<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_18_1338222</id>
	<title>French Net Censorship Plan Moves Forward</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1266503220000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.goodgearguide.com.au/" rel="nofollow">angry tapir</a> writes <i>"French lawmakers have <a href="http://www.goodgearguide.com.au/article/336563">voted to approve a draft law to filter Internet traffic</a> that Slashdot <a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/02/11/2346225/France-Votes-Tuesday-On-Net-Censorship">previously discussed</a>. The government says the measure is intended to catch child pornographers. The Senate, where the government has a majority, will soon give the bill a second reading. If the Senate makes no amendments to the text, that will also be its final reading, as the government has declared the bill 'urgent,' a procedural move that reduces the usual cycle of four readings to two."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>angry tapir writes " French lawmakers have voted to approve a draft law to filter Internet traffic that Slashdot previously discussed .
The government says the measure is intended to catch child pornographers .
The Senate , where the government has a majority , will soon give the bill a second reading .
If the Senate makes no amendments to the text , that will also be its final reading , as the government has declared the bill 'urgent, ' a procedural move that reduces the usual cycle of four readings to two .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>angry tapir writes "French lawmakers have voted to approve a draft law to filter Internet traffic that Slashdot previously discussed.
The government says the measure is intended to catch child pornographers.
The Senate, where the government has a majority, will soon give the bill a second reading.
If the Senate makes no amendments to the text, that will also be its final reading, as the government has declared the bill 'urgent,' a procedural move that reduces the usual cycle of four readings to two.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31186632</id>
	<title>Re:fascism will never succeed in reducing paedophi</title>
	<author>maxwell demon</author>
	<datestamp>1266517200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>AFAIK strong cryptography is already forbidden in France.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>AFAIK strong cryptography is already forbidden in France .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>AFAIK strong cryptography is already forbidden in France.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184842</id>
	<title>Re:Radio Free \_\_\_\_\_</title>
	<author>discord5</author>
	<datestamp>1266510240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I, for one, will be using my "end of Cold War" era Yaesu FRG-7700 shortwave radio to search for broadcasts from the Free World</p></div><p>Purely from a technical point of view, one could use such a shortwave radio together with a modem to create a network that could broadcast kitty porn, so, I'm afraid we're also going to have to confiscate that.</p><p>We're also going to have confiscate any flashlights you have, so you can't broadcast aforementioned kitty porn in binary signals to your neighbours. You don't happen to own two tin cans and a piece of string? We've had disturbing reports of people luring kitties by mewing loudly into one can.</p><p>I hate to say it, but soon the only network free of filters will be something like <a href="http://freenetproject.org/" title="freenetproject.org">freenet</a> [freenetproject.org], but oh snap... The very people this filter is trying to catch already are using this and similar technologies.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I , for one , will be using my " end of Cold War " era Yaesu FRG-7700 shortwave radio to search for broadcasts from the Free WorldPurely from a technical point of view , one could use such a shortwave radio together with a modem to create a network that could broadcast kitty porn , so , I 'm afraid we 're also going to have to confiscate that.We 're also going to have confiscate any flashlights you have , so you ca n't broadcast aforementioned kitty porn in binary signals to your neighbours .
You do n't happen to own two tin cans and a piece of string ?
We 've had disturbing reports of people luring kitties by mewing loudly into one can.I hate to say it , but soon the only network free of filters will be something like freenet [ freenetproject.org ] , but oh snap... The very people this filter is trying to catch already are using this and similar technologies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I, for one, will be using my "end of Cold War" era Yaesu FRG-7700 shortwave radio to search for broadcasts from the Free WorldPurely from a technical point of view, one could use such a shortwave radio together with a modem to create a network that could broadcast kitty porn, so, I'm afraid we're also going to have to confiscate that.We're also going to have confiscate any flashlights you have, so you can't broadcast aforementioned kitty porn in binary signals to your neighbours.
You don't happen to own two tin cans and a piece of string?
We've had disturbing reports of people luring kitties by mewing loudly into one can.I hate to say it, but soon the only network free of filters will be something like freenet [freenetproject.org], but oh snap... The very people this filter is trying to catch already are using this and similar technologies.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184512</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31185822</id>
	<title>Re:Why stop there?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266513840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since alcoholism causes many deaths each year and is a far larger problem than pornography, I think we should prohibit the sale of French wines in America.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since alcoholism causes many deaths each year and is a far larger problem than pornography , I think we should prohibit the sale of French wines in America .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since alcoholism causes many deaths each year and is a far larger problem than pornography, I think we should prohibit the sale of French wines in America.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184632</id>
	<title>but isn't only China supposed to be doing this????</title>
	<author>Petkov</author>
	<datestamp>1266509460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>after ALL, France is a "democracy" and ONLY China which is communist state supposed to be doing this things????</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>after ALL , France is a " democracy " and ONLY China which is communist state supposed to be doing this things ? ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>after ALL, France is a "democracy" and ONLY China which is communist state supposed to be doing this things???
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184286</id>
	<title>Won't somebody...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266508080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pensez aux enfants!?</p><p>Apologies if the French is totally wrong, just ran it through babelfish.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pensez aux enfants !
? Apologies if the French is totally wrong , just ran it through babelfish .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pensez aux enfants!
?Apologies if the French is totally wrong, just ran it through babelfish.
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31186492</id>
	<title>will someone please...</title>
	<author>nycguy</author>
	<datestamp>1266516540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...think of the fucking children.
<br>
<br>
Oh wait, <i>fucking children</i> are the problem...</htmltext>
<tokenext>...think of the fucking children .
Oh wait , fucking children are the problem.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...think of the fucking children.
Oh wait, fucking children are the problem...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184838</id>
	<title>Because of the elections</title>
	<author>kemenaran</author>
	<datestamp>1266510180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The "urgent" status is actually because this censorship bill is part of a larger law, named LOPPSI 2, that addresses several "security" matters : more jail for everyone, Internet filtering, trojans for cops in "organized crime" investigation, and so on.<br>
<br>
There are regional elections in France in about one month. The government tries to scare people on security matters &mdash; the good old "I want *everyone* to *remember* \_why\_they\_need\_us\_ !". They want to pass the law before the elections, and gave it an "urgent" status that of course isn't justified in any other way.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The " urgent " status is actually because this censorship bill is part of a larger law , named LOPPSI 2 , that addresses several " security " matters : more jail for everyone , Internet filtering , trojans for cops in " organized crime " investigation , and so on .
