<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_17_2142214</id>
	<title><em>StarCraft II</em> Closed Beta Begins</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1266399960000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Blizzard announced today that the multiplayer <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/blizzard-entertainment-begins-closed-beta-testing-of-starcraftr-ii-wings-of-libertytm-2010-02-17?reflink=MW\_news\_stmp">beta test for <em>StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty</em> is now underway</a>. The client downloader is available through <a href="http://www.battle.net/">Battle.net</a> for people who have received invites, and the <a href="http://us.blizzard.com/support/article.xml?locale=en\_US&amp;articleId=26242&amp;parentCategoryId&amp;pageNumber=1&amp;categoryId=3633">system requirements</a> have been posted as well. A <a href="http://forums.battle.net/thread.html?topicId=23279958079&amp;sid=5000">list of known issues</a> is up on the official forums. <em>StarCraft II</em> and the revamped Battle.net are planned for release "in the first half of 2010."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Blizzard announced today that the multiplayer beta test for StarCraft II : Wings of Liberty is now underway .
The client downloader is available through Battle.net for people who have received invites , and the system requirements have been posted as well .
A list of known issues is up on the official forums .
StarCraft II and the revamped Battle.net are planned for release " in the first half of 2010 .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Blizzard announced today that the multiplayer beta test for StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty is now underway.
The client downloader is available through Battle.net for people who have received invites, and the system requirements have been posted as well.
A list of known issues is up on the official forums.
StarCraft II and the revamped Battle.net are planned for release "in the first half of 2010.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177136</id>
	<title>Can anyone post system requirements?</title>
	<author>Bobfrankly1</author>
	<datestamp>1265023320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can anyone post system requirements for those of us unable to reach particular sites?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can anyone post system requirements for those of us unable to reach particular sites ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can anyone post system requirements for those of us unable to reach particular sites?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177752</id>
	<title>Battle.net required?  No Thanks</title>
	<author>ubergeek65536</author>
	<datestamp>1265025600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why do I need to join battle.net for a game I only want to play against the computer.  Playing against people online gets very tiring.  It's hard to find anyone online that doesn't act like a spoiled six year old.  Just shut up and play.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do I need to join battle.net for a game I only want to play against the computer .
Playing against people online gets very tiring .
It 's hard to find anyone online that does n't act like a spoiled six year old .
Just shut up and play .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do I need to join battle.net for a game I only want to play against the computer.
Playing against people online gets very tiring.
It's hard to find anyone online that doesn't act like a spoiled six year old.
Just shut up and play.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31185210</id>
	<title>Re:How long until DotS (Defense of the Stars) Mod?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266511620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Get League Of Legends.  Its free profesionally made game and one of the big DoTA creators had his hands in it.  Lots of fun, lots of champs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Get League Of Legends .
Its free profesionally made game and one of the big DoTA creators had his hands in it .
Lots of fun , lots of champs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get League Of Legends.
Its free profesionally made game and one of the big DoTA creators had his hands in it.
Lots of fun, lots of champs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177420</id>
	<title>System Requirements, Screenshots, etc...</title>
	<author>Shohat</author>
	<datestamp>1265024520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Howdy.
Bit self-promotional... but..  Read my blog. It is the best StarCraft  Blog on the web.
<br>
<b>I am in the beta</b>, all the info that was published this month (including the massive SC2 Beta FAQ) is there, system requirements, screenshots, and will soon be posting replays/videos.
Currently 500 users online, so I can handle bit of slashdotting<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)
<br>
Cheers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Howdy .
Bit self-promotional... but.. Read my blog .
It is the best StarCraft Blog on the web .
I am in the beta , all the info that was published this month ( including the massive SC2 Beta FAQ ) is there , system requirements , screenshots , and will soon be posting replays/videos .
Currently 500 users online , so I can handle bit of slashdotting : ) Cheers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Howdy.
Bit self-promotional... but..  Read my blog.
It is the best StarCraft  Blog on the web.
I am in the beta, all the info that was published this month (including the massive SC2 Beta FAQ) is there, system requirements, screenshots, and will soon be posting replays/videos.
Currently 500 users online, so I can handle bit of slashdotting :)

Cheers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177330</id>
	<title>Re:Can anyone post system requirements?</title>
	<author>Rewind</author>
	<datestamp>1265024160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Can anyone post system requirements for those of us unable to reach particular sites? </i>
<br> <br>
sure:<br>
PC Minimum Requirements:<br>
 Windows XP SP3/Vista SP1/Windows 7<br>
 2.2 Ghz Pentium IV or equivalent AMD Athlon processor<br>
 1 GB system RAM/1.5 GB for Vista and Windows 7<br>
 128 MB NVidia GeForce 6600 GT/ATI Radeon 9800 PRO video card<br>
 1024x768 minimum display resolution<br>
 4 GB free hard space<br>
 Broadband connection</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can anyone post system requirements for those of us unable to reach particular sites ?
