<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_12_1553221</id>
	<title>Mining EXIF Data From Camera Phones</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1265998260000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>emeitner notes that folks at the Internet Storm Center wrote scripts that harvested 15,291 images from Twitpic and <a href="http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=8203">analyzed the EXIF information</a>. This reader adds, "While mining EXIF data from images is nothing new, how many people would allow this data to leave their cell phone if they knew what it contained? The source code for the scripts is also available from the article." <i>"399 images included the location of the camera at the time the image was taken, and 102 images included the name of the photographer. ... The iPhone is including the most EXIF information among the images we found. ... It not only includes the phone's location, but also accelerometer data showing if the phone was moved at the time the picture was taken and the readout from the [built-]in compass showing in which direction the phone was pointed at the time."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>emeitner notes that folks at the Internet Storm Center wrote scripts that harvested 15,291 images from Twitpic and analyzed the EXIF information .
This reader adds , " While mining EXIF data from images is nothing new , how many people would allow this data to leave their cell phone if they knew what it contained ?
The source code for the scripts is also available from the article .
" " 399 images included the location of the camera at the time the image was taken , and 102 images included the name of the photographer .
... The iPhone is including the most EXIF information among the images we found .
... It not only includes the phone 's location , but also accelerometer data showing if the phone was moved at the time the picture was taken and the readout from the [ built- ] in compass showing in which direction the phone was pointed at the time .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>emeitner notes that folks at the Internet Storm Center wrote scripts that harvested 15,291 images from Twitpic and analyzed the EXIF information.
This reader adds, "While mining EXIF data from images is nothing new, how many people would allow this data to leave their cell phone if they knew what it contained?
The source code for the scripts is also available from the article.
" "399 images included the location of the camera at the time the image was taken, and 102 images included the name of the photographer.
... The iPhone is including the most EXIF information among the images we found.
... It not only includes the phone's location, but also accelerometer data showing if the phone was moved at the time the picture was taken and the readout from the [built-]in compass showing in which direction the phone was pointed at the time.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117118</id>
	<title>Re:Oh Noes!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266007080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Now someone will be able to track down the location of my precious kitty cat, Scruffles.</p></div><p>I haz Scruffles, will ak-cupt ranzom<br>3 punds of catnip &amp; 2 fish<br>lv ranzom bi garage<br>den Scruffles will be relezed</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now someone will be able to track down the location of my precious kitty cat , Scruffles.I haz Scruffles , will ak-cupt ranzom3 punds of catnip &amp; 2 fishlv ranzom bi garageden Scruffles will be relezed</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now someone will be able to track down the location of my precious kitty cat, Scruffles.I haz Scruffles, will ak-cupt ranzom3 punds of catnip &amp; 2 fishlv ranzom bi garageden Scruffles will be relezed
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116822</id>
	<title>Re:meh</title>
	<author>KC7JHO</author>
	<datestamp>1266005700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>While I completely understand the sentiment, even most Point and Shoot cameras come with some type of software for downloading the pictures from the camera. This software will usually use the EXIF data to help organize your pictures by date taken, location (If available), etc. The real problem is that when uploading directly from your cell phone you are not given the option to strip that data from the file. If you upload it to your computer first you can just right click on it in windows explorer, or what ever other file browser you are using, and select properties (then advanced properties if needed on windows XP) and delete the data you want to, close the file ant the new properties will be saved to it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>While I completely understand the sentiment , even most Point and Shoot cameras come with some type of software for downloading the pictures from the camera .
This software will usually use the EXIF data to help organize your pictures by date taken , location ( If available ) , etc .
The real problem is that when uploading directly from your cell phone you are not given the option to strip that data from the file .
If you upload it to your computer first you can just right click on it in windows explorer , or what ever other file browser you are using , and select properties ( then advanced properties if needed on windows XP ) and delete the data you want to , close the file ant the new properties will be saved to it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I completely understand the sentiment, even most Point and Shoot cameras come with some type of software for downloading the pictures from the camera.
This software will usually use the EXIF data to help organize your pictures by date taken, location (If available), etc.
The real problem is that when uploading directly from your cell phone you are not given the option to strip that data from the file.
If you upload it to your computer first you can just right click on it in windows explorer, or what ever other file browser you are using, and select properties (then advanced properties if needed on windows XP) and delete the data you want to, close the file ant the new properties will be saved to it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116078</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31118026</id>
	<title>Re:So?</title>
	<author>bill\_mcgonigle</author>
	<datestamp>1265966700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>In fact knowing where pictures were taken can lead to some really cool mashups of tourist photos and such.</i></p><p>Yes, eventually Street Maps will just be a projection of user-published pictures.</p><p>In the meantime, a good picture uploader will include a [x] Strip Identifying Information UI widget next to the 'upload' button, so it's all informed consent.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In fact knowing where pictures were taken can lead to some really cool mashups of tourist photos and such.Yes , eventually Street Maps will just be a projection of user-published pictures.In the meantime , a good picture uploader will include a [ x ] Strip Identifying Information UI widget next to the 'upload ' button , so it 's all informed consent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In fact knowing where pictures were taken can lead to some really cool mashups of tourist photos and such.Yes, eventually Street Maps will just be a projection of user-published pictures.In the meantime, a good picture uploader will include a [x] Strip Identifying Information UI widget next to the 'upload' button, so it's all informed consent.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116136</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117082</id>
	<title>Remove EXIF metadata?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266006960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Someone should make a software that removes EXIF metadata. That strips it from an image.</p><p>$ stripexif img\_5643.jpg</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone should make a software that removes EXIF metadata .
That strips it from an image. $ stripexif img \ _5643.jpg</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone should make a software that removes EXIF metadata.
That strips it from an image.$ stripexif img\_5643.jpg</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116122</id>
	<title>Re:Photosynth Would Like This</title>
	<author>Midnight Thunder</author>
	<datestamp>1266002400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now you mention it, the information from the iPhone could be useful for correctly placing a photo in an application such as Google Earth. You would know what angle the camera was in, what direction it was pointing and given the fact its a fixed zoom how line everything up. You could then even use a temporal guide to view evolution of the location over time, given multiple photos.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now you mention it , the information from the iPhone could be useful for correctly placing a photo in an application such as Google Earth .
You would know what angle the camera was in , what direction it was pointing and given the fact its a fixed zoom how line everything up .
You could then even use a temporal guide to view evolution of the location over time , given multiple photos .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now you mention it, the information from the iPhone could be useful for correctly placing a photo in an application such as Google Earth.
You would know what angle the camera was in, what direction it was pointing and given the fact its a fixed zoom how line everything up.
You could then even use a temporal guide to view evolution of the location over time, given multiple photos.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116062</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117130</id>
	<title>Re:The metadata</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266007140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cool, now Obama doesn't even need to invent some rope-a-dope justification for obtaining your phone's location without a warrant!</p><p>Yours in Totalitarianism,<br>Tony Rezko, convicted felon, former Chicago slumlord, and one-time realtor to the Obamas</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cool , now Obama does n't even need to invent some rope-a-dope justification for obtaining your phone 's location without a warrant ! Yours in Totalitarianism,Tony Rezko , convicted felon , former Chicago slumlord , and one-time realtor to the Obamas</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cool, now Obama doesn't even need to invent some rope-a-dope justification for obtaining your phone's location without a warrant!Yours in Totalitarianism,Tony Rezko, convicted felon, former Chicago slumlord, and one-time realtor to the Obamas</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31115988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116594</id>
	<title>Re:Sharpie in the pooper!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266004380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As disappoint in myself I am to admit it, I've seen a few threads that went that way.</p><p>"Hey look, I'm a camwhore with bathroom mirror nudie pix!"</p><p>"Hey, look, I found your lat/lon in the EXIF data"</p><p>"Hey, look, I found your house on Google Maps at this link. RAEDZ!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As disappoint in myself I am to admit it , I 've seen a few threads that went that way .
" Hey look , I 'm a camwhore with bathroom mirror nudie pix !
" " Hey , look , I found your lat/lon in the EXIF data " " Hey , look , I found your house on Google Maps at this link .
RAEDZ ! "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As disappoint in myself I am to admit it, I've seen a few threads that went that way.
"Hey look, I'm a camwhore with bathroom mirror nudie pix!
""Hey, look, I found your lat/lon in the EXIF data""Hey, look, I found your house on Google Maps at this link.
