<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_16_2051217</id>
	<title>Next Flash Version Will Support Private Browsing</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1266320940000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"The world rolled its eyes when the problem of Flash cookies came to light several months ago. Even if you're careful about cookies or even if you use your browser's private surfing feature, sites can still track you through cookies stored by Flash. However, soon enough the <a href="http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flashplayer/articles/privacy\_mode\_fp10.1.html">next version of Flash, 10.1, will support private browsing</a> and will integrate with browsers to turn it on when the browser itself is in private browsing mode. Browsers still store data during a private browser session, but they will delete it all at the end of the session. The same will be true of Flash private browsing."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " The world rolled its eyes when the problem of Flash cookies came to light several months ago .
Even if you 're careful about cookies or even if you use your browser 's private surfing feature , sites can still track you through cookies stored by Flash .
However , soon enough the next version of Flash , 10.1 , will support private browsing and will integrate with browsers to turn it on when the browser itself is in private browsing mode .
Browsers still store data during a private browser session , but they will delete it all at the end of the session .
The same will be true of Flash private browsing .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "The world rolled its eyes when the problem of Flash cookies came to light several months ago.
Even if you're careful about cookies or even if you use your browser's private surfing feature, sites can still track you through cookies stored by Flash.
However, soon enough the next version of Flash, 10.1, will support private browsing and will integrate with browsers to turn it on when the browser itself is in private browsing mode.
Browsers still store data during a private browser session, but they will delete it all at the end of the session.
The same will be true of Flash private browsing.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162680</id>
	<title>Re:Burn All Flashes</title>
	<author>Fex303</author>
	<datestamp>1266327000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ah yes... because that campaign was completely successful.</p><p>I can barely remember the last time I came across a site that uses GIF images...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah yes... because that campaign was completely successful.I can barely remember the last time I came across a site that uses GIF images.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah yes... because that campaign was completely successful.I can barely remember the last time I came across a site that uses GIF images...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162434</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31165280</id>
	<title>Excellent move, can't wait for it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266344700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Flash adds a vibrancy to the interwebs that I'd ssooooo miss if it wasn't there. And the efficiency of the flash player is absolutely remarkable. Can't wait for the next version so I can see what wonderful OTHER new features have arrived!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Flash adds a vibrancy to the interwebs that I 'd ssooooo miss if it was n't there .
And the efficiency of the flash player is absolutely remarkable .
Ca n't wait for the next version so I can see what wonderful OTHER new features have arrived !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Flash adds a vibrancy to the interwebs that I'd ssooooo miss if it wasn't there.
And the efficiency of the flash player is absolutely remarkable.
Can't wait for the next version so I can see what wonderful OTHER new features have arrived!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31165198</id>
	<title>the next version of flash is html5</title>
	<author>binarybum</author>
	<datestamp>1266344160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the next version of flash will be obsolete, dead on arrival.  it will be mourned by few.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the next version of flash will be obsolete , dead on arrival .
it will be mourned by few .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the next version of flash will be obsolete, dead on arrival.
it will be mourned by few.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31165712</id>
	<title>Re:use 'shred' not 'rm'. or encrypt your hard driv</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266347880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>He has no wireless card, never plugs an ethernet cord into the slot, and never gives his compy to anyone else. Very difficult to sniff traffic that doesn't exist (but not impossible).</p></div><p>Also makes it kinda hard to surf for pr0n^H^H^H^Hsurprise birthday parties.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>He has no wireless card , never plugs an ethernet cord into the slot , and never gives his compy to anyone else .
Very difficult to sniff traffic that does n't exist ( but not impossible ) .Also makes it kinda hard to surf for pr0n ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ Hsurprise birthday parties .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He has no wireless card, never plugs an ethernet cord into the slot, and never gives his compy to anyone else.
Very difficult to sniff traffic that doesn't exist (but not impossible).Also makes it kinda hard to surf for pr0n^H^H^H^Hsurprise birthday parties.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162632</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162372</id>
	<title>Re:Horay!</title>
	<author>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</author>
	<datestamp>1266325200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>All my "birthday parties" end up being absorbed by tissues. I'm not sure why I keep bothering to plan them...</htmltext>
<tokenext>All my " birthday parties " end up being absorbed by tissues .
I 'm not sure why I keep bothering to plan them.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All my "birthday parties" end up being absorbed by tissues.
I'm not sure why I keep bothering to plan them...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162298</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162476</id>
	<title>Re:Crontab to Delete Flash Cookies</title>
	<author>baez</author>
	<datestamp>1266325680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I like the idea of chown/chmod on the directory. I'll have to give that a shot.
<br> <br>
I did just look again, and it appears that they've changed the storage directory to:
<br> <br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>/home/me/.adobe/Flash\_Player/AssetCache</htmltext>
<tokenext>I like the idea of chown/chmod on the directory .
I 'll have to give that a shot .
I did just look again , and it appears that they 've changed the storage directory to : /home/me/.adobe/Flash \ _Player/AssetCache</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like the idea of chown/chmod on the directory.
I'll have to give that a shot.
I did just look again, and it appears that they've changed the storage directory to:
  /home/me/.adobe/Flash\_Player/AssetCache</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31167314</id>
	<title>Re:Several months ago?</title>
	<author>ytpete</author>
	<datestamp>1265027280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Make no mistake about it Adobe isn't being quick to respond to the issue.</p></div><p>I don't know if that's fair.  "Private browsing mode" is a relatively new browser feature.  How could Flash support a browser feature years ago that hadn't been invented yet?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Make no mistake about it Adobe is n't being quick to respond to the issue.I do n't know if that 's fair .
" Private browsing mode " is a relatively new browser feature .
How could Flash support a browser feature years ago that had n't been invented yet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Make no mistake about it Adobe isn't being quick to respond to the issue.I don't know if that's fair.
"Private browsing mode" is a relatively new browser feature.
How could Flash support a browser feature years ago that hadn't been invented yet?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163066</id>
	<title>Re:Apostophe usage problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266329160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You spelled apostrophe wrong, dick.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You spelled apostrophe wrong , dick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You spelled apostrophe wrong, dick.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162466</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31165334</id>
	<title>Re:That's simply not an adequate response</title>
	<author>mcbutterbuns</author>
	<datestamp>1266345000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe when Adobe stops <a href="http://ln.hixie.ch/?start=1265967771&amp;count=1" title="hixie.ch" rel="nofollow">blocking the HTML5 spec</a> [hixie.ch].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe when Adobe stops blocking the HTML5 spec [ hixie.ch ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe when Adobe stops blocking the HTML5 spec [hixie.ch].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163236</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163598</id>
	<title>next version... HTML5?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266333300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh look.... private browsing is already a feature in html 5. Just sayin.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh look.... private browsing is already a feature in html 5 .
Just sayin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh look.... private browsing is already a feature in html 5.
Just sayin.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31164536</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds great</title>
	<author>naz404</author>
	<datestamp>1266339540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>When will Flash 10.1 be available for my Android G1 phone?</p></div><p> <a href="http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/2010/02/air-and-flash-player-coming-for-android-and-mobile-devices/" title="digitalbackcountry.com">AIR and Flash Player coming for Android and Mobile Devices</a> [digitalbackcountry.com]. Adobe has been showing demo videos of Flash running on Android phones since last year. This week at the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, they showed Flash 10.1 and AIR 2.0 running on a whole number of devices. It's running on the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8wuJ129d0w" title="youtube.com">Motorola Droid</a> [youtube.com], <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlWOocHwcLo" title="youtube.com">Google Nexus One</a> [youtube.com] and other new Android phones like the <a href="http://tech.yahoo.com/blogs/patterson/65656/htcs-new-android-phones-the-unibody-aluminum-legend-and-flash-ready-desire/" title="yahoo.com">HTC Desire &amp; Legend</a> [yahoo.com]. <br> <br>

They've also got it running for <a href="http://www.webkitchen.be/2010/02/17/flash-player-10-1-and-air-coming-to-blackberry-devices/" title="webkitchen.be">Blackberry</a> [webkitchen.be] and <a href="http://tv.adobe.com/watch/open-screen-project/flash-player-101-on-the-palm-pre-/" title="adobe.com">Palm Pre</a> [adobe.com]. Symbian has been running Flash Lite for some time now, so you'll also see Flash 10.1 and AIR coming to it. Browser Flash has running on Maemo for some time too, so no problem there.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Yes, Adobe's reluctance to support any platform other than a PC is the main reason why I think Flash should die a horrible (but quick) death</p></div><p>On the contrary, Adobe has been making a major effort to provide Flash for every single device and modern OS out there (The Open Screen Project).
The fruits of this can now be <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Adobe-Unveils-AIR-on-Mobile-bw-730511059.html?x=0&amp;.v=1" title="yahoo.com">seen at the Mobile World Congress</a> [yahoo.com] where they're showing Flash 10.1 and AIR running on a whole bunch of mobile and internet devices.
Check out the list of <a href="http://www.openscreenproject.org/partners/current\_partners.html" title="openscreenproject.org">Adobe Open Screen partners</a> [openscreenproject.org] (the only one missing is Apple who refuses to have Flash run on the iPhone and iPad, so Adobe got around that by <a href="http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashcs5/appsfor\_iphone/" title="adobe.com">providing export to native iPhone apps with Flash CS5</a> [adobe.com])</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>When will Flash 10.1 be available for my Android G1 phone ?
AIR and Flash Player coming for Android and Mobile Devices [ digitalbackcountry.com ] .
Adobe has been showing demo videos of Flash running on Android phones since last year .
This week at the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona , they showed Flash 10.1 and AIR 2.0 running on a whole number of devices .
It 's running on the Motorola Droid [ youtube.com ] , Google Nexus One [ youtube.com ] and other new Android phones like the HTC Desire &amp; Legend [ yahoo.com ] .
They 've also got it running for Blackberry [ webkitchen.be ] and Palm Pre [ adobe.com ] .
Symbian has been running Flash Lite for some time now , so you 'll also see Flash 10.1 and AIR coming to it .
Browser Flash has running on Maemo for some time too , so no problem there.Yes , Adobe 's reluctance to support any platform other than a PC is the main reason why I think Flash should die a horrible ( but quick ) deathOn the contrary , Adobe has been making a major effort to provide Flash for every single device and modern OS out there ( The Open Screen Project ) .
The fruits of this can now be seen at the Mobile World Congress [ yahoo.com ] where they 're showing Flash 10.1 and AIR running on a whole bunch of mobile and internet devices .
Check out the list of Adobe Open Screen partners [ openscreenproject.org ] ( the only one missing is Apple who refuses to have Flash run on the iPhone and iPad , so Adobe got around that by providing export to native iPhone apps with Flash CS5 [ adobe.com ] )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When will Flash 10.1 be available for my Android G1 phone?
AIR and Flash Player coming for Android and Mobile Devices [digitalbackcountry.com].
Adobe has been showing demo videos of Flash running on Android phones since last year.