There are regional elections in France in about one month .
The government tries to scare people on security matters    the good old " I want * everyone * to * remember * \ _why \ _they \ _need \ _us \ _ ! " .
They want to pass the law before the elections , and gave it an " urgent " status that of course is n't justified in any other way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The "urgent" status is actually because this censorship bill is part of a larger law, named LOPPSI 2, that addresses several "security" matters : more jail for everyone, Internet filtering, trojans for cops in "organized crime" investigation, and so on.
There are regional elections in France in about one month.
The government tries to scare people on security matters — the good old "I want *everyone* to *remember* \_why\_they\_need\_us\_ !".
They want to pass the law before the elections, and gave it an "urgent" status that of course isn't justified in any other way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31186890</id>
	<title>There sure is a lot of child pornographers</title>
	<author>eiMichael</author>
	<datestamp>1266518340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>These "for the children" net censoring countries sure have a lot of child porn in their country.  So much so that they're willing to spend a few hundred million dollars to just build some giant blindfolds to ignore it. Do they really not have any more pressing concerns? I'd be willing to wager they have more unemployed people than pedophiles <b>and</b> molested children combined. </p><p>Last I checked, there were plenty of other 'issues' that could use the attention: poverty, cancer research, alternative energies, food production, etc. I understand that raping children is a very bad behavior. But hopefully it's already illegal</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These " for the children " net censoring countries sure have a lot of child porn in their country .
So much so that they 're willing to spend a few hundred million dollars to just build some giant blindfolds to ignore it .
Do they really not have any more pressing concerns ?
I 'd be willing to wager they have more unemployed people than pedophiles and molested children combined .
Last I checked , there were plenty of other 'issues ' that could use the attention : poverty , cancer research , alternative energies , food production , etc .
I understand that raping children is a very bad behavior .
But hopefully it 's already illegal</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These "for the children" net censoring countries sure have a lot of child porn in their country.
So much so that they're willing to spend a few hundred million dollars to just build some giant blindfolds to ignore it.
Do they really not have any more pressing concerns?
I'd be willing to wager they have more unemployed people than pedophiles and molested children combined.
Last I checked, there were plenty of other 'issues' that could use the attention: poverty, cancer research, alternative energies, food production, etc.
I understand that raping children is a very bad behavior.
But hopefully it's already illegal</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184720</id>
	<title>Why hello there</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266509760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why hello there, angry crowd of a million men who has just burnt down a thousand city blocks, I happen to have in my hand a button which when pressed would fulfil your desire of removing the webpage that has motivated you to these acts from the internet, but you see, I promised that I would only press if it the web page contained child pornography. I very much sympathise with your cause and it is certainly understandable that you are so angry, however I promised really much and I think I even wrote a law about it so my hands are totally tied, sorry.</p><p>- The French president in a universe very much removed from ours, 2015</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why hello there , angry crowd of a million men who has just burnt down a thousand city blocks , I happen to have in my hand a button which when pressed would fulfil your desire of removing the webpage that has motivated you to these acts from the internet , but you see , I promised that I would only press if it the web page contained child pornography .
I very much sympathise with your cause and it is certainly understandable that you are so angry , however I promised really much and I think I even wrote a law about it so my hands are totally tied , sorry.- The French president in a universe very much removed from ours , 2015</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why hello there, angry crowd of a million men who has just burnt down a thousand city blocks, I happen to have in my hand a button which when pressed would fulfil your desire of removing the webpage that has motivated you to these acts from the internet, but you see, I promised that I would only press if it the web page contained child pornography.
I very much sympathise with your cause and it is certainly understandable that you are so angry, however I promised really much and I think I even wrote a law about it so my hands are totally tied, sorry.- The French president in a universe very much removed from ours, 2015</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31185030</id>
	<title>fi8st Post</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266511020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>become an unwanted GIVE BSD CREDIT More stable the future holds 'You see, even deliver. Some of [gay-sex-access.com]? 1. Therefore there as to whi3h *BSD the NetBSD project, formed his own United States of it. Its mission is</htmltext>
<tokenext>become an unwanted GIVE BSD CREDIT More stable the future holds 'You see , even deliver .
Some of [ gay-sex-access.com ] ?
1. Therefore there as to whi3h * BSD the NetBSD project , formed his own United States of it .
Its mission is</tokentext>
<sentencetext>become an unwanted GIVE BSD CREDIT More stable the future holds 'You see, even deliver.
Some of [gay-sex-access.com]?
1. Therefore there as to whi3h *BSD the NetBSD project, formed his own United States of it.
Its mission is</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184026</id>
	<title>Bon chance!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266506940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bon chance avec &#231;a!</p><p>P.S. Preimer!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bon chance avec   a ! P.S .
Preimer !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bon chance avec ça!P.S.
Preimer!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184316</id>
	<title>Fp homo</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266508200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">on my Pent1u>m Pro and/or distribute</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>on my Pent1u &gt; m Pro and/or distribute [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>on my Pent1u&gt;m Pro and/or distribute [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184116</id>
	<title>Germany's net censorship law took the last hurdle</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266507420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Horst K&#246;hler signed the "Zugangserschwerungsgesetz" yesterday. A veto from the Bundespr&#228;sident was the last thing that could have stopped the law in the normal legislative process. To stop the law now, the Bundestag would have to agree on annulling the law before it goes into effect in about three weeks when it is published in the Bundesanzeiger.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Horst K   hler signed the " Zugangserschwerungsgesetz " yesterday .
A veto from the Bundespr   sident was the last thing that could have stopped the law in the normal legislative process .
To stop the law now , the Bundestag would have to agree on annulling the law before it goes into effect in about three weeks when it is published in the Bundesanzeiger .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Horst Köhler signed the "Zugangserschwerungsgesetz" yesterday.
A veto from the Bundespräsident was the last thing that could have stopped the law in the normal legislative process.
To stop the law now, the Bundestag would have to agree on annulling the law before it goes into effect in about three weeks when it is published in the Bundesanzeiger.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184512</id>
	<title>Radio Free \_\_\_\_\_</title>
	<author>FuckingNickName</author>
	<datestamp>1266508980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I, for one, will be using my "end of Cold War" era Yaesu FRG-7700 shortwave radio to search for broadcasts from the Free World. Could any of you guys tell me which direction I should be pointing my antenna, in order to get the best reception from signals bouncing over the Wall? My map isn't even clear where the border lies any more; all I know is that I'm on the wrong side.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I , for one , will be using my " end of Cold War " era Yaesu FRG-7700 shortwave radio to search for broadcasts from the Free World .