RAEDZ!"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116464</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117648</id>
	<title>Re:Off-Topic: Good EXIF editing library?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265965620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ExifTool</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ExifTool</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ExifTool</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116092</id>
	<title>Oh Noes!!!</title>
	<author>RemoWilliams84</author>
	<datestamp>1266002280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now someone will be able to track down the location of my precious kitty cat, Scruffles.</p><p>I must never take pictures of him again.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/sarcasm</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now someone will be able to track down the location of my precious kitty cat , Scruffles.I must never take pictures of him again .
/sarcasm</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now someone will be able to track down the location of my precious kitty cat, Scruffles.I must never take pictures of him again.
/sarcasm</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116188</id>
	<title>Pakistani Pizza?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266002580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That looks more like a quiche...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That looks more like a quiche.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That looks more like a quiche...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31115988</id>
	<title>The metadata</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266001860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Someday soon a politician will post what appears to be a benign photo with an embarrassing long/lat location.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Someday soon a politician will post what appears to be a benign photo with an embarrassing long/lat location .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someday soon a politician will post what appears to be a benign photo with an embarrassing long/lat location.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117184</id>
	<title>yuO fail it!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266007320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>provide sodas, the most. Look at a relatively of ,business and</htmltext>
<tokenext>provide sodas , the most .
Look at a relatively of ,business and</tokentext>
<sentencetext>provide sodas, the most.
Look at a relatively of ,business and</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116462</id>
	<title>"Twitpic"?</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1266003780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Amazing honesty.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Amazing honesty .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Amazing honesty.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31162284</id>
	<title>I've been warning about that</title>
	<author>^\_^x</author>
	<datestamp>1266324780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Even today, I posted my EXIF rant on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.</p><p>I didn't know about some of those things - like photographer name and compass direction. I was thinking geotagging on GPS phones. So you upload your pics to Flickr or a photo storage site for phones, cops get a warrant to search the server which, of course, doesn't use per-user crypto. The cops run a simple off the shelf harvest tool to identify faces...</p><p>Now they know everyone who has been on anyone's photo on the server, where they were, at what times, with who, who their friends' friends are, where they habitually go, times and places of people who happened to be caught in the pics accidentally, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Even today , I posted my EXIF rant on /.I did n't know about some of those things - like photographer name and compass direction .
I was thinking geotagging on GPS phones .
So you upload your pics to Flickr or a photo storage site for phones , cops get a warrant to search the server which , of course , does n't use per-user crypto .
The cops run a simple off the shelf harvest tool to identify faces...Now they know everyone who has been on anyone 's photo on the server , where they were , at what times , with who , who their friends ' friends are , where they habitually go , times and places of people who happened to be caught in the pics accidentally , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even today, I posted my EXIF rant on /.I didn't know about some of those things - like photographer name and compass direction.
I was thinking geotagging on GPS phones.
So you upload your pics to Flickr or a photo storage site for phones, cops get a warrant to search the server which, of course, doesn't use per-user crypto.
The cops run a simple off the shelf harvest tool to identify faces...Now they know everyone who has been on anyone's photo on the server, where they were, at what times, with who, who their friends' friends are, where they habitually go, times and places of people who happened to be caught in the pics accidentally, etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116476</id>
	<title>Facebook strips exif</title>
	<author>Leebert</author>
	<datestamp>1266003840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've actually found it kind of annoying that Facebook strips exif data.  I've wanted to pull it out of some of the pics of friends' iPhone photos and creep them out by knowing where they were when they took them.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've actually found it kind of annoying that Facebook strips exif data .
I 've wanted to pull it out of some of the pics of friends ' iPhone photos and creep them out by knowing where they were when they took them .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've actually found it kind of annoying that Facebook strips exif data.
I've wanted to pull it out of some of the pics of friends' iPhone photos and creep them out by knowing where they were when they took them.
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31126918</id>
	<title>Re:The iPhone metadata was already known I thought</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1266076260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't think warnings are the way to go. In many cases of typical user warnings look scary; the website is scary. Better to use one without scary things...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think warnings are the way to go .
In many cases of typical user warnings look scary ; the website is scary .
Better to use one without scary things.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think warnings are the way to go.
In many cases of typical user warnings look scary; the website is scary.
Better to use one without scary things...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116946</id>
	<title>"Big Brother" made cool...</title>
	<author>logicassasin</author>
	<datestamp>1266006360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... The title pretty much sums it up. Big Brother was made "cool" and the public welcomed it with open arms.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... The title pretty much sums it up .
Big Brother was made " cool " and the public welcomed it with open arms .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... The title pretty much sums it up.
Big Brother was made "cool" and the public welcomed it with open arms.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31121418</id>
	<title>Re:So?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265976780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>then i take it you won't mind if i start mining faces of your friends in your photgraphs and correlate them with their respective photos to get more detail of where you live, usual patterns of movement / activity so that once i've got enough information i can steal basically everything from you without you even knowing (and i'm not just talking about digital details).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>then i take it you wo n't mind if i start mining faces of your friends in your photgraphs and correlate them with their respective photos to get more detail of where you live , usual patterns of movement / activity so that once i 've got enough information i can steal basically everything from you without you even knowing ( and i 'm not just talking about digital details ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>then i take it you won't mind if i start mining faces of your friends in your photgraphs and correlate them with their respective photos to get more detail of where you live, usual patterns of movement / activity so that once i've got enough information i can steal basically everything from you without you even knowing (and i'm not just talking about digital details).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116136</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116232</id>
	<title>no problem...</title>
	<author>sohp</author>
	<datestamp>1266002760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is why I shoot film on an old manual camera.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is why I shoot film on an old manual camera .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is why I shoot film on an old manual camera.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116404</id>
	<title>Re:The metadata</title>
	<author>TheLink</author>
	<datestamp>1266003480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Most people have a lassitude attitude with latitude.<br><br>They give sites way too much latitude. Even if it may reveal their turpitude.<br><br>Not enough aptitude and too much ineptitude.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Most people have a lassitude attitude with latitude.They give sites way too much latitude .
Even if it may reveal their turpitude.Not enough aptitude and too much ineptitude .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most people have a lassitude attitude with latitude.They give sites way too much latitude.
Even if it may reveal their turpitude.Not enough aptitude and too much ineptitude.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31115988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31120150</id>
	<title>What cameras?</title>
	<author>bicho</author>
	<datestamp>1265972220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What digital cameras (not<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.*phones) add exif location metadata information to the pictures?</p><p>I have a simple Canon PowerShot SX100IS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What digital cameras ( not .
* phones ) add exif location metadata information to the pictures ? I have a simple Canon PowerShot SX100IS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What digital cameras (not .
*phones) add exif location metadata information to the pictures?I have a simple Canon PowerShot SX100IS.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116386</id>
	<title>If you're surprised you're a fool</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1266003420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You have to go out of your way to include location in your pic. You need to be outdoors with most phones to get a clean GPS signal and have the GPS on the phone switched on and the camera set to include GPS data. GPS is still an advanced (and desired!) feature on non-mobile phone cameras that people pay extra money for. It's just that many phones now happen to include both a camera and a GPS so giving the user the option to record the two makes sense. On a decent camera, in all but the top of the line SLRs you still have to get additional hardware to do it.</p><p>Pretending this is some sort of major security iisk is asinine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You have to go out of your way to include location in your pic .
You need to be outdoors with most phones to get a clean GPS signal and have the GPS on the phone switched on and the camera set to include GPS data .
GPS is still an advanced ( and desired !
) feature on non-mobile phone cameras that people pay extra money for .
It 's just that many phones now happen to include both a camera and a GPS so giving the user the option to record the two makes sense .
On a decent camera , in all but the top of the line SLRs you still have to get additional hardware to do it.Pretending this is some sort of major security iisk is asinine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have to go out of your way to include location in your pic.
You need to be outdoors with most phones to get a clean GPS signal and have the GPS on the phone switched on and the camera set to include GPS data.
GPS is still an advanced (and desired!
) feature on non-mobile phone cameras that people pay extra money for.
It's just that many phones now happen to include both a camera and a GPS so giving the user the option to record the two makes sense.
On a decent camera, in all but the top of the line SLRs you still have to get additional hardware to do it.Pretending this is some sort of major security iisk is asinine.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117370</id>
	<title>Re:So?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266008040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>-1? That's moderation abuse.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>-1 ?
That 's moderation abuse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>-1?