This week at the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, they showed Flash 10.1 and AIR 2.0 running on a whole number of devices.
It's running on the Motorola Droid [youtube.com], Google Nexus One [youtube.com] and other new Android phones like the HTC Desire &amp; Legend [yahoo.com].
They've also got it running for Blackberry [webkitchen.be] and Palm Pre [adobe.com].
Symbian has been running Flash Lite for some time now, so you'll also see Flash 10.1 and AIR coming to it.
Browser Flash has running on Maemo for some time too, so no problem there.Yes, Adobe's reluctance to support any platform other than a PC is the main reason why I think Flash should die a horrible (but quick) deathOn the contrary, Adobe has been making a major effort to provide Flash for every single device and modern OS out there (The Open Screen Project).
The fruits of this can now be seen at the Mobile World Congress [yahoo.com] where they're showing Flash 10.1 and AIR running on a whole bunch of mobile and internet devices.
Check out the list of Adobe Open Screen partners [openscreenproject.org] (the only one missing is Apple who refuses to have Flash run on the iPhone and iPad, so Adobe got around that by providing export to native iPhone apps with Flash CS5 [adobe.com])
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31164298</id>
	<title>Re:Remind me why</title>
	<author>NicknamesAreStupid</author>
	<datestamp>1266338160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maintaining state has been the holy grail and tar baby of AI and advertising.  You can't think about much without it, and you can't respond well with much of it.  Advertisers need just enough of 'state' to justify their existence, e.g., "Our reader, John, saw our ad and bought your product!"  But if they get too much, they can find their revenue source compromised, e.g., "80 million other viewers did not."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maintaining state has been the holy grail and tar baby of AI and advertising .
You ca n't think about much without it , and you ca n't respond well with much of it .
Advertisers need just enough of 'state ' to justify their existence , e.g. , " Our reader , John , saw our ad and bought your product !
" But if they get too much , they can find their revenue source compromised , e.g. , " 80 million other viewers did not .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maintaining state has been the holy grail and tar baby of AI and advertising.
You can't think about much without it, and you can't respond well with much of it.
Advertisers need just enough of 'state' to justify their existence, e.g., "Our reader, John, saw our ad and bought your product!
"  But if they get too much, they can find their revenue source compromised, e.g., "80 million other viewers did not.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31165474</id>
	<title>Re:Firefox extensions</title>
	<author>JackAxe</author>
	<datestamp>1266345960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is why plug-ins are good, they can be blocked.  Do you have any recommendations on a way to block those advertising pop-up bubbles?</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is why plug-ins are good , they can be blocked .
Do you have any recommendations on a way to block those advertising pop-up bubbles ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is why plug-ins are good, they can be blocked.
Do you have any recommendations on a way to block those advertising pop-up bubbles?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162354</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31164704</id>
	<title>Re:Remind me why</title>
	<author>izomiac</author>
	<datestamp>1266340920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have to wonder why they don't use normal browser cookies...  Is having 100k of storage so important as to reinvent the wheel?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have to wonder why they do n't use normal browser cookies... Is having 100k of storage so important as to reinvent the wheel ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have to wonder why they don't use normal browser cookies...  Is having 100k of storage so important as to reinvent the wheel?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31172740</id>
	<title>Re:HTML5 is not an adequate response</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1265051100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Sure. HTML combined with CSS and Javascript / AJAX will do 80-90\% of what Flash is used for.</p></div><p>No. XHTML5+CSS3+JS2+AJAX+DOM3+SVG+Video/Audio will not only do 100\% of what Flash does. It will do more. Like being able to seamlessly embed everything that Flash does with the rest of the page.<br>And there is no reason why JavaScript can&rsquo;t be as fast or faster than ActionScript. After all it&rsquo;s pretty much the same language.</p><p>Here are some examples: <a href="http://people.mozilla.com/~prouget/demos/" title="mozilla.com">http://people.mozilla.com/~prouget/demos/</a> [mozilla.com] (Try the movement tracker.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure .
HTML combined with CSS and Javascript / AJAX will do 80-90 \ % of what Flash is used for.No .
XHTML5 + CSS3 + JS2 + AJAX + DOM3 + SVG + Video/Audio will not only do 100 \ % of what Flash does .
It will do more .
Like being able to seamlessly embed everything that Flash does with the rest of the page.And there is no reason why JavaScript can    t be as fast or faster than ActionScript .
After all it    s pretty much the same language.Here are some examples : http : //people.mozilla.com/ ~ prouget/demos/ [ mozilla.com ] ( Try the movement tracker .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure.
HTML combined with CSS and Javascript / AJAX will do 80-90\% of what Flash is used for.No.
XHTML5+CSS3+JS2+AJAX+DOM3+SVG+Video/Audio will not only do 100\% of what Flash does.
It will do more.
Like being able to seamlessly embed everything that Flash does with the rest of the page.And there is no reason why JavaScript can’t be as fast or faster than ActionScript.
After all it’s pretty much the same language.Here are some examples: http://people.mozilla.com/~prouget/demos/ [mozilla.com] (Try the movement tracker.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163072</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31164250</id>
	<title>Re:FlashBlock</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266337800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then be surprised no more: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2008/Jul/444<br>("exploit" link: http://secway.org/pr14/flashblock.htm)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then be surprised no more : http : //seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2008/Jul/444 ( " exploit " link : http : //secway.org/pr14/flashblock.htm )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then be surprised no more: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2008/Jul/444("exploit" link: http://secway.org/pr14/flashblock.htm)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162704</id>
	<title>Overreacting?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266327060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The website knows that I'm the same person as before. So what?<br> <br>Can someone explain me how can this be used against me if the cookies are stored in my personal computer?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The website knows that I 'm the same person as before .
So what ?
Can someone explain me how can this be used against me if the cookies are stored in my personal computer ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The website knows that I'm the same person as before.
So what?
Can someone explain me how can this be used against me if the cookies are stored in my personal computer?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31166994</id>
	<title>Cross Platform ?!?</title>
	<author>DrYak</author>
	<datestamp>1265023620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>World needs a full-blown rich client platform for the browsers and so far Adobe has been the only one who were able to provide a cross-platform, browser-independent solution.</p></div><p>Sorry what do you mean by "<i>Cross-Platform and Browser-Independent</i>" solution ?<br>The damn thing only runs mostly correctly on Windows and Mac OS X, and is half broken on Linux. And that's only 32bits support - the 64bits support is currently catastrophic.<br>In the 90s, when Windows and Mac OS were the only platforms, your sentence would have had made sense.<br>In 2010, where smartphones are pervasive, when every single gadget seems to be internet-enabled, Flash is a big problem because it only runs on a fraction of what a modern user may find.<br>The iPhone has no official Adobe Flash support, for exemple.</p><p>Either Flash should die and get replaced by modern standards such as HTML5/CSS/Javascript/etc. (that's my preferred solution)<br>Or, Adobe should open their Flash and release some freely accessible specifications (and grant free use for any submarine patents) so people like the Gnash dev team could provide 100\% compatible support for any platform under the sun.</p><p>But the current situation is far from the cross-platform heaven we need.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>World needs a full-blown rich client platform for the browsers and so far Adobe has been the only one who were able to provide a cross-platform , browser-independent solution.Sorry what do you mean by " Cross-Platform and Browser-Independent " solution ? The damn thing only runs mostly correctly on Windows and Mac OS X , and is half broken on Linux .
And that 's only 32bits support - the 64bits support is currently catastrophic.In the 90s , when Windows and Mac OS were the only platforms , your sentence would have had made sense.In 2010 , where smartphones are pervasive , when every single gadget seems to be internet-enabled , Flash is a big problem because it only runs on a fraction of what a modern user may find.The iPhone has no official Adobe Flash support , for exemple.Either Flash should die and get replaced by modern standards such as HTML5/CSS/Javascript/etc .
( that 's my preferred solution ) Or , Adobe should open their Flash and release some freely accessible specifications ( and grant free use for any submarine patents ) so people like the Gnash dev team could provide 100 \ % compatible support for any platform under the sun.But the current situation is far from the cross-platform heaven we need .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>World needs a full-blown rich client platform for the browsers and so far Adobe has been the only one who were able to provide a cross-platform, browser-independent solution.Sorry what do you mean by "Cross-Platform and Browser-Independent" solution ?The damn thing only runs mostly correctly on Windows and Mac OS X, and is half broken on Linux.
And that's only 32bits support - the 64bits support is currently catastrophic.In the 90s, when Windows and Mac OS were the only platforms, your sentence would have had made sense.In 2010, where smartphones are pervasive, when every single gadget seems to be internet-enabled, Flash is a big problem because it only runs on a fraction of what a modern user may find.The iPhone has no official Adobe Flash support, for exemple.Either Flash should die and get replaced by modern standards such as HTML5/CSS/Javascript/etc.
(that's my preferred solution)Or, Adobe should open their Flash and release some freely accessible specifications (and grant free use for any submarine patents) so people like the Gnash dev team could provide 100\% compatible support for any platform under the sun.But the current situation is far from the cross-platform heaven we need.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31165440</id>
	<title>Re:That's simply not an adequate response</title>
	<author>JackAxe</author>
	<datestamp>1266345720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sorry Adobe, for this guy's ignorance.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry Adobe , for this guy 's ignorance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry Adobe, for this guy's ignorance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31173118</id>
	<title>Re:Burn All Flashes</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1265052300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Extremism &mdash; &ldquo;The choice of the wise man.&rdquo;(TM)<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Extremism       The choice of the wise man.    ( TM ) ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Extremism — “The choice of the wise man.”(TM) ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162434</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31167672</id>
	<title>Re:Remind me why</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265031420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I dont think that slashdotters understand you they are IT guys mostly.... they are on VPN....</p><p>Advertisers are biggest customers to Adobe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I dont think that slashdotters understand you they are IT guys mostly.... they are on VPN....Advertisers are biggest customers to Adobe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I dont think that slashdotters understand you they are IT guys mostly.... they are on VPN....Advertisers are biggest customers to Adobe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162348</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162858</id>
	<title>HTML5 is not an adequate response</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266327960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does HTML5 provides for the same level of rich client platform development as Flash/Flex? With numerous widgets just like in Motif/MFC, just easier to use? (MXML just shines in GUI development, far beyond of what Motif/MFC/AWT/Swing offer).</p><p>Does HTML5 allows you to play video with some advertisement in a running text over it?</p><p>Does HTML5 protects your video site from hotlinking? I.E. can you make sure that nobody can embed your videos into their pages and make sales while you pay for the bandwidth?</p><p>Sorry, HTML5 'video', 'audio' tags and other dings and wistles... you have your place (probably on YouTube), but you ain't gonna replace Flash anytime soon. Especially not on commercial sites (like pr0n tubes), not for RCP development either. World needs a full-blown rich client platform for the browsers and so far Adobe has been the only one who were able to provide a cross-platform, browser-independent solution. And they did it quite well, despite of some quirks.  Sun with JavaFX has failed... would you like MS to take over with their Windows-only Silverlight technology?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does HTML5 provides for the same level of rich client platform development as Flash/Flex ?
