<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_18_1442221</id>
	<title>Google Donates $2 Million To the Wikimedia Foundation</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1266507660000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>k33l0r writes <i>"Yesterday, the Wikimedia Foundation, which runs Wikipedia and other projects, announced that it has <a href="http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Press\_releases/Wikimedia\_Foundation\_announces\_$2\_million\_grant\_from\_Google">received a $2 million donation from Google</a>. This is the first time that Google has supported Wikipedia, and it <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2010/feb/18/wikipedia-google">has many wondering why</a>. Anyone remember <a href="http://knol.google.com/k">Knol</a>, Google's answer to Wikipedia?"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>k33l0r writes " Yesterday , the Wikimedia Foundation , which runs Wikipedia and other projects , announced that it has received a $ 2 million donation from Google .
This is the first time that Google has supported Wikipedia , and it has many wondering why .
Anyone remember Knol , Google 's answer to Wikipedia ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>k33l0r writes "Yesterday, the Wikimedia Foundation, which runs Wikipedia and other projects, announced that it has received a $2 million donation from Google.
This is the first time that Google has supported Wikipedia, and it has many wondering why.
Anyone remember Knol, Google's answer to Wikipedia?
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185870</id>
	<title>So what?</title>
	<author>interval1066</author>
	<datestamp>1266514020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Its not like Google bought a controlling interest in wp, it was a donation. Don't look a gift horse in the mouth.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its not like Google bought a controlling interest in wp , it was a donation .
Do n't look a gift horse in the mouth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its not like Google bought a controlling interest in wp, it was a donation.
Don't look a gift horse in the mouth.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186166</id>
	<title>Why?   Google is broken</title>
	<author>fermion</author>
	<datestamp>1266515280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>On popular topics, Google is only useful as interface to Wikipedia or IMDB or the like.  Occasionally a few other links are useful, but most of the time they are "we have more information on widgets" with tons of ads.
<p>
On technical topics I just go directly to the place I know, like Wolfram.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On popular topics , Google is only useful as interface to Wikipedia or IMDB or the like .
Occasionally a few other links are useful , but most of the time they are " we have more information on widgets " with tons of ads .
On technical topics I just go directly to the place I know , like Wolfram .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On popular topics, Google is only useful as interface to Wikipedia or IMDB or the like.
Occasionally a few other links are useful, but most of the time they are "we have more information on widgets" with tons of ads.
On technical topics I just go directly to the place I know, like Wolfram.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185942</id>
	<title>Re:I was much mor generous.</title>
	<author>Permutation Citizen</author>
	<datestamp>1266514320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>2/6600 = 0.000303 that is 0.0303\%</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>2/6600 = 0.000303 that is 0.0303 \ %</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2/6600 = 0.000303 that is 0.0303\%</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185338</id>
	<title>First Time Supported with *Cash*</title>
	<author>RobotRunAmok</author>
	<datestamp>1266512040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google has kept Wikimedia afloat with gimmicked page rankings and search results for years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google has kept Wikimedia afloat with gimmicked page rankings and search results for years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google has kept Wikimedia afloat with gimmicked page rankings and search results for years.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185410</id>
	<title>What about Wikileaks?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266512280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google claims a commitment to freedom of information, yet Wikileaks languishes.  Wikimedia was not faced with a shutdown due to lack of funds -- Wikileaks was.</p><p>In terms of bang for the buck, a fraction of what they gave to Wikimedia would have done much more "good" at Wikileaks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google claims a commitment to freedom of information , yet Wikileaks languishes .
Wikimedia was not faced with a shutdown due to lack of funds -- Wikileaks was.In terms of bang for the buck , a fraction of what they gave to Wikimedia would have done much more " good " at Wikileaks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google claims a commitment to freedom of information, yet Wikileaks languishes.
Wikimedia was not faced with a shutdown due to lack of funds -- Wikileaks was.In terms of bang for the buck, a fraction of what they gave to Wikimedia would have done much more "good" at Wikileaks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31187286</id>
	<title>Re:No. No one remembers</title>
	<author>neogeographer</author>
	<datestamp>1266520080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who is 'they'- Google or Microsoft?

I ask because your question "Is there anything <b>they <i>can't</i> </b> fail at?" implies that 'they' have never done anything right.

So it must be Microsoft....right?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who is 'they'- Google or Microsoft ?
I ask because your question " Is there anything they ca n't fail at ?
" implies that 'they ' have never done anything right .
So it must be Microsoft....right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who is 'they'- Google or Microsoft?
I ask because your question "Is there anything they can't  fail at?
" implies that 'they' have never done anything right.
So it must be Microsoft....right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31187076</id>
	<title>Google helps Wikimedia, a first!</title>
	<author>ljhiller</author>
	<datestamp>1266519240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can see how the submitter might be surprised that Google would help Wikipedia, which competed with its own Knol, because Google has certainly <a href="http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Lack\_of\_facts\_no\_hindrance\_to\_speculation\_about\_Google,\_Wikipedia" title="wikinews.org">never tried</a> [wikinews.org] to do this <a href="http://slashdot.org/articles/05/02/10/2355202.shtml?tid=217" title="slashdot.org">before</a> [slashdot.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can see how the submitter might be surprised that Google would help Wikipedia , which competed with its own Knol , because Google has certainly never tried [ wikinews.org ] to do this before [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can see how the submitter might be surprised that Google would help Wikipedia, which competed with its own Knol, because Google has certainly never tried [wikinews.org] to do this before [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186296</id>
	<title>Knol? Not exactly Wikipedia :)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266515760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Observe:<br>http://knol.google.com/k/macedonia-the-greek-kingdom-in-antiquity#</p><p>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic\_of\_Macedonia</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Observe : http : //knol.google.com/k/macedonia-the-greek-kingdom-in-antiquity # http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic \ _of \ _Macedonia</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Observe:http://knol.google.com/k/macedonia-the-greek-kingdom-in-antiquity#http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic\_of\_Macedonia</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31192284</id>
	<title>Re:No. No one remembers</title>
	<author>magnusrex1280</author>
	<datestamp>1266492840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Is there anything they [Google] can't fail at?</p></div><p>The summary lists Knol.  Recently I watched Wave flounder.  You're being disingenuous to claim that all Google touches is gold.  Their advertising revenues support a lot of their endeavors similar to how Microsoft operating system stranglehold allowed them to elbow their way into hardware and gaming.  Impressive?  Yes.  King Midas?  No.  Infallible?  No.</p><p>He's asking if there's anything Google succeeds at, and you're giving examples of things they've failed at. Did he mean to ask what he asked, or was he trying to ask "Is there anything Google fails at?" If he meant to ask exactly what he said, then your answer is completely wrong. The things you list are all failures, not successes.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is there anything they [ Google ] ca n't fail at ? The summary lists Knol .
Recently I watched Wave flounder .
You 're being disingenuous to claim that all Google touches is gold .
Their advertising revenues support a lot of their endeavors similar to how Microsoft operating system stranglehold allowed them to elbow their way into hardware and gaming .
Impressive ? Yes .
King Midas ?
No. Infallible ?
No.He 's asking if there 's anything Google succeeds at , and you 're giving examples of things they 've failed at .
Did he mean to ask what he asked , or was he trying to ask " Is there anything Google fails at ?
" If he meant to ask exactly what he said , then your answer is completely wrong .
The things you list are all failures , not successes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is there anything they [Google] can't fail at?The summary lists Knol.
Recently I watched Wave flounder.
You're being disingenuous to claim that all Google touches is gold.
Their advertising revenues support a lot of their endeavors similar to how Microsoft operating system stranglehold allowed them to elbow their way into hardware and gaming.
Impressive?  Yes.
King Midas?
No.  Infallible?
No.He's asking if there's anything Google succeeds at, and you're giving examples of things they've failed at.
Did he mean to ask what he asked, or was he trying to ask "Is there anything Google fails at?
" If he meant to ask exactly what he said, then your answer is completely wrong.
The things you list are all failures, not successes.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185216</id>
	<title>eh...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266511680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...Google, please please <b>please</b> don't even think about offering to buy Wikimedia.  I (and others that use their services) appreciate your donation, but it does make me a bit nervous...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...Google , please please please do n't even think about offering to buy Wikimedia .
