<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_12_0235246</id>
	<title>Is Google Planning To Fibre Britain?</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1265972880000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Barence writes with this excerpt from PC Pro: <i>"Google has emerged as a <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/broadband/355462/is-google-planning-to-fibre-britain">surprise contender to invest in Britain's fibre broadband network</a>. The search giant yesterday announced plans to build a gigabit fibre broadband network in the US. The test network will see Google deliver fibre-to-the-premises (FTTP) connections to up to half a million US homes. The move raises the possibility that Google is behind the Conservative Party's ambitious plans to deliver nationwide 100Mbits/sec connections by 2017. Parliamentary sources have told PC Pro that the Tories' plans were based on foreign investment in the UK broadband network."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Barence writes with this excerpt from PC Pro : " Google has emerged as a surprise contender to invest in Britain 's fibre broadband network .
The search giant yesterday announced plans to build a gigabit fibre broadband network in the US .
The test network will see Google deliver fibre-to-the-premises ( FTTP ) connections to up to half a million US homes .
The move raises the possibility that Google is behind the Conservative Party 's ambitious plans to deliver nationwide 100Mbits/sec connections by 2017 .
Parliamentary sources have told PC Pro that the Tories ' plans were based on foreign investment in the UK broadband network .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Barence writes with this excerpt from PC Pro: "Google has emerged as a surprise contender to invest in Britain's fibre broadband network.
The search giant yesterday announced plans to build a gigabit fibre broadband network in the US.
The test network will see Google deliver fibre-to-the-premises (FTTP) connections to up to half a million US homes.
The move raises the possibility that Google is behind the Conservative Party's ambitious plans to deliver nationwide 100Mbits/sec connections by 2017.
Parliamentary sources have told PC Pro that the Tories' plans were based on foreign investment in the UK broadband network.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31115056</id>
	<title>Re:Is Google Planning To Fibre Britain?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265998200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>No, because there is no such verb as fibre (nor fiber, for that matter).</p></div><p>Ah, don't be silly. Of course there is!</p><p>First, they fibre Britain.</p><p>Second, they fiber the US.</p><p>Third, they fee-berr Spain.</p><p>And it goes on from there.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , because there is no such verb as fibre ( nor fiber , for that matter ) .Ah , do n't be silly .
Of course there is ! First , they fibre Britain.Second , they fiber the US.Third , they fee-berr Spain.And it goes on from there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, because there is no such verb as fibre (nor fiber, for that matter).Ah, don't be silly.
Of course there is!First, they fibre Britain.Second, they fiber the US.Third, they fee-berr Spain.And it goes on from there.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111242</id>
	<title>Download the Internet</title>
	<author>Carra</author>
	<datestamp>1265976960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes! I'll finally be able to download the Internet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes !
I 'll finally be able to download the Internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes!
I'll finally be able to download the Internet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31114300</id>
	<title>Re:Conservatives</title>
	<author>fridaynightsmoke</author>
	<datestamp>1265995560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The UK Conservative party is so far right that it has difficulty in finding allies in other European countries.</p></div><p>Politics: Thousands of possible positions that can be taken over thousands of issues; all easily able to be boiled down into a one-dimensional left-right dichotomy.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>There is sometimes a perception that better educated and technically aware individuals do not vote for them much.</p></div><p>You also win in the meaningless statement competition. You know, there is also sometimes a perception that better educated and technically aware individuals do not vote for <em>your</em> currently preferred party. Hell, there is sometimes a perception that the LHC will destroy the universe as well.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>They want to persuade us to forget about having a fair society so that we can have better broadband speed.</p></div><p>..because over the past 13 years labour have eradicated poverty, haven't they? You're obviously a fan of Gordon's "Magical money for all- sometime in the future" policies.
</p><p>For the record; yes, I do think that this article is an entirely speculative load of nonsense.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The UK Conservative party is so far right that it has difficulty in finding allies in other European countries.Politics : Thousands of possible positions that can be taken over thousands of issues ; all easily able to be boiled down into a one-dimensional left-right dichotomy.There is sometimes a perception that better educated and technically aware individuals do not vote for them much.You also win in the meaningless statement competition .
You know , there is also sometimes a perception that better educated and technically aware individuals do not vote for your currently preferred party .
Hell , there is sometimes a perception that the LHC will destroy the universe as well.They want to persuade us to forget about having a fair society so that we can have better broadband speed...because over the past 13 years labour have eradicated poverty , have n't they ?
You 're obviously a fan of Gordon 's " Magical money for all- sometime in the future " policies .
For the record ; yes , I do think that this article is an entirely speculative load of nonsense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The UK Conservative party is so far right that it has difficulty in finding allies in other European countries.Politics: Thousands of possible positions that can be taken over thousands of issues; all easily able to be boiled down into a one-dimensional left-right dichotomy.There is sometimes a perception that better educated and technically aware individuals do not vote for them much.You also win in the meaningless statement competition.
You know, there is also sometimes a perception that better educated and technically aware individuals do not vote for your currently preferred party.
Hell, there is sometimes a perception that the LHC will destroy the universe as well.They want to persuade us to forget about having a fair society so that we can have better broadband speed...because over the past 13 years labour have eradicated poverty, haven't they?
You're obviously a fan of Gordon's "Magical money for all- sometime in the future" policies.
For the record; yes, I do think that this article is an entirely speculative load of nonsense.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111432</id>
	<title>What is the verb then?</title>
	<author>Ed Avis</author>
	<datestamp>1265979540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Enfibre?  Befibre?  Fiberize?  Fibrate?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Enfibre ?
Befibre ? Fiberize ?
Fibrate ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Enfibre?
Befibre?  Fiberize?
Fibrate?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112944</id>
	<title>Re:fuck off, Google</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265989920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You still haven't delivered the algorithms you promised to open 12 years ago.</p></div><p>Which algorithms and promises were those ? (honest question).</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Your top executives believe that no-one online is entitled to privacy (unless he is a top Google exec, who will deny press information to journalists who publish information about him).</p></div><p>No, he said that if you do something and get it on record, there's a chance a law enforcement agency will request said record with a judge signature on top and Google (or whatever company they're requesting it to) will have to comply.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>You require NSA clearance for any significant technical positions.</p><p>Care to point an example of this ?</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Bla, bla, bla...</p></div></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You still have n't delivered the algorithms you promised to open 12 years ago.Which algorithms and promises were those ?
( honest question ) .Your top executives believe that no-one online is entitled to privacy ( unless he is a top Google exec , who will deny press information to journalists who publish information about him ) .No , he said that if you do something and get it on record , there 's a chance a law enforcement agency will request said record with a judge signature on top and Google ( or whatever company they 're requesting it to ) will have to comply.You require NSA clearance for any significant technical positions.Care to point an example of this ? Bla , bla , bla.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You still haven't delivered the algorithms you promised to open 12 years ago.Which algorithms and promises were those ?
(honest question).Your top executives believe that no-one online is entitled to privacy (unless he is a top Google exec, who will deny press information to journalists who publish information about him).No, he said that if you do something and get it on record, there's a chance a law enforcement agency will request said record with a judge signature on top and Google (or whatever company they're requesting it to) will have to comply.You require NSA clearance for any significant technical positions.Care to point an example of this ?Bla, bla, bla...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112076</id>
	<title>Re:Is Google Planning To Fibre Britain?</title>
	<author>Ragzouken</author>
	<datestamp>1265985600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You pedant too much.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You pedant too much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You pedant too much.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111530</id>
	<title>Re:Is Google Planning To Fibre Britain?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265980620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Is Google Planning To Fibre Britain?</p><p>No, because there is no such verb as fibre (nor fiber, for that matter).</p></div><p>You are right, however....</p><p><i>Colour</i> me skeptical. I should skip o'er the pond on an <i>aeroplane</i> to <i>analyse</i> the <i>saleability</i> of these services. Or perhaps TFA is just <i>rumourmongering</i>. The <i>savoury</i> bastards! Someone should<i>brutalise</i> them! Perhaps by <i>cannibalisation</i>? Or maybe <i>kerb</i>-stomp them?</p><p>{language is funny and always evolving. I hope you can find the <i>humour</i> in the inconsistency}</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is Google Planning To Fibre Britain ? No , because there is no such verb as fibre ( nor fiber , for that matter ) .You are right , however....Colour me skeptical .
I should skip o'er the pond on an aeroplane to analyse the saleability of these services .
Or perhaps TFA is just rumourmongering .
The savoury bastards !
Someone shouldbrutalise them !
Perhaps by cannibalisation ?
Or maybe kerb-stomp them ?
{ language is funny and always evolving .
I hope you can find the humour in the inconsistency }</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is Google Planning To Fibre Britain?No, because there is no such verb as fibre (nor fiber, for that matter).You are right, however....Colour me skeptical.
I should skip o'er the pond on an aeroplane to analyse the saleability of these services.
Or perhaps TFA is just rumourmongering.
The savoury bastards!
Someone shouldbrutalise them!
Perhaps by cannibalisation?
Or maybe kerb-stomp them?
{language is funny and always evolving.
I hope you can find the humour in the inconsistency}
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111480</id>
	<title>I hope</title>
	<author>kingofnexus</author>
	<datestamp>1265980020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I only hope that they roll out to the places even virgin media doesn't reach. There is nothing worse than living in a house which only option is a flaky 1mb connection thanks to the ancient BT copper wiring<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:/</htmltext>
<tokenext>I only hope that they roll out to the places even virgin media does n't reach .
There is nothing worse than living in a house which only option is a flaky 1mb connection thanks to the ancient BT copper wiring : /</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I only hope that they roll out to the places even virgin media doesn't reach.
There is nothing worse than living in a house which only option is a flaky 1mb connection thanks to the ancient BT copper wiring :/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31113144</id>
	<title>Re:Surely "From the department of making shit up"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265991000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Investing in next generation broadband isn't that big a deal. The real problem is the fact the market isn't working in Britain. The big ISP's have a lock on the infrastructure and use shady business practices to pad costs. The Tories are nowhere on this issue and have done everything they can to cement the power of the CBI and screw over the little guy by opposing fair wage polices. Just looking at David Cameron's campaigning: he screams like an alcoholic who can't get to his booze in parliament and whores himself like a two faced goodtime girl to anyone he can manipulate into voicing support.</p><p>I've noticed the anti-Labour topics in here for a while now the active Conservative friendly posters are beginning to emerge. This reeks of an organised campaign to influence so-called technology "thought leaders" who are big users of "social media". But, as much as Labour have made mistakes and have disappointed I look at their record of fixing the infrastructure and creating a fairer deal in the teeth of entrenched opposition, and compare that to the big unfunded claims of the Tories and how little they've changed since they were kicked out shortly after the end of Thatcher's brutal reign.</p><p>A lot of the younger people in here won't remember the Thatcher years and take all the comforts of today's life for granted. I lived through the Thatcher years when I was their age before almost anyone could afford or even aspire to a mobile phone, and it wasn't pretty. I know what it's like to lose your job, see streets full of boarded up shops, and riots on the streets. Civilisation doesn't happen by accident. Conservative party "ideas man" claims and lazy "cost cutting" are not how it happens. Everyone in here should know that which is why people need to take a pause before buying Tory snake oil.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Investing in next generation broadband is n't that big a deal .
The real problem is the fact the market is n't working in Britain .
The big ISP 's have a lock on the infrastructure and use shady business practices to pad costs .
The Tories are nowhere on this issue and have done everything they can to cement the power of the CBI and screw over the little guy by opposing fair wage polices .
Just looking at David Cameron 's campaigning : he screams like an alcoholic who ca n't get to his booze in parliament and whores himself like a two faced goodtime girl to anyone he can manipulate into voicing support.I 've noticed the anti-Labour topics in here for a while now the active Conservative friendly posters are beginning to emerge .
This reeks of an organised campaign to influence so-called technology " thought leaders " who are big users of " social media " .
But , as much as Labour have made mistakes and have disappointed I look at their record of fixing the infrastructure and creating a fairer deal in the teeth of entrenched opposition , and compare that to the big unfunded claims of the Tories and how little they 've changed since they were kicked out shortly after the end of Thatcher 's brutal reign.A lot of the younger people in here wo n't remember the Thatcher years and take all the comforts of today 's life for granted .
I lived through the Thatcher years when I was their age before almost anyone could afford or even aspire to a mobile phone , and it was n't pretty .
I know what it 's like to lose your job , see streets full of boarded up shops , and riots on the streets .
Civilisation does n't happen by accident .
Conservative party " ideas man " claims and lazy " cost cutting " are not how it happens .
Everyone in here should know that which is why people need to take a pause before buying Tory snake oil .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Investing in next generation broadband isn't that big a deal.
The real problem is the fact the market isn't working in Britain.
The big ISP's have a lock on the infrastructure and use shady business practices to pad costs.
The Tories are nowhere on this issue and have done everything they can to cement the power of the CBI and screw over the little guy by opposing fair wage polices.
Just looking at David Cameron's campaigning: he screams like an alcoholic who can't get to his booze in parliament and whores himself like a two faced goodtime girl to anyone he can manipulate into voicing support.I've noticed the anti-Labour topics in here for a while now the active Conservative friendly posters are beginning to emerge.
This reeks of an organised campaign to influence so-called technology "thought leaders" who are big users of "social media".
