<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_19_131235</id>
	<title>Trash-To-Fuel Process Validated By US Military</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1266585960000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"After going through all kinds of grief, including being shut down by the Washington State Ecology Department, classifying them as an 'incinerator,' it looks like Green Power Inc is finally ready to shine.  The Air Force, Navy, Army, and Marines, in a joint effort, validated their technology in November, and the results are now being <a href="http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-8199-Breakthrough-Energy-Examiner~y2010m2d19-GPIs-trashtofuel-process-third-party-tested-by-US-military">published for the first time</a>.  For every 100 tons of municipal solid waste feedstock processed each day, the plant produces 1240 gallons of Naphtha, 3700 gallons of Kerosene, 6900 gallons of Diesel and 3000 gallons of Fuel Oil.  And even the ash can be used for cement or asphalt.  They generate 1 MW of electricity to sell to the grid 24/7, running three shifts per day to keep the plant going, employing approximately five people per shift.  Sticker price is $25 million.  ROI, 3.5 years.  Maybe with this announcement, the trend of no sales in the US will change, compared to the 72 foreign contracts backed by letters of credit."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " After going through all kinds of grief , including being shut down by the Washington State Ecology Department , classifying them as an 'incinerator, ' it looks like Green Power Inc is finally ready to shine .
The Air Force , Navy , Army , and Marines , in a joint effort , validated their technology in November , and the results are now being published for the first time .
For every 100 tons of municipal solid waste feedstock processed each day , the plant produces 1240 gallons of Naphtha , 3700 gallons of Kerosene , 6900 gallons of Diesel and 3000 gallons of Fuel Oil .
And even the ash can be used for cement or asphalt .
They generate 1 MW of electricity to sell to the grid 24/7 , running three shifts per day to keep the plant going , employing approximately five people per shift .
Sticker price is $ 25 million .
ROI , 3.5 years .
Maybe with this announcement , the trend of no sales in the US will change , compared to the 72 foreign contracts backed by letters of credit .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "After going through all kinds of grief, including being shut down by the Washington State Ecology Department, classifying them as an 'incinerator,' it looks like Green Power Inc is finally ready to shine.
The Air Force, Navy, Army, and Marines, in a joint effort, validated their technology in November, and the results are now being published for the first time.
For every 100 tons of municipal solid waste feedstock processed each day, the plant produces 1240 gallons of Naphtha, 3700 gallons of Kerosene, 6900 gallons of Diesel and 3000 gallons of Fuel Oil.
And even the ash can be used for cement or asphalt.
They generate 1 MW of electricity to sell to the grid 24/7, running three shifts per day to keep the plant going, employing approximately five people per shift.
Sticker price is $25 million.
ROI, 3.5 years.
Maybe with this announcement, the trend of no sales in the US will change, compared to the 72 foreign contracts backed by letters of credit.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31199186</id>
	<title>Re:If it sounds too good. to be true...</title>
	<author>ladadadada</author>
	<datestamp>1266594600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I didn't see anything in that link to indicate that he is a snake oil salesman.  There were certainly plenty of concerning allegations, but none of them alleged that he has sold them a product that didn't work.  Most of them are regarding his failure to pay bills.

The article mentioned the same thing, after mentioning that the reporter was a personal friend of the CEO.

It all looks to me like he's a genuine guy with a decent product and bad business sense.

I think I would have waited to see the results published by the third party before running this on Slashdot.  The results linked from the site are actually hosted on its sister site, both of which are funded by Michael Spitzauer and don't look to be published by the US Military at all.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I did n't see anything in that link to indicate that he is a snake oil salesman .
There were certainly plenty of concerning allegations , but none of them alleged that he has sold them a product that did n't work .
Most of them are regarding his failure to pay bills .
The article mentioned the same thing , after mentioning that the reporter was a personal friend of the CEO .
It all looks to me like he 's a genuine guy with a decent product and bad business sense .
I think I would have waited to see the results published by the third party before running this on Slashdot .
The results linked from the site are actually hosted on its sister site , both of which are funded by Michael Spitzauer and do n't look to be published by the US Military at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I didn't see anything in that link to indicate that he is a snake oil salesman.
There were certainly plenty of concerning allegations, but none of them alleged that he has sold them a product that didn't work.
Most of them are regarding his failure to pay bills.
The article mentioned the same thing, after mentioning that the reporter was a personal friend of the CEO.
It all looks to me like he's a genuine guy with a decent product and bad business sense.
I think I would have waited to see the results published by the third party before running this on Slashdot.
