<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_19_141246</id>
	<title>Opera Open Sources Dragonfly</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1266593820000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>netux writes to mention that <a href="http://my.opera.com/dragonfly/blog/opera-dragonfly-open-for-business">Opera has released Dragonfly</a>, their answer to <a href="http://getfirebug.com/">Firebug</a>, as an open source project under the BSD license.  The release features a complete architectural overhaul using a modern version of the Scope Protocol (STP-1), a Mercurial <a href="http://bitbucket.org/scope/dragonfly-stp-1/">repository on BitBucket</a>, and a <a href="http://bitbucket.org/scope/dragonfly-stp-1/wiki/Home">Wiki</a> to get the ball rolling.  <i>"This is Opera&rsquo;s first full open source project, so there will be a learning curve. We ask you to bear with us while we get everything up and running and policies in place. Coming from a closed source background there are some hurdles to overcome, such as the current bug tracking system being on a closed server. We hope to migrate to an open bug tracking system as the project gets on its feet."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>netux writes to mention that Opera has released Dragonfly , their answer to Firebug , as an open source project under the BSD license .
The release features a complete architectural overhaul using a modern version of the Scope Protocol ( STP-1 ) , a Mercurial repository on BitBucket , and a Wiki to get the ball rolling .
" This is Opera    s first full open source project , so there will be a learning curve .
We ask you to bear with us while we get everything up and running and policies in place .
Coming from a closed source background there are some hurdles to overcome , such as the current bug tracking system being on a closed server .
We hope to migrate to an open bug tracking system as the project gets on its feet .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>netux writes to mention that Opera has released Dragonfly, their answer to Firebug, as an open source project under the BSD license.
The release features a complete architectural overhaul using a modern version of the Scope Protocol (STP-1), a Mercurial repository on BitBucket, and a Wiki to get the ball rolling.
"This is Opera’s first full open source project, so there will be a learning curve.
We ask you to bear with us while we get everything up and running and policies in place.
Coming from a closed source background there are some hurdles to overcome, such as the current bug tracking system being on a closed server.
We hope to migrate to an open bug tracking system as the project gets on its feet.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31201008</id>
	<title>Re:And all of this is already available in Chrome</title>
	<author>westlake</author>
	<datestamp>1266603000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Can you believe it? Vista just came out a couple years ago and it's already gotten to the point that the original amount of RAM is completely used up by the OS.</i> </p><p>Which is as it should be.</p><p> <a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/02/18/0429258/86-of-Windows-7-PCs-Maxing-Out-Memory?art\_pos=18" title="slashdot.org"> 86\% of Windows 7 PCs Maxing Out Memory</a> [slashdot.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can you believe it ?
Vista just came out a couple years ago and it 's already gotten to the point that the original amount of RAM is completely used up by the OS .
Which is as it should be .
86 \ % of Windows 7 PCs Maxing Out Memory [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can you believe it?
Vista just came out a couple years ago and it's already gotten to the point that the original amount of RAM is completely used up by the OS.
Which is as it should be.
86\% of Windows 7 PCs Maxing Out Memory [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199844</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31201798</id>
	<title>Re:Let the Name Confusion BEGIN!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266606540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, Matt Dillon's project is DragonFly not Dragonfly, so no problem, except when emailing from my Hazeltine 1400.</p><p>Matt Dillon on the other hand is quite ambiguous, which, along with his great willingness to speak and write eloquently at length about the innards of his operating system, has me seriously tempted to do yet another BSD switch, what with all the positive Gunsmoke overtones I feel whenever he's interviewed on BSDTalk.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , Matt Dillon 's project is DragonFly not Dragonfly , so no problem , except when emailing from my Hazeltine 1400.Matt Dillon on the other hand is quite ambiguous , which , along with his great willingness to speak and write eloquently at length about the innards of his operating system , has me seriously tempted to do yet another BSD switch , what with all the positive Gunsmoke overtones I feel whenever he 's interviewed on BSDTalk .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, Matt Dillon's project is DragonFly not Dragonfly, so no problem, except when emailing from my Hazeltine 1400.Matt Dillon on the other hand is quite ambiguous, which, along with his great willingness to speak and write eloquently at length about the innards of his operating system, has me seriously tempted to do yet another BSD switch, what with all the positive Gunsmoke overtones I feel whenever he's interviewed on BSDTalk.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31208818</id>
	<title>Re:Let the Name Confusion BEGIN!</title>
	<author>jgrahn</author>
	<datestamp>1266661380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Opera was originally a Norwegian company, right? They should have went with the Norwegian word for Dragonfly: "&#216;yenstikker." Which literally means "Eye Poker." Well, okay, maybe not<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div></blockquote><p>
Yeah, dragonfiles <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragonfly#Dragonflies\_in\_cultures" title="wikipedia.org">were not well-liked in N Europe in the past</a> [wikipedia.org].
I particularly like "troll's spindle" and "Satan's little horse".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Opera was originally a Norwegian company , right ?
They should have went with the Norwegian word for Dragonfly : "   yenstikker .
" Which literally means " Eye Poker .