That's moderation abuse.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116162</id>
	<title>What the heck!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266002520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are zillions of images posted on public domain by millions...why should I care if you got to know that "I" took this picture in Tunisia and the camera was pointed to some blasted direction at some freaking angle...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are zillions of images posted on public domain by millions...why should I care if you got to know that " I " took this picture in Tunisia and the camera was pointed to some blasted direction at some freaking angle.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are zillions of images posted on public domain by millions...why should I care if you got to know that "I" took this picture in Tunisia and the camera was pointed to some blasted direction at some freaking angle...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31120144</id>
	<title>Re:Off-Topic: Good EXIF editing library?</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1265972220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exiv fits your description:</p><p><a href="http://www.exiv2.org/index.html" title="exiv2.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.exiv2.org/index.html</a> [exiv2.org]</p><p>(I find the already mentioned ExifTool better for command line stuff)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Exiv fits your description : http : //www.exiv2.org/index.html [ exiv2.org ] ( I find the already mentioned ExifTool better for command line stuff )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exiv fits your description:http://www.exiv2.org/index.html [exiv2.org](I find the already mentioned ExifTool better for command line stuff)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116638</id>
	<title>Re:no problem...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266004620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course, you'll need your own darkroom if you don't want one of those 1-hour photo places seeing your pictures.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course , you 'll need your own darkroom if you do n't want one of those 1-hour photo places seeing your pictures .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course, you'll need your own darkroom if you don't want one of those 1-hour photo places seeing your pictures.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116232</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116064</id>
	<title>dumb question</title>
	<author>toastar</author>
	<datestamp>1266002220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How hard is it to extract this data, Do you need a special tool or can i see it all in photoshop</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How hard is it to extract this data , Do you need a special tool or can i see it all in photoshop</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How hard is it to extract this data, Do you need a special tool or can i see it all in photoshop</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116556</id>
	<title>Re:The metadata</title>
	<author>Dogtanian</author>
	<datestamp>1266004260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Someday soon a politician will post what appears to be a benign photo with an embarrassing long/lat location.</p></div><p>Ah... but perhaps they already have, and it's already out there- it's just that no-one has realised it yet.<br> <br>
In which case, there's nothing they can do about it now.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-/<br> <br>
This is why you should be cautious about what information you release. Even if there's no known exploit for information at the time you give it out; even if you tighten things up once a given danger becomes known... your old information is still out there, and now subject to *newer* information-retrieval techniques.<br> <br>
If it's time-sensitive information (e.g. you don't want $REPRESSIVE\_DICTATORIAL\_REGIME to know your current location), then their being able to retrieve such info two years down the line is meaningless. On the other hand, if it (e.g.) revealed the previously unknown fact that you were active with an anti-government organisation, you're in trouble.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Someday soon a politician will post what appears to be a benign photo with an embarrassing long/lat location.Ah... but perhaps they already have , and it 's already out there- it 's just that no-one has realised it yet .
In which case , there 's nothing they can do about it now .
: -/ This is why you should be cautious about what information you release .
Even if there 's no known exploit for information at the time you give it out ; even if you tighten things up once a given danger becomes known... your old information is still out there , and now subject to * newer * information-retrieval techniques .
If it 's time-sensitive information ( e.g .
you do n't want $ REPRESSIVE \ _DICTATORIAL \ _REGIME to know your current location ) , then their being able to retrieve such info two years down the line is meaningless .
On the other hand , if it ( e.g .
) revealed the previously unknown fact that you were active with an anti-government organisation , you 're in trouble .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someday soon a politician will post what appears to be a benign photo with an embarrassing long/lat location.Ah... but perhaps they already have, and it's already out there- it's just that no-one has realised it yet.
In which case, there's nothing they can do about it now.
:-/ 
This is why you should be cautious about what information you release.
Even if there's no known exploit for information at the time you give it out; even if you tighten things up once a given danger becomes known... your old information is still out there, and now subject to *newer* information-retrieval techniques.
If it's time-sensitive information (e.g.
you don't want $REPRESSIVE\_DICTATORIAL\_REGIME to know your current location), then their being able to retrieve such info two years down the line is meaningless.
On the other hand, if it (e.g.
) revealed the previously unknown fact that you were active with an anti-government organisation, you're in trouble.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31115988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116696</id>
	<title>Re:Warrent</title>
	<author>StreetStealth</author>
	<datestamp>1266004980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just checked my most recent Yfrog upload (of something completely innocuous) which I shot and tweeted directly from my iPhone and it looks like every last bit of metadata has been stripped. It doesn't even say what it was shot with.</p><p>Don't know how Twitpic and others work, but so far so good.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just checked my most recent Yfrog upload ( of something completely innocuous ) which I shot and tweeted directly from my iPhone and it looks like every last bit of metadata has been stripped .
It does n't even say what it was shot with.Do n't know how Twitpic and others work , but so far so good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just checked my most recent Yfrog upload (of something completely innocuous) which I shot and tweeted directly from my iPhone and it looks like every last bit of metadata has been stripped.
It doesn't even say what it was shot with.Don't know how Twitpic and others work, but so far so good.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116114</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116474</id>
	<title>Re:So?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266003840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know what? Why argue? Go ahead and publish your life. Don't come crying to us when we exploit the information that you so generously provided. If you don't have the imagination to come up with ways how this may be bad for you and good for someone else, rest assured that we do have plenty ideas. I'm serious. I am really fed up with this whole "who cares" bullshit. I used to care for other people's privacy, but I don't anymore. If you publish it, I use it.</p><p>When chased by a tiger, you don't have to outrun the tiger. You only have to outrun your colleague.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know what ?
Why argue ?
Go ahead and publish your life .
Do n't come crying to us when we exploit the information that you so generously provided .
If you do n't have the imagination to come up with ways how this may be bad for you and good for someone else , rest assured that we do have plenty ideas .
I 'm serious .
I am really fed up with this whole " who cares " bullshit .
I used to care for other people 's privacy , but I do n't anymore .
If you publish it , I use it.When chased by a tiger , you do n't have to outrun the tiger .
You only have to outrun your colleague .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know what?
Why argue?
Go ahead and publish your life.
Don't come crying to us when we exploit the information that you so generously provided.
If you don't have the imagination to come up with ways how this may be bad for you and good for someone else, rest assured that we do have plenty ideas.
I'm serious.
I am really fed up with this whole "who cares" bullshit.
I used to care for other people's privacy, but I don't anymore.
If you publish it, I use it.When chased by a tiger, you don't have to outrun the tiger.
You only have to outrun your colleague.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116136</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116078</id>
	<title>meh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266002280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't be bothered to set the clock on my camera, let alone enter personal data.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't be bothered to set the clock on my camera , let alone enter personal data .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't be bothered to set the clock on my camera, let alone enter personal data.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116506</id>
	<title>Off-Topic: Good EXIF editing library?</title>
	<author>TejWC</author>
	<datestamp>1266004080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry for being off-topic here, but I was wondering if anybody knows a good OSS EXIF editing library/software.</p><p>I tried libexif, but it seems to be rather limited in functionality (you can't add in new comments) and other libraries seem to be read only. It would be really useful to be able to easily edit the EXIF data like location, name of photographer, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry for being off-topic here , but I was wondering if anybody knows a good OSS EXIF editing library/software.I tried libexif , but it seems to be rather limited in functionality ( you ca n't add in new comments ) and other libraries seem to be read only .
It would be really useful to be able to easily edit the EXIF data like location , name of photographer , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry for being off-topic here, but I was wondering if anybody knows a good OSS EXIF editing library/software.I tried libexif, but it seems to be rather limited in functionality (you can't add in new comments) and other libraries seem to be read only.
It would be really useful to be able to easily edit the EXIF data like location, name of photographer, etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117286</id>
	<title>Re:Warrent</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266007680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>jpegs downloaded from Facebook do not appear to retain the EXIF info</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>jpegs downloaded from Facebook do not appear to retain the EXIF info</tokentext>
<sentencetext>jpegs downloaded from Facebook do not appear to retain the EXIF info</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116114</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116922</id>
	<title>NASA, I'm on to you!</title>
	<author>nicknamenotavailable</author>
	<datestamp>1266006180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The EXIF data in the moon photographs will surely prove that the moon landings were faked.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The EXIF data in the moon photographs will surely prove that the moon landings were faked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The EXIF data in the moon photographs will surely prove that the moon landings were faked.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31127482</id>
	<title>Godsend for stalkers.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266080640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why this is not obvious to you is a mystery that shall remind unsolved.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why this is not obvious to you is a mystery that shall remind unsolved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why this is not obvious to you is a mystery that shall remind unsolved.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116136</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116970</id>
	<title>Re:If you're surprised you're a fool</title>
	<author>KC7JHO</author>
	<datestamp>1266006480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yep those pictures of that chick you took with your cell phone and then forwarded to everyone at your school? Yep those pictures have your name saved to the EXIF data and is easily readable on any computer some one wants to upload them to. In fact I bet "There is an App for that!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep those pictures of that chick you took with your cell phone and then forwarded to everyone at your school ?
