<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_19_1650248</id>
	<title>Researchers Say Women Secretly Desire Hairy Geeks</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1266572220000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>jasper\_amsterdam writes <i>"The Daily Mail has a story about a study looking into women's preference for men. More specifically, about how women say they want one kind of man, but really want another. From the article: 'Most women claim to be attracted to tall, dark and handsome men, but a new study has revealed that <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1251929/The-perfect-man-geek-facial-stubble--womens-secret-turn-ons-revealed.html">facial stubble and a geeky personality are their biggest secret turn-ons</a>. Despite complaining that it looks unkempt and feels rough to touch, the unshaven look on a man is actually a turn-on for 41 per cent of women. A slightly geeky personality came second, proving that women really do like a guy who knows their stuff when it comes to technology. A hairy chest was voted third, followed by a man who loves to read or cries at a soppy film.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>jasper \ _amsterdam writes " The Daily Mail has a story about a study looking into women 's preference for men .
More specifically , about how women say they want one kind of man , but really want another .
From the article : 'Most women claim to be attracted to tall , dark and handsome men , but a new study has revealed that facial stubble and a geeky personality are their biggest secret turn-ons .
Despite complaining that it looks unkempt and feels rough to touch , the unshaven look on a man is actually a turn-on for 41 per cent of women .
A slightly geeky personality came second , proving that women really do like a guy who knows their stuff when it comes to technology .
A hairy chest was voted third , followed by a man who loves to read or cries at a soppy film .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>jasper\_amsterdam writes "The Daily Mail has a story about a study looking into women's preference for men.
More specifically, about how women say they want one kind of man, but really want another.
From the article: 'Most women claim to be attracted to tall, dark and handsome men, but a new study has revealed that facial stubble and a geeky personality are their biggest secret turn-ons.
Despite complaining that it looks unkempt and feels rough to touch, the unshaven look on a man is actually a turn-on for 41 per cent of women.
A slightly geeky personality came second, proving that women really do like a guy who knows their stuff when it comes to technology.
A hairy chest was voted third, followed by a man who loves to read or cries at a soppy film.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31247130</id>
	<title>Re:This is absurd</title>
	<author>precariousgray</author>
	<datestamp>1266951660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"It's not the size that matters, honey, it's that it shoots $100 bills is what's important!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>" It 's not the size that matters , honey , it 's that it shoots $ 100 bills is what 's important !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"It's not the size that matters, honey, it's that it shoots $100 bills is what's important!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31206008</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31205150</id>
	<title>Re:This cracks me up</title>
	<author>Wraithlyn</author>
	<datestamp>1266578400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey now, not ALL men and women have different tastes.  Stop generalizing!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey now , not ALL men and women have different tastes .
Stop generalizing !
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey now, not ALL men and women have different tastes.
Stop generalizing!
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204732</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31207158</id>
	<title>Basic Rules</title>
	<author>Silvrmane</author>
	<datestamp>1266593940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>basic rules - don't smell like ass, be funny, and don't be a spaz.</htmltext>
<tokenext>basic rules - do n't smell like ass , be funny , and do n't be a spaz .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>basic rules - don't smell like ass, be funny, and don't be a spaz.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31205526</id>
	<title>As a hairy geek who is married</title>
	<author>toadlife</author>
	<datestamp>1266580500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My wife comes from an Italian family where all of the men are extremely hairy, and thinks hairless guys are a huge turnoff because "they look like little boys". She descries the stereotype of all women desiring hairless men and says that many of her friends also like hairy guys too.</p><p>As for the geeky part, I think that goes back to Women's innate desire for a man that will be a "provider". Being geeky is evidence that the man is not a dumb ass, and therefore has earning potential.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My wife comes from an Italian family where all of the men are extremely hairy , and thinks hairless guys are a huge turnoff because " they look like little boys " .
She descries the stereotype of all women desiring hairless men and says that many of her friends also like hairy guys too.As for the geeky part , I think that goes back to Women 's innate desire for a man that will be a " provider " .
Being geeky is evidence that the man is not a dumb ass , and therefore has earning potential .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My wife comes from an Italian family where all of the men are extremely hairy, and thinks hairless guys are a huge turnoff because "they look like little boys".
