<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_16_1416220</id>
	<title>Meteorite Contains Complex Organic Molecules</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1266333360000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"Previously unknown <a href="http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/news/3313/extraterrestrial-organic-molecules-more-complex-earth">organic molecules have been discovered in a 100 kg meteorite</a> that hit Australia in 1969, suggesting that our early Solar System contained a soup of highly complex organic chemistry long before life appeared. Quoting: 'According to [the study's lead author], the newly discovered compounds in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murchison\_meteorite">Murchison meteorite</a> "may have contributed to the organic complexity of the early 'soup' that led to the development of life on Earth." The findings also suggest that extraterrestrial chemical diversity surpasses that found on Earth. The meteor probably passed through primordial clouds in the early solar system, accumulating organic molecules in a snowball effect along the way. By tracing the sequence of organic molecules in the meteorite, researchers believe they may also be able to create a timeline for their formation and alteration since the early days of our solar system.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " Previously unknown organic molecules have been discovered in a 100 kg meteorite that hit Australia in 1969 , suggesting that our early Solar System contained a soup of highly complex organic chemistry long before life appeared .
Quoting : 'According to [ the study 's lead author ] , the newly discovered compounds in the Murchison meteorite " may have contributed to the organic complexity of the early 'soup ' that led to the development of life on Earth .
" The findings also suggest that extraterrestrial chemical diversity surpasses that found on Earth .
The meteor probably passed through primordial clouds in the early solar system , accumulating organic molecules in a snowball effect along the way .
By tracing the sequence of organic molecules in the meteorite , researchers believe they may also be able to create a timeline for their formation and alteration since the early days of our solar system .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "Previously unknown organic molecules have been discovered in a 100 kg meteorite that hit Australia in 1969, suggesting that our early Solar System contained a soup of highly complex organic chemistry long before life appeared.
Quoting: 'According to [the study's lead author], the newly discovered compounds in the Murchison meteorite "may have contributed to the organic complexity of the early 'soup' that led to the development of life on Earth.
" The findings also suggest that extraterrestrial chemical diversity surpasses that found on Earth.
The meteor probably passed through primordial clouds in the early solar system, accumulating organic molecules in a snowball effect along the way.
By tracing the sequence of organic molecules in the meteorite, researchers believe they may also be able to create a timeline for their formation and alteration since the early days of our solar system.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31157372</id>
	<title>Re:science-ignorant article</title>
	<author>Inda</author>
	<datestamp>1266346020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I didn't RTFA because I read it here the other day: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8516319.stm<br><br>I thought it was informative.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I did n't RTFA because I read it here the other day : http : //news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8516319.stmI thought it was informative .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I didn't RTFA because I read it here the other day: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8516319.stmI thought it was informative.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31167484</id>
	<title>Re:wouldn't it be awesome</title>
	<author>famebait</author>
	<datestamp>1265029440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If life is pretty much inevitable wherever the conditions are right, why resort to space-faring RNA to explain life here on earth?</htmltext>
<tokenext>If life is pretty much inevitable wherever the conditions are right , why resort to space-faring RNA to explain life here on earth ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If life is pretty much inevitable wherever the conditions are right, why resort to space-faring RNA to explain life here on earth?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155626</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155976</id>
	<title>Re:organic sources</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266340560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>.............umm.......... and it's less far fetched it was formed on some tiny asteroid in the middle of nowhere?<br>The universe might be filled with lots and lots of galaxies and planets, but it contains a several magnitudes greater amount of void, hence, the chance of this asteroid forming life, traveling across the galaxy, surviving a kiloton/megaton impact against earth is more likely?<br>If the earth was blasted into pieces right now, do you seriously think anything would survive and any of those pieces would spread life to other solarsystems?</p><p>What 'makes more sense' to me is that you wish you had some 'ancient' alien dna in you, that would allow you to control a starship and save the earth one day or that you would 'know' what the meaning of life is blahblahblah...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.............umm.......... and it 's less far fetched it was formed on some tiny asteroid in the middle of nowhere ? The universe might be filled with lots and lots of galaxies and planets , but it contains a several magnitudes greater amount of void , hence , the chance of this asteroid forming life , traveling across the galaxy , surviving a kiloton/megaton impact against earth is more likely ? If the earth was blasted into pieces right now , do you seriously think anything would survive and any of those pieces would spread life to other solarsystems ? What 'makes more sense ' to me is that you wish you had some 'ancient ' alien dna in you , that would allow you to control a starship and save the earth one day or that you would 'know ' what the meaning of life is blahblahblah.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.............umm.......... and it's less far fetched it was formed on some tiny asteroid in the middle of nowhere?The universe might be filled with lots and lots of galaxies and planets, but it contains a several magnitudes greater amount of void, hence, the chance of this asteroid forming life, traveling across the galaxy, surviving a kiloton/megaton impact against earth is more likely?If the earth was blasted into pieces right now, do you seriously think anything would survive and any of those pieces would spread life to other solarsystems?What 'makes more sense' to me is that you wish you had some 'ancient' alien dna in you, that would allow you to control a starship and save the earth one day or that you would 'know' what the meaning of life is blahblahblah...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155504</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155504</id>
	<title>organic sources</title>
	<author>Scarumanga</author>
	<datestamp>1266337860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well the thought of the building blocks for life to have just "formed" on earth is too far fetched. This just helps solidify that earth was somehow seeded by meteorites long before life started and that is where life started up from i believe. It just makes more sense. Also once you do the math as to how many galaxies there are just in the visible portion of the sky, it just becomes even more realistic that we are not alone, but space is just so big that we pretty much are alone in our tiny sector of the Galaxy perhaps.