Yep those pictures have your name saved to the EXIF data and is easily readable on any computer some one wants to upload them to .
In fact I bet " There is an App for that !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep those pictures of that chick you took with your cell phone and then forwarded to everyone at your school?
Yep those pictures have your name saved to the EXIF data and is easily readable on any computer some one wants to upload them to.
In fact I bet "There is an App for that!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116386</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117966</id>
	<title>Re:The iPhone metadata was already known I thought</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265966580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i just bought an iphone 3gs yesterday... the location metadata was not enabled by default as you claim.</p><p>in fact every time the phone wants to attach the data it prompts the user.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i just bought an iphone 3gs yesterday... the location metadata was not enabled by default as you claim.in fact every time the phone wants to attach the data it prompts the user .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i just bought an iphone 3gs yesterday... the location metadata was not enabled by default as you claim.in fact every time the phone wants to attach the data it prompts the user.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116356</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117098</id>
	<title>Oh no!</title>
	<author>LeonPierre</author>
	<datestamp>1266007020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You mean to tell me that a photograph of something is capable telling me where that thing is?!</p><p>I sure hope that if I take a picture of the Empire State Building no one would be able to determine where I was where I took it.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean to tell me that a photograph of something is capable telling me where that thing is ?
! I sure hope that if I take a picture of the Empire State Building no one would be able to determine where I was where I took it.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean to tell me that a photograph of something is capable telling me where that thing is?
!I sure hope that if I take a picture of the Empire State Building no one would be able to determine where I was where I took it.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116394</id>
	<title>Re:no problem...</title>
	<author>imunfair</author>
	<datestamp>1266003480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well if you're taking photos with a digital SLR you're probably saving to RAW, and then resaving a post-processed version in another format, so this wouldn't be an issue.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well if you 're taking photos with a digital SLR you 're probably saving to RAW , and then resaving a post-processed version in another format , so this would n't be an issue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well if you're taking photos with a digital SLR you're probably saving to RAW, and then resaving a post-processed version in another format, so this wouldn't be an issue.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116232</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117510</id>
	<title>Re:Off-Topic: Good EXIF editing library?</title>
	<author>warriorpostman</author>
	<datestamp>1265965260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Any machine where you can install the ImageMagick library should have the utilities you need to strip that info.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Any machine where you can install the ImageMagick library should have the utilities you need to strip that info .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any machine where you can install the ImageMagick library should have the utilities you need to strip that info.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116114</id>
	<title>Warrent</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266002340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder how many grow ops have been busted by the cops looking through twitpics/myspace photos metadata.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how many grow ops have been busted by the cops looking through twitpics/myspace photos metadata .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how many grow ops have been busted by the cops looking through twitpics/myspace photos metadata.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116384</id>
	<title>There is always the alternative...</title>
	<author>geegel</author>
	<datestamp>1266003420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... of <a href="http://www.fileguru.com/EXIF-Toolbox/download" title="fileguru.com">stripping</a> [fileguru.com] the EXIF metadata. Just saying.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... of stripping [ fileguru.com ] the EXIF metadata .
Just saying .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... of stripping [fileguru.com] the EXIF metadata.
Just saying.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116964</id>
	<title>Re:The iPhone metadata was already known I thought</title>
	<author>Firehed</author>
	<datestamp>1266006480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Given the choice of convenience/cool features or privacy/security, users* will ALWAYS pick convenience/features. 100\% of the time. To them, it's not "leaking a bunch of personal information", but enabling that "oh cool, it knows I took these pictures down by the waterfront and stuck them on the map for me" stuff.</p><p>* Normal users. Us paranoid slashdotters (and, in general, people that actually understand the necessity and implications of privacy and security) need not apply to that stat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Given the choice of convenience/cool features or privacy/security , users * will ALWAYS pick convenience/features .
100 \ % of the time .
To them , it 's not " leaking a bunch of personal information " , but enabling that " oh cool , it knows I took these pictures down by the waterfront and stuck them on the map for me " stuff .
* Normal users .
Us paranoid slashdotters ( and , in general , people that actually understand the necessity and implications of privacy and security ) need not apply to that stat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given the choice of convenience/cool features or privacy/security, users* will ALWAYS pick convenience/features.
100\% of the time.
To them, it's not "leaking a bunch of personal information", but enabling that "oh cool, it knows I took these pictures down by the waterfront and stuck them on the map for me" stuff.
* Normal users.
Us paranoid slashdotters (and, in general, people that actually understand the necessity and implications of privacy and security) need not apply to that stat.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116356</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116740</id>
	<title>Re:dumb question</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1266005220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You should be able to look at the most interesting details in most up to date image software.</p><p>The buzzsaw is ExifTool:</p><p><a href="http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/" title="queensu.ca" rel="nofollow">http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/</a> [queensu.ca]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You should be able to look at the most interesting details in most up to date image software.The buzzsaw is ExifTool : http : //www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/ ~ phil/exiftool/ [ queensu.ca ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You should be able to look at the most interesting details in most up to date image software.The buzzsaw is ExifTool:http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/ [queensu.ca]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116064</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116062</id>
	<title>Photosynth Would Like This</title>
	<author>QBasicer</author>
	<datestamp>1266002160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photosynth" title="wikipedia.org">Photosynth</a> [wikipedia.org] would probably find the information to be extremely useful.  Unfortunately, the iPhone camera isn't terribly great (for now), but I can see some of the exif tags coming to more "consumer" cameras (Point and shoot).  Almost every online photo service and social networking site could use this information in many ways, such as automatic correlation of pictures and events, concerts, etc.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Photosynth [ wikipedia.org ] would probably find the information to be extremely useful .
Unfortunately , the iPhone camera is n't terribly great ( for now ) , but I can see some of the exif tags coming to more " consumer " cameras ( Point and shoot ) .
Almost every online photo service and social networking site could use this information in many ways , such as automatic correlation of pictures and events , concerts , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Photosynth [wikipedia.org] would probably find the information to be extremely useful.
Unfortunately, the iPhone camera isn't terribly great (for now), but I can see some of the exif tags coming to more "consumer" cameras (Point and shoot).
Almost every online photo service and social networking site could use this information in many ways, such as automatic correlation of pictures and events, concerts, etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31118894</id>
	<title>Re:Sharpie in the pooper!</title>
	<author>Dogtanian</author>
	<datestamp>1265968800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Someone posted a picture of their girlfriend's rear end with a sharpie sticking out of it to a popular anonymous image-sharing web board.</p></div><p>Could she write stuff with it, or did she have it in, um... the wrong way round to do that?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone posted a picture of their girlfriend 's rear end with a sharpie sticking out of it to a popular anonymous image-sharing web board.Could she write stuff with it , or did she have it in , um... the wrong way round to do that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone posted a picture of their girlfriend's rear end with a sharpie sticking out of it to a popular anonymous image-sharing web board.Could she write stuff with it, or did she have it in, um... the wrong way round to do that?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116464</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116504</id>
	<title>More fun with Math</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266004020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>399 images included the location of the camera at the time the image was taken, and 102 images included the name of the photographer.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p> </div><p>Or, to summarize from the other point of view...</p><p>"<strong>97.4\% of images did <em>not</em> include the location</strong> of the camera at the time the image was taken, and <strong>99.3\% of images did <em>not</em> include the name</strong> of the photographer.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... "</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>399 images included the location of the camera at the time the image was taken , and 102 images included the name of the photographer .
... Or , to summarize from the other point of view... " 97.4 \ % of images did not include the location of the camera at the time the image was taken , and 99.3 \ % of images did not include the name of the photographer .
... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>399 images included the location of the camera at the time the image was taken, and 102 images included the name of the photographer.
... Or, to summarize from the other point of view..."97.4\% of images did not include the location of the camera at the time the image was taken, and 99.3\% of images did not include the name of the photographer.
... "
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117776</id>
	<title>Probably fake, but</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265966040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This one went around recently:</p><p>http://www.buzzfeed.com/akdobbins/someones-doing-coke-at-the-white-house</p><p>I think the consensus was it was probably faked (which is a useful point about metadata in itself!). But it shows the kind of problems that metadata could cause.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This one went around recently : http : //www.buzzfeed.com/akdobbins/someones-doing-coke-at-the-white-houseI think the consensus was it was probably faked ( which is a useful point about metadata in itself ! ) .