With numerous widgets just like in Motif/MFC , just easier to use ?
( MXML just shines in GUI development , far beyond of what Motif/MFC/AWT/Swing offer ) .Does HTML5 allows you to play video with some advertisement in a running text over it ? Does HTML5 protects your video site from hotlinking ?
I.E. can you make sure that nobody can embed your videos into their pages and make sales while you pay for the bandwidth ? Sorry , HTML5 'video ' , 'audio ' tags and other dings and wistles... you have your place ( probably on YouTube ) , but you ai n't gon na replace Flash anytime soon .
Especially not on commercial sites ( like pr0n tubes ) , not for RCP development either .
World needs a full-blown rich client platform for the browsers and so far Adobe has been the only one who were able to provide a cross-platform , browser-independent solution .
And they did it quite well , despite of some quirks .
Sun with JavaFX has failed... would you like MS to take over with their Windows-only Silverlight technology ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does HTML5 provides for the same level of rich client platform development as Flash/Flex?
With numerous widgets just like in Motif/MFC, just easier to use?
(MXML just shines in GUI development, far beyond of what Motif/MFC/AWT/Swing offer).Does HTML5 allows you to play video with some advertisement in a running text over it?Does HTML5 protects your video site from hotlinking?
I.E. can you make sure that nobody can embed your videos into their pages and make sales while you pay for the bandwidth?Sorry, HTML5 'video', 'audio' tags and other dings and wistles... you have your place (probably on YouTube), but you ain't gonna replace Flash anytime soon.
Especially not on commercial sites (like pr0n tubes), not for RCP development either.
World needs a full-blown rich client platform for the browsers and so far Adobe has been the only one who were able to provide a cross-platform, browser-independent solution.
And they did it quite well, despite of some quirks.
Sun with JavaFX has failed... would you like MS to take over with their Windows-only Silverlight technology?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163678</id>
	<title>In Windows XP</title>
	<author>thethibs</author>
	<datestamp>1266333720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the meantime, this will lose them</p><blockquote><div><p> <tt>  del<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/S<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/Q "C:\Documents and Settings\marc\Application Data\Macromedia\Flash Player\macromedia.com\support\flashplayer\sys\*.*"<br>  rd<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/S<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/Q "C:\Documents and Settings\marc\Application Data\Macromedia\Flash Player\macromedia.com\support\flashplayer\sys\"</tt></p></div> </blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In the meantime , this will lose them del /S /Q " C : \ Documents and Settings \ marc \ Application Data \ Macromedia \ Flash Player \ macromedia.com \ support \ flashplayer \ sys \ * .
* " rd /S /Q " C : \ Documents and Settings \ marc \ Application Data \ Macromedia \ Flash Player \ macromedia.com \ support \ flashplayer \ sys \ "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the meantime, this will lose them   del /S /Q "C:\Documents and Settings\marc\Application Data\Macromedia\Flash Player\macromedia.com\support\flashplayer\sys\*.
*"  rd /S /Q "C:\Documents and Settings\marc\Application Data\Macromedia\Flash Player\macromedia.com\support\flashplayer\sys\" 
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31166634</id>
	<title>Oh those lazy designers!</title>
	<author>ElusiveJoe</author>
	<datestamp>1265019720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The designers are normally just clueless and have no wish to learn code or how stuff works after taking their 1-week Adobe course and getting accreditation as a "web developer".</p></div><p>Not willing to spend a year learning technologies, which were not intended to be used for games, then spend another year writing some kind of a game engine, which would try to bind these technologies together in a suitable way, then spend another year writing a game development environment for that engine, then at last actually making the game, then testing the game in different browsers, because the JS implementation still varies much between them, then making workarounds for browser incompatibilities<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>But it's the tru way, the slashdotter has shown us!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The designers are normally just clueless and have no wish to learn code or how stuff works after taking their 1-week Adobe course and getting accreditation as a " web developer " .Not willing to spend a year learning technologies , which were not intended to be used for games , then spend another year writing some kind of a game engine , which would try to bind these technologies together in a suitable way , then spend another year writing a game development environment for that engine , then at last actually making the game , then testing the game in different browsers , because the JS implementation still varies much between them , then making workarounds for browser incompatibilities ...But it 's the tru way , the slashdotter has shown us !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The designers are normally just clueless and have no wish to learn code or how stuff works after taking their 1-week Adobe course and getting accreditation as a "web developer".Not willing to spend a year learning technologies, which were not intended to be used for games, then spend another year writing some kind of a game engine, which would try to bind these technologies together in a suitable way, then spend another year writing a game development environment for that engine, then at last actually making the game, then testing the game in different browsers, because the JS implementation still varies much between them, then making workarounds for browser incompatibilities ...But it's the tru way, the slashdotter has shown us!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163072</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31166044</id>
	<title>Re:HTML5 is not an adequate response</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265055240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>in HTML 6 there will be a  tag.  Then we can get rid of flash.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>in HTML 6 there will be a tag .
Then we can get rid of flash .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in HTML 6 there will be a  tag.
Then we can get rid of flash.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31164506</id>
	<title>Re:In Windows XP</title>
	<author>cbhacking</author>
	<datestamp>1266339420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pretty sure you can shorten that path a lot using the APPDATA environment variable, as in<br>
&nbsp; "\%APPDATA\%\Macromedia\Flash Player\macromedia.com\support\flashplayer\sys\*"<br>or something like that. At least use "\%USERPROFILE\%\Application Data\..."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pretty sure you can shorten that path a lot using the APPDATA environment variable , as in   " \ % APPDATA \ % \ Macromedia \ Flash Player \ macromedia.com \ support \ flashplayer \ sys \ * " or something like that .
At least use " \ % USERPROFILE \ % \ Application Data \ ... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pretty sure you can shorten that path a lot using the APPDATA environment variable, as in
  "\%APPDATA\%\Macromedia\Flash Player\macromedia.com\support\flashplayer\sys\*"or something like that.
At least use "\%USERPROFILE\%\Application Data\..."</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162702</id>
	<title>be sure to fully close between session types...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266327060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>from the article:<br>"Likewise, if the browser is in normal browsing mode when the Flash Player instance is created, then that particular instance will forever be in normal browsing mode (private browsing is turned off). Accordingly, toggling private browsing on or off without refreshing the page or closing the private browsing window will not impact Flash Player."<br>so be sure you close all your ff windows and fully close, then start a fresh session, and enter private browsing mode before hitting any sites, then fully close and start a fresh session before resuming normal browsing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>from the article : " Likewise , if the browser is in normal browsing mode when the Flash Player instance is created , then that particular instance will forever be in normal browsing mode ( private browsing is turned off ) .
Accordingly , toggling private browsing on or off without refreshing the page or closing the private browsing window will not impact Flash Player .
" so be sure you close all your ff windows and fully close , then start a fresh session , and enter private browsing mode before hitting any sites , then fully close and start a fresh session before resuming normal browsing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>from the article:"Likewise, if the browser is in normal browsing mode when the Flash Player instance is created, then that particular instance will forever be in normal browsing mode (private browsing is turned off).
Accordingly, toggling private browsing on or off without refreshing the page or closing the private browsing window will not impact Flash Player.
"so be sure you close all your ff windows and fully close, then start a fresh session, and enter private browsing mode before hitting any sites, then fully close and start a fresh session before resuming normal browsing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163292</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, nice design</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1266330840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's kind of like the idea of having an OS within the OS.  Now the sub-OS gets to run a browser.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's kind of like the idea of having an OS within the OS .
Now the sub-OS gets to run a browser .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's kind of like the idea of having an OS within the OS.
Now the sub-OS gets to run a browser.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163096</id>
	<title>Re:HTML5 is not an adequate response</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266329400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Does HTML5 provides for the same level of rich client platform development as Flash/Flex? With numerous widgets just like in Motif/MFC, just easier to use? (MXML just shines in GUI development, far beyond of what Motif/MFC/AWT/Swing offer).</i></p><p>Care to offer specifics or just leave it at a rant?</p><p><i>Does HTML5 allows you to play video with some advertisement in a running text over it?</i></p><p>yes, HTML 5 can do this</p><p><i>Does HTML5 protects your video site from hotlinking? I.E. can you make sure that nobody can embed your videos into their pages and make sales while you pay for the bandwidth?</i></p><p>Your web server can do this for you....have it send alternate content</p><p><i>Sorry, HTML5 'video', 'audio' tags and other dings and wistles... you have your place (probably on YouTube), but you ain't gonna replace Flash anytime soon. Especially not on commercial sites (like pr0n tubes), not for RCP development either. World needs a full-blown rich client platform for the browsers and so far Adobe has been the only one who were able to provide a cross-platform, browser-independent solution. And they did it quite well, despite of some quirks. Sun with JavaFX has failed... would you like MS to take over with their Windows-only Silverlight technology?</i></p><p>Sorry, but your ill informed thoughts around HTML 5 and the horrid Adobe Flash / M$ Silverturd proprietary environments blinds you to the reality of where the web is heading.  The world does not need a full blown rich client platform in the form of a proprietary, patent encumbered plug-in.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does HTML5 provides for the same level of rich client platform development as Flash/Flex ?
With numerous widgets just like in Motif/MFC , just easier to use ?
( MXML just shines in GUI development , far beyond of what Motif/MFC/AWT/Swing offer ) .Care to offer specifics or just leave it at a rant ? Does HTML5 allows you to play video with some advertisement in a running text over it ? yes , HTML 5 can do thisDoes HTML5 protects your video site from hotlinking ?
I.E. can you make sure that nobody can embed your videos into their pages and make sales while you pay for the bandwidth ? Your web server can do this for you....have it send alternate contentSorry , HTML5 'video ' , 'audio ' tags and other dings and wistles... you have your place ( probably on YouTube ) , but you ai n't gon na replace Flash anytime soon .
Especially not on commercial sites ( like pr0n tubes ) , not for RCP development either .
World needs a full-blown rich client platform for the browsers and so far Adobe has been the only one who were able to provide a cross-platform , browser-independent solution .
And they did it quite well , despite of some quirks .
Sun with JavaFX has failed... would you like MS to take over with their Windows-only Silverlight technology ? Sorry , but your ill informed thoughts around HTML 5 and the horrid Adobe Flash / M $ Silverturd proprietary environments blinds you to the reality of where the web is heading .
The world does not need a full blown rich client platform in the form of a proprietary , patent encumbered plug-in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does HTML5 provides for the same level of rich client platform development as Flash/Flex?
With numerous widgets just like in Motif/MFC, just easier to use?
(MXML just shines in GUI development, far beyond of what Motif/MFC/AWT/Swing offer).Care to offer specifics or just leave it at a rant?Does HTML5 allows you to play video with some advertisement in a running text over it?yes, HTML 5 can do thisDoes HTML5 protects your video site from hotlinking?
