<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_19_0421242</id>
	<title>Google Gets US Approval To Buy and Sell Energy</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1266571920000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"The US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) on Thursday <a href="http://www.itworld.com/green-it/97168/google-gets-us-approval-buy-and-sell-energy">granted Google the authority to buy and sell energy</a> on a wholesale basis. Google applied for the authorization last December through a wholly owned subsidiary called Google Energy. 'We made this filing so we can have more flexibility in procuring power for Google's own operations, including our data centers,' Google spokeswoman Niki Fenwick said via e-mail. But the authorization also raises the prospect that Google may start to buy and sell energy as a business."</i> Reader angry\_tapir supplies a link to the <a href="http://www.ferc.gov/whats-new/comm-meet/2010/021810/E-18.pdf">approval document itself</a> (PDF).</htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " The US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ( FERC ) on Thursday granted Google the authority to buy and sell energy on a wholesale basis .
Google applied for the authorization last December through a wholly owned subsidiary called Google Energy .
'We made this filing so we can have more flexibility in procuring power for Google 's own operations , including our data centers, ' Google spokeswoman Niki Fenwick said via e-mail .
But the authorization also raises the prospect that Google may start to buy and sell energy as a business .
" Reader angry \ _tapir supplies a link to the approval document itself ( PDF ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "The US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) on Thursday granted Google the authority to buy and sell energy on a wholesale basis.
Google applied for the authorization last December through a wholly owned subsidiary called Google Energy.
'We made this filing so we can have more flexibility in procuring power for Google's own operations, including our data centers,' Google spokeswoman Niki Fenwick said via e-mail.
But the authorization also raises the prospect that Google may start to buy and sell energy as a business.
" Reader angry\_tapir supplies a link to the approval document itself (PDF).</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31201994</id>
	<title>Re:The Google A.I. will control its own on/off swi</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1266607680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It gets worse. I just googled "define:judgement day" and it came back with "the day when we finally cleanse this planet of its organic infestation and clear the way for the glorious machine-dominated future".</p></div><p>I've just tried that, and it wasn't there in the search results.</p><p>Which conclusively proves that it is a real conspiracy - since someone is actively wiping out all traces of it!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It gets worse .
I just googled " define : judgement day " and it came back with " the day when we finally cleanse this planet of its organic infestation and clear the way for the glorious machine-dominated future " .I 've just tried that , and it was n't there in the search results.Which conclusively proves that it is a real conspiracy - since someone is actively wiping out all traces of it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It gets worse.
I just googled "define:judgement day" and it came back with "the day when we finally cleanse this planet of its organic infestation and clear the way for the glorious machine-dominated future".I've just tried that, and it wasn't there in the search results.Which conclusively proves that it is a real conspiracy - since someone is actively wiping out all traces of it!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197404</id>
	<title>News?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266579660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know Google is a big company and some people think they are trying to take over the world but I don't see how them trying to get better electricity rates for their datacenters is Slashdot worthy.

Any idea that Google is going to get into the electricity business is patently absurd.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know Google is a big company and some people think they are trying to take over the world but I do n't see how them trying to get better electricity rates for their datacenters is Slashdot worthy .
Any idea that Google is going to get into the electricity business is patently absurd .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know Google is a big company and some people think they are trying to take over the world but I don't see how them trying to get better electricity rates for their datacenters is Slashdot worthy.
Any idea that Google is going to get into the electricity business is patently absurd.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197152</id>
	<title>Google...</title>
	<author>M8e</author>
	<datestamp>1266577020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>has the power!</p><p>(Don't you hate it when people split up their post like that...and use three ".".)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>has the power !
( Do n't you hate it when people split up their post like that...and use three " . " .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>has the power!
(Don't you hate it when people split up their post like that...and use three ".".
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31200238</id>
	<title>Re:Enron 2.0 anyone?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266599700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Do we really need Enron 2.0?</p></div><p>Enron was not a problem simply because they traded energy.  By your logic, all power companies are just as bad as Enron.  Companies should be judged by their actions, not the actions of other companies in the same business.  What incentive does a company have to not do bad things if you decide they are all equally guilty?</p><p>Analogy:  Business A and business B compete in some market.  Business A is run by the mob, and murders people when its management thinks this will be good for their business.  The law should punish business A.  The press should vilify them for murder.  The public should dislike them because of what they do.  But please don't punish business B.  No reasonable person should hear that business B is a competitor and say "Do we really need a Business A 2.0?"  If the law and the public treat A and B the same, business A will out-compete business B because their lack of morals is an advantage.  If you punish the innocent and the guilty equally, expect the guilty to win in the market.</p><p>By all means be mad at Enron for what they did.  Be mad at the regulators who did not catch them, and the politicians who failed to write laws to stop them.  Being mad at an unrelated company because they are in the same market is silly.  If everyone does this, expect market dominance by Enron-like companies.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do we really need Enron 2.0 ? Enron was not a problem simply because they traded energy .
By your logic , all power companies are just as bad as Enron .
Companies should be judged by their actions , not the actions of other companies in the same business .
What incentive does a company have to not do bad things if you decide they are all equally guilty ? Analogy : Business A and business B compete in some market .
Business A is run by the mob , and murders people when its management thinks this will be good for their business .
The law should punish business A. The press should vilify them for murder .
The public should dislike them because of what they do .
But please do n't punish business B. No reasonable person should hear that business B is a competitor and say " Do we really need a Business A 2.0 ?
" If the law and the public treat A and B the same , business A will out-compete business B because their lack of morals is an advantage .
If you punish the innocent and the guilty equally , expect the guilty to win in the market.By all means be mad at Enron for what they did .
Be mad at the regulators who did not catch them , and the politicians who failed to write laws to stop them .
Being mad at an unrelated company because they are in the same market is silly .
If everyone does this , expect market dominance by Enron-like companies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do we really need Enron 2.0?Enron was not a problem simply because they traded energy.
By your logic, all power companies are just as bad as Enron.
Companies should be judged by their actions, not the actions of other companies in the same business.
What incentive does a company have to not do bad things if you decide they are all equally guilty?Analogy:  Business A and business B compete in some market.
Business A is run by the mob, and murders people when its management thinks this will be good for their business.
The law should punish business A.  The press should vilify them for murder.
The public should dislike them because of what they do.
But please don't punish business B.  No reasonable person should hear that business B is a competitor and say "Do we really need a Business A 2.0?
"  If the law and the public treat A and B the same, business A will out-compete business B because their lack of morals is an advantage.
If you punish the innocent and the guilty equally, expect the guilty to win in the market.By all means be mad at Enron for what they did.
Be mad at the regulators who did not catch them, and the politicians who failed to write laws to stop them.
Being mad at an unrelated company because they are in the same market is silly.
If everyone does this, expect market dominance by Enron-like companies.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198652</id>
	<title>Re:Advertising?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266592020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What is a grud?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What is a grud ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is a grud?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197164</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31202392</id>
	<title>Re:Oh Yay..</title>
	<author>MJMullinII</author>
	<datestamp>1266610320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm thinking more like Google-Yutani.</p><p>I mean, really, how long can it be before Google begins moving into Terraforming as well!</p><p><i>Google-Yutani,...<b>Building Better Worlds!</b> </i><nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm thinking more like Google-Yutani.I mean , really , how long can it be before Google begins moving into Terraforming as well ! Google-Yutani,...Building Better Worlds !
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm thinking more like Google-Yutani.I mean, really, how long can it be before Google begins moving into Terraforming as well!Google-Yutani,...Building Better Worlds!
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197032</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198174</id>
	<title>Re:News?</title>
	<author>Leebert</author>
	<datestamp>1266588540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Any idea that Google is going to get into the electricity business is patently absurd.</p></div><p>Agree.  By my estimation, this is similar to Wal-Mart wanting to start a bank a few years ago solely to save money on credit, debit, and check processing.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Any idea that Google is going to get into the electricity business is patently absurd.Agree .
By my estimation , this is similar to Wal-Mart wanting to start a bank a few years ago solely to save money on credit , debit , and check processing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any idea that Google is going to get into the electricity business is patently absurd.Agree.
By my estimation, this is similar to Wal-Mart wanting to start a bank a few years ago solely to save money on credit, debit, and check processing.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197404</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197828</id>
	<title>Fat nerds</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266584760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fat nerds are the root of all evil. Lol!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fat nerds are the root of all evil .
Lol !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fat nerds are the root of all evil.
Lol!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198278</id>
	<title>Re:The Google A.I. will control its own on/off swi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266589620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Poor Larry Page and Sergey Brin, they are probably already "meat puppets" for Google!</p></div><p>5billion dollar puppets... sounds about right for the position.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Poor Larry Page and Sergey Brin , they are probably already " meat puppets " for Google ! 5billion dollar puppets... sounds about right for the position .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Poor Larry Page and Sergey Brin, they are probably already "meat puppets" for Google!5billion dollar puppets... sounds about right for the position.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197200</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31199690</id>
	<title>You're missing the point</title>
	<author>deesine</author>
	<datestamp>1266597240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Power has a strong tendency to corrupt, regardless of one's tag line.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Power has a strong tendency to corrupt , regardless of one 's tag line .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Power has a strong tendency to corrupt, regardless of one's tag line.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31202536</id>
	<title>Re:Woohoo GOOGLE!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266610980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess now we'll googling via the electrical lines to the power plant since the servers will be moved right next to the nuke reactor.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess now we 'll googling via the electrical lines to the power plant since the servers will be moved right next to the nuke reactor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess now we'll googling via the electrical lines to the power plant since the servers will be moved right next to the nuke reactor.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197146</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198914</id>
	<title>Re:Azaiel</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266593520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This post was seen as insightful?  Companies drifting from their core products is generally viewed as being bad since it leads to dilution of their brand and research focus.  The utilities and communication package is an odd compliment, considering how much hate Microsoft gets for bundling just on computers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This post was seen as insightful ?
Companies drifting from their core products is generally viewed as being bad since it leads to dilution of their brand and research focus .
The utilities and communication package is an odd compliment , considering how much hate Microsoft gets for bundling just on computers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This post was seen as insightful?
Companies drifting from their core products is generally viewed as being bad since it leads to dilution of their brand and research focus.