But it shows the kind of problems that metadata could cause .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This one went around recently:http://www.buzzfeed.com/akdobbins/someones-doing-coke-at-the-white-houseI think the consensus was it was probably faked (which is a useful point about metadata in itself!).
But it shows the kind of problems that metadata could cause.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117424</id>
	<title>Re:So?</title>
	<author>BobNET</author>
	<datestamp>1266008160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, I'd be pretty concerned if I put up a gallery titled "Niagara Falls - January, 2010" and someone checked the EXIF tags to discover that I was in Niagara Falls in January, 2010...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , I 'd be pretty concerned if I put up a gallery titled " Niagara Falls - January , 2010 " and someone checked the EXIF tags to discover that I was in Niagara Falls in January , 2010.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, I'd be pretty concerned if I put up a gallery titled "Niagara Falls - January, 2010" and someone checked the EXIF tags to discover that I was in Niagara Falls in January, 2010...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116136</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31120990</id>
	<title>Re:I'm all for EXIF</title>
	<author>mewsenews</author>
	<datestamp>1265974980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Especially when it means 800815</p></div></blockquote><p>BOOBIS?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Especially when it means 800815BOOBIS ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Especially when it means 800815BOOBIS?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116216</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116216</id>
	<title>I'm all for EXIF</title>
	<author>raddan</author>
	<datestamp>1266002700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Especially when it means 800815.  I'm looking at you, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catherine\_Schwartz#Personal\_life" title="wikipedia.org">Cat Schwartz</a> [wikipedia.org]!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Especially when it means 800815 .
I 'm looking at you , Cat Schwartz [ wikipedia.org ] !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Especially when it means 800815.
I'm looking at you, Cat Schwartz [wikipedia.org]!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116356</id>
	<title>Re:The iPhone metadata was already known I thought</title>
	<author>girlintraining</author>
	<datestamp>1266003300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I suppose some people could think it was "magic", since embedded data in an image isn't something that is immediately obvious to a normal user.</p></div><p>Try saying "metadata" to the average computer user. It's like watching a BSOD on someone's face; And that's exactly the problem here -- devices shipping with privacy-compromising features <i>enabled</i> by default. Joe Average doesn't even know it's possible, let alone that his iPhone is serrepticiously leaking a bunch of personal information everytime he posts a photo he snapped with it to some internet site. I can see it now -- "Hey, check out this cute girl's panties I snapped in class..." <i>Oops.</i> Oh, the bitter irony to be had there -- you're busted violating someone else's privacy because you didn't know your own was being violated by your cell phone. Brilliant.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suppose some people could think it was " magic " , since embedded data in an image is n't something that is immediately obvious to a normal user.Try saying " metadata " to the average computer user .
It 's like watching a BSOD on someone 's face ; And that 's exactly the problem here -- devices shipping with privacy-compromising features enabled by default .
Joe Average does n't even know it 's possible , let alone that his iPhone is serrepticiously leaking a bunch of personal information everytime he posts a photo he snapped with it to some internet site .
I can see it now -- " Hey , check out this cute girl 's panties I snapped in class... " Oops .
Oh , the bitter irony to be had there -- you 're busted violating someone else 's privacy because you did n't know your own was being violated by your cell phone .
Brilliant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suppose some people could think it was "magic", since embedded data in an image isn't something that is immediately obvious to a normal user.Try saying "metadata" to the average computer user.
It's like watching a BSOD on someone's face; And that's exactly the problem here -- devices shipping with privacy-compromising features enabled by default.
Joe Average doesn't even know it's possible, let alone that his iPhone is serrepticiously leaking a bunch of personal information everytime he posts a photo he snapped with it to some internet site.
I can see it now -- "Hey, check out this cute girl's panties I snapped in class..." Oops.
Oh, the bitter irony to be had there -- you're busted violating someone else's privacy because you didn't know your own was being violated by your cell phone.
Brilliant.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31119412</id>
	<title>Nothing new here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265970180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been looking at EXIF data in photos for years.  It can work in to prove people are lying or at least maybe not being completely truthful with a specific forum post.  Like someone claims they just took a photo of an accident scene or some a product and the EXIF data has references to a completely different person or a date a few years ago etc...  I use a viewer app in Windows called XNView to modify or sanitize my pictures EXIF data in batches before I upload to places like photobucket or Google. Irvanview does it as well but I like XNView better.</p><p>If you want to view EXIF data, Windows can see it be default with properties as can the default Gnome viewer "EYE of Gnome".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been looking at EXIF data in photos for years .
It can work in to prove people are lying or at least maybe not being completely truthful with a specific forum post .
Like someone claims they just took a photo of an accident scene or some a product and the EXIF data has references to a completely different person or a date a few years ago etc... I use a viewer app in Windows called XNView to modify or sanitize my pictures EXIF data in batches before I upload to places like photobucket or Google .
Irvanview does it as well but I like XNView better.If you want to view EXIF data , Windows can see it be default with properties as can the default Gnome viewer " EYE of Gnome " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been looking at EXIF data in photos for years.
It can work in to prove people are lying or at least maybe not being completely truthful with a specific forum post.
Like someone claims they just took a photo of an accident scene or some a product and the EXIF data has references to a completely different person or a date a few years ago etc...  I use a viewer app in Windows called XNView to modify or sanitize my pictures EXIF data in batches before I upload to places like photobucket or Google.
Irvanview does it as well but I like XNView better.If you want to view EXIF data, Windows can see it be default with properties as can the default Gnome viewer "EYE of Gnome".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117096</id>
	<title>Re:The metadata</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266007020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You mean like when Arnold did it, last year?<br><a href="http://strydehax.blogspot.com/2009/10/wheres-arnold.html" title="blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://strydehax.blogspot.com/2009/10/wheres-arnold.html</a> [blogspot.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean like when Arnold did it , last year ? http : //strydehax.blogspot.com/2009/10/wheres-arnold.html [ blogspot.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean like when Arnold did it, last year?http://strydehax.blogspot.com/2009/10/wheres-arnold.html [blogspot.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31115988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116136</id>
	<title>So?</title>
	<author>stokessd</author>
	<datestamp>1266002400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe I need another layer on my tinfoil hat, but after reading the summary (and only the summary, obviously) all I can say is, "So what?"</p><p>After all, it's not like the pictures somehow snuck onto the interwebs without the users knowledge, the photographs actively put them there.  Beyond that, I really don't care if someone knows my name, and where I was standing when I took a picture.  In fact knowing where pictures were taken can lead to some really cool mashups of tourist photos and such.</p><p>Wake me when exif data routinely contains my passwords, social security number, and credit card number.</p><p>Sheldon</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe I need another layer on my tinfoil hat , but after reading the summary ( and only the summary , obviously ) all I can say is , " So what ?
" After all , it 's not like the pictures somehow snuck onto the interwebs without the users knowledge , the photographs actively put them there .
Beyond that , I really do n't care if someone knows my name , and where I was standing when I took a picture .
In fact knowing where pictures were taken can lead to some really cool mashups of tourist photos and such.Wake me when exif data routinely contains my passwords , social security number , and credit card number.Sheldon</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe I need another layer on my tinfoil hat, but after reading the summary (and only the summary, obviously) all I can say is, "So what?
"After all, it's not like the pictures somehow snuck onto the interwebs without the users knowledge, the photographs actively put them there.
Beyond that, I really don't care if someone knows my name, and where I was standing when I took a picture.
In fact knowing where pictures were taken can lead to some really cool mashups of tourist photos and such.Wake me when exif data routinely contains my passwords, social security number, and credit card number.Sheldon</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116332</id>
	<title>The horror!</title>
	<author>paimin</author>
	<datestamp>1266003240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> It not only includes the phone's location, but also accelerometer data showing if the phone was moved at the time the picture was taken and the readout from the [built-]in compass showing in which direction the phone was pointed at the time.</p></div><p>Not only that, the file exposes an image from the phone's camera. Won't someone think of the children!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It not only includes the phone 's location , but also accelerometer data showing if the phone was moved at the time the picture was taken and the readout from the [ built- ] in compass showing in which direction the phone was pointed at the time.Not only that , the file exposes an image from the phone 's camera .