The results linked from the site are actually hosted on its sister site, both of which are funded by Michael Spitzauer and don't look to be published by the US Military at all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198410</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31199274</id>
	<title>Mr Fusion, Finally!!!</title>
	<author>lemur3</author>
	<datestamp>1266595020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe Doc Brown just got the name wrong?!</p><p>This sounds like an interesting idea to me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe Doc Brown just got the name wrong ?
! This sounds like an interesting idea to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe Doc Brown just got the name wrong?
!This sounds like an interesting idea to me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198462</id>
	<title>Other companies are also working on this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266590940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The one I know also focuses on stuff like straw and manure/sewer waste, it's advantageous for wet waste that can't go into power plants (some places burn garbage for electricity/district heating). Much of the fertilizer value (nitrates, phosphates) stays in the water phase, you can cycle this back into agriculture in order not to deprive your fields long term. Definitely has potential, especially if it's as cheap as they say.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The one I know also focuses on stuff like straw and manure/sewer waste , it 's advantageous for wet waste that ca n't go into power plants ( some places burn garbage for electricity/district heating ) .
Much of the fertilizer value ( nitrates , phosphates ) stays in the water phase , you can cycle this back into agriculture in order not to deprive your fields long term .
Definitely has potential , especially if it 's as cheap as they say .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The one I know also focuses on stuff like straw and manure/sewer waste, it's advantageous for wet waste that can't go into power plants (some places burn garbage for electricity/district heating).
Much of the fertilizer value (nitrates, phosphates) stays in the water phase, you can cycle this back into agriculture in order not to deprive your fields long term.
Definitely has potential, especially if it's as cheap as they say.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31201290</id>
	<title>Go USA!</title>
	<author>517714</author>
	<datestamp>1266604080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> So far, all of his 72 contracts are foreign, guaranteed by letters of credit.  None in the U.S. yet.  What does that say?</p> </div><p>Americans are not the stupidiest people on the planet?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So far , all of his 72 contracts are foreign , guaranteed by letters of credit .
None in the U.S. yet. What does that say ?
Americans are not the stupidiest people on the planet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> So far, all of his 72 contracts are foreign, guaranteed by letters of credit.
None in the U.S. yet.  What does that say?
Americans are not the stupidiest people on the planet?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198742</id>
	<title>Cool Stuff</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266592560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How long before we can integrate this into our De Loreans with a "Mr. Fusion" recycling unit?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How long before we can integrate this into our De Loreans with a " Mr. Fusion " recycling unit ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How long before we can integrate this into our De Loreans with a "Mr. Fusion" recycling unit?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198322</id>
	<title>Very nice</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266589860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If this is for real &amp; doesn't have any game-breaking drawbacks down the road, this could go a long, long way to curing our energy dependence on other nations until we get our stuff together with more renewable power sources.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If this is for real &amp; does n't have any game-breaking drawbacks down the road , this could go a long , long way to curing our energy dependence on other nations until we get our stuff together with more renewable power sources .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this is for real &amp; doesn't have any game-breaking drawbacks down the road, this could go a long, long way to curing our energy dependence on other nations until we get our stuff together with more renewable power sources.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198532</id>
	<title>3rd party results?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266591300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I want to see the actual reports from the military. The "3rd party results" on the article have Green Power Inc stamped all over them. Until I see those results, I'm skeptical.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I want to see the actual reports from the military .
The " 3rd party results " on the article have Green Power Inc stamped all over them .
Until I see those results , I 'm skeptical .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want to see the actual reports from the military.
The "3rd party results" on the article have Green Power Inc stamped all over them.
Until I see those results, I'm skeptical.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198312</id>
	<title>Turning trash into things of value</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266589800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's pretty much the whole point of the military.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's pretty much the whole point of the military .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's pretty much the whole point of the military.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198358</id>
	<title>Naptha</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266590220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Great!  Just what I've been asking for more Naphtha!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Great !
Just what I 've been asking for more Naphtha !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great!
Just what I've been asking for more Naphtha!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31202032</id>
	<title>Return on Investment</title>
	<author>glodime</author>
	<datestamp>1266607980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>From the article:<p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...the return on investment of this $25 million dollar plant is estimated to be in just over three and a half years...</p></div><p>Beware of the salesman that quotes a Return on Investment in terms of time. </p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the article : ...the return on investment of this $ 25 million dollar plant is estimated to be in just over three and a half years...Beware of the salesman that quotes a Return on Investment in terms of time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the article: ...the return on investment of this $25 million dollar plant is estimated to be in just over three and a half years...Beware of the salesman that quotes a Return on Investment in terms of time. 
