<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_15_0223251</id>
	<title>Hands On With Notion Ink's Pixel-Qi Equipped Adam Tablet</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1266227400000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Jax7 writes with this snippet from Technoholik, which dispatched a team with a video camera to get some <a href="http://www.technoholik.com/news/sneak-peek-video-notion-ink-adam/">early footage of the upcoming Android Tablet from Notion Ink</a>, with Android and a Pixel-Qi transflective screen. Also interesting is the back-mounted touchpad.

<i>"We flew down to Hyderabad and caught up with the Notion Ink team just before they left for Barcelona to showcase the Android-based tablet tomorrow at the Mobile World Congress. Note that this product was 'one engineering day short' but we aren't complaining since we literally badgered them into giving us this sneak peak. The top panel over the screen was still a bit loose, so they took it off before booting the system."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Jax7 writes with this snippet from Technoholik , which dispatched a team with a video camera to get some early footage of the upcoming Android Tablet from Notion Ink , with Android and a Pixel-Qi transflective screen .
Also interesting is the back-mounted touchpad .
" We flew down to Hyderabad and caught up with the Notion Ink team just before they left for Barcelona to showcase the Android-based tablet tomorrow at the Mobile World Congress .
Note that this product was 'one engineering day short ' but we are n't complaining since we literally badgered them into giving us this sneak peak .
The top panel over the screen was still a bit loose , so they took it off before booting the system .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jax7 writes with this snippet from Technoholik, which dispatched a team with a video camera to get some early footage of the upcoming Android Tablet from Notion Ink, with Android and a Pixel-Qi transflective screen.
Also interesting is the back-mounted touchpad.
"We flew down to Hyderabad and caught up with the Notion Ink team just before they left for Barcelona to showcase the Android-based tablet tomorrow at the Mobile World Congress.
Note that this product was 'one engineering day short' but we aren't complaining since we literally badgered them into giving us this sneak peak.
The top panel over the screen was still a bit loose, so they took it off before booting the system.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31143646</id>
	<title>Re:"literally badgered"</title>
	<author>oddaddresstrap</author>
	<datestamp>1266247560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nah, you only use real badgers when you need to literally rip somebody a new one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nah , you only use real badgers when you need to literally rip somebody a new one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nah, you only use real badgers when you need to literally rip somebody a new one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142374</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31144054</id>
	<title>Re:Think Kick Ass Book - Not Computer</title>
	<author>phaggood</author>
	<datestamp>1266249660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>clicking thru to the 'pictures' link in the article, a <a href="http://www.technoholik.com/news/exclusive-a-sneak-peek-at-the-notion-ink-adam-tablet-specs-pics/" title="technoholik.com" rel="nofollow">comparison chart</a> [technoholik.com] between this device and the iPad says it should be somwehere between $327-$800.</htmltext>
<tokenext>clicking thru to the 'pictures ' link in the article , a comparison chart [ technoholik.com ] between this device and the iPad says it should be somwehere between $ 327- $ 800 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>clicking thru to the 'pictures' link in the article, a comparison chart [technoholik.com] between this device and the iPad says it should be somwehere between $327-$800.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142914</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142340</id>
	<title>Like the LCD</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266232200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The LCD does look pretty impressive, it seems like it would totally address all of the concerns of those who claim you can't read books on an LCD.  They forget that no LCD is emissive, they are all reflective at heart... it's just a matter of what the light source is.</p><p>I think the form factor seems decent, I like the faux notebook look and I think the bulge up top is to let you get to the trackpad easily when the device is on your lap - though the trackpad on the back seems a little wierd when you already have a touch-screen, it will be interesting to play with that and see how it works in practice.</p><p>The only thing that I saw as a potential downside is the tracking looked kind of slow - when he scribbled rapidly across the screen it lost almost all the input, it was only when they drew much slower that it worked and even then there was a little lag.  But hey, they are still working on the software.  I wonder what the SDK is like for this device, since it's Android what have they added I wonder?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The LCD does look pretty impressive , it seems like it would totally address all of the concerns of those who claim you ca n't read books on an LCD .
They forget that no LCD is emissive , they are all reflective at heart... it 's just a matter of what the light source is.I think the form factor seems decent , I like the faux notebook look and I think the bulge up top is to let you get to the trackpad easily when the device is on your lap - though the trackpad on the back seems a little wierd when you already have a touch-screen , it will be interesting to play with that and see how it works in practice.The only thing that I saw as a potential downside is the tracking looked kind of slow - when he scribbled rapidly across the screen it lost almost all the input , it was only when they drew much slower that it worked and even then there was a little lag .
But hey , they are still working on the software .
I wonder what the SDK is like for this device , since it 's Android what have they added I wonder ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The LCD does look pretty impressive, it seems like it would totally address all of the concerns of those who claim you can't read books on an LCD.
They forget that no LCD is emissive, they are all reflective at heart... it's just a matter of what the light source is.I think the form factor seems decent, I like the faux notebook look and I think the bulge up top is to let you get to the trackpad easily when the device is on your lap - though the trackpad on the back seems a little wierd when you already have a touch-screen, it will be interesting to play with that and see how it works in practice.The only thing that I saw as a potential downside is the tracking looked kind of slow - when he scribbled rapidly across the screen it lost almost all the input, it was only when they drew much slower that it worked and even then there was a little lag.
But hey, they are still working on the software.
I wonder what the SDK is like for this device, since it's Android what have they added I wonder?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142742</id>
	<title>Re:Frankly...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266237780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Android is Linux.  You mean '...and if you can easily switch to another distro.'</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Android is Linux .
You mean '...and if you can easily switch to another distro .
'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Android is Linux.
You mean '...and if you can easily switch to another distro.
'</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142360</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31144790</id>
	<title>Re:Nice, but Android?</title>
	<author>Jimmy\_B</author>
	<datestamp>1266252960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>You aren't forced to write in Java, you're forced to write for the JVM. There are <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List\_of\_JVM\_languages" title="wikipedia.org">other languages</a> [wikipedia.org] that target the JVM, including versions of Ruby, Python, LISP, and my personal favorite, Scala. Using the JVM means that Android isn't locked in to using any one particular CPU instruction set (which was what destroyed the original PalmOS), and that all Android programs and libraries are API-compatible with each other without the need for setting up special bindings.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You are n't forced to write in Java , you 're forced to write for the JVM .
There are other languages [ wikipedia.org ] that target the JVM , including versions of Ruby , Python , LISP , and my personal favorite , Scala .
Using the JVM means that Android is n't locked in to using any one particular CPU instruction set ( which was what destroyed the original PalmOS ) , and that all Android programs and libraries are API-compatible with each other without the need for setting up special bindings .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You aren't forced to write in Java, you're forced to write for the JVM.
There are other languages [wikipedia.org] that target the JVM, including versions of Ruby, Python, LISP, and my personal favorite, Scala.
Using the JVM means that Android isn't locked in to using any one particular CPU instruction set (which was what destroyed the original PalmOS), and that all Android programs and libraries are API-compatible with each other without the need for setting up special bindings.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31152226</id>
	<title>Re:"literally badgered"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266256200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>THANK YOU!  I was THIS close to posting.  I cannot stand the people who use the word "literally" when it is not literal.  Literally means it actually happened. Do people know how dumb they sound? Another one is the common "Astericks" pronunciation of asterisk - and the best part is that this usually comes out of the mouth of someone making fun of anther person saying "axe" instead of ask.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>THANK YOU !
I was THIS close to posting .
I can not stand the people who use the word " literally " when it is not literal .
Literally means it actually happened .
Do people know how dumb they sound ?
Another one is the common " Astericks " pronunciation of asterisk - and the best part is that this usually comes out of the mouth of someone making fun of anther person saying " axe " instead of ask .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>THANK YOU!
I was THIS close to posting.
I cannot stand the people who use the word "literally" when it is not literal.
Literally means it actually happened.
Do people know how dumb they sound?
Another one is the common "Astericks" pronunciation of asterisk - and the best part is that this usually comes out of the mouth of someone making fun of anther person saying "axe" instead of ask.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142374</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142914</id>
	<title>Think Kick Ass Book - Not Computer</title>
	<author>Shihar</author>
	<datestamp>1266240000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think a lightweight tablet has a lot of potential if it is cheap enough.  The $500+ Apple tablet I think costs WAY too much for any but the fanboys who will buy anything Job's touches.  If they could get this tablet down to the $200-$300 range I think they could have a winner.  I would love to have a little tablet that lets me browse the web, read e-books, store/play music, maybe watch movies, and do other passive media consumption tasks.  It is easier and more ergonomic than a laptop when lounging around the house, is the sort of thing you can take on the subway on the way to work with you, and in general is a decent substitute for a book.  I can't pull out my laptop and use it while waiting in line, but I could pull out a tablet.</p><p>The real issue is that this IS a limited device.  It overlaps with smartphones and computers, and it can't be used for much "real" work beyond reading e-mails.  The price has to be such that you can justify getting media consumption tool that is only better than  your other tools in its convenience.  At $500+, it just costs too much.  $200-$300 is, in my opinion, closer to the range you need to be in.  If you could get it down to $100-$200 and still turn a profit I think every middle class family and their dog would get one.  The real issue in my mind is the price.  Price is going to determine if this thing breaks open a new market or if it flops horribly.  Apple's price is too high.  Their tablet is only going to do well on fanboi'ism, and even then I don't think it will go far.  An Android tablet is going to battle it out on price alone.  If they try and sell at Apple prices this thing is dead on arrival.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think a lightweight tablet has a lot of potential if it is cheap enough .
The $ 500 + Apple tablet I think costs WAY too much for any but the fanboys who will buy anything Job 's touches .
If they could get this tablet down to the $ 200- $ 300 range I think they could have a winner .
I would love to have a little tablet that lets me browse the web , read e-books , store/play music , maybe watch movies , and do other passive media consumption tasks .
It is easier and more ergonomic than a laptop when lounging around the house , is the sort of thing you can take on the subway on the way to work with you , and in general is a decent substitute for a book .
I ca n't pull out my laptop and use it while waiting in line , but I could pull out a tablet.The real issue is that this IS a limited device .
It overlaps with smartphones and computers , and it ca n't be used for much " real " work beyond reading e-mails .
The price has to be such that you can justify getting media consumption tool that is only better than your other tools in its convenience .
At $ 500 + , it just costs too much .
$ 200- $ 300 is , in my opinion , closer to the range you need to be in .
If you could get it down to $ 100- $ 200 and still turn a profit I think every middle class family and their dog would get one .
The real issue in my mind is the price .
Price is going to determine if this thing breaks open a new market or if it flops horribly .
Apple 's price is too high .
Their tablet is only going to do well on fanboi'ism , and even then I do n't think it will go far .
An Android tablet is going to battle it out on price alone .
If they try and sell at Apple prices this thing is dead on arrival .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think a lightweight tablet has a lot of potential if it is cheap enough.
The $500+ Apple tablet I think costs WAY too much for any but the fanboys who will buy anything Job's touches.
If they could get this tablet down to the $200-$300 range I think they could have a winner.
I would love to have a little tablet that lets me browse the web, read e-books, store/play music, maybe watch movies, and do other passive media consumption tasks.
It is easier and more ergonomic than a laptop when lounging around the house, is the sort of thing you can take on the subway on the way to work with you, and in general is a decent substitute for a book.
I can't pull out my laptop and use it while waiting in line, but I could pull out a tablet.The real issue is that this IS a limited device.
It overlaps with smartphones and computers, and it can't be used for much "real" work beyond reading e-mails.
The price has to be such that you can justify getting media consumption tool that is only better than  your other tools in its convenience.
At $500+, it just costs too much.
$200-$300 is, in my opinion, closer to the range you need to be in.
If you could get it down to $100-$200 and still turn a profit I think every middle class family and their dog would get one.
The real issue in my mind is the price.
Price is going to determine if this thing breaks open a new market or if it flops horribly.
Apple's price is too high.
Their tablet is only going to do well on fanboi'ism, and even then I don't think it will go far.
An Android tablet is going to battle it out on price alone.
If they try and sell at Apple prices this thing is dead on arrival.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142300</id>
	<title>RAWR</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266231600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><b> <br> <tt>*\_g\_o\_a\_t\_s\_e\_x\_*\_g\_o\_a\_t\_s\_e\_x\_*\_g\_o\_a\_t\_s\_e\_x\_*\_       <br>