She descries the stereotype of all women desiring hairless men and says that many of her friends also like hairy guys too.As for the geeky part, I think that goes back to Women's innate desire for a man that will be a "provider".
Being geeky is evidence that the man is not a dumb ass, and therefore has earning potential.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204646</id>
	<title>Well fuck me.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266576300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have all those traits and still remain single.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have all those traits and still remain single .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have all those traits and still remain single.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204966</id>
	<title>Re:um...</title>
	<author>neosaurus</author>
	<datestamp>1266577440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Are you a tall, dark and handsome fellow who's obviously not happy with these findings?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you a tall , dark and handsome fellow who 's obviously not happy with these findings ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you a tall, dark and handsome fellow who's obviously not happy with these findings?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204828</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31206060</id>
	<title>Consider the Source</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266583500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let's not forget that this is the same Daily Fail that has a mind-staggering list of things that cause cancer...so many in fact that there's at least one group on Facebook that keeps count: <a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=269512464297" title="facebook.com" rel="nofollow">here</a> [facebook.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's not forget that this is the same Daily Fail that has a mind-staggering list of things that cause cancer...so many in fact that there 's at least one group on Facebook that keeps count : here [ facebook.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's not forget that this is the same Daily Fail that has a mind-staggering list of things that cause cancer...so many in fact that there's at least one group on Facebook that keeps count: here [facebook.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31208482</id>
	<title>Re:um...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266697980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...and the ancillary data:
<br>
"...the unshaven look on a woman is actually a turn-<b>off</b> for 99.998 per cent of men..."</htmltext>
<tokenext>...and the ancillary data : " ...the unshaven look on a woman is actually a turn-off for 99.998 per cent of men... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and the ancillary data:

"...the unshaven look on a woman is actually a turn-off for 99.998 per cent of men..."</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204828</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204680</id>
	<title>survey was conducted by...</title>
	<author>milkmage</author>
	<datestamp>1266576360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>a bunch of hairy geeks?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>a bunch of hairy geeks ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a bunch of hairy geeks?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31205942</id>
	<title>well damn...</title>
	<author>Greylin</author>
	<datestamp>1266582780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>.. so I shouldn't have shaved my head after all?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.. so I should n't have shaved my head after all ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.. so I shouldn't have shaved my head after all?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31208120</id>
	<title>What she said-  idle musings</title>
	<author>aqk</author>
	<datestamp>1266605160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>And "idle" is the (non)operative word here on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.   Right, lads?   <br>
 <br> <b> "I don't want a brave man, I just want a cave man!" </b> <br>
<br>
As for me-<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...Got a devil's haircut in my my mind- <br>
Alas,<br>
 Something's wrong 'cause my mind is fading,<br>
And everywhere I look, there's a dead end waiting...<br>

<br>OK- you get the point.<br>
  It's too bad.  I'm considerably older than Beck, although I still have most of my (grey) hair...</htmltext>
<tokenext>And " idle " is the ( non ) operative word here on / .
Right , lads ?
" I do n't want a brave man , I just want a cave man !
" As for me- ...Got a devil 's haircut in my my mind- Alas , Something 's wrong 'cause my mind is fading , And everywhere I look , there 's a dead end waiting.. . OK- you get the point .
It 's too bad .
I 'm considerably older than Beck , although I still have most of my ( grey ) hair.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And "idle" is the (non)operative word here on /.
Right, lads?
"I don't want a brave man, I just want a cave man!
"  

As for me- ...Got a devil's haircut in my my mind- 
Alas,
 Something's wrong 'cause my mind is fading,
And everywhere I look, there's a dead end waiting...

OK- you get the point.
It's too bad.
I'm considerably older than Beck, although I still have most of my (grey) hair...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31205682</id>
	<title>Too Bad for Gillette</title>
	<author>meustrus</author>
	<datestamp>1266581340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Gillette's advertising campaign will surely suffer if the image of the sexy woman caressing your face after a ridiculously smooth shave is no longer scientifically accurate. That women act that way is now disproven...by science!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Gillette 's advertising campaign will surely suffer if the image of the sexy woman caressing your face after a ridiculously smooth shave is no longer scientifically accurate .