Wo n't someone think of the children !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> It not only includes the phone's location, but also accelerometer data showing if the phone was moved at the time the picture was taken and the readout from the [built-]in compass showing in which direction the phone was pointed at the time.Not only that, the file exposes an image from the phone's camera.
Won't someone think of the children!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31118836</id>
	<title>Re:So?</title>
	<author>Carnildo</author>
	<datestamp>1265968620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>After all, it's not like the pictures somehow snuck onto the interwebs without the users knowledge, the photographs actively put them there. Beyond that, I really don't care if someone knows my name, and where I was standing when I took a picture.</p></div></blockquote><p>Say I was taking pictures of last summer's police beating of a protester.  I'd want to post the pictures immediately, not waiting until I get home and have a chance to remove the metadata, but at the same time, I'd want to post them anonymously until I'm sure I won't be subject to retaliation.</p><p>(And yes, the police did attempt to retaliate against the people who posted video of the incident.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>After all , it 's not like the pictures somehow snuck onto the interwebs without the users knowledge , the photographs actively put them there .
Beyond that , I really do n't care if someone knows my name , and where I was standing when I took a picture.Say I was taking pictures of last summer 's police beating of a protester .
I 'd want to post the pictures immediately , not waiting until I get home and have a chance to remove the metadata , but at the same time , I 'd want to post them anonymously until I 'm sure I wo n't be subject to retaliation .
( And yes , the police did attempt to retaliate against the people who posted video of the incident .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After all, it's not like the pictures somehow snuck onto the interwebs without the users knowledge, the photographs actively put them there.
Beyond that, I really don't care if someone knows my name, and where I was standing when I took a picture.Say I was taking pictures of last summer's police beating of a protester.
I'd want to post the pictures immediately, not waiting until I get home and have a chance to remove the metadata, but at the same time, I'd want to post them anonymously until I'm sure I won't be subject to retaliation.
(And yes, the police did attempt to retaliate against the people who posted video of the incident.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116136</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117072</id>
	<title>Re:The metadata</title>
	<author>Advocatus Diaboli</author>
	<datestamp>1266006900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hey,

I wrote about this concept a few weeks ago on my blog. Even submitted a link to slashdot and have outlined certain possibilities that we will likely see in the future.

Here it is again:

<a href="http://dissention.wordpress.com/2010/01/13/self-shots-gps-enabled-smartphones-and-data-mining/" title="wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://dissention.wordpress.com/2010/01/13/self-shots-gps-enabled-smartphones-and-data-mining/</a> [wordpress.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , I wrote about this concept a few weeks ago on my blog .
Even submitted a link to slashdot and have outlined certain possibilities that we will likely see in the future .
Here it is again : http : //dissention.wordpress.com/2010/01/13/self-shots-gps-enabled-smartphones-and-data-mining/ [ wordpress.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey,

I wrote about this concept a few weeks ago on my blog.
Even submitted a link to slashdot and have outlined certain possibilities that we will likely see in the future.
Here it is again:

http://dissention.wordpress.com/2010/01/13/self-shots-gps-enabled-smartphones-and-data-mining/ [wordpress.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31115988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116300</id>
	<title>Re:dumb question</title>
	<author>Z34107</author>
	<datestamp>1266003120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>How hard is it to extract this data, Do you need a special tool or can i see it all in photoshop</i> </p><p>It's not hard at all.  On Vista and 7, right-click on the file, select properties, and go to "details."  It might work on XP as well.</p><p>Depending on your folder view, all you might have to do is select the file.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How hard is it to extract this data , Do you need a special tool or can i see it all in photoshop It 's not hard at all .
On Vista and 7 , right-click on the file , select properties , and go to " details .
" It might work on XP as well.Depending on your folder view , all you might have to do is select the file .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> How hard is it to extract this data, Do you need a special tool or can i see it all in photoshop It's not hard at all.
On Vista and 7, right-click on the file, select properties, and go to "details.
"  It might work on XP as well.Depending on your folder view, all you might have to do is select the file.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116064</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116986</id>
	<title>EXIF Twiddling</title>
	<author>GeoVizer</author>
	<datestamp>1266006600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perl-its can use the excellent "Image::EXIF" on CPAN.

I'd love to find an equivalent library for Java. Anyone know of one?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perl-its can use the excellent " Image : : EXIF " on CPAN .
I 'd love to find an equivalent library for Java .
Anyone know of one ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perl-its can use the excellent "Image::EXIF" on CPAN.
I'd love to find an equivalent library for Java.
Anyone know of one?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117158</id>
	<title>Re:Sharpie in the pooper!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266007260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, and then it&rsquo;s only a short matter of time before the picture gets mailed to your parents, faxed and e-mailed to your school,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , and then it    s only a short matter of time before the picture gets mailed to your parents , faxed and e-mailed to your school , .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, and then it’s only a short matter of time before the picture gets mailed to your parents, faxed and e-mailed to your school, ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116594</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116182</id>
	<title>Re:Photosynth Would Like This</title>
	<author>Sockatume</author>
	<datestamp>1266002580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nokia is already <a href="http://betalabs.nokia.com/apps/nokia-image-space" title="nokia.com">working on that</a> [nokia.com], albeit opt-in.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nokia is already working on that [ nokia.com ] , albeit opt-in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nokia is already working on that [nokia.com], albeit opt-in.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116062</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31120482</id>
	<title>Nuke it with ExifTool</title>
	<author>korpenkraxar</author>
	<datestamp>1265973300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If metadata is such a concern, one simple command with ExifTool <a href="http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/" title="queensu.ca" rel="nofollow">http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/</a> [queensu.ca] can recursively delete all exif info in your whole image collection. And no, I will not post it can be just as destructive as rm -rf /</htmltext>
<tokenext>If metadata is such a concern , one simple command with ExifTool http : //www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/ ~ phil/exiftool/ [ queensu.ca ] can recursively delete all exif info in your whole image collection .
And no , I will not post it can be just as destructive as rm -rf /</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If metadata is such a concern, one simple command with ExifTool http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/ [queensu.ca] can recursively delete all exif info in your whole image collection.
And no, I will not post it can be just as destructive as rm -rf /</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116322</id>
	<title>EXIF and hidden thumbnails</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266003180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>EXIFs can also contain thumbnails that can sometimes reveal more than needed after for example cropping the original.<br><a href="http://no.spam.ee/~tonu/exif/" title="no.spam.ee" rel="nofollow">http://no.spam.ee/~tonu/exif/</a> [no.spam.ee]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>EXIFs can also contain thumbnails that can sometimes reveal more than needed after for example cropping the original.http : //no.spam.ee/ ~ tonu/exif/ [ no.spam.ee ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>EXIFs can also contain thumbnails that can sometimes reveal more than needed after for example cropping the original.http://no.spam.ee/~tonu/exif/ [no.spam.ee]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116126</id>
	<title>Scrubbing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266002400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No picture leaves this computer before it has been subjected to "jhead -purejpg". Something else to look out for: Image data beyond the edge of the image after lossless resizing and orphaned preview images embedded in the JPG, showing the full uncropped picture. The latter is dealt with by the "jhead -purejpg" command, the former isn't.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No picture leaves this computer before it has been subjected to " jhead -purejpg " .
Something else to look out for : Image data beyond the edge of the image after lossless resizing and orphaned preview images embedded in the JPG , showing the full uncropped picture .
The latter is dealt with by the " jhead -purejpg " command , the former is n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No picture leaves this computer before it has been subjected to "jhead -purejpg".
Something else to look out for: Image data beyond the edge of the image after lossless resizing and orphaned preview images embedded in the JPG, showing the full uncropped picture.
The latter is dealt with by the "jhead -purejpg" command, the former isn't.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116084</id>
	<title>The iPhone metadata was already known I thought?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266002280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wasn't there a demo during the release of the iPhone 3GS keynote that showed the use of this metadata with a bunch of GPS-aware cameras, including the iPhone and the new version of iPhoto that uses this data to create clickable maps with pushpins for each photo you have taken?</p><p>I suppose some people could think it was "magic", since embedded data in an image isn't something that is immediately obvious to a normal user. Perhaps if it was called "Virtual Writing on the back of your Photos".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Was n't there a demo during the release of the iPhone 3GS keynote that showed the use of this metadata with a bunch of GPS-aware cameras , including the iPhone and the new version of iPhoto that uses this data to create clickable maps with pushpins for each photo you have taken ? I suppose some people could think it was " magic " , since embedded data in an image is n't something that is immediately obvious to a normal user .
