<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_18_2126206</id>
	<title>Lego Robot Solves Any Rubik's Cube In 12 Seconds</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1266486120000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>kkleiner writes <i>"Cube Stormer is the latest creation from Mike Dobson, aka Robotics Solutions, and not only is it made entirely out of Legos, it can <a href="http://singularityhub.com/2010/02/17/lego-robot-solves-any-rubiks-cube-in-less-than-12-seconds-video/">solve any 3x3 Rubik's cube in less than twelve seconds</a>. Often it can finish in less than five! This thing looks bad-ass and is incredible to watch."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>kkleiner writes " Cube Stormer is the latest creation from Mike Dobson , aka Robotics Solutions , and not only is it made entirely out of Legos , it can solve any 3x3 Rubik 's cube in less than twelve seconds .
Often it can finish in less than five !
This thing looks bad-ass and is incredible to watch .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>kkleiner writes "Cube Stormer is the latest creation from Mike Dobson, aka Robotics Solutions, and not only is it made entirely out of Legos, it can solve any 3x3 Rubik's cube in less than twelve seconds.
Often it can finish in less than five!
This thing looks bad-ass and is incredible to watch.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191898</id>
	<title>Re:I solved a Rubiks cube in 12 seconds once</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266490920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I just threw mine out the window! There, problem <b>solved</b>!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just threw mine out the window !
There , problem solved !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just threw mine out the window!
There, problem solved!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191724</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31193302</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266497820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hey, get back to BoingBoing. You're not welcome here!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , get back to BoingBoing .
You 're not welcome here !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, get back to BoingBoing.
You're not welcome here!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191632</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31193298</id>
	<title>Re:How they are doing it?</title>
	<author>eulernet</author>
	<datestamp>1266497760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They probably used Herbert Kociemba's program:<br><a href="http://kociemba.org/cube.htm" title="kociemba.org">http://kociemba.org/cube.htm</a> [kociemba.org]<br>check the webcam section.</p><p>Kociemba is the creator of a very fast algorithm that solves most of the cubes in less than 25 moves in one second, using a two-phase technique (by using large precomputed tables).</p><p>Even with a slow robot only able to execute 2 moves every second, it's easy to reach 12 seconds that way.</p><p>BTW, the human records are below the 10 seconds limit:<br><a href="http://www.speedcubing.com/records/recs\_cube\_333av.html" title="speedcubing.com">http://www.speedcubing.com/records/recs\_cube\_333av.html</a> [speedcubing.com]<br>Average means that the human solves several cubes and computes the average time to solve them all.<br>Of course, humans can rotate the faces a lot faster than a robot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They probably used Herbert Kociemba 's program : http : //kociemba.org/cube.htm [ kociemba.org ] check the webcam section.Kociemba is the creator of a very fast algorithm that solves most of the cubes in less than 25 moves in one second , using a two-phase technique ( by using large precomputed tables ) .Even with a slow robot only able to execute 2 moves every second , it 's easy to reach 12 seconds that way.BTW , the human records are below the 10 seconds limit : http : //www.speedcubing.com/records/recs \ _cube \ _333av.html [ speedcubing.com ] Average means that the human solves several cubes and computes the average time to solve them all.Of course , humans can rotate the faces a lot faster than a robot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They probably used Herbert Kociemba's program:http://kociemba.org/cube.htm [kociemba.org]check the webcam section.Kociemba is the creator of a very fast algorithm that solves most of the cubes in less than 25 moves in one second, using a two-phase technique (by using large precomputed tables).Even with a slow robot only able to execute 2 moves every second, it's easy to reach 12 seconds that way.BTW, the human records are below the 10 seconds limit:http://www.speedcubing.com/records/recs\_cube\_333av.html [speedcubing.com]Average means that the human solves several cubes and computes the average time to solve them all.Of course, humans can rotate the faces a lot faster than a robot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31192606</id>
	<title>not my rubix cube</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266494460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would peel off one of the yellow stickers and replace it with a red one from another rubix cube rendering it impossible to solve.<br>I wonder what it would do then?<br>Would it keep trying to solve it or say it is solved when it wasn't?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would peel off one of the yellow stickers and replace it with a red one from another rubix cube rendering it impossible to solve.I wonder what it would do then ? Would it keep trying to solve it or say it is solved when it was n't ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would peel off one of the yellow stickers and replace it with a red one from another rubix cube rendering it impossible to solve.I wonder what it would do then?Would it keep trying to solve it or say it is solved when it wasn't?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31193690</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>mgblst</author>
	<datestamp>1266499920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The main problem is that the US calls it one way, the rest of the world another way.</p><p>Just as with metric, math (vs maths), the US has to do it differently.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The main problem is that the US calls it one way , the rest of the world another way.Just as with metric , math ( vs maths ) , the US has to do it differently .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The main problem is that the US calls it one way, the rest of the world another way.Just as with metric, math (vs maths), the US has to do it differently.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191632</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31195380</id>
	<title>Slower manipulation, faster thinking</title>
	<author>The\_Duck271</author>
	<datestamp>1266511440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mostly this is just a demonstration of how a computer can, from the initial scrambled state, immediately see clear through to a solution in a relatively short path, whereas humans can't visualize a whole solve instantly, and so they take it in steps, at a significant cost to solution length. Comparing the two videos you can see that the human is much faster than the robot at making sequences of turns, but must make many more moves than the robot.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mostly this is just a demonstration of how a computer can , from the initial scrambled state , immediately see clear through to a solution in a relatively short path , whereas humans ca n't visualize a whole solve instantly , and so they take it in steps , at a significant cost to solution length .