I.E. can you make sure that nobody can embed your videos into their pages and make sales while you pay for the bandwidth?Your web server can do this for you....have it send alternate contentSorry, HTML5 'video', 'audio' tags and other dings and wistles... you have your place (probably on YouTube), but you ain't gonna replace Flash anytime soon.
Especially not on commercial sites (like pr0n tubes), not for RCP development either.
World needs a full-blown rich client platform for the browsers and so far Adobe has been the only one who were able to provide a cross-platform, browser-independent solution.
And they did it quite well, despite of some quirks.
Sun with JavaFX has failed... would you like MS to take over with their Windows-only Silverlight technology?Sorry, but your ill informed thoughts around HTML 5 and the horrid Adobe Flash / M$ Silverturd proprietary environments blinds you to the reality of where the web is heading.
The world does not need a full blown rich client platform in the form of a proprietary, patent encumbered plug-in.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31167116</id>
	<title>Misdirected Adobe</title>
	<author>wadeal</author>
	<datestamp>1265024880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How about instead of developing shit like this they FINALLY release 64 bit Flash for Windows.. Only taken 5+ years so far. If they can't now they should open source flash.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How about instead of developing shit like this they FINALLY release 64 bit Flash for Windows.. Only taken 5 + years so far .
If they ca n't now they should open source flash .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about instead of developing shit like this they FINALLY release 64 bit Flash for Windows.. Only taken 5+ years so far.
If they can't now they should open source flash.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163236</id>
	<title>Re:That's simply not an adequate response</title>
	<author>westlake</author>
	<datestamp>1266330360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Sorry Adobe, but it's time for HTML5.</i> </p><p>Whn will there be a final HTML 5 standard to support?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry Adobe , but it 's time for HTML5 .
Whn will there be a final HTML 5 standard to support ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry Adobe, but it's time for HTML5.
Whn will there be a final HTML 5 standard to support?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163072</id>
	<title>Re:HTML5 is not an adequate response</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266329220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Does HTML5 provides for the same level of rich client platform development as Flash/Flex? With numerous widgets just like in Motif/MFC, just easier to use? (MXML just shines in GUI development, far beyond of what Motif/MFC/AWT/Swing offer).</p></div><p>Sure. HTML combined with CSS and Javascript / AJAX will do 80-90\% of what Flash is used for.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Does HTML5 allows you to play video with some advertisement in a running text over it?</p></div><p>Sure. Just use a CSS layer.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Does HTML5 protects your video site from hotlinking? I.E. can you make sure that nobody can embed your videos into their pages and make sales while you pay for the bandwidth?</p></div><p>This is a HTTP issue and server side security issue. It is trivial to grep a Flash file for the raw SWF download location most times.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Sorry, HTML5 'video', 'audio' tags and other dings and wistles... you have your place (probably on YouTube), but you ain't gonna replace Flash anytime soon. Especially not on commercial sites (like pr0n tubes), not for RCP development either. World needs a full-blown rich client platform for the browsers and so far Adobe has been the only one who were able to provide a cross-platform, browser-independent solution. And they did it quite well, despite of some quirks.  Sun with JavaFX has failed... would you like MS to take over with their Windows-only Silverlight technology?</p></div><p>Hardcore Flash games I can see and some super heavy duty flash "applications", but so often this can be done in HTML with CSS / AJAX. The designers are normally just clueless and have no wish to learn code or how stuff works after taking their 1-week Adobe course and getting accreditation as a "web developer".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does HTML5 provides for the same level of rich client platform development as Flash/Flex ?
With numerous widgets just like in Motif/MFC , just easier to use ?
( MXML just shines in GUI development , far beyond of what Motif/MFC/AWT/Swing offer ) .Sure .
HTML combined with CSS and Javascript / AJAX will do 80-90 \ % of what Flash is used for.Does HTML5 allows you to play video with some advertisement in a running text over it ? Sure .
Just use a CSS layer.Does HTML5 protects your video site from hotlinking ?
I.E. can you make sure that nobody can embed your videos into their pages and make sales while you pay for the bandwidth ? This is a HTTP issue and server side security issue .
It is trivial to grep a Flash file for the raw SWF download location most times.Sorry , HTML5 'video ' , 'audio ' tags and other dings and wistles... you have your place ( probably on YouTube ) , but you ai n't gon na replace Flash anytime soon .
Especially not on commercial sites ( like pr0n tubes ) , not for RCP development either .
World needs a full-blown rich client platform for the browsers and so far Adobe has been the only one who were able to provide a cross-platform , browser-independent solution .
And they did it quite well , despite of some quirks .
Sun with JavaFX has failed... would you like MS to take over with their Windows-only Silverlight technology ? Hardcore Flash games I can see and some super heavy duty flash " applications " , but so often this can be done in HTML with CSS / AJAX .
The designers are normally just clueless and have no wish to learn code or how stuff works after taking their 1-week Adobe course and getting accreditation as a " web developer " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does HTML5 provides for the same level of rich client platform development as Flash/Flex?
With numerous widgets just like in Motif/MFC, just easier to use?
(MXML just shines in GUI development, far beyond of what Motif/MFC/AWT/Swing offer).Sure.
HTML combined with CSS and Javascript / AJAX will do 80-90\% of what Flash is used for.Does HTML5 allows you to play video with some advertisement in a running text over it?Sure.
Just use a CSS layer.Does HTML5 protects your video site from hotlinking?
I.E. can you make sure that nobody can embed your videos into their pages and make sales while you pay for the bandwidth?This is a HTTP issue and server side security issue.
It is trivial to grep a Flash file for the raw SWF download location most times.Sorry, HTML5 'video', 'audio' tags and other dings and wistles... you have your place (probably on YouTube), but you ain't gonna replace Flash anytime soon.
Especially not on commercial sites (like pr0n tubes), not for RCP development either.
World needs a full-blown rich client platform for the browsers and so far Adobe has been the only one who were able to provide a cross-platform, browser-independent solution.
And they did it quite well, despite of some quirks.
Sun with JavaFX has failed... would you like MS to take over with their Windows-only Silverlight technology?Hardcore Flash games I can see and some super heavy duty flash "applications", but so often this can be done in HTML with CSS / AJAX.
The designers are normally just clueless and have no wish to learn code or how stuff works after taking their 1-week Adobe course and getting accreditation as a "web developer".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162292</id>
	<title>Remind me why</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266324780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Remind me why Flash needs to be stateful, again?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Remind me why Flash needs to be stateful , again ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Remind me why Flash needs to be stateful, again?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162390</id>
	<title>Re:Remind me why</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266325260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are a number of flash based games which use the flash cookies to save info you might want around so you don't have to start from scratch each time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are a number of flash based games which use the flash cookies to save info you might want around so you do n't have to start from scratch each time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are a number of flash based games which use the flash cookies to save info you might want around so you don't have to start from scratch each time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31164582</id>
	<title>Flash Cookies View</title>
	<author>flinchlock</author>
	<datestamp>1266339900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/flash\_cookies\_view.html" title="nirsoft.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/flash\_cookies\_view.html</a> [nirsoft.net]

"FlashCookiesView is a small utility that displays the list of cookie files created by Flash component (Local Shared Object) in your Web browser. For each cookie file, the lower pane of FlashCookiesView displays the content of the file in readable format or as Hex dump.
You can also select one or more cookie files, and then copy them to the clipboard, save them to text/html/xml file or delete them."</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.nirsoft.net/utils/flash \ _cookies \ _view.html [ nirsoft.net ] " FlashCookiesView is a small utility that displays the list of cookie files created by Flash component ( Local Shared Object ) in your Web browser .
For each cookie file , the lower pane of FlashCookiesView displays the content of the file in readable format or as Hex dump .
You can also select one or more cookie files , and then copy them to the clipboard , save them to text/html/xml file or delete them .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/flash\_cookies\_view.html [nirsoft.net]

"FlashCookiesView is a small utility that displays the list of cookie files created by Flash component (Local Shared Object) in your Web browser.
For each cookie file, the lower pane of FlashCookiesView displays the content of the file in readable format or as Hex dump.
You can also select one or more cookie files, and then copy them to the clipboard, save them to text/html/xml file or delete them.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163842</id>
	<title>Re:That's simply not an adequate response</title>
	<author>fermion</author>
	<datestamp>1266335340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hopefully competition will push Flash to become less user hostile.  Control of flash cookies is a step forward, but not enough. First, browsing is almost impossible when flash cookies are set to "ask".  I think they might be doing this on purpose.
<p>
What we make me want less opposed to flash is if the site included an option to not autoplay flash content. True, we can use flashblock, but if flash is truly a tool for the user, and not just a way to deliver advertising, this little tweak should not be such a huge problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hopefully competition will push Flash to become less user hostile .
Control of flash cookies is a step forward , but not enough .
First , browsing is almost impossible when flash cookies are set to " ask " .
I think they might be doing this on purpose .
What we make me want less opposed to flash is if the site included an option to not autoplay flash content .
True , we can use flashblock , but if flash is truly a tool for the user , and not just a way to deliver advertising , this little tweak should not be such a huge problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hopefully competition will push Flash to become less user hostile.
Control of flash cookies is a step forward, but not enough.
First, browsing is almost impossible when flash cookies are set to "ask".
I think they might be doing this on purpose.
What we make me want less opposed to flash is if the site included an option to not autoplay flash content.
True, we can use flashblock, but if flash is truly a tool for the user, and not just a way to deliver advertising, this little tweak should not be such a huge problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162424</id>
	<title>FLASH, another word for BEND OVER</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266325500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>bend over baby</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>bend over baby</tokentext>
<sentencetext>bend over baby</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162400</id>
	<title>Re:Remind me why</title>
	<author>broken\_chaos</author>
	<datestamp>1266325320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Online games are a major user (as opposed to abuser) of storing data with Flash. There are some that actually are complex and long enough (and fun, too!) to warrant a save function. It can also be mildly-to-moderately helpful for some other Flash 'applications', like a video/audio player storing settings like volume levels.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Online games are a major user ( as opposed to abuser ) of storing data with Flash .
There are some that actually are complex and long enough ( and fun , too !
) to warrant a save function .
It can also be mildly-to-moderately helpful for some other Flash 'applications ' , like a video/audio player storing settings like volume levels .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Online games are a major user (as opposed to abuser) of storing data with Flash.
There are some that actually are complex and long enough (and fun, too!
) to warrant a save function.
It can also be mildly-to-moderately helpful for some other Flash 'applications', like a video/audio player storing settings like volume levels.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31168332</id>
	<title>Just delete?</title>
	<author>linuxcoder</author>
	<datestamp>1265036520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>For security, it would have to overwrite the cache, not just delete it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>For security , it would have to overwrite the cache , not just delete it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For security, it would have to overwrite the cache, not just delete it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162378</id>
	<title>Better Privacy extension</title>
	<author>harmonise</author>
	<datestamp>1266325260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This feature is here now for Firefox users with the <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/6623" title="mozilla.org">Better Privacy</a> [mozilla.org] extension.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This feature is here now for Firefox users with the Better Privacy [ mozilla.org ] extension .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This feature is here now for Firefox users with the Better Privacy [mozilla.org] extension.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162608</id>
	<title>And after that..</title>
	<author>Peter Cooper</author>
	<datestamp>1266326580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After that feature, could they make Flash respect the "Block Pop Up Windows" features in Safari and Firefox? I expect NO popups when I have this set.. yet Flash seems to be able to open them still!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After that feature , could they make Flash respect the " Block Pop Up Windows " features in Safari and Firefox ?
