<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_19_219245</id>
	<title>Considering Cheaper Pico-Projectors As Standard Equipment On Cell Phones</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1266571620000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"Will <a href="http://bit.ly/autHUA">pico-projectors</a> become standard equipment on mobile phones, the same way that digital cameras have become? The jury is still out on user acceptance &mdash; after all, only <a href="http://bit.ly/9BWkZf">four mobile phones use pico-projectors</a> today &mdash; but if they get small and cheap enough, mobile phone makers are going to install them. There are four vendors today &mdash; Microvision, National Semiconductor, 3M and Texas Instruments &mdash; but only TI has design wins in cell phones already on the market. And at the recent Mobile World Congress, TI showed a <a href="http://bit.ly/dBZwsp">smaller digital light processor (DLP) chip</a> that fits inside even the slimmest mobile phones, and which it claims is cheap enough to become standard equipment. A lot of us never use the camera in our phones now &mdash; would you use a pico-projector if it was built into your phone?"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " Will pico-projectors become standard equipment on mobile phones , the same way that digital cameras have become ?
The jury is still out on user acceptance    after all , only four mobile phones use pico-projectors today    but if they get small and cheap enough , mobile phone makers are going to install them .
There are four vendors today    Microvision , National Semiconductor , 3M and Texas Instruments    but only TI has design wins in cell phones already on the market .
And at the recent Mobile World Congress , TI showed a smaller digital light processor ( DLP ) chip that fits inside even the slimmest mobile phones , and which it claims is cheap enough to become standard equipment .
A lot of us never use the camera in our phones now    would you use a pico-projector if it was built into your phone ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "Will pico-projectors become standard equipment on mobile phones, the same way that digital cameras have become?
The jury is still out on user acceptance — after all, only four mobile phones use pico-projectors today — but if they get small and cheap enough, mobile phone makers are going to install them.
There are four vendors today — Microvision, National Semiconductor, 3M and Texas Instruments — but only TI has design wins in cell phones already on the market.
And at the recent Mobile World Congress, TI showed a smaller digital light processor (DLP) chip that fits inside even the slimmest mobile phones, and which it claims is cheap enough to become standard equipment.
A lot of us never use the camera in our phones now — would you use a pico-projector if it was built into your phone?
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206882</id>
	<title>Re:Tricorders.</title>
	<author>DigiShaman</author>
	<datestamp>1266590700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It's interesting, though, that our imaginary selves are interested in exploration, and their portable technology was tuned to that, (probing and measuring the environment)</p></div></blockquote><p>Unlike Star Trek however, we don't need a Tricorder to explore Earth as it's already been reviewed at the most basic of levels. For in-depth analysis of the weather, geophysics, traffic reports...etc, we already have specialized equipment for that. No need to reinvent the wheel of exploration when you can simply use your cell phone to tap into these resources remotely. Right now, I have access to all of the aforementioned items through the Internet. No probing required on my part.</p><blockquote><div><p>The question of one's state of bondage can be determined by a quick assessment of one's collection of iPhone apps.</p></div></blockquote><p>You may see it as bondage, but for some it's a sought after escape from reality.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's interesting , though , that our imaginary selves are interested in exploration , and their portable technology was tuned to that , ( probing and measuring the environment ) Unlike Star Trek however , we do n't need a Tricorder to explore Earth as it 's already been reviewed at the most basic of levels .
For in-depth analysis of the weather , geophysics , traffic reports...etc , we already have specialized equipment for that .
No need to reinvent the wheel of exploration when you can simply use your cell phone to tap into these resources remotely .
Right now , I have access to all of the aforementioned items through the Internet .
No probing required on my part.The question of one 's state of bondage can be determined by a quick assessment of one 's collection of iPhone apps.You may see it as bondage , but for some it 's a sought after escape from reality .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's interesting, though, that our imaginary selves are interested in exploration, and their portable technology was tuned to that, (probing and measuring the environment)Unlike Star Trek however, we don't need a Tricorder to explore Earth as it's already been reviewed at the most basic of levels.
For in-depth analysis of the weather, geophysics, traffic reports...etc, we already have specialized equipment for that.
No need to reinvent the wheel of exploration when you can simply use your cell phone to tap into these resources remotely.
Right now, I have access to all of the aforementioned items through the Internet.
No probing required on my part.The question of one's state of bondage can be determined by a quick assessment of one's collection of iPhone apps.You may see it as bondage, but for some it's a sought after escape from reality.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205224</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204906</id>
	<title>it could turn your smart phone into a 'laptop'</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266577200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>what about a projected screen and a projected keyboard on your smartphone?<br>then if you have full flat surfaces you could do some real work on it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>what about a projected screen and a projected keyboard on your smartphone ? then if you have full flat surfaces you could do some real work on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what about a projected screen and a projected keyboard on your smartphone?then if you have full flat surfaces you could do some real work on it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204964</id>
	<title>Re:Phone? ABSOLUTELY Laptop? ABSOLUTELY.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266577440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>think if it was the price and size that the camera's are right now. Think of all the times you wanted show someone a picture or video you have on you phone.</p><p>I would love to have a projector on both.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>think if it was the price and size that the camera 's are right now .
Think of all the times you wanted show someone a picture or video you have on you phone.I would love to have a projector on both .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>think if it was the price and size that the camera's are right now.
Think of all the times you wanted show someone a picture or video you have on you phone.I would love to have a projector on both.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206726</id>
	<title>Re:I'll just take the projector</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1266588840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Or instead of that if you want to see a play from the latest game.</p><p>Careful.  The image had better not be over 55 inches.</p><p>&gt; OR if you really do want to sit the thing down and play a movie.</p><p>Now you're looking for real trouble.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Or instead of that if you want to see a play from the latest game.Careful .
The image had better not be over 55 inches. &gt; OR if you really do want to sit the thing down and play a movie.Now you 're looking for real trouble .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Or instead of that if you want to see a play from the latest game.Careful.
The image had better not be over 55 inches.&gt; OR if you really do want to sit the thing down and play a movie.Now you're looking for real trouble.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204952</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204462</id>
	<title>Phone?  No.  Laptop?  ABSOLUTELY.</title>
	<author>CDS</author>
	<datestamp>1266575640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, I wouldn't use one in my phone - but I would ABSOLUTELY use one in my laptop.<br><br>It'd be great to be able to project onto a wall for a spur-of-the-moment code discussion, etc.  It seems like every time I'm in a meeting &amp; want to share an idea or code snippet, etc. with the group, it happens to be in an area without a projector.  If we could have a picoprojector on the backside of my laptop's LCD, you could project from there whenever you need...</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , I would n't use one in my phone - but I would ABSOLUTELY use one in my laptop.It 'd be great to be able to project onto a wall for a spur-of-the-moment code discussion , etc .
It seems like every time I 'm in a meeting &amp; want to share an idea or code snippet , etc .
with the group , it happens to be in an area without a projector .
If we could have a picoprojector on the backside of my laptop 's LCD , you could project from there whenever you need.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, I wouldn't use one in my phone - but I would ABSOLUTELY use one in my laptop.It'd be great to be able to project onto a wall for a spur-of-the-moment code discussion, etc.
It seems like every time I'm in a meeting &amp; want to share an idea or code snippet, etc.
with the group, it happens to be in an area without a projector.
If we could have a picoprojector on the backside of my laptop's LCD, you could project from there whenever you need...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205386</id>
	<title>Smartphone with projector already exists</title>
	<author>PGillingwater</author>
	<datestamp>1266579600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This phone already exists.  At least, the following web page suggests very strongly that it exists, but YMMV...</p><p><a href="http://www.pomegranatephone.com/" title="pomegranatephone.com">http://www.pomegranatephone.com/</a> [pomegranatephone.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This phone already exists .
At least , the following web page suggests very strongly that it exists , but YMMV...http : //www.pomegranatephone.com/ [ pomegranatephone.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This phone already exists.
At least, the following web page suggests very strongly that it exists, but YMMV...http://www.pomegranatephone.com/ [pomegranatephone.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205508</id>
	<title>SixthSense</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1266580380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Could be in the middle of the path to get to <a href="http://www.ted.com/talks/pranav\_mistry\_the\_thrilling\_potential\_of\_sixthsense\_technology.html" title="ted.com">SixthSense</a> [ted.com] technology to phones.  But if it even works to get a bigger screen for the phone (i.e. to see a movie in a wall instead of in a tiny phone screen) could have some sense.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Could be in the middle of the path to get to SixthSense [ ted.com ] technology to phones .
But if it even works to get a bigger screen for the phone ( i.e .
to see a movie in a wall instead of in a tiny phone screen ) could have some sense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could be in the middle of the path to get to SixthSense [ted.com] technology to phones.
But if it even works to get a bigger screen for the phone (i.e.
to see a movie in a wall instead of in a tiny phone screen) could have some sense.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205086</id>
	<title>Re:No way, a phone is for talking...</title>
	<author>robot256</author>
	<datestamp>1266578100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...Texting...toilet...projector...</p></div><p>Now Larry Craig doesn't have to use his foot ask for favors from the next stall over.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...Texting...toilet...projector...Now Larry Craig does n't have to use his foot ask for favors from the next stall over .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...Texting...toilet...projector...Now Larry Craig doesn't have to use his foot ask for favors from the next stall over.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31208358</id>
	<title>Re:Before that, forward facing camera</title>
	<author>Anarki2004</author>
	<datestamp>1266609180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My Nokia E-71 has a camera on the front and back. Unfortunately, I live in a country where the network operators don't think live video chat is something worth supporting. Come to think of it, about half the features of this phone are crippled by shoddy American telecos.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My Nokia E-71 has a camera on the front and back .
Unfortunately , I live in a country where the network operators do n't think live video chat is something worth supporting .
Come to think of it , about half the features of this phone are crippled by shoddy American telecos .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My Nokia E-71 has a camera on the front and back.
Unfortunately, I live in a country where the network operators don't think live video chat is something worth supporting.
Come to think of it, about half the features of this phone are crippled by shoddy American telecos.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204970</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205166</id>
	<title>a deck of cards</title>
	<author>rossdee</author>
	<datestamp>1266578460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"How about a wireless projecter, the size of a deck of cards"</p><p>You do know that you can get decks of cards of different sizes,even if you are just limitting it to the common playing cards.</p><p>Why can't people use standard units of measurements like millimeters, or even inches?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" How about a wireless projecter , the size of a deck of cards " You do know that you can get decks of cards of different sizes,even if you are just limitting it to the common playing cards.Why ca n't people use standard units of measurements like millimeters , or even inches ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"How about a wireless projecter, the size of a deck of cards"You do know that you can get decks of cards of different sizes,even if you are just limitting it to the common playing cards.Why can't people use standard units of measurements like millimeters, or even inches?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204522</id>
	<title>would you use a pico-projector if it was built in?</title>
	<author>KaimaraZatar</author>
	<datestamp>1266575820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's sure to get a little use.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's sure to get a little use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's sure to get a little use.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204840</id>
	<title>Re:I'll just take the projector</title>
	<author>Zerth</author>
	<datestamp>1266576900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>How about a wireless projecter, the size of a deck of cards, with built-in wireless USB and/or bluetooth? Then you can use it with nearly anything, the way wi-fi projectors work now.</p></div></blockquote><p>That's what I want.  Pretty much any projector that can fit in a phone without bulking it up is probably too faint or too draining to use for any serious purpose.  I want something that can last a few hours, but still be bright enough to use with the lights on, or only slightly dimmed.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How about a wireless projecter , the size of a deck of cards , with built-in wireless USB and/or bluetooth ?
