>Makes You Wonder...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266685020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did the Chinese hackers gain access to the "Battle of the Brains" problems prior to the contest?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did the Chinese hackers gain access to the " Battle of the Brains " problems prior to the contest ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did the Chinese hackers gain access to the "Battle of the Brains" problems prior to the contest?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210378</id>
	<title>Re:this attack finally convinced me</title>
	<author>DeltaQH</author>
	<datestamp>1266685440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>But don't boycott Taiwan (Repuplic of China)</htmltext>
<tokenext>But do n't boycott Taiwan ( Repuplic of China )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But don't boycott Taiwan (Repuplic of China)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210262</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210256</id>
	<title>The Chinese</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266684300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>are better than those lame, whining, but staying in People's Republic of China, jews.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>are better than those lame , whining , but staying in People 's Republic of China , jews .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>are better than those lame, whining, but staying in People's Republic of China, jews.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211708</id>
	<title>Re:The racist 1940s</title>
	<author>flyneye</author>
	<datestamp>1266695520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We've had most of our dark days and loss of freedom from Wilson onward.<br>Every president has had a way of pissing off a percentage of the population, but from Wilson onward we lost more freedom than we gained.<br>Minorities and women not part of the statement, as this is just good sense and necessary to our evolution.</p><p>Over time and circumstances, its been Asians jailed, Negroes jailed, Communists jailed,Hippies jailed, Tax protesters jailed, Marijuana smokers jailed and others who just didn't fit the bill. Race is no barrier to being an enemy of the socialist state.</p><p>One could say Lincoln was the beginning of the shitstorm. The civil war wasn't mainly about slavery as suggested by safe state sponsored school books, it was about money and states rights. Of course Negroes fell under the money/property heading, but it is wrong to highlight this as the main cause merely to obscure the Fed scrambling for power. Lincoln wasn't particularly non racist, but that is another matter.<br>Both sides had massive P.O.W. camps for those disagreeable with policy on either side of the Mason/Dixon line.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; If we stay constitutional about our wars, we will just defend our borders, keep our financial interests within, and quit policing the world.<br>We have a lot of ways we've developed over time to do away with in order to start over again. In the interest of my grandchildren to come, I'm all for trashing a lot of legislation, foreign policy and business practices and weather the storm in order to achieve repair. Anyone who is not is part of the problem and should seek other borders to live within where their desires can be met. I value freedom over safety or convenience, if that is flamebait to anyone, so be it. We all know the old saying, and what they deserve.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Personally, if my car has been modified to run faster but wear out sooner, I'd take off the mods and go with factory parts originally engineered to last. Even if it meant the car would be out of service for a while.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; As for our national debt, just hand over those , still alive, who have legislated it so<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,to work it off. Not part of our original plan and therefore not valid. Note that states rights don't apply to D.C. and other federal holdings, this means constitutional rights. Don't believe me? Just ask any tax protester dragged into court, denied bail and whisked around the country on federal properties while his lawyers tried to locate him.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; It's a sick sad government and we are the worse off for it in spite of the lies taught in school. It's easy to blow me off as nuts instead of trying to see my points of view. But ask yourself this, isn't even a broken clock right, twice a day?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We 've had most of our dark days and loss of freedom from Wilson onward.Every president has had a way of pissing off a percentage of the population , but from Wilson onward we lost more freedom than we gained.Minorities and women not part of the statement , as this is just good sense and necessary to our evolution.Over time and circumstances , its been Asians jailed , Negroes jailed , Communists jailed,Hippies jailed , Tax protesters jailed , Marijuana smokers jailed and others who just did n't fit the bill .
Race is no barrier to being an enemy of the socialist state.One could say Lincoln was the beginning of the shitstorm .
The civil war was n't mainly about slavery as suggested by safe state sponsored school books , it was about money and states rights .
Of course Negroes fell under the money/property heading , but it is wrong to highlight this as the main cause merely to obscure the Fed scrambling for power .
Lincoln was n't particularly non racist , but that is another matter.Both sides had massive P.O.W .
camps for those disagreeable with policy on either side of the Mason/Dixon line .
          If we stay constitutional about our wars , we will just defend our borders , keep our financial interests within , and quit policing the world.We have a lot of ways we 've developed over time to do away with in order to start over again .
In the interest of my grandchildren to come , I 'm all for trashing a lot of legislation , foreign policy and business practices and weather the storm in order to achieve repair .
Anyone who is not is part of the problem and should seek other borders to live within where their desires can be met .
I value freedom over safety or convenience , if that is flamebait to anyone , so be it .
We all know the old saying , and what they deserve .
        Personally , if my car has been modified to run faster but wear out sooner , I 'd take off the mods and go with factory parts originally engineered to last .
Even if it meant the car would be out of service for a while .
          As for our national debt , just hand over those , still alive , who have legislated it so ,to work it off .
Not part of our original plan and therefore not valid .
Note that states rights do n't apply to D.C. and other federal holdings , this means constitutional rights .
Do n't believe me ?
Just ask any tax protester dragged into court , denied bail and whisked around the country on federal properties while his lawyers tried to locate him .
              It 's a sick sad government and we are the worse off for it in spite of the lies taught in school .
It 's easy to blow me off as nuts instead of trying to see my points of view .
But ask yourself this , is n't even a broken clock right , twice a day ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We've had most of our dark days and loss of freedom from Wilson onward.Every president has had a way of pissing off a percentage of the population, but from Wilson onward we lost more freedom than we gained.Minorities and women not part of the statement, as this is just good sense and necessary to our evolution.Over time and circumstances, its been Asians jailed, Negroes jailed, Communists jailed,Hippies jailed, Tax protesters jailed, Marijuana smokers jailed and others who just didn't fit the bill.
Race is no barrier to being an enemy of the socialist state.One could say Lincoln was the beginning of the shitstorm.
The civil war wasn't mainly about slavery as suggested by safe state sponsored school books, it was about money and states rights.
Of course Negroes fell under the money/property heading, but it is wrong to highlight this as the main cause merely to obscure the Fed scrambling for power.
Lincoln wasn't particularly non racist, but that is another matter.Both sides had massive P.O.W.
camps for those disagreeable with policy on either side of the Mason/Dixon line.
          If we stay constitutional about our wars, we will just defend our borders, keep our financial interests within, and quit policing the world.We have a lot of ways we've developed over time to do away with in order to start over again.
In the interest of my grandchildren to come, I'm all for trashing a lot of legislation, foreign policy and business practices and weather the storm in order to achieve repair.
Anyone who is not is part of the problem and should seek other borders to live within where their desires can be met.
I value freedom over safety or convenience, if that is flamebait to anyone, so be it.
We all know the old saying, and what they deserve.
        Personally, if my car has been modified to run faster but wear out sooner, I'd take off the mods and go with factory parts originally engineered to last.
Even if it meant the car would be out of service for a while.
          As for our national debt, just hand over those , still alive, who have legislated it so ,to work it off.
Not part of our original plan and therefore not valid.
Note that states rights don't apply to D.C. and other federal holdings, this means constitutional rights.
Don't believe me?
Just ask any tax protester dragged into court, denied bail and whisked around the country on federal properties while his lawyers tried to locate him.
              It's a sick sad government and we are the worse off for it in spite of the lies taught in school.
It's easy to blow me off as nuts instead of trying to see my points of view.
But ask yourself this, isn't even a broken clock right, twice a day?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210158</id>
	<title>Hum.</title>
	<author>bbqsrc</author>
	<datestamp>1266683160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd like to say I'm shocked by the previous 4 moronic comments, but this is slashdot, so I am not.

So they confirm where the attacks came from, where does it go from there? Banning the IP range of those schools from Google services? I somehow doubt they'll find a way to directly pin this on the Chinese government, regardless of if they did it or not.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd like to say I 'm shocked by the previous 4 moronic comments , but this is slashdot , so I am not .
So they confirm where the attacks came from , where does it go from there ?
Banning the IP range of those schools from Google services ?
I somehow doubt they 'll find a way to directly pin this on the Chinese government , regardless of if they did it or not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd like to say I'm shocked by the previous 4 moronic comments, but this is slashdot, so I am not.
So they confirm where the attacks came from, where does it go from there?
Banning the IP range of those schools from Google services?