Its like living out in the boonies where everyone house would be separated by 5 miles with trees in the way, just because you can't see their house, doesn't mean its not there, but just out of sight.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well the thought of the building blocks for life to have just " formed " on earth is too far fetched .
This just helps solidify that earth was somehow seeded by meteorites long before life started and that is where life started up from i believe .
It just makes more sense .
Also once you do the math as to how many galaxies there are just in the visible portion of the sky , it just becomes even more realistic that we are not alone , but space is just so big that we pretty much are alone in our tiny sector of the Galaxy perhaps .
Its like living out in the boonies where everyone house would be separated by 5 miles with trees in the way , just because you ca n't see their house , does n't mean its not there , but just out of sight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well the thought of the building blocks for life to have just "formed" on earth is too far fetched.
This just helps solidify that earth was somehow seeded by meteorites long before life started and that is where life started up from i believe.
It just makes more sense.
Also once you do the math as to how many galaxies there are just in the visible portion of the sky, it just becomes even more realistic that we are not alone, but space is just so big that we pretty much are alone in our tiny sector of the Galaxy perhaps.
Its like living out in the boonies where everyone house would be separated by 5 miles with trees in the way, just because you can't see their house, doesn't mean its not there, but just out of sight.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155756</id>
	<title>Nonbelievers shall perish.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266339240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hallowed are the Ori!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hallowed are the Ori !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hallowed are the Ori!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31158154</id>
	<title>Re:wouldn't it be awesome</title>
	<author>panda.punter</author>
	<datestamp>1266349020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't confuse how life arose on Earth with how it may have evolved elsewhere. It's unlikely that RNA is the universal carrier for genetic information.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't confuse how life arose on Earth with how it may have evolved elsewhere .
It 's unlikely that RNA is the universal carrier for genetic information .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't confuse how life arose on Earth with how it may have evolved elsewhere.
It's unlikely that RNA is the universal carrier for genetic information.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155626</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31157660</id>
	<title>Re:Proof there is a god</title>
	<author>mister\_playboy</author>
	<datestamp>1266347160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well played!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well played !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well played!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155622</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31158056</id>
	<title>Re:Panspermia? Yeah right.</title>
	<author>Scarumanga</author>
	<datestamp>1266348660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think life came from space, and did not originate here on this planet.
I have just come to accept that there is more at play than any human can understand at the moment, and probably won't be understood for a very long time.
 I also believe that all religions (in general) might have stemmed up from something else all together, someone passes a story on and changes it when he tells it to someone else, the process repeats itself until you have several different version of the same story (all religions have "a higher power" in common). Obviously something happened in human history that no one understood at all and that's where religion started, this is why i am not religious as i know its all baloney.

No one is an idiot for having their own concepts, without different concepts or theories, well we would be lost.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think life came from space , and did not originate here on this planet .
I have just come to accept that there is more at play than any human can understand at the moment , and probably wo n't be understood for a very long time .
I also believe that all religions ( in general ) might have stemmed up from something else all together , someone passes a story on and changes it when he tells it to someone else , the process repeats itself until you have several different version of the same story ( all religions have " a higher power " in common ) .
Obviously something happened in human history that no one understood at all and that 's where religion started , this is why i am not religious as i know its all baloney .
No one is an idiot for having their own concepts , without different concepts or theories , well we would be lost .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think life came from space, and did not originate here on this planet.
I have just come to accept that there is more at play than any human can understand at the moment, and probably won't be understood for a very long time.
I also believe that all religions (in general) might have stemmed up from something else all together, someone passes a story on and changes it when he tells it to someone else, the process repeats itself until you have several different version of the same story (all religions have "a higher power" in common).
Obviously something happened in human history that no one understood at all and that's where religion started, this is why i am not religious as i know its all baloney.
No one is an idiot for having their own concepts, without different concepts or theories, well we would be lost.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155532</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31157032</id>
	<title>Re:wouldn't it be awesome</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266344940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All of this has happened before, and will happen again.  so say we all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All of this has happened before , and will happen again .
so say we all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All of this has happened before, and will happen again.
so say we all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155626</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155642</id>
	<title>Published???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266338700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>From TFA:<nobr> <wbr></nobr><i>...according to the study <b>published</b> in the U.S. Journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.</i> <br> <br>
I'm going on the assumption that "published" implies past tense. As in, done. Yet, a search of PNAS finds no connection between the quoted author Philippe Schmitt-Kopplin and the word "Murchison" appearing ANYWHERE in the text of an article. And since no title is mentioned and no other authors are mentioned, I'm not really sure what to say.<br> <br>

I mean, I suppose it's possible PNAS completely screwed up somehow. I tried matching just the guy's first name, just his last name. He has written for PNAS in the past. He's written three articles on wine. That's quite a jump, from wine to meteorites.<br> <br>

I'm not saying it's not there. I just can't find it among the 81 PNAS articles on the Murchison meteorite.</htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA : ...according to the study published in the U.S. Journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences .
I 'm going on the assumption that " published " implies past tense .
As in , done .
Yet , a search of PNAS finds no connection between the quoted author Philippe Schmitt-Kopplin and the word " Murchison " appearing ANYWHERE in the text of an article .