I ( and others that use their services ) appreciate your donation , but it does make me a bit nervous.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Google, please please please don't even think about offering to buy Wikimedia.
I (and others that use their services) appreciate your donation, but it does make me a bit nervous...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186118</id>
	<title>Re:State of the Knol</title>
	<author>LordVader717</author>
	<datestamp>1266515100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Knol isn't meant to be a general encyclopedia but a database for articles. It isn't collaborative and only one author can edit it. That means you're relying on the authors reputation and authority. So unlike an encyclopedia, you can cite it. A number of Wikipedia pages link to reputable sources on Knol.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Knol is n't meant to be a general encyclopedia but a database for articles .
It is n't collaborative and only one author can edit it .
That means you 're relying on the authors reputation and authority .
So unlike an encyclopedia , you can cite it .
A number of Wikipedia pages link to reputable sources on Knol .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Knol isn't meant to be a general encyclopedia but a database for articles.
It isn't collaborative and only one author can edit it.
That means you're relying on the authors reputation and authority.
So unlike an encyclopedia, you can cite it.
A number of Wikipedia pages link to reputable sources on Knol.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185970</id>
	<title>Re:Giving back</title>
	<author>kdogg73</author>
	<datestamp>1266514440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>IMHO, Google searches Wikipedia better than Wikipedia searches itself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IMHO , Google searches Wikipedia better than Wikipedia searches itself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IMHO, Google searches Wikipedia better than Wikipedia searches itself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185208</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186108</id>
	<title>Probably a Waste</title>
	<author>afabbro</author>
	<datestamp>1266515040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem with giving to Wikimedia is that they have been so wasteful of the money they've been given.  The move to the Bay Area is chief exhibit #1 - why move an organization whose whole purpose, mission, and asset is a web page to one of the most expensive real estate locations on earth?  </p><p>I'm not <a href="http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2007/10/27/141234/14" title="kuro5hin.org">the only one who thinks Wikimedia has more than enough money</a> [kuro5hin.org].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem with giving to Wikimedia is that they have been so wasteful of the money they 've been given .
The move to the Bay Area is chief exhibit # 1 - why move an organization whose whole purpose , mission , and asset is a web page to one of the most expensive real estate locations on earth ?
I 'm not the only one who thinks Wikimedia has more than enough money [ kuro5hin.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem with giving to Wikimedia is that they have been so wasteful of the money they've been given.
The move to the Bay Area is chief exhibit #1 - why move an organization whose whole purpose, mission, and asset is a web page to one of the most expensive real estate locations on earth?
I'm not the only one who thinks Wikimedia has more than enough money [kuro5hin.org].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31187650</id>
	<title>Re:No. No one remembers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266521280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And it's hard to sell them Windows 7 if their dead too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And it 's hard to sell them Windows 7 if their dead too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And it's hard to sell them Windows 7 if their dead too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185678</id>
	<title>Cheaper than the alternatives</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266513240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's in Googles interest to keep Wikipedia running strong. It gives them a massive, (mostly) reliable source of good information to stick at the top of a results page. If Wikipedia can't pay the bills, then MS and Google will have to fight over who is going to buy it and the inevitable PR disaster that would follow as users splintered, competitors emerged and we all lose something really wonderful. The problem is that Wikimedia could very easily become dependent on that kind of money. I think they should just have a single text ad on every page until they meet their monthly goal. Allow people who donate to turn them off. Tada!</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's in Googles interest to keep Wikipedia running strong .
It gives them a massive , ( mostly ) reliable source of good information to stick at the top of a results page .
If Wikipedia ca n't pay the bills , then MS and Google will have to fight over who is going to buy it and the inevitable PR disaster that would follow as users splintered , competitors emerged and we all lose something really wonderful .
The problem is that Wikimedia could very easily become dependent on that kind of money .
I think they should just have a single text ad on every page until they meet their monthly goal .
Allow people who donate to turn them off .
Tada !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's in Googles interest to keep Wikipedia running strong.
It gives them a massive, (mostly) reliable source of good information to stick at the top of a results page.
If Wikipedia can't pay the bills, then MS and Google will have to fight over who is going to buy it and the inevitable PR disaster that would follow as users splintered, competitors emerged and we all lose something really wonderful.
The problem is that Wikimedia could very easily become dependent on that kind of money.
I think they should just have a single text ad on every page until they meet their monthly goal.
Allow people who donate to turn them off.
Tada!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31189462</id>
	<title>Re:A bit background info...</title>
	<author>pclminion</author>
	<datestamp>1266526560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <em>WMF isn't a company you can just 'buy out'. It's a charitable 501(c)(3) organization that is controlled by the Board of Trustees</em> </p><p>Interesting that you mention that. Because of WMF's classification, they are legally required to honor any stipulations that were specified along with the grant money. In other words, Google can ask them to spend the $2 million on specific things, and WMF has to either honor that request, or return the funds to Google. So I'm wondering if there were any interesting stipulations attached to this grant.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WMF is n't a company you can just 'buy out' .
It 's a charitable 501 ( c ) ( 3 ) organization that is controlled by the Board of Trustees Interesting that you mention that .
Because of WMF 's classification , they are legally required to honor any stipulations that were specified along with the grant money .
In other words , Google can ask them to spend the $ 2 million on specific things , and WMF has to either honor that request , or return the funds to Google .
So I 'm wondering if there were any interesting stipulations attached to this grant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> WMF isn't a company you can just 'buy out'.
It's a charitable 501(c)(3) organization that is controlled by the Board of Trustees Interesting that you mention that.
Because of WMF's classification, they are legally required to honor any stipulations that were specified along with the grant money.
In other words, Google can ask them to spend the $2 million on specific things, and WMF has to either honor that request, or return the funds to Google.
So I'm wondering if there were any interesting stipulations attached to this grant.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185522</id>
	<title>Re:Giving back</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266512700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Without doubt Google is making more money of off Wikipedia than Wikipedia is. 2 million dollar is pocket change.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Without doubt Google is making more money of off Wikipedia than Wikipedia is .
2 million dollar is pocket change .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Without doubt Google is making more money of off Wikipedia than Wikipedia is.
2 million dollar is pocket change.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185208</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31187326</id>
	<title>No necessarily</title>
	<author>BeanThere</author>
	<datestamp>1266520260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's extremely un-PC to say this, and it's also somewhat counterintuitive, but merely vaccinating a population doesn't *necessarily* raise their standard of living --- it may merely raise the *number* of people living in poverty. Africa is a prime example; it historically has been one of the biggest benefactors of vaccinations since vaccinations were first developed<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... do most Africans now have a high standard of living? No, instead they have a massive population explosion but are still living about the same poor quality of life they did 100 years ago. In other words, 'well done, you just made even more poor people'. (PS I am speaking as an African, and have lived in Africa and worked with Africans my whole life, this is not just armchair rubbish.)</p><p>Bill Gates seems to genuinely mean well, but I fear his efforts will just serve to further explode the population of people living in poverty, and then there'll be even more people that need to be fed that can't feed themselves. You need to also simultaneously educate those people whose lives you are saving, to teach them to run their own modern industrialised economies, and that is much, much harder than merely sending them a bunch of medicine or food.</p><p>I think if I had that much money, I'd rather create an investment fund for funding free-market entrepreneurs within poor communities who help build solutions to their own problems.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's extremely un-PC to say this , and it 's also somewhat counterintuitive , but merely vaccinating a population does n't * necessarily * raise their standard of living --- it may merely raise the * number * of people living in poverty .
Africa is a prime example ; it historically has been one of the biggest benefactors of vaccinations since vaccinations were first developed ... do most Africans now have a high standard of living ?
No , instead they have a massive population explosion but are still living about the same poor quality of life they did 100 years ago .
In other words , 'well done , you just made even more poor people' .
( PS I am speaking as an African , and have lived in Africa and worked with Africans my whole life , this is not just armchair rubbish .
) Bill Gates seems to genuinely mean well , but I fear his efforts will just serve to further explode the population of people living in poverty , and then there 'll be even more people that need to be fed that ca n't feed themselves .