sure : PC Minimum Requirements : Windows XP SP3/Vista SP1/Windows 7 2.2 Ghz Pentium IV or equivalent AMD Athlon processor 1 GB system RAM/1.5 GB for Vista and Windows 7 128 MB NVidia GeForce 6600 GT/ATI Radeon 9800 PRO video card 1024x768 minimum display resolution 4 GB free hard space Broadband connection</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can anyone post system requirements for those of us unable to reach particular sites?
sure:
PC Minimum Requirements:
 Windows XP SP3/Vista SP1/Windows 7
 2.2 Ghz Pentium IV or equivalent AMD Athlon processor
 1 GB system RAM/1.5 GB for Vista and Windows 7
 128 MB NVidia GeForce 6600 GT/ATI Radeon 9800 PRO video card
 1024x768 minimum display resolution
 4 GB free hard space
 Broadband connection</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177136</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31180010</id>
	<title>Requiring the will make me pirate it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265042400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't need the multiplayer. I just want to play the campaign and get the story. However according to Blizzard, you have to connected to even play the single player campaign. Screw that for a joke. I'd rather get a cracked version, risking virus' and trojans, just so that I can play on my laptop wherever and whenever I want. If they just wanted to activate it once, that would be fine, but to basically monitor when, where, how, and how long you play. Don't tell me that they wont, because all of that information would be gather as a standard of you connecting to *any* server. The only difference between companies is what they then do with that data.</p><p>It is truely sad that half of the things that made starcraft so huge has been ripped out of it. Your friend wants to play? no problem, you can install a spawn version on another machine. Lanning at a friends place whose parents have bought the cheapest internet connection they can find? No problem, fire up a lan game with him and a couple of bot players. I remeber thinking when I got starcraft originally that such features were worth half the games worth.</p><p>I have never used battlenet. I don't want to either! I don't sign up or register or join the groups that games want me to unless it's for multiplayer online, when I actually WANT to play online. I wont be playing this online, so why do I have to be online to play?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't need the multiplayer .
I just want to play the campaign and get the story .
However according to Blizzard , you have to connected to even play the single player campaign .
Screw that for a joke .
I 'd rather get a cracked version , risking virus ' and trojans , just so that I can play on my laptop wherever and whenever I want .
If they just wanted to activate it once , that would be fine , but to basically monitor when , where , how , and how long you play .
Do n't tell me that they wont , because all of that information would be gather as a standard of you connecting to * any * server .
The only difference between companies is what they then do with that data.It is truely sad that half of the things that made starcraft so huge has been ripped out of it .
Your friend wants to play ?
no problem , you can install a spawn version on another machine .
Lanning at a friends place whose parents have bought the cheapest internet connection they can find ?
No problem , fire up a lan game with him and a couple of bot players .
I remeber thinking when I got starcraft originally that such features were worth half the games worth.I have never used battlenet .
I do n't want to either !
I do n't sign up or register or join the groups that games want me to unless it 's for multiplayer online , when I actually WANT to play online .
I wont be playing this online , so why do I have to be online to play ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't need the multiplayer.
I just want to play the campaign and get the story.
However according to Blizzard, you have to connected to even play the single player campaign.
Screw that for a joke.
I'd rather get a cracked version, risking virus' and trojans, just so that I can play on my laptop wherever and whenever I want.
If they just wanted to activate it once, that would be fine, but to basically monitor when, where, how, and how long you play.
Don't tell me that they wont, because all of that information would be gather as a standard of you connecting to *any* server.
The only difference between companies is what they then do with that data.It is truely sad that half of the things that made starcraft so huge has been ripped out of it.
Your friend wants to play?
no problem, you can install a spawn version on another machine.
Lanning at a friends place whose parents have bought the cheapest internet connection they can find?
No problem, fire up a lan game with him and a couple of bot players.
I remeber thinking when I got starcraft originally that such features were worth half the games worth.I have never used battlenet.
I don't want to either!
I don't sign up or register or join the groups that games want me to unless it's for multiplayer online, when I actually WANT to play online.
I wont be playing this online, so why do I have to be online to play?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31179654</id>
	<title>Re:My wife's on fire</title>
	<author>-Bacon-</author>
	<datestamp>1265039280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I always thought it sounded like: my life for hire.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I always thought it sounded like : my life for hire .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always thought it sounded like: my life for hire.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31326944</id>
	<title>Wow.</title>
	<author>ForTheHive</author>
	<datestamp>1267470480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>
Just three words, folks. Three words: It is orgasmic.

Nothing else to say.

I didn't even have a key until earlier today, when I posted on some blog claiming to have a ton of invites for free. I
figured it was a scam, but posted a comment requesting an invite since I was hopeless and desitute. Lo and behold, three hours later, I actually had an invite. Go figure dude...

Anyway, not sure if they have any invites left, but who knows, here's the link to the free starcraft 2 beta invites blog I found: <a href="http://starcraft2betainvites.blogspot.com/" title="blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://starcraft2betainvites.blogspot.com/</a> [blogspot.com]

Good luck! And one more thing...