I somehow doubt they'll find a way to directly pin this on the Chinese government, regardless of if they did it or not.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210134</id>
	<title>i would like to think...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266682920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>that china has the common sense to execute queers outright. fags are a drain on society.</htmltext>
<tokenext>that china has the common sense to execute queers outright .
fags are a drain on society .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that china has the common sense to execute queers outright.
fags are a drain on society.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211652</id>
	<title>Re:The racist 1940s</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266695220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In fact, somewhere between one-third and one-half of Chinese immigrants are already spying/aiding for the Chinese mainland in some way.</p></div><p>Care to enlighten us as to where you got these (albeit, very broad) statistics? Certainly, a carefully conducted study of this "fact" would be very newsworthy.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In fact , somewhere between one-third and one-half of Chinese immigrants are already spying/aiding for the Chinese mainland in some way.Care to enlighten us as to where you got these ( albeit , very broad ) statistics ?
Certainly , a carefully conducted study of this " fact " would be very newsworthy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In fact, somewhere between one-third and one-half of Chinese immigrants are already spying/aiding for the Chinese mainland in some way.Care to enlighten us as to where you got these (albeit, very broad) statistics?
Certainly, a carefully conducted study of this "fact" would be very newsworthy.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31215182</id>
	<title>Re:Verbal diarrhea</title>
	<author>indiechild</author>
	<datestamp>1266677880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's attention-whoring... like phoning the police hotline during the DC Beltway sniper attacks and dropping a hot tip, then seeing the police and media react.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's attention-whoring... like phoning the police hotline during the DC Beltway sniper attacks and dropping a hot tip , then seeing the police and media react .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's attention-whoring... like phoning the police hotline during the DC Beltway sniper attacks and dropping a hot tip, then seeing the police and media react.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210508</id>
	<title>Does this prove that our hackers are better</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266686640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>because they didn't get caught?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>because they did n't get caught ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>because they didn't get caught?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31213600</id>
	<title>Re:The most awesome vocational school in the world</title>
	<author>theArtificial</author>
	<datestamp>1266664260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>All I can say is wow. The situation of the students attending these "schools" reminds me of the saying: Criminals are not born. They are made.</htmltext>
<tokenext>All I can say is wow .
The situation of the students attending these " schools " reminds me of the saying : Criminals are not born .
They are made .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All I can say is wow.
The situation of the students attending these "schools" reminds me of the saying: Criminals are not born.
They are made.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210476</id>
	<title>Re:Act Of War</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266686400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Massive Nuclear Strike. It's the only way to fight 1.2 Billion people. Why wonder, it's always been our strategy for war with China.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Massive Nuclear Strike .
It 's the only way to fight 1.2 Billion people .
Why wonder , it 's always been our strategy for war with China .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Massive Nuclear Strike.
It's the only way to fight 1.2 Billion people.
Why wonder, it's always been our strategy for war with China.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210244</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210124</id>
	<title>WTF China</title>
	<author>Merakis</author>
	<datestamp>1266682800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>All hail our red computer programmed overlords.</htmltext>
<tokenext>All hail our red computer programmed overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All hail our red computer programmed overlords.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210792</id>
	<title>Re:Hum.</title>
	<author>WindBourne</author>
	<datestamp>1266689160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Very sad, actually. I am one of many opposed to what Chinese gov. is doing, but to be racists against the people is a very different thing. Sad that kids are being raised this way.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Very sad , actually .
I am one of many opposed to what Chinese gov .
is doing , but to be racists against the people is a very different thing .
Sad that kids are being raised this way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Very sad, actually.
I am one of many opposed to what Chinese gov.
is doing, but to be racists against the people is a very different thing.
Sad that kids are being raised this way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31214618</id>
	<title>Re:That isn't the question at all</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266672720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is a double edged sword isn't it?  The US went into China with the hope of selling product to 1 billion customers.  They forgot that people are too poor to buy US manufactured goods.  They thought about cheap labour in China, and built plants for the Chinese.  The Chinese started having better lives, but the government made sure there were no changes to the government.  The Americans started buying cheap goods made from their factories in China.  The trade deficit between the US and China swelled.  The US complained about countries like Canada stealing jobs, but no one ever mentioned US companies building plants in China.  The US started running out of money, so China offered the US loans.  The US bought more Chinese products with Chinese money, till it was all gone.  Then China offered the US more money.  US companies realised that Chinese companies can make product much cheaper.  Shut down US factories, move them to China.  Unemployed Americans, employed Chinese, poor Americans, rich Chinese.  Go back and tell me how the free market is the very best for the US again.  Go back and tell me how the Republicans are the only choice.  Go back and tell me how its only right that bank executives shoud get ginormous bonuses, how the Tea Party is the only choice, why its so important for corporations to have the same or more rights than people.  Go back and tell me these things.  You won't mind though if I give you a punch for luck though, right?  You know, just a little tap on the nose, or you know with a club or something.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a double edged sword is n't it ?
The US went into China with the hope of selling product to 1 billion customers .
They forgot that people are too poor to buy US manufactured goods .
They thought about cheap labour in China , and built plants for the Chinese .
The Chinese started having better lives , but the government made sure there were no changes to the government .
The Americans started buying cheap goods made from their factories in China .
The trade deficit between the US and China swelled .
The US complained about countries like Canada stealing jobs , but no one ever mentioned US companies building plants in China .
The US started running out of money , so China offered the US loans .
The US bought more Chinese products with Chinese money , till it was all gone .
Then China offered the US more money .
US companies realised that Chinese companies can make product much cheaper .
Shut down US factories , move them to China .
Unemployed Americans , employed Chinese , poor Americans , rich Chinese .
Go back and tell me how the free market is the very best for the US again .
Go back and tell me how the Republicans are the only choice .
Go back and tell me how its only right that bank executives shoud get ginormous bonuses , how the Tea Party is the only choice , why its so important for corporations to have the same or more rights than people .
Go back and tell me these things .
You wo n't mind though if I give you a punch for luck though , right ?
You know , just a little tap on the nose , or you know with a club or something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a double edged sword isn't it?
The US went into China with the hope of selling product to 1 billion customers.
They forgot that people are too poor to buy US manufactured goods.
They thought about cheap labour in China, and built plants for the Chinese.
The Chinese started having better lives, but the government made sure there were no changes to the government.
The Americans started buying cheap goods made from their factories in China.
The trade deficit between the US and China swelled.
The US complained about countries like Canada stealing jobs, but no one ever mentioned US companies building plants in China.
The US started running out of money, so China offered the US loans.
The US bought more Chinese products with Chinese money, till it was all gone.
Then China offered the US more money.
US companies realised that Chinese companies can make product much cheaper.
Shut down US factories, move them to China.
Unemployed Americans, employed Chinese, poor Americans, rich Chinese.
Go back and tell me how the free market is the very best for the US again.
Go back and tell me how the Republicans are the only choice.
Go back and tell me how its only right that bank executives shoud get ginormous bonuses, how the Tea Party is the only choice, why its so important for corporations to have the same or more rights than people.
Go back and tell me these things.
You won't mind though if I give you a punch for luck though, right?
You know, just a little tap on the nose, or you know with a club or something.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210406</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210588</id>
	<title>Re:this attack finally convinced me</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266687240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After the various Chinese food scandals, I refuse to buy any food from that comes from China.  It's obvious to me the cause of the THREE separate melamine food scandals (milk, wheat gluten and pet food) and the poisoned toothpaste scandal were a corrupt system that's setup to reward bad behavior.  Essentially milk producers got more money if they had high protein levels in the milk.  Adding melamine gave a high false reading for protein.  Someone obviously started marketing this melamine to farmers or someone else in the distribution channel to raise protein levels.  They might not even have known what the hell the stuff was.  If the price of milk is so low you can't survive without watering it down and putting this poison in it to "enhance" it, how many people won't do that? So the problem is systemic, and not just "a few bad apples", which is how I heard China was trying to spin it as.  Not a system I want to gamble my health on.</p><p>The whole thing reminds me of the U.S. banking system that caused the housing collapse.  That's a similar system that rewarded bad behavior where banks bundle up bad mortgages (throwing away information in the process), and then get a ratings agency to give the resulting security a triple-A rating (low risk).  The securities then got sold around the world.  The ratings agencies are "independent", but are highly motivated to give good ratings since banks will shop around for good rating agencies.  Of course, we STILL haven't really fixed the system in any way, and the will to do so is quickly disappearing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After the various Chinese food scandals , I refuse to buy any food from that comes from China .