You need to also simultaneously educate those people whose lives you are saving , to teach them to run their own modern industrialised economies , and that is much , much harder than merely sending them a bunch of medicine or food.I think if I had that much money , I 'd rather create an investment fund for funding free-market entrepreneurs within poor communities who help build solutions to their own problems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's extremely un-PC to say this, and it's also somewhat counterintuitive, but merely vaccinating a population doesn't *necessarily* raise their standard of living --- it may merely raise the *number* of people living in poverty.
Africa is a prime example; it historically has been one of the biggest benefactors of vaccinations since vaccinations were first developed ... do most Africans now have a high standard of living?
No, instead they have a massive population explosion but are still living about the same poor quality of life they did 100 years ago.
In other words, 'well done, you just made even more poor people'.
(PS I am speaking as an African, and have lived in Africa and worked with Africans my whole life, this is not just armchair rubbish.
)Bill Gates seems to genuinely mean well, but I fear his efforts will just serve to further explode the population of people living in poverty, and then there'll be even more people that need to be fed that can't feed themselves.
You need to also simultaneously educate those people whose lives you are saving, to teach them to run their own modern industrialised economies, and that is much, much harder than merely sending them a bunch of medicine or food.I think if I had that much money, I'd rather create an investment fund for funding free-market entrepreneurs within poor communities who help build solutions to their own problems.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185726</id>
	<title>Re:H.264 License</title>
	<author>FooAtWFU</author>
	<datestamp>1266513420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If they can redistribute it under the relevant open-source license (MPL, is it?), I'm sure they will. Otherwise, they'll probably not know what to do with it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If they can redistribute it under the relevant open-source license ( MPL , is it ?
) , I 'm sure they will .
Otherwise , they 'll probably not know what to do with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they can redistribute it under the relevant open-source license (MPL, is it?
), I'm sure they will.
Otherwise, they'll probably not know what to do with it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185300</id>
	<title>Re:No. No one remembers</title>
	<author>Helios1182</author>
	<datestamp>1266511980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow.  Trolling this took talent.  Both are good causes, and I would say vaccinating a population so they can survive will do wonders for raising their standard of living.  It is hard to build knowledge when you are dead.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow .
Trolling this took talent .
Both are good causes , and I would say vaccinating a population so they can survive will do wonders for raising their standard of living .
It is hard to build knowledge when you are dead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow.
Trolling this took talent.
Both are good causes, and I would say vaccinating a population so they can survive will do wonders for raising their standard of living.
It is hard to build knowledge when you are dead.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185264</id>
	<title>May be</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266511860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>because Bing does <a href="http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Benefactors" title="wikimediafoundation.org">http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Benefactors</a> [wikimediafoundation.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>because Bing does http : //wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Benefactors [ wikimediafoundation.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>because Bing does http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Benefactors [wikimediafoundation.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186196</id>
	<title>Re:Giving back</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1266515400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's retarded.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's retarded .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's retarded.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186074</id>
	<title>Already has been in the UK</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266514860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But quickly corrected:</p><p>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet\_Watch\_Foundation\_and\_Wikipedia</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But quickly corrected : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet \ _Watch \ _Foundation \ _and \ _Wikipedia</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But quickly corrected:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet\_Watch\_Foundation\_and\_Wikipedia</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186172</id>
	<title>Re:Giving back</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266515280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or <a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/02/18/1332220/Google-Makes-500m-a-Year-on-Typos" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">giving back 0.4\% of the typos</a> [slashdot.org].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or giving back 0.4 \ % of the typos [ slashdot.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or giving back 0.4\% of the typos [slashdot.org].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185208</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185444</id>
	<title>Re:No. No one remembers</title>
	<author>eldavojohn</author>
	<datestamp>1266512400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Again, Google upstages Microsoft.</p></div><p>Well, to be fair, that wasn't Microsoft, it was Bill Gates.  Yes, he built his money from Microsoft but we need to wait and see what Larry and Sergey do with their cash when they hit Gates' age.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>The impact of the Gates' money is immediate, but in the long run a well-funded knowledge base is much more effective at raising the standard of living worldwide.</p></div><p>Now you've gone and done it.  Now you've put me in the very awkward position of defending William Gates.  Recently the foundation committed <a href="http://www.news-medical.net/news/20100129/Bill-Melinda-Gates-Foundation-commits-2410-billion-for-vaccine-research-and-development.aspx" title="news-medical.net">$10 billion</a> [news-medical.net] to <a href="http://www.gatesfoundation.org/topics/Pages/malaria.aspx#" title="gatesfoundation.org">Malaria <b>Research and Development</b> </a> [gatesfoundation.org].  Not distribution and deployment but R&amp;D.  Technically this has no immediate effect but instead contributes to our "well-funded knowledge base" of vaccine development.  It's entirely probable that the first world will benefit from $10 billion being dumped into any medical R&amp;D.  I'm not even going to get into the number of zeros that ten <b>b</b>illion has compared to two <b>m</b>illion but I trust you to be able to discern between the significance.  <br> <br>

I got my own problem with the Gates Foundation<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... like who gets the money, where the money is spent and how American companies keep building their infrastructure off of it when you should probably be dumping it into the countries that you pledged to help.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Is there anything they [Google] can't fail at?</p></div><p>The summary lists Knol.  Recently I watched Wave flounder.  You're being disingenuous to claim that all Google touches is gold.  Their advertising revenues support a lot of their endeavors similar to how Microsoft operating system stranglehold allowed them to elbow their way into hardware and gaming.  Impressive?  Yes.  King Midas?  No.  Infallible?  No.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Again , Google upstages Microsoft.Well , to be fair , that was n't Microsoft , it was Bill Gates .
Yes , he built his money from Microsoft but we need to wait and see what Larry and Sergey do with their cash when they hit Gates ' age.The impact of the Gates ' money is immediate , but in the long run a well-funded knowledge base is much more effective at raising the standard of living worldwide.Now you 've gone and done it .
Now you 've put me in the very awkward position of defending William Gates .
Recently the foundation committed $ 10 billion [ news-medical.net ] to Malaria Research and Development [ gatesfoundation.org ] .
Not distribution and deployment but R&amp;D .
Technically this has no immediate effect but instead contributes to our " well-funded knowledge base " of vaccine development .
It 's entirely probable that the first world will benefit from $ 10 billion being dumped into any medical R&amp;D .
I 'm not even going to get into the number of zeros that ten billion has compared to two million but I trust you to be able to discern between the significance .
I got my own problem with the Gates Foundation ... like who gets the money , where the money is spent and how American companies keep building their infrastructure off of it when you should probably be dumping it into the countries that you pledged to help.Is there anything they [ Google ] ca n't fail at ? The summary lists Knol .
Recently I watched Wave flounder .
You 're being disingenuous to claim that all Google touches is gold .
Their advertising revenues support a lot of their endeavors similar to how Microsoft operating system stranglehold allowed them to elbow their way into hardware and gaming .
Impressive ? Yes .
King Midas ?
No. Infallible ?
No .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Again, Google upstages Microsoft.Well, to be fair, that wasn't Microsoft, it was Bill Gates.
Yes, he built his money from Microsoft but we need to wait and see what Larry and Sergey do with their cash when they hit Gates' age.The impact of the Gates' money is immediate, but in the long run a well-funded knowledge base is much more effective at raising the standard of living worldwide.Now you've gone and done it.
Now you've put me in the very awkward position of defending William Gates.
Recently the foundation committed $10 billion [news-medical.net] to Malaria Research and Development  [gatesfoundation.org].
Not distribution and deployment but R&amp;D.
Technically this has no immediate effect but instead contributes to our "well-funded knowledge base" of vaccine development.
It's entirely probable that the first world will benefit from $10 billion being dumped into any medical R&amp;D.
I'm not even going to get into the number of zeros that ten billion has compared to two million but I trust you to be able to discern between the significance.
I got my own problem with the Gates Foundation ... like who gets the money, where the money is spent and how American companies keep building their infrastructure off of it when you should probably be dumping it into the countries that you pledged to help.Is there anything they [Google] can't fail at?The summary lists Knol.
Recently I watched Wave flounder.
You're being disingenuous to claim that all Google touches is gold.
