<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_15_1738249</id>
	<title>Anti Terror Honor System</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1266255060000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Fortunately for us, the FAA has imposed <a href="http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1929195?utm\_source=feedburner&amp;utm\_medium=feed&amp;utm\_campaign=Feed\%3A+collegehumor\%2Fvideos+(CollegeHumor+Newest+Videos)">the honor system</a> as our next best defense against terrorism.  Hopefully this will allow them to increase the volume of non-bladder liquid I'm allowed to take on planes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fortunately for us , the FAA has imposed the honor system as our next best defense against terrorism .
Hopefully this will allow them to increase the volume of non-bladder liquid I 'm allowed to take on planes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fortunately for us, the FAA has imposed the honor system as our next best defense against terrorism.
Hopefully this will allow them to increase the volume of non-bladder liquid I'm allowed to take on planes.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31148416</id>
	<title>Reminds me of old times</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1266227640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You ever try to pick up some woman in a bar and have her ask you, "You're not a rapist or an axe murderer, are you?" This makes exactly as much sense as that question... I always want to respond "No I'm not... which is exactly the same answer a rapist or axe murderer would give you!" Or perhaps "No... but I am a pathological liar!" However, since those snarky answers would reduce the chances of my actually getting laid, I always just smiled and answered "No, of course not!" Which is exactly the same answer the terrorists will give.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You ever try to pick up some woman in a bar and have her ask you , " You 're not a rapist or an axe murderer , are you ?
" This makes exactly as much sense as that question... I always want to respond " No I 'm not... which is exactly the same answer a rapist or axe murderer would give you !
" Or perhaps " No... but I am a pathological liar !
" However , since those snarky answers would reduce the chances of my actually getting laid , I always just smiled and answered " No , of course not !
" Which is exactly the same answer the terrorists will give .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You ever try to pick up some woman in a bar and have her ask you, "You're not a rapist or an axe murderer, are you?
" This makes exactly as much sense as that question... I always want to respond "No I'm not... which is exactly the same answer a rapist or axe murderer would give you!
" Or perhaps "No... but I am a pathological liar!
" However, since those snarky answers would reduce the chances of my actually getting laid, I always just smiled and answered "No, of course not!
" Which is exactly the same answer the terrorists will give.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146276</id>
	<title>Re:Plz check the "Not here to commit acts of terro</title>
	<author>Pikkebaas</author>
	<datestamp>1266260280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I think from what I've heard, Israel does the most ardous security check ever and they do it without being dicks about it. They have intelligent agents, who ask the right questions and do not invade your personal space to intimidate you. And it seems to work for them, especially since they back it up with the kind of stuff Mossad did at Entebe (despite the international legalities of doing so),
</p></div><p>Have you read "The Pillars of Hercules" by Paul Theroux? There are some passages in there about entering Israel and the procedures involved.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think from what I 've heard , Israel does the most ardous security check ever and they do it without being dicks about it .
They have intelligent agents , who ask the right questions and do not invade your personal space to intimidate you .
And it seems to work for them , especially since they back it up with the kind of stuff Mossad did at Entebe ( despite the international legalities of doing so ) , Have you read " The Pillars of Hercules " by Paul Theroux ?
There are some passages in there about entering Israel and the procedures involved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think from what I've heard, Israel does the most ardous security check ever and they do it without being dicks about it.
They have intelligent agents, who ask the right questions and do not invade your personal space to intimidate you.
And it seems to work for them, especially since they back it up with the kind of stuff Mossad did at Entebe (despite the international legalities of doing so),
Have you read "The Pillars of Hercules" by Paul Theroux?
There are some passages in there about entering Israel and the procedures involved.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146146</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146154</id>
	<title>Not News For Nerds</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266259740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This barely even is worth putting on idle (easily the worst idea slashdot has had, and that's saying a lot) and its certainly not front page material.</p><p>CmdrTaco, you are definitely coasting now.. This site has turned to shit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This barely even is worth putting on idle ( easily the worst idea slashdot has had , and that 's saying a lot ) and its certainly not front page material.CmdrTaco , you are definitely coasting now.. This site has turned to shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This barely even is worth putting on idle (easily the worst idea slashdot has had, and that's saying a lot) and its certainly not front page material.CmdrTaco, you are definitely coasting now.. This site has turned to shit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31147274</id>
	<title>TERRORISM versus ESR</title>
	<author>Aan Cocks</author>
	<datestamp>1266265200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since the 2009 Iranian election protests, Eric S. Raymond, self-appointed public face of the hacker movement and alleged core developer of the Linux kernel, had been running wild thinking about wishing for Middle East problems spilling over into the Americas.</p><p>His long-standing suspicion of Islam, coupled with a throbbing curiosity about a people who wiped excrement from their backsides with their bare hands, had Eric in disarray. One minute he was conspiring with Iranian hackers in IRC, the next he was bolted to Fox News, foaming at the mouth and shouting at the television.</p><p>Alongside all of this were his trusty companions, a never-ending bottle of J&#228;germeister and his Glock.</p><p>Eric was just posting another rant to his blog when his 386 started swapping like a man at a computer auction; Felchmale was loading a new message.</p><p>