And since no title is mentioned and no other authors are mentioned , I 'm not really sure what to say .
I mean , I suppose it 's possible PNAS completely screwed up somehow .
I tried matching just the guy 's first name , just his last name .
He has written for PNAS in the past .
He 's written three articles on wine .
That 's quite a jump , from wine to meteorites .
I 'm not saying it 's not there .
I just ca n't find it among the 81 PNAS articles on the Murchison meteorite .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA: ...according to the study published in the U.S. Journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
I'm going on the assumption that "published" implies past tense.
As in, done.
Yet, a search of PNAS finds no connection between the quoted author Philippe Schmitt-Kopplin and the word "Murchison" appearing ANYWHERE in the text of an article.
And since no title is mentioned and no other authors are mentioned, I'm not really sure what to say.
I mean, I suppose it's possible PNAS completely screwed up somehow.
I tried matching just the guy's first name, just his last name.
He has written for PNAS in the past.
He's written three articles on wine.
That's quite a jump, from wine to meteorites.
I'm not saying it's not there.
I just can't find it among the 81 PNAS articles on the Murchison meteorite.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155448</id>
	<title>Discrimination of rocks.</title>
	<author>Polarina</author>
	<datestamp>1266337620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Find a rock, ???, report to the press, ???, profit!</p><p>This rock looks exactly the same as the one I got at home -- it has the same shape, color, size and is just as aggressive as the rock advertised, yet, my rock doesn't get all the fame.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Find a rock , ? ?
? , report to the press , ? ?
? , profit ! This rock looks exactly the same as the one I got at home -- it has the same shape , color , size and is just as aggressive as the rock advertised , yet , my rock does n't get all the fame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Find a rock, ??
?, report to the press, ??
?, profit!This rock looks exactly the same as the one I got at home -- it has the same shape, color, size and is just as aggressive as the rock advertised, yet, my rock doesn't get all the fame.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156304</id>
	<title>anyone ?</title>
	<author>alobar72</author>
	<datestamp>1266342420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>And I, for one, welcome...
and so forth
Did anzbody mention it by now ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>And I , for one , welcome.. . and so forth Did anzbody mention it by now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I, for one, welcome...
and so forth
Did anzbody mention it by now ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31159070</id>
	<title>Re:Published???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266352680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You internet fu is weak.</p><p>Original article.</p><p>http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/02/12/0912157107.abstract</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You internet fu is weak.Original article.http : //www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/02/12/0912157107.abstract</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You internet fu is weak.Original article.http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/02/12/0912157107.abstract</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155642</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156430</id>
	<title>Re:I for one</title>
	<author>RavenChild</author>
	<datestamp>1266342900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Look at the world today.  Perhaps we are ex-meteor-dwelling overlords.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Look at the world today .
Perhaps we are ex-meteor-dwelling overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look at the world today.
Perhaps we are ex-meteor-dwelling overlords.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155348</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156524</id>
	<title>Re:science-ignorant article</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266343260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He got the answer to "what is organic chemistry" on Jeopardy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He got the answer to " what is organic chemistry " on Jeopardy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He got the answer to "what is organic chemistry" on Jeopardy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156070</id>
	<title>Either that ...</title>
	<author>Tired and Emotional</author>
	<datestamp>1266341100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>or it whacked a dinosaur.</htmltext>
<tokenext>or it whacked a dinosaur .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or it whacked a dinosaur.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156170</id>
	<title>There Is Life</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266341580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is life on Mars!!! Run, run to the hills!!!</p><p>Oh and welcome alien invaders!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is life on Mars ! ! !
Run , run to the hills ! !
! Oh and welcome alien invaders !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is life on Mars!!!
Run, run to the hills!!
!Oh and welcome alien invaders!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156448</id>
	<title>Re:science-ignorant article</title>
	<author>burningcpu</author>
	<datestamp>1266342960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>This depends on your definition of organic compound. If you are referring to the prevalent definition in chemistry, then yes, these are organic compounds.

If you are going to be snarky about it you should at least double check yourself first.

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic\_compound" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic\_compound</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>This depends on your definition of organic compound .
If you are referring to the prevalent definition in chemistry , then yes , these are organic compounds .
If you are going to be snarky about it you should at least double check yourself first .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic \ _compound [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This depends on your definition of organic compound.
If you are referring to the prevalent definition in chemistry, then yes, these are organic compounds.
If you are going to be snarky about it you should at least double check yourself first.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic\_compound [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31164154</id>
	<title>Re:wouldn't it be awesome</title>
	<author>Nazlfrag</author>
	<datestamp>1266337200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>'I refuse to prove that I exist,' says God, 'for proof denies faith, and without faith I am nothing.'</p><p>'But,' says Man, 'The Murchison meteorite is a dead giveaway, isn't it? It could not have evolved by chance. It proves you exist, and so therefore, by your own arguments, you don't. QED.'</p><p>'Oh dear,' says God, 'I hadn&rsquo;t thought of that,' and promptly vanished in a puff of logic.</p><p>They call them fingers but I've never seen them fing... wait, there they go.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>'I refuse to prove that I exist, ' says God , 'for proof denies faith , and without faith I am nothing .
''But, ' says Man , 'The Murchison meteorite is a dead giveaway , is n't it ?
It could not have evolved by chance .
It proves you exist , and so therefore , by your own arguments , you do n't .