Their advertising revenues support a lot of their endeavors similar to how Microsoft operating system stranglehold allowed them to elbow their way into hardware and gaming.
Impressive?  Yes.
King Midas?
No.  Infallible?
No.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31188118</id>
	<title>I raise my hat</title>
	<author>openfrog</author>
	<datestamp>1266522720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wikipedia is an accomplishment of immense proportions.</p><p>For what is does directly as well as for the example it sets on what is possible on the Internet.</p><p>Larry Page and Sergey Brin have made a gesture recognizing this accomplishment, as the mission of Google shares a lot with Wikipedia's.</p><p>Kudos to them for applauding the work of a competitor. I raise my hat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wikipedia is an accomplishment of immense proportions.For what is does directly as well as for the example it sets on what is possible on the Internet.Larry Page and Sergey Brin have made a gesture recognizing this accomplishment , as the mission of Google shares a lot with Wikipedia 's.Kudos to them for applauding the work of a competitor .
I raise my hat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wikipedia is an accomplishment of immense proportions.For what is does directly as well as for the example it sets on what is possible on the Internet.Larry Page and Sergey Brin have made a gesture recognizing this accomplishment, as the mission of Google shares a lot with Wikipedia's.Kudos to them for applauding the work of a competitor.
I raise my hat.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185534</id>
	<title>Re:First Time Supported with *Cash*</title>
	<author>Sockatume</author>
	<datestamp>1266512700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Gimmicked", how? It's not like there's not a huge amount of people linking to Wikipedia. I'm not sure how boosted search rankings and the corresponding increased traffic helps keep an ad-free site "afloat" either.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Gimmicked " , how ?
It 's not like there 's not a huge amount of people linking to Wikipedia .
I 'm not sure how boosted search rankings and the corresponding increased traffic helps keep an ad-free site " afloat " either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Gimmicked", how?
It's not like there's not a huge amount of people linking to Wikipedia.
I'm not sure how boosted search rankings and the corresponding increased traffic helps keep an ad-free site "afloat" either.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185338</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185346</id>
	<title>$2m, not that much</title>
	<author>tiger32kw</author>
	<datestamp>1266512100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>because Google makes $500m a year off typos...</htmltext>
<tokenext>because Google makes $ 500m a year off typos.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>because Google makes $500m a year off typos...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186636</id>
	<title>Re:State of the Knol</title>
	<author>iknowcss</author>
	<datestamp>1266517200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>From the linked article:<blockquote><div><p>If Millikan could neutralize the force of Gravity by opposing it with a simple Electromagnetic Force, then Gravity must be a simple Electromagnetic Force of Classical Physics.</p></div></blockquote><p>Makes sense to me. I wish I was that smart<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the linked article : If Millikan could neutralize the force of Gravity by opposing it with a simple Electromagnetic Force , then Gravity must be a simple Electromagnetic Force of Classical Physics.Makes sense to me .
I wish I was that smart : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the linked article:If Millikan could neutralize the force of Gravity by opposing it with a simple Electromagnetic Force, then Gravity must be a simple Electromagnetic Force of Classical Physics.Makes sense to me.
I wish I was that smart :)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186864</id>
	<title>Why google is donating to wikipedia</title>
	<author>Mister\_Stoopid</author>
	<datestamp>1266518220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>OK here's my theory... just hear me out.

Google is in the business of indexing the internet, right?  That's a pretty hard job!  Maybe Google is having some trouble keeping up; maybe they're looking for someone to "lighten the load" a little, as it were.  That's where wikipedia comes in.

The way I figure it, Google would like to see the wikipedia editors expand their domain of influence.  Imagine if wikipedia editors had the power to delete knowledge not only from wikipedia, but from the web as a whole!  If google gets wikipedia editors to delete all the non-notable content from the internet, Google's job get's a lot easier!

Really makes you think...</htmltext>
<tokenext>OK here 's my theory... just hear me out .
Google is in the business of indexing the internet , right ?
That 's a pretty hard job !
Maybe Google is having some trouble keeping up ; maybe they 're looking for someone to " lighten the load " a little , as it were .
That 's where wikipedia comes in .
The way I figure it , Google would like to see the wikipedia editors expand their domain of influence .
Imagine if wikipedia editors had the power to delete knowledge not only from wikipedia , but from the web as a whole !
If google gets wikipedia editors to delete all the non-notable content from the internet , Google 's job get 's a lot easier !
Really makes you think.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK here's my theory... just hear me out.
Google is in the business of indexing the internet, right?
That's a pretty hard job!
Maybe Google is having some trouble keeping up; maybe they're looking for someone to "lighten the load" a little, as it were.
That's where wikipedia comes in.
The way I figure it, Google would like to see the wikipedia editors expand their domain of influence.
Imagine if wikipedia editors had the power to delete knowledge not only from wikipedia, but from the web as a whole!
If google gets wikipedia editors to delete all the non-notable content from the internet, Google's job get's a lot easier!
Really makes you think...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31194038</id>
	<title>Re:What about Wikileaks?</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1266502320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google also claims committment to laws...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google also claims committment to laws.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google also claims committment to laws...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185410</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185664</id>
	<title>Re:eh...</title>
	<author>ArsonSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1266513180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Usually by offering a large amount of cash and then privatizing the foundation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Usually by offering a large amount of cash and then privatizing the foundation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Usually by offering a large amount of cash and then privatizing the foundation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185290</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186072</id>
	<title>Re:eh...</title>
	<author>gad\_zuki!</author>
	<datestamp>1266514860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its difficult to buy a non-profit. You cant just put in an offer. You pretty much have to convince the board to switch to a private system and hand over the organization as a sale. I doubt Jimbo can even do this. The result would be a massive migration away from the Googlepedia and its collapse.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its difficult to buy a non-profit .
You cant just put in an offer .
You pretty much have to convince the board to switch to a private system and hand over the organization as a sale .
I doubt Jimbo can even do this .
The result would be a massive migration away from the Googlepedia and its collapse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its difficult to buy a non-profit.
You cant just put in an offer.
You pretty much have to convince the board to switch to a private system and hand over the organization as a sale.
I doubt Jimbo can even do this.
The result would be a massive migration away from the Googlepedia and its collapse.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185216</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31196048</id>
	<title>It's time to turn up the heat on Wikimedia...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266519420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...because they're a corrupt "charity" that is now in a prime position to control anything and everything they want online.</p><p>It can start by forcing the media to be reminded of Jimbo's indiscretions, and the infamous "essjay" controversy. It shouldn't stop there, though. There's always the "SlimVirgin" debacle, and some of David Gerard's creepy "hobbies" could stand to be brought to a brighter light.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...because they 're a corrupt " charity " that is now in a prime position to control anything and everything they want online.It can start by forcing the media to be reminded of Jimbo 's indiscretions , and the infamous " essjay " controversy .
It should n't stop there , though .
There 's always the " SlimVirgin " debacle , and some of David Gerard 's creepy " hobbies " could stand to be brought to a brighter light .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...because they're a corrupt "charity" that is now in a prime position to control anything and everything they want online.It can start by forcing the media to be reminded of Jimbo's indiscretions, and the infamous "essjay" controversy.
It shouldn't stop there, though.
There's always the "SlimVirgin" debacle, and some of David Gerard's creepy "hobbies" could stand to be brought to a brighter light.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185388</id>
	<title>I was much mor generous.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266512220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As I told on my <a href="http://twitter.com/javipas/status/9230356988" title="twitter.com"> Twitter account</a> [twitter.com]..., just a little quick math: </p><p>Google's revenues on Q409: $6,6 billion dollars. So $2 millions (0.000299\% of that) wasted here and there don't seem much of a problem.</p><p>I was much more generous. My Q409 was well bellow that, and I donated $10. That's aprox 0.0024\% of that revenues. 10 times more.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As I told on my Twitter account [ twitter.com ] ... , just a little quick math : Google 's revenues on Q409 : $ 6,6 billion dollars .
So $ 2 millions ( 0.000299 \ % of that ) wasted here and there do n't seem much of a problem.I was much more generous .
My Q409 was well bellow that , and I donated $ 10 .
That 's aprox 0.0024 \ % of that revenues .
