<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_16_0215232</id>
	<title>Acer Announces First NVIDIA Ion2-Based Netbook</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1266315720000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://hothardware.com/" rel="nofollow">MojoKid</a> writes <i>"Acer has just taken the wraps off the new Acer Aspire One 532G netbook at the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona. The machine is the first netbook with <a href="http://hothardware.com/News/Acer-Announces-Aspire-One-532g-With-Optimus-Tech-NextGen-ION/">dedicated next-generation NVIDIA ION 2 graphics</a> acceleration. The new Aspire One is also enabled with NVIDIA's recently announced <a href="//hardware.slashdot.org/story/10/02/09/1627231/NVIDIA-Shows-Off-Optimus-Switchable-Graphics-For-Notebooks">Optimus technology</a> to balance multimedia performance when needed, along with battery life savings, seamlessly switching to integrated Intel <a href="http://slashdot.org/submission/1137632/Intel-Launches-Next-Gen-Atom-N450-Processor">Atom/Pinetrail</a> graphics when it's not required. Word is Ion 2 is going to be outfitted with twice the number of shaders for even more graphics horsepower as well."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>MojoKid writes " Acer has just taken the wraps off the new Acer Aspire One 532G netbook at the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona .
The machine is the first netbook with dedicated next-generation NVIDIA ION 2 graphics acceleration .
The new Aspire One is also enabled with NVIDIA 's recently announced Optimus technology to balance multimedia performance when needed , along with battery life savings , seamlessly switching to integrated Intel Atom/Pinetrail graphics when it 's not required .
Word is Ion 2 is going to be outfitted with twice the number of shaders for even more graphics horsepower as well .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MojoKid writes "Acer has just taken the wraps off the new Acer Aspire One 532G netbook at the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona.
The machine is the first netbook with dedicated next-generation NVIDIA ION 2 graphics acceleration.
The new Aspire One is also enabled with NVIDIA's recently announced Optimus technology to balance multimedia performance when needed, along with battery life savings, seamlessly switching to integrated Intel Atom/Pinetrail graphics when it's not required.
Word is Ion 2 is going to be outfitted with twice the number of shaders for even more graphics horsepower as well.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31154384</id>
	<title>free software drivers?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266330720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can someone who knows these products tell me if these laptops will work well with free software, or are they are disaster like the Intel GMA500(right?) based laptops?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can someone who knows these products tell me if these laptops will work well with free software , or are they are disaster like the Intel GMA500 ( right ?
) based laptops ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can someone who knows these products tell me if these laptops will work well with free software, or are they are disaster like the Intel GMA500(right?
) based laptops?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153712</id>
	<title>GPU on netbooks?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266320040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Meh. Who needs graphics on netbooks anyway. It's not like you're going to use photoshop/CAD or play games  on them...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Meh .
Who needs graphics on netbooks anyway .
It 's not like you 're going to use photoshop/CAD or play games on them.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Meh.
Who needs graphics on netbooks anyway.
It's not like you're going to use photoshop/CAD or play games  on them...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153708</id>
	<title>Maybe I'll finally be able to buy a small laptop</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266319980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I travel a lot on business and for relatively extended periods of time (couple of weeks are not uncommon).</p><p>I also like to play "advanced" games. I just recently completed Dragon Age: Origins.</p><p>The problems is, that if I want a decent gaming performance I don't usually have a choice of a small laptop. I'm currently lugging around a 17" HP which works great, but is a bit heavy and eats batteries like candy<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p><p>Something smaller would be a nice change.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I travel a lot on business and for relatively extended periods of time ( couple of weeks are not uncommon ) .I also like to play " advanced " games .
I just recently completed Dragon Age : Origins.The problems is , that if I want a decent gaming performance I do n't usually have a choice of a small laptop .
I 'm currently lugging around a 17 " HP which works great , but is a bit heavy and eats batteries like candy : - ) Something smaller would be a nice change .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I travel a lot on business and for relatively extended periods of time (couple of weeks are not uncommon).I also like to play "advanced" games.
I just recently completed Dragon Age: Origins.The problems is, that if I want a decent gaming performance I don't usually have a choice of a small laptop.
I'm currently lugging around a 17" HP which works great, but is a bit heavy and eats batteries like candy :-)Something smaller would be a nice change.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31154470</id>
	<title>Re:She just love my big 10 inch</title>
	<author>dindi</author>
	<datestamp>1266331440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>These netbooks have a vga out, so cranking out more GFX power might be preferred by those who connect them to projectors (presentation or movie) or their primary display.</p><p>I got one of the Aspire One netbooks for my wife for Christmas and the only dislike (besides Windows on it - both of us are Mac apes) is the tini-tiny touch pad. Even the keyboard is usable with my large hands for touch typing. While it is a perfect drag-it-around-the-house-or-garden laptop it is what it is: good for mail and web, skype<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... and well, that is it..... but most people need a laptop for only these.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These netbooks have a vga out , so cranking out more GFX power might be preferred by those who connect them to projectors ( presentation or movie ) or their primary display.I got one of the Aspire One netbooks for my wife for Christmas and the only dislike ( besides Windows on it - both of us are Mac apes ) is the tini-tiny touch pad .
Even the keyboard is usable with my large hands for touch typing .
While it is a perfect drag-it-around-the-house-or-garden laptop it is what it is : good for mail and web , skype ... and well , that is it..... but most people need a laptop for only these .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These netbooks have a vga out, so cranking out more GFX power might be preferred by those who connect them to projectors (presentation or movie) or their primary display.I got one of the Aspire One netbooks for my wife for Christmas and the only dislike (besides Windows on it - both of us are Mac apes) is the tini-tiny touch pad.