g\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_g\_       \_<br>

o\_/\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_o\_       \_<br>
a|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_a\_       \_<br>
t|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_`.\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_:\_\_\_\_\_t\_       \_<br>

s`\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_s\_       \_<br>

e\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_/\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_\_\\\\_\_\_--\_\_\_\\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_:\_\_\_\_e\_       \_<br>
x\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\/\_\_\_\_--~~\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_~--\_\_|\_\\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_x\_       \_<br>
*\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_-~\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_~-\_\\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_*\_       \_<br>

g\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_.--------.\_\_\_\_\_\_\|\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_g\_       \_<br>

o\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_//\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_(\_(\_\_&gt;\_\_\\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_o\_       \_<br>
a\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_.\_\_C\_\_\_\_)\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_(\_(\_\_\_\_&gt;\_\_|\_\_/\_\_\_\_a\_       \_<br>

t\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\\_|\_\_\_C\_\_\_\_\_)/INSERT\\_(\_\_\_\_\_&gt;\_\_|\_/\_\_\_\_\_t\_       \_<br>

s\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_/\|\_\_\_C\_\_\_\_\_)\_GERBIL|\_\_(\_\_\_&gt;\_\_\_/\_\_\\_\_\_\_s\_       \_<br>
e\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_(\_\_\_\_C\_\_\_\_\_)\\_HERE\_/\_\_//\_\_/\_/\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_e\_       \_<br>

x\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_//\_(\_\_/\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_x\_       \_<br>

*\_\_\_\_|\_\\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_)\_\_\_`----\_\_\_--'\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_*\_       \_<br>
g\_\_\_\_|\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_|\_g\_       \_<br>
o\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_o\_       \_<br>

a\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_/\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_a\_       \_<br>

t\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_/\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|t\_       \_<br>
s\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_/\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_/\\_\_\_/\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|s\_       \_<br>
e\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_/\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|e\_       \_<br>

x\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|x\_       \_<br>

*\_g\_o\_a\_t\_s\_e\_x\_*\_g\_o\_a\_t\_s\_e\_x\_*\_g\_o\_a\_t\_s\_e\_x\_*\_   </tt> <br> <br>
Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic. Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads. Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said. Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about. Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page) If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.
<br> <br>
Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic. Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads. Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said. Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about. Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page) If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.
<br> <br>

Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic. Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads. Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said. Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about. Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page) If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.</b></htmltext>
<tokenext>* \ _g \ _o \ _a \ _t \ _s \ _e \ _x \ _ * \ _g \ _o \ _a \ _t \ _s \ _e \ _x \ _ * \ _g \ _o \ _a \ _t \ _s \ _e \ _x \ _ * \ _ g \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _g \ _ \ _ o \ _/ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _/ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _o \ _ \ _ a | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _a \ _ \ _ t | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ ` . \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ : \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _t \ _ \ _ s ` \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _s \ _ \ _ e \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _/ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _/ \ _ \ _ \ \ \ \ _ \ _ \ _-- \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ : \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _e \ _ \ _ x \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ / \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _-- ~ ~ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ ~ -- \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _x \ _ \ _ * \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ _- ~ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ ~ - \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ * \ _ \ _ g \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _.--------. \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ | \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _g \ _ \ _ o \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _// \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ ( \ _ ( \ _ \ _ &gt; \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _o \ _ \ _ a \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _. \ _ \ _C \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ ) \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ ( \ _ ( \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ &gt; \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _/ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _a \ _ \ _ t \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _/ \ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _C \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ ) /INSERT \ \ _ ( \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ &gt; \ _ \ _ | \ _/ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _t \ _ \ _ s \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _/ \ _/ \ | \ _ \ _ \ _C \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ ) \ _GERBIL | \ _ \ _ ( \ _ \ _ \ _ &gt; \ _ \ _ \ _/ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _s \ _ \ _ e \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ ( \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _C \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ ) \ \ _HERE \ _/ \ _ \ _// \ _ \ _/ \ _/ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _e \ _ \ _ x \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _// \ _ ( \ _ \ _/ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _x \ _ \ _ * \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ ) \ _ \ _ \ _ ` ---- \ _ \ _ \ _-- ' \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ * \ _ \ _ g \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _/ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _/ \ _ | \ _g \ _ \ _ o \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _/ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _o \ _ \ _ a \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _/ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _a \ _ \ _ t \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _/ \ _/ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | t \ _ \ _ s \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _/ \ _/ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ \ _ \ _/ \ \ _ \ _ \ _/ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | s \ _ \ _ e \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _/ \ _/ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | e \ _ \ _ x \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ | x \ _ \ _ * \ _g \ _o \ _a \ _t \ _s \ _e \ _x \ _ * \ _g \ _o \ _a \ _t \ _s \ _e \ _x \ _ * \ _g \ _o \ _a \ _t \ _s \ _e \ _x \ _ * \ _ Important Stuff : Please try to keep posts on topic .
Try to reply to other people 's comments instead of starting new threads .
Read other people 's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said .
Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about .
Offtopic , Inflammatory , Inappropriate , Illegal , or Offensive comments might be moderated .
( You can read everything , even moderated posts , by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page ) If you want replies to your comments sent to you , consider logging in or creating an account .
Important Stuff : Please try to keep posts on topic .
Try to reply to other people 's comments instead of starting new threads .
Read other people 's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said .
Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about .
Offtopic , Inflammatory , Inappropriate , Illegal , or Offensive comments might be moderated .
( You can read everything , even moderated posts , by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page ) If you want replies to your comments sent to you , consider logging in or creating an account .
Important Stuff : Please try to keep posts on topic .
Try to reply to other people 's comments instead of starting new threads .
Read other people 's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said .
Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about .
Offtopic , Inflammatory , Inappropriate , Illegal , or Offensive comments might be moderated .
( You can read everything , even moderated posts , by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page ) If you want replies to your comments sent to you , consider logging in or creating an account .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  *\_g\_o\_a\_t\_s\_e\_x\_*\_g\_o\_a\_t\_s\_e\_x\_*\_g\_o\_a\_t\_s\_e\_x\_*\_       

g\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_g\_       \_

o\_/\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_o\_       \_
a|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_a\_       \_
t|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_`.\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_:\_\_\_\_\_t\_       \_

s`\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_s\_       \_

e\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_/\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_\_\\\\_\_\_--\_\_\_\\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_:\_\_\_\_e\_       \_
x\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\/\_\_\_\_--~~\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_~--\_\_|\_\\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_x\_       \_
*\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_-~\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_~-\_\\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_*\_       \_

g\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_.--------.\_\_\_\_\_\_\|\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_g\_       \_

o\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_//\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_(\_(\_\_&gt;\_\_\\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_o\_       \_
a\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_.\_\_C\_\_\_\_)\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_(\_(\_\_\_\_&gt;\_\_|\_\_/\_\_\_\_a\_       \_

t\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\\_|\_\_\_C\_\_\_\_\_)/INSERT\\_(\_\_\_\_\_&gt;\_\_|\_/\_\_\_\_\_t\_       \_

s\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_/\|\_\_\_C\_\_\_\_\_)\_GERBIL|\_\_(\_\_\_&gt;\_\_\_/\_\_\\_\_\_\_s\_       \_
e\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_(\_\_\_\_C\_\_\_\_\_)\\_HERE\_/\_\_//\_\_/\_/\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_e\_       \_

x\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_//\_(\_\_/\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_x\_       \_