Then you can use it with nearly anything , the way wi-fi projectors work now.That 's what I want .
Pretty much any projector that can fit in a phone without bulking it up is probably too faint or too draining to use for any serious purpose .
I want something that can last a few hours , but still be bright enough to use with the lights on , or only slightly dimmed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about a wireless projecter, the size of a deck of cards, with built-in wireless USB and/or bluetooth?
Then you can use it with nearly anything, the way wi-fi projectors work now.That's what I want.
Pretty much any projector that can fit in a phone without bulking it up is probably too faint or too draining to use for any serious purpose.
I want something that can last a few hours, but still be bright enough to use with the lights on, or only slightly dimmed.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31207758</id>
	<title>Re:No way, a phone is for talking...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266600060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>So it was you the other day in the cubicle I could hear saying "Oh no, Why won't it come out?"</htmltext>
<tokenext>So it was you the other day in the cubicle I could hear saying " Oh no , Why wo n't it come out ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So it was you the other day in the cubicle I could hear saying "Oh no, Why won't it come out?
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205908</id>
	<title>Re:Your phone IS an ipod, IS a TV, IS a web browse</title>
	<author>TheTyrannyOfForcedRe</author>
	<datestamp>1266582660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>My phone is only a phone and I like it that way. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ATTtelephone-large.jpg" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ATTtelephone-large.jpg</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>My phone is only a phone and I like it that way .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File : ATTtelephone-large.jpg [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My phone is only a phone and I like it that way.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ATTtelephone-large.jpg [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204936</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204608</id>
	<title>Re:Phone? No. Laptop? ABSOLUTELY.</title>
	<author>Colin Smith</author>
	<datestamp>1266576120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It'd be great to be able to project onto a wall for a spur-of-the-moment code discussion, etc. It seems like every time I'm in a meeting &amp; want to share an idea or code snippet, etc. with the group</p></div><p>My my, don't you have a bushy tail.</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 'd be great to be able to project onto a wall for a spur-of-the-moment code discussion , etc .
It seems like every time I 'm in a meeting &amp; want to share an idea or code snippet , etc .
with the groupMy my , do n't you have a bushy tail .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>It'd be great to be able to project onto a wall for a spur-of-the-moment code discussion, etc.
It seems like every time I'm in a meeting &amp; want to share an idea or code snippet, etc.
with the groupMy my, don't you have a bushy tail.
 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205702</id>
	<title>Re:Your phone IS an ipod, IS a TV, IS a web browse</title>
	<author>CohibaVancouver</author>
	<datestamp>1266581460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Fuck, I can even run multi user ssh sessions, DB servers and web sites on it</i> </p><p>

Maddox, is that you?<br> <br>

<a href="http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=iphone" title="thebestpag...iverse.net">http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=iphone</a> [thebestpag...iverse.net]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fuck , I can even run multi user ssh sessions , DB servers and web sites on it Maddox , is that you ?
http : //www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi ? u = iphone [ thebestpag...iverse.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fuck, I can even run multi user ssh sessions, DB servers and web sites on it 

Maddox, is that you?
http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=iphone [thebestpag...iverse.net]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204936</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31207612</id>
	<title>Re:Depends on the output</title>
	<author>nurb432</author>
	<datestamp>1266598560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bring a charger.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bring a charger .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bring a charger.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31209136</id>
	<title>Re:I'll just take the projector</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1266668040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The size isn't really an issue when it comes to brightness.  A modern LED can provide as much light as the bulb in my projector (which is usable for most of the day, but not with direct sunlight on the screen).  The LED would draw 11-20W, depending on the technology used.  That's about the amount that a laptop display uses, so it's not impossible but it's a bit much for something the size of a mobile phone.  On the other hand, the amount of light that you need is proportional to the area of the screen.  If you're on battery power, you probably only want to project a small screen; say, 24".  That's around a tenth of the area that I use at home, so you'd only need about 1-2W, which is feasible.  If you want a big screen, then you'd need to plug it in, or flatten the battery very quickly.</p><p>
It's a shame that these projectors are still so low resolution.  I'd love to have a projector that was sufficiently low power that I could use it all day instead of a monitor, but it would need to have at least as many pixels as my laptop screen for that, and ideally more.  Give me a 1080p projector that draws 20W and I'll be very happy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The size is n't really an issue when it comes to brightness .
A modern LED can provide as much light as the bulb in my projector ( which is usable for most of the day , but not with direct sunlight on the screen ) .
The LED would draw 11-20W , depending on the technology used .
That 's about the amount that a laptop display uses , so it 's not impossible but it 's a bit much for something the size of a mobile phone .
On the other hand , the amount of light that you need is proportional to the area of the screen .
If you 're on battery power , you probably only want to project a small screen ; say , 24 " .
That 's around a tenth of the area that I use at home , so you 'd only need about 1-2W , which is feasible .
If you want a big screen , then you 'd need to plug it in , or flatten the battery very quickly .
It 's a shame that these projectors are still so low resolution .
I 'd love to have a projector that was sufficiently low power that I could use it all day instead of a monitor , but it would need to have at least as many pixels as my laptop screen for that , and ideally more .
Give me a 1080p projector that draws 20W and I 'll be very happy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The size isn't really an issue when it comes to brightness.
A modern LED can provide as much light as the bulb in my projector (which is usable for most of the day, but not with direct sunlight on the screen).
The LED would draw 11-20W, depending on the technology used.
That's about the amount that a laptop display uses, so it's not impossible but it's a bit much for something the size of a mobile phone.
On the other hand, the amount of light that you need is proportional to the area of the screen.
If you're on battery power, you probably only want to project a small screen; say, 24".
That's around a tenth of the area that I use at home, so you'd only need about 1-2W, which is feasible.
If you want a big screen, then you'd need to plug it in, or flatten the battery very quickly.
It's a shame that these projectors are still so low resolution.
I'd love to have a projector that was sufficiently low power that I could use it all day instead of a monitor, but it would need to have at least as many pixels as my laptop screen for that, and ideally more.
Give me a 1080p projector that draws 20W and I'll be very happy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31237420</id>
	<title>Re:It needs a corresponding killer app</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266838620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>On the other hand, combined with an accelerometer, a compass, and/or a camera, someone might be able to make a fairly novel application.  For example, a game where moving the phone would scroll the projected image, like moving the sights of a gun.  (Clearly the game would have to be a little more creative than that, but you get the general idea.)</p></div><p>this type of gaming is a few years off,  lots of potential with the FPS and AR genre.</p><p>fresh from CES 2010  http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/microvision-laser-projection-gun-hands-on/</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>On the other hand , combined with an accelerometer , a compass , and/or a camera , someone might be able to make a fairly novel application .
For example , a game where moving the phone would scroll the projected image , like moving the sights of a gun .
( Clearly the game would have to be a little more creative than that , but you get the general idea .
) this type of gaming is a few years off , lots of potential with the FPS and AR genre.fresh from CES 2010 http : //www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/microvision-laser-projection-gun-hands-on/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the other hand, combined with an accelerometer, a compass, and/or a camera, someone might be able to make a fairly novel application.
For example, a game where moving the phone would scroll the projected image, like moving the sights of a gun.
(Clearly the game would have to be a little more creative than that, but you get the general idea.
)this type of gaming is a few years off,  lots of potential with the FPS and AR genre.fresh from CES 2010  http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/11/microvision-laser-projection-gun-hands-on/
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205842</id>
	<title>Re:Tricorders.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266582180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Captain Picard calls bullshit on this from the holodeck.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Captain Picard calls bullshit on this from the holodeck .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Captain Picard calls bullshit on this from the holodeck.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205224</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204896</id>
	<title>Re:I'll just take the projector</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266577140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You're right; it only makes sense to combine camera and phone because they both require a screen and some sort of interactive interface. A basic projector just needs a jack (or wireless) and a power button. That said, I have no doubt that phone manufacturers will integrate projectors into phones anyway.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're right ; it only makes sense to combine camera and phone because they both require a screen and some sort of interactive interface .
A basic projector just needs a jack ( or wireless ) and a power button .
That said , I have no doubt that phone manufacturers will integrate projectors into phones anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're right; it only makes sense to combine camera and phone because they both require a screen and some sort of interactive interface.
A basic projector just needs a jack (or wireless) and a power button.
That said, I have no doubt that phone manufacturers will integrate projectors into phones anyway.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31212482</id>
	<title>YES!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266656640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been looking for a heads-up display that can be used on a vehicle (hint - needs to be BRIGHT).</p><p>Display GPS data, vehicle data, traffic data.  I can get the data to a laptop or a phone.  Get me an output device.  Wired, wireless - I'll make it work.</p><p>The 3M projector that I tried was visible in sunlight if the display was about 1 by 2 inches.  Not quite there.</p><p>The operating system would have to be open (chrome, linux, etc) or at least programmable (palm, nokia) so I can access the data.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been looking for a heads-up display that can be used on a vehicle ( hint - needs to be BRIGHT ) .Display GPS data , vehicle data , traffic data .
I can get the data to a laptop or a phone .
Get me an output device .
Wired , wireless - I 'll make it work.The 3M projector that I tried was visible in sunlight if the display was about 1 by 2 inches .
Not quite there.The operating system would have to be open ( chrome , linux , etc ) or at least programmable ( palm , nokia ) so I can access the data .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been looking for a heads-up display that can be used on a vehicle (hint - needs to be BRIGHT).Display GPS data, vehicle data, traffic data.
I can get the data to a laptop or a phone.
Get me an output device.
Wired, wireless - I'll make it work.The 3M projector that I tried was visible in sunlight if the display was about 1 by 2 inches.
Not quite there.The operating system would have to be open (chrome, linux, etc) or at least programmable (palm, nokia) so I can access the data.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206880</id>
	<title>Re:Tricorders.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266590580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Huh?</p><p>You haven't seen a spectraphotometer hooked up to a Palm.  Ocean Optics used to do something like that.</p><p>Oh, maybe the highly trained explorers in the future will have tricorders that collect complex, hard-to-interpret for laypeople data and everybody else will use theirs to play solitare.</p><p>Compact, "magical" devices for chemical analysis are coming and some are here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Huh ? You have n't seen a spectraphotometer hooked up to a Palm .
