<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_16_1548213</id>
	<title>64-Bit Flash Player For Linux Finally In Alpha</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1266339780000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Luchio writes <i>"Finally, a little bit of respect from Adobe with this <a href="http://blogs.computerworld.com/64\_bit\_linux\_adobe\_flash\_player\_surprisingly\_good">alpha release of the Adobe Flash Player 10</a> that was <a href="http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10\_64bit.html">made available for all Linux 64-bit enthusiasts</a>!  As noted, 'this is a prerelease version,' so handle with care.  Just remove any existing Flash player and extract the new .so file in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins (or /usr/lib/opera/plugins)."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Luchio writes " Finally , a little bit of respect from Adobe with this alpha release of the Adobe Flash Player 10 that was made available for all Linux 64-bit enthusiasts !
As noted , 'this is a prerelease version, ' so handle with care .
Just remove any existing Flash player and extract the new .so file in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins ( or /usr/lib/opera/plugins ) .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Luchio writes "Finally, a little bit of respect from Adobe with this alpha release of the Adobe Flash Player 10 that was made available for all Linux 64-bit enthusiasts!
As noted, 'this is a prerelease version,' so handle with care.
Just remove any existing Flash player and extract the new .so file in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins (or /usr/lib/opera/plugins).
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156884</id>
	<title>I can just see the press release</title>
	<author>mandark1967</author>
	<datestamp>1266344460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"64 bit support! Now with 2x the number of vulnerabilities of any 32bit software, and available on Linux because fuxxoring the Windows platform isn't enough! WE WANT IT ALL!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" 64 bit support !
Now with 2x the number of vulnerabilities of any 32bit software , and available on Linux because fuxxoring the Windows platform is n't enough !
WE WANT IT ALL !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"64 bit support!
Now with 2x the number of vulnerabilities of any 32bit software, and available on Linux because fuxxoring the Windows platform isn't enough!
WE WANT IT ALL!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157788</id>
	<title>Re:Old news, slight revision, still broken Hulu.</title>
	<author>Hadlock</author>
	<datestamp>1266347640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Now Netflix, that's a different story. Videos are unwatchably glitchy unless I use IE, where they play fine (yes, on Windows).</p></div></blockquote><p>My buddy reports the same thing. He's switched back to windows (7) due to a) win7s lack of shittyness and most importantly b) he can watch netlix on his laptop</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now Netflix , that 's a different story .
Videos are unwatchably glitchy unless I use IE , where they play fine ( yes , on Windows ) .My buddy reports the same thing .
He 's switched back to windows ( 7 ) due to a ) win7s lack of shittyness and most importantly b ) he can watch netlix on his laptop</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now Netflix, that's a different story.
Videos are unwatchably glitchy unless I use IE, where they play fine (yes, on Windows).My buddy reports the same thing.
He's switched back to windows (7) due to a) win7s lack of shittyness and most importantly b) he can watch netlix on his laptop
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156616</id>
	<title>Old???</title>
	<author>ryanjsull</author>
	<datestamp>1266343620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hasn't this been out for a while already?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Has n't this been out for a while already ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hasn't this been out for a while already?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157664</id>
	<title>Re:Moving straight off-topic</title>
	<author>Bourbonium</author>
	<datestamp>1266347160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the open source world, you are encouraged to get up off your butt and do something when you see a problem that is not being properly addressed.  Blogging tools are easily available all over the place.  If you don't like the Linux bloggers you have been reading, start your own blog and promote it.</p><p>You might also want to subscribe to any one of the hundreds of open source podcasts out there.  I listen to FLOSS Weekly (Randal Schwarz + Leo LaPorte and sometimes Jono Bacon), Fresh Ubuntu (Peter Nicholitis and Harlem Kianu), the Ubuntu UK Podcast and some others.  I'm less impressed by the Linux Action Show, but I still check it out every now and then.<br>You can find these and many others at <a href="http://www.thelinuxlink.net/" title="thelinuxlink.net">http://www.thelinuxlink.net/</a> [thelinuxlink.net]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the open source world , you are encouraged to get up off your butt and do something when you see a problem that is not being properly addressed .
Blogging tools are easily available all over the place .
If you do n't like the Linux bloggers you have been reading , start your own blog and promote it.You might also want to subscribe to any one of the hundreds of open source podcasts out there .
I listen to FLOSS Weekly ( Randal Schwarz + Leo LaPorte and sometimes Jono Bacon ) , Fresh Ubuntu ( Peter Nicholitis and Harlem Kianu ) , the Ubuntu UK Podcast and some others .
I 'm less impressed by the Linux Action Show , but I still check it out every now and then.You can find these and many others at http : //www.thelinuxlink.net/ [ thelinuxlink.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the open source world, you are encouraged to get up off your butt and do something when you see a problem that is not being properly addressed.
Blogging tools are easily available all over the place.
If you don't like the Linux bloggers you have been reading, start your own blog and promote it.You might also want to subscribe to any one of the hundreds of open source podcasts out there.
I listen to FLOSS Weekly (Randal Schwarz + Leo LaPorte and sometimes Jono Bacon), Fresh Ubuntu (Peter Nicholitis and Harlem Kianu), the Ubuntu UK Podcast and some others.
I'm less impressed by the Linux Action Show, but I still check it out every now and then.You can find these and many others at http://www.thelinuxlink.net/ [thelinuxlink.net]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156844</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157406</id>
	<title>Hey, Adobe...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266346140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We need a native BSD port too, even though fedora makes a nice emulator<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We need a native BSD port too , even though fedora makes a nice emulator : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We need a native BSD port too, even though fedora makes a nice emulator :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31160444</id>
	<title>Re:What was the previous release?</title>
	<author>Jesus\_666</author>
	<datestamp>1266315780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The previous release was the omega version of the 63-bit plugin.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The previous release was the omega version of the 63-bit plugin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The previous release was the omega version of the 63-bit plugin.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31159332</id>
	<title>Re:Old news, slight revision, still broken Hulu.</title>
	<author>SafeMode</author>
	<datestamp>1266353880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, it's just the website that causes the error.  You can use hulu to embed it's player and host it on any other site (a local one even) and it will stream you the video just fine with your 64bit flash plugin.</p><p>So it is their website script writers that seem to have broken 64bit flash and dont care about fixing it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , it 's just the website that causes the error .
You can use hulu to embed it 's player and host it on any other site ( a local one even ) and it will stream you the video just fine with your 64bit flash plugin.So it is their website script writers that seem to have broken 64bit flash and dont care about fixing it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, it's just the website that causes the error.
You can use hulu to embed it's player and host it on any other site (a local one even) and it will stream you the video just fine with your 64bit flash plugin.So it is their website script writers that seem to have broken 64bit flash and dont care about fixing it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156678</id>
	<title>Re:What was the previous release?</title>
	<author>Coopjust</author>
	<datestamp>1266343800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Prealpha- development releases/nightly, when it is not only extremely unstable, but is not yet feature complete.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Prealpha- development releases/nightly , when it is not only extremely unstable , but is not yet feature complete .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Prealpha- development releases/nightly, when it is not only extremely unstable, but is not yet feature complete.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31167692</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't news...</title>
	<author>AzP</author>
	<datestamp>1265031780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>64-bit enthusiasts?</p><p>x86-64 is THE de-facto architecture. Save the enthusiast label for all the retro x86 steam punk guys.</p></div><p>Hehe tell Adobe that.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>64-bit enthusiasts ? x86-64 is THE de-facto architecture .
Save the enthusiast label for all the retro x86 steam punk guys.Hehe tell Adobe that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>64-bit enthusiasts?x86-64 is THE de-facto architecture.
Save the enthusiast label for all the retro x86 steam punk guys.Hehe tell Adobe that.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31161708</id>
	<title>Re:Old news, slight revision, still broken Hulu.</title>
	<author>Alef</author>
	<datestamp>1266321720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I can watch the videos, but the player controls are unusable (clicking on them does nothing).</p></div></blockquote><p>
I think this has got to do with GDK using "client-side windows" nowadays. Try adding "<i>export GDK\_NATIVE\_WINDOWS=1</i>" in<nobr> <wbr></nobr><i>/usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer</i> (or equivalent) to force it to use native windows.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can watch the videos , but the player controls are unusable ( clicking on them does nothing ) .
I think this has got to do with GDK using " client-side windows " nowadays .
Try adding " export GDK \ _NATIVE \ _WINDOWS = 1 " in /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer ( or equivalent ) to force it to use native windows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can watch the videos, but the player controls are unusable (clicking on them does nothing).
I think this has got to do with GDK using "client-side windows" nowadays.
Try adding "export GDK\_NATIVE\_WINDOWS=1" in /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer (or equivalent) to force it to use native windows.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156648</id>
	<title>Do not want</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266343680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll get it when they fix the bug where flash pages play annoying loud audio, the bug where web pages that are supposed to be static play annoying moving advertisements, the bug where flash pages can't be represented by real URL's because it all loads in a single flash file, and the bug where flash breaks the www.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll get it when they fix the bug where flash pages play annoying loud audio , the bug where web pages that are supposed to be static play annoying moving advertisements , the bug where flash pages ca n't be represented by real URL 's because it all loads in a single flash file , and the bug where flash breaks the www .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll get it when they fix the bug where flash pages play annoying loud audio, the bug where web pages that are supposed to be static play annoying moving advertisements, the bug where flash pages can't be represented by real URL's because it all loads in a single flash file, and the bug where flash breaks the www.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31158006</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't news...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266348480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's called astroturfing. Fuck Adobe and their sucky flash player.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's called astroturfing .
Fuck Adobe and their sucky flash player .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's called astroturfing.
Fuck Adobe and their sucky flash player.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157828</id>
	<title>Re:Old news, slight revision, still broken Hulu.</title>
	<author>TheSpoom</author>
	<datestamp>1266347820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's very easy to continue to use the 32-bit plugin in Ubuntu 64-bit; I believe Ubuntu still installs it (and the 64-bit wrapper) by default.  Unless you specifically install the 64-bit alpha plugin <i>and</i> delete the others from your system (and there's a few places in which they can reside), you're probably still running 32-bit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's very easy to continue to use the 32-bit plugin in Ubuntu 64-bit ; I believe Ubuntu still installs it ( and the 64-bit wrapper ) by default .
Unless you specifically install the 64-bit alpha plugin and delete the others from your system ( and there 's a few places in which they can reside ) , you 're probably still running 32-bit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's very easy to continue to use the 32-bit plugin in Ubuntu 64-bit; I believe Ubuntu still installs it (and the 64-bit wrapper) by default.
Unless you specifically install the 64-bit alpha plugin and delete the others from your system (and there's a few places in which they can reside), you're probably still running 32-bit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157096</id>
	<title>Not so much "news"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266345180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is <i>really</i>, <i>really</i> old news.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is really , really old news .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is really, really old news.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31160528</id>
	<title>Re:64 bit flash .... Why?</title>