I expect NO popups when I have this set.. yet Flash seems to be able to open them still !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After that feature, could they make Flash respect the "Block Pop Up Windows" features in Safari and Firefox?
I expect NO popups when I have this set.. yet Flash seems to be able to open them still!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31164126</id>
	<title>Re:Firefox extensions</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266337080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No flash?<br>I think you're forgetting why people use 'privacy-mode'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No flash ? I think you 're forgetting why people use 'privacy-mode' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No flash?I think you're forgetting why people use 'privacy-mode'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162354</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162354</id>
	<title>Firefox extensions</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266325140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Get <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/de/firefox/addon/433" title="mozilla.org">FlashBlock</a> [mozilla.org] or <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/de/firefox/addon/722" title="mozilla.org">NoScript</a> [mozilla.org] to turn off flash altogether.</p><p>Get <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/de/firefox/addon/6623" title="mozilla.org">BetterPrivacy</a> [mozilla.org] to automatically delete Flash cookies on exit; it seems to work well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Get FlashBlock [ mozilla.org ] or NoScript [ mozilla.org ] to turn off flash altogether.Get BetterPrivacy [ mozilla.org ] to automatically delete Flash cookies on exit ; it seems to work well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get FlashBlock [mozilla.org] or NoScript [mozilla.org] to turn off flash altogether.Get BetterPrivacy [mozilla.org] to automatically delete Flash cookies on exit; it seems to work well.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163084</id>
	<title>FlashBlock</title>
	<author>shovas</author>
	<datestamp>1266329280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Someone mentioned it in passing but I'll say it directly: <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/433" title="mozilla.org" rel="nofollow">FlackBlock</a> [mozilla.org] </p><p>I'm not one to turn off the web with NoScript or not contribute to sites I'm visiting by using AdBlock. FlashBlock is a great compromise. Normal ads, no stupid flash instability. Click on the flash when actually want it to run for where it's actually needed. You'll be surprised how well it works.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone mentioned it in passing but I 'll say it directly : FlackBlock [ mozilla.org ] I 'm not one to turn off the web with NoScript or not contribute to sites I 'm visiting by using AdBlock .
FlashBlock is a great compromise .
Normal ads , no stupid flash instability .
Click on the flash when actually want it to run for where it 's actually needed .
You 'll be surprised how well it works .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone mentioned it in passing but I'll say it directly: FlackBlock [mozilla.org] I'm not one to turn off the web with NoScript or not contribute to sites I'm visiting by using AdBlock.
FlashBlock is a great compromise.
Normal ads, no stupid flash instability.
Click on the flash when actually want it to run for where it's actually needed.
You'll be surprised how well it works.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163426</id>
	<title>Re:use 'shred' not 'rm'. or encrypt your hard driv</title>
	<author>caluml</author>
	<datestamp>1266332040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>He has no wireless card, never plugs an ethernet cord into the slot, and never gives his compy to anyone else.</p></div><p>Meh. I hacked his computer twice. Once over Bluetooth, and then again over Infrared. All I found were secret plans of his to dominate the world - nothing unusual.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>He has no wireless card , never plugs an ethernet cord into the slot , and never gives his compy to anyone else.Meh .
I hacked his computer twice .
Once over Bluetooth , and then again over Infrared .
All I found were secret plans of his to dominate the world - nothing unusual .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He has no wireless card, never plugs an ethernet cord into the slot, and never gives his compy to anyone else.Meh.
I hacked his computer twice.
Once over Bluetooth, and then again over Infrared.
All I found were secret plans of his to dominate the world - nothing unusual.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162632</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163382</id>
	<title>Sounds great</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1266331560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When will Flash 10.1 be available for my Android G1 phone? How 'bout my Wii? How 'bout any device that isn't X86 based? Yes, Adobe's reluctance to support any platform other than a PC is the main reason why I think Flash should die a horrible (but quick) death and everybody should switch to HTML5 instead. Heck, I think even Silverlight is better supported by mobile devices than the latest version of Flash.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When will Flash 10.1 be available for my Android G1 phone ?
How 'bout my Wii ?
How 'bout any device that is n't X86 based ?
Yes , Adobe 's reluctance to support any platform other than a PC is the main reason why I think Flash should die a horrible ( but quick ) death and everybody should switch to HTML5 instead .
Heck , I think even Silverlight is better supported by mobile devices than the latest version of Flash .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When will Flash 10.1 be available for my Android G1 phone?
How 'bout my Wii?
How 'bout any device that isn't X86 based?
Yes, Adobe's reluctance to support any platform other than a PC is the main reason why I think Flash should die a horrible (but quick) death and everybody should switch to HTML5 instead.
Heck, I think even Silverlight is better supported by mobile devices than the latest version of Flash.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162344</id>
	<title>That's simply not an adequate response</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266325140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry Adobe, but it's time for HTML5.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry Adobe , but it 's time for HTML5 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry Adobe, but it's time for HTML5.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163260</id>
	<title>Flash must die</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266330540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone EVER visit a flash site and think, "man... wish the designer used MORE flash." Let's just get rid of flash... or at least beat it into submission so it only shows in spaces that make sense... er.... well... I'm open to suggestions.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone EVER visit a flash site and think , " man... wish the designer used MORE flash .
" Let 's just get rid of flash... or at least beat it into submission so it only shows in spaces that make sense... er.... well... I 'm open to suggestions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone EVER visit a flash site and think, "man... wish the designer used MORE flash.
" Let's just get rid of flash... or at least beat it into submission so it only shows in spaces that make sense... er.... well... I'm open to suggestions.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31170390</id>
	<title>Re:Apostophe usage problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265044080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apostrophe</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apostrophe</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apostrophe</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162466</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31167220</id>
	<title>Re:HTML5 is not an adequate response</title>
	<author>ytpete</author>
	<datestamp>1265026140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm sorry, but whenever I read comments like this I have to ask &ndash; <i>how much AJAX web development have you really done</i>?  It's easy to build a couple pop-up menus and accordion controls and then decide that DHTML + CSS is all-powerful.  But, frankly, it's not even close yet.</p><p>I spent years doing bleeding-edge AJAX development, and DHTML is by far the shabbiest development "platform" I have <i>ever</i> used.  Frameworks like Dojo help, some.  HTML5 will help, some.  But it's all wallpaper overtop one core flaw: HTML was fundamentally never designed as an interactive-content development platform.  Its programming language is embarrassing.  It lacks any mechanism for reusing markup code (componentization).  It lacks declarative data binding.  It makes animated transitions far too hard.  Its layout model is absurdly complex.  And that's not even getting into the issues with browser and API fragmentation, backwards-compatibility, etc.</p><p>One other question for you: <i>have you ever tried using Adobe Flex?</i>  Don't knock it till you try it.  It is imperfect, for sure, but it positively <i>screams</i> maturity when you try it after years of banging your head on AJAX development.  And sorry, but I just don't see HTML5 turning that around any time soon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sorry , but whenever I read comments like this I have to ask    how much AJAX web development have you really done ?
It 's easy to build a couple pop-up menus and accordion controls and then decide that DHTML + CSS is all-powerful .
But , frankly , it 's not even close yet.I spent years doing bleeding-edge AJAX development , and DHTML is by far the shabbiest development " platform " I have ever used .
Frameworks like Dojo help , some .
HTML5 will help , some .
But it 's all wallpaper overtop one core flaw : HTML was fundamentally never designed as an interactive-content development platform .
Its programming language is embarrassing .
It lacks any mechanism for reusing markup code ( componentization ) .
It lacks declarative data binding .
It makes animated transitions far too hard .
Its layout model is absurdly complex .
And that 's not even getting into the issues with browser and API fragmentation , backwards-compatibility , etc.One other question for you : have you ever tried using Adobe Flex ?
Do n't knock it till you try it .
It is imperfect , for sure , but it positively screams maturity when you try it after years of banging your head on AJAX development .
And sorry , but I just do n't see HTML5 turning that around any time soon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sorry, but whenever I read comments like this I have to ask – how much AJAX web development have you really done?
It's easy to build a couple pop-up menus and accordion controls and then decide that DHTML + CSS is all-powerful.
But, frankly, it's not even close yet.I spent years doing bleeding-edge AJAX development, and DHTML is by far the shabbiest development "platform" I have ever used.
Frameworks like Dojo help, some.
HTML5 will help, some.
But it's all wallpaper overtop one core flaw: HTML was fundamentally never designed as an interactive-content development platform.
Its programming language is embarrassing.
It lacks any mechanism for reusing markup code (componentization).
It lacks declarative data binding.
It makes animated transitions far too hard.
Its layout model is absurdly complex.
And that's not even getting into the issues with browser and API fragmentation, backwards-compatibility, etc.One other question for you: have you ever tried using Adobe Flex?
Don't knock it till you try it.
It is imperfect, for sure, but it positively screams maturity when you try it after years of banging your head on AJAX development.
And sorry, but I just don't see HTML5 turning that around any time soon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163072</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162348</id>
	<title>Re:Remind me why</title>
	<author>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</author>
	<datestamp>1266325140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because Advertisers are the customers that matter, and they love having something that survives a naive "clear cookies" attempt by the pitiful consumer?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because Advertisers are the customers that matter , and they love having something that survives a naive " clear cookies " attempt by the pitiful consumer ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because Advertisers are the customers that matter, and they love having something that survives a naive "clear cookies" attempt by the pitiful consumer?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162632</id>
	<title>use 'shred' not 'rm'.  or encrypt your hard drive.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266326700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So I've been using this line in my crontab for a long time now without any problems (well no more problems than I usually experience with Flash under Linux):<br>
<br>
* * * * * rm -fr<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/home/me/.macromedia</p><p>

I think this solves the problem, but maybe I'm mistaken...?</p></div><p>That depends on your threat model.  Your cron job might keep your kid brother from discovering your cookies.  If you *really* don't want people to know what flash is caching, I'd s/rm -rf/shred -uf/ there for starters.  Then I'd think about putting my whole OS on an encrypted partition (trivial these days with Fedora, not sure about other distribs).</p><p>

Of course, you still have problem with sniffing and all manner of malware, all of which could defeat your goal of preventing people from knowing what kind of flash content you're downloading.</p><p>

I hung out with Bruce Schneier for a 1-hour talk once.  If you want to scale up your paranoia further, you can do what he does: never let your computer touch a network or another person's hands.  He has no wireless card, never plugs an ethernet cord into the slot, and never gives his compy to anyone else.  Very difficult to sniff traffic that doesn't exist (but <a href="http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9595\_22-280184.html" title="zdnet.com">not</a> [zdnet.com] impossible).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So I 've been using this line in my crontab for a long time now without any problems ( well no more problems than I usually experience with Flash under Linux ) : * * * * * rm -fr /home/me/.macromedia I think this solves the problem , but maybe I 'm mistaken... ? That depends on your threat model .