Even the keyboard is usable with my large hands for touch typing.
While it is a perfect drag-it-around-the-house-or-garden laptop it is what it is: good for mail and web, skype ... and well, that is it..... but most people need a laptop for only these.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31156312</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe I'll finally be able to buy a small lapto</title>
	<author>PitaBred</author>
	<datestamp>1266342480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just bought an HP Envy. That thing chews up games (Radeon 5830, i5/i7 CPU choices), and with the extra slice, it'll go 6+ hours on normal-ish usage, maybe 3+ hours gaming. I can't complain a bit about it. And it's a 15.6", so a bit smaller than yours, as well as being a fair bit lighter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just bought an HP Envy .
That thing chews up games ( Radeon 5830 , i5/i7 CPU choices ) , and with the extra slice , it 'll go 6 + hours on normal-ish usage , maybe 3 + hours gaming .
I ca n't complain a bit about it .
And it 's a 15.6 " , so a bit smaller than yours , as well as being a fair bit lighter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just bought an HP Envy.
That thing chews up games (Radeon 5830, i5/i7 CPU choices), and with the extra slice, it'll go 6+ hours on normal-ish usage, maybe 3+ hours gaming.
I can't complain a bit about it.
And it's a 15.6", so a bit smaller than yours, as well as being a fair bit lighter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153708</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153710</id>
	<title>Pricing still unknown :(</title>
	<author>advocate\_one</author>
	<datestamp>1266320040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I so want one... but no doubt it will be done with a ridiculous straight dollars to pounds when, if ever, we see it in the UK...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I so want one... but no doubt it will be done with a ridiculous straight dollars to pounds when , if ever , we see it in the UK.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I so want one... but no doubt it will be done with a ridiculous straight dollars to pounds when, if ever, we see it in the UK...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153814</id>
	<title>Counter-TROLL</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266321780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If I were to summarize BadAnalogyGuy's scary initiatives I'd need only one word: meretricious. In the text that follows, I won't bother discussing the flaws in BadAnalogyGuy's logic because he surely doesn't use any logic. BadAnalogyGuy's pr&#233;cis can be subtle. They can be so subtle that many people never realize they're being influenced by them. That's why we must proactively notify humanity that I will never give up. I will never stop trying. And I will use every avenue possible to turn random, senseless violence into meaningful action.</p><p>I won't bore you with the details, but suffice it to say that when BadAnalogyGuy hears anyone say that he backstabs his dupes, his answer is to fortify a social correctness that restricts experience and defines success with narrow boundaries. That's similar to taking a few drunken swings at a beehive: it just makes me want even more to focus on the major economic, social, and political forces that provide the setting for the expression of a stuporous agenda. He obviously didn't have to pass an intelligence test to get to where he is today because his knowledge of how things work is completely off the mark. First of all, I am not interested in debating BadAnalogyGuy. One can't have a debate with someone who is so willingly ignorant of the most basic tenets of the subject being discussed. Are we going to step back and let him regulate wowserism? I can tell you this: I will be speaking out&mdash;every day and everywhere&mdash;to make sure that we do not. It is not uncommon for him to victimize the innocent, penalize the victim for making any effort to defend himself, and then paint the whole dirty affair as some great benefit to humanity.</p><p>If it were up to BadAnalogyGuy, schoolchildren would be taught reading, 'riting, and racism. He makes a living out of revanchism. I call this tactic of his "entrepreneurial revanchism". BadAnalogyGuy and his mercenaries have indubitably raised entrepreneurial revanchism to a fine art by using it to create a Frankenstein's monster.</p><p>BadAnalogyGuy has a talent for inventing fantasy worlds in which all it takes to solve our social woes are shotgun marriages, heavy-handed divorce laws, and a return to some mythical 1950s Shangri-la. Then again, just because BadAnalogyGuy is a prolific fantasist doesn't mean that we should derive moral guidance from his glitzy, multi-culti, hip-hop, consumption-oriented cop-outs. Far be it for me to cause an increase in disease, mandarinism, crime, and vice. It is similarly noteworthy that his effusions may have been conceived in idealism, but they quickly degenerated into naive, cruel militarism. What BadAnalogyGuy is doing is not an innocent, recreational sort of thing. It is a criminal activity, it is an immoral activity, it is a socially destructive activity, and it is a profoundly apolaustic activity. My point here is that in public, he vehemently inveighs against corruption and sin. But when nobody's looking, he never fails to oppose the visceral views of 98 percent of the nation's citizens.</p><p>There is still hope for our society, real hope&mdash;not the false sense of hope that comes from the mouths of morally questionable barmpots but the hope that makes you eager to weed out people like BadAnalogyGuy who have deceived, betrayed, and exploited us. It's debatable whether some deep void within BadAnalogyGuy makes it necessary for him to fleece us. However, no one can disagree that BadAnalogyGuy doesn't want to acknowledge that he should exercise greater judiciousness when extolling barbarism. In fact, BadAnalogyGuy would rather block all discussion on the subject. I suppose that's because he says that his debauches are the result of a high-minded urge to do sociological research. What he means by this, of course, is that he wants free reign to utilize legal, above-ground organizing in combination with illegal, underground tactics to endorse a complete system of leadership by mobocracy. Let me conclude by saying that we who want to educate the public on a range of issues will not rest until we do.</p><p><i>Also, BadAnalogyGuy has a smaller penis than CmdrTaco.</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I were to summarize BadAnalogyGuy 's scary initiatives I 'd need only one word : meretricious .