*\_\_\_\_|\_\\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_)\_\_\_`----\_\_\_--'\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_*\_       \_
g\_\_\_\_|\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_|\_g\_       \_
o\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_o\_       \_

a\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_/\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_a\_       \_

t\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_/\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|t\_       \_
s\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_/\_\_\_\_\_\_\\_\_/\\_\_\_/\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|s\_       \_
e\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_/\_/\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|e\_       \_

x\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|x\_       \_

*\_g\_o\_a\_t\_s\_e\_x\_*\_g\_o\_a\_t\_s\_e\_x\_*\_g\_o\_a\_t\_s\_e\_x\_*\_     
Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic.
Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads.
Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated.
(You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page) If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.
Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic.
Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads.
Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated.
(You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page) If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.
Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic.
Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads.
Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated.
(You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page) If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142496</id>
	<title>Re:Nice, but Android?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266234600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's not locked down in any way so you will be able to install standard Ubuntu on it once it supports the Tegra platform.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not locked down in any way so you will be able to install standard Ubuntu on it once it supports the Tegra platform .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not locked down in any way so you will be able to install standard Ubuntu on it once it supports the Tegra platform.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31143410</id>
	<title>Re:Nice, but Android?</title>
	<author>DrXym</author>
	<datestamp>1266245760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It did seem to have a touchscreen since the guy was tapping on things but I couldn't tell if the screen was colour or mono, or switchable between the two. I sort of like the form factor although it's a little too thick. The weird lump looks (well weird) but it would make the device easy to hold while moving around so the device would be quite practical. The biggest question mark is over the OS and what apps it ships with (for bookreading etc.).</htmltext>
<tokenext>It did seem to have a touchscreen since the guy was tapping on things but I could n't tell if the screen was colour or mono , or switchable between the two .
I sort of like the form factor although it 's a little too thick .
The weird lump looks ( well weird ) but it would make the device easy to hold while moving around so the device would be quite practical .
The biggest question mark is over the OS and what apps it ships with ( for bookreading etc .
) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It did seem to have a touchscreen since the guy was tapping on things but I couldn't tell if the screen was colour or mono, or switchable between the two.
I sort of like the form factor although it's a little too thick.
The weird lump looks (well weird) but it would make the device easy to hold while moving around so the device would be quite practical.
The biggest question mark is over the OS and what apps it ships with (for bookreading etc.
).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31143036</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142738</id>
	<title>Amazing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266237720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's amazing how many companies get it wrong on what to bring to market. I'm sorry to say this, but 3 USB ports makes this a neckbeard device. These poor guys in India read the comments on engadget and elsewhere and think that by adding all these superfluous features to a device they'll be able to get the competitive edge over Apple. This formula has been tried before in MP3 player space and it failed in the most spectacular way. I remember Neuros bringing out this monster of a device that supported every format under the sun and 50+ features over the iPod. It still failed. Simplicity won the day.</p><p>The general consumer who spends money on these things doesn't think like a geek. They think in situational terms on how it will fit into their life. Spec sheets and feature matrices are the last thing a casual buyer would pay attention to, especially when the tablet category isn't even defined yet.</p><p>Why in the hell do I need 3 fucking USB ports on an underpowered toy? What well-adjusted person would connect a fucking tablet to a TV? What is the benefit of running 1080i video on this tiny ass screen?</p><p>I'm going to chalk this up to other vaporware products like Crunchpad/JooJoo/Courier. I bet it misses its June target, ships in September and is promptly forgotten 2 days later.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's amazing how many companies get it wrong on what to bring to market .
I 'm sorry to say this , but 3 USB ports makes this a neckbeard device .
These poor guys in India read the comments on engadget and elsewhere and think that by adding all these superfluous features to a device they 'll be able to get the competitive edge over Apple .
This formula has been tried before in MP3 player space and it failed in the most spectacular way .
I remember Neuros bringing out this monster of a device that supported every format under the sun and 50 + features over the iPod .
It still failed .
Simplicity won the day.The general consumer who spends money on these things does n't think like a geek .
They think in situational terms on how it will fit into their life .
Spec sheets and feature matrices are the last thing a casual buyer would pay attention to , especially when the tablet category is n't even defined yet.Why in the hell do I need 3 fucking USB ports on an underpowered toy ?
What well-adjusted person would connect a fucking tablet to a TV ?
What is the benefit of running 1080i video on this tiny ass screen ? I 'm going to chalk this up to other vaporware products like Crunchpad/JooJoo/Courier .
I bet it misses its June target , ships in September and is promptly forgotten 2 days later .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's amazing how many companies get it wrong on what to bring to market.
I'm sorry to say this, but 3 USB ports makes this a neckbeard device.
These poor guys in India read the comments on engadget and elsewhere and think that by adding all these superfluous features to a device they'll be able to get the competitive edge over Apple.
This formula has been tried before in MP3 player space and it failed in the most spectacular way.
I remember Neuros bringing out this monster of a device that supported every format under the sun and 50+ features over the iPod.
It still failed.
Simplicity won the day.The general consumer who spends money on these things doesn't think like a geek.
They think in situational terms on how it will fit into their life.
Spec sheets and feature matrices are the last thing a casual buyer would pay attention to, especially when the tablet category isn't even defined yet.Why in the hell do I need 3 fucking USB ports on an underpowered toy?
What well-adjusted person would connect a fucking tablet to a TV?
What is the benefit of running 1080i video on this tiny ass screen?I'm going to chalk this up to other vaporware products like Crunchpad/JooJoo/Courier.
I bet it misses its June target, ships in September and is promptly forgotten 2 days later.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142956</id>
	<title>Re:Sigh,</title>
	<author>quadrox</author>
	<datestamp>1266240660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obviously you'd have to lay it on a desk or your lap when you for example want to type an email.</p><p>For me the point is not that this sort of device can be used as a handheld device (and ONLY that), but it should work well as a handheld device IN ADDITION to being a proper computer, albeit with lower performance than a big desktop machine.</p><p>That way you have ONE device that you can take with you anywhere, which is always useful AT LEAST as a handheld device.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously you 'd have to lay it on a desk or your lap when you for example want to type an email.For me the point is not that this sort of device can be used as a handheld device ( and ONLY that ) , but it should work well as a handheld device IN ADDITION to being a proper computer , albeit with lower performance than a big desktop machine.That way you have ONE device that you can take with you anywhere , which is always useful AT LEAST as a handheld device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously you'd have to lay it on a desk or your lap when you for example want to type an email.For me the point is not that this sort of device can be used as a handheld device (and ONLY that), but it should work well as a handheld device IN ADDITION to being a proper computer, albeit with lower performance than a big desktop machine.That way you have ONE device that you can take with you anywhere, which is always useful AT LEAST as a handheld device.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31143036</id>
	<title>Re:Nice, but Android?</title>
	<author>Lumpy</author>
	<datestamp>1266242040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Android is fine, no touchscreen but a trackpad in back??   EPIC FAIL.   this junk will never sell.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Android is fine , no touchscreen but a trackpad in back ? ?
EPIC FAIL .
this junk will never sell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Android is fine, no touchscreen but a trackpad in back??
EPIC FAIL.
this junk will never sell.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31273498</id>
	<title>Re:Amazing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267120260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Seriously?  Has anybody ever truly said, "Damn!  I really need to plug my laptop into a television!"&gt;</p> </div><p>Actually I have plugged my computer and my laptop from time to time to watch movies in my tv and projector. IMO this feature would be a must have for me (and the USB ports too).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously ?
Has anybody ever truly said , " Damn !
I really need to plug my laptop into a television !
" &gt; Actually I have plugged my computer and my laptop from time to time to watch movies in my tv and projector .
IMO this feature would be a must have for me ( and the USB ports too ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously?
Has anybody ever truly said, "Damn!
I really need to plug my laptop into a television!
"&gt; Actually I have plugged my computer and my laptop from time to time to watch movies in my tv and projector.
IMO this feature would be a must have for me (and the USB ports too).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31143868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31143066</id>
	<title>Re:Amazing</title>
	<author>slim</author>
	<datestamp>1266242400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why in the hell do I need 3 fucking USB ports on an underpowered toy?</p></div><p>Keyboard, mouse, flash drive, and they're all used up.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>What well-adjusted person would connect a fucking tablet to a TV?</p></div><p>Just as an example, you could show one person your holiday photos on the tablet, or plug into a big TV to show a larger group of people.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>What is the benefit of running 1080i video on this tiny ass screen?</p></div><p>They important thing is that this "underpowered toy" can *decode* 1080p video: no need to transcode to a smaller format just to play it on your tablet. Plus, as you noted, plug it into a TV to see the full resolution.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why in the hell do I need 3 fucking USB ports on an underpowered toy ? Keyboard , mouse , flash drive , and they 're all used up.What well-adjusted person would connect a fucking tablet to a TV ? Just as an example , you could show one person your holiday photos on the tablet , or plug into a big TV to show a larger group of people.What is the benefit of running 1080i video on this tiny ass screen ? They important thing is that this " underpowered toy " can * decode * 1080p video : no need to transcode to a smaller format just to play it on your tablet .
Plus , as you noted , plug it into a TV to see the full resolution .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why in the hell do I need 3 fucking USB ports on an underpowered toy?Keyboard, mouse, flash drive, and they're all used up.What well-adjusted person would connect a fucking tablet to a TV?Just as an example, you could show one person your holiday photos on the tablet, or plug into a big TV to show a larger group of people.What is the benefit of running 1080i video on this tiny ass screen?They important thing is that this "underpowered toy" can *decode* 1080p video: no need to transcode to a smaller format just to play it on your tablet.
Plus, as you noted, plug it into a TV to see the full resolution.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142642</id>
	<title>Re:Nice, but Android?</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1266236820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Depend what you call "better". Sometimes a full desktop operating system with an interface meant for mouse with several buttons and keyboard could be more complicated for the tasks meant for a simple touchscreen interface? Accessing Android market of apps (some fitting pretty well to the hardware features of it, like camera, gps, or accelerometer) won't hurt neither.<br><br>Why ChromeOS if you plan to use that device more for playing multimedia or reading local books than accessing internet? What if you want it primary as internet terminal over all other uses?<br><br>And having Ubuntu doesn't have to mean full ubuntu, could be the NBR edition, or running Moblin.<br><br>All the alternatives have their own strenghts depending of the use you plan to give to it. And one of the strong points of the device is to have those alternatives.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Depend what you call " better " .
Sometimes a full desktop operating system with an interface meant for mouse with several buttons and keyboard could be more complicated for the tasks meant for a simple touchscreen interface ?
Accessing Android market of apps ( some fitting pretty well to the hardware features of it , like camera , gps , or accelerometer ) wo n't hurt neither.Why ChromeOS if you plan to use that device more for playing multimedia or reading local books than accessing internet ?
What if you want it primary as internet terminal over all other uses ? And having Ubuntu does n't have to mean full ubuntu , could be the NBR edition , or running Moblin.All the alternatives have their own strenghts depending of the use you plan to give to it .
And one of the strong points of the device is to have those alternatives .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Depend what you call "better".
Sometimes a full desktop operating system with an interface meant for mouse with several buttons and keyboard could be more complicated for the tasks meant for a simple touchscreen interface?