Perhaps if it was called " Virtual Writing on the back of your Photos " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wasn't there a demo during the release of the iPhone 3GS keynote that showed the use of this metadata with a bunch of GPS-aware cameras, including the iPhone and the new version of iPhoto that uses this data to create clickable maps with pushpins for each photo you have taken?I suppose some people could think it was "magic", since embedded data in an image isn't something that is immediately obvious to a normal user.
Perhaps if it was called "Virtual Writing on the back of your Photos".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116480</id>
	<title>Conspiracy!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266003900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FBI Agent A: Dammit guys, they found out about the EXIF stuff.  Now what are we going to do to get data from these pictures?</p><p>FBI Agent B: Let's just Photoshop in some crack like we used to.</p><p>FBI Agent A: Promote that man!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FBI Agent A : Dammit guys , they found out about the EXIF stuff .
Now what are we going to do to get data from these pictures ? FBI Agent B : Let 's just Photoshop in some crack like we used to.FBI Agent A : Promote that man !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FBI Agent A: Dammit guys, they found out about the EXIF stuff.
Now what are we going to do to get data from these pictures?FBI Agent B: Let's just Photoshop in some crack like we used to.FBI Agent A: Promote that man!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116742</id>
	<title>Re:The iPhone metadata was already known I thought</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266005220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Really though, most people will benifit from these tags, I think the cameras recording them is great.<br><br>However I think websites should strip this content when uploaded, or at least offer some kind of warning to users that the content exists (reading exif data is simple, it could easily show them what is in the photo and ask them what they'd like to do..)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Really though , most people will benifit from these tags , I think the cameras recording them is great.However I think websites should strip this content when uploaded , or at least offer some kind of warning to users that the content exists ( reading exif data is simple , it could easily show them what is in the photo and ask them what they 'd like to do.. )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really though, most people will benifit from these tags, I think the cameras recording them is great.However I think websites should strip this content when uploaded, or at least offer some kind of warning to users that the content exists (reading exif data is simple, it could easily show them what is in the photo and ask them what they'd like to do..)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116356</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31119844</id>
	<title>Paranoid?</title>
	<author>careysb</author>
	<datestamp>1265971260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just 'cause you're paranoid doesn't mean that somebody isn't out to get you.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:o]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just 'cause you 're paranoid does n't mean that somebody is n't out to get you .
: o ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just 'cause you're paranoid doesn't mean that somebody isn't out to get you.
:o]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116390</id>
	<title>Does the Iphone turn all that on by default?</title>
	<author>jeffmeden</author>
	<datestamp>1266003420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Personally, I enabled the GPS tagging on my phone on purpose.  Normally it's off, and the only other interesting thing in the exif tags are the model of the phone.  I enjoy having a GPS tag on each pic in case I want to go back and look at exactly where I was when it was taken.  I did remember to turn it off before taking a picture of the secret location I buried my treasure of gold doubloons, so I think it should be safe.</p><p>Long story short, what could possibly go wrong?  I could see how an Iphone user (if this stuff is turned on by default) would be caught off guard by all the extra info in the tag.  However, unless you are really oversharing everything else, like "look at this sweet pic of my new 50" tv... too bad I will be on vacation for two weeks starting tomorrow and wont be able to watch it... hope no one realizes the spare key is under the door mat...  And my social security card is in the cookie jar next to my birth certificate..."  Would an Iphone user really be *that* stupid?  Wait, no, don't answer that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Personally , I enabled the GPS tagging on my phone on purpose .
Normally it 's off , and the only other interesting thing in the exif tags are the model of the phone .
I enjoy having a GPS tag on each pic in case I want to go back and look at exactly where I was when it was taken .
I did remember to turn it off before taking a picture of the secret location I buried my treasure of gold doubloons , so I think it should be safe.Long story short , what could possibly go wrong ?
I could see how an Iphone user ( if this stuff is turned on by default ) would be caught off guard by all the extra info in the tag .
However , unless you are really oversharing everything else , like " look at this sweet pic of my new 50 " tv... too bad I will be on vacation for two weeks starting tomorrow and wont be able to watch it... hope no one realizes the spare key is under the door mat... And my social security card is in the cookie jar next to my birth certificate... " Would an Iphone user really be * that * stupid ?
Wait , no , do n't answer that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Personally, I enabled the GPS tagging on my phone on purpose.
Normally it's off, and the only other interesting thing in the exif tags are the model of the phone.
I enjoy having a GPS tag on each pic in case I want to go back and look at exactly where I was when it was taken.
I did remember to turn it off before taking a picture of the secret location I buried my treasure of gold doubloons, so I think it should be safe.Long story short, what could possibly go wrong?
I could see how an Iphone user (if this stuff is turned on by default) would be caught off guard by all the extra info in the tag.
However, unless you are really oversharing everything else, like "look at this sweet pic of my new 50" tv... too bad I will be on vacation for two weeks starting tomorrow and wont be able to watch it... hope no one realizes the spare key is under the door mat...  And my social security card is in the cookie jar next to my birth certificate..."  Would an Iphone user really be *that* stupid?
Wait, no, don't answer that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31118126</id>
	<title>Re:So?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265966940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <em>Beyond that, I really don't care if someone knows my name, and where I was standing when I took a picture.</em> </p><p>"Hmm, this random dude took a picture of his wife... She's hot. Looks like she's standing in front of her house. Let's see, where is that? Okay Bobby, you get the van, I'll grab the duct tape."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Beyond that , I really do n't care if someone knows my name , and where I was standing when I took a picture .
" Hmm , this random dude took a picture of his wife... She 's hot .
Looks like she 's standing in front of her house .
Let 's see , where is that ?
Okay Bobby , you get the van , I 'll grab the duct tape .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Beyond that, I really don't care if someone knows my name, and where I was standing when I took a picture.
"Hmm, this random dude took a picture of his wife... She's hot.
Looks like she's standing in front of her house.
Let's see, where is that?
Okay Bobby, you get the van, I'll grab the duct tape.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116136</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117178</id>
	<title>Accelerometer</title>
	<author>kcitren</author>
	<datestamp>1266007260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>How good is the accelerometer and digital compass?  Is it good enough to be able to do some blur / shake reduction of the image?  Or how about improved panorama auto-stitching?  This could actually be interesting...  Maybe I need to break down and get an iphone, or wait for a camera enabled ipod.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How good is the accelerometer and digital compass ?
Is it good enough to be able to do some blur / shake reduction of the image ?
Or how about improved panorama auto-stitching ?
This could actually be interesting... Maybe I need to break down and get an iphone , or wait for a camera enabled ipod .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How good is the accelerometer and digital compass?
Is it good enough to be able to do some blur / shake reduction of the image?
Or how about improved panorama auto-stitching?
This could actually be interesting...  Maybe I need to break down and get an iphone, or wait for a camera enabled ipod.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31130166</id>
	<title>Re:The metadata</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1266057900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Someday soon a politician will post what appears to be a benign photo with an embarrassing long/lat location.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>And soon thereafter there will be laws that require cameras to default to minimal EXIF data.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Someday soon a politician will post what appears to be a benign photo with an embarrassing long/lat location .
And soon thereafter there will be laws that require cameras to default to minimal EXIF data .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someday soon a politician will post what appears to be a benign photo with an embarrassing long/lat location.
And soon thereafter there will be laws that require cameras to default to minimal EXIF data.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31115988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116620</id>
	<title>Wait a second</title>
	<author>AGSHender</author>
	<datestamp>1266004560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's a privacy concern about the digital compass metadata telling someone else what direction you were facing...when they're looking at the picture?  Can't you just look at the picture and figure out what direction the photographer was facing?</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a privacy concern about the digital compass metadata telling someone else what direction you were facing...when they 're looking at the picture ?
Ca n't you just look at the picture and figure out what direction the photographer was facing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a privacy concern about the digital compass metadata telling someone else what direction you were facing...when they're looking at the picture?
Can't you just look at the picture and figure out what direction the photographer was facing?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116586</id>
	<title>Considering</title>
	<author>earnest murderer</author>
	<datestamp>1266004320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>how much I paid for the features, it damn well better be in there.</p><p>The real issue at hand is that neither the camera or management software have a system to remove/obfiscate that data and some apparently deliberately hide it from you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>how much I paid for the features , it damn well better be in there.The real issue at hand is that neither the camera or management software have a system to remove/obfiscate that data and some apparently deliberately hide it from you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>how much I paid for the features, it damn well better be in there.The real issue at hand is that neither the camera or management software have a system to remove/obfiscate that data and some apparently deliberately hide it from you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116408</id>
	<title>I never publish with EXIF</title>
	<author>rimugu</author>
	<datestamp>1266003480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I never publish photos with any EXIF.<br>There are tons of utilities out there to remove it, I use this: <a href="http://www.sentex.net/~mwandel/jhead/" title="sentex.net">http://www.sentex.net/~mwandel/jhead/</a> [sentex.net]</p><p>I still have to silence the cell phone camera. It is annoying.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I never publish photos with any EXIF.There are tons of utilities out there to remove it , I use this : http : //www.sentex.net/ ~ mwandel/jhead/ [ sentex.net ] I still have to silence the cell phone camera .