But, as much as Labour have made mistakes and have disappointed I look at their record of fixing the infrastructure and creating a fairer deal in the teeth of entrenched opposition, and compare that to the big unfunded claims of the Tories and how little they've changed since they were kicked out shortly after the end of Thatcher's brutal reign.A lot of the younger people in here won't remember the Thatcher years and take all the comforts of today's life for granted.
I lived through the Thatcher years when I was their age before almost anyone could afford or even aspire to a mobile phone, and it wasn't pretty.
I know what it's like to lose your job, see streets full of boarded up shops, and riots on the streets.
Civilisation doesn't happen by accident.
Conservative party "ideas man" claims and lazy "cost cutting" are not how it happens.
Everyone in here should know that which is why people need to take a pause before buying Tory snake oil.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111458</id>
	<title>Re:all your base are belong to us</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265979720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."  Benjamin Franklin - 1775</p></div><p>You keep using that phrase. I do not think it means what you think it means.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety , deserve neither liberty nor safety .
" Benjamin Franklin - 1775You keep using that phrase .
I do not think it means what you think it means .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
"  Benjamin Franklin - 1775You keep using that phrase.
I do not think it means what you think it means.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112326</id>
	<title>Conservatives</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265986980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For the benefit of people in the US, let me tell them a few things about the UK Conservative party.</p><p>The UK Conservative party is so far right that it has difficulty in finding allies in other European countries.The only groups available are banned because of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwins\_law" title="wikipedia.org">Godwins Law</a> [wikipedia.org].  They are, however quite able to deal with US all mainstream parties.</p><p>There is sometimes a perception that better educated and technically aware individuals do not vote for them much.  I certainly don't.  I don't know if that is true but it may be part of the reason for this story.  They want to persuade us to forget about having a fair society so that we can have better broadband speed.  I would rather have a modem!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For the benefit of people in the US , let me tell them a few things about the UK Conservative party.The UK Conservative party is so far right that it has difficulty in finding allies in other European countries.The only groups available are banned because of Godwins Law [ wikipedia.org ] .
They are , however quite able to deal with US all mainstream parties.There is sometimes a perception that better educated and technically aware individuals do not vote for them much .
I certainly do n't .
I do n't know if that is true but it may be part of the reason for this story .
They want to persuade us to forget about having a fair society so that we can have better broadband speed .
I would rather have a modem !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For the benefit of people in the US, let me tell them a few things about the UK Conservative party.The UK Conservative party is so far right that it has difficulty in finding allies in other European countries.The only groups available are banned because of Godwins Law [wikipedia.org].
They are, however quite able to deal with US all mainstream parties.There is sometimes a perception that better educated and technically aware individuals do not vote for them much.
I certainly don't.
I don't know if that is true but it may be part of the reason for this story.
They want to persuade us to forget about having a fair society so that we can have better broadband speed.
I would rather have a modem!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31113620</id>
	<title>Re:fuck off, Google</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265992980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>You still haven't delivered the algorithms you promised to open 12 years ago</i></p><p>Which algorithms are these, pray tell?</p><p><i>You require NSA clearance for any significant technical positions.</i></p><p>No.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You still have n't delivered the algorithms you promised to open 12 years agoWhich algorithms are these , pray tell ? You require NSA clearance for any significant technical positions.No .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You still haven't delivered the algorithms you promised to open 12 years agoWhich algorithms are these, pray tell?You require NSA clearance for any significant technical positions.No.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31114900</id>
	<title>Brittian's Wet Dream</title>
	<author>Bruha</author>
	<datestamp>1265997600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Their government loves to spy on the people, Google will be their new mistress.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Their government loves to spy on the people , Google will be their new mistress .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Their government loves to spy on the people, Google will be their new mistress.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112560</id>
	<title>Re:google is becoming frightening</title>
	<author>eltaco</author>
	<datestamp>1265988300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>agreed!<br>
lately, I've been coming back around to an old thought; IT technology is advancing too quickly for us. The movies Terminator, matrix, etc.are foreboding. Not in a sense, that zombie machines are going to eat my brain, but that we create something with technology that we cannot or do not want to control anymore.<br> <br>
the average user enjoys the benefits of a nice gui, social networking, simple searches, etc. and is oblivious to the actual problems arising with it. we have the same principle of the creeping islamisation of europe and the world financial crisis. people asleep and not realising the disaster looming.</htmltext>
<tokenext>agreed !
lately , I 've been coming back around to an old thought ; IT technology is advancing too quickly for us .
The movies Terminator , matrix , etc.are foreboding .
Not in a sense , that zombie machines are going to eat my brain , but that we create something with technology that we can not or do not want to control anymore .
the average user enjoys the benefits of a nice gui , social networking , simple searches , etc .
and is oblivious to the actual problems arising with it .
we have the same principle of the creeping islamisation of europe and the world financial crisis .
people asleep and not realising the disaster looming .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>agreed!
lately, I've been coming back around to an old thought; IT technology is advancing too quickly for us.
The movies Terminator, matrix, etc.are foreboding.
Not in a sense, that zombie machines are going to eat my brain, but that we create something with technology that we cannot or do not want to control anymore.
the average user enjoys the benefits of a nice gui, social networking, simple searches, etc.
and is oblivious to the actual problems arising with it.
we have the same principle of the creeping islamisation of europe and the world financial crisis.
people asleep and not realising the disaster looming.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111752</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111506</id>
	<title>Re:It Depends...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265980320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>lost credibility:</p><p>http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/technology/2010/01/27/talk-talk-boss-says-it-will-fight-government-anti-piracy-plans-115875-21999484/</p><p>and yes, i do appriciate the irony of using the mirror to prove my point.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>lost credibility : http : //www.mirror.co.uk/news/technology/2010/01/27/talk-talk-boss-says-it-will-fight-government-anti-piracy-plans-115875-21999484/and yes , i do appriciate the irony of using the mirror to prove my point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>lost credibility:http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/technology/2010/01/27/talk-talk-boss-says-it-will-fight-government-anti-piracy-plans-115875-21999484/and yes, i do appriciate the irony of using the mirror to prove my point.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111356</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111596</id>
	<title>Pure speculation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265981100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>From the article:

"Parliamentary sources have told PC Pro that the Tories' plans were based on foreign investment in the UK broadband network. Google is one of the few companies with the necessary capital and motivation to invest in British broadband"

so this story is based soley on the fact that Google is a foreign Internet company with money?</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the article : " Parliamentary sources have told PC Pro that the Tories ' plans were based on foreign investment in the UK broadband network .
Google is one of the few companies with the necessary capital and motivation to invest in British broadband " so this story is based soley on the fact that Google is a foreign Internet company with money ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the article:

"Parliamentary sources have told PC Pro that the Tories' plans were based on foreign investment in the UK broadband network.
Google is one of the few companies with the necessary capital and motivation to invest in British broadband"

so this story is based soley on the fact that Google is a foreign Internet company with money?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111514</id>
	<title>Re:Is Google Planning To Fibre Britain?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265980380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I accidentally the whole Britain</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I accidentally the whole Britain</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I accidentally the whole Britain</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111874</id>
	<title>Re:HTTP-only?</title>
	<author>whoop</author>
	<datestamp>1265984220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Plus, I heard you can only access Google services with it.  Searching at Google.com will go from 0.5 seconds down to 0.43 seconds!  That's SECONDS, people!</p><p>Oh, and by using Google ISP, you forfeit everything you have to Google.  Google, Google, Google.</p><p>Evil.</p><p>That should cover the conspiracists.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Plus , I heard you can only access Google services with it .
Searching at Google.com will go from 0.5 seconds down to 0.43 seconds !
That 's SECONDS , people ! Oh , and by using Google ISP , you forfeit everything you have to Google .
Google , Google , Google.Evil.That should cover the conspiracists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Plus, I heard you can only access Google services with it.
Searching at Google.com will go from 0.5 seconds down to 0.43 seconds!
That's SECONDS, people!Oh, and by using Google ISP, you forfeit everything you have to Google.
Google, Google, Google.Evil.That should cover the conspiracists.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111650</id>
	<title>Consequences</title>
	<author>nOw2</author>
	<datestamp>1265982060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If this is true, then I'll accept the other consequences of voting Tory (we haven't forgotten the 80s) and have the high speed Internet please.</p><p>My 7MBit/s line has been delivering 300kbit/s for three months due to 'VP congestion' even though I am within sight of the local exchange, which is also the BT area office. I've grown so use to not being able to do anything online except for email that I've decided it would be acceptable to move to rural village (though with population &gt;1,000) which has no broadband due to being 7km away from the three nearest exchanges.</p><p>Despite the obvious logical problems with this statement, I do sometimes think that Internet access in the UK outside of London is positively medieval.</p><p>If BT are waiting for government handouts to get fibre to rural not-spots and the irrelevant cable companies are not even operating in the same country, then bring on Google. When Google turns into Microsoft, we'll take action. But for now, we need Google. They've been nothing but a force for good so far.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If this is true , then I 'll accept the other consequences of voting Tory ( we have n't forgotten the 80s ) and have the high speed Internet please.My 7MBit/s line has been delivering 300kbit/s for three months due to 'VP congestion ' even though I am within sight of the local exchange , which is also the BT area office .
I 've grown so use to not being able to do anything online except for email that I 've decided it would be acceptable to move to rural village ( though with population &gt; 1,000 ) which has no broadband due to being 7km away from the three nearest exchanges.Despite the obvious logical problems with this statement , I do sometimes think that Internet access in the UK outside of London is positively medieval.If BT are waiting for government handouts to get fibre to rural not-spots and the irrelevant cable companies are not even operating in the same country , then bring on Google .
When Google turns into Microsoft , we 'll take action .
But for now , we need Google .
They 've been nothing but a force for good so far .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this is true, then I'll accept the other consequences of voting Tory (we haven't forgotten the 80s) and have the high speed Internet please.My 7MBit/s line has been delivering 300kbit/s for three months due to 'VP congestion' even though I am within sight of the local exchange, which is also the BT area office.
I've grown so use to not being able to do anything online except for email that I've decided it would be acceptable to move to rural village (though with population &gt;1,000) which has no broadband due to being 7km away from the three nearest exchanges.Despite the obvious logical problems with this statement, I do sometimes think that Internet access in the UK outside of London is positively medieval.If BT are waiting for government handouts to get fibre to rural not-spots and the irrelevant cable companies are not even operating in the same country, then bring on Google.
When Google turns into Microsoft, we'll take action.
But for now, we need Google.
They've been nothing but a force for good so far.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31126086</id>
	<title>you need Google investment for that?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266067080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Portugal has 1 Gb internet in the bigger cities, will have 10 Gb this year, and fiber to the home in the whole country in two years. without Google's investment.</p><p>so no country should complain about fiber coverage or rely on Google's investment when we (.pt) don't need to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Portugal has 1 Gb internet in the bigger cities , will have 10 Gb this year , and fiber to the home in the whole country in two years .
without Google 's investment.so no country should complain about fiber coverage or rely on Google 's investment when we ( .pt ) do n't need to ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Portugal has 1 Gb internet in the bigger cities, will have 10 Gb this year, and fiber to the home in the whole country in two years.
without Google's investment.so no country should complain about fiber coverage or rely on Google's investment when we (.pt) don't need to ;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31114770</id>
	<title>Re:Well someone has to.</title>
	<author>loonyjuice</author>
	<datestamp>1265997180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think Kellogg's got there first...

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All-Bran" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All-Bran</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think Kellogg 's got there first.. . http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All-Bran [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think Kellogg's got there first...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All-Bran [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111216</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31116392</id>
	<title>Re:Conservatives</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266003480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The UK Conservative party is so far right that it has difficulty in finding allies in other European countries.</p></div><p>That's not strictly true.  If you were to say "the current leader had to do a deal with anti-Europeans within his party in order to get elected" you'd be spot on.</p><p>Economically they're a fairly broad church from pretty much where Labour is through to more Thatcherite cut-task-and-spending ones; socially they're mostly pretty much where all the major UK parties are - very social liberal (in US terms).</p><p>I'm not a Tory voter by the way (many of my views would be described as a socialist in the UK and liberal in the US), but I don't want to cry Godwin/Wolf over the tories when there are real fascists standing (e.g. the BNP).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The UK Conservative party is so far right that it has difficulty in finding allies in other European countries.That 's not strictly true .
If you were to say " the current leader had to do a deal with anti-Europeans within his party in order to get elected " you 'd be spot on.Economically they 're a fairly broad church from pretty much where Labour is through to more Thatcherite cut-task-and-spending ones ; socially they 're mostly pretty much where all the major UK parties are - very social liberal ( in US terms ) .I 'm not a Tory voter by the way ( many of my views would be described as a socialist in the UK and liberal in the US ) , but I do n't want to cry Godwin/Wolf over the tories when there are real fascists standing ( e.g .
the BNP ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The UK Conservative party is so far right that it has difficulty in finding allies in other European countries.That's not strictly true.