Battlecruisers Operational!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just three words , folks .
Three words : It is orgasmic .
Nothing else to say .
I did n't even have a key until earlier today , when I posted on some blog claiming to have a ton of invites for free .
I figured it was a scam , but posted a comment requesting an invite since I was hopeless and desitute .
Lo and behold , three hours later , I actually had an invite .
Go figure dude.. . Anyway , not sure if they have any invites left , but who knows , here 's the link to the free starcraft 2 beta invites blog I found : http : //starcraft2betainvites.blogspot.com/ [ blogspot.com ] Good luck !
And one more thing.. . Battlecruisers Operational ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Just three words, folks.
Three words: It is orgasmic.
Nothing else to say.
I didn't even have a key until earlier today, when I posted on some blog claiming to have a ton of invites for free.
I
figured it was a scam, but posted a comment requesting an invite since I was hopeless and desitute.
Lo and behold, three hours later, I actually had an invite.
Go figure dude...

Anyway, not sure if they have any invites left, but who knows, here's the link to the free starcraft 2 beta invites blog I found: http://starcraft2betainvites.blogspot.com/ [blogspot.com]

Good luck!
And one more thing...

Battlecruisers Operational!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176922</id>
	<title>Re:Mac</title>
	<author>verbalcontract</author>
	<datestamp>1265022360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>According to the beta FAQ, the Mac version is coming:</p><p>
<strong>Will there be a Mac version of the beta client?</strong> <br>

We plan to release a Mac version of the beta client at some point during the beta test period. We&rsquo;ll have further details to share as the beta test progresses.
</p><p>via <a href="http://forums.battle.net/thread.html?topicId=23214531243&amp;sid=5010" title="battle.net">the beta FAQ</a> [battle.net].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>According to the beta FAQ , the Mac version is coming : Will there be a Mac version of the beta client ?
We plan to release a Mac version of the beta client at some point during the beta test period .
We    ll have further details to share as the beta test progresses .
via the beta FAQ [ battle.net ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to the beta FAQ, the Mac version is coming:
Will there be a Mac version of the beta client?
We plan to release a Mac version of the beta client at some point during the beta test period.
We’ll have further details to share as the beta test progresses.
via the beta FAQ [battle.net].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176992</id>
	<title>Two questions....</title>
	<author>Itninja</author>
	<datestamp>1265022720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>....that I have yet to get a firm answer on:<p>Will SC2 support true LAN play, or just that pseudo-LAN thing where one have to 'authenticate' first?
</p><p>Will SC2 support multi-core systems? I got this fancy quad-core system and core 1 thru 3 get pissed when core 0 is being pegged.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>....that I have yet to get a firm answer on : Will SC2 support true LAN play , or just that pseudo-LAN thing where one have to 'authenticate ' first ?
Will SC2 support multi-core systems ?
I got this fancy quad-core system and core 1 thru 3 get pissed when core 0 is being pegged .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>....that I have yet to get a firm answer on:Will SC2 support true LAN play, or just that pseudo-LAN thing where one have to 'authenticate' first?
Will SC2 support multi-core systems?
I got this fancy quad-core system and core 1 thru 3 get pissed when core 0 is being pegged.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177092</id>
	<title>My wife's on fire</title>
	<author>mafian911</author>
	<datestamp>1265023080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or was it my life for A'jur?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or was it my life for A'jur ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or was it my life for A'jur?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176866</id>
	<title>Re:Lost my interest</title>
	<author>sopssa</author>
	<datestamp>1265022120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do we really have to go thru this in every StarCraft II story?</p><p>Why would you lose interest in the game because of that? Please tell me. They're separate stories and most likely priced as expansions too. And it's not like they made the 100\% ready and are just keeping the two later expansion packs with them self now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do we really have to go thru this in every StarCraft II story ? Why would you lose interest in the game because of that ?
Please tell me .
They 're separate stories and most likely priced as expansions too .
And it 's not like they made the 100 \ % ready and are just keeping the two later expansion packs with them self now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do we really have to go thru this in every StarCraft II story?Why would you lose interest in the game because of that?
Please tell me.
They're separate stories and most likely priced as expansions too.
And it's not like they made the 100\% ready and are just keeping the two later expansion packs with them self now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31185316</id>
	<title>Re:Lost my interest</title>
	<author>goose-incarnated</author>
	<datestamp>1266512040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Exactly, they will sell the games for what they are worth. Get ready for the game of the decade, or miss it because of some false anti blizzard rant. Either way it will be a <b>giant hit</b>.</p></div><p>
It might not be. After all, I don't much relish the thought of RPG elements in a RTS game. Not all of us want a WoW experience in our games.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly , they will sell the games for what they are worth .
Get ready for the game of the decade , or miss it because of some false anti blizzard rant .
Either way it will be a giant hit .
It might not be .
After all , I do n't much relish the thought of RPG elements in a RTS game .
Not all of us want a WoW experience in our games .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly, they will sell the games for what they are worth.