Ocean Optics used to do something like that.Oh , maybe the highly trained explorers in the future will have tricorders that collect complex , hard-to-interpret for laypeople data and everybody else will use theirs to play solitare.Compact , " magical " devices for chemical analysis are coming and some are here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Huh?You haven't seen a spectraphotometer hooked up to a Palm.
Ocean Optics used to do something like that.Oh, maybe the highly trained explorers in the future will have tricorders that collect complex, hard-to-interpret for laypeople data and everybody else will use theirs to play solitare.Compact, "magical" devices for chemical analysis are coming and some are here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205224</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205198</id>
	<title>Re:I'll just take the projector</title>
	<author>Belial6</author>
	<datestamp>1266578580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, kidding.  I don't want to be on the phone with someone who cannot stop watching their video for two minutes anyway.  Honestly, the fact that the projector and the phone are integrated would work out well.  In the same way that a phone and an MP3 play work out well.  When a call comes in, I don't have to pause the music.  It pauses for me.  Then when I hang up, the music starts back up.  This is a good thing, not a problem.  Slightly off topic, but also cool is that a program on my Android phone will pause movies on my XBMC box when a call comes in.  So, if I have a movie playing while I work, and someone from the office calls me, I don't have to fiddle with the remote to get the video to pause before I answer.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , kidding .
I do n't want to be on the phone with someone who can not stop watching their video for two minutes anyway .
Honestly , the fact that the projector and the phone are integrated would work out well .
In the same way that a phone and an MP3 play work out well .
When a call comes in , I do n't have to pause the music .
It pauses for me .
Then when I hang up , the music starts back up .
This is a good thing , not a problem .
Slightly off topic , but also cool is that a program on my Android phone will pause movies on my XBMC box when a call comes in .
So , if I have a movie playing while I work , and someone from the office calls me , I do n't have to fiddle with the remote to get the video to pause before I answer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, kidding.
I don't want to be on the phone with someone who cannot stop watching their video for two minutes anyway.
Honestly, the fact that the projector and the phone are integrated would work out well.
In the same way that a phone and an MP3 play work out well.
When a call comes in, I don't have to pause the music.
It pauses for me.
Then when I hang up, the music starts back up.
This is a good thing, not a problem.
Slightly off topic, but also cool is that a program on my Android phone will pause movies on my XBMC box when a call comes in.
So, if I have a movie playing while I work, and someone from the office calls me, I don't have to fiddle with the remote to get the video to pause before I answer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204690</id>
	<title>Re:Phone? No. Laptop? ABSOLUTELY.</title>
	<author>AliasMarlowe</author>
	<datestamp>1266576420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It'd be great to be able to project onto a wall for a spur-of-the-moment code discussion, etc. It seems like every time I'm in a meeting &amp; want to share an idea or code snippet, etc. with the group, it happens to be in an area without a projector. If we could have a picoprojector on the backside of my laptop's LCD, you could project from there whenever you need...</p></div><p>Before long, you'd be invited to damn few meetings. You might be on to something there...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 'd be great to be able to project onto a wall for a spur-of-the-moment code discussion , etc .
It seems like every time I 'm in a meeting &amp; want to share an idea or code snippet , etc .
with the group , it happens to be in an area without a projector .
If we could have a picoprojector on the backside of my laptop 's LCD , you could project from there whenever you need...Before long , you 'd be invited to damn few meetings .
You might be on to something there.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It'd be great to be able to project onto a wall for a spur-of-the-moment code discussion, etc.
It seems like every time I'm in a meeting &amp; want to share an idea or code snippet, etc.
with the group, it happens to be in an area without a projector.
If we could have a picoprojector on the backside of my laptop's LCD, you could project from there whenever you need...Before long, you'd be invited to damn few meetings.
You might be on to something there...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205026</id>
	<title>Re:I'll just take the projector</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266577800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Besides, if you're playing a video with your phone, what if you want to then take a phone call?</p></div><p>You pause the video?</p><p>You can already get wifi pico projectors and yup, they're about the size of a pack of cards.<br>
&nbsp;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Besides , if you 're playing a video with your phone , what if you want to then take a phone call ? You pause the video ? You can already get wifi pico projectors and yup , they 're about the size of a pack of cards .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Besides, if you're playing a video with your phone, what if you want to then take a phone call?You pause the video?You can already get wifi pico projectors and yup, they're about the size of a pack of cards.
 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31208148</id>
	<title>seen it</title>
	<author>luther349</author>
	<datestamp>1266605460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>i saw a ad for a phone with a projector hear in the usa. but it looked like a add-on not something built in. my car has one to. no joke its used for putting the speedo in the corner of the windshield works very will in daylight. i ust hope they use led projecters for there long life and cheap replacement cost.</htmltext>
<tokenext>i saw a ad for a phone with a projector hear in the usa .
but it looked like a add-on not something built in .
my car has one to .
no joke its used for putting the speedo in the corner of the windshield works very will in daylight .
i ust hope they use led projecters for there long life and cheap replacement cost .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i saw a ad for a phone with a projector hear in the usa.
but it looked like a add-on not something built in.
my car has one to.
no joke its used for putting the speedo in the corner of the windshield works very will in daylight.
i ust hope they use led projecters for there long life and cheap replacement cost.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205062</id>
	<title>Pointless</title>
	<author>gilesjuk</author>
	<datestamp>1266577980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From what I've seen they're low-res, dim and no better than a nice big touch screen for showing content.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From what I 've seen they 're low-res , dim and no better than a nice big touch screen for showing content .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From what I've seen they're low-res, dim and no better than a nice big touch screen for showing content.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31207294</id>
	<title>Re:"Obi-Wan Kenobi, You're our only hope!"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266595260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your lack of faith in Star Wars holoprojection systems is disturbing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your lack of faith in Star Wars holoprojection systems is disturbing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your lack of faith in Star Wars holoprojection systems is disturbing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204952</id>
	<title>Re:I'll just take the projector</title>
	<author>MBGMorden</author>
	<datestamp>1266577380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Besides, if you're playing a video with your phone, what if you want to then take a phone call?</p></div><p>Accept that you either don't use the technology or don't take calls while watching the video?</p><p>Personally I don't have a problem not having access to a phone for a while.  People can leave a message.  It wasn't 15 years ago that people, I shit you not, left their homes for HOURS AT A TIME without access to a phone. Having this as merely an option isn't going to hurt anyone.</p><p>And it can come in handy.  Example: your friend was at a bachelor party that had a stripper.  You and the rest of the people at your current party want to know how she looked. Would you rather huddle around his phone to see a picture, or him point it at the nearest wall and project a nice big image?</p><p>Or instead of that if you want to see a play from the latest game.</p><p>OR if you really do want to sit the thing down and play a movie.</p><p>Sure there are times when you wouldn't want to use it.  It's certainly not going to replace dedicated projectors anymore than camera phones replaced dedicated cameras, but it can and will have uses.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Besides , if you 're playing a video with your phone , what if you want to then take a phone call ? Accept that you either do n't use the technology or do n't take calls while watching the video ? Personally I do n't have a problem not having access to a phone for a while .
People can leave a message .
It was n't 15 years ago that people , I shit you not , left their homes for HOURS AT A TIME without access to a phone .
Having this as merely an option is n't going to hurt anyone.And it can come in handy .
Example : your friend was at a bachelor party that had a stripper .
You and the rest of the people at your current party want to know how she looked .
Would you rather huddle around his phone to see a picture , or him point it at the nearest wall and project a nice big image ? Or instead of that if you want to see a play from the latest game.OR if you really do want to sit the thing down and play a movie.Sure there are times when you would n't want to use it .
It 's certainly not going to replace dedicated projectors anymore than camera phones replaced dedicated cameras , but it can and will have uses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Besides, if you're playing a video with your phone, what if you want to then take a phone call?Accept that you either don't use the technology or don't take calls while watching the video?Personally I don't have a problem not having access to a phone for a while.
People can leave a message.
It wasn't 15 years ago that people, I shit you not, left their homes for HOURS AT A TIME without access to a phone.
Having this as merely an option isn't going to hurt anyone.And it can come in handy.
Example: your friend was at a bachelor party that had a stripper.
You and the rest of the people at your current party want to know how she looked.
Would you rather huddle around his phone to see a picture, or him point it at the nearest wall and project a nice big image?Or instead of that if you want to see a play from the latest game.OR if you really do want to sit the thing down and play a movie.Sure there are times when you wouldn't want to use it.
It's certainly not going to replace dedicated projectors anymore than camera phones replaced dedicated cameras, but it can and will have uses.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31279214</id>
	<title>Re:It doesn't make sense to me.</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1267099020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>BY 'dongle' do you mean Blue Tooth? cause that exists.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>BY 'dongle ' do you mean Blue Tooth ?
cause that exists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>BY 'dongle' do you mean Blue Tooth?
cause that exists.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204764</id>
	<title>It doesn't make sense to me.</title>
	<author>obarthelemy</author>
	<datestamp>1266576660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd rather have some kind of standard video port (probably via a dongle for size reasons), so that I can connect my phone to a computer screen or TV or projector (pico or not) as I feel the need. And a pico projector on the side, which I may use with my phone or with my netbook, but I don't think I'll use that a lot.</p><p>There could be some specialty phones with an integrated pico projector, but that doesn't sound like a basic feature to me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd rather have some kind of standard video port ( probably via a dongle for size reasons ) , so that I can connect my phone to a computer screen or TV or projector ( pico or not ) as I feel the need .
And a pico projector on the side , which I may use with my phone or with my netbook , but I do n't think I 'll use that a lot.There could be some specialty phones with an integrated pico projector , but that does n't sound like a basic feature to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd rather have some kind of standard video port (probably via a dongle for size reasons), so that I can connect my phone to a computer screen or TV or projector (pico or not) as I feel the need.