10 times more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As I told on my  Twitter account [twitter.com]..., just a little quick math: Google's revenues on Q409: $6,6 billion dollars.
So $2 millions (0.000299\% of that) wasted here and there don't seem much of a problem.I was much more generous.
My Q409 was well bellow that, and I donated $10.
That's aprox 0.0024\% of that revenues.
10 times more.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186106</id>
	<title>Just to unlock Bill Gates wiki page</title>
	<author>RedTeflon</author>
	<datestamp>1266515040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Google paid 2 million just so Wiki would unlock Bill Gates's page so Google can go back to defacing it for giggles. $$$ well spent</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google paid 2 million just so Wiki would unlock Bill Gates 's page so Google can go back to defacing it for giggles .
$ $ $ well spent</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google paid 2 million just so Wiki would unlock Bill Gates's page so Google can go back to defacing it for giggles.
$$$ well spent</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31187962</id>
	<title>Re:Nice list... but Anonymous also donated a lot</title>
	<author>soulsteal</author>
	<datestamp>1266522120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Only if WikiMedia's got small tits.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Only if WikiMedia 's got small tits .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only if WikiMedia's got small tits.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185442</id>
	<title>everything2?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266512400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't remember Knol, but I do remember everything2, Slashdot's failed attempt at a Wikipedia.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't remember Knol , but I do remember everything2 , Slashdot 's failed attempt at a Wikipedia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't remember Knol, but I do remember everything2, Slashdot's failed attempt at a Wikipedia.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31194200</id>
	<title>Who remembers</title>
	<author>GWBasic</author>
	<datestamp>1266503400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who remembers the article that floated around about a year ago about how Google manually tunes their search results.  One of the manual things that they check is to ensure that Wikipedia articles are top links.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who remembers the article that floated around about a year ago about how Google manually tunes their search results .
One of the manual things that they check is to ensure that Wikipedia articles are top links .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who remembers the article that floated around about a year ago about how Google manually tunes their search results.
One of the manual things that they check is to ensure that Wikipedia articles are top links.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185344</id>
	<title>State of the Knol</title>
	<author>Sockatume</author>
	<datestamp>1266512100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had completely forgotten Knol existed until right now. I promptly did a quick search for a popular video game's title and was given <a href="http://knol.google.com/k/anti-gravity-and-electro-magnetic-flight#" title="google.com">this</a> [google.com].</p><p><i>Chilling the circuits is still not efficient if you are using more electricity to do it... But chilling the circuits in outer space could be done efficiently by using the cold environment of space itself to chill them...</i></p><p>It looks like they've basically reinvented Geocities.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had completely forgotten Knol existed until right now .
I promptly did a quick search for a popular video game 's title and was given this [ google.com ] .Chilling the circuits is still not efficient if you are using more electricity to do it... But chilling the circuits in outer space could be done efficiently by using the cold environment of space itself to chill them...It looks like they 've basically reinvented Geocities .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had completely forgotten Knol existed until right now.
I promptly did a quick search for a popular video game's title and was given this [google.com].Chilling the circuits is still not efficient if you are using more electricity to do it... But chilling the circuits in outer space could be done efficiently by using the cold environment of space itself to chill them...It looks like they've basically reinvented Geocities.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185320</id>
	<title>Re:No. No one remembers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266512040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation donates money to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. <b> school building in third world countries.</b> </p><p>... a well-funded knowledge base is much more effective at raising the standard of living worldwide. </p></div><p>Do you really think that Wikipedia is more essential to a well-funded knowledge base than schools? Oh I forgot, everything Google does is better than anything Bill Gates does.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation donates money to .. school building in third world countries .
... a well-funded knowledge base is much more effective at raising the standard of living worldwide .
Do you really think that Wikipedia is more essential to a well-funded knowledge base than schools ?
Oh I forgot , everything Google does is better than anything Bill Gates does .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation donates money to ..  school building in third world countries.
... a well-funded knowledge base is much more effective at raising the standard of living worldwide.
Do you really think that Wikipedia is more essential to a well-funded knowledge base than schools?
Oh I forgot, everything Google does is better than anything Bill Gates does.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185670</id>
	<title>Re:First Time Supported with *Cash*</title>
	<author>msantosn</author>
	<datestamp>1266513240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What? This is what page rank is used for... Is the nature of Google, so having said that I wouldn't say that:<p><div class="quote"><p>Google has kept Wikimedia afloat with gimmicked page rankings and search results for years.</p></div><p>Google hasn't done anything for them... except of course the 2 million dollars donation.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What ?
This is what page rank is used for... Is the nature of Google , so having said that I would n't say that : Google has kept Wikimedia afloat with gimmicked page rankings and search results for years.Google has n't done anything for them... except of course the 2 million dollars donation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What?
This is what page rank is used for... Is the nature of Google, so having said that I wouldn't say that:Google has kept Wikimedia afloat with gimmicked page rankings and search results for years.Google hasn't done anything for them... except of course the 2 million dollars donation.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185338</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185952</id>
	<title>Re:Wikileaks</title>
	<author>jgtg32a</author>
	<datestamp>1266514380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wikileaks would reject it though, they have a policy against that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wikileaks would reject it though , they have a policy against that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wikileaks would reject it though, they have a policy against that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185354</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31193360</id>
	<title>Re:Probably a Waste</title>
	<author>Eil</author>
	<datestamp>1266498180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Non-profits are often "non-profit" only in the sense that they don't follow the traditional business model and the organization itself doesn't keep the donations given to it. The employees who work for non-profits, however, can be compensated very well for their time.</p><p>(Disclaimer: I'm not dogging <i>all</i> non-profits here. I'm sure there are many that are run almost entirely on volunteers, have little overhead, and do a lot of good for the cause that they serve. But as an I.T. consultant, I've had an up-close view of how the majority of non-profits operate and that is in a word: self-sustaining.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Non-profits are often " non-profit " only in the sense that they do n't follow the traditional business model and the organization itself does n't keep the donations given to it .
The employees who work for non-profits , however , can be compensated very well for their time .
( Disclaimer : I 'm not dogging all non-profits here .
I 'm sure there are many that are run almost entirely on volunteers , have little overhead , and do a lot of good for the cause that they serve .
But as an I.T .
consultant , I 've had an up-close view of how the majority of non-profits operate and that is in a word : self-sustaining .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Non-profits are often "non-profit" only in the sense that they don't follow the traditional business model and the organization itself doesn't keep the donations given to it.
The employees who work for non-profits, however, can be compensated very well for their time.
(Disclaimer: I'm not dogging all non-profits here.
I'm sure there are many that are run almost entirely on volunteers, have little overhead, and do a lot of good for the cause that they serve.
But as an I.T.
consultant, I've had an up-close view of how the majority of non-profits operate and that is in a word: self-sustaining.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186596</id>
	<title>why?</title>
	<author>Errtu76</author>
	<datestamp>1266516960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just learned that Google earns 500m on typos alone. Wikipedia is full of typos (and incorrect 'facts', but that's another issue). The 2m is just a "thank you".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just learned that Google earns 500m on typos alone .
Wikipedia is full of typos ( and incorrect 'facts ' , but that 's another issue ) .
The 2m is just a " thank you " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just learned that Google earns 500m on typos alone.
Wikipedia is full of typos (and incorrect 'facts', but that's another issue).
The 2m is just a "thank you".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31192938</id>
	<title>Yahoo even mirrors them</title>
	<author>Ilgaz</author>
	<datestamp>1266496080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As far as I know, Yahoo maintains a large set of Wikipedia servers all for free without strings attached.</p><p><a href="http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Yahoo!\_hosting" title="wikimedia.org">http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Yahoo!\_hosting</a> [wikimedia.org]</p><p>Yahoo has an amazing PR problem, for sure.</p><p>Of course; If you consider people thinking "Hopefully, my browser won't hit google analytics after this donation.", perhaps Google's PR problem is deeper. I am personally amazed that they didn't donate a single cent before.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As far as I know , Yahoo maintains a large set of Wikipedia servers all for free without strings attached.http : //meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Yahoo ! \ _hosting [ wikimedia.org ] Yahoo has an amazing PR problem , for sure.Of course ; If you consider people thinking " Hopefully , my browser wo n't hit google analytics after this donation .