QED.''Oh dear, ' says God , 'I hadn    t thought of that, ' and promptly vanished in a puff of logic.They call them fingers but I 've never seen them fing... wait , there they go .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'I refuse to prove that I exist,' says God, 'for proof denies faith, and without faith I am nothing.
''But,' says Man, 'The Murchison meteorite is a dead giveaway, isn't it?
It could not have evolved by chance.
It proves you exist, and so therefore, by your own arguments, you don't.
QED.''Oh dear,' says God, 'I hadn’t thought of that,' and promptly vanished in a puff of logic.They call them fingers but I've never seen them fing... wait, there they go.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155626</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31158344</id>
	<title>Does anyone have an actual link.</title>
	<author>mbone</author>
	<datestamp>1266349680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The author of the original article  clearly doesn't understand what a molecule is, and the article is not very informative.</p><p>Does anyone have an actual link to a scientific article about this ? ArXiv would do just fine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The author of the original article clearly does n't understand what a molecule is , and the article is not very informative.Does anyone have an actual link to a scientific article about this ?
ArXiv would do just fine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The author of the original article  clearly doesn't understand what a molecule is, and the article is not very informative.Does anyone have an actual link to a scientific article about this ?
ArXiv would do just fine.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155380</id>
	<title>I shit organic material, but so does Kilauea</title>
	<author>BadAnalogyGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1266337260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Before we get all excited about finding "organic" material in space rocks, it's important to remember that organic doesn't really mean anything unless it is certified by the government. There is a battery of tests and criteria that must be passed before anything can truly be referred to as organic.</p><p>I doubt anyone has certified a ROCK from OUTER SPACE as anything but a space rock. You can't eat it anyway, so there really isn't any reason to get it certified organic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Before we get all excited about finding " organic " material in space rocks , it 's important to remember that organic does n't really mean anything unless it is certified by the government .
There is a battery of tests and criteria that must be passed before anything can truly be referred to as organic.I doubt anyone has certified a ROCK from OUTER SPACE as anything but a space rock .
You ca n't eat it anyway , so there really is n't any reason to get it certified organic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Before we get all excited about finding "organic" material in space rocks, it's important to remember that organic doesn't really mean anything unless it is certified by the government.
There is a battery of tests and criteria that must be passed before anything can truly be referred to as organic.I doubt anyone has certified a ROCK from OUTER SPACE as anything but a space rock.
You can't eat it anyway, so there really isn't any reason to get it certified organic.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155470</id>
	<title>Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266337680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>The Murchison meteorite contains complex organic molecules &ndash; including carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen and sulphur.</i> <br> <br> <b>Molecules do not work that way!</b> <br> <br>
TFA is short on details.<br> <br>
Again, TFA: <i>Now, for the first time, scientists have used advanced analytical methods to conduct a non-targeted experiment.</i>...wtf?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Murchison meteorite contains complex organic molecules    including carbon , hydrogen , oxygen , nitrogen and sulphur .
Molecules do not work that way !
TFA is short on details .
Again , TFA : Now , for the first time , scientists have used advanced analytical methods to conduct a non-targeted experiment....wtf ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Murchison meteorite contains complex organic molecules – including carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen and sulphur.
Molecules do not work that way!
TFA is short on details.
Again, TFA: Now, for the first time, scientists have used advanced analytical methods to conduct a non-targeted experiment....wtf?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31158784</id>
	<title>FRRRRRRP!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266351420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It didn't contain as many as that!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It did n't contain as many as that !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It didn't contain as many as that!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31158712</id>
	<title>Re:organic sources</title>
	<author>Black Parrot</author>
	<datestamp>1266351120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Well the thought of the building blocks for life to have just "formed" on earth is too far fetched.</p></div><p>Why is it so hard to imagine organic molecules forming on Earth, if they for on asteroids (or wherever the meteorite came from), and, for that matter, <a href="http://www.cv.nrao.edu/~awootten/allmols.html" title="nrao.edu">in deep space</a> [nrao.edu]?</p><p>I agree with your suggestion that we're probably not alone, though.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well the thought of the building blocks for life to have just " formed " on earth is too far fetched.Why is it so hard to imagine organic molecules forming on Earth , if they for on asteroids ( or wherever the meteorite came from ) , and , for that matter , in deep space [ nrao.edu ] ? I agree with your suggestion that we 're probably not alone , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well the thought of the building blocks for life to have just "formed" on earth is too far fetched.Why is it so hard to imagine organic molecules forming on Earth, if they for on asteroids (or wherever the meteorite came from), and, for that matter, in deep space [nrao.edu]?I agree with your suggestion that we're probably not alone, though.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155504</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31159688</id>
	<title>Re:Panspermia? Yeah right.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266312540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It seems inevitable that panspermia exists. So I propose a radical rethink in how we conduct space missions. We have been careful to not contaminate other planets with Earth microbes, etc. Lets take the gloves off and load up our probes with all sorts of organic matter, maybe giving greater attention to adding extremophiles to the mix. Especially for Mars, this could help the terraforming process. Add lichens and stuff, and let it stew for a few thousand years, and we can watch evolution in action. If meteorites have been dropping random stuff on planets, the concept of contamination no longer exists. You could say we have a duty to spread our lifeforms onto as many places as possible. Recently they even said ice was found on the our moon, a place with no atmosphere. Lets shit bomb the planets and asteroids!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems inevitable that panspermia exists .