And a pico projector on the side, which I may use with my phone or with my netbook, but I don't think I'll use that a lot.There could be some specialty phones with an integrated pico projector, but that doesn't sound like a basic feature to me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31217184</id>
	<title>what i want them to put on phones...</title>
	<author>Nyder</author>
	<datestamp>1266748440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>is a battery that actually lasts more then 2 hours running all the extra crap they put on phones now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is a battery that actually lasts more then 2 hours running all the extra crap they put on phones now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is a battery that actually lasts more then 2 hours running all the extra crap they put on phones now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31335552</id>
	<title>Re:It needs a corresponding killer app</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267524120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Check this out..  gaming projector gun with scrolling projected image!<br>http://tv.hexus.net/show/2010/03/CeBIT\_2010\_Simply\_THE\_coolest\_gadget\_at\_CeBIT</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Check this out.. gaming projector gun with scrolling projected image ! http : //tv.hexus.net/show/2010/03/CeBIT \ _2010 \ _Simply \ _THE \ _coolest \ _gadget \ _at \ _CeBIT</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Check this out..  gaming projector gun with scrolling projected image!http://tv.hexus.net/show/2010/03/CeBIT\_2010\_Simply\_THE\_coolest\_gadget\_at\_CeBIT</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205690</id>
	<title>Re:It needs a corresponding killer app</title>
	<author>Orbijx</author>
	<datestamp>1266581340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Where/when could you use such a device in an effective way?</p></div><p>Hello from a tourist trap city in Florida!<br>I've been asked for directions many a time by someone who's new to the area, or just traveling through.</p><p>I'd have loved to be able to show them a map of how to get to <em>there</em> from <em>here</em>, and know that they can see it. Squinting at a small screen to visualize directions isn't likely to be as effective as projecting a map on the back of a tray at a local Subway.</p><p>I can say something like:<br>"Take Busch to 56th, turn right. Take 56th to Hillsborough, turn left. Take Hillsborough to Orient Road, turn right. Hard Rock's on your left." and get looked at strangely.<br>Same happens with "Take Busch to I-275, and grab the southbound ramp. Merge into I-4 by taking the right-side ramp. Get off on the Orient Road Exit, and turn left. Hard Rock is on your right."</p><p>People are visual creatures when traveling, using things to set waypoints, making it easier for them to find their way home.<br>Some of them just forget to print directions before they go places.<br>So projecting something in a minute's time would be useful.</p><p>(At the same time, I worry about projecting, because someone will invariably use a mapping application with a GPS, project the map on the windshield while driving, and manage to run someone over.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Where/when could you use such a device in an effective way ? Hello from a tourist trap city in Florida ! I 've been asked for directions many a time by someone who 's new to the area , or just traveling through.I 'd have loved to be able to show them a map of how to get to there from here , and know that they can see it .
Squinting at a small screen to visualize directions is n't likely to be as effective as projecting a map on the back of a tray at a local Subway.I can say something like : " Take Busch to 56th , turn right .
Take 56th to Hillsborough , turn left .
Take Hillsborough to Orient Road , turn right .
Hard Rock 's on your left .
" and get looked at strangely.Same happens with " Take Busch to I-275 , and grab the southbound ramp .
Merge into I-4 by taking the right-side ramp .
Get off on the Orient Road Exit , and turn left .
Hard Rock is on your right .
" People are visual creatures when traveling , using things to set waypoints , making it easier for them to find their way home.Some of them just forget to print directions before they go places.So projecting something in a minute 's time would be useful .
( At the same time , I worry about projecting , because someone will invariably use a mapping application with a GPS , project the map on the windshield while driving , and manage to run someone over .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where/when could you use such a device in an effective way?Hello from a tourist trap city in Florida!I've been asked for directions many a time by someone who's new to the area, or just traveling through.I'd have loved to be able to show them a map of how to get to there from here, and know that they can see it.
Squinting at a small screen to visualize directions isn't likely to be as effective as projecting a map on the back of a tray at a local Subway.I can say something like:"Take Busch to 56th, turn right.
Take 56th to Hillsborough, turn left.
Take Hillsborough to Orient Road, turn right.
Hard Rock's on your left.
" and get looked at strangely.Same happens with "Take Busch to I-275, and grab the southbound ramp.
Merge into I-4 by taking the right-side ramp.
Get off on the Orient Road Exit, and turn left.
Hard Rock is on your right.
"People are visual creatures when traveling, using things to set waypoints, making it easier for them to find their way home.Some of them just forget to print directions before they go places.So projecting something in a minute's time would be useful.
(At the same time, I worry about projecting, because someone will invariably use a mapping application with a GPS, project the map on the windshield while driving, and manage to run someone over.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206552</id>
	<title>Re:Tricorders.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266587160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In Star Trek they were too busy having adventures to spend much time in Fantasy Lad.</p></div><p>I bet Fantasy Lad is thankful for that!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In Star Trek they were too busy having adventures to spend much time in Fantasy Lad.I bet Fantasy Lad is thankful for that !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Star Trek they were too busy having adventures to spend much time in Fantasy Lad.I bet Fantasy Lad is thankful for that!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205224</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205784</id>
	<title>Re:Speaking of stupidity...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266581880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I would've expected this from kdawson, but not from timothy.</p></div><p>Really, you wouldn't expect it of timothy? I would expect it of any of them.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would 've expected this from kdawson , but not from timothy.Really , you would n't expect it of timothy ?
I would expect it of any of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would've expected this from kdawson, but not from timothy.Really, you wouldn't expect it of timothy?
I would expect it of any of them.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204876</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204638</id>
	<title>Re:"Obi-Wan Kenobi, You're our only hope!"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266576240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It needs to be a holographic projector, or don't bother.</p></div><p>I have one of those, but it's locked to Vaderfone</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It needs to be a holographic projector , or do n't bother.I have one of those , but it 's locked to Vaderfone</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It needs to be a holographic projector, or don't bother.I have one of those, but it's locked to Vaderfone
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205172</id>
	<title>Re:What does not using a camera have to do with th</title>
	<author>Itninja</author>
	<datestamp>1266578460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Agreed. A camera is an input device. A projector would be an output device. It's like comparing a keyboard with speakers....</htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed .
A camera is an input device .
A projector would be an output device .
It 's like comparing a keyboard with speakers... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed.
A camera is an input device.
A projector would be an output device.
It's like comparing a keyboard with speakers....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204914</id>
	<title>Just ask the teens...</title>
	<author>HikingStick</author>
	<datestamp>1266577260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>And people thought sexting was bad with just those cell phone LCDs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And people thought sexting was bad with just those cell phone LCDs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And people thought sexting was bad with just those cell phone LCDs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205082</id>
	<title>Re:Phone? No. PDA? ABSOLUTELY.</title>
	<author>odin84gk</author>
	<datestamp>1266578100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, I wouldn't use one in my phone - but I would ABSOLUTELY use one in my PDA.</p><p>1.) I'm going to the lab and a co-worker stops me to ask about a hardware issue. There is no Way I can read a schematic on a PDA. But, if I could project it onto a surface, I wouldn't have to go upstairs to my main PC to open the schematic<br>2.) I'm sitting on an airplane wanting to watch a movie. Pulling out a laptop is pretty freaking annoying, but this could project it onto the seat in front of me.<br>3.) Games. Finally I can play a video game on my phone.<br>4.) You have a plumbing issue. You take a picture of the part, take it to the store, project it so the person behind the counter can see it, and they give you the right item.<br>5.) You are meeting some new friends. "Oh! I have a dog! Here is their picture"... and you look at it on a tiny screen and go "What kind of dog Is that?" Or, take out a projector and actually show a decent picture of your dog/family/car/house/injury/vacation/logo/design</p><p>There are MANY reasons that I would want this on my PDA. Oh, and it would be great if my PDA acted like a cell phone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , I would n't use one in my phone - but I would ABSOLUTELY use one in my PDA.1 .
) I 'm going to the lab and a co-worker stops me to ask about a hardware issue .
There is no Way I can read a schematic on a PDA .
But , if I could project it onto a surface , I would n't have to go upstairs to my main PC to open the schematic2 .
) I 'm sitting on an airplane wanting to watch a movie .
Pulling out a laptop is pretty freaking annoying , but this could project it onto the seat in front of me.3 .
) Games .
Finally I can play a video game on my phone.4 .
) You have a plumbing issue .
You take a picture of the part , take it to the store , project it so the person behind the counter can see it , and they give you the right item.5 .
) You are meeting some new friends .
" Oh ! I have a dog !
Here is their picture " ... and you look at it on a tiny screen and go " What kind of dog Is that ?
" Or , take out a projector and actually show a decent picture of your dog/family/car/house/injury/vacation/logo/designThere are MANY reasons that I would want this on my PDA .
Oh , and it would be great if my PDA acted like a cell phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, I wouldn't use one in my phone - but I would ABSOLUTELY use one in my PDA.1.
) I'm going to the lab and a co-worker stops me to ask about a hardware issue.
There is no Way I can read a schematic on a PDA.
But, if I could project it onto a surface, I wouldn't have to go upstairs to my main PC to open the schematic2.
) I'm sitting on an airplane wanting to watch a movie.
Pulling out a laptop is pretty freaking annoying, but this could project it onto the seat in front of me.3.
) Games.
Finally I can play a video game on my phone.4.
) You have a plumbing issue.
You take a picture of the part, take it to the store, project it so the person behind the counter can see it, and they give you the right item.5.
) You are meeting some new friends.
"Oh! I have a dog!
Here is their picture"... and you look at it on a tiny screen and go "What kind of dog Is that?
" Or, take out a projector and actually show a decent picture of your dog/family/car/house/injury/vacation/logo/designThere are MANY reasons that I would want this on my PDA.
Oh, and it would be great if my PDA acted like a cell phone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204570</id>
	<title>Mod Parent Down</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266576000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>n/t</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>n/t</tokentext>
<sentencetext>n/t</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205014</id>
	<title>Re:Depends on the output</title>
	<author>m2shariy</author>
	<datestamp>1266577740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What matters to me is whether the projection is bright enough for my audience to see the projected images clearly.</p></div><p>Bright enough, providing the projection size is no larger than the cell phone screen.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What matters to me is whether the projection is bright enough for my audience to see the projected images clearly.Bright enough , providing the projection size is no larger than the cell phone screen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What matters to me is whether the projection is bright enough for my audience to see the projected images clearly.Bright enough, providing the projection size is no larger than the cell phone screen.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204704</id>
	<title>Will pico-projectors become standard equipment?</title>
	<author>KharmaWidow</author>
	<datestamp>1266576480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It all depends on what Steve Jobs likes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It all depends on what Steve Jobs likes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It all depends on what Steve Jobs likes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204762</id>
	<title>The reason nobody uses cell-phone cameras..</title>
	<author>faedle</author>
	<datestamp>1266576660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>.. is, by in large, they're shite.</p><p>I suspect the pico-projector will suffer the same fate.  Not good enough to be anything more than an executive toy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.. is , by in large , they 're shite.I suspect the pico-projector will suffer the same fate .
Not good enough to be anything more than an executive toy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.. is, by in large, they're shite.I suspect the pico-projector will suffer the same fate.
Not good enough to be anything more than an executive toy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31213990</id>
	<title>One word:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266667980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Gimme!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Gim me !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gimme!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31279160</id>
	<title>Yes they will become standard.</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1267098720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There too useful not to. From showing a group something on the device, to needing a bigger view of a map, to new types of games, and boardroom meetings.</p><p>I even imagine using it to share information by having on device see whats on the other is projecting creating a new type of AR.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There too useful not to .
From showing a group something on the device , to needing a bigger view of a map , to new types of games , and boardroom meetings.I even imagine using it to share information by having on device see whats on the other is projecting creating a new type of AR .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There too useful not to.
