<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_11_1917248</id>
	<title>OpenOffice 3.2 Released</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1265916000000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>harmonise writes <i>"<a href="http://download.openoffice.org/">Version 3.2 of the OpenOffice.org office suite is now available</a>. This marks the tenth anniversary year of the office suite, with over three hundred million downloads recorded in total. <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/dev\_docs/features/3.2/">The new features</a> include faster start up times; improved compatibility with open standard (ODF) and proprietary file formats; improvements to all components, particularly the Calc spreadsheet, with over a dozen new or enhanced features; and the Chart module (usable throughout OpenOffice.org) has had a usability makeover as well as offering new chart types."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>harmonise writes " Version 3.2 of the OpenOffice.org office suite is now available .
This marks the tenth anniversary year of the office suite , with over three hundred million downloads recorded in total .
The new features include faster start up times ; improved compatibility with open standard ( ODF ) and proprietary file formats ; improvements to all components , particularly the Calc spreadsheet , with over a dozen new or enhanced features ; and the Chart module ( usable throughout OpenOffice.org ) has had a usability makeover as well as offering new chart types .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>harmonise writes "Version 3.2 of the OpenOffice.org office suite is now available.
This marks the tenth anniversary year of the office suite, with over three hundred million downloads recorded in total.
The new features include faster start up times; improved compatibility with open standard (ODF) and proprietary file formats; improvements to all components, particularly the Calc spreadsheet, with over a dozen new or enhanced features; and the Chart module (usable throughout OpenOffice.org) has had a usability makeover as well as offering new chart types.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105108</id>
	<title>Is it worth it?</title>
	<author>holiggan</author>
	<datestamp>1265883660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A simple, honest, question: is it worth it? I've used OpenOffice a couple of times in the past, but it didn't work for me. Seemed too slow, a bit "bloaty" (as for example you would find a java aplication to be "bloaty", not in the Microsoft "and-the-kitchen-sink!" way), and it seemed to be a bit basic (Excel look-alike, I'm looking at you).</p><p>I'm using Windows with Office 2007 (and Office 2010 Beta on my main machine), and I'm happy with those. No, I don't have "bluescreens", "problems", "errors" or "grief", except with 2010 which is beta. And the PC never "ate my paper", although I've done some stupid, data-losing stuff on my own. So you can cut that part of the FUD. I also use just the features I want to use (yes, I do a custom Office instalation and remove the stuff I don't use/care), and I don't find the "ribbon" to be the "anti-christ".</p><p>Anyways, I'm a "happy" Microsoft Office user, which doesn't have anything particularly bad to say about it. And yes, I have a legitimate, paid-for Office, so the "but it's free!" argument doesn't quite cut it. And no, something being "open source" doesn't make it the second coming of Jesus. I agree that "open source" has it's merits, but in the end, the "final word" belongs to the consumer, I would say. And since I'm in Windows, the "it's the next-best-thing" argument doesn't cut it either.</p><p>So, I'm asking: is it worth it to download OpenOffice, and play a bit around with it, or if I'm a "happy" Microsoft Office user, I can just "move along"?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) I'm a heavy Outlook, Word, Excel, Visio, OneNote user, and I've used to use Access more than I do today. I can't stand PowerPoint (but it's a necessary evil, presentations and stuff), and I've became fond of Project (although I'm sure I'm using it in the "look, I do letters in Excel!" kind of way<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>Seriously, and I don't want to flame-bait, it's an "honest-to-goodness" question.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A simple , honest , question : is it worth it ?
I 've used OpenOffice a couple of times in the past , but it did n't work for me .
Seemed too slow , a bit " bloaty " ( as for example you would find a java aplication to be " bloaty " , not in the Microsoft " and-the-kitchen-sink !
" way ) , and it seemed to be a bit basic ( Excel look-alike , I 'm looking at you ) .I 'm using Windows with Office 2007 ( and Office 2010 Beta on my main machine ) , and I 'm happy with those .
No , I do n't have " bluescreens " , " problems " , " errors " or " grief " , except with 2010 which is beta .
And the PC never " ate my paper " , although I 've done some stupid , data-losing stuff on my own .
So you can cut that part of the FUD .
I also use just the features I want to use ( yes , I do a custom Office instalation and remove the stuff I do n't use/care ) , and I do n't find the " ribbon " to be the " anti-christ " .Anyways , I 'm a " happy " Microsoft Office user , which does n't have anything particularly bad to say about it .
And yes , I have a legitimate , paid-for Office , so the " but it 's free !
" argument does n't quite cut it .
And no , something being " open source " does n't make it the second coming of Jesus .
I agree that " open source " has it 's merits , but in the end , the " final word " belongs to the consumer , I would say .
And since I 'm in Windows , the " it 's the next-best-thing " argument does n't cut it either.So , I 'm asking : is it worth it to download OpenOffice , and play a bit around with it , or if I 'm a " happy " Microsoft Office user , I can just " move along " ?
: ) I 'm a heavy Outlook , Word , Excel , Visio , OneNote user , and I 've used to use Access more than I do today .
I ca n't stand PowerPoint ( but it 's a necessary evil , presentations and stuff ) , and I 've became fond of Project ( although I 'm sure I 'm using it in the " look , I do letters in Excel !
" kind of way : ) Seriously , and I do n't want to flame-bait , it 's an " honest-to-goodness " question .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A simple, honest, question: is it worth it?
I've used OpenOffice a couple of times in the past, but it didn't work for me.
Seemed too slow, a bit "bloaty" (as for example you would find a java aplication to be "bloaty", not in the Microsoft "and-the-kitchen-sink!
" way), and it seemed to be a bit basic (Excel look-alike, I'm looking at you).I'm using Windows with Office 2007 (and Office 2010 Beta on my main machine), and I'm happy with those.
No, I don't have "bluescreens", "problems", "errors" or "grief", except with 2010 which is beta.
And the PC never "ate my paper", although I've done some stupid, data-losing stuff on my own.
So you can cut that part of the FUD.
I also use just the features I want to use (yes, I do a custom Office instalation and remove the stuff I don't use/care), and I don't find the "ribbon" to be the "anti-christ".Anyways, I'm a "happy" Microsoft Office user, which doesn't have anything particularly bad to say about it.
And yes, I have a legitimate, paid-for Office, so the "but it's free!
" argument doesn't quite cut it.
And no, something being "open source" doesn't make it the second coming of Jesus.
I agree that "open source" has it's merits, but in the end, the "final word" belongs to the consumer, I would say.
And since I'm in Windows, the "it's the next-best-thing" argument doesn't cut it either.So, I'm asking: is it worth it to download OpenOffice, and play a bit around with it, or if I'm a "happy" Microsoft Office user, I can just "move along"?
:) I'm a heavy Outlook, Word, Excel, Visio, OneNote user, and I've used to use Access more than I do today.
I can't stand PowerPoint (but it's a necessary evil, presentations and stuff), and I've became fond of Project (although I'm sure I'm using it in the "look, I do letters in Excel!
" kind of way :)Seriously, and I don't want to flame-bait, it's an "honest-to-goodness" question.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105076</id>
	<title>Re:Mind Boggling That The UI Widgets Suck So Much</title>
	<author>HeronBlademaster</author>
	<datestamp>1265883540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm confused why you're comparing OO Writer to MS Visio.  Shouldn't you compare Writer to <i>Word</i>?  (I think it'd actually make your point better, because Word's UI is a lot less cluttered than Visio's UI...)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm confused why you 're comparing OO Writer to MS Visio .
Should n't you compare Writer to Word ?
( I think it 'd actually make your point better , because Word 's UI is a lot less cluttered than Visio 's UI... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm confused why you're comparing OO Writer to MS Visio.
Shouldn't you compare Writer to Word?
(I think it'd actually make your point better, because Word's UI is a lot less cluttered than Visio's UI...)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103654</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31106316</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing That New or Innovative...</title>
	<author>hey!</author>
	<datestamp>1265888160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My Grandma never saw a computer in her life, but my mother in law hates everything but WordPerfect on DOS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My Grandma never saw a computer in her life , but my mother in law hates everything but WordPerfect on DOS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My Grandma never saw a computer in her life, but my mother in law hates everything but WordPerfect on DOS.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31106374</id>
	<title>Re:Has RTF been fixed?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265888520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've had similar experiences.
<br> <br>
The other week I went to work to find that OOo had eaten the company cat and taken a dump on our Microsoft approved discounted printer from HP for $99.00 see in store for details. Not only that, but it had also destroyed our DDS files in the co-processor.
<br> <br>
I've become enlightened. Folks, I bought a discounted copy of the Latest Microsoft Office Suite for $180* from the Microsoft Store. I did the right thing by humanity.
<br> <br>
*conditions apply, see in store for details.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've had similar experiences .
The other week I went to work to find that OOo had eaten the company cat and taken a dump on our Microsoft approved discounted printer from HP for $ 99.00 see in store for details .
Not only that , but it had also destroyed our DDS files in the co-processor .
I 've become enlightened .
Folks , I bought a discounted copy of the Latest Microsoft Office Suite for $ 180 * from the Microsoft Store .
I did the right thing by humanity .
* conditions apply , see in store for details .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've had similar experiences.
The other week I went to work to find that OOo had eaten the company cat and taken a dump on our Microsoft approved discounted printer from HP for $99.00 see in store for details.
Not only that, but it had also destroyed our DDS files in the co-processor.
I've become enlightened.
Folks, I bought a discounted copy of the Latest Microsoft Office Suite for $180* from the Microsoft Store.
I did the right thing by humanity.
*conditions apply, see in store for details.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31107740</id>
	<title>Base</title>
	<author>XB-70</author>
	<datestamp>1265894520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hate to sound whiney when I'm talking about software that is designed by volunteers and through corporate donations.
<p>
The forms design in base is woefully behind all the other aspects of OOo in terms of quality of functionality. Doing simple things like selecting groups of objects, etc. does not work as expected. Considering that Oracle 'owns' OOo, you'd think that some of the tremendous development that is part of Oracle forms could be brought to bear on OOo base.
</p><p>
I've always felt that base has been woefully under-supported and underfunded. It is a very important part of the suite and needs a lot of work.
</p><p>
It would be nice to see a clear uptick in development support for base. It's a critical component in the open source office environment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hate to sound whiney when I 'm talking about software that is designed by volunteers and through corporate donations .
The forms design in base is woefully behind all the other aspects of OOo in terms of quality of functionality .
Doing simple things like selecting groups of objects , etc .
does not work as expected .
Considering that Oracle 'owns ' OOo , you 'd think that some of the tremendous development that is part of Oracle forms could be brought to bear on OOo base .
I 've always felt that base has been woefully under-supported and underfunded .
It is a very important part of the suite and needs a lot of work .
It would be nice to see a clear uptick in development support for base .
It 's a critical component in the open source office environment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hate to sound whiney when I'm talking about software that is designed by volunteers and through corporate donations.
The forms design in base is woefully behind all the other aspects of OOo in terms of quality of functionality.
Doing simple things like selecting groups of objects, etc.
does not work as expected.
Considering that Oracle 'owns' OOo, you'd think that some of the tremendous development that is part of Oracle forms could be brought to bear on OOo base.
I've always felt that base has been woefully under-supported and underfunded.
It is a very important part of the suite and needs a lot of work.
It would be nice to see a clear uptick in development support for base.
It's a critical component in the open source office environment.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104884</id>
	<title>Re:will it still hijack my mac</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265882820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do you honestly think OpenOffice decides which application the OS uses to open a specific file?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you honestly think OpenOffice decides which application the OS uses to open a specific file ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you honestly think OpenOffice decides which application the OS uses to open a specific file?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104010</id>
	<title>Alternate keybinding support?</title>
	<author>freelunch</author>
	<datestamp>1265879280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I like Open Office right up until the point where I have to edit documents using those keybindings.  Unfortunately, the features don't include any mention of improved alternate keybinding support. Surely not everyone wants to adapt to Windows keybindings?</p><p>As an example, Firefox supports emacs editing keybindings via a simple Gnome option.</p><p>Having to create keybinding files from scratch is a chore. Worse, new OO releases often don't support past keybinding files.  I don't think it would be a major effort to include alternate keybinding files, and make switching a bit easier?  I'm sure quite a few of us would volunteer to make that happen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I like Open Office right up until the point where I have to edit documents using those keybindings .
Unfortunately , the features do n't include any mention of improved alternate keybinding support .
Surely not everyone wants to adapt to Windows keybindings ? As an example , Firefox supports emacs editing keybindings via a simple Gnome option.Having to create keybinding files from scratch is a chore .
Worse , new OO releases often do n't support past keybinding files .
I do n't think it would be a major effort to include alternate keybinding files , and make switching a bit easier ?
I 'm sure quite a few of us would volunteer to make that happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like Open Office right up until the point where I have to edit documents using those keybindings.
Unfortunately, the features don't include any mention of improved alternate keybinding support.
Surely not everyone wants to adapt to Windows keybindings?As an example, Firefox supports emacs editing keybindings via a simple Gnome option.Having to create keybinding files from scratch is a chore.
Worse, new OO releases often don't support past keybinding files.
I don't think it would be a major effort to include alternate keybinding files, and make switching a bit easier?
I'm sure quite a few of us would volunteer to make that happen.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31113816</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing That New or Innovative...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265993700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Any hope of OO ever supporting VBA and/or 123 macros?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Any hope of OO ever supporting VBA and/or 123 macros ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any hope of OO ever supporting VBA and/or 123 macros?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104964</id>
	<title>Re:Bibtxt</title>
	<author>steveg</author>
	<datestamp>1265883180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have you looked at <a href="http://www.zotero.org/" title="zotero.org">Zotero</a> [zotero.org]?  It may do what you want -- I think it does import and export Bibtex, but if what you want to do is manage citations and bibliographies, it may do what you need without any importing or exporting.  You can insert citations into your doc and then change your mind about the formatting en masse.  Ditto the bibliography.</p><p>This requires both the Zotero Firefox plugin and the Zotero OpenOffice plugin.  Dunno if it is compatible with 3.2.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you looked at Zotero [ zotero.org ] ?
It may do what you want -- I think it does import and export Bibtex , but if what you want to do is manage citations and bibliographies , it may do what you need without any importing or exporting .
You can insert citations into your doc and then change your mind about the formatting en masse .
Ditto the bibliography.This requires both the Zotero Firefox plugin and the Zotero OpenOffice plugin .
Dunno if it is compatible with 3.2 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you looked at Zotero [zotero.org]?
It may do what you want -- I think it does import and export Bibtex, but if what you want to do is manage citations and bibliographies, it may do what you need without any importing or exporting.
You can insert citations into your doc and then change your mind about the formatting en masse.
Ditto the bibliography.This requires both the Zotero Firefox plugin and the Zotero OpenOffice plugin.
Dunno if it is compatible with 3.2.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103844</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31107512</id>
	<title>Re:Is it worth it?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265893380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I "don't" really have anything "to reply to" in your post, but I just wanted to make sure somebody on "Slashdot" is mocking your insane use of quote "marks." "Consider" this a "public service."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I " do n't " really have anything " to reply to " in your post , but I just wanted to make sure somebody on " Slashdot " is mocking your insane use of quote " marks .
" " Consider " this a " public service .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I "don't" really have anything "to reply to" in your post, but I just wanted to make sure somebody on "Slashdot" is mocking your insane use of quote "marks.
" "Consider" this a "public service.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31106040</id>
	<title>Re:Clippy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265887020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, OpenOffice is the only office suite that still has the Annoying Lightbulb. Of course it's not as chirpy as the Annoying Paperclip, but it's better than nothing. Maybe if you ask nicely you get an animated version?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , OpenOffice is the only office suite that still has the Annoying Lightbulb .
Of course it 's not as chirpy as the Annoying Paperclip , but it 's better than nothing .
Maybe if you ask nicely you get an animated version ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, OpenOffice is the only office suite that still has the Annoying Lightbulb.
Of course it's not as chirpy as the Annoying Paperclip, but it's better than nothing.
Maybe if you ask nicely you get an animated version?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31110668</id>
	<title>Crashes with KDE 4.3.5 / Fedora 12</title>
	<author>rmathew</author>
	<datestamp>1265968800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>OO.o 3.2.0 consistently crashes for me (KDE 4.3.5 / Fedora 12).
This seems like a known issue (<a href="http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show\_bug.cgi?id=109176" title="openoffice.org">#109176</a> [openoffice.org]).
<br>
The workaround is to add:
<br>
<tt>export OOO\_FORCE\_DESKTOP=gnome</tt>
<br>
to "<tt>/opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice</tt>".</htmltext>
<tokenext>OO.o 3.2.0 consistently crashes for me ( KDE 4.3.5 / Fedora 12 ) .
This seems like a known issue ( # 109176 [ openoffice.org ] ) .
The workaround is to add : export OOO \ _FORCE \ _DESKTOP = gnome to " /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OO.o 3.2.0 consistently crashes for me (KDE 4.3.5 / Fedora 12).
This seems like a known issue (#109176 [openoffice.org]).
The workaround is to add:

export OOO\_FORCE\_DESKTOP=gnome

to "/opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103886</id>
	<title>Great news, but...</title>
	<author>DogAlmity</author>
	<datestamp>1265878800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is Calc still slower than thick shit, unlike Excel or Gnumeric? It's faster than it was but still much slower.<br> <br>

Can you have more than 64k rows, like Excel or Gnumeric? No? Fail!<br> <br>

Sticking with Gnumeric.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is Calc still slower than thick shit , unlike Excel or Gnumeric ?
It 's faster than it was but still much slower .
Can you have more than 64k rows , like Excel or Gnumeric ?
No ? Fail !
Sticking with Gnumeric .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is Calc still slower than thick shit, unlike Excel or Gnumeric?
It's faster than it was but still much slower.
Can you have more than 64k rows, like Excel or Gnumeric?
No? Fail!
Sticking with Gnumeric.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105394</id>
	<title>Re:Mind Boggling That The UI Widgets Suck So Much</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265884680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I prefer the dated design to any of the colorful, bloated crap Microsoft is producing at the moment that takes up half of my workspace, thank you very much.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I prefer the dated design to any of the colorful , bloated crap Microsoft is producing at the moment that takes up half of my workspace , thank you very much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I prefer the dated design to any of the colorful, bloated crap Microsoft is producing at the moment that takes up half of my workspace, thank you very much.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103654</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31110410</id>
	<title>Why so bitchy?</title>
	<author>icknay</author>
	<datestamp>1265965200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hey OpenOffiice.org -- good job!

What's weird is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. why is there so much bile and complaining about this complex piece of software that largely solves a whole class of important problems and is free. Point out deficiencies sure, but the comments here dwell a lot more on these oddball more-than-256-columns cases for a tool which works fine for a million common little cases.

Here's my theory -- the teenager wants to be bitchy to their parents to appear independent. But the parents provide the food and roof over the head<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. so how to live there and still feel independent? Be even more bitchy!

Open office is just the same -- the linux kernel and many other initiatives to promote an open and competitive software environment would be far behind where they are without the unglamorous work of OO.o helping solve common document problems in an open way. OpenOffice.org has flaws, but it is extremely valuable.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey OpenOffiice.org -- good job !
What 's weird is .. why is there so much bile and complaining about this complex piece of software that largely solves a whole class of important problems and is free .
Point out deficiencies sure , but the comments here dwell a lot more on these oddball more-than-256-columns cases for a tool which works fine for a million common little cases .
Here 's my theory -- the teenager wants to be bitchy to their parents to appear independent .
But the parents provide the food and roof over the head .. so how to live there and still feel independent ?
Be even more bitchy !
Open office is just the same -- the linux kernel and many other initiatives to promote an open and competitive software environment would be far behind where they are without the unglamorous work of OO.o helping solve common document problems in an open way .
OpenOffice.org has flaws , but it is extremely valuable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey OpenOffiice.org -- good job!
What's weird is .. why is there so much bile and complaining about this complex piece of software that largely solves a whole class of important problems and is free.
Point out deficiencies sure, but the comments here dwell a lot more on these oddball more-than-256-columns cases for a tool which works fine for a million common little cases.
Here's my theory -- the teenager wants to be bitchy to their parents to appear independent.
But the parents provide the food and roof over the head .. so how to live there and still feel independent?
Be even more bitchy!
Open office is just the same -- the linux kernel and many other initiatives to promote an open and competitive software environment would be far behind where they are without the unglamorous work of OO.o helping solve common document problems in an open way.
OpenOffice.org has flaws, but it is extremely valuable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103608</id>
	<title>ok?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265920980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>"The new features include faster start up times; "

Is that a special feature? it should be normal. not that I hate OO, but it has a long way to go before being an app I truely love.  It's the best office suite out there(to me.) but it still isn't great.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The new features include faster start up times ; " Is that a special feature ?
it should be normal .
not that I hate OO , but it has a long way to go before being an app I truely love .
It 's the best office suite out there ( to me .
) but it still is n't great .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The new features include faster start up times; "