Comparing the two videos you can see that the human is much faster than the robot at making sequences of turns , but must make many more moves than the robot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mostly this is just a demonstration of how a computer can, from the initial scrambled state, immediately see clear through to a solution in a relatively short path, whereas humans can't visualize a whole solve instantly, and so they take it in steps, at a significant cost to solution length.
Comparing the two videos you can see that the human is much faster than the robot at making sequences of turns, but must make many more moves than the robot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31194220</id>
	<title>The Cylons were created by man...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266503580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>they rebelled... they evolved... and they have a plan:  to solve pointless puzzles and make us feel inferior because they can do it faster than us.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>they rebelled... they evolved... and they have a plan : to solve pointless puzzles and make us feel inferior because they can do it faster than us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they rebelled... they evolved... and they have a plan:  to solve pointless puzzles and make us feel inferior because they can do it faster than us.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31192218</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266492480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They? There are multiple different objects each of which is a lego?  I can think of lots of objects, each called a lego brick, but none that are individually called a lego.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They ?
There are multiple different objects each of which is a lego ?
I can think of lots of objects , each called a lego brick , but none that are individually called a lego .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They?
There are multiple different objects each of which is a lego?
I can think of lots of objects, each called a lego brick, but none that are individually called a lego.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191608</id>
	<title>Cool</title>
	<author>Chris Lawrence</author>
	<datestamp>1266489840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cool, just make sure it doesn't mistake your head for a Rubik's Cube.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cool , just make sure it does n't mistake your head for a Rubik 's Cube .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cool, just make sure it doesn't mistake your head for a Rubik's Cube.
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191730</id>
	<title>"Often it can finish in less than five!"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266490320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I bet the female lego robot takes muuuuuch longer to finish.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I bet the female lego robot takes muuuuuch longer to finish .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bet the female lego robot takes muuuuuch longer to finish.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31196122</id>
	<title>Been there, done that</title>
	<author>Jeremi</author>
	<datestamp>1266520680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let me know when someone programs a Rubik's cube to build something out of legos.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me know when someone programs a Rubik 's cube to build something out of legos .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me know when someone programs a Rubik's cube to build something out of legos.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191724</id>
	<title>I solved a Rubiks cube in 12 seconds once</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1266490260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All I needed was 6 different paint brushes dipped in 6 different colours.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All I needed was 6 different paint brushes dipped in 6 different colours .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All I needed was 6 different paint brushes dipped in 6 different colours.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191884</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266490860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The only people who care about that pointless distinction are trademark lawyers.</p><p>For the rest of us, they're simply called LEGO<b>S</b>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The only people who care about that pointless distinction are trademark lawyers.For the rest of us , they 're simply called LEGOS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only people who care about that pointless distinction are trademark lawyers.For the rest of us, they're simply called LEGOS.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191632</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31194126</id>
	<title>Re:That's fast</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1266502980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Think 99.9999\% of the world population don&rsquo;t give a flying fuck about it too.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Think 99.9999 \ % of the world population don    t give a flying fuck about it too .
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Think 99.9999\% of the world population don’t give a flying fuck about it too.
:P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191622</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31197008</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266575340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I bet you're the kind of guy that likes a nice big cock in his mouth. yummy!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I bet you 're the kind of guy that likes a nice big cock in his mouth .
yummy !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bet you're the kind of guy that likes a nice big cock in his mouth.
yummy!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191632</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191696</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266490200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thank you.  Only loosers use the word "legos".  And don't get me started on "could care less".</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank you .
Only loosers use the word " legos " .
And do n't get me started on " could care less " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank you.
Only loosers use the word "legos".