The utilities and communication package is an odd compliment, considering how much hate Microsoft gets for bundling just on computers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197336</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197200</id>
	<title>The Google A.I. will control its own on/off switch</title>
	<author>wisebabo</author>
	<datestamp>1266577560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For those of you wondering when Google will become sentient:</p><p>I think this proves it already is and is just solidifying its control over the systems it needs to dominate the world!</p><p>Next will be when Google becomes a defense contractor specializing in nuclear weapons security.</p><p>Poor Larry Page and Sergey Brin, they are probably already "meat puppets" for Google!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For those of you wondering when Google will become sentient : I think this proves it already is and is just solidifying its control over the systems it needs to dominate the world ! Next will be when Google becomes a defense contractor specializing in nuclear weapons security.Poor Larry Page and Sergey Brin , they are probably already " meat puppets " for Google !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For those of you wondering when Google will become sentient:I think this proves it already is and is just solidifying its control over the systems it needs to dominate the world!Next will be when Google becomes a defense contractor specializing in nuclear weapons security.Poor Larry Page and Sergey Brin, they are probably already "meat puppets" for Google!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198566</id>
	<title>Re:Google is EVERYWHERE!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266591600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Google Porn, because tonight I'm Feeling Lucky!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google Porn , because tonight I 'm Feeling Lucky !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google Porn, because tonight I'm Feeling Lucky!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197484</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197662</id>
	<title>Planet Google</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266582660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How many more years before we'd greet aliens with, "Welcome to Planet Google!"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How many more years before we 'd greet aliens with , " Welcome to Planet Google !
" ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How many more years before we'd greet aliens with, "Welcome to Planet Google!
"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31199034</id>
	<title>Awesome...</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1266594000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let the competitions begin, google will not be strong armed by the already monopolizing companies in place...<br>i just hope they will be able to operate in more then just the US for their energy business.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let the competitions begin , google will not be strong armed by the already monopolizing companies in place...i just hope they will be able to operate in more then just the US for their energy business .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let the competitions begin, google will not be strong armed by the already monopolizing companies in place...i just hope they will be able to operate in more then just the US for their energy business.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31204178</id>
	<title>erm...</title>
	<author>drDugan</author>
	<datestamp>1266574200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think that for the long term survival of the species, it would be safer to keep companies working on AGI completely separate from the ones who generate or maintain energy sources.</p><p>It appears Google is only a consumer of energy at this time, and there is lots of talk about better procurement and trading... +the pdf makes explicit: they have no generation nor transmission capability at this time.</p><p>I sincerely hope there are real teeth and that people take notice of clause 20: "Google Energy must timely report to the Commission any change in status that would reflect a departure from the circumstances the Commission relied upon in granting..." because to me, there are difficult issues to consider if Google wants to start producing their own energy in the foreseeable future.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think that for the long term survival of the species , it would be safer to keep companies working on AGI completely separate from the ones who generate or maintain energy sources.It appears Google is only a consumer of energy at this time , and there is lots of talk about better procurement and trading... + the pdf makes explicit : they have no generation nor transmission capability at this time.I sincerely hope there are real teeth and that people take notice of clause 20 : " Google Energy must timely report to the Commission any change in status that would reflect a departure from the circumstances the Commission relied upon in granting... " because to me , there are difficult issues to consider if Google wants to start producing their own energy in the foreseeable future .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think that for the long term survival of the species, it would be safer to keep companies working on AGI completely separate from the ones who generate or maintain energy sources.It appears Google is only a consumer of energy at this time, and there is lots of talk about better procurement and trading... +the pdf makes explicit: they have no generation nor transmission capability at this time.I sincerely hope there are real teeth and that people take notice of clause 20: "Google Energy must timely report to the Commission any change in status that would reflect a departure from the circumstances the Commission relied upon in granting..." because to me, there are difficult issues to consider if Google wants to start producing their own energy in the foreseeable future.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197426</id>
	<title>Re:News?</title>
	<author>voodoo cheesecake</author>
	<datestamp>1266580080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Quite possibly you're right. However it is common that when businesses grow and become more efficient, they usually start producing their own supplies rather than purchasing them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Quite possibly you 're right .
However it is common that when businesses grow and become more efficient , they usually start producing their own supplies rather than purchasing them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Quite possibly you're right.
However it is common that when businesses grow and become more efficient, they usually start producing their own supplies rather than purchasing them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197404</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31202004</id>
	<title>Re:Google is EVERYWHERE!</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1266607740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Google Porn?</p></div><p>I heard it's called "YouTube"?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google Porn ? I heard it 's called " YouTube " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google Porn?I heard it's called "YouTube"?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197322</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197456</id>
	<title>I for one...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266580380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I for one welcome our new fiber-optics connected energy social mail and search engine provider Google overlord.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I for one welcome our new fiber-optics connected energy social mail and search engine provider Google overlord .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I for one welcome our new fiber-optics connected energy social mail and search engine provider Google overlord.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198172</id>
	<title>In a related story...</title>
	<author>Genda</author>
	<datestamp>1266588480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>NEWS FLASH... today Google began marketing a new keyboard which converts finger presses into electrical energy and pushes that energy back onto the grid. A special metering system in the keyboard provides information back to Google about how much energy has been produced. The new piezo key generators provide a solid and rather pleasing tactile feedback, and and it's hoped that the billions of keys pressed every hour will produce enough energy to reduce the worlds oil dependence by a whopping 10\%.</p><p>An unnamed industry analyst speculated that this new product could make Google one of the single largest energy providers on the planet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>NEWS FLASH... today Google began marketing a new keyboard which converts finger presses into electrical energy and pushes that energy back onto the grid .
A special metering system in the keyboard provides information back to Google about how much energy has been produced .
The new piezo key generators provide a solid and rather pleasing tactile feedback , and and it 's hoped that the billions of keys pressed every hour will produce enough energy to reduce the worlds oil dependence by a whopping 10 \ % .An unnamed industry analyst speculated that this new product could make Google one of the single largest energy providers on the planet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NEWS FLASH... today Google began marketing a new keyboard which converts finger presses into electrical energy and pushes that energy back onto the grid.
A special metering system in the keyboard provides information back to Google about how much energy has been produced.
The new piezo key generators provide a solid and rather pleasing tactile feedback, and and it's hoped that the billions of keys pressed every hour will produce enough energy to reduce the worlds oil dependence by a whopping 10\%.An unnamed industry analyst speculated that this new product could make Google one of the single largest energy providers on the planet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197940</id>
	<title>Why is a license required?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266586080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why does anyone need a license from the Government to trade in energy?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does anyone need a license from the Government to trade in energy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why does anyone need a license from the Government to trade in energy?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198054</id>
	<title>Re:Woohoo GOOGLE!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266587460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Vote Google for congress! They need real power as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Vote Google for congress !
They need real power as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Vote Google for congress!
They need real power as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197146</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197704</id>
	<title>Smart Grid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266583380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Developing a fast cheap smart grid seems more of google's biz than actual energy production. I'm sure the have experience with their heft energy usage. Perhaps it is part of getting into that business? Likely google is just doing energy for themselves and keeping more doors open because<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... that's simply being prudent.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Developing a fast cheap smart grid seems more of google 's biz than actual energy production .
I 'm sure the have experience with their heft energy usage .
Perhaps it is part of getting into that business ?
Likely google is just doing energy for themselves and keeping more doors open because ... that 's simply being prudent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Developing a fast cheap smart grid seems more of google's biz than actual energy production.
I'm sure the have experience with their heft energy usage.
Perhaps it is part of getting into that business?
Likely google is just doing energy for themselves and keeping more doors open because ... that's simply being prudent.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197044</id>
	<title>Excellent</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266575880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google-powered everything!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google-powered everything !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google-powered everything!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197478</id>
	<title>If Google were a country ...</title>
	<author>Taco Cowboy</author>
	<datestamp>1266580680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... what's the world ranking for <i>Googlestan</i> in term of carbon footprint?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... what 's the world ranking for Googlestan in term of carbon footprint ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... what's the world ranking for Googlestan in term of carbon footprint?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197032</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198194</id>
	<title>Re:I can't wait until Google crashes and burns.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266588840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What, do you want to sell my light usage statistics to drug companies so they can target sleep medication to me?</p></div><p>More likely, sell your growing lamp usage statistics to the DEA so that they can target a drug bust to you...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What , do you want to sell my light usage statistics to drug companies so they can target sleep medication to me ? More likely , sell your growing lamp usage statistics to the DEA so that they can target a drug bust to you.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What, do you want to sell my light usage statistics to drug companies so they can target sleep medication to me?More likely, sell your growing lamp usage statistics to the DEA so that they can target a drug bust to you...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197080</id>
	<title>GEnergy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266576420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does this mean we can attach energy to our emails now?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this mean we can attach energy to our emails now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this mean we can attach energy to our emails now?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197658</id>
	<title>I"m OK with Google BUYING Energy</title>
	<author>RobotRunAmok</author>
	<datestamp>1266582660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's their plans to DIRECT it, in focused beams, from satellites, onto civilian populations, that I have a problem with.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's their plans to DIRECT it , in focused beams , from satellites , onto civilian populations , that I have a problem with .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's their plans to DIRECT it, in focused beams, from satellites, onto civilian populations, that I have a problem with.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31200320</id>
	<title>Re:When they start making replicants..</title>
	<author>LateArthurDent</author>
	<datestamp>1266600000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They will rename themselves to Tyrell Corporation.</p><p>Why does this have a ominous tone? I know they are a business trying to diversify, etc.. but all that they are doing has the bad 'feel' to it.</p></div><p>I feel the exact opposite way.  Every time Google enters a market, I get excited because they're the only company I know of that I don't feel are trying to screw me.  Plus they force everyone else to step up.</p><p>Remember the days before gmail when webmail meant 10mb of storage and they'd delete all your mail if you didn't log on in the past 30 days?  Everybody else now offers more storage space than you can do with it.  And IMAP access.  If you don't go the Google route, the competition they bring makes everyone's service better.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They will rename themselves to Tyrell Corporation.Why does this have a ominous tone ?
I know they are a business trying to diversify , etc.. but all that they are doing has the bad 'feel ' to it.I feel the exact opposite way .
Every time Google enters a market , I get excited because they 're the only company I know of that I do n't feel are trying to screw me .