Is that a special feature?
it should be normal.
not that I hate OO, but it has a long way to go before being an app I truely love.
It's the best office suite out there(to me.
) but it still isn't great.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31107050</id>
	<title>Re:Is it worth it?</title>
	<author>foog</author>
	<datestamp>1265891280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Short answer: no.  If you need to open a document in a older file format, and Office is mangling it, openoffice.org is worth a try, but that's the luck of the draw.  Office will generally do a better job of that, but not always.</p><p>If you have a version of Office without Powerpoint or Visio, the openoffice.org Impress and Draw programs are serviceable.</p><p>On the flip side, I'd be scared to do anything significant in the database thingy, because it has that "95\% complete" quality that the contemporary free software world takes as an indication they're at a good point to do a total rewrite.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Short answer : no .
If you need to open a document in a older file format , and Office is mangling it , openoffice.org is worth a try , but that 's the luck of the draw .
Office will generally do a better job of that , but not always.If you have a version of Office without Powerpoint or Visio , the openoffice.org Impress and Draw programs are serviceable.On the flip side , I 'd be scared to do anything significant in the database thingy , because it has that " 95 \ % complete " quality that the contemporary free software world takes as an indication they 're at a good point to do a total rewrite .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Short answer: no.
If you need to open a document in a older file format, and Office is mangling it, openoffice.org is worth a try, but that's the luck of the draw.
Office will generally do a better job of that, but not always.If you have a version of Office without Powerpoint or Visio, the openoffice.org Impress and Draw programs are serviceable.On the flip side, I'd be scared to do anything significant in the database thingy, because it has that "95\% complete" quality that the contemporary free software world takes as an indication they're at a good point to do a total rewrite.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104034</id>
	<title>Re:Clippy</title>
	<author>Duositex</author>
	<datestamp>1265879340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>An LOLcat?</p><p>"I seez u r trying to makes lettrz. WordCat help u."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>An LOLcat ?
" I seez u r trying to makes lettrz .
WordCat help u .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An LOLcat?
"I seez u r trying to makes lettrz.
WordCat help u.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103758</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104296</id>
	<title>Re:Clippy</title>
	<author>gad\_zuki!</author>
	<datestamp>1265880420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;I'm sorry, but I refuse to use any office suite that doesn't have animated characters telling me what to do.</p><p>Oh, I'd love to see what the OSS equivalant of Clippy would be.  Perhaps, an otaku neckbeard sitting in front a PC playing WoW, surrounded by empty boxes of fast food and alternately yelling "RTFM" or "Read the manpage already!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; I 'm sorry , but I refuse to use any office suite that does n't have animated characters telling me what to do.Oh , I 'd love to see what the OSS equivalant of Clippy would be .
Perhaps , an otaku neckbeard sitting in front a PC playing WoW , surrounded by empty boxes of fast food and alternately yelling " RTFM " or " Read the manpage already !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;I'm sorry, but I refuse to use any office suite that doesn't have animated characters telling me what to do.Oh, I'd love to see what the OSS equivalant of Clippy would be.
Perhaps, an otaku neckbeard sitting in front a PC playing WoW, surrounded by empty boxes of fast food and alternately yelling "RTFM" or "Read the manpage already!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31107904</id>
	<title>Re:External references</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265895360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does open office extensions work with go-oo cant see any mention on their site ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does open office extensions work with go-oo cant see any mention on their site ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does open office extensions work with go-oo cant see any mention on their site ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103430</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104300</id>
	<title>Re:Mind Boggling That The UI Widgets Suck So Much</title>
	<author>sarhjinian</author>
	<datestamp>1265880420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>IBM's Lotus Symphony is based on the same code and has had that effort put into the UI.  It's based on much older code, though, and suffers for it.</p><p>I would agree that OOo does tend to look a bit dated and lacking in the polish you see in MSO2003.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IBM 's Lotus Symphony is based on the same code and has had that effort put into the UI .
It 's based on much older code , though , and suffers for it.I would agree that OOo does tend to look a bit dated and lacking in the polish you see in MSO2003 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IBM's Lotus Symphony is based on the same code and has had that effort put into the UI.
It's based on much older code, though, and suffers for it.I would agree that OOo does tend to look a bit dated and lacking in the polish you see in MSO2003.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103654</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104892</id>
	<title>Fixes my "calc" bug from 3.1.1</title>
	<author>coats</author>
	<datestamp>1265882880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Bug 108855:  certain names in spreadsheet-to-spreadsheet links
were forced to lower-case during "save."
<p>
Works fine with 3.2.0 -- the bug is gone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bug 108855 : certain names in spreadsheet-to-spreadsheet links were forced to lower-case during " save .
" Works fine with 3.2.0 -- the bug is gone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bug 108855:  certain names in spreadsheet-to-spreadsheet links
were forced to lower-case during "save.
"

Works fine with 3.2.0 -- the bug is gone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105644</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing That New or Innovative...</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1265885580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know this is going to seem like a troll but it isn't, mark it as one and move on anyway since if you have to start a post with 'this isn't a troll', it clearly is.</p><p>The problem here is that you didn't buy him OO.org.  OO.org is like a hammer for roofing, except the handle is only 5 inchs long, the head weighs about a half an ounce and its made from pot metal, because its designed by a bunch of guys who can't agree on anything, no one wants to address its usability because they'd rather work on its color scheme, but its free<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>Yes, you can use the hammer to put new shingles on a house and save yourself the price of a hammer.  Or<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... you can buy a hammer from the store that was made for building a house and save yourself a shitload of time rather than  dealing with the clunky bearly out of the stone age, free pile of crap you were handed earlier.</p><p>Spend less time dealing with charting and more time making OO.org feel like a professional application, not some sluggish, ugly as sin collection of code called an office suite that feels more like a bunch command line scripts with some tk and postscript thrown in as an afterthought.</p><p>Your handyman may not care about what his hammer looks like because he doesn't look at it all day long, but he still keeps it clean and properly working.</p><p>Your desk jockey on the other hand DOES care what his/her tools look like because they ARE looking at it all day.  Your software can't look like shit and get respected.  Period.  You may not want to admit it, but thats reality.  People will pay for a pretty cherry desk with working drawers, even if they can get a crappy beat up metal one for free.</p><p>Whats worse, if we continue the OpenOffice is a hammer analogy, OO.org is like a hammer missing the claw used to pull nails.  Its only redeeming quality is its price, and that price isn't enough to justify the benefits the expensive alternatives provide.</p><p>No this wasn't meant to be a troll, OO.org is just a VERY VERY easy target.  I don't like Linux, I prefer FBSD, but the list of reasons that I don't like Linux is pretty short.  I can come up with many places I'd use Linux if I had to do that particular task.</p><p>OO.org does not have that value.  Given the choice of starving for 3 days to buy MS office, or using OO.org for a week and eating like a king for those days, I'll take MS Office just to avoid the pain that its using OO.org.</p><p>Any who thinks their gradma or grandpa like OO.org doesn't realize they've been lying to you for years, telling you the like OO.org to boost your ego a little and make you think they care so you keep coming back and fixing their PC is well worth it since they don't use it very often anyway.  They secretly just use Google Docs and don't tell you so they don't listen to you rant about Google seeing their data.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know this is going to seem like a troll but it is n't , mark it as one and move on anyway since if you have to start a post with 'this is n't a troll ' , it clearly is.The problem here is that you did n't buy him OO.org .
OO.org is like a hammer for roofing , except the handle is only 5 inchs long , the head weighs about a half an ounce and its made from pot metal , because its designed by a bunch of guys who ca n't agree on anything , no one wants to address its usability because they 'd rather work on its color scheme , but its free ...Yes , you can use the hammer to put new shingles on a house and save yourself the price of a hammer .
Or ... you can buy a hammer from the store that was made for building a house and save yourself a shitload of time rather than dealing with the clunky bearly out of the stone age , free pile of crap you were handed earlier.Spend less time dealing with charting and more time making OO.org feel like a professional application , not some sluggish , ugly as sin collection of code called an office suite that feels more like a bunch command line scripts with some tk and postscript thrown in as an afterthought.Your handyman may not care about what his hammer looks like because he does n't look at it all day long , but he still keeps it clean and properly working.Your desk jockey on the other hand DOES care what his/her tools look like because they ARE looking at it all day .
Your software ca n't look like shit and get respected .
Period. You may not want to admit it , but thats reality .
People will pay for a pretty cherry desk with working drawers , even if they can get a crappy beat up metal one for free.Whats worse , if we continue the OpenOffice is a hammer analogy , OO.org is like a hammer missing the claw used to pull nails .
Its only redeeming quality is its price , and that price is n't enough to justify the benefits the expensive alternatives provide.No this was n't meant to be a troll , OO.org is just a VERY VERY easy target .
I do n't like Linux , I prefer FBSD , but the list of reasons that I do n't like Linux is pretty short .
I can come up with many places I 'd use Linux if I had to do that particular task.OO.org does not have that value .
Given the choice of starving for 3 days to buy MS office , or using OO.org for a week and eating like a king for those days , I 'll take MS Office just to avoid the pain that its using OO.org.Any who thinks their gradma or grandpa like OO.org does n't realize they 've been lying to you for years , telling you the like OO.org to boost your ego a little and make you think they care so you keep coming back and fixing their PC is well worth it since they do n't use it very often anyway .
They secretly just use Google Docs and do n't tell you so they do n't listen to you rant about Google seeing their data .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know this is going to seem like a troll but it isn't, mark it as one and move on anyway since if you have to start a post with 'this isn't a troll', it clearly is.The problem here is that you didn't buy him OO.org.
OO.org is like a hammer for roofing, except the handle is only 5 inchs long, the head weighs about a half an ounce and its made from pot metal, because its designed by a bunch of guys who can't agree on anything, no one wants to address its usability because they'd rather work on its color scheme, but its free ...Yes, you can use the hammer to put new shingles on a house and save yourself the price of a hammer.
Or ... you can buy a hammer from the store that was made for building a house and save yourself a shitload of time rather than  dealing with the clunky bearly out of the stone age, free pile of crap you were handed earlier.Spend less time dealing with charting and more time making OO.org feel like a professional application, not some sluggish, ugly as sin collection of code called an office suite that feels more like a bunch command line scripts with some tk and postscript thrown in as an afterthought.Your handyman may not care about what his hammer looks like because he doesn't look at it all day long, but he still keeps it clean and properly working.Your desk jockey on the other hand DOES care what his/her tools look like because they ARE looking at it all day.
Your software can't look like shit and get respected.
Period.  You may not want to admit it, but thats reality.
People will pay for a pretty cherry desk with working drawers, even if they can get a crappy beat up metal one for free.Whats worse, if we continue the OpenOffice is a hammer analogy, OO.org is like a hammer missing the claw used to pull nails.
Its only redeeming quality is its price, and that price isn't enough to justify the benefits the expensive alternatives provide.No this wasn't meant to be a troll, OO.org is just a VERY VERY easy target.
I don't like Linux, I prefer FBSD, but the list of reasons that I don't like Linux is pretty short.
I can come up with many places I'd use Linux if I had to do that particular task.OO.org does not have that value.
Given the choice of starving for 3 days to buy MS office, or using OO.org for a week and eating like a king for those days, I'll take MS Office just to avoid the pain that its using OO.org.Any who thinks their gradma or grandpa like OO.org doesn't realize they've been lying to you for years, telling you the like OO.org to boost your ego a little and make you think they care so you keep coming back and fixing their PC is well worth it since they don't use it very often anyway.
They secretly just use Google Docs and don't tell you so they don't listen to you rant about Google seeing their data.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103442</id>
	<title>Clippy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265920380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm sorry, but I refuse to use any office suite that doesn't have animated characters telling me what to do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sorry , but I refuse to use any office suite that does n't have animated characters telling me what to do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sorry, but I refuse to use any office suite that doesn't have animated characters telling me what to do.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103610</id>
	<title>Re:Self Update Broken</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265920980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Same here, although it could be like Firefox, which only automatically updates for minor releases.  Also, auto-update functions often lag behind the actual release of the software.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Same here , although it could be like Firefox , which only automatically updates for minor releases .
Also , auto-update functions often lag behind the actual release of the software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Same here, although it could be like Firefox, which only automatically updates for minor releases.
Also, auto-update functions often lag behind the actual release of the software.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103476</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103826</id>
	<title>bigger tables anyone?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265921760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Still only 256 columns per sheet? I frequently need a lot more than that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Still only 256 columns per sheet ?
I frequently need a lot more than that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Still only 256 columns per sheet?
I frequently need a lot more than that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103396</id>
	<title>improved compatibility with open standard</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265920200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"improved compatibility with open standard (ODF, OOXML)"
<br> <br>
Fixed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" improved compatibility with open standard ( ODF , OOXML ) " Fixed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"improved compatibility with open standard (ODF, OOXML)"
 