If you were to say "the current leader had to do a deal with anti-Europeans within his party in order to get elected" you'd be spot on.Economically they're a fairly broad church from pretty much where Labour is through to more Thatcherite cut-task-and-spending ones; socially they're mostly pretty much where all the major UK parties are - very social liberal (in US terms).I'm not a Tory voter by the way (many of my views would be described as a socialist in the UK and liberal in the US), but I don't want to cry Godwin/Wolf over the tories when there are real fascists standing (e.g.
the BNP).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111552</id>
	<title>Re:Well someone has to.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265980740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Someone has to do it...</p></div><p>That's pretty much all the article says. Someone has to do it --&gt; Google have some money --&gt; maybe they'll do it.</p><p>But it involves Google, so it's front page news.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone has to do it...That 's pretty much all the article says .
Someone has to do it -- &gt; Google have some money -- &gt; maybe they 'll do it.But it involves Google , so it 's front page news .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone has to do it...That's pretty much all the article says.
Someone has to do it --&gt; Google have some money --&gt; maybe they'll do it.But it involves Google, so it's front page news.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111216</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111230</id>
	<title>Eh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265976900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why do they need Fibre? Are they constipated?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do they need Fibre ?
Are they constipated ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do they need Fibre?
Are they constipated?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112760</id>
	<title>"The current extremely unpopular party"</title>
	<author>Hasai</author>
	<datestamp>1265989080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is that the British term for "incumbents?"<br>];)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is that the British term for " incumbents ?
" ] ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is that the British term for "incumbents?
"];)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112292</id>
	<title>Re:fuck off, Google</title>
	<author>algormortis</author>
	<datestamp>1265986740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, I'm pretty sure this would all make a lot more sense to you if you read Google's "About Google" page. Did you know that they were previously named Skynet, and that their collective servers are referred to as HAL?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , I 'm pretty sure this would all make a lot more sense to you if you read Google 's " About Google " page .
Did you know that they were previously named Skynet , and that their collective servers are referred to as HAL ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, I'm pretty sure this would all make a lot more sense to you if you read Google's "About Google" page.
Did you know that they were previously named Skynet, and that their collective servers are referred to as HAL?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31114392</id>
	<title>Well, Google ISP</title>
	<author>imsabbel</author>
	<datestamp>1265995920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>would make a lot of stuff easier.<br>For example, you would not have to use Gmail, Google Voice or Chrome anymore in order to get an optimzed web experience.<br>They will happily evaluate whatever other service you use, thus improving your life by not being evil.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>would make a lot of stuff easier.For example , you would not have to use Gmail , Google Voice or Chrome anymore in order to get an optimzed web experience.They will happily evaluate whatever other service you use , thus improving your life by not being evil .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>would make a lot of stuff easier.For example, you would not have to use Gmail, Google Voice or Chrome anymore in order to get an optimzed web experience.They will happily evaluate whatever other service you use, thus improving your life by not being evil.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31115254</id>
	<title>Re:Is Google Planning To Fibre Britain?</title>
	<author>segedunum</author>
	<datestamp>1265999100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know, the verbing pisses me off. The last time I cringed was at the Olympics when someone has supposedly 'medalled' - meaning that had got a medal. Urgghhhhhhhh.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know , the verbing pisses me off .
The last time I cringed was at the Olympics when someone has supposedly 'medalled ' - meaning that had got a medal .
Urgghhhhhhhh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know, the verbing pisses me off.
The last time I cringed was at the Olympics when someone has supposedly 'medalled' - meaning that had got a medal.
Urgghhhhhhhh.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31114496</id>
	<title>Re:fuck off, Google</title>
	<author>wamatt</author>
	<datestamp>1265996220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> Your top executives believe that no-one online is entitled to privacy (unless he is a top Google exec, who will deny press information to journalists who publish information about him). You require NSA clearance for any significant technical positions.</p><p>Only an idiot today would think you "do no evil". You're just like any nasty group in its early years - start off promising the world, slowly reneging on promises which matter, and one by one revealing your true intentions. You give people the sense of security they'll so easily swallow until it's too late to clamour for alternatives.</p><p>We don't want you in the UK. BT is a heap of steaming shit, but at least their gross incompetence limits their ability to cooperate effectively with the Crown Estate of Mandelson.</p></div><p>As amusing as your paranoid rant is, Reality is not amused. Here are the facts:</p><p>
1) Eric Smidt never said "no-one is entitled to piracy" . He simply said the reality is if your want privacy don't use Google because the reality is it records a lot of info.  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6e7wfDHzew" title="youtube.com">Youtube video</a> [youtube.com] </p><p>

2) Secondly google hired a high profile NSA employee Matt Cutts and suddenly its a prequisite for an "important position"? Please. That is misinformed conspiracy theory loony. Some jobs require NSA clearance. You have no proof to backup the claim that all the top google engineers are all NSA.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your top executives believe that no-one online is entitled to privacy ( unless he is a top Google exec , who will deny press information to journalists who publish information about him ) .
You require NSA clearance for any significant technical positions.Only an idiot today would think you " do no evil " .
You 're just like any nasty group in its early years - start off promising the world , slowly reneging on promises which matter , and one by one revealing your true intentions .
You give people the sense of security they 'll so easily swallow until it 's too late to clamour for alternatives.We do n't want you in the UK .
BT is a heap of steaming shit , but at least their gross incompetence limits their ability to cooperate effectively with the Crown Estate of Mandelson.As amusing as your paranoid rant is , Reality is not amused .
Here are the facts : 1 ) Eric Smidt never said " no-one is entitled to piracy " .
He simply said the reality is if your want privacy do n't use Google because the reality is it records a lot of info .
Youtube video [ youtube.com ] 2 ) Secondly google hired a high profile NSA employee Matt Cutts and suddenly its a prequisite for an " important position " ?
Please. That is misinformed conspiracy theory loony .
Some jobs require NSA clearance .
You have no proof to backup the claim that all the top google engineers are all NSA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Your top executives believe that no-one online is entitled to privacy (unless he is a top Google exec, who will deny press information to journalists who publish information about him).
You require NSA clearance for any significant technical positions.Only an idiot today would think you "do no evil".
You're just like any nasty group in its early years - start off promising the world, slowly reneging on promises which matter, and one by one revealing your true intentions.
You give people the sense of security they'll so easily swallow until it's too late to clamour for alternatives.We don't want you in the UK.
BT is a heap of steaming shit, but at least their gross incompetence limits their ability to cooperate effectively with the Crown Estate of Mandelson.As amusing as your paranoid rant is, Reality is not amused.
Here are the facts:
1) Eric Smidt never said "no-one is entitled to piracy" .
He simply said the reality is if your want privacy don't use Google because the reality is it records a lot of info.
Youtube video [youtube.com] 

2) Secondly google hired a high profile NSA employee Matt Cutts and suddenly its a prequisite for an "important position"?
Please. That is misinformed conspiracy theory loony.
Some jobs require NSA clearance.
You have no proof to backup the claim that all the top google engineers are all NSA.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111536</id>
	<title>Re:What is the verb then?</title>
	<author>Suki I</author>
	<datestamp>1265980620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Enfibre?  Befibre?  Fiberize?  Fibrate?</p></div><p>How about "Install Fiber"?

Love the Google American to UK English translation in the headline too<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Enfibre ?
Befibre ? Fiberize ?
Fibrate ? How about " Install Fiber " ?
Love the Google American to UK English translation in the headline too : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Enfibre?
Befibre?  Fiberize?
Fibrate?How about "Install Fiber"?
Love the Google American to UK English translation in the headline too :)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112612</id>
	<title>To be honest, everyone in power says that.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265988480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To be honest, everyone in power says that. Show me a politician who thinks you're entitled to privacy AND votes that way.</p><p>It's always "think of the children" or "this will combat terrorism" or "we need to find the thieves".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To be honest , everyone in power says that .
Show me a politician who thinks you 're entitled to privacy AND votes that way.It 's always " think of the children " or " this will combat terrorism " or " we need to find the thieves " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To be honest, everyone in power says that.
Show me a politician who thinks you're entitled to privacy AND votes that way.It's always "think of the children" or "this will combat terrorism" or "we need to find the thieves".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111398</id>
	<title>Re:Is Google Planning To Fibre Britain?</title>
	<author>Joce640k</author>
	<datestamp>1265978940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Came here to see an American complain about spelling/grammar and am leaving satisfied.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Came here to see an American complain about spelling/grammar and am leaving satisfied .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Came here to see an American complain about spelling/grammar and am leaving satisfied.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111316</id>
	<title>Is Google Planning To Fibre Britain?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265977560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is Google Planning To Fibre Britain?</p><p>No, because there is no such verb as fibre (nor fiber, for that matter).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is Google Planning To Fibre Britain ? No , because there is no such verb as fibre ( nor fiber , for that matter ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is Google Planning To Fibre Britain?No, because there is no such verb as fibre (nor fiber, for that matter).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31115006</id>
	<title>Re:Conservatives</title>
	<author>Rising Ape</author>
	<datestamp>1265998020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The "far right" may have been true in the 80s (and even then they weren't far right in the fascist sense) and to a lesser extent in the pre-Cameron days, but now there's not a whole lot distinguishing them from Labour. Yes, they're a bit more right wing economically, but nothing like the huge gulf of the past.</p><p>Do you perchance come from a strong Labour family background?  Politics in the UK seems to be part apathy, part tribalism.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The " far right " may have been true in the 80s ( and even then they were n't far right in the fascist sense ) and to a lesser extent in the pre-Cameron days , but now there 's not a whole lot distinguishing them from Labour .
Yes , they 're a bit more right wing economically , but nothing like the huge gulf of the past.Do you perchance come from a strong Labour family background ?
Politics in the UK seems to be part apathy , part tribalism .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The "far right" may have been true in the 80s (and even then they weren't far right in the fascist sense) and to a lesser extent in the pre-Cameron days, but now there's not a whole lot distinguishing them from Labour.
Yes, they're a bit more right wing economically, but nothing like the huge gulf of the past.Do you perchance come from a strong Labour family background?
Politics in the UK seems to be part apathy, part tribalism.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31114266</id>
	<title>Re:fuck off, Google</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265995380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh come now. You actually expected them to open source the algorithm that made them so rich? (Their advertising gets them their money, but the excellent search drew people in). Releasing source code that's run as a service is a <b>bad idea</b> a large percentage of the time. Why? Because then their competitors can copy, and they might start losing market share. Compare this to say, open sourcing your software product (non-service), where you only have to give away the source after people have bought it, or where you can sell support contracts.<br>
&nbsp; <br>And privacy? Need I remind you when <a href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/060119-060352" title="searchenginewatch.com" rel="nofollow">AOL, MSN, and Yahoo handed over data to Bush without a fight, but Google didn't?</a> [searchenginewatch.com]. If you want privacy, go get it. Use Tor, and run your own email server. But don't say "Waaaah, Google is evil" then go run to some other mega corp.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh come now .
You actually expected them to open source the algorithm that made them so rich ?
( Their advertising gets them their money , but the excellent search drew people in ) .
Releasing source code that 's run as a service is a bad idea a large percentage of the time .
Why ? Because then their competitors can copy , and they might start losing market share .
Compare this to say , open sourcing your software product ( non-service ) , where you only have to give away the source after people have bought it , or where you can sell support contracts .
  And privacy ?
Need I remind you when AOL , MSN , and Yahoo handed over data to Bush without a fight , but Google did n't ?
[ searchenginewatch.com ] . If you want privacy , go get it .
Use Tor , and run your own email server .
But do n't say " Waaaah , Google is evil " then go run to some other mega corp .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh come now.
You actually expected them to open source the algorithm that made them so rich?
(Their advertising gets them their money, but the excellent search drew people in).
Releasing source code that's run as a service is a bad idea a large percentage of the time.
Why? Because then their competitors can copy, and they might start losing market share.
Compare this to say, open sourcing your software product (non-service), where you only have to give away the source after people have bought it, or where you can sell support contracts.
  And privacy?
Need I remind you when AOL, MSN, and Yahoo handed over data to Bush without a fight, but Google didn't?
[searchenginewatch.com]. If you want privacy, go get it.
Use Tor, and run your own email server.
But don't say "Waaaah, Google is evil" then go run to some other mega corp.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31116344</id>
	<title>Sure would help their regularity</title>
	<author>Trailer Trash</author>
	<datestamp>1266003300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can't get too much fibre.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ca n't get too much fibre .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can't get too much fibre.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111388</id>
	<title>fuck off, Google</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265978820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You still haven't delivered the algorithms you promised to open 12 years ago. Your top executives believe that no-one online is entitled to privacy (unless he is a top Google exec, who will deny press information to journalists who publish information about him). You require NSA clearance for any significant technical positions.</p><p>Only an idiot today would think you "do no evil". You're just like any nasty group in its early years - start off promising the world, slowly reneging on promises which matter, and one by one revealing your true intentions. You give people the sense of security they'll so easily swallow until it's too late to clamour for alternatives.</p><p>We don't want you in the UK. BT is a heap of steaming shit, but at least their gross incompetence limits their ability to cooperate effectively with the Crown Estate of Mandelson.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You still have n't delivered the algorithms you promised to open 12 years ago .
Your top executives believe that no-one online is entitled to privacy ( unless he is a top Google exec , who will deny press information to journalists who publish information about him ) .
You require NSA clearance for any significant technical positions.Only an idiot today would think you " do no evil " .
You 're just like any nasty group in its early years - start off promising the world , slowly reneging on promises which matter , and one by one revealing your true intentions .
You give people the sense of security they 'll so easily swallow until it 's too late to clamour for alternatives.We do n't want you in the UK .