    From: emad.opensores@gmail.com<br>
    To: esr@catb.org<br>
    Date: JUN 20 2009 16:27<br>
    Subject: IRANIAN HACKER COMMUNIQU&#201;</p><p>
    Eric,</p><p>
    It's Emad.</p><p>
    I know we haven't spoken since that whole Michael incident, but I think we should put our heads together about these Iranian hackers.</p><p>
    Meet me at the Carney's Point Flying J at 10 PM. Get shower stall 16 and wait for me. I'll be wearing a Slashdot t-shirt and drinking Bawls.</p><p>
    Don't be late. The future of Iranian hackers depends on it. So does the security of America too I guess, and gun ownership or something.</p><p>
    Emad</p><p>Eric smiled, lurid and yellow, and checked his X11 clock. Just after 4:30. He had several hours before he was to meet Emad. He took a shot of J&#228;ger to celebrate and logged back into the Iranian hacker IRC channel. He shoved his glock down the front of his jeans, poured another shot of J&#228;ger, and logged into the Iranian IRC server.</p><p>Eric's glow-in-the-dark Casio calculator watch luminesced 9:59 PM at him in the darkened shower stall. He was at the Flyin' J's Travel Plaza near Penns Grove, New Jersey, and had just finished a Double Whopper with cheese and a king-sized order of onion rings. His cola sat nearby, untouched, since he'd spirited a fresh bottle of J&#228;germeister in with him by means of his Hackers bookbag. He was lucky to have found the rare tie-in merchandise on eBay and jumped at it; now the leader of hackers everywhere had an official bookbag.</p><p>Into his fourth shot of the night, Eric relished the ice-cold herbal liqueur. Emad was several minutes late, and Eric had taken the chance to make a particularly loud bowel movement and was now courtesy flushing for the third time in as many minutes. He downed his fifth shot of J&#228;germeister, whipped his sweatpants up to his belly, replaced his Glock in the waistband, and began some hacker stretches and exercises when he heard a knock at the door.</p><p>"Yes, can I help you?" Eric shouted through the thick steel door. "This shower is occupied."</p><p>"Just like Iran is occupied by the Great Satan of American interventionist politics?" came the reply from the other side.</p><p>Eric fumbled with the lock and opened the door with a scrape.</p><p>"Emad! As the leader of hackers around the world, I'd like to welcome you to my makeshift office!" Eric said, bowing. "We shall liberate our Iranian brothers this night!"</p><p>Emad looked around at the fastfood garbage, the bottle of J&#228;ger cocked in the urinal full of ice, and a tan, tank-like Toshiba laptop sitting propped on the sink. It smelled like feces slathered in Burger King onion ring sauce. A fly buzzed somewhere in the shower stall.</p><p>"Hello, Eric," Emad said, finally locking eyes as best he could with the leader of hackerdom before him. "Before we begin this, you must explain something to me."</p><p>"Uh, what's that, Emad? I thought we had this all planned out."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since the 2009 Iranian election protests , Eric S. Raymond , self-appointed public face of the hacker movement and alleged core developer of the Linux kernel , had been running wild thinking about wishing for Middle East problems spilling over into the Americas.His long-standing suspicion of Islam , coupled with a throbbing curiosity about a people who wiped excrement from their backsides with their bare hands , had Eric in disarray .
One minute he was conspiring with Iranian hackers in IRC , the next he was bolted to Fox News , foaming at the mouth and shouting at the television.Alongside all of this were his trusty companions , a never-ending bottle of J   germeister and his Glock.Eric was just posting another rant to his blog when his 386 started swapping like a man at a computer auction ; Felchmale was loading a new message .
From : emad.opensores @ gmail.com To : esr @ catb.org Date : JUN 20 2009 16 : 27 Subject : IRANIAN HACKER COMMUNIQU   Eric , It 's Emad .
I know we have n't spoken since that whole Michael incident , but I think we should put our heads together about these Iranian hackers .
Meet me at the Carney 's Point Flying J at 10 PM .
Get shower stall 16 and wait for me .
I 'll be wearing a Slashdot t-shirt and drinking Bawls .
Do n't be late .
The future of Iranian hackers depends on it .
So does the security of America too I guess , and gun ownership or something .
EmadEric smiled , lurid and yellow , and checked his X11 clock .
Just after 4 : 30 .
He had several hours before he was to meet Emad .
He took a shot of J   ger to celebrate and logged back into the Iranian hacker IRC channel .
He shoved his glock down the front of his jeans , poured another shot of J   ger , and logged into the Iranian IRC server.Eric 's glow-in-the-dark Casio calculator watch luminesced 9 : 59 PM at him in the darkened shower stall .
He was at the Flyin ' J 's Travel Plaza near Penns Grove , New Jersey , and had just finished a Double Whopper with cheese and a king-sized order of onion rings .
His cola sat nearby , untouched , since he 'd spirited a fresh bottle of J   germeister in with him by means of his Hackers bookbag .
He was lucky to have found the rare tie-in merchandise on eBay and jumped at it ; now the leader of hackers everywhere had an official bookbag.Into his fourth shot of the night , Eric relished the ice-cold herbal liqueur .
Emad was several minutes late , and Eric had taken the chance to make a particularly loud bowel movement and was now courtesy flushing for the third time in as many minutes .
He downed his fifth shot of J   germeister , whipped his sweatpants up to his belly , replaced his Glock in the waistband , and began some hacker stretches and exercises when he heard a knock at the door .
" Yes , can I help you ?
" Eric shouted through the thick steel door .
" This shower is occupied .
" " Just like Iran is occupied by the Great Satan of American interventionist politics ?
" came the reply from the other side.Eric fumbled with the lock and opened the door with a scrape. " Emad !
As the leader of hackers around the world , I 'd like to welcome you to my makeshift office !
" Eric said , bowing .
" We shall liberate our Iranian brothers this night !
" Emad looked around at the fastfood garbage , the bottle of J   ger cocked in the urinal full of ice , and a tan , tank-like Toshiba laptop sitting propped on the sink .
It smelled like feces slathered in Burger King onion ring sauce .
A fly buzzed somewhere in the shower stall .
" Hello , Eric , " Emad said , finally locking eyes as best he could with the leader of hackerdom before him .
" Before we begin this , you must explain something to me .