Your cron job might keep your kid brother from discovering your cookies .
If you * really * do n't want people to know what flash is caching , I 'd s/rm -rf/shred -uf/ there for starters .
Then I 'd think about putting my whole OS on an encrypted partition ( trivial these days with Fedora , not sure about other distribs ) .
Of course , you still have problem with sniffing and all manner of malware , all of which could defeat your goal of preventing people from knowing what kind of flash content you 're downloading .
I hung out with Bruce Schneier for a 1-hour talk once .
If you want to scale up your paranoia further , you can do what he does : never let your computer touch a network or another person 's hands .
He has no wireless card , never plugs an ethernet cord into the slot , and never gives his compy to anyone else .
Very difficult to sniff traffic that does n't exist ( but not [ zdnet.com ] impossible ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So I've been using this line in my crontab for a long time now without any problems (well no more problems than I usually experience with Flash under Linux):

* * * * * rm -fr /home/me/.macromedia

I think this solves the problem, but maybe I'm mistaken...?That depends on your threat model.
Your cron job might keep your kid brother from discovering your cookies.
If you *really* don't want people to know what flash is caching, I'd s/rm -rf/shred -uf/ there for starters.
Then I'd think about putting my whole OS on an encrypted partition (trivial these days with Fedora, not sure about other distribs).
Of course, you still have problem with sniffing and all manner of malware, all of which could defeat your goal of preventing people from knowing what kind of flash content you're downloading.
I hung out with Bruce Schneier for a 1-hour talk once.
If you want to scale up your paranoia further, you can do what he does: never let your computer touch a network or another person's hands.
He has no wireless card, never plugs an ethernet cord into the slot, and never gives his compy to anyone else.
Very difficult to sniff traffic that doesn't exist (but not [zdnet.com] impossible).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31173584</id>
	<title>Re:This is the same Flash</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265053860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Different people have different opinions.  Film at 11.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Different people have different opinions .
Film at 11 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Different people have different opinions.
Film at 11.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31165622</id>
	<title>But still no x64 Flash...</title>
	<author>Daswolfen</author>
	<datestamp>1266347160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thats nice, but where is my x64 (NOT Linux) Flash? Its been 3 years Adobe!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thats nice , but where is my x64 ( NOT Linux ) Flash ?
Its been 3 years Adobe !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thats nice, but where is my x64 (NOT Linux) Flash?
Its been 3 years Adobe!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31164484</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds great</title>
	<author>cbhacking</author>
	<datestamp>1266339240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Windows Mobile (mostly ARM) and Nokia N800/810/900 (ARM) devices have had Flash for a while. It's typically a version behind the desktop release, but it's the full player,a nd any applet that ran in that version of the player will run on the mobile device.</p><p>If it's important to you that your device can play Flash, you have three options: complain to Adobe directly, complain to the device/OS developer, or use a device/OS which already supports it (and has for years). It's obviously not a major technical problem; if Nokia and Microsoft can get it supported, then Google or Apple could too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Windows Mobile ( mostly ARM ) and Nokia N800/810/900 ( ARM ) devices have had Flash for a while .
It 's typically a version behind the desktop release , but it 's the full player,a nd any applet that ran in that version of the player will run on the mobile device.If it 's important to you that your device can play Flash , you have three options : complain to Adobe directly , complain to the device/OS developer , or use a device/OS which already supports it ( and has for years ) .
It 's obviously not a major technical problem ; if Nokia and Microsoft can get it supported , then Google or Apple could too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Windows Mobile (mostly ARM) and Nokia N800/810/900 (ARM) devices have had Flash for a while.
It's typically a version behind the desktop release, but it's the full player,a nd any applet that ran in that version of the player will run on the mobile device.If it's important to you that your device can play Flash, you have three options: complain to Adobe directly, complain to the device/OS developer, or use a device/OS which already supports it (and has for years).
It's obviously not a major technical problem; if Nokia and Microsoft can get it supported, then Google or Apple could too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162300</id>
	<title>Crontab to Delete Flash Cookies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266324900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So I've been using this line in my crontab for a long time now without any problems (well no more problems than I usually experience with Flash under Linux):</p><p>* * * * * rm -fr<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/home/me/.macromedia</p><p>I think this solves the problem, but maybe I'm mistaken...?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So I 've been using this line in my crontab for a long time now without any problems ( well no more problems than I usually experience with Flash under Linux ) : * * * * * rm -fr /home/me/.macromediaI think this solves the problem , but maybe I 'm mistaken... ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So I've been using this line in my crontab for a long time now without any problems (well no more problems than I usually experience with Flash under Linux):* * * * * rm -fr /home/me/.macromediaI think this solves the problem, but maybe I'm mistaken...?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162534</id>
	<title>You better be careful with my Flash cookies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266326040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's where I store my saves for sites like <a href="http://kongregate.com/" title="kongregate.com" rel="nofollow">Kongregate</a> [kongregate.com].<br> <br>Please, think of the Flash games.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's where I store my saves for sites like Kongregate [ kongregate.com ] .
Please , think of the Flash games .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's where I store my saves for sites like Kongregate [kongregate.com].
Please, think of the Flash games.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162412</id>
	<title>Re:Remind me why</title>
	<author>Wingman 5</author>
	<datestamp>1266325380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can give one good legitimate example, flash games. It allows you to save your game and allow a more complex game that that could need more than one sitting to beat.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can give one good legitimate example , flash games .
It allows you to save your game and allow a more complex game that that could need more than one sitting to beat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can give one good legitimate example, flash games.
It allows you to save your game and allow a more complex game that that could need more than one sitting to beat.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162466</id>
	<title>Apostophe usage problem</title>
	<author>sych</author>
	<datestamp>1266325620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"The world rolled its eyes when the problem of Flash cookies came to light several months ago.[...]"</p></div><p>There, fixed that for you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The world rolled its eyes when the problem of Flash cookies came to light several months ago. [ .. .
] " There , fixed that for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The world rolled its eyes when the problem of Flash cookies came to light several months ago.[...
]"There, fixed that for you.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162826</id>
	<title>Re:Remind me why</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266327720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's very useful for games. Let's say you've made an online game, and you want settings for things like volume, key controls, etc. Sure, you could have the server remember those things and send them up to the flash player each time. But what if you have a different keyboard at home and want a different key layout? What if you want the volume off at work, but on at home? These are perfect applications for client-side flash variables.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's very useful for games .
Let 's say you 've made an online game , and you want settings for things like volume , key controls , etc .
Sure , you could have the server remember those things and send them up to the flash player each time .
But what if you have a different keyboard at home and want a different key layout ?
What if you want the volume off at work , but on at home ?
These are perfect applications for client-side flash variables .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's very useful for games.
Let's say you've made an online game, and you want settings for things like volume, key controls, etc.
Sure, you could have the server remember those things and send them up to the flash player each time.
But what if you have a different keyboard at home and want a different key layout?
What if you want the volume off at work, but on at home?
These are perfect applications for client-side flash variables.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31164674</id>
	<title>um</title>
	<author>Charliemopps</author>
	<datestamp>1266340680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wait... flash isn't dead yet?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait... flash is n't dead yet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait... flash isn't dead yet?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162376</id>
	<title>Oh snap...</title>
	<author>FF8Jake</author>
	<datestamp>1266325260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This will also introduce the "alert('omigoshhaxedurflashcookie')" vulnerability.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This will also introduce the " alert ( 'omigoshhaxedurflashcookie ' ) " vulnerability .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This will also introduce the "alert('omigoshhaxedurflashcookie')" vulnerability.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163760</id>
	<title>This is the same Flash</title>
	<author>joeflies</author>
	<datestamp>1266334740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>that everyone's up in a tizzy just because the iPad doesn't support it?  Mention iPad, and someone will say "but it doesn't support flash", and for platforms that do support flash, people say they don't want to run it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>that everyone 's up in a tizzy just because the iPad does n't support it ?
Mention iPad , and someone will say " but it does n't support flash " , and for platforms that do support flash , people say they do n't want to run it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that everyone's up in a tizzy just because the iPad doesn't support it?
Mention iPad, and someone will say "but it doesn't support flash", and for platforms that do support flash, people say they don't want to run it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31167276</id>
	<title>Re:Burn All Flashes</title>
	<author>ytpete</author>
	<datestamp>1265026860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's dinosaur technology built for the internet stone age. Time to get rid of it for good.</p></div><p>I get this funny feeling that you know very little about Flash.  Coming from a background of AJAX / DHTML development, to me the Flash "platform" actually feels far <i>more</i> modern, stable, and well-designed (for web app development) than anything else out there.  If anything, DHTML is what feels like an outdated hack on top of an even more ancient tech stack, little of which was designed with its current uses in mind.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's dinosaur technology built for the internet stone age .
Time to get rid of it for good.I get this funny feeling that you know very little about Flash .
Coming from a background of AJAX / DHTML development , to me the Flash " platform " actually feels far more modern , stable , and well-designed ( for web app development ) than anything else out there .
If anything , DHTML is what feels like an outdated hack on top of an even more ancient tech stack , little of which was designed with its current uses in mind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's dinosaur technology built for the internet stone age.
Time to get rid of it for good.I get this funny feeling that you know very little about Flash.
Coming from a background of AJAX / DHTML development, to me the Flash "platform" actually feels far more modern, stable, and well-designed (for web app development) than anything else out there.
If anything, DHTML is what feels like an outdated hack on top of an even more ancient tech stack, little of which was designed with its current uses in mind.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162434</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162884</id>
	<title>Yeah, nice design</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1266328200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> However, soon enough the next version of Flash, 10.1, will support private browsing and will integrate with browsers to turn it on when the browser itself is in private browsing mode.</p></div><p>That's such an elegant and simple design, that isn't problematic at all! I mean, who cares about essentially having a browser within your browser, as long as your browser can communicate stuff to the other browser, at the whim of each browser developer?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>However , soon enough the next version of Flash , 10.1 , will support private browsing and will integrate with browsers to turn it on when the browser itself is in private browsing mode.That 's such an elegant and simple design , that is n't problematic at all !
I mean , who cares about essentially having a browser within your browser , as long as your browser can communicate stuff to the other browser , at the whim of each browser developer ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> However, soon enough the next version of Flash, 10.1, will support private browsing and will integrate with browsers to turn it on when the browser itself is in private browsing mode.That's such an elegant and simple design, that isn't problematic at all!