Get ready for the game of the decade, or miss it because of some false anti blizzard rant.
Either way it will be a giant hit.
It might not be.
After all, I don't much relish the thought of RPG elements in a RTS game.
Not all of us want a WoW experience in our games.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31180870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31192524</id>
	<title>Re:Lost my interest</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266493980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, they have given that indication.  The official FAQ says they will be "priced as expansions."  For someone so loud, you haven't even done your research.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , they have given that indication .
The official FAQ says they will be " priced as expansions .
" For someone so loud , you have n't even done your research .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, they have given that indication.
The official FAQ says they will be "priced as expansions.
"  For someone so loud, you haven't even done your research.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177512</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177512</id>
	<title>Re:Lost my interest</title>
	<author>HeronBlademaster</author>
	<datestamp>1265024760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They're separate stories and most likely priced as expansions too.</p></div><p>They have given no indication the second and third games will be priced as expansions.  In fact, given their claims about campaign lengths, they're indicating that they will be priced as full games, <i>not</i> as expansions.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're separate stories and most likely priced as expansions too.They have given no indication the second and third games will be priced as expansions .
In fact , given their claims about campaign lengths , they 're indicating that they will be priced as full games , not as expansions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're separate stories and most likely priced as expansions too.They have given no indication the second and third games will be priced as expansions.
In fact, given their claims about campaign lengths, they're indicating that they will be priced as full games, not as expansions.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177684</id>
	<title>How long until DotS (Defense of the Stars) Mod?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265025300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My favorite mod for WC3 is DotA.  I hope something similar is created for SC2.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My favorite mod for WC3 is DotA .
I hope something similar is created for SC2 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My favorite mod for WC3 is DotA.
I hope something similar is created for SC2.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31180870</id>
	<title>Re:Lost my interest</title>
	<author>Loomismeister</author>
	<datestamp>1265052120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exactly, they will sell the games for what they are worth. Get ready for the game of the decade, or miss it because of some false anti blizzard rant. Either way it will be a giant hit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly , they will sell the games for what they are worth .
Get ready for the game of the decade , or miss it because of some false anti blizzard rant .
Either way it will be a giant hit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly, they will sell the games for what they are worth.
Get ready for the game of the decade, or miss it because of some false anti blizzard rant.
Either way it will be a giant hit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177512</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31179232</id>
	<title>Re:Battle.net required? No Thanks</title>
	<author>DavidD\_CA</author>
	<datestamp>1265035680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe I missed it, but where does Blizzard say that you must play on Battle.Net?</p><p>StarCraft 2 ships with single-player campaigns, just like the first one did.  And I haven't heard anything that says you cannot play games againt the computer.</p><p>What I *have* heard is that, during the beta, they are only focusing on player vs player games.  And these, of course, require Battle.net.  But I don't believe this applies to what will actually be shipping.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe I missed it , but where does Blizzard say that you must play on Battle.Net ? StarCraft 2 ships with single-player campaigns , just like the first one did .
And I have n't heard anything that says you can not play games againt the computer.What I * have * heard is that , during the beta , they are only focusing on player vs player games .
And these , of course , require Battle.net .
But I do n't believe this applies to what will actually be shipping .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe I missed it, but where does Blizzard say that you must play on Battle.Net?StarCraft 2 ships with single-player campaigns, just like the first one did.
And I haven't heard anything that says you cannot play games againt the computer.What I *have* heard is that, during the beta, they are only focusing on player vs player games.
And these, of course, require Battle.net.
But I don't believe this applies to what will actually be shipping.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177752</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31178496</id>
	<title>At least slashdot users...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265029620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At least Slashdot users won't have to spawn any more Overlords. We already have plenty.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At least Slashdot users wo n't have to spawn any more Overlords .
We already have plenty .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least Slashdot users won't have to spawn any more Overlords.
We already have plenty.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31186376</id>
	<title>Re:Battle.net required? No Thanks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266516060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh, it was fun when there was an actual, well, <i>community</i> (ca. 1998)... Nowadays, battle.net is little more than hardcore WoW players who essentially want you to get out of their way* and the occasional D2/Brood War/WC3 player who acts like a spoiled six-year-old. You have to convince friends to go and login when you want to play multi outside of a LAN party (and if Blizzard cuts TCP/IP play out of SC2, that would be a serious mistake), and that's not always possible. How they're going to improve that for someone like me who would rather not squeeze another player's virtual nuts escapes me, but then, I suppose I'm vastly outnumbered.</p><p>* Okay, I confess: I don't play WoW. I have played RO, however, and I imagine the player-to-player experience would be similar: "Hey no KS" *string of expletives and abuse* ; hardcore MMORPG players are some of the most selfish bastards I have ever encountered, and I've seen a <i>lot</i> of selfish bastards in meatspace.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , it was fun when there was an actual , well , community ( ca .
1998 ) ... Nowadays , battle.net is little more than hardcore WoW players who essentially want you to get out of their way * and the occasional D2/Brood War/WC3 player who acts like a spoiled six-year-old .