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198410</id>
	<title>If it sounds too good. to be true...</title>
	<author>tomhath</author>
	<datestamp>1266590520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>... it probably isn't. This guy is a <a href="http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/news/Stock\%20News/2474527/" title="tradingmarkets.com">snake oil salesman</a> [tradingmarkets.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>... it probably is n't .
This guy is a snake oil salesman [ tradingmarkets.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... it probably isn't.
This guy is a snake oil salesman [tradingmarkets.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31199318</id>
	<title>W00T 7p!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266595260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>users of BSD/OS. A of Jordan Hubbard community at not so bad.  To the</htmltext>
<tokenext>users of BSD/OS .
A of Jordan Hubbard community at not so bad .
To the</tokentext>
<sentencetext>users of BSD/OS.
A of Jordan Hubbard community at not so bad.
To the</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198308</id>
	<title>Does this mean...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266589800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I still have to sort my recycling?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I still have to sort my recycling ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I still have to sort my recycling?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198366</id>
	<title>FTFS</title>
	<author>Pojut</author>
	<datestamp>1266590280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Sticker price is $25 million. ROI, 3.5 years.</p></div><p>Only $25 Million?  Dude.  If this process really works as well as they are reporting, this is a HUGE deal.  Think of the implications of setting up these facilities in multiple parts of the country.</p><p>This won't solve our energy or trash problems, but it could put a sizeable dent in both.  Huzzah!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sticker price is $ 25 million .
ROI , 3.5 years.Only $ 25 Million ?
Dude. If this process really works as well as they are reporting , this is a HUGE deal .
Think of the implications of setting up these facilities in multiple parts of the country.This wo n't solve our energy or trash problems , but it could put a sizeable dent in both .
Huzzah !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sticker price is $25 million.
ROI, 3.5 years.Only $25 Million?
Dude.  If this process really works as well as they are reporting, this is a HUGE deal.
Think of the implications of setting up these facilities in multiple parts of the country.This won't solve our energy or trash problems, but it could put a sizeable dent in both.
Huzzah!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31204416</id>
	<title>Mass genocide finally becomes profitable</title>
	<author>ae1294</author>
	<datestamp>1266575460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So it sounds like this technology could convert human corpses into energy. I'm not saying the US military would use it in that manner but perhaps china would find it useful? Makes me wonder what Hitler might have to say about this development if he was still alive...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So it sounds like this technology could convert human corpses into energy .
I 'm not saying the US military would use it in that manner but perhaps china would find it useful ?
Makes me wonder what Hitler might have to say about this development if he was still alive.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So it sounds like this technology could convert human corpses into energy.
I'm not saying the US military would use it in that manner but perhaps china would find it useful?
Makes me wonder what Hitler might have to say about this development if he was still alive...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31204648</id>
	<title>Garbage</title>
	<author>RedTeflon</author>
	<datestamp>1266576300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Garbage!  This post is just trash</htmltext>
<tokenext>Garbage !
This post is just trash</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Garbage!
This post is just trash</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198356</id>
	<title>Naptha &amp; oils !?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266590220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a Napalm factory ! No wonder the military love it !</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a Napalm factory !
No wonder the military love it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a Napalm factory !
No wonder the military love it !</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31205050</id>
	<title>Re:Very nice</title>
	<author>tuxgeek</author>
	<datestamp>1266577920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been watching this technology, and resulting company for several years now. <b>This is real!</b> </p><p>This is very cool stuff. It takes average refuse that would go to a landfill, cooks it down into diesel fuel and fertilizer. It is completely self contained. It releases nothing into the environment. Generates it's own power and then some.</p><p>The up side here is that the military has finally taken notice. Maybe something good will become of it after all.</p><p>I seriously urge everyone out there to call your congress critter and urge them to pull the oil corporate dick from their mouths and allow this technology to be expanded and built on a national level. It would release us from our addiction to foreign fossil fuel reserves and stop us from financing terrorist sponsoring nations.</p><p>Check it out<br>http://www.cleanenergyprojects.com/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been watching this technology , and resulting company for several years now .
This is real !
This is very cool stuff .
It takes average refuse that would go to a landfill , cooks it down into diesel fuel and fertilizer .
It is completely self contained .
It releases nothing into the environment .
Generates it 's own power and then some.The up side here is that the military has finally taken notice .
Maybe something good will become of it after all.I seriously urge everyone out there to call your congress critter and urge them to pull the oil corporate dick from their mouths and allow this technology to be expanded and built on a national level .
It would release us from our addiction to foreign fossil fuel reserves and stop us from financing terrorist sponsoring nations.Check it outhttp : //www.cleanenergyprojects.com/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been watching this technology, and resulting company for several years now.
This is real!
This is very cool stuff.