" " Uh , what 's that , Emad ?
I thought we had this all planned out .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since the 2009 Iranian election protests, Eric S. Raymond, self-appointed public face of the hacker movement and alleged core developer of the Linux kernel, had been running wild thinking about wishing for Middle East problems spilling over into the Americas.His long-standing suspicion of Islam, coupled with a throbbing curiosity about a people who wiped excrement from their backsides with their bare hands, had Eric in disarray.
One minute he was conspiring with Iranian hackers in IRC, the next he was bolted to Fox News, foaming at the mouth and shouting at the television.Alongside all of this were his trusty companions, a never-ending bottle of Jägermeister and his Glock.Eric was just posting another rant to his blog when his 386 started swapping like a man at a computer auction; Felchmale was loading a new message.
From: emad.opensores@gmail.com
    To: esr@catb.org
    Date: JUN 20 2009 16:27
    Subject: IRANIAN HACKER COMMUNIQUÉ
    Eric,
    It's Emad.
I know we haven't spoken since that whole Michael incident, but I think we should put our heads together about these Iranian hackers.
Meet me at the Carney's Point Flying J at 10 PM.
Get shower stall 16 and wait for me.
I'll be wearing a Slashdot t-shirt and drinking Bawls.
Don't be late.
The future of Iranian hackers depends on it.
So does the security of America too I guess, and gun ownership or something.
EmadEric smiled, lurid and yellow, and checked his X11 clock.
Just after 4:30.
He had several hours before he was to meet Emad.
He took a shot of Jäger to celebrate and logged back into the Iranian hacker IRC channel.
He shoved his glock down the front of his jeans, poured another shot of Jäger, and logged into the Iranian IRC server.Eric's glow-in-the-dark Casio calculator watch luminesced 9:59 PM at him in the darkened shower stall.
He was at the Flyin' J's Travel Plaza near Penns Grove, New Jersey, and had just finished a Double Whopper with cheese and a king-sized order of onion rings.
His cola sat nearby, untouched, since he'd spirited a fresh bottle of Jägermeister in with him by means of his Hackers bookbag.
He was lucky to have found the rare tie-in merchandise on eBay and jumped at it; now the leader of hackers everywhere had an official bookbag.Into his fourth shot of the night, Eric relished the ice-cold herbal liqueur.
Emad was several minutes late, and Eric had taken the chance to make a particularly loud bowel movement and was now courtesy flushing for the third time in as many minutes.
He downed his fifth shot of Jägermeister, whipped his sweatpants up to his belly, replaced his Glock in the waistband, and began some hacker stretches and exercises when he heard a knock at the door.
"Yes, can I help you?
" Eric shouted through the thick steel door.
"This shower is occupied.
""Just like Iran is occupied by the Great Satan of American interventionist politics?
" came the reply from the other side.Eric fumbled with the lock and opened the door with a scrape."Emad!
As the leader of hackers around the world, I'd like to welcome you to my makeshift office!
" Eric said, bowing.
"We shall liberate our Iranian brothers this night!
"Emad looked around at the fastfood garbage, the bottle of Jäger cocked in the urinal full of ice, and a tan, tank-like Toshiba laptop sitting propped on the sink.
It smelled like feces slathered in Burger King onion ring sauce.
A fly buzzed somewhere in the shower stall.
"Hello, Eric," Emad said, finally locking eyes as best he could with the leader of hackerdom before him.
"Before we begin this, you must explain something to me.
""Uh, what's that, Emad?
I thought we had this all planned out.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146130</id>
	<title>yes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266259620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>yes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>yes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146266</id>
	<title>Poop Dog.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266260220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Poop dog, baby. POOP DOG.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Poop dog , baby .
POOP DOG .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Poop dog, baby.
POOP DOG.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31147750</id>
	<title>Re:Plz check the "Not here to commit acts of terro</title>
	<author>jfenwick</author>
	<datestamp>1266267540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I think from what I've heard, Israel does the most ardous security check ever and they do it without being dicks about it.</p></div><p>
<a href="http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1135243.html" title="haaretz.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1135243.html</a> [haaretz.com]</p><p>
Yes, Israeli security never invades anyone's personal space.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think from what I 've heard , Israel does the most ardous security check ever and they do it without being dicks about it .
http : //www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1135243.html [ haaretz.com ] Yes , Israeli security never invades anyone 's personal space .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think from what I've heard, Israel does the most ardous security check ever and they do it without being dicks about it.
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1135243.html [haaretz.com]
Yes, Israeli security never invades anyone's personal space.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146146</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146350</id>
	<title>Quality</title>
	<author>xbeefsupreme</author>
	<datestamp>1266260580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The video wasn't even that funny.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The video was n't even that funny .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The video wasn't even that funny.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31148496</id>
	<title>Re:Plz check the "Not here to commit acts of terro</title>
	<author>icannotthinkofaname</author>
	<datestamp>1266228060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The video is actually fairly funny, heh the "never do it again".</p></div><p>"Also, you'll still have to take off your shoes."</p><p>That's ridiculous!  What am I going to do with my shoes, attack the President of the United States?  Don't be absurd!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The video is actually fairly funny , heh the " never do it again " .
" Also , you 'll still have to take off your shoes .
" That 's ridiculous !
What am I going to do with my shoes , attack the President of the United States ?
Do n't be absurd !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The video is actually fairly funny, heh the "never do it again".
"Also, you'll still have to take off your shoes.
"That's ridiculous!
What am I going to do with my shoes, attack the President of the United States?
Don't be absurd!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146146</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31148504</id>
	<title>Re:Part 3, please read</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266228120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow. They still ask if you're a member of the Communist Party. Did Joe McCarthy design the form?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow .
They still ask if you 're a member of the Communist Party .