	<author>JustNiz</author>
	<datestamp>1266316260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Uhh.. to take full advantage of your hardware rather than shoot it in the foot?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Uhh.. to take full advantage of your hardware rather than shoot it in the foot ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uhh.. to take full advantage of your hardware rather than shoot it in the foot?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31158836</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156624</id>
	<title>Windows x64</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266343620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What about a Windows x64 build?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What about a Windows x64 build ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about a Windows x64 build?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157040</id>
	<title>Don't trust proprietary software</title>
	<author>nawitus</author>
	<datestamp>1266344940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is why you shouldn't trust proprietary software. Once they have the market they don't care about the small operating systems, and there's nothing you can do about it (other than writing a free alternative). The problem is that once gnash can play flash10 files Adobe will release a new standard.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is why you should n't trust proprietary software .
Once they have the market they do n't care about the small operating systems , and there 's nothing you can do about it ( other than writing a free alternative ) .
The problem is that once gnash can play flash10 files Adobe will release a new standard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is why you shouldn't trust proprietary software.
Once they have the market they don't care about the small operating systems, and there's nothing you can do about it (other than writing a free alternative).
The problem is that once gnash can play flash10 files Adobe will release a new standard.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31158280</id>
	<title>Nothing (new) to see here, move along...</title>
	<author>EkriirkE</author>
	<datestamp>1266349440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've had adobe's 64bit linux plugin forever, both in FF and Chrome.  The only thing new may be the subversion (instead of 10.1.2.3 or whatever I've been on, now they are on 10.1.2.3b?)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've had adobe 's 64bit linux plugin forever , both in FF and Chrome .
The only thing new may be the subversion ( instead of 10.1.2.3 or whatever I 've been on , now they are on 10.1.2.3b ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've had adobe's 64bit linux plugin forever, both in FF and Chrome.
The only thing new may be the subversion (instead of 10.1.2.3 or whatever I've been on, now they are on 10.1.2.3b?
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31159774</id>
	<title>Re:Downtime is the name of the game</title>
	<author>PastaLover</author>
	<datestamp>1266312900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Last I read that thread, Mike was working really hard to only respond to the obvious trolls in the comments and just ignore any real technical discussion. I also get the distinct impression the linux "team" at adobe is basically him. That post is exactly what put me over the edge from wishy-washy on flash stuff to we-need-to-replace-this-shit-now. Adobe simply has no respect whatsoever for its linux users. Sure they provide a plugin that to this day allows developers to do a lot that is really hard to do natively (i.e. canvas2d+ javascript is often still slower, and there are other hurdles). But HTML5 video is the way to go, even though it means replacing the bad with the ugly (unlicensed h.264 on linux, basically the same situation as we have with dvds).</p><p>Having apparently pissed off both Apple and Google, I'm pretty sure they're on the way out when it comes to video anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Last I read that thread , Mike was working really hard to only respond to the obvious trolls in the comments and just ignore any real technical discussion .
I also get the distinct impression the linux " team " at adobe is basically him .
That post is exactly what put me over the edge from wishy-washy on flash stuff to we-need-to-replace-this-shit-now .
Adobe simply has no respect whatsoever for its linux users .
Sure they provide a plugin that to this day allows developers to do a lot that is really hard to do natively ( i.e .
canvas2d + javascript is often still slower , and there are other hurdles ) .
But HTML5 video is the way to go , even though it means replacing the bad with the ugly ( unlicensed h.264 on linux , basically the same situation as we have with dvds ) .Having apparently pissed off both Apple and Google , I 'm pretty sure they 're on the way out when it comes to video anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Last I read that thread, Mike was working really hard to only respond to the obvious trolls in the comments and just ignore any real technical discussion.
I also get the distinct impression the linux "team" at adobe is basically him.
That post is exactly what put me over the edge from wishy-washy on flash stuff to we-need-to-replace-this-shit-now.
Adobe simply has no respect whatsoever for its linux users.
Sure they provide a plugin that to this day allows developers to do a lot that is really hard to do natively (i.e.
canvas2d+ javascript is often still slower, and there are other hurdles).
But HTML5 video is the way to go, even though it means replacing the bad with the ugly (unlicensed h.264 on linux, basically the same situation as we have with dvds).Having apparently pissed off both Apple and Google, I'm pretty sure they're on the way out when it comes to video anyway.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157722</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156628</id>
	<title>just say NO to adobe's shit</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266343620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>FREE as in FREEdom.  Also as in free from ads.  Suck it, adobe!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>FREE as in FREEdom .
Also as in free from ads .
Suck it , adobe ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FREE as in FREEdom.
Also as in free from ads.
Suck it, adobe!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157916</id>
	<title>I prefer Gnash.</title>
	<author>Bill, Shooter of Bul</author>
	<datestamp>1266348120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>yeah, its not perfect and doesn't work for every flash file. But, it does work for the flash I do want to see. Plus, stopping the annoying flash file is pretty simple. Its just a right click away.</htmltext>
<tokenext>yeah , its not perfect and does n't work for every flash file .
But , it does work for the flash I do want to see .
Plus , stopping the annoying flash file is pretty simple .
Its just a right click away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yeah, its not perfect and doesn't work for every flash file.
But, it does work for the flash I do want to see.
Plus, stopping the annoying flash file is pretty simple.
Its just a right click away.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157390</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't news...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266346080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe its a Beta or `testing' release? I have used 64bit flash on linux of recent too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe its a Beta or ` testing ' release ?
I have used 64bit flash on linux of recent too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe its a Beta or `testing' release?
I have used 64bit flash on linux of recent too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31161808</id>
	<title>Re:And In Other News</title>
	<author>selven</author>
	<datestamp>1266322440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In other news, Nortel has announced another quarter of record profits. CEO John Roth foresees a bright future for the company in the years to come.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In other news , Nortel has announced another quarter of record profits .
CEO John Roth foresees a bright future for the company in the years to come .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In other news, Nortel has announced another quarter of record profits.
CEO John Roth foresees a bright future for the company in the years to come.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157352</id>
	<title>Re:html5</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266345960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>we will have better luck waiting for mass adoption of html5 than waiting for a REAL release of the adobe flash plugin. Maybe html5 is whats causing them to wake up</p></div><p>By some reports, as of last week Adobe was stopping the publication of the new version of HTML5 via objections in the W3C working group to the canvas element. Sadly, this is all going on behind closed doors and the only reason anyone knows about it is because Google's Ian Hickson blogged about it. Mind you Adobe is denying any such thing is happening. Hickson wrote "the latest publication of HTML5 is now blocked by Adobe, via an objection that has still not been made public (despite yesterday's promise to make it so)."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>we will have better luck waiting for mass adoption of html5 than waiting for a REAL release of the adobe flash plugin .
Maybe html5 is whats causing them to wake upBy some reports , as of last week Adobe was stopping the publication of the new version of HTML5 via objections in the W3C working group to the canvas element .
Sadly , this is all going on behind closed doors and the only reason anyone knows about it is because Google 's Ian Hickson blogged about it .
Mind you Adobe is denying any such thing is happening .
Hickson wrote " the latest publication of HTML5 is now blocked by Adobe , via an objection that has still not been made public ( despite yesterday 's promise to make it so ) .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>we will have better luck waiting for mass adoption of html5 than waiting for a REAL release of the adobe flash plugin.
Maybe html5 is whats causing them to wake upBy some reports, as of last week Adobe was stopping the publication of the new version of HTML5 via objections in the W3C working group to the canvas element.
Sadly, this is all going on behind closed doors and the only reason anyone knows about it is because Google's Ian Hickson blogged about it.
Mind you Adobe is denying any such thing is happening.
Hickson wrote "the latest publication of HTML5 is now blocked by Adobe, via an objection that has still not been made public (despite yesterday's promise to make it so).
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156822</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31171864</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't news...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265048460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And yet it *STILL* doesn't support DRM (which is normally a good thing) except that you cannot watch anything from Amazon's Video on Demand without it. It's been an issue in Adobe's JIRA(FP-1513) for the last year and they haven't done any thing about it....<br>http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-1513</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And yet it * STILL * does n't support DRM ( which is normally a good thing ) except that you can not watch anything from Amazon 's Video on Demand without it .
It 's been an issue in Adobe 's JIRA ( FP-1513 ) for the last year and they have n't done any thing about it....http : //bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-1513</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And yet it *STILL* doesn't support DRM (which is normally a good thing) except that you cannot watch anything from Amazon's Video on Demand without it.
It's been an issue in Adobe's JIRA(FP-1513) for the last year and they haven't done any thing about it....http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-1513</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157206</id>
	<title>Re:Old news, slight revision, still broken Hulu.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266345480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, that's not true.  Hulu mostly works fine for me in 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10 and the latest Firefox.  I'm running the latest Flash alpha.  I can watch the videos, but the player controls are unusable (clicking on them does nothing).  Fortunately, Hulu Desktop works, although the video is occasionally a little glitchy.
<br> <br>
Now Netflix, that's a different story.  Videos are unwatchably glitchy unless I use IE, where they play fine (yes, on Windows).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , that 's not true .
Hulu mostly works fine for me in 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10 and the latest Firefox .
I 'm running the latest Flash alpha .
I can watch the videos , but the player controls are unusable ( clicking on them does nothing ) .
Fortunately , Hulu Desktop works , although the video is occasionally a little glitchy .
Now Netflix , that 's a different story .
Videos are unwatchably glitchy unless I use IE , where they play fine ( yes , on Windows ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, that's not true.
Hulu mostly works fine for me in 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10 and the latest Firefox.
I'm running the latest Flash alpha.
I can watch the videos, but the player controls are unusable (clicking on them does nothing).
Fortunately, Hulu Desktop works, although the video is occasionally a little glitchy.
Now Netflix, that's a different story.
Videos are unwatchably glitchy unless I use IE, where they play fine (yes, on Windows).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157464</id>
	<title>What's taking so long?</title>
	<author>jfbilodeau</author>
	<datestamp>1266346380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously. 64-Bit Linux has been around for a long time. Why is it so hard for Adobe to create a 64-bit version of Flash for Linux?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously .
64-Bit Linux has been around for a long time .
Why is it so hard for Adobe to create a 64-bit version of Flash for Linux ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously.
64-Bit Linux has been around for a long time.
Why is it so hard for Adobe to create a 64-bit version of Flash for Linux?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157758</id>
	<title>Re:Countdown timer initiated</title>
	<author>Dahan</author>
	<datestamp>1266347520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Que the Anti Adobe Activists in 3... 2...</p><p>[inverted?]Que?</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Que the Anti Adobe Activists in 3.. .
2... [ inverted ? ] Que ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Que the Anti Adobe Activists in 3...
2...[inverted?]Que?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31160380</id>