It takes average refuse that would go to a landfill, cooks it down into diesel fuel and fertilizer.
It is completely self contained.
It releases nothing into the environment.
Generates it's own power and then some.The up side here is that the military has finally taken notice.
Maybe something good will become of it after all.I seriously urge everyone out there to call your congress critter and urge them to pull the oil corporate dick from their mouths and allow this technology to be expanded and built on a national level.
It would release us from our addiction to foreign fossil fuel reserves and stop us from financing terrorist sponsoring nations.Check it outhttp://www.cleanenergyprojects.com/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198322</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198290</id>
	<title>what about...</title>
	<author>Adolf Hitroll</author>
	<datestamp>1266589680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...taking their chemical weapon off of the bottom of the Atlantic, for a change: that's trash that needs to be properly disposed of...</p><p>The US Army is really a bunch of righteaous fucking rapists.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...taking their chemical weapon off of the bottom of the Atlantic , for a change : that 's trash that needs to be properly disposed of...The US Army is really a bunch of righteaous fucking rapists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...taking their chemical weapon off of the bottom of the Atlantic, for a change: that's trash that needs to be properly disposed of...The US Army is really a bunch of righteaous fucking rapists.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31203538</id>
	<title>Re:Amazingly efficient...</title>
	<author>queazocotal</author>
	<datestamp>1266571800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Alas it's worse.</p><p><a href="http://pesn.com/2010/02/19/959019\_GPI\_3rd-party\_test\_results\_trash-to-fuel/material-energy\%20balance\%202010.pdf" title="pesn.com">http://pesn.com/2010/02/19/959019\_GPI\_3rd-party\_test\_results\_trash-to-fuel/material-energy\%20balance\%202010.pdf</a> [pesn.com]</p><p>Right.<br>Test results. Okaaaay.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Inputs totalling  2,257,710.0000 MJ.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Total output from distillation column 2,257,710.0000 MJ</p><p>Run away, run far away!</p><p>These are not test results.</p><p>These are at best numbers from someone who has taken a wild stab at a reasonable output for the maximum theoretical output of an \_ENERGY\_CONSUMING\_ process, and someone else who has done a writeup based on these numbers at best not understanding this, at worst fraudulently.</p><p>These are \_HOPELESSLY\_ optimistic. It's assuming 100\% of the carbon is converted into useful fuel oil.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Alas it 's worse.http : //pesn.com/2010/02/19/959019 \ _GPI \ _3rd-party \ _test \ _results \ _trash-to-fuel/material-energy \ % 20balance \ % 202010.pdf [ pesn.com ] Right.Test results .
Okaaaay .           Inputs totalling 2,257,710.0000 MJ .
          Total output from distillation column 2,257,710.0000 MJRun away , run far away ! These are not test results.These are at best numbers from someone who has taken a wild stab at a reasonable output for the maximum theoretical output of an \ _ENERGY \ _CONSUMING \ _ process , and someone else who has done a writeup based on these numbers at best not understanding this , at worst fraudulently.These are \ _HOPELESSLY \ _ optimistic .
It 's assuming 100 \ % of the carbon is converted into useful fuel oil .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Alas it's worse.http://pesn.com/2010/02/19/959019\_GPI\_3rd-party\_test\_results\_trash-to-fuel/material-energy\%20balance\%202010.pdf [pesn.com]Right.Test results.
Okaaaay.
          Inputs totalling  2,257,710.0000 MJ.
          Total output from distillation column 2,257,710.0000 MJRun away, run far away!These are not test results.These are at best numbers from someone who has taken a wild stab at a reasonable output for the maximum theoretical output of an \_ENERGY\_CONSUMING\_ process, and someone else who has done a writeup based on these numbers at best not understanding this, at worst fraudulently.These are \_HOPELESSLY\_ optimistic.
It's assuming 100\% of the carbon is converted into useful fuel oil.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31199622</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31199158</id>
	<title>Whats the catch?</title>
	<author>phoenixdna</author>
	<datestamp>1266594420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>(from the article)<br>
&gt; So far, all of his 72 contracts are foreign, guaranteed by letters of credit.  None in the U.S. yet.  What does that say?<br> <br>

I think it probably says that there is something we don't know about that prospective buyers do know about.  If no one in the US wants this, then there is a reason for it.  At first glance, this seems like a great advancement.  Who wouldn't want to turn all their garbage into profit?  That seems like a no brainer to me.  So if we set up a few thousand of these, then we convert most of our waste into free fuel.  Awesome!  Its Back To The Future.  All we need next are intelligent pants and shoes that shrink to fit and a cool hover board that glides in mid air.