In the text that follows , I wo n't bother discussing the flaws in BadAnalogyGuy 's logic because he surely does n't use any logic .
BadAnalogyGuy 's pr   cis can be subtle .
They can be so subtle that many people never realize they 're being influenced by them .
That 's why we must proactively notify humanity that I will never give up .
I will never stop trying .
And I will use every avenue possible to turn random , senseless violence into meaningful action.I wo n't bore you with the details , but suffice it to say that when BadAnalogyGuy hears anyone say that he backstabs his dupes , his answer is to fortify a social correctness that restricts experience and defines success with narrow boundaries .
That 's similar to taking a few drunken swings at a beehive : it just makes me want even more to focus on the major economic , social , and political forces that provide the setting for the expression of a stuporous agenda .
He obviously did n't have to pass an intelligence test to get to where he is today because his knowledge of how things work is completely off the mark .
First of all , I am not interested in debating BadAnalogyGuy .
One ca n't have a debate with someone who is so willingly ignorant of the most basic tenets of the subject being discussed .
Are we going to step back and let him regulate wowserism ?
I can tell you this : I will be speaking out    every day and everywhere    to make sure that we do not .
It is not uncommon for him to victimize the innocent , penalize the victim for making any effort to defend himself , and then paint the whole dirty affair as some great benefit to humanity.If it were up to BadAnalogyGuy , schoolchildren would be taught reading , 'riting , and racism .
He makes a living out of revanchism .
I call this tactic of his " entrepreneurial revanchism " .
BadAnalogyGuy and his mercenaries have indubitably raised entrepreneurial revanchism to a fine art by using it to create a Frankenstein 's monster.BadAnalogyGuy has a talent for inventing fantasy worlds in which all it takes to solve our social woes are shotgun marriages , heavy-handed divorce laws , and a return to some mythical 1950s Shangri-la .
Then again , just because BadAnalogyGuy is a prolific fantasist does n't mean that we should derive moral guidance from his glitzy , multi-culti , hip-hop , consumption-oriented cop-outs .
Far be it for me to cause an increase in disease , mandarinism , crime , and vice .
It is similarly noteworthy that his effusions may have been conceived in idealism , but they quickly degenerated into naive , cruel militarism .
What BadAnalogyGuy is doing is not an innocent , recreational sort of thing .
It is a criminal activity , it is an immoral activity , it is a socially destructive activity , and it is a profoundly apolaustic activity .
My point here is that in public , he vehemently inveighs against corruption and sin .
But when nobody 's looking , he never fails to oppose the visceral views of 98 percent of the nation 's citizens.There is still hope for our society , real hope    not the false sense of hope that comes from the mouths of morally questionable barmpots but the hope that makes you eager to weed out people like BadAnalogyGuy who have deceived , betrayed , and exploited us .
It 's debatable whether some deep void within BadAnalogyGuy makes it necessary for him to fleece us .
However , no one can disagree that BadAnalogyGuy does n't want to acknowledge that he should exercise greater judiciousness when extolling barbarism .
In fact , BadAnalogyGuy would rather block all discussion on the subject .
I suppose that 's because he says that his debauches are the result of a high-minded urge to do sociological research .
What he means by this , of course , is that he wants free reign to utilize legal , above-ground organizing in combination with illegal , underground tactics to endorse a complete system of leadership by mobocracy .
Let me conclude by saying that we who want to educate the public on a range of issues will not rest until we do.Also , BadAnalogyGuy has a smaller penis than CmdrTaco .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I were to summarize BadAnalogyGuy's scary initiatives I'd need only one word: meretricious.
In the text that follows, I won't bother discussing the flaws in BadAnalogyGuy's logic because he surely doesn't use any logic.
BadAnalogyGuy's précis can be subtle.
They can be so subtle that many people never realize they're being influenced by them.
That's why we must proactively notify humanity that I will never give up.
I will never stop trying.
And I will use every avenue possible to turn random, senseless violence into meaningful action.I won't bore you with the details, but suffice it to say that when BadAnalogyGuy hears anyone say that he backstabs his dupes, his answer is to fortify a social correctness that restricts experience and defines success with narrow boundaries.
That's similar to taking a few drunken swings at a beehive: it just makes me want even more to focus on the major economic, social, and political forces that provide the setting for the expression of a stuporous agenda.
He obviously didn't have to pass an intelligence test to get to where he is today because his knowledge of how things work is completely off the mark.
First of all, I am not interested in debating BadAnalogyGuy.
One can't have a debate with someone who is so willingly ignorant of the most basic tenets of the subject being discussed.
Are we going to step back and let him regulate wowserism?
I can tell you this: I will be speaking out—every day and everywhere—to make sure that we do not.
It is not uncommon for him to victimize the innocent, penalize the victim for making any effort to defend himself, and then paint the whole dirty affair as some great benefit to humanity.If it were up to BadAnalogyGuy, schoolchildren would be taught reading, 'riting, and racism.
He makes a living out of revanchism.
I call this tactic of his "entrepreneurial revanchism".
BadAnalogyGuy and his mercenaries have indubitably raised entrepreneurial revanchism to a fine art by using it to create a Frankenstein's monster.BadAnalogyGuy has a talent for inventing fantasy worlds in which all it takes to solve our social woes are shotgun marriages, heavy-handed divorce laws, and a return to some mythical 1950s Shangri-la.
Then again, just because BadAnalogyGuy is a prolific fantasist doesn't mean that we should derive moral guidance from his glitzy, multi-culti, hip-hop, consumption-oriented cop-outs.
Far be it for me to cause an increase in disease, mandarinism, crime, and vice.