Did Joe McCarthy design the form ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow.
They still ask if you're a member of the Communist Party.
Did Joe McCarthy design the form?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31258744</id>
	<title>Re:Reminds me of old times</title>
	<author>thickdiick</author>
	<datestamp>1265123280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>By responding "No, of course not!" you are supplicating to the woman, making yourself seem like a less-attractive man. You need to take control of the frame and not let her dictate the conversation. Untrained people will most likely direct the conversation to boring subjects. You must stop that from happening if she is to like you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>By responding " No , of course not !
" you are supplicating to the woman , making yourself seem like a less-attractive man .
You need to take control of the frame and not let her dictate the conversation .
Untrained people will most likely direct the conversation to boring subjects .
You must stop that from happening if she is to like you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By responding "No, of course not!
" you are supplicating to the woman, making yourself seem like a less-attractive man.
You need to take control of the frame and not let her dictate the conversation.
Untrained people will most likely direct the conversation to boring subjects.
You must stop that from happening if she is to like you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31148416</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31147954</id>
	<title>Re:Uhm....</title>
	<author>Geoffrey.landis</author>
	<datestamp>1266225420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I read news, and I also do read humor, but I agree, I like it when they're correctly labelled as to which is which.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I read news , and I also do read humor , but I agree , I like it when they 're correctly labelled as to which is which .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read news, and I also do read humor, but I agree, I like it when they're correctly labelled as to which is which.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31148104</id>
	<title>Re:What's next?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266226200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://xkcd.com/651/" title="xkcd.com" rel="nofollow">Here</a> [xkcd.com] you go<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here [ xkcd.com ] you go : - ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here [xkcd.com] you go :-).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31153838</id>
	<title>At work and loud</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266322320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thanks for the loud guitar riff ad mother fuckers.  Give a warning or something when these sites have loud ads.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks for the loud guitar riff ad mother fuckers .
Give a warning or something when these sites have loud ads .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks for the loud guitar riff ad mother fuckers.
Give a warning or something when these sites have loud ads.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146242</id>
	<title>oh well</title>
	<author>Fëanáro</author>
	<datestamp>1266260100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, that is a minute of my life I won't get back.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , that is a minute of my life I wo n't get back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, that is a minute of my life I won't get back.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146264</id>
	<title>THE FAA DOES NOT DO THIS!</title>
	<author>Suzuran</author>
	<datestamp>1266260220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>DHS is responsible for the Security Circus, not the FAA. Please put the blame where it belongs!</htmltext>
<tokenext>DHS is responsible for the Security Circus , not the FAA .
Please put the blame where it belongs !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DHS is responsible for the Security Circus, not the FAA.
Please put the blame where it belongs!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31148130</id>
	<title>hey, that could work!</title>
	<author>arielCo</author>
	<datestamp>1266226320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Judging by the stories I've read here and there, a straight look in the eye, asking more than twice and their gut feelings could actually work better than the current system.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Judging by the stories I 've read here and there , a straight look in the eye , asking more than twice and their gut feelings could actually work better than the current system .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Judging by the stories I've read here and there, a straight look in the eye, asking more than twice and their gut feelings could actually work better than the current system.
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146972</id>
	<title>New TSA logos</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266263820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In almost related news, ok ok not really, check out <a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/01/tsa\_logo\_contes.html" title="schneier.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/01/tsa\_logo\_contes.html</a> [schneier.com]</p><p>It's funny. Promise.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In almost related news , ok ok not really , check out http : //www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/01/tsa \ _logo \ _contes.html [ schneier.com ] It 's funny .
Promise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In almost related news, ok ok not really, check out http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/01/tsa\_logo\_contes.html [schneier.com]It's funny.
Promise.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31157850</id>
	<title>Re:Ironically...</title>
	<author>DeVilla</author>
	<datestamp>1266347940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>As humorous as that was, this is exactly the sort of security that actually works: looking people in the eyes, asking questions, being trained to skillfully detect what constitutes an honest response.</p></div><p>
Once you do that you are using <i>judgment</i>.  You are on the verge of profiling, or even worse racism.
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As humorous as that was , this is exactly the sort of security that actually works : looking people in the eyes , asking questions , being trained to skillfully detect what constitutes an honest response .
Once you do that you are using judgment .
You are on the verge of profiling , or even worse racism .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As humorous as that was, this is exactly the sort of security that actually works: looking people in the eyes, asking questions, being trained to skillfully detect what constitutes an honest response.
Once you do that you are using judgment.
You are on the verge of profiling, or even worse racism.

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31147206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146124</id>
	<title>Uhm....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266259620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is a link to College Humor... did Taco even mouse over?  Why is this on the front page?  Quit wasting my time while I'm wasting my employer's time!</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a link to College Humor... did Taco even mouse over ?
Why is this on the front page ?
Quit wasting my time while I 'm wasting my employer 's time !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a link to College Humor... did Taco even mouse over?
Why is this on the front page?
Quit wasting my time while I'm wasting my employer's time!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146786</id>
	<title>Re:Part 3, please read</title>
	<author>fastest fascist</author>
	<datestamp>1266262980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I suspect it's more that revoking citizenship is not a simple matter, but if it turns out you lied on the application form, and were therefore granted citizenship on false grounds, it can be revoked much more easily.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suspect it 's more that revoking citizenship is not a simple matter , but if it turns out you lied on the application form , and were therefore granted citizenship on false grounds , it can be revoked much more easily .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suspect it's more that revoking citizenship is not a simple matter, but if it turns out you lied on the application form, and were therefore granted citizenship on false grounds, it can be revoked much more easily.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31148068</id>
	<title>Why don't we focus on not pissing off countries?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266226020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nobody wakes up in the morning and says... "HEY, I have an idea.... just for the hell of it, let's go kill some American's"<br>They want to stop America from F'ing around with their country...... so.... why don't we do that?  Believe me, we have PLENTY of people here that need educating first.</p><p>Since FDR and before, the Constitution that PROTECTS your rights has been corrupted.  You have rights because you are a living breathing human... not because the Constitution 'gives' them to you.</p><p>Do a search for Michael Badnarik and his constitution class.  If you're not totally pissed off at the state of our country..... you're not in possession of the real facts.</p><p>EDUCATE YOURSELF!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nobody wakes up in the morning and says... " HEY , I have an idea.... just for the hell of it , let 's go kill some American 's " They want to stop America from F'ing around with their country...... so.... why do n't we do that ?