It 's obvious to me the cause of the THREE separate melamine food scandals ( milk , wheat gluten and pet food ) and the poisoned toothpaste scandal were a corrupt system that 's setup to reward bad behavior .
Essentially milk producers got more money if they had high protein levels in the milk .
Adding melamine gave a high false reading for protein .
Someone obviously started marketing this melamine to farmers or someone else in the distribution channel to raise protein levels .
They might not even have known what the hell the stuff was .
If the price of milk is so low you ca n't survive without watering it down and putting this poison in it to " enhance " it , how many people wo n't do that ?
So the problem is systemic , and not just " a few bad apples " , which is how I heard China was trying to spin it as .
Not a system I want to gamble my health on.The whole thing reminds me of the U.S. banking system that caused the housing collapse .
That 's a similar system that rewarded bad behavior where banks bundle up bad mortgages ( throwing away information in the process ) , and then get a ratings agency to give the resulting security a triple-A rating ( low risk ) .
The securities then got sold around the world .
The ratings agencies are " independent " , but are highly motivated to give good ratings since banks will shop around for good rating agencies .
Of course , we STILL have n't really fixed the system in any way , and the will to do so is quickly disappearing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After the various Chinese food scandals, I refuse to buy any food from that comes from China.
It's obvious to me the cause of the THREE separate melamine food scandals (milk, wheat gluten and pet food) and the poisoned toothpaste scandal were a corrupt system that's setup to reward bad behavior.
Essentially milk producers got more money if they had high protein levels in the milk.
Adding melamine gave a high false reading for protein.
Someone obviously started marketing this melamine to farmers or someone else in the distribution channel to raise protein levels.
They might not even have known what the hell the stuff was.
If the price of milk is so low you can't survive without watering it down and putting this poison in it to "enhance" it, how many people won't do that?
So the problem is systemic, and not just "a few bad apples", which is how I heard China was trying to spin it as.
Not a system I want to gamble my health on.The whole thing reminds me of the U.S. banking system that caused the housing collapse.
That's a similar system that rewarded bad behavior where banks bundle up bad mortgages (throwing away information in the process), and then get a ratings agency to give the resulting security a triple-A rating (low risk).
The securities then got sold around the world.
The ratings agencies are "independent", but are highly motivated to give good ratings since banks will shop around for good rating agencies.
Of course, we STILL haven't really fixed the system in any way, and the will to do so is quickly disappearing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210262</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210400</id>
	<title>Re:Hum.</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1266685680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who knows, maybe the government ain't responsible for it after all?</p><p>Let's be honest here, think back to your school years. I dunno about you, but I grew up with the (motion) picture of the evil Russian and the heroic US agents and spies that steal (and steal back) $secret from Russian developers, or sabotage the development of $evil\_weapon. I can well imagine that the Chinese movie market pushes out the same kind of propaganda, with US for Russia and China for US.</p><p>Now, unlike us who had, at best, analog modems with 900something baud (if that), these kids have fast internet connections at their disposal. Security is actually WORSE than it was in our youth, when the only servers you'd find were by definition pretty secure because they were ran by highly trained professionals (because no ordinary company and certainly no ordinary person could cough up the dough to run one) instead of being set up by idiots that got a crib sheet for setting one up in their evening school class. And let's not even consider the millions of people online who think TCP is the Chinese Secret Service or something like that.</p><p>I can see how it could be tempting to a teenager with the tools and the knowledge to go and cause havoc to "that evil power".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who knows , maybe the government ai n't responsible for it after all ? Let 's be honest here , think back to your school years .
I dunno about you , but I grew up with the ( motion ) picture of the evil Russian and the heroic US agents and spies that steal ( and steal back ) $ secret from Russian developers , or sabotage the development of $ evil \ _weapon .
I can well imagine that the Chinese movie market pushes out the same kind of propaganda , with US for Russia and China for US.Now , unlike us who had , at best , analog modems with 900something baud ( if that ) , these kids have fast internet connections at their disposal .
Security is actually WORSE than it was in our youth , when the only servers you 'd find were by definition pretty secure because they were ran by highly trained professionals ( because no ordinary company and certainly no ordinary person could cough up the dough to run one ) instead of being set up by idiots that got a crib sheet for setting one up in their evening school class .
And let 's not even consider the millions of people online who think TCP is the Chinese Secret Service or something like that.I can see how it could be tempting to a teenager with the tools and the knowledge to go and cause havoc to " that evil power " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who knows, maybe the government ain't responsible for it after all?Let's be honest here, think back to your school years.
I dunno about you, but I grew up with the (motion) picture of the evil Russian and the heroic US agents and spies that steal (and steal back) $secret from Russian developers, or sabotage the development of $evil\_weapon.
I can well imagine that the Chinese movie market pushes out the same kind of propaganda, with US for Russia and China for US.Now, unlike us who had, at best, analog modems with 900something baud (if that), these kids have fast internet connections at their disposal.
Security is actually WORSE than it was in our youth, when the only servers you'd find were by definition pretty secure because they were ran by highly trained professionals (because no ordinary company and certainly no ordinary person could cough up the dough to run one) instead of being set up by idiots that got a crib sheet for setting one up in their evening school class.
And let's not even consider the millions of people online who think TCP is the Chinese Secret Service or something like that.I can see how it could be tempting to a teenager with the tools and the knowledge to go and cause havoc to "that evil power".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31213652</id>
	<title>Re:this attack finally convinced me</title>
	<author>zill</author>
	<datestamp>1266664680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Please let me know where you can purchase a computer that's not assembled in China.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Please let me know where you can purchase a computer that 's not assembled in China .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please let me know where you can purchase a computer that's not assembled in China.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210262</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210536</id>
	<title>You Can't Find Me, I'm the Gingerbread Man!</title>
	<author>icepick72</author>
	<datestamp>1266686820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Of all the computers in all the world, USA investigates and traces attacks to two computers in two schools in China, yet several people with knowledge of the investigation asked for *anonymity* because they are not authorized to discuss the inquiry. Yep they're going to be really hard to track down. Love it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of all the computers in all the world , USA investigates and traces attacks to two computers in two schools in China , yet several people with knowledge of the investigation asked for * anonymity * because they are not authorized to discuss the inquiry .
Yep they 're going to be really hard to track down .
Love it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of all the computers in all the world, USA investigates and traces attacks to two computers in two schools in China, yet several people with knowledge of the investigation asked for *anonymity* because they are not authorized to discuss the inquiry.
Yep they're going to be really hard to track down.
Love it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31215884</id>
	<title>Oh really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266685380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The recent unrest in Tibet and Xinjiang were funded by the CIA. Just part of the continuing effort to keep China off balance. The DL is just a pawn in this power game. With the grab for resources in Central Asia by both China, Russia and the West, it is going to get worse. The cold war never stopped, the Chinese just made it more obvious. Remember the US-based Afghans and Iraqis that are slotted in positions of power by the US occupying forces, you can be sure similar persons are primed and waiting in the US should a regime change be successful.</p><p>Imagine how the US public would feel if the Chinese started aiding native Americans, disfranchised minorities in the US and some of the oddball independence movements in the US, say Texas or Hawaii?</p><p>As for the quest for democracy, that is the choice of the Chinese people. We have no right to impose that on others. I am a Singaporean living in China and have lived in the US as well. I can tell you I feel safer walking the streets (except for the damn traffic and crazy drivers) and have my children attend school here rather than in the US.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The recent unrest in Tibet and Xinjiang were funded by the CIA .
Just part of the continuing effort to keep China off balance .
The DL is just a pawn in this power game .
With the grab for resources in Central Asia by both China , Russia and the West , it is going to get worse .
The cold war never stopped , the Chinese just made it more obvious .
Remember the US-based Afghans and Iraqis that are slotted in positions of power by the US occupying forces , you can be sure similar persons are primed and waiting in the US should a regime change be successful.Imagine how the US public would feel if the Chinese started aiding native Americans , disfranchised minorities in the US and some of the oddball independence movements in the US , say Texas or Hawaii ? As for the quest for democracy , that is the choice of the Chinese people .
We have no right to impose that on others .
I am a Singaporean living in China and have lived in the US as well .