So I propose a radical rethink in how we conduct space missions .
We have been careful to not contaminate other planets with Earth microbes , etc .
Lets take the gloves off and load up our probes with all sorts of organic matter , maybe giving greater attention to adding extremophiles to the mix .
Especially for Mars , this could help the terraforming process .
Add lichens and stuff , and let it stew for a few thousand years , and we can watch evolution in action .
If meteorites have been dropping random stuff on planets , the concept of contamination no longer exists .
You could say we have a duty to spread our lifeforms onto as many places as possible .
Recently they even said ice was found on the our moon , a place with no atmosphere .
Lets shit bomb the planets and asteroids !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems inevitable that panspermia exists.
So I propose a radical rethink in how we conduct space missions.
We have been careful to not contaminate other planets with Earth microbes, etc.
Lets take the gloves off and load up our probes with all sorts of organic matter, maybe giving greater attention to adding extremophiles to the mix.
Especially for Mars, this could help the terraforming process.
Add lichens and stuff, and let it stew for a few thousand years, and we can watch evolution in action.
If meteorites have been dropping random stuff on planets, the concept of contamination no longer exists.
You could say we have a duty to spread our lifeforms onto as many places as possible.
Recently they even said ice was found on the our moon, a place with no atmosphere.
Lets shit bomb the planets and asteroids!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155532</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31161800</id>
	<title>Then again...</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1266322320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...organic does <em>not</em> equal building block of life. Because it&rsquo;s <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=piWCBOsJr-w" title="youtube.com">&lt;John Cleese&gt;</a> [youtube.com]just one way... <em>just one way</em>... <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=piWCBOsJr-w" title="youtube.com">&lt;/John Cleese&gt;</a> [youtube.com] life can evolve.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...organic does not equal building block of life .
Because it    s [ youtube.com ] just one way... just one way... [ youtube.com ] life can evolve .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...organic does not equal building block of life.
Because it’s  [youtube.com]just one way... just one way...  [youtube.com] life can evolve.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155626</id>
	<title>wouldn't it be awesome</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1266338580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>if, as we sample more planetary, asteroid, and interstellar matter, that we simply find RNA everywhere?</p><p>that RNA simply permeates the entire universe: in the oort cloud, on europa, on ceres, in interstellar dust, in the data sent back to from probes to other stars/ exoplanets, etc</p><p>that life is not unique to earth, and that life is pretty much inevitable wherever the conditions are right. we got used to the fact that earth is not the center of the universe, and then that our star isn't even that notable. as we discover more exoplanets, we'e beginning to come to grips with the ho hum mundane facts of the existence of millions of planets. yet right now we operate on the assumption life on earth is this rare unique thing native to here. really?</p><p>and then the question would be: why RNA everywhere? how long has this been going on? where did it start? or for all practical purposes has it always been so and the ubiquity of panspermic RNA makes it pretty much a pat cosmological fact without discoverable cause or reason?</p><p>it would be a pretty awesome intersection of;  astronomy, cosmology, theology, biology, and even mathematics/ physics/ information technologythat complexity is simply inevitable, and that information storage and retrieval is an emergent phenomenon intrinsic to the way physical laws inexorably play out... and that this is "God". deus ex machina</p><p>and it's entirely possible, as we keep looking</p><p>ok, sorry, i'll put down the marijuana. dude: have you ever looked at your hand? l mean REALLY look at your HAND</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>if , as we sample more planetary , asteroid , and interstellar matter , that we simply find RNA everywhere ? that RNA simply permeates the entire universe : in the oort cloud , on europa , on ceres , in interstellar dust , in the data sent back to from probes to other stars/ exoplanets , etcthat life is not unique to earth , and that life is pretty much inevitable wherever the conditions are right .
we got used to the fact that earth is not the center of the universe , and then that our star is n't even that notable .
as we discover more exoplanets , we'e beginning to come to grips with the ho hum mundane facts of the existence of millions of planets .
yet right now we operate on the assumption life on earth is this rare unique thing native to here .
really ? and then the question would be : why RNA everywhere ?
how long has this been going on ?
where did it start ?
or for all practical purposes has it always been so and the ubiquity of panspermic RNA makes it pretty much a pat cosmological fact without discoverable cause or reason ? it would be a pretty awesome intersection of ; astronomy , cosmology , theology , biology , and even mathematics/ physics/ information technologythat complexity is simply inevitable , and that information storage and retrieval is an emergent phenomenon intrinsic to the way physical laws inexorably play out... and that this is " God " .
deus ex machinaand it 's entirely possible , as we keep lookingok , sorry , i 'll put down the marijuana .
dude : have you ever looked at your hand ?
l mean REALLY look at your HAND</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if, as we sample more planetary, asteroid, and interstellar matter, that we simply find RNA everywhere?that RNA simply permeates the entire universe: in the oort cloud, on europa, on ceres, in interstellar dust, in the data sent back to from probes to other stars/ exoplanets, etcthat life is not unique to earth, and that life is pretty much inevitable wherever the conditions are right.
we got used to the fact that earth is not the center of the universe, and then that our star isn't even that notable.
as we discover more exoplanets, we'e beginning to come to grips with the ho hum mundane facts of the existence of millions of planets.
yet right now we operate on the assumption life on earth is this rare unique thing native to here.
really?and then the question would be: why RNA everywhere?
how long has this been going on?
where did it start?