That women act that way is now disproven...by science !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gillette's advertising campaign will surely suffer if the image of the sexy woman caressing your face after a ridiculously smooth shave is no longer scientifically accurate.
That women act that way is now disproven...by science!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31205314</id>
	<title>daily mail</title>
	<author>Alinabi</author>
	<datestamp>1266579120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh, yeah, the Daily Mail. The pinnacle of peer reviewed publishing, the hallmark of accuracy<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , yeah , the Daily Mail .
The pinnacle of peer reviewed publishing , the hallmark of accuracy : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, yeah, the Daily Mail.
The pinnacle of peer reviewed publishing, the hallmark of accuracy :-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204714</id>
	<title>Re:My research</title>
	<author>ukemike</author>
	<datestamp>1266576480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Canadians.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Canadians .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Canadians.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204854</id>
	<title>Ouch!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266576960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who's pulling my leg?!</p><p>Hey, I feel that, stop it... stop it....</p><p>I'm a hairy geek, why aren't women secretly desiring me?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who 's pulling my leg ?
! Hey , I feel that , stop it... stop it....I 'm a hairy geek , why are n't women secretly desiring me ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who's pulling my leg?
!Hey, I feel that, stop it... stop it....I'm a hairy geek, why aren't women secretly desiring me?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204634</id>
	<title>My research</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266576240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>has proven the opposite to be true. What kind of women are they interviewing?</htmltext>
<tokenext>has proven the opposite to be true .
What kind of women are they interviewing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>has proven the opposite to be true.
What kind of women are they interviewing?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204732</id>
	<title>This cracks me up</title>
	<author>Alexandra Erenhart</author>
	<datestamp>1266576540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They keep doing stupid researches about men and women. What do they gain for this? We all know every particular man and woman have different tastes, and generalizing is wrong. Researches like this keeps stereotypes alive. Or create new ones. Bleh.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They keep doing stupid researches about men and women .
What do they gain for this ?
We all know every particular man and woman have different tastes , and generalizing is wrong .
Researches like this keeps stereotypes alive .
Or create new ones .
Bleh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They keep doing stupid researches about men and women.
What do they gain for this?
We all know every particular man and woman have different tastes, and generalizing is wrong.
Researches like this keeps stereotypes alive.
Or create new ones.
Bleh.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31207112</id>
	<title>Re:My research</title>
	<author>FatdogHaiku</author>
	<datestamp>1266593640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What kind of women are they interviewing?</p></div><p>Imaginary.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What kind of women are they interviewing ? Imaginary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What kind of women are they interviewing?Imaginary.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31227666</id>
	<title>Re:This is absurd</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266840420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Geek or not, no woman will never be happy until we come factory-installed with an 11-inch schlong that shoots out free money</p></div><p>If you had one this big (and with the diameter that goes along with it), you'd know it's not as fancy as you think. The first girl I went to bed with simply stated: "<i>you're not putting that thing inside me</i>". Then the 2nd one kept doing: "<i>Ouch, slow down, not so deep, etc...</i>" so much that all I could do was simply stay static inside, hence neither of us came that night. Then much later when I was with her younger sister, she could somehow take it, but I thought I'd never get the pleasure of a 'balls deep, full thrust pounding' until I met a girl who not only told me 'deeper' on the first night (that's when I fell in love), but also loved to used alternate means of entry without depth limit.
</p><p>Those who think girls like to be split in half are delusional from watching too much porn. Some girls do, but they are hard to find, and I've been keeping mine for 15 years...  C:-)
</p><p>As for the 'shooting free money' part, I've never got a good price for that stuff.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Geek or not , no woman will never be happy until we come factory-installed with an 11-inch schlong that shoots out free moneyIf you had one this big ( and with the diameter that goes along with it ) , you 'd know it 's not as fancy as you think .
The first girl I went to bed with simply stated : " you 're not putting that thing inside me " .
Then the 2nd one kept doing : " Ouch , slow down , not so deep , etc... " so much that all I could do was simply stay static inside , hence neither of us came that night .
Then much later when I was with her younger sister , she could somehow take it , but I thought I 'd never get the pleasure of a 'balls deep , full thrust pounding ' until I met a girl who not only told me 'deeper ' on the first night ( that 's when I fell in love ) , but also loved to used alternate means of entry without depth limit .