Accessing Android market of apps (some fitting pretty well to the hardware features of it, like camera, gps, or accelerometer) won't hurt neither.Why ChromeOS if you plan to use that device more for playing multimedia or reading local books than accessing internet?
What if you want it primary as internet terminal over all other uses?And having Ubuntu doesn't have to mean full ubuntu, could be the NBR edition, or running Moblin.All the alternatives have their own strenghts depending of the use you plan to give to it.
And one of the strong points of the device is to have those alternatives.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31146768</id>
	<title>Did they REALLY sic a badger on them?</title>
	<author>EWAdams</author>
	<datestamp>1266262920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Somebody needs to learn the meaning of "literally."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Somebody needs to learn the meaning of " literally .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somebody needs to learn the meaning of "literally.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31148122</id>
	<title>Re:Sigh,</title>
	<author>joh</author>
	<datestamp>1266226320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>For me the point is not that this sort of device can be used as a handheld device (and ONLY that), but it should work well as a handheld device IN ADDITION to being a proper computer, albeit with lower performance than a big desktop machine.</p><p>That way you have ONE device that you can take with you anywhere, which is always useful AT LEAST as a handheld device.</p></div><p>To be honest, the keyboard-dock for the iPad was the point where my modest disappointment with the iPad (I hadn't expected anything else than a larger iPhone anyway) turned into shy interest. This thing, along with iWork, looks *so* much like an old-fashioned typewriter executed with modern means. It's probably just a dream but I had some flash of finally using a computer just as a tool I have to and want to waste only very limited thoughts on. I very much doubt that we're there yet, but the dream is still alive.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>For me the point is not that this sort of device can be used as a handheld device ( and ONLY that ) , but it should work well as a handheld device IN ADDITION to being a proper computer , albeit with lower performance than a big desktop machine.That way you have ONE device that you can take with you anywhere , which is always useful AT LEAST as a handheld device.To be honest , the keyboard-dock for the iPad was the point where my modest disappointment with the iPad ( I had n't expected anything else than a larger iPhone anyway ) turned into shy interest .
This thing , along with iWork , looks * so * much like an old-fashioned typewriter executed with modern means .
It 's probably just a dream but I had some flash of finally using a computer just as a tool I have to and want to waste only very limited thoughts on .
I very much doubt that we 're there yet , but the dream is still alive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For me the point is not that this sort of device can be used as a handheld device (and ONLY that), but it should work well as a handheld device IN ADDITION to being a proper computer, albeit with lower performance than a big desktop machine.That way you have ONE device that you can take with you anywhere, which is always useful AT LEAST as a handheld device.To be honest, the keyboard-dock for the iPad was the point where my modest disappointment with the iPad (I hadn't expected anything else than a larger iPhone anyway) turned into shy interest.
This thing, along with iWork, looks *so* much like an old-fashioned typewriter executed with modern means.
It's probably just a dream but I had some flash of finally using a computer just as a tool I have to and want to waste only very limited thoughts on.
I very much doubt that we're there yet, but the dream is still alive.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142374</id>
	<title>"literally badgered"</title>
	<author>jellyfrog</author>
	<datestamp>1266232860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>What, with real badgers?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What , with real badgers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What, with real badgers?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31145380</id>
	<title>Re:Amazing</title>
	<author>Orbijx</author>
	<datestamp>1266255720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Has anybody ever truly said, "Damn! I really need to plug my laptop into a television!"</p></div><p>I have.</p><p>Plug a set of speakers in, connected an S-Video cable and the AC Adapter, disabled screensaver.</p><p>Watch Hulu and Youtube videos on a screen significantly larger than my laptop's, so I can sit back and enjoy the first week of being in my new apartment (Cable company came and hooked us up to the internet on the same afternoon we moved in, which was amazing).</p><p>It's one of the draws to a compact device -- knowing you can carry it from room to room and show videos.</p><p>Depending on the setup, I could see this as being useful in an educational setting -- give the teachers a lightweight device that they can check out from a central repository (the media center at my old high school comes to mind), and something to project images up to. When they're done, check 'em back in, or chain them down securely to something that's immobile.</p><p>Instead of those boring laminate slides and the plain overhead projectors, you could have something that can be colorful and interactive. It could certainly make Biology much more interesting, for example.</p><p>If a device like this catches on in an educational setting, you could end up with lots of applications that can save money in the long run.<br>Virtual dissection for biology class, anyone? Can't object so much to cutting things open when there's no formaldehyde smell (note to self: if this app happens, create a formaldehyde scented diffuser for that "Real Dissection Smell"...).<br>No? How about 3D rotatable molecules for chemistry classes to help visualize what's being worked with?<br>No? How about a visual math application, helping people who are learning the basics of algebra visualize how you get from one point to another when using it? I know I could have used it -- I nearly failed Algebra the first time, because I couldn't make it make sense in my head until someone actually started drawing some of it out for me.<br>I'm sure that there are a boatload of other suggestions that are out there, too. Make the device and the necessary gear to set it up in an educational environment affordable, and I'd dare say there are schools that would consider running a pilot program to see how much it boosts education by, at the very least.</p><p>But alas, I ramble too much and feel like I might be preaching to the choir.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Has anybody ever truly said , " Damn !
I really need to plug my laptop into a television !
" I have.Plug a set of speakers in , connected an S-Video cable and the AC Adapter , disabled screensaver.Watch Hulu and Youtube videos on a screen significantly larger than my laptop 's , so I can sit back and enjoy the first week of being in my new apartment ( Cable company came and hooked us up to the internet on the same afternoon we moved in , which was amazing ) .It 's one of the draws to a compact device -- knowing you can carry it from room to room and show videos.Depending on the setup , I could see this as being useful in an educational setting -- give the teachers a lightweight device that they can check out from a central repository ( the media center at my old high school comes to mind ) , and something to project images up to .
When they 're done , check 'em back in , or chain them down securely to something that 's immobile.Instead of those boring laminate slides and the plain overhead projectors , you could have something that can be colorful and interactive .
It could certainly make Biology much more interesting , for example.If a device like this catches on in an educational setting , you could end up with lots of applications that can save money in the long run.Virtual dissection for biology class , anyone ?
Ca n't object so much to cutting things open when there 's no formaldehyde smell ( note to self : if this app happens , create a formaldehyde scented diffuser for that " Real Dissection Smell " ... ) .No ?
How about 3D rotatable molecules for chemistry classes to help visualize what 's being worked with ? No ?
How about a visual math application , helping people who are learning the basics of algebra visualize how you get from one point to another when using it ?
I know I could have used it -- I nearly failed Algebra the first time , because I could n't make it make sense in my head until someone actually started drawing some of it out for me.I 'm sure that there are a boatload of other suggestions that are out there , too .
Make the device and the necessary gear to set it up in an educational environment affordable , and I 'd dare say there are schools that would consider running a pilot program to see how much it boosts education by , at the very least.But alas , I ramble too much and feel like I might be preaching to the choir .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has anybody ever truly said, "Damn!
I really need to plug my laptop into a television!
"I have.Plug a set of speakers in, connected an S-Video cable and the AC Adapter, disabled screensaver.Watch Hulu and Youtube videos on a screen significantly larger than my laptop's, so I can sit back and enjoy the first week of being in my new apartment (Cable company came and hooked us up to the internet on the same afternoon we moved in, which was amazing).It's one of the draws to a compact device -- knowing you can carry it from room to room and show videos.Depending on the setup, I could see this as being useful in an educational setting -- give the teachers a lightweight device that they can check out from a central repository (the media center at my old high school comes to mind), and something to project images up to.
When they're done, check 'em back in, or chain them down securely to something that's immobile.Instead of those boring laminate slides and the plain overhead projectors, you could have something that can be colorful and interactive.
It could certainly make Biology much more interesting, for example.If a device like this catches on in an educational setting, you could end up with lots of applications that can save money in the long run.Virtual dissection for biology class, anyone?
Can't object so much to cutting things open when there's no formaldehyde smell (note to self: if this app happens, create a formaldehyde scented diffuser for that "Real Dissection Smell"...).No?
How about 3D rotatable molecules for chemistry classes to help visualize what's being worked with?No?
How about a visual math application, helping people who are learning the basics of algebra visualize how you get from one point to another when using it?
I know I could have used it -- I nearly failed Algebra the first time, because I couldn't make it make sense in my head until someone actually started drawing some of it out for me.I'm sure that there are a boatload of other suggestions that are out there, too.
Make the device and the necessary gear to set it up in an educational environment affordable, and I'd dare say there are schools that would consider running a pilot program to see how much it boosts education by, at the very least.But alas, I ramble too much and feel like I might be preaching to the choir.
:)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31143868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142360</id>
	<title>Frankly...</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1266232620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...this is the first touchpad I was ever excited about. And the first device since the N900.</p><p>Let&rsquo;s see what it costs, and if you can easily format it and install Linux (including working drivers)...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...this is the first touchpad I was ever excited about .
And the first device since the N900.Let    s see what it costs , and if you can easily format it and install Linux ( including working drivers ) .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...this is the first touchpad I was ever excited about.
And the first device since the N900.Let’s see what it costs, and if you can easily format it and install Linux (including working drivers)...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142818</id>
	<title>this FP fo8 GNAA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266238680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">as it is l1censejd</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>as it is l1censejd [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>as it is l1censejd [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142640</id>
	<title>Re:Nice, but Android?</title>
	<author>Trepidity</author>
	<datestamp>1266236820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm guessing Java never really made it onto the radar. This is an answer to the iPad+iPhoneOS combo: a different tablet with Android as the OS. It has has some of the same advantages, using a smartphone-style, fairly simple, app-centric OS for a tablet, rather than a normal desktop/laptop OS. Java just comes along for the ride because it's what Android happens to use for its apps. Whether Android should be using Java for its apps or not in the first place is sort of a separate discussion (although Android does already have a native development kit).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm guessing Java never really made it onto the radar .
This is an answer to the iPad + iPhoneOS combo : a different tablet with Android as the OS .
It has has some of the same advantages , using a smartphone-style , fairly simple , app-centric OS for a tablet , rather than a normal desktop/laptop OS .
Java just comes along for the ride because it 's what Android happens to use for its apps .
Whether Android should be using Java for its apps or not in the first place is sort of a separate discussion ( although Android does already have a native development kit ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm guessing Java never really made it onto the radar.
This is an answer to the iPad+iPhoneOS combo: a different tablet with Android as the OS.
It has has some of the same advantages, using a smartphone-style, fairly simple, app-centric OS for a tablet, rather than a normal desktop/laptop OS.
Java just comes along for the ride because it's what Android happens to use for its apps.
Whether Android should be using Java for its apps or not in the first place is sort of a separate discussion (although Android does already have a native development kit).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142564</id>
	<title>Re:Frankly...</title>
	<author>DeBaas</author>
	<datestamp>1266235740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>...this is the first touchpad I was ever excited about. And the first device since the N900.</p></div><p>So you haven't been exited about a device since September last year.... Hard times</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...this is the first touchpad I was ever excited about .
And the first device since the N900.So you have n't been exited about a device since September last year.... Hard times</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...this is the first touchpad I was ever excited about.
And the first device since the N900.So you haven't been exited about a device since September last year.... Hard times
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142360</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142924</id>
	<title>Re:Nice, but Android?</title>
	<author>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</author>
	<datestamp>1266240180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't know exactly why loads of random vendors who would never have touched linux are putting out android devices rather than stock linux devices, or maemo devices, or moblin devices; but I'd say that Google's motives for using more-or-less-java are fairly clear:<br> <br>