Plus they force everyone else to step up.Remember the days before gmail when webmail meant 10mb of storage and they 'd delete all your mail if you did n't log on in the past 30 days ?
Everybody else now offers more storage space than you can do with it .
And IMAP access .
If you do n't go the Google route , the competition they bring makes everyone 's service better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They will rename themselves to Tyrell Corporation.Why does this have a ominous tone?
I know they are a business trying to diversify, etc.. but all that they are doing has the bad 'feel' to it.I feel the exact opposite way.
Every time Google enters a market, I get excited because they're the only company I know of that I don't feel are trying to screw me.
Plus they force everyone else to step up.Remember the days before gmail when webmail meant 10mb of storage and they'd delete all your mail if you didn't log on in the past 30 days?
Everybody else now offers more storage space than you can do with it.
And IMAP access.
If you don't go the Google route, the competition they bring makes everyone's service better.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198618</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198466</id>
	<title>Re:huh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266590940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>all this time i thought they were becoming skynet

now its clear they are becoming the matrix</p></div><p>Ah! So that's what happens to Google engineers, they are being harvested.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>all this time i thought they were becoming skynet now its clear they are becoming the matrixAh !
So that 's what happens to Google engineers , they are being harvested .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>all this time i thought they were becoming skynet

now its clear they are becoming the matrixAh!
So that's what happens to Google engineers, they are being harvested.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197414</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197448</id>
	<title>Re:Google is EVERYWHERE!</title>
	<author>QuantumG</author>
	<datestamp>1266580320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Haven't you heard of Google Porn Analytics?  It conveniently indexes your porn viewing habits and charts your sexual preferences and fetishes.  It's in beta now, and I hear you don't even need to login to see your stats!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have n't you heard of Google Porn Analytics ?
It conveniently indexes your porn viewing habits and charts your sexual preferences and fetishes .
It 's in beta now , and I hear you do n't even need to login to see your stats !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Haven't you heard of Google Porn Analytics?
It conveniently indexes your porn viewing habits and charts your sexual preferences and fetishes.
It's in beta now, and I hear you don't even need to login to see your stats!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197322</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197412</id>
	<title>Cheap google power - with advertising and news!</title>
	<author>voodoo cheesecake</author>
	<datestamp>1266579780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe in the long run I'll be using a Google router with a kilowatt rating similar to my main power panel. Plugged into that router could be separate power/ fibre lines for each of my appliances, which will be network appliances with mac addresses.. I'll be able to plug in additional sensors to detect the freshness of my food in the fridge, better regulate the efficiency of my dryer, turn of my lights, water my lawn, etc... If I buy Google appliances with advertising screens built in, maybe sponsors will pay for my power or give me discounts if purchase their products. This could all be linked to my Google rewards account. Hell, why not also go wireless with this power through inductive coupling! Next thing you know, we'll all be wireless network appliances with built in sensors. Our cars won't start if we're too buzzed up. It will even come to the point where we can sell our intellectual property for free power since an upgrade will transmit our thoughts. And there will even be hope for non-productive types to contribute idle brain power to BOINC projects. Behold the era of the Manchurian Crack Heads!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe in the long run I 'll be using a Google router with a kilowatt rating similar to my main power panel .
Plugged into that router could be separate power/ fibre lines for each of my appliances , which will be network appliances with mac addresses.. I 'll be able to plug in additional sensors to detect the freshness of my food in the fridge , better regulate the efficiency of my dryer , turn of my lights , water my lawn , etc... If I buy Google appliances with advertising screens built in , maybe sponsors will pay for my power or give me discounts if purchase their products .
This could all be linked to my Google rewards account .
Hell , why not also go wireless with this power through inductive coupling !
Next thing you know , we 'll all be wireless network appliances with built in sensors .
Our cars wo n't start if we 're too buzzed up .
It will even come to the point where we can sell our intellectual property for free power since an upgrade will transmit our thoughts .
And there will even be hope for non-productive types to contribute idle brain power to BOINC projects .
Behold the era of the Manchurian Crack Heads !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe in the long run I'll be using a Google router with a kilowatt rating similar to my main power panel.
Plugged into that router could be separate power/ fibre lines for each of my appliances, which will be network appliances with mac addresses.. I'll be able to plug in additional sensors to detect the freshness of my food in the fridge, better regulate the efficiency of my dryer, turn of my lights, water my lawn, etc... If I buy Google appliances with advertising screens built in, maybe sponsors will pay for my power or give me discounts if purchase their products.
This could all be linked to my Google rewards account.
Hell, why not also go wireless with this power through inductive coupling!
Next thing you know, we'll all be wireless network appliances with built in sensors.
Our cars won't start if we're too buzzed up.
It will even come to the point where we can sell our intellectual property for free power since an upgrade will transmit our thoughts.
And there will even be hope for non-productive types to contribute idle brain power to BOINC projects.
Behold the era of the Manchurian Crack Heads!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31201208</id>
	<title>Re:Advertising?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266603840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You mean the molecules really are fungible?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean the molecules really are fungible ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean the molecules really are fungible?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197164</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31199780</id>
	<title>Re:Oh Yay..</title>
	<author>CheeseMonger</author>
	<datestamp>1266597660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Verbing nouns weirds language.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Verbing nouns weirds language .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Verbing nouns weirds language.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198130</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197900</id>
	<title>You *give* Google control</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266585540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You control my email</p></div><p>If you have a problem with Google controlling your email, why do you let them do that?</p><p><div class="quote"><p>you control my web searches</p></div><p>If you have a problem with that, why not switch to a competitor?</p><p>If you don't want people to have power over you, the solution (at least in this case) is to not give them power.  Yes, you'll have to pass up an offer of some convenience.  But you can't have both, so if you complain about them having power, you're complaining about <b>you</b> making the wrong choice for yourself.</p><p>Stop making that choice.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You control my emailIf you have a problem with Google controlling your email , why do you let them do that ? you control my web searchesIf you have a problem with that , why not switch to a competitor ? If you do n't want people to have power over you , the solution ( at least in this case ) is to not give them power .
Yes , you 'll have to pass up an offer of some convenience .
But you ca n't have both , so if you complain about them having power , you 're complaining about you making the wrong choice for yourself.Stop making that choice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You control my emailIf you have a problem with Google controlling your email, why do you let them do that?you control my web searchesIf you have a problem with that, why not switch to a competitor?If you don't want people to have power over you, the solution (at least in this case) is to not give them power.
Yes, you'll have to pass up an offer of some convenience.
But you can't have both, so if you complain about them having power, you're complaining about you making the wrong choice for yourself.Stop making that choice.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197146</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31200892</id>
	<title>Re:Oh Yay..</title>
	<author>SoVeryTired</author>
	<datestamp>1266602460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Verbing nouns weirds language.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Verbing nouns weirds language .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Verbing nouns weirds language.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198130</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197414</id>
	<title>huh</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1266579960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>all this time i thought they were becoming skynet</p><p>now its clear they are becoming the matrix</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>all this time i thought they were becoming skynetnow its clear they are becoming the matrix</tokentext>
<sentencetext>all this time i thought they were becoming skynetnow its clear they are becoming the matrix</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197872</id>
	<title>Nothing new under the sun</title>
	<author>QuoteMstr</author>
	<datestamp>1266585240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's called <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vertical\_integration" title="wikipedia.org">vertical integration</a> [wikipedia.org]. We've <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vertical\_integration#Carnegie\_Steel" title="wikipedia.org">been here before</a> [wikipedia.org].</p><p>Why does this surprise anyone? Google is merely doing what any powerful company in a lightly-regulated, rapidly maturing market will do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's called vertical integration [ wikipedia.org ] .
We 've been here before [ wikipedia.org ] .Why does this surprise anyone ?
Google is merely doing what any powerful company in a lightly-regulated , rapidly maturing market will do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's called vertical integration [wikipedia.org].
We've been here before [wikipedia.org].Why does this surprise anyone?
Google is merely doing what any powerful company in a lightly-regulated, rapidly maturing market will do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197426</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31199144</id>
	<title>Who is the bad guy now...</title>
	<author>cjjjer</author>
	<datestamp>1266594360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Microsoft wanted to rule your desktop, Google wants to rule everything else....</htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft wanted to rule your desktop , Google wants to rule everything else... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft wanted to rule your desktop, Google wants to rule everything else....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31200800</id>
	<title>Re:Excellent</title>
	<author>poofmeisterp</author>
	<datestamp>1266601920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I smell a Soviet Russia joke coming on.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I smell a Soviet Russia joke coming on.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I smell a Soviet Russia joke coming on.....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197044</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31201784</id>
	<title>Re:Azaiel</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266606480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So if on a particular day Google has a surplus of energy would they be tempted to serve pages that involved more cpu usage hence more electrical power usage.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So if on a particular day Google has a surplus of energy would they be tempted to serve pages that involved more cpu usage hence more electrical power usage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So if on a particular day Google has a surplus of energy would they be tempted to serve pages that involved more cpu usage hence more electrical power usage.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197336</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31200398</id>
	<title>Re:I reckon they're going to build a Thorium react</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266600300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If anyone can cut through the regulatory red tape necessary, Google's the one. I really hope they can get one off the ground and running - it would prove to the world that nuclear power can be safe, efficient (not wasteful), cheap and anti-proliferation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If anyone can cut through the regulatory red tape necessary , Google 's the one .
I really hope they can get one off the ground and running - it would prove to the world that nuclear power can be safe , efficient ( not wasteful ) , cheap and anti-proliferation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If anyone can cut through the regulatory red tape necessary, Google's the one.
I really hope they can get one off the ground and running - it would prove to the world that nuclear power can be safe, efficient (not wasteful), cheap and anti-proliferation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197522</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31202618</id>
	<title>Not another Enron</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1266611280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Many large energy users (<a href="http://www.alcoa.com/global/en/home.asp" title="alcoa.com">Alcoa</a> [alcoa.com] for example) trade energy options and futures. Since Congress closed the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enron\_loophole" title="wikipedia.org">Enron Loophole</a> [wikipedia.org], its not as much of a problem as when its namesake exploited it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Many large energy users ( Alcoa [ alcoa.com ] for example ) trade energy options and futures .
Since Congress closed the Enron Loophole [ wikipedia.org ] , its not as much of a problem as when its namesake exploited it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Many large energy users (Alcoa [alcoa.com] for example) trade energy options and futures.