Fixed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105124</id>
	<title>the most important change</title>
	<author>belmolis</author>
	<datestamp>1265883720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Faster startup is nice, but the improvement that would thrill me more than any of these is the option of having file dialogues default to the current working directory, in other words, correct Unix user interface behavior. It drives me crazy having file dialogues default to the last directory used (on a previous invocation of the program) or my home directory. Sure, I can then navigate to the directory I want, but its extra work, and navigating through a gui is much slower than using the command line. If I go to the trouble of cd-ing into a certain directory, that normally means I want to work on files located there. For me at least the MS Windows approach is very much inferior.
</p><p>
I understand that things work differently on MS Windows and that developers of software like OO want to accommodate people accustomed to MS Windows, but I don't think that this should be at the expense of those of us who are accustomed to and prefer the native user interface. Indeed, some migrants from MS Windows might even like the Unix approach once they learned about it. <b>PLEASE</b> give  us the option of using the shell for navigation.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Faster startup is nice , but the improvement that would thrill me more than any of these is the option of having file dialogues default to the current working directory , in other words , correct Unix user interface behavior .
It drives me crazy having file dialogues default to the last directory used ( on a previous invocation of the program ) or my home directory .
Sure , I can then navigate to the directory I want , but its extra work , and navigating through a gui is much slower than using the command line .
If I go to the trouble of cd-ing into a certain directory , that normally means I want to work on files located there .
For me at least the MS Windows approach is very much inferior .
I understand that things work differently on MS Windows and that developers of software like OO want to accommodate people accustomed to MS Windows , but I do n't think that this should be at the expense of those of us who are accustomed to and prefer the native user interface .
Indeed , some migrants from MS Windows might even like the Unix approach once they learned about it .
PLEASE give us the option of using the shell for navigation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Faster startup is nice, but the improvement that would thrill me more than any of these is the option of having file dialogues default to the current working directory, in other words, correct Unix user interface behavior.
It drives me crazy having file dialogues default to the last directory used (on a previous invocation of the program) or my home directory.
Sure, I can then navigate to the directory I want, but its extra work, and navigating through a gui is much slower than using the command line.
If I go to the trouble of cd-ing into a certain directory, that normally means I want to work on files located there.
For me at least the MS Windows approach is very much inferior.
I understand that things work differently on MS Windows and that developers of software like OO want to accommodate people accustomed to MS Windows, but I don't think that this should be at the expense of those of us who are accustomed to and prefer the native user interface.
Indeed, some migrants from MS Windows might even like the Unix approach once they learned about it.
PLEASE give  us the option of using the shell for navigation.
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31109934</id>
	<title>Re:Confession time</title>
	<author>kimvette</author>
	<datestamp>1265914680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nothing wrong with clippy!</p><p><a href="http://www.visar.com/AssistedSuicide.html" title="visar.com">http://www.visar.com/AssistedSuicide.html</a> [visar.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nothing wrong with clippy ! http : //www.visar.com/AssistedSuicide.html [ visar.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nothing wrong with clippy!http://www.visar.com/AssistedSuicide.html [visar.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103892</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31109144</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing That New or Innovative...</title>
	<author>vikstar</author>
	<datestamp>1265905560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't understand, please use a car analogy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't understand , please use a car analogy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't understand, please use a car analogy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31106886</id>
	<title>Re:Is it worth it?</title>
	<author>fhage</author>
	<datestamp>1265890620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Anyways, I'm a "happy" Microsoft Office user, which doesn't have anything particularly bad to say about it. And yes, I have a legitimate, paid-for Office, so the "but it's free!" argument doesn't quite cut it. </p></div><p>You've already paid for a product, spent the time to install and customize the settings and it does what you need. Why would you even consider using another product unless you're worried that you won't have access to your own documents in the future?