Believe me , we have PLENTY of people here that need educating first.Since FDR and before , the Constitution that PROTECTS your rights has been corrupted .
You have rights because you are a living breathing human... not because the Constitution 'gives ' them to you.Do a search for Michael Badnarik and his constitution class .
If you 're not totally pissed off at the state of our country..... you 're not in possession of the real facts.EDUCATE YOURSELF !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nobody wakes up in the morning and says... "HEY, I have an idea.... just for the hell of it, let's go kill some American's"They want to stop America from F'ing around with their country...... so.... why don't we do that?
Believe me, we have PLENTY of people here that need educating first.Since FDR and before, the Constitution that PROTECTS your rights has been corrupted.
You have rights because you are a living breathing human... not because the Constitution 'gives' them to you.Do a search for Michael Badnarik and his constitution class.
If you're not totally pissed off at the state of our country..... you're not in possession of the real facts.EDUCATE YOURSELF!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146930</id>
	<title>Re:Uhm....</title>
	<author>Arthur Grumbine</author>
	<datestamp>1266263640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm pretty sure this is actually an accurate representation of <a href="http://news.slashdot.org/story/10/02/10/2347257/Subversive-Groups-Must-Now-Register-In-South-Carolina" title="slashdot.org">South Carolina's advice</a> [slashdot.org] for the TSA.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty sure this is actually an accurate representation of South Carolina 's advice [ slashdot.org ] for the TSA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty sure this is actually an accurate representation of South Carolina's advice [slashdot.org] for the TSA.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146192</id>
	<title>Re:Uhm....</title>
	<author>courteaudotbiz</author>
	<datestamp>1266259920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Quit wasting my time while I'm wasting my employer's time!</p></div><p>I guess this is why it is tagged "Idle"...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Quit wasting my time while I 'm wasting my employer 's time ! I guess this is why it is tagged " Idle " .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Quit wasting my time while I'm wasting my employer's time!I guess this is why it is tagged "Idle"...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146146</id>
	<title>Plz check the "Not here to commit acts of terror"</title>
	<author>Gopal.V</author>
	<datestamp>1266259740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
I find that a hilarious option on my US entry form. Because you see if I was actually there to do something illegal, I'd be declaring it when I enter. Yeah, right.
</p><p>
But it makes sense as a sort of "But<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... but<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... but<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... he said so!" legal CYA move. (Wait, CYA<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... that sounds like something else).
</p><p>
I think from what I've heard, Israel does the most ardous security check ever and they do it without being dicks about it. They have intelligent agents, who ask the right questions and do not invade your personal space to intimidate you. And it seems to work for them, especially since they back it up with the kind of stuff Mossad did at Entebe (despite the international legalities of doing so),
</p><p>
The video is actually fairly funny, heh the "never do it again".
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I find that a hilarious option on my US entry form .
Because you see if I was actually there to do something illegal , I 'd be declaring it when I enter .
Yeah , right .
But it makes sense as a sort of " But ... but ... but ... he said so !
" legal CYA move .
( Wait , CYA ... that sounds like something else ) .
I think from what I 've heard , Israel does the most ardous security check ever and they do it without being dicks about it .
They have intelligent agents , who ask the right questions and do not invade your personal space to intimidate you .
And it seems to work for them , especially since they back it up with the kind of stuff Mossad did at Entebe ( despite the international legalities of doing so ) , The video is actually fairly funny , heh the " never do it again " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
I find that a hilarious option on my US entry form.
Because you see if I was actually there to do something illegal, I'd be declaring it when I enter.
Yeah, right.
But it makes sense as a sort of "But ... but ... but ... he said so!
" legal CYA move.
(Wait, CYA ... that sounds like something else).
I think from what I've heard, Israel does the most ardous security check ever and they do it without being dicks about it.
They have intelligent agents, who ask the right questions and do not invade your personal space to intimidate you.
And it seems to work for them, especially since they back it up with the kind of stuff Mossad did at Entebe (despite the international legalities of doing so),

The video is actually fairly funny, heh the "never do it again".
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146182</id>
	<title>Re:Uhm....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266259860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was just thinking the same thing... Surely this is something for idle?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was just thinking the same thing... Surely this is something for idle ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was just thinking the same thing... Surely this is something for idle?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31147320</id>
	<title>Re:Plz check the "Not here to commit acts of terro</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266265380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I find that a hilarious option on my US entry form. Because you see if I was actually there to do something illegal, I'd be declaring it when I enter. Yeah, right. </i></p><p>There is an offense called "lying to US Customs". If you're a foreigner caught lying to US Customs, the customs officer has the authority to ban you from the USA for up to 5 years. No judge, lawyer, jury, or appeal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I find that a hilarious option on my US entry form .
Because you see if I was actually there to do something illegal , I 'd be declaring it when I enter .
Yeah , right .
There is an offense called " lying to US Customs " .
If you 're a foreigner caught lying to US Customs , the customs officer has the authority to ban you from the USA for up to 5 years .