" Well , okay , maybe not .. . Yeah , dragonfiles were not well-liked in N Europe in the past [ wikipedia.org ] .
I particularly like " troll 's spindle " and " Satan 's little horse " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Opera was originally a Norwegian company, right?
They should have went with the Norwegian word for Dragonfly: "Øyenstikker.
" Which literally means "Eye Poker.
" Well, okay, maybe not ...
Yeah, dragonfiles were not well-liked in N Europe in the past [wikipedia.org].
I particularly like "troll's spindle" and "Satan's little horse".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31201910</id>
	<title>Re:Let the Name Confusion BEGIN!</title>
	<author>Duradin</author>
	<datestamp>1266607140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And the Firebird RDBMS stole its name from Pontiac.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And the Firebird RDBMS stole its name from Pontiac .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And the Firebird RDBMS stole its name from Pontiac.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200210</id>
	<title>Re:Let the Name Confusion BEGIN!</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1266599580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Dragonfly? Well, guess the FreeBSD fork by Matt Dillon (not the actor) that was named Dragonfly will now have to be referred to as Dragonfly BSD to avoid confusion.</p></div><p>It already was for as long as I can remember.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>It boggles my mind why people pick project names that are not more original. You're basically shooting yourself in the foot as far as domain registration, marketability and search rankings are concerned.</p></div><p>When introduced, Opera Dragonfly was not a separate product - more like a feature in Opera. It's something that comes out of the box, so it doesn't need any particular marketability apart from Opera itself.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dragonfly ?
Well , guess the FreeBSD fork by Matt Dillon ( not the actor ) that was named Dragonfly will now have to be referred to as Dragonfly BSD to avoid confusion.It already was for as long as I can remember.It boggles my mind why people pick project names that are not more original .
You 're basically shooting yourself in the foot as far as domain registration , marketability and search rankings are concerned.When introduced , Opera Dragonfly was not a separate product - more like a feature in Opera .
It 's something that comes out of the box , so it does n't need any particular marketability apart from Opera itself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dragonfly?
Well, guess the FreeBSD fork by Matt Dillon (not the actor) that was named Dragonfly will now have to be referred to as Dragonfly BSD to avoid confusion.It already was for as long as I can remember.It boggles my mind why people pick project names that are not more original.
You're basically shooting yourself in the foot as far as domain registration, marketability and search rankings are concerned.When introduced, Opera Dragonfly was not a separate product - more like a feature in Opera.
It's something that comes out of the box, so it doesn't need any particular marketability apart from Opera itself.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199804</id>
	<title>Re:Let the Name Confusion BEGIN!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266597720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So a FreeBSD fork was the first live Linux distribution you played around with?  That definitely is +3 interesting...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So a FreeBSD fork was the first live Linux distribution you played around with ?
That definitely is + 3 interesting.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So a FreeBSD fork was the first live Linux distribution you played around with?
That definitely is +3 interesting...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200118</id>
	<title>There's always google</title>
	<author>Kjella</author>
	<datestamp>1266599160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>netux writes to mention that Opera has released Dragonfly, their answer to Firebug, as an open source project under the BSD license. The release features a complete architectural overhaul using a modern version of the Scope Protocol (STP-1), a Mercurial repository on BitBucket, and a Wiki to get the ball rolling.</p></div><p>But would it be too much to ask that the summary contains at least once sentence about WTF the Scope Protocol is and what it can be used for?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>netux writes to mention that Opera has released Dragonfly , their answer to Firebug , as an open source project under the BSD license .
The release features a complete architectural overhaul using a modern version of the Scope Protocol ( STP-1 ) , a Mercurial repository on BitBucket , and a Wiki to get the ball rolling.But would it be too much to ask that the summary contains at least once sentence about WTF the Scope Protocol is and what it can be used for ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>netux writes to mention that Opera has released Dragonfly, their answer to Firebug, as an open source project under the BSD license.
The release features a complete architectural overhaul using a modern version of the Scope Protocol (STP-1), a Mercurial repository on BitBucket, and a Wiki to get the ball rolling.But would it be too much to ask that the summary contains at least once sentence about WTF the Scope Protocol is and what it can be used for?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200462</id>
	<title>Re:I never knew that's what my.opera.com was for!</title>
	<author>Steauengeglase</author>
	<datestamp>1266600480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ahh, I've had this problem before. Autodial ended up being the culprit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ahh , I 've had this problem before .
Autodial ended up being the culprit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ahh, I've had this problem before.