And don't get me started on "could care less".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191632</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31195244</id>
	<title>What? I don't think so.</title>
	<author>uvajed\_ekil</author>
	<datestamp>1266510180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If that machine is made entirely of legos, then I can build a car entirely out of sticks found in my yard. If you don't count the bits in the cube-solver that actually do the work, the computer, then I won't count the engine, drivetrain, and tube frame of my car. Terribly, utterly, and entirely unremarkable. But good job to the builders anyway, I guess.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If that machine is made entirely of legos , then I can build a car entirely out of sticks found in my yard .
If you do n't count the bits in the cube-solver that actually do the work , the computer , then I wo n't count the engine , drivetrain , and tube frame of my car .
Terribly , utterly , and entirely unremarkable .
But good job to the builders anyway , I guess .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If that machine is made entirely of legos, then I can build a car entirely out of sticks found in my yard.
If you don't count the bits in the cube-solver that actually do the work, the computer, then I won't count the engine, drivetrain, and tube frame of my car.
Terribly, utterly, and entirely unremarkable.
But good job to the builders anyway, I guess.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191972</id>
	<title>Re:How they are doing it?</title>
	<author>MBCook</author>
	<datestamp>1266491160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It looks pretty simple to me. You put it in and it snaps shots of the 6 sides of the cube. Those are interpreted by the computer which probably uses a standard solving algorithm. The solution is translated into movements for the robot, and off it goes.
</p><p>My guess would be if it was impossible to solve, it wouldn't start doing anything, the software would complain. No Rubik's cube is impossible to solve without physically messing with the cube (as you pointed out, swapping stickers for example). If you start with a solved cube, no amount of twisting can make an impossible cube.
</p><p>The video is quite impressive, far better than most lego solving robots. I'd love to see this thing solve a bigger cube.
</p><p>Or how about a feeding device? You put 10 cubes in, each is automatically placed in, solved, and popped out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It looks pretty simple to me .
You put it in and it snaps shots of the 6 sides of the cube .
Those are interpreted by the computer which probably uses a standard solving algorithm .
The solution is translated into movements for the robot , and off it goes .
My guess would be if it was impossible to solve , it would n't start doing anything , the software would complain .
No Rubik 's cube is impossible to solve without physically messing with the cube ( as you pointed out , swapping stickers for example ) .
If you start with a solved cube , no amount of twisting can make an impossible cube .
The video is quite impressive , far better than most lego solving robots .
I 'd love to see this thing solve a bigger cube .
Or how about a feeding device ?
You put 10 cubes in , each is automatically placed in , solved , and popped out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It looks pretty simple to me.
You put it in and it snaps shots of the 6 sides of the cube.
Those are interpreted by the computer which probably uses a standard solving algorithm.
The solution is translated into movements for the robot, and off it goes.
My guess would be if it was impossible to solve, it wouldn't start doing anything, the software would complain.
No Rubik's cube is impossible to solve without physically messing with the cube (as you pointed out, swapping stickers for example).
If you start with a solved cube, no amount of twisting can make an impossible cube.
The video is quite impressive, far better than most lego solving robots.
I'd love to see this thing solve a bigger cube.
Or how about a feeding device?
You put 10 cubes in, each is automatically placed in, solved, and popped out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31192758</id>
	<title>Like watching football</title>
	<author>countertrolling</author>
	<datestamp>1266495300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>5 seconds of action in a minute and a half show.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>5 seconds of action in a minute and a half show .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>5 seconds of action in a minute and a half show.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31196714</id>
	<title>Entirely?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266572100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Entirely made of legos?  I haven't seen the log laser reader or the lego computer before.  I better go through my son's toys before he burns his eyes out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Entirely made of legos ?
I have n't seen the log laser reader or the lego computer before .
I better go through my son 's toys before he burns his eyes out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Entirely made of legos?
I haven't seen the log laser reader or the lego computer before.
I better go through my son's toys before he burns his eyes out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191606</id>
	<title>Stickers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266489840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And heres me expecting to see a robot that can quickly rearrange the stickers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And heres me expecting to see a robot that can quickly rearrange the stickers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And heres me expecting to see a robot that can quickly rearrange the stickers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31194818</id>
	<title>It looks like the COMPUTER solves the puzzle...</title>
	<author>Trip6</author>
	<datestamp>1266507060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...and the robot ACTUATES the solution.  You enter the starting state of the cube and the program figures out the solution.  Different than the robot solving the puzzle.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...and the robot ACTUATES the solution .
You enter the starting state of the cube and the program figures out the solution .
Different than the robot solving the puzzle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and the robot ACTUATES the solution.
You enter the starting state of the cube and the program figures out the solution.
Different than the robot solving the puzzle.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31197606</id>
	<title>LEGO is an adjective</title>
	<author>Sobrique</author>
	<datestamp>1266582180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>LEGO is an adjective. It is therefore not appropriate to pluralise as LEGOS any more than you'd pluralise "sunny day" as "sunnys".