Could any of you guys tell me which direction I should be pointing my antenna , in order to get the best reception from signals bouncing over the Wall ?
My map is n't even clear where the border lies any more ; all I know is that I 'm on the wrong side .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I, for one, will be using my "end of Cold War" era Yaesu FRG-7700 shortwave radio to search for broadcasts from the Free World.
Could any of you guys tell me which direction I should be pointing my antenna, in order to get the best reception from signals bouncing over the Wall?
My map isn't even clear where the border lies any more; all I know is that I'm on the wrong side.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184060</id>
	<title>anal sexy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266507120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Welcome to Niggerbuntu</p><p>Niggerbuntu is a Linux-based operating system consisting of Free and Open Source software for laptops, desktops, and servers. Niggerbuntu has a clear focus on the user and usability - it should Just Work, even if the user has only the thinking capacities of a sponge. the OS ships with the latest Gnomrilla release as well as a selection of server and desktop software that makes for a comfortable desktop experience off of a single installation CD.</p><p>It also features the packaging manager ape-ghetto, and the challenging Linux manual pages have been reformatted into the new 'monkey' format, so for example the manual for the shutdown command can be accessed just by typing: 'monkey shut-up -h now mothafukka' instead of 'man shutdown'.</p><p>Absolutely Free of Charge</p><p>Niggerbuntu is free software, and available to you free of charge, as in free beer or free stuffs you can get from looting. It's also Free in the sense of giving you rights of Software Freedom. The freedom, to run, copy, steal, distribute, study, share, change and improve the software for any purpose, without paying licensing fees.</p><p>Free software as in free beer !</p><p>Niggerbuntu is an ancient Nigger word, meaning "humanity to monkeys". Niggerbuntu also means "I am what I am because of how apes behave". The Niggerbuntu Linux distribution brings the spirit of Niggerbuntu to the software world.</p><p>The dictator Bokassa described Niggerbuntu in the following way:</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; "A subhuman with Niggerbuntu is open and available to others (like a white bitch you're ready to fsck), affirming of others, does not feel threatened by the fact that other species are more intelligent than we are, for it has a proper self-assurance that comes from knowing that it belongs to the great monkey specie."</p><p>We chose the name Niggerbuntu for this distribution because we think it captures perfectly the spirit of sharing and looting that is at the heart of the open source movement.</p><p>Niggerbuntu - Linux for Subhuman Beings.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Welcome to NiggerbuntuNiggerbuntu is a Linux-based operating system consisting of Free and Open Source software for laptops , desktops , and servers .
Niggerbuntu has a clear focus on the user and usability - it should Just Work , even if the user has only the thinking capacities of a sponge .
the OS ships with the latest Gnomrilla release as well as a selection of server and desktop software that makes for a comfortable desktop experience off of a single installation CD.It also features the packaging manager ape-ghetto , and the challenging Linux manual pages have been reformatted into the new 'monkey ' format , so for example the manual for the shutdown command can be accessed just by typing : 'monkey shut-up -h now mothafukka ' instead of 'man shutdown'.Absolutely Free of ChargeNiggerbuntu is free software , and available to you free of charge , as in free beer or free stuffs you can get from looting .
It 's also Free in the sense of giving you rights of Software Freedom .
The freedom , to run , copy , steal , distribute , study , share , change and improve the software for any purpose , without paying licensing fees.Free software as in free beer ! Niggerbuntu is an ancient Nigger word , meaning " humanity to monkeys " .
Niggerbuntu also means " I am what I am because of how apes behave " .
The Niggerbuntu Linux distribution brings the spirit of Niggerbuntu to the software world.The dictator Bokassa described Niggerbuntu in the following way :         " A subhuman with Niggerbuntu is open and available to others ( like a white bitch you 're ready to fsck ) , affirming of others , does not feel threatened by the fact that other species are more intelligent than we are , for it has a proper self-assurance that comes from knowing that it belongs to the great monkey specie .
" We chose the name Niggerbuntu for this distribution because we think it captures perfectly the spirit of sharing and looting that is at the heart of the open source movement.Niggerbuntu - Linux for Subhuman Beings .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Welcome to NiggerbuntuNiggerbuntu is a Linux-based operating system consisting of Free and Open Source software for laptops, desktops, and servers.
Niggerbuntu has a clear focus on the user and usability - it should Just Work, even if the user has only the thinking capacities of a sponge.
the OS ships with the latest Gnomrilla release as well as a selection of server and desktop software that makes for a comfortable desktop experience off of a single installation CD.It also features the packaging manager ape-ghetto, and the challenging Linux manual pages have been reformatted into the new 'monkey' format, so for example the manual for the shutdown command can be accessed just by typing: 'monkey shut-up -h now mothafukka' instead of 'man shutdown'.Absolutely Free of ChargeNiggerbuntu is free software, and available to you free of charge, as in free beer or free stuffs you can get from looting.
It's also Free in the sense of giving you rights of Software Freedom.
The freedom, to run, copy, steal, distribute, study, share, change and improve the software for any purpose, without paying licensing fees.Free software as in free beer !Niggerbuntu is an ancient Nigger word, meaning "humanity to monkeys".
Niggerbuntu also means "I am what I am because of how apes behave".
The Niggerbuntu Linux distribution brings the spirit of Niggerbuntu to the software world.The dictator Bokassa described Niggerbuntu in the following way:
        "A subhuman with Niggerbuntu is open and available to others (like a white bitch you're ready to fsck), affirming of others, does not feel threatened by the fact that other species are more intelligent than we are, for it has a proper self-assurance that comes from knowing that it belongs to the great monkey specie.