Autodial ended up being the culprit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31202898</id>
	<title>Re:Let the Name Confusion BEGIN!</title>
	<author>FreeFull</author>
	<datestamp>1266612540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Even more confusing if you consider that there is a version of Debian with a BSD kernel</htmltext>
<tokenext>Even more confusing if you consider that there is a version of Debian with a BSD kernel</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even more confusing if you consider that there is a version of Debian with a BSD kernel</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31204154</id>
	<title>Re:And all of this is already available in Chrome</title>
	<author>styrotech</author>
	<datestamp>1266574080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>In the same way, using a debug tool to determine whether a webpage is working correctly is a crapshoot. Should I go with the best browser (Opera)? How about the most wide-spread browser (IE)? Or should I target the browser most likely to gain the most marketshare (Webkit, aka Chrome and Safari)? Or what about the old stalwart (Netscape)?</p><p>They all purport to do the same thing, provide great debugging tools. But how can I trust them when they work so differently from each other and have such different levels of standards support?</p></div></blockquote><p>I think you're missing the point. These tools aren't entirely for debugging as such - there are validators for finding the actual bugs in your own HTML/CSS.</p><p>These tools are more for inspecting how that particular browser is working with and interpreting your code, letting you manipulate that on the fly, and identifying the exact parts of your (hopefully already valid) code that the browser is having trouble with rendering or running. They need to work inside the browser as each browser has its own set of bugs or quirks you need to work around and/or learn to avoid in the first place.</p><p>Whether a web page is working properly or not to an end user can't really be judged from outside that users browser - they are using their web browsers interpretation of the web page rather than some absolute objective measure.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In the same way , using a debug tool to determine whether a webpage is working correctly is a crapshoot .
Should I go with the best browser ( Opera ) ?
How about the most wide-spread browser ( IE ) ?
Or should I target the browser most likely to gain the most marketshare ( Webkit , aka Chrome and Safari ) ?
Or what about the old stalwart ( Netscape ) ? They all purport to do the same thing , provide great debugging tools .
But how can I trust them when they work so differently from each other and have such different levels of standards support ? I think you 're missing the point .
These tools are n't entirely for debugging as such - there are validators for finding the actual bugs in your own HTML/CSS.These tools are more for inspecting how that particular browser is working with and interpreting your code , letting you manipulate that on the fly , and identifying the exact parts of your ( hopefully already valid ) code that the browser is having trouble with rendering or running .
They need to work inside the browser as each browser has its own set of bugs or quirks you need to work around and/or learn to avoid in the first place.Whether a web page is working properly or not to an end user ca n't really be judged from outside that users browser - they are using their web browsers interpretation of the web page rather than some absolute objective measure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the same way, using a debug tool to determine whether a webpage is working correctly is a crapshoot.
Should I go with the best browser (Opera)?
How about the most wide-spread browser (IE)?
Or should I target the browser most likely to gain the most marketshare (Webkit, aka Chrome and Safari)?
Or what about the old stalwart (Netscape)?They all purport to do the same thing, provide great debugging tools.
But how can I trust them when they work so differently from each other and have such different levels of standards support?I think you're missing the point.
These tools aren't entirely for debugging as such - there are validators for finding the actual bugs in your own HTML/CSS.These tools are more for inspecting how that particular browser is working with and interpreting your code, letting you manipulate that on the fly, and identifying the exact parts of your (hopefully already valid) code that the browser is having trouble with rendering or running.
They need to work inside the browser as each browser has its own set of bugs or quirks you need to work around and/or learn to avoid in the first place.Whether a web page is working properly or not to an end user can't really be judged from outside that users browser - they are using their web browsers interpretation of the web page rather than some absolute objective measure.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199844</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199888</id>
	<title>Re:Let the Name Confusion BEGIN!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266598020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I read Firefly and was a lil bit excited.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I read Firefly and was a lil bit excited .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read Firefly and was a lil bit excited.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200714</id>
	<title>Re:And all of this is already available in Chrome</title>
	<author>FlyingBishop</author>
	<datestamp>1266601560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That was a really long-winded way of saying you don't do web design. Unlike RAM it's really easy to swap out web browsers. And all this means is you now have some sort of debugging tools on all major browsers. Which you were testing in anyway if you had half a brain.</p><p>Also, Firefox has had Firebug for years. So Chrome wasn't exactly innovating.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That was a really long-winded way of saying you do n't do web design .
Unlike RAM it 's really easy to swap out web browsers .
And all this means is you now have some sort of debugging tools on all major browsers .
Which you were testing in anyway if you had half a brain.Also , Firefox has had Firebug for years .
So Chrome was n't exactly innovating .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That was a really long-winded way of saying you don't do web design.
Unlike RAM it's really easy to swap out web browsers.
And all this means is you now have some sort of debugging tools on all major browsers.
Which you were testing in anyway if you had half a brain.Also, Firefox has had Firebug for years.
So Chrome wasn't exactly innovating.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199844</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199974</id>
	<title>Re:Let the Name Confusion BEGIN!</title>
	<author>commodore64\_love</author>
	<datestamp>1266598380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Using similar names makes sense in marketing.  "I'm looking for a civic."  "Oh no, you meant Cirrus.  We have one of those right over here," says the marketing drone.  Confusion == opportunity to mislead customer.</p><p>Sometimes I think spending ten years in retail made me cynical.  l-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Using similar names makes sense in marketing .
" I 'm looking for a civic .
" " Oh no , you meant Cirrus .
We have one of those right over here , " says the marketing drone .
Confusion = = opportunity to mislead customer.Sometimes I think spending ten years in retail made me cynical .
l- )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Using similar names makes sense in marketing.
"I'm looking for a civic.