I can tell you I feel safer walking the streets ( except for the damn traffic and crazy drivers ) and have my children attend school here rather than in the US .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The recent unrest in Tibet and Xinjiang were funded by the CIA.
Just part of the continuing effort to keep China off balance.
The DL is just a pawn in this power game.
With the grab for resources in Central Asia by both China, Russia and the West, it is going to get worse.
The cold war never stopped, the Chinese just made it more obvious.
Remember the US-based Afghans and Iraqis that are slotted in positions of power by the US occupying forces, you can be sure similar persons are primed and waiting in the US should a regime change be successful.Imagine how the US public would feel if the Chinese started aiding native Americans, disfranchised minorities in the US and some of the oddball independence movements in the US, say Texas or Hawaii?As for the quest for democracy, that is the choice of the Chinese people.
We have no right to impose that on others.
I am a Singaporean living in China and have lived in the US as well.
I can tell you I feel safer walking the streets (except for the damn traffic and crazy drivers) and have my children attend school here rather than in the US.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210228</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210308</id>
	<title>Re:Act Of War</title>
	<author>commodore64\_love</author>
	<datestamp>1266684780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Instead of shipping across the Pacific, we'd simply ship across the Atlantic, and buy stuff from Europe, Africa, and India.  It might cost a little more to buy from those areas, but the goods will still fit our needs.</p><p>And China would be hurt from the sudden lack of income from the US and the EU.  It would probably throw them into an economic depression.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Instead of shipping across the Pacific , we 'd simply ship across the Atlantic , and buy stuff from Europe , Africa , and India .
It might cost a little more to buy from those areas , but the goods will still fit our needs.And China would be hurt from the sudden lack of income from the US and the EU .
It would probably throw them into an economic depression .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Instead of shipping across the Pacific, we'd simply ship across the Atlantic, and buy stuff from Europe, Africa, and India.
It might cost a little more to buy from those areas, but the goods will still fit our needs.And China would be hurt from the sudden lack of income from the US and the EU.
It would probably throw them into an economic depression.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210244</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210344</id>
	<title>The racist 1940s</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266685140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt;&gt;"Beware of the yellow peril! Be a patriotic American<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...!"</p><p>+1 funny. (dark humor)</p><p>People who admire FDR always forget this part of his presidency, where he locked-up American citizens and deprived them of their rights to property, trial by jury, free speech, and so on.  Why?  Simply because these Americans looked like asians.  -  In many respects FDR was our worst president.  I know that's an unpopular view, nevertheless that's what I think.</p><p>I hope IF we have another war with the Asian continent (i.e. China) that we do a better job of obeying the Constitution instead of ignoring it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; &gt; " Beware of the yellow peril !
Be a patriotic American ... !
" + 1 funny .
( dark humor ) People who admire FDR always forget this part of his presidency , where he locked-up American citizens and deprived them of their rights to property , trial by jury , free speech , and so on .
Why ? Simply because these Americans looked like asians .
- In many respects FDR was our worst president .
I know that 's an unpopular view , nevertheless that 's what I think.I hope IF we have another war with the Asian continent ( i.e .
China ) that we do a better job of obeying the Constitution instead of ignoring it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt;&gt;"Beware of the yellow peril!
Be a patriotic American ...!
"+1 funny.
(dark humor)People who admire FDR always forget this part of his presidency, where he locked-up American citizens and deprived them of their rights to property, trial by jury, free speech, and so on.
Why?  Simply because these Americans looked like asians.
-  In many respects FDR was our worst president.
I know that's an unpopular view, nevertheless that's what I think.I hope IF we have another war with the Asian continent (i.e.
China) that we do a better job of obeying the Constitution instead of ignoring it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210114</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210230</id>
	<title>Re:Act Of War</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266684060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You do realize that by those standards of treating industrial/state espionage as an act of war you should also be including countries like france, germany, israel, russia, south africa and so on? Not to mention the dozens and dozens of countries the US regularly performs hostile intelligence operations on? So you're really hoping for WWIII? Welcome to the real world, kid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You do realize that by those standards of treating industrial/state espionage as an act of war you should also be including countries like france , germany , israel , russia , south africa and so on ?
Not to mention the dozens and dozens of countries the US regularly performs hostile intelligence operations on ?
So you 're really hoping for WWIII ?
Welcome to the real world , kid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You do realize that by those standards of treating industrial/state espionage as an act of war you should also be including countries like france, germany, israel, russia, south africa and so on?
Not to mention the dozens and dozens of countries the US regularly performs hostile intelligence operations on?
So you're really hoping for WWIII?
Welcome to the real world, kid.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31213820</id>
	<title>unpopular</title>
	<author>bomcha</author>
	<datestamp>1266666060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Lets suppose it's true about the origin of the attacks...but can we say the US government is also totally without it's guilt???</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lets suppose it 's true about the origin of the attacks...but can we say the US government is also totally without it 's guilt ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lets suppose it's true about the origin of the attacks...but can we say the US government is also totally without it's guilt??
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210726</id>
	<title>Re:this attack finally convinced me</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266688620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't be stupid. Because of China's unique economic position, it has very diverse manufacturing, meaning that "China" will make anything you care to specify. If the companies you buy from are specifying crap, China will make crap to order, those companies will sell you the crap with a nice American markup, and when you call to complain that it is crap, they will tell you a story about stuff made in China, which of course is the stuff they told China to make in the first place. End result? You blame China and hold no ill for the American company that knowingly sold you overpriced garbage, because you're a sucker.</p><p>China also makes top-end electronics like the iPod and Nintendo DS. Why? Because Apple and Nintendo tell them to make top-end electronics. They do that because they care about their brand image and want people to associate their brands with high-quality stuff. They (i.e. you) get what was paid for. Walmart however doesn't give a damn about its image, and if you only buy the cheap crap they order from China, then you're only going to get cheap crap. Yeah your $10 Walmart shoes made in China fell apart in a couple of months? Go figure. My $100 Nikes that lasted all the way through college and beyond? Also made in China. Do the math.</p><p>An American company will gladly sell you cheap junk if they care nothing for their image, and if you're stupid enough to keep buying it. China has nothing to do with your problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't be stupid .
Because of China 's unique economic position , it has very diverse manufacturing , meaning that " China " will make anything you care to specify .
If the companies you buy from are specifying crap , China will make crap to order , those companies will sell you the crap with a nice American markup , and when you call to complain that it is crap , they will tell you a story about stuff made in China , which of course is the stuff they told China to make in the first place .
End result ?
You blame China and hold no ill for the American company that knowingly sold you overpriced garbage , because you 're a sucker.China also makes top-end electronics like the iPod and Nintendo DS .
Why ? Because Apple and Nintendo tell them to make top-end electronics .
They do that because they care about their brand image and want people to associate their brands with high-quality stuff .
They ( i.e .
you ) get what was paid for .
Walmart however does n't give a damn about its image , and if you only buy the cheap crap they order from China , then you 're only going to get cheap crap .
Yeah your $ 10 Walmart shoes made in China fell apart in a couple of months ?
Go figure .
My $ 100 Nikes that lasted all the way through college and beyond ?
Also made in China .
Do the math.An American company will gladly sell you cheap junk if they care nothing for their image , and if you 're stupid enough to keep buying it .
China has nothing to do with your problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't be stupid.
Because of China's unique economic position, it has very diverse manufacturing, meaning that "China" will make anything you care to specify.
If the companies you buy from are specifying crap, China will make crap to order, those companies will sell you the crap with a nice American markup, and when you call to complain that it is crap, they will tell you a story about stuff made in China, which of course is the stuff they told China to make in the first place.
End result?
You blame China and hold no ill for the American company that knowingly sold you overpriced garbage, because you're a sucker.China also makes top-end electronics like the iPod and Nintendo DS.
Why? Because Apple and Nintendo tell them to make top-end electronics.
They do that because they care about their brand image and want people to associate their brands with high-quality stuff.
They (i.e.
you) get what was paid for.
Walmart however doesn't give a damn about its image, and if you only buy the cheap crap they order from China, then you're only going to get cheap crap.
Yeah your $10 Walmart shoes made in China fell apart in a couple of months?
Go figure.
My $100 Nikes that lasted all the way through college and beyond?
Also made in China.
Do the math.An American company will gladly sell you cheap junk if they care nothing for their image, and if you're stupid enough to keep buying it.