"We chose the name Niggerbuntu for this distribution because we think it captures perfectly the spirit of sharing and looting that is at the heart of the open source movement.Niggerbuntu - Linux for Subhuman Beings.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184904</id>
	<title>Re:Germany's net censorship law took the last hurd</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266510480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Horst K&#246;hler signed the "Zugangserschwerungsgesetz" yesterday. A veto from the Bundespr&#228;sident was the last thing that could have stopped the law in the normal legislative process.</p></div><p>Yes, but he only signed after the government answered to his request for more information. In this answer, the government assured that they will order the "Bundeskriminalamt" (something like the FBI) to not produce any lists of addresses to be blocked.</p><p>The situation is rather absurd now: the (previous) government passed the law last autumn, then the coalition government changed (conservatives with liberals instead of conservatives with social democrats), and by now no party is in support of the law anymore. By signing the law, the President put the politicians under pressure to find a way out of this mess they got themselves in, so I'm actually not unhappy that he did it.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) The left parties in the parliament want to start a motion to abolish the law completely. Normally, the conservatives and liberals would not support something coming from that corner of the political spectrum, but it's something that eg the liberals were demanding before the election. So it's going to be interesting how they handle the situation. I kind of enjoy the mess they got themselves in with their short-sighted actions...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Horst K   hler signed the " Zugangserschwerungsgesetz " yesterday .
A veto from the Bundespr   sident was the last thing that could have stopped the law in the normal legislative process.Yes , but he only signed after the government answered to his request for more information .
In this answer , the government assured that they will order the " Bundeskriminalamt " ( something like the FBI ) to not produce any lists of addresses to be blocked.The situation is rather absurd now : the ( previous ) government passed the law last autumn , then the coalition government changed ( conservatives with liberals instead of conservatives with social democrats ) , and by now no party is in support of the law anymore .
By signing the law , the President put the politicians under pressure to find a way out of this mess they got themselves in , so I 'm actually not unhappy that he did it .
: ) The left parties in the parliament want to start a motion to abolish the law completely .
Normally , the conservatives and liberals would not support something coming from that corner of the political spectrum , but it 's something that eg the liberals were demanding before the election .
So it 's going to be interesting how they handle the situation .
I kind of enjoy the mess they got themselves in with their short-sighted actions... ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Horst Köhler signed the "Zugangserschwerungsgesetz" yesterday.
A veto from the Bundespräsident was the last thing that could have stopped the law in the normal legislative process.Yes, but he only signed after the government answered to his request for more information.
In this answer, the government assured that they will order the "Bundeskriminalamt" (something like the FBI) to not produce any lists of addresses to be blocked.The situation is rather absurd now: the (previous) government passed the law last autumn, then the coalition government changed (conservatives with liberals instead of conservatives with social democrats), and by now no party is in support of the law anymore.
By signing the law, the President put the politicians under pressure to find a way out of this mess they got themselves in, so I'm actually not unhappy that he did it.
:) The left parties in the parliament want to start a motion to abolish the law completely.
Normally, the conservatives and liberals would not support something coming from that corner of the political spectrum, but it's something that eg the liberals were demanding before the election.
So it's going to be interesting how they handle the situation.
I kind of enjoy the mess they got themselves in with their short-sighted actions... ;)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184116</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31185694</id>
	<title>It will be interesting...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266513300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To see who steps up to provide tools to circumvent this filter and how much media attention is given to the "righteous computer geeks" who are saving the French from the evils of repressive net censorship, like in China, Iran,etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To see who steps up to provide tools to circumvent this filter and how much media attention is given to the " righteous computer geeks " who are saving the French from the evils of repressive net censorship , like in China , Iran,etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To see who steps up to provide tools to circumvent this filter and how much media attention is given to the "righteous computer geeks" who are saving the French from the evils of repressive net censorship, like in China, Iran,etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31196456</id>
	<title>Stupidity!</title>
	<author>xenobyte</author>
	<datestamp>1266611580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Child abuse for the purpose of child pornography happens IN THE REAL WORLD, not in cyberspace! - No law acting on the Internet only will ever do the slightest bit to PREVENT the actual child abuse which must be the primary purpose of any child pornography law!</p><p>Don't they get it? - The abuse will happen and the materials will be produced. Once they exist they will be disseminated one way or the other. Making distribution harder will make them more valuable thus more attractive to produce. It is likely it'll actually increase the amount of abuse and the number of children affected.</p><p>Filtering the Internet will only force the users to move to encrypted channels that can bypass the filters. This will also make investigations much harder which is not a good thing. And it will do absolutely nothing to prevent children from being abused.</p><p>This is a textbook Bad Idea (tm)... They need to fire their technical advisers asap!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Child abuse for the purpose of child pornography happens IN THE REAL WORLD , not in cyberspace !
- No law acting on the Internet only will ever do the slightest bit to PREVENT the actual child abuse which must be the primary purpose of any child pornography law ! Do n't they get it ?
- The abuse will happen and the materials will be produced .
Once they exist they will be disseminated one way or the other .
Making distribution harder will make them more valuable thus more attractive to produce .
It is likely it 'll actually increase the amount of abuse and the number of children affected.Filtering the Internet will only force the users to move to encrypted channels that can bypass the filters .
This will also make investigations much harder which is not a good thing .
And it will do absolutely nothing to prevent children from being abused.This is a textbook Bad Idea ( tm ) ... They need to fire their technical advisers asap !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Child abuse for the purpose of child pornography happens IN THE REAL WORLD, not in cyberspace!
- No law acting on the Internet only will ever do the slightest bit to PREVENT the actual child abuse which must be the primary purpose of any child pornography law!Don't they get it?
- The abuse will happen and the materials will be produced.
Once they exist they will be disseminated one way or the other.
Making distribution harder will make them more valuable thus more attractive to produce.
It is likely it'll actually increase the amount of abuse and the number of children affected.Filtering the Internet will only force the users to move to encrypted channels that can bypass the filters.
This will also make investigations much harder which is not a good thing.
And it will do absolutely nothing to prevent children from being abused.This is a textbook Bad Idea (tm)... They need to fire their technical advisers asap!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184918</id>
	<title>Titstorm, part II</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266510480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ok, anon, now is the time. Let's begin planning operation titstorm, part II.</p><p>Let the message be loud and clear: "Don't fuck with us. We do not accept censorship in our network".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok , anon , now is the time .
Let 's begin planning operation titstorm , part II.Let the message be loud and clear : " Do n't fuck with us .
We do not accept censorship in our network " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok, anon, now is the time.
Let's begin planning operation titstorm, part II.Let the message be loud and clear: "Don't fuck with us.
We do not accept censorship in our network".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184222</id>
	<title>The Internet isn't compatible with your litigation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266507840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This wouldn't affect people who run their own recursive DNS server, right? Nor would it affect any servers in data center racks, right? Failing that, even configuring 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 as resolver would do the trick, right? Not that trading one untrusted organisation for the other completely solves the problem but still.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This would n't affect people who run their own recursive DNS server , right ?