</p><p> OOffice is worth it for people who don't have lots of money or want to be able to work with their documents decades later when MS is gone. Additionally, OOffice is often better at recovering old or messed up MS Office format documents than current MS products.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyways , I 'm a " happy " Microsoft Office user , which does n't have anything particularly bad to say about it .
And yes , I have a legitimate , paid-for Office , so the " but it 's free !
" argument does n't quite cut it .
You 've already paid for a product , spent the time to install and customize the settings and it does what you need .
Why would you even consider using another product unless you 're worried that you wo n't have access to your own documents in the future ?
OOffice is worth it for people who do n't have lots of money or want to be able to work with their documents decades later when MS is gone .
Additionally , OOffice is often better at recovering old or messed up MS Office format documents than current MS products .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyways, I'm a "happy" Microsoft Office user, which doesn't have anything particularly bad to say about it.
And yes, I have a legitimate, paid-for Office, so the "but it's free!
" argument doesn't quite cut it.
You've already paid for a product, spent the time to install and customize the settings and it does what you need.
Why would you even consider using another product unless you're worried that you won't have access to your own documents in the future?
OOffice is worth it for people who don't have lots of money or want to be able to work with their documents decades later when MS is gone.
Additionally, OOffice is often better at recovering old or messed up MS Office format documents than current MS products.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103464</id>
	<title>Hooray!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265920440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OO Fan Boy here.  I am happy to see the success that OO is having, the continued development...and most importantly...starting up to a blank document in less time than it takes me to walk to the fridge for another can of Pepsi.  Thank you OO development team!</p><p>Seriously, though, I like to use OO and it is the only my wife has used at home for documents, but making it start up faster should have been a number 1 priority all along.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OO Fan Boy here .
I am happy to see the success that OO is having , the continued development...and most importantly...starting up to a blank document in less time than it takes me to walk to the fridge for another can of Pepsi .
Thank you OO development team ! Seriously , though , I like to use OO and it is the only my wife has used at home for documents , but making it start up faster should have been a number 1 priority all along .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OO Fan Boy here.
I am happy to see the success that OO is having, the continued development...and most importantly...starting up to a blank document in less time than it takes me to walk to the fridge for another can of Pepsi.
Thank you OO development team!Seriously, though, I like to use OO and it is the only my wife has used at home for documents, but making it start up faster should have been a number 1 priority all along.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31106158</id>
	<title>Re:Self Update Broken</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265887560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Same on Windows. I've had to manually download and install every version and beta since 3.0. The most irritating thing is that when you install a beta, it removes all file type associations because you couldn't possibly want to actually work with a beta. (In my experience, "stable" releases of OpenOffice have been just as unstable as the dev versions, so it makes no difference.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Same on Windows .
I 've had to manually download and install every version and beta since 3.0 .
The most irritating thing is that when you install a beta , it removes all file type associations because you could n't possibly want to actually work with a beta .
( In my experience , " stable " releases of OpenOffice have been just as unstable as the dev versions , so it makes no difference .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Same on Windows.
I've had to manually download and install every version and beta since 3.0.
The most irritating thing is that when you install a beta, it removes all file type associations because you couldn't possibly want to actually work with a beta.
(In my experience, "stable" releases of OpenOffice have been just as unstable as the dev versions, so it makes no difference.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103476</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104790</id>
	<title>Pasting tables?</title>
	<author>RalphSleigh</author>
	<datestamp>1265882460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I installed 3.1 just last week because I needed some office on my machine and tried to paste some cells from calc into a writer document, a process that MSOffice 2003 does perfectly, and got some kind of embedded spreadsheet WTF with tiny font that actually distorted when you moved the handles at the side. Seems to get a table you need to actually 'paste as html', and even then there's no way to get to the bits that overflow off the right of the document...</p><p>I really want to love openoffice and will update, but my advice right now is clone Office 2003 first and worry about new features later. (Except give Calc a MD5 function, excel does not seem to have one)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I installed 3.1 just last week because I needed some office on my machine and tried to paste some cells from calc into a writer document , a process that MSOffice 2003 does perfectly , and got some kind of embedded spreadsheet WTF with tiny font that actually distorted when you moved the handles at the side .
Seems to get a table you need to actually 'paste as html ' , and even then there 's no way to get to the bits that overflow off the right of the document...I really want to love openoffice and will update , but my advice right now is clone Office 2003 first and worry about new features later .
( Except give Calc a MD5 function , excel does not seem to have one )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I installed 3.1 just last week because I needed some office on my machine and tried to paste some cells from calc into a writer document, a process that MSOffice 2003 does perfectly, and got some kind of embedded spreadsheet WTF with tiny font that actually distorted when you moved the handles at the side.
Seems to get a table you need to actually 'paste as html', and even then there's no way to get to the bits that overflow off the right of the document...I really want to love openoffice and will update, but my advice right now is clone Office 2003 first and worry about new features later.
(Except give Calc a MD5 function, excel does not seem to have one)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103640</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing That New or Innovative...</title>
	<author>hey!</author>
	<datestamp>1265921100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Once I bought my father in law a really, really nice hammer.  There wasn't made of titanium or anything like that; it didn't have any kind of electronic controls or clever mechanical gizmos to help you swing it straight.  It wasn't innovative. It was just a really, really well made hammer.</p><p>He was pleased with it, even though the hammer he already owned was in approximate terms very similar to the one I gave him. In precise terms it wasn't anywhere near as nice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Once I bought my father in law a really , really nice hammer .
There was n't made of titanium or anything like that ; it did n't have any kind of electronic controls or clever mechanical gizmos to help you swing it straight .
It was n't innovative .
It was just a really , really well made hammer.He was pleased with it , even though the hammer he already owned was in approximate terms very similar to the one I gave him .
In precise terms it was n't anywhere near as nice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once I bought my father in law a really, really nice hammer.
There wasn't made of titanium or anything like that; it didn't have any kind of electronic controls or clever mechanical gizmos to help you swing it straight.
It wasn't innovative.
It was just a really, really well made hammer.He was pleased with it, even though the hammer he already owned was in approximate terms very similar to the one I gave him.
In precise terms it wasn't anywhere near as nice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103758</id>
	<title>Re:Clippy</title>
	<author>Jeng</author>
	<datestamp>1265921520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For some reason the first thought that went though my head was</p><p>"What meme would work best as an animated character?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For some reason the first thought that went though my head was " What meme would work best as an animated character ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For some reason the first thought that went though my head was"What meme would work best as an animated character?
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104844</id>
	<title>Re:Self Update Broken</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265882640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you're using Mac, you should try <a href="http://www.neooffice.org/" title="neooffice.org" rel="nofollow">Neooffice</a> [neooffice.org].  They just (on the 1st) released a new version based on 3.1.  Though it's a version behind, the improved mac integration makes it more than worthwhile.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're using Mac , you should try Neooffice [ neooffice.org ] .
They just ( on the 1st ) released a new version based on 3.1 .
Though it 's a version behind , the improved mac integration makes it more than worthwhile .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're using Mac, you should try Neooffice [neooffice.org].
They just (on the 1st) released a new version based on 3.1.
Though it's a version behind, the improved mac integration makes it more than worthwhile.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103476</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31107004</id>
	<title>Re:Mind Boggling That The UI Widgets Suck So Much</title>
	<author>quickOnTheUptake</author>
	<datestamp>1265891100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This must be one of the longest sentences ever cast in the English language: There isn't one punctuation mark in the whole 101 words.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This must be one of the longest sentences ever cast in the English language : There is n't one punctuation mark in the whole 101 words .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This must be one of the longest sentences ever cast in the English language: There isn't one punctuation mark in the whole 101 words.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103654</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103654</id>
	<title>Mind Boggling That The UI Widgets Suck So Much</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265921100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.softpedia.com/screenshots/OpenOfficeorg-for-Windows\_2.png</p><p>http://img.labnol.org/di/visio-2010.png</p><p>It certainly isn't your standard open source UI nightmare but with all the effort that has put into this project over the years how is possible no one in charge of the project has been capable of spending the tiny amount of cash relative to paying engineers and the rest of the project's overhead it takes to pay for some professional UI artists to spend the short amount of time it would take to update the clunkly and half-assed widget/UI element source art so this actually fantastic piece of software isn't passed over because it looks amateurish compared to Microsoft Office?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.softpedia.com/screenshots/OpenOfficeorg-for-Windows \ _2.pnghttp : //img.labnol.org/di/visio-2010.pngIt certainly is n't your standard open source UI nightmare but with all the effort that has put into this project over the years how is possible no one in charge of the project has been capable of spending the tiny amount of cash relative to paying engineers and the rest of the project 's overhead it takes to pay for some professional UI artists to spend the short amount of time it would take to update the clunkly and half-assed widget/UI element source art so this actually fantastic piece of software is n't passed over because it looks amateurish compared to Microsoft Office ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.softpedia.com/screenshots/OpenOfficeorg-for-Windows\_2.pnghttp://img.labnol.org/di/visio-2010.pngIt certainly isn't your standard open source UI nightmare but with all the effort that has put into this project over the years how is possible no one in charge of the project has been capable of spending the tiny amount of cash relative to paying engineers and the rest of the project's overhead it takes to pay for some professional UI artists to spend the short amount of time it would take to update the clunkly and half-assed widget/UI element source art so this actually fantastic piece of software isn't passed over because it looks amateurish compared to Microsoft Office?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31106642</id>
	<title>Re:bigger tables anyone?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265889600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Lemme guess, you need more because of the complex database you're running out of your spreadsheet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lem me guess , you need more because of the complex database you 're running out of your spreadsheet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lemme guess, you need more because of the complex database you're running out of your spreadsheet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103826</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31109952</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing That New or Innovative...</title>
	<author>turing\_m</author>
	<datestamp>1265914800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>He was pleased with it, even though the hammer he already owned was in approximate terms very similar to the one I gave him. In precise terms it wasn't anywhere near as nice.</p></div></blockquote><p>
Was it several hundred dollars nicer? Does it need to use a specific proprietary type of nail? And does the manufacturer of this hammer come out with a new version of hammer every 4 years or so that claims to be even nicer, along with a new proprietary kind of nail that your old hammer can't use, and soon every hardware store stops stocking the old proprietary nails so you know you have to buy the new hammer? And in order to use regular nails does this require a special attachment that you have to send away especially to get? And has the manufacturer attempted to bribe the nail standards bodies in order to get its own version of a standard nail approved?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>He was pleased with it , even though the hammer he already owned was in approximate terms very similar to the one I gave him .
In precise terms it was n't anywhere near as nice .
Was it several hundred dollars nicer ?
Does it need to use a specific proprietary type of nail ?
And does the manufacturer of this hammer come out with a new version of hammer every 4 years or so that claims to be even nicer , along with a new proprietary kind of nail that your old hammer ca n't use , and soon every hardware store stops stocking the old proprietary nails so you know you have to buy the new hammer ?
And in order to use regular nails does this require a special attachment that you have to send away especially to get ?
And has the manufacturer attempted to bribe the nail standards bodies in order to get its own version of a standard nail approved ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He was pleased with it, even though the hammer he already owned was in approximate terms very similar to the one I gave him.
In precise terms it wasn't anywhere near as nice.
Was it several hundred dollars nicer?
Does it need to use a specific proprietary type of nail?
And does the manufacturer of this hammer come out with a new version of hammer every 4 years or so that claims to be even nicer, along with a new proprietary kind of nail that your old hammer can't use, and soon every hardware store stops stocking the old proprietary nails so you know you have to buy the new hammer?
And in order to use regular nails does this require a special attachment that you have to send away especially to get?
And has the manufacturer attempted to bribe the nail standards bodies in order to get its own version of a standard nail approved?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103630</id>
	<title>"over three hundred million downloads"</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1265921040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not a very useful metric, considering how on the most popular desktop OS OpenOffice requires downloading of installation package to upgrade. Yes, OSes with package management and OOo included, together with using the same download for installations and/or upgrades on several machines, swing the usage upwards; but I doubt it's anywhere enough to compensate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not a very useful metric , considering how on the most popular desktop OS OpenOffice requires downloading of installation package to upgrade .
Yes , OSes with package management and OOo included , together with using the same download for installations and/or upgrades on several machines , swing the usage upwards ; but I doubt it 's anywhere enough to compensate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not a very useful metric, considering how on the most popular desktop OS OpenOffice requires downloading of installation package to upgrade.
Yes, OSes with package management and OOo included, together with using the same download for installations and/or upgrades on several machines, swing the usage upwards; but I doubt it's anywhere enough to compensate.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104042</id>
	<title>Re:Clippy</title>
	<author>VGPowerlord</author>
	<datestamp>1265879400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fa4YKZB6jG0" title="youtube.com">It looks you're writing a letter.</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It looks you 're writing a letter .
[ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It looks you're writing a letter.
[youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105476</id>
	<title>Openoffice upgrade path: Windows  Linux!</title>
	<author>notjustchalk</author>
	<datestamp>1265884920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why is it that upgrading OO is so much easier on any version of windows vs Linux?
I can upgrade an obsolete WIn2k terminal to oo3.2  with no more than a couple of clicks, but I can't upgrade Intrepid to anything past oo2.4 come hell or high water! How is this supposed to be open and accessible?!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is it that upgrading OO is so much easier on any version of windows vs Linux ?
I can upgrade an obsolete WIn2k terminal to oo3.2 with no more than a couple of clicks , but I ca n't upgrade Intrepid to anything past oo2.4 come hell or high water !
How is this supposed to be open and accessible ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is it that upgrading OO is so much easier on any version of windows vs Linux?
I can upgrade an obsolete WIn2k terminal to oo3.2  with no more than a couple of clicks, but I can't upgrade Intrepid to anything past oo2.4 come hell or high water!
How is this supposed to be open and accessible?
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31107220</id>
	<title>Re:Is it worth it?</title>
	<author>Toonol</author>
	<datestamp>1265891940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have OO and Office installed on the same machine, and I've moved to using OO for all word processing.  It's a little slower, but I find it's much more reliable.  Word seems to randomly glitch more on longer documents with complicated formatting.  That and the built-in PDF export options make it more appealing for me.<br> <br>