Those who think girls like to be split in half are delusional from watching too much porn .
Some girls do , but they are hard to find , and I 've been keeping mine for 15 years... C : - ) As for the 'shooting free money ' part , I 've never got a good price for that stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Geek or not, no woman will never be happy until we come factory-installed with an 11-inch schlong that shoots out free moneyIf you had one this big (and with the diameter that goes along with it), you'd know it's not as fancy as you think.
The first girl I went to bed with simply stated: "you're not putting that thing inside me".
Then the 2nd one kept doing: "Ouch, slow down, not so deep, etc..." so much that all I could do was simply stay static inside, hence neither of us came that night.
Then much later when I was with her younger sister, she could somehow take it, but I thought I'd never get the pleasure of a 'balls deep, full thrust pounding' until I met a girl who not only told me 'deeper' on the first night (that's when I fell in love), but also loved to used alternate means of entry without depth limit.
Those who think girls like to be split in half are delusional from watching too much porn.
Some girls do, but they are hard to find, and I've been keeping mine for 15 years...  C:-)
As for the 'shooting free money' part, I've never got a good price for that stuff.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31206008</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31210526</id>
	<title>Re:My research</title>
	<author>Tolkien</author>
	<datestamp>1266686700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As a hairy Canadian geek I say woohoo!</p><p>But why can't I get laid?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a hairy Canadian geek I say woohoo ! But why ca n't I get laid ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a hairy Canadian geek I say woohoo!But why can't I get laid?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204714</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31211634</id>
	<title>Pssh...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266695160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Fifty-eight per cent of women even want a guy who doesn't care what he eats over someone who is watching his weight and counting calories."</p><p>Sounds like an excuse to not cook.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Fifty-eight per cent of women even want a guy who does n't care what he eats over someone who is watching his weight and counting calories .
" Sounds like an excuse to not cook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Fifty-eight per cent of women even want a guy who doesn't care what he eats over someone who is watching his weight and counting calories.
"Sounds like an excuse to not cook.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31207850</id>
	<title>Re:This cracks me up</title>
	<author>Aurisor</author>
	<datestamp>1266601200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you figure women out, you could get laid pretty much constantly...or so the theory goes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you figure women out , you could get laid pretty much constantly...or so the theory goes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you figure women out, you could get laid pretty much constantly...or so the theory goes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204732</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31225172</id>
	<title>Re:This is absurd</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1266768480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What... you mean yours isn't, and doesn't? Oh, I thought you said "free money <i>shots</i>!</htmltext>
<tokenext>What... you mean yours is n't , and does n't ?
Oh , I thought you said " free money shots !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What... you mean yours isn't, and doesn't?
Oh, I thought you said "free money shots!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31206008</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31205078</id>
	<title>no wonder</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266578040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm tall, dark, handsome and a hairy geek!!! i'm so in!!!!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm tall , dark , handsome and a hairy geek ! ! !
i 'm so in ! ! ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm tall, dark, handsome and a hairy geek!!!
i'm so in!!!!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204828</id>
	<title>um...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266576840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>"the unshaven look on a man is actually a turn-on for 41 per cent of women."<br>
Could that not mean that most (59\%) actually dislike it?<br>
Without some idea of how many dislike or are neutral for the unshaved look as well I do not see that statistic saying that women in general like unshaven men.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" the unshaven look on a man is actually a turn-on for 41 per cent of women .
" Could that not mean that most ( 59 \ % ) actually dislike it ?
Without some idea of how many dislike or are neutral for the unshaved look as well I do not see that statistic saying that women in general like unshaven men .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"the unshaven look on a man is actually a turn-on for 41 per cent of women.
"
Could that not mean that most (59\%) actually dislike it?
Without some idea of how many dislike or are neutral for the unshaved look as well I do not see that statistic saying that women in general like unshaven men.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31206576</id>
	<title>Re:My research</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266587520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who cares? The only question is where are they! I need names and numbers! Hairy geeks FTW!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who cares ?
The only question is where are they !
I need names and numbers !
Hairy geeks FTW !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who cares?
The only question is where are they!
I need names and numbers!