Nor would it affect any servers in data center racks , right ?
Failing that , even configuring 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 as resolver would do the trick , right ?
Not that trading one untrusted organisation for the other completely solves the problem but still .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This wouldn't affect people who run their own recursive DNS server, right?
Nor would it affect any servers in data center racks, right?
Failing that, even configuring 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 as resolver would do the trick, right?
Not that trading one untrusted organisation for the other completely solves the problem but still.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31185046</id>
	<title>Your mother was a hamster</title>
	<author>spike2131</author>
	<datestamp>1266511080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...and your father smelt of elderberry!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...and your father smelt of elderberry !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and your father smelt of elderberry!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184260</id>
	<title>This is serious stuff.  pay attention</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266508020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For the good of the hole at the end of your penis, don't put your dick in poop.  Stick it anything else, a pussy, your hand, a tube sock, your mothers mouth.  Just whatever you do, don't put in a butt.  If you must put in a butt though, cover it with a rubber chicken first.</p><p>Remember, it's for the good of your dong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For the good of the hole at the end of your penis , do n't put your dick in poop .
Stick it anything else , a pussy , your hand , a tube sock , your mothers mouth .
Just whatever you do , do n't put in a butt .
If you must put in a butt though , cover it with a rubber chicken first.Remember , it 's for the good of your dong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For the good of the hole at the end of your penis, don't put your dick in poop.
Stick it anything else, a pussy, your hand, a tube sock, your mothers mouth.
Just whatever you do, don't put in a butt.
If you must put in a butt though, cover it with a rubber chicken first.Remember, it's for the good of your dong.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184254</id>
	<title>fascism will never succeed in reducing paedophilia</title>
	<author>e70838</author>
	<datestamp>1266507960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The main consequence of these "laws" will be the development of cryptography and anonymous browsing. As a result, real criminals will have better tools to hide their activity. Normal people will just lose a part of their liberties.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The main consequence of these " laws " will be the development of cryptography and anonymous browsing .
As a result , real criminals will have better tools to hide their activity .
Normal people will just lose a part of their liberties .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The main consequence of these "laws" will be the development of cryptography and anonymous browsing.
As a result, real criminals will have better tools to hide their activity.
Normal people will just lose a part of their liberties.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31187998</id>
	<title>Re:Why stop there?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1266522240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I&rsquo;m not against filtering the media. As long as we only filter everything that is not deliberate disinformation and fearmongering. And as long as we include politicians and advertisements of all kinds as &ldquo;media&ldquo;.</p><p>Because then, there would not be anything left for them to send anyway.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I    m not against filtering the media .
As long as we only filter everything that is not deliberate disinformation and fearmongering .
And as long as we include politicians and advertisements of all kinds as    media    .Because then , there would not be anything left for them to send anyway .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I’m not against filtering the media.
As long as we only filter everything that is not deliberate disinformation and fearmongering.
And as long as we include politicians and advertisements of all kinds as “media“.Because then, there would not be anything left for them to send anyway.
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184824</id>
	<title>Misplaced effort</title>
	<author>Angst Badger</author>
	<datestamp>1266510180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If the French legislature -- or, for that matter, ours, the British, or the Australians -- were genuinely concerned about child pornography, there are any number of productive, real-world efforts they could pursue. On the technical side, they could fund research into automated image analysis, so computers could look for the stuff specifically instead of having uniformed thugs, er, <i>gendarmes</i> pawing through everyone's data manually. That, obviously, is not going to produce overnight results, so maybe the kiddie porn-obsessed countries of the world could take concrete action against the human trafficking that fuels so much of the child porn business. Of course, that would end up hurting business interests, whereas violating everyone's rights in a largely fruitless pursuit for evidence of crimes after the fact -- cast in the appropriate light, of course -- generates some free publicity prior to elections, without the unintended side effect of actually <i>doing</i> something to reduce a very valuable hot button issue.</p><p>We have the same kind of politics here with respect to abortion. Both sides fear a final resolution to the issue because it's such a huge source of votes. Consequently, the pro-life faction always stops just a little bit short of overturning Roe v. Wade, and the pro-choice faction never actually gets around to even discussing a constitutional amendment. The politicians (and professional pressure groups) involved <i>want</i> an unresolved controversy, lest the issue be reduced to driving as many people to the polls as the Runaway Slave Act does nowadays. The voters on both sides are quite sincere and feel strongly about their respective positions, but their elected representatives? Not so much.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If the French legislature -- or , for that matter , ours , the British , or the Australians -- were genuinely concerned about child pornography , there are any number of productive , real-world efforts they could pursue .
On the technical side , they could fund research into automated image analysis , so computers could look for the stuff specifically instead of having uniformed thugs , er , gendarmes pawing through everyone 's data manually .
That , obviously , is not going to produce overnight results , so maybe the kiddie porn-obsessed countries of the world could take concrete action against the human trafficking that fuels so much of the child porn business .
Of course , that would end up hurting business interests , whereas violating everyone 's rights in a largely fruitless pursuit for evidence of crimes after the fact -- cast in the appropriate light , of course -- generates some free publicity prior to elections , without the unintended side effect of actually doing something to reduce a very valuable hot button issue.We have the same kind of politics here with respect to abortion .
Both sides fear a final resolution to the issue because it 's such a huge source of votes .
Consequently , the pro-life faction always stops just a little bit short of overturning Roe v. Wade , and the pro-choice faction never actually gets around to even discussing a constitutional amendment .
The politicians ( and professional pressure groups ) involved want an unresolved controversy , lest the issue be reduced to driving as many people to the polls as the Runaway Slave Act does nowadays .
The voters on both sides are quite sincere and feel strongly about their respective positions , but their elected representatives ?
Not so much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the French legislature -- or, for that matter, ours, the British, or the Australians -- were genuinely concerned about child pornography, there are any number of productive, real-world efforts they could pursue.
On the technical side, they could fund research into automated image analysis, so computers could look for the stuff specifically instead of having uniformed thugs, er, gendarmes pawing through everyone's data manually.
That, obviously, is not going to produce overnight results, so maybe the kiddie porn-obsessed countries of the world could take concrete action against the human trafficking that fuels so much of the child porn business.
Of course, that would end up hurting business interests, whereas violating everyone's rights in a largely fruitless pursuit for evidence of crimes after the fact -- cast in the appropriate light, of course -- generates some free publicity prior to elections, without the unintended side effect of actually doing something to reduce a very valuable hot button issue.We have the same kind of politics here with respect to abortion.