No judge , lawyer , jury , or appeal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I find that a hilarious option on my US entry form.
Because you see if I was actually there to do something illegal, I'd be declaring it when I enter.
Yeah, right.
There is an offense called "lying to US Customs".
If you're a foreigner caught lying to US Customs, the customs officer has the authority to ban you from the USA for up to 5 years.
No judge, lawyer, jury, or appeal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146146</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31152662</id>
	<title>We need a vote system for crappy submissions</title>
	<author>Nyder</author>
	<datestamp>1266260880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sure, we can moderate individuals posts, but how about stupid ass submissions like this?</p><p>While I like you Captain Chimichanga, I come here for news.   that was not news.  I expect better of you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , we can moderate individuals posts , but how about stupid ass submissions like this ? While I like you Captain Chimichanga , I come here for news .
that was not news .
I expect better of you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, we can moderate individuals posts, but how about stupid ass submissions like this?While I like you Captain Chimichanga, I come here for news.
that was not news.
I expect better of you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31152930</id>
	<title>GAY people are terrorists</title>
	<author>NSN A392-99-964-5927</author>
	<datestamp>1266351540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This is a link to College Humor... did Taco even mouse over?  Why is this on the front page?  Quit wasting my time while I'm wasting my employer's time!</p></div><p>haha ahaha muhAHAHA</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a link to College Humor... did Taco even mouse over ?
Why is this on the front page ?
Quit wasting my time while I 'm wasting my employer 's time ! haha ahaha muhAHAHA</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a link to College Humor... did Taco even mouse over?
Why is this on the front page?
Quit wasting my time while I'm wasting my employer's time!haha ahaha muhAHAHA
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31154124</id>
	<title>Re:</title>
	<author>clint999</author>
	<datestamp>1266327000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>"A few years ago, I was moving a new bed into my apartment, and this woman who lived in the building opened the front door for me with her key. She said, 'I'm not worried because a rapist wouldn't have a bed like that.' That's how she started the conversation. Now, what I should have said was nothing. What I did say was 'You'd be surprised.' '</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" A few years ago , I was moving a new bed into my apartment , and this woman who lived in the building opened the front door for me with her key .
She said , 'I 'm not worried because a rapist would n't have a bed like that .
' That 's how she started the conversation .
Now , what I should have said was nothing .
What I did say was 'You 'd be surprised .
' '</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"A few years ago, I was moving a new bed into my apartment, and this woman who lived in the building opened the front door for me with her key.
She said, 'I'm not worried because a rapist wouldn't have a bed like that.
' That's how she started the conversation.
Now, what I should have said was nothing.
What I did say was 'You'd be surprised.
' '
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31153164</id>
	<title>What if I change my mind ?</title>
	<author>Builder</author>
	<datestamp>1266310980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My big problem with that form is that you can't change your mind later. I mean, what if I am visiting the US on holiday, and I have only good intentions when I arrive, so I don't tick the box. But when I get there, I realise that the arrogant running imperial dogs must all die and decide to martyr myself for the cause.</p><p>Who do I see to get my form back to change the option? There are no contact details on the form and it seems to me that your government make it as hard as possible to update my details. So you see, it's not my fault that I have to break the law when I change my mind - you've forced me to this by not providing a simple way to update my details!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My big problem with that form is that you ca n't change your mind later .
I mean , what if I am visiting the US on holiday , and I have only good intentions when I arrive , so I do n't tick the box .
But when I get there , I realise that the arrogant running imperial dogs must all die and decide to martyr myself for the cause.Who do I see to get my form back to change the option ?
There are no contact details on the form and it seems to me that your government make it as hard as possible to update my details .
So you see , it 's not my fault that I have to break the law when I change my mind - you 've forced me to this by not providing a simple way to update my details !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My big problem with that form is that you can't change your mind later.
I mean, what if I am visiting the US on holiday, and I have only good intentions when I arrive, so I don't tick the box.
But when I get there, I realise that the arrogant running imperial dogs must all die and decide to martyr myself for the cause.Who do I see to get my form back to change the option?
There are no contact details on the form and it seems to me that your government make it as hard as possible to update my details.
So you see, it's not my fault that I have to break the law when I change my mind - you've forced me to this by not providing a simple way to update my details!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146146</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146404</id>
	<title>Y'know...</title>
	<author>TheSpoom</author>
	<datestamp>1266260880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm OK with the idle section, so long as articles that belong there are categorized as such.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm OK with the idle section , so long as articles that belong there are categorized as such .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm OK with the idle section, so long as articles that belong there are categorized as such.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31147206</id>
	<title>Ironically...</title>
	<author>epp\_b</author>
	<datestamp>1266264840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>As humorous as that was, this is exactly the sort of security that actually works: looking people in the eyes, asking questions, being trained to skillfully detect what constitutes an honest response.<br> <br>

The general stupid masses of the western world see the fancy x-ray machines, silvery conveyor tables and shiny rent-a-cop badges and think this somehow translates to better security.  But this is not security, this is an illusion of security.  This is just put on for show so that your representatives in government (hahahaha... I know) can appear to be doing something about those dern terrrrists.<br> <br>

Security is not a product or a technology.  Security, in the case of an airport, is an active process of identifying risks through layers of highly-trained intelligence personel; not high school drop-outs hired to press buttons.<br> <br>

Wait, why does that <a href="http://www.thestar.com/news/world/article/744199---israelification-high-security-little-bother" title="thestar.com">sound familiar?</a> [thestar.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>As humorous as that was , this is exactly the sort of security that actually works : looking people in the eyes , asking questions , being trained to skillfully detect what constitutes an honest response .
The general stupid masses of the western world see the fancy x-ray machines , silvery conveyor tables and shiny rent-a-cop badges and think this somehow translates to better security .