	<title>Re:Linux not user friendly</title>
	<author>MathiasRav</author>
	<datestamp>1266315480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This is another reason Linux is not that user friendly.  It's a chicken and an egg problem.  I'm have average computer skills and using Linux is a lot less user friendly because of issues such as the issues with Flash.  It appears to be getting better and I hope to use Linux on my laptop eventually, but it is still a pain in the ass to use Linux.  Also, I have a Verizon broadband card that doesn't have Linux software for it.</p></div><p>If configuring your system is a pain, maybe Linux is not for you. Luckily, it's big enough as a platform that any user-level problem can be answered with a little Google search on the right search terms (in my experience. YMMV). Yes, there's no unified one-click-install for Flash on Linux, but once you've followed the instructions to set it up, you're all the more capable of troubleshooting it if anything goes wrong down the road. Moving from Windows to Ubuntu on my desktop around half a year ago was a real speed boost in the short term (might just be the fresh system install effect), and recently my (very non-tech-savvy) little sister made the switch as well, and I'm teaching her to search the web whenever she has problems and helping her with the command line whenever.</p><p>If you have problems setting up Flash, <b>search the web</b>. Someone's probably had exactly the same problem as you before.</p><p>With regard to lack of hardware/driver support<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... sometimes there's 3rd party software that can help you. Sometimes, there's nothing you can do.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is another reason Linux is not that user friendly .
It 's a chicken and an egg problem .
I 'm have average computer skills and using Linux is a lot less user friendly because of issues such as the issues with Flash .
It appears to be getting better and I hope to use Linux on my laptop eventually , but it is still a pain in the ass to use Linux .
Also , I have a Verizon broadband card that does n't have Linux software for it.If configuring your system is a pain , maybe Linux is not for you .
Luckily , it 's big enough as a platform that any user-level problem can be answered with a little Google search on the right search terms ( in my experience .
YMMV ) . Yes , there 's no unified one-click-install for Flash on Linux , but once you 've followed the instructions to set it up , you 're all the more capable of troubleshooting it if anything goes wrong down the road .
Moving from Windows to Ubuntu on my desktop around half a year ago was a real speed boost in the short term ( might just be the fresh system install effect ) , and recently my ( very non-tech-savvy ) little sister made the switch as well , and I 'm teaching her to search the web whenever she has problems and helping her with the command line whenever.If you have problems setting up Flash , search the web .
Someone 's probably had exactly the same problem as you before.With regard to lack of hardware/driver support ... sometimes there 's 3rd party software that can help you .
Sometimes , there 's nothing you can do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is another reason Linux is not that user friendly.
It's a chicken and an egg problem.
I'm have average computer skills and using Linux is a lot less user friendly because of issues such as the issues with Flash.
It appears to be getting better and I hope to use Linux on my laptop eventually, but it is still a pain in the ass to use Linux.
Also, I have a Verizon broadband card that doesn't have Linux software for it.If configuring your system is a pain, maybe Linux is not for you.
Luckily, it's big enough as a platform that any user-level problem can be answered with a little Google search on the right search terms (in my experience.
YMMV). Yes, there's no unified one-click-install for Flash on Linux, but once you've followed the instructions to set it up, you're all the more capable of troubleshooting it if anything goes wrong down the road.
Moving from Windows to Ubuntu on my desktop around half a year ago was a real speed boost in the short term (might just be the fresh system install effect), and recently my (very non-tech-savvy) little sister made the switch as well, and I'm teaching her to search the web whenever she has problems and helping her with the command line whenever.If you have problems setting up Flash, search the web.
Someone's probably had exactly the same problem as you before.With regard to lack of hardware/driver support ... sometimes there's 3rd party software that can help you.
Sometimes, there's nothing you can do.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157610</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157160</id>
	<title>Hardware acceleration?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266345300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This 64-bit version has always had hardware acceleration disabled. The 32-bit version does acceleration through OpenGL. I can watch full screen HD youtube videos smoothly with the 32-bit plugin, but the 64-bit plugin isn't even usable for that. I've stayed away from it just for that reason... I'd rather just run 32-bit and have things actually playable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This 64-bit version has always had hardware acceleration disabled .
The 32-bit version does acceleration through OpenGL .
I can watch full screen HD youtube videos smoothly with the 32-bit plugin , but the 64-bit plugin is n't even usable for that .
I 've stayed away from it just for that reason... I 'd rather just run 32-bit and have things actually playable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This 64-bit version has always had hardware acceleration disabled.
The 32-bit version does acceleration through OpenGL.
I can watch full screen HD youtube videos smoothly with the 32-bit plugin, but the 64-bit plugin isn't even usable for that.
I've stayed away from it just for that reason... I'd rather just run 32-bit and have things actually playable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31163646</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't news...</title>
	<author>Narcocide</author>
	<datestamp>1266333600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pretty much every time flash opens something it seems to instantly demand 4GB of RAM...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...I'm not sure how much of that Flash at fault or just undisciplined authoring.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pretty much every time flash opens something it seems to instantly demand 4GB of RAM... ...I 'm not sure how much of that Flash at fault or just undisciplined authoring .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pretty much every time flash opens something it seems to instantly demand 4GB of RAM... ...I'm not sure how much of that Flash at fault or just undisciplined authoring.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31158660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156744</id>
	<title>Old news, slight revision, still broken Hulu.</title>
	<author>proxima</author>
	<datestamp>1266343980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is another revision over previous 64-bit Flash revisions.  I've been using it for months, mostly without trouble.</p><p>Around mid-January though, Hulu broke with all Linux clients running 64-bit Flash. You get "Sorry, we are unable to stream this video", and the <a href="http://www.hulu.com/discussions/9" title="hulu.com">support forum</a> [hulu.com] is full of people reporting it.  As far as I know Hulu has provided no response, and there are rumors that something related to video DRM that Hulu enabled (must be recently) is not supported in the 64-bit Flash player yet.  Workarounds including using the Hulu desktop (which some report as buggy), watching at least some of the videos via Fancast (which I didn't even know existed), or using the 32-bit plugin.  I just tried this 10.0.45 release and it has the same problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is another revision over previous 64-bit Flash revisions .
I 've been using it for months , mostly without trouble.Around mid-January though , Hulu broke with all Linux clients running 64-bit Flash .
You get " Sorry , we are unable to stream this video " , and the support forum [ hulu.com ] is full of people reporting it .
As far as I know Hulu has provided no response , and there are rumors that something related to video DRM that Hulu enabled ( must be recently ) is not supported in the 64-bit Flash player yet .
Workarounds including using the Hulu desktop ( which some report as buggy ) , watching at least some of the videos via Fancast ( which I did n't even know existed ) , or using the 32-bit plugin .
I just tried this 10.0.45 release and it has the same problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is another revision over previous 64-bit Flash revisions.
I've been using it for months, mostly without trouble.Around mid-January though, Hulu broke with all Linux clients running 64-bit Flash.
You get "Sorry, we are unable to stream this video", and the support forum [hulu.com] is full of people reporting it.
As far as I know Hulu has provided no response, and there are rumors that something related to video DRM that Hulu enabled (must be recently) is not supported in the 64-bit Flash player yet.
Workarounds including using the Hulu desktop (which some report as buggy), watching at least some of the videos via Fancast (which I didn't even know existed), or using the 32-bit plugin.
I just tried this 10.0.45 release and it has the same problem.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31160306</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't news...</title>
	<author>maxwell demon</author>
	<datestamp>1266315120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OK, so they have a port for 64 bit Alpha, but what about 64 bit x86-64?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK , so they have a port for 64 bit Alpha , but what about 64 bit x86-64 ?
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK, so they have a port for 64 bit Alpha, but what about 64 bit x86-64?
:-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31160950</id>
	<title>Re:Old news, slight revision, still broken Hulu.</title>
	<author>cr\_nucleus</author>
	<datestamp>1266318240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Getting and installing the 64-bit flash plugin directly from adobe and not from the repository package fixed the non clickable flash issue for me.</p><p>Just though you might want to know. Plus there seems to be <a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/410407" title="launchpad.net">other ways</a> [launchpad.net] to solve the problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Getting and installing the 64-bit flash plugin directly from adobe and not from the repository package fixed the non clickable flash issue for me.Just though you might want to know .
Plus there seems to be other ways [ launchpad.net ] to solve the problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Getting and installing the 64-bit flash plugin directly from adobe and not from the repository package fixed the non clickable flash issue for me.Just though you might want to know.
Plus there seems to be other ways [launchpad.net] to solve the problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156720</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't news...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266343920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, the ComputerWorld article is dated November 2008.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , the ComputerWorld article is dated November 2008 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, the ComputerWorld article is dated November 2008.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31159150</id>
	<title>Re:Old news, slight revision, still broken Hulu.</title>
	<author>ebmi</author>
	<datestamp>1266353040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...  I can watch the videos, but the player controls are unusable (clicking on them does nothing).</p>  </div><p>I have this problem too on Hulu and Youtube alike.  I found that if I click and hold the middle button on my mouse and click the first button, I can use the controls again.  Pretty ugly hack, I know, but it works!  What's worse is that this bug comes and goes, and I can't figure out what's causing it.  In fullscreen mode, the controls work normally again.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... I can watch the videos , but the player controls are unusable ( clicking on them does nothing ) .
I have this problem too on Hulu and Youtube alike .
I found that if I click and hold the middle button on my mouse and click the first button , I can use the controls again .
Pretty ugly hack , I know , but it works !
What 's worse is that this bug comes and goes , and I ca n't figure out what 's causing it .
In fullscreen mode , the controls work normally again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...  I can watch the videos, but the player controls are unusable (clicking on them does nothing).
I have this problem too on Hulu and Youtube alike.
I found that if I click and hold the middle button on my mouse and click the first button, I can use the controls again.
Pretty ugly hack, I know, but it works!
What's worse is that this bug comes and goes, and I can't figure out what's causing it.
In fullscreen mode, the controls work normally again.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156738</id>
	<title>No performance improvement</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266343980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplayer10/faq.html</p><p>Will application performance improve with the 64-bit Flash Player?<br>A 64-bit Flash Player will not necessarily result in improved application performance. The major benefit is for Flash Player to be fully compatible with 64-bit Linux distributions so that it is both easier to install and works as expected without requiring emulation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From http : //labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplayer10/faq.htmlWill application performance improve with the 64-bit Flash Player ? A 64-bit Flash Player will not necessarily result in improved application performance .
The major benefit is for Flash Player to be fully compatible with 64-bit Linux distributions so that it is both easier to install and works as expected without requiring emulation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplayer10/faq.htmlWill application performance improve with the 64-bit Flash Player?A 64-bit Flash Player will not necessarily result in improved application performance.
The major benefit is for Flash Player to be fully compatible with 64-bit Linux distributions so that it is both easier to install and works as expected without requiring emulation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31161994</id>
	<title>and there is no 64bit of 10.1beta2 yet</title>
	<author>anton\_kg</author>
	<datestamp>1266323280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="https://bugs.gentoo.org/show\_bug.cgi?id=294003" title="gentoo.org" rel="nofollow">https://bugs.gentoo.org/show\_bug.cgi?id=294003</a> [gentoo.org] <br>