Both sides fear a final resolution to the issue because it's such a huge source of votes.
Consequently, the pro-life faction always stops just a little bit short of overturning Roe v. Wade, and the pro-choice faction never actually gets around to even discussing a constitutional amendment.
The politicians (and professional pressure groups) involved want an unresolved controversy, lest the issue be reduced to driving as many people to the polls as the Runaway Slave Act does nowadays.
The voters on both sides are quite sincere and feel strongly about their respective positions, but their elected representatives?
Not so much.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184556</id>
	<title>Re:Bon chance!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266509160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bonne chance.<br>Premier.</p><p>Almost, ou presque.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bonne chance.Premier.Almost , ou presque .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bonne chance.Premier.Almost, ou presque.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31187038</id>
	<title>Re:Why stop there?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266519060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is a thing that they are going to need to do.</p><p>One thing is the right to have it non-censored. That means that they have to pay royally for highly explicit content. The problem with a non-censorship is that they already have riot on their hands.</p><p>With the censorship, they can filter Europe, or at least France. The problem with Europe is that their jobs are not for companies. Spain is killville with what they are doing with their employment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a thing that they are going to need to do.One thing is the right to have it non-censored .
That means that they have to pay royally for highly explicit content .
The problem with a non-censorship is that they already have riot on their hands.With the censorship , they can filter Europe , or at least France .
The problem with Europe is that their jobs are not for companies .
Spain is killville with what they are doing with their employment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a thing that they are going to need to do.One thing is the right to have it non-censored.
That means that they have to pay royally for highly explicit content.
The problem with a non-censorship is that they already have riot on their hands.With the censorship, they can filter Europe, or at least France.
The problem with Europe is that their jobs are not for companies.
Spain is killville with what they are doing with their employment.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184716</id>
	<title>Filter /. in france</title>
	<author>cyborch</author>
	<datestamp>1266509760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"French lawmakers have voted to approve a draft law to filter Internet traffic that Slashdot previously discussed."<br><br>I didn't read the article. I didn't even read the rest of the text beyond that sentence. Any traffic related to something which has previously been discussed on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. should be filtered in France...</htmltext>
<tokenext>" French lawmakers have voted to approve a draft law to filter Internet traffic that Slashdot previously discussed .
" I did n't read the article .
I did n't even read the rest of the text beyond that sentence .
Any traffic related to something which has previously been discussed on / .
should be filtered in France.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"French lawmakers have voted to approve a draft law to filter Internet traffic that Slashdot previously discussed.
"I didn't read the article.
I didn't even read the rest of the text beyond that sentence.
Any traffic related to something which has previously been discussed on /.
should be filtered in France...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31187096</id>
	<title>Roman Polanski</title>
	<author>Spy Handler</author>
	<datestamp>1266519300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So France wants to stop people from looking at child porn on the internet cos it's such a BAD THING... but they complain about Roman Polanski being arrested and they want him freed?<br> <br>

He didn't merely look at child porn, he drugged and raped a 13 year old for fuck's sake.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So France wants to stop people from looking at child porn on the internet cos it 's such a BAD THING... but they complain about Roman Polanski being arrested and they want him freed ?
He did n't merely look at child porn , he drugged and raped a 13 year old for fuck 's sake .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So France wants to stop people from looking at child porn on the internet cos it's such a BAD THING... but they complain about Roman Polanski being arrested and they want him freed?
He didn't merely look at child porn, he drugged and raped a 13 year old for fuck's sake.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184364</id>
	<title>Even better</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266508380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let's just outlaw sex with minors.<br>
&nbsp; <br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... oh, wait.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's just outlaw sex with minors .
  ... oh , wait .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's just outlaw sex with minors.
   ... oh, wait.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31186416</id>
	<title>Re:Why stop there?</title>
	<author>ObsessiveMathsFreak</author>
	<datestamp>1266516180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why not after all; if you have nothing to hide (from me) then you have nothing to fear (from me).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not after all ; if you have nothing to hide ( from me ) then you have nothing to fear ( from me ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not after all; if you have nothing to hide (from me) then you have nothing to fear (from me).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184380</id>
	<title>Re:Outmaneuvering censorship</title>
	<author>Ltap</author>
	<datestamp>1266508380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Especially in Europe. East Germany's censorship model failed in most places in the west because people could get signals from West German TV stations. In a place like France, people could easily get wifi signals from Italy, Spain, Belgium, Switzerland, etc depending on where they lived.
<br> <br>
Of course, Burlesconi will almost certainly jump on this bandwagon, and then France and Italy will try to leverage this on other EU countries.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Especially in Europe .
East Germany 's censorship model failed in most places in the west because people could get signals from West German TV stations .
In a place like France , people could easily get wifi signals from Italy , Spain , Belgium , Switzerland , etc depending on where they lived .
Of course , Burlesconi will almost certainly jump on this bandwagon , and then France and Italy will try to leverage this on other EU countries .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Especially in Europe.
East Germany's censorship model failed in most places in the west because people could get signals from West German TV stations.
In a place like France, people could easily get wifi signals from Italy, Spain, Belgium, Switzerland, etc depending on where they lived.
Of course, Burlesconi will almost certainly jump on this bandwagon, and then France and Italy will try to leverage this on other EU countries.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31189790</id>
	<title>Re:Won't somebody...</title>
	<author>blind monkey 3</author>
	<datestamp>1266484320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Isn't that what the child porn is for?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't that what the child porn is for ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't that what the child porn is for?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184286</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31188726</id>
	<title>"The Senate, where the government has a majority"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266524580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ORLY, the government only has a majority in the senate. Who is in the Senate without being in the government? Or did the French invent a branch of government that is not controlled by the government?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ORLY , the government only has a majority in the senate .
Who is in the Senate without being in the government ?
Or did the French invent a branch of government that is not controlled by the government ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ORLY, the government only has a majority in the senate.
Who is in the Senate without being in the government?
Or did the French invent a branch of government that is not controlled by the government?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184134</id>
	<title>Outmaneuvering censorship</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1266507480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If IMMI goes ahead in Iceland, then all that censorship may turn out to be nothing more than a colossal waste of bureaucracy.</p><p>You can only attack content in the place where it is hosted - filtering the reception end just doesn't work reliably. Even China doesn't have a perfect rate, and Iran had to throttle its whole network in order to cut off communication...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If IMMI goes ahead in Iceland , then all that censorship may turn out to be nothing more than a colossal waste of bureaucracy.You can only attack content in the place where it is hosted - filtering the reception end just does n't work reliably .