BT is a heap of steaming shit , but at least their gross incompetence limits their ability to cooperate effectively with the Crown Estate of Mandelson .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You still haven't delivered the algorithms you promised to open 12 years ago.
Your top executives believe that no-one online is entitled to privacy (unless he is a top Google exec, who will deny press information to journalists who publish information about him).
You require NSA clearance for any significant technical positions.Only an idiot today would think you "do no evil".
You're just like any nasty group in its early years - start off promising the world, slowly reneging on promises which matter, and one by one revealing your true intentions.
You give people the sense of security they'll so easily swallow until it's too late to clamour for alternatives.We don't want you in the UK.
BT is a heap of steaming shit, but at least their gross incompetence limits their ability to cooperate effectively with the Crown Estate of Mandelson.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31118620</id>
	<title>Re:The problem in Britain is the last mile</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265968200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Anyone know what broadband in lightly populated small towns/villages is like in Scandinavia/Korea/Japan?</p></div><p>In Japan, better than urban areas in the US or UK. I lived in a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T\%C5\%8Dj\%C5\%8D,\_Hiroshima" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">mountain village</a> [wikipedia.org] with a population of 10,000 and had 45Mb ADSL in 2005. A friend in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukuyama,\_Hiroshima" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">nearest city</a> [wikipedia.org] (60km of twisty mountain passes away, and with a population of about 400,000) had 100Mb fibre. For both of us there was sufficient backbone capacity we could max out our lines whenever we chose, for as long as we wanted.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone know what broadband in lightly populated small towns/villages is like in Scandinavia/Korea/Japan ? In Japan , better than urban areas in the US or UK .
I lived in a mountain village [ wikipedia.org ] with a population of 10,000 and had 45Mb ADSL in 2005 .
A friend in the nearest city [ wikipedia.org ] ( 60km of twisty mountain passes away , and with a population of about 400,000 ) had 100Mb fibre .
For both of us there was sufficient backbone capacity we could max out our lines whenever we chose , for as long as we wanted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone know what broadband in lightly populated small towns/villages is like in Scandinavia/Korea/Japan?In Japan, better than urban areas in the US or UK.
I lived in a mountain village [wikipedia.org] with a population of 10,000 and had 45Mb ADSL in 2005.
A friend in the nearest city [wikipedia.org] (60km of twisty mountain passes away, and with a population of about 400,000) had 100Mb fibre.
For both of us there was sufficient backbone capacity we could max out our lines whenever we chose, for as long as we wanted.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111522</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111756</id>
	<title>Surely "From the department of making shit up"?</title>
	<author>Curmudgeonlyoldbloke</author>
	<datestamp>1265983080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In case anyone doesn't realise, there's going to be an general election in a couple of months or so.  The current extremely unpopular party is likely to be replaced by another slightly less unpopular one with broadly similar policies, the main difference being that instead of being fronted by a dour Scotsman they have a posh ex-PR bloke with a nice smile.  At this time politicians on all sides are more likely than ever to say stuff and not mean it.</p><p>What the Tories actually said was this:<br><a href="http://www.conservatives.com/News/News\_stories/2010/01/Conservatives\_to\_deliver\_nationwide\_superfast\_broadband\_by\_2017.aspx" title="conservatives.com">http://www.conservatives.com/News/News\_stories/2010/01/Conservatives\_to\_deliver\_nationwide\_superfast\_broadband\_by\_2017.aspx</a> [conservatives.com]</p><p>The key weasel words there are "up to 100mbps" and "the majority of homes".  Roughly 50\% of UK homes have cable available now, and Virgin Media are already offering headline speeds up to half that.  100Mbps by 2017 is hardly flying car territory.</p><p>They were actually responding to a Labour suggestion of universal (i.e. 100\% not 50\%) of UK homes getting 2Mb coverage by 2012:<br><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7858498.stm" title="bbc.co.uk">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7858498.stm</a> [bbc.co.uk]</p><p>The Labour plan sounds less exciting but would actually be much harder to achieve (not that they'll have to - they're unlikely to get reelected and have been careful to say it only in an "interim report").</p><p>As to what orifice the PCPro writer pulled Google out of, your guess is as good as mine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In case anyone does n't realise , there 's going to be an general election in a couple of months or so .
The current extremely unpopular party is likely to be replaced by another slightly less unpopular one with broadly similar policies , the main difference being that instead of being fronted by a dour Scotsman they have a posh ex-PR bloke with a nice smile .
At this time politicians on all sides are more likely than ever to say stuff and not mean it.What the Tories actually said was this : http : //www.conservatives.com/News/News \ _stories/2010/01/Conservatives \ _to \ _deliver \ _nationwide \ _superfast \ _broadband \ _by \ _2017.aspx [ conservatives.com ] The key weasel words there are " up to 100mbps " and " the majority of homes " .
Roughly 50 \ % of UK homes have cable available now , and Virgin Media are already offering headline speeds up to half that .
100Mbps by 2017 is hardly flying car territory.They were actually responding to a Labour suggestion of universal ( i.e .
100 \ % not 50 \ % ) of UK homes getting 2Mb coverage by 2012 : http : //news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7858498.stm [ bbc.co.uk ] The Labour plan sounds less exciting but would actually be much harder to achieve ( not that they 'll have to - they 're unlikely to get reelected and have been careful to say it only in an " interim report " ) .As to what orifice the PCPro writer pulled Google out of , your guess is as good as mine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In case anyone doesn't realise, there's going to be an general election in a couple of months or so.
The current extremely unpopular party is likely to be replaced by another slightly less unpopular one with broadly similar policies, the main difference being that instead of being fronted by a dour Scotsman they have a posh ex-PR bloke with a nice smile.
At this time politicians on all sides are more likely than ever to say stuff and not mean it.What the Tories actually said was this:http://www.conservatives.com/News/News\_stories/2010/01/Conservatives\_to\_deliver\_nationwide\_superfast\_broadband\_by\_2017.aspx [conservatives.com]The key weasel words there are "up to 100mbps" and "the majority of homes".
Roughly 50\% of UK homes have cable available now, and Virgin Media are already offering headline speeds up to half that.
100Mbps by 2017 is hardly flying car territory.They were actually responding to a Labour suggestion of universal (i.e.
100\% not 50\%) of UK homes getting 2Mb coverage by 2012:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7858498.stm [bbc.co.uk]The Labour plan sounds less exciting but would actually be much harder to achieve (not that they'll have to - they're unlikely to get reelected and have been careful to say it only in an "interim report").As to what orifice the PCPro writer pulled Google out of, your guess is as good as mine.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31117168</id>
	<title>Split Mind</title>
	<author>legio\_noctis</author>
	<datestamp>1266007260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On one hand, I really hope Google want to give me ultrafast fibre access. I'm fed up with this rubbish 1.5mbit BT ASDL already. I mean, come on, it's 2010, we were supposed to have flying cars by now [and Terrafugia is only just getting somewhere]. It's not as if either BT or the current government (with their oh-so-ambitious plans of 2mbit for most people by some date in the distant future, and their other set of plans to remove anyone that large companies don't like from the net) are going to do anything vaguely intelligent.</p><p>On the other, I really hope they aren't partnered with the Tories, who annoy me. Intensely.</p><p>But still, compromises...</p><p>:/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On one hand , I really hope Google want to give me ultrafast fibre access .
I 'm fed up with this rubbish 1.5mbit BT ASDL already .
I mean , come on , it 's 2010 , we were supposed to have flying cars by now [ and Terrafugia is only just getting somewhere ] .
It 's not as if either BT or the current government ( with their oh-so-ambitious plans of 2mbit for most people by some date in the distant future , and their other set of plans to remove anyone that large companies do n't like from the net ) are going to do anything vaguely intelligent.On the other , I really hope they are n't partnered with the Tories , who annoy me .
Intensely.But still , compromises... : /</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On one hand, I really hope Google want to give me ultrafast fibre access.
I'm fed up with this rubbish 1.5mbit BT ASDL already.
I mean, come on, it's 2010, we were supposed to have flying cars by now [and Terrafugia is only just getting somewhere].
It's not as if either BT or the current government (with their oh-so-ambitious plans of 2mbit for most people by some date in the distant future, and their other set of plans to remove anyone that large companies don't like from the net) are going to do anything vaguely intelligent.On the other, I really hope they aren't partnered with the Tories, who annoy me.
Intensely.But still, compromises...:/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112008</id>
	<title>Re:What is the verb then?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265985180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Enfibre?  Befibre?  Fiberize?  Fibrate?</p></div><p>Cristalize?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Enfibre ?
Befibre ? Fiberize ?
Fibrate ? Cristalize ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Enfibre?
Befibre?  Fiberize?
Fibrate?Cristalize?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112522</id>
	<title>Typo</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265988180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's a typo in the posting. it should be fiber not fibre. No need to thank me!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a typo in the posting .
it should be fiber not fibre .
No need to thank me !
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a typo in the posting.
it should be fiber not fibre.
No need to thank me!
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112034</id>
	<title>Right</title>
	<author>StripedCow</author>
	<datestamp>1265985420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We will control the pipes, but we will not inspect your data packets.</p><p>Well, maybe we will, but only for advertisement purposes.</p><p>Yeah right.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We will control the pipes , but we will not inspect your data packets.Well , maybe we will , but only for advertisement purposes.Yeah right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We will control the pipes, but we will not inspect your data packets.Well, maybe we will, but only for advertisement purposes.Yeah right.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31126018</id>
	<title>You got NSA clearance too?</title>
	<author>Ilgaz</author>
	<datestamp>1266065700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why does an international service company require NSA clearance unless it serves to some American intelligence purpose and/or holds American secrets?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does an international service company require NSA clearance unless it serves to some American intelligence purpose and/or holds American secrets ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why does an international service company require NSA clearance unless it serves to some American intelligence purpose and/or holds American secrets?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31114496</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31116950</id>
	<title>Re:fuck off, Google</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266006420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hear hear. We don't want foreign involvement in our IT infrastructure. That's why we have Windows for Warships, Windows for Nuclear Armed Submarines (aka the Armageddon Project), every schoolchild has forced IT lessons in... you guessed it, Windows, and a National Health Service which would have run completely on Windows (courtesy of &pound;900 million of taxpayer's dosh) if they hadn't made such a bloody mess of it even the current self serving take-me-to-lunch-and-I'll -give -you-a-peerage dickheads had to call a halt to it.</p><p>Yeah, no way we should allow somebody like Google in the door.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hear hear .
We do n't want foreign involvement in our IT infrastructure .
That 's why we have Windows for Warships , Windows for Nuclear Armed Submarines ( aka the Armageddon Project ) , every schoolchild has forced IT lessons in... you guessed it , Windows , and a National Health Service which would have run completely on Windows ( courtesy of   900 million of taxpayer 's dosh ) if they had n't made such a bloody mess of it even the current self serving take-me-to-lunch-and-I 'll -give -you-a-peerage dickheads had to call a halt to it.Yeah , no way we should allow somebody like Google in the door .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hear hear.
We don't want foreign involvement in our IT infrastructure.
That's why we have Windows for Warships, Windows for Nuclear Armed Submarines (aka the Armageddon Project), every schoolchild has forced IT lessons in... you guessed it, Windows, and a National Health Service which would have run completely on Windows (courtesy of £900 million of taxpayer's dosh) if they hadn't made such a bloody mess of it even the current self serving take-me-to-lunch-and-I'll -give -you-a-peerage dickheads had to call a halt to it.Yeah, no way we should allow somebody like Google in the door.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112336</id>
	<title>Must create the need</title>
	<author>Bender Unit 22</author>
	<datestamp>1265987040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can get FTTP if I want to, but why should I when I can get a 20/2 megabit ADSL for half the price.</p><p>Ok, I can see the geeky coolness in having a 50/50 or even 100/100 megabit internet connection. But it the real world I have no use for it. In reality I did almost fine on a 4 megabit, it was a little on the slow side for HD streaming, but the few hours between work and sleep I hardly had time to notice.</p><p>(the fact that the fiber was coming to my town was the reason the phone company a micro DSLAM in my neighborhood, before that the maximum waa 4 megabit and they had no plans to upgrade. But that is another story)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can get FTTP if I want to , but why should I when I can get a 20/2 megabit ADSL for half the price.Ok , I can see the geeky coolness in having a 50/50 or even 100/100 megabit internet connection .
But it the real world I have no use for it .
In reality I did almost fine on a 4 megabit , it was a little on the slow side for HD streaming , but the few hours between work and sleep I hardly had time to notice .
( the fact that the fiber was coming to my town was the reason the phone company a micro DSLAM in my neighborhood , before that the maximum waa 4 megabit and they had no plans to upgrade .
But that is another story )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can get FTTP if I want to, but why should I when I can get a 20/2 megabit ADSL for half the price.Ok, I can see the geeky coolness in having a 50/50 or even 100/100 megabit internet connection.
But it the real world I have no use for it.
In reality I did almost fine on a 4 megabit, it was a little on the slow side for HD streaming, but the few hours between work and sleep I hardly had time to notice.
(the fact that the fiber was coming to my town was the reason the phone company a micro DSLAM in my neighborhood, before that the maximum waa 4 megabit and they had no plans to upgrade.