From showing a group something on the device, to needing a bigger view of a map, to new types of games, and boardroom meetings.I even imagine using it to share information by having on device see whats on the other is projecting creating a new type of AR.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31207860</id>
	<title>Smaller battery = Less Bright</title>
	<author>billstewart</author>
	<datestamp>1266601440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suppose it's no worse than showing people a demo on a laptop screen, but that's also suboptimal for more than two people.</p><p>Basically, if you want brightness, you're going to need to plug the projector into a reasonable power source; I don't know if USB's enough (probably not) or if that means the wall socket.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suppose it 's no worse than showing people a demo on a laptop screen , but that 's also suboptimal for more than two people.Basically , if you want brightness , you 're going to need to plug the projector into a reasonable power source ; I do n't know if USB 's enough ( probably not ) or if that means the wall socket .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suppose it's no worse than showing people a demo on a laptop screen, but that's also suboptimal for more than two people.Basically, if you want brightness, you're going to need to plug the projector into a reasonable power source; I don't know if USB's enough (probably not) or if that means the wall socket.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206196</id>
	<title>take a call?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266584220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Remember answering machines?  They're back, Baby, and Better Than Ever (TM)!!</p><p>Introducing a hot concept - Voice Mail!</p><p>It's like an answering machine, but SMARTER!  You can skip, listen, even SAVE - all at the press of a button.</p><p>Yes, you may do something else, be somewhere else, and have someone "leave a message", even when your phone is IN THE PALM OF YOUR HAND!</p><p>That's right, available now, as a service plan addon or value-added service, "Voice Mail" can be yours, and it may already be!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Remember answering machines ?
They 're back , Baby , and Better Than Ever ( TM ) !
! Introducing a hot concept - Voice Mail ! It 's like an answering machine , but SMARTER !
You can skip , listen , even SAVE - all at the press of a button.Yes , you may do something else , be somewhere else , and have someone " leave a message " , even when your phone is IN THE PALM OF YOUR HAND ! That 's right , available now , as a service plan addon or value-added service , " Voice Mail " can be yours , and it may already be !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Remember answering machines?
They're back, Baby, and Better Than Ever (TM)!
!Introducing a hot concept - Voice Mail!It's like an answering machine, but SMARTER!
You can skip, listen, even SAVE - all at the press of a button.Yes, you may do something else, be somewhere else, and have someone "leave a message", even when your phone is IN THE PALM OF YOUR HAND!That's right, available now, as a service plan addon or value-added service, "Voice Mail" can be yours, and it may already be!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31277038</id>
	<title>Re:It needs a corresponding killer app</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267089720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Microvision already has demonstrated just such a gun and game.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Microvision already has demonstrated just such a gun and game .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microvision already has demonstrated just such a gun and game.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206094</id>
	<title>Verizon, Sprint, and AT&amp;T</title>
	<author>tepples</author>
	<datestamp>1266583680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Where have you been for the last 5 years?</p></div><p>I've been in the United States, where the wireless carriers with decent coverage don't give a discount for bringing your own handset.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Where have you been for the last 5 years ? I 've been in the United States , where the wireless carriers with decent coverage do n't give a discount for bringing your own handset .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where have you been for the last 5 years?I've been in the United States, where the wireless carriers with decent coverage don't give a discount for bringing your own handset.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204936</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204528</id>
	<title>iPico</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266575880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A projector wouldn't make Pico any more pleasant to use on a cellphone. Plus, you'd get all the DRM activists complaining that they hate Pico and that Apple won't let them projected emacs and vi on their iPhones.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A projector would n't make Pico any more pleasant to use on a cellphone .
Plus , you 'd get all the DRM activists complaining that they hate Pico and that Apple wo n't let them projected emacs and vi on their iPhones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A projector wouldn't make Pico any more pleasant to use on a cellphone.
Plus, you'd get all the DRM activists complaining that they hate Pico and that Apple won't let them projected emacs and vi on their iPhones.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204936</id>
	<title>Your phone IS an ipod, IS a TV, IS a web browser</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266577320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It IS a videophone, is a word processor, is a spreadsheet, is also a map and a satnav, and is a super small computing device designed for visual display of information.</p><p>Fuck, I can even run multi user ssh sessions, DB servers and web sites on it. Y'know I reckon I could run mult user X desktops on the thing as well.</p><p><a href="http://maemo.nokia.com/n900/" title="nokia.com">http://maemo.nokia.com/n900/</a> [nokia.com]</p><p>Where have you been for the last 5 years?</p><p>Projector too? Hell yeah!<br>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It IS a videophone , is a word processor , is a spreadsheet , is also a map and a satnav , and is a super small computing device designed for visual display of information.Fuck , I can even run multi user ssh sessions , DB servers and web sites on it .
Y'know I reckon I could run mult user X desktops on the thing as well.http : //maemo.nokia.com/n900/ [ nokia.com ] Where have you been for the last 5 years ? Projector too ?
Hell yeah !
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>It IS a videophone, is a word processor, is a spreadsheet, is also a map and a satnav, and is a super small computing device designed for visual display of information.Fuck, I can even run multi user ssh sessions, DB servers and web sites on it.
Y'know I reckon I could run mult user X desktops on the thing as well.http://maemo.nokia.com/n900/ [nokia.com]Where have you been for the last 5 years?Projector too?
Hell yeah!
 </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204486</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204980</id>
	<title>Re:What does not using a camera have to do with th</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266577560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They are two completely different technologies with completely different purposes filling completely different needs.</p></div><p>Depends on how you look at it.  You could argue that they're the same thing, just running in opposite directions.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They are two completely different technologies with completely different purposes filling completely different needs.Depends on how you look at it .
You could argue that they 're the same thing , just running in opposite directions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are two completely different technologies with completely different purposes filling completely different needs.Depends on how you look at it.
You could argue that they're the same thing, just running in opposite directions.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31209066</id>
	<title>Re:No way, a phone is for talking...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266666420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I use a computer for 4 purposes.</p><p>1. Browsing the web<br>2. Email<br>3. Graphic design<br>4. Watching videos</p><p>I have no need or desire to make music, program, or write articles, and whenever people talk about that kind of functionality, I interject to let them know that I don't need it. No thank you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I use a computer for 4 purposes.1 .
Browsing the web2 .
Email3. Graphic design4 .
Watching videosI have no need or desire to make music , program , or write articles , and whenever people talk about that kind of functionality , I interject to let them know that I do n't need it .
No thank you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use a computer for 4 purposes.1.
Browsing the web2.
Email3. Graphic design4.
Watching videosI have no need or desire to make music, program, or write articles, and whenever people talk about that kind of functionality, I interject to let them know that I don't need it.
No thank you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204784</id>
	<title>"Unboxing" promo for the LG Expo</title>
	<author>kervin</author>
	<datestamp>1266576720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No connection to the product, but this <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJDRcqCMpW0" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">fake geek unboxing</a> [youtube.com] for the LG Expo ( projector phone ) was kind of amusing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No connection to the product , but this fake geek unboxing [ youtube.com ] for the LG Expo ( projector phone ) was kind of amusing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No connection to the product, but this fake geek unboxing [youtube.com] for the LG Expo ( projector phone ) was kind of amusing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204970</id>
	<title>Before that, forward facing camera</title>
	<author>Nukenbar</author>
	<datestamp>1266577440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Before we worry about projectors, how about we get forward facing cameras on our phone for video Skype.  It is already a pretty common feature on Japanese phones.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Before we worry about projectors , how about we get forward facing cameras on our phone for video Skype .
It is already a pretty common feature on Japanese phones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Before we worry about projectors, how about we get forward facing cameras on our phone for video Skype.
It is already a pretty common feature on Japanese phones.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204916</id>
	<title>No way, a phone is for talking...</title>
	<author>zero\_out</author>
	<datestamp>1266577260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I use a cell phone for 3 purposes.</p><p>1.  Talking</p><p>2.  Texting when I can't talk (like brief and infrequent messages to my wife while at work)</p><p>3.  Sudoku while I'm on the toilet</p><p>I have no need nor desire to have a camera, web browser, or projector on my phone.  No thank you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I use a cell phone for 3 purposes.1 .
Talking2. Texting when I ca n't talk ( like brief and infrequent messages to my wife while at work ) 3 .
Sudoku while I 'm on the toiletI have no need nor desire to have a camera , web browser , or projector on my phone .
No thank you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use a cell phone for 3 purposes.1.
Talking2.  Texting when I can't talk (like brief and infrequent messages to my wife while at work)3.
Sudoku while I'm on the toiletI have no need nor desire to have a camera, web browser, or projector on my phone.
No thank you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204602</id>
	<title>How big and bright can these things project?</title>
	<author>Orange Crush</author>
	<datestamp>1266576120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't projectors of reasonable "cell phone" size generally max out at 11"x17" on a light-colored wall in a dim room?  And despite seldom having any use for my phone's camera, I have in the past thought "Gee, it would be really nice if I had a camera right now" (still do sometimes, as I have yet to have a cell phone with a camera that's usable in low light)  I've never found myself thinking "Gee, it would be really awesome if I could project an image the size of a smallish poster from my phone!".</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't projectors of reasonable " cell phone " size generally max out at 11 " x17 " on a light-colored wall in a dim room ?
And despite seldom having any use for my phone 's camera , I have in the past thought " Gee , it would be really nice if I had a camera right now " ( still do sometimes , as I have yet to have a cell phone with a camera that 's usable in low light ) I 've never found myself thinking " Gee , it would be really awesome if I could project an image the size of a smallish poster from my phone !
" .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't projectors of reasonable "cell phone" size generally max out at 11"x17" on a light-colored wall in a dim room?
And despite seldom having any use for my phone's camera, I have in the past thought "Gee, it would be really nice if I had a camera right now" (still do sometimes, as I have yet to have a cell phone with a camera that's usable in low light)  I've never found myself thinking "Gee, it would be really awesome if I could project an image the size of a smallish poster from my phone!
".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206546</id>
	<title>Re:Depends on the output</title>
	<author>bill\_mcgonigle</author>
	<datestamp>1266587100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>What matters to me is whether the projection is bright enough for my audience to see the projected images clearly.</i></p><p>The Microvision one is 10 ANSI lumens.  No zeros lost there either.</p><p>I wish they'd just get to projecting the cell phone display onto my retina so I could have a smaller phone with a higher res display.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What matters to me is whether the projection is bright enough for my audience to see the projected images clearly.The Microvision one is 10 ANSI lumens .
No zeros lost there either.I wish they 'd just get to projecting the cell phone display onto my retina so I could have a smaller phone with a higher res display .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What matters to me is whether the projection is bright enough for my audience to see the projected images clearly.The Microvision one is 10 ANSI lumens.