"  "Oh no, you meant Cirrus.
We have one of those right over here," says the marketing drone.
Confusion == opportunity to mislead customer.Sometimes I think spending ten years in retail made me cynical.
l-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199810</id>
	<title>Re:Let the Name Confusion BEGIN!</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1266597780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Live Linux BSD?</p><p>Confusion indeed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Live Linux BSD ? Confusion indeed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Live Linux BSD?Confusion indeed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199740</id>
	<title>Let the Name Confusion BEGIN!</title>
	<author>eldavojohn</author>
	<datestamp>1266597420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>

Dragonfly?  Well, guess the FreeBSD fork by Matt Dillon (not the actor) that was named Dragonfly will now have to be referred to as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DragonFly\_BSD" title="wikipedia.org">Dragonfly BSD</a> [wikipedia.org] to avoid confusion.  That was one of the first live Linux distributions I played around with and what comes to mind when I hear the name "Dragonfly" in software.  <br> <br>

It boggles my mind why people pick project names that are not more original.  You're basically shooting yourself in the foot as far as domain registration, marketability and search rankings are concerned.  <br> <br>

Opera was originally a Norwegian company, right?  They should have went with the Norwegian word for Dragonfly: "&#216;yenstikker."  Which literally means "Eye Poker."  Well, okay, maybe not<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dragonfly ?
Well , guess the FreeBSD fork by Matt Dillon ( not the actor ) that was named Dragonfly will now have to be referred to as Dragonfly BSD [ wikipedia.org ] to avoid confusion .
That was one of the first live Linux distributions I played around with and what comes to mind when I hear the name " Dragonfly " in software .
It boggles my mind why people pick project names that are not more original .
You 're basically shooting yourself in the foot as far as domain registration , marketability and search rankings are concerned .
Opera was originally a Norwegian company , right ?
They should have went with the Norwegian word for Dragonfly : "   yenstikker .
" Which literally means " Eye Poker .
" Well , okay , maybe not .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>

Dragonfly?
Well, guess the FreeBSD fork by Matt Dillon (not the actor) that was named Dragonfly will now have to be referred to as Dragonfly BSD [wikipedia.org] to avoid confusion.
That was one of the first live Linux distributions I played around with and what comes to mind when I hear the name "Dragonfly" in software.
It boggles my mind why people pick project names that are not more original.
You're basically shooting yourself in the foot as far as domain registration, marketability and search rankings are concerned.
Opera was originally a Norwegian company, right?
They should have went with the Norwegian word for Dragonfly: "Øyenstikker.
"  Which literally means "Eye Poker.
"  Well, okay, maybe not ...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199890</id>
	<title>time for a rename</title>
	<author>larry bagina</author>
	<datestamp>1266598080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
firebug : firefox<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:: ??? : opera
</p><p>
given that opera singers are cowboy-neal level morbidly obese, how about "high cholestorol" or "heart attack"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>firebug : firefox : : ? ? ?
: opera given that opera singers are cowboy-neal level morbidly obese , how about " high cholestorol " or " heart attack " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
firebug : firefox :: ???
: opera

given that opera singers are cowboy-neal level morbidly obese, how about "high cholestorol" or "heart attack"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31202220</id>
	<title>Re:There's always google</title>
	<author>StikyPad</author>
	<datestamp>1266609060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it too much to ask that people <a href="http://lmgtfy.com/?q=scope+protocol" title="lmgtfy.com">type some words into a box at the top of the browser</a> [lmgtfy.com], and then actually contribute to the discussion?  FFS, it's the <i>first</i> result:</p><blockquote><div><p>Today we are happy to release the <a href="http://dragonfly.opera.com/app/scope-interface/" title="opera.com">specification</a> [opera.com] for the Scope protocol. This is the protocol used for communication between the Opera browser and Opera Dragonfly.</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it too much to ask that people type some words into a box at the top of the browser [ lmgtfy.com ] , and then actually contribute to the discussion ?
FFS , it 's the first result : Today we are happy to release the specification [ opera.com ] for the Scope protocol .
This is the protocol used for communication between the Opera browser and Opera Dragonfly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it too much to ask that people type some words into a box at the top of the browser [lmgtfy.com], and then actually contribute to the discussion?
FFS, it's the first result:Today we are happy to release the specification [opera.com] for the Scope protocol.
This is the protocol used for communication between the Opera browser and Opera Dragonfly.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31201298</id>
	<title>Re:Let the Name Confusion BEGIN!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266604140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Like the open-source Firebird browser never confusted things with the open-source Firebird SQL server.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like the open-source Firebird browser never confusted things with the open-source Firebird SQL server .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like the open-source Firebird browser never confusted things with the open-source Firebird SQL server.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199818</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31201176</id>
	<title>Kudos to Opera</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266603660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>... for finally being a man (figuratively) and actually open-sourcing something, rather than trying to squeeze blood from a stone (or money from a browser). Admittedly, this is only a peripheral part, but hopefully this will start a gradual transition.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... for finally being a man ( figuratively ) and actually open-sourcing something , rather than trying to squeeze blood from a stone ( or money from a browser ) .