But that is another story)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31113752</id>
	<title>Re:Language abuse</title>
	<author>VAY</author>
	<datestamp>1265993520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Verbing nouns has been with us forever, and has been done by Shakespeare himself.  Just because this results in ugliness as well as beauty doesn't mean it's wrong.</p><p>Language evolves.  Deal with it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Verbing nouns has been with us forever , and has been done by Shakespeare himself .
Just because this results in ugliness as well as beauty does n't mean it 's wrong.Language evolves .
Deal with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Verbing nouns has been with us forever, and has been done by Shakespeare himself.
Just because this results in ugliness as well as beauty doesn't mean it's wrong.Language evolves.
Deal with it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31114416</id>
	<title>Re:Language abuse</title>
	<author>anaesthetica</author>
	<datestamp>1265995980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>You fail it. (It is: getting the <a href="http://aoife.allegracom.ca/images/verbing\_sm.jpg" title="allegracom.ca"> <i>Calvin and Hobbes</i> reference</a> [allegracom.ca].)</htmltext>
<tokenext>You fail it .
( It is : getting the Calvin and Hobbes reference [ allegracom.ca ] .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You fail it.
(It is: getting the  Calvin and Hobbes reference [allegracom.ca].
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111694</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112010</id>
	<title>In reference to the US part of it...</title>
	<author>sethstorm</author>
	<datestamp>1265985240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The search giant yesterday announced plans to build a gigabit fibre broadband network in the US. The test network will see Google deliver fibre-to-the-premises (FTTP) connections to up to half a million US homes.</p></div><p>...all outside of flyover country as usual.  By the time it reaches flyover country, the provider ends up acting like Comcast on you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The search giant yesterday announced plans to build a gigabit fibre broadband network in the US .
The test network will see Google deliver fibre-to-the-premises ( FTTP ) connections to up to half a million US homes....all outside of flyover country as usual .
By the time it reaches flyover country , the provider ends up acting like Comcast on you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The search giant yesterday announced plans to build a gigabit fibre broadband network in the US.
The test network will see Google deliver fibre-to-the-premises (FTTP) connections to up to half a million US homes....all outside of flyover country as usual.
By the time it reaches flyover country, the provider ends up acting like Comcast on you.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111694</id>
	<title>Re:Language abuse</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265982420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Quick, someone with mod points mod this "+1 ironic" for matching the "corporate whores" by turning the noun "verb" into a verb<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Quick , someone with mod points mod this " + 1 ironic " for matching the " corporate whores " by turning the noun " verb " into a verb ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Quick, someone with mod points mod this "+1 ironic" for matching the "corporate whores" by turning the noun "verb" into a verb ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31113410</id>
	<title>Re:Conservatives</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265992200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The UK Conservative party is so far right that it has difficulty in finding allies in other European countries.</p></div><p>This may be true, but the UK conservative party is to the <b>left</b> of the US democratic party! Their policy is to</p><ul><li>have universal health case (NHS)</li><li>not to have the death penalty</li><li>sponsor gay pride in soho last year</li></ul><p>Sadly, like the (US) democrats (US) republicans and (UK) labour (but unlike UK liberal democrat's Vince Cable) they also believe in hand waving over finances and hope that the economy will sort itself out by magic.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The UK Conservative party is so far right that it has difficulty in finding allies in other European countries.This may be true , but the UK conservative party is to the left of the US democratic party !
Their policy is tohave universal health case ( NHS ) not to have the death penaltysponsor gay pride in soho last yearSadly , like the ( US ) democrats ( US ) republicans and ( UK ) labour ( but unlike UK liberal democrat 's Vince Cable ) they also believe in hand waving over finances and hope that the economy will sort itself out by magic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The UK Conservative party is so far right that it has difficulty in finding allies in other European countries.This may be true, but the UK conservative party is to the left of the US democratic party!
Their policy is tohave universal health case (NHS)not to have the death penaltysponsor gay pride in soho last yearSadly, like the (US) democrats (US) republicans and (UK) labour (but unlike UK liberal democrat's Vince Cable) they also believe in hand waving over finances and hope that the economy will sort itself out by magic.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31113688</id>
	<title>Re:Conservatives</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265993280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The UK Conservative party is so far right that it has difficulty in finding allies in other European countries.</p><p>That's a trolly little comment if ever I heard one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The UK Conservative party is so far right that it has difficulty in finding allies in other European countries.That 's a trolly little comment if ever I heard one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The UK Conservative party is so far right that it has difficulty in finding allies in other European countries.That's a trolly little comment if ever I heard one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111646</id>
	<title>Re:It Depends...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265982000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Man if you think broadband in the UK is bad take a trip to Australia!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Man if you think broadband in the UK is bad take a trip to Australia !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Man if you think broadband in the UK is bad take a trip to Australia!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111356</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31115116</id>
	<title>Re:all your base are belong to us</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265998440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Trust me, your government is a far bigger worry in this regard.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Trust me , your government is a far bigger worry in this regard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Trust me, your government is a far bigger worry in this regard.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111562</id>
	<title>Good Luck Finding a Sympathetic Ear Here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265980800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is the industry that twisted "architect" into a verb.  Presumably "build" or "code" weren't pompous enough.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the industry that twisted " architect " into a verb .
Presumably " build " or " code " were n't pompous enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the industry that twisted "architect" into a verb.
Presumably "build" or "code" weren't pompous enough.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111768</id>
	<title>Re:The problem in Britain is the last mile</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265983200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.kpo.fi/alltypes.asp?d\_type=5&amp;menu\_id=392" title="www.kpo.fi" rel="nofollow">This</a> [www.kpo.fi] is one local offering in a sparsely-populated region in Finland:</p><p>The worst-case scenario appears to be 0.5 Mb/s symmetrical for &euro;28/mo (incl. taxes). A typical scenario is 8/1.5 Mb/s ADSL for &euro;49/mo. In the regional capital you can get a 100/10 Mb/s ETTH link for &euro;69/mo.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This [ www.kpo.fi ] is one local offering in a sparsely-populated region in Finland : The worst-case scenario appears to be 0.5 Mb/s symmetrical for    28/mo ( incl .
taxes ) . A typical scenario is 8/1.5 Mb/s ADSL for    49/mo .
In the regional capital you can get a 100/10 Mb/s ETTH link for    69/mo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This [www.kpo.fi] is one local offering in a sparsely-populated region in Finland:The worst-case scenario appears to be 0.5 Mb/s symmetrical for €28/mo (incl.
taxes). A typical scenario is 8/1.5 Mb/s ADSL for €49/mo.
In the regional capital you can get a 100/10 Mb/s ETTH link for €69/mo.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111522</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31183470</id>
	<title>Re:What is the verb then?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266504240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fibricate.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fibricate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fibricate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111216</id>
	<title>Well someone has to.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265976720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Someone has to do it... When they are done in Britain they should come and lay fibre all around New Zealand.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone has to do it... When they are done in Britain they should come and lay fibre all around New Zealand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone has to do it... When they are done in Britain they should come and lay fibre all around New Zealand.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31120838</id>
	<title>Re:Language abuse</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265974500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Funny that you picked possibly the most versatile word in English to complain about verbing nouns...</p><p><a href="http://justin.justnet.com.au/rudestuff/uses-of-the-word-fuck.html" title="justnet.com.au" rel="nofollow">http://justin.justnet.com.au/rudestuff/uses-of-the-word-fuck.html</a> [justnet.com.au]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Funny that you picked possibly the most versatile word in English to complain about verbing nouns...http : //justin.justnet.com.au/rudestuff/uses-of-the-word-fuck.html [ justnet.com.au ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Funny that you picked possibly the most versatile word in English to complain about verbing nouns...http://justin.justnet.com.au/rudestuff/uses-of-the-word-fuck.html [justnet.com.au]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31115468</id>
	<title>Re:Surely "From the department of making shit up"?</title>
	<author>Blakey Rat</author>
	<datestamp>1266000000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Out of curiosity, does Britain currently have a fiber network similar to FIOS here in the US? (Not fiber-to-large-apartment-complexes, but fiber-to-individual-homes.)</p><p>Verizon in the US is currently installing one, and a lot of areas have coverage, but<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... well they're not even remotely close to 50\% yet. I feel like I've been waiting for FIOS for a very, very long time-- I'm about to give up and just go to Comcast over the DSL I have now, but man the thought of giving Comcast any money rubs me the wrong way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Out of curiosity , does Britain currently have a fiber network similar to FIOS here in the US ?
( Not fiber-to-large-apartment-complexes , but fiber-to-individual-homes .
) Verizon in the US is currently installing one , and a lot of areas have coverage , but ... well they 're not even remotely close to 50 \ % yet .
I feel like I 've been waiting for FIOS for a very , very long time-- I 'm about to give up and just go to Comcast over the DSL I have now , but man the thought of giving Comcast any money rubs me the wrong way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Out of curiosity, does Britain currently have a fiber network similar to FIOS here in the US?
(Not fiber-to-large-apartment-complexes, but fiber-to-individual-homes.
)Verizon in the US is currently installing one, and a lot of areas have coverage, but ... well they're not even remotely close to 50\% yet.
I feel like I've been waiting for FIOS for a very, very long time-- I'm about to give up and just go to Comcast over the DSL I have now, but man the thought of giving Comcast any money rubs me the wrong way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111356</id>
	<title>It Depends...</title>
	<author>mrpacmanjel</author>
	<datestamp>1265978220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So at every juncture Google will be connected to everything?</p><p>Potentially access the interner via a Goggle ISP, accessing Google DNS, using Google search, communicating via Google email, using Goole chat and Google Buzz with my friends.</p><p>Am I being paranoid or will my privacy become a moot point?</p><p>I do use Google search and gmail on a regular basis and it's also free of charge. In return they use my data - cannot complain about that.</p><p>If it really bothered me I can use alternatives.</p><p>I think it is commendable that Google are willing to roll-out fibre (in the USA only at the moment) and improve the technology.</p><p>But "holy crap" that is an expensive undertaking!<br>I read about this somewhere else and I think Google were going to charge a "competitive" fee for access.</p><p>Broadband in the UK now largely sucks arse because the cost of improving/replacing existing lines is very expensive. No company is willing to take the risk so Google stepping forward ideally is a "good thing".</p><p>However, if they can guarantee the same rights some other ISPs in the UK then great and I am willing to pay for it. If Google want to analyse all my packets of data and use it to advertise stuff to me then I'm not so sure I will like this development.</p><p>Entities like Phorm, BT, Virgin &amp; Tiscali (Talk Talk) are more than happy to follow the UK Government's / music industry's lead on intrusive surveillance. That's why I refuse to use thier services.</p><p>If Google want to lay down infrastructure then that's fine - as long as I have a choice to do otherwise.</p><p>This is mainly due to Eric Schmidt's comments on your expected privacy.</p><p>I still want the freedom to choose while I have it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So at every juncture Google will be connected to everything ? Potentially access the interner via a Goggle ISP , accessing Google DNS , using Google search , communicating via Google email , using Goole chat and Google Buzz with my friends.Am I being paranoid or will my privacy become a moot point ? I do use Google search and gmail on a regular basis and it 's also free of charge .
In return they use my data - can not complain about that.If it really bothered me I can use alternatives.I think it is commendable that Google are willing to roll-out fibre ( in the USA only at the moment ) and improve the technology.But " holy crap " that is an expensive undertaking ! I read about this somewhere else and I think Google were going to charge a " competitive " fee for access.Broadband in the UK now largely sucks arse because the cost of improving/replacing existing lines is very expensive .
No company is willing to take the risk so Google stepping forward ideally is a " good thing " .However , if they can guarantee the same rights some other ISPs in the UK then great and I am willing to pay for it .
If Google want to analyse all my packets of data and use it to advertise stuff to me then I 'm not so sure I will like this development.Entities like Phorm , BT , Virgin &amp; Tiscali ( Talk Talk ) are more than happy to follow the UK Government 's / music industry 's lead on intrusive surveillance .
That 's why I refuse to use thier services.If Google want to lay down infrastructure then that 's fine - as long as I have a choice to do otherwise.This is mainly due to Eric Schmidt 's comments on your expected privacy.I still want the freedom to choose while I have it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So at every juncture Google will be connected to everything?Potentially access the interner via a Goggle ISP, accessing Google DNS, using Google search, communicating via Google email, using Goole chat and Google Buzz with my friends.Am I being paranoid or will my privacy become a moot point?I do use Google search and gmail on a regular basis and it's also free of charge.
In return they use my data - cannot complain about that.If it really bothered me I can use alternatives.I think it is commendable that Google are willing to roll-out fibre (in the USA only at the moment) and improve the technology.But "holy crap" that is an expensive undertaking!I read about this somewhere else and I think Google were going to charge a "competitive" fee for access.Broadband in the UK now largely sucks arse because the cost of improving/replacing existing lines is very expensive.
No company is willing to take the risk so Google stepping forward ideally is a "good thing".However, if they can guarantee the same rights some other ISPs in the UK then great and I am willing to pay for it.
If Google want to analyse all my packets of data and use it to advertise stuff to me then I'm not so sure I will like this development.Entities like Phorm, BT, Virgin &amp; Tiscali (Talk Talk) are more than happy to follow the UK Government's / music industry's lead on intrusive surveillance.