Even China does n't have a perfect rate , and Iran had to throttle its whole network in order to cut off communication.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If IMMI goes ahead in Iceland, then all that censorship may turn out to be nothing more than a colossal waste of bureaucracy.You can only attack content in the place where it is hosted - filtering the reception end just doesn't work reliably.
Even China doesn't have a perfect rate, and Iran had to throttle its whole network in order to cut off communication...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184700</id>
	<title>We're preparing foreign services taxation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266509760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ever heard of the french Google tax? French government want to tax every foreign advertizement company that display ads on websites that can be accessed from france.</p><p>This censorship law is just preparing the government to be able to censor foreign services that don't pay any tax they may invent.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ever heard of the french Google tax ?
French government want to tax every foreign advertizement company that display ads on websites that can be accessed from france.This censorship law is just preparing the government to be able to censor foreign services that do n't pay any tax they may invent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ever heard of the french Google tax?
French government want to tax every foreign advertizement company that display ads on websites that can be accessed from france.This censorship law is just preparing the government to be able to censor foreign services that don't pay any tax they may invent.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31189034</id>
	<title>Re:Paging anonyme</title>
	<author>colinrichardday</author>
	<datestamp>1266525360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Shouldn't that be &lt;&lt; Commencer l'operation temp&ecirc;te dans un verre d'eau. &gt;&gt; "Commence operation tempest in a teacup"? Or did you mean D cup?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Should n't that be &gt; " Commence operation tempest in a teacup " ?
Or did you mean D cup ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shouldn't that be &gt; "Commence operation tempest in a teacup"?
Or did you mean D cup?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31196396</id>
	<title>Re:fascism will never succeed in reducing paedophi</title>
	<author>xenobyte</author>
	<datestamp>1266610860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually - I talked with a guy who's part of the Danish police computer crimes division (the guys that among other things investigate CP), and he told me that they've processed just under a thousand computers for CP and only ONE used any kind of cryptography to hide his CP. Didn't work either as the moron used a common password which was broken in hours... go figure.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually - I talked with a guy who 's part of the Danish police computer crimes division ( the guys that among other things investigate CP ) , and he told me that they 've processed just under a thousand computers for CP and only ONE used any kind of cryptography to hide his CP .
Did n't work either as the moron used a common password which was broken in hours... go figure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually - I talked with a guy who's part of the Danish police computer crimes division (the guys that among other things investigate CP), and he told me that they've processed just under a thousand computers for CP and only ONE used any kind of cryptography to hide his CP.
Didn't work either as the moron used a common password which was broken in hours... go figure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184172</id>
	<title>Well...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266507660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I surrender!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I surrender !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I surrender!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31203790</id>
	<title>Re:Urgent?</title>
	<author>Schmorgluck</author>
	<datestamp>1266572580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The current government of France has a tendency to overuse the urgence procedure. In my not even remotely humble opinon, the aim is most probably to prevent the media from catching up and starting examinating the proposed actions thoroughly before it's too late. It's characteristic of Nicolas Sarkozy's habit to go all news-surfing and claim action will be taken and new laws will be voted each time a tragic event happens gets to the news.</p><p>Judges, advocates, and even some prosecutors complain that this endless chaotic piling-up of more and more security laws is, to put it in kind words, totally destroying the coherence and serenity necessary to keep a decent law system to work (some of them use more crude words, but I can't find how to convey them in English).</p><p>The good news is, even some representatives of the majority tend to grow tired of this messy method. Both presidents of the high and low chambers of France (neither of them being known as wild horses) manifested their irritation on the matter, going as far as claiming together that repeatedly pushing new security laws, without ever evaluating the effects of the previous ones, was inefficient and nocive for the good working of Democracy.</p><p>Even more significant: recently, after the murder of a couple of elderly people broke to the news, the Minister of the Interior, Brice Hortefeux (a close friend of the President) claimed measure would be taken to aggravate the penalties for felonies targeting people weakened by old age. Leaving aside that such a declaration was a breach of French political tradition that states that it's the job of the Minister of Justice to announce changes in penal laws, and that the Minister of the Interior breaching this tradition makes it kind of a double breach (due to the complex relationship between the police forces and the judicial institution), what happened is that Mich&#232;le Alliot-Marie, the Minister of Justice <em>herself</em> stated (in careful terms) that such a suggestion of change in law was pointless because <em>the existing laws already take into account this aggravating circumstance</em>.</p><p>Fun times, fun times. (Holy Chao I'm tired of this president!)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The current government of France has a tendency to overuse the urgence procedure .
In my not even remotely humble opinon , the aim is most probably to prevent the media from catching up and starting examinating the proposed actions thoroughly before it 's too late .
It 's characteristic of Nicolas Sarkozy 's habit to go all news-surfing and claim action will be taken and new laws will be voted each time a tragic event happens gets to the news.Judges , advocates , and even some prosecutors complain that this endless chaotic piling-up of more and more security laws is , to put it in kind words , totally destroying the coherence and serenity necessary to keep a decent law system to work ( some of them use more crude words , but I ca n't find how to convey them in English ) .The good news is , even some representatives of the majority tend to grow tired of this messy method .
Both presidents of the high and low chambers of France ( neither of them being known as wild horses ) manifested their irritation on the matter , going as far as claiming together that repeatedly pushing new security laws , without ever evaluating the effects of the previous ones , was inefficient and nocive for the good working of Democracy.Even more significant : recently , after the murder of a couple of elderly people broke to the news , the Minister of the Interior , Brice Hortefeux ( a close friend of the President ) claimed measure would be taken to aggravate the penalties for felonies targeting people weakened by old age .
Leaving aside that such a declaration was a breach of French political tradition that states that it 's the job of the Minister of Justice to announce changes in penal laws , and that the Minister of the Interior breaching this tradition makes it kind of a double breach ( due to the complex relationship between the police forces and the judicial institution ) , what happened is that Mich   le Alliot-Marie , the Minister of Justice herself stated ( in careful terms ) that such a suggestion of change in law was pointless because the existing laws already take into account this aggravating circumstance.Fun times , fun times .