Admittedly , this is only a peripheral part , but hopefully this will start a gradual transition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... for finally being a man (figuratively) and actually open-sourcing something, rather than trying to squeeze blood from a stone (or money from a browser).
Admittedly, this is only a peripheral part, but hopefully this will start a gradual transition.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200434</id>
	<title>Re:There's always google</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266600420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After googling it (as TFA is slashdotted for me), the relevant information that is missing from the headline//blurb is:<br>
&nbsp; </p><p><div class="quote"><p>Opera Dragonfly is a cross device, cross platform debugging environment for the Opera browser</p> </div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>After googling it ( as TFA is slashdotted for me ) , the relevant information that is missing from the headline//blurb is :   Opera Dragonfly is a cross device , cross platform debugging environment for the Opera browser</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After googling it (as TFA is slashdotted for me), the relevant information that is missing from the headline//blurb is:
  Opera Dragonfly is a cross device, cross platform debugging environment for the Opera browser 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31203472</id>
	<title>Re:And all of this is already available in Chrome</title>
	<author>amicusNYCL</author>
	<datestamp>1266571560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Should I go with the best browser (Opera)? How about the most wide-spread browser (IE)? Or should I target the browser most likely to gain the most marketshare (Webkit, aka Chrome and Safari)?</p></div><p>Yes.  When your site or application is not working in a given browser, you use that browser's tools to figure out why.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Should I go with the best browser ( Opera ) ?
How about the most wide-spread browser ( IE ) ?
Or should I target the browser most likely to gain the most marketshare ( Webkit , aka Chrome and Safari ) ? Yes .
When your site or application is not working in a given browser , you use that browser 's tools to figure out why .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Should I go with the best browser (Opera)?
How about the most wide-spread browser (IE)?
Or should I target the browser most likely to gain the most marketshare (Webkit, aka Chrome and Safari)?Yes.
When your site or application is not working in a given browser, you use that browser's tools to figure out why.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199844</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31201352</id>
	<title>Should have called it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266604380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...crickets...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...crickets.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...crickets...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31202650</id>
	<title>Re:Let the Name Confusion BEGIN!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266611520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Chrome was a bit of a crap name too. Any time I'm searching for something chrome related, I wind up with Firefox pages since they cover the same topics along with the word "chrome". It's bleedin' annoying, that's what it is!!!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</htmltext>
<tokenext>Chrome was a bit of a crap name too .
Any time I 'm searching for something chrome related , I wind up with Firefox pages since they cover the same topics along with the word " chrome " .
It 's bleedin ' annoying , that 's what it is ! ! !
: D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chrome was a bit of a crap name too.
Any time I'm searching for something chrome related, I wind up with Firefox pages since they cover the same topics along with the word "chrome".
It's bleedin' annoying, that's what it is!!!
:D</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31201278</id>
	<title>Opera ===  EU Penalties</title>
	<author>Colonel Korn</author>
	<datestamp>1266604020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The EU fines Firebug 3.5 billion euro and demands a web development tool ballot screen in 3...2...1...</htmltext>
<tokenext>The EU fines Firebug 3.5 billion euro and demands a web development tool ballot screen in 3...2...1.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The EU fines Firebug 3.5 billion euro and demands a web development tool ballot screen in 3...2...1...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200874</id>
	<title>Re:Grumble</title>
	<author>davonshire</author>
	<datestamp>1266602340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Go Matt Go! Opera is for the rich and snooty! And you can only enjoy it if the acoustics are just right and you have a decent.. ooh wait....the browser currently known as Opera.</p><p>I'll have to sing a different tune now.</p><p>Davonshire</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Go Matt Go !
Opera is for the rich and snooty !
And you can only enjoy it if the acoustics are just right and you have a decent.. ooh wait....the browser currently known as Opera.I 'll have to sing a different tune now.Davonshire</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go Matt Go!
Opera is for the rich and snooty!
And you can only enjoy it if the acoustics are just right and you have a decent.. ooh wait....the browser currently known as Opera.I'll have to sing a different tune now.Davonshire</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200346</id>
	<title>Grumble</title>
	<author>m.dillon</author>
	<datestamp>1266600120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sigh.</p><p>--- Matt starts working on Opera Viruses.</p><p>-Matt</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sigh.--- Matt starts working on Opera Viruses.-Matt</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sigh.--- Matt starts working on Opera Viruses.-Matt</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200028</id>
	<title>Re:Let the Name Confusion BEGIN!</title>
	<author>Ephemeriis</author>
	<datestamp>1266598620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Dragonfly?  Well, guess the FreeBSD fork by Matt Dillon (not the actor) that was named Dragonfly will now have to be referred to as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DragonFly\_BSD" title="wikipedia.org">Dragonfly BSD</a> [wikipedia.org] to avoid confusion.  That was one of the first live Linux distributions I played around with and what comes to mind when I hear the name "Dragonfly" in software.</p><p>It boggles my mind why people pick project names that are not more original.  You're basically shooting yourself in the foot as far as domain registration, marketability and search rankings are concerned.</p></div><p>First thing I thought of was the <a href="http://dragonflycms.org/" title="dragonflycms.org">CMS</a> [dragonflycms.org]...  Obviously this is a crowded namespace.  Seems to me that they could have picked something a little more original.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dragonfly ?