Hairy geeks FTW!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204754</id>
	<title>Uh yeah....</title>
	<author>Srsen</author>
	<datestamp>1266576600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>....according to a team of hairy, geeky researchers.  Nice try, guys.</htmltext>
<tokenext>....according to a team of hairy , geeky researchers .
Nice try , guys .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>....according to a team of hairy, geeky researchers.
Nice try, guys.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31207014</id>
	<title>Re:I guess this means ...</title>
	<author>EnsilZah</author>
	<datestamp>1266592260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sort of looks like it's <a href="http://bradpitt.ru/img/brad\_pitt\_35.jpg" title="bradpitt.ru">the other way around</a> [bradpitt.ru].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sort of looks like it 's the other way around [ bradpitt.ru ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sort of looks like it's the other way around [bradpitt.ru].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204752</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31207096</id>
	<title>Johnny Depp, Tobey Maguire, Gerard Butler</title>
	<author>jeko</author>
	<datestamp>1266593460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Look at the article. These women mean they like scruffy, geeky traits on Johnny Depp, Tobey Maguire, Gerard Butler and David Beckham.</p><p>So if you look like any of those four guys, you're in luck.</p><p>Although, actually, Tobey Maguire didn't get the girl until she found out he had superpowers too.</p><p>So OK, if you look like Johnny Depp, Gerard Butler or David Beckham, OR you actually are a superhero, then you're in luck.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Look at the article .
These women mean they like scruffy , geeky traits on Johnny Depp , Tobey Maguire , Gerard Butler and David Beckham.So if you look like any of those four guys , you 're in luck.Although , actually , Tobey Maguire did n't get the girl until she found out he had superpowers too.So OK , if you look like Johnny Depp , Gerard Butler or David Beckham , OR you actually are a superhero , then you 're in luck .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look at the article.
These women mean they like scruffy, geeky traits on Johnny Depp, Tobey Maguire, Gerard Butler and David Beckham.So if you look like any of those four guys, you're in luck.Although, actually, Tobey Maguire didn't get the girl until she found out he had superpowers too.So OK, if you look like Johnny Depp, Gerard Butler or David Beckham, OR you actually are a superhero, then you're in luck.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31206646</id>
	<title>Groundhog Day response</title>
	<author>dorianh49</author>
	<datestamp>1266588120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Me... me... me... me, also... this is a man we're talking about, right?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Me... me... me... me , also... this is a man we 're talking about , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Me... me... me... me, also... this is a man we're talking about, right?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31207162</id>
	<title>That clears it up</title>
	<author>Alvare</author>
	<datestamp>1266594060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>of course!<br>
that would explain all the virgins over at 4chan.<br>
wait<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</htmltext>
<tokenext>of course !
that would explain all the virgins over at 4chan .
wait .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>of course!
that would explain all the virgins over at 4chan.
wait ...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204846</id>
	<title>Re:My research</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266576960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Probably the female researchers doing the research.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably the female researchers doing the research .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably the female researchers doing the research.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31205790</id>
	<title>um what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266581940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The unshaven look on a man is actually a turn-on for 41 per cent of women."</p><p>It's also a turn off for 59\% of them. What kind of article is this??</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The unshaven look on a man is actually a turn-on for 41 per cent of women .
" It 's also a turn off for 59 \ % of them .
What kind of article is this ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The unshaven look on a man is actually a turn-on for 41 per cent of women.
"It's also a turn off for 59\% of them.
What kind of article is this?
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31205590</id>
	<title>This research was sponsored by...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266580860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...geeks?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...geeks ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...geeks?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31209774</id>
	<title>But of course this study...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266678180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>was conducted by a bunch of hofeful, unshaven geeks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>was conducted by a bunch of hofeful , unshaven geeks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>was conducted by a bunch of hofeful, unshaven geeks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204664</id>
	<title>I can't tell the Onion and Slashdot apart anymore!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266576360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seriously, this has me wondering. In my experience this is simply not true. Hairy? Maybe. Geeks? Umm, no.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , this has me wondering .
In my experience this is simply not true .
Hairy ? Maybe .
Geeks ? Umm , no .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, this has me wondering.
In my experience this is simply not true.