First, of course, they bought Android when it was a startup, founded primarily by ex-Danger guys. They were using java for Android because they had used it for Sidekick, where they had presumably been using it to give themselves some degree of architecture independence. <br> <br>

Second, if Google is planning in the long term for Android, they won't necessarily know what architectures it will be running on. ARM is obvious today; but, who knows, intel might get their mobile act together, or Android might become the darling of set top boxes, or whatever. If the vast majority of 3rd party applications are running in Dalvik, rather than natively, there is some hope that the market won't be hopelessly fragmented by devices of different architecture.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know exactly why loads of random vendors who would never have touched linux are putting out android devices rather than stock linux devices , or maemo devices , or moblin devices ; but I 'd say that Google 's motives for using more-or-less-java are fairly clear : First , of course , they bought Android when it was a startup , founded primarily by ex-Danger guys .
They were using java for Android because they had used it for Sidekick , where they had presumably been using it to give themselves some degree of architecture independence .
Second , if Google is planning in the long term for Android , they wo n't necessarily know what architectures it will be running on .
ARM is obvious today ; but , who knows , intel might get their mobile act together , or Android might become the darling of set top boxes , or whatever .
If the vast majority of 3rd party applications are running in Dalvik , rather than natively , there is some hope that the market wo n't be hopelessly fragmented by devices of different architecture .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know exactly why loads of random vendors who would never have touched linux are putting out android devices rather than stock linux devices, or maemo devices, or moblin devices; but I'd say that Google's motives for using more-or-less-java are fairly clear: 

First, of course, they bought Android when it was a startup, founded primarily by ex-Danger guys.
They were using java for Android because they had used it for Sidekick, where they had presumably been using it to give themselves some degree of architecture independence.
Second, if Google is planning in the long term for Android, they won't necessarily know what architectures it will be running on.
ARM is obvious today; but, who knows, intel might get their mobile act together, or Android might become the darling of set top boxes, or whatever.
If the vast majority of 3rd party applications are running in Dalvik, rather than natively, there is some hope that the market won't be hopelessly fragmented by devices of different architecture.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142630</id>
	<title>Re:Like the LCD</title>
	<author>TeknoHog</author>
	<datestamp>1266236760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The LCD does look pretty impressive, it seems like it would totally address all of the concerns of those who claim you can't read books on an LCD.  They forget that no LCD is emissive, they are all reflective at heart... it's just a matter of what the light source is.</p></div><p>
Actually, LCDs are transmissive by nature. Put a mirror behind it, and it becomes reflective. This is how digital watches and calculators have worked for ages, though the "mirror" is not a smooth, shiny reflector for practical reasons. Today you can have a transreflective display with both a backlight and a mirror, thanks to improved light transmission through the LCD.
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The LCD does look pretty impressive , it seems like it would totally address all of the concerns of those who claim you ca n't read books on an LCD .
They forget that no LCD is emissive , they are all reflective at heart... it 's just a matter of what the light source is .
Actually , LCDs are transmissive by nature .
Put a mirror behind it , and it becomes reflective .
This is how digital watches and calculators have worked for ages , though the " mirror " is not a smooth , shiny reflector for practical reasons .
Today you can have a transreflective display with both a backlight and a mirror , thanks to improved light transmission through the LCD .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The LCD does look pretty impressive, it seems like it would totally address all of the concerns of those who claim you can't read books on an LCD.
They forget that no LCD is emissive, they are all reflective at heart... it's just a matter of what the light source is.
Actually, LCDs are transmissive by nature.
Put a mirror behind it, and it becomes reflective.
This is how digital watches and calculators have worked for ages, though the "mirror" is not a smooth, shiny reflector for practical reasons.
Today you can have a transreflective display with both a backlight and a mirror, thanks to improved light transmission through the LCD.