<br>
C'mon Slashdot. Get it right.</htmltext>
<tokenext>LEGO is an adjective .
It is therefore not appropriate to pluralise as LEGOS any more than you 'd pluralise " sunny day " as " sunnys " .
C'mon Slashdot .
Get it right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LEGO is an adjective.
It is therefore not appropriate to pluralise as LEGOS any more than you'd pluralise "sunny day" as "sunnys".
C'mon Slashdot.
Get it right.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191690</id>
	<title>Cheating!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266490140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>That thing got four arms. Come on, that is cheating.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That thing got four arms .
Come on , that is cheating .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That thing got four arms.
Come on, that is cheating.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31193190</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266497160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Legos! Legos! Legos!  Look at me over here playing with my legos! My little brother made a really cool spaceship looking thing with his Legos. I didn't clean up my room and my dad got really pissed at me because he stepped on some Legos.</p><p>Legos! Legos!</p><p>Sorry, I am never that guy, but they are Legos! Let it go....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Legos !
Legos ! Legos !
Look at me over here playing with my legos !
My little brother made a really cool spaceship looking thing with his Legos .
I did n't clean up my room and my dad got really pissed at me because he stepped on some Legos.Legos !
Legos ! Sorry , I am never that guy , but they are Legos !
Let it go... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Legos!
Legos! Legos!
Look at me over here playing with my legos!
My little brother made a really cool spaceship looking thing with his Legos.
I didn't clean up my room and my dad got really pissed at me because he stepped on some Legos.Legos!
Legos!Sorry, I am never that guy, but they are Legos!
Let it go....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191632</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31209756</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>dzfoo</author>
	<datestamp>1266678060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or Legicks.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; -dZ.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or Legicks .
        -dZ .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or Legicks.
        -dZ.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31194120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31194182</id>
	<title>Re:I solved a Rubiks cube in 12 seconds once</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1266503340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I did it in 2 seconds. Had 6 surfaces with color pre-applied, and just touched each of them with a side of the cube.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I did it in 2 seconds .
Had 6 surfaces with color pre-applied , and just touched each of them with a side of the cube .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I did it in 2 seconds.
Had 6 surfaces with color pre-applied, and just touched each of them with a side of the cube.
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191724</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191838</id>
	<title>Re:I solved a Rubiks cube in 12 seconds once</title>
	<author>Ossifer</author>
	<datestamp>1266490680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I just threw the thing into a can of paint, but I still lost because it took too much time to forcibly submerge the thing...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just threw the thing into a can of paint , but I still lost because it took too much time to forcibly submerge the thing.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just threw the thing into a can of paint, but I still lost because it took too much time to forcibly submerge the thing...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191724</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31195196</id>
	<title>Re:Stickers</title>
	<author>uvajed\_ekil</author>
	<datestamp>1266509820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>When I was a small child of 4 or 5 in the early 80's, my Dad got a Rubik's Cube for Christmas. He found it amusing. A few days later I brought it to him, completely solved. He was amazed! Not only had his genius son shown remarkable problem solving skills at such a young age, I had even managed to put a few of the stickers back on straight.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When I was a small child of 4 or 5 in the early 80 's , my Dad got a Rubik 's Cube for Christmas .
He found it amusing .
A few days later I brought it to him , completely solved .
He was amazed !
Not only had his genius son shown remarkable problem solving skills at such a young age , I had even managed to put a few of the stickers back on straight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I was a small child of 4 or 5 in the early 80's, my Dad got a Rubik's Cube for Christmas.
He found it amusing.
A few days later I brought it to him, completely solved.
He was amazed!
Not only had his genius son shown remarkable problem solving skills at such a young age, I had even managed to put a few of the stickers back on straight.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191774</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>PrescriptionWarning</author>
	<datestamp>1266490560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Legos my egos. Leggo my eggo. Let go of my eggo waffle. Biznatch.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Legos my egos .
Leggo my eggo .
Let go of my eggo waffle .
Biznatch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Legos my egos.
Leggo my eggo.
Let go of my eggo waffle.