Hairy? Maybe.
Geeks? Umm, no.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31205520</id>
	<title>Still doesn't help some of us.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266580440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>While the occasional woman likes a geek, us rarer gay geeks tend to not catch the eye of our mostly trendy shallow ilk. While I think my "I failed the turing test" shirt is witty and looks good on me, I'm immediately IDed as straight or laughable in a bar. My appearance is not sub par either. Maybe I should petition AE to start making apparel for my kind.</htmltext>
<tokenext>While the occasional woman likes a geek , us rarer gay geeks tend to not catch the eye of our mostly trendy shallow ilk .
While I think my " I failed the turing test " shirt is witty and looks good on me , I 'm immediately IDed as straight or laughable in a bar .
My appearance is not sub par either .
Maybe I should petition AE to start making apparel for my kind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While the occasional woman likes a geek, us rarer gay geeks tend to not catch the eye of our mostly trendy shallow ilk.
While I think my "I failed the turing test" shirt is witty and looks good on me, I'm immediately IDed as straight or laughable in a bar.
My appearance is not sub par either.
Maybe I should petition AE to start making apparel for my kind.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204640</id>
	<title>Women don't know what they want</title>
	<author>MosX</author>
	<datestamp>1266576240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>So... women don't know what they want. I thought that was a well known fact.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So... women do n't know what they want .
I thought that was a well known fact .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So... women don't know what they want.
I thought that was a well known fact.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31206784</id>
	<title>In a related study...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266589500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...an overwhelming majority of the researchers say their moms think they're cool.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...an overwhelming majority of the researchers say their moms think they 're cool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...an overwhelming majority of the researchers say their moms think they're cool.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31205366</id>
	<title>Re:My research</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266579480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>What kind of women have you met?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>What kind of women have you met ?
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What kind of women have you met?
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204752</id>
	<title>I guess this means ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266576600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Richard Stallman is the new Brad Pitt.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Richard Stallman is the new Brad Pitt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Richard Stallman is the new Brad Pitt.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31205674</id>
	<title>I laughed Coke out my nose ...</title>
	<author>Bob-taro</author>
	<datestamp>1266581280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... when I read the headline.  My first thought was, "I'd like to see a picture of these researchers!"  I guess the next study will be to determine how to persuade women to bring this secret attraction "out of the closet".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... when I read the headline .
My first thought was , " I 'd like to see a picture of these researchers !
" I guess the next study will be to determine how to persuade women to bring this secret attraction " out of the closet " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... when I read the headline.
My first thought was, "I'd like to see a picture of these researchers!
"  I guess the next study will be to determine how to persuade women to bring this secret attraction "out of the closet".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31208440</id>
	<title>Re:My research</title>
	<author>aqk</author>
	<datestamp>1266697020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What kind of women are they interviewing?</p></div><p>
Chimpettes.  Similar to Jivettes, except they don't chew gum.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What kind of women are they interviewing ?
Chimpettes. Similar to Jivettes , except they do n't chew gum .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What kind of women are they interviewing?
Chimpettes.  Similar to Jivettes, except they don't chew gum.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31211264</id>
	<title>Hmm.</title>
	<author>Kingrames</author>
	<datestamp>1266693060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perhaps it is time to test a new hypothesis. I shall prepare a document and walk up to the next moderately attractive woman with ample bosom and child-bearing hips that I see, and recite this, which I have prepared.<br>
"Greetings. My name is Antonio. I am tall, dark, and handsome, by some standards, but as you can see I am unshaven, I have knowledge of computers and technology, I have a hairy chest, I have an extensive library of leather-bound books, and I cry at sad movies. Based on this information I have concluded that I am 92\% desirable to women of high caliber such as yourself."<br>
<br>
I shall then document the response.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps it is time to test a new hypothesis .
I shall prepare a document and walk up to the next moderately attractive woman with ample bosom and child-bearing hips that I see , and recite this , which I have prepared .
" Greetings. My name is Antonio .
I am tall , dark , and handsome , by some standards , but as you can see I am unshaven , I have knowledge of computers and technology , I have a hairy chest , I have an extensive library of leather-bound books , and I cry at sad movies .
Based on this information I have concluded that I am 92 \ % desirable to women of high caliber such as yourself .