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31143044</id>
	<title>This is gogat5ex</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266242160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">to use the GGNA the project to baby...don't fear faster chip</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>to use the GGNA the project to baby...do n't fear faster chip [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to use the GGNA the project to baby...don't fear faster chip [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142316</id>
	<title>I might switch</title>
	<author>iMac Were</author>
	<datestamp>1266231900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Love the touchpad.  Like any Apple fanboy, I'm a big fan of reach-arounds.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Love the touchpad .
Like any Apple fanboy , I 'm a big fan of reach-arounds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Love the touchpad.
Like any Apple fanboy, I'm a big fan of reach-arounds.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31143282</id>
	<title>Re:Nice, but Android?</title>
	<author>DrXym</author>
	<datestamp>1266244680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well you don't <i>have</i> to use Java (strictly speaking it's not Java but Dalvik), since Android supports native methods. Your Java app could be a stubs that invoke C/C++ for the most part. I am not sure there is any reason to do this unless you absolutely have timing critical code to execute.
<p>
Most of the time apps are bound by latency of the user, the network, the database or whatever so it really doesn't matter what they're written in so long as they are responsive enough. Java fulfills this role admirably and also relieves the programmer a lot of the pitfalls and drudgery of development and providing decent system APIs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well you do n't have to use Java ( strictly speaking it 's not Java but Dalvik ) , since Android supports native methods .
Your Java app could be a stubs that invoke C/C + + for the most part .
I am not sure there is any reason to do this unless you absolutely have timing critical code to execute .
Most of the time apps are bound by latency of the user , the network , the database or whatever so it really does n't matter what they 're written in so long as they are responsive enough .
Java fulfills this role admirably and also relieves the programmer a lot of the pitfalls and drudgery of development and providing decent system APIs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well you don't have to use Java (strictly speaking it's not Java but Dalvik), since Android supports native methods.
Your Java app could be a stubs that invoke C/C++ for the most part.
I am not sure there is any reason to do this unless you absolutely have timing critical code to execute.
Most of the time apps are bound by latency of the user, the network, the database or whatever so it really doesn't matter what they're written in so long as they are responsive enough.
Java fulfills this role admirably and also relieves the programmer a lot of the pitfalls and drudgery of development and providing decent system APIs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142514</id>
	<title>Re:Like the LCD</title>
	<author>hitmark</author>
	<datestamp>1266234900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the one problem i have had with browsing when using a touch screen, is the need for "mouse over" various elements.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the one problem i have had with browsing when using a touch screen , is the need for " mouse over " various elements .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the one problem i have had with browsing when using a touch screen, is the need for "mouse over" various elements.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31146620</id>
	<title>Got my Adam Tablet, now where's the Eve. . .</title>
	<author>JSBiff</author>
	<datestamp>1266262080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just need to inject some Eve now, and I'll be all set for my trip to Rapture!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just need to inject some Eve now , and I 'll be all set for my trip to Rapture !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just need to inject some Eve now, and I'll be all set for my trip to Rapture!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31144960</id>
	<title>Re:Like the LCD</title>
	<author>hakey</author>
	<datestamp>1266253620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>the one problem i have had with browsing when using a touch screen, is the need for "mouse over" various elements.</p></div><p>Watch the video, they put a trackpad on the back so that you can mouse over. Looks like a neat idea, but hard to say if it will catch on or not.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>the one problem i have had with browsing when using a touch screen , is the need for " mouse over " various elements.Watch the video , they put a trackpad on the back so that you can mouse over .
Looks like a neat idea , but hard to say if it will catch on or not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the one problem i have had with browsing when using a touch screen, is the need for "mouse over" various elements.Watch the video, they put a trackpad on the back so that you can mouse over.
Looks like a neat idea, but hard to say if it will catch on or not.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142540</id>
	<title>Re:Nice, but Android?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266235500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Since it's clearly able to run Linux, just provide a standard Ubuntu installation. That'd be much better.</p></div><p>The <a href="http://www.technoholik.com/news/exclusive-a-sneak-peek-at-the-notion-ink-adam-tablet-specs-pics/" title="technoholik.com">spec page</a> [technoholik.com] lists "Android, Ubuntu, Chromium" under OS. I'm guessing that just means they're leaving it open for you to install whatever you want on it rather than shipping multiple version with different OSes, but I could be wrong.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since it 's clearly able to run Linux , just provide a standard Ubuntu installation .
That 'd be much better.The spec page [ technoholik.com ] lists " Android , Ubuntu , Chromium " under OS .
I 'm guessing that just means they 're leaving it open for you to install whatever you want on it rather than shipping multiple version with different OSes , but I could be wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since it's clearly able to run Linux, just provide a standard Ubuntu installation.
That'd be much better.The spec page [technoholik.com] lists "Android, Ubuntu, Chromium" under OS.
I'm guessing that just means they're leaving it open for you to install whatever you want on it rather than shipping multiple version with different OSes, but I could be wrong.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31281210</id>
	<title>Re:Nice, but Android?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267115640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and you can always boot into ubuntu if you absolutely have to have the traditional interface.<br>just a dualboot away.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and you can always boot into ubuntu if you absolutely have to have the traditional interface.just a dualboot away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and you can always boot into ubuntu if you absolutely have to have the traditional interface.just a dualboot away.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31145614</id>
	<title>Re:Amazing</title>
	<author>hazydave</author>
	<datestamp>1266256740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Why in the hell do I need 3 fucking USB ports on an underpowered toy?</p><p>So you can hook in a mouse or keyboard. Or your digital video or still camera, to preview what you just shot on a big screen (Epson sells specialty devices that do this for $500+). To access additional information from USB storage devices, keys or HDDs. To download routes to your car GPS unit (they're not all wireless yet). To download music to your media player. USB is a dandy thing to have... Apple as bone stupid to not support at least one USB port in the iPad.</p><p>&gt; What well-adjusted person would connect a fucking tablet to a TV? What is the benefit of running 1080i video on this tiny ass screen?</p><p>The 1080p output is for the HDMI connector.. obviously, you don't run full resolution on a smaller screen. The reason you'd want to hook this to a TV? Same reason you would want to hook any PMP to a television -- you have this portable media player with you, and hey, look, a TV. Same reason I can hook every one of my camcorders to a TV. Apple was bone stupid not to offer HDMI out on the iPad.</p><p>The whole point of a general purpose tablet computer is to replace a bunch of things done by "digital appliances" today. It's an eBook reader. And a PMP.  And a photo/video previewer. And an internet tablet. And anything else you want it to be.</p><p>Ever used a smartphone? If you use one for awhile, you'll notice it's not really so much a telephone anymore, it's a general purpose pocket computer. It's a GPS, It's a PMP/MP3 player. It's an organizer. It's a mobile search engine. Same thing here with a well designed tablet. This is a well designed tablet.. in fact, perhaps the first one with the hardware necessary to actually deliver more than just "fat iPod" functionality.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Why in the hell do I need 3 fucking USB ports on an underpowered toy ? So you can hook in a mouse or keyboard .
Or your digital video or still camera , to preview what you just shot on a big screen ( Epson sells specialty devices that do this for $ 500 + ) .
To access additional information from USB storage devices , keys or HDDs .
To download routes to your car GPS unit ( they 're not all wireless yet ) .
To download music to your media player .
USB is a dandy thing to have... Apple as bone stupid to not support at least one USB port in the iPad. &gt; What well-adjusted person would connect a fucking tablet to a TV ?
What is the benefit of running 1080i video on this tiny ass screen ? The 1080p output is for the HDMI connector.. obviously , you do n't run full resolution on a smaller screen .
The reason you 'd want to hook this to a TV ?
Same reason you would want to hook any PMP to a television -- you have this portable media player with you , and hey , look , a TV .
Same reason I can hook every one of my camcorders to a TV .
Apple was bone stupid not to offer HDMI out on the iPad.The whole point of a general purpose tablet computer is to replace a bunch of things done by " digital appliances " today .
It 's an eBook reader .
And a PMP .
And a photo/video previewer .
And an internet tablet .
And anything else you want it to be.Ever used a smartphone ?
If you use one for awhile , you 'll notice it 's not really so much a telephone anymore , it 's a general purpose pocket computer .
It 's a GPS , It 's a PMP/MP3 player .
It 's an organizer .
It 's a mobile search engine .
Same thing here with a well designed tablet .
This is a well designed tablet.. in fact , perhaps the first one with the hardware necessary to actually deliver more than just " fat iPod " functionality .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Why in the hell do I need 3 fucking USB ports on an underpowered toy?So you can hook in a mouse or keyboard.
Or your digital video or still camera, to preview what you just shot on a big screen (Epson sells specialty devices that do this for $500+).
To access additional information from USB storage devices, keys or HDDs.
To download routes to your car GPS unit (they're not all wireless yet).
To download music to your media player.
USB is a dandy thing to have... Apple as bone stupid to not support at least one USB port in the iPad.&gt; What well-adjusted person would connect a fucking tablet to a TV?
What is the benefit of running 1080i video on this tiny ass screen?The 1080p output is for the HDMI connector.. obviously, you don't run full resolution on a smaller screen.
The reason you'd want to hook this to a TV?
Same reason you would want to hook any PMP to a television -- you have this portable media player with you, and hey, look, a TV.
Same reason I can hook every one of my camcorders to a TV.
Apple was bone stupid not to offer HDMI out on the iPad.The whole point of a general purpose tablet computer is to replace a bunch of things done by "digital appliances" today.
It's an eBook reader.
And a PMP.
And a photo/video previewer.
And an internet tablet.
And anything else you want it to be.Ever used a smartphone?
If you use one for awhile, you'll notice it's not really so much a telephone anymore, it's a general purpose pocket computer.
It's a GPS, It's a PMP/MP3 player.
It's an organizer.
It's a mobile search engine.
Same thing here with a well designed tablet.
This is a well designed tablet.. in fact, perhaps the first one with the hardware necessary to actually deliver more than just "fat iPod" functionality.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31148788</id>
	<title>The Sort of Innovation We Wanted from Apple</title>
	<author>donnacha</author>
	<datestamp>1266229500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The rear trackpad is wonderful.

Before the iPad was introduced, I suspected that Apple would use two rear trackpads to allow users to type while gripping the pad, I thought that was what the rumors about a "surprising" input method meant.

Whether for cursor movement or the more advanced idea of text entry, using the back of a pad - where our fingers will be most of the time anyway - if such an obviously good idea.  When you have a small screen, why obscure it with your hands?

I had also hoped that the iPad would use the Pixel Qi screen.

Apple decided to build upon their previous iPhone innovation rather than introduce new innovation - Apple are remorselessly focused upon creating a mainstream, "appliance" product and, to be fair, that makes a lot more business sense than trying to delight techies like us.