China has nothing to do with your problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210262</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211510</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah. So what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266694560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>BULLSHIT.</p><p>China is NOT in cold war. China is in competition. Well, I should say China Inc. is in competition with US businesses.</p><p>If China was a democracy, who knows, it may be even more nationalistic. Democracy is not a panacea. Just look what happened to Gaza thanks to democracy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>BULLSHIT.China is NOT in cold war .
China is in competition .
Well , I should say China Inc. is in competition with US businesses.If China was a democracy , who knows , it may be even more nationalistic .
Democracy is not a panacea .
Just look what happened to Gaza thanks to democracy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>BULLSHIT.China is NOT in cold war.
China is in competition.
Well, I should say China Inc. is in competition with US businesses.If China was a democracy, who knows, it may be even more nationalistic.
Democracy is not a panacea.
Just look what happened to Gaza thanks to democracy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210228</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210228</id>
	<title>Yeah. So what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266684000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seriously, so what? China is in a cold war with the west. Sadly, the west has not woke up to this. This is just one more of their approaches. And to be honest, it is SMART on their part. The west is working hard to avoid another cold war, but we are in it and losing it. If China was a democracy, then it would be different. However, you will note that all of the nations that are not full democracies are coming together, and they are winning.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , so what ?
China is in a cold war with the west .
Sadly , the west has not woke up to this .
This is just one more of their approaches .
And to be honest , it is SMART on their part .
The west is working hard to avoid another cold war , but we are in it and losing it .
If China was a democracy , then it would be different .
However , you will note that all of the nations that are not full democracies are coming together , and they are winning .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, so what?
China is in a cold war with the west.
Sadly, the west has not woke up to this.
This is just one more of their approaches.
And to be honest, it is SMART on their part.
The west is working hard to avoid another cold war, but we are in it and losing it.
If China was a democracy, then it would be different.
However, you will note that all of the nations that are not full democracies are coming together, and they are winning.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210438</id>
	<title>Re:The racist 1940s</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266686100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There won't be a war with China. They don't need to resort to military action.</p><p>Have you been to an American college lately? It varies by region, but you'll notice that about 60\% of the students in the important STEM programs are Asian (mostly Chinese, with a smattering of South Korean, Japanese and Taiwanese), and most of them are not American. The same goes for professors. It depends on the school you're considering, but it's typical to have 40\% to 50\% of the professors coming directly from an Asian nation, even if they received their education in the US.</p><p>What's worse, Americans themselves who want at least some sort of an education are avoiding these actually-useful STEM programs, in favor of getting near-useless liberal arts or "business" degrees of various kinds. Other large groups of Americans, mainly black and Hispanics, go out of their way to shun education from their early years.</p><p>Within a generation, the vast majority of people in the United States capable of performing math or performing engineering or developing high technology will not be Americans. They will be these Asian students, after they have rising through the ranks of American colleges and corporations, becoming the leadership. And as everyone knows, those who control the American corporations control American politics, as well as exerting huge influence over international relations. So war won't be a necessity, and won't even be in China's best interest, due to how entangled they will have become with the American corporate leadership.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There wo n't be a war with China .
They do n't need to resort to military action.Have you been to an American college lately ?
It varies by region , but you 'll notice that about 60 \ % of the students in the important STEM programs are Asian ( mostly Chinese , with a smattering of South Korean , Japanese and Taiwanese ) , and most of them are not American .
The same goes for professors .
It depends on the school you 're considering , but it 's typical to have 40 \ % to 50 \ % of the professors coming directly from an Asian nation , even if they received their education in the US.What 's worse , Americans themselves who want at least some sort of an education are avoiding these actually-useful STEM programs , in favor of getting near-useless liberal arts or " business " degrees of various kinds .
Other large groups of Americans , mainly black and Hispanics , go out of their way to shun education from their early years.Within a generation , the vast majority of people in the United States capable of performing math or performing engineering or developing high technology will not be Americans .
They will be these Asian students , after they have rising through the ranks of American colleges and corporations , becoming the leadership .
And as everyone knows , those who control the American corporations control American politics , as well as exerting huge influence over international relations .
So war wo n't be a necessity , and wo n't even be in China 's best interest , due to how entangled they will have become with the American corporate leadership .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There won't be a war with China.
They don't need to resort to military action.Have you been to an American college lately?
It varies by region, but you'll notice that about 60\% of the students in the important STEM programs are Asian (mostly Chinese, with a smattering of South Korean, Japanese and Taiwanese), and most of them are not American.
The same goes for professors.
It depends on the school you're considering, but it's typical to have 40\% to 50\% of the professors coming directly from an Asian nation, even if they received their education in the US.What's worse, Americans themselves who want at least some sort of an education are avoiding these actually-useful STEM programs, in favor of getting near-useless liberal arts or "business" degrees of various kinds.
Other large groups of Americans, mainly black and Hispanics, go out of their way to shun education from their early years.Within a generation, the vast majority of people in the United States capable of performing math or performing engineering or developing high technology will not be Americans.
They will be these Asian students, after they have rising through the ranks of American colleges and corporations, becoming the leadership.
And as everyone knows, those who control the American corporations control American politics, as well as exerting huge influence over international relations.
So war won't be a necessity, and won't even be in China's best interest, due to how entangled they will have become with the American corporate leadership.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211968</id>
	<title>HAHA your all commies now</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266696840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>hows it feel to be owned by the commies</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>hows it feel to be owned by the commies</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hows it feel to be owned by the commies</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210632</id>
	<title>Google Search Language Preferences</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266687600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone else notice the change to Search Language Preferences after the Google/China incident? It may just be a coincidence but the "Search for pages written in any language (Recommended)" option is no longer the default or an available option. The only option now is "Prefer pages written in these language(s)" with one of the languages sometimes selected and unselectable by default depending on your "Interface Language" setting or which localized version of Google you visit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone else notice the change to Search Language Preferences after the Google/China incident ?
It may just be a coincidence but the " Search for pages written in any language ( Recommended ) " option is no longer the default or an available option .
The only option now is " Prefer pages written in these language ( s ) " with one of the languages sometimes selected and unselectable by default depending on your " Interface Language " setting or which localized version of Google you visit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone else notice the change to Search Language Preferences after the Google/China incident?
It may just be a coincidence but the "Search for pages written in any language (Recommended)" option is no longer the default or an available option.
The only option now is "Prefer pages written in these language(s)" with one of the languages sometimes selected and unselectable by default depending on your "Interface Language" setting or which localized version of Google you visit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210768</id>
	<title>wow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266688920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow. reading all these comments, it seems like a lot of hidden fears coming to surface. Worries about Chinese dominance may be justified but come on,<br>what shook me up was the casual by-the-way remark of jailing all Chinese americans plus all the justifications that came after it. Hitler anyone....<br>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow .
reading all these comments , it seems like a lot of hidden fears coming to surface .
Worries about Chinese dominance may be justified but come on,what shook me up was the casual by-the-way remark of jailing all Chinese americans plus all the justifications that came after it .
Hitler anyone... .  </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow.
reading all these comments, it seems like a lot of hidden fears coming to surface.
Worries about Chinese dominance may be justified but come on,what shook me up was the casual by-the-way remark of jailing all Chinese americans plus all the justifications that came after it.
Hitler anyone....
 </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210450</id>
	<title>Re:The racist 1940s</title>
	<author>crazycheetah</author>
	<datestamp>1266686160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Goddamn, I'm 22 and don't know shit about history (relative to other topics), but I thought about this as I read the OP. In its own dark way, it's kinda funny...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Goddamn , I 'm 22 and do n't know shit about history ( relative to other topics ) , but I thought about this as I read the OP .
In its own dark way , it 's kinda funny.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Goddamn, I'm 22 and don't know shit about history (relative to other topics), but I thought about this as I read the OP.
In its own dark way, it's kinda funny...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210262</id>
	<title>this attack finally convinced me</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266684360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>to go ABC with my buying habits, ie Anything But China.  I refuse unless absolutely necessary to buy goods manufactured in China.  They are obvious hellbent on telling the rest of the world what they are allowed to do(such as meet with the Dalai Lama), not to mention they have the most hypocritical trade policy on the planet.  Fuck them, fuck them all.<br> <br>
It's not easy, but if you are vigilant you can find really good deals on stuff not made in China(which is pretty much all shit quality anyway).  I've noticed that clothes made in Vietnam have much better quality than those made in China, ditto for electronics and Japan.  I have a camera that is made in Japan and has lasted a long time despite being repeatedly abused.  It was certainly worth the extra bit of money I paid over the Chinese made piece of shit I bought before.  The last pair of shoes I bought that were made in China fell apart in a couple of months, the US made ones I am wearing now are much durable.  The list goes on.  Boycott China.</htmltext>
<tokenext>to go ABC with my buying habits , ie Anything But China .