But this is not security , this is an illusion of security .
This is just put on for show so that your representatives in government ( hahahaha... I know ) can appear to be doing something about those dern terrrrists .
Security is not a product or a technology .
Security , in the case of an airport , is an active process of identifying risks through layers of highly-trained intelligence personel ; not high school drop-outs hired to press buttons .
Wait , why does that sound familiar ?
[ thestar.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As humorous as that was, this is exactly the sort of security that actually works: looking people in the eyes, asking questions, being trained to skillfully detect what constitutes an honest response.
The general stupid masses of the western world see the fancy x-ray machines, silvery conveyor tables and shiny rent-a-cop badges and think this somehow translates to better security.
But this is not security, this is an illusion of security.
This is just put on for show so that your representatives in government (hahahaha... I know) can appear to be doing something about those dern terrrrists.
Security is not a product or a technology.
Security, in the case of an airport, is an active process of identifying risks through layers of highly-trained intelligence personel; not high school drop-outs hired to press buttons.
Wait, why does that sound familiar?
[thestar.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31153628</id>
	<title>Re:Uhm....</title>
	<author>dugeen</author>
	<datestamp>1266318420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We aren't wasting our employers' time. We're keeping abreast of developments in the industry. In fact, I'm using my break time to do so, so really I'm entitled to credit rather than reproach.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We are n't wasting our employers ' time .
We 're keeping abreast of developments in the industry .
In fact , I 'm using my break time to do so , so really I 'm entitled to credit rather than reproach .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We aren't wasting our employers' time.
We're keeping abreast of developments in the industry.
In fact, I'm using my break time to do so, so really I'm entitled to credit rather than reproach.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146444</id>
	<title>What's next?</title>
	<author>dotfile</author>
	<datestamp>1266261060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is it such a slow tech news day that we're going to see links to 4chan and xkcd all day?
<br> <br>
Jeebus.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it such a slow tech news day that we 're going to see links to 4chan and xkcd all day ?
Jeebus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it such a slow tech news day that we're going to see links to 4chan and xkcd all day?
Jeebus.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146158</id>
	<title>Part 3, please read</title>
	<author>BadAnalogyGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1266259740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The following URL is a petition for permanent residence in the United States of America.</p><p><a href="http://www.uscis.gov/files/form/i-485.pdf" title="uscis.gov" rel="nofollow">http://www.uscis.gov/files/form/i-485.pdf</a> [uscis.gov]</p><p>Part 3 is the part that catches terrorists.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The following URL is a petition for permanent residence in the United States of America.http : //www.uscis.gov/files/form/i-485.pdf [ uscis.gov ] Part 3 is the part that catches terrorists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The following URL is a petition for permanent residence in the United States of America.http://www.uscis.gov/files/form/i-485.pdf [uscis.gov]Part 3 is the part that catches terrorists.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146170</id>
	<title>Anecdotally Effective</title>
	<author>thethirdwheel</author>
	<datestamp>1266259800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Based on their experience with the finger-crosser, I'd say this is a stunningly effective anti-terror mechanism</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Based on their experience with the finger-crosser , I 'd say this is a stunningly effective anti-terror mechanism</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Based on their experience with the finger-crosser, I'd say this is a stunningly effective anti-terror mechanism</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146224</id>
	<title>Really?</title>
	<author>Velorium</author>
	<datestamp>1266260040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Put this in Idle, not in Tech where I expect actual news.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Put this in Idle , not in Tech where I expect actual news .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Put this in Idle, not in Tech where I expect actual news.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146718</id>
	<title>Re:Part 3, please read</title>
	<author>JWSmythe</author>
	<datestamp>1266262620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; So does an "Yes"   Part 3 Item 3a get hot chicks into the country?   It seems like a good filter.  "She's hot.  She's worked as a prostitute.  We can ask for a few "favors" to make her paperwork move easier."</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; I'd do Part 3 Item 14, except having one at a time is bad enough.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>    So does an " Yes " Part 3 Item 3a get hot chicks into the country ?
It seems like a good filter .
" She 's hot .
She 's worked as a prostitute .
We can ask for a few " favors " to make her paperwork move easier .
"       I 'd do Part 3 Item 14 , except having one at a time is bad enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
    So does an "Yes"   Part 3 Item 3a get hot chicks into the country?
It seems like a good filter.
"She's hot.
She's worked as a prostitute.
We can ask for a few "favors" to make her paperwork move easier.
"
      I'd do Part 3 Item 14, except having one at a time is bad enough.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31148158</id>
	<title>Re:Plz check the "Not here to commit acts of terro</title>
	<author>commodoresloat</author>
	<datestamp>1266226500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I think from what I've heard, Israel does the most ardous security check ever and they do it without being dicks about it. They have intelligent agents, who ask the right questions and do not invade your personal space to intimidate you.</p></div><p>I'm guessing you've never gone through this security check as a young Arab male.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think from what I 've heard , Israel does the most ardous security check ever and they do it without being dicks about it .
They have intelligent agents , who ask the right questions and do not invade your personal space to intimidate you.I 'm guessing you 've never gone through this security check as a young Arab male .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think from what I've heard, Israel does the most ardous security check ever and they do it without being dicks about it.
They have intelligent agents, who ask the right questions and do not invade your personal space to intimidate you.I'm guessing you've never gone through this security check as a young Arab male.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146146</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31154672</id>
	<title>Re:Ironically...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266332940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Queue the slashdot faggots sucking Bruce Schneier's cock.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Queue the slashdot faggots sucking Bruce Schneier 's cock .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Queue the slashdot faggots sucking Bruce Schneier's cock.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31147206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146524</id>
	<title>I'm incapable of laughter you insensitive clod!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266261540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oops that was meant for the Slashdot editor, not you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oops that was meant for the Slashdot editor , not you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oops that was meant for the Slashdot editor, not you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31148054</id>
	<title>Re:Uhm....</title>
	<author>newdsfornerds</author>
	<datestamp>1266225960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree. The collegehumor.com video wasn't all the funny either. Colbert could pull stuff better than that out of his hat before he's had his coffee.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree .
The collegehumor.com video was n't all the funny either .
Colbert could pull stuff better than that out of his hat before he 's had his coffee .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree.
The collegehumor.com video wasn't all the funny either.
Colbert could pull stuff better than that out of his hat before he's had his coffee.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31148012</id>
	<title>Re:Plz check the "Not here to commit acts of terro</title>
	<author>stephanruby</author>
	<datestamp>1266225660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I find that a hilarious option on my US entry form. Because you see if I was actually there to do something illegal, I'd be declaring it when I enter. Yeah, right.</p> </div><p>Out of <a href="http://images.google.com/images?q=us+customs+form&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;ei=HqB5S6OHGIOOtAP1iPjLCA&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=image\_result\_group&amp;ct=title&amp;resnum=4&amp;ved=0CDEQsAQwAw" title="google.com">these</a> [google.com] US Customs forms, can you point to the one that said that.</p><p> I looked at a few of them, and couldn't find the entry you mentioned.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>I think from what I've heard, Israel does the most ardous security check ever and they do it without being dicks about it.</p></div><p>
Not according to one plaintiff on Judge Judy (not a big sample I know, but I've never heard anyone else other than him describe their experience with Israeli Airport guards). The guy sued EL AL (Air Israel), the guards basically had diplomatic immunity -- so he couldn't sue them directly, but the guards were real dickheads to him (because supposedly, he had brown skin -- although he was Israeli and Jewish himself).</p><p>So if you go by that measure, how did they treat me, or how do they treat white people in general, then the cops in the US -- especially the local Sheriffs in the backwaters of the South -- are probably some of the nicest and most courteous cops in the World -- assuming you really do go by that measure.
</p><p><div class="quote"><p>They have intelligent agents, who ask the right questions and do not invade your personal space to intimidate you.</p></div><p>
Yeah, if I were an Israeli airport guard, I'd probably stand a couple of feet away from the possible suicide bomber too. </p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I find that a hilarious option on my US entry form .
Because you see if I was actually there to do something illegal , I 'd be declaring it when I enter .
Yeah , right .
Out of these [ google.com ] US Customs forms , can you point to the one that said that .
I looked at a few of them , and could n't find the entry you mentioned.I think from what I 've heard , Israel does the most ardous security check ever and they do it without being dicks about it .
Not according to one plaintiff on Judge Judy ( not a big sample I know , but I 've never heard anyone else other than him describe their experience with Israeli Airport guards ) .
The guy sued EL AL ( Air Israel ) , the guards basically had diplomatic immunity -- so he could n't sue them directly , but the guards were real dickheads to him ( because supposedly , he had brown skin -- although he was Israeli and Jewish himself ) .So if you go by that measure , how did they treat me , or how do they treat white people in general , then the cops in the US -- especially the local Sheriffs in the backwaters of the South -- are probably some of the nicest and most courteous cops in the World -- assuming you really do go by that measure .
They have intelligent agents , who ask the right questions and do not invade your personal space to intimidate you .
Yeah , if I were an Israeli airport guard , I 'd probably stand a couple of feet away from the possible suicide bomber too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I find that a hilarious option on my US entry form.
Because you see if I was actually there to do something illegal, I'd be declaring it when I enter.
Yeah, right.
Out of these [google.com] US Customs forms, can you point to the one that said that.
I looked at a few of them, and couldn't find the entry you mentioned.I think from what I've heard, Israel does the most ardous security check ever and they do it without being dicks about it.
Not according to one plaintiff on Judge Judy (not a big sample I know, but I've never heard anyone else other than him describe their experience with Israeli Airport guards).
The guy sued EL AL (Air Israel), the guards basically had diplomatic immunity -- so he couldn't sue them directly, but the guards were real dickheads to him (because supposedly, he had brown skin -- although he was Israeli and Jewish himself).So if you go by that measure, how did they treat me, or how do they treat white people in general, then the cops in the US -- especially the local Sheriffs in the backwaters of the South -- are probably some of the nicest and most courteous cops in the World -- assuming you really do go by that measure.
They have intelligent agents, who ask the right questions and do not invade your personal space to intimidate you.
Yeah, if I were an Israeli airport guard, I'd probably stand a couple of feet away from the possible suicide bomber too. 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146146</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1738249_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31148496
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1738249_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1738249_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31148104
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1738249_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146158
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1738249_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31157850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31147206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1738249_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31148054
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1738249_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31148504
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146158
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1738249_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1738249_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31258744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31148416
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1738249_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31153164
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1738249_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1738249_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146266
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1738249_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146158
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1738249_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31152930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1738249_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1738249_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31153628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1738249_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31154672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31147206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1738249_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31147954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1738249_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31147320
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1738249_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31147750
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1738249_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1738249_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31148012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1738249_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31148158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1738249.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31147206
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31154672
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31157850
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1738249.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146264
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1738249.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31152662
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1738249.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146972
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1738249.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146158
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146718
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31148504
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146786
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1738249.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31148416
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31258744
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1738249.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146124
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31152930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31153628
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31148054
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146182
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31147954
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146266
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146524
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1738249.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146444
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31148104
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1738249.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146146
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31147750
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31148158
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146276
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31153164
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31148012
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31147320
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31148496
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1738249.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1738249.31146224
</commentlist>
</conversation>