" I shall then document the response .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps it is time to test a new hypothesis.
I shall prepare a document and walk up to the next moderately attractive woman with ample bosom and child-bearing hips that I see, and recite this, which I have prepared.
"Greetings. My name is Antonio.
I am tall, dark, and handsome, by some standards, but as you can see I am unshaven, I have knowledge of computers and technology, I have a hairy chest, I have an extensive library of leather-bound books, and I cry at sad movies.
Based on this information I have concluded that I am 92\% desirable to women of high caliber such as yourself.
"

I shall then document the response.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31206596</id>
	<title>Who would have guessed?</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1266587640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://kanorben.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/richard-stallman.jpg" title="kanorben.net">RMS</a> [kanorben.net] is a babe magnet! At least that explains why Hurd has never shipped... he's too busy hittin' it!</htmltext>
<tokenext>RMS [ kanorben.net ] is a babe magnet !
At least that explains why Hurd has never shipped... he 's too busy hittin ' it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RMS [kanorben.net] is a babe magnet!
At least that explains why Hurd has never shipped... he's too busy hittin' it!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31206008</id>
	<title>This is absurd</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266583200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Geek or not, no woman will never be happy until we come factory-installed with an 11-inch schlong that shoots out free money.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Geek or not , no woman will never be happy until we come factory-installed with an 11-inch schlong that shoots out free money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Geek or not, no woman will never be happy until we come factory-installed with an 11-inch schlong that shoots out free money.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31205332</id>
	<title>The key term here is "slightly geeky" . . .</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266579300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>. . . not "slashdot-reading, ssh-using, kernel-compiling geeky," there is a difference.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.
. .
not " slashdot-reading , ssh-using , kernel-compiling geeky , " there is a difference .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.
. .
not "slashdot-reading, ssh-using, kernel-compiling geeky," there is a difference.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31207094</id>
	<title>One Word</title>
	<author>Paxtez</author>
	<datestamp>1266593460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>w00t!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>w00t !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>w00t!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31215872</id>
	<title>Re:My research</title>
	<author>grepya</author>
	<datestamp>1266685260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>What kind of women are they interviewing?</p></div><p>Imaginary.</p></div><p> That's perfect. Exactly the kind of women most slashdotters "date".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What kind of women are they interviewing ? Imaginary .
That 's perfect .
Exactly the kind of women most slashdotters " date " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What kind of women are they interviewing?Imaginary.
That's perfect.
Exactly the kind of women most slashdotters "date".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31207112</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204652</id>
	<title>In other news...</title>
	<author>jijacob</author>
	<datestamp>1266576300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>In other news, said researchers are hairy geeks that need evidence to prove they are sexually attractive at the bar.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In other news , said researchers are hairy geeks that need evidence to prove they are sexually attractive at the bar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In other news, said researchers are hairy geeks that need evidence to prove they are sexually attractive at the bar.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204824</id>
	<title>Hm. I'm a non-hairy geek</title>
	<author>Grimbleton</author>
	<datestamp>1266576840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And the women love me.</p><p>Maybe it has nothing to do with hair.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And the women love me.Maybe it has nothing to do with hair .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And the women love me.Maybe it has nothing to do with hair.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31210016</id>
	<title>Other paper by the same authors</title>
	<author>MathiasRav</author>
	<datestamp>1266681660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.cracked.com/article\_16780\_6-sex-myths-as-explained-by-science\_p2.html" title="cracked.com" rel="nofollow">An Analysis of the Prevalence of Enormous Genitalia Among Scientists (and We Do Mean Enormous, Ladies)</a> [cracked.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>An Analysis of the Prevalence of Enormous Genitalia Among Scientists ( and We Do Mean Enormous , Ladies ) [ cracked.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An Analysis of the Prevalence of Enormous Genitalia Among Scientists (and We Do Mean Enormous, Ladies) [cracked.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31208600</id>
	<title>New Rule?</title>
	<author>brillow</author>
	<datestamp>1266657120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can we not post so called "articles" from British "newspapers" anymore?  Except maybe The Economist?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can we not post so called " articles " from British " newspapers " anymore ?
Except maybe The Economist ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can we not post so called "articles" from British "newspapers" anymore?