I refuse unless absolutely necessary to buy goods manufactured in China .
They are obvious hellbent on telling the rest of the world what they are allowed to do ( such as meet with the Dalai Lama ) , not to mention they have the most hypocritical trade policy on the planet .
Fuck them , fuck them all .
It 's not easy , but if you are vigilant you can find really good deals on stuff not made in China ( which is pretty much all shit quality anyway ) .
I 've noticed that clothes made in Vietnam have much better quality than those made in China , ditto for electronics and Japan .
I have a camera that is made in Japan and has lasted a long time despite being repeatedly abused .
It was certainly worth the extra bit of money I paid over the Chinese made piece of shit I bought before .
The last pair of shoes I bought that were made in China fell apart in a couple of months , the US made ones I am wearing now are much durable .
The list goes on .
Boycott China .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to go ABC with my buying habits, ie Anything But China.
I refuse unless absolutely necessary to buy goods manufactured in China.
They are obvious hellbent on telling the rest of the world what they are allowed to do(such as meet with the Dalai Lama), not to mention they have the most hypocritical trade policy on the planet.
Fuck them, fuck them all.
It's not easy, but if you are vigilant you can find really good deals on stuff not made in China(which is pretty much all shit quality anyway).
I've noticed that clothes made in Vietnam have much better quality than those made in China, ditto for electronics and Japan.
I have a camera that is made in Japan and has lasted a long time despite being repeatedly abused.
It was certainly worth the extra bit of money I paid over the Chinese made piece of shit I bought before.
The last pair of shoes I bought that were made in China fell apart in a couple of months, the US made ones I am wearing now are much durable.
The list goes on.
Boycott China.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210276</id>
	<title>Jiaotong university topped the ACM</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266684480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Four Chinese teams and four Russian teams dominated the top 10  rankings of the 2010 ACM International Collegiate Programming Contest (ACM ICPC).  Shanghai Jiaotong University took first place followed by Moscow State University in second place, and National Taiwan University in third place. "</p><p>From <a href="http://www.acm.org/press-room/news-releases/2010/icpc-2010" title="acm.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.acm.org/press-room/news-releases/2010/icpc-2010</a> [acm.org]</p><p>No wonder why they are so good.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Four Chinese teams and four Russian teams dominated the top 10 rankings of the 2010 ACM International Collegiate Programming Contest ( ACM ICPC ) .
Shanghai Jiaotong University took first place followed by Moscow State University in second place , and National Taiwan University in third place .
" From http : //www.acm.org/press-room/news-releases/2010/icpc-2010 [ acm.org ] No wonder why they are so good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Four Chinese teams and four Russian teams dominated the top 10  rankings of the 2010 ACM International Collegiate Programming Contest (ACM ICPC).
Shanghai Jiaotong University took first place followed by Moscow State University in second place, and National Taiwan University in third place.
"From http://www.acm.org/press-room/news-releases/2010/icpc-2010 [acm.org]No wonder why they are so good.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31214036</id>
	<title>Re:Verbal diarrhea</title>
	<author>Erinnys Tisiphone</author>
	<datestamp>1266668340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Agreed. This should be kept completely under wraps until there is solid evidence against a particular party and its time to press charges or involve diplomatic agencies.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed .
This should be kept completely under wraps until there is solid evidence against a particular party and its time to press charges or involve diplomatic agencies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed.
This should be kept completely under wraps until there is solid evidence against a particular party and its time to press charges or involve diplomatic agencies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210168</id>
	<title>Act Of War</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266683280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It seems clear that if the Chinese government is ultimately responsible for these heinous attacks, it is an act of war, and should be responded to forcefully and directly.</p><p>This is just like terrorist acts prior to 9/11.  We should not wait for the digital Pearl Harbor to occur before we act.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems clear that if the Chinese government is ultimately responsible for these heinous attacks , it is an act of war , and should be responded to forcefully and directly.This is just like terrorist acts prior to 9/11 .
We should not wait for the digital Pearl Harbor to occur before we act .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems clear that if the Chinese government is ultimately responsible for these heinous attacks, it is an act of war, and should be responded to forcefully and directly.This is just like terrorist acts prior to 9/11.
We should not wait for the digital Pearl Harbor to occur before we act.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210290</id>
	<title>Re:Act Of War</title>
	<author>Halo1</author>
	<datestamp>1266684660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The scary part is that the parent is modded insightful instead of funny. There are many documented cases of the CIA, NSA, US Department of Commerce and other US entities (both governmental and non-governmental) committing industrial espionage in various forms (breaking into networks, tapping into video conferences, phone tapping, planting microphones and cameras,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...). See e.g. the list under "Published cases" in the <a href="http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+REPORT+A5-2001-0264+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN" title="europa.eu">Echelon report</a> [europa.eu] by the European Parliament.</p><p>So please stop acting like Virgin Mary already, it doesn't become you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The scary part is that the parent is modded insightful instead of funny .
There are many documented cases of the CIA , NSA , US Department of Commerce and other US entities ( both governmental and non-governmental ) committing industrial espionage in various forms ( breaking into networks , tapping into video conferences , phone tapping , planting microphones and cameras , ... ) .
See e.g .
the list under " Published cases " in the Echelon report [ europa.eu ] by the European Parliament.So please stop acting like Virgin Mary already , it does n't become you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The scary part is that the parent is modded insightful instead of funny.
There are many documented cases of the CIA, NSA, US Department of Commerce and other US entities (both governmental and non-governmental) committing industrial espionage in various forms (breaking into networks, tapping into video conferences, phone tapping, planting microphones and cameras, ...).
See e.g.
the list under "Published cases" in the Echelon report [europa.eu] by the European Parliament.So please stop acting like Virgin Mary already, it doesn't become you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31214950</id>
	<title>....Or they're just BSing...</title>
	<author>taishi07</author>
	<datestamp>1266675960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is from the Lanxiang school they're talking about =.=;

<a href="http://zonaeuropa.com/201002b.brief.htm#015" title="zonaeuropa.com" rel="nofollow">http://zonaeuropa.com/201002b.brief.htm#015</a> [zonaeuropa.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is from the Lanxiang school they 're talking about = . = ; http : //zonaeuropa.com/201002b.brief.htm # 015 [ zonaeuropa.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is from the Lanxiang school they're talking about =.=;

http://zonaeuropa.com/201002b.brief.htm#015 [zonaeuropa.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210422</id>
	<title>What they teach there?</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1266685920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Social Engineering 101<br>Exploiting Windows for fun and profit<br>Deploying trojans<br>Advanced botnets<br>Hacking NSA<br>Hacking Google<br>And the final exam consist in hacking into Independence Day's Alien mainframe</htmltext>
<tokenext>Social Engineering 101Exploiting Windows for fun and profitDeploying trojansAdvanced botnetsHacking NSAHacking GoogleAnd the final exam consist in hacking into Independence Day 's Alien mainframe</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Social Engineering 101Exploiting Windows for fun and profitDeploying trojansAdvanced botnetsHacking NSAHacking GoogleAnd the final exam consist in hacking into Independence Day's Alien mainframe</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211246</id>
	<title>Re:Act Of War</title>
	<author>hackingbear</author>
	<datestamp>1266692940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Simple! Stop exporting wheat, pork, beef, chicken feet to China. They may have to worry about food again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Simple !
Stop exporting wheat , pork , beef , chicken feet to China .
They may have to worry about food again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Simple!
Stop exporting wheat, pork, beef, chicken feet to China.