No zeros lost there either.I wish they'd just get to projecting the cell phone display onto my retina so I could have a smaller phone with a higher res display.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205254</id>
	<title>Everyone I know has a camera of some sort, but...</title>
	<author>ukemike</author>
	<datestamp>1266578880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Everyone I know has a camera of some sort, and most use the camera in their phones from time to time when they don't have a real camera with them.  With the exception of people who do presentations or commercial training I know ONE person who owns a projector.  <br> <br>

So I don't think there is a big demand for super dim, hard to hold steady, low res, battery killing projectors that you can carry in your pocket.  The cell phone is turning into the digital swiss army knife.  The mini projector might belong on a super specialized model (kinda like the golfer's swiss army knife that has the divot tool and the cleat cleaner).<br> <br>

the very small projectors I have seen are almost uselessly dim.  "Hey could you cover up your glow-in-the-dark watch face it's ruining everyone's night vision and we can't see the projector image!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Everyone I know has a camera of some sort , and most use the camera in their phones from time to time when they do n't have a real camera with them .
With the exception of people who do presentations or commercial training I know ONE person who owns a projector .
So I do n't think there is a big demand for super dim , hard to hold steady , low res , battery killing projectors that you can carry in your pocket .
The cell phone is turning into the digital swiss army knife .
The mini projector might belong on a super specialized model ( kinda like the golfer 's swiss army knife that has the divot tool and the cleat cleaner ) .
the very small projectors I have seen are almost uselessly dim .
" Hey could you cover up your glow-in-the-dark watch face it 's ruining everyone 's night vision and we ca n't see the projector image !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everyone I know has a camera of some sort, and most use the camera in their phones from time to time when they don't have a real camera with them.
With the exception of people who do presentations or commercial training I know ONE person who owns a projector.
So I don't think there is a big demand for super dim, hard to hold steady, low res, battery killing projectors that you can carry in your pocket.
The cell phone is turning into the digital swiss army knife.
The mini projector might belong on a super specialized model (kinda like the golfer's swiss army knife that has the divot tool and the cleat cleaner).
the very small projectors I have seen are almost uselessly dim.
"Hey could you cover up your glow-in-the-dark watch face it's ruining everyone's night vision and we can't see the projector image!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206706</id>
	<title>Syndiant HD and focus free!</title>
	<author>Mr Z</author>
	<datestamp>1266588660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm waiting for these <a href="http://syndiant.com/pr15.html" title="syndiant.com">SVGA resolution, focus free</a> [syndiant.com] projectors before I jump on the bandwagon.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm waiting for these SVGA resolution , focus free [ syndiant.com ] projectors before I jump on the bandwagon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm waiting for these SVGA resolution, focus free [syndiant.com] projectors before I jump on the bandwagon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204564</id>
	<title>mod parent down</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266576000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>this is lame</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this is lame</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this is lame</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31208044</id>
	<title>Re:How big and bright can these things project?</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1266603960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>At lunch maybe you think of something relevant online to the conversation to show people. Maybe it is a [citation needed] situation, maybe some pianist on youtube that you think is awesome. Whipping out a laptop is rarely ok, but a cellphone could work. The cellphone needs to be able to balance standing easily and aim the projector downwards (with some correction to fix the skewing) to allow to you show things on the table. Or to be able to point it at a wall if you want to do so. This would be a powerful use.<br> <br>The other option is cellphones turning into netbooks. A projector combined with a camera or ladar type system gives you a screen and a full size keyboard on your desk, in something that fits in a pocket! That is truly powerful. You only need a 12x10cm 'screen' not poster sized for that to have vast uses. I'm sure given time I could think of more uses for a phone projector but I imagine time will tell better than I ever could.</htmltext>
<tokenext>At lunch maybe you think of something relevant online to the conversation to show people .
Maybe it is a [ citation needed ] situation , maybe some pianist on youtube that you think is awesome .
Whipping out a laptop is rarely ok , but a cellphone could work .
The cellphone needs to be able to balance standing easily and aim the projector downwards ( with some correction to fix the skewing ) to allow to you show things on the table .
Or to be able to point it at a wall if you want to do so .
This would be a powerful use .
The other option is cellphones turning into netbooks .
A projector combined with a camera or ladar type system gives you a screen and a full size keyboard on your desk , in something that fits in a pocket !
That is truly powerful .
You only need a 12x10cm 'screen ' not poster sized for that to have vast uses .
I 'm sure given time I could think of more uses for a phone projector but I imagine time will tell better than I ever could .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At lunch maybe you think of something relevant online to the conversation to show people.
Maybe it is a [citation needed] situation, maybe some pianist on youtube that you think is awesome.
Whipping out a laptop is rarely ok, but a cellphone could work.
The cellphone needs to be able to balance standing easily and aim the projector downwards (with some correction to fix the skewing) to allow to you show things on the table.
Or to be able to point it at a wall if you want to do so.
This would be a powerful use.
The other option is cellphones turning into netbooks.
A projector combined with a camera or ladar type system gives you a screen and a full size keyboard on your desk, in something that fits in a pocket!
That is truly powerful.
You only need a 12x10cm 'screen' not poster sized for that to have vast uses.
I'm sure given time I could think of more uses for a phone projector but I imagine time will tell better than I ever could.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205044</id>
	<title>Would I use it?</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1266577860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes. Until my battery runs dead.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes .
Until my battery runs dead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes.
Until my battery runs dead.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31207006</id>
	<title>Why the shortened links?</title>
	<author>The\_Duck271</author>
	<datestamp>1266592080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why are all the links in this article to bit.ly shortened versions? I want to know what site I'm going to.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why are all the links in this article to bit.ly shortened versions ?
I want to know what site I 'm going to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why are all the links in this article to bit.ly shortened versions?
I want to know what site I'm going to.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204958</id>
	<title>Re:I'll just take the projector</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266577380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WTFV</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WTFV</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTFV</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205510</id>
	<title>Re:Tricorders.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266580380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Regrettably, we can't all live in imaginary worlds.
</p><p>But if we could, I'd prefer adventuring that's a little more "fantasy" than "sci-fi". You usually get to spend more time out of doors, and it's more pleasant. Though I suppose there's some standard-of-living issues if you're just with the random peasantry.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Regrettably , we ca n't all live in imaginary worlds .
But if we could , I 'd prefer adventuring that 's a little more " fantasy " than " sci-fi " .
You usually get to spend more time out of doors , and it 's more pleasant .
Though I suppose there 's some standard-of-living issues if you 're just with the random peasantry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Regrettably, we can't all live in imaginary worlds.
But if we could, I'd prefer adventuring that's a little more "fantasy" than "sci-fi".
You usually get to spend more time out of doors, and it's more pleasant.
Though I suppose there's some standard-of-living issues if you're just with the random peasantry.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205224</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206092</id>
	<title>Bruce Forsyth's Play Your Cards Right!</title>
	<author>Dogtanian</author>
	<datestamp>1266583620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why can't people use standard units of measurements like millimeters, or even inches?</p></div><p>Perhaps because regardless of <i>minor</i> variations- which I haven't really noticed- the vast majority of playing cards are close enough to the same size and any normal person would understand the approximate scale that the authors meant.<br> <br>
I mean, seriously, most people would know they didn't mean <a href="http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Arts/Arts\_/Pictures/2008/08/01/bruce460.jpg" title="guardian.co.uk">cards this size</a> [guardian.co.uk] or require precise measurements unless they were some way along the autistic spectrum of literalness.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why ca n't people use standard units of measurements like millimeters , or even inches ? Perhaps because regardless of minor variations- which I have n't really noticed- the vast majority of playing cards are close enough to the same size and any normal person would understand the approximate scale that the authors meant .
I mean , seriously , most people would know they did n't mean cards this size [ guardian.co.uk ] or require precise measurements unless they were some way along the autistic spectrum of literalness .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why can't people use standard units of measurements like millimeters, or even inches?Perhaps because regardless of minor variations- which I haven't really noticed- the vast majority of playing cards are close enough to the same size and any normal person would understand the approximate scale that the authors meant.
I mean, seriously, most people would know they didn't mean cards this size [guardian.co.uk] or require precise measurements unless they were some way along the autistic spectrum of literalness.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205166</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31207872</id>
	<title>bet http://www.nuigroup.com/ could use these well!</title>
	<author>aleqi\_njbp</author>
	<datestamp>1266601500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think that a portable projector with a cam facing the same way could be exploited to make one of these multitouch units made at <a href="http://www.nuigroup.com/" title="nuigroup.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.nuigroup.com/</a> [nuigroup.com] that rock.  Mount it on a tripod and all you would need would be a touch surface.  Very portable multitouch interface you could use with or without your desktop to power it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think that a portable projector with a cam facing the same way could be exploited to make one of these multitouch units made at http : //www.nuigroup.com/ [ nuigroup.com ] that rock .
Mount it on a tripod and all you would need would be a touch surface .
Very portable multitouch interface you could use with or without your desktop to power it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think that a portable projector with a cam facing the same way could be exploited to make one of these multitouch units made at http://www.nuigroup.com/ [nuigroup.com] that rock.
Mount it on a tripod and all you would need would be a touch surface.
Very portable multitouch interface you could use with or without your desktop to power it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205224</id>
	<title>Tricorders.</title>
	<author>Fantastic Lad</author>
	<datestamp>1266578700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know Star Trek has fallen from popular attention, but these cell phone things are becoming more and more like the kind of gear we collectively envision "Future People" walking around with.</p><p>It's interesting, though, that our imaginary selves are interested in exploration, and their portable technology was tuned to that, (probing and measuring the environment), whereas our devices seem to be more about insulating people from reality.  (Headphones and music and videos and games, etc.)</p><p>In Star Trek they were too busy having adventures to spend much time in Fantasy Lad.</p><p>The question of one's state of bondage can be determined by a quick assessment of one's collection of iPhone apps.</p><p>-FL</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know Star Trek has fallen from popular attention , but these cell phone things are becoming more and more like the kind of gear we collectively envision " Future People " walking around with.It 's interesting , though , that our imaginary selves are interested in exploration , and their portable technology was tuned to that , ( probing and measuring the environment ) , whereas our devices seem to be more about insulating people from reality .
( Headphones and music and videos and games , etc .
) In Star Trek they were too busy having adventures to spend much time in Fantasy Lad.The question of one 's state of bondage can be determined by a quick assessment of one 's collection of iPhone apps.-FL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know Star Trek has fallen from popular attention, but these cell phone things are becoming more and more like the kind of gear we collectively envision "Future People" walking around with.It's interesting, though, that our imaginary selves are interested in exploration, and their portable technology was tuned to that, (probing and measuring the environment), whereas our devices seem to be more about insulating people from reality.
(Headphones and music and videos and games, etc.