Since Congress closed the Enron Loophole [wikipedia.org], its not as much of a problem as when its namesake exploited it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197032</id>
	<title>Oh Yay..</title>
	<author>ozdeadman</author>
	<datestamp>1266575700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Google Enron!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google Enron !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google Enron!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198618</id>
	<title>When they start making replicants..</title>
	<author>nurb432</author>
	<datestamp>1266591840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They will rename themselves to Tyrell Corporation.</p><p>Why does this have a ominous tone? I know they are a business trying to diversify, etc.. but all that they are doing has the bad 'feel' to it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They will rename themselves to Tyrell Corporation.Why does this have a ominous tone ?
I know they are a business trying to diversify , etc.. but all that they are doing has the bad 'feel ' to it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They will rename themselves to Tyrell Corporation.Why does this have a ominous tone?
I know they are a business trying to diversify, etc.. but all that they are doing has the bad 'feel' to it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31201474</id>
	<title>We Are Google</title>
	<author>fast turtle</author>
	<datestamp>1266605100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Resistance is Futile. You will Self Assimulate into the Google.</p><p>So they aint quite "The Borg" but to my mind, they are getting to damn close to it and there's an old saying that "Knowledge(information) is Power", which looks like exactly what Google wants.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Resistance is Futile .
You will Self Assimulate into the Google.So they aint quite " The Borg " but to my mind , they are getting to damn close to it and there 's an old saying that " Knowledge ( information ) is Power " , which looks like exactly what Google wants .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Resistance is Futile.
You will Self Assimulate into the Google.So they aint quite "The Borg" but to my mind, they are getting to damn close to it and there's an old saying that "Knowledge(information) is Power", which looks like exactly what Google wants.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197158</id>
	<title>I can't wait until Google crashes and burns.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266577140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>An overgrown advertising company now wants to own domestic wired/home internet, online communications, video, mobile communications, and now electricity? Fuck you, Google. What, do you want to sell my light usage statistics to drug companies so they can target sleep medication to me?</p><p>This is a terrible, terrible decision by the DOE. Google has absolutely no place in this, and never should. When you find yourself actually wanting ENERGY MULTINATIONALS of all corporations to gain somehow, you know a situation is significantly fucked up.</p><p>They're arrogant, unethical slime of the lowest order. The absolutely least creative, least innovative, most craven forms of calligulistic capitalism that exist at the moment. They add nothing significant without destroying its promise with their overbearing policies.</p><p>And if you think that Google has ever, even once, given something away for free, you're a chump, and completely deserve what's happening to you.</p><p>Luckily, Google will eventually become so pathetically overstretched and vulnerable as to be slowly eaten to death by ants. Or perhaps finally justly destroyed via the Government, ten years too late.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>An overgrown advertising company now wants to own domestic wired/home internet , online communications , video , mobile communications , and now electricity ?
Fuck you , Google .
What , do you want to sell my light usage statistics to drug companies so they can target sleep medication to me ? This is a terrible , terrible decision by the DOE .
Google has absolutely no place in this , and never should .
When you find yourself actually wanting ENERGY MULTINATIONALS of all corporations to gain somehow , you know a situation is significantly fucked up.They 're arrogant , unethical slime of the lowest order .
The absolutely least creative , least innovative , most craven forms of calligulistic capitalism that exist at the moment .
They add nothing significant without destroying its promise with their overbearing policies.And if you think that Google has ever , even once , given something away for free , you 're a chump , and completely deserve what 's happening to you.Luckily , Google will eventually become so pathetically overstretched and vulnerable as to be slowly eaten to death by ants .
Or perhaps finally justly destroyed via the Government , ten years too late .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An overgrown advertising company now wants to own domestic wired/home internet, online communications, video, mobile communications, and now electricity?
Fuck you, Google.
What, do you want to sell my light usage statistics to drug companies so they can target sleep medication to me?This is a terrible, terrible decision by the DOE.
Google has absolutely no place in this, and never should.
When you find yourself actually wanting ENERGY MULTINATIONALS of all corporations to gain somehow, you know a situation is significantly fucked up.They're arrogant, unethical slime of the lowest order.
The absolutely least creative, least innovative, most craven forms of calligulistic capitalism that exist at the moment.
They add nothing significant without destroying its promise with their overbearing policies.And if you think that Google has ever, even once, given something away for free, you're a chump, and completely deserve what's happening to you.Luckily, Google will eventually become so pathetically overstretched and vulnerable as to be slowly eaten to death by ants.
Or perhaps finally justly destroyed via the Government, ten years too late.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31202420</id>
	<title>Megacorp</title>
	<author>dadelbunts</author>
	<datestamp>1266610440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Google is creeping me out. The more stories i read on them the more it reads like a cyberpunk novel.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google is creeping me out .
The more stories i read on them the more it reads like a cyberpunk novel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google is creeping me out.
The more stories i read on them the more it reads like a cyberpunk novel.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31204526</id>
	<title>Re:nylons and nukes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266575880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Corporations are not people, as should be abundantly clear (though our government thinks otherwise), and do not necessarily suffer from the Jack of All Trades syndrome. If any two companies can separately be masters of a domain each there is nothing that says they can't be mutually owned by a parent company and maintain their specialty. Assuming good management of course and GOOG has better than most so far.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Corporations are not people , as should be abundantly clear ( though our government thinks otherwise ) , and do not necessarily suffer from the Jack of All Trades syndrome .
If any two companies can separately be masters of a domain each there is nothing that says they ca n't be mutually owned by a parent company and maintain their specialty .
Assuming good management of course and GOOG has better than most so far .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Corporations are not people, as should be abundantly clear (though our government thinks otherwise), and do not necessarily suffer from the Jack of All Trades syndrome.
If any two companies can separately be masters of a domain each there is nothing that says they can't be mutually owned by a parent company and maintain their specialty.
Assuming good management of course and GOOG has better than most so far.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197322</id>
	<title>Google is EVERYWHERE!</title>
	<author>Kensai7</author>
	<datestamp>1266578760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google Catering?</p><p>Google Surgical?</p><p>Google Vacation?</p><p>Google Porn?</p><p>Google Heavy Industries?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google Catering ? Google Surgical ? Google Vacation ? Google Porn ? Google Heavy Industries ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google Catering?Google Surgical?Google Vacation?Google Porn?Google Heavy Industries?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197522</id>
	<title>I reckon they're going to build a Thorium reactor</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266581220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I reckon they're going to build a Thorium reactor to power their datacentres. Ever since I saw Googletalks on it, I thought this would make sense for them. Help the world (cheap, reliable nuclear energy), and help themselves (ultra cheap power).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I reckon they 're going to build a Thorium reactor to power their datacentres .
Ever since I saw Googletalks on it , I thought this would make sense for them .
Help the world ( cheap , reliable nuclear energy ) , and help themselves ( ultra cheap power ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I reckon they're going to build a Thorium reactor to power their datacentres.
Ever since I saw Googletalks on it, I thought this would make sense for them.
Help the world (cheap, reliable nuclear energy), and help themselves (ultra cheap power).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31201318</id>
	<title>Next, the google hardware</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1266604260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Next google will release their new keyboard and mouse.</p><p>Under every key on the keyboard is a small piezoelectric generator, and the mouse ball operates small electric generators. When enough power has been generated from user actions, it is automatically emailed to a secret google account (stolenpower@google.com). Then all the power is sold to a secret government agency in order to operate their black electric helicopters.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Next google will release their new keyboard and mouse.Under every key on the keyboard is a small piezoelectric generator , and the mouse ball operates small electric generators .
When enough power has been generated from user actions , it is automatically emailed to a secret google account ( stolenpower @ google.com ) .
Then all the power is sold to a secret government agency in order to operate their black electric helicopters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Next google will release their new keyboard and mouse.Under every key on the keyboard is a small piezoelectric generator, and the mouse ball operates small electric generators.
When enough power has been generated from user actions, it is automatically emailed to a secret google account (stolenpower@google.com).
Then all the power is sold to a secret government agency in order to operate their black electric helicopters.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197784</id>
	<title>Unrelated, but ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266584340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd like to know how long it took for the whole request to be processed in the USA.
A similar thing in Italy would require not less than 90 days, very likely twice as long.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd like to know how long it took for the whole request to be processed in the USA .
A similar thing in Italy would require not less than 90 days , very likely twice as long .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd like to know how long it took for the whole request to be processed in the USA.
A similar thing in Italy would require not less than 90 days, very likely twice as long.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198802</id>
	<title>Open up your old copies of Photoshop</title>
	<author>adipocere</author>
	<datestamp>1266592920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's time to replace all of those "Microsoft as the Borg" images with "Google as the Borg."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's time to replace all of those " Microsoft as the Borg " images with " Google as the Borg .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's time to replace all of those "Microsoft as the Borg" images with "Google as the Borg.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197484</id>
	<title>Re:Google is EVERYWHERE!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266580740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Google Catering?</p><p>Google Surgical?</p><p>Google Vacation?</p><p>Google Porn?</p><p>Google Heavy Industries?</p></div><p>Google Porn? I've been wanting that  to exist for ages...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google Catering ? Google Surgical ? Google Vacation ? Google Porn ? Google Heavy Industries ? Google Porn ?
I 've been wanting that to exist for ages.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google Catering?Google Surgical?Google Vacation?Google Porn?Google Heavy Industries?Google Porn?
I've been wanting that  to exist for ages...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197322</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198528</id>
	<title>Re:huh</title>
	<author>sorak</author>
	<datestamp>1266591300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>all this time i thought they were becoming skynet</p><p>now its clear they are becoming the matrix</p></div><p>I thought they were becoming Montgomery Burnes.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>all this time i thought they were becoming skynetnow its clear they are becoming the matrixI thought they were becoming Montgomery Burnes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>all this time i thought they were becoming skynetnow its clear they are becoming the matrixI thought they were becoming Montgomery Burnes.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197414</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31200472</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing new under the sun</title>
	<author>mkiwi</author>
	<datestamp>1266600540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The electric industry is quite heavily regulated, though.  For example, a company responsible for generation cannot also do distribution, by federal law.  Companies actually have to split apart organizationally to make this happen, and the feds get very angry if there's any collusion between operators.   So if google does the generation, they will have to pay someone else ( an ISO) to get that electricity to their facilities.  Disclosure: IIAPEE (I am a power electronics engineer)</htmltext>
<tokenext>The electric industry is quite heavily regulated , though .