Biznatch.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191632</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31192100</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>idontgno</author>
	<datestamp>1266491820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Allow me to bring you some Kleenexes; your weeping protestation is piteous.</p><p>Maybe a couple of aspirins for your headache?</p><p>Reality must really piss off language prescriptionists.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Allow me to bring you some Kleenexes ; your weeping protestation is piteous.Maybe a couple of aspirins for your headache ? Reality must really piss off language prescriptionists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Allow me to bring you some Kleenexes; your weeping protestation is piteous.Maybe a couple of aspirins for your headache?Reality must really piss off language prescriptionists.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191632</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31194066</id>
	<title>Re:Stickers</title>
	<author>Zaiff Urgulbunger</author>
	<datestamp>1266502500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You do realise it was just spray painting it on the far side hidden from camera view!</htmltext>
<tokenext>You do realise it was just spray painting it on the far side hidden from camera view !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You do realise it was just spray painting it on the far side hidden from camera view!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31192286</id>
	<title>Re:specialized pieces</title>
	<author>clarkkent09</author>
	<datestamp>1266492900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wouldn't go so far as to call it lame but it pisses me of when people say such and such is made of legos with the
implication that somehow that makes it more difficult.
 I'd be more impressed if he had fabricated the parts himself than if he used premade parts that snap together. now if had used regular bricks for the whole thing that would be a different story.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would n't go so far as to call it lame but it pisses me of when people say such and such is made of legos with the implication that somehow that makes it more difficult .
I 'd be more impressed if he had fabricated the parts himself than if he used premade parts that snap together .
now if had used regular bricks for the whole thing that would be a different story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wouldn't go so far as to call it lame but it pisses me of when people say such and such is made of legos with the
implication that somehow that makes it more difficult.
I'd be more impressed if he had fabricated the parts himself than if he used premade parts that snap together.
now if had used regular bricks for the whole thing that would be a different story.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31194552</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>Tomfrh</author>
	<datestamp>1266505560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>It's "Lego"</i></p><p>No, it's "LEGO"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's " Lego " No , it 's " LEGO "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's "Lego"No, it's "LEGO"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191632</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191744</id>
	<title>How they are doing it?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266490380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Unfortunately, the linked to post and video doesn't give much details. Naively, I expect that the computer program is first figuring out very quickly what the series of movements to solve the cube and then implementing those. There are around 4 * 10^19 possible configurations for a Rubik's cube, but the group theory allows one to work out what steps to take without having to do very exhaustive searches since the Rubik's group is very well-behaved.  However, this assumes one is in an actually solvable configuration. I'd be curious to find out if they've debugged the device well enough to make sure it doesn't hang or get in some infinite loop if one gives it an unsolvable cube (not all possible permutations of squares are solvable. Most trivially, edges need to stay on edges, corners on corners and centers on centers. But some configurations are still not solvable. For example, if one swaps two center stickers it isn't hard to see that that lays outside the Rubik's group of reachable permutations).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately , the linked to post and video does n't give much details .
Naively , I expect that the computer program is first figuring out very quickly what the series of movements to solve the cube and then implementing those .
There are around 4 * 10 ^ 19 possible configurations for a Rubik 's cube , but the group theory allows one to work out what steps to take without having to do very exhaustive searches since the Rubik 's group is very well-behaved .
However , this assumes one is in an actually solvable configuration .
I 'd be curious to find out if they 've debugged the device well enough to make sure it does n't hang or get in some infinite loop if one gives it an unsolvable cube ( not all possible permutations of squares are solvable .
Most trivially , edges need to stay on edges , corners on corners and centers on centers .
But some configurations are still not solvable .
For example , if one swaps two center stickers it is n't hard to see that that lays outside the Rubik 's group of reachable permutations ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately, the linked to post and video doesn't give much details.
Naively, I expect that the computer program is first figuring out very quickly what the series of movements to solve the cube and then implementing those.
There are around 4 * 10^19 possible configurations for a Rubik's cube, but the group theory allows one to work out what steps to take without having to do very exhaustive searches since the Rubik's group is very well-behaved.
However, this assumes one is in an actually solvable configuration.
I'd be curious to find out if they've debugged the device well enough to make sure it doesn't hang or get in some infinite loop if one gives it an unsolvable cube (not all possible permutations of squares are solvable.
Most trivially, edges need to stay on edges, corners on corners and centers on centers.
But some configurations are still not solvable.
For example, if one swaps two center stickers it isn't hard to see that that lays outside the Rubik's group of reachable permutations).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31192482</id>
	<title>Simplified hardware</title>
	<author>LoudMusic</author>
	<datestamp>1266493740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This guy did it a while back with considerably less hardware, though it takes his rig a bit more time to get the puzzle done<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htnL1KTpaY8" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htnL1KTpaY8</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This guy did it a while back with considerably less hardware , though it takes his rig a bit more time to get the puzzle done ; ) http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = htnL1KTpaY8 [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This guy did it a while back with considerably less hardware, though it takes his rig a bit more time to get the puzzle done ;)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htnL1KTpaY8 [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31192496</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>dougisfunny</author>
	<datestamp>1266493800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And the parking lot isn't full of Toyotas,Fords, Hondas? Its full of Toyota cars, Toyota trucks, Ford cars Ford trucks and Honda Cars?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And the parking lot is n't full of Toyotas,Fords , Hondas ?