You have to convince friends to go and login when you want to play multi outside of a LAN party ( and if Blizzard cuts TCP/IP play out of SC2 , that would be a serious mistake ) , and that 's not always possible .
How they 're going to improve that for someone like me who would rather not squeeze another player 's virtual nuts escapes me , but then , I suppose I 'm vastly outnumbered .
* Okay , I confess : I do n't play WoW .
I have played RO , however , and I imagine the player-to-player experience would be similar : " Hey no KS " * string of expletives and abuse * ; hardcore MMORPG players are some of the most selfish bastards I have ever encountered , and I 've seen a lot of selfish bastards in meatspace .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, it was fun when there was an actual, well, community (ca.
1998)... Nowadays, battle.net is little more than hardcore WoW players who essentially want you to get out of their way* and the occasional D2/Brood War/WC3 player who acts like a spoiled six-year-old.
You have to convince friends to go and login when you want to play multi outside of a LAN party (and if Blizzard cuts TCP/IP play out of SC2, that would be a serious mistake), and that's not always possible.
How they're going to improve that for someone like me who would rather not squeeze another player's virtual nuts escapes me, but then, I suppose I'm vastly outnumbered.
* Okay, I confess: I don't play WoW.
I have played RO, however, and I imagine the player-to-player experience would be similar: "Hey no KS" *string of expletives and abuse* ; hardcore MMORPG players are some of the most selfish bastards I have ever encountered, and I've seen a lot of selfish bastards in meatspace.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177752</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31179090</id>
	<title>Re:Battle.net required? No Thanks</title>
	<author>Archon-X</author>
	<datestamp>1265034540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>..curious, seems you exhibit the very attitude you bemoan..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>..curious , seems you exhibit the very attitude you bemoan. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..curious, seems you exhibit the very attitude you bemoan..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177752</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177286</id>
	<title>Re:Can anyone post system requirements?</title>
	<author>daveywest</author>
	<datestamp>1265023980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The minimum system requirements for the Starcraft II Beta are as follows:<br>
<br>
PC Minimum Requirements:<br>
 Windows XP SP3/Vista SP1/Windows 7<br>
 2.2 Ghz Pentium IV or equivalent AMD Athlon processor<br>
 1 GB system RAM/1.5 GB for Vista and Windows 7<br>
 128 MB NVidia GeForce 6600 GT/ATI Radeon 9800 PRO video card<br>
 1024x768 minimum display resolution<br>
 4 GB free hard space (Beta)<br>
 Broadband connection<br>
<br>
*Note* the final requirements for Starcraft II have not yet been determined. Due to ongoing development the minimum requirements listed above are subject to change at any time. During this phase a Mac version will NOT be available, please check back.</p> </div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The minimum system requirements for the Starcraft II Beta are as follows : PC Minimum Requirements : Windows XP SP3/Vista SP1/Windows 7 2.2 Ghz Pentium IV or equivalent AMD Athlon processor 1 GB system RAM/1.5 GB for Vista and Windows 7 128 MB NVidia GeForce 6600 GT/ATI Radeon 9800 PRO video card 1024x768 minimum display resolution 4 GB free hard space ( Beta ) Broadband connection * Note * the final requirements for Starcraft II have not yet been determined .
Due to ongoing development the minimum requirements listed above are subject to change at any time .
During this phase a Mac version will NOT be available , please check back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The minimum system requirements for the Starcraft II Beta are as follows:

PC Minimum Requirements:
 Windows XP SP3/Vista SP1/Windows 7
 2.2 Ghz Pentium IV or equivalent AMD Athlon processor
 1 GB system RAM/1.5 GB for Vista and Windows 7
 128 MB NVidia GeForce 6600 GT/ATI Radeon 9800 PRO video card
 1024x768 minimum display resolution
 4 GB free hard space (Beta)
 Broadband connection

*Note* the final requirements for Starcraft II have not yet been determined.
Due to ongoing development the minimum requirements listed above are subject to change at any time.
During this phase a Mac version will NOT be available, please check back. 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177136</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176788</id>
	<title>Re:Been so long</title>
	<author>sopssa</author>
	<datestamp>1265021820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exactly and like:<br><i>Release date(s)     2011 or later</i></p><p>What is this I don't even</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly and like : Release date ( s ) 2011 or laterWhat is this I do n't even</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly and like:Release date(s)     2011 or laterWhat is this I don't even</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176652</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176854</id>
	<title>Re:Been so long</title>
	<author>Conchobair</author>
	<datestamp>1265022060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nope.  Announced Dates: <br>
StarCraft II - May 19, 2007 <br>
Diablo 3 - June 28, 2008 <br>
<br>
Although, it would not be inconceivable for Blizzard to have done that.  They are all about taking as much time as it takes to get things done and have never shied away from pushing a title or patch back in order to ensure it was as polished as possible.  This is why all of their games kick ass and kill Koreans imo.  They go for quality over cutting content for a early release (KOTR2) or a pretty release date (Hellgate).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nope .