Also, Adobe didn't bother fixing 6month old security bug:<br>
<a href="http://flashcrash.dempsky.org/" title="dempsky.org" rel="nofollow">http://flashcrash.dempsky.org/</a> [dempsky.org] <br>

Adobe suck really big. But why somebody would post such a stupid "news" in the slashdot?..</htmltext>
<tokenext>https : //bugs.gentoo.org/show \ _bug.cgi ? id = 294003 [ gentoo.org ] Also , Adobe did n't bother fixing 6month old security bug : http : //flashcrash.dempsky.org/ [ dempsky.org ] Adobe suck really big .
But why somebody would post such a stupid " news " in the slashdot ? . .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>https://bugs.gentoo.org/show\_bug.cgi?id=294003 [gentoo.org] 

Also, Adobe didn't bother fixing 6month old security bug:
http://flashcrash.dempsky.org/ [dempsky.org] 

Adobe suck really big.
But why somebody would post such a stupid "news" in the slashdot?..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156986</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't news...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266344820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Even after a year, it's still shit, though. I just installed this plugin on my Fedora system, and it's fucked up. Firefox crashes outright the moment I try to access YouTube or any site using Flash. Opera doesn't crash, but still can't play the Flash content.</p><p>I know a lot of people say that HTML5 will be the answer, but I suspect it'll just bring in a whole new set of problems.</p><p>Honestly, even Java applets work better than Flash, and until Flash became popular we all thought Java applets were the shittiest that things could get.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Even after a year , it 's still shit , though .
I just installed this plugin on my Fedora system , and it 's fucked up .
Firefox crashes outright the moment I try to access YouTube or any site using Flash .
Opera does n't crash , but still ca n't play the Flash content.I know a lot of people say that HTML5 will be the answer , but I suspect it 'll just bring in a whole new set of problems.Honestly , even Java applets work better than Flash , and until Flash became popular we all thought Java applets were the shittiest that things could get .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even after a year, it's still shit, though.
I just installed this plugin on my Fedora system, and it's fucked up.
Firefox crashes outright the moment I try to access YouTube or any site using Flash.
Opera doesn't crash, but still can't play the Flash content.I know a lot of people say that HTML5 will be the answer, but I suspect it'll just bring in a whole new set of problems.Honestly, even Java applets work better than Flash, and until Flash became popular we all thought Java applets were the shittiest that things could get.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31159140</id>
	<title>Slashdot - Last Year's News Today</title>
	<author>Hel Toupee</author>
	<datestamp>1266352980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Slashdot -- "Last year's news, today!!!"<br> <br>

I've been running this since I saw it announced on Slashdot a year and some ago (and linked to the same article, I think).  It's better than Alpha quality, IMHO.  Still slow as hell.  At least they got the sound-out-of-sync-with-video problem on youtube fixed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdot -- " Last year 's news , today ! ! !
" I 've been running this since I saw it announced on Slashdot a year and some ago ( and linked to the same article , I think ) .
It 's better than Alpha quality , IMHO .
Still slow as hell .
At least they got the sound-out-of-sync-with-video problem on youtube fixed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slashdot -- "Last year's news, today!!!
" 

I've been running this since I saw it announced on Slashdot a year and some ago (and linked to the same article, I think).
It's better than Alpha quality, IMHO.
Still slow as hell.
At least they got the sound-out-of-sync-with-video problem on youtube fixed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156668</id>
	<title>OMG</title>
	<author>binarylarry</author>
	<datestamp>1266343800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just knew the strange spacetime distortion field I drove through on the way to work was going to cause issues!</p><p>I've apparently gone a few years back in time, wait.. wha.. nooooo, I have to relive going through the recession again!</p><p>Oh wait...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just knew the strange spacetime distortion field I drove through on the way to work was going to cause issues ! I 've apparently gone a few years back in time , wait.. wha.. nooooo , I have to relive going through the recession again ! Oh wait.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just knew the strange spacetime distortion field I drove through on the way to work was going to cause issues!I've apparently gone a few years back in time, wait.. wha.. nooooo, I have to relive going through the recession again!Oh wait...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156822</id>
	<title>html5</title>
	<author>brenddie</author>
	<datestamp>1266344220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>we will have better luck waiting for mass adoption of html5 than waiting for a REAL release of the adobe flash plugin. Maybe html5 is whats causing them to wake up</htmltext>
<tokenext>we will have better luck waiting for mass adoption of html5 than waiting for a REAL release of the adobe flash plugin .
Maybe html5 is whats causing them to wake up</tokentext>
<sentencetext>we will have better luck waiting for mass adoption of html5 than waiting for a REAL release of the adobe flash plugin.
Maybe html5 is whats causing them to wake up</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157756</id>
	<title>It like flash</title>
	<author>obarthelemy</author>
	<datestamp>1266347520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>because it's easy to block it and get rid of 80\% of obnoxious ads. With HTML5 coming up, i'm dreading having no choice but christmas-tree websites all over.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>because it 's easy to block it and get rid of 80 \ % of obnoxious ads .
With HTML5 coming up , i 'm dreading having no choice but christmas-tree websites all over .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>because it's easy to block it and get rid of 80\% of obnoxious ads.
With HTML5 coming up, i'm dreading having no choice but christmas-tree websites all over.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156766</id>
	<title>And In Other News</title>
	<author>MightyMartian</author>
	<datestamp>1266344040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Microsoft has just announced the release of Windows Vista, predicting that it will surely be the best selling operating system the Redmond, WA based company has ever released.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft has just announced the release of Windows Vista , predicting that it will surely be the best selling operating system the Redmond , WA based company has ever released .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft has just announced the release of Windows Vista, predicting that it will surely be the best selling operating system the Redmond, WA based company has ever released.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156844</id>
	<title>Moving straight off-topic</title>
	<author>Enderandrew</author>
	<datestamp>1266344280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, we're now taking articles from 2008 and putting them on the front page of Slashdot. We're already discovered there is nothing to see here. So please allow me an OT question here, but are there any really good Linux bloggers out there?</p><p>Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols is just one of the many writers I really don't like and so I started thinking. Are there any Linux bloggers out there I do like? I'm at a loss.</p><p>Matt Asay is also incredibly popular, but his blog is supposedly dedicated to open source. Yet he spends about 30-40\% of his time praising Apple and IBM for closed-source proprietary products, and another 30-40\% bashing Microsoft for anything and everything. Then he spends a very small amount of time trying to advocate or report on actual FOSS products. A good chunk of that time is promoting his company, Alfresco.</p><p>I'd love to find a good Linux/FOSS blog worth reading.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , we 're now taking articles from 2008 and putting them on the front page of Slashdot .
We 're already discovered there is nothing to see here .
So please allow me an OT question here , but are there any really good Linux bloggers out there ? Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols is just one of the many writers I really do n't like and so I started thinking .
Are there any Linux bloggers out there I do like ?
I 'm at a loss.Matt Asay is also incredibly popular , but his blog is supposedly dedicated to open source .
Yet he spends about 30-40 \ % of his time praising Apple and IBM for closed-source proprietary products , and another 30-40 \ % bashing Microsoft for anything and everything .
Then he spends a very small amount of time trying to advocate or report on actual FOSS products .
A good chunk of that time is promoting his company , Alfresco.I 'd love to find a good Linux/FOSS blog worth reading .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, we're now taking articles from 2008 and putting them on the front page of Slashdot.
We're already discovered there is nothing to see here.
So please allow me an OT question here, but are there any really good Linux bloggers out there?Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols is just one of the many writers I really don't like and so I started thinking.
Are there any Linux bloggers out there I do like?
I'm at a loss.Matt Asay is also incredibly popular, but his blog is supposedly dedicated to open source.
Yet he spends about 30-40\% of his time praising Apple and IBM for closed-source proprietary products, and another 30-40\% bashing Microsoft for anything and everything.
Then he spends a very small amount of time trying to advocate or report on actual FOSS products.
A good chunk of that time is promoting his company, Alfresco.I'd love to find a good Linux/FOSS blog worth reading.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31158278</id>
	<title>Flash, flaaaash !</title>
	<author>lolo60150</author>
	<datestamp>1266349440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can somebody explain me why on my Fedora 11 x64, the same libflashplayer.so works fine on Opera 10 and not on Firefox 3.5.6 ? And Gnash<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... well it's a good initiative, but too young to be really usable (well at least with my computer)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can somebody explain me why on my Fedora 11 x64 , the same libflashplayer.so works fine on Opera 10 and not on Firefox 3.5.6 ?
And Gnash ... well it 's a good initiative , but too young to be really usable ( well at least with my computer )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can somebody explain me why on my Fedora 11 x64, the same libflashplayer.so works fine on Opera 10 and not on Firefox 3.5.6 ?
And Gnash ... well it's a good initiative, but too young to be really usable (well at least with my computer)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31160918</id>
	<title>Re:flash and silverlight need to die</title>
	<author>arndawg</author>
	<datestamp>1266318000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But could you do live tv-streams with HTML? In my country they're doing the Olympic Games livestream in silverlight and it works surprisingly well (in HD@3,5mbps). I'm no web-developer so i have no idea if you could do it with HTML5 but my guess is that you can't.