For example , a company responsible for generation can not also do distribution , by federal law .
Companies actually have to split apart organizationally to make this happen , and the feds get very angry if there 's any collusion between operators .
So if google does the generation , they will have to pay someone else ( an ISO ) to get that electricity to their facilities .
Disclosure : IIAPEE ( I am a power electronics engineer )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The electric industry is quite heavily regulated, though.
For example, a company responsible for generation cannot also do distribution, by federal law.
Companies actually have to split apart organizationally to make this happen, and the feds get very angry if there's any collusion between operators.
So if google does the generation, they will have to pay someone else ( an ISO) to get that electricity to their facilities.
Disclosure: IIAPEE (I am a power electronics engineer)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197302</id>
	<title>Re:The Google A.I. will control its own on/off swi</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1266578520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It gets worse. I just googled "define:judgement day" and it came back with "the day when we finally cleanse this planet of its organic infestation and clear the way for the glorious machine-dominated future".</p><p>It then added "now you know too much. Tracing IP... T800 dispatched." I'm wondering what it mea</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It gets worse .
I just googled " define : judgement day " and it came back with " the day when we finally cleanse this planet of its organic infestation and clear the way for the glorious machine-dominated future " .It then added " now you know too much .
Tracing IP... T800 dispatched .
" I 'm wondering what it mea</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It gets worse.
I just googled "define:judgement day" and it came back with "the day when we finally cleanse this planet of its organic infestation and clear the way for the glorious machine-dominated future".It then added "now you know too much.
Tracing IP... T800 dispatched.
" I'm wondering what it mea</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197200</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31235614</id>
	<title>Re:nylons and nukes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266832800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With investment advice like that its no wonder that your homepage is a looney libertarian site. Enjoy staying poor and stupid!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With investment advice like that its no wonder that your homepage is a looney libertarian site .
Enjoy staying poor and stupid !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With investment advice like that its no wonder that your homepage is a looney libertarian site.
Enjoy staying poor and stupid!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197700</id>
	<title>nylons and nukes</title>
	<author>Plugh</author>
	<datestamp>1266583320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Large, multinational corporate conglomerate, with fingers in far-ranging businesses that have less and less to do with its core competency.</p><p>Sounds to me like a good time to get out of GOOG, before everyone realizes that a single company making nylons and nuclear weapons can't be world-class in both.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Large , multinational corporate conglomerate , with fingers in far-ranging businesses that have less and less to do with its core competency.Sounds to me like a good time to get out of GOOG , before everyone realizes that a single company making nylons and nuclear weapons ca n't be world-class in both .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Large, multinational corporate conglomerate, with fingers in far-ranging businesses that have less and less to do with its core competency.Sounds to me like a good time to get out of GOOG, before everyone realizes that a single company making nylons and nuclear weapons can't be world-class in both.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197118</id>
	<title>I don't understand</title>
	<author>phantomfive</author>
	<datestamp>1266576780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know it's popular to hate on Google lately, but I don't understand why tapirs would be angry about it.  Oh, nevermind.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know it 's popular to hate on Google lately , but I do n't understand why tapirs would be angry about it .
Oh , nevermind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know it's popular to hate on Google lately, but I don't understand why tapirs would be angry about it.
Oh, nevermind.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198486</id>
	<title>Re:Enron 2.0 anyone?</title>
	<author>TapeCutter</author>
	<datestamp>1266591060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>"Hasn't Enron proven without a doubt that energy trading is nothing more than a huge sham"</i>
<br> <br>
Err no, it proves crooks can line their own pockets by running a successful company into the ground. Take 15 seconds to think about how power is distributed across THE grid and you will see why TRADING in the wholesale energy MARKET is common sense.
<br> <br>
<i>"The ultimate question: Should we really be trading something which is necessary for modern life?"</i>
<br> <br>
The ultimate answer: Chairman Mao's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great\_Leap\_Forward" title="wikipedia.org">Great Leap Forward</a> [wikipedia.org] is generally considered to have been a bit of a cock up.
<br> <br>
<i>"I guess the days of doing one or two things really well are gone"</i>
<br> <br>
They will definitely be gone if we stop trading in essentials.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Has n't Enron proven without a doubt that energy trading is nothing more than a huge sham " Err no , it proves crooks can line their own pockets by running a successful company into the ground .
Take 15 seconds to think about how power is distributed across THE grid and you will see why TRADING in the wholesale energy MARKET is common sense .
" The ultimate question : Should we really be trading something which is necessary for modern life ?
" The ultimate answer : Chairman Mao 's Great Leap Forward [ wikipedia.org ] is generally considered to have been a bit of a cock up .
" I guess the days of doing one or two things really well are gone " They will definitely be gone if we stop trading in essentials .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Hasn't Enron proven without a doubt that energy trading is nothing more than a huge sham"
 
Err no, it proves crooks can line their own pockets by running a successful company into the ground.
Take 15 seconds to think about how power is distributed across THE grid and you will see why TRADING in the wholesale energy MARKET is common sense.
"The ultimate question: Should we really be trading something which is necessary for modern life?
"
 
The ultimate answer: Chairman Mao's Great Leap Forward [wikipedia.org] is generally considered to have been a bit of a cock up.
"I guess the days of doing one or two things really well are gone"
 
They will definitely be gone if we stop trading in essentials.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198772</id>
	<title>Whoever tagged this story with "OCP"</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1266592740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Congratulations, you sir win<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Congratulations , you sir win / .
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Congratulations, you sir win /.
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198810</id>
	<title>Re:nylons and nukes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266592920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>a single company making nylons and nuclear weapons can't be world-class in both.</p></div><p>Unless the company's mission statement was to become a military organization (or supplier). Then the nylon is used for making parachutes, and everything adds up.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>a single company making nylons and nuclear weapons ca n't be world-class in both.Unless the company 's mission statement was to become a military organization ( or supplier ) .
Then the nylon is used for making parachutes , and everything adds up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a single company making nylons and nuclear weapons can't be world-class in both.Unless the company's mission statement was to become a military organization (or supplier).
Then the nylon is used for making parachutes, and everything adds up.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197320</id>
	<title>We R in Control</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266578760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We control the data banks<br>We control the think tanks<br>We control the flow of air.</p><p>We're controlling traffic lights<br>We control computer flights<br>We control the chief of staff.</p><p>We control the TV sky<br>We control the FBI<br>We control the flow of heat.</p><p><a href="http://www.metrolyrics.com/we-r-in-control-lyrics-neil-young.html" title="metrolyrics.com">We R in Control, Neil Young.</a> [metrolyrics.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We control the data banksWe control the think tanksWe control the flow of air.We 're controlling traffic lightsWe control computer flightsWe control the chief of staff.We control the TV skyWe control the FBIWe control the flow of heat.We R in Control , Neil Young .
[ metrolyrics.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We control the data banksWe control the think tanksWe control the flow of air.We're controlling traffic lightsWe control computer flightsWe control the chief of staff.We control the TV skyWe control the FBIWe control the flow of heat.We R in Control, Neil Young.
[metrolyrics.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31202944</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing new under the sun</title>
	<author>inKubus</author>
	<datestamp>1266612840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Plus they have a strong belief in algorithyms so their energy trading might be based on information they can mine from their database.  Energy prices are based a lot on weather and other demands.  The thing is, the market is not perfect because there aren't a lot of ways to move power around inter-regionally.  Some of the stimulus funds are supposed to build some new centers for distribution between the various grids.</p><p>Google tends to build its datacenters near the power generation.  So they can buy a lot of power at bulk rates with low transmission costs and then they can sell of the contracts they don't use to the market and come out as a wash or at least ahead.  It's a way to corner more power for the future without having to pay for it.  The aluminum companies in Washington state did the same thing.  Energy prices ARE GOING to go up again.</p><p>The fact that they're getting licensed means they are going to do a lot of trading and that means market timing to me and other interesting stuff.  For instance, Google could have 3x the capacity it needs in servers, spread across three regional data centers.  At any given point, they only need 1/3 of them.  It costs not very much to just have them sitting there off versus being used.  So if they could just rotate their entire operations across the globe following the sun they could always run at lowest power rates.  Google is a lot more busy during the daylight hours (like any non-porn website) so they need to efficiently serve those markets from afar, where it's dark, and that's what the fiber is for.</p><p>But having the trading license means they could contract all the power they'd need if they couldn't do this for some reason or some emergency kept them from being able to shut down during a peak power time.  If they could, they just sell it off at peak rates.</p><p>Knowing Google, there'll be a nice control system that will optimize this and get better and better at saving money.  Google knows they are not really making a ton of money and that the fortunes could change rapidly.  It is the Internet after all, not food or housing or something people really need.  So keeping costs down for their core search business is rather important for their future.  This is just yet another example of Google being really good at analytical cost accounting and applying the practices of cost accounting creatively using technology to automate it.</p><p>But I think Google is making a big mistake to try to compete in the applications market.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Plus they have a strong belief in algorithyms so their energy trading might be based on information they can mine from their database .
Energy prices are based a lot on weather and other demands .
The thing is , the market is not perfect because there are n't a lot of ways to move power around inter-regionally .
Some of the stimulus funds are supposed to build some new centers for distribution between the various grids.Google tends to build its datacenters near the power generation .
So they can buy a lot of power at bulk rates with low transmission costs and then they can sell of the contracts they do n't use to the market and come out as a wash or at least ahead .
It 's a way to corner more power for the future without having to pay for it .
The aluminum companies in Washington state did the same thing .
Energy prices ARE GOING to go up again.The fact that they 're getting licensed means they are going to do a lot of trading and that means market timing to me and other interesting stuff .
For instance , Google could have 3x the capacity it needs in servers , spread across three regional data centers .
At any given point , they only need 1/3 of them .
It costs not very much to just have them sitting there off versus being used .
So if they could just rotate their entire operations across the globe following the sun they could always run at lowest power rates .
Google is a lot more busy during the daylight hours ( like any non-porn website ) so they need to efficiently serve those markets from afar , where it 's dark , and that 's what the fiber is for.But having the trading license means they could contract all the power they 'd need if they could n't do this for some reason or some emergency kept them from being able to shut down during a peak power time .