" , perhaps Google 's PR problem is deeper .
I am personally amazed that they did n't donate a single cent before .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As far as I know, Yahoo maintains a large set of Wikipedia servers all for free without strings attached.http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Yahoo!\_hosting [wikimedia.org]Yahoo has an amazing PR problem, for sure.Of course; If you consider people thinking "Hopefully, my browser won't hit google analytics after this donation.
", perhaps Google's PR problem is deeper.
I am personally amazed that they didn't donate a single cent before.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185264</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185260</id>
	<title>The article explains it already</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266511860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As the article already states: there are "long-term motivations" at play here, (probably to soften its image) in preparation for some new project, as already mentioned with Firefox and Chrome.</p><p>As usual, since the article summary does not include this info which is easily found by <i>reading the article,</i> people will speculate here in the forums and end up rewriting the article themselves<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As the article already states : there are " long-term motivations " at play here , ( probably to soften its image ) in preparation for some new project , as already mentioned with Firefox and Chrome.As usual , since the article summary does not include this info which is easily found by reading the article , people will speculate here in the forums and end up rewriting the article themselves : D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As the article already states: there are "long-term motivations" at play here, (probably to soften its image) in preparation for some new project, as already mentioned with Firefox and Chrome.As usual, since the article summary does not include this info which is easily found by reading the article, people will speculate here in the forums and end up rewriting the article themselves :D</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31189372</id>
	<title>Re:H.264 License</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266526320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mozilla can afford the license fee.  But including the code will prevent redistribution by 3rd parties, so it is not an acceptable option.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mozilla can afford the license fee .
But including the code will prevent redistribution by 3rd parties , so it is not an acceptable option .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mozilla can afford the license fee.
But including the code will prevent redistribution by 3rd parties, so it is not an acceptable option.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31189752</id>
	<title>Re:Nice list... but Anonymous also donated a lot</title>
	<author>saibot834</author>
	<datestamp>1266484200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You mean <a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/12/07/1253228" title="slashdot.org">like in the UK?</a> [slashdot.org] (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virgin\_Killer" title="wikipedia.org">more info</a> [wikipedia.org])</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean like in the UK ?
[ slashdot.org ] ( more info [ wikipedia.org ] )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean like in the UK?
[slashdot.org] (more info [wikipedia.org])</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185460</id>
	<title>I scratched my balls, people are wondering why...</title>
	<author>bigsexyjoe</author>
	<datestamp>1266512460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I mean this just isn't that much to them.<p>
They probably mostly did it for publicity.  And this article on Slashdot was probably $2 million worth of good press to them.
</p><p>
Remember, a lot of people on this site are avid technologists who are becoming suspicious of Google now over privacy and such things.  But they are all going to have a geekgasm over this donation to Wikipedia.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean this just is n't that much to them .
They probably mostly did it for publicity .
And this article on Slashdot was probably $ 2 million worth of good press to them .
Remember , a lot of people on this site are avid technologists who are becoming suspicious of Google now over privacy and such things .
But they are all going to have a geekgasm over this donation to Wikipedia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean this just isn't that much to them.
They probably mostly did it for publicity.
And this article on Slashdot was probably $2 million worth of good press to them.
Remember, a lot of people on this site are avid technologists who are becoming suspicious of Google now over privacy and such things.
But they are all going to have a geekgasm over this donation to Wikipedia.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31187340</id>
	<title>Re:Probably a Waste</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266520320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The move to the Bay Area is chief exhibit #1 - why move an organization whose whole purpose, mission, and asset is a web page to one of the most expensive real estate locations on earth?</p> </div><p>Easy -- close proximity and easy access to well-heeled donors.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The move to the Bay Area is chief exhibit # 1 - why move an organization whose whole purpose , mission , and asset is a web page to one of the most expensive real estate locations on earth ?
Easy -- close proximity and easy access to well-heeled donors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The move to the Bay Area is chief exhibit #1 - why move an organization whose whole purpose, mission, and asset is a web page to one of the most expensive real estate locations on earth?
Easy -- close proximity and easy access to well-heeled donors.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185198</id>
	<title>No. No one remembers</title>
	<author>BadAnalogyGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1266511560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google does so many things. It's hard to keep track of every little project they are involved in.</p><p>The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation donates money to causes like vaccination and school building in third world countries.</p><p>The impact of the Gates' money is immediate, but in the long run a well-funded knowledge base is much more effective at raising the standard of living worldwide. Again, Google upstages Microsoft. Is there anything they can't fail at?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google does so many things .
It 's hard to keep track of every little project they are involved in.The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation donates money to causes like vaccination and school building in third world countries.The impact of the Gates ' money is immediate , but in the long run a well-funded knowledge base is much more effective at raising the standard of living worldwide .
Again , Google upstages Microsoft .
Is there anything they ca n't fail at ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google does so many things.
It's hard to keep track of every little project they are involved in.The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation donates money to causes like vaccination and school building in third world countries.The impact of the Gates' money is immediate, but in the long run a well-funded knowledge base is much more effective at raising the standard of living worldwide.
Again, Google upstages Microsoft.
Is there anything they can't fail at?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31220742</id>
	<title>Re:eh...</title>
	<author>blai</author>
	<datestamp>1266782400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>download <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia\_database" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">wikipedia</a> [wikipedia.org] and mirror it elsewhere if Google does buy...</htmltext>
<tokenext>download wikipedia [ wikipedia.org ] and mirror it elsewhere if Google does buy.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>download wikipedia [wikipedia.org] and mirror it elsewhere if Google does buy...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185216</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185838</id>
	<title>Nice list... but Anonymous also donated a lot</title>
	<author>thijsh</author>
	<datestamp>1266513900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>...does that mean WikiMedia will also be classified as kiddie porn in Australia now?</htmltext>
<tokenext>...does that mean WikiMedia will also be classified as kiddie porn in Australia now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...does that mean WikiMedia will also be classified as kiddie porn in Australia now?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185264</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31206278</id>
	<title>Wikileaks</title>
	<author>Gaffod</author>
	<datestamp>1266584820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't necessarily that wikimedia does not deserve donations, wouldn't donating to wikileaks do more good at this point, seeing as how their site has been down for some time now?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't necessarily that wikimedia does not deserve donations , would n't donating to wikileaks do more good at this point , seeing as how their site has been down for some time now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't necessarily that wikimedia does not deserve donations, wouldn't donating to wikileaks do more good at this point, seeing as how their site has been down for some time now?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186094</id>
	<title>Re:No. No one remembers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266514920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Google has their core cash cow but everything else seems half assed.  Not everything, but knol, wave, buzz, base, orkut, etc.  I understand, it's more fun to design and build new stuff, but epic failure.  MS is similar, of course, but they are seem willing to dump money and resources into some of their half assed shit (zune, xbox)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google has their core cash cow but everything else seems half assed .
Not everything , but knol , wave , buzz , base , orkut , etc .
I understand , it 's more fun to design and build new stuff , but epic failure .
MS is similar , of course , but they are seem willing to dump money and resources into some of their half assed shit ( zune , xbox )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google has their core cash cow but everything else seems half assed.
Not everything, but knol, wave, buzz, base, orkut, etc.
I understand, it's more fun to design and build new stuff, but epic failure.
MS is similar, of course, but they are seem willing to dump money and resources into some of their half assed shit (zune, xbox)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185282</id>
	<title>Re:No. No one remembers</title>
	<author>calibre-not-output</author>
	<datestamp>1266511920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation isn't Microsoft. It just belongs to Bill Gates.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is n't Microsoft .
It just belongs to Bill Gates .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation isn't Microsoft.
It just belongs to Bill Gates.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185600</id>
	<title>Re:Giving back</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266513000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah right.</p><p>1. Search for "$WHATEVER wikipedia" in google.<br>2. First result probably is wikipedia. You click on it<br>3. You are now on totally ads free site.<br>4. Profit?????</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah right.1 .
Search for " $ WHATEVER wikipedia " in google.2 .
First result probably is wikipedia .
You click on it3 .
You are now on totally ads free site.4 .
Profit ? ? ? ? ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah right.1.