I mean, who cares about essentially having a browser within your browser, as long as your browser can communicate stuff to the other browser, at the whim of each browser developer?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163082</id>
	<title>Re:Remind me why</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266329280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry for comment hijacking.</p><p>Adobe provides <a href="http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings\_manager07.html" title="macromedia.com" rel="nofollow">Flash Settings Manager</a> [macromedia.com] to allay your privacy concerns. Of course, it is not very user-friendly for average Joe but average Joe probably can't be bothered about privacy anyway. And there is "Delete All" button as well, for paranoids.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry for comment hijacking.Adobe provides Flash Settings Manager [ macromedia.com ] to allay your privacy concerns .
Of course , it is not very user-friendly for average Joe but average Joe probably ca n't be bothered about privacy anyway .
And there is " Delete All " button as well , for paranoids .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry for comment hijacking.Adobe provides Flash Settings Manager [macromedia.com] to allay your privacy concerns.
Of course, it is not very user-friendly for average Joe but average Joe probably can't be bothered about privacy anyway.
And there is "Delete All" button as well, for paranoids.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31164182</id>
	<title>Re:HTML5 is not an adequate response</title>
	<author>jo42</author>
	<datestamp>1266337380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do not want - have no need - for any of that crap. Want Flash to dry up and blow away like old dog shit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do not want - have no need - for any of that crap .
Want Flash to dry up and blow away like old dog shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do not want - have no need - for any of that crap.
Want Flash to dry up and blow away like old dog shit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31179094</id>
	<title>Re:FlashBlock</title>
	<author>shovas</author>
	<datestamp>1265034600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's a good find. I'm confident we'll get better blocking as time goes by.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's a good find .
I 'm confident we 'll get better blocking as time goes by .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's a good find.
I'm confident we'll get better blocking as time goes by.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31164250</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162678</id>
	<title>Re:Remind me why</title>
	<author>DragonWriter</author>
	<datestamp>1266326940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>There are a number of flash based games which use the flash cookies to save info you might want around so you don't have to start from scratch each time.</p></div></blockquote><p>If its a flash-based game on an account-based site, you could just save the state to a resource on the server linked to the user account and restore it from that the next time the user opened the game.</p><p>This also doesn't rely on the user using the same browser to continue the game.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There are a number of flash based games which use the flash cookies to save info you might want around so you do n't have to start from scratch each time.If its a flash-based game on an account-based site , you could just save the state to a resource on the server linked to the user account and restore it from that the next time the user opened the game.This also does n't rely on the user using the same browser to continue the game .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are a number of flash based games which use the flash cookies to save info you might want around so you don't have to start from scratch each time.If its a flash-based game on an account-based site, you could just save the state to a resource on the server linked to the user account and restore it from that the next time the user opened the game.This also doesn't rely on the user using the same browser to continue the game.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162408</id>
	<title>Re:Crontab to Delete Flash Cookies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266325380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>sudo chown 0:0<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.macromedia<br>sudo chmod 0000<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.macromedia</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>sudo chown 0 : 0 .macromediasudo chmod 0000 .macromedia</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sudo chown 0:0 .macromediasudo chmod 0000 .macromedia</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31168394</id>
	<title>Re:Remind me why</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265036760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If its a flash-based game on an account-based site, you could just save the state to a resource on the server linked to the user account and restore it from that the next time the user opened the game.</p></div><p>In some cases, yes.  However, there are various issues relating to the number of different developers creating Flash games (who often have no association with the sites hosting the games), the reluctance of some people to bother with logging in, and the viral nature of Flash games (where plenty of people visit a site because they were linked to that specific game, and the have no interest in the site itself).</p><p>That being said, there are some solutions available.  For example, Mochi Media (best known for pre-game ads in Flash games) have added account-based data storage that's tied to the accounts they already use for microtransactions.  Since they're not tied to a specific site, it's a better solution for games that wind up on a lot of sites.  But you still have people who are reluctant to sign up.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If its a flash-based game on an account-based site , you could just save the state to a resource on the server linked to the user account and restore it from that the next time the user opened the game.In some cases , yes .
However , there are various issues relating to the number of different developers creating Flash games ( who often have no association with the sites hosting the games ) , the reluctance of some people to bother with logging in , and the viral nature of Flash games ( where plenty of people visit a site because they were linked to that specific game , and the have no interest in the site itself ) .That being said , there are some solutions available .
For example , Mochi Media ( best known for pre-game ads in Flash games ) have added account-based data storage that 's tied to the accounts they already use for microtransactions .
Since they 're not tied to a specific site , it 's a better solution for games that wind up on a lot of sites .
But you still have people who are reluctant to sign up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If its a flash-based game on an account-based site, you could just save the state to a resource on the server linked to the user account and restore it from that the next time the user opened the game.In some cases, yes.
However, there are various issues relating to the number of different developers creating Flash games (who often have no association with the sites hosting the games), the reluctance of some people to bother with logging in, and the viral nature of Flash games (where plenty of people visit a site because they were linked to that specific game, and the have no interest in the site itself).That being said, there are some solutions available.
For example, Mochi Media (best known for pre-game ads in Flash games) have added account-based data storage that's tied to the accounts they already use for microtransactions.
Since they're not tied to a specific site, it's a better solution for games that wind up on a lot of sites.
But you still have people who are reluctant to sign up.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163002</id>
	<title>Several months ago?</title>
	<author>NotBorg</author>
	<datestamp>1266328680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>... when the problem of Flash cookies came to light several months ago.</p></div></blockquote><p>several: of an indefinite number more than 2 or 3 <em>but not many</em>.</p><p>Most of us knew about this <em>many</em> months ago.  If you only found out several months ago you are behind the curve.</p><p>It would be nice if Adobe was responding to an issue that was discovered several months ago but this has been around and known for quite some time.  Make no mistake about it Adobe isn't being quick to respond to the issue.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... when the problem of Flash cookies came to light several months ago.several : of an indefinite number more than 2 or 3 but not many.Most of us knew about this many months ago .
If you only found out several months ago you are behind the curve.It would be nice if Adobe was responding to an issue that was discovered several months ago but this has been around and known for quite some time .
Make no mistake about it Adobe is n't being quick to respond to the issue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... when the problem of Flash cookies came to light several months ago.several: of an indefinite number more than 2 or 3 but not many.Most of us knew about this many months ago.
If you only found out several months ago you are behind the curve.It would be nice if Adobe was responding to an issue that was discovered several months ago but this has been around and known for quite some time.
Make no mistake about it Adobe isn't being quick to respond to the issue.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162720</id>
	<title>This doesn't really solve the problem...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266327180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought that the main problem wasn't that flash stored its own cookies, but that it doesn't separate the cookies by each flash program/website. The main problem being that any flash program can access the information. All this "private browsing" feature seems to do is delete the cookies, but if you delete the cookies after each session then what's the point of using cookies to begin with?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought that the main problem was n't that flash stored its own cookies , but that it does n't separate the cookies by each flash program/website .
The main problem being that any flash program can access the information .
All this " private browsing " feature seems to do is delete the cookies , but if you delete the cookies after each session then what 's the point of using cookies to begin with ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought that the main problem wasn't that flash stored its own cookies, but that it doesn't separate the cookies by each flash program/website.
The main problem being that any flash program can access the information.
All this "private browsing" feature seems to do is delete the cookies, but if you delete the cookies after each session then what's the point of using cookies to begin with?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163100</id>
	<title>Re:HTML5 is not an adequate response</title>
	<author>h4rr4r</author>
	<datestamp>1266329400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not everything should be done in the webbrowser.</p><p>Get off my lawn!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not everything should be done in the webbrowser.Get off my lawn !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not everything should be done in the webbrowser.Get off my lawn!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31166950</id>
	<title>BetterPrivacy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265023020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ouch, have you tried: <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/6623" title="mozilla.org" rel="nofollow">BetterPrivacy</a> [mozilla.org]<br>Auto deletes flash cookies on exit and/or after a user-configurable expiration timeout.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ouch , have you tried : BetterPrivacy [ mozilla.org ] Auto deletes flash cookies on exit and/or after a user-configurable expiration timeout .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ouch, have you tried: BetterPrivacy [mozilla.org]Auto deletes flash cookies on exit and/or after a user-configurable expiration timeout.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163474</id>
	<title>Re:use 'shred' not 'rm'. or encrypt your hard driv</title>
	<author>caluml</author>
	<datestamp>1266332280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>never let your computer touch a network or another person's hands. He has no wireless card, never plugs an ethernet cord into the slot, and never gives his compy to anyone else.</p></div><p>I wonder what it must be like to be as paranoid as him?<br>
And seriously - at what point does a computer lose its usefulness - for me, it's pretty much when it has no network connectivity. I'm at a loss when I'm on a machine with no connectivity. It's like it isn't much use for anything.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>never let your computer touch a network or another person 's hands .
He has no wireless card , never plugs an ethernet cord into the slot , and never gives his compy to anyone else.I wonder what it must be like to be as paranoid as him ?
And seriously - at what point does a computer lose its usefulness - for me , it 's pretty much when it has no network connectivity .
I 'm at a loss when I 'm on a machine with no connectivity .
It 's like it is n't much use for anything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>never let your computer touch a network or another person's hands.
He has no wireless card, never plugs an ethernet cord into the slot, and never gives his compy to anyone else.I wonder what it must be like to be as paranoid as him?
And seriously - at what point does a computer lose its usefulness - for me, it's pretty much when it has no network connectivity.
I'm at a loss when I'm on a machine with no connectivity.
It's like it isn't much use for anything.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162632</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162298</id>
	<title>Horay!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266324900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now I can plan that birthday party without anyone knowing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now I can plan that birthday party without anyone knowing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now I can plan that birthday party without anyone knowing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31164398</id>
	<title>HTML 5</title>
	<author>sunfly</author>
	<datestamp>1266338760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't get why anyone would argue for a closed Flash from a single vendor, when there is a capable open option in HTML 5.  The sooner we all move on the better.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't get why anyone would argue for a closed Flash from a single vendor , when there is a capable open option in HTML 5 .
The sooner we all move on the better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't get why anyone would argue for a closed Flash from a single vendor, when there is a capable open option in HTML 5.
The sooner we all move on the better.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162972</id>
	<title>co3k</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266328560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">Every chance I got live apnd a 6ob to dying. All major</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Every chance I got live apnd a 6ob to dying .
All major [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every chance I got live apnd a 6ob to dying.