)In Star Trek they were too busy having adventures to spend much time in Fantasy Lad.The question of one's state of bondage can be determined by a quick assessment of one's collection of iPhone apps.-FL</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206078</id>
	<title>Re:Micro, Nano, Pico, Femto</title>
	<author>TubeSteak</author>
	<datestamp>1266583500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Somehow I don't think that a "pico-projector" is one trillionth the size of a regular projector. Asshole marketers.</p></div><p>Their frame of reference was some dude from the marketing department making shadow puppets using the sun.<br>When you look at it that way, it all makes sense.<br>
&nbsp; <br>/If you want to be pedantic about it, the scale is closer to 10^-11 than 10^-12</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Somehow I do n't think that a " pico-projector " is one trillionth the size of a regular projector .
Asshole marketers.Their frame of reference was some dude from the marketing department making shadow puppets using the sun.When you look at it that way , it all makes sense .
  /If you want to be pedantic about it , the scale is closer to 10 ^ -11 than 10 ^ -12</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somehow I don't think that a "pico-projector" is one trillionth the size of a regular projector.
Asshole marketers.Their frame of reference was some dude from the marketing department making shadow puppets using the sun.When you look at it that way, it all makes sense.
  /If you want to be pedantic about it, the scale is closer to 10^-11 than 10^-12
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204438</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204992</id>
	<title>Re:Depends on the output</title>
	<author>be951</author>
	<datestamp>1266577620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Agreed.  I think eventually, we will see phones/pocket-sized devices with a "pico" projector and one of <a href="http://www.thinkgeek.com/computing/keyboards-mice/8193/" title="thinkgeek.com">these</a> [thinkgeek.com] built in. And as storage gets smaller and chips get more powerful, we will end up with an all-in-one device that can replace laptops/netbooks as well.  We already have convergence of phone, digital camera, video camera, PDA, MP3 player, GPS, etc...  One of the things that makes the iPad attractive (YMMV) is the larger screen.  A pico projector can provide that in a smaller device.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed .
I think eventually , we will see phones/pocket-sized devices with a " pico " projector and one of these [ thinkgeek.com ] built in .
And as storage gets smaller and chips get more powerful , we will end up with an all-in-one device that can replace laptops/netbooks as well .
We already have convergence of phone , digital camera , video camera , PDA , MP3 player , GPS , etc... One of the things that makes the iPad attractive ( YMMV ) is the larger screen .
A pico projector can provide that in a smaller device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed.
I think eventually, we will see phones/pocket-sized devices with a "pico" projector and one of these [thinkgeek.com] built in.
And as storage gets smaller and chips get more powerful, we will end up with an all-in-one device that can replace laptops/netbooks as well.
We already have convergence of phone, digital camera, video camera, PDA, MP3 player, GPS, etc...  One of the things that makes the iPad attractive (YMMV) is the larger screen.
A pico projector can provide that in a smaller device.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206068</id>
	<title>Yes, but design them better</title>
	<author>Nethemas the Great</author>
	<datestamp>1266583500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think the notion of a built in project is great.  However I really cannot understand why they're designing them so bloody thick just to accommodate the projector chip.  The ones that the TI guy was showing off were fairly wide but actually quite thin.  I think it would make far more sense to simply have the projector chip lay flat just like the camera chip but have the ability to "pop-up" and be adjustable to different angles.  That way not only do you enable the phone to remain nice and thin, but you also have the ability to lay the phone on an ordinary surface without propping it up at an angle for people to see the picture.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the notion of a built in project is great .
However I really can not understand why they 're designing them so bloody thick just to accommodate the projector chip .
The ones that the TI guy was showing off were fairly wide but actually quite thin .
I think it would make far more sense to simply have the projector chip lay flat just like the camera chip but have the ability to " pop-up " and be adjustable to different angles .
That way not only do you enable the phone to remain nice and thin , but you also have the ability to lay the phone on an ordinary surface without propping it up at an angle for people to see the picture .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the notion of a built in project is great.
However I really cannot understand why they're designing them so bloody thick just to accommodate the projector chip.
The ones that the TI guy was showing off were fairly wide but actually quite thin.
I think it would make far more sense to simply have the projector chip lay flat just like the camera chip but have the ability to "pop-up" and be adjustable to different angles.
That way not only do you enable the phone to remain nice and thin, but you also have the ability to lay the phone on an ordinary surface without propping it up at an angle for people to see the picture.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204438</id>
	<title>Micro, Nano, Pico, Femto</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266575460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Somehow I don't think that a "pico-projector" is one trillionth the size of a regular projector. Asshole marketers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Somehow I do n't think that a " pico-projector " is one trillionth the size of a regular projector .
Asshole marketers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somehow I don't think that a "pico-projector" is one trillionth the size of a regular projector.
Asshole marketers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206998</id>
	<title>Re:Micro, Nano, Pico, Femto</title>
	<author>mfnickster</author>
	<datestamp>1266591840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Pico" is also Spanish for "peak," but somehow I don't think that's what the marketroids had in mind!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Pico " is also Spanish for " peak , " but somehow I do n't think that 's what the marketroids had in mind !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Pico" is also Spanish for "peak," but somehow I don't think that's what the marketroids had in mind!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204438</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204450</id>
	<title>I'll just take the projector</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266575580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about a wireless projecter, the size of a deck of cards, with built-in wireless USB and/or bluetooth? Then you can use it with nearly anything, the way wi-fi projectors work now.</p><p>Besides, if you're playing a video with your phone, what if you want to then take a phone call?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about a wireless projecter , the size of a deck of cards , with built-in wireless USB and/or bluetooth ?
Then you can use it with nearly anything , the way wi-fi projectors work now.Besides , if you 're playing a video with your phone , what if you want to then take a phone call ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about a wireless projecter, the size of a deck of cards, with built-in wireless USB and/or bluetooth?
Then you can use it with nearly anything, the way wi-fi projectors work now.Besides, if you're playing a video with your phone, what if you want to then take a phone call?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204876</id>
	<title>Speaking of stupidity...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266577080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why the fuck did the submission author use that goddamn bit.ly URL shortening disservice to shit up all of the URLs in the summary? And why didn't the Slashdot editor replace them with the real URLs? I would've expected this from kdawson, but not from timothy.</p><p>There's absolutely no reason to have used shortened URLs here. There isn't a stupid 140-character limit like at twitter. I much prefer being able to see where a link is pointing to.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why the fuck did the submission author use that goddamn bit.ly URL shortening disservice to shit up all of the URLs in the summary ?
And why did n't the Slashdot editor replace them with the real URLs ?
I would 've expected this from kdawson , but not from timothy.There 's absolutely no reason to have used shortened URLs here .
There is n't a stupid 140-character limit like at twitter .
I much prefer being able to see where a link is pointing to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why the fuck did the submission author use that goddamn bit.ly URL shortening disservice to shit up all of the URLs in the summary?
And why didn't the Slashdot editor replace them with the real URLs?
I would've expected this from kdawson, but not from timothy.There's absolutely no reason to have used shortened URLs here.
There isn't a stupid 140-character limit like at twitter.
I much prefer being able to see where a link is pointing to.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204438</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206334</id>
	<title>Re:Tricorders.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266585420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In Star Trek they were too busy having adventures to spend much time in Fantasy La(n)d.</p></div><p>I take it you never watched many of the newer ones where many of them centered around the holo-decks.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In Star Trek they were too busy having adventures to spend much time in Fantasy La ( n ) d.I take it you never watched many of the newer ones where many of them centered around the holo-decks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Star Trek they were too busy having adventures to spend much time in Fantasy La(n)d.I take it you never watched many of the newer ones where many of them centered around the holo-decks.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205224</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204486</id>
	<title>iP*d</title>
	<author>dazedNconfuzed</author>
	<datestamp>1266575700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't want a projector in my phone. I want my phone to be a phone. Make it a videophone before adding some non-personal-communications projector app.</p><p>I want the projector in my iP*d, or other super-small computing device which IS designed for visual display of information.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't want a projector in my phone .
I want my phone to be a phone .
Make it a videophone before adding some non-personal-communications projector app.I want the projector in my iP * d , or other super-small computing device which IS designed for visual display of information .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't want a projector in my phone.
I want my phone to be a phone.
Make it a videophone before adding some non-personal-communications projector app.I want the projector in my iP*d, or other super-small computing device which IS designed for visual display of information.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204988</id>
	<title>The phone is not the killer platform here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266577620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The car dashboard and the portable GPS are. Pico projectors enable automotive HUDs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The car dashboard and the portable GPS are .
Pico projectors enable automotive HUDs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The car dashboard and the portable GPS are.
Pico projectors enable automotive HUDs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31207092</id>
	<title>Retinal Projection</title>
	<author>meehawl</author>
	<datestamp>1266593460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obviously the killer app for mobile handset projectors is direct projection onto the user's retina, perhaps aided by adaptive calibration using cams and ultrasound to detect ocular motions/sacaddes,slow pursuits and to respond to them both in real time and in anticipation. I expect eventually this will be on a bunch of phones for 2-3 years but many will disregard it as pointless and most will ignore it or simply be utterly oblivious to it until Apple releases a phone using this technology and dropping a massive marketing budget spamming all media, whereupon everything will be filled with stories of Apple's miraculous game changer that is utterly unlike anything that has gone before.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously the killer app for mobile handset projectors is direct projection onto the user 's retina , perhaps aided by adaptive calibration using cams and ultrasound to detect ocular motions/sacaddes,slow pursuits and to respond to them both in real time and in anticipation .
I expect eventually this will be on a bunch of phones for 2-3 years but many will disregard it as pointless and most will ignore it or simply be utterly oblivious to it until Apple releases a phone using this technology and dropping a massive marketing budget spamming all media , whereupon everything will be filled with stories of Apple 's miraculous game changer that is utterly unlike anything that has gone before .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously the killer app for mobile handset projectors is direct projection onto the user's retina, perhaps aided by adaptive calibration using cams and ultrasound to detect ocular motions/sacaddes,slow pursuits and to respond to them both in real time and in anticipation.
I expect eventually this will be on a bunch of phones for 2-3 years but many will disregard it as pointless and most will ignore it or simply be utterly oblivious to it until Apple releases a phone using this technology and dropping a massive marketing budget spamming all media, whereupon everything will be filled with stories of Apple's miraculous game changer that is utterly unlike anything that has gone before.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204684</id>
	<title>It needs a corresponding killer app</title>
	<author>jwietelmann</author>
	<datestamp>1266576420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>would you use a pico-projector if it was built into your phone?<p>No. Next question please...</p><p>More seriously though, I'm sure that this would be very useful for a handful of people.  It might even be good for the phone makers as a short-term marketing gimmick.  I bet a lot of people might initally buy such a phone for the "wow" factor before realizing the limitations.</p><p>The problem is this:  Where/when could you use such a device in an effective way?  You'd need a screen and/or a blank wall, as well as something close enough to that wall to set your phone on, unless you and your comrades enjoy watching a very wobbly video.</p><p>On the other hand, combined with an accelerometer, a compass, and/or a camera, someone might be able to make a fairly novel application.  For example, a game where moving the phone would scroll the projected image, like moving the sights of a gun.  (Clearly the game would have to be a little more creative than that, but you get the general idea.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>would you use a pico-projector if it was built into your phone ? No .