They may have to worry about food again.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210244</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211626</id>
	<title>Re:The racist 1940s</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266695100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I live in a community where a large majority of Nisei were.  My family understood their plight and stored many of their things (hiding them would have been treason) during the rounding up and shipping out to the Salinas Rodeo (where they were penned overnight like cattle, before being crammed like sardines into trains and shipped to beautiful Nevada.)  My best friend's Father was in the 522nd and the man was as patriotic as anyone I ever met.  What we did to them was terrible, what they did for us won the war.</p><p>Chinese immigrants have been coming here for years, and they've fought in our wars and worked in our intelligence, energy, and defense services.  1/5th of the world is chinese, that's a lot of room for diverse opinions.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I live in a community where a large majority of Nisei were .
My family understood their plight and stored many of their things ( hiding them would have been treason ) during the rounding up and shipping out to the Salinas Rodeo ( where they were penned overnight like cattle , before being crammed like sardines into trains and shipped to beautiful Nevada .
) My best friend 's Father was in the 522nd and the man was as patriotic as anyone I ever met .
What we did to them was terrible , what they did for us won the war.Chinese immigrants have been coming here for years , and they 've fought in our wars and worked in our intelligence , energy , and defense services .
1/5th of the world is chinese , that 's a lot of room for diverse opinions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I live in a community where a large majority of Nisei were.
My family understood their plight and stored many of their things (hiding them would have been treason) during the rounding up and shipping out to the Salinas Rodeo (where they were penned overnight like cattle, before being crammed like sardines into trains and shipped to beautiful Nevada.
)  My best friend's Father was in the 522nd and the man was as patriotic as anyone I ever met.
What we did to them was terrible, what they did for us won the war.Chinese immigrants have been coming here for years, and they've fought in our wars and worked in our intelligence, energy, and defense services.
1/5th of the world is chinese, that's a lot of room for diverse opinions.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211830</id>
	<title>Re:Act Of War</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266696060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, if we went to war with China, wouldn't you target manufacturing first anyways?</p><p>Isn't that the whole strategum of Total Warfare?  Destroy your enemies ability to wage war and winning is a matter of time.</p><p>That, and seizing assets + annexation etc.  Was Hong Kong's return to the Red Machine really all that long ago that we have forgotten the last time we were dependent on china for an unnecessary good that caused human beings harm?  It seems we have an opportunity to save ourselves from the Sneakers and Cheap Electronics war of the future by making it cheaper and better ourselves.  It doesn't take manpower so much as smarts, look at the innovations coming out of the Japanese Auto industry.  We're just placated into being stupid.</p><p>Drive car, chow, watch tv, sleep, work, read email, read silly news sites, chow, watch tv, sleep</p><p>Let "them" do the hard work, is the placated worker's mantra.  And we've been saying it for decades now.</p><p>Someone needs to light a fire under our asses to get us moving.  War is good at that, but it's also good at getting people killed and causing defecits...  *sigh* oh Irony.  We develop all this technology to fight a war we don't want to participate in.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , if we went to war with China , would n't you target manufacturing first anyways ? Is n't that the whole strategum of Total Warfare ?
Destroy your enemies ability to wage war and winning is a matter of time.That , and seizing assets + annexation etc .
Was Hong Kong 's return to the Red Machine really all that long ago that we have forgotten the last time we were dependent on china for an unnecessary good that caused human beings harm ?
It seems we have an opportunity to save ourselves from the Sneakers and Cheap Electronics war of the future by making it cheaper and better ourselves .
It does n't take manpower so much as smarts , look at the innovations coming out of the Japanese Auto industry .
We 're just placated into being stupid.Drive car , chow , watch tv , sleep , work , read email , read silly news sites , chow , watch tv , sleepLet " them " do the hard work , is the placated worker 's mantra .
And we 've been saying it for decades now.Someone needs to light a fire under our asses to get us moving .
War is good at that , but it 's also good at getting people killed and causing defecits... * sigh * oh Irony .
We develop all this technology to fight a war we do n't want to participate in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, if we went to war with China, wouldn't you target manufacturing first anyways?Isn't that the whole strategum of Total Warfare?
Destroy your enemies ability to wage war and winning is a matter of time.That, and seizing assets + annexation etc.
Was Hong Kong's return to the Red Machine really all that long ago that we have forgotten the last time we were dependent on china for an unnecessary good that caused human beings harm?
It seems we have an opportunity to save ourselves from the Sneakers and Cheap Electronics war of the future by making it cheaper and better ourselves.
It doesn't take manpower so much as smarts, look at the innovations coming out of the Japanese Auto industry.
We're just placated into being stupid.Drive car, chow, watch tv, sleep, work, read email, read silly news sites, chow, watch tv, sleepLet "them" do the hard work, is the placated worker's mantra.
And we've been saying it for decades now.Someone needs to light a fire under our asses to get us moving.
War is good at that, but it's also good at getting people killed and causing defecits...  *sigh* oh Irony.
We develop all this technology to fight a war we don't want to participate in.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210244</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31215968</id>
	<title>Re:The racist 1940s</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266686400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All these people denying fact.  The pillars are still there, even if they are never acted on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All these people denying fact .
The pillars are still there , even if they are never acted on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All these people denying fact.
The pillars are still there, even if they are never acted on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210284</id>
	<title>Re:Hum.</title>
	<author>liquidpele</author>
	<datestamp>1266684600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, banning all of China, Russia, Brazil, etc is pretty common practice for a long time if you don't do international business.   A google search gives you the IP blocks to use.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , banning all of China , Russia , Brazil , etc is pretty common practice for a long time if you do n't do international business .
A google search gives you the IP blocks to use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, banning all of China, Russia, Brazil, etc is pretty common practice for a long time if you don't do international business.
A google search gives you the IP blocks to use.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210688</id>
	<title>Verbal diarrhea</title>
	<author>Internalist</author>
	<datestamp>1266688260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>according to several people with knowledge of the investigation who asked for anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the inquiry</p></div><p>WTF is wrong with people that they can't shut up?? I see stuff like this all the time, and it boggles my mind that people on the inside are willing to discuss stuff that is likely to at least partially jeopardize the investigation under way. Surely it's not a profit-motive...I can't imagine journalists can pay very much for this kind of information...so what is it?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>according to several people with knowledge of the investigation who asked for anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the inquiryWTF is wrong with people that they ca n't shut up ? ?
I see stuff like this all the time , and it boggles my mind that people on the inside are willing to discuss stuff that is likely to at least partially jeopardize the investigation under way .
Surely it 's not a profit-motive...I ca n't imagine journalists can pay very much for this kind of information...so what is it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>according to several people with knowledge of the investigation who asked for anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the inquiryWTF is wrong with people that they can't shut up??
I see stuff like this all the time, and it boggles my mind that people on the inside are willing to discuss stuff that is likely to at least partially jeopardize the investigation under way.
Surely it's not a profit-motive...I can't imagine journalists can pay very much for this kind of information...so what is it?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210954</id>
	<title>Problem with the US - Lazy trains</title>
	<author>eternalelegy</author>
	<datestamp>1266690420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Lanxiang, in east China&amp;rsquo;s Shandong Province, is a huge vocational school that was established with military support and trains some computer scientists for the military.'"<br><br>That's the problem with the US nowadays, our trains are always off hauling freight or mucking about with passengers while the Chinese trains are establishing huge vocational schools for CS students.<br><br>Shameful.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Lanxiang , in east China    s Shandong Province , is a huge vocational school that was established with military support and trains some computer scientists for the military .
' " That 's the problem with the US nowadays , our trains are always off hauling freight or mucking about with passengers while the Chinese trains are establishing huge vocational schools for CS students.Shameful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Lanxiang, in east China’s Shandong Province, is a huge vocational school that was established with military support and trains some computer scientists for the military.
'"That's the problem with the US nowadays, our trains are always off hauling freight or mucking about with passengers while the Chinese trains are establishing huge vocational schools for CS students.Shameful.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31212226</id>
	<title>Re:this attack finally convinced me</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266698400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Buying Japan may not be an option for much longer either. The current government in Japan (the DPJ) is pushing a very hard pro-China anti-US slant as of late, in their actions and rhetoric.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Buying Japan may not be an option for much longer either .
The current government in Japan ( the DPJ ) is pushing a very hard pro-China anti-US slant as of late , in their actions and rhetoric .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Buying Japan may not be an option for much longer either.
The current government in Japan (the DPJ) is pushing a very hard pro-China anti-US slant as of late, in their actions and rhetoric.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210262</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210930</id>
	<title>You going to boycott the US government?</title>
	<author>Colin Smith</author>
	<datestamp>1266690180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cos China owns trillions of US government bonds, which your income taxes pay for.</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cos China owns trillions of US government bonds , which your income taxes pay for .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cos China owns trillions of US government bonds, which your income taxes pay for.