Congratulations, though, to Notion Ink for creating a truly innovative tablet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The rear trackpad is wonderful .
Before the iPad was introduced , I suspected that Apple would use two rear trackpads to allow users to type while gripping the pad , I thought that was what the rumors about a " surprising " input method meant .
Whether for cursor movement or the more advanced idea of text entry , using the back of a pad - where our fingers will be most of the time anyway - if such an obviously good idea .
When you have a small screen , why obscure it with your hands ?
I had also hoped that the iPad would use the Pixel Qi screen .
Apple decided to build upon their previous iPhone innovation rather than introduce new innovation - Apple are remorselessly focused upon creating a mainstream , " appliance " product and , to be fair , that makes a lot more business sense than trying to delight techies like us .
Congratulations , though , to Notion Ink for creating a truly innovative tablet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The rear trackpad is wonderful.
Before the iPad was introduced, I suspected that Apple would use two rear trackpads to allow users to type while gripping the pad, I thought that was what the rumors about a "surprising" input method meant.
Whether for cursor movement or the more advanced idea of text entry, using the back of a pad - where our fingers will be most of the time anyway - if such an obviously good idea.
When you have a small screen, why obscure it with your hands?
I had also hoped that the iPad would use the Pixel Qi screen.
Apple decided to build upon their previous iPhone innovation rather than introduce new innovation - Apple are remorselessly focused upon creating a mainstream, "appliance" product and, to be fair, that makes a lot more business sense than trying to delight techies like us.
Congratulations, though, to Notion Ink for creating a truly innovative tablet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31147950</id>
	<title>Re:Think Kick Ass Book - Not Computer</title>
	<author>joh</author>
	<datestamp>1266225420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I think a lightweight tablet has a lot of potential if it is cheap enough.  The $500+ Apple tablet I think costs WAY too much for any but the fanboys who will buy anything Job's touches.  If they could get this tablet down to the $200-$300 range I think they could have a winner.  I would love to have a little tablet that lets me browse the web, read e-books, store/play music, maybe watch movies, and do other passive media consumption tasks.</p> </div><p>As always the question is how much money your time is worth (and if you want to have it metered). If the iPad with its OS and apps require/allow much less tinkering than that tablet with Android and Android apps, $500 may be cheaper than $300.</p><p>I have seen only very few Android apps that are really great and the fact that there is so much hardware and different screen resolutions to be supported by those apps makes me think that for "just use the thing" an iPad isn't that a bad idea.</p><p>I'm not an Apple fanboi but Apple *is* good at making the technology vanish and to make it look like magic instead. Android doesn't even try, it still looks and feels like an OS. I do not want to deal with an OS for consuming media, I want it to be magic.</p><p>Saving $200 at my current rate means I have 4 hours over the lifetime of such a tablet to waste with tinkering around before the return turns negative.</p><p>I may very well end up with an iPad for the lazy/magic part and an Adam tablet for something I can hack... Or with just hacking real computers, which I have more than enough of. I'm still not really sure if this isn't the point to take some time-out from always screwing around with my devices and get one to just turn into a mindless user now and then. And I'm *very* tempted by the iPad, my geek mind just wants to explore how it feels to just use something that my mother could also use. There may be new fields of insight to be found here.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think a lightweight tablet has a lot of potential if it is cheap enough .
The $ 500 + Apple tablet I think costs WAY too much for any but the fanboys who will buy anything Job 's touches .
If they could get this tablet down to the $ 200- $ 300 range I think they could have a winner .
I would love to have a little tablet that lets me browse the web , read e-books , store/play music , maybe watch movies , and do other passive media consumption tasks .
As always the question is how much money your time is worth ( and if you want to have it metered ) .
If the iPad with its OS and apps require/allow much less tinkering than that tablet with Android and Android apps , $ 500 may be cheaper than $ 300.I have seen only very few Android apps that are really great and the fact that there is so much hardware and different screen resolutions to be supported by those apps makes me think that for " just use the thing " an iPad is n't that a bad idea.I 'm not an Apple fanboi but Apple * is * good at making the technology vanish and to make it look like magic instead .
Android does n't even try , it still looks and feels like an OS .
I do not want to deal with an OS for consuming media , I want it to be magic.Saving $ 200 at my current rate means I have 4 hours over the lifetime of such a tablet to waste with tinkering around before the return turns negative.I may very well end up with an iPad for the lazy/magic part and an Adam tablet for something I can hack... Or with just hacking real computers , which I have more than enough of .
I 'm still not really sure if this is n't the point to take some time-out from always screwing around with my devices and get one to just turn into a mindless user now and then .
And I 'm * very * tempted by the iPad , my geek mind just wants to explore how it feels to just use something that my mother could also use .
There may be new fields of insight to be found here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think a lightweight tablet has a lot of potential if it is cheap enough.
The $500+ Apple tablet I think costs WAY too much for any but the fanboys who will buy anything Job's touches.
If they could get this tablet down to the $200-$300 range I think they could have a winner.
I would love to have a little tablet that lets me browse the web, read e-books, store/play music, maybe watch movies, and do other passive media consumption tasks.
As always the question is how much money your time is worth (and if you want to have it metered).
If the iPad with its OS and apps require/allow much less tinkering than that tablet with Android and Android apps, $500 may be cheaper than $300.I have seen only very few Android apps that are really great and the fact that there is so much hardware and different screen resolutions to be supported by those apps makes me think that for "just use the thing" an iPad isn't that a bad idea.I'm not an Apple fanboi but Apple *is* good at making the technology vanish and to make it look like magic instead.
Android doesn't even try, it still looks and feels like an OS.
I do not want to deal with an OS for consuming media, I want it to be magic.Saving $200 at my current rate means I have 4 hours over the lifetime of such a tablet to waste with tinkering around before the return turns negative.I may very well end up with an iPad for the lazy/magic part and an Adam tablet for something I can hack... Or with just hacking real computers, which I have more than enough of.
I'm still not really sure if this isn't the point to take some time-out from always screwing around with my devices and get one to just turn into a mindless user now and then.
And I'm *very* tempted by the iPad, my geek mind just wants to explore how it feels to just use something that my mother could also use.
There may be new fields of insight to be found here.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142914</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31144860</id>
	<title>I'm sorry but no.</title>
	<author>pavon</author>
	<datestamp>1266253200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm usually a fan of Apple's minimalistic design, but the iPad feature set is worthless to me.</p><p>Reading: the main purpose of a device like this, but reflective displays are much nicer than emissive. +1 Notion Ink<br>Drawing: these ought to be great for drawing and sketching but iPad can't due to lack of stylus. -1 Apple<br>Note taking: again this could be a major use case, but the iPad doesn't support it at all. -1 Apple<br>Slide Shows: external monitor support, both will require dongles for some situations, iPad always will. -0.5 Apple<br>Data Transfer: Even for a view-only device I need to copy things off of USB drives and cameras. -1 Apple<br>Data Sync: I don't want to have to use a fucking remote server to sync with my desktop computer. -1 Apple<br>Multitasking: I wanted in on the Palm Pilot, you bet your ass I'm going to want it here. -1 Apple<br>Single hand use: I agree that the UI of these should allow one barehand control for everything it can, which both the iPhone OS and Android should do a better job at than previous Windows Tablets +1 Apple &amp; Notion Ink</p><p>And that isn't even getting into the fact that Apple has set itself up as a gatekeep for what applications are even allowed on the device. I love my 20GB iPod and Mac OS X and can see the appeal of the iPhone. I don't get the iPad at all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm usually a fan of Apple 's minimalistic design , but the iPad feature set is worthless to me.Reading : the main purpose of a device like this , but reflective displays are much nicer than emissive .
+ 1 Notion InkDrawing : these ought to be great for drawing and sketching but iPad ca n't due to lack of stylus .
-1 AppleNote taking : again this could be a major use case , but the iPad does n't support it at all .
-1 AppleSlide Shows : external monitor support , both will require dongles for some situations , iPad always will .
-0.5 AppleData Transfer : Even for a view-only device I need to copy things off of USB drives and cameras .
-1 AppleData Sync : I do n't want to have to use a fucking remote server to sync with my desktop computer .
-1 AppleMultitasking : I wanted in on the Palm Pilot , you bet your ass I 'm going to want it here .
-1 AppleSingle hand use : I agree that the UI of these should allow one barehand control for everything it can , which both the iPhone OS and Android should do a better job at than previous Windows Tablets + 1 Apple &amp; Notion InkAnd that is n't even getting into the fact that Apple has set itself up as a gatekeep for what applications are even allowed on the device .
I love my 20GB iPod and Mac OS X and can see the appeal of the iPhone .
I do n't get the iPad at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm usually a fan of Apple's minimalistic design, but the iPad feature set is worthless to me.Reading: the main purpose of a device like this, but reflective displays are much nicer than emissive.
+1 Notion InkDrawing: these ought to be great for drawing and sketching but iPad can't due to lack of stylus.
-1 AppleNote taking: again this could be a major use case, but the iPad doesn't support it at all.
-1 AppleSlide Shows: external monitor support, both will require dongles for some situations, iPad always will.
-0.5 AppleData Transfer: Even for a view-only device I need to copy things off of USB drives and cameras.
-1 AppleData Sync: I don't want to have to use a fucking remote server to sync with my desktop computer.
-1 AppleMultitasking: I wanted in on the Palm Pilot, you bet your ass I'm going to want it here.
-1 AppleSingle hand use: I agree that the UI of these should allow one barehand control for everything it can, which both the iPhone OS and Android should do a better job at than previous Windows Tablets +1 Apple &amp; Notion InkAnd that isn't even getting into the fact that Apple has set itself up as a gatekeep for what applications are even allowed on the device.
I love my 20GB iPod and Mac OS X and can see the appeal of the iPhone.
I don't get the iPad at all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142720</id>
	<title>Failed a patent on the swivelling camera?</title>
	<author>argent</author>
	<datestamp>1266237480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, friend, swivelling cameras like that have been around on laptops and handhelds for years.</p><p>Eg, <a href="http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/ciu/d2/d2/985b4310fca01b4db85b7010.L.\_SL500\_AA280\_.jpg" title="images-amazon.com">Sony TR3A</a> [images-amazon.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , friend , swivelling cameras like that have been around on laptops and handhelds for years.Eg , Sony TR3A [ images-amazon.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, friend, swivelling cameras like that have been around on laptops and handhelds for years.Eg, Sony TR3A [images-amazon.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142282</id>
	<title>Nice, but Android?</title>
	<author>BadAnalogyGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1266231360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I like Java as much as the next guy, but why would you want to force all your developers into that language?</p><p>Since it's clearly able to run Linux, just provide a standard Ubuntu installation. That'd be much better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I like Java as much as the next guy , but why would you want to force all your developers into that language ? Since it 's clearly able to run Linux , just provide a standard Ubuntu installation .
That 'd be much better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like Java as much as the next guy, but why would you want to force all your developers into that language?Since it's clearly able to run Linux, just provide a standard Ubuntu installation.
That'd be much better.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31146102</id>
	<title>As an eReader</title>
	<author>masmullin</author>
	<datestamp>1266259440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Im being picky here, but the screen is an awkward shape for eBooks.  1024x600 as 10.1" is a rather elongated rectangle, and isn't anywhere near the same ratios as 8.5"x11" paper (22:17 which pdfs emulate).  It's not a 16:9 ratio It's a strange 128:75 ratio</p><p>I think this will leave readers of pdfs with a shrunken page so that it will fit into the slimness when the tablet is held vertically, and with a little bit of the next page seen at the bottom of the screen.</p><p>I dont think the screen shape will be good for text reading, I dont think it will be good for holding, I dont think its good for movies, I dont think its particularly good for normal applications.</p><p>Other than "because thats the size the pixel Qi makes" I cant think of a good reason for this elongated screen.</p><p>However, I truly truly hope that I am wrong.  I really want this product to succeed, but why the weird screen?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Im being picky here , but the screen is an awkward shape for eBooks .
1024x600 as 10.1 " is a rather elongated rectangle , and is n't anywhere near the same ratios as 8.5 " x11 " paper ( 22 : 17 which pdfs emulate ) .
It 's not a 16 : 9 ratio It 's a strange 128 : 75 ratioI think this will leave readers of pdfs with a shrunken page so that it will fit into the slimness when the tablet is held vertically , and with a little bit of the next page seen at the bottom of the screen.I dont think the screen shape will be good for text reading , I dont think it will be good for holding , I dont think its good for movies , I dont think its particularly good for normal applications.Other than " because thats the size the pixel Qi makes " I cant think of a good reason for this elongated screen.However , I truly truly hope that I am wrong .
I really want this product to succeed , but why the weird screen ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Im being picky here, but the screen is an awkward shape for eBooks.
1024x600 as 10.1" is a rather elongated rectangle, and isn't anywhere near the same ratios as 8.5"x11" paper (22:17 which pdfs emulate).
It's not a 16:9 ratio It's a strange 128:75 ratioI think this will leave readers of pdfs with a shrunken page so that it will fit into the slimness when the tablet is held vertically, and with a little bit of the next page seen at the bottom of the screen.I dont think the screen shape will be good for text reading, I dont think it will be good for holding, I dont think its good for movies, I dont think its particularly good for normal applications.Other than "because thats the size the pixel Qi makes" I cant think of a good reason for this elongated screen.However, I truly truly hope that I am wrong.
I really want this product to succeed, but why the weird screen?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31143868</id>
	<title>Re:Amazing</title>
	<author>Fantastic Lad</author>