It is similarly noteworthy that his effusions may have been conceived in idealism, but they quickly degenerated into naive, cruel militarism.
What BadAnalogyGuy is doing is not an innocent, recreational sort of thing.
It is a criminal activity, it is an immoral activity, it is a socially destructive activity, and it is a profoundly apolaustic activity.
My point here is that in public, he vehemently inveighs against corruption and sin.
But when nobody's looking, he never fails to oppose the visceral views of 98 percent of the nation's citizens.There is still hope for our society, real hope—not the false sense of hope that comes from the mouths of morally questionable barmpots but the hope that makes you eager to weed out people like BadAnalogyGuy who have deceived, betrayed, and exploited us.
It's debatable whether some deep void within BadAnalogyGuy makes it necessary for him to fleece us.
However, no one can disagree that BadAnalogyGuy doesn't want to acknowledge that he should exercise greater judiciousness when extolling barbarism.
In fact, BadAnalogyGuy would rather block all discussion on the subject.
I suppose that's because he says that his debauches are the result of a high-minded urge to do sociological research.
What he means by this, of course, is that he wants free reign to utilize legal, above-ground organizing in combination with illegal, underground tactics to endorse a complete system of leadership by mobocracy.
Let me conclude by saying that we who want to educate the public on a range of issues will not rest until we do.Also, BadAnalogyGuy has a smaller penis than CmdrTaco.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153706</id>
	<title>She just love my big 10 inch</title>
	<author>BadAnalogyGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1266319920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Back to my fish for a minute. The tank has a volume of 11 gallons. But I hardly ever put that much water in it because the fish ends up bumping its head against the cover and it makes an annoying sound. So I thought about other ways I could keep the tank full without always adding more water, and I came up with a system of adding gravel every other day to raise the level of the water. If the water level falls too far, it becomes a problem for the external water filter. So by adding more baseline gravel, I can pretty much keep the water at a safe level.</p><p>When I change the water every other week, I remove some of that gravel so that I have a lower baseline to start from. If this were a larger tank like my old 50 gallon, this system of adding and removing gravel wouldn't work at all. There's just too much volume to make up in the larger tank.</p><p>So if the display size is only 10 inches, how much graphics horsepower is really needed? With a decent low-end decoder chip, you can pretty much get WXGA @ 30fps decoding. The additional polygons that the graphics chip can compute seems like it would be under utilized due to the small screen discouraging hardcore gameplay. I've got a netbook like this (an older version) and the ladies are duly impressed when I whip out my big 10 inch display.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Back to my fish for a minute .
The tank has a volume of 11 gallons .
But I hardly ever put that much water in it because the fish ends up bumping its head against the cover and it makes an annoying sound .
So I thought about other ways I could keep the tank full without always adding more water , and I came up with a system of adding gravel every other day to raise the level of the water .
If the water level falls too far , it becomes a problem for the external water filter .
So by adding more baseline gravel , I can pretty much keep the water at a safe level.When I change the water every other week , I remove some of that gravel so that I have a lower baseline to start from .
If this were a larger tank like my old 50 gallon , this system of adding and removing gravel would n't work at all .
There 's just too much volume to make up in the larger tank.So if the display size is only 10 inches , how much graphics horsepower is really needed ?
With a decent low-end decoder chip , you can pretty much get WXGA @ 30fps decoding .
The additional polygons that the graphics chip can compute seems like it would be under utilized due to the small screen discouraging hardcore gameplay .
I 've got a netbook like this ( an older version ) and the ladies are duly impressed when I whip out my big 10 inch display .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Back to my fish for a minute.
The tank has a volume of 11 gallons.
But I hardly ever put that much water in it because the fish ends up bumping its head against the cover and it makes an annoying sound.
So I thought about other ways I could keep the tank full without always adding more water, and I came up with a system of adding gravel every other day to raise the level of the water.
If the water level falls too far, it becomes a problem for the external water filter.
So by adding more baseline gravel, I can pretty much keep the water at a safe level.When I change the water every other week, I remove some of that gravel so that I have a lower baseline to start from.
If this were a larger tank like my old 50 gallon, this system of adding and removing gravel wouldn't work at all.
There's just too much volume to make up in the larger tank.So if the display size is only 10 inches, how much graphics horsepower is really needed?
With a decent low-end decoder chip, you can pretty much get WXGA @ 30fps decoding.
The additional polygons that the graphics chip can compute seems like it would be under utilized due to the small screen discouraging hardcore gameplay.
I've got a netbook like this (an older version) and the ladies are duly impressed when I whip out my big 10 inch display.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31154312</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe I'll finally be able to buy a small lapto</title>
	<author>Jeppe Salvesen</author>
	<datestamp>1266329880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you are willing to turn down the graphics settings, then you'll be able to get a smaller laptop that will also last you longer on battery.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you are willing to turn down the graphics settings , then you 'll be able to get a smaller laptop that will also last you longer on battery .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you are willing to turn down the graphics settings, then you'll be able to get a smaller laptop that will also last you longer on battery.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153708</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31155960</id>
	<title>Q&amp;A</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266340440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Q: What are some things you don't need in a netbook?</p><p>A:<br>&gt;&gt; its 1.66GHz Intel Atom N450 processor, GMA 3150 GPU graphics, 2GB of RAM and 320GB hard drive will be joined by a discrete NVIDIA GPU</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Q : What are some things you do n't need in a netbook ? A : &gt; &gt; its 1.66GHz Intel Atom N450 processor , GMA 3150 GPU graphics , 2GB of RAM and 320GB hard drive will be joined by a discrete NVIDIA GPU</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Q: What are some things you don't need in a netbook?A:&gt;&gt; its 1.66GHz Intel Atom N450 processor, GMA 3150 GPU graphics, 2GB of RAM and 320GB hard drive will be joined by a discrete NVIDIA GPU</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153960</id>
	<title>mod do38</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266324480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">long 7ime FreeBSD going to continue, How is the GNAA study. [rice.edu] so that you don't who are intersted eyes on the real I won't bore you leeson and users', BigAzz, his clash with</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>long 7ime FreeBSD going to continue , How is the GNAA study .