Well , guess the FreeBSD fork by Matt Dillon ( not the actor ) that was named Dragonfly will now have to be referred to as Dragonfly BSD [ wikipedia.org ] to avoid confusion .
That was one of the first live Linux distributions I played around with and what comes to mind when I hear the name " Dragonfly " in software.It boggles my mind why people pick project names that are not more original .
You 're basically shooting yourself in the foot as far as domain registration , marketability and search rankings are concerned.First thing I thought of was the CMS [ dragonflycms.org ] ... Obviously this is a crowded namespace .
Seems to me that they could have picked something a little more original .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dragonfly?
Well, guess the FreeBSD fork by Matt Dillon (not the actor) that was named Dragonfly will now have to be referred to as Dragonfly BSD [wikipedia.org] to avoid confusion.
That was one of the first live Linux distributions I played around with and what comes to mind when I hear the name "Dragonfly" in software.It boggles my mind why people pick project names that are not more original.
You're basically shooting yourself in the foot as far as domain registration, marketability and search rankings are concerned.First thing I thought of was the CMS [dragonflycms.org]...  Obviously this is a crowded namespace.
Seems to me that they could have picked something a little more original.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199798</id>
	<title>Re:Let the Name Confusion BEGIN!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266597720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This just goes to show you how out of touch those in the web community are with the greater open source community. I mean, the Firefox developers fucked up twice, with the second time being when they outright stole the name of the <a href="http://www.firebirdsql.org/" title="firebirdsql.org" rel="nofollow">Firebird</a> [firebirdsql.org] RDBMS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This just goes to show you how out of touch those in the web community are with the greater open source community .
I mean , the Firefox developers fucked up twice , with the second time being when they outright stole the name of the Firebird [ firebirdsql.org ] RDBMS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This just goes to show you how out of touch those in the web community are with the greater open source community.
I mean, the Firefox developers fucked up twice, with the second time being when they outright stole the name of the Firebird [firebirdsql.org] RDBMS.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200030</id>
	<title>But Opera develops all new features first!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266598620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Opera has released Dragonfly, their answer to Firebug</p></div></blockquote><p>
I propose a new betting pool: How long until an Opera fanatic claims Opera developed Dragonfly first, and Firebug is just a ripoff.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Opera has released Dragonfly , their answer to Firebug I propose a new betting pool : How long until an Opera fanatic claims Opera developed Dragonfly first , and Firebug is just a ripoff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Opera has released Dragonfly, their answer to Firebug
I propose a new betting pool: How long until an Opera fanatic claims Opera developed Dragonfly first, and Firebug is just a ripoff.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199818</id>
	<title>Re:Let the Name Confusion BEGIN!</title>
	<author>Rhaban</author>
	<datestamp>1266597780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The name is not new, dragonfly has been in opera for something like 2 years.</p><p>Since it can not possibly be mistaken for dragonfly bsd, I think it's not a real problem. If you want your product name not to be used for something else, start by not using an existing word.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The name is not new , dragonfly has been in opera for something like 2 years.Since it can not possibly be mistaken for dragonfly bsd , I think it 's not a real problem .
If you want your product name not to be used for something else , start by not using an existing word .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The name is not new, dragonfly has been in opera for something like 2 years.Since it can not possibly be mistaken for dragonfly bsd, I think it's not a real problem.
If you want your product name not to be used for something else, start by not using an existing word.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31205358</id>
	<title>Re:Let the Name Confusion BEGIN!</title>
	<author>richlv</author>
	<datestamp>1266579420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and their choice of <a href="http://code.google.com/chromium/" title="google.com">chromium</a> [google.com] was even more stupid because of an already existing <a href="http://www.reptilelabour.com/software/chromium/" title="reptilelabour.com">game with such a name</a> [reptilelabour.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and their choice of chromium [ google.com ] was even more stupid because of an already existing game with such a name [ reptilelabour.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and their choice of chromium [google.com] was even more stupid because of an already existing game with such a name [reptilelabour.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31202650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31202448</id>
	<title>Re:There's always google</title>
	<author>AmberBlackCat</author>
	<datestamp>1266610560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Based on my experience, I'd say they're just waiting for somebody to ask so they can promote Google and call you stupid.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Based on my experience , I 'd say they 're just waiting for somebody to ask so they can promote Google and call you stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Based on my experience, I'd say they're just waiting for somebody to ask so they can promote Google and call you stupid.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200882</id>
	<title>Re:Let the Name Confusion BEGIN!</title>
	<author>mikkelm</author>
	<datestamp>1266602400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree completely with your argument against adopting names used elsewhere. I was googling for local lacrosse teams, and next thing you know I'm at a dealership buying a Buick. It's so confusing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree completely with your argument against adopting names used elsewhere .
I was googling for local lacrosse teams , and next thing you know I 'm at a dealership buying a Buick .