All major [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31164416</id>
	<title>The world rolled its eyes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266338880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The world rolled its eyes when "it's" was used incorrectly on Slashdot for the 100,000,00th time</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The world rolled its eyes when " it 's " was used incorrectly on Slashdot for the 100,000,00th time</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The world rolled its eyes when "it's" was used incorrectly on Slashdot for the 100,000,00th time</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31167864</id>
	<title>Simple solution</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265033820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>rm -r ~.macromedia/* ; chmod -w ~/.macromedia</i><br>problem gone</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>rm -r ~ .macromedia/ * ; chmod -w ~ /.macromediaproblem gone</tokentext>
<sentencetext>rm -r ~.macromedia/* ; chmod -w ~/.macromediaproblem gone</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31166102</id>
	<title>Re:FlashBlock</title>
	<author>cerberusss</author>
	<datestamp>1265056080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>FlashBlock is a great compromise. [...] You'll be surprised how well it works.</p></div><p>What I was surprised about, is after installation: the number of times that the little Flash icon appears. I was like "huh? This page didn't have Flash content before, right?". So I clicked the Flash icon to see what was actually happening and -- nothing happened. Apparently, a number of sites use Flash just as a very tiny, uneraseable way to track users. Regardless of Private Browsing. Mind you, it wasn't a porn site, just a huge eBay-like site in a particular North-West European country.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>FlashBlock is a great compromise .
[ ... ] You 'll be surprised how well it works.What I was surprised about , is after installation : the number of times that the little Flash icon appears .
I was like " huh ?
This page did n't have Flash content before , right ? " .
So I clicked the Flash icon to see what was actually happening and -- nothing happened .
Apparently , a number of sites use Flash just as a very tiny , uneraseable way to track users .
Regardless of Private Browsing .
Mind you , it was n't a porn site , just a huge eBay-like site in a particular North-West European country .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FlashBlock is a great compromise.
[...] You'll be surprised how well it works.What I was surprised about, is after installation: the number of times that the little Flash icon appears.
I was like "huh?
This page didn't have Flash content before, right?".
So I clicked the Flash icon to see what was actually happening and -- nothing happened.
Apparently, a number of sites use Flash just as a very tiny, uneraseable way to track users.
Regardless of Private Browsing.
Mind you, it wasn't a porn site, just a huge eBay-like site in a particular North-West European country.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162458</id>
	<title>Re:Crontab to Delete Flash Cookies</title>
	<author>Bottles</author>
	<datestamp>1266325560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The other option is to make that directory non-writable, which is what I've done on every machine I own.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The other option is to make that directory non-writable , which is what I 've done on every machine I own .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The other option is to make that directory non-writable, which is what I've done on every machine I own.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31173080</id>
	<title>Re:Firefox extensions</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1265052120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Even better: Get <a href="http://netcat.sourceforge.net/" title="sourceforge.net">netcat</a> [sourceforge.net] to turn off images, CSS, HTML, and graphical renderers entirely.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Even better : Get netcat [ sourceforge.net ] to turn off images , CSS , HTML , and graphical renderers entirely .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even better: Get netcat [sourceforge.net] to turn off images, CSS, HTML, and graphical renderers entirely.
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162354</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162652</id>
	<title>Change Permissions on Flash Cookie Directory</title>
	<author>caffeinejolt</author>
	<datestamp>1266326760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A while back I got tired of everybody tracking me online so I cracked down on permanent browser storage.  I ended up getting rid of all cookies on browser close and ran these commands:</p><p>rm -rf ~/.macromedia/Flash\_Player/*<br>rm -rf ~/.adobe/Flash\_Player/*</p><p>With sudo:<br>chown -R root.root<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/home/user/.macromedia<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/home/user/.adobe/Flash\_Player/<br>chmod -R 0600<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/home/user/.macromedia<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/home/user/.adobe/Flash\_Player/</p><p>The flash cookie problem was solved and I have not noticed anything has changed.  Of course, I don't really see much flash other than flash ads - so it might break some things I am unaware of.</p><p>On windows the same directories are stored elsewhere - but the same overall technique should work fine I would think.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A while back I got tired of everybody tracking me online so I cracked down on permanent browser storage .
I ended up getting rid of all cookies on browser close and ran these commands : rm -rf ~ /.macromedia/Flash \ _Player/ * rm -rf ~ /.adobe/Flash \ _Player/ * With sudo : chown -R root.root /home/user/.macromedia /home/user/.adobe/Flash \ _Player/chmod -R 0600 /home/user/.macromedia /home/user/.adobe/Flash \ _Player/The flash cookie problem was solved and I have not noticed anything has changed .
Of course , I do n't really see much flash other than flash ads - so it might break some things I am unaware of.On windows the same directories are stored elsewhere - but the same overall technique should work fine I would think .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A while back I got tired of everybody tracking me online so I cracked down on permanent browser storage.
I ended up getting rid of all cookies on browser close and ran these commands:rm -rf ~/.macromedia/Flash\_Player/*rm -rf ~/.adobe/Flash\_Player/*With sudo:chown -R root.root /home/user/.macromedia /home/user/.adobe/Flash\_Player/chmod -R 0600 /home/user/.macromedia /home/user/.adobe/Flash\_Player/The flash cookie problem was solved and I have not noticed anything has changed.
Of course, I don't really see much flash other than flash ads - so it might break some things I am unaware of.On windows the same directories are stored elsewhere - but the same overall technique should work fine I would think.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162434</id>
	<title>Burn All Flashes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266325500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Remember this site? <a href="http://burnallgifs.org/archives/" title="burnallgifs.org">http://burnallgifs.org</a> [burnallgifs.org]</p><p>We need a similar campaign for Adobe Flash. It's dinosaur technology built for the internet stone age. Time to get rid of it for good.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Remember this site ?
http : //burnallgifs.org [ burnallgifs.org ] We need a similar campaign for Adobe Flash .
It 's dinosaur technology built for the internet stone age .
Time to get rid of it for good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Remember this site?
http://burnallgifs.org [burnallgifs.org]We need a similar campaign for Adobe Flash.
It's dinosaur technology built for the internet stone age.
Time to get rid of it for good.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162550</id>
	<title>Surf with VM and revert to snapshot</title>
	<author>OnTheEdge</author>
	<datestamp>1266326100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Surf using a virtual machine and revert to a stored snapshot upon close. Problem solved.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Surf using a virtual machine and revert to a stored snapshot upon close .
Problem solved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Surf using a virtual machine and revert to a stored snapshot upon close.
Problem solved.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31166486</id>
	<title>Video "stealing": watch your tcp/http flows</title>
	<author>jonaskoelker</author>
	<datestamp>1265017860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>Does HTML5 protects your video site from hotlinking? I.E. can you make sure that nobody can embed your videos into their pages and make sales while you pay for the bandwidth?</p></div><p>This is a HTTP issue and server side security issue. It is trivial to grep a Flash file for the raw SWF download location most times.</p></div><p>Or you can monitor the HTTP traffic you send to see which URL you're requesting.  Or run the Flash in a rigged virtual machine which captures this information.</p><p>Whatever server-side test is done to see whether a request comes from someone visiting the server itself or a third party can be fooled; the third party just sends the data that'll make the server say "You're visiting <em>me</em>".</p><p>It's an unsolvable problem; any solution is at odds with how the internet works.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does HTML5 protects your video site from hotlinking ?
I.E. can you make sure that nobody can embed your videos into their pages and make sales while you pay for the bandwidth ? This is a HTTP issue and server side security issue .
It is trivial to grep a Flash file for the raw SWF download location most times.Or you can monitor the HTTP traffic you send to see which URL you 're requesting .
Or run the Flash in a rigged virtual machine which captures this information.Whatever server-side test is done to see whether a request comes from someone visiting the server itself or a third party can be fooled ; the third party just sends the data that 'll make the server say " You 're visiting me " .It 's an unsolvable problem ; any solution is at odds with how the internet works .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does HTML5 protects your video site from hotlinking?
I.E. can you make sure that nobody can embed your videos into their pages and make sales while you pay for the bandwidth?This is a HTTP issue and server side security issue.
It is trivial to grep a Flash file for the raw SWF download location most times.Or you can monitor the HTTP traffic you send to see which URL you're requesting.
Or run the Flash in a rigged virtual machine which captures this information.Whatever server-side test is done to see whether a request comes from someone visiting the server itself or a third party can be fooled; the third party just sends the data that'll make the server say "You're visiting me".It's an unsolvable problem; any solution is at odds with how the internet works.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163072</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162750</id>
	<title>Re:Burn All Flashes</title>
	<author>blitzkrieg3</author>
	<datestamp>1266327360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>burnallmpegs.org makes more sense, since it's technologies like h.264 that are preventing widespread use of the  tag.</htmltext>
<tokenext>burnallmpegs.org makes more sense , since it 's technologies like h.264 that are preventing widespread use of the tag .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>burnallmpegs.org makes more sense, since it's technologies like h.264 that are preventing widespread use of the  tag.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162434</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163136</id>
	<title>Can also use this Flash program.</title>
	<author>antdude</author>
	<datestamp>1266329640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings\_manager06.html" title="macromedia.com">http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings\_manager06.html</a> [macromedia.com] to control your Flash player settings.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings \ _manager06.html [ macromedia.com ] to control your Flash player settings .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings\_manager06.html [macromedia.com] to control your Flash player settings.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162354</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31168000</id>
	<title>Why Flash?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265034600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who watches porn in Flash? I thought it was all QuickTime and JPEGs. No need for porn mode in Flash, is there?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who watches porn in Flash ?
I thought it was all QuickTime and JPEGs .
No need for porn mode in Flash , is there ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who watches porn in Flash?
I thought it was all QuickTime and JPEGs.
No need for porn mode in Flash, is there?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31165712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162632
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162300
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162300
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31167672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31172740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163072
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31167276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162434
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31166102
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162680
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162434
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31165474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162354
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31164298
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31164704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31166486
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163072
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163136
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162354
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31166634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163072
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31164536
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163382
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31166994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31173080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162354
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162476
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162300
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31164506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31167220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163072
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162750
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162434
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31166044
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31164182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162632
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162300
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162466
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162298
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31164126
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162354
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31165334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163236
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31164484
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163382
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163842
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163100
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31165440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31170390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162466
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31167314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31173118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162434
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31168394
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162678
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31166950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162300
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31173584
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163760
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31179094
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31164250
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163426
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162632
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162300
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162408
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162300
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_2051217_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_2051217.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162704
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_2051217.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163382
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31164536
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31164484
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_2051217.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31168000
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_2051217.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162534
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_2051217.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163084
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31166102
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31164250
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31179094
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_2051217.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162884
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163292
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_2051217.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163002
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31167314
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_2051217.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162300
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31166950
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162458
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162476
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162408
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162632
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163474
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163426
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31165712
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_2051217.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163678
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31164506
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_2051217.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162292
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31164298
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162826
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31164704
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162400
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162412
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162390
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162678
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31168394
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163082
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162348
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31167672
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_2051217.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162702
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_2051217.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162466
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31170390
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163066
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_2051217.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162720
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_2051217.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162434
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162680
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31167276
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31173118
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162750
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_2051217.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162344
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163842
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162858
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31164182
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163096
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31166994
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163072
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31172740
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31166486
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31166634
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31167220
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163100
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31166044
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163236
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31165334
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31165440
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_2051217.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162354
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31165474
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163136
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31164126
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31173080
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_2051217.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162298
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162372
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_2051217.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31162550
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_2051217.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31163760
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_2051217.31173584
</commentlist>
</conversation>