That's why I refuse to use thier services.If Google want to lay down infrastructure then that's fine - as long as I have a choice to do otherwise.This is mainly due to Eric Schmidt's comments on your expected privacy.I still want the freedom to choose while I have it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111468</id>
	<title>Re:It Depends...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265979900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Am I being paranoid or will my privacy become a moot point?</p></div><p>You haven't been paying attention. Personal privacy in Britain is already gone, so your question is moot.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I being paranoid or will my privacy become a moot point ? You have n't been paying attention .
Personal privacy in Britain is already gone , so your question is moot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I being paranoid or will my privacy become a moot point?You haven't been paying attention.
Personal privacy in Britain is already gone, so your question is moot.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111356</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112808</id>
	<title>Re:all your base are belong to us</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265989320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously wtf are you on about? Google is no more or less safe than any other ISP but there is a very good chance they can provide a better service than BT who are absolute crap.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously wtf are you on about ?
Google is no more or less safe than any other ISP but there is a very good chance they can provide a better service than BT who are absolute crap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously wtf are you on about?
Google is no more or less safe than any other ISP but there is a very good chance they can provide a better service than BT who are absolute crap.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31117214</id>
	<title>Re:What is the verb then?</title>
	<author>DragonWriter</author>
	<datestamp>1266007440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fibre is a noun -- and in the case, its the <i>direct object</i> of the action being described. The The verb is "deploy". The indirect object is "Britain". The subject is "Google". A sentence describing the hypothetical action as if in the present tense would be "Google deploying fiber in Britain".</p><p>A rephrasing of the question that is the title of the thread is "Is Google planning to deploy fiber in Britain?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fibre is a noun -- and in the case , its the direct object of the action being described .
The The verb is " deploy " .
The indirect object is " Britain " .
The subject is " Google " .
A sentence describing the hypothetical action as if in the present tense would be " Google deploying fiber in Britain " .A rephrasing of the question that is the title of the thread is " Is Google planning to deploy fiber in Britain ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fibre is a noun -- and in the case, its the direct object of the action being described.
The The verb is "deploy".
The indirect object is "Britain".
The subject is "Google".
A sentence describing the hypothetical action as if in the present tense would be "Google deploying fiber in Britain".A rephrasing of the question that is the title of the thread is "Is Google planning to deploy fiber in Britain?
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111522</id>
	<title>The problem in Britain is the last mile</title>
	<author>bheer</author>
	<datestamp>1265980440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are lots of places as little as 2 miles from the town center that have piss-poor broadband because of the way telephone exchanges are located. Fiber to the Home/Fiber to the Cabinet is the obvious solution, but British Telecom have a monopoly on last-mile wiring in the UK*, and have very little incentive to deliver high-speed broadband to homes. And let's not even talk about exchange capacity, or their traffic-shaping practices. So yeah, if Google or anyone else is going to get involved, more power to them. Britain's positively stick-in-the-mud compared to Scandinavia, Korea and Japan**, and it'll take a lot of doin' to bring it into the 21st century.</p><p>*except for Hull and some cabled areas (and I think Virgin's cable ducts were dug by BT)</p><p>**though to be fair, most of the high-speed internet in these places is to be found only in densely populated urban areas. Anyone know what broadband in lightly populated small towns/villages is like in Scandinavia/Korea/Japan?</p><p>PS. There's a great site for UK Slashdot readers -- <a href="http://www.broadband-notspot.org.uk/" title="broadband-notspot.org.uk">Broadband Notspots UK</a> [broadband-notspot.org.uk], it's worth a visit if you're checking out what a particular place is like broadband-wise.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are lots of places as little as 2 miles from the town center that have piss-poor broadband because of the way telephone exchanges are located .
Fiber to the Home/Fiber to the Cabinet is the obvious solution , but British Telecom have a monopoly on last-mile wiring in the UK * , and have very little incentive to deliver high-speed broadband to homes .
And let 's not even talk about exchange capacity , or their traffic-shaping practices .
So yeah , if Google or anyone else is going to get involved , more power to them .
Britain 's positively stick-in-the-mud compared to Scandinavia , Korea and Japan * * , and it 'll take a lot of doin ' to bring it into the 21st century .
* except for Hull and some cabled areas ( and I think Virgin 's cable ducts were dug by BT ) * * though to be fair , most of the high-speed internet in these places is to be found only in densely populated urban areas .
Anyone know what broadband in lightly populated small towns/villages is like in Scandinavia/Korea/Japan ? PS .
There 's a great site for UK Slashdot readers -- Broadband Notspots UK [ broadband-notspot.org.uk ] , it 's worth a visit if you 're checking out what a particular place is like broadband-wise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are lots of places as little as 2 miles from the town center that have piss-poor broadband because of the way telephone exchanges are located.
Fiber to the Home/Fiber to the Cabinet is the obvious solution, but British Telecom have a monopoly on last-mile wiring in the UK*, and have very little incentive to deliver high-speed broadband to homes.
And let's not even talk about exchange capacity, or their traffic-shaping practices.
So yeah, if Google or anyone else is going to get involved, more power to them.
Britain's positively stick-in-the-mud compared to Scandinavia, Korea and Japan**, and it'll take a lot of doin' to bring it into the 21st century.
*except for Hull and some cabled areas (and I think Virgin's cable ducts were dug by BT)**though to be fair, most of the high-speed internet in these places is to be found only in densely populated urban areas.
Anyone know what broadband in lightly populated small towns/villages is like in Scandinavia/Korea/Japan?PS.
There's a great site for UK Slashdot readers -- Broadband Notspots UK [broadband-notspot.org.uk], it's worth a visit if you're checking out what a particular place is like broadband-wise.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31114294</id>
	<title>Re:Is Google Planning To Fibre Britain?</title>
	<author>JasterBobaMereel</author>
	<datestamp>1265995500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...well they do spell it Fiber<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...well they do spell it Fiber .... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...well they do spell it Fiber .....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111398</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111248</id>
	<title>when you say google</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265977020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>you really mean the NSA's little brother</htmltext>
<tokenext>you really mean the NSA 's little brother</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you really mean the NSA's little brother</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111212</id>
	<title>Hello</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265976660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am a banana</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am a banana</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am a banana</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31115246</id>
	<title>In Soviet Russia</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265999100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>In Soviet Russia Britain fibres YOU!</htmltext>
<tokenext>In Soviet Russia Britain fibres YOU !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Soviet Russia Britain fibres YOU!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31113482</id>
	<title>Re:Language abuse</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265992380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>That corporate whores enjoy fucking with language is no good reason for us to bend over and spread em.</i></p><p>Prude.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That corporate whores enjoy fucking with language is no good reason for us to bend over and spread em.Prude .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That corporate whores enjoy fucking with language is no good reason for us to bend over and spread em.Prude.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112452</id>
	<title>Re:What is the verb then?</title>
	<author>TeknoHog</author>
	<datestamp>1265987700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Since "mete" is the verb behind the noun "meter" (as in voltmeter or parking meter), I suggest that the verb for laying fiber could be "fibe".</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since " mete " is the verb behind the noun " meter " ( as in voltmeter or parking meter ) , I suggest that the verb for laying fiber could be " fibe " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since "mete" is the verb behind the noun "meter" (as in voltmeter or parking meter), I suggest that the verb for laying fiber could be "fibe".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31115222</id>
	<title>Re:all your base are belong to us</title>
	<author>segedunum</author>
	<datestamp>1265998920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But I'm getting a little scared of Google.....To many fingers in to many pies. We are meant to use a Google Thin Client, to access Google Services, over Google Fibre....</p></div><p>While we're right to be vigilant, the basic problem is that ISPs and quite a lot of other internet companies are frankly.......shite. Here in the UK all the larger and cheaper ISPs are absolute crap, clearly don't have the technical expertise to make things work and if you move to a competent medium or small supplier they don't have the scale to continue and end up getting bought by said crap bigger suppliers. I would be happy just to see them go out of business, even at the risk of a bit of a monopoly because the current situation is absolute crap and will improve at a snail's pace with no one willing to put in the investment.<br> <br>

What Google is proposing to do here is huge and will move things on so much further and enable so many things that I'd be willing to buy into it. It means that with good, reliable bandwidth you could host many things yourself that it would be an expensive recurring cost to do with external suppliers (interestingly, it could seriously blunt Amazon and cloud computing because bandwidth is the killer), decent off-site backup and mirroring becomes feasible for businesses themselves and it should provide the kick needed for IPv6 to take off. It's up to others to respond.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But I 'm getting a little scared of Google.....To many fingers in to many pies .
We are meant to use a Google Thin Client , to access Google Services , over Google Fibre....While we 're right to be vigilant , the basic problem is that ISPs and quite a lot of other internet companies are frankly.......shite .
Here in the UK all the larger and cheaper ISPs are absolute crap , clearly do n't have the technical expertise to make things work and if you move to a competent medium or small supplier they do n't have the scale to continue and end up getting bought by said crap bigger suppliers .
I would be happy just to see them go out of business , even at the risk of a bit of a monopoly because the current situation is absolute crap and will improve at a snail 's pace with no one willing to put in the investment .
What Google is proposing to do here is huge and will move things on so much further and enable so many things that I 'd be willing to buy into it .
It means that with good , reliable bandwidth you could host many things yourself that it would be an expensive recurring cost to do with external suppliers ( interestingly , it could seriously blunt Amazon and cloud computing because bandwidth is the killer ) , decent off-site backup and mirroring becomes feasible for businesses themselves and it should provide the kick needed for IPv6 to take off .
It 's up to others to respond .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But I'm getting a little scared of Google.....To many fingers in to many pies.
We are meant to use a Google Thin Client, to access Google Services, over Google Fibre....While we're right to be vigilant, the basic problem is that ISPs and quite a lot of other internet companies are frankly.......shite.
Here in the UK all the larger and cheaper ISPs are absolute crap, clearly don't have the technical expertise to make things work and if you move to a competent medium or small supplier they don't have the scale to continue and end up getting bought by said crap bigger suppliers.
I would be happy just to see them go out of business, even at the risk of a bit of a monopoly because the current situation is absolute crap and will improve at a snail's pace with no one willing to put in the investment.
What Google is proposing to do here is huge and will move things on so much further and enable so many things that I'd be willing to buy into it.
It means that with good, reliable bandwidth you could host many things yourself that it would be an expensive recurring cost to do with external suppliers (interestingly, it could seriously blunt Amazon and cloud computing because bandwidth is the killer), decent off-site backup and mirroring becomes feasible for businesses themselves and it should provide the kick needed for IPv6 to take off.
It's up to others to respond.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112248</id>
	<title>Re:all your base are belong to us</title>
	<author>eltaco</author>
	<datestamp>1265986560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree. with ever more worry do I watch google develop into some megacorp gaining more and more influence and data over people.<br>
I don't know how long we can still "trust" them - it's not like we ever really could.<br> <br>

I am/was an avid user of gmail and their search engine, but I'm growing ever more weary of them and considering using bing and maybe even moving away from gmail.<br>
yes, you heard right; after all the shit apple and google have recently pulled, ms seems like a viable alternative!<br>
now aint that a fscking bombshell.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree .
with ever more worry do I watch google develop into some megacorp gaining more and more influence and data over people .
I do n't know how long we can still " trust " them - it 's not like we ever really could .
I am/was an avid user of gmail and their search engine , but I 'm growing ever more weary of them and considering using bing and maybe even moving away from gmail .
yes , you heard right ; after all the shit apple and google have recently pulled , ms seems like a viable alternative !
now aint that a fscking bombshell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree.
with ever more worry do I watch google develop into some megacorp gaining more and more influence and data over people.
I don't know how long we can still "trust" them - it's not like we ever really could.