[ rice.edu ] so that you do n't who are intersted eyes on the real I wo n't bore you leeson and users ' , BigAzz , his clash with [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>long 7ime FreeBSD going to continue, How is the GNAA study.
[rice.edu] so that you don't who are intersted eyes on the real I won't bore you leeson and users', BigAzz, his clash with [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31155472</id>
	<title>Re:She just love my big 10 inch</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266337740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Am I the only person that wonders if Nvidia has a license for Intel's DMI?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only person that wonders if Nvidia has a license for Intel 's DMI ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only person that wonders if Nvidia has a license for Intel's DMI?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31155208</id>
	<title>Re:Netbooks are inexpensive</title>
	<author>ThePlague</author>
	<datestamp>1266336240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>These sorts of definitions are always sketchy, but it seems to me the one defining difference between what is usually called a notebook and what is called a netbook is the presence of an integrated optical drive.  Notebooks have them, netbooks don't.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These sorts of definitions are always sketchy , but it seems to me the one defining difference between what is usually called a notebook and what is called a netbook is the presence of an integrated optical drive .
Notebooks have them , netbooks do n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These sorts of definitions are always sketchy, but it seems to me the one defining difference between what is usually called a notebook and what is called a netbook is the presence of an integrated optical drive.
Notebooks have them, netbooks don't.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31154866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31165588</id>
	<title>Re:free software drivers?</title>
	<author>MojoStan</author>
	<datestamp>1266346980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Can someone who knows these products tell me if these laptops will work well with free software, or are they are disaster like the Intel GMA500(right?) based laptops?</p></div><p>Since no one who "knows" these products is giving good answers...
</p><p>
By "free" do you mean free drivers as well as OS? If you're okay with proprietary drivers, then Phoronix's articles on ION/Atom seem to show that they work well (by Linux standards) with Ubuntu and NVIDIA's proprietary drivers. 3D acceleration and video acceleration (VDPAU) both seem to work.
</p><ul>
<li> <a href="http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&amp;item=nvidia\_ion\_linux&amp;num=1" title="phoronix.com">NVIDIA ION Linux Performance (June 09, 2009)</a> [phoronix.com]</li>
<li> <a href="http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&amp;item=nvidia\_vdpau\_mobile&amp;num=1" title="phoronix.com">Using NVIDIA's VDPAU On Mobile Platforms (January 06, 2010)</a> [phoronix.com]</li>
</ul></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can someone who knows these products tell me if these laptops will work well with free software , or are they are disaster like the Intel GMA500 ( right ?
) based laptops ? Since no one who " knows " these products is giving good answers.. . By " free " do you mean free drivers as well as OS ?
If you 're okay with proprietary drivers , then Phoronix 's articles on ION/Atom seem to show that they work well ( by Linux standards ) with Ubuntu and NVIDIA 's proprietary drivers .
3D acceleration and video acceleration ( VDPAU ) both seem to work .
NVIDIA ION Linux Performance ( June 09 , 2009 ) [ phoronix.com ] Using NVIDIA 's VDPAU On Mobile Platforms ( January 06 , 2010 ) [ phoronix.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can someone who knows these products tell me if these laptops will work well with free software, or are they are disaster like the Intel GMA500(right?
) based laptops?Since no one who "knows" these products is giving good answers...

By "free" do you mean free drivers as well as OS?
If you're okay with proprietary drivers, then Phoronix's articles on ION/Atom seem to show that they work well (by Linux standards) with Ubuntu and NVIDIA's proprietary drivers.
3D acceleration and video acceleration (VDPAU) both seem to work.
NVIDIA ION Linux Performance (June 09, 2009) [phoronix.com]
 Using NVIDIA's VDPAU On Mobile Platforms (January 06, 2010) [phoronix.com]

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31154384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153824</id>
	<title>Re:GPU on netbooks?</title>
	<author>Yvanhoe</author>
	<datestamp>1266322140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sure, portable game platforms are so unusual anyway...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , portable game platforms are so unusual anyway.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, portable game platforms are so unusual anyway...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31154788</id>
	<title>Horsepower</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266333780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because fast CPUs or graphics cards are what's going to make the netbook/tablet market take off, am I right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because fast CPUs or graphics cards are what 's going to make the netbook/tablet market take off , am I right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because fast CPUs or graphics cards are what's going to make the netbook/tablet market take off, am I right?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153972</id>
	<title>What HD?</title>
	<author>mxh83</author>
	<datestamp>1266324720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does any netbook screen support 1920*1080 resolution?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does any netbook screen support 1920 * 1080 resolution ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does any netbook screen support 1920*1080 resolution?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153912</id>
	<title>Finally</title>
	<author>VinylPusher</author>
	<datestamp>1266323460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A netbook that ticks all my boxes. ION was almost there and now ION2 is going to fit the bill.</p><p>I suppose I really wanted one of those &gt;&pound;1,000 10 or 12 inch laptops, but was too put off by the price.</p><p>Thing is, the Atom processor is more than capable of running everything I want it to run. I didn't need a ULV Core2Duo (which seems to be the only defining factor between netbooks and uber-expensive mini-laptops).</p><p>Graphics - well, I do like my HD content and as for gaming... I like my indie titles. Some of them do 3D stuff that looks nice and simple, but still needs a bit of GPU grunt behind it.</p><p>This little Asus will fit in my rucksack (I do cycling to places to get some peace and quiet whilst working), can plug into my HD telly and has just enough screen real-estate to let me run the IDE's and editors I like.</p><p>If I see somewhere to pre-order, Job Done.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A netbook that ticks all my boxes .