It is annoying .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I never publish photos with any EXIF.There are tons of utilities out there to remove it, I use this: http://www.sentex.net/~mwandel/jhead/ [sentex.net]I still have to silence the cell phone camera.
It is annoying.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116852</id>
	<title>Re:The metadata</title>
	<author>kent\_eh</author>
	<datestamp>1266005820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How much more information would it take to identify <a href="http://maps.google.ca/?ie=UTF8&amp;hq=&amp;hnear=Winnipeg,+Division+No.+11,+Manitoba&amp;ll=49.88214,-97.098547&amp;spn=0,359.995177&amp;t=h&amp;z=18&amp;layer=c&amp;cbll=49.88239,-97.09898&amp;panoid=rxBBhzv259Hw\_rqctz4sHg&amp;cbp=12,287.36,,1,1.52" title="google.ca">this guy</a> [google.ca] to his wife? Or to someone who might want to embarrass him for some reason?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How much more information would it take to identify this guy [ google.ca ] to his wife ?
Or to someone who might want to embarrass him for some reason ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How much more information would it take to identify this guy [google.ca] to his wife?
Or to someone who might want to embarrass him for some reason?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116556</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116488</id>
	<title>Re:Photosynth Would Like This</title>
	<author>SEWilco</author>
	<datestamp>1266003900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Aren't all the online photo services and social networking sites already using EXIF data?  I think they're only hindered by the people who aren't inserting latitude/longitude info.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are n't all the online photo services and social networking sites already using EXIF data ?
I think they 're only hindered by the people who are n't inserting latitude/longitude info .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aren't all the online photo services and social networking sites already using EXIF data?
I think they're only hindered by the people who aren't inserting latitude/longitude info.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116062</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31122042</id>
	<title>Interesting use of EXIF data</title>
	<author>cdrguru</author>
	<datestamp>1265979600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some particularly non-techie types that enjoy taking and sharing pictures of under-18 folks have been known to save and distribute such pictures with EXIF data.  Sometimes including GPS information or camera serial number data.</p><p>The camera serial number is useful if the owner registers the camera with the manufacturer.  The serial number can be used to look up the registration.</p><p>The GPS information is of pretty obvious value, assuming the pictures are taken at home.  Put that information into a GPS device and it will guide you right there.</p><p>Either way, the result is a visit from Officer Friendly and the charge is distributing child porn.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some particularly non-techie types that enjoy taking and sharing pictures of under-18 folks have been known to save and distribute such pictures with EXIF data .
Sometimes including GPS information or camera serial number data.The camera serial number is useful if the owner registers the camera with the manufacturer .
The serial number can be used to look up the registration.The GPS information is of pretty obvious value , assuming the pictures are taken at home .
Put that information into a GPS device and it will guide you right there.Either way , the result is a visit from Officer Friendly and the charge is distributing child porn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some particularly non-techie types that enjoy taking and sharing pictures of under-18 folks have been known to save and distribute such pictures with EXIF data.
Sometimes including GPS information or camera serial number data.The camera serial number is useful if the owner registers the camera with the manufacturer.
The serial number can be used to look up the registration.The GPS information is of pretty obvious value, assuming the pictures are taken at home.
Put that information into a GPS device and it will guide you right there.Either way, the result is a visit from Officer Friendly and the charge is distributing child porn.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31119430</id>
	<title>Re:So?</title>
	<author>grumbel</author>
	<datestamp>1265970240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>After all, it's not like the pictures somehow snuck onto the interwebs without the users knowledge,</p></div><p>The photo didn't, but the info did. Normally your name or at least your address is something you keep away from random strangers on the Internet, but if you post a photo with EXIF data you open that up to everybody. You also link your real name to your pseudonym or in turn allow others to connect different pseudonyms that you might have wanted to keep seperate. If you post photos regularly they can also reconstruct what you are doing all day and especially when. And of course cropping the picture might not actually crop the thumbnail in the EXIF data.</p><p>EXIF data also as plenty of legitimate use, that doesn't stop it from being pretty open to abuse.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>After all , it 's not like the pictures somehow snuck onto the interwebs without the users knowledge,The photo did n't , but the info did .
Normally your name or at least your address is something you keep away from random strangers on the Internet , but if you post a photo with EXIF data you open that up to everybody .
You also link your real name to your pseudonym or in turn allow others to connect different pseudonyms that you might have wanted to keep seperate .
If you post photos regularly they can also reconstruct what you are doing all day and especially when .
And of course cropping the picture might not actually crop the thumbnail in the EXIF data.EXIF data also as plenty of legitimate use , that does n't stop it from being pretty open to abuse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After all, it's not like the pictures somehow snuck onto the interwebs without the users knowledge,The photo didn't, but the info did.
Normally your name or at least your address is something you keep away from random strangers on the Internet, but if you post a photo with EXIF data you open that up to everybody.
You also link your real name to your pseudonym or in turn allow others to connect different pseudonyms that you might have wanted to keep seperate.
If you post photos regularly they can also reconstruct what you are doing all day and especially when.
And of course cropping the picture might not actually crop the thumbnail in the EXIF data.EXIF data also as plenty of legitimate use, that doesn't stop it from being pretty open to abuse.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116136</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116686</id>
	<title>Re:dumb question</title>
	<author>nicknamenotavailable</author>
	<datestamp>1266004920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For most of my photos, this works:</p><p>cat image\_name.jpg | strings | more</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For most of my photos , this works : cat image \ _name.jpg | strings | more</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For most of my photos, this works:cat image\_name.jpg | strings | more</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116064</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116464</id>
	<title>Sharpie in the pooper!</title>
	<author>AdamTrace</author>
	<datestamp>1266003780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Someone posted a picture of their girlfriend's rear end with a sharpie sticking out of it to a popular anonymous image-sharing web board.</p><p>Unfortunately, the image contained EXIF data, including latitude and longitude.  It was quick work to come up with a name and address and all sorts of other information...</p><p>Good times.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone posted a picture of their girlfriend 's rear end with a sharpie sticking out of it to a popular anonymous image-sharing web board.Unfortunately , the image contained EXIF data , including latitude and longitude .
It was quick work to come up with a name and address and all sorts of other information...Good times .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone posted a picture of their girlfriend's rear end with a sharpie sticking out of it to a popular anonymous image-sharing web board.Unfortunately, the image contained EXIF data, including latitude and longitude.
It was quick work to come up with a name and address and all sorts of other information...Good times.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116556
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31115988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116078
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31118894
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116464
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31130166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31115988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31126918
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31120990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116216
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116232
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116062
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116064
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31115988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116064
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117370
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116506
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116062
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116114
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116686
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116064
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117130
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31115988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116394
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116232
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116970
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116386
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31120144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116506
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116404
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31115988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31127482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31118836
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116594
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116464
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31118126
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117648
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116506
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31118026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117072
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31115988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31121418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116062
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31119430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_1553221_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116696
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116114
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_1553221.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116464
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31118894
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116594
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117158
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_1553221.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116084
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116356
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116964
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117966
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116742
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31126918
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_1553221.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116480
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_1553221.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116092
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117118
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_1553221.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116114
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117286
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116696
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_1553221.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116476
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_1553221.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116232
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116638
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116394
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_1553221.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117178
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_1553221.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116504
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_1553221.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116064
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116300
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116740
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116686
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_1553221.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116386
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116970
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_1553221.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31115988
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31130166
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117096
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116556
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116852
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116404
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117072
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117130
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_1553221.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116322
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_1553221.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116136
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31121418
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31127482
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116474
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117370
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31119430
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31118836
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117424
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31118026
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31118126
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_1553221.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116390
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_1553221.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116126
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_1553221.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116062
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116182
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116488
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116122
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_1553221.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116506
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31120144
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117648
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31117510
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_1553221.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116216
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31120990
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_1553221.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116078
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116822
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_1553221.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_1553221.31116408
</commentlist>
</conversation>