I'm not trying to be doom and gloom here, but I'm just betting that there is more to this story that we don't know about.  I hope I am wrong, however, and that this ends up being exactly what it appears to be.  If thats the case, then I hope we see more of these in the US.</htmltext>
<tokenext>( from the article ) &gt; So far , all of his 72 contracts are foreign , guaranteed by letters of credit .
None in the U.S. yet. What does that say ?
I think it probably says that there is something we do n't know about that prospective buyers do know about .
If no one in the US wants this , then there is a reason for it .
At first glance , this seems like a great advancement .
Who would n't want to turn all their garbage into profit ?
That seems like a no brainer to me .
So if we set up a few thousand of these , then we convert most of our waste into free fuel .
Awesome ! Its Back To The Future .
All we need next are intelligent pants and shoes that shrink to fit and a cool hover board that glides in mid air .
I 'm not trying to be doom and gloom here , but I 'm just betting that there is more to this story that we do n't know about .
I hope I am wrong , however , and that this ends up being exactly what it appears to be .
If thats the case , then I hope we see more of these in the US .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(from the article)
&gt; So far, all of his 72 contracts are foreign, guaranteed by letters of credit.
None in the U.S. yet.  What does that say?
I think it probably says that there is something we don't know about that prospective buyers do know about.
If no one in the US wants this, then there is a reason for it.
At first glance, this seems like a great advancement.
Who wouldn't want to turn all their garbage into profit?
That seems like a no brainer to me.
So if we set up a few thousand of these, then we convert most of our waste into free fuel.
Awesome!  Its Back To The Future.
All we need next are intelligent pants and shoes that shrink to fit and a cool hover board that glides in mid air.
I'm not trying to be doom and gloom here, but I'm just betting that there is more to this story that we don't know about.
I hope I am wrong, however, and that this ends up being exactly what it appears to be.
If thats the case, then I hope we see more of these in the US.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31199514</id>
	<title>Re:If it sounds too good. to be true...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266596340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is too good to be true.  This failed horribly and left investors high and dry 4 years ago in the southern USA.  This free publicity will ensure new investors are duped.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is too good to be true .
This failed horribly and left investors high and dry 4 years ago in the southern USA .
This free publicity will ensure new investors are duped .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is too good to be true.
This failed horribly and left investors high and dry 4 years ago in the southern USA.
This free publicity will ensure new investors are duped.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198410</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198354</id>
	<title>Re:Very nice</title>
	<author>ZosX</author>
	<datestamp>1266590220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah. It is for real. The tech has been around for at least 5 years that I know of, probably longer. There aren't any real drawbacks except that you are producing more greenhouse gasses in the end. I don't know if we produce enough bio-waste to generate fuel for all of our gas guzzling needs, but it should go a long, long way if utilized to making some of our problems better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah .
It is for real .
The tech has been around for at least 5 years that I know of , probably longer .
There are n't any real drawbacks except that you are producing more greenhouse gasses in the end .
I do n't know if we produce enough bio-waste to generate fuel for all of our gas guzzling needs , but it should go a long , long way if utilized to making some of our problems better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah.
It is for real.
The tech has been around for at least 5 years that I know of, probably longer.
There aren't any real drawbacks except that you are producing more greenhouse gasses in the end.
I don't know if we produce enough bio-waste to generate fuel for all of our gas guzzling needs, but it should go a long, long way if utilized to making some of our problems better.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198322</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198980</id>
	<title>Exactly who in DoD?</title>
	<author>gnieboer</author>
	<datestamp>1266593820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Like others here, I'm not convinced.  DoD is a very big place, and to say that was a 'joint' validation is odd... who was this joint organization who specializes in trash recycling within DoD?  Probably one exists someplace (next to the agency researching favorite alien ice cream flavours), but what's telling is that the article doesn't mention who they are.</p><p>And the 'link' referred to doesn't have any mention of DoD in it either.  Since the PDF has PES watermarks and was authored by Word 2010 (which the DoD won't be using), it's 99\% likely it's not a 3rd party document.  I suppose it might be based on a 3rd party report, but why not just include the test report?  A government test report like this should be public info.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like others here , I 'm not convinced .
DoD is a very big place , and to say that was a 'joint ' validation is odd... who was this joint organization who specializes in trash recycling within DoD ?
Probably one exists someplace ( next to the agency researching favorite alien ice cream flavours ) , but what 's telling is that the article does n't mention who they are.And the 'link ' referred to does n't have any mention of DoD in it either .
Since the PDF has PES watermarks and was authored by Word 2010 ( which the DoD wo n't be using ) , it 's 99 \ % likely it 's not a 3rd party document .
I suppose it might be based on a 3rd party report , but why not just include the test report ?