Except maybe The Economist?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31231316</id>
	<title>Re:My research</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266862680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hairy, geeky women.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hairy , geeky women .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hairy, geeky women.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31205910</id>
	<title>Are these researchers ...</title>
	<author>517714</author>
	<datestamp>1266582660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hairy Geeks?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hairy Geeks ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hairy Geeks?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31211698</id>
	<title>Okay</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266695460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>if that makes you sleep better..... alone again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>if that makes you sleep better..... alone again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if that makes you sleep better..... alone again.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31208596</id>
	<title>tobey mcguire is a geek?</title>
	<author>brillow</author>
	<datestamp>1266657060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The guy dropped out of high school.  Geeky is more than awkward.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The guy dropped out of high school .
Geeky is more than awkward .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The guy dropped out of high school.
Geeky is more than awkward.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31208474</id>
	<title>Re:This cracks me up</title>
	<author>aqk</author>
	<datestamp>1266697860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hey, babe.   <br>
 I haven't shaved in 3 days.  Wanna conjugate?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , babe .
I have n't shaved in 3 days .
Wan na conjugate ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, babe.
I haven't shaved in 3 days.
Wanna conjugate?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204732</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204934</id>
	<title>I checked the Calender, it isn't April 1st yet...</title>
	<author>PrairieFire</author>
	<datestamp>1266577320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...but maybe the editors wanted an early start this year?</htmltext>
<tokenext>...but maybe the editors wanted an early start this year ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...but maybe the editors wanted an early start this year?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204948</id>
	<title>Re:My research</title>
	<author>PitaBred</author>
	<datestamp>1266577380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pretty much all women need a personality to go along with those attributes listed. Being smart and hairy while being otherwise uninteresting and unengaging isn't really going to get you very far with the ladies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pretty much all women need a personality to go along with those attributes listed .
Being smart and hairy while being otherwise uninteresting and unengaging is n't really going to get you very far with the ladies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pretty much all women need a personality to go along with those attributes listed.
Being smart and hairy while being otherwise uninteresting and unengaging isn't really going to get you very far with the ladies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31208622</id>
	<title>congratulations</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266657540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>this is a new lowest for slashdot. we are so used to reading how open source is selling better then commercial, how firefox beats the hell out of explorer, how android is the way more cooler than iphone, etc. but this is the most stupid and meaningless bullshit I've ever heart.</p><p>so congratulations slashdot for this new level of "completely out of reality" style.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this is a new lowest for slashdot .
we are so used to reading how open source is selling better then commercial , how firefox beats the hell out of explorer , how android is the way more cooler than iphone , etc .
but this is the most stupid and meaningless bullshit I 've ever heart.so congratulations slashdot for this new level of " completely out of reality " style .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this is a new lowest for slashdot.
we are so used to reading how open source is selling better then commercial, how firefox beats the hell out of explorer, how android is the way more cooler than iphone, etc.
but this is the most stupid and meaningless bullshit I've ever heart.so congratulations slashdot for this new level of "completely out of reality" style.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_1650248_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31227666
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31206008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_1650248_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31207014
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204752
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_1650248_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31208482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204828
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_1650248_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31207850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204732
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_1650248_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204828
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_1650248_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_1650248_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31215872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31207112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_1650248_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31210526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204714
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_1650248_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31225172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31206008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_1650248_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31231316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_1650248_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31206576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_1650248_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204948
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_1650248_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31247130
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31206008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_1650248_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31205150
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204732
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_1650248_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31208440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_1650248_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31208474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204732
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_1650248_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31205366
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_1650248.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204634
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204846
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31205366
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31207112
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31215872
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31208440
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204714
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31210526
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31231316
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204948
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31206576
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_1650248.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204732
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31205150
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31208474
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31207850
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_1650248.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204854
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_1650248.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31205520
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_1650248.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204752
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31207014
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_1650248.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31205790
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_1650248.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204664
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_1650248.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204824
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_1650248.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204640
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_1650248.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31205526
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_1650248.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204646
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_1650248.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31206008
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31227666
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31247130
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31225172
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_1650248.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204828
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31208482
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_1650248.31204966
</commentlist>
</conversation>