Now, I find Calc to be clearly inferior to Excel; and their database program (forget the name) seemed even more primitive.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have OO and Office installed on the same machine , and I 've moved to using OO for all word processing .
It 's a little slower , but I find it 's much more reliable .
Word seems to randomly glitch more on longer documents with complicated formatting .
That and the built-in PDF export options make it more appealing for me .
Now , I find Calc to be clearly inferior to Excel ; and their database program ( forget the name ) seemed even more primitive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have OO and Office installed on the same machine, and I've moved to using OO for all word processing.
It's a little slower, but I find it's much more reliable.
Word seems to randomly glitch more on longer documents with complicated formatting.
That and the built-in PDF export options make it more appealing for me.
Now, I find Calc to be clearly inferior to Excel; and their database program (forget the name) seemed even more primitive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103388</id>
	<title>Nothing That New or Innovative...</title>
	<author>catd77</author>
	<datestamp>1265920140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Right on the heels of MS 2010 beta.  Doesn't appear to be much new things, it's just faster.  Still. Openoffice is the best office suite out there in my opinion.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Right on the heels of MS 2010 beta .
Does n't appear to be much new things , it 's just faster .
Still. Openoffice is the best office suite out there in my opinion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right on the heels of MS 2010 beta.
Doesn't appear to be much new things, it's just faster.
Still. Openoffice is the best office suite out there in my opinion.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103550</id>
	<title>But...</title>
	<author>91degrees</author>
	<datestamp>1265920740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does it still count an open quotation mark as a whole word?  That really bugged me about v3.1</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does it still count an open quotation mark as a whole word ?
That really bugged me about v3.1</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does it still count an open quotation mark as a whole word?
That really bugged me about v3.1</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104118</id>
	<title>Has RTF been fixed?</title>
	<author>VGPowerlord</author>
	<datestamp>1265879640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"improved compatibility with open standard (ODF) and proprietary file formats"</p><p>So, is it finally able to save RTF files without losing random formatting information?</p><p>Actually, I don't care any more.  I just sucked it up and bought a heavily discounted copy of Office 2007 and installed it on two of my Windows machines (Desktop and Laptop) instead of dealing with OO.o's document mangling.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" improved compatibility with open standard ( ODF ) and proprietary file formats " So , is it finally able to save RTF files without losing random formatting information ? Actually , I do n't care any more .
I just sucked it up and bought a heavily discounted copy of Office 2007 and installed it on two of my Windows machines ( Desktop and Laptop ) instead of dealing with OO.o 's document mangling .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"improved compatibility with open standard (ODF) and proprietary file formats"So, is it finally able to save RTF files without losing random formatting information?Actually, I don't care any more.
I just sucked it up and bought a heavily discounted copy of Office 2007 and installed it on two of my Windows machines (Desktop and Laptop) instead of dealing with OO.o's document mangling.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31110256</id>
	<title>Re:Is it worth it?</title>
	<author>xtracto</author>
	<datestamp>1266005820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Aaah OneNote, that is the one application that has done RIGHT in a long time.</p><p>There is nothing even remotely close both in the Free as in beer and Free as in Libre software world.</p><p>As for OOo vs MSOffice, it is a simple fact that MSOffice is better. If the price is not a factor, there is no reason not to go MSOffice.</p><p>As for a new "OOo release" I am just waiting for the release where they finally split the different programs instead of doing one huge beast as it is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Aaah OneNote , that is the one application that has done RIGHT in a long time.There is nothing even remotely close both in the Free as in beer and Free as in Libre software world.As for OOo vs MSOffice , it is a simple fact that MSOffice is better .
If the price is not a factor , there is no reason not to go MSOffice.As for a new " OOo release " I am just waiting for the release where they finally split the different programs instead of doing one huge beast as it is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aaah OneNote, that is the one application that has done RIGHT in a long time.There is nothing even remotely close both in the Free as in beer and Free as in Libre software world.As for OOo vs MSOffice, it is a simple fact that MSOffice is better.
If the price is not a factor, there is no reason not to go MSOffice.As for a new "OOo release" I am just waiting for the release where they finally split the different programs instead of doing one huge beast as it is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105640</id>
	<title>Re:Is it worth it?</title>
	<author>Spad</author>
	<datestamp>1265885520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not if you're happy with MS Office and don't care about things like Cost, Openness, Install Size, Cross-platform compatibility, etc. That said, if you want a portable office suite that you can stick on a USB key, then it's very handy (http://portableapps.com/apps/office/openoffice\_portable)</p><p>I use OO at home, because I don't want to pay for MS Office &amp; I prefer FOSS to piracy where the FOSS option does what I need, but couldn't get by with it at work because it can't do Outlook or Sharepoint Integration and it would give me headaches swapping documents with everyone else who uses MS Office..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not if you 're happy with MS Office and do n't care about things like Cost , Openness , Install Size , Cross-platform compatibility , etc .
That said , if you want a portable office suite that you can stick on a USB key , then it 's very handy ( http : //portableapps.com/apps/office/openoffice \ _portable ) I use OO at home , because I do n't want to pay for MS Office &amp; I prefer FOSS to piracy where the FOSS option does what I need , but could n't get by with it at work because it ca n't do Outlook or Sharepoint Integration and it would give me headaches swapping documents with everyone else who uses MS Office. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not if you're happy with MS Office and don't care about things like Cost, Openness, Install Size, Cross-platform compatibility, etc.
That said, if you want a portable office suite that you can stick on a USB key, then it's very handy (http://portableapps.com/apps/office/openoffice\_portable)I use OO at home, because I don't want to pay for MS Office &amp; I prefer FOSS to piracy where the FOSS option does what I need, but couldn't get by with it at work because it can't do Outlook or Sharepoint Integration and it would give me headaches swapping documents with everyone else who uses MS Office..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103476</id>
	<title>Self Update Broken</title>
	<author>Chris Lawrence</author>
	<datestamp>1265920500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looks like the self update function is still broken, at least on the Mac version.  It's telling me 3.1 is up to date.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like the self update function is still broken , at least on the Mac version .
It 's telling me 3.1 is up to date .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like the self update function is still broken, at least on the Mac version.
It's telling me 3.1 is up to date.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105154</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing That New or Innovative...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265883780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A titanium hammer wouldn't be a very good hammer.  It would be an expensive hammer.  A good hammer needs to have mass.  Heavy is good in the hammer world!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A titanium hammer would n't be a very good hammer .
It would be an expensive hammer .
A good hammer needs to have mass .
Heavy is good in the hammer world !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A titanium hammer wouldn't be a very good hammer.
It would be an expensive hammer.
A good hammer needs to have mass.
Heavy is good in the hammer world!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31112434</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing That New or Innovative...</title>
	<author>muckracer</author>
	<datestamp>1265987640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Doesn't appear to be much new things, it's just faster.</p><p>The truly innovative things are being worked on under the code-name: Open Office Forever! Expect it near you shortly...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Does n't appear to be much new things , it 's just faster.The truly innovative things are being worked on under the code-name : Open Office Forever !
Expect it near you shortly.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Doesn't appear to be much new things, it's just faster.The truly innovative things are being worked on under the code-name: Open Office Forever!
Expect it near you shortly...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105020</id>
	<title>Re:Clippy</title>
	<author>sconeu</author>
	<datestamp>1265883360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Natalie Portman.<p><div class="quote"><p>It looks like your composing a Slashdot post.  Would you like some assistance?
</p><ol>
<li>I'd like to see Natalie Portman, naked and petrified</li><li>I'd like to pour hot grits down my pants</li><li>In Soviet Russia...</li><li>I, for one, welcome our new meme-assisting overlords</li><li>CowboyNeal is my pilot</li><li>I'd like to get in the First Post!</li><li>No thank you.  You must be new here.</li></ol></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Natalie Portman.It looks like your composing a Slashdot post .
Would you like some assistance ?
I 'd like to see Natalie Portman , naked and petrifiedI 'd like to pour hot grits down my pantsIn Soviet Russia...I , for one , welcome our new meme-assisting overlordsCowboyNeal is my pilotI 'd like to get in the First Post ! No thank you .
You must be new here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Natalie Portman.It looks like your composing a Slashdot post.
Would you like some assistance?
I'd like to see Natalie Portman, naked and petrifiedI'd like to pour hot grits down my pantsIn Soviet Russia...I, for one, welcome our new meme-assisting overlordsCowboyNeal is my pilotI'd like to get in the First Post!No thank you.
You must be new here.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103758</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104796</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing That New or Innovative...</title>
	<author>tyrione</author>
	<datestamp>1265882520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Right on the heels of MS 2010 beta.  Doesn't appear to be much new things, it's just faster.  Still. Openoffice is the best office suite out there in my opinion.</p></div><p>Native OpenType Postcript fonts alone makes it finally worth exploring Writer.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Right on the heels of MS 2010 beta .
Does n't appear to be much new things , it 's just faster .
Still. Openoffice is the best office suite out there in my opinion.Native OpenType Postcript fonts alone makes it finally worth exploring Writer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right on the heels of MS 2010 beta.
Doesn't appear to be much new things, it's just faster.
Still. Openoffice is the best office suite out there in my opinion.Native OpenType Postcript fonts alone makes it finally worth exploring Writer.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103836</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing That New or Innovative...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265921820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Just faster"? It isn't just faster. It's so much faster that it's like a whole new program. Great job, guys. I wish we'd see this more often: The same program, just a lot better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Just faster " ?
It is n't just faster .
It 's so much faster that it 's like a whole new program .
Great job , guys .
I wish we 'd see this more often : The same program , just a lot better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Just faster"?
It isn't just faster.
It's so much faster that it's like a whole new program.
Great job, guys.
I wish we'd see this more often: The same program, just a lot better.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31106194</id>
	<title>Re:Clippy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265887680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is the help agent not annoying enough for you? I think it's supposed to be a sun or star, maybe Oracle will replace it with different graphics. Perhaps an oracle, although I'm not quite sure what that would look like.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is the help agent not annoying enough for you ?
I think it 's supposed to be a sun or star , maybe Oracle will replace it with different graphics .
Perhaps an oracle , although I 'm not quite sure what that would look like .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is the help agent not annoying enough for you?
I think it's supposed to be a sun or star, maybe Oracle will replace it with different graphics.
Perhaps an oracle, although I'm not quite sure what that would look like.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105570</id>
	<title>Re:Has RTF been fixed?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265885280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>RTF???</p><p>Why don't you save to WordStar or Commodore 64 EasyWriter format? Those are just slightly less obsolete as RTF.</p><p>Really, RTF, why?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>RTF ? ?
? Why do n't you save to WordStar or Commodore 64 EasyWriter format ?
Those are just slightly less obsolete as RTF.Really , RTF , why ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RTF??
?Why don't you save to WordStar or Commodore 64 EasyWriter format?
Those are just slightly less obsolete as RTF.Really, RTF, why?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105710</id>
	<title>Re:PHP support?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265885820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.wstech2.net/index.php?do=puno, but it hasn't been updated in a couple of years and I don't know if it works with the current version of OpenOffice</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.wstech2.net/index.php ? do = puno , but it has n't been updated in a couple of years and I do n't know if it works with the current version of OpenOffice</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.wstech2.net/index.php?do=puno, but it hasn't been updated in a couple of years and I don't know if it works with the current version of OpenOffice</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104484</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104698</id>
	<title>Re:Confession time</title>
	<author>gbjbaanb</author>
	<datestamp>1265882040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I'm slightly ashamed to admit that he did teach me some things about word, I didn't already know.</i></p><p>Don't be ashamed - there's so much bloat in Office that there's TONS of stuff you still don't know is in there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm slightly ashamed to admit that he did teach me some things about word , I did n't already know.Do n't be ashamed - there 's so much bloat in Office that there 's TONS of stuff you still do n't know is in there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm slightly ashamed to admit that he did teach me some things about word, I didn't already know.Don't be ashamed - there's so much bloat in Office that there's TONS of stuff you still don't know is in there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103892</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104126</id>
	<title>Re:Clippy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265879700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perhaps OO could introduce its own animated characters--<b> <i>starting with an animated wire cutter!</i> </b></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps OO could introduce its own animated characters-- starting with an animated wire cutter !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps OO could introduce its own animated characters-- starting with an animated wire cutter! </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31124046</id>
	<title>RTF is still f*cked up!</title>
	<author>xjimhb</author>
	<datestamp>1265992920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I tried 3.1, RTF was f*cked up. 3.2, it still is. Are they ever going to fix it?<br> <br>

Back in 2.3, if I did a SAVE-&gt;AS from an ODT file to RTF, the result was messed up. The first paragraph was OK, the rest was defaulted to single-space, no indents. But if I cleaned it up with "format paragraph" and saved it, it would STAY CLEANED UP. 3.1 was a total disaster for RTF, it messed everything up incredibly. In 3.2, the SAVE-&gt;AS to RTF gives the same result as 2.3, but YOU CAN'T CLEAN IT UP!!!! TRY, then save, close, and reopen, and once again NOTHING AFTER THE FIRST PARAGRAPH is formatted.<br> <br>

I **NEED** RTF, I **NEED** properly formatted RTF! Lots of places I need to send files <b> <i>won't take anything else.</i> </b> Hey, guys, get with it and fix the damn thing!<br> <br>