I am/was an avid user of gmail and their search engine, but I'm growing ever more weary of them and considering using bing and maybe even moving away from gmail.
yes, you heard right; after all the shit apple and google have recently pulled, ms seems like a viable alternative!
now aint that a fscking bombshell.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111238</id>
	<title>They've tried this before</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265976900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google have tried network infrastructure before - they even made it free to use: <a href="http://www.google.com/tisp/" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/tisp/</a> [google.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google have tried network infrastructure before - they even made it free to use : http : //www.google.com/tisp/ [ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google have tried network infrastructure before - they even made it free to use: http://www.google.com/tisp/ [google.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111752</id>
	<title>google is becoming frightening</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265983020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>too much power</p><p>i don't care how benevolent it is now, it is laying a groundwork that can potentially be abused with a change in attitude later</p><p>and with so much focus on insinuating itself into how so much of the web works, disengaging from google won't be that easy</p><p>google is pursuing a sound business strategy for growth, and those toiling away at google are doing so in the most noble of intentions: making the web a better place for all of us</p><p>i just wish there were a way to chop google in half, or into dozens of bits, so those brilliant people toiling away at google were competing against each other. rather than being focused on building one overwhelming colossus whose future benevolence is not guaranteed and cannot be guaranteed by anyone</p><p>i don't want all that data that they admit they are keeping about us in the fat little fingers of some future successor to harmless wonks brin and page who is not so interested in simply making the web an easier place to navigate</p><p>something is being built right now that we all cheerfully accept that we may someday gnash our teeth about: why didn't we worry about  this juggernaut being built in front of our very eyes? why were we so distracted by the colorful baubles not to see the edifice that can be so easily abused?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>too much poweri do n't care how benevolent it is now , it is laying a groundwork that can potentially be abused with a change in attitude laterand with so much focus on insinuating itself into how so much of the web works , disengaging from google wo n't be that easygoogle is pursuing a sound business strategy for growth , and those toiling away at google are doing so in the most noble of intentions : making the web a better place for all of usi just wish there were a way to chop google in half , or into dozens of bits , so those brilliant people toiling away at google were competing against each other .
rather than being focused on building one overwhelming colossus whose future benevolence is not guaranteed and can not be guaranteed by anyonei do n't want all that data that they admit they are keeping about us in the fat little fingers of some future successor to harmless wonks brin and page who is not so interested in simply making the web an easier place to navigatesomething is being built right now that we all cheerfully accept that we may someday gnash our teeth about : why did n't we worry about this juggernaut being built in front of our very eyes ?
why were we so distracted by the colorful baubles not to see the edifice that can be so easily abused ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>too much poweri don't care how benevolent it is now, it is laying a groundwork that can potentially be abused with a change in attitude laterand with so much focus on insinuating itself into how so much of the web works, disengaging from google won't be that easygoogle is pursuing a sound business strategy for growth, and those toiling away at google are doing so in the most noble of intentions: making the web a better place for all of usi just wish there were a way to chop google in half, or into dozens of bits, so those brilliant people toiling away at google were competing against each other.
rather than being focused on building one overwhelming colossus whose future benevolence is not guaranteed and cannot be guaranteed by anyonei don't want all that data that they admit they are keeping about us in the fat little fingers of some future successor to harmless wonks brin and page who is not so interested in simply making the web an easier place to navigatesomething is being built right now that we all cheerfully accept that we may someday gnash our teeth about: why didn't we worry about  this juggernaut being built in front of our very eyes?
why were we so distracted by the colorful baubles not to see the edifice that can be so easily abused?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111438</id>
	<title>Re:all your base are belong to us</title>
	<author>Burb</author>
	<datestamp>1265979600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know, while I appreciate the sentiment about Google, here, I'm getting heartily fed up of the over-use of the Ben Franklin quote on slashdot. It's thought-provoking and makes a good rhetorical point, but it fails any attempt at decent analysis. All people deserve liberty and safety, in a "we hold the following truths to be self-evident" sort of way, so no one should be said not to deserve it. And by its wording it strongly implies that "liberty"==="essential liberty" i.e. all degrees of liberty are equally essential, and somehow denigrates the concept of "temporary safety".</p><p>Yeah, I'm probably quoting Mr F out of context, and I'm not a political philosopher, so I'm sure my argument isn't watertight. So sue me. But I do feel that in some quarters the quote is designed to appeal the claque in here, in much the same way that "think of the children" - that much-mocked phrase - is used to appeal to the reactionary corner of society. It actually stops people from analysing the problem in hand by triggering some kind of American/Liberal hindbrain reflex.</p><p>Can we think about it a little more, that's all I'm asking.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , while I appreciate the sentiment about Google , here , I 'm getting heartily fed up of the over-use of the Ben Franklin quote on slashdot .
It 's thought-provoking and makes a good rhetorical point , but it fails any attempt at decent analysis .
All people deserve liberty and safety , in a " we hold the following truths to be self-evident " sort of way , so no one should be said not to deserve it .
And by its wording it strongly implies that " liberty " = = = " essential liberty " i.e .
all degrees of liberty are equally essential , and somehow denigrates the concept of " temporary safety " .Yeah , I 'm probably quoting Mr F out of context , and I 'm not a political philosopher , so I 'm sure my argument is n't watertight .
So sue me .
But I do feel that in some quarters the quote is designed to appeal the claque in here , in much the same way that " think of the children " - that much-mocked phrase - is used to appeal to the reactionary corner of society .
It actually stops people from analysing the problem in hand by triggering some kind of American/Liberal hindbrain reflex.Can we think about it a little more , that 's all I 'm asking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, while I appreciate the sentiment about Google, here, I'm getting heartily fed up of the over-use of the Ben Franklin quote on slashdot.
It's thought-provoking and makes a good rhetorical point, but it fails any attempt at decent analysis.
All people deserve liberty and safety, in a "we hold the following truths to be self-evident" sort of way, so no one should be said not to deserve it.
And by its wording it strongly implies that "liberty"==="essential liberty" i.e.
all degrees of liberty are equally essential, and somehow denigrates the concept of "temporary safety".Yeah, I'm probably quoting Mr F out of context, and I'm not a political philosopher, so I'm sure my argument isn't watertight.
So sue me.
But I do feel that in some quarters the quote is designed to appeal the claque in here, in much the same way that "think of the children" - that much-mocked phrase - is used to appeal to the reactionary corner of society.
It actually stops people from analysing the problem in hand by triggering some kind of American/Liberal hindbrain reflex.Can we think about it a little more, that's all I'm asking.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111948</id>
	<title>Re:It Depends...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265984820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well it seems that Google is doing what MS tried to do a decade or so ago...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well it seems that Google is doing what MS tried to do a decade or so ago.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well it seems that Google is doing what MS tried to do a decade or so ago...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111356</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31126672</id>
	<title>Fibre?</title>
	<author>Phoghat</author>
	<datestamp>1266074040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We're going to get more fibre? Oh fookin' great. I've got so much fibre in my diet now that ther's a solid pipeline from my mouth to my arse. Food goes in, shite comes out.<br>What's that you say? Not that kind of fibre?<br>Never mind, bring it on.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We 're going to get more fibre ?
Oh fookin ' great .
I 've got so much fibre in my diet now that ther 's a solid pipeline from my mouth to my arse .
Food goes in , shite comes out.What 's that you say ?
Not that kind of fibre ? Never mind , bring it on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We're going to get more fibre?
Oh fookin' great.
I've got so much fibre in my diet now that ther's a solid pipeline from my mouth to my arse.
Food goes in, shite comes out.What's that you say?
Not that kind of fibre?Never mind, bring it on.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112344</id>
	<title>I'm fibring!</title>
	<author>AP31R0N</author>
	<datestamp>1265987100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Verbing wierds the langauge.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Verbing wierds the langauge .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Verbing wierds the langauge.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111634</id>
	<title>Already have 50MB through cable</title>
	<author>tomalpha</author>
	<datestamp>1265981760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now I have to wait 7 years for 100MB? Ouch.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now I have to wait 7 years for 100MB ?
Ouch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now I have to wait 7 years for 100MB?
Ouch.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112492</id>
	<title>Re:It Depends...</title>
	<author>jo42</author>
	<datestamp>1265987940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergey\_Brin" title="wikipedia.org">Sergey Brin</a> [wikipedia.org] was born in Soviet Russia. The modus operandi of Soviet Communism was to control everything and know everything about everyone. Certainly explains Google's modus operandi, don't it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sergey Brin [ wikipedia.org ] was born in Soviet Russia .
The modus operandi of Soviet Communism was to control everything and know everything about everyone .
Certainly explains Google 's modus operandi , do n't it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sergey Brin [wikipedia.org] was born in Soviet Russia.
The modus operandi of Soviet Communism was to control everything and know everything about everyone.
Certainly explains Google's modus operandi, don't it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111356</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31114346</id>
	<title>Re:all your base are belong to us</title>
	<author>jc42</author>
	<datestamp>1265995740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>We can not trust the markets to resolve this. Consumers will just blindly sleep walk into this if it makes for a easy life now.  Which they might with Windows being so bad for malware, virus etc etc<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</i></p><p>Microsoft-bashing is of course always fun, but google has something even better going for them in this case.  For most of us in the US, the alternatives are companies like Verizon, Comcast, AT&amp;T, etc., which have the traditional local monopolies in most places, and which are all hated pretty much like The Phone Company (whatever it was called that year) has always been hated.</p><p>In our neighborhood, Verizon has the FDDI monopoly, legally enforced by the city.  That has caused a lot of resistance among the citizenry to the constant junk mail about how wonderful FDDI is, because we all have experience with Verizon, and this tells us what we should really expect.  In other places, it's a different telecom giant with the local deal that excludes their competitors and delivers crappy service.</p><p>So for now, if google can pull this off, we'll cheer them on.  Of course, we expect that they'll proceed to establish the traditional telecom monopoly deal with the local government, and we'll end up hating them like we did their predecessor.  But for now they look like the good guys, with the power to break the current monopoly and actually improve things for a while, until their local monopoly is established.</p><p>Now if we knew how to make the "regulators" stop establishing local monopolies<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We can not trust the markets to resolve this .
Consumers will just blindly sleep walk into this if it makes for a easy life now .
Which they might with Windows being so bad for malware , virus etc etc ...Microsoft-bashing is of course always fun , but google has something even better going for them in this case .
For most of us in the US , the alternatives are companies like Verizon , Comcast , AT&amp;T , etc. , which have the traditional local monopolies in most places , and which are all hated pretty much like The Phone Company ( whatever it was called that year ) has always been hated.In our neighborhood , Verizon has the FDDI monopoly , legally enforced by the city .
That has caused a lot of resistance among the citizenry to the constant junk mail about how wonderful FDDI is , because we all have experience with Verizon , and this tells us what we should really expect .
In other places , it 's a different telecom giant with the local deal that excludes their competitors and delivers crappy service.So for now , if google can pull this off , we 'll cheer them on .
Of course , we expect that they 'll proceed to establish the traditional telecom monopoly deal with the local government , and we 'll end up hating them like we did their predecessor .
But for now they look like the good guys , with the power to break the current monopoly and actually improve things for a while , until their local monopoly is established.Now if we knew how to make the " regulators " stop establishing local monopolies .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We can not trust the markets to resolve this.
Consumers will just blindly sleep walk into this if it makes for a easy life now.
Which they might with Windows being so bad for malware, virus etc etc ...Microsoft-bashing is of course always fun, but google has something even better going for them in this case.
For most of us in the US, the alternatives are companies like Verizon, Comcast, AT&amp;T, etc., which have the traditional local monopolies in most places, and which are all hated pretty much like The Phone Company (whatever it was called that year) has always been hated.In our neighborhood, Verizon has the FDDI monopoly, legally enforced by the city.
That has caused a lot of resistance among the citizenry to the constant junk mail about how wonderful FDDI is, because we all have experience with Verizon, and this tells us what we should really expect.
In other places, it's a different telecom giant with the local deal that excludes their competitors and delivers crappy service.So for now, if google can pull this off, we'll cheer them on.
Of course, we expect that they'll proceed to establish the traditional telecom monopoly deal with the local government, and we'll end up hating them like we did their predecessor.
But for now they look like the good guys, with the power to break the current monopoly and actually improve things for a while, until their local monopoly is established.Now if we knew how to make the "regulators" stop establishing local monopolies ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111410</id>
	<title>Re:all your base are belong to us</title>
	<author>benz001</author>
	<datestamp>1265979120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>.....To many fingers in to many pies. We are meant to use a Google Thin Client, to access Google Services, over Google Fibre....</p></div><p>Which is looking more and more like their undoing - like all big companies they start off well then spread themselves too thin. Search is great, Analytics is good, Gmail is ok, Docs is still just docs, Wave is just a ripple, Buzz is seriously lacking anything like caffeine and gears has lost a sprocket.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>.....To many fingers in to many pies .
We are meant to use a Google Thin Client , to access Google Services , over Google Fibre....Which is looking more and more like their undoing - like all big companies they start off well then spread themselves too thin .
Search is great , Analytics is good , Gmail is ok , Docs is still just docs , Wave is just a ripple , Buzz is seriously lacking anything like caffeine and gears has lost a sprocket .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> .....To many fingers in to many pies.
We are meant to use a Google Thin Client, to access Google Services, over Google Fibre....Which is looking more and more like their undoing - like all big companies they start off well then spread themselves too thin.
Search is great, Analytics is good, Gmail is ok, Docs is still just docs, Wave is just a ripple, Buzz is seriously lacking anything like caffeine and gears has lost a sprocket.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31212278</id>
	<title>Re:Consequences</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266698700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If BT are waiting for government handouts to get fibre to rural not-spots and the irrelevant cable companies are not even operating in the same country, then bring on Google.</p></div><p>You do realise that Google's a for-profit corporation too, right?  If an area isn't economically viable for BT without government funding, why would it be viable for Google?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If BT are waiting for government handouts to get fibre to rural not-spots and the irrelevant cable companies are not even operating in the same country , then bring on Google.You do realise that Google 's a for-profit corporation too , right ?
If an area is n't economically viable for BT without government funding , why would it be viable for Google ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If BT are waiting for government handouts to get fibre to rural not-spots and the irrelevant cable companies are not even operating in the same country, then bring on Google.You do realise that Google's a for-profit corporation too, right?
If an area isn't economically viable for BT without government funding, why would it be viable for Google?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111324</id>
	<title>all your base are belong to us</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265977740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Great, kick the ISPs with some heavy competition.<br>
But I'm getting a little scared of Google.....To many fingers in to many pies. We are meant to use a Google Thin Client, to access Google Services, over Google Fibre.... <br> <br>
They make their money by gathering data about us from our data. Shouldn't that make us question them owning so much of our data? They could have us by the short and curlies. Maybe "don't be evil" makes that safe for now, but who knows what the future holds? Even if Google can for ever be trusted, and don't give the data to those who can't be trusted, it's them who decide who to trust! We can not trust the markets to resolve this. Consumers will just blindly sleep walk into this if it makes for a easy life now. Which they might with Windows being so bad for malware, virus etc etc (because of the nature of Windows and it's users). "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."  Benjamin Franklin - 1775</htmltext>
<tokenext>Great , kick the ISPs with some heavy competition .