My point? Not much. Only that standards takes a while to complete (for good reasons), so in the meantime proprietary stuff takes over.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But could you do live tv-streams with HTML ?
In my country they 're doing the Olympic Games livestream in silverlight and it works surprisingly well ( in HD @ 3,5mbps ) .
I 'm no web-developer so i have no idea if you could do it with HTML5 but my guess is that you ca n't .
My point ?
Not much .
Only that standards takes a while to complete ( for good reasons ) , so in the meantime proprietary stuff takes over .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But could you do live tv-streams with HTML?
In my country they're doing the Olympic Games livestream in silverlight and it works surprisingly well (in HD@3,5mbps).
I'm no web-developer so i have no idea if you could do it with HTML5 but my guess is that you can't.
My point?
Not much.
Only that standards takes a while to complete (for good reasons), so in the meantime proprietary stuff takes over.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31160180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31158660</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't news...</title>
	<author>cream wobbly</author>
	<datestamp>1266350880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So you kicked out all your 32-bit binaries?</p><p>64-bit Flash<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... for Flash games that use more than 4 GB of RAM.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So you kicked out all your 32-bit binaries ? 64-bit Flash ... for Flash games that use more than 4 GB of RAM .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you kicked out all your 32-bit binaries?64-bit Flash ... for Flash games that use more than 4 GB of RAM.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157424</id>
	<title>Or the home folder</title>
	<author>Tubal-Cain</author>
	<datestamp>1266346200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Just remove any existing Flash player and extract the new<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.so file in<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins (or<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/usr/lib/opera/plugins).</p></div><p>It works just as well (for single-user systems) in ~/.mozilla/plugins.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just remove any existing Flash player and extract the new .so file in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins ( or /usr/lib/opera/plugins ) .It works just as well ( for single-user systems ) in ~ /.mozilla/plugins .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just remove any existing Flash player and extract the new .so file in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins (or /usr/lib/opera/plugins).It works just as well (for single-user systems) in ~/.mozilla/plugins.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156746</id>
	<title>Re:What was the previous release?</title>
	<author>Jugalator</author>
	<datestamp>1266344040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Reading labs.adobe.com more closely, the news here is that an alpha <b>refresh</b> has been released.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Reading labs.adobe.com more closely , the news here is that an alpha refresh has been released .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reading labs.adobe.com more closely, the news here is that an alpha refresh has been released.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31163528</id>
	<title>Great! So now where is the Linux ARM version, hm?</title>
	<author>mrflash818</author>
	<datestamp>1266332760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great! So now where is the Linux ARM version, hm?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great !
So now where is the Linux ARM version , hm ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great!
So now where is the Linux ARM version, hm?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31159386</id>
	<title>Re:Old news, slight revision, still broken Hulu.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266311040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fire up lsof(8) next time when you are watching a video on Hulu. Look for flash, be surprised it is 32-bit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fire up lsof ( 8 ) next time when you are watching a video on Hulu .
Look for flash , be surprised it is 32-bit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fire up lsof(8) next time when you are watching a video on Hulu.
Look for flash, be surprised it is 32-bit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31159316</id>
	<title>Re:Really good!?!? You must be kidding!</title>
	<author>Rakarra</author>
	<datestamp>1266353820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nope, happens to me all the time. Even just with Youtube, the premiere Flash site on the 'net.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nope , happens to me all the time .
Even just with Youtube , the premiere Flash site on the 'net .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nope, happens to me all the time.
Even just with Youtube, the premiere Flash site on the 'net.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31158410</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157666</id>
	<title>I can has FreeBSD plugin now?</title>
	<author>blakedev</author>
	<datestamp>1266347220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Please?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Please ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157978</id>
	<title>Re:Downtime is the name of the game</title>
	<author>Dr.Syshalt</author>
	<datestamp>1266348360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I develop Flex application on Linux right now, using Intellij IDEA + Flex SDK from Adobe.</p><p>Quite complex GUI application, with numerous connected graphs, grids, sliders - one that would be just impossible to develop using AJAX or whatnot.</p><p>Zero problems so far. Everything works properly, including Flash debugging in 32-bit SeaMonkey (there is no 64-bit debug version of Flash on <b>neither</b> platform, so 64 bit is for usual browsing). The app is working, I'm going to release it today or tomorrow - yes, Flash application + server part on Perl with JSON bindings, developed 100\% on Linux. It would be <b>masochistic</b> to develop it using "HTML5" or whatever buzzword you wanted to use as a replacement for Flash. Flash is here and it works - I don't care what your theories say</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I develop Flex application on Linux right now , using Intellij IDEA + Flex SDK from Adobe.Quite complex GUI application , with numerous connected graphs , grids , sliders - one that would be just impossible to develop using AJAX or whatnot.Zero problems so far .
Everything works properly , including Flash debugging in 32-bit SeaMonkey ( there is no 64-bit debug version of Flash on neither platform , so 64 bit is for usual browsing ) .
The app is working , I 'm going to release it today or tomorrow - yes , Flash application + server part on Perl with JSON bindings , developed 100 \ % on Linux .
It would be masochistic to develop it using " HTML5 " or whatever buzzword you wanted to use as a replacement for Flash .
Flash is here and it works - I do n't care what your theories say</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I develop Flex application on Linux right now, using Intellij IDEA + Flex SDK from Adobe.Quite complex GUI application, with numerous connected graphs, grids, sliders - one that would be just impossible to develop using AJAX or whatnot.Zero problems so far.
Everything works properly, including Flash debugging in 32-bit SeaMonkey (there is no 64-bit debug version of Flash on neither platform, so 64 bit is for usual browsing).
The app is working, I'm going to release it today or tomorrow - yes, Flash application + server part on Perl with JSON bindings, developed 100\% on Linux.
It would be masochistic to develop it using "HTML5" or whatever buzzword you wanted to use as a replacement for Flash.
Flash is here and it works - I don't care what your theories say</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156636</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157498</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't news...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266346500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>flash64Bit forever</p><p>also flashwithdecentproformanceoutsideofwindowsland forever</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>flash64Bit foreveralso flashwithdecentproformanceoutsideofwindowsland forever</tokentext>
<sentencetext>flash64Bit foreveralso flashwithdecentproformanceoutsideofwindowsland forever</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156752</id>
	<title>Who cares?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266344040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Soon after YouTube goes HTML5 we will witness the death of Flash.  They had a good run and played a large part in making the Internet what is today but it is time to move on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Soon after YouTube goes HTML5 we will witness the death of Flash .
They had a good run and played a large part in making the Internet what is today but it is time to move on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Soon after YouTube goes HTML5 we will witness the death of Flash.
They had a good run and played a large part in making the Internet what is today but it is time to move on.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157302</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't news...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266345840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>This article seems to have popped up because Adobe have indeed released an updated version of the flash player on the 11th of this month. Still alpha, but slightly newer. Pleasingly, it seems to have fixed the only persistent bug I had with the player (which caused Firefox to report a crash every time it was closed - no actual errant behaviour, however).<p>
Why exactly the submitter picked at year-and-a-bit old article as a reference for this news is still a mystery, however.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This article seems to have popped up because Adobe have indeed released an updated version of the flash player on the 11th of this month .
Still alpha , but slightly newer .
Pleasingly , it seems to have fixed the only persistent bug I had with the player ( which caused Firefox to report a crash every time it was closed - no actual errant behaviour , however ) .
Why exactly the submitter picked at year-and-a-bit old article as a reference for this news is still a mystery , however .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This article seems to have popped up because Adobe have indeed released an updated version of the flash player on the 11th of this month.
Still alpha, but slightly newer.
Pleasingly, it seems to have fixed the only persistent bug I had with the player (which caused Firefox to report a crash every time it was closed - no actual errant behaviour, however).
Why exactly the submitter picked at year-and-a-bit old article as a reference for this news is still a mystery, however.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31158682</id>
	<title>Re:Linux not user friendly</title>
	<author>h4rr4r</author>
	<datestamp>1266350940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is no need for separate software for those cards.</p><p>if you kindly post which one it is I will tell you how to make it work. Most likely though just using a newer ubuntu it will work out of the box.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is no need for separate software for those cards.if you kindly post which one it is I will tell you how to make it work .
Most likely though just using a newer ubuntu it will work out of the box .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is no need for separate software for those cards.if you kindly post which one it is I will tell you how to make it work.
Most likely though just using a newer ubuntu it will work out of the box.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157610</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157328</id>
	<title>Wake me up when it becomes beta.</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1266345900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So that finally Kongregate will support it.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So that finally Kongregate will support it .
: /</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So that finally Kongregate will support it.
:/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31158818</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't news...</title>
	<author>HNS-I</author>
	<datestamp>1266351540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You've got it all wrong, you're supposed to say: <p><div class="quote"><p>Why is this even news, the 64 bit flash player has been in alpha for over a year...</p> </div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 've got it all wrong , you 're supposed to say : Why is this even news , the 64 bit flash player has been in alpha for over a year.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You've got it all wrong, you're supposed to say: Why is this even news, the 64 bit flash player has been in alpha for over a year... 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31163186</id>
	<title>Re:flash and silverlight need to die</title>
	<author>Thundersnatch</author>
	<datestamp>1266330060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Silverlight is an open specification that anyone can implement royalty-free. Moonlight already exists, to prove that point.
Conversely, HTML5 is not even close to official, and will likely not implementable in any standardized way (too big, with too many optional behaviors). Flash and Silverlight exist because the W3C sucks as a standards body. They should hand the keys over to the IETF or ISO.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Silverlight is an open specification that anyone can implement royalty-free .
Moonlight already exists , to prove that point .
Conversely , HTML5 is not even close to official , and will likely not implementable in any standardized way ( too big , with too many optional behaviors ) .
Flash and Silverlight exist because the W3C sucks as a standards body .
They should hand the keys over to the IETF or ISO .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Silverlight is an open specification that anyone can implement royalty-free.
Moonlight already exists, to prove that point.
Conversely, HTML5 is not even close to official, and will likely not implementable in any standardized way (too big, with too many optional behaviors).
Flash and Silverlight exist because the W3C sucks as a standards body.
They should hand the keys over to the IETF or ISO.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31160180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31164968</id>
	<title>Re:Old news, slight revision, still broken Hulu.</title>
	<author>fluffynuts</author>
	<datestamp>1266342720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Try holding down another mouse button (eg, the third), and then, with that button still down, click as you would normally on the control you want to click.