A government test report like this should be public info .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like others here, I'm not convinced.
DoD is a very big place, and to say that was a 'joint' validation is odd... who was this joint organization who specializes in trash recycling within DoD?
Probably one exists someplace (next to the agency researching favorite alien ice cream flavours), but what's telling is that the article doesn't mention who they are.And the 'link' referred to doesn't have any mention of DoD in it either.
Since the PDF has PES watermarks and was authored by Word 2010 (which the DoD won't be using), it's 99\% likely it's not a 3rd party document.
I suppose it might be based on a 3rd party report, but why not just include the test report?
A government test report like this should be public info.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31207462</id>
	<title>So the US military has just validated Mr. Fusion.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266597060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dr. Emmett Brown would be proud.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dr. Emmett Brown would be proud .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dr. Emmett Brown would be proud.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198476</id>
	<title>Re:Very nice</title>
	<author>Jaysyn</author>
	<datestamp>1266591000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it just for biowaste?  When they say trash I think landfills &amp; not sewage &amp; old food.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just for biowaste ?
When they say trash I think landfills &amp; not sewage &amp; old food .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just for biowaste?
When they say trash I think landfills &amp; not sewage &amp; old food.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198354</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198548</id>
	<title>check out the website</title>
	<author>shanmuha</author>
	<datestamp>1266591420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The website of Green Power Inc. seems quite dodgy - <a href="http://cleanenergyprojects.com/" title="cleanenergyprojects.com" rel="nofollow">http://cleanenergyprojects.com/</a> [cleanenergyprojects.com]. Now, that can be either a very good sign or a very very very bad sign. It reminds me of the website of the Atom chip corporation(http://atomchip.com/) with their quantum optical processors.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The website of Green Power Inc. seems quite dodgy - http : //cleanenergyprojects.com/ [ cleanenergyprojects.com ] .
Now , that can be either a very good sign or a very very very bad sign .
It reminds me of the website of the Atom chip corporation ( http : //atomchip.com/ ) with their quantum optical processors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The website of Green Power Inc. seems quite dodgy - http://cleanenergyprojects.com/ [cleanenergyprojects.com].
Now, that can be either a very good sign or a very very very bad sign.
It reminds me of the website of the Atom chip corporation(http://atomchip.com/) with their quantum optical processors.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31202584</id>
	<title>Re:Very nice</title>
	<author>Shatteredstar</author>
	<datestamp>1266611160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have to agree, the whole concept can do great things and I look forward to the tech and methods being refined further.</p><p>Imagine landfills disappearing more and more while our fuel issues are eased and removed.</p><p>Now if we just get the little fusion thing from Back to the Future.  Some banana peels and other trash and flying car!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have to agree , the whole concept can do great things and I look forward to the tech and methods being refined further.Imagine landfills disappearing more and more while our fuel issues are eased and removed.Now if we just get the little fusion thing from Back to the Future .
Some banana peels and other trash and flying car !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have to agree, the whole concept can do great things and I look forward to the tech and methods being refined further.Imagine landfills disappearing more and more while our fuel issues are eased and removed.Now if we just get the little fusion thing from Back to the Future.
Some banana peels and other trash and flying car!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198322</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31202014</id>
	<title>Unknowable Inputs</title>
	<author>ThatsNotPudding</author>
	<datestamp>1266607800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It sounds great and all, but show me a municipal waste stream that <i>doesn't</i> have things it shouldn't have (tube tvs with lead and mercury or even just flourescent light bulbs).  Maybe they weed all the bad stuff (they can know about) before hand, but that surely isn't a cost-free undertaking.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It sounds great and all , but show me a municipal waste stream that does n't have things it should n't have ( tube tvs with lead and mercury or even just flourescent light bulbs ) .
Maybe they weed all the bad stuff ( they can know about ) before hand , but that surely is n't a cost-free undertaking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It sounds great and all, but show me a municipal waste stream that doesn't have things it shouldn't have (tube tvs with lead and mercury or even just flourescent light bulbs).
Maybe they weed all the bad stuff (they can know about) before hand, but that surely isn't a cost-free undertaking.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31202036</id>
	<title>Re:If it sounds too good. to be true...</title>
	<author>Abcd1234</author>
	<datestamp>1266608040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So you're saying the military are incompetent idiots and that the technology *doesn't* actually work?  That, while they claimed to have validated the technology, they actually didn't?  Do you have a source for these allegations?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So you 're saying the military are incompetent idiots and that the technology * does n't * actually work ?
That , while they claimed to have validated the technology , they actually did n't ?
Do you have a source for these allegations ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you're saying the military are incompetent idiots and that the technology *doesn't* actually work?