or for all practical purposes has it always been so and the ubiquity of panspermic RNA makes it pretty much a pat cosmological fact without discoverable cause or reason?it would be a pretty awesome intersection of;  astronomy, cosmology, theology, biology, and even mathematics/ physics/ information technologythat complexity is simply inevitable, and that information storage and retrieval is an emergent phenomenon intrinsic to the way physical laws inexorably play out... and that this is "God".
deus ex machinaand it's entirely possible, as we keep lookingok, sorry, i'll put down the marijuana.
dude: have you ever looked at your hand?
l mean REALLY look at your HAND</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155984</id>
	<title>Re:organic sources</title>
	<author>vlm</author>
	<datestamp>1266340620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Well the thought of the building blocks for life to have just "formed" on earth is too far fetched.</p></div><p>Basically you're promoting "vitalism"</p><p>Organic chemistry dropped vitalism around 1828 more or less due to Wohler synthesis.</p><p>Looks like biology still hasn't made that advance yet, OR your belief is a bit out of date, out of step with modern bio beliefs.</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wohler\_synthesis" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wohler\_synthesis</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitalism" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitalism</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well the thought of the building blocks for life to have just " formed " on earth is too far fetched.Basically you 're promoting " vitalism " Organic chemistry dropped vitalism around 1828 more or less due to Wohler synthesis.Looks like biology still has n't made that advance yet , OR your belief is a bit out of date , out of step with modern bio beliefs.http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wohler \ _synthesis [ wikipedia.org ] http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitalism [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well the thought of the building blocks for life to have just "formed" on earth is too far fetched.Basically you're promoting "vitalism"Organic chemistry dropped vitalism around 1828 more or less due to Wohler synthesis.Looks like biology still hasn't made that advance yet, OR your belief is a bit out of date, out of step with modern bio beliefs.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wohler\_synthesis [wikipedia.org]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitalism [wikipedia.org]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155504</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156862</id>
	<title>Re:Proof there is a god</title>
	<author>garompeta</author>
	<datestamp>1266344400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext> Maybe it has the same odds of a town landing on a meteorite of the same name</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe it has the same odds of a town landing on a meteorite of the same name</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Maybe it has the same odds of a town landing on a meteorite of the same name</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155622</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156586</id>
	<title>Re:I shit organic material, but so does Kilauea</title>
	<author>steelfood</author>
	<datestamp>1266343500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But it contains a chemical known to the state of California to cause cancer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But it contains a chemical known to the state of California to cause cancer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But it contains a chemical known to the state of California to cause cancer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31159934</id>
	<title>Re:science-ignorant article</title>
	<author>rubycodez</author>
	<datestamp>1266313620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>problem was wording of linked article implying that hydrogen, sulphur, nitrogen, oxygen were organic molecules in picture caption and in text; they are not.  They should for picture and in article have said "organic molecules containing atoms of<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>problem was wording of linked article implying that hydrogen , sulphur , nitrogen , oxygen were organic molecules in picture caption and in text ; they are not .
They should for picture and in article have said " organic molecules containing atoms of ..... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>problem was wording of linked article implying that hydrogen, sulphur, nitrogen, oxygen were organic molecules in picture caption and in text; they are not.
They should for picture and in article have said "organic molecules containing atoms of ....."</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156550</id>
	<title>Re:I for one</title>
	<author>steelfood</author>
	<datestamp>1266343380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This finding can only mean one thing: Space dolphins passed by billions of years ago, dropped some bricks behind, and we resulted.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This finding can only mean one thing : Space dolphins passed by billions of years ago , dropped some bricks behind , and we resulted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This finding can only mean one thing: Space dolphins passed by billions of years ago, dropped some bricks behind, and we resulted.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155348</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155434</id>
	<title>Teeming with organic molecules</title>
	<author>proverbialcow</author>
	<datestamp>1266337560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A giant rock has been on Earth for forty years, and just now they're discovering that it's contains organic compounds? Um...did it fall directly into a controlled vacuum?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A giant rock has been on Earth for forty years , and just now they 're discovering that it 's contains organic compounds ?
Um...did it fall directly into a controlled vacuum ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A giant rock has been on Earth for forty years, and just now they're discovering that it's contains organic compounds?
Um...did it fall directly into a controlled vacuum?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155532</id>
	<title>Panspermia? Yeah right.</title>
	<author>T Murphy</author>
	<datestamp>1266337980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I tried to explain on another website how this means life may have come to earth from space, and the only response I got was someone pointing out how I'm an idiot because this meteor is only from 40 years ago. He must be right, given no one would call someone an idiot when he himself is the idiot, so I must inform all of you panspermia is wrong and you should be ashamed of yourselves for believing it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I tried to explain on another website how this means life may have come to earth from space , and the only response I got was someone pointing out how I 'm an idiot because this meteor is only from 40 years ago .
He must be right , given no one would call someone an idiot when he himself is the idiot , so I must inform all of you panspermia is wrong and you should be ashamed of yourselves for believing it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I tried to explain on another website how this means life may have come to earth from space, and the only response I got was someone pointing out how I'm an idiot because this meteor is only from 40 years ago.
He must be right, given no one would call someone an idiot when he himself is the idiot, so I must inform all of you panspermia is wrong and you should be ashamed of yourselves for believing it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31162360</id>
	<title>Re:Does anyone have an actual link.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266325200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.pnas.org/content/107/7/2763.abstract?sid=300b2847-a085-4846-b7c6-b0ac3fd6fdc8" title="pnas.org" rel="nofollow">Like this?</a> [pnas.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like this ?