I've had this in the past. It's not uncommon. I remember setting an environment variable pertaining to GTK to fix this -- though I can't find it and I can't remember it now. Hopefully, google will be as kind to you as it was to me when I looked.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Try holding down another mouse button ( eg , the third ) , and then , with that button still down , click as you would normally on the control you want to click .
I 've had this in the past .
It 's not uncommon .
I remember setting an environment variable pertaining to GTK to fix this -- though I ca n't find it and I ca n't remember it now .
Hopefully , google will be as kind to you as it was to me when I looked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try holding down another mouse button (eg, the third), and then, with that button still down, click as you would normally on the control you want to click.
I've had this in the past.
It's not uncommon.
I remember setting an environment variable pertaining to GTK to fix this -- though I can't find it and I can't remember it now.
Hopefully, google will be as kind to you as it was to me when I looked.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31163162</id>
	<title>Re:Old news, slight revision, still broken Hulu.</title>
	<author>at\_slashdot</author>
	<datestamp>1266329880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ubuntu 64 bit uses 32 bit flash<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P (and it sucks, 64 bit flash works better, with the exception of Hulu of course)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ubuntu 64 bit uses 32 bit flash : P ( and it sucks , 64 bit flash works better , with the exception of Hulu of course )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ubuntu 64 bit uses 32 bit flash :P (and it sucks, 64 bit flash works better, with the exception of Hulu of course)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157610</id>
	<title>Linux not user friendly</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266346980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is another reason Linux is not that user friendly.  It's a chicken and an egg problem.  I'm have average computer skills and using Linux is a lot less user friendly because of issues such as the issues with Flash.  It appears to be getting better and I hope to use Linux on my laptop eventually, but it is still a pain in the ass to use Linux.  Also, I have a Verizon broadband card that doesn't have Linux software for it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is another reason Linux is not that user friendly .
It 's a chicken and an egg problem .
I 'm have average computer skills and using Linux is a lot less user friendly because of issues such as the issues with Flash .
It appears to be getting better and I hope to use Linux on my laptop eventually , but it is still a pain in the ass to use Linux .
Also , I have a Verizon broadband card that does n't have Linux software for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is another reason Linux is not that user friendly.
It's a chicken and an egg problem.
I'm have average computer skills and using Linux is a lot less user friendly because of issues such as the issues with Flash.
It appears to be getting better and I hope to use Linux on my laptop eventually, but it is still a pain in the ass to use Linux.
Also, I have a Verizon broadband card that doesn't have Linux software for it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156620</id>
	<title>What was the previous release?</title>
	<author>Enderandrew</author>
	<datestamp>1266343620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I do believe I've been using this already for a year. (I'm bad with time). But I know I've been using it for some time now.</p><p>The previous release wasn't considered an alpha?</p><p>What comes before alpha? My greek alphabet must be really rusty.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do believe I 've been using this already for a year .
( I 'm bad with time ) .
But I know I 've been using it for some time now.The previous release was n't considered an alpha ? What comes before alpha ?
My greek alphabet must be really rusty .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I do believe I've been using this already for a year.
(I'm bad with time).
But I know I've been using it for some time now.The previous release wasn't considered an alpha?What comes before alpha?
My greek alphabet must be really rusty.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157248</id>
	<title>Adobe Reader</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266345600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now all we need is Adobe Reader 64-bit please?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now all we need is Adobe Reader 64-bit please ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now all we need is Adobe Reader 64-bit please?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156760</id>
	<title>Slow player - slow announcement</title>
	<author>dmesg0</author>
	<datestamp>1266344040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The announcement is new, but the player isn't. Must be a very slow company, if it takes one year from the alpha release to the announcement.
</p><p>