Announced Dates : StarCraft II - May 19 , 2007 Diablo 3 - June 28 , 2008 Although , it would not be inconceivable for Blizzard to have done that .
They are all about taking as much time as it takes to get things done and have never shied away from pushing a title or patch back in order to ensure it was as polished as possible .
This is why all of their games kick ass and kill Koreans imo .
They go for quality over cutting content for a early release ( KOTR2 ) or a pretty release date ( Hellgate ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nope.
Announced Dates: 
StarCraft II - May 19, 2007 
Diablo 3 - June 28, 2008 

Although, it would not be inconceivable for Blizzard to have done that.
They are all about taking as much time as it takes to get things done and have never shied away from pushing a title or patch back in order to ensure it was as polished as possible.
This is why all of their games kick ass and kill Koreans imo.
They go for quality over cutting content for a early release (KOTR2) or a pretty release date (Hellgate).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176652</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31185874</id>
	<title>Annoyed</title>
	<author>dosilegecko</author>
	<datestamp>1266514020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Its kind of annoying that I did not get a beta key, even though I have been a Blizzard fan and customer for most of my life. I know they have no real way of knowing that I own every Blizzard game (minus the atrocity that is WoW (hey, maybe thats why I didnt get a SC2 beta key)), but it would be nice to be rewarded for loyalty at least once in a while.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its kind of annoying that I did not get a beta key , even though I have been a Blizzard fan and customer for most of my life .
I know they have no real way of knowing that I own every Blizzard game ( minus the atrocity that is WoW ( hey , maybe thats why I didnt get a SC2 beta key ) ) , but it would be nice to be rewarded for loyalty at least once in a while .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its kind of annoying that I did not get a beta key, even though I have been a Blizzard fan and customer for most of my life.
I know they have no real way of knowing that I own every Blizzard game (minus the atrocity that is WoW (hey, maybe thats why I didnt get a SC2 beta key)), but it would be nice to be rewarded for loyalty at least once in a while.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31179664</id>
	<title>Re:System Requirements, Screenshots, etc...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265039340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>um.. if you're in closed beta, and you're releasing all this beta information, aren't your breaking the NDA you signed when you got accepted into closed beta?</htmltext>
<tokenext>um.. if you 're in closed beta , and you 're releasing all this beta information , are n't your breaking the NDA you signed when you got accepted into closed beta ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>um.. if you're in closed beta, and you're releasing all this beta information, aren't your breaking the NDA you signed when you got accepted into closed beta?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177420</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31180470</id>
	<title>Re:Battle.net required? No Thanks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265047260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why do I need to join battle.net for a game I only want to play against the computer.  Playing against people online gets very tiring.  It's hard to find anyone online that doesn't act like a spoiled six year old.  Just shut up and play.</p></div><p>You only have to join Battle.net if you want to play against other Humans, or if you want to be part of the Beta trial. According to Blizzard's website, the online Beta is multi-player only (which includes 1 on 1 human vs. computer just FYI) or in other words the Beta does not include the offline campaign content.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do I need to join battle.net for a game I only want to play against the computer .
Playing against people online gets very tiring .
It 's hard to find anyone online that does n't act like a spoiled six year old .
Just shut up and play.You only have to join Battle.net if you want to play against other Humans , or if you want to be part of the Beta trial .
According to Blizzard 's website , the online Beta is multi-player only ( which includes 1 on 1 human vs. computer just FYI ) or in other words the Beta does not include the offline campaign content .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do I need to join battle.net for a game I only want to play against the computer.
Playing against people online gets very tiring.
It's hard to find anyone online that doesn't act like a spoiled six year old.
Just shut up and play.You only have to join Battle.net if you want to play against other Humans, or if you want to be part of the Beta trial.
According to Blizzard's website, the online Beta is multi-player only (which includes 1 on 1 human vs. computer just FYI) or in other words the Beta does not include the offline campaign content.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177752</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176728</id>
	<title>Lost my interest</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265021580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>When they declared it would be sold as three different packs, one per race. While they do have a history of expansion packs, it's never been 1 with 2 more like this, nor planned this far in advanced to break it up and sell the parts.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When they declared it would be sold as three different packs , one per race .
While they do have a history of expansion packs , it 's never been 1 with 2 more like this , nor planned this far in advanced to break it up and sell the parts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When they declared it would be sold as three different packs, one per race.
While they do have a history of expansion packs, it's never been 1 with 2 more like this, nor planned this far in advanced to break it up and sell the parts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177270</id>
	<title>Re:Two questions....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265023920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;Will SC2 support true LAN play, or just that pseudo-LAN thing where one have to 'authenticate' first?</p><p>It's been said before, that all the emphasis is with the online experience.. Since it's P2P instead of client-server, you will get the same performance on a LAN as you normally would with the added benefit of still being available to your online friends via Battle.net.  Even if all players are on a LAN, you can still communicate with all your battle.net buddies (whether on your LAN or not) while a game is in progress.</p><p>&gt;Will SC2 support multi-core systems?<br>Yes. It's been said before indirectly, not sure where, but the physics engine in SC2 is run on a separate thread so you're looking at using at least 2 cores..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Will SC2 support true LAN play , or just that pseudo-LAN thing where one have to 'authenticate ' first ? It 's been said before , that all the emphasis is with the online experience.. Since it 's P2P instead of client-server , you will get the same performance on a LAN as you normally would with the added benefit of still being available to your online friends via Battle.net .