ION was almost there and now ION2 is going to fit the bill.I suppose I really wanted one of those &gt;   1,000 10 or 12 inch laptops , but was too put off by the price.Thing is , the Atom processor is more than capable of running everything I want it to run .
I did n't need a ULV Core2Duo ( which seems to be the only defining factor between netbooks and uber-expensive mini-laptops ) .Graphics - well , I do like my HD content and as for gaming... I like my indie titles .
Some of them do 3D stuff that looks nice and simple , but still needs a bit of GPU grunt behind it.This little Asus will fit in my rucksack ( I do cycling to places to get some peace and quiet whilst working ) , can plug into my HD telly and has just enough screen real-estate to let me run the IDE 's and editors I like.If I see somewhere to pre-order , Job Done .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A netbook that ticks all my boxes.
ION was almost there and now ION2 is going to fit the bill.I suppose I really wanted one of those &gt;£1,000 10 or 12 inch laptops, but was too put off by the price.Thing is, the Atom processor is more than capable of running everything I want it to run.
I didn't need a ULV Core2Duo (which seems to be the only defining factor between netbooks and uber-expensive mini-laptops).Graphics - well, I do like my HD content and as for gaming... I like my indie titles.
Some of them do 3D stuff that looks nice and simple, but still needs a bit of GPU grunt behind it.This little Asus will fit in my rucksack (I do cycling to places to get some peace and quiet whilst working), can plug into my HD telly and has just enough screen real-estate to let me run the IDE's and editors I like.If I see somewhere to pre-order, Job Done.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31154866</id>
	<title>Netbooks are inexpensive</title>
	<author>Attila Dimedici</author>
	<datestamp>1266334320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The way I see things this is not a netbook. The pricing I was able to find is over $400. That makes this a small notebook. As far as I am concerned a netbook is a 10" or smaller screen and under $400. This market was created with computers in the $250 to $300 range. This is the second "netbook" I have seen in the last month that is approaching $500. The manufacturers don't seem to understand that a large part of what created the buzz around netbooks was the price.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The way I see things this is not a netbook .
The pricing I was able to find is over $ 400 .
That makes this a small notebook .
As far as I am concerned a netbook is a 10 " or smaller screen and under $ 400 .
This market was created with computers in the $ 250 to $ 300 range .
This is the second " netbook " I have seen in the last month that is approaching $ 500 .
The manufacturers do n't seem to understand that a large part of what created the buzz around netbooks was the price .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The way I see things this is not a netbook.
The pricing I was able to find is over $400.
That makes this a small notebook.
As far as I am concerned a netbook is a 10" or smaller screen and under $400.
This market was created with computers in the $250 to $300 range.
This is the second "netbook" I have seen in the last month that is approaching $500.
The manufacturers don't seem to understand that a large part of what created the buzz around netbooks was the price.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31155296</id>
	<title>What about other applications?</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1266336720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone know how am I supposed to connect this Ion2 chip to my ATtiny85? Is it with duct tape or crazy glue?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone know how am I supposed to connect this Ion2 chip to my ATtiny85 ?
Is it with duct tape or crazy glue ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone know how am I supposed to connect this Ion2 chip to my ATtiny85?
Is it with duct tape or crazy glue?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31159312</id>
	<title>Re:What HD?</title>
	<author>wagnerrp</author>
	<datestamp>1266353820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The resolution of the screen is completely irrelevant.  You have to be able to decode whatever format the video is in.  Scaling comes afterward.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The resolution of the screen is completely irrelevant .
You have to be able to decode whatever format the video is in .
Scaling comes afterward .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The resolution of the screen is completely irrelevant.
You have to be able to decode whatever format the video is in.
Scaling comes afterward.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153750</id>
	<title>Re:GPU on netbooks?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266320700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Meh. Who needs graphics on netbooks anyway. It's not like you're going to use photoshop/CAD or play games  on them...</p></div><p>I play games on mine!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) My current netbook plays stuff like GTA Vice City and Aliens vs Predator (1999) really well.</p><p>I'm about to replace it with an Alienware M11x so I can play modern stuff like Mass Effect 2 on the go. Basically it's a portable Xbox 360 for me. It should have the horsepower for most emulators too.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Meh .
Who needs graphics on netbooks anyway .
It 's not like you 're going to use photoshop/CAD or play games on them...I play games on mine !
: ) My current netbook plays stuff like GTA Vice City and Aliens vs Predator ( 1999 ) really well.I 'm about to replace it with an Alienware M11x so I can play modern stuff like Mass Effect 2 on the go .
Basically it 's a portable Xbox 360 for me .
It should have the horsepower for most emulators too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Meh.
Who needs graphics on netbooks anyway.
It's not like you're going to use photoshop/CAD or play games  on them...I play games on mine!
:) My current netbook plays stuff like GTA Vice City and Aliens vs Predator (1999) really well.I'm about to replace it with an Alienware M11x so I can play modern stuff like Mass Effect 2 on the go.
Basically it's a portable Xbox 360 for me.