By the way, the 64-bit alpha was always just as stable (or just as unstable) for me as the 32-bit version. I wonder if they have really made any changes since then.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The announcement is new , but the player is n't .
Must be a very slow company , if it takes one year from the alpha release to the announcement .
By the way , the 64-bit alpha was always just as stable ( or just as unstable ) for me as the 32-bit version .
I wonder if they have really made any changes since then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The announcement is new, but the player isn't.
Must be a very slow company, if it takes one year from the alpha release to the announcement.
By the way, the 64-bit alpha was always just as stable (or just as unstable) for me as the 32-bit version.
I wonder if they have really made any changes since then.
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31162302</id>
	<title>Finally!</title>
	<author>Trogre</author>
	<datestamp>1266324900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can start using the 64 bit Linux Flash plugin that I've been using for over a year now...</p><p>(not that I really blame the editors that much - Adobe haven't exactly gone out of their way to advertise it)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can start using the 64 bit Linux Flash plugin that I 've been using for over a year now... ( not that I really blame the editors that much - Adobe have n't exactly gone out of their way to advertise it )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can start using the 64 bit Linux Flash plugin that I've been using for over a year now...(not that I really blame the editors that much - Adobe haven't exactly gone out of their way to advertise it)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156710</id>
	<title>Re:What was the previous release?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266343920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>TFA is even dated November 2008!  So not quite as "new and shiny" as CmdrTaco seems to think<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>TFA is even dated November 2008 !
So not quite as " new and shiny " as CmdrTaco seems to think : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TFA is even dated November 2008!
So not quite as "new and shiny" as CmdrTaco seems to think :-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31158064</id>
	<title>Withdrawn</title>
	<author>Concern</author>
	<datestamp>1266348720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From here: <a href="http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/HTML5-controversy-centres-on-Adobe-Update-931069.html" title="h-online.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/HTML5-controversy-centres-on-Adobe-Update-931069.html</a> [h-online.com]</p><p><i>Update - Ian Hickson has withdrawn his claims. In a posting to the W3C mailing list he said "I was under the impression (based on [1] and some posts to secret mailing lists) that Larry had filed a formal objection on the 2D Context part of what people outside this working group call HTML5. However, I see Larry has now posted publicly that this is not the case".</i></p><p>My guess, this troublemaking was real, but they are backpedalling now.</p><p>Adobe is playing the last cards in their slimy little hand to sabotage HTML5.</p><p>Standards bodies either survive attempts by wealthy corporate troublemakers to stop the open standards process, or they become irrelevant.</p><p>I can't wait to see Flash finally end. It's been a buggy, annoying tool to work with since it came on the scene. Even so, their reign should have been as endless as Windows - all it would have taken was the slightest bit of good stewardship. Too bad they couldn't even be bothered to keep up with 5-10 year old changes in hardware and operating systems.</p><p>It's fitting that Macromedia/Adobe's laziness and arrogance will destroy their grip on the web.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From here : http : //www.h-online.com/open/news/item/HTML5-controversy-centres-on-Adobe-Update-931069.html [ h-online.com ] Update - Ian Hickson has withdrawn his claims .
In a posting to the W3C mailing list he said " I was under the impression ( based on [ 1 ] and some posts to secret mailing lists ) that Larry had filed a formal objection on the 2D Context part of what people outside this working group call HTML5 .
However , I see Larry has now posted publicly that this is not the case " .My guess , this troublemaking was real , but they are backpedalling now.Adobe is playing the last cards in their slimy little hand to sabotage HTML5.Standards bodies either survive attempts by wealthy corporate troublemakers to stop the open standards process , or they become irrelevant.I ca n't wait to see Flash finally end .
It 's been a buggy , annoying tool to work with since it came on the scene .
Even so , their reign should have been as endless as Windows - all it would have taken was the slightest bit of good stewardship .
Too bad they could n't even be bothered to keep up with 5-10 year old changes in hardware and operating systems.It 's fitting that Macromedia/Adobe 's laziness and arrogance will destroy their grip on the web .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From here: http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/HTML5-controversy-centres-on-Adobe-Update-931069.html [h-online.com]Update - Ian Hickson has withdrawn his claims.
In a posting to the W3C mailing list he said "I was under the impression (based on [1] and some posts to secret mailing lists) that Larry had filed a formal objection on the 2D Context part of what people outside this working group call HTML5.
However, I see Larry has now posted publicly that this is not the case".My guess, this troublemaking was real, but they are backpedalling now.Adobe is playing the last cards in their slimy little hand to sabotage HTML5.Standards bodies either survive attempts by wealthy corporate troublemakers to stop the open standards process, or they become irrelevant.I can't wait to see Flash finally end.
It's been a buggy, annoying tool to work with since it came on the scene.
Even so, their reign should have been as endless as Windows - all it would have taken was the slightest bit of good stewardship.
Too bad they couldn't even be bothered to keep up with 5-10 year old changes in hardware and operating systems.It's fitting that Macromedia/Adobe's laziness and arrogance will destroy their grip on the web.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157352</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31158836</id>
	<title>64 bit flash .... Why?</title>
	<author>heffrey</author>
	<datestamp>1266351660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Would somebody like to give a convincing reason for running 64 bit browser and extensions rather than the 32 bit versions? I can't work out why one would want to do so.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would somebody like to give a convincing reason for running 64 bit browser and extensions rather than the 32 bit versions ?
I ca n't work out why one would want to do so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would somebody like to give a convincing reason for running 64 bit browser and extensions rather than the 32 bit versions?
I can't work out why one would want to do so.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156904</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't news...</title>
	<author>sakdoctor</author>
	<datestamp>1266344580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>64-bit enthusiasts?</p><p>x86-64 is THE de-facto architecture. Save the enthusiast label for all the retro x86 steam punk guys.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>64-bit enthusiasts ? x86-64 is THE de-facto architecture .
Save the enthusiast label for all the retro x86 steam punk guys .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>64-bit enthusiasts?x86-64 is THE de-facto architecture.
Save the enthusiast label for all the retro x86 steam punk guys.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156940</id>
	<title>Flash for the 64bit DEC  Alpha !!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266344640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Finally,</p><p>Though wouldn't a PPC Linux binary be more useful?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally,Though would n't a PPC Linux binary be more useful ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally,Though wouldn't a PPC Linux binary be more useful?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156618</id>
	<title>"Finally?"</title>
	<author>MSG</author>
	<datestamp>1266343620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That story is more than a year old!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That story is more than a year old !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That story is more than a year old!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31158998</id>
	<title>It's a trap</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266352380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it's useless and a trap, ignore Flash.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's useless and a trap , ignore Flash .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's useless and a trap, ignore Flash.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31160992</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't news...</title>
	<author>HBoar</author>
	<datestamp>1266318420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The 64bit version of flash for linux allows users to smoothly play standard definition video.  With a good PC, you can even sometimes watch HD stuff from youtube!  Pretty amazing really, I couldn't believe it when I first tried it some 4 months ago.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The 64bit version of flash for linux allows users to smoothly play standard definition video .
With a good PC , you can even sometimes watch HD stuff from youtube !
Pretty amazing really , I could n't believe it when I first tried it some 4 months ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The 64bit version of flash for linux allows users to smoothly play standard definition video.
With a good PC, you can even sometimes watch HD stuff from youtube!
Pretty amazing really, I couldn't believe it when I first tried it some 4 months ago.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31158660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31158410</id>
	<title>Really good!?!? You must be kidding!</title>
	<author>lofoforabr</author>
	<datestamp>1266349920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm kind of astonished to see so many people here running the flash plugin without a problem. Unless the definition of 'without a problem' changed somewhere.<br>
I run it in Ubuntu (karmic, 64-bit) and it sure is the worst piece of shitware I got. Whenever I have a page with flash plugin, cpu stays fixed at 100\% usage (well, at 25\%, because luckily I'm on a quad-core). Also, the plugin segfaults more than my tests when I was learning assembly. After a few days turned on, last lines of my dmesg are always something like:<br>
<br>
[562380.585402] npviewer.bin[8191]: segfault at ff999ed8 ip 00000000ff999ed8 sp 00000000ffe4d0ec error 14<br>
[565094.972209] npviewer.bin[10145]: segfault at 1020000 ip 0000000001020000 sp 00000000ffc9727c error 14 in npviewer.bin[8048000+23000]<br>
[572699.544263] npviewer.bin[11284]: segfault at ff999ea8 ip 00000000ff999ea8 sp 00000000fff58c0c error 14<br>
[575806.593733] npviewer.bin[14840]: segfault at ff999ea8 ip 00000000ff999ea8 sp 00000000ffebc38c error 14<br>
<br>
npviewer.bin is the flash plugin.<br>
Really, am I the only one who has any problems with this? Sometimes, it even hangs firefox for several seconds before giving back control.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm kind of astonished to see so many people here running the flash plugin without a problem .
Unless the definition of 'without a problem ' changed somewhere .
I run it in Ubuntu ( karmic , 64-bit ) and it sure is the worst piece of shitware I got .
Whenever I have a page with flash plugin , cpu stays fixed at 100 \ % usage ( well , at 25 \ % , because luckily I 'm on a quad-core ) .
Also , the plugin segfaults more than my tests when I was learning assembly .
After a few days turned on , last lines of my dmesg are always something like : [ 562380.585402 ] npviewer.bin [ 8191 ] : segfault at ff999ed8 ip 00000000ff999ed8 sp 00000000ffe4d0ec error 14 [ 565094.972209 ] npviewer.bin [ 10145 ] : segfault at 1020000 ip 0000000001020000 sp 00000000ffc9727c error 14 in npviewer.bin [ 8048000 + 23000 ] [ 572699.544263 ] npviewer.bin [ 11284 ] : segfault at ff999ea8 ip 00000000ff999ea8 sp 00000000fff58c0c error 14 [ 575806.593733 ] npviewer.bin [ 14840 ] : segfault at ff999ea8 ip 00000000ff999ea8 sp 00000000ffebc38c error 14 npviewer.bin is the flash plugin .
Really , am I the only one who has any problems with this ?
Sometimes , it even hangs firefox for several seconds before giving back control .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm kind of astonished to see so many people here running the flash plugin without a problem.
Unless the definition of 'without a problem' changed somewhere.
I run it in Ubuntu (karmic, 64-bit) and it sure is the worst piece of shitware I got.
Whenever I have a page with flash plugin, cpu stays fixed at 100\% usage (well, at 25\%, because luckily I'm on a quad-core).
Also, the plugin segfaults more than my tests when I was learning assembly.
After a few days turned on, last lines of my dmesg are always something like:

[562380.585402] npviewer.bin[8191]: segfault at ff999ed8 ip 00000000ff999ed8 sp 00000000ffe4d0ec error 14
[565094.972209] npviewer.bin[10145]: segfault at 1020000 ip 0000000001020000 sp 00000000ffc9727c error 14 in npviewer.bin[8048000+23000]
[572699.544263] npviewer.bin[11284]: segfault at ff999ea8 ip 00000000ff999ea8 sp 00000000fff58c0c error 14
[575806.593733] npviewer.bin[14840]: segfault at ff999ea8 ip 00000000ff999ea8 sp 00000000ffebc38c error 14

npviewer.bin is the flash plugin.
Really, am I the only one who has any problems with this?
Sometimes, it even hangs firefox for several seconds before giving back control.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31167866</id>
	<title>qweqwewqe</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265033820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://brnckvvtmllttrhaberi.co.tv/" title="brnckvvtml...beri.co.tv" rel="nofollow">revizyon ile organize matbaaclk brnckvvtmllttrhaberi</a> [brnckvvtml...beri.co.tv]<br><a href="http://revizyonorganizebrnckvvtmllttrhaberi.kiwi.gen.tr/" title="kiwi.gen.tr" rel="nofollow">revizyon ile organize matbaaclk brnckvvtmllttrhaberi</a> [kiwi.gen.tr]</p><p><a href="http://www.bacanak.net/" title="bacanak.net" rel="nofollow">pornoizle</a> [bacanak.net]<br><a href="http://www.trfani.com/" title="trfani.com" rel="nofollow">pornoizle</a> [trfani.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>revizyon ile organize matbaaclk brnckvvtmllttrhaberi [ brnckvvtml...beri.co.tv ] revizyon ile organize matbaaclk brnckvvtmllttrhaberi [ kiwi.gen.tr ] pornoizle [ bacanak.net ] pornoizle [ trfani.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>revizyon ile organize matbaaclk brnckvvtmllttrhaberi [brnckvvtml...beri.co.tv]revizyon ile organize matbaaclk brnckvvtmllttrhaberi [kiwi.gen.tr]pornoizle [bacanak.net]pornoizle [trfani.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31158274</id>
	<title>Re:What was the previous release?</title>
	<author>gral</author>
	<datestamp>1266349440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>@ comes before Alpha, at least in the ascii table.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)

The flash player just got updated on the 11th.  It is still in alpha, just a new version of the alpha release.</htmltext>
<tokenext>@ comes before Alpha , at least in the ascii table .
; - ) The flash player just got updated on the 11th .
It is still in alpha , just a new version of the alpha release .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>@ comes before Alpha, at least in the ascii table.
;-)