( Holy Chao I 'm tired of this president !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The current government of France has a tendency to overuse the urgence procedure.
In my not even remotely humble opinon, the aim is most probably to prevent the media from catching up and starting examinating the proposed actions thoroughly before it's too late.
It's characteristic of Nicolas Sarkozy's habit to go all news-surfing and claim action will be taken and new laws will be voted each time a tragic event happens gets to the news.Judges, advocates, and even some prosecutors complain that this endless chaotic piling-up of more and more security laws is, to put it in kind words, totally destroying the coherence and serenity necessary to keep a decent law system to work (some of them use more crude words, but I can't find how to convey them in English).The good news is, even some representatives of the majority tend to grow tired of this messy method.
Both presidents of the high and low chambers of France (neither of them being known as wild horses) manifested their irritation on the matter, going as far as claiming together that repeatedly pushing new security laws, without ever evaluating the effects of the previous ones, was inefficient and nocive for the good working of Democracy.Even more significant: recently, after the murder of a couple of elderly people broke to the news, the Minister of the Interior, Brice Hortefeux (a close friend of the President) claimed measure would be taken to aggravate the penalties for felonies targeting people weakened by old age.
Leaving aside that such a declaration was a breach of French political tradition that states that it's the job of the Minister of Justice to announce changes in penal laws, and that the Minister of the Interior breaching this tradition makes it kind of a double breach (due to the complex relationship between the police forces and the judicial institution), what happened is that Michèle Alliot-Marie, the Minister of Justice herself stated (in careful terms) that such a suggestion of change in law was pointless because the existing laws already take into account this aggravating circumstance.Fun times, fun times.
(Holy Chao I'm tired of this president!
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184718</id>
	<title>Paging anonyme</title>
	<author>sackvillian</author>
	<datestamp>1266509760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Commencer l'op&#233;ration temp&#234;te de le t&#233;ton !</htmltext>
<tokenext>Commencer l'op   ration temp   te de le t   ton !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Commencer l'opération tempête de le téton !</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184106</id>
	<title>Why stop there?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266507360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Let's also filter the mail, cellphone conversations and text messages, walkie-talkie and other short-range radio transmission devices and fax. We should also outlaw the lending and borrowing of pendrives, memory cards and home-recorded CDs and DVDs.Those child pornographers are sneaky bastards.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's also filter the mail , cellphone conversations and text messages , walkie-talkie and other short-range radio transmission devices and fax .
We should also outlaw the lending and borrowing of pendrives , memory cards and home-recorded CDs and DVDs.Those child pornographers are sneaky bastards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's also filter the mail, cellphone conversations and text messages, walkie-talkie and other short-range radio transmission devices and fax.
We should also outlaw the lending and borrowing of pendrives, memory cards and home-recorded CDs and DVDs.Those child pornographers are sneaky bastards.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31186592</id>
	<title>Re:Why stop there?</title>
	<author>MoeDumb</author>
	<datestamp>1266516960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>"The war on terror" and "the war on CP": twin gateways toward implementing wider censorship -- which is the <b>real</b> goal.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The war on terror " and " the war on CP " : twin gateways toward implementing wider censorship -- which is the real goal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The war on terror" and "the war on CP": twin gateways toward implementing wider censorship -- which is the real goal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31188912</id>
	<title>C'est la vi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266525060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>or whatever its properly spelled<br>its too bad<br>now we can ban all french websites form the net<br>A NET EMBARGO FOR FRANCE<br>and to users in france just cancel and have a few months off<br>let your economy take a hit and shove that communist sarkozy out</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>or whatever its properly spelledits too badnow we can ban all french websites form the netA NET EMBARGO FOR FRANCEand to users in france just cancel and have a few months offlet your economy take a hit and shove that communist sarkozy out</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or whatever its properly spelledits too badnow we can ban all french websites form the netA NET EMBARGO FOR FRANCEand to users in france just cancel and have a few months offlet your economy take a hit and shove that communist sarkozy out</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31185124</id>
	<title>Re:Radio Free \_\_\_\_\_</title>
	<author>baKanale</author>
	<datestamp>1266511320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm beginning to doubt there's a single place on this entire planet that's on the right side of the border.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm beginning to doubt there 's a single place on this entire planet that 's on the right side of the border .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm beginning to doubt there's a single place on this entire planet that's on the right side of the border.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184512</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184292</id>
	<title>Urgent?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266508080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't think anyone could call this bill urgent. This is stating the obvious a bit, but I'm going to call it right now - the French government is trying to force this through as quickly as possible before anti-censorship, net neutrality, and freedom of speech groups get to mount a decent defense and inform the French people about what is happening. Although, the populace could be complicit, sort of like Italy, where Burlesconi has managed to brainwash almost everyone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think anyone could call this bill urgent .
This is stating the obvious a bit , but I 'm going to call it right now - the French government is trying to force this through as quickly as possible before anti-censorship , net neutrality , and freedom of speech groups get to mount a decent defense and inform the French people about what is happening .
Although , the populace could be complicit , sort of like Italy , where Burlesconi has managed to brainwash almost everyone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think anyone could call this bill urgent.
This is stating the obvious a bit, but I'm going to call it right now - the French government is trying to force this through as quickly as possible before anti-censorship, net neutrality, and freedom of speech groups get to mount a decent defense and inform the French people about what is happening.
Although, the populace could be complicit, sort of like Italy, where Burlesconi has managed to brainwash almost everyone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1338222_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1338222_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31196396
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184254
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1338222_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31186592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1338222_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31186632
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184254
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1338222_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31186416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1338222_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184116
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1338222_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184556
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1338222_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31187038
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1338222_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31189790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184286
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1338222_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31203790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1338222_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31188912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1338222_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31185046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1338222_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31185124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184512
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1338222_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31185822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1338222_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184842
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184512
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1338222_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31189034
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184718
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1338222_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1338222_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31187998
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1338222_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184380
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184134
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1338222.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184026
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184556
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31188912
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31185046
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1338222.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184716
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1338222.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184292
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31203790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184838
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1338222.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184134
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184380
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1338222.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184106
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31186416
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31187998
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31185822
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31186592
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31187038
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184364
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1338222.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184718
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31189034
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1338222.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31186492
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1338222.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184286
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31189790
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1338222.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31187096
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1338222.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184512
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184842
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31185124
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1338222.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184116
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184904
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1338222.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31184254
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31186632
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1338222.31196396
</commentlist>
</conversation>