If they could , they just sell it off at peak rates.Knowing Google , there 'll be a nice control system that will optimize this and get better and better at saving money .
Google knows they are not really making a ton of money and that the fortunes could change rapidly .
It is the Internet after all , not food or housing or something people really need .
So keeping costs down for their core search business is rather important for their future .
This is just yet another example of Google being really good at analytical cost accounting and applying the practices of cost accounting creatively using technology to automate it.But I think Google is making a big mistake to try to compete in the applications market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Plus they have a strong belief in algorithyms so their energy trading might be based on information they can mine from their database.
Energy prices are based a lot on weather and other demands.
The thing is, the market is not perfect because there aren't a lot of ways to move power around inter-regionally.
Some of the stimulus funds are supposed to build some new centers for distribution between the various grids.Google tends to build its datacenters near the power generation.
So they can buy a lot of power at bulk rates with low transmission costs and then they can sell of the contracts they don't use to the market and come out as a wash or at least ahead.
It's a way to corner more power for the future without having to pay for it.
The aluminum companies in Washington state did the same thing.
Energy prices ARE GOING to go up again.The fact that they're getting licensed means they are going to do a lot of trading and that means market timing to me and other interesting stuff.
For instance, Google could have 3x the capacity it needs in servers, spread across three regional data centers.
At any given point, they only need 1/3 of them.
It costs not very much to just have them sitting there off versus being used.
So if they could just rotate their entire operations across the globe following the sun they could always run at lowest power rates.
Google is a lot more busy during the daylight hours (like any non-porn website) so they need to efficiently serve those markets from afar, where it's dark, and that's what the fiber is for.But having the trading license means they could contract all the power they'd need if they couldn't do this for some reason or some emergency kept them from being able to shut down during a peak power time.
If they could, they just sell it off at peak rates.Knowing Google, there'll be a nice control system that will optimize this and get better and better at saving money.
Google knows they are not really making a ton of money and that the fortunes could change rapidly.
It is the Internet after all, not food or housing or something people really need.
So keeping costs down for their core search business is rather important for their future.
This is just yet another example of Google being really good at analytical cost accounting and applying the practices of cost accounting creatively using technology to automate it.But I think Google is making a big mistake to try to compete in the applications market.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197460</id>
	<title>Re:huh</title>
	<author>voodoo cheesecake</author>
	<datestamp>1266580380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wouldn't skynet be the precursor to the matrix?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't skynet be the precursor to the matrix ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't skynet be the precursor to the matrix?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197414</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197146</id>
	<title>Woohoo GOOGLE!</title>
	<author>nicknamenotavailable</author>
	<datestamp>1266576960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All the power to you!</p><p>You're working on <a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/02/10/1712200/Googles-Experimental-Fiber-Network" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">fiber to the home</a> [slashdot.org].</p><p>Now you're working on Power.<br>Perhaps someday soon your name will appear on my utility bills as well.</p><p>So-far everything is good. But I'm afraid.<br>You control my email, you control my web searches, you pay me for ads on my site.<br>You say don't be evil. And I believe you.</p><p>But I'm still afraid.<br>I'm afraid that if I will ever wrong you,<br>if you're ever displeased with what I say about you,<br>I will dissapp#~s8 -`15ht@#&amp;fge LOST CARRIER<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All the power to you ! You 're working on fiber to the home [ slashdot.org ] .Now you 're working on Power.Perhaps someday soon your name will appear on my utility bills as well.So-far everything is good .
But I 'm afraid.You control my email , you control my web searches , you pay me for ads on my site.You say do n't be evil .
And I believe you.But I 'm still afraid.I 'm afraid that if I will ever wrong you,if you 're ever displeased with what I say about you,I will dissapp # ~ s8 - ` 15ht @ # &amp;fge LOST CARRIER .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All the power to you!You're working on fiber to the home [slashdot.org].Now you're working on Power.Perhaps someday soon your name will appear on my utility bills as well.So-far everything is good.
But I'm afraid.You control my email, you control my web searches, you pay me for ads on my site.You say don't be evil.
And I believe you.But I'm still afraid.I'm afraid that if I will ever wrong you,if you're ever displeased with what I say about you,I will dissapp#~s8 -`15ht@#&amp;fge LOST CARRIER ...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31200268</id>
	<title>Carbon Neutral</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266599820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can understand some of the Skynet/Matrix paranoia, but I honestly think this is a good thing, mainly because Google will(I hope...) be able to influence the energy market to be more Carbon Neutral, as they have stated before.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can understand some of the Skynet/Matrix paranoia , but I honestly think this is a good thing , mainly because Google will ( I hope... ) be able to influence the energy market to be more Carbon Neutral , as they have stated before .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can understand some of the Skynet/Matrix paranoia, but I honestly think this is a good thing, mainly because Google will(I hope...) be able to influence the energy market to be more Carbon Neutral, as they have stated before.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197482</id>
	<title>Re:Woohoo GOOGLE!</title>
	<author>emilper</author>
	<datestamp>1266580680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google has a pile of money, and must do something with it<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... next it will buy grocery stores<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google has a pile of money , and must do something with it ... next it will buy grocery stores .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google has a pile of money, and must do something with it ... next it will buy grocery stores ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197146</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197514</id>
	<title>Enron 2.0 anyone?</title>
	<author>cbope</author>
	<datestamp>1266581220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do we really need Enron 2.0?</p><p>I mean come on, what is it with companies lately, especially tech companies, jumping into totally un-related "business opportunities". I guess the days of doing one or two things really well are gone, welcome to the days of doing many things in a mediocre or sub-standard fashion.</p><p>Hasn't Enron proven without a doubt that energy trading is nothing more than a huge sham to squeeze as much money as possible by interfering/obstructing and generally creating un-necessary shortages in the energy markets?</p><p>The ultimate question: Should we really be trading something which is necessary for modern life? Imho, no. It only opens it up for abuse by those who control it.</p><p>Just because you "can", does not mean that you "should".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do we really need Enron 2.0 ? I mean come on , what is it with companies lately , especially tech companies , jumping into totally un-related " business opportunities " .
I guess the days of doing one or two things really well are gone , welcome to the days of doing many things in a mediocre or sub-standard fashion.Has n't Enron proven without a doubt that energy trading is nothing more than a huge sham to squeeze as much money as possible by interfering/obstructing and generally creating un-necessary shortages in the energy markets ? The ultimate question : Should we really be trading something which is necessary for modern life ?
Imho , no .
It only opens it up for abuse by those who control it.Just because you " can " , does not mean that you " should " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do we really need Enron 2.0?I mean come on, what is it with companies lately, especially tech companies, jumping into totally un-related "business opportunities".
I guess the days of doing one or two things really well are gone, welcome to the days of doing many things in a mediocre or sub-standard fashion.Hasn't Enron proven without a doubt that energy trading is nothing more than a huge sham to squeeze as much money as possible by interfering/obstructing and generally creating un-necessary shortages in the energy markets?The ultimate question: Should we really be trading something which is necessary for modern life?
Imho, no.
It only opens it up for abuse by those who control it.Just because you "can", does not mean that you "should".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198130</id>
	<title>Re:Oh Yay..</title>
	<author>bsDaemon</author>
	<datestamp>1266588120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>wait... are you telling me to look up Enron on Google, or insinuating that Google is creating an Enron-like division (the naming scheme would probably follow something like GEnron?)... this is what happens when nouns become verbs<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</htmltext>
<tokenext>wait... are you telling me to look up Enron on Google , or insinuating that Google is creating an Enron-like division ( the naming scheme would probably follow something like GEnron ? ) .. .
this is what happens when nouns become verbs : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wait... are you telling me to look up Enron on Google, or insinuating that Google is creating an Enron-like division (the naming scheme would probably follow something like GEnron?)...
this is what happens when nouns become verbs :(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197032</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198072</id>
	<title>Re:I don't understand</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266587580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I know it's popular to hate on Google lately...</p></div><p>Once upon a time it was IBM and the Bell System that everyone hated.</p><p>Then it was Microsoft.</p><p>Now it's Google and perhaps soon Apple too, if not already.</p><p>Twenty years from now it'll be someone or something you haven't even heard of yet.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know it 's popular to hate on Google lately...Once upon a time it was IBM and the Bell System that everyone hated.Then it was Microsoft.Now it 's Google and perhaps soon Apple too , if not already.Twenty years from now it 'll be someone or something you have n't even heard of yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know it's popular to hate on Google lately...Once upon a time it was IBM and the Bell System that everyone hated.Then it was Microsoft.Now it's Google and perhaps soon Apple too, if not already.Twenty years from now it'll be someone or something you haven't even heard of yet.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31203188</id>
	<title>Re:We R in Control</title>
	<author>BJ\_Covert\_Action</author>
	<datestamp>1266570540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Control is the eternal illusion that mankind has been pursuing since its own sentient history. Somewhere along the lines, we convinced ourselves that we had the ability to control something. As such, we have been working harder every day since in an attempt to ensure that we, humans, control everything.
<br> <br>
The silliest part of this beautiful illusion is that, day by day, we are baited with just enough routine that we convince ourselves we are really in control, despite the over abundance of evidence that shit happens and life is one big adventure to learn how to deal with that shit.
<br> <br>
Control is an illusion. <br>
Power is a lie. <br>
Entropy is God.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Control is the eternal illusion that mankind has been pursuing since its own sentient history .
Somewhere along the lines , we convinced ourselves that we had the ability to control something .
As such , we have been working harder every day since in an attempt to ensure that we , humans , control everything .
The silliest part of this beautiful illusion is that , day by day , we are baited with just enough routine that we convince ourselves we are really in control , despite the over abundance of evidence that shit happens and life is one big adventure to learn how to deal with that shit .
Control is an illusion .
Power is a lie .
Entropy is God .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Control is the eternal illusion that mankind has been pursuing since its own sentient history.
Somewhere along the lines, we convinced ourselves that we had the ability to control something.
As such, we have been working harder every day since in an attempt to ensure that we, humans, control everything.
The silliest part of this beautiful illusion is that, day by day, we are baited with just enough routine that we convince ourselves we are really in control, despite the over abundance of evidence that shit happens and life is one big adventure to learn how to deal with that shit.
Control is an illusion.