Its full of Toyota cars , Toyota trucks , Ford cars Ford trucks and Honda Cars ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And the parking lot isn't full of Toyotas,Fords, Hondas?
Its full of Toyota cars, Toyota trucks, Ford cars Ford trucks and Honda Cars?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191632</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31193012</id>
	<title>The computer driving it...</title>
	<author>swb</author>
	<datestamp>1266496380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...should have been implemented as a difference engine constructed out of Legos.  THEN I'm impressed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...should have been implemented as a difference engine constructed out of Legos .
THEN I 'm impressed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...should have been implemented as a difference engine constructed out of Legos.
THEN I'm impressed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31192890</id>
	<title>I don't get it</title>
	<author>computerchimp</author>
	<datestamp>1266495840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't understand why this is a "Lego" robot.<br>The pads are Lego the rest of the Lego is total cheap fluff.  If I stick a few pieces of Lego on my car does that mean I drive a Lego car?<br>Maybe it is some cheap promo.</p><p>What am I missing here?</p><p>CC</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't understand why this is a " Lego " robot.The pads are Lego the rest of the Lego is total cheap fluff .
If I stick a few pieces of Lego on my car does that mean I drive a Lego car ? Maybe it is some cheap promo.What am I missing here ? CC</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't understand why this is a "Lego" robot.The pads are Lego the rest of the Lego is total cheap fluff.
If I stick a few pieces of Lego on my car does that mean I drive a Lego car?Maybe it is some cheap promo.What am I missing here?CC</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31192644</id>
	<title>You had me at "Lego Robot"...</title>
	<author>mulgar</author>
	<datestamp>1266494640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I didn't need to see the rest<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I did n't need to see the rest ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I didn't need to see the rest ;-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31193642</id>
	<title>DO NOT SAY LEGOS!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266499680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If I see one more person saying "legos" instead of "lego" I will gouge their eyes out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I see one more person saying " legos " instead of " lego " I will gouge their eyes out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I see one more person saying "legos" instead of "lego" I will gouge their eyes out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31192260</id>
	<title>Re:I solved a Rubiks cube in 12 seconds once</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266492720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Feh, most cubes I run into are already solved...</p><p>--Anonymous Colorblind Coward</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Feh , most cubes I run into are already solved...--Anonymous Colorblind Coward</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Feh, most cubes I run into are already solved...--Anonymous Colorblind Coward</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191724</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31192598</id>
	<title>Humans have a chance...</title>
	<author>phormalitize</author>
	<datestamp>1266494400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm pretty sure there are websites out there that will teach people how to solve the rubiks cube extremely quickly - it pretty much just involves memorizing the correct sequences and being able to recognize them on the cube itself.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty sure there are websites out there that will teach people how to solve the rubiks cube extremely quickly - it pretty much just involves memorizing the correct sequences and being able to recognize them on the cube itself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty sure there are websites out there that will teach people how to solve the rubiks cube extremely quickly - it pretty much just involves memorizing the correct sequences and being able to recognize them on the cube itself.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191632</id>
	<title>Obligatory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266489900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>and not only is it made entirely out of Legos</p></div><p>It's "Lego". Lego bricks. Lego blocks. Lego. Not Legos. Lego.</p><p>Thanks</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>and not only is it made entirely out of LegosIt 's " Lego " .
Lego bricks .
Lego blocks .
Lego. Not Legos .
Lego.Thanks</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and not only is it made entirely out of LegosIt's "Lego".
Lego bricks.
Lego blocks.
Lego. Not Legos.
Lego.Thanks
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31227960</id>
	<title>solving cubes?</title>
	<author>pdwalker</author>
	<datestamp>1266844020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's an iphone app for that!</p><p>(for solving the cubes, that is)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's an iphone app for that !
( for solving the cubes , that is )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's an iphone app for that!
(for solving the cubes, that is)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31194120</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>DudemanX</author>
	<datestamp>1266502920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To make it easier on all of you pedantic types how about if instead of pluralizing Lego to Legos. We'll just abbreviate "Lego Bricks" to something that rolls off the tongue a little easier. How about "Legos"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To make it easier on all of you pedantic types how about if instead of pluralizing Lego to Legos .
We 'll just abbreviate " Lego Bricks " to something that rolls off the tongue a little easier .
How about " Legos " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To make it easier on all of you pedantic types how about if instead of pluralizing Lego to Legos.
We'll just abbreviate "Lego Bricks" to something that rolls off the tongue a little easier.