 </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210262</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31215772</id>
	<title>Re:The racist 1940s</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266684300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>There seems to be some problems with your statements. Basically they are all bullshit. Have a nice day.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There seems to be some problems with your statements .
Basically they are all bullshit .
Have a nice day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There seems to be some problems with your statements.
Basically they are all bullshit.
Have a nice day.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210556</id>
	<title>Re:The racist 1940s</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1266686940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I hope IF we have another war with the Asian continent (i.e. China) that we do a better job of obeying the Constitution instead of ignoring it.</i></p><p>You mean as well as the constitution is upheld in the war already being waged on the Asian continent, in respect of imprisoning people the US deem "terrorists"? Most likely we're going to see more loopholes used, akin to "if it's not on US soil, it doesn't matter to the Constitution...".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope IF we have another war with the Asian continent ( i.e .
China ) that we do a better job of obeying the Constitution instead of ignoring it.You mean as well as the constitution is upheld in the war already being waged on the Asian continent , in respect of imprisoning people the US deem " terrorists " ?
Most likely we 're going to see more loopholes used , akin to " if it 's not on US soil , it does n't matter to the Constitution... " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope IF we have another war with the Asian continent (i.e.
China) that we do a better job of obeying the Constitution instead of ignoring it.You mean as well as the constitution is upheld in the war already being waged on the Asian continent, in respect of imprisoning people the US deem "terrorists"?
Most likely we're going to see more loopholes used, akin to "if it's not on US soil, it doesn't matter to the Constitution...".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210406</id>
	<title>That isn't the question at all</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266685740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The question is, who do you get to buy your debts?</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The question is , who do you get to buy your debts ?
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>The question is, who do you get to buy your debts?
 </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210244</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210606</id>
	<title>Re:The racist 1940s</title>
	<author>Mashiki</author>
	<datestamp>1266687420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're saying this like this was a bad thing.  We did the same thing in Canada. As a 1st generation descendant of German/Japanese parents let me just say.  Given the opportunity at the time, plenty would have been happy to follow the orders of the fatherland and/or the god-emperor to do whatever it takes to kill you from within.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're saying this like this was a bad thing .
We did the same thing in Canada .
As a 1st generation descendant of German/Japanese parents let me just say .
Given the opportunity at the time , plenty would have been happy to follow the orders of the fatherland and/or the god-emperor to do whatever it takes to kill you from within .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're saying this like this was a bad thing.
We did the same thing in Canada.
As a 1st generation descendant of German/Japanese parents let me just say.
Given the opportunity at the time, plenty would have been happy to follow the orders of the fatherland and/or the god-emperor to do whatever it takes to kill you from within.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210410</id>
	<title>Re:this attack finally convinced me</title>
	<author>euyis</author>
	<datestamp>1266685800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What's a "repuplic"...</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's a " repuplic " .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's a "repuplic"...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210378</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210492</id>
	<title>Re:The racist 1940s</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266686520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Chinese immigrants to the USA are far less patriotic (to the USA) than were Japanese immigrants to the USA during WWII. In fact, somewhere between one-third and one-half of Chinese immigrants are already spying/aiding for the Chinese mainland in some way. Ask any sample of Chinese immigrants to the USA about where their loyalties lie. At the very best they are ambivalent.

</p><p>In a war with China the USA would have serious problems with its internal Chinese population. The lessons of the unjust Japanese imprisonment in WWII would not apply. We would be forced to imprison the Chinese. That would not be a racist act but a reasonable and necessary one.

</p><p>You have made the mistake of comparing two situations that appear to be similar but that are in fact quite different.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Chinese immigrants to the USA are far less patriotic ( to the USA ) than were Japanese immigrants to the USA during WWII .
In fact , somewhere between one-third and one-half of Chinese immigrants are already spying/aiding for the Chinese mainland in some way .
Ask any sample of Chinese immigrants to the USA about where their loyalties lie .
At the very best they are ambivalent .
In a war with China the USA would have serious problems with its internal Chinese population .
The lessons of the unjust Japanese imprisonment in WWII would not apply .
We would be forced to imprison the Chinese .
That would not be a racist act but a reasonable and necessary one .
You have made the mistake of comparing two situations that appear to be similar but that are in fact quite different .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chinese immigrants to the USA are far less patriotic (to the USA) than were Japanese immigrants to the USA during WWII.
In fact, somewhere between one-third and one-half of Chinese immigrants are already spying/aiding for the Chinese mainland in some way.
Ask any sample of Chinese immigrants to the USA about where their loyalties lie.
At the very best they are ambivalent.
In a war with China the USA would have serious problems with its internal Chinese population.
The lessons of the unjust Japanese imprisonment in WWII would not apply.
We would be forced to imprison the Chinese.
That would not be a racist act but a reasonable and necessary one.
You have made the mistake of comparing two situations that appear to be similar but that are in fact quite different.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31212564</id>
	<title>Re:this attack finally convinced me</title>
	<author>sadboyzz</author>
	<datestamp>1266657360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What are your afraid of if you're so sure Chinese made products are inferior to anything made everywhere else? Just let the free market sort it out. That is, after all, how capitalism works, is it not?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What are your afraid of if you 're so sure Chinese made products are inferior to anything made everywhere else ?
Just let the free market sort it out .
That is , after all , how capitalism works , is it not ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What are your afraid of if you're so sure Chinese made products are inferior to anything made everywhere else?
Just let the free market sort it out.
That is, after all, how capitalism works, is it not?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210262</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210718</id>
	<title>Re:Act Of War</title>
	<author>pitchaxistheory</author>
	<datestamp>1266688560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The answer to your question is Fallout 3.

But the problem is, where are all the Vaults?? Oh right... Vault-Tec lost it all on Lehman Bros. bonds... We're screwed!...

(I jest. I JEST!!)</htmltext>
<tokenext>The answer to your question is Fallout 3 .
But the problem is , where are all the Vaults ? ?
Oh right... Vault-Tec lost it all on Lehman Bros. bonds... We 're screwed ! .. .
( I jest .
I JEST ! !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The answer to your question is Fallout 3.
But the problem is, where are all the Vaults??
Oh right... Vault-Tec lost it all on Lehman Bros. bonds... We're screwed!...
(I jest.
I JEST!!
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210244</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31215772
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210114
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31218062
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210262
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210726
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210262
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210476
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210244
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210262
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31215372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210688
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31218440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210262
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31213332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210410
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210262
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210556
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210114
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210114
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210438
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210114
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210244
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31214618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210244
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210308
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210244
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31212564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210262
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31212734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210410
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210262
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210158
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210428
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210158
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210158
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31217130
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210262
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210262
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210244
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210158
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211652
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210114
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210114
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31213600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210234
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210158
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31214036
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210688
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210158
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31224740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210158
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31215182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210688
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210114
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31213652
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210262
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210244
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31213170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210262
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210228
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31216126
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210114
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210158
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31215884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210228
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31215968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210114
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210114
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31213800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211632
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210114
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31215524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210276
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211708
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210114
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211626
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210114
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210234
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_20_1416232_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31212226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210262
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_20_1416232.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210276
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31215524
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_20_1416232.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210164
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_20_1416232.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210768
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_20_1416232.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210114
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211898
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210344
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211708
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210492
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211626
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31215772
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211652
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211632
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31213800
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31216126
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31215968
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210606
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210438
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211656
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210556
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210450
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_20_1416232.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210228
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31215884
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211510
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_20_1416232.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210422
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_20_1416232.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210262
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210726
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31217130
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210378
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210410
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31212734
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31213332
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210588
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31213170
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31213652
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31212564
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31218062
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31218440
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31212226
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210930
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_20_1416232.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210128
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_20_1416232.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210158
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210984
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210284
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211968
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210796
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210326
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31224740
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210400
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210428
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210792
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_20_1416232.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210536
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_20_1416232.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210234
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211340
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31213600
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_20_1416232.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210168
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211668
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210230
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210290
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210244
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210476
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210718
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211246
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210406
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31214618
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210308
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31211830
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_20_1416232.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31210688
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31215182
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31214036
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_20_1416232.31215372
</commentlist>
</conversation>