It 's so confusing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree completely with your argument against adopting names used elsewhere.
I was googling for local lacrosse teams, and next thing you know I'm at a dealership buying a Buick.
It's so confusing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31201404</id>
	<title>Re:And all of this is already available in Chrome</title>
	<author>tepples</author>
	<datestamp>1266604740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>Vista [has] already gotten to the point that the original amount of RAM is completely used up by the OS.</p></div><p>Which is as it should be.</p></div><p>I thought the consensus in comments to our last article about this issue was that Windows was deciding wrong about what to evict from RAM: namely swapping out running processes in favor of keeping disk files cached that need not be cached.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Vista [ has ] already gotten to the point that the original amount of RAM is completely used up by the OS.Which is as it should be.I thought the consensus in comments to our last article about this issue was that Windows was deciding wrong about what to evict from RAM : namely swapping out running processes in favor of keeping disk files cached that need not be cached .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Vista [has] already gotten to the point that the original amount of RAM is completely used up by the OS.Which is as it should be.I thought the consensus in comments to our last article about this issue was that Windows was deciding wrong about what to evict from RAM: namely swapping out running processes in favor of keeping disk files cached that need not be cached.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31201008</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199820</id>
	<title>Great!  Now if only my ISP was an actual ISP</title>
	<author>commodore64\_love</author>
	<datestamp>1266597780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great!  Now I can read usenet and email.  Too bad Verizon has stopped carrying Usenet groups and providing POP email.  They also refuse to give me the password on my modem so I can open the incoming ports.  My Internet Service Provider has slowly-but-surely turned a WWW-only Provider.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-(</p><p>Anyway...... this is great news.  I love Opera and Opera Dragonfly sounds like a great product.  I wish them much success with their new open source plan.  I hope the users are patient enough to withstand the transition from closed source to open source.</p><p>Aside -</p><p>Remember when Opera was ad-supported?  That model has faded-away but there are still some that support it, like the ad-suppported Free Netzero.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great !
Now I can read usenet and email .
Too bad Verizon has stopped carrying Usenet groups and providing POP email .
They also refuse to give me the password on my modem so I can open the incoming ports .
My Internet Service Provider has slowly-but-surely turned a WWW-only Provider .
: - ( Anyway...... this is great news .
I love Opera and Opera Dragonfly sounds like a great product .
I wish them much success with their new open source plan .
I hope the users are patient enough to withstand the transition from closed source to open source.Aside -Remember when Opera was ad-supported ?
That model has faded-away but there are still some that support it , like the ad-suppported Free Netzero .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great!
Now I can read usenet and email.
Too bad Verizon has stopped carrying Usenet groups and providing POP email.
They also refuse to give me the password on my modem so I can open the incoming ports.
My Internet Service Provider has slowly-but-surely turned a WWW-only Provider.
:-(Anyway...... this is great news.
I love Opera and Opera Dragonfly sounds like a great product.
I wish them much success with their new open source plan.
I hope the users are patient enough to withstand the transition from closed source to open source.Aside -Remember when Opera was ad-supported?
That model has faded-away but there are still some that support it, like the ad-suppported Free Netzero.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31201654</id>
	<title>Re:Let the Name Confusion BEGIN!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266605760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>And let's refer to that thing with wings also called Dragonfly as the 'Dragonfly BUG'.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And let 's refer to that thing with wings also called Dragonfly as the 'Dragonfly BUG' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And let's refer to that thing with wings also called Dragonfly as the 'Dragonfly BUG'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31201294</id>
	<title>Re:Grumble</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266604140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>See, that's the problem today.  Every time there is a name conflict, people have to start calling lawyers and threatening to sue everyone . . . oh wait, THAT kind of virus.  Never mind.</htmltext>
<tokenext>See , that 's the problem today .
Every time there is a name conflict , people have to start calling lawyers and threatening to sue everyone .
. .
oh wait , THAT kind of virus .
Never mind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>See, that's the problem today.
Every time there is a name conflict, people have to start calling lawyers and threatening to sue everyone .
. .
oh wait, THAT kind of virus.
Never mind.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199844</id>
	<title>And all of this is already available in Chrome</title>
	<author>BadAnalogyGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1266597900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Last week I bought some DRAM for my aging Vista PC. Can you believe it? Vista just came out a couple years ago and it's already gotten to the point that the original amount of RAM is completely used up by the OS. XP didn't get that way until SP3!</p><p>Anyway, I digress. There was RAM from many different companies, in many different configurations, with different speeds and all sorts of things that I never thought about when I bought my first computer way back in the old days when dinosaurs roamed the Albuquerque halls. Things have changed so much that I now have more RAM than my first computer had hard disk space!</p><p>So all these different standards for RAM made it a pain in the ass, because not only was my computer only compatible with certain models, there was a different model for each RAM manufacturer.</p><p>In the same way, using a debug tool to determine whether a webpage is working correctly is a crapshoot. Should I go with the best browser (Opera)? How about the most wide-spread browser (IE)? Or should I target the browser most likely to gain the most marketshare (Webkit, aka Chrome and Safari)? Or what about the old stalwart (Netscape)?</p><p>They all purport to do the same thing, provide great debugging tools. But how can I trust them when they work so differently from each other and have such different levels of standards support?</p><p>Opera is great to release these tools, but I'm afraid such low usage makes it useless for most purposes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Last week I bought some DRAM for my aging Vista PC .