[ pnas.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like this?
[pnas.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31158344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156936</id>
	<title>Re:Panspermia? Yeah right.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266344640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The part I prefer is the "sperm" part of Panspermia.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The part I prefer is the " sperm " part of Panspermia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The part I prefer is the "sperm" part of Panspermia.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155532</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31157724</id>
	<title>Re:Published???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266347400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Heh.. heh heh.. </p><p>You said PNAS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Heh.. heh heh.. You said PNAS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heh.. heh heh.. You said PNAS.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155642</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155812</id>
	<title>Wildfire alert</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266339660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Call in Dr Jeremy Stone and his team</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Call in Dr Jeremy Stone and his team</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Call in Dr Jeremy Stone and his team</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155490</id>
	<title>science-ignorant article</title>
	<author>rubycodez</author>
	<datestamp>1266337800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looking at better news sources, one finds the scientists found over 14,000 organic compounds which contained (besides carbon), the hydrogen, sulfur, nitrogen, etc.   None of those things by themselves constitutes an organic substance.  Do kids even study chemistry in high school anymore?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looking at better news sources , one finds the scientists found over 14,000 organic compounds which contained ( besides carbon ) , the hydrogen , sulfur , nitrogen , etc .
None of those things by themselves constitutes an organic substance .
Do kids even study chemistry in high school anymore ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looking at better news sources, one finds the scientists found over 14,000 organic compounds which contained (besides carbon), the hydrogen, sulfur, nitrogen, etc.
None of those things by themselves constitutes an organic substance.
Do kids even study chemistry in high school anymore?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31157050</id>
	<title>yuo fail I9t?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266345000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">cans can become 'superi0r' machine.</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>cans can become 'superi0r ' machine .
[ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>cans can become 'superi0r' machine.
[goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155676</id>
	<title>Well, I for one...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266338820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Welcome our dark, smudgy, foul smelling organic overlords.</p><p>Oh wait, that's who's been here for millennia already. Damn. Damn. Damn!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Welcome our dark , smudgy , foul smelling organic overlords.Oh wait , that 's who 's been here for millennia already .
Damn. Damn .
Damn !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Welcome our dark, smudgy, foul smelling organic overlords.Oh wait, that's who's been here for millennia already.
Damn. Damn.
Damn!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156730</id>
	<title>Re:Teeming with organic molecules</title>
	<author>eleuthero</author>
	<datestamp>1266343980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have often wondered how this worked with the "martian" asteroids. The news articles never explained why the scientists involved were certain they came from Mars and why the bacteria in them had to have come from there - the answers to your post are somewhat helpful but I would still like to understand the methods behind it all a bit better.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have often wondered how this worked with the " martian " asteroids .
The news articles never explained why the scientists involved were certain they came from Mars and why the bacteria in them had to have come from there - the answers to your post are somewhat helpful but I would still like to understand the methods behind it all a bit better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have often wondered how this worked with the "martian" asteroids.
The news articles never explained why the scientists involved were certain they came from Mars and why the bacteria in them had to have come from there - the answers to your post are somewhat helpful but I would still like to understand the methods behind it all a bit better.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155434</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156016</id>
	<title>Re:Published???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266340800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A search into the isi web of knowledge does not link the mentioned author to the meteorite either. They may just have cited someone who has just commented without participating ?, nooooo<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... From his published papers it would appear that he is a good candidate for such an analytical work... I was hoping someone would find the paper... well there are other interesting and related articles available.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A search into the isi web of knowledge does not link the mentioned author to the meteorite either .
They may just have cited someone who has just commented without participating ? , nooooo ... From his published papers it would appear that he is a good candidate for such an analytical work... I was hoping someone would find the paper... well there are other interesting and related articles available .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A search into the isi web of knowledge does not link the mentioned author to the meteorite either.
They may just have cited someone who has just commented without participating ?, nooooo ... From his published papers it would appear that he is a good candidate for such an analytical work... I was hoping someone would find the paper... well there are other interesting and related articles available.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155642</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155652</id>
	<title>Titan has complex organics.</title>
	<author>Kupfernigk</author>
	<datestamp>1266338700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Article in February Scientific American says latest astronomical research shows that Titan has sand deserts where the grains are complex organic molecules. (a great place for a vacation - deserts of bituminous sand, littered with rocks made of water ice, and with occasional heavy methane showers. )</htmltext>
<tokenext>Article in February Scientific American says latest astronomical research shows that Titan has sand deserts where the grains are complex organic molecules .
( a great place for a vacation - deserts of bituminous sand , littered with rocks made of water ice , and with occasional heavy methane showers .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Article in February Scientific American says latest astronomical research shows that Titan has sand deserts where the grains are complex organic molecules.
(a great place for a vacation - deserts of bituminous sand, littered with rocks made of water ice, and with occasional heavy methane showers.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155348</id>
	<title>I for one</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266337080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>welcome our new meteor-dwelling overlords.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>welcome our new meteor-dwelling overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>welcome our new meteor-dwelling overlords.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155702</id>
	<title>Re:Teeming with organic molecules</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266339000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, it's one thing to have it covered in moss, it's another thing to find complex carbon-based molecules embedded into the structure. Rocks generally contain pockets, so you can tell if a molecule was there when the rock solidified or not. Plus, I'd imagine that the organic compounds found in space would have different concentrations than what you'd expect to find breezing around the outback.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , it 's one thing to have it covered in moss , it 's another thing to find complex carbon-based molecules embedded into the structure .