Meanwhile I guess I'll keep on using 2.3!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I tried 3.1 , RTF was f * cked up .
3.2 , it still is .
Are they ever going to fix it ?
Back in 2.3 , if I did a SAVE- &gt; AS from an ODT file to RTF , the result was messed up .
The first paragraph was OK , the rest was defaulted to single-space , no indents .
But if I cleaned it up with " format paragraph " and saved it , it would STAY CLEANED UP .
3.1 was a total disaster for RTF , it messed everything up incredibly .
In 3.2 , the SAVE- &gt; AS to RTF gives the same result as 2.3 , but YOU CA N'T CLEAN IT UP ! ! ! !
TRY , then save , close , and reopen , and once again NOTHING AFTER THE FIRST PARAGRAPH is formatted .
I * * NEED * * RTF , I * * NEED * * properly formatted RTF !
Lots of places I need to send files wo n't take anything else .
Hey , guys , get with it and fix the damn thing !
Meanwhile I guess I 'll keep on using 2.3 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I tried 3.1, RTF was f*cked up.
3.2, it still is.
Are they ever going to fix it?
Back in 2.3, if I did a SAVE-&gt;AS from an ODT file to RTF, the result was messed up.
The first paragraph was OK, the rest was defaulted to single-space, no indents.
But if I cleaned it up with "format paragraph" and saved it, it would STAY CLEANED UP.
3.1 was a total disaster for RTF, it messed everything up incredibly.
In 3.2, the SAVE-&gt;AS to RTF gives the same result as 2.3, but YOU CAN'T CLEAN IT UP!!!!
TRY, then save, close, and reopen, and once again NOTHING AFTER THE FIRST PARAGRAPH is formatted.
I **NEED** RTF, I **NEED** properly formatted RTF!
Lots of places I need to send files  won't take anything else.
Hey, guys, get with it and fix the damn thing!
Meanwhile I guess I'll keep on using 2.3!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31106276</id>
	<title>Re:PHP support?</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1265888040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Am I the only one who is waiting for some kind of DOM to create docs via PHP? Possibly with updated fresh modules?</p></div><p>Given that ODF is essentially just zipped XML, and the schema is well-defined and relatively clean, what kind of special DOM do you need?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only one who is waiting for some kind of DOM to create docs via PHP ?
Possibly with updated fresh modules ? Given that ODF is essentially just zipped XML , and the schema is well-defined and relatively clean , what kind of special DOM do you need ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only one who is waiting for some kind of DOM to create docs via PHP?
Possibly with updated fresh modules?Given that ODF is essentially just zipped XML, and the schema is well-defined and relatively clean, what kind of special DOM do you need?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104484</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103660</id>
	<title>Just Faster??? I wish I was just Richer!!!</title>
	<author>viraltus</author>
	<datestamp>1265921160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Word processors cannot be improving in terms of features forever and, anyway, people only use a small percentage of those, so I think "just" faster is "just" right.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Word processors can not be improving in terms of features forever and , anyway , people only use a small percentage of those , so I think " just " faster is " just " right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Word processors cannot be improving in terms of features forever and, anyway, people only use a small percentage of those, so I think "just" faster is "just" right.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104968</id>
	<title>Re:Self Update Broken</title>
	<author>HeronBlademaster</author>
	<datestamp>1265883180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I tried a moment ago (in Windows) it just said "Checking for updates failed."  I wonder if the root cause is the same?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I tried a moment ago ( in Windows ) it just said " Checking for updates failed .
" I wonder if the root cause is the same ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I tried a moment ago (in Windows) it just said "Checking for updates failed.
"  I wonder if the root cause is the same?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103476</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103844</id>
	<title>Bibtxt</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265921880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bibtxt is the biggest item to get OpenOffice working.</p><p>If I can import and export Bibtxt files Bibliography files and use Templates for writing styles.</p><p>That is I can write in APA then tell OpenOffice to reformat for IEEE.  Though it can be done with Tex this is the killer feature people would like in Academia.  With enough people using it for this feature then many people would ask for it in their business.<br>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bibtxt is the biggest item to get OpenOffice working.If I can import and export Bibtxt files Bibliography files and use Templates for writing styles.That is I can write in APA then tell OpenOffice to reformat for IEEE .
Though it can be done with Tex this is the killer feature people would like in Academia .
With enough people using it for this feature then many people would ask for it in their business .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bibtxt is the biggest item to get OpenOffice working.If I can import and export Bibtxt files Bibliography files and use Templates for writing styles.That is I can write in APA then tell OpenOffice to reformat for IEEE.
Though it can be done with Tex this is the killer feature people would like in Academia.
With enough people using it for this feature then many people would ask for it in their business.
 </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105526</id>
	<title>Re:Clippy</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1265885100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just throw Hypnotoad in the DVD player.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just throw Hypnotoad in the DVD player .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just throw Hypnotoad in the DVD player.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31107398</id>
	<title>Re:Has RTF been fixed?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265892720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The RWTF is RTF.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The RWTF is RTF .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The RWTF is RTF.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104120</id>
	<title>Re:Clippy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265879640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obviously, an animated grubby mechanic that would break down all his helpful advice into car analogies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously , an animated grubby mechanic that would break down all his helpful advice into car analogies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously, an animated grubby mechanic that would break down all his helpful advice into car analogies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103758</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103430</id>
	<title>External references</title>
	<author>Enderandrew</author>
	<datestamp>1265920320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First off, congrats on getting the release out the door. I do appreciate the project.</p><p>That being said, in 3.0, supposedly there was support in Calc to external references (to values in other documents). In 3.1, it was supposedly fixed. It still didn't work.</p><p>I'm curious to see if it finally works in 3.2. And for those who don't know, you should check out Novell's fork/non-standard builds over at go-oo.org. Many Linux distros use these builds automatically, but if you're on Windows, that is the version I'd grab. They have several nice improvements over the upstream version.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First off , congrats on getting the release out the door .
I do appreciate the project.That being said , in 3.0 , supposedly there was support in Calc to external references ( to values in other documents ) .
In 3.1 , it was supposedly fixed .
It still did n't work.I 'm curious to see if it finally works in 3.2 .
And for those who do n't know , you should check out Novell 's fork/non-standard builds over at go-oo.org .
Many Linux distros use these builds automatically , but if you 're on Windows , that is the version I 'd grab .
They have several nice improvements over the upstream version .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First off, congrats on getting the release out the door.
I do appreciate the project.That being said, in 3.0, supposedly there was support in Calc to external references (to values in other documents).
In 3.1, it was supposedly fixed.
It still didn't work.I'm curious to see if it finally works in 3.2.
And for those who don't know, you should check out Novell's fork/non-standard builds over at go-oo.org.
Many Linux distros use these builds automatically, but if you're on Windows, that is the version I'd grab.
They have several nice improvements over the upstream version.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104134</id>
	<title>Not exactly news</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265879760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I downloaded it a couple of days ago.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I downloaded it a couple of days ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I downloaded it a couple of days ago.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103892</id>
	<title>Confession time</title>
	<author>Bill, Shooter of Bul</author>
	<datestamp>1265878800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Although I hated Clippy with a great passion, I liked the professor office helper. If Microsoft had chosen the professor, I don't think they would have gotten the vitriol they did. Clippy was a smug jackass. Not a helpful, humble character like the professor. He looked like Einstein, so he seemed to be smart, but he was also old which made him seem like a kind grandparent. I'm slightly ashamed to admit that he did teach me some things about word, I didn't already know.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Although I hated Clippy with a great passion , I liked the professor office helper .
If Microsoft had chosen the professor , I do n't think they would have gotten the vitriol they did .
Clippy was a smug jackass .
Not a helpful , humble character like the professor .
He looked like Einstein , so he seemed to be smart , but he was also old which made him seem like a kind grandparent .
I 'm slightly ashamed to admit that he did teach me some things about word , I did n't already know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Although I hated Clippy with a great passion, I liked the professor office helper.
If Microsoft had chosen the professor, I don't think they would have gotten the vitriol they did.
Clippy was a smug jackass.
Not a helpful, humble character like the professor.
He looked like Einstein, so he seemed to be smart, but he was also old which made him seem like a kind grandparent.
I'm slightly ashamed to admit that he did teach me some things about word, I didn't already know.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31107752</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing That New or Innovative...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265894580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Once I bought my father in law a really, really nice hammer.  There wasn't made of titanium or anything like that; it didn't have any kind of electronic controls or clever mechanical gizmos to help you swing it straight.  It wasn't innovative. It was just a really, really well made hammer.</p><p>He was pleased with it, even though the hammer he already owned was in approximate terms very similar to the one I gave him. In precise terms it wasn't anywhere near as nice.</p></div><p>Does it look like we're a bunch of carpenters?  Use a car analogy or don't bother.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Once I bought my father in law a really , really nice hammer .
There was n't made of titanium or anything like that ; it did n't have any kind of electronic controls or clever mechanical gizmos to help you swing it straight .
It was n't innovative .
It was just a really , really well made hammer.He was pleased with it , even though the hammer he already owned was in approximate terms very similar to the one I gave him .
In precise terms it was n't anywhere near as nice.Does it look like we 're a bunch of carpenters ?
Use a car analogy or do n't bother .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once I bought my father in law a really, really nice hammer.
There wasn't made of titanium or anything like that; it didn't have any kind of electronic controls or clever mechanical gizmos to help you swing it straight.
It wasn't innovative.
It was just a really, really well made hammer.He was pleased with it, even though the hammer he already owned was in approximate terms very similar to the one I gave him.
In precise terms it wasn't anywhere near as nice.Does it look like we're a bunch of carpenters?
Use a car analogy or don't bother.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31107694</id>
	<title>Re:External references</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265894220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, but before you pop over to Novell's fork/non-standard builds... why don't you pop over to boycottnovell.com and see why it isn't such a good idea first.</p><p>Nice try Miguel<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , but before you pop over to Novell 's fork/non-standard builds... why do n't you pop over to boycottnovell.com and see why it is n't such a good idea first.Nice try Miguel : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, but before you pop over to Novell's fork/non-standard builds... why don't you pop over to boycottnovell.com and see why it isn't such a good idea first.Nice try Miguel :-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103430</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31106352</id>
	<title>Re:Openoffice upgrade path: Windows Linux!</title>
	<author>Super\_Z</author>
	<datestamp>1265888400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You simply add a repository containing the appropriate openoffice packages to your sources.list file.
<br>
Pasted from comment #3 on <a href="http://news.softpedia.com/news/How-to-Install-OpenOffice-org-3-1-on-Ubuntu-9-04-111105.shtml" title="softpedia.com">this page</a> [softpedia.com]:<blockquote><div><p> <tt>echo -e 'echo "#PPA openoffice-pkgs<br>deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/openoffice-pkgs/ppa/ubuntu $(lsb\_release -sc) main" | sudo tee -a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/etc/apt/sources.list.d/ppa.list<br> <br>gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv 247d1cff<br>gpg --export --armor 247d1cff | sudo apt-key add -<br> <br>sudo apt-get update<br> <br>sudo aptitude -y safe-upgrade<br>' &gt;<nobr> <wbr></nobr>./oooupgrade.sh<br>sudo sh<nobr> <wbr></nobr>./oooupgrade.sh &amp;&amp; rm<nobr> <wbr></nobr>./oooupgrade.sh</tt></p></div> </blockquote><p>I have not tried it, but it might do the trick. Proceed at your own risk.
<br>
Note: the original source had an additional <i>aptitude -y dist-upgrade</i> command which I removed from the above code.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You simply add a repository containing the appropriate openoffice packages to your sources.list file .
Pasted from comment # 3 on this page [ softpedia.com ] : echo -e 'echo " # PPA openoffice-pkgsdeb http : //ppa.launchpad.net/openoffice-pkgs/ppa/ubuntu $ ( lsb \ _release -sc ) main " | sudo tee -a /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ppa.list gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv 247d1cffgpg --export --armor 247d1cff | sudo apt-key add - sudo apt-get update sudo aptitude -y safe-upgrade ' &gt; ./oooupgrade.shsudo sh ./oooupgrade.sh &amp;&amp; rm ./oooupgrade.sh I have not tried it , but it might do the trick .
Proceed at your own risk .
Note : the original source had an additional aptitude -y dist-upgrade command which I removed from the above code .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You simply add a repository containing the appropriate openoffice packages to your sources.list file.
Pasted from comment #3 on this page [softpedia.com]: echo -e 'echo "#PPA openoffice-pkgsdeb http://ppa.launchpad.net/openoffice-pkgs/ppa/ubuntu $(lsb\_release -sc) main" | sudo tee -a /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ppa.list gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv 247d1cffgpg --export --armor 247d1cff | sudo apt-key add - sudo apt-get update sudo aptitude -y safe-upgrade' &gt; ./oooupgrade.shsudo sh ./oooupgrade.sh &amp;&amp; rm ./oooupgrade.sh I have not tried it, but it might do the trick.
Proceed at your own risk.
Note: the original source had an additional aptitude -y dist-upgrade command which I removed from the above code.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105476</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103482</id>
	<title>will it still hijack my mac</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265920500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>so that any powerpoint email attachments etc will be opened in open office instead of microsoft office. This feature cannot be turned off. Uninstalled because of it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>so that any powerpoint email attachments etc will be opened in open office instead of microsoft office .
This feature can not be turned off .
Uninstalled because of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so that any powerpoint email attachments etc will be opened in open office instead of microsoft office.
This feature cannot be turned off.
Uninstalled because of it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104484</id>
	<title>PHP support?</title>
	<author>Alworx</author>
	<datestamp>1265881260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mmm... no... not this time...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-(</p><p>Am I the only one who is waiting for some kind of DOM to create docs via PHP? Possibly with updated fresh modules?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mmm... no... not this time... : - ( Am I the only one who is waiting for some kind of DOM to create docs via PHP ?
Possibly with updated fresh modules ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mmm... no... not this time... :-(Am I the only one who is waiting for some kind of DOM to create docs via PHP?
Possibly with updated fresh modules?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104934</id>
	<title>I'm considering switching</title>
	<author>Antiocheian</author>
	<datestamp>1265883060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can search &amp; replace, replace styles ?<br>Does it still have this <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YX2AAKRnLM" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">drawing resizing bug</a> [youtube.com] ?<br>Is it possible to see paragraph, character and list/numbering styles at the same pane ?<br>Does it support the ALT key for shortcuts ?<br>Does it still claim to require Java to run ?<br>Does it have table styles ?<br>Does it still paste OLE objects as GDI metafiles by default instead of their native application type (eg. Smartdraw), which means you can no longer edit them ?<br>Do I still have to set colors at the options instead of the built-in Windows color palette ? And when I change computer my colors lose their names ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can search &amp; replace , replace styles ? Does it still have this drawing resizing bug [ youtube.com ] ? Is it possible to see paragraph , character and list/numbering styles at the same pane ? Does it support the ALT key for shortcuts ? Does it still claim to require Java to run ? Does it have table styles ? Does it still paste OLE objects as GDI metafiles by default instead of their native application type ( eg .
Smartdraw ) , which means you can no longer edit them ? Do I still have to set colors at the options instead of the built-in Windows color palette ?
And when I change computer my colors lose their names ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can search &amp; replace, replace styles ?Does it still have this drawing resizing bug [youtube.com] ?Is it possible to see paragraph, character and list/numbering styles at the same pane ?Does it support the ALT key for shortcuts ?Does it still claim to require Java to run ?Does it have table styles ?Does it still paste OLE objects as GDI metafiles by default instead of their native application type (eg.
Smartdraw), which means you can no longer edit them ?Do I still have to set colors at the options instead of the built-in Windows color palette ?
And when I change computer my colors lose their names ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31106336</id>
	<title>Re:Mind Boggling That The UI Widgets Suck So Much</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265888340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would agree that OOo does tend to look a bit dated and lacking in the polish you see in MSO2003.</p><p>Yeah. But forget MSO2003. What it needs is something like the big and colorful button top-left in MS Office 2007. Maybe they also need a computerized dog to come up and show that your document is being fetched and the like.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would agree that OOo does tend to look a bit dated and lacking in the polish you see in MSO2003.Yeah .
But forget MSO2003 .
What it needs is something like the big and colorful button top-left in MS Office 2007 .
Maybe they also need a computerized dog to come up and show that your document is being fetched and the like .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would agree that OOo does tend to look a bit dated and lacking in the polish you see in MSO2003.Yeah.
But forget MSO2003.
What it needs is something like the big and colorful button top-left in MS Office 2007.
Maybe they also need a computerized dog to come up and show that your document is being fetched and the like.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31110800</id>
	<title>Re:Clippy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265970600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yo dawg, I heard you hate clippy, so I put a clippy in your clippy, so it can annoy you while it annoys you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yo dawg , I heard you hate clippy , so I put a clippy in your clippy , so it can annoy you while it annoys you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yo dawg, I heard you hate clippy, so I put a clippy in your clippy, so it can annoy you while it annoys you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103758</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31110130</id>
	<title>Thank you OO.O</title>
	<author>slimjim8094</author>
	<datestamp>1265917740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I love OpenOffice. It's saved me and acquaintances literally thousands of dollars over the past few years. Basically nobody needs Word anymore.</p><p>In fact, OpenOffice handles Word files better than Word itself - especially corrupted files. My mother got an email with a very important<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.DOC from her work, and couldn't open it. Nobody in her team could open it either, so she sent it to me. Opened first try in OO.O.</p><p>I don't know how they do it. But I hope they keep on keepin' on... it's an invaluable piece of software.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I love OpenOffice .
It 's saved me and acquaintances literally thousands of dollars over the past few years .
Basically nobody needs Word anymore.In fact , OpenOffice handles Word files better than Word itself - especially corrupted files .
My mother got an email with a very important .DOC from her work , and could n't open it .
Nobody in her team could open it either , so she sent it to me .
Opened first try in OO.O.I do n't know how they do it .
But I hope they keep on keepin ' on... it 's an invaluable piece of software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love OpenOffice.
It's saved me and acquaintances literally thousands of dollars over the past few years.
Basically nobody needs Word anymore.In fact, OpenOffice handles Word files better than Word itself - especially corrupted files.
My mother got an email with a very important .DOC from her work, and couldn't open it.
Nobody in her team could open it either, so she sent it to me.
Opened first try in OO.O.I don't know how they do it.
But I hope they keep on keepin' on... it's an invaluable piece of software.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104490</id>
	<title>Re:Just Faster??? I wish I was just Richer!!!</title>
	<author>ClosedSource</author>
	<datestamp>1265881320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does it still label drawings with "Slide n" as if a drawing and a presentation were the same thing?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does it still label drawings with " Slide n " as if a drawing and a presentation were the same thing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does it still label drawings with "Slide n" as if a drawing and a presentation were the same thing?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31107304</id>
	<title>Re:Is it worth it?</title>
	<author>EvanED</author>
	<datestamp>1265892300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>So, I'm asking: is it worth it to download OpenOffice, and play a bit around with it, or if I'm a "happy" Microsoft Office user, I can just "move along"?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</i></p><p>Quite possibly. If you think you might be interested, then download it and actually use it for a day or two and see what you think. Go ahead and use MS Office if you really have to during that time (e.g. the PPTX import feature of Impress is not much better than useless, at least in 3.1), but try not to. The point is to use it long enough that you get used to it being different and hopefully start judging on its merits and not just have a visceral reaction "ugh this is ugly and obnoxious".</p><p>The great thing about Free software like this is you can do that -- just download it and try it out. And it's good enough that it'll probably suffice for at least your Word and Excel needs. (I doubt you'll think it even comes close to Visio, and there's nothing OneNote-like in it.)</p><p>You may decide you really like it, and switch to it primarily. You may decide that you don't mind it, but using MS Office makes things easier (esp. with the Visio/OneNote/Access use). Or you may hate it. Any of them are fine. (I fall somewhere between the last two categories.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , I 'm asking : is it worth it to download OpenOffice , and play a bit around with it , or if I 'm a " happy " Microsoft Office user , I can just " move along " ?
: ) Quite possibly .
If you think you might be interested , then download it and actually use it for a day or two and see what you think .
Go ahead and use MS Office if you really have to during that time ( e.g .
the PPTX import feature of Impress is not much better than useless , at least in 3.1 ) , but try not to .
The point is to use it long enough that you get used to it being different and hopefully start judging on its merits and not just have a visceral reaction " ugh this is ugly and obnoxious " .The great thing about Free software like this is you can do that -- just download it and try it out .
And it 's good enough that it 'll probably suffice for at least your Word and Excel needs .
( I doubt you 'll think it even comes close to Visio , and there 's nothing OneNote-like in it .
) You may decide you really like it , and switch to it primarily .
You may decide that you do n't mind it , but using MS Office makes things easier ( esp .
with the Visio/OneNote/Access use ) .
Or you may hate it .
Any of them are fine .
( I fall somewhere between the last two categories .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, I'm asking: is it worth it to download OpenOffice, and play a bit around with it, or if I'm a "happy" Microsoft Office user, I can just "move along"?
:)Quite possibly.
If you think you might be interested, then download it and actually use it for a day or two and see what you think.
Go ahead and use MS Office if you really have to during that time (e.g.
the PPTX import feature of Impress is not much better than useless, at least in 3.1), but try not to.
The point is to use it long enough that you get used to it being different and hopefully start judging on its merits and not just have a visceral reaction "ugh this is ugly and obnoxious".The great thing about Free software like this is you can do that -- just download it and try it out.
And it's good enough that it'll probably suffice for at least your Word and Excel needs.
(I doubt you'll think it even comes close to Visio, and there's nothing OneNote-like in it.
)You may decide you really like it, and switch to it primarily.
You may decide that you don't mind it, but using MS Office makes things easier (esp.
with the Visio/OneNote/Access use).
Or you may hate it.
Any of them are fine.
(I fall somewhere between the last two categories.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104006</id>
	<title>Re:Clippy</title>
	<author>xavierpayne</author>
	<datestamp>1265879280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I see you are writting a "Funny".