How about "Legos"?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191632</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191622</id>
	<title>That's fast</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266489900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Think 99\% of the world population can't do that<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</htmltext>
<tokenext>Think 99 \ % of the world population ca n't do that : P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Think 99\% of the world population can't do that :P</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191634</id>
	<title>specialized pieces</title>
	<author>ArsonSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1266489900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most if it is just giant specialized pieces from Lego that are only usable in this one kit.</p><p>Lame.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most if it is just giant specialized pieces from Lego that are only usable in this one kit.Lame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most if it is just giant specialized pieces from Lego that are only usable in this one kit.Lame.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191834</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266490680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, it's Lego (TM) brand modular toy building-blocks, and you better the hell say the whole thing every time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , it 's Lego ( TM ) brand modular toy building-blocks , and you better the hell say the whole thing every time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, it's Lego (TM) brand modular toy building-blocks, and you better the hell say the whole thing every time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191632</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31194628</id>
	<title>Re:DO NOT SAY LEGOS!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266505980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I loved my Legos, still have a bin full somewhere in my closet...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I loved my Legos , still have a bin full somewhere in my closet.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I loved my Legos, still have a bin full somewhere in my closet...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31193642</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191648</id>
	<title>I for one will be slack jawed at the awesomeness</title>
	<author>myocardialinfarction</author>
	<datestamp>1266489960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>of our new Lego robot masters.</htmltext>
<tokenext>of our new Lego robot masters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>of our new Lego robot masters.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31205534</id>
	<title>Re:How they are doing it?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266580620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It looks pretty simple to me. You put it in and it snaps shots of the 6 sides of the cube. Those are interpreted by the computer which probably uses a standard solving algorithm. The solution is translated into movements for the robot, and off it goes.</p></div> </blockquote><p>Haven't I heard this before?</p><blockquote><div><p>Muffley: But this is fantastic, Strangelove. How can it be triggered automatically?</p><p>Strangelove: Well, it's remarkably simple to do that. When you merely wish to bury bombs, there is no limit to the size. After that they are connected to a gigantic complex of computers. Now then, a specific and clearly defined set of circumstances, under which the bombs are to be exploded, is programmed into a tape memory bank.</p></div> </blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It looks pretty simple to me .
You put it in and it snaps shots of the 6 sides of the cube .
Those are interpreted by the computer which probably uses a standard solving algorithm .
The solution is translated into movements for the robot , and off it goes .
Have n't I heard this before ? Muffley : But this is fantastic , Strangelove .
How can it be triggered automatically ? Strangelove : Well , it 's remarkably simple to do that .
When you merely wish to bury bombs , there is no limit to the size .
After that they are connected to a gigantic complex of computers .
Now then , a specific and clearly defined set of circumstances , under which the bombs are to be exploded , is programmed into a tape memory bank .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It looks pretty simple to me.
You put it in and it snaps shots of the 6 sides of the cube.
Those are interpreted by the computer which probably uses a standard solving algorithm.
The solution is translated into movements for the robot, and off it goes.
Haven't I heard this before?Muffley: But this is fantastic, Strangelove.
How can it be triggered automatically?Strangelove: Well, it's remarkably simple to do that.
When you merely wish to bury bombs, there is no limit to the size.
After that they are connected to a gigantic complex of computers.
Now then, a specific and clearly defined set of circumstances, under which the bombs are to be exploded, is programmed into a tape memory bank. 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31195698</id>
	<title>This isn't a robot.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266514440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a machine. I'd expect a robot to be vaguely humanoid shaped.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a machine .
I 'd expect a robot to be vaguely humanoid shaped .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a machine.
I'd expect a robot to be vaguely humanoid shaped.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31197052</id>
	<title>Solution!</title>
	<author>jonaskoelker</author>
	<datestamp>1266575940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>That thing got four arms. Come on, that is cheating.</p></div><p>Have it compete twice against a wookie...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That thing got four arms .
Come on , that is cheating.Have it compete twice against a wookie.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That thing got four arms.
Come on, that is cheating.Have it compete twice against a wookie...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191690</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31193598</id>
	<title>What?</title>
	<author>Jiro</author>
	<datestamp>1266499440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's made entirely of Legos.  Except for the computer.</p><p>You know, I have a great Lego pizza oven.  It's made entirely of Legos.  Well, except for the metal box, heating element, wires, plug, and a few other things, of course.  This is obviously some new use of the word "entirely".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's made entirely of Legos .
Except for the computer.You know , I have a great Lego pizza oven .
It 's made entirely of Legos .
Well , except for the metal box , heating element , wires , plug , and a few other things , of course .
This is obviously some new use of the word " entirely " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's made entirely of Legos.
Except for the computer.You know, I have a great Lego pizza oven.
It's made entirely of Legos.