The flash player just got updated on the 11th.
It is still in alpha, just a new version of the alpha release.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156608</id>
	<title>This isn't news...</title>
	<author>AllyGreen</author>
	<datestamp>1266343560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The 64 bit flash player has been in alpha for over a year....</htmltext>
<tokenext>The 64 bit flash player has been in alpha for over a year... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The 64 bit flash player has been in alpha for over a year....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31158096</id>
	<title>Re:Old news, slight revision, still broken Hulu.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266348840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can use Hulu just fine on 64-bit Linux with 64-bit Flash plugin. Sometimes I get error messages that go away when I refresh the page.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can use Hulu just fine on 64-bit Linux with 64-bit Flash plugin .
Sometimes I get error messages that go away when I refresh the page .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can use Hulu just fine on 64-bit Linux with 64-bit Flash plugin.
Sometimes I get error messages that go away when I refresh the page.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31160180</id>
	<title>flash and silverlight need to die</title>
	<author>B.Stolk</author>
	<datestamp>1266314580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is absolutely no place for proprietary standards on the web.<br>Both flash and silverlight need to die.</p><p>Just imagine what would happen if HTML was proprietary: the web would never have taken off as it has now.</p><p>There is a perfectly good alternative for vector graphics on the web: SVG is an open standard.<br>It works very well e.g. on iPhones.<br>At least apple is not polluting the internet with crap as Microsoft and Adobe do with SilverLight and Flash.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is absolutely no place for proprietary standards on the web.Both flash and silverlight need to die.Just imagine what would happen if HTML was proprietary : the web would never have taken off as it has now.There is a perfectly good alternative for vector graphics on the web : SVG is an open standard.It works very well e.g .
on iPhones.At least apple is not polluting the internet with crap as Microsoft and Adobe do with SilverLight and Flash .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is absolutely no place for proprietary standards on the web.Both flash and silverlight need to die.Just imagine what would happen if HTML was proprietary: the web would never have taken off as it has now.There is a perfectly good alternative for vector graphics on the web: SVG is an open standard.It works very well e.g.
on iPhones.At least apple is not polluting the internet with crap as Microsoft and Adobe do with SilverLight and Flash.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157722</id>
	<title>Re:Downtime is the name of the game</title>
	<author>diegocg</author>
	<datestamp>1266347340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Adobe Linux guys wrote a blog post explaining <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/penguin.swf/2010/01/solving\_different\_problems.html" title="adobe.com">why Adobe Flash is so slow</a> [adobe.com].  It seems that because Flash needs to mix the video image with other flash controls, it can't accelerate video like a typical player does. It seems that the HTML5 people have the same problem.</p><p><i>"The key point here is that the decoded video frames need to be accessible by the Player which needs to do its thing before the data can be presented to the user. As of this writing, none of these drivers in Linux allow retrieval of the decoded video data. Their counterpart Windows drivers do allow this which is why this feature is supported in Windows.</i></p><p><i>That's for Linux. What about Mac? I'm not sure but my Mac colleagues have mentioned something about Apple not making their hardware decoding APIs available to applications (if the APIs exist at all, which I'm not sure they do)"</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Adobe Linux guys wrote a blog post explaining why Adobe Flash is so slow [ adobe.com ] .
It seems that because Flash needs to mix the video image with other flash controls , it ca n't accelerate video like a typical player does .
It seems that the HTML5 people have the same problem .
" The key point here is that the decoded video frames need to be accessible by the Player which needs to do its thing before the data can be presented to the user .
As of this writing , none of these drivers in Linux allow retrieval of the decoded video data .
Their counterpart Windows drivers do allow this which is why this feature is supported in Windows.That 's for Linux .
What about Mac ?
I 'm not sure but my Mac colleagues have mentioned something about Apple not making their hardware decoding APIs available to applications ( if the APIs exist at all , which I 'm not sure they do ) "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Adobe Linux guys wrote a blog post explaining why Adobe Flash is so slow [adobe.com].
It seems that because Flash needs to mix the video image with other flash controls, it can't accelerate video like a typical player does.
It seems that the HTML5 people have the same problem.
"The key point here is that the decoded video frames need to be accessible by the Player which needs to do its thing before the data can be presented to the user.
As of this writing, none of these drivers in Linux allow retrieval of the decoded video data.
Their counterpart Windows drivers do allow this which is why this feature is supported in Windows.That's for Linux.
What about Mac?
I'm not sure but my Mac colleagues have mentioned something about Apple not making their hardware decoding APIs available to applications (if the APIs exist at all, which I'm not sure they do)"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156636</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157568</id>
	<title>Re:Flash for the 64bit DEC Alpha !!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266346740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I went fishing explicitly for this comment. It's awesome how nonspecific the summary is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I went fishing explicitly for this comment .
It 's awesome how nonspecific the summary is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I went fishing explicitly for this comment.
It's awesome how nonspecific the summary is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156636</id>
	<title>Downtime is the name of the game</title>
	<author>Coopjust</author>
	<datestamp>1266343680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Man, Flash Player locks up the CPU and crashes more often with gold releases than most alpha software. I think you'd have to be sadist to run software in alpha for Linux from Adobe.
<br> <br>Seriously, I hope it leads to an improvement for the Flash Player for the platform- it's sorely needed.
<br> <br>On another note, I was surprised to hear that H.264 GPU video acceleration in Flash Player 10.1, in addition to being limited to very new cards, only works on Windows, the platform with the most stable Flash Player (stable is relative).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Man , Flash Player locks up the CPU and crashes more often with gold releases than most alpha software .
I think you 'd have to be sadist to run software in alpha for Linux from Adobe .
Seriously , I hope it leads to an improvement for the Flash Player for the platform- it 's sorely needed .
On another note , I was surprised to hear that H.264 GPU video acceleration in Flash Player 10.1 , in addition to being limited to very new cards , only works on Windows , the platform with the most stable Flash Player ( stable is relative ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Man, Flash Player locks up the CPU and crashes more often with gold releases than most alpha software.
I think you'd have to be sadist to run software in alpha for Linux from Adobe.
Seriously, I hope it leads to an improvement for the Flash Player for the platform- it's sorely needed.
On another note, I was surprised to hear that H.264 GPU video acceleration in Flash Player 10.1, in addition to being limited to very new cards, only works on Windows, the platform with the most stable Flash Player (stable is relative).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156694</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't news...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266343860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The date on the article is November 19, 2008. Even by Slashdot standards, this is ridiculously old news.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The date on the article is November 19 , 2008 .
Even by Slashdot standards , this is ridiculously old news .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The date on the article is November 19, 2008.
Even by Slashdot standards, this is ridiculously old news.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156612</id>
	<title>Countdown timer initiated</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266343620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Que the Anti Adobe Activists in 3... 2...</p><p>Wait hang on... This flash ad is causing my browser to lag...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Que the Anti Adobe Activists in 3... 2...Wait hang on... This flash ad is causing my browser to lag.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Que the Anti Adobe Activists in 3... 2...Wait hang on... This flash ad is causing my browser to lag...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31162500</id>
	<title>Re:Old news, slight revision, still broken Hulu.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266325860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The interesting part was that I was able to watch hulu content being fed from fancast. They just redirected the video stream, didn't even bother rebranding. So to be clear:
<ul>
<li>All other flash video and apps seem to work fine (youtube, flash heavy sites and games).</li><li>Hulu's video stream works fine when viewed via another site or hulu's desktop client using the same flash plugin.</li><li>The only place it doesn't work is in the browser, at hulu.com.</li></ul><p>
The only answer I come up with is that they're blacklisting linux x64 on the site. The only sense I can make of that is that they're going to migrate to a desktop client only model (to lock out other sites and devices like boxee and playon) And they're starting with the smallest portion of their users. Add this to all the talk about subscriptions and it sounds very plausible...
<br> <br>
Of course I could be wrong and there could be a benign explanation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The interesting part was that I was able to watch hulu content being fed from fancast .
They just redirected the video stream , did n't even bother rebranding .
So to be clear : All other flash video and apps seem to work fine ( youtube , flash heavy sites and games ) .Hulu 's video stream works fine when viewed via another site or hulu 's desktop client using the same flash plugin.The only place it does n't work is in the browser , at hulu.com .
The only answer I come up with is that they 're blacklisting linux x64 on the site .
The only sense I can make of that is that they 're going to migrate to a desktop client only model ( to lock out other sites and devices like boxee and playon ) And they 're starting with the smallest portion of their users .
Add this to all the talk about subscriptions and it sounds very plausible.. . Of course I could be wrong and there could be a benign explanation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The interesting part was that I was able to watch hulu content being fed from fancast.
They just redirected the video stream, didn't even bother rebranding.
So to be clear:

All other flash video and apps seem to work fine (youtube, flash heavy sites and games).Hulu's video stream works fine when viewed via another site or hulu's desktop client using the same flash plugin.The only place it doesn't work is in the browser, at hulu.com.
The only answer I come up with is that they're blacklisting linux x64 on the site.
The only sense I can make of that is that they're going to migrate to a desktop client only model (to lock out other sites and devices like boxee and playon) And they're starting with the smallest portion of their users.
Add this to all the talk about subscriptions and it sounds very plausible...
 
Of course I could be wrong and there could be a benign explanation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156744</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31162500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31158274
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31158682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157610
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31164968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157978
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156636
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31159150
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31160950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31160444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31161994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31160306
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31159774
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156636
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31161708
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31158006
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31167692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156678
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156986
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31163186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31160180
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157788
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31159316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31158410
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157828
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31159332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156844
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31160918
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31160180
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31158096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31160992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31158660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156746
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31159386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31158818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31163646
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31158660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31163162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31171864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31161808
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156766
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31158064
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156822
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31160380
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157610
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31160528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31158836
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1548213_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156612
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1548213.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156608
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157390
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31158818
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157498
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156694
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156904
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31167692
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31158660
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31160992
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31163646
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157302
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156720
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156986
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31161994
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31158006
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31160306
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31171864
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1548213.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157248
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1548213.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157040
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1548213.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156766
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31161808
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1548213.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156822
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157352
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31158064
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1548213.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156636
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157722
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31159774
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157978
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1548213.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156752
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1548213.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156844
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157664
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1548213.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156668
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1548213.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156620
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31160444
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156710
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31158274
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156746
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156678
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1548213.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157666
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1548213.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156940
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157568
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1548213.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31158410
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31159316
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1548213.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31160180
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31160918
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31163186
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1548213.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156738
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1548213.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156648
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1548213.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157464
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1548213.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156612
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157758
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1548213.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156616
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1548213.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31156744
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31162500
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31158096
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31159332
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157206
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31159386
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157828
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31161708
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157788
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31159150
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31160950
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31164968
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31163162
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1548213.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157756
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1548213.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157096
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1548213.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31157610
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31160380
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31158682
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1548213.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31158836
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1548213.31160528
</commentlist>
</conversation>