That, while they claimed to have validated the technology, they actually didn't?
Do you have a source for these allegations?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198410</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31199622</id>
	<title>Amazingly efficient...</title>
	<author>rickb928</author>
	<datestamp>1266596880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So I go to <a href="http://www.convert-me.com/en/convert/weight2volume" title="convert-me.com">this site</a> [convert-me.com], and I get these conversions:</p><p>Naptha; 1,200 Gal = 6,900 lbs<br>Kerosene; 3,700 Gal = 25,000 lbs<br>Diesel (as fuel Oil); 6,900 Gal = 51,000 lbs<br>Fuel Oil; 3,00 Gal = 23,000 lbs</p><p>Total: 168,000 pounds;  84 tons.</p><p>84\% efficiency.  Not counting the ash.</p><p>Or not.</p><p>Like how I comma everything?  Metric is overrated...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So I go to this site [ convert-me.com ] , and I get these conversions : Naptha ; 1,200 Gal = 6,900 lbsKerosene ; 3,700 Gal = 25,000 lbsDiesel ( as fuel Oil ) ; 6,900 Gal = 51,000 lbsFuel Oil ; 3,00 Gal = 23,000 lbsTotal : 168,000 pounds ; 84 tons.84 \ % efficiency .
Not counting the ash.Or not.Like how I comma everything ?
Metric is overrated.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So I go to this site [convert-me.com], and I get these conversions:Naptha; 1,200 Gal = 6,900 lbsKerosene; 3,700 Gal = 25,000 lbsDiesel (as fuel Oil); 6,900 Gal = 51,000 lbsFuel Oil; 3,00 Gal = 23,000 lbsTotal: 168,000 pounds;  84 tons.84\% efficiency.
Not counting the ash.Or not.Like how I comma everything?
Metric is overrated...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198374</id>
	<title>Nice numbers.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266590340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>No wonder the return on investment of this $25 million dollar plant is estimated to be in just over three and a half years, after which it is pure profit -....</p></div><p>That's a bit of an exaggeration. There's personnel, insurance, maintenance, etc.... </p><p>They look like nice numbers but I'd have to sit down and look at them real close with an auditor.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No wonder the return on investment of this $ 25 million dollar plant is estimated to be in just over three and a half years , after which it is pure profit -....That 's a bit of an exaggeration .
There 's personnel , insurance , maintenance , etc.... They look like nice numbers but I 'd have to sit down and look at them real close with an auditor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No wonder the return on investment of this $25 million dollar plant is estimated to be in just over three and a half years, after which it is pure profit -....That's a bit of an exaggeration.
There's personnel, insurance, maintenance, etc.... They look like nice numbers but I'd have to sit down and look at them real close with an auditor.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31200520</id>
	<title>Many big 'if's</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266600720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Firstly, there is no unaffiliated source for the claim of US DoD involvement. Secondly, the report is clearly not written by the DoD.</p><p>Thirdly, the input waste seems prescreened - consisting mostly of paper and cardboard, some paper waste, plastic waste with no elements except carbon, hydrogen and oxygen, and zero metals or glass.</p><p>If you are doing catalytic conversion, this is the waste that is perfect. There is nothing surprising per se for being able to convert a wooden log into oil. Competing uses at the moment are for heating (e.g. wood burning) and recyling of paper. If you already \_have\_ your waste sorted like this, it should be really easy to incinerate cleanly or to recycle. In any case it means that this isnt' for converting \_existing\_ landfills. Claims about eliminating CO2 are uncertain, because this would only be able to use already-sorted material which already is recycled, and hence an increase in the amount of paper turned into oil, would mean a reduction in the amount turned into new paper, meaning more new paper needed.</p><p>My main question would be how it would be affected by tiny amounts of noncarbon elements like glass, metals, chlorine from PVC, and other crap which forms from imperfect sorting of municipal waste. I have a sneaking suspicion that glass particles in your jet fuel will be a problem.</p><p>Of course, this would be fantastic IF close to perfect sorting CAN be done and IF trace amounts of noncarbon elements are acceptable and IF once you have done this it's a more efficient method than either paper recycling or electricity through combustion. If those ifs line up, here's to the next superstar. Being a suspicious person I suspect that the reason a large chemicals company hasn't patended it already is because they don't.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Firstly , there is no unaffiliated source for the claim of US DoD involvement .
Secondly , the report is clearly not written by the DoD.Thirdly , the input waste seems prescreened - consisting mostly of paper and cardboard , some paper waste , plastic waste with no elements except carbon , hydrogen and oxygen , and zero metals or glass.If you are doing catalytic conversion , this is the waste that is perfect .