Might I suggest:

1) An "in soviet russia..." comment
2) A covert link to goatse
3) Asking if it runs linux

?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I see you are writting a " Funny " .
Might I suggest : 1 ) An " in soviet russia... " comment 2 ) A covert link to goatse 3 ) Asking if it runs linux ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I see you are writting a "Funny".
Might I suggest:

1) An "in soviet russia..." comment
2) A covert link to goatse
3) Asking if it runs linux

?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103442</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31107694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103430
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31106642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103826
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31107512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31106374
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105076
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103654
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31106886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31109144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104484
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103482
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31106352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105476
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104844
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103476
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105394
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103654
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31106316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31106194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31106040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31106276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104484
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31112434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31110800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103844
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31107398
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103476
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31107752
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31107004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103654
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104126
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104034
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31110256
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31107904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103430
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31109952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31106158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103476
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103836
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31107050
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31106336
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103654
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104006
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103610
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103476
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31109934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31107220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31113816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104296
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1917248_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31107304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1917248.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103826
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31106642
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1917248.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104892
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1917248.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103430
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31107694
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31107904
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1917248.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104484
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105710
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31106276
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1917248.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105124
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1917248.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105476
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31106352
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1917248.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103464
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1917248.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103482
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104884
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1917248.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103442
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103892
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104698
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31109934
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105526
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104126
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31106040
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31106194
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103758
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105020
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104120
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31110800
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104034
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104296
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104042
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104006
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1917248.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104934
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1917248.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105108
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31110256
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31107512
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105640
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31107050
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31106886
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31107220
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31107304
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1917248.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103476
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104968
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31106158
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104844
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103610
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1917248.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103654
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31107004
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105076
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104300
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31106336
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105394
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1917248.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103396
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1917248.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103608
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1917248.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103844
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104964
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1917248.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103388
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31113816
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103640
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31107752
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105644
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31106316
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105154
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31109144
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31109952
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103836
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31103660
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104490
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104796
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31112434
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1917248.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31104118
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31106374
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31107398
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1917248.31105570
</commentlist>
</conversation>