Next question please...More seriously though , I 'm sure that this would be very useful for a handful of people .
It might even be good for the phone makers as a short-term marketing gimmick .
I bet a lot of people might initally buy such a phone for the " wow " factor before realizing the limitations.The problem is this : Where/when could you use such a device in an effective way ?
You 'd need a screen and/or a blank wall , as well as something close enough to that wall to set your phone on , unless you and your comrades enjoy watching a very wobbly video.On the other hand , combined with an accelerometer , a compass , and/or a camera , someone might be able to make a fairly novel application .
For example , a game where moving the phone would scroll the projected image , like moving the sights of a gun .
( Clearly the game would have to be a little more creative than that , but you get the general idea .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>would you use a pico-projector if it was built into your phone?No.
Next question please...More seriously though, I'm sure that this would be very useful for a handful of people.
It might even be good for the phone makers as a short-term marketing gimmick.
I bet a lot of people might initally buy such a phone for the "wow" factor before realizing the limitations.The problem is this:  Where/when could you use such a device in an effective way?
You'd need a screen and/or a blank wall, as well as something close enough to that wall to set your phone on, unless you and your comrades enjoy watching a very wobbly video.On the other hand, combined with an accelerometer, a compass, and/or a camera, someone might be able to make a fairly novel application.
For example, a game where moving the phone would scroll the projected image, like moving the sights of a gun.
(Clearly the game would have to be a little more creative than that, but you get the general idea.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204514</id>
	<title>What does not using a camera have to do with this?</title>
	<author>Anita Coney</author>
	<datestamp>1266575820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"<i>A lot of us never use the camera in our phones now -- would you use a pico-projector if it was built into your phone?</i>"</p><p>How does the fact that you don't use the camera in your phone have <i>anything</i> to do with the fact that you would not use a pico-projector?  They are two completely different technologies with completely different purposes filling completely different needs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" A lot of us never use the camera in our phones now -- would you use a pico-projector if it was built into your phone ?
" How does the fact that you do n't use the camera in your phone have anything to do with the fact that you would not use a pico-projector ?
They are two completely different technologies with completely different purposes filling completely different needs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"A lot of us never use the camera in our phones now -- would you use a pico-projector if it was built into your phone?
"How does the fact that you don't use the camera in your phone have anything to do with the fact that you would not use a pico-projector?
They are two completely different technologies with completely different purposes filling completely different needs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204622</id>
	<title>Opens a world of uses</title>
	<author>Ustice</author>
	<datestamp>1266576180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would absolutely use a small projector on my phone. It would be great for sharing info, and would help with augmented reality apps. It also allows you to get outside of the limitations of a tiny screen.  You could even use it as a replacement for a screen, and make the phone the shape of a pen that folds out with a screen that the interface gets projected onto.

This is the next step, I think.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would absolutely use a small projector on my phone .
It would be great for sharing info , and would help with augmented reality apps .
It also allows you to get outside of the limitations of a tiny screen .
You could even use it as a replacement for a screen , and make the phone the shape of a pen that folds out with a screen that the interface gets projected onto .
This is the next step , I think .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would absolutely use a small projector on my phone.
It would be great for sharing info, and would help with augmented reality apps.
It also allows you to get outside of the limitations of a tiny screen.
You could even use it as a replacement for a screen, and make the phone the shape of a pen that folds out with a screen that the interface gets projected onto.
This is the next step, I think.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204490</id>
	<title>Depends on the output</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266575760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't really care what device I use as a projector.  What matters to me is whether the projection is bright enough for my audience to see the projected images clearly.  If I can do that from my phone, great (one less piece of equipment to lug around).<br> <br>The other question I would ask is whether using my phone as a projector would drain the battery, precluding me using the phone as a phone.  A phone with a flat battery is not much use.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't really care what device I use as a projector .
What matters to me is whether the projection is bright enough for my audience to see the projected images clearly .
If I can do that from my phone , great ( one less piece of equipment to lug around ) .
The other question I would ask is whether using my phone as a projector would drain the battery , precluding me using the phone as a phone .
A phone with a flat battery is not much use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't really care what device I use as a projector.
What matters to me is whether the projection is bright enough for my audience to see the projected images clearly.
If I can do that from my phone, great (one less piece of equipment to lug around).
The other question I would ask is whether using my phone as a projector would drain the battery, precluding me using the phone as a phone.
A phone with a flat battery is not much use.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31208270</id>
	<title>Re:It needs a corresponding killer app</title>
	<author>Spazntwich</author>
	<datestamp>1266607380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You actually raise an interesting alternate point by mentioning both cameras and accelerometers.</p><p>Consumer grade digital cameras already have image stabilization that works to some degree. It likely wouldn't be a stretch to apply that tech to the picoprojector. Stick the "bulb" or whatever on a ball and socket joint then using accelerometer input and camera input (like an optical mouse, say), use it to display a fairly consistently placed image, barring extreme changes in orientation.</p><p>I think enabling use of the projector while still being held will be a critical part of getting average people to accept these, at least as parts of their phones.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You actually raise an interesting alternate point by mentioning both cameras and accelerometers.Consumer grade digital cameras already have image stabilization that works to some degree .
It likely would n't be a stretch to apply that tech to the picoprojector .
Stick the " bulb " or whatever on a ball and socket joint then using accelerometer input and camera input ( like an optical mouse , say ) , use it to display a fairly consistently placed image , barring extreme changes in orientation.I think enabling use of the projector while still being held will be a critical part of getting average people to accept these , at least as parts of their phones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You actually raise an interesting alternate point by mentioning both cameras and accelerometers.Consumer grade digital cameras already have image stabilization that works to some degree.
It likely wouldn't be a stretch to apply that tech to the picoprojector.
Stick the "bulb" or whatever on a ball and socket joint then using accelerometer input and camera input (like an optical mouse, say), use it to display a fairly consistently placed image, barring extreme changes in orientation.I think enabling use of the projector while still being held will be a critical part of getting average people to accept these, at least as parts of their phones.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205396</id>
	<title>Re:Micro, Nano, Pico, Femto</title>
	<author>cvtan</author>
	<datestamp>1266579660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Chris Parks, a designer at Eastman Kodak's Image Sensor Solutions, invented the term "marketing physics" to describe ridiculous claims and other violations of physical laws and common sense made by marketing types.  The pico-projector name falls in this category.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Chris Parks , a designer at Eastman Kodak 's Image Sensor Solutions , invented the term " marketing physics " to describe ridiculous claims and other violations of physical laws and common sense made by marketing types .
The pico-projector name falls in this category .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chris Parks, a designer at Eastman Kodak's Image Sensor Solutions, invented the term "marketing physics" to describe ridiculous claims and other violations of physical laws and common sense made by marketing types.
The pico-projector name falls in this category.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204438</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204412</id>
	<title>"Obi-Wan Kenobi, You're our only hope!"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266575460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It needs to be a holographic projector, or don't bother.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It needs to be a holographic projector , or do n't bother .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It needs to be a holographic projector, or don't bother.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31207702</id>
	<title>Re:I'll just take the projector</title>
	<author>gothzilla</author>
	<datestamp>1266599520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My wife loved her portable dvd player till the dog chewed the power cables up. Instead of buying a new one I just learned how to rip and shrink her dvd's so they would play on her LG Xenon. She LOVES IT. Yes, movies stop when a text or call comes in but she just starts the movie again and moves the slider to about where she was.</p><p>Yes she does find it annoying but she prefers it over carting around a portable dvd player.</p><p>When she saw the AT&amp;T commercial for the LG phone with a projector she flipped and demanded I get it for her. Yes, buying that new 1TB drive has been put on hold. lol</p><p>If they build a phone to resume a movie when you return to it then they'll have a perfect product.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My wife loved her portable dvd player till the dog chewed the power cables up .
Instead of buying a new one I just learned how to rip and shrink her dvd 's so they would play on her LG Xenon .
She LOVES IT .
Yes , movies stop when a text or call comes in but she just starts the movie again and moves the slider to about where she was.Yes she does find it annoying but she prefers it over carting around a portable dvd player.When she saw the AT&amp;T commercial for the LG phone with a projector she flipped and demanded I get it for her .
Yes , buying that new 1TB drive has been put on hold .
lolIf they build a phone to resume a movie when you return to it then they 'll have a perfect product .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My wife loved her portable dvd player till the dog chewed the power cables up.
Instead of buying a new one I just learned how to rip and shrink her dvd's so they would play on her LG Xenon.
She LOVES IT.
Yes, movies stop when a text or call comes in but she just starts the movie again and moves the slider to about where she was.Yes she does find it annoying but she prefers it over carting around a portable dvd player.When she saw the AT&amp;T commercial for the LG phone with a projector she flipped and demanded I get it for her.
Yes, buying that new 1TB drive has been put on hold.
lolIf they build a phone to resume a movie when you return to it then they'll have a perfect product.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204770</id>
	<title>Probably not</title>
	<author>killmenow</author>
	<datestamp>1266576660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's kind of difficult to pretend to be working during meetings while actually watching internet porn on my phone if I'm watching it by projecting it life-size on a wall.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's kind of difficult to pretend to be working during meetings while actually watching internet porn on my phone if I 'm watching it by projecting it life-size on a wall .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's kind of difficult to pretend to be working during meetings while actually watching internet porn on my phone if I'm watching it by projecting it life-size on a wall.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206552
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205224
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205842
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205224
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205198
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31207294
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31208270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206998
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206546
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204490
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206880
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205224
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205086
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31208358
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204970
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31207758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205702
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31209066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205396
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204490
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206078
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205224
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31335552
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206094
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31209136
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204840
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205224
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31207702
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206726
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205224
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31208044
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31279214
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205908
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31207612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204490
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205014
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204490
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31277038
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204896
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31237420
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_219245_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31207860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_219245.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205062
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_219245.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204514
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205172
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204980
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_219245.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204462
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204608
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204690
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204964
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205082
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_219245.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204970
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31208358
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_219245.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205224
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205842
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206882
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206880
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206552
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206334
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205510
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_219245.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204602
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31208044
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31207860
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_219245.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204438
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204876
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205784
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205396
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206078
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206998
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_219245.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204450
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205166
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206092
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204840
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31209136
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206196
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205026
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205198
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204958
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204896
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31207702
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204952
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206726
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_219245.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204764
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31279214
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_219245.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204412
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204638
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31207294
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204564
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204570
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_219245.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204916
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31207758
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31209066
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205086
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_219245.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204914
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_219245.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204528
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_219245.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205254
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_219245.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206068
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_219245.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204490
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31207612
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206546
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205014
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204992
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_219245.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204486
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204936
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31206094
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205702
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205908
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_219245.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31204684
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31277038
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31205690
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31237420
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31335552
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_219245.31208270
</commentlist>
</conversation>