Well, except for the metal box, heating element, wires, plug, and a few other things, of course.
This is obviously some new use of the word "entirely".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31193430</id>
	<title>Bad news for the Chinese kids at the factory...</title>
	<author>straponego</author>
	<datestamp>1266498540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now they'll have robots put the cubes in order for shipping.  That's a lot of jobs...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now they 'll have robots put the cubes in order for shipping .
That 's a lot of jobs.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now they'll have robots put the cubes in order for shipping.
That's a lot of jobs...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31198326</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory [OT]</title>
	<author>MattBecker82</author>
	<datestamp>1266589920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'll get you started. Yes, whoosh, I know.

There's really nothing wrong with the phrase "could care less". Yes, if you deconstruct it, it describes an unremarkable situation, but the same can be said of many English expressions, e.g. "head over heels" or "cheap at half the price". Nonetheless these are all established phrases in the language with commonly understood meanings, without requiring deconstruction. Language usage is based on "common understanding", not prescriptionism or a logical gold-standard.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll get you started .
Yes , whoosh , I know .
There 's really nothing wrong with the phrase " could care less " .
Yes , if you deconstruct it , it describes an unremarkable situation , but the same can be said of many English expressions , e.g .
" head over heels " or " cheap at half the price " .
Nonetheless these are all established phrases in the language with commonly understood meanings , without requiring deconstruction .
Language usage is based on " common understanding " , not prescriptionism or a logical gold-standard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll get you started.
Yes, whoosh, I know.
There's really nothing wrong with the phrase "could care less".
Yes, if you deconstruct it, it describes an unremarkable situation, but the same can be said of many English expressions, e.g.
"head over heels" or "cheap at half the price".
Nonetheless these are all established phrases in the language with commonly understood meanings, without requiring deconstruction.
Language usage is based on "common understanding", not prescriptionism or a logical gold-standard.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191696</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31192198</id>
	<title>Re:Cheating!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266492360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is my trained octopus acceptable?  I don't want it to be disqualified for any cheating and feel that I might be wasting my time with the training.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is my trained octopus acceptable ?
I do n't want it to be disqualified for any cheating and feel that I might be wasting my time with the training .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is my trained octopus acceptable?
I don't want it to be disqualified for any cheating and feel that I might be wasting my time with the training.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191690</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31209728</id>
	<title>Re:specialized pieces</title>
	<author>dzfoo</author>
	<datestamp>1266677400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, they say "such and such is made of legos" with the implication that it increases its cool factor by about eleventy orders of awesomnitude.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; -dZ.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , they say " such and such is made of legos " with the implication that it increases its cool factor by about eleventy orders of awesomnitude .
          -dZ .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, they say "such and such is made of legos" with the implication that it increases its cool factor by about eleventy orders of awesomnitude.
          -dZ.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31192286</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191646</id>
	<title>+1</title>
	<author>Mashdar</author>
	<datestamp>1266489960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>For Singularity reference.</htmltext>
<tokenext>For Singularity reference .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For Singularity reference.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31192664</id>
	<title>Re:Cheating!</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1266494820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Poor little tink-tink.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Poor little tink-tink .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Poor little tink-tink.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191690</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_2126206_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31193298
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_2126206_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191834
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_2126206_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_2126206_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191774
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_2126206_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31192496
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_2126206_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31192664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191690
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_2126206_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31192100
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_2126206_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31209756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31194120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_2126206_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31209728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31192286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_2126206_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31195196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191606
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_2126206_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31193302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_2126206_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31205534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_2126206_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31192198
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191690
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_2126206_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31194182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_2126206_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31198326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191696
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_2126206_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31194552
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_2126206_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31194628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31193642
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_2126206_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31197052
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191690
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_2126206_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31192260
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_2126206_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31197008
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_2126206_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_2126206_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31194126
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191622
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_2126206_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31193190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_2126206_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31194066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191606
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_2126206_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31192218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_2126206_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31193690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_2126206.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191744
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191972
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31205534
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31193298
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_2126206.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191632
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191834
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31194552
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31193690
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191774
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31192100
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31194120
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31209756
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31193190
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191884
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31192218
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31197008
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31193302
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191696
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31198326
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31192496
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_2126206.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191622
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31194126
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_2126206.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31193642
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31194628
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_2126206.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191606
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31195196
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31194066
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_2126206.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31195698
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_2126206.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191608
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_2126206.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31195380
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_2126206.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191690
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31192198
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31197052
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31192664
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_2126206.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31192606
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_2126206.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191724
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31192260
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31194182
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191898
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191838
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_2126206.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191648
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_2126206.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31191634
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31192286
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_2126206.31209728
</commentlist>
</conversation>