There is nothing surprising per se for being able to convert a wooden log into oil .
Competing uses at the moment are for heating ( e.g .
wood burning ) and recyling of paper .
If you already \ _have \ _ your waste sorted like this , it should be really easy to incinerate cleanly or to recycle .
In any case it means that this isnt ' for converting \ _existing \ _ landfills .
Claims about eliminating CO2 are uncertain , because this would only be able to use already-sorted material which already is recycled , and hence an increase in the amount of paper turned into oil , would mean a reduction in the amount turned into new paper , meaning more new paper needed.My main question would be how it would be affected by tiny amounts of noncarbon elements like glass , metals , chlorine from PVC , and other crap which forms from imperfect sorting of municipal waste .
I have a sneaking suspicion that glass particles in your jet fuel will be a problem.Of course , this would be fantastic IF close to perfect sorting CAN be done and IF trace amounts of noncarbon elements are acceptable and IF once you have done this it 's a more efficient method than either paper recycling or electricity through combustion .
If those ifs line up , here 's to the next superstar .
Being a suspicious person I suspect that the reason a large chemicals company has n't patended it already is because they do n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Firstly, there is no unaffiliated source for the claim of US DoD involvement.
Secondly, the report is clearly not written by the DoD.Thirdly, the input waste seems prescreened - consisting mostly of paper and cardboard, some paper waste, plastic waste with no elements except carbon, hydrogen and oxygen, and zero metals or glass.If you are doing catalytic conversion, this is the waste that is perfect.
There is nothing surprising per se for being able to convert a wooden log into oil.
Competing uses at the moment are for heating (e.g.
wood burning) and recyling of paper.
If you already \_have\_ your waste sorted like this, it should be really easy to incinerate cleanly or to recycle.
In any case it means that this isnt' for converting \_existing\_ landfills.
Claims about eliminating CO2 are uncertain, because this would only be able to use already-sorted material which already is recycled, and hence an increase in the amount of paper turned into oil, would mean a reduction in the amount turned into new paper, meaning more new paper needed.My main question would be how it would be affected by tiny amounts of noncarbon elements like glass, metals, chlorine from PVC, and other crap which forms from imperfect sorting of municipal waste.
I have a sneaking suspicion that glass particles in your jet fuel will be a problem.Of course, this would be fantastic IF close to perfect sorting CAN be done and IF trace amounts of noncarbon elements are acceptable and IF once you have done this it's a more efficient method than either paper recycling or electricity through combustion.
If those ifs line up, here's to the next superstar.
Being a suspicious person I suspect that the reason a large chemicals company hasn't patended it already is because they don't.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198860</id>
	<title>Re:Turning trash into things of value</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266593220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>By modding the parent post down, you are disrespecting every serviceman who has been transformed by Basic Training.</p><p>But I wouldn't expect anything less from people who have no respect for the military in the first place.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>By modding the parent post down , you are disrespecting every serviceman who has been transformed by Basic Training.But I would n't expect anything less from people who have no respect for the military in the first place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By modding the parent post down, you are disrespecting every serviceman who has been transformed by Basic Training.But I wouldn't expect anything less from people who have no respect for the military in the first place.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198312</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31206012</id>
	<title>And they said the millitary can't be in harmony...</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1266583200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...with the cycles of life...</p><p>Yeah baby!</p><p>Sure, it&rsquo;s not perfect. But the fact that it instantly reminds me of natural cycles (which are very efficient), where nothing is wasted, is a sure sign that this is a good thing.</p><p>We need more like this!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...with the cycles of life...Yeah baby ! Sure , it    s not perfect .
But the fact that it instantly reminds me of natural cycles ( which are very efficient ) , where nothing is wasted , is a sure sign that this is a good thing.We need more like this !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...with the cycles of life...Yeah baby!Sure, it’s not perfect.
But the fact that it instantly reminds me of natural cycles (which are very efficient), where nothing is wasted, is a sure sign that this is a good thing.We need more like this!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_131235_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198476
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198354
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198322
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_131235_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31199186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198410
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_131235_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31202584
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198322
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_131235_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31203538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31199622
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_131235_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31202036
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198410
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_131235_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198312
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_131235_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31199514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198410
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_131235_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31205050
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198322
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_131235.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198356
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_131235.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31199622
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31203538
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_131235.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198322
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31202584
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198354
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198476
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31205050
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_131235.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198410
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31202036
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31199514
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31199186
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_131235.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198312
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198860
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_131235.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198358
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_131235.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198308
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_131235.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198462
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_131235.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31199158
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_131235.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_131235.31198548
</commentlist>
</conversation>