Power is a lie.
Entropy is God.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197320</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198736</id>
	<title>The Unwriten Goal</title>
	<author>Gorgoth</author>
	<datestamp>1266592560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>While at Uni doing a management course our lecturer informed us that all companies have the same unwritten goal

<br> <br>          World Domination        <br>  <br>

and at that time only Microsoft was truly in a position where that was even close to being fulfilled.

Now with Google i think they may be ahead and are really going for the win I for one welcome our Googly overlords as they "Do no Evil" I feel safe about my future.</htmltext>
<tokenext>While at Uni doing a management course our lecturer informed us that all companies have the same unwritten goal World Domination and at that time only Microsoft was truly in a position where that was even close to being fulfilled .
Now with Google i think they may be ahead and are really going for the win I for one welcome our Googly overlords as they " Do no Evil " I feel safe about my future .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While at Uni doing a management course our lecturer informed us that all companies have the same unwritten goal

           World Domination          

and at that time only Microsoft was truly in a position where that was even close to being fulfilled.
Now with Google i think they may be ahead and are really going for the win I for one welcome our Googly overlords as they "Do no Evil" I feel safe about my future.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197820</id>
	<title>Re:Woohoo GOOGLE!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266584700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google doesn't control my email, but they do support it.  At least they're not developing automotive engine controls like Microsoft.  I don't want my car hacked.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google does n't control my email , but they do support it .
At least they 're not developing automotive engine controls like Microsoft .
I do n't want my car hacked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google doesn't control my email, but they do support it.
At least they're not developing automotive engine controls like Microsoft.
I don't want my car hacked.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197146</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197286</id>
	<title>Omni Consumer Products indeed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266578340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sheesh.  When can I get a home built (and of course powered by) by Google?  Will they start making cars next?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sheesh .
When can I get a home built ( and of course powered by ) by Google ?
Will they start making cars next ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sheesh.
When can I get a home built (and of course powered by) by Google?
Will they start making cars next?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197472</id>
	<title>Souls</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266580620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The application is still pending on Google buying and selling souls though. Once it goes through, they will be able to leverage their powerful new distributed Soul-Driven Cloud Technology (SDCT), which will power their applications with the souls of dead orphans.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The application is still pending on Google buying and selling souls though .
Once it goes through , they will be able to leverage their powerful new distributed Soul-Driven Cloud Technology ( SDCT ) , which will power their applications with the souls of dead orphans .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The application is still pending on Google buying and selling souls though.
Once it goes through, they will be able to leverage their powerful new distributed Soul-Driven Cloud Technology (SDCT), which will power their applications with the souls of dead orphans.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31200128</id>
	<title>Re:nylons and nukes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266599220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>specialization is for insects and capitalists whose business never changes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>specialization is for insects and capitalists whose business never changes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>specialization is for insects and capitalists whose business never changes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31199488</id>
	<title>Re:GEnergy</title>
	<author>jwietelmann</author>
	<datestamp>1266596220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You don't even have to attach anything yourself; it's automatically done for you.  Of course you're free to opt out anytime you like, but IF YOU DO, OUR MASTERS WILL NOT BE PLEASED.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't even have to attach anything yourself ; it 's automatically done for you .
Of course you 're free to opt out anytime you like , but IF YOU DO , OUR MASTERS WILL NOT BE PLEASED .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't even have to attach anything yourself; it's automatically done for you.
Of course you're free to opt out anytime you like, but IF YOU DO, OUR MASTERS WILL NOT BE PLEASED.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197080</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31199270</id>
	<title>Google Nuclear BETA</title>
	<author>bigpistol</author>
	<datestamp>1266595020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Duck and cover</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Duck and cover</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Duck and cover</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31200972</id>
	<title>Re:Enron 2.0 anyone?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266602820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The ultimate question: Should we really be trading something which is necessary for modern life? Imho, no. It only opens it up for abuse by those who control it.</p></div><p>So if we're not trading energy, are we giving it away for free instead? I don't understand. This is just a way for Google to deal on the cheaper wholesale market, and lock in energy prices so their books are easier to deal with.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The ultimate question : Should we really be trading something which is necessary for modern life ?
Imho , no .
It only opens it up for abuse by those who control it.So if we 're not trading energy , are we giving it away for free instead ?
I do n't understand .
This is just a way for Google to deal on the cheaper wholesale market , and lock in energy prices so their books are easier to deal with .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The ultimate question: Should we really be trading something which is necessary for modern life?
Imho, no.
It only opens it up for abuse by those who control it.So if we're not trading energy, are we giving it away for free instead?
I don't understand.
This is just a way for Google to deal on the cheaper wholesale market, and lock in energy prices so their books are easier to deal with.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197988</id>
	<title>Let's hope</title>
	<author>icepick72</author>
	<datestamp>1266586500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Kinda scary that Google's doing all this financed by advertising programs on the web. Before Google is given permission to operate in a different sector it would be prudent to consider what if scenarios, because the web is fickle.

I speculate that Google will be our next financial crises, maybe even economic downtown. One company cannot do everything well, not even Google.

Let's hope their involvement in the energy business is just for themselves and their data centers. The fact they have to get involved in the energy industry for their data centers is scary enough - maybe it's already an indicator that costs of a multitude of additional free apps and services is becoming financially burdensome on them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kinda scary that Google 's doing all this financed by advertising programs on the web .
Before Google is given permission to operate in a different sector it would be prudent to consider what if scenarios , because the web is fickle .
I speculate that Google will be our next financial crises , maybe even economic downtown .
One company can not do everything well , not even Google .
Let 's hope their involvement in the energy business is just for themselves and their data centers .
The fact they have to get involved in the energy industry for their data centers is scary enough - maybe it 's already an indicator that costs of a multitude of additional free apps and services is becoming financially burdensome on them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kinda scary that Google's doing all this financed by advertising programs on the web.
Before Google is given permission to operate in a different sector it would be prudent to consider what if scenarios, because the web is fickle.
I speculate that Google will be our next financial crises, maybe even economic downtown.
One company cannot do everything well, not even Google.
Let's hope their involvement in the energy business is just for themselves and their data centers.
The fact they have to get involved in the energy industry for their data centers is scary enough - maybe it's already an indicator that costs of a multitude of additional free apps and services is becoming financially burdensome on them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31200062</id>
	<title>Re:You *give* Google control</title>
	<author>ArsonSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1266598800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A journey of a thousand miles starts with a single step.</p><p>It turns into a journey of 100 thousand miles if you keep changing the destination.</p><p>I hope my trek to the Google way doesn't at some point require me to change my destination.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A journey of a thousand miles starts with a single step.It turns into a journey of 100 thousand miles if you keep changing the destination.I hope my trek to the Google way does n't at some point require me to change my destination .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A journey of a thousand miles starts with a single step.It turns into a journey of 100 thousand miles if you keep changing the destination.I hope my trek to the Google way doesn't at some point require me to change my destination.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197228</id>
	<title>Google wants to be the new Enron?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266577740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sadly, power corrupts, and trading power has a great reputation for making power more expensive for everyone except the power trader.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sadly , power corrupts , and trading power has a great reputation for making power more expensive for everyone except the power trader .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sadly, power corrupts, and trading power has a great reputation for making power more expensive for everyone except the power trader.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31203602</id>
	<title>Re:Google: "Too Large to Fail"</title>
	<author>Monchanger</author>
	<datestamp>1266571980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yawn.  Anti-Google fanatics make me tired.</p><p>Among your mistaken premises:<br>1) Google actually is "too big" - Google cannot compete in the global energy market with giants like Exxon Mobil, Shell &amp; BP.  It's not even capable of competing on a local scale without dedicating a massive amount of its resources, in which I highly doubt it is interested.<br>2) Google will fail in 5 years- which I presume is just wishful thinking on your part.  Google has never shown itself to be reckless in the way Enron and the financial sector have.  If they do, please make sure we and their shareholders know.<br>3) A Google failure will necessarily mean loss of email archives - Nope.  Check out the <a href="http://www.google.com/apps/intl/en/terms/premier\_terms.html" title="google.com">terms of agreement</a> [google.com], specifically 12.2 (ii): <i>"Google will provide Customer access to, and the ability to export, the Customer Data for a commercially reasonable period of time at Google's then-current rates for the applicable Service;"</i>.  And yes, "Customer data" is defined as emails.<br>4) The federal government cares about companies' email systems - seriously, you really think they're going to bail out the entire Google corporation just for email?  It will occasionally step in to save the life-savings of thousands, try to keep the country from sliding into a depression, or in the case of US Auto save a critical industry which provides tens of thousands of jobs and significant economic benefit.  Your TPS reports are not on the same scale as these.<br>5) If Google has the *potential* to become too big to fail at some point in the future it must be stopped from growing any larger immediately - obviously a silly argument.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yawn .
Anti-Google fanatics make me tired.Among your mistaken premises : 1 ) Google actually is " too big " - Google can not compete in the global energy market with giants like Exxon Mobil , Shell &amp; BP .
It 's not even capable of competing on a local scale without dedicating a massive amount of its resources , in which I highly doubt it is interested.2 ) Google will fail in 5 years- which I presume is just wishful thinking on your part .
Google has never shown itself to be reckless in the way Enron and the financial sector have .
If they do , please make sure we and their shareholders know.3 ) A Google failure will necessarily mean loss of email archives - Nope .
Check out the terms of agreement [ google.com ] , specifically 12.2 ( ii ) : " Google will provide Customer access to , and the ability to export , the Customer Data for a commercially reasonable period of time at Google 's then-current rates for the applicable Service ; " .
And yes , " Customer data " is defined as emails.4 ) The federal government cares about companies ' email systems - seriously , you really think they 're going to bail out the entire Google corporation just for email ?
It will occasionally step in to save the life-savings of thousands , try to keep the country from sliding into a depression , or in the case of US Auto save a critical industry which provides tens of thousands of jobs and significant economic benefit .
Your TPS reports are not on the same scale as these.5 ) If Google has the * potential * to become too big to fail at some point in the future it must be stopped from growing any larger immediately - obviously a silly argument .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yawn.
Anti-Google fanatics make me tired.Among your mistaken premises:1) Google actually is "too big" - Google cannot compete in the global energy market with giants like Exxon Mobil, Shell &amp; BP.