Even if all players are on a LAN , you can still communicate with all your battle.net buddies ( whether on your LAN or not ) while a game is in progress. &gt; Will SC2 support multi-core systems ? Yes .
It 's been said before indirectly , not sure where , but the physics engine in SC2 is run on a separate thread so you 're looking at using at least 2 cores. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;Will SC2 support true LAN play, or just that pseudo-LAN thing where one have to 'authenticate' first?It's been said before, that all the emphasis is with the online experience.. Since it's P2P instead of client-server, you will get the same performance on a LAN as you normally would with the added benefit of still being available to your online friends via Battle.net.
Even if all players are on a LAN, you can still communicate with all your battle.net buddies (whether on your LAN or not) while a game is in progress.&gt;Will SC2 support multi-core systems?Yes.
It's been said before indirectly, not sure where, but the physics engine in SC2 is run on a separate thread so you're looking at using at least 2 cores..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176688</id>
	<title>Mac</title>
	<author>Chris Lawrence</author>
	<datestamp>1265021460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No Mac version yet, unfortunately.  Both Mac and PC versions are going to be released together on the same media, but no word yet if Mac users will get to play with the beta.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No Mac version yet , unfortunately .
Both Mac and PC versions are going to be released together on the same media , but no word yet if Mac users will get to play with the beta .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No Mac version yet, unfortunately.
Both Mac and PC versions are going to be released together on the same media, but no word yet if Mac users will get to play with the beta.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31178358</id>
	<title>Epp.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265028780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">to stick something worse 4nd worse. As violated. In the I'll have Offended to predict *BSD's locating #GNAA, see. The number</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>to stick something worse 4nd worse .
As violated .
In the I 'll have Offended to predict * BSD 's locating # GNAA , see .
The number [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to stick something worse 4nd worse.
As violated.
In the I'll have Offended to predict *BSD's locating #GNAA, see.
The number [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177880</id>
	<title>No fun in europe</title>
	<author>Picardo85</author>
	<datestamp>1265026080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>And as usual we are lagging behind in europe. I wonder why it's so hard to have releases in europe and the US at the same time.That doesn't just go for the games but movies and series aswell.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And as usual we are lagging behind in europe .
I wonder why it 's so hard to have releases in europe and the US at the same time.That does n't just go for the games but movies and series aswell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And as usual we are lagging behind in europe.
I wonder why it's so hard to have releases in europe and the US at the same time.That doesn't just go for the games but movies and series aswell.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177120</id>
	<title>Oblig Alien Over...</title>
	<author>Bobfrankly1</author>
	<datestamp>1265023260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I for one welcome our zerg..."You need more Overlords".</htmltext>
<tokenext>I for one welcome our zerg... " You need more Overlords " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I for one welcome our zerg..."You need more Overlords".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177600</id>
	<title>But...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265025000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... does it run on Linux? D:</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... does it run on Linux ?
D :</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... does it run on Linux?
D:</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31180060</id>
	<title>Re:Been so long</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265042880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All games made by Blizzard suck.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All games made by Blizzard suck .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All games made by Blizzard suck.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176652</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31178832</id>
	<title>They don't accounce dates</title>
	<author>Snaller</author>
	<datestamp>1265032200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unless you mean when they told people they were going to make a sequel.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless you mean when they told people they were going to make a sequel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless you mean when they told people they were going to make a sequel.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31179336</id>
	<title>Re:Been so long</title>
	<author>Vaphell</author>
	<datestamp>1265036520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>hellgate was rushed by the publisher because they wanted to see the monies, unfortunately unpolished mmo-like product usually doesn't get a second chance and the game failed. Blizzard is unique because they are immune to the hard gamedev reality thanks to endless stream of money from WoW. If there was no WoW they would be in trouble, after all SC2 is in development for 7 or 8 years already.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>hellgate was rushed by the publisher because they wanted to see the monies , unfortunately unpolished mmo-like product usually does n't get a second chance and the game failed .
Blizzard is unique because they are immune to the hard gamedev reality thanks to endless stream of money from WoW .
If there was no WoW they would be in trouble , after all SC2 is in development for 7 or 8 years already .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hellgate was rushed by the publisher because they wanted to see the monies, unfortunately unpolished mmo-like product usually doesn't get a second chance and the game failed.
Blizzard is unique because they are immune to the hard gamedev reality thanks to endless stream of money from WoW.