Can you believe it ?
Vista just came out a couple years ago and it 's already gotten to the point that the original amount of RAM is completely used up by the OS .
XP did n't get that way until SP3 ! Anyway , I digress .
There was RAM from many different companies , in many different configurations , with different speeds and all sorts of things that I never thought about when I bought my first computer way back in the old days when dinosaurs roamed the Albuquerque halls .
Things have changed so much that I now have more RAM than my first computer had hard disk space ! So all these different standards for RAM made it a pain in the ass , because not only was my computer only compatible with certain models , there was a different model for each RAM manufacturer.In the same way , using a debug tool to determine whether a webpage is working correctly is a crapshoot .
Should I go with the best browser ( Opera ) ?
How about the most wide-spread browser ( IE ) ?
Or should I target the browser most likely to gain the most marketshare ( Webkit , aka Chrome and Safari ) ?
Or what about the old stalwart ( Netscape ) ? They all purport to do the same thing , provide great debugging tools .
But how can I trust them when they work so differently from each other and have such different levels of standards support ? Opera is great to release these tools , but I 'm afraid such low usage makes it useless for most purposes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Last week I bought some DRAM for my aging Vista PC.
Can you believe it?
Vista just came out a couple years ago and it's already gotten to the point that the original amount of RAM is completely used up by the OS.
XP didn't get that way until SP3!Anyway, I digress.
There was RAM from many different companies, in many different configurations, with different speeds and all sorts of things that I never thought about when I bought my first computer way back in the old days when dinosaurs roamed the Albuquerque halls.
Things have changed so much that I now have more RAM than my first computer had hard disk space!So all these different standards for RAM made it a pain in the ass, because not only was my computer only compatible with certain models, there was a different model for each RAM manufacturer.In the same way, using a debug tool to determine whether a webpage is working correctly is a crapshoot.
Should I go with the best browser (Opera)?
How about the most wide-spread browser (IE)?
Or should I target the browser most likely to gain the most marketshare (Webkit, aka Chrome and Safari)?
Or what about the old stalwart (Netscape)?They all purport to do the same thing, provide great debugging tools.
But how can I trust them when they work so differently from each other and have such different levels of standards support?Opera is great to release these tools, but I'm afraid such low usage makes it useless for most purposes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199806</id>
	<title>I never knew that's what my.opera.com was for!</title>
	<author>metamechanical</author>
	<datestamp>1266597720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Would someone be so kind as to provide a mirror?</p><p>I tried to RTFA, but my office has my.opera.com blocked under the Forbidden Category "Intimate Apparel/Swimsuit". Who knew?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would someone be so kind as to provide a mirror ? I tried to RTFA , but my office has my.opera.com blocked under the Forbidden Category " Intimate Apparel/Swimsuit " .
Who knew ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would someone be so kind as to provide a mirror?I tried to RTFA, but my office has my.opera.com blocked under the Forbidden Category "Intimate Apparel/Swimsuit".
Who knew?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31201808</id>
	<title>Re:Grumble</title>
	<author>Bill, Shooter of Bul</author>
	<datestamp>1266606600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just wait, next week they'll announce Dragon Fly comes with HammerFS A cloud based FS for storing your Dragon Fly Related data.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just wait , next week they 'll announce Dragon Fly comes with HammerFS A cloud based FS for storing your Dragon Fly Related data .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just wait, next week they'll announce Dragon Fly comes with HammerFS A cloud based FS for storing your Dragon Fly Related data.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200346</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_141246_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199740
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_141246_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_141246_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31201808
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200346
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_141246_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199740
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_141246_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31201654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199740
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_141246_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199740
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_141246_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_141246_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200874
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200346
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_141246_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199740
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_141246_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31203472
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199844
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_141246_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31202220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_141246_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31201298
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199740
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_141246_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31201910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199740
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_141246_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200210
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199740
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_141246_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31202898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199740
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_141246_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31201294
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200346
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_141246_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31201404
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31201008
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199844
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_141246_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31201798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199740
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_141246_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31205358
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31202650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199740
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_141246_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31204154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199844
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_141246_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199804
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199740
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_141246_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200714
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199844
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_141246_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31202448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_141246_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31208818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199740
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_141246.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199806
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200462
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_141246.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199820
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_141246.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199740
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200028
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199888
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199804
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200210
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199798
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31201910
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31208818
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31201654
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199818
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31201298
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31201798
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199974
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199810
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31202898
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31202650
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31205358
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200882
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_141246.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31201176
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_141246.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31199844
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200714
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31203472
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31204154
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31201008
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31201404
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_141246.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200030
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_141246.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200346
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31201294
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200874
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31201808
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_141246.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200118
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31202220
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31200434
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_141246.31202448
</commentlist>
</conversation>