	<datestamp>1266248640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I actually looked up "Neckbeard Device" and found nothing.  I have no idea what you are talking about.  Please advise, because if you have a cool explanation, I'm totally using it at the next cocktail party I attend.</p><p>Also, as has been pointed out. . .</p><p>Mouse, Keyboard, USB stick.  Done.</p><p>Though I sort of agree with you on the video out.  Seriously?  Has anybody ever truly said, "Damn!  I really need to plug my laptop into a television!"  -Though, I <i>can</i> envision some sort of emerging market whereby your computer game controller also happens to be your handheld computer.  -People being able to bring their own fully personalized game controller to a gaming meet. . , that could be very popular.  People extend self-identification to the devices they carry around and use all the time, so being able to plug it in and compete with it in public could be very appealing.  But this Notion device certainly isn't thinking that way, so essentially the video-out is just there because of market momentum and because it probably cost them virtually nothing to include.</p><p>Still, I have to say that this is the first device of its kind which I have an inkling of interest in.  The screen tech is pretty advanced.  But you're right; I don't think the Indian manufacturing market has worked out how to sell to the garden variety American.  Indians are super-charged with economic energy and optimism, and that's great to see, but they're also operating under the influence of a truly different set of cultural imperatives.  The Indian and Western cultures really don't fit together comfortably at all.  It'll take a few tries to get it right, and Apple is like GM.  It has home turf advantage.  Funny thing is that in a few years, (if we're all still here), when the billion people in India transform into potential customers and as our economy tanks, they probably won't bother even trying to sell over here with such verve.</p><p>-FL</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I actually looked up " Neckbeard Device " and found nothing .
I have no idea what you are talking about .
Please advise , because if you have a cool explanation , I 'm totally using it at the next cocktail party I attend.Also , as has been pointed out .
. .Mouse , Keyboard , USB stick .
Done.Though I sort of agree with you on the video out .
Seriously ? Has anybody ever truly said , " Damn !
I really need to plug my laptop into a television !
" -Though , I can envision some sort of emerging market whereby your computer game controller also happens to be your handheld computer .
-People being able to bring their own fully personalized game controller to a gaming meet .
. , that could be very popular .
People extend self-identification to the devices they carry around and use all the time , so being able to plug it in and compete with it in public could be very appealing .
But this Notion device certainly is n't thinking that way , so essentially the video-out is just there because of market momentum and because it probably cost them virtually nothing to include.Still , I have to say that this is the first device of its kind which I have an inkling of interest in .
The screen tech is pretty advanced .
But you 're right ; I do n't think the Indian manufacturing market has worked out how to sell to the garden variety American .
Indians are super-charged with economic energy and optimism , and that 's great to see , but they 're also operating under the influence of a truly different set of cultural imperatives .
The Indian and Western cultures really do n't fit together comfortably at all .
It 'll take a few tries to get it right , and Apple is like GM .
It has home turf advantage .
Funny thing is that in a few years , ( if we 're all still here ) , when the billion people in India transform into potential customers and as our economy tanks , they probably wo n't bother even trying to sell over here with such verve.-FL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I actually looked up "Neckbeard Device" and found nothing.
I have no idea what you are talking about.
Please advise, because if you have a cool explanation, I'm totally using it at the next cocktail party I attend.Also, as has been pointed out.
. .Mouse, Keyboard, USB stick.
Done.Though I sort of agree with you on the video out.
Seriously?  Has anybody ever truly said, "Damn!
I really need to plug my laptop into a television!
"  -Though, I can envision some sort of emerging market whereby your computer game controller also happens to be your handheld computer.
-People being able to bring their own fully personalized game controller to a gaming meet.
. , that could be very popular.
People extend self-identification to the devices they carry around and use all the time, so being able to plug it in and compete with it in public could be very appealing.
But this Notion device certainly isn't thinking that way, so essentially the video-out is just there because of market momentum and because it probably cost them virtually nothing to include.Still, I have to say that this is the first device of its kind which I have an inkling of interest in.
The screen tech is pretty advanced.
But you're right; I don't think the Indian manufacturing market has worked out how to sell to the garden variety American.
Indians are super-charged with economic energy and optimism, and that's great to see, but they're also operating under the influence of a truly different set of cultural imperatives.
The Indian and Western cultures really don't fit together comfortably at all.
It'll take a few tries to get it right, and Apple is like GM.
It has home turf advantage.
Funny thing is that in a few years, (if we're all still here), when the billion people in India transform into potential customers and as our economy tanks, they probably won't bother even trying to sell over here with such verve.-FL</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31143334</id>
	<title>Re:Nice, but Android?</title>
	<author>slim</author>
	<datestamp>1266245160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I assume Android doesn't insist that your Java bytecode was compiled from Java source.</p><p>So if you're really averse to Java syntax, pick from Jython, jRuby, Groovy, Scala, Clojure etc., or compile to Java bytecode from C, Ada, even Cobol!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I assume Android does n't insist that your Java bytecode was compiled from Java source.So if you 're really averse to Java syntax , pick from Jython , jRuby , Groovy , Scala , Clojure etc. , or compile to Java bytecode from C , Ada , even Cobol !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I assume Android doesn't insist that your Java bytecode was compiled from Java source.So if you're really averse to Java syntax, pick from Jython, jRuby, Groovy, Scala, Clojure etc., or compile to Java bytecode from C, Ada, even Cobol!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142402</id>
	<title>Sigh,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266233340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apple in a way hit spot on, there is no reason to pack the tablet full of features when the form factor hinders utilization of those features, what can you seriously do with a tablet?..<br>I know people argued the same about netbooks, mainly because of the smaller displays, but fact remains it's a 'hold while using' concept with input requiring at least one free hand, preferably two. I don't have 4 hands and holding it with one will be quite a strain (tried reading a book while lying on your back).<br>Applications; writing/coding (not really), drawing (not really), reading/browsing (yes), movies (maybe if you don't mind holding it and arching forward, very inconvenient if you eat while watching), gaming (not really) unless you are really into arcade games.<br>If everything was as easy as it was in Stargate Atlantis for McKay to control everything with only a few clicks, sure, unfortunately, not there yet.</p><p>Not saying I wouldn't see the benefits of a tablet in certain situations, but then I'd really prefer an iPad which is 'slimmer'!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple in a way hit spot on , there is no reason to pack the tablet full of features when the form factor hinders utilization of those features , what can you seriously do with a tablet ? ..I know people argued the same about netbooks , mainly because of the smaller displays , but fact remains it 's a 'hold while using ' concept with input requiring at least one free hand , preferably two .
I do n't have 4 hands and holding it with one will be quite a strain ( tried reading a book while lying on your back ) .Applications ; writing/coding ( not really ) , drawing ( not really ) , reading/browsing ( yes ) , movies ( maybe if you do n't mind holding it and arching forward , very inconvenient if you eat while watching ) , gaming ( not really ) unless you are really into arcade games.If everything was as easy as it was in Stargate Atlantis for McKay to control everything with only a few clicks , sure , unfortunately , not there yet.Not saying I would n't see the benefits of a tablet in certain situations , but then I 'd really prefer an iPad which is 'slimmer ' !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple in a way hit spot on, there is no reason to pack the tablet full of features when the form factor hinders utilization of those features, what can you seriously do with a tablet?..I know people argued the same about netbooks, mainly because of the smaller displays, but fact remains it's a 'hold while using' concept with input requiring at least one free hand, preferably two.
I don't have 4 hands and holding it with one will be quite a strain (tried reading a book while lying on your back).Applications; writing/coding (not really), drawing (not really), reading/browsing (yes), movies (maybe if you don't mind holding it and arching forward, very inconvenient if you eat while watching), gaming (not really) unless you are really into arcade games.If everything was as easy as it was in Stargate Atlantis for McKay to control everything with only a few clicks, sure, unfortunately, not there yet.Not saying I wouldn't see the benefits of a tablet in certain situations, but then I'd really prefer an iPad which is 'slimmer'!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142670</id>
	<title>Re:Nice, but Android?</title>
	<author>Tapewolf</author>
	<datestamp>1266236940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>AFAIK you can only write subroutines in native code, you have to use Java for the main program and IIRC the user interface.  The NDK is intended to be used for number-crunching, or reusing large amounts of existing logic written in C/C++.</htmltext>
<tokenext>AFAIK you can only write subroutines in native code , you have to use Java for the main program and IIRC the user interface .
The NDK is intended to be used for number-crunching , or reusing large amounts of existing logic written in C/C + + .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>AFAIK you can only write subroutines in native code, you have to use Java for the main program and IIRC the user interface.
The NDK is intended to be used for number-crunching, or reusing large amounts of existing logic written in C/C++.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142416</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142416</id>
	<title>Re:Nice, but Android?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266233520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Android has a <a href="http://developer.android.com/sdk/ndk/1.6\_r1/index.html" title="android.com">NDK</a> [android.com] (Native Development Kit); it's possible to write Android apps for the Market in languages other than Java.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Android has a NDK [ android.com ] ( Native Development Kit ) ; it 's possible to write Android apps for the Market in languages other than Java .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Android has a NDK [android.com] (Native Development Kit); it's possible to write Android apps for the Market in languages other than Java.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142622</id>
	<title>Re:"literally badgered"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266236580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>real badgers, mushrooms and an occasional snake.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>real badgers , mushrooms and an occasional snake .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>real badgers, mushrooms and an occasional snake.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142374</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_0223251_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142630
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142340
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_0223251_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31145614
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_0223251_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_0223251_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_0223251_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31144054
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_0223251_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31152226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142374
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_0223251_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31144790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_0223251_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31147950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_0223251_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142360
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_0223251_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_0223251_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31143066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_0223251_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31143646
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142374
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_0223251_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31148122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_0223251_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31281210
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_0223251_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142360
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_0223251_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31144960
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142340
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_0223251_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142496
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_0223251_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31145380
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31143868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_0223251_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31273498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31143868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_0223251_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142622
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142374
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_0223251_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31143282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_0223251_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31143334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_0223251_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142540
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_0223251_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31143410
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31143036
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_0223251_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31144860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_0223251.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142360
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142564
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142742
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_0223251.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142402
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31144860
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142956
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31148122
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142914
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31147950
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31144054
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_0223251.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142340
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142630
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142514
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31144960
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_0223251.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31146768
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_0223251.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31146102
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_0223251.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142374
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31143646
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31152226
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142622
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_0223251.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142738
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31145614
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31143868
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31145380
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31273498
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31143066
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_0223251.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142282
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142640
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31281210
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142642
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142496
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142540
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31144790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31143036
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31143410
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142416
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142670
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31142924
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31143334
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_0223251.31143282
</commentlist>
</conversation>