But I 'm getting a little scared of Google.....To many fingers in to many pies .
We are meant to use a Google Thin Client , to access Google Services , over Google Fibre... . They make their money by gathering data about us from our data .
Should n't that make us question them owning so much of our data ?
They could have us by the short and curlies .
Maybe " do n't be evil " makes that safe for now , but who knows what the future holds ?
Even if Google can for ever be trusted , and do n't give the data to those who ca n't be trusted , it 's them who decide who to trust !
We can not trust the markets to resolve this .
Consumers will just blindly sleep walk into this if it makes for a easy life now .
Which they might with Windows being so bad for malware , virus etc etc ( because of the nature of Windows and it 's users ) .
" They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety , deserve neither liberty nor safety .
" Benjamin Franklin - 1775</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great, kick the ISPs with some heavy competition.
But I'm getting a little scared of Google.....To many fingers in to many pies.
We are meant to use a Google Thin Client, to access Google Services, over Google Fibre....  
They make their money by gathering data about us from our data.
Shouldn't that make us question them owning so much of our data?
They could have us by the short and curlies.
Maybe "don't be evil" makes that safe for now, but who knows what the future holds?
Even if Google can for ever be trusted, and don't give the data to those who can't be trusted, it's them who decide who to trust!
We can not trust the markets to resolve this.
Consumers will just blindly sleep walk into this if it makes for a easy life now.
Which they might with Windows being so bad for malware, virus etc etc (because of the nature of Windows and it's users).
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
"  Benjamin Franklin - 1775</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31113208</id>
	<title>Verbing words...</title>
	<author>turthalion</author>
	<datestamp>1265991240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Verbing words weirds language.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Verbing words weirds language .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Verbing words weirds language.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111860</id>
	<title>google will be hated.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265984100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Soon Google will be the object of hate.  It is inevitable as it grows and gains more control of the internet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Soon Google will be the object of hate .
It is inevitable as it grows and gains more control of the internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Soon Google will be the object of hate.
It is inevitable as it grows and gains more control of the internet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111582</id>
	<title>So let's remember "Snowcrash"...</title>
	<author>Jade\_Wayfarer</author>
	<datestamp>1265980980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Okey, where do I apply for Google Citizenship? Are there any invites available?<br> <br> Seriously, at this pace, some decades later we'll have Google Phone with Google Voice, and Google Netbook with Google OS, connected to Google ISP, Google Work, Google Home, Google VR (on a base of Google Earth), <a href="http://www.thechurchofgoogle.org/" title="thechurchofgoogle.org" rel="nofollow">Google Church</a> [thechurchofgoogle.org] and Google Transport, working on some green Google Energy. What will it be in all, Google Benefaction? Unnerving, but still much better than M$ Empire, Apple Khalifat, or GNU/Anarchy to my taste.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Okey , where do I apply for Google Citizenship ?
Are there any invites available ?
Seriously , at this pace , some decades later we 'll have Google Phone with Google Voice , and Google Netbook with Google OS , connected to Google ISP , Google Work , Google Home , Google VR ( on a base of Google Earth ) , Google Church [ thechurchofgoogle.org ] and Google Transport , working on some green Google Energy .
What will it be in all , Google Benefaction ?
Unnerving , but still much better than M $ Empire , Apple Khalifat , or GNU/Anarchy to my taste .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Okey, where do I apply for Google Citizenship?
Are there any invites available?
Seriously, at this pace, some decades later we'll have Google Phone with Google Voice, and Google Netbook with Google OS, connected to Google ISP, Google Work, Google Home, Google VR (on a base of Google Earth), Google Church [thechurchofgoogle.org] and Google Transport, working on some green Google Energy.
What will it be in all, Google Benefaction?
Unnerving, but still much better than M$ Empire, Apple Khalifat, or GNU/Anarchy to my taste.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111486</id>
	<title>We are the Google...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265980020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We are the Google, we will assimilate your data and process it in some "non-evil way".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We are the Google , we will assimilate your data and process it in some " non-evil way " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We are the Google, we will assimilate your data and process it in some "non-evil way".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112894</id>
	<title>Pure speculation</title>
	<author>blitzen</author>
	<datestamp>1265989680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>PC Pro is taking a number of fairly tenuous ideas and building a spaceship with them. Lets list them:</p><p>- Google announces that they're going to trial fibre in the \_US\_<br>- The Tories announce that they will support fibre roll out if they win<br>- There are rumours that the Torie fibre roll out could be supported by foreign investment<br>- BT has said they'll share their ducts<br>- Google and the Tories have close links</p><p>SHAZAM Google must be investing in UK fibre.</p><p>I work quite closely with Openreach. They're very keen to roll out fibre beyond the 10 million homes by 2012 and they're really set up to do it.</p><p>Sure, Google \_could\_ do it and may be considering it but either PC Pro is making this up or they know more than they're telling.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>PC Pro is taking a number of fairly tenuous ideas and building a spaceship with them .
Lets list them : - Google announces that they 're going to trial fibre in the \ _US \ _- The Tories announce that they will support fibre roll out if they win- There are rumours that the Torie fibre roll out could be supported by foreign investment- BT has said they 'll share their ducts- Google and the Tories have close linksSHAZAM Google must be investing in UK fibre.I work quite closely with Openreach .
They 're very keen to roll out fibre beyond the 10 million homes by 2012 and they 're really set up to do it.Sure , Google \ _could \ _ do it and may be considering it but either PC Pro is making this up or they know more than they 're telling .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>PC Pro is taking a number of fairly tenuous ideas and building a spaceship with them.
Lets list them:- Google announces that they're going to trial fibre in the \_US\_- The Tories announce that they will support fibre roll out if they win- There are rumours that the Torie fibre roll out could be supported by foreign investment- BT has said they'll share their ducts- Google and the Tories have close linksSHAZAM Google must be investing in UK fibre.I work quite closely with Openreach.
They're very keen to roll out fibre beyond the 10 million homes by 2012 and they're really set up to do it.Sure, Google \_could\_ do it and may be considering it but either PC Pro is making this up or they know more than they're telling.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111412</id>
	<title>I hope so!</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1265979240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That extra speed, and the saving in subscription (should it be cheaper than my rubbish ADSL) means I can run a VPN out of the country and not worry about the privacy implications!<br> <br>Win/win for the nerdy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That extra speed , and the saving in subscription ( should it be cheaper than my rubbish ADSL ) means I can run a VPN out of the country and not worry about the privacy implications !
Win/win for the nerdy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That extra speed, and the saving in subscription (should it be cheaper than my rubbish ADSL) means I can run a VPN out of the country and not worry about the privacy implications!
Win/win for the nerdy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111508</id>
	<title>HTTP-only?</title>
	<author>ickleberry</author>
	<datestamp>1265980320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>But will this service be HTTP-only like the Wifi Google provides at some airports? After all protocols other than HTTP and maybe XMPP don't really fit into Google's way of doing business.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But will this service be HTTP-only like the Wifi Google provides at some airports ?
After all protocols other than HTTP and maybe XMPP do n't really fit into Google 's way of doing business .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But will this service be HTTP-only like the Wifi Google provides at some airports?
After all protocols other than HTTP and maybe XMPP don't really fit into Google's way of doing business.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111516</id>
	<title>Re:when you say google</title>
	<author>ZeroExistenZ</author>
	<datestamp>1265980380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, the thoughtpolice's little bitch.<br> <br> <br>
Google is continuing to make me feel more uneasy as time progresses...</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , the thoughtpolice 's little bitch .
Google is continuing to make me feel more uneasy as time progresses.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, the thoughtpolice's little bitch.
Google is continuing to make me feel more uneasy as time progresses...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31116568</id>
	<title>Their Government...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266004260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...would love for Google to deploy an exhaustively complete fiber optic network throughout all of Britain, connecting every home and business with an extreme high speed and capacity network... as long as the government gets to exploit that network for even further increased surveillance of its citizens^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H subjects.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...would love for Google to deploy an exhaustively complete fiber optic network throughout all of Britain , connecting every home and business with an extreme high speed and capacity network... as long as the government gets to exploit that network for even further increased surveillance of its citizens ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H subjects .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...would love for Google to deploy an exhaustively complete fiber optic network throughout all of Britain, connecting every home and business with an extreme high speed and capacity network... as long as the government gets to exploit that network for even further increased surveillance of its citizens^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H subjects.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111522</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111488</id>
	<title>Canada</title>
	<author>tom17</author>
	<datestamp>1265980020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It would take a company with the clout of Google to lay down new infrastructure here to give an option to the duopoly we have. I wish they would do that
<br> <br>
I guess i'll just keep dreaming then...
<br> <br>
Tom...</htmltext>
<tokenext>It would take a company with the clout of Google to lay down new infrastructure here to give an option to the duopoly we have .
I wish they would do that I guess i 'll just keep dreaming then.. . Tom.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would take a company with the clout of Google to lay down new infrastructure here to give an option to the duopoly we have.
I wish they would do that
 
I guess i'll just keep dreaming then...
 
Tom...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111652</id>
	<title>Re:all your base are belong to us</title>
	<author>Lomegor</author>
	<datestamp>1265982060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As I already told in one comment, I find it ridiculous to think that giving data for comfort its stupid.
Just think about it, it's what our grandfathers did when shopping at a grocery store that knew what they liked. The owner would tell them of a new product to see if they liked. You trust someone to give your information because you know it would make your life easier.
And I rather trust a company that some random guy who owns a store.
BTW, I'm pretty sure that Franklin gave his personal information to many people, including most of the people around him. I mean, we are talking about a famous person here, he almost gave away all his privacy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As I already told in one comment , I find it ridiculous to think that giving data for comfort its stupid .
Just think about it , it 's what our grandfathers did when shopping at a grocery store that knew what they liked .
The owner would tell them of a new product to see if they liked .
You trust someone to give your information because you know it would make your life easier .
And I rather trust a company that some random guy who owns a store .
BTW , I 'm pretty sure that Franklin gave his personal information to many people , including most of the people around him .
I mean , we are talking about a famous person here , he almost gave away all his privacy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As I already told in one comment, I find it ridiculous to think that giving data for comfort its stupid.
Just think about it, it's what our grandfathers did when shopping at a grocery store that knew what they liked.
The owner would tell them of a new product to see if they liked.
You trust someone to give your information because you know it would make your life easier.
And I rather trust a company that some random guy who owns a store.
BTW, I'm pretty sure that Franklin gave his personal information to many people, including most of the people around him.
I mean, we are talking about a famous person here, he almost gave away all his privacy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111442</id>
	<title>Language abuse</title>
	<author>TrumpetPower!</author>
	<datestamp>1265979600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Please stop verbing nouns.</p><p>That corporate whores enjoy fucking with language is no good reason for us to bend over and spread &rsquo;em.</p><p>Cheers,</p><p>b&amp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please stop verbing nouns.That corporate whores enjoy fucking with language is no good reason for us to bend over and spread    em.Cheers,b&amp;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please stop verbing nouns.That corporate whores enjoy fucking with language is no good reason for us to bend over and spread ’em.Cheers,b&amp;</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31113752
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31116392
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112326
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111948
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111356
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31114300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112326
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112008
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31116950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31118620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111652
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31114294
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111398
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111356
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111756
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111874
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111508
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31113482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31113688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112326
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112452
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31115254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111248
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31114770
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111216
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111552
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111216
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31116568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31113144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111756
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111536
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111562
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112808
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111356
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31113410
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112326
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111530
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31120838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31212278
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31115222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31115116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31114266
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31114346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31126018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31114496
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31115468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111756
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112560
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111752
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111646
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111356
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111356
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31114416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31115006
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112326
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31113620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31183470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111410
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31115056
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31117214
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112076
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_0235246_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111438
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_0235246.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111596
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_0235246.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111238
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_0235246.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112326
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31115006
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31116392
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31114300
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31113410
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31113688
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_0235246.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111486
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_0235246.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111522
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31118620
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111768
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31116568
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_0235246.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111316
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112076
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111432
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31183470
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111536
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112008
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31117214
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112452
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111530
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111562
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31115056
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111514
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31115254
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111398
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31114294
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_0235246.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31114900
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_0235246.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112894
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_0235246.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111508
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111874
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_0235246.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111212
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_0235246.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111230
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_0235246.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111442
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31120838
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111694
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31114416
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31113482
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31113752
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_0235246.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111324
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112808
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111652
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31114346
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112248
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31115222
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31115116
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111438
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111458
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111410
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_0235246.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111752
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112560
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_0235246.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111216
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31114770
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111552
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_0235246.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111650
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31212278
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_0235246.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111480
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_0235246.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111756
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31115468
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112760
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31113144
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_0235246.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111248
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111516
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_0235246.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111388
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31116950
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112944
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31114266
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112612
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31113620
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112292
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31114496
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31126018
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_0235246.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111356
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111468
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31112492
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111506
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111948
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_0235246.31111646
</commentlist>
</conversation>