Rocks generally contain pockets , so you can tell if a molecule was there when the rock solidified or not .
Plus , I 'd imagine that the organic compounds found in space would have different concentrations than what you 'd expect to find breezing around the outback .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, it's one thing to have it covered in moss, it's another thing to find complex carbon-based molecules embedded into the structure.
Rocks generally contain pockets, so you can tell if a molecule was there when the rock solidified or not.
Plus, I'd imagine that the organic compounds found in space would have different concentrations than what you'd expect to find breezing around the outback.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155434</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156934</id>
	<title>Re:organic sources</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266344640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All this really proves is that these compounds are actually quite common, and all the talk about them being rare is baseless.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All this really proves is that these compounds are actually quite common , and all the talk about them being rare is baseless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All this really proves is that these compounds are actually quite common, and all the talk about them being rare is baseless.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155504</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156066</id>
	<title>Re:Proof there is a god</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266341100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Proof that he is opposed to panspermicidal Oz filtering of space porn too!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Proof that he is opposed to panspermicidal Oz filtering of space porn too !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Proof that he is opposed to panspermicidal Oz filtering of space porn too!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155622</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155596</id>
	<title>Soup Again?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266338400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>We already had soup yesterday <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/story/10/02/15/1729253/" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://science.slashdot.org/story/10/02/15/1729253/</a> [slashdot.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>We already had soup yesterday http : //science.slashdot.org/story/10/02/15/1729253/ [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We already had soup yesterday http://science.slashdot.org/story/10/02/15/1729253/ [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155622</id>
	<title>Proof there is a god</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266338580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The Murchison meteorite landed near a town of the same name... "</p><p>What are the odds for THAT happening?!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The Murchison meteorite landed near a town of the same name... " What are the odds for THAT happening ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The Murchison meteorite landed near a town of the same name... "What are the odds for THAT happening?
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155786</id>
	<title>failzo8S</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266339480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>standPoint, I don'[t you are a screaming Darren Reed, which what we've known</htmltext>
<tokenext>standPoint , I don ' [ t you are a screaming Darren Reed , which what we 've known</tokentext>
<sentencetext>standPoint, I don'[t you are a screaming Darren Reed, which what we've known</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155404</id>
	<title>2323 Origin of life in our solar system discovered</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266337380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>A passing space cruise liner flushing passenger waste as it passed our primordial solar system injected the base complex organic molecules needed to form life on our planet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A passing space cruise liner flushing passenger waste as it passed our primordial solar system injected the base complex organic molecules needed to form life on our planet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A passing space cruise liner flushing passenger waste as it passed our primordial solar system injected the base complex organic molecules needed to form life on our planet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31170056</id>
	<title>Re:wouldn't it be awesome</title>
	<author>valduboisvert</author>
	<datestamp>1265042820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>not a chemistry major here, but from what I know RNA has a greater instability than DNA. This is most of the time a problem in biological experiments. So I would be curious to find an ( scientific) answer to how come RNA can survive the harsh conditions of outer space plus harsh conditions of a meteorite impact/landing?</htmltext>
<tokenext>not a chemistry major here , but from what I know RNA has a greater instability than DNA .
This is most of the time a problem in biological experiments .
So I would be curious to find an ( scientific ) answer to how come RNA can survive the harsh conditions of outer space plus harsh conditions of a meteorite impact/landing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>not a chemistry major here, but from what I know RNA has a greater instability than DNA.
This is most of the time a problem in biological experiments.
So I would be curious to find an ( scientific) answer to how come RNA can survive the harsh conditions of outer space plus harsh conditions of a meteorite impact/landing?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155626</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155724</id>
	<title>They made a documentary about this years ago</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266339120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0064393/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.imdb.com/title/tt0064393/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0064393/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1416220_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156730
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155434
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1416220_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156586
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155380
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1416220_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31157660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155622
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1416220_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155702
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155434
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1416220_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1416220_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31159070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155642
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1416220_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31157724
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155642
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1416220_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31162360
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31158344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1416220_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155504
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1416220_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31170056
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1416220_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155976
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155504
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1416220_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155532
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1416220_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155622
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1416220_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31159934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155490
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1416220_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31159688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155532
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1416220_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31158154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1416220_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31157032
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1416220_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155622
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1416220_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155490
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1416220_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31158056
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155532
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1416220_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155642
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1416220_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1416220_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31167484
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1416220_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155504
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1416220_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31164154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1416220_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31158712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155504
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1416220_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31157372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155490
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1416220.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155504
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156934
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31158712
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155984
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155976
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1416220.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155348
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156550
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156430
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1416220.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155642
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31159070
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156016
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31157724
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1416220.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155380
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156586
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1416220.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155532
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31159688
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31158056
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156936
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1416220.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155470
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1416220.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155596
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1416220.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155626
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31167484
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31157032
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31170056
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31158154
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31164154
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1416220.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155404
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1416220.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156070
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1416220.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155434
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155702
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156730
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1416220.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155676
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1416220.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156304
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1416220.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155490
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31157372
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156448
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31159934
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156524
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1416220.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31158344
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31162360
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1416220.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31155622
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156862
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31157660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1416220.31156066
</commentlist>
</conversation>