Search for "$WHATEVER wikipedia" in google.2.
First result probably is wikipedia.
You click on it3.
You are now on totally ads free site.4.
Profit?????</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185208</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31187158</id>
	<title>What's $2 million to Google?</title>
	<author>JustinFreid</author>
	<datestamp>1266519600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A good way to spend some of the $500 million they make from ads on typosquatting domains.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A good way to spend some of the $ 500 million they make from ads on typosquatting domains .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A good way to spend some of the $500 million they make from ads on typosquatting domains.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185482</id>
	<title>Re:Giving back</title>
	<author>buruonbrails</author>
	<datestamp>1266512520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Google ranks Wikipedia very high in its search results, which bring enormous amount of traffic. Scaling and maintaining the infrastructure to deal with this traffic is the major part of Wikimedia Foundation's expenses. So, Google is in fact responsible for a huge chunk of Wikipedia's expenses, and it probably feels obligated to give Wikipedia some compensation for this.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google ranks Wikipedia very high in its search results , which bring enormous amount of traffic .
Scaling and maintaining the infrastructure to deal with this traffic is the major part of Wikimedia Foundation 's expenses .
So , Google is in fact responsible for a huge chunk of Wikipedia 's expenses , and it probably feels obligated to give Wikipedia some compensation for this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google ranks Wikipedia very high in its search results, which bring enormous amount of traffic.
Scaling and maintaining the infrastructure to deal with this traffic is the major part of Wikimedia Foundation's expenses.
So, Google is in fact responsible for a huge chunk of Wikipedia's expenses, and it probably feels obligated to give Wikipedia some compensation for this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185208</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186598</id>
	<title>Re:H.264 License</title>
	<author>bflong</author>
	<datestamp>1266516960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It wouldn't matter. They still couldn't allow it to be redistributed. They would have to keep track of every Firefox download and pay a fee for each one. Nobody could include Firefox in any other download. Linux distros would have to fork it to strip the patented code out. Mozilla is making the right choice by pushing for an open video format instead of trying to find a 'workaround' for getting h.264 working. H.264 is a minefield and doesn't belong on an open and Free Internet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It would n't matter .
They still could n't allow it to be redistributed .
They would have to keep track of every Firefox download and pay a fee for each one .
Nobody could include Firefox in any other download .
Linux distros would have to fork it to strip the patented code out .
Mozilla is making the right choice by pushing for an open video format instead of trying to find a 'workaround ' for getting h.264 working .
H.264 is a minefield and does n't belong on an open and Free Internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It wouldn't matter.
They still couldn't allow it to be redistributed.
They would have to keep track of every Firefox download and pay a fee for each one.
Nobody could include Firefox in any other download.
Linux distros would have to fork it to strip the patented code out.
Mozilla is making the right choice by pushing for an open video format instead of trying to find a 'workaround' for getting h.264 working.
H.264 is a minefield and doesn't belong on an open and Free Internet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31187680</id>
	<title>Re:Giving back</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1266521340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Google must get huge revenue from searches like $WHATEVER wikipedia</p></div><p>Not from me. I use Wikipedia to find the Google homepage.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google must get huge revenue from searches like $ WHATEVER wikipediaNot from me .
I use Wikipedia to find the Google homepage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google must get huge revenue from searches like $WHATEVER wikipediaNot from me.
I use Wikipedia to find the Google homepage.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185208</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185486</id>
	<title>it has many wondering why</title>
	<author>wisnoskij</author>
	<datestamp>1266512520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well Google still is relatively a new company (at least as a company successful enough to be handing out millions to charity), I am sure they just never got around to it yet. <br>
Big companies give money to charity and Wikimedia makes sense for Internet based companies like Google because they make the web so much more worth using.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well Google still is relatively a new company ( at least as a company successful enough to be handing out millions to charity ) , I am sure they just never got around to it yet .
Big companies give money to charity and Wikimedia makes sense for Internet based companies like Google because they make the web so much more worth using .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well Google still is relatively a new company (at least as a company successful enough to be handing out millions to charity), I am sure they just never got around to it yet.
Big companies give money to charity and Wikimedia makes sense for Internet based companies like Google because they make the web so much more worth using.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31187748</id>
	<title>Re:eh...</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1266521460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>With money?</htmltext>
<tokenext>With money ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With money?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185290</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31190106</id>
	<title>Bill &amp; Melinda Foundation is wonderfull</title>
	<author>silarulz</author>
	<datestamp>1266485160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I live in Africa, Malaria kills more people (I mean children under 5) than AIDS in a year in some places. Thanks to the B&amp;M Foundation, free treated mosquito nets have been handed out to pregnant mothers.

And thanks to George W. Bush, PEPFAR is doing wonders when it comes to AIDS!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I live in Africa , Malaria kills more people ( I mean children under 5 ) than AIDS in a year in some places .
Thanks to the B&amp;M Foundation , free treated mosquito nets have been handed out to pregnant mothers .
And thanks to George W. Bush , PEPFAR is doing wonders when it comes to AIDS !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I live in Africa, Malaria kills more people (I mean children under 5) than AIDS in a year in some places.
Thanks to the B&amp;M Foundation, free treated mosquito nets have been handed out to pregnant mothers.
And thanks to George W. Bush, PEPFAR is doing wonders when it comes to AIDS!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185462</id>
	<title>H.264 License</title>
	<author>Fantom42</author>
	<datestamp>1266512460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe Google will buy the Firefox guys an H.264 license.  I wonder if they would accept it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe Google will buy the Firefox guys an H.264 license .
I wonder if they would accept it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe Google will buy the Firefox guys an H.264 license.
I wonder if they would accept it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31203736</id>
	<title>Re:Probably a Waste</title>
	<author>Simetrical</author>
	<datestamp>1266572400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The problem with giving to Wikimedia is that they have been so wasteful of the money they've been given.  The move to the Bay Area is chief exhibit #1 - why move an organization whose whole purpose, mission, and asset is a web page to one of the most expensive real estate locations on earth?  </p></div><p>Maybe because it's a lot easier to find software developers in the Bay Area?  Their previous location was Florida &ndash; better known for its retirees than its programming industry.  Even though Wikimedia runs a website, and many people work remotely, they still do have quite a few people working from their office.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem with giving to Wikimedia is that they have been so wasteful of the money they 've been given .
The move to the Bay Area is chief exhibit # 1 - why move an organization whose whole purpose , mission , and asset is a web page to one of the most expensive real estate locations on earth ?
Maybe because it 's a lot easier to find software developers in the Bay Area ?
Their previous location was Florida    better known for its retirees than its programming industry .
Even though Wikimedia runs a website , and many people work remotely , they still do have quite a few people working from their office .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem with giving to Wikimedia is that they have been so wasteful of the money they've been given.
The move to the Bay Area is chief exhibit #1 - why move an organization whose whole purpose, mission, and asset is a web page to one of the most expensive real estate locations on earth?
Maybe because it's a lot easier to find software developers in the Bay Area?
Their previous location was Florida – better known for its retirees than its programming industry.
Even though Wikimedia runs a website, and many people work remotely, they still do have quite a few people working from their office.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186340</id>
	<title>Traffic, sure, but not revenue</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266515940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google makes no money off of those searches unless you search for "$WHATEVER wikipedia" and then click on a sponsored link (and not the Wikipedia page you were actually looking for.)</p><p>If you click through to the Wikipedia, or do a Feeling Lucky search, all Google gets out of the deal is a higher bandwidth bill.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google makes no money off of those searches unless you search for " $ WHATEVER wikipedia " and then click on a sponsored link ( and not the Wikipedia page you were actually looking for .
) If you click through to the Wikipedia , or do a Feeling Lucky search , all Google gets out of the deal is a higher bandwidth bill .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google makes no money off of those searches unless you search for "$WHATEVER wikipedia" and then click on a sponsored link (and not the Wikipedia page you were actually looking for.
)If you click through to the Wikipedia, or do a Feeling Lucky search, all Google gets out of the deal is a higher bandwidth bill.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185208</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185290</id>
	<title>Re:eh...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266511920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How do you buy a charity?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How do you buy a charity ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do you buy a charity?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185216</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31187212</id>
	<title>Knol does not compete with Wikipedia</title>
	<author>fusiongyro</author>
	<datestamp>1266519780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The whole point of Knol was to provide source material for Wikipedia articles. Remember?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The whole point of Knol was to provide source material for Wikipedia articles .