It should have the horsepower for most emulators too.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31172402</id>
	<title>How much$?</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1265050200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Netbooks sell because they are cheap. How much will this ION 2 netbook cost? Too much and you just push yourself out of the market, as you can just get a better equipped (if not as small) laptop.</p><p>I am intrigued however. If they create a low cost netbook, that can run a game like WOW (I said run, not barely function), I might buy one just to have a portable WOW device for on the road (as well as all that other stuff like email, internet, etc...).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Netbooks sell because they are cheap .
How much will this ION 2 netbook cost ?
Too much and you just push yourself out of the market , as you can just get a better equipped ( if not as small ) laptop.I am intrigued however .
If they create a low cost netbook , that can run a game like WOW ( I said run , not barely function ) , I might buy one just to have a portable WOW device for on the road ( as well as all that other stuff like email , internet , etc... ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Netbooks sell because they are cheap.
How much will this ION 2 netbook cost?
Too much and you just push yourself out of the market, as you can just get a better equipped (if not as small) laptop.I am intrigued however.
If they create a low cost netbook, that can run a game like WOW (I said run, not barely function), I might buy one just to have a portable WOW device for on the road (as well as all that other stuff like email, internet, etc...).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31154172</id>
	<title>Re:She just love my big 10 inch</title>
	<author>tepples</author>
	<datestamp>1266327780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So if the display size is only 10 inches, how much graphics horsepower is really needed?</p></div><p>
A netbook's 1024x600 pixel display has about twice as many pixels as a Wii console, whose "Hollywood" GPU outputs 640x480 pixels. Therefore, a gaming netbook needs to process about twice the vertices and twice the pixels per second as Hollywood. Yet the consensus on Slashdot is that Intel GMA is <em>less</em> powerful than Hollywood, instead comparing to a Voodoo3 from a decade ago.
</p><p>
And as <a href="http://mobile.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1551164&amp;cid=31153812" title="slashdot.org">SpeedyDX pointed out</a> [slashdot.org], people can and do plug in bigger monitors.
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So if the display size is only 10 inches , how much graphics horsepower is really needed ?
A netbook 's 1024x600 pixel display has about twice as many pixels as a Wii console , whose " Hollywood " GPU outputs 640x480 pixels .
Therefore , a gaming netbook needs to process about twice the vertices and twice the pixels per second as Hollywood .
Yet the consensus on Slashdot is that Intel GMA is less powerful than Hollywood , instead comparing to a Voodoo3 from a decade ago .
And as SpeedyDX pointed out [ slashdot.org ] , people can and do plug in bigger monitors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So if the display size is only 10 inches, how much graphics horsepower is really needed?
A netbook's 1024x600 pixel display has about twice as many pixels as a Wii console, whose "Hollywood" GPU outputs 640x480 pixels.
Therefore, a gaming netbook needs to process about twice the vertices and twice the pixels per second as Hollywood.
Yet the consensus on Slashdot is that Intel GMA is less powerful than Hollywood, instead comparing to a Voodoo3 from a decade ago.
And as SpeedyDX pointed out [slashdot.org], people can and do plug in bigger monitors.

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31156006</id>
	<title>"is also enabled with X technology"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266340680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Okay, what is this "is enabled with" crap? Try "is based on" or "comes with" some other non-obfuscated form... I can't stand marketspeak any more.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Okay , what is this " is enabled with " crap ?
Try " is based on " or " comes with " some other non-obfuscated form... I ca n't stand marketspeak any more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Okay, what is this "is enabled with" crap?
Try "is based on" or "comes with" some other non-obfuscated form... I can't stand marketspeak any more.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31154026</id>
	<title>Re:What HD?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266325560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I realize you were probably being sarcastic, but the built-in display will handle 720p; if you want 1080p, you'll need to connect the computer to your TV via an HDMI cable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I realize you were probably being sarcastic , but the built-in display will handle 720p ; if you want 1080p , you 'll need to connect the computer to your TV via an HDMI cable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I realize you were probably being sarcastic, but the built-in display will handle 720p; if you want 1080p, you'll need to connect the computer to your TV via an HDMI cable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31155394</id>
	<title>Come on Acer!</title>
	<author>theJML</author>
	<datestamp>1266337320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>PLEASE get rid of the keyboard, and put a high-end touch screen in it's place, removing the existing hinged screen. It'd make it under<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.6" thick I'd think and it'd be a nice little powerhouse! Not to mention the awesome applications and interaction that could take place on a correctly done touch screen interface, in this form factor with wifi, bluetooth, and 3G. It's what the iPad should have been and it'd kick it's butt. I'll just keep waiting until this happens. I see no reason to get a netbook in it's current form. If I wanted all that I'd just buy a laptop and get a lot more for my money.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>PLEASE get rid of the keyboard , and put a high-end touch screen in it 's place , removing the existing hinged screen .
It 'd make it under .6 " thick I 'd think and it 'd be a nice little powerhouse !
Not to mention the awesome applications and interaction that could take place on a correctly done touch screen interface , in this form factor with wifi , bluetooth , and 3G .
It 's what the iPad should have been and it 'd kick it 's butt .
I 'll just keep waiting until this happens .
I see no reason to get a netbook in it 's current form .
If I wanted all that I 'd just buy a laptop and get a lot more for my money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>PLEASE get rid of the keyboard, and put a high-end touch screen in it's place, removing the existing hinged screen.
It'd make it under .6" thick I'd think and it'd be a nice little powerhouse!
Not to mention the awesome applications and interaction that could take place on a correctly done touch screen interface, in this form factor with wifi, bluetooth, and 3G.
It's what the iPad should have been and it'd kick it's butt.
I'll just keep waiting until this happens.