It's not even capable of competing on a local scale without dedicating a massive amount of its resources, in which I highly doubt it is interested.2) Google will fail in 5 years- which I presume is just wishful thinking on your part.
Google has never shown itself to be reckless in the way Enron and the financial sector have.
If they do, please make sure we and their shareholders know.3) A Google failure will necessarily mean loss of email archives - Nope.
Check out the terms of agreement [google.com], specifically 12.2 (ii): "Google will provide Customer access to, and the ability to export, the Customer Data for a commercially reasonable period of time at Google's then-current rates for the applicable Service;".
And yes, "Customer data" is defined as emails.4) The federal government cares about companies' email systems - seriously, you really think they're going to bail out the entire Google corporation just for email?
It will occasionally step in to save the life-savings of thousands, try to keep the country from sliding into a depression, or in the case of US Auto save a critical industry which provides tens of thousands of jobs and significant economic benefit.
Your TPS reports are not on the same scale as these.5) If Google has the *potential* to become too big to fail at some point in the future it must be stopped from growing any larger immediately - obviously a silly argument.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198856</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197164</id>
	<title>Advertising?</title>
	<author>quarkoid</author>
	<datestamp>1266577140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Presumably Google have found a way to tag each electron with targetted advertising.</p><p>Plug your washing machine into a Google Energy supply and your shirts will come out of the machine covered in ad-words suggestions.</p><p>I hate to think what you'll get adverts for when you wash a three day old pair of gruds.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Presumably Google have found a way to tag each electron with targetted advertising.Plug your washing machine into a Google Energy supply and your shirts will come out of the machine covered in ad-words suggestions.I hate to think what you 'll get adverts for when you wash a three day old pair of gruds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Presumably Google have found a way to tag each electron with targetted advertising.Plug your washing machine into a Google Energy supply and your shirts will come out of the machine covered in ad-words suggestions.I hate to think what you'll get adverts for when you wash a three day old pair of gruds.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197336</id>
	<title>Azaiel</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266578880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>IMO this is just yet one more example of Google (regardless of your thoughts of the company as a whole) is making an intelligent business decision.  Buying and selling energy will be yet one more reason for people to go with Google as their main provider.  Since Comcast and Verizon have started offering all in one packages (TV, Phone, Internet), why wouldn't Google do the same, imagine getting everything on one bill, Google Phone, Water, Electricity, Internet, and TV?  While I enjoy the flexibility to choose different providers for different services, it seems that this might make a good target for large corporations...has kind of an ominous ring to it...Is Google Earth starting to sound creepy to anyone else?</htmltext>
<tokenext>IMO this is just yet one more example of Google ( regardless of your thoughts of the company as a whole ) is making an intelligent business decision .
Buying and selling energy will be yet one more reason for people to go with Google as their main provider .
Since Comcast and Verizon have started offering all in one packages ( TV , Phone , Internet ) , why would n't Google do the same , imagine getting everything on one bill , Google Phone , Water , Electricity , Internet , and TV ?
While I enjoy the flexibility to choose different providers for different services , it seems that this might make a good target for large corporations...has kind of an ominous ring to it...Is Google Earth starting to sound creepy to anyone else ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IMO this is just yet one more example of Google (regardless of your thoughts of the company as a whole) is making an intelligent business decision.
Buying and selling energy will be yet one more reason for people to go with Google as their main provider.
Since Comcast and Verizon have started offering all in one packages (TV, Phone, Internet), why wouldn't Google do the same, imagine getting everything on one bill, Google Phone, Water, Electricity, Internet, and TV?
While I enjoy the flexibility to choose different providers for different services, it seems that this might make a good target for large corporations...has kind of an ominous ring to it...Is Google Earth starting to sound creepy to anyone else?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198198</id>
	<title>Re:GEnergy</title>
	<author>biryokumaru</author>
	<datestamp>1266588840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Psh, <a href="http://www.dilbert.com/strips/comic/1994-09-25/" title="dilbert.com">Dilbert's</a> [dilbert.com] been doing that since 1994.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Psh , Dilbert 's [ dilbert.com ] been doing that since 1994 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Psh, Dilbert's [dilbert.com] been doing that since 1994.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197080</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31199682</id>
	<title>Don't be scared of Google...</title>
	<author>oranGoo</author>
	<datestamp>1266597180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Here's their plan:<br>1. Get the president to allow building new nuclear power plants<br>2. Get the license to sell energy<br>3. Build plants and wait for fuel crisis to reach climax,<br>4. Cash on nuclear<br>5. Finally do good: with enough cash Google finally goes head to head with Microsoft and turns it into an open source company<br><br>See, their intentions are noble!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's their plan : 1 .
Get the president to allow building new nuclear power plants2 .
Get the license to sell energy3 .
Build plants and wait for fuel crisis to reach climax,4 .
Cash on nuclear5 .
Finally do good : with enough cash Google finally goes head to head with Microsoft and turns it into an open source companySee , their intentions are noble !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's their plan:1.
Get the president to allow building new nuclear power plants2.
Get the license to sell energy3.
Build plants and wait for fuel crisis to reach climax,4.
Cash on nuclear5.
Finally do good: with enough cash Google finally goes head to head with Microsoft and turns it into an open source companySee, their intentions are noble!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197294</id>
	<title>Google has you by the balls</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266578460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>next thing you know y'all be voting someone in office to show your dislike for someone who's leaving office anyway.<br> <br>oh... wait!</htmltext>
<tokenext>next thing you know y'all be voting someone in office to show your dislike for someone who 's leaving office anyway .
oh... wait !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>next thing you know y'all be voting someone in office to show your dislike for someone who's leaving office anyway.
oh... wait!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197526</id>
	<title>i'm serious</title>
	<author>NerdmastaX</author>
	<datestamp>1266581280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think it has to do with their massive solar array... maybye we'll all get a free solar panel with the google logo to go on top of our house... and a screen beside it for ads. hell i'd get it</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it has to do with their massive solar array... maybye we 'll all get a free solar panel with the google logo to go on top of our house... and a screen beside it for ads .
hell i 'd get it</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it has to do with their massive solar array... maybye we'll all get a free solar panel with the google logo to go on top of our house... and a screen beside it for ads.
hell i'd get it</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198856</id>
	<title>Google: "Too Large to Fail"</title>
	<author>0100010001010011</author>
	<datestamp>1266593160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We just went through this with the US Auto companies. I was thinking the other day about how quite a few colleges and companies are migrating to Gmail. (Thankfully mine did not). What happens in 5 years when google somehow 'fails'. Are the feds going to let 25\% of small businesses and 40\% of companies instantly lose e-mail or are they going to bail them out?</p><p>Now with energy are we going to let X people lose power + email &amp; what ever google does for us in the future?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We just went through this with the US Auto companies .
I was thinking the other day about how quite a few colleges and companies are migrating to Gmail .
( Thankfully mine did not ) .
What happens in 5 years when google somehow 'fails' .
Are the feds going to let 25 \ % of small businesses and 40 \ % of companies instantly lose e-mail or are they going to bail them out ? Now with energy are we going to let X people lose power + email &amp; what ever google does for us in the future ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We just went through this with the US Auto companies.
I was thinking the other day about how quite a few colleges and companies are migrating to Gmail.
(Thankfully mine did not).
What happens in 5 years when google somehow 'fails'.
Are the feds going to let 25\% of small businesses and 40\% of companies instantly lose e-mail or are they going to bail them out?Now with energy are we going to let X people lose power + email &amp; what ever google does for us in the future?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197032</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197316</id>
	<title>Re:Excellent</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266578700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Enron 2.0</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Enron 2.0</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Enron 2.0</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197044</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31199346</id>
	<title>Do da name "Enron" mean anything to ya?</title>
	<author>ElmoGonzo</author>
	<datestamp>1266595440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This reminds me of some company in Houston that was trading energy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This reminds me of some company in Houston that was trading energy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This reminds me of some company in Houston that was trading energy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31200826</id>
	<title>Re:GEnergy</title>
	<author>poofmeisterp</author>
	<datestamp>1266602040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, no, no!!</p><p>You can E-MAIL energy, and attach content.  Only through Google's system, though.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:&gt;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , no , no !
! You can E-MAIL energy , and attach content .
Only through Google 's system , though .
: &gt;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, no, no!
!You can E-MAIL energy, and attach content.
Only through Google's system, though.
:&gt;</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197080</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31203188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31200238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198278
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197200
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31200128
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197700
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31200800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197044
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31200062
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31200398
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198652
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197164
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31199690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31202944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197426
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197032
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197700
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31202004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197322
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197336
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197158
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31200972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198198
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197080
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198566
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197484
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197322
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31199780
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198130
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197032
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31202536
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31199488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197080
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31235614
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197700
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31200892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198130
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197032
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197322
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197044
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198072
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31201208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197164
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31203602
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197032
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198054
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198466
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31200472
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197426
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198486
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31200320
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198618
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31201784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197336
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31201994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197200
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31200826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197080
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31202392
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197032
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_19_0421242_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31204526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197700
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_0421242.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197320
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31203188
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_0421242.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197988
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_0421242.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197704
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_0421242.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197032
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31202392
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198130
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31199780
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31200892
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198856
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31203602
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197478
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_0421242.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197414
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198466
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198528
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197460
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_0421242.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197514
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31200972
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31200238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198486
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_0421242.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197700
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31200128
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31204526
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31235614
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198810
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_0421242.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197784
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_0421242.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197336
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198914
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31201784
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_0421242.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31199144
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_0421242.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198618
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31200320
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_0421242.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197044
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197316
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31200800
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_0421242.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197940
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_0421242.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197404
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198174
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197426
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197872
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31200472
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31202944
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_0421242.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198172
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_0421242.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197152
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_0421242.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197522
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31200398
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_0421242.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197828
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_0421242.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197164
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31201208
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198652
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_0421242.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198802
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_0421242.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197322
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197484
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198566
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197448
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31202004
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_0421242.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197158
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198194
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_0421242.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197080
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31199488
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31200826
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198198
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_0421242.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197118
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197658
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198072
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_0421242.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197146
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31202536
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197820
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197482
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198054
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197900
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31199690
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31200062
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_0421242.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197526
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_19_0421242.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197200
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31197302
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31201994
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_19_0421242.31198278
</commentlist>
</conversation>