Remember ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The whole point of Knol was to provide source material for Wikipedia articles.
Remember?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31196760</id>
	<title>Re:eh...</title>
	<author>Lemmy Caution</author>
	<datestamp>1266572580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WMF is a non-profit, not a charity. Most (but not all) charities are non-profits, but "charity" implies an organization with a charter to provide help to the less fortunate. WMF is more like an educational or research organization.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WMF is a non-profit , not a charity .
Most ( but not all ) charities are non-profits , but " charity " implies an organization with a charter to provide help to the less fortunate .
WMF is more like an educational or research organization .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WMF is a non-profit, not a charity.
Most (but not all) charities are non-profits, but "charity" implies an organization with a charter to provide help to the less fortunate.
WMF is more like an educational or research organization.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185290</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185354</id>
	<title>Wikileaks</title>
	<author>mariushm</author>
	<datestamp>1266512100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd be more impressed if Google would donate even $50-100.000 to Wikileaks  - it brings almost as much good as Wikipedia. Not every benefit is directly visible.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd be more impressed if Google would donate even $ 50-100.000 to Wikileaks - it brings almost as much good as Wikipedia .
Not every benefit is directly visible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd be more impressed if Google would donate even $50-100.000 to Wikileaks  - it brings almost as much good as Wikipedia.
Not every benefit is directly visible.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186530</id>
	<title>For those of you who are wondering...</title>
	<author>hey!</author>
	<datestamp>1266516660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knol" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knol</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knol [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knol [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185208</id>
	<title>Giving back</title>
	<author>srussia</author>
	<datestamp>1266511620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Google must get huge revenue from searches like $WHATEVER wikipedia</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google must get huge revenue from searches like $ WHATEVER wikipedia</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google must get huge revenue from searches like $WHATEVER wikipedia</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185536</id>
	<title>New Google Company Motto..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266512760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>do no ation</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>do no ation</tokentext>
<sentencetext>do no ation</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185780</id>
	<title>A bit background info...</title>
	<author>saibot834</author>
	<datestamp>1266513660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nothing like that will happen. The Wikimedia Foundation has received large grants before (such as Omidyar's <a href="http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Press\_releases/Omidyar\_Network\_Grant\_August\_2009" title="wikimediafoundation.org">$2M grant</a> [wikimediafoundation.org]). WMF isn't a company you can just 'buy out'. It's a charitable 501(c)(3) organization that is controlled by the <a href="http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Board\_of\_Trustees" title="wikimediafoundation.org">Board of Trustees</a> [wikimediafoundation.org], which is composed of 3 community-elected seats, 2 community-seats elected by <a href="http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Local\_chapters" title="wikimediafoundation.org">chapters</a> [wikimediafoundation.org], a "Jimbo-seat" for the Wikipedia founder, and up to four "Specific expertise" seats elected by the board itself (<a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/foundation/b/b2/BOARD\_RESTRUCTURE\_FINAL\_April\_2008.pdf" title="wikimedia.org">source</a> [wikimedia.org]). Google could attempt to get a "Specific expertise" seat, but they can't do anything to significantly change the course of the foundation. Also, if they tried, there'd be a major outcry by the community (and perhaps a fork).</p><p>(To be fair, one should address the Omidyar case. Around the time Omidyar granted $2M, Matt Halprin, an Omidyar employee got a "Specific expertise" seat. There were of course conspiracy theories about Omidyar 'buying' a seat in the board. I've discussed this matter with one of the board members, and the result was something like this: Omidyar didn't 'buy' a seat, but in the grant negotiations, they became aware of Matt Halprin's expertise and realized of which value he'd be on the board.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nothing like that will happen .
The Wikimedia Foundation has received large grants before ( such as Omidyar 's $ 2M grant [ wikimediafoundation.org ] ) .
WMF is n't a company you can just 'buy out' .
It 's a charitable 501 ( c ) ( 3 ) organization that is controlled by the Board of Trustees [ wikimediafoundation.org ] , which is composed of 3 community-elected seats , 2 community-seats elected by chapters [ wikimediafoundation.org ] , a " Jimbo-seat " for the Wikipedia founder , and up to four " Specific expertise " seats elected by the board itself ( source [ wikimedia.org ] ) .
Google could attempt to get a " Specific expertise " seat , but they ca n't do anything to significantly change the course of the foundation .
Also , if they tried , there 'd be a major outcry by the community ( and perhaps a fork ) .
( To be fair , one should address the Omidyar case .
Around the time Omidyar granted $ 2M , Matt Halprin , an Omidyar employee got a " Specific expertise " seat .
There were of course conspiracy theories about Omidyar 'buying ' a seat in the board .
I 've discussed this matter with one of the board members , and the result was something like this : Omidyar did n't 'buy ' a seat , but in the grant negotiations , they became aware of Matt Halprin 's expertise and realized of which value he 'd be on the board .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nothing like that will happen.
The Wikimedia Foundation has received large grants before (such as Omidyar's $2M grant [wikimediafoundation.org]).
WMF isn't a company you can just 'buy out'.
It's a charitable 501(c)(3) organization that is controlled by the Board of Trustees [wikimediafoundation.org], which is composed of 3 community-elected seats, 2 community-seats elected by chapters [wikimediafoundation.org], a "Jimbo-seat" for the Wikipedia founder, and up to four "Specific expertise" seats elected by the board itself (source [wikimedia.org]).
Google could attempt to get a "Specific expertise" seat, but they can't do anything to significantly change the course of the foundation.
Also, if they tried, there'd be a major outcry by the community (and perhaps a fork).
(To be fair, one should address the Omidyar case.
Around the time Omidyar granted $2M, Matt Halprin, an Omidyar employee got a "Specific expertise" seat.
There were of course conspiracy theories about Omidyar 'buying' a seat in the board.
I've discussed this matter with one of the board members, and the result was something like this: Omidyar didn't 'buy' a seat, but in the grant negotiations, they became aware of Matt Halprin's expertise and realized of which value he'd be on the board.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185216</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185720</id>
	<title>Re:First Time Supported with *Cash*</title>
	<author>Rogerborg</author>
	<datestamp>1266513420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How is Google sending Wikimedia traffic keeping them "afloat"?  Every unpaid-for GET is an anchor, not a lifebelt.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How is Google sending Wikimedia traffic keeping them " afloat " ?
Every unpaid-for GET is an anchor , not a lifebelt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is Google sending Wikimedia traffic keeping them "afloat"?
Every unpaid-for GET is an anchor, not a lifebelt.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185338</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31189372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185208
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31192284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185726
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185216
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31187680
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185208
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186636
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185338
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31189752
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185264
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31187748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185216
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31187962
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185264
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31206278
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185970
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185208
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31187340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31187326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185208
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31196760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185216
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185208
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31192938
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185264
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31187286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185264
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186072
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185216
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31203736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185338
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185208
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31193360
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185338
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31188118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31189462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185780
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185216
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186094
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31194038
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185410
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185320
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31220742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185216
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186598
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185522
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185208
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185354
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1442221_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31187650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1442221.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185338
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185720
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185670
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185534
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1442221.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185260
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1442221.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186108
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31206278
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31187340
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31193360
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31203736
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31188118
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1442221.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185346
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1442221.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186166
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1442221.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185442
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1442221.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185264
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185838
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31189752
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31187962
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186074
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31192938
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1442221.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185460
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1442221.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186530
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1442221.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185388
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185942
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1442221.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185208
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185522
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186172
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185600
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185970
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186340
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185482
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186196
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31187680
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1442221.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185410
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31194038
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1442221.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185344
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186118
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186636
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1442221.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185462
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185726
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186598
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31189372
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1442221.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185198
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185444
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186094
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31192284
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31187286
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185300
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31187326
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31187650
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185320
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185282
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1442221.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185870
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1442221.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185354
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185952
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1442221.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185216
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185780
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31189462
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31220742
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185290
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31196760
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31187748
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31185664
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1442221.31186072
</commentlist>
</conversation>