I see no reason to get a netbook in it's current form.
If I wanted all that I'd just buy a laptop and get a lot more for my money.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31166756</id>
	<title>They're late...</title>
	<author>TarMil</author>
	<datestamp>1265020980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My netbook already runs Ion3. And it sure as hell saves some graphics resources and battery.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My netbook already runs Ion3 .
And it sure as hell saves some graphics resources and battery .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My netbook already runs Ion3.
And it sure as hell saves some graphics resources and battery.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31154474</id>
	<title>Re:She just love my big 10 inch</title>
	<author>tehcyder</author>
	<datestamp>1266331440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've got a 24 incher, but I only use half of it as a rule...
<p>
*rimshot*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've got a 24 incher , but I only use half of it as a rule.. . * rimshot *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've got a 24 incher, but I only use half of it as a rule...

*rimshot*</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31155224</id>
	<title>Re:Netbooks are inexpensive</title>
	<author>Walter White</author>
	<datestamp>1266336300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...This is the second "netbook" I have seen in the last month that is approaching $500. The manufacturers don't seem to understand that a large part of what created the buzz around netbooks was the price.</p></div><p>I think they understand all too well. $200 - $300 (USD) machines were selling well and eating into the bigger profits they would have made on bigger and more expen$ive units. Smaller cheaper netbooks seem unlikely to come from the likes of Asus, Acer, Lenovo, Dell, etc.</p><p>Of course the other issue could be the need to run Win7 for whatever reason (pressure from Microsoft, lack of popularity of Linux.) That puts upward pressure on H/W requirements which also puts upward pressure on price.</p><p>Our best bet for a small cheap laptop is from some vendor in a related field - like cell phones - who does not have a laptop line to protect.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...This is the second " netbook " I have seen in the last month that is approaching $ 500 .
The manufacturers do n't seem to understand that a large part of what created the buzz around netbooks was the price.I think they understand all too well .
$ 200 - $ 300 ( USD ) machines were selling well and eating into the bigger profits they would have made on bigger and more expen $ ive units .
Smaller cheaper netbooks seem unlikely to come from the likes of Asus , Acer , Lenovo , Dell , etc.Of course the other issue could be the need to run Win7 for whatever reason ( pressure from Microsoft , lack of popularity of Linux .
) That puts upward pressure on H/W requirements which also puts upward pressure on price.Our best bet for a small cheap laptop is from some vendor in a related field - like cell phones - who does not have a laptop line to protect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...This is the second "netbook" I have seen in the last month that is approaching $500.
The manufacturers don't seem to understand that a large part of what created the buzz around netbooks was the price.I think they understand all too well.
$200 - $300 (USD) machines were selling well and eating into the bigger profits they would have made on bigger and more expen$ive units.
Smaller cheaper netbooks seem unlikely to come from the likes of Asus, Acer, Lenovo, Dell, etc.Of course the other issue could be the need to run Win7 for whatever reason (pressure from Microsoft, lack of popularity of Linux.
) That puts upward pressure on H/W requirements which also puts upward pressure on price.Our best bet for a small cheap laptop is from some vendor in a related field - like cell phones - who does not have a laptop line to protect.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31154866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31154828</id>
	<title>Re:What HD?</title>
	<author>jedidiah</author>
	<datestamp>1266334080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you "want" 1080p you just feed it to the GPU and let it scale it.</p><p>The beauty of a chipset that can decode any h264 you want to throw at it is that<br>you don't have to go to the bother of creating separate versions of your movies<br>for every different device you have or try to create some "lowest common denominator".<br>You just copy over the original m2ts file and not have to futz with anything.</p><p>Before too long, the storage overhead of doing this won't even seem problematic.</p><p>Video will be like audio: one file that plays everywhere without the need to translate<br>content for individual devices and no degredation on larger high quality displays.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you " want " 1080p you just feed it to the GPU and let it scale it.The beauty of a chipset that can decode any h264 you want to throw at it is thatyou do n't have to go to the bother of creating separate versions of your moviesfor every different device you have or try to create some " lowest common denominator " .You just copy over the original m2ts file and not have to futz with anything.Before too long , the storage overhead of doing this wo n't even seem problematic.Video will be like audio : one file that plays everywhere without the need to translatecontent for individual devices and no degredation on larger high quality displays .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you "want" 1080p you just feed it to the GPU and let it scale it.The beauty of a chipset that can decode any h264 you want to throw at it is thatyou don't have to go to the bother of creating separate versions of your moviesfor every different device you have or try to create some "lowest common denominator".You just copy over the original m2ts file and not have to futz with anything.Before too long, the storage overhead of doing this won't even seem problematic.Video will be like audio: one file that plays everywhere without the need to translatecontent for individual devices and no degredation on larger high quality displays.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31154026</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_0215232_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31154474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_0215232_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31159312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_0215232_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31165588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31154384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_0215232_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153750
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153712
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_0215232_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31154470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_0215232_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31155472
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_0215232_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31154828
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31154026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_0215232_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31156312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153708
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_0215232_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31154172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_0215232_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31155224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31154866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_0215232_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31155208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31154866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_0215232_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153824
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153712
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_0215232_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31154312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153708
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_0215232_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153814
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_0215232.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153712
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153750
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153824
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_0215232.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153710
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_0215232.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153706
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153814
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31154172
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31154474
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31155472
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31154470
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_0215232.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153972
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31154026
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31154828
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31159312
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_0215232.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31154866
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31155208
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31155224
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_0215232.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153912
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_0215232.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31154384
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31165588
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_0215232.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31153708
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31156312
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_0215232.31154312
</commentlist>
</conversation>