If there was no WoW they would be in trouble, after all SC2 is in development for 7 or 8 years already.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177320</id>
	<title>Submitting system specs for beta via Wine</title>
	<author>CyDharttha</author>
	<datestamp>1265024100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>In order to sign up for possible beta access, you have to download a program that sends your system specs to your battle.net account. The system test application for Windows worked without issue in Wine, allowing me to upload my specs and be considered for beta access.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In order to sign up for possible beta access , you have to download a program that sends your system specs to your battle.net account .
The system test application for Windows worked without issue in Wine , allowing me to upload my specs and be considered for beta access .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In order to sign up for possible beta access, you have to download a program that sends your system specs to your battle.net account.
The system test application for Windows worked without issue in Wine, allowing me to upload my specs and be considered for beta access.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177446</id>
	<title>Re:Can anyone post system requirements?</title>
	<author>flabordec</author>
	<datestamp>1265024580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From <a href="http://us.blizzard.com/support/article.xml?locale=en\_US&amp;articleId=26242&amp;parentCategoryId&amp;pageNumber=1&amp;categoryId=3633" title="blizzard.com" rel="nofollow">Blizzard's page:</a> [blizzard.com] </p><p>PC Minimum Requirements:</p><ul>
<li>Windows XP SP3/Vista SP1/Windows 7</li><li>2.2 Ghz Pentium IV or equivalent AMD Athlon processor</li><li>1 GB system RAM/1.5 GB for Vista and Windows 7</li><li>128 MB NVidia GeForce 6600 GT/ATI Radeon 9800 PRO video card</li><li>1024&#215;768 minimum display resolution</li><li>4 GB free hard space (Beta)</li><li>Broadband connection</li></ul></htmltext>
<tokenext>From Blizzard 's page : [ blizzard.com ] PC Minimum Requirements : Windows XP SP3/Vista SP1/Windows 72.2 Ghz Pentium IV or equivalent AMD Athlon processor1 GB system RAM/1.5 GB for Vista and Windows 7128 MB NVidia GeForce 6600 GT/ATI Radeon 9800 PRO video card1024   768 minimum display resolution4 GB free hard space ( Beta ) Broadband connection</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From Blizzard's page: [blizzard.com] PC Minimum Requirements:
Windows XP SP3/Vista SP1/Windows 72.2 Ghz Pentium IV or equivalent AMD Athlon processor1 GB system RAM/1.5 GB for Vista and Windows 7128 MB NVidia GeForce 6600 GT/ATI Radeon 9800 PRO video card1024×768 minimum display resolution4 GB free hard space (Beta)Broadband connection</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177136</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31188896</id>
	<title>Re:Been so long</title>
	<author>heson</author>
	<datestamp>1266525000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>May 19, "Excellent", lots of time for a nice warm up with Supreme Commander 2 to get the rsi going.</htmltext>
<tokenext>May 19 , " Excellent " , lots of time for a nice warm up with Supreme Commander 2 to get the rsi going .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>May 19, "Excellent", lots of time for a nice warm up with Supreme Commander 2 to get the rsi going.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31185794</id>
	<title>Re:Requiring the will make me pirate it</title>
	<author>dosilegecko</author>
	<datestamp>1266513660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sorry bub, battle.net is awesome, free, and here to stay. If you don't like it, you can geeeet ouuut.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry bub , battle.net is awesome , free , and here to stay .
If you do n't like it , you can geeeet ouuut .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry bub, battle.net is awesome, free, and here to stay.
If you don't like it, you can geeeet ouuut.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31180010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176652</id>
	<title>Been so long</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265021280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>But wasn't Diablo 3 announced first? Where is that beta?</htmltext>
<tokenext>But was n't Diablo 3 announced first ?
Where is that beta ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But wasn't Diablo 3 announced first?
Where is that beta?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_17_2142214_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31178832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176652
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_17_2142214_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31179664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_17_2142214_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176922
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176688
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_17_2142214_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31186376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177752
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_17_2142214_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31179654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_17_2142214_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31185210
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_17_2142214_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31179232
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177752
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_17_2142214_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31185794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31180010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_17_2142214_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31180060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176652
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_17_2142214_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_17_2142214_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177330
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_17_2142214_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31180470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177752
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_17_2142214_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31179090
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177752
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_17_2142214_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31188896
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176652
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_17_2142214_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31179336
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176652
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_17_2142214_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_17_2142214_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176788
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176652
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_17_2142214_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_17_2142214_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31185316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31180870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_17_2142214_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31192524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_17_2142214.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177684
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31185210
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_17_2142214.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177136
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177446
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177286
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177330
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_17_2142214.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176652
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176788
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176854
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31188896
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31178832
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31179336
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31180060
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_17_2142214.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177092
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31179654
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_17_2142214.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177880
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_17_2142214.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177120
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_17_2142214.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176688
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176922
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_17_2142214.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176992
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177270
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_17_2142214.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176728
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31176866
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177512
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31192524
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31180870
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31185316
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_17_2142214.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177752
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31180470
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31179090
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31186376
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31179232
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_17_2142214.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31180010
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31185794
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_17_2142214.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31177420
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_17_2142214.31179664
</commentlist>
</conversation>
